A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Child's Nervous System
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
CASE REPORT
Anatomical implications of posterior cephaloceles in the dural
venous sinuses
Anderson Alexsander Rodrigues Teixeira
1
&Fernando Furtado de Melo Neto
1
&Nina Maia Pinheiro de Abreu
2
&
Daniel Aguiar Dias
3
&Moyses Loiola Ponte Souza
1
Received: 23 October 2019 / Accepted: 25 January 2020
#Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Objective To analyze the venous anatomy of the dural sinuses of patients with posterior encephaloceles, in order to formulate
anatomical patterns which can ensure safer surgery.
Methods This is a retrospective study, analyzing eight patients diagnosed with posterior encephalocele throughout 1 year.
Results Eight patients with cephaloceles were evaluated in our study from January 2017 to January 2018. The most common
alteration was dysgenesis of the straight sinus (n= 7), followed by venous anomalies in the encephalocele and alterations in the
SSS (superior sagittal sinus) (n= 4), and the occurrence of a falcine sinus (FC) in 3 patients.
Conclusion Anatomical variations are frequent in patients with cephaloceles. Therefore, an understanding of them is necessary
for safe and effective treatment.
Keywords Encephalocele .Nervous system malformations .Dural venous sinuses .Anomalous venous system
Introduction
A cephalocele is the herniation of one or more intracranial
structures through a congenital cranial bone defect or, more
rarely, through normal foramen or fissures in the skull. It can
also be called cranial dysraphism [9,10].
One hypothesis is that both encephalocele and
meningocele develop due to a failure of fusion of the
paraxial mesoderm of the dura mater and the cranium
along the midline, secondary to an adhesion between
the neural and cutaneous ectoderm, before their
disjunction.
The classification of encephaloceles is based on the ana-
tomical location of the skull defect, and the two main groups
are anterior and posterior: anterior encephaloceles are divided
into sincipital (sinciput or forehead) and basal, while posterior
encephaloceles are divided into occipital, occipitocervical,
and parietal [28].
The prevalence of encephaloceles may range from 0.08 to
0.5/1000 live births [1,11,24,27]. Occipital encephaloceles
are more common in the west, while in Asia, frontal or sincip-
ital variations are more prevalent [5,24].
Only 50% of fetuses with encephalocele survive until birth,
with occipital encephaloceles being almost exclusively asso-
ciated with the highest mortality rates [11,13]. Children with
meningocele (a defect that does not contain nervous tissue, but
only the leptomeninges) tend to be neurologically normal
[24], unlike with encephaloceles, which present a higher inci-
dence of seizures and spasticity, and more commonly possess
chromosomal abnormalities (up to 50% of cases). Most have
hydrocephalus and cognitive deficits [5,8,11]. The occipital
variation of these defects is more associated with hydroceph-
alus [7,24](Figs.1,2,and3).
Surgical correction of these defects is important and
diagnostic imaging is required to assess whether struc-
tures that will be reduced or resected contain dural si-
nuses, thus preventing injury or subsequent venous con-
gestion [19]. In light of this, it is necessary to know the
vascular anatomical variations, in order to avoid surgical
complications.
*Anderson Alexsander Rodrigues Teixeira
andersonalexrteixeira@gmail.com
1
Department of Neurosurgery, Federal University of Ceará - UFC,
Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
2
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Federal University of São Paulo -
UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
3
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Federal University of Ceará -
UFC, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04525-6
/ Published online: 30 January 2020
Child's Nervous System (2020) 36:2857–2862
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.