ArticlePDF Available

Deschampsia cespitosa subsp. parviflora (Poaceae) - an overlooked woodland grass

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) P. Beauv. subsp. parviflora (Thuill.) Dumort was, to British and Irish botanists, a little known taxon prior to1988, and current distribution mapping shows a marked geographical recording bias. It is confirmed as being primarily a woodland taxon, at low altitudes; modal mean altitude 50-75 m AOD, with 97% of locations at ≤300 m AOD. A combination of woodland or shaded habitat, bright green narrow leaves, and delicate panicle, with small spikelets, is suggestive of subsp. parviflora. In combination, degree of leaf blade scabridity on the adaxial surface, appearance of papillae on flat surfaces of adaxial ridges of the leaf, and spikelet length, provide the most reliable means of distinguishing this subspecies from subsp. cespitosa. There is no reason to suspect that subsp. parviflora is increasing, rather it had previously been overlooked.
Content may be subject to copyright.
117
British & Irish Botany
1(2): 117-127, 2019
Deschampsia cespitosa
subsp
. parviflora
(Poaceae) - an
under-recorded woodland grass
Andy Amphlett*
Grantown on Spey, Scotland
*Corresponding author: Andy Amphlett, email: amphlett1958@gmail.com
This pdf constitutes the Version of Record published on 21st May 2019
Abstract
Deschampsia cespitosa
(L.) P. Beauv. subsp
. parviflora
(Thuill.) Dumort was, to
British and Irish botanists, a little known taxon prior to1988, and current distribution
mapping shows a marked geographical recording bias. It is confirmed as being
primarily a woodland taxon, at low altitudes; modal mean altitude 50-75 m AOD,
with 97% of locations at ≤300 m AOD. A combination of woodland or shaded
habitat, bright green narrow leaves, and delicate panicle, with small spikelets, is
suggestive of subsp
. parviflora
. In combination, degree of leaf blade scabridity on
the adaxial surface, appearance of papillae on flat surfaces of adaxial ridges of the
leaf, and spikelet length, provide the most reliable means of distinguishing this
subspecies from subsp.
cespitosa
. There is no reason to suspect that subsp
.
parviflora
is increasing, rather it had previously been overlooked.
Key Words
Identification; recording bias; altitudinal range; habitat; tufted hair-grass.
Introduction
In British and Irish Floras,
Deschampsia cespitosa
(L.) P. Beauv.
subsp
. parviflora
(Thuill.) Dumort, was first mentioned (at varietal level) in the first edition of the
Flora of the British Isles (Clapham et al 1952). However, it was not until the more
detailed account in the Plant Crib (McAllister 1988), that this taxon became more
widely known, and there was a rapid increase in recording, as documented by
records in the Distribution Database maintained by the Botanical Society of Britain
and Ireland (https://database.bsbi.org/), henceforth referred to as the ‘BSBI
database’ (Fig. 1).
Although aware of subsp.
parviflora
, it was not until 2015 that I first found
distinctive examples of this subspecies, at two sites in Derbyshire (v.c.57). This
encouraged me to follow up an old Easterness (v.c.96) record in 2016, but without
success. On 1st June 2017, accompanied by Linda Henderson, I visited an area of
woodland at Ferness in the valley of the River Findhorn (v.c.96) to see a newly
found population of Bird's-nest Orchid
Neottia nidus-avis
. Almost as soon as we
entered the wood, we came across tens of small tussocks of a non-flowering
graminoid plant, with bright grass-green, narrow leaves (Fig. 2), that I initially took
to be Remote Sedge
Carex remota
, a rather local species in north Scotland. On
closer examination of the leaves, and pulling apart an unopened inflorescence, I
118
realised the tussocks were of
D. cespitosa
. I returned on 11th June, when several
tussocks had ± open panicles, to collect specimens for closer examination,
confirming that the plants were indeed
D. cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
.
Figure 1.
Deschampsia cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
. Number of hectads per decade
in GB and Ireland, based on records in the BSBI database.
Figure 2.
Deschampsia cespitosa
subsp
. parviflora
: Ferness (River Findhorn)
(v.c.96) June 2017.
0
50
100
150
200
-1929
1930-1939
1940-1949
1950-1959
1960-1969
1970-1979
1980-1989
1990-1999
2000-2009
2010-2019
Hectads
119
During June 2017, I found additional stands of
D. cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
at three more locations in the River Findhorn valley, and beside a tributary of this
river (Fig. 3). I also found plants at a single site in Glen Affric (v.c.96). In July 2017,
I found plants at an additional site in v.c.57 and in Staffordshire (v.c.39).
Figure 3. Deschampsia cespitosa
subsp
. parviflora
: Tomnarroch Burn (v.c.96)
June 2017.
Distribution
On current knowledge, within the BSBI recording area,
D. cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
is almost restricted to England, Wales and Scotland, which account for 98% of the
recorded hectad range (Table 1). There is a single record from the Isle of Man
(v.c.71) collected in 1950. There are no records from the Channel Isles (v.c.113).
In Ireland, there are un-localised 1967 / 1968 records from woodland in Co.
Clare (H09), North Kerry (H02) and Co. Cavan (H30), (Farragher 1969); these are
not included in Table 1. The first localised record was in 1999 (Dines 2000) in a
'wonderful fragment of deciduous woodland south of Easky' (Co. Sligo). In N.
Ireland, John Harron reported this subspecies from Co. Armagh (H37) in 2005, and
in four hectads in Co. Antrim (H39) between 2006 and 2016.
In Scotland, excluding the author's recent finds, there are 41 distinct records,
from 37 locations, in 34 hectads, in 14 vice-counties. There are concentrations of
120
records in Fife (v.c.85) 11 hectads, and in Ayrshire (v.c.75) 5 hectads. North of the
central belt, all but one of the post-1999 records are by the author or George
Ballantyne.
Table 1.
Deschampsia cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
. Number of hectads up to and
post-1999. Based on records in the BSBI database.
Pre-
2000
2000-
Total
England
194
249
352
Wales
29
28
49
Scotland
29
9
36
N. Ireland
0
5
5
Ireland
1
0
1
Isle of Man
1
0
1
Figure 4.
Deschampsia cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
hectad distribution map. (From
BSBI database 14/2/2019). Black (post-1999), red (pre-2000).
The hectad distribution map (Fig. 4), is strongly suggestive of a geographical
recording bias, with marked concentrations of records in (inter alia) Worcestershire
(v.c.37), Denbighshire (v.c.50), Derbyshire (v.c.57), Cheshire (v.c.58), and South
and West Lancashire (v.c.s 59, 60). The recording bias is especially pronounced
post-1999.
121
Habitat
Floras and other published accounts broadly agree on the habitat within which this
subspecies occurs: woodland on heavy soils (Clapham et al 1987); woods & shady
hedgerows (Stace 2019); woods & shady places, especially on heavy soils (Sell &
Murrell 1996); lowland woods on heavy soils (Cope and Gray 2009); lowland
woodland (Parnell and Curtis 2012); damp shady places on heavy soils (Hubbard
1984); shaded places in ancient woodland (McAllister 1998). Of the 1550 records of
D. cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
on the BSBI database (DDb) (at February 2019), 150
records have some indication of habitat. Of these 150 records, 130 (87%) refer to
woodland or shade. Habitat and associated species of populations of
D. cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
found by the author in 2017, are summarised in Table 2.
Table 2. Habitat and associated species of populations of
D. cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
found by the author in 2017 in v.c.s 39, 57 and 96.
VC
Locality
Grid
reference
39
Coldwall Bridge
(S. of)
SK14874958
39
Coldwall Bridge
(SW of)
SK14844963
39
Coldwall Bridge
(SE of)
SK15224959
57
Miller's Dale
SK138731
57
Carsington Water:
Shiningford Farm
(SE of)
SK24635226
57
Carsington Water:
Sheepwash Car
Park (NE of)
SK25035297
57
Via Gellia
SK265565
96
Allt na Ciche
(W. side of)
NH12091922
96
River Findhorn (S.
side): Dulsie
Bridge (upstream
of)
NH92664042
122
96
River Findhorn (SE
side): Dulsie
Bridge (upstream
of)
NH92844056
NH92844057
96
River Findhorn (S.
side): Dulsie
Bridge (upstream
of)
NH92674041
96
Tomnarroch Burn
(E. of)
NH96214406
96
Ferness (W. of)
NH96174486
96
Cairnglass (SW of)
NH96044666
NH96064665
Altitudinal range
There are records of
D. cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
on the BSBI database from 1057
unique grid references, at tetrad or better precision. Mean altitude for each grid cell
was calculated and plotted against the number of unique grid references (Fig. 5).
Figure 5.
Deschampsia cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
. Number of unique location
grid references x mean grid cell altitude (25 m class intervals).
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
<25
25-50
50-75
75-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-225
225-250
250-275
275-300
300-325
325-350
350-375
375-400
400-425
425-450
450-475
475-500
Number of unique grid references
Altitude (m)
123
The modal mean grid cell altitude is 50-75 m AOD, and 97% of locations are ≤300
m. A similar analysis was undertaken for all records of
D. cespitosa
on the BSBI
database, excluding those of subsp.
parviflora
; 110,081 unique grid references.
Compared to records only identified to species level, or ascribed explicitly to other
infraspecific taxa, subsp.
parviflora
is proportionately more frequent in the altitude
ranges 25-200 m and 250-275 m. Nearly all localised records of subsp.
parviflora
>300 m AOD are in Wales, the highest reported being at c.365 m AOD at Craig y
Moch, Denbighshire (v.c.50).
In the broad sense,
D. cespitosa
reaches a maximum altitude of 1335 m AOD
on Ben Nevis, West Inverness-shire (v.c.97). While many of the highest altitude
records are of
D. cespitosa
subsp.
alpina
(Alpine Hair-grass),
D. cespitosa
subsp.
cespitosa
is found to at least 1000 m AOD in the Cairngorm Mountains, and probably
higher.
Identification
A number of features have been reported to distinguish
D. cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
from subsp.
cespitosa
(Table 3). These are discussed in turn, below.
Chiapella and Probatova (2003) put forward two discriminatory characters
additional to those listed in Table 3. Awn length: exceeding (or not) the top of their
lemmas in subsp.
parviflora,
cf not exceeding the top of their lemmas in subsp
.
cespitosa
. Spikelets per panicle: 100-150 in subsp.
parviflora
cf <100 in subsp
.
cespitosa
. I have not investigated either of these, but it should be noted that
D.
cespitosa
is extremely variable (Cope & Gray 2009).
A combination of woodland or shaded habitat, bright green leaf colour, narrow
leaves and delicate panicle, with small spikelets, is suggestive of subsp
. parviflora
. In
combination, leaf blade scabridity on the adaxial surface, appearance of papillae on
flat surfaces of adaxial ridges of the leaf, and (accurately measured) spikelet length,
provide the most reliable means of distinguishing the two subspecies.
Habitat
Subspecies
parviflora
is very strongly associated with shaded habitats, principally
woodland. I have not found it in fully open habitats. However, in itself, that
association is insufficient to identify this taxon.
Leaf colour
Bright grass-green (Figs 2 and 3), cf the bluish, mid or dark green of subsp.
cespitosa
. This qualitative difference is consistent in the plants I have examined.
Leaf width
Viewing a whole tussock, the leaves of subsp.
parviflora
do tend to appear narrower
than those of subsp.
cespitosa
. However, I failed to find a practical and unbiased
method of measuring leaf widths; there is so much variation within a tussock. It is
best considered a jizz feature, markedly narrow leaves being possibly suggestive of
subsp.
parviflora
.
Leaf blade scabridity on the adaxial surface
The ridges on the adaxial (upper) surface of leaves of subsp.
cespitosa
are armed
with forward pointing spines. Hold a leaf firmly between finger and thumb of one
124
hand; with your other hand squeeze the leaf blade between finger and the other
thumb, and try to move your hand towards the base of the leaf. It will be difficult or
impossible to slide your finger and thumb along the leaf in subsp.
cespitosa
; the leaf
is likely to snap in fresh material. If you do the same with a leaf of subsp.
parviflora
your finger and thumb will slide, relatively easily along the leaf, though with some
resistance. Test this with several leaves.
D. cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
D. cespitosa
subsp.
cespitosa
Habitat 2, 3
Woodland; shade
tolerant plant
More open habitats
Leaf colour 1, 3
Bright green
Bluish-green; medium to
dark green
Leaf width 4
Narrower than subsp.
cespitosa
Wider than subsp.
parviflora
Leaf blade scabridity on the
adaxial surface 1, 3
Less scabrid than
subsp.
cespitosa
Coarsely scabrid
Papillae ('spines' sensu
McAllister) on flat surface of
adaxial ridges of leaf 1, 3
Appearing as light or
yellowish green
translucent spots (in
living material)
Appearing as more opaque
whitish green spots
Spikelet length (mean of 10
published ranges; original
values at 0.5 mm precision) 2
2.1 - 3.3 mm
3.4 - 5.5 mm
Spikelet length (range of
spikelet length
measurements by author
(this paper); 0.1 mm
precision 3
2.6 - 3.8 mm
3.8 - 5.6 mm
Hairs at base of rhachilla 1, 6
Shorter than rhachilla,
Usually longer than
rhachilla
Hairs on rhachilla 1
Less than half rhachilla
length
More than half rhachilla
length
Spikelet colour 5
Pale green
Green, dark green or
violaceous, or a mix
Table 3.
Deschampsia cespitosa
. Distinguishing features of subspecies
parviflora
and
cespitosa
. Sources: 1 McAllister (1998); 2 Clapham et al (1987), Stace (2019),
Sell and Murrell (1996), Rose (1989), Cope & Gray (2009), Parnell & Curtis
(2012), Hubbard (1984), McAllister (1998), Chiapella and Probatova (2003); 3
Amphlett (this paper), 4 Cope and Gray (2009); 5 Chiapella and Probatova (2003);
6 Stace (2019).
Papillae on flat surface of adaxial ridges of leaf
The flat surfaces, either side of the ridges on the adaxial surface of leaves, support
low rounded papillae. McAllister (1998) refers to these structures as 'spines', but that
is a misleading description. At x10 magnification, they resemble stomata (or a
125
structure surrounding the stomata). However, at x30 they are revealed as papillae.
The appearance of these papillae differs between the two subspecies, but to see this
requires good illumination and a good quality hand lens. It is best to examine leaves
under a low power stereo microscope, ensuring that the angle of incident
illumination is kept constant. The appearance of the papillae is best assessed under
medium intensity illumination. The papillae of subsp.
parviflora
are light or yellowish
green, appearing as glistening, translucent dots, c.0.03 mm in diameter, while those
of subsp.
cespitosa
are more easily seen, being larger (c.0.1 - 0.2 mm), and a more
opaque whitish green.
Spikelet length
All published accounts refer to a difference in spikelet length. Nine Floras and other
published accounts give mean minimum and maximum spikelet lengths (extreme
values in brackets) of subsp.
parviflora
(2.0) 2.1-3.3 (3.5) mm and subsp.
cespitosa
(3.0) 3.5-5.7 (6.0) mm. The original values are only given to 0.5 mm precision.
To investigate this character further, I collected single, whole panicles, from 79
tussocks of
D. cespitosa
. Based on leaf colour, leaf blade scabridity on the adaxial
surface, and appearance of papillae on the flat surface of adaxial ridges of the
leaves, they were allocated to one or other of the subspecies. 42 tussocks were of
subsp.
parviflora
(21 from Scotland (v.c.96) and 21 from England (v.c.s 39 and 57),
and 37 tussocks were of subsp.
cespitosa
from Scotland (v.c.s 95 and 96). Spikelet
lengths within a panicle are variable, and an attempt was made to collect an
unbiased sample of lengths per panicle, by measuring spikelets from all parts of
each panicle. Ten spikelets were measured per panicle, and the mean length
calculated. Lengths were measured to 0.1 mm precision, using a stereo microscope
with a calibrated eyepiece graticule. Spikelet length was defined as the straight-line
distance from the lowest point of green tissue at the base of the lowest glume to the
tip of the hyaline apex of the apical lemma. It is very difficult to accurately measure
spikelet lengths in the field. The position of the hyaline apices of the lemmas are
easily misjudged, and accurate measurements obtained under a microscope are
usually longer than those estimated in the field.
Mean spikelet lengths are shown in Figure 6. Although Cope and Gray (2009)
stated that variation in this character is continuous, on the basis of my results it is
markedly bimodal. Ranges of mean spikelet lengths in the plants sampled were
subsp.
parviflora
2.6 - 3.8 mm and subsp.
cespitosa
3.8 - 5.6 mm. The sampled
Scottish plants of subsp.
parviflora
had slightly longer spikelets than the sampled
English plants, median 3.4 cf 3.1 mm (p<0.05, Mann Whitney U-test). Insufficient
separate populations have been sampled to judge if this difference is of biological
interest. That plants differentiated on other morphological grounds differed in
spikelet length, adds weight to the distinctiveness of the two subspecies.
Apparently intermediate forms do occur. Two examples measured had mean
spikelet lengths of 3.4 and 3.7 mm. Once I had found subsp.
parviflora
in v.c.96,
and gained some appreciation of its preferred habitat, my searching and sampling
may have been biased to finding 'good' examples of this subspecies, and I may have
avoided habitats where plants were less distinctive. I have looked for subsp.
parviflora
under
A. glutinosa
along the banks of the River Spey in Moray v.c.95 and
though I have found plants with something of the appearance of this subspecies,
126
none have (to date) been convincing. These plants are not included in the above
measurements.
Figure 6. Mean spikelet length,
Deschampsia cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
cf subsp.
cespitosa
.
Rhachilla hairs
The relative length of hairs at the base of, and on the rhachilla, I found an
impractical character. It is difficult to dissect individual spikelets, and there remains
the problem of classifying hairs that are ± the same length as the supposedly
discriminating character.
Spikelet colour
Spikelets of subsp.
parviflora
are pale green, and those of subsp.
cespitosa
are often
violaceous, but I have not investigated if the colour difference is reliably consistent.
It would, anyway, only be applicable to fresh material.
Conclusion
Deschampsia cespitosa
subsp.
parviflora
is a distinct taxon, which can be
distinguished in the great majority of cases from subsp
.
cespitosa
by a combination
of quantitative and qualitative characters. The taxon was not recognised from a
European perspective by Clarke (1980), but has been included in Floras of the British
Isles since Clapham et al (1952), and was accepted by Chiapella (2000) in his review
of
D. cespitosa
in central and northern Europe.
Of 441 hectads in which subsp.
parviflora
has been recorded in Britain and
Ireland, it was first recorded in 381 hectads (86%) post-1986. Records from several
vice-counties where subsp.
parviflora
is now considered to be fairly frequent, show a
marked increase more recently: Derbyshire (v.c.57) from 1997; West Lancashire
(v.c.60) from 1998; Cheshire (v.c.58) from 2000; and Worcestershire (v.c.37) from
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.5
3.7
3.9
4.1
4.3
4.5
4.7
4.9
5.1
5.3
5.5
5.7
5.9
Frequency
Mean spikelet length (mm)
parviflora
cespitosa
127
2003. There is no reason to suspect that this subspecies is increasing; rather that it
had previously been overlooked.
In the course of general botanical recording in north Scotland over the last two
years (mainly in v.c.96), of 135 locations where I noted
D. cespitosa
, <5%
supported subsp.
parviflora
. Hence in northern Scotland, subsp.
cespitosa
is by far
the commoner taxon.
References
Chiapella, J. 2000. The
Deschampsia cespitosa
complex in central and northern
Europe: a morphological analysis.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
,
134: 495-512.
Chiapella, J. & Probatova, N.S. 2003. The
Deschampsia cespitosa
complex (
Poaceae:
Aveneae
) with special reference to Russia.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society
, 142: 213228.
Clapham, A.R., Tutin, T.G. & Warburg, E.F. 1952.
Flora of the British Isles
.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clapham, A.R., Tutin, T.G. & Moore, D.N. 1987.
Flora of the British Isles
. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, G.C.S. 1980.
Deschampsia
account, In Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges,
N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A.,
Flora
Europaea
, Volume 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cope, T. & Gray, A. 2009.
Grasses of the British Isles
. BSBI: London.
Dines, T. 2000. A little more Atlas recording in Ireland. BSBI News 84: 78-79.
Farragher, M.A. 1969.
Deschampsia caespitosa
(L.) Beauv.
var parviflora
(Thuill.)
Coss. and Germ.
The Irish Naturalists' Journal
: 16, No. 6, p. 177.
Hubbard, C.E. 1984.
Grasses. A guide to their Structure, Identification, Uses and
Distribution in the British Isles
. London: Penguin.
McAllister, H. 1988.
Deschampsia cespitosa
account, In Rich, T.C.G. & Rich, M.D.B.,
Plant Crib
. London: BSBI.
McAllister, H. 1998.
Deschampsia cespitosa
account, In Rich, T.C.G. & Jermy, A.C.,
Plant Crib 1998
. London: BSBI.
Parnell, J. & Curtis, T. 2012.
Webb's An Irish Flora
. Cork: Cork University Press.
Preston, C.D., Pearman, D.A. & Dines, T.D. 2002.
New Atlas of the British and Irish
Flora
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rose, F. 1989.
Colour Identification Guide to the Grasses, Sedges, Rushes and Ferns
of the British Isles and north-western Europe
. London: Viking.
Stace, C.A. 2019.
New Flora of the British Isles
. 4th ed. Middlewood Green: C & M
Floristics.
Sell, P. and Murrell, G. 1996.
Flora of Great Britain and Ireland
. Volume 5.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright retained by author(s). Published by BSBI under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License.
ISSN: 2632-4970
https://doi.org/10.33928/bib.2019.01.117
... Current taxonomy of European Deschampsia is based on morphology (Clarke, 1980;Chiapella, 2000) and some regional taxonomic summaries (e.g. Conert, 1987;Amphlett, 2019;McAllister & Amphlett, 2022). A few northern European samples [D. ...
Article
Full-text available
The highly variable tufted hairgrass Deschampsia cespitosa is a tussock-forming plant especially of cool and humid environments. Although common and widespread, its phylogeographic structure and the significance of polyploidy for its evolution are poorly understood. Here we used a phylogenomic approach to study the genetic structure of this species in Europe and how the polyploid cytotypes/subspecies are related to the diploids. Using genomic data (RADseq and whole plastid sequencing) we found a highly divergent Iberian group, including the Spanish Deschampsia cespitosa subsp. cespitosa (diploid and tetraploid) and the Macaronesian island endemic diploid Deschampsia argentea. Moreover, we found substantial divergence of pseudoviviparous tetraploids (Deschampsia cespitosa subspp. neoalpina and rhenana) from seminiferous tetraploids (except Deschampsia cespitosa subsp. littoralis) and all diploids of the remaining European samples. The divergent pseudoviviparous tetraploids (D. cespitosa subspp. neoalpina and rhenana) and the seminiferous tetraploid D. cespitosa subsp. littoralis probably represent periglacial and relict lineages of unknown origin regarding auto- and/or allo-polyploidy, whereas other seminiferous tetraploid variants of D. cespitosa are always nested in the diploid D. cespitosa, suggesting multiple autopolyploid origins. An analysis after excluding the Iberian Group and the highly divergent tetraploids revealed five genetic groups with overlapping geographical patterns. However, the recovered geographical structure, the overall low genetic divergence and the diffuse genetic structure point to recolonization from various refugial areas and secondary contact. Effective wind dispersal of pollen and seeds in an open early post-glacial tundra landscape and, finally, increasing human impact on dispersal of this grass since the Neolithic, may have enhanced admixture and resulted in the complex patterns detected today.
... In N. Scotland (v.c.96) a few isolated populations of D. parviflora have recently been found (Amphlett, 2019). These were in woodland, typically on flushed ground under Alnus glutinosa. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Deschampsia cespitosa complex in Great Britain and Ireland is shown to consist of three distinct species, one represented by three variants: (1) D. parviflora (Thuill.) P. de Beauvois, a shade tolerant diploid species with spikelets less than 3.5 mm, of heavy clay or flushed soils in ancient woodland, principally from East Inverness-shire and central Scotland southwards; (2) D. alpina (L.) Roemer and Schultes, a small, tetraploid, viviparous species, with hooded leaf-tips and brittle plantlets with appressed glumes and lemmas, of wet, open habitats at high altitudes in the Scottish Highlands and (rarely) in Ireland; (3) D. cespitosa (L.) P. de Beauvois, represented by three variants, (a) a seed-bearing diploid found primarily in peripheral coastal areas and islands in northern and western Scotland and on mountains in the central and northern Scottish Highlands and Teesdale, (b) a seed-bearing tetraploid which is the common cytotype of the species in unshaded and many woodland habitats from central Scotland southwards, (c) a viviparous tetraploid, which is a form of the seed-bearing tetraploid, found in the south-west Scottish Highlands, English Lake District and Snowdonia and is probably unique to Britain. Suspected viviparous triploid hybrids were found between diploid D. cespitosa and both D. alpina and tetraploid D. cespitosa.
... parviflora was previously reported in Italy only for Piemonte, Lombardia, Toscana and Calabria [33,62,63]. Like in UK [112], this taxon is probably under-recorded in Italy. In Abruzzo, a population with several tens of individuals, in an area of about two hectares whithin a mixed forest with Quercus cerris L. and Fagus sylvatica L. subsp. ...
Article
Full-text available
The tradition of floristic studies in Italy has made it possible to obtain a good knowledge of plant diversity both on a national and regional scale. However, the lack of knowledge for some areas, advances in plant systematics and human activities related to globalization, highlight the need for further studies aimed at improving floristic knowledge. In this paper, based on fieldwork and herbaria and literature surveys, we update the knowledge on the Italian vascular flora and analyze the floristic similarities between the administrative regions. Four taxa, all exotic, were recorded for the first time in Italy and Europe. In detail, Elaeodendron croceum, Kalanchoë blossfeldiana, and Sedum spathulifolium var. spathulifolium were found as casual aliens, while Oxalis brasiliensis was reported as historical record based on some herbarium specimens. Furthermore, Kalanchoë laxiflora was confirmed as a casual alien species for Italy and Europe. Status changes for some taxa were proposed at both national and regional levels, as well as many taxa were reported as new or confirmed at the regional level. Currently the Italian vascular flora comprises 9150 taxa of which 7547 are native (of which 1598 are Italian endemics) and 1603 are exotic at the national level. The multivariate analysis of updated floristic data on a regional scale showed a clear distribution along the latitudinal gradient, in accordance with the natural geographical location of the regions in Italy. This pattern of plants distribution was not affected by the introduction of alien species. Despite some taxonomic and methodological issues which are still open, the data obtained confirm the important role of floristic investigations in the field and in herbaria, as well as the collaborative approach among botanists, in order to improve the knowledge of the Italian and European vascular flora.
Article
Full-text available
Fifty-four exomorphological characters were recorded from 130 herbarium specimens belonging to Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) P. Beauv. subsp. cespitosa, D. alpina (L.) Roem. et Schult, D. bottnica (Wahlenb.) Trim, D. cespitosa subsp. glauca (Hartm.) C. Hartm., D. littoralis (Gaudin) Reuter, D. cespitosa subsp. parviflora (Thuill.) K. Richter and D. wibeliana (Sond.) Pari. These were treated as Operational Taxonomical Units (OTUs) and studied using cluster analysis, principal component analysis and the Mann-Whitney U-test; box plots of selected quantitative characters were also made. To evaluate the relationship between environment and morphology, a redundancy analysis was carried out. Due to extensive overlapping in the diagnostic characters, all the taxa at specific level are reduced to subspecies of Deschampsia cespitosa. Geographical distribution is considered to be of considerable importance in the identification of the taxa.
Article
Full-text available
The Deschampsia cespitosa complex in Russia is revised. Related taxa common to Russia and adjacent regions (i.e. northern Europe, Arctic America and Japan) are also considered. Deschampsia cespitosa s.l. is characterized by open to less commonly rather contracted panicles, spikelets (1) 2 (3)-flowered, 4-toothed lemmas with the lateral teeth larger, and awns straight or bent, inserted from the base to the top of the lemmas. Due to extensive overlapping in diagnostic characters, it is not possible to accept the specific status for D. borealis (Traut.) Roshev., D. brevifolia R.Br., D. macrothyrsa Tatew. et Ohwi and D. obensis Roshev; instead, they are treated as subspecies of D. cespitosa (L.) Beauv. Morphological differences are insufficient for a clear differentiation among subspecies, and geographical distributions also need to be considered. A total of 14 subspecies is accepted. Observations on ecology, problems of specific and subspecific delimitation, a distribution map, and considerations of evolution of the complex are provided. One new combination is made, Deschampsia cespitosa ssp. sukatschewii (Popl.) Chiapella & Prob. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 142, 213–228.
Book
This handbook will provide the reader with a clear and reliable means of identifying those plants which grow wild in Ireland. This book is a comprehensive re-working of the classic and standard Flora of Ireland which was last published 16 years ago: this will be the eighth edition of that work. It has been brought fully up to date through incorporating the latest in botanical research and it reflects contemporary and modern approaches to plant classification based on recent advances in genetics. Trees, shrubs and climbers in winter are now covered for the first time. Also included is a list of plants that have legal protection in Ireland. Webb's an Irish Flora is illustrated throughout with hand-coloured drawings. This handy reference book for botanists both amateur and professional, gardeners, hill walkers, students, farmers and naturalists. It is about the higher plants that grow wild and which are commonly naturalised or otherwise encountered in Ireland. It is designed to help you identify and provide you with background information on plant morphology, distribution and rarity and to educate all those interested in recognising the species of the flora of Ireland. Previous editions of the book have been used by workers outside of the specific field of study of plant identification - such as environmental consultants, the general public, students, professional and amateur botanists etc. There is a genuine demand for a Flora whose subject matter refers explicitly to Ireland whilst placing that flora in a wider context. Furthermore, a concise flora of a discrete geographical area is of interest internationally to many professional and amateur botanists and gardeners. The book has, is and will be used in student training (it is used as a basic botanical text book in some Universities in Ireland) and on training courses for professionals wishing to improve their skills and for all those needing to improve their levels of botanical expertise.
Grasses of the British Isles
  • T Cope
  • A Gray
Cope, T. & Gray, A. 2009. Grasses of the British Isles. BSBI: London.
A little more Atlas recording in Ireland
  • T Dines
Dines, T. 2000. A little more Atlas recording in Ireland. BSBI News 84: 78-79.
Deschampsia caespitosa (L.) Beauv. var parviflora (Thuill.) Coss. and Germ. The Irish Naturalists
  • M A Farragher
Farragher, M.A. 1969. Deschampsia caespitosa (L.) Beauv. var parviflora (Thuill.) Coss. and Germ. The Irish Naturalists' Journal: 16, No. 6, p. 177.
Deschampsia cespitosa account
  • H Mcallister
McAllister, H. 1998. Deschampsia cespitosa account, In Rich, T.C.G. & Jermy, A.C., Plant Crib 1998. London: BSBI.
Colour Identification Guide to the Grasses, Sedges, Rushes and Ferns of the British Isles and north-western Europe
  • F Rose
Rose, F. 1989. Colour Identification Guide to the Grasses, Sedges, Rushes and Ferns of the British Isles and north-western Europe. London: Viking.
  • P Sell
  • G Murrell
Sell, P. and Murrell, G. 1996. Flora of Great Britain and Ireland. Volume 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.