ChapterPDF Available

Bait Stations for Control of Mexican Fruit Flies (Anastrepha ludens), First Year

Authors:
89
6AReview of the Natural
Host Plants of the
Anastrepha fraterculus
Complex in the Americas
Vicente Hernández-Ortiz*, Nancy Barradas-Juanz,
and Cecilia Díaz-Castelazo
Abstract There is now enough support for the hypothesis that nominal Anastrepha fraterculus
is a complex of cryptic species that are currently recognized, using morphometric procedures,
as eight morphotypes that probably correspond to different biological species. In addition to this
variability, there is also evidence that this nominal species presents important variation in its
range of preferential host use. The aim of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive understand-
ing of the natural host plants used by the nominal A. fraterculus under natural eld conditions.
This was accomplished through a bibliographic examination of information from the original
sources of host plants recorded for this y species. A total of 200 references from all regions of
the Americas were examined. Data useful to the analysis were captured in a database incorporat-
ing information pertaining to host identity, original source of data, and location of distribution,
where available. The list of host plants for the A. fraterculus complex comprised 177 species
belonging to 40 plant families, which together accounted for 1,622 documented reports. The
most highly represented families were Myrtaceae (27.1%), Rosaceae (11.9%), and Rutaceae
(8.5%). The Myrtaceae exhibited a high percentage (>90%) of native species in contrast to the
higher proportions of exotic species presented in the other families. Guava was the only com-
mon host shared by different populations throughout the tropical and subtropical landscapes of
the Americas. The highest number of hosts was recorded in Brazil (121), followed by Argentina
(40), Ecuador (40), Colombia (38), Venezuela (24), and Mexico (19). The landscapes occupied
by different populations of this nominal species presented some preferential patterns in terms
CONTENTS
6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................90
6.2 Methods and Analysis ............................................................................................................ 91
6.3 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 91
6.3.1 Diversity of Host Plants .............................................................................................. 91
6.3.2 Host Origin ............................................................................................................... 109
6.3.3 Geographical Distribution ........................................................................................ 111
6.4 Remarks and Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 113
Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................... 114
References ...................................................................................................................................... 114
* Corresponding author.
90 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
of resource use. This reinforces the hypothesis of distinct taxonomic entities because most of
the plants are present throughout the range but are not found to be common hosts to all of the
y populations. In this context, the potential application of the sterile insect technique (SIT) in
certain geographical areas requires knowledge of the particular hosts consumed by the target
species.
6.1 INTRODUCTION
TheSouth American fruit y (SAFF), Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann, 1830), is widely dis-
tributed throughout the Americas; from the southern United States (Texas), through Mexico, Central
America and South America to Argentina (Hernández-Ortiz& Aluja 1993). Based on previous
research under different approaches, including the use of karyotypes, molecular DNAsequences,
reproductive isolation, pheromone proles, or even integrative approaches (reviewed in Selivon
etal. 2004, 2005a, 2005b, Vera etal. 2006, Cáceres etal. 2009, Vačková etal. 2015, Dias etal.
2016, and others), there is nowenough support for the hypothesis that this nominal species in fact
comprises a complex of cryptic species that are currently recognized using morphometric proce-
dures as eight morphotypes, most likely corresponding to different biological species (Hernández-
Ortiz etal. 2004, 2012, 2015).
There is also evidence that some populations exhibit important differences in the host range
used, using preferential hosts at the regional scale. Moreover, their pest status can differ depending
on the geographical area in which they occur; for instance, Baker etal. (1944) showed that citrus
fruits such as oranges were unsuitable hosts for Mexican SAFF females and Aluja etal. (2003a)
later conrmed that fruits of Citrus sinensis and Citrus paradisi in Mexico are notinfested, either
in the eld or under laboratory-induced conditions. Incontrast, studies in South America revealed
that citrus fruits are common hosts for Brazilian populations of the SAFF (Malavasi etal. 1980,
Zucchi 2007, and others). Inthis regard, there are some highly questionable reports indicating that
A. fraterculus is able to infest citrus fruits in Guatemala (Eska& Cunningham 1987, Eska1990).
Thisvariation in the range of host plants consumed in different regions of the neotropics presents a
problem in terms of enforcing effective quarantine procedures.
Historical accounts indicate that nearly 150 plant species host larvae feeding on their fruits across
the Americas (Norrbom 2004). However, many of these records were derived from observations under
laboratory conditions or copied from previous literature reports, and some fail to specify an explicit
location, or even country, or there is some uncertainty regarding the y or host plant identity. Various
studies at the regional level provide information on the population dynamics of the SAFF derived
from specimens caught in traps baited with food attractants. These traps are usually hung on fruit
trees of commercial importance; however, this does notnecessarily demonstrate that these y larvae
infest such fruits under natural conditions. Thisinformation has led to the identication of three key
problems of the phytosanitary measures that must be applied: (1) the presence of erroneous records
featuring wrongly identied or unconrmed hosts; (2) misidentication of the taxonomic species
because other wild y species are also attracted to the food baits; and (3) misinterpretation of dis-
tribution patterns based on records with inaccurate locations. As a consequence, implementation of
quarantine measures and methods of integrated pest management (IPM) based on such erroneous or
ambiguous information can lead to poor planning of control strategies based on concepts of y-free
or low prevalence areas, or even the application of the sterile insect technique (SIT) in specic geo-
graphical areas, which requires accurate identication of the hosts consumed by the target species.
Thisstudy therefore aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the host plants used as natu-
ral food resources by A. fraterculus. Thereview focuses particularly on records produced under eld
conditions to conduct an analysis of botanical families and host species using current botanical nomen-
clature and homogenizing past and current species names, as well as examining their occurrence in dif-
ferent countries using the information available in the literature produced over nearly a century. Thisis
a critical rst step to elucidate the host range of the SAFF across several regions of the neotropics.
91AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
6.2 METHODS AND ANALYSIS
Information was sought in the original published sources of recorded host plants of the nominal
species A. fraterculus. Thesearch was largely conducted in articles published in scientic journals,
books, and unpublished dissertations available online. The main requirements of credibility for
each record were inclusion of the full identity of the host plant, as well as the occurrence of fruit
infestation under natural conditions in the eld, with no ambiguity regarding the recorded location
(to country level at least). We therefore excluded doubtful reports, those obtained under laboratory
conditions, and those in which the accurate identity of the fruit y species could notbe veried.
Nearly 170 references as primary sources of information from all regions of the Americas were
examined. All information useful for the analysis was captured in a database, including the host
identity, botanical family, original source of data, country, state or province, locality, coordinates
and collection date, where available. If a single publication reported the same host in several loca-
tions, each report was considered a separate record in the database. Furthermore, each host plant
was classied as native or exotic based on its origin because many were species that had been intro-
duced to the Americas.
Afew records were omitted from the analysis, even though they were obtained under natural
conditions. Thiswas the case of two historical records for Annona cherimola Mill. in Arica (Chile)
because A. fraterculus does not occur in that country since its eradication in 1964. Inaddition,
other reports for several countries of Rubus spp., as well as Ravenia wampi Oliv (Rutaceae) and
Cyphomandra betacea (Cav.) Stendtn. (Solanaceae) for Brazil were also excluded from the analysis
because their status as unresolved names prevented conrmation of their identity and origin.
Because some original names have changed because publication in the primary source, the
attached list presents a single identity for each host plant. Thenomenclature used for the scien-
tic names of plants was updated following the classication of “ThePlant List” (2013) to avoid
duplication or potential synonymies among species, as well as to facilitate their correct assignment
to the corresponding family. Thelist of host plants of A. fraterculus (sensu lato) is organized and
presented by host family and specic binomial name, with the authorship, origin, key code by host
species, total number of records and countries where this fruit y has been reported, as well as the
original source of information (Table6.1).
To analyze host plant trends, interaction networks depicting the associations of A. fraterculus
and its host plant species across the Americas were evaluated, considering the origin of the hosts
(native or exotic) and their plant families. Acluster analysis was also conducted based on the fre-
quency of records of hosts throughout the countries. All analyses were executed using the “plot-
web function” of the “bipartite” package (Dormann& Gruber 2009) in “R software” (RCore
Team 2014).
6.3 RESULTS
6.3.1 dIversIty oF host plants
As a result of the examination of natural host plants of A. fraterculus throughout the Americas, 177
host plants belonging to 40 plant families were recorded, which together accounted for 1,622doc-
umented reports in different localities. The plant families with highest species richness were
Myrtaceae (48), Rosaceae (20), Rutaceae (14), Leguminosae (11), Sapotaceae (10), Anacardiaceae
(8), and Annonaceae (7), which together represented nearly 66% of all recorded hosts. Forinstance,
the family Myrtaceae was represented by at least 10 different genera, having the highest species
richness. The highest frequency of records was found for Psidium guajava (298), Eugenia uni-
ora (48), Syzygium jambos (35), Acca sellowiana (31), and Psidium cattleianum (22). Myrtaceae
is therefore the most important food plant family widespread throughout the distribution range of
the SAFF.
92 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
TABLE 6.1
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Actinidiaceae Actinidia deliciosa
(AChev) CS Liang&
AR Ferguson
Exotic Ac-del 2 Bra Hickel and Schuck (1993)
Anacardiaceae Anacardium
occidentale L.
Native An-occ 2 Bra, Gua Eska and Cunningham (1987), Jesus-Barros etal. (2012)
Anacardiaceae Byrsonima crassifolia
(L.) Kunth
Native By-cra 1 Bra Jesus-Barros etal. (2012)
Anacardiaceae Mangifera indica L. Exotic Ma-ind 46 Arg, Bra, Col, Ecu,
FrG, Gua, Mex,
Per, Ven
Aluja etal. (1987), Alvarenga etal. (2009), Araujo (2015), Boscán de Martínez and
Godoy (1996), Campos (1960), Caraballo (1981), Eska (1990), Eska and
Cunningham (1987), Ferreira etal. (2003), Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Guagliumi
(1966), Hernández-Ortiz etal. (2012), Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña (1968),
Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña. (1969), Malavasi etal. (1980), Marchiori etal.
(2000), Marinho (2004), Molineros etal. (1992), Núñez Bueno (1981), Ovruski
etal. (2003), Putruele etal. (1996), Raga etal. (2011), Sá etal. (2008), Silva
(1993), Silva etal. (1996), Stone (1942b), Tigrero (2009), Uramoto (2002),
Uramoto etal. (2004), Vayssières etal. (2013), Veloso etal. (2000), Zucchi (2000)
Anacardiaceae Spondias dulcis
Parkinson
Exotic Sp-dul 5 Bra Araujo (2015), Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004)
Anacardiaceae Spondias mombin L. Native Sp-mom 12 Bra, Col, Mex, Per,
Ven
Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2007), Almeida (2016), Boscán de Martínez and Godoy
(1996), Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Jesus-Barros etal. (2012), Korytkowski and
Ojeda Peña (1968), Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña (1969), Lemos (2014), Lemos
etal. (2017), McPhail and Bliss (1933), Sarmiento etal. (2012)
Anacardiaceae Spondias purpurea L. Native Sp-pur 23 Bra, Ecu, Pan, Per Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2001), Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2007), Alvarenga etal. (2000,
2009), Bressan and Da Costa Teles (1991), Campos (1960), Korytkowski and
Ojeda Peña (1968), Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña. (1969), Leal etal. (2009),
Lemos (2014), Lemos etal. (2017), Malavasi etal. (1980), Pirovani (2011),
Pirovani etal. (2010), Raga etal. (2011), Sá etal. (2008), Silva etal. (2010),
Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Stone (1942b), Tigrero (2009), Zucchi (2000)
(Continued)
93AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
(Continued)
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Anacardiaceae Spondias sp. Native Sp-sp 7Bra, Col, Ecu, Mex Aluja (1984), Molineros etal. (1992), Núñez Bueno (1981), Sá etal. (2008), Santos
(2003), Silva etal. (2010), Zucchi (2000)
Anacardiaceae Spondias tuberosa
Arruda
Native Sp-tub 2 Bra Alvarenga etal. (2009), Sá etal. (2008)
Annonaceae Annona cherimola Mill. Native An-che 21 Arg, Bra, Col, Ecu,
Per
Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Greene (1934), Hernández-Ortiz etal. (2012),
Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña (1968), Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña. (1969),
Molineros etal. (1992), Núñez Bueno (1981), Ovruski etal. (2003), Rust (1918),
Stone (1942b), Tigrero (2009), White and Elson-Harris (1992), Wille (1941)
Annonaceae Annona crassiora
Mart.
Native An-cra 2 Bra Veloso etal. (2000), Zucchi (2000)
Annonaceae Annona muricata L. Native An-mur 4 Col Gonzalez Mendoza (1952)
Annonaceae Annona rugulosa
(Schltdl.) H. Rainer
Native An-rug 2 Bra Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Marsaro Júnior (2014)
Annonaceae Rollinia emarginata
Schltdl.
Native Ro-ema 2 Bra Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Zucchi (2000)
Annonaceae Rollinia laurifolia
Schltdl.
Native Ro-lau 2 Bra Uramoto (2007), Uramoto etal. (2008)
Annonaceae Rollinia sericea (R. E.
Fr.) R. E. Fr.
Native Ro-ser 3 Bra Raga etal. (2011), Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Zucchi (2000)
Arecaceae Butia eriospatha (Mart.
ex Drude) Becc.
Native Bu-eri 1 Bra Savaris etal. (2013)
Arecaceae Syagrus romanzofana
(Cham.) Glassman
Native Sy-rom 2 Bra Araujo (2015), Uramoto (2002)
Calophyllaceae Mammea americana L. Exotic Ma-ame 2 Col, Ecu Campos (1960), Gonzalez Mendoza (1952)
Cannabaceae Celtis iguanaea (Jacq.)
Sarg.
Native Ce-igu 1 Bra Garcia and Norrbom (2011)
Caricaceae Carica papaya L. Native Ca-pap 2 Arg, Col Gonzalez Mendoza (1952)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
94 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Celastraceae Peritassa campestris
(Cambess.) A. C. Sm.
Native Pe-cam 2 Bra Veloso etal. (2000), Zucchi (2000)
Chrysobalanaceae Chrysobalanus icaco L. Native Ch-ica 2 Bra, Col Deus etal. (2013), Gonzalez Mendoza (1952)
Clusiaceae Garcinia brasiliensis
Mart.
Native Ga-bra 2 Bra Pirovani (2011), Raga etal. (2011)
Combretaceae Terminalia catappa L. Exotic Te-cat 32 Bra, CR, Ecu,
Mex, Ven
Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2007), Aluja etal. (1987, 2000), Araujo etal. (2000), Araujo
(2012), Boscán de Martínez and Godoy (1996), Boscán de Martínez etal. (1980),
Caraballo (1981), Hernández-Ortiz and Morales-Valles (2004), Hernández-Ortiz
etal. (2012), Katiyar etal. (1995), Mascarenhas (2007), Raga etal. (2011), Silva
etal. (1996), Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Steck (1991), Steck etal. (1990), Tigrero
(2009), Zucchi (2000)
Ebenaceae Diospyros kaki L. Exotic Di-kak 12 Arg, Bra Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Malavasi etal. (1980), Marsaro Júnior (2014), Nasca
etal. (1996), Ovruski etal. (2003), Segura etal. (2004, 2006), Souza-Filho etal.
(2000), Zucchi (2000)
Euphorbiaceae Alchornea latifolia Sw. Native Al-lat 2Mex Aluja (1984), Aluja etal. (1987)
Euphorbiaceae Manihot esculenta
Crantz
Native Mn-esc 1Ven Boscán de Martínez and Godoy (1996)
Juglandaceae Juglans australis
Griseb.
Native Ju-aus 6Arg Ovruski etal. (2003, 2004)
Juglandaceae Juglans neotropica
Diels
Native Ju-neo 4 Ecu, Per Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña (1969), Molineros etal. (1992), Tigrero (2009)
Lauraceae Cryptocarya
aschersoniana Mez
Native Cr-asc 2 Bra Marinho etal. (2009), Raga etal. (2011)
Lauraceae Endlicheria paniculata
(Spreng.) J. F. Macbr.
Native En-pan 1 Bra Pirovani (2011)
Lauraceae Persea americana Mill. Native Pe-ame 4 Arg, Bra Araujo (2015), Putruele etal. (1996), Rust (1918), Uramoto (2002)
Leguminosae Andira humilis Mart. ex
Benth.
Native An-hum 2 Bra Veloso etal. (2000), Zucchi (2000)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
95AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Leguminosae Inga edulis Mart. Native In-edu 8 Bra, Col, Ecu Deus etal. (2010), Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Lemos (2014), Lemos etal. (2017),
Malavasi etal. (1980), Tigrero (2009), Zucchi (2000)
Leguminosae Inga feuilleei DC. Native In-feu 1 Ecu Tigrero (2009)
Leguminosae Inga insignis Kunth Native In-ins 1 Ecu Tigrero (2009)
Leguminosae Inga micheliana Harms Native In-mic 1 Gua Eska and Cunningham (1987)
Leguminosae Inga paterna Harms Native In-pat 1 Gua Eska and Cunningham (1987)
Leguminosae Inga sellowiana Benth. Native In-sel 1 Bra Garcia and Norrbom (2011)
Leguminosae Inga semialata (Vell.)
C. Mart.
Native In-sem 1Arg Oroño etal. (2005)
Leguminosae Inga sp. Native In-sp 4Bra, Ecu, Ven Briceño Vergara (1975), Campos (1960), Molineros etal. (1992), Raga etal. (2011)
Leguminosae Inga spectabilis (Vahl)
Willd.
Native In-spe 2 Ecu Tigrero (2009)
Leguminosae Inga vera subsp. spuria
(Willd.) J. Leon
Native In-ver 1 Col Gonzalez Mendoza (1952)
Lythraceae Punica granatum L. Exotic Pu-gra 5 Arg, Bra, Ecu Molineros etal. (1992), Nasca etal. (1996), Putruele etal. (1996), Raga etal.
(2011), Tigrero (2009)
Malpighiaceae Malpighia emarginata
DC.
Exotic Ml-ema 4 Col, Ecu Campos (1960), Pirovani (2011), Raga etal. (2011), Sá etal. (2008)
Malpighiaceae Malpighia glabra L. Native Ml-gla 13 Bra, Col, Ecu Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2001), Araujo (2015), Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Leal etal.
(2009), Malavasi etal. (1980), Marinho (2004), Souza-Filho etal. (2000),
Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Zucchi (2000)
Malvaceae Quararibea cordata
(Bonpl.) Vischer
Native Qu-cor 3 Ecu Molineros etal. (1992), Tigrero (2009)
Malvaceae Theobroma cacao L. Native Th-cac 2Ve n Caraballo (1981), Hernández-Ortiz and Morales-Valles (2004)
Melastomataceae Bellucia
grossularioides (L.)
Triana
Native Be-gro 1 FrGuy Vayssières etal. (2013)
96 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Melastomataceae Mouriri acutiora
Naudin
Native Mo-acu 1 Bra Jesus-Barros etal. (2012)
Melastomataceae Mouriri glazioviana
Cogn.
Native Mo-gla 2 Bra Uramoto (2007), Uramoto etal. (2008)
Moraceae Ficus carica L. Exotic Fi-car 16 Arg, Bra, Ecu Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Molineros etal. (1992), Nasca etal. (1996), Ovruski
etal. (2003), Putruele etal. (1996), Rust (1918), Tigrero (2009)
Moraceae Helicostylis sp. Native He-sp 3 Bra Bondar (1950), Kovaleski etal. (1999), Zucchi (2000)
Moraceae Helicostylis tomentosa
(Poepp.& Endl.)
J.F.Macbr.
Native He-tom 1 Bra Bondar (1950)
Myrtaceae Acca sellowiana
(O.Berg) Burret
Native Ac-sel 31 Arg, Bra, Col, Ecu Alberti etal. (2002), Cruz etal. (2017), Custódio etal. (2017), Garcia and Norrbom
(2011), Hernández-Ortiz etal. (2015), Hickel and Ducroquet (1994), Kovaleski
etal. (1999, 2000), Marsaro Júnior (2014), Molineros etal. (1992), Nasca etal.
(1996), Nunes etal. (2012), Ovruski etal. (2008), Pereira-Rêgo etal. (2011), Rust
(1918), Salles (1995), Schliserman etal. (2010), Segura etal. (2004, 2006),
Tigrero (2009), Yepes and Vélez (1989), Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Calycolpus moritzianus
(O. Berg) Burret
Native Ca-mor 3Ven Hernández-Ortiz and Morales-Valles (2004), Hernández-Ortiz etal. (2012), Katiyar
etal. (2000)
Myrtaceae Campomanesia
adamantium
(Cambess.) O. Berg
Native Cm-ada 8 Bra Malavasi etal. (1980), Selivon (2000), Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Veloso etal.
(2000), Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Campomanesia
espiritosantensis
Landrum
Native Cm-esp 2 Bra Uramoto (2007), Uramoto etal. (2008)
Myrtaceae Campomanesia
guaviroba (DC.)
Kiaersk.
Native Cm-gua 1 Bra Zucchi (2000)
(Continued)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
97AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
(Continued)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Myrtaceae Campomanesia
guazumifolia
(Cambess.) O. Berg
Native Cm-guz 2 Bra Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Marsaro Júnior (2014)
Myrtaceae Campomanesia
lineatifolia Ruiz&
Pav.
Native Cm-lin 2 Bra Uramoto (2007), Uramoto etal. (2008)
Myrtaceae Campomanesia
pubescens (Mart. ex
DC.) O. Berg
Native Cm-pub 2 Bra Guimarães etal. (1999), Raga etal. (2005)
Myrtaceae Campomanesia
xanthocarpa (Mart.)
O. Berg
Native Cm-xan 8 Arg, Bra Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Kovaleski etal. (1999, 2000), Malavasi etal. (1980),
Marsaro Júnior (2014), Salles (1995), Schliserman etal. (2010), Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Eugenia brasiliensis
Lam.
Native Eu-bra 8 Bra Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2007), Raga etal. (2005), Steck and Malavasi (1988), Steck
etal. (1990), Stone (1942b), Uramoto (2007), Uramoto etal. (2008), Wille (1941)
Myrtaceae Eugenia dodonaeifolia
Cambess.
Native Eu-dod 1 Bra Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Eugenia dysenterica
DC.
Native Eu-dys 3 Bra Silva etal. (2010), Veloso etal. (2000), Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Eugenia orida DC. Native Eu-o 1Pan Stone (1942a)
Myrtaceae Eugenia gemmiora
O.Berg
Native Eu-gem 2 Bra Uramoto (2007), Uramoto etal. (2008)
Myrtaceae Eugenia involucrata
DC.
Native Eu-inv 15 Bra Araujo (2015), Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Haji and Da Gama Miranda (2000),
Kovaleski etal. (1999, 2000), Marsaro Júnior (2014), Nunes etal. (2012), Raga
etal. (2005), Salles (1995), Uramoto (2002, 2007), Uramoto etal. (2004, 2008),
Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Eugenia lambertiana
DC.
Native Eu-lam 2 Bra Raga etal. (2005), Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Eugenia leitonii D.
Legrand
Native Eu-lei 2 Bra Raga etal. (2005), Zucchi (2000)
98 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Myrtaceae Eugenia myrcianthes
Nied.
Native Eu-myr 2Arg Putruele etal. (1996), Segura etal. (2006)
Myrtaceae Eugenia platyphylla
O.Berg
Native Eu-pla 3 Bra Uramoto (2007)
Myrtaceae Eugenia platysema
O.Berg
Native Eu-plt 1 Bra Uramoto etal. (2008)
Myrtaceae Eugenia punicifolia
(Kunth) DC.
Native Eu-pun 2Ven Fernandez Yepez (1953), Guagliumi (1966)
Myrtaceae Eugenia pyriformis
Cambess.
Native Eu-pyr 19 Bra Araujo (2015), Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Guimarães etal. (1999), Kovaleski
etal. (1999, 2000), Malavasi etal. (1980), Marinho (2004), Marsaro Júnior
(2014), Nunes etal. (2012), Perre (2016), Raga etal. (2005), Souza-Filho etal.
(2000), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Eugenia stipitata
McVaugh
Native Eu-sti 8 Bra, Ecu Lemos (2014), Lemos etal. (2017), Molineros etal. (1992), Silva etal. (2010),
Tigrero (2009), Uramoto (2007), Uramoto etal. (2008)
Myrtaceae Eugenia uniora L. Native Eu-uni 48 Arg, Bra, Gua,
Mex, Pan
Aguiar-Menezes and Menezes (2000), Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2003), Aguiar-
Menezes etal. (2007), Aluja etal. (1987), Alvarenga etal. (2009), Alvarenga etal.
(2000), Araujo (2015), Eska (1990), Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Guimarães
etal. (1999), Hernández-Ortiz etal. (2012), Malavasi etal. (1980), Marchiori etal.
(2000), Marinho (2004), Marsaro Júnior (2014), Nunes etal. (2012), Ovruski etal.
(2003, 2004), Ovruski etal. (2008), Pirovani (2011), Pirovani etal. (2010), Raga
etal. (2005), Salles (1995), Silva etal. (2010, 2011), Souza-Filho etal. (2000),
Stone (1942b), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Veloso etal. (2000),
Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Myrceugenia euosma
(O. Berg) D. Legrand
Native Me-euo 3 Bra Kovaleski etal. (1999, 2000), Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Myrcia clausseniana
Berg
Native Mc-cla 2 Bra Uramoto (2007), Uramoto etal. (2008)
Myrtaceae Myrcia popayanensis
Hieron.
Native Mc-pop 1 Col Olarte Espinosa (1980)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
99AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Myrtaceae Myrcianthes fragrans
(Sw.) McVaugh
Exotic My-fra 1 Col Gonzalez Mendoza (1952)
Myrtaceae Myrcianthes pungens
(O. Berg) D. Legrand
Native My-pun 11 Arg, Bra Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Marsaro Júnior (2014), Ovruski etal. (2003, 2004,
2008), Putruele etal. (1996)
Myrtaceae Myrciaria dubia
(Kunth) McVaugh
Native Mr-dub 1 Bra Custódio etal. (2017)
Myrtaceae Myrciaria oribunda
(H.West ex Willd.)
O.Berg
Native Mr-o 1Mex Aluja etal. (2000)
Myrtaceae Myrciaria glazioviana
(Kiaersk.) G. M.
Barroso ex Sobral
Native Mr-gla 1 Bra Pirovani (2011)
Myrtaceae Myrciaria glomerata
O.Berg
Native Mr-glo 5 Bra Araujo (2015), Marinho (2004), Raga etal. (2005), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal.
(2004)
Myrtaceae Myrciaria strigipes
O.Berg
Native Mr-str 2 Bra Uramoto (2007), Uramoto etal. (2008)
Myrtaceae Plinia cauliora
(Mart.) Kausel
Native Pl-cau 15 Bra Aguiar-Menezes and Menezes (2000), Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2007), Araujo (2015),
Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Marinho (2004), Pirovani (2011), Pirovani etal.
(2010), Raga etal. (2005), Salles (1995), Silva etal. (2011), Souza-Filho etal.
(2000), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Plinia edulis (Vell.)
Sobral
Native Pl-edu 2 Bra Raga etal. (2005), Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Psidium acutangulum
Mart. ex DC.
Native Ps-acu 1 Col Hernández-Ortiz etal. (2015)
Myrtaceae Psidium cattleianum
Afzel. ex Sabine
Native Ps-cat 22 Arg, Bra, Gua Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2001), Eska and Cunningham (1987), Garcia and Norrbom
(2011), Kovaleski etal. (1999, 2000), Leal etal. (2009), Manni etal. (2015),
Marinho (2004), Marsaro Júnior (2014), Nunes etal. (2012), Pereira-Rêgo etal.
(2011), Raga etal. (2005), Rust (1918), Zucchi (2000)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
100 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Myrtaceae Psidium guajava L. Native Ps-gua 298 Arg, Bol, Bra, Col,
CR, Ecu, FrG,
Gua, Mex, Pan,
Per, Ven
Adaime etal. (2017), Aguiar-Menezes and Menezes (1997, 2000), Aguiar-Menezes
etal. (2001, 2007), Alberti etal. (2002), Aluja (1984), Aluja etal. (1987, 2000),
Alvarenga etal. (2000. 2009), Araujo etal. (2000), Araujo (2012, 2015), Baker etal.
(1944), Barros (2008), Bomm etal. (2007), Boscán de Martínez and Godoy (1996),
Campos (1960), Caraballo (1981), Castañeda etal. (2010), Corsato (2004), Cruz etal.
(2017), Deus etal. (2010), Eska (1990), Eska and Cunningham (1987), Fernandez
Yepez (1953), Fischer (1934), Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Gonzalez Mendoza
(1952), Guagliumi (1966), Haji and Da Gama Miranda (2000), Hedström (1987),
Hernández-Ortiz and Morales-Valles (2004), Hernández-Ortiz and Pérez-Alonso
(1993), Hernández-Ortiz etal. (1994, 2004, 2012, 2015), Isaac (1905), Jesus-Barros
etal. (2012), Jirón and Hedström (1988), Katiyar etal. (2000), Korytkowski etal.
(2001), Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña (1968, 1969),Leal etal. (2009), Lemos (2014),
Lemos etal. (2017), Malavasi etal. (1980), Manni etal. (2015), Marchiori etal.
(2000), Marsaro Júnior (2014), Mascarenhas (2007), McPhail and Bliss (1933),
Molineros etal. (1992), Nunes etal. (2012), Núñez Bueno (1981), Nuñez Bueno
etal. (2004), Ovruski (1995), Ovruski etal. (2003, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2009),
Pereira-Rêgo etal. (2011), Perre (2016), Pirovani (2011), Pirovani etal. (2010),
Putruele etal. (1996), Querino etal. (2014), Raga etal. (2005), Sá etal. (2008), Salles
(1995), Sarmiento etal. (2012), Schliserman etal. (2010), Segura etal. (2006),
Selivon (2000), Silva etal. (2010, 2011a, 2011b), Silva and Silva (2007), Souza-Filho
(2005, 2006), Souza-Filho etal. (2009), Steck (1991), Steck etal. (1990), Stone
(1942b), Taira (2012), Taira etal. (2013), Tigrero (1998, 2009), Uchôa-Fernandes and
Zucchi (2000), Uchôa-Fernandes etal. (2002), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal.
(2004), Vayssières etal. (2013), Veloso etal. (2000), Wille (1937), Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Psidium guineense Sw. Native Ps-gui 17 Bra, Col, Mex, Ven Aluja etal. (2000), Araujo etal. (2000), Bomm etal. (2007), Castañeda etal. (2010),
Fernandez Yepez (1953), Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Guagliumi (1966), Hernández-
Ortiz etal. (2004), Katiyar etal. (2000), Pirovani (2011), Pirovani etal. (2010), Silva
etal. (2010, 2011), Uramoto etal. (2008), Veloso etal. (2000), Zucchi (2000)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
101AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Myrtaceae Psidium guyanense
Pers.
Native Ps-guy 1 Bra Uramoto (2007)
Myrtaceae Psidium kennedyanum
Morong
Native Ps-ken 1 Bra Uchôa-Fernandes and Nicácio (2010)
Myrtaceae Psidium myrtoides O.
Berg
Native Ps-myr 2 Bra Uramoto (2007), Uramoto etal. (2008)
Myrtaceae Psidium sartorianum
(O. Berg) Nied.
Native Ps-sar 4Mex Aluja etal. (2000), Aluja etal. (2003b)
Myrtaceae Psidium sp. Native Ps-sp 8 Arg, Bra, Ecu Molineros etal. (1992), Rust (1918), Salles (1995), Tigrero (2009), Uchôa-
Fernandes and Zucchi (2000), Uchôa-Fernandes etal. (2002)
Myrtaceae Syzygium aqueum
(Burm. f.) Alston
Exotic Sy-aqu 1 Bra Zucchi (2000)
Myrtaceae Syzygium jambos (L.)
Alston
Exotic Sy-jam 35 Bra, Ecu, Mex,
Per, Ven
Aluja (1984), Aluja etal. (1987, 2000), Araujo (2015), Baker etal. (1944), Baker
(1945), Bomm etal. (2007), Bush (1962), Campos (1960), Hernández-Ortiz etal.
(2004), Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña (1968, 1969), Marinho (2004), Molineros
etal. (1992), Perre (2016), Raga etal. (2005), Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Steck
(1991), Steck etal. (1990), Tigrero (2009), Uchôa-Fernandes and Nicácio (2010),
Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004)
Myrtaceae Syzygium malaccense
(L.) Merr.& L. M.
Perry
Exotic Sy-mal 4 Bra, Pan Silva etal. (2010, 2011), Stone (1942b)
Oleaceae Olea europaea L. Exotic Ol-eur 1Arg Nasca etal. (1996)
Oxalidaceae Averrhoa carambola L. Exotic Av-car 18 Bra Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2001, 2007), Araujo (2015), Feitosa etal. (2007), Garcia
and Norrbom (2011), Leal etal. (2009), Malavasi etal. (1980), Marchiori etal.
(2000), Raga etal. (2011), Silva etal. (2010), Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Uramoto
(2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Veloso etal. (2000), Zucchi (2000)
Passioraceae Passiora alata Curtis Native Pa-ala 3 Bra Pirovani (2011), Pirovani etal. (2010), Souza-Filho etal. (2000)
Passioraceae Passiora caerulea L. Native Pa-cae 3Arg Ovruski etal. (2003), Putruele etal. (1996)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
102 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Passioraceae Passiora edulis Sims Native Pa-edu 4 Bra Araujo (2015), Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004)
Passioraceae Passiora sp. Native Pa-sp 3 Bra Kovaleski etal. (1999, 2000), Zucchi (2000)
Passioraceae Passiora tripartita
(Juss.) Poir.
Native Pa-tri 1 Col Castro (2009)
Picramniaceae Picramnia sp. Native Pi-sp 1 Bra Raga etal. (2011)
Rhamnaceae Ziziphus joazeiro Mart. Native Zi-joa 1 Bra Sá etal. (2008)
Rhamnaceae Ziziphus jujuba Mill. Native Zi-juj 1 Col Gonzalez Mendoza (1952)
Rosaceae Cydonia oblonga Mill. Exotic Cy-obl 6Arg, Per, Ven Guagliumi (1966), Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña (1968, 1969), Nasca etal. (1996),
Ovruski etal. (2010), Putruele etal. (1996)
Rosaceae Eriobotrya japonica
(Thunb.) Lindl.
Exotic Er-jap 75 Arg, Bra, Col, Ecu,
Mex, Per, Ven
Aguiar-Menezes and Menezes (2000), Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2007), Alberti etal.
(2002), Aluja (1984), Araujo (2015), Briceño Vergara (1975, 1979), Caraballo
(1981), Cruz etal. (2017), Fernandez Yepez (1953), Garcia and Norrbom (2011),
Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Guagliumi (1966), Hernández-Ortiz and Morales-
Valles (2004), Hernández-Ortiz etal. (2012), Katiyar etal. (1995), Kovaleski etal.
(1999, 2000), Malavasi etal. (1980), Marinho (2004), Mascarenhas (2007),
Molineros etal. (1992), Nunes etal. (2012), Ovruski etal. (2003), Perre (2016),
Pirovani (2011), Pirovani etal. (2010), Putruele etal. (1996), Raga etal. (2011),
Salles (1995), Schliserman etal. (2010), Segura etal. (2006), Souza-Filho (2006),
Souza-Filho etal. (2000, 2009), Steck (1991), Stone (1942b), Tigrero (2009),
Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Yepes and Vélez (1989), Zucchi (2000)
Rosaceae Fragaria×ananassa
(Duchesne ex Weston)
Duchesne ex Rozier
Exotic Fg-ana 1 Bra Raga etal. (2011)
Rosaceae Fragaria vesca L. Exotic Fg-ves 2 Bra Salles (1995), Zucchi (2000)
Rosaceae Malus domestica
Borkh.
Exotic Ma-dom 16 Bra, Col, Ecu, Ven Ballou (1945), Boscán de Martínez etal. (1980), Campos (1960), Caraballo (1981),
Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Guagliumi (1966), Kovaleski etal. (1999, 2000),
Malavasi etal. (1980), Molineros etal. (1992), Perre (2016), Raga etal. (2011),
Salles (1995), Tigrero (2009), Zucchi (2000)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
103AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Rosaceae Prunus armeniaca L. Exotic Pr-arm 6Arg Nasca etal. (1996), Ovruski etal. (2003, 2004), Putruele etal. (1996), Rust (1918)
Rosaceae Prunus avium (L.) L. Exotic Pr-avi 1 Bra Garcia and Norrbom (2011)
Rosaceae Prunus domestica L. Exotic Pr-dom 17 Arg, Bra, Col, Ecu Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Guimarães etal. (1999), Kovaleski etal. (1999, 2000),
Marin Patiño (2002), Molineros etal. (1992), Nasca etal. (1996), Ovruski etal.
(2003, 2004, 2010), Raga etal. (2011), Salles (1995), Tigrero (2009), Zucchi
(2000)
Rosaceae Prunus domestica
subsp. insititia (L.)
Bonnier& Layens
Exotic Pr-dom 2Arg Putruele etal. (1996), Segura etal. (2006)
Rosaceae Prunus dulcis (Mill.)
D. A.Webb
Exotic Pr-dul 1Arg Nasca etal. (1996)
Rosaceae Prunus mume (Siebold)
Siebold& Zucc.
Exotic Pr-mum 2 Bra Perre (2016), Raga etal. (2011)
Rosaceae Prunus persica (L.)
Batsch
Exotic Pr-per 177 Arg, Bol, Bra, Col,
Ecu, Gua, Mex,
Per, Ven
Aguiar-Menezes and Menezes (1997), Alberti etal. (2002), Aluja etal. (2000),
Araujo (2015), Baker etal. (1944), Boscán de Martínez and Godoy (1996),
Boscán de Martínez etal. (1980), Briceño Vergara (1975, 1979), Campos (1960),
Caraballo (1981), Cruz etal. (2017), Eska and Cunningham (1987), Garcia and
Norrbom (2011), Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Greene (1934), Guagliumi (1966),
Hernández-Ortiz and Morales-Valles (2004), Kovaleski etal. (1999, 2000),
Malavasi etal. (1980), Marsaro Júnior (2014), Molineros etal. (1992), Nasca etal.
(1996), Nunes etal. (2012), Ovruski (1995), Ovruski etal. (2003, 2004, 2009,
2010), Perre (2016), Putruele etal. (1996), Raga etal. (2011), Salles (1995),
Schliserman etal. (2010), Segura etal. (2004, 2006), Shaw (1947), Souza-Filho
(2006), Souza-Filho etal. (2000, 2009), Steck (1991), Tigrero (2009), Uramoto
(2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Zucchi (2000)
Rosaceae Prunus salicina Lindl. Exotic Pr-sal 7 Arg, Bra Alberti etal. (2002), Marinho (2004), Marinho etal. (2009), Perre (2016)
Rosaceae Prunus serotina Ehrh.
ssp. capuli (Cav.)
McVaugh
Native Pr-ser 1 Gua Eska and Cunningham (1987)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
104 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Rosaceae Prunus sp. Exotic Pr-sp 5 Bra, Col Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Malavasi etal. (1980), Salles (1995), Zucchi (2000)
Rosaceae Pyrus communis L. Exotic Py-com 18 Arg, Bra, Ecu, Per Aguiar-Menezes and Menezes (2000), Campos (1960), Garcia and Norrbom
(2011), Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña (1968, 1969), Kovaleski etal. (2000),
Molineros etal. (1992), Nasca etal. (1996), Nunes etal. (2015), Raga etal.
(2011), Salles (1995), Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Stone (1942b), Tigrero (2009),
Zucchi (2000)
Rosaceae Rubus eriocarpus
Liebm.
Native Ru-eri 3Ecu, Ven Hernández-Ortiz and Morales-Valles (2004), Tigrero (2009)
Rosaceae Rubus idaeus L. Exotic Ru-ida 1Arg Funes etal. (2017)
Rosaceae Rubus sp. ? Ru-sp 26 Arg, Bra, Col, Ecu,
Ven
Araujo (2015), Briceño Vergara (1975, 1979), Castañeda etal. (2010), Funes etal.
(2017), Hernández-Ortiz etal. (2012), Katiyar etal. (1995), Kovaleski etal. (2000),
Manni etal. (2015), Molineros etal. (1992), Núñez Bueno (1981), Salles (1995), Steck
(1991), Steck etal. (1990), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Zucchi (2000)
Rosaceae Rubus ulmifolius Schott Exotic Ru-ulm 1 Bra Raga etal. (2011)
Rubiaceae Coffea arabica L. Exotic Co-ara 51 Bra, Col, Mex, Ven Aluja (1984), Aluja etal. (1987), Araujo (2015), Boscán de Martínez etal. (1980),
Caraballo (1981), Castañeda etal. (2010), Cruz etal. (2017), Gonzalez Mendoza
(1952), Hernández-Ortiz and Morales-Valles (2004), Hernández-Ortiz etal.
(2012), Hernández-Ortiz etal. (2015), Katiyar etal. (1995), Malavasi etal. (1980),
Núñez Bueno (1981), Nuñez Bueno etal. (2004), Sarmiento etal. (2012), Souza
etal. (2005), Steck (1991), Steck etal. (1990), Stone (1942b), Torres (2004),
Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Yepes and Vélez (1989), Zucchi (2000)
Rubiaceae Coffea liberica Hiern Exotic Co-lib 1Ve n Guagliumi (1966)
Rutaceae Citrus aurantiifolia
(Christm.) Swingle
Exotic Ct-arn 4 Bra Salles (1995), Zucchi (2000)
Rutaceae Citrus japonica Thunb. Exotic Ct-jap 5 Arg, Bra, Col Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Raga etal. (2004), Rust (1918), Salles (1995), Zucchi
(2000)
Rutaceae Citrus limon (L.)
Osbeck
Exotic Ct-lim 3 Bra Salles (1995). Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Zucchi (2000)
(Continued)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
105AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Rutaceae Citrus maxima (Burm.)
Merr.
Exotic Ct-max 8 Arg, Bra, Ecu, Per Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña (1968, 1969), Malavasi etal. (1980), Raga etal.
(2004), Rust (1918), Souza-Filho etal. (2000), Tigrero (2009), Zucchi (2000)
Rutaceae Citrus medica L. Exotic Ct-med 2 Bra, Gua Eska and Cunningham (1987), Raga etal. (2004)
Rutaceae Citrus nobilis Lour. Exotic Ct-nob 1Arg Rust (1918)
Rutaceae Citrus paradisi Macfad. Exotic Ct-par 32 Arg, Bra, Ecu,
Gua, Ven
Caraballo (1981), Eska and Cunningham (1987), Molineros etal. (1992), Nasca
etal. (1996), Ovruski etal. (2003), Putruele etal. (1996), Schliserman etal.
(2010), Segura etal. (2006), Zucchi (2000)
Rutaceae Citrus reticulata
Blanco
Exotic Ct-ret 30 Arg, Bra, Col, Ecu Araujo (2015), Castañeda etal. (2010), Garcia and Norrbom (2011), Molineros
etal. (1992), Ovruski etal. (2003), Putruele etal. (1996), Raga etal. (2004),
Schliserman etal. (2010), Segura etal. (2004, 2006), Souza-Filho etal. (2000),
Tigrero (2009), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004)
Rutaceae Citrus sinensis (L.)
Osbeck
Exotic Ct-sin 44 Arg, Bra, Ecu,
Gua, Per
Aguiar-Menezes and Menezes (2000), Ballou (1945), Boscán de Martínez etal.
(1980), Eska (1990), Eska and Cunningham (1987), Guagliumi (1966),
Guimarães etal. (1999), Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña (1968, 1969), Malavasi
etal. (1980), Molineros etal. (1992), Ovruski etal. (2003), Pirovani (2011),
Pirovani etal. (2010), Putruele etal. (1996), Raga etal. (2004), Salles (1995),
Selivon (2000), Silva etal. (2006), Stone (1942b), Tigrero (2009), Zucchi (2000)
Rutaceae Citrus sinensis x C
reticulata
Exotic Ct-sxr 2 Bra Silva etal. (2006)
Rutaceae Citrus sp. Exotic Ct-sp 34 Bra, Col, Ecu, Ven Araujo (2012, 2015), Briceño Vergara (1979), Caraballo (1981), Gonzalez Mendoza
(1952), Molineros etal. (1992), Núñez Bueno (1981), Raga etal. (2004), Salles
(1995), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Zucchi (2000)
Rutaceae Citrus trifoliata L. Exotic Ct-tri 2 Ecu Molineros etal. (1992), Tigrero (2009)
Rutaceae Citrus x aurantium L. Exotic Ct-aur 39 Arg, Bra, Col, Ecu,
Mex, Ven
Briceño Vergara (1975), Campos (1960), Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Hernández-
Ortiz etal. (1994, 2006), Malavasi etal. (1980), Marchiori etal. (2000), Ovruski
etal. (2003), Putruele etal. (1996), Raga etal. (2004), Schliserman and Ovruski
(2004), Schliserman etal. (2010), Segura etal. (2006), Tigrero (1998, 2009),
Yepes and Vélez (1989), Zucchi (2000)
106 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Rutaceae Ravenia wampi Oliv. ? unres.
name
1 Bra Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2001)
Salicaceae Dovyalis abyssinica
(A.Rich.) Warb.
Exotic Do-aby 2 Ecu Molineros etal. (1992), Tigrero (2009)
Salicaceae Dovyalis hebecarpa
(Gardner) Warb.
Exotic Do-heb 1Pan Stone (1942b)
Salicaceae Zuelania guidonia
(Sw.) Britton&
Millsp.
Native Zu-gui 1Mex García-Ramírez etal. (2010)
Sapindaceae Diatenopteryx
sorbifolia Radlk.
Native Di-sor 2 Bra Salles (1995), Zucchi (2000)
Sapindaceae Melicoccus bijugatus
Jacq.
Native Me-bij 1 Bra Gonzalez Mendoza (1952)
Sapindaceae Melicoccus oliviformis
Kunth
Native Me-oli 1Mex García-Ramírez etal. (2010)
Sapotaceae Chrysophyllum cainito L. Native Cs-cai 3Ecu, Ven Campos (1960), Hernández-Ortiz and Morales-Valles (2004)
Sapotaceae Chrysophyllum
gonocarpum (Mart.&
Eichler ex Miq.) Engl.
Native Cs-gon 3 Arg, Bra Oroño etal. (2005), Salles (1995), Zucchi (2000)
Sapotaceae Chrysophyllum
mexicanum Brandegee
Native Cs-mex 1 Bra Souza-Filho etal. (2000)
Sapotaceae Manilkara zapota (L.)
P. Royen
Native Ma-zap 8 Bra, Col, Ecu, Pan Araujo (2015), Campos (1960), Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Núñez Bueno (1981),
Raga etal. (2011), Stone (1942b), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004)
Sapotaceae Planchonella obovata
(R. Br.) Pierre
Native Pl-obo 1 Per Korytkowski and Ojeda Peña. (1969)
Sapotaceae Pouteria caimito
(Ruiz& Pav.) Radlk.
Native Po-cai 10 Bra, Ecu Aguiar-Menezes etal. (2007), Araujo (2015), Raga etal. (2011), Souza-Filho etal.
(2000), Tigrero (2009), Uramoto (2002), Uramoto etal. (2004), Veloso etal.
(2000), Zucchi (2000)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
107AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Sapotaceae Pouteria gardneriana
(A. DC.) Radlk.
Native Po-gar 3 Bra Veloso etal. (1996, 2000), Zucchi (2000)
Sapotaceae Pouteria ramiora
(Mart.) Radlk.
Native Po-ram 3 Bra Veloso etal. (1996, 2000), Zucchi (2000)
Sapotaceae Pouteria torta (Mart.)
Radlk.
Native Po-tor 1 Bra Taira (2012)
Sapotaceae Sideroxylon capiri
(A.DC.) Pittier
Native Si-cap 1Mex Aluja etal. (1987)
Simaroubaceae Simaba guianensis
Aubl.
Native Sm-gui 1 Bra Deus etal. (2013)
Siparunaceae Siparuna guianensis
Aubl.
Native Sp-gui 1 Bra Pirovani (2011)
Solanaceae Capsicum annuum L. Native Ca-ann 1 Col Castañeda etal. (2010)
Solanaceae Cyphomandra betacea
(Cav.) Sendtn.
?unres.
name
1 Col Gonzalez Mendoza (1952)
Solanaceae Solanum
decompositiorum
Sendtn.
Native So-dec 1 Bra Pirovani (2011)
Solanaceae Solanum nudum Dunal Native So-nud 1 Col Castañeda etal. (2010)
Solanaceae Solanum quitoense
Lam.
Native So-qui 1 Col Núñez Bueno (1981)
Solanaceae Solanum triste Jacq. Native So-tri 1 Col Gonzalez Mendoza (1952)
Staphyleaceae Turpinia occidentalis
(Sw.) G. Don
Native Tu-occ 1Pan Stone (1942b)
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
(Continued)
108 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Host Family Valid Scientic Name
Host
Origin
Host-
Code
Total
records Countries References
Ulmaceae Ampelocera hottlei
(Standl.) Standl.
Native Am-hot 1Mex Aluja etal. (2003b)
Urticaceae Pourouma sp. Native Po-sp 1 Bra Bondar (1950)
Vitaceae Vitis vinifera L. Exotic Vi-vin 3 Arg, Col Gonzalez Mendoza (1952), Nasca etal. (1996), Stone (1942b)
Note: Nomenclatures of scientic names are currently valid according to ThePlant List (2013).
Abbreviations: Arg, Argentina; Bra, Brazil; Bol, Bolivia; Col, Colombia; CR, Costa Rica; Ecu, Ecuador; FrG, French Guyana; Gua, Guatemala; Mex, Mexico; Pan, Panama; Per, Peru; Ven,
Venezuela.
TABLE 6.1 (Continued)
List of Host Plants for the Nominal Species Anastrepha fraterculus Reported in the Literature as Food Plants Infested in Nature
109AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
Inthe family Rosaceae, 20 species were found, with most reports featuring Prunus spp., Rubus
spp., and Eriobotrya japonica. Thefamily Rutaceae included 14 host species, almost all of which
were Citrus spp. Inthe case of the family Combretaceae, all reports were of a single host, the tropi-
cal almond Terminalia cattapa. Alarge proportion of at least 18 plant families presented only one
tothree hosts and a similarly low number of reports; thus, these could be considered rare hosts.
These included Actinidia deliciosa (Actinidaceae), Celtis iguanaea (Cannabaceae), Endlicheria
paniculata (Lauraceae), Butia eriospatha (Arecaceae), and Simaba guianensis (Simaroubaceae),
among others (Figure6.1 and Table6.1).
6.3.2 Host origin
Examination of the origin of hosts revealed that the SAFF feeds on 50 exotic plant species in
the Americas, representing 28.3% of the total number of their host plant species. Five of these,
all belonging to different families, accounted for the highest number of records: Prunus persica
(Rosaceae), Eriobotrya japonica (Myrtaceae), Coffea arabica (Rubiaceae), Mangifera indica
(Anacardiaceae), and Citrus spp. (Rutaceae). Thefrequency of records for these species accounted
for slightly more than 30% of the total number of reports. Thepeach is recognized as the exotic
host that is most frequently reported throughout the distributional range of the SAFF. However, at
a regional level, there is a higher proportion of records for other species, such as coffee, mango,
and citrus because each of these have economic signicance in specic regions or countries
(Figure 6.2). For instance, infestation of Coffea arabica coffee cherries was found mainly in
FIGURE6.1 Host plant families for the Anastrepha fraterculus complex recorded in the Americas. Bars
indicate the number of plant species; black bars, native species; white bars, exotic species.
110 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
FIGURE6.2 Trophic network interactions of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex with exotic host plants
recorded in various countries across the Americas. Plant species with less than ve records are omitted.
Thethickness of the linking gray lines represents the frequency of records. Same color nodes (left) denote that
the hosts belong to the same family; the red nodes (right) depict countries of distribution.
111AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
the northern region of the Andes in Venezuela and Colombia but also in some Brazilian loca-
tions. InCitrus spp., almost all of the records were from South America, especially Brazil and
Argentina, whereas fruits of Mangifera indica have been most commonly reported as hosts in
Brazil, Argentina, and Ecuador. These results revealed the occurrence of certain preferences in the
use of hosts at a regional level, suggesting the relatively recent adaptation of some y populations
in order to exploit those exotic hosts.
On the other hand, the list of native hosts comprised a total of 124 plant species throughout the
American tropics, accounting for 70% of all of the known hosts listed. Thehighest frequencies of
records were found for Psidium guajava (298), Eugenia uniora (48), Acca sellowiana (31), Spondias
purpurea (23), Psidium cattleianum (22), and Annona cherimola (21), among others. Itshould be
noted that 8 of the 10 native species with the highest number of records belonged to the family
Myrtaceae, which represented nearly 29% of the total. Itis also noteworthy that guava fruits are the
only common host shared by different populations throughout the tropical and subtropical regions of
the Americas. Incontrast, other common host species (e.g., Surinam cherry, feijoa, seriguela, araçá,
and chirimoya) are only found infested in certain biogeographical provinces of the neotropical region
(Figure6.3).
6.3.3 geographICal dIstrIbutIon
Examination of the geographical distribution of host plants used by the SAFF produced records
for 12Latin American countries. Thelargest numbers of host plants were documented for South
America, including Brazil (121), Argentina (40), Ecuador (40), Colombia (38), and Venezuela (24).
InMexico, one of the most well-studied countries in the north of the Americas, the infestation of
19host plants has been recorded.
The data on host plants recorded for each country allowed us to explore shared resources
through a cluster analysis. In this context, Brazil exhibited the highest dissimilarities of hosts
shared with all other countries. Thisis supported by previous studies that highlight the presence
of three morphotypes in this territory (Selivon 2004, 2005a, 2005b), which would explain the
existence of 120 host species, including many native species. Incontrast, Colombia, Ecuador, and
Argentina added another subgroup with closer afnities in terms of resource use. These countries
shared exotic plants such as Prunus domestica, Punica granatum, and Ficus carica, but also native
plants such as Acca sellowiana, Malphigia glabra, and Annona cherimola, among others. Mexico
and Venezuela formed a third cluster, sharing hosts such as Terminalia catappa, Syzygium jambos,
and Psidium guineense (Figure6.4).
With respect to taxonomic richness, 30 plant families were found in Brazil, representing nearly
twice the number of families found in other countries. Thiscontrasts with the situation in Argentina,
where only 16 families were recognized. TheBrazilian territory is larger, and three distinct mor-
photypes have been characterized within the SAFF species complex, whereas just one of them has
been reported in Argentina (Hernández-Ortiz etal. 2012). Thishas led to the hypothesis that the
widespread host range found in Brazilian populations could be explained by the presence of differ-
ent taxa, which requires further investigation.
Therichness in the Andean region comprised 10–17families and 24–40plant species. Those
countries share the common infestation of coffee berries, pineapple guava, custard apple, and berry
of the Andes, among others. These are hosts that are rare or absent elsewhere in the Americas.
In the entire northern region, from Mesoamerica to Central America, including Mexico, Costa
Rica, Guatemala, and Panama, 33 host plant species are recognized. In the northern and central
Andean countries, such as Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia, a total of 68 host
plants are known. Incontrast, in the Amazonian, Atlantic Forest and Chacoan subregions of Brazil
and Argentina, a total of 135 plant species are recorded.
112 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
FIGURE6.3 Network of trophic interactions of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex with native host plants
recorded in various countries across the Americas. Plant species with less than ve records are omitted.
Thethickness of the linking gray lines represents the frequency of records. Same color nodes (left) denote that
the hosts belong to the same family; the red nodes (right) depict countries of distribution.
113AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
6.4 REMARKS AND CONCLUSIONS
Thecurrent knowledge of host plants occupied by populations of the nominal species A. fratercu-
lus throughout the Americas shows the persistence of gaps in the information. Thiswas evident in
nearly all of the countries of Central America and some others from South America (i.e., Bolivia,
Peru, Surinam, Paraguay, and Uruguay).
Plant richness showed a great diversication of hosts under natural conditions constituted by
70.1% of native species. Prominent among these are the species of the Myrtaceae family, which
accounted for 25% of the total number of host species. These plants could therefore have been
the most important inuence in the original diversication of the A. fraterculus species complex.
However, other families, such as the Sapotaceae, Annonaceae, Leguminosae, Anacardiaceae,
Passioraceae, and Solanaceae, might have been used secondarily. Theexotic species belonged to
17botanical families, although most were represented only by a few species. Thenotable exceptions
to this were the two richest families, Rosaceae and Rutaceae, which together accounted for two-
thirds of all the exotic species recorded, particularly of plants within the respective genera Prunus
and Citrus.
Thehigh richness of native host plants for the A. fraterculus complex denotes an explicit sign of
host diversication. However, it should be noted that exotic plants have played a signicant role in
the divergence of the species complex because some have become almost exclusive hosts of popu-
lations in certain biogeographical zones. Forexample, in the central region of the Andes, Coffea
arabica is widely used as a preferred host by the SAFF but is virtually an unknown host in other
neotropical locations. Thissuggests that such plants could have played a critical role in the current
dispersion of the SAFF following their introduction to the Americas.
Theareas occupied by certain populations of this nominal species reect some preferences in the
use of resources. Thiswould reinforce the hypothesis regarding the existence of distinct taxonomic
entities because, although these resources exist throughout the range, they are notcommon hosts
FIGURE 6.4 Dendrogram of dissimilarities (Ward distance: 0–2.33) by countries across the Americas,
based on qualitative records (presence–absence)of the host plant species.
114 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
for all y populations. Thefact that there are at least eight morphotypes, presumably corresponding
to different species within the SAFF complex, leads us to conclude that knowledge on host use at a
regional level is critical. Thedata analyzed here indicated strong preferences at the regional level for
both native and introduced plants, and the latter have served as a scattering factor, thus converting
some of these populations into distinct species or hosting races of economic importance.
Inthis context, the potential application of the SIT in certain geographical areas requires
knowledge in terms of the host plants consumed by the target species. Aholistic view of the
trophic interactions among populations of this complex allows the use of much of the published
host information. Thiscould help to outline a condence range of preferred hosts exploited by
each biological species and ultimately determine their pest status in different regions of the
Americas.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thisresearch received nancial support from the International Atomic Energy Agency (Vienna,
Austria) through the Research Contract No:22457/R0–MEX. We thank José F. Dzul-Cauich for
technical assistance with capturing of part of the databases. We appreciate the feedback and sugges-
tions from two anonymous reviewers that improved the nal version of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Adaime, R., M. S. M. Sousa, C. R. Jesus-Barros et al. 2017. Frugivorous ies (Diptera: Tephritidae,
Lonchaeidae), their host plants, and associated parasitoids in the extreme north of Amapá State, Brazil.
Florida Entomologist 10 0:316 –324.
Aguiar-Menezes, E. L.,& E. B. Menezes. 1997. Natural occurrence of parasitoids of Anastrepha spp. Schiner,
1868 (Diptera: Tephritidae) in different host plants, in Itaguai (RJ), Brazil. Biological Control 8:1–6.
Aguiar-Menezes, E.L. & E.B. Menezes. 2000. Moscas-das-frutas nos estados brasileiros: Rio de Janeiro.
In Moscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil. Conhecimento básico e aplicado,
A.Malavasi& R. A. Zucchi (Eds.), pp.259–263. Holos Ed, Riberão Preto, Brazil.
Aguiar-Menezes, E. L., E. B. Menezes,& M. S. Loiácono. 2003. First record of Coptera haywardi Loiácono
(Hymenoptera: Diapriidae) as a parasitoid of fruit-infesting Tephritidae (Diptera) in Brazil. Neotropical
Entomology 32:355–358.
Aguiar-Menezes, E. L., E. B. Menezes, P. S. Silva, A. C. Bittar,& P. C. R. Cassino. 2001. Native Hymenopteran
Parasitoids Associated with Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Seropedica City, Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil. Florida Entomologist 84:70 6 –711.
Aguiar-Menezes, E. L., M. Lima-Filho, F. A. A. Ferrara etal. 2007. Estrutura e utuação das populações de
moscas-das-frutas no polo de fruticultura das regiões norte e noroeste Fluminense. Boletim de Pesquisa
e Desenvolvimient 16:4 –40.
Alberti, A.C., M. S. Rodriguero, P. C. Gomez, B. O. Saidman,& J. C. Vilardi. 2002. Evidence indicating that
Argentine populations of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) belong to a single biological
species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95:505–512.
Almeida, R. R. 2016. Dípteros (Tephritidae e Lonchaeidae) associados à produção de frutas na ilha de Santana,
Amazônia brasileira. MSc Dissertation, Fundação Universidade Federal do Amapá, 93p.
Aluja, M. 1984. Manejo integrado de las moscas de la fruta (Diptera: Tephritidae). Dirección General
Sanidad Vegetal SARH, Mexico DF, 241p.
Aluja, M., A. J. Guillén, G. De la Rosa etal. 1987. Natural host plant survey of the economically important
fruit ies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of Chiapas, Mexico. Florida Entomologist 70:329–338.
Aluja, M., D. Pérez-Staples, R. Macías-Ordoñez et al. 2003a. Nonhost status of Citrus sinensis Cultivar
Valencia and C. paradisi Cultivar Ruby Red to Mexican Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae).
Journal of Economic Entomology 96:1693 1703.
Aluja, M., J. Pinero, M. Lopez etal. 2000. New host plant and distribution records in Mexico for Anastrepha
spp., Toxotrypana curvicauda Gerstacker, Rhagoletis zoqui Bush, Rhagoletis sp., and Hexachaeta sp.
(Diptera: Tephritidae). Proceedings Entomological Society of Washington 102:802–815.
115AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
Aluja, M., J. Rull, J. Sivinski etal. 2003b. Fruit ies of the genus Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) and asso-
ciated native parasitoids (Hymenoptera) in the tropical rainforest biosphere reserve of Montes Azules,
Chiapas, Mexico. Environmental Entomology 32:1377–1385.
Alvarenga, C. D., C. A. R. Matrangolo, G. N. Lopes et al. 2009. Moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae)
e seus parasitóides em plantas hospedeiras de três municípios do norte do estado de Minas Gerais.
Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 76:195–204.
Alvarenga, C. D., N. A. Canal, & R. A. Zucchi. 2000. Moscas-das-frutas nos estados brasileiros: Minas
Gerais. InMoscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil. Conhecimento básico e aplicado
A. Malavasi& R. A. Zucchi (Eds.), 265–270. Holos Ed, Riberão Preto, Brazil.
Araujo, E. L., J. L. Batista, & R. A. Zucchi. 2000. Moscas-das-frutas nos estados brasileiros: Paraíba.
In Moscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil. Conhecimento básico e aplicado,
A.Malavasi& R. A. Zucchi (Eds.), 227–228. Holos Ed, Riberão Preto, Brazil.
Araujo, M. R. 2015. Análise comparativa e modelagem espacial de espécies de Anastrepha (Diptera,
Tephritidae) coletadas em armadilhas e em plantas hospedeiras. MSc thesis. São Paulo, Brazil: Escola
Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, 98p.
Araujo, N. S. 2012. Análise de espécies crípticas do complexo Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae)
no Brasil através de sequências do gene mitocondrial Cytochrome Oxidase I. MSc thesis. São Paulo,
Brazil: Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, 79p.
Baker, A. C., W. E. Stone, C. C. Plummer,& M. McPhail. 1944. Areview of studies on the Mexican fruit-
y and related Mexican species. United States Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication
531:1–155.
Baker, E. W. 1945. Studies on the Mexican fruity known as Anastrepha fraterculus. Journal of Economic
Entomology 38:95–100.
Ballou, C. H. 1945. Notas sobre insectos dañ inos observados en Venezuela 1938–1943. Comisión Organiz adora.
Tercera Conferencia Interamericana de Agricultura, Cuaderno Verde 34:125.
Barros, N. E. L. 2008. Ecologia de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) em goiaba (Psidium guajava
L.; Myrtaceae) cultivada em sistema agroorestal, em Santana, Amapá. MSc thesis. Amapá, Brazil:
Universidade Federal do Amapá, 84p.
Bomm, D. A., M. A. Uchôa-Fernandes,& M. A. Bragança. 2007. Hosts and parasitoids of fruit ies (Diptera:
Tephritoidea) in the State of Tocantins, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 36:984–986.
Bondar, G. 1950. Moscas de frutas na Bahia. Boletin Campo 6:13–15.
Boscán de Martínez, N., & F. Godoy. 1996. Nuevos parasitoides de moscas de las frutas de los generos
Anastrepha y Ceratitis en Venezuela. Agronomía Tropical 46:465–471.
Boscán de Martínez, N., J. R. Dedordy,& J. R. Requena. 1980. Estado actual de la distribucion geo-
graca y hospederas de Anastrepha spp. (Diptera-Trypetidae) en Venezuela. Agronomía Tropical
30:5563.
Bressan, S., & M. Da Costa Teles. 1991. Host range and infestation by species of the genus Anastrepha
(Diptera: Tephritidae) in the region of Ribeirão Preto-SP, Brazil. Anais Sociedade Entomologica
Brasileira 20:5–15.
Briceño Vergara, A. J. 1975. Distribución de las moscas de las frutas (Anastrepha spp., Diptera: Tephritidae)
y sus plantas hospederas en los Andes venezolanos. Revista Facultad de Agronomía (Maracaibo)
3:45 49.
Briceño Vergara, A. J. 1979. Las moscas de las frutas Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae), en los Andes
venezolanos. Revista Facultad de Agronomía (Maracaibo) 5:449–457.
Bush, G. L.1962. The cytotaxonomy of the larvae of some Mexican fruit ies in the genus Anastrepha
(Tephritidae, Diptera). Psyche 68:87–101.
Cáceres, C., D. F. Segura, M. T. Vera et al. 2009. Incipient speciation revealed in Anastrepha fraterculus
(Diptera; Tephritidae) by studies on mating compatibility, sex pheromones, hybridization, and cytology.
Biological Journal of Linnean Society 97:152–165.
Campos, R. F. 1960. Las moscas (Brachycera) del Ecuador. Revista Ecuatoriana Higiene y Medicina Tropical
17:1– 6 6.
Caraballo, C. J. 1981. Las moscas de frutas del género Anastrepha Schiner, 1868 (Diptera: Tephritidae) de
Venezuela. MSc Dissertation, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Maracay, 210p.
Castañeda, M. R., F. A. Osorio, N. A. Canal,& P. E. Galeano. 2010. Especies, distribución y hospederos
del género Anastrepha Schiner en el departamento del Tolima, Colombia. Agronomía Colombiana
28:265–271.
116 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Castro, P. E. 2009. Dinâmica populacional das Moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) em agroecosistemas
nosEstados de Guayas e Santa Elena, Equador. Dissertation PhD, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo
da Bahia, 107p.
Chiaradia, L. A., J. M. Milanez, & R. Dittrich. 2004. Flutuação populacional de moscas-das-frutas em
pomares de citros no oeste de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Ciência Rural 34:337–343.
Corsato, C. D. A. 2004. Moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) em pomares de goiaba no norte de Minas
Gerais: biodiversidade, parasitóides e controle biológico. PhD diss. São Paulo, Brazil: Escola Superior
de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz,” Universidade de São Paulo, 83p.
Cruz, M. I., T. Bacca,& N. A. Canal. 2017. Diversidad de las moscas de las frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) y
sus parasitoides en siete municipios del departamento de Nariño. Boletín Cientíco Museo de Historia
Natural Universidad de Caldas 21:81–98.
Custódio, A. C., C. L. Lago, M. F. Souza-Filho, L. R. F. Louzeiro,& A. Raga. 2017. Moscas-das-frutas do
gênero Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae): Novas associações hospedeiras. Biológico 79:1–2 .
Deus, E. G., L. D. S. Pinheiro, C. R. Lima etal. 2013. Wild hosts of frugivorous dipterans (Tephritidae and
Lonchaeidae) and associated parasitoids in the Brazilian Amazon. Florida Entomologist 96:1621–1625.
Deus, E. G., R. A. Silva, D. B. Nascimiento, C. F. Marinho,& R. A. Zucchi. 2010. Hospedeiros e parasitóides
de especies de Anastrepha (Diptera, Tephritidae) em dois municípios do estado do Amapá. Revista de
Agricultura 84:194–2 03.
Dias, S. V., J. G. Silva, K. M. Lima etal. 2016. An integrative multidisciplinary approach to understanding
cryptic divergence in Brazilian species of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex (Diptera: Tephritidae).
Biological Journal of Linnean Society 117:725 –746.
Dormann, C. F.,& B. Gruber. 2009. Package “Bipartite”: visualizing bipartite networks and calculating
some ecological indices. R statistical software. “R group”. Available at: https://github.com/biometry/
bipartite.
Duarte, P. A. S., F. R. M. Garcia, & V. Andaló. 2016. Faunal analysis and population density of fruit ies
(Diptera: Tephritidae) in an orchard located in the central western region of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Bioscience Journal 32:960–968.
Eska, F. M. 1990. Parasitism of fruit ies Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha-spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) in
Guatemala. Entomophaga 35:355–362.
Eska, F. M.,& R.T. Cunningham. 1987. Host plants of fruit ies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of economic impor-
tance in Guatemala. Florida Entomologist 70:116 123.
Feitosa, S. S., P. P. R. Silva, L. E. M. Pádua, M. P. S. Sousa, E. P. Passos,& A. A. R. Soares. 2007. Primeiro
registro de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) em carambola nosmunicípios de Teresina, Altos e
Parnaíba no estado do Piauí. Ciências Agrárias 28:629–634.
Fernandez Yepez, F. 1953. Contribución al estudio de las moscas de las frutas del género Anastrepha Schiner
(Diptera: Trypetidae) de Venezuela. II Congreso de Ciencias Naturales y Anes, Caracas. Cuaderno
77:1– 42.
Ferreira, H. J., V. R. S. Veloso, R. V. Naves,& J. R. Braga Filho. 2003. Infestação de moscas-das-frutas
em variedades de manga (Mangifera indica L.) no estado de Goiás. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical
33:4348.
Fischer, C. R. 1934. Variação das cerdas frontaes e outras notas sobre duas especies de Anastrepha (Dipt.
Trypetidae). Revista de Entomologia 4:17–22.
Funes, C. F., L. I. Escobar, N. G. Meneguzzi, S. M. Ovruski, & D. S. Kirschbaum. 2017. Occurrence of
Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in organically grown Rubus
(Rosales: Rosaceae), in two contrasting environments of northwestern Argentina. Florida Entomologist
100:672674.
Garcia, F. R. M.,& A. L. Norrbom. 2011. Tephritoid ies (Diptera, Tephritoidea) and their plant hosts from
the state of Santa Catarina in southern Brazil. Florida Entomologist 94:151–157.
García-Ramírez, M. J., H. R. E. Medina, V. López-Martínez, L. M. Vázquez, U. I. E. Duarte,& H. Delfín-
González. 2010. Talisia olivaeformis (Sapindaceae) and Zuelania guidonia (Flacourtiaceae): New host
records for Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) in México. Florida Entomologist 93:633–634.
Gonzalez Mendoza, R. 1952. Contribucion al estudio de las moscas Anastrepha en Colombia. Revista Facultad
Nacional de Agronomía 12:423–549.
Greene, C. T. 1934. Arevision of the genus Anastrepha based on a study of the wings and on the length
of the ovipositor sheath (Diptera: Trypetidae). Proceedings Entomological Society of Washington
36:127–179.
Guagliumi, P. 1966. Insetti e aracnidi delle piante comuni del Venezuela segnalati nel periodo 1938–1963.
Relazione Monograca Agricola Subtropical y Tropical (ns) 86:1–392.
117AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
Guimarães, J. A., R. A. Zucchi, N. B. Díaz, M. F. Souza Filho,& M. A. Uchôa. 1999. Espécies de Eucoilinae
(Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae) parasitóides de larvas frugívoras (Diptera: Tephritidae e
Lonchaeidae) no Brasil. Anais Sociedade Entomologica Brasileira 28:263–273.
Haji, F. N. P., & I. Da Gama Miranda. 2000. Moscas-das-frutas nos estados brasileiros: Pernambuco.
In Moscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil. Conhecimento básico e aplicado, A.
Malavasi& R. A. Zucchi (Eds.), 229–233. Holos Ed, Riberão Preto, Brazil.
Hedström, I. 1987. Fruit ies (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting common g uava (Psidium guajava L.) (Myrtaceae)
in Ecuador. Revista de Biología Tropical 35:373–374.
Hernández-Ortiz, V.,& M. Aluja. 1993. Lista preliminar del género neotropical Anastrepha Schiner (Diptera:
Tephritidae) con notas sobre su distribución y plantas hospederas. Folia Entomológica Mexicana
88:89–105.
Hernández-Ortiz, V., A. F. Bartolucci, P. Morales-Valles, D. Frías,& D. Selivon. 2012. Cryptic species of the
Anastrepha fraterculus complex (Diptera: Tephritidae): Amultivariate approach for the recognition of
South American morphotypes. Annals of the Entomological Societ y of America 105:305–318.
Hernández-Ortiz, V.,& P. Morales-Valles. 2004. Distribución geográca y plantas hospederas de Ananstrepha
fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) en Venezuela. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 43:181–189.
Hernández-Ortiz, V., N. A. Canal, J. O. Tigrero Salas, F. M. Ruíz-Hurtado, & J. F. Dzul-Cauich. 2015.
Taxonomy and phenotypic relationships of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex in the Mesoamerican
and Pacic Neotropical dominions (Diptera, Tephritidae). Zookeys 540:95–124.
Hernández-Ortiz, V., H. Delfín-González, A. Escalante-Tió,& P. Manrique-Saide. 2006. Hymenopteran para-
sitoids of Anastrepha fruit ies (Diptera: Tephritidae) reared from different hosts in Yucatan, Mexico.
Florida Entomologist 89:508–515.
Hernández-Ortiz, V., J. A. Gómez-Anaya, A. Sánchez, B. A. McPheron,& M. Aluja. 2004. Morphometric
analysis of Mexican and South American populations of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex (Diptera:
Tephritidae) and recognition of a distinct Mexican morphotype. Bulletin of Entomological Research
94:487–499.
Hernández-Ortiz, V.,& R. Pérez-Alonso. 1993. Thenatural host plants of Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae)
in a tropical rain forest of Mexico. Florida Entomologist 76:447–460.
Hernández-Ortiz, V., R. Pérez-Alonso,& R. A. Wharton. 1994. Native parasitoids associated with the genus
Anastrepha (Dipt.: Tephritidae) in Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Entomophaga 39:171–178.
Hickel, E. R.,& J-P. H. J. Ducroquet. 1994. Ocorrência de moscas-das-frutas Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.)
em frutas de goiabeira serrana. Anais Sociedade Entomologica Brasileira 23:311–315.
Hickel, E. R., & E. Schuck. 1993. Ocorrência da moscas-das frutas, Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera:
Tephritidae) em frutos de quivi. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 28:1345–1347.
Isaac, J. 1905. Report on the Mexican orange worm (Trypeta ludens) in Mexico. California State Horticulture
Communications 428:7– 48.
Jesus-Barros, C. R., R. Adaime, M. N. Oliveira, W. R. Silva, S. V. Costa-Neto,& M. F. Souza-Filho. 2012.
Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) species, their hosts and parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in
ve municipalities of the state of Amapá, Brazil. Florida Entomologist 95:694–705.
Jirón, L. F.,& I. Hedström. 1988. Occurrence of fruit ies of the genera Anastrepha and Ceratitis (Diptera:
Tephritidae), and their host plant availability in Costa Rica. Florida Entomologist 71:62 –73.
Katiyar, K. P., J. M. Camacho, & R. Matheus. 2000. Fruit ies (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting fruits of
the genus Psidium (Myrtaceae) and their altitudinal distribution in Western Venezuela. Florida
Entomologist 83:480–486.
Katiyar, K. P., J. M. Camacho, F. Geraud,& R. Matheus. 1995. Parasitoides hymenópteros de moscas de las frutas
(Diptera: Tephritidae) en la región occidental de Venezuela. Revista Facultad de Agronomía 12:303–312.
Korytkowski, C. A. 2001. Situación actual del género Anastrepha Schiner, 1868 (Diptera: Tephritidae) en el
Perú. Revista Peruana de Entomología 42:97–158.
Korytkowski, C. A., & D. Ojeda Pena. 1968. Especies del género Anastrepha Schiner 1868 en el nor-oeste
peruano. Revista Peruana de Entomología 11:32–70.
Korytkowski, C.A.,& D. Ojeda Peña. 1969. Distribution ecológica de especies del género Anastrepha Schiner
en el nor-oeste peruano. Revista Peruana de Entomología 12:71–95.
Kovaleski, A., R. L. Sugayama, K. Uramoto,& A. Malavasi. 2000. Moscas-das-frutas nosestados brasileiros:
Rio Grande do Sul. InMoscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil. Conhecimento básico e
aplicado, A. Malavasi& R. A. Zucchi (Eds.), 285–290. Holos Ed, Riberão Preto, Brazil.
Kovaleski, A., K. Uramoto, R. L. Sugayama, N. A. Canal,& A. Malavasi. 1999. Asurvey of Anastrepha
Schiner (Diptera, Tephritidae) species in the apple growing area of the state of Rio Grande do Sul,
Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 43:229–234.
118 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Lemos, L. N. 2014. Moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae e Lonchaeidae) em sistemas de cultivo e entorno
no Estado do Amapá, Brasil. PhD diss. Amapá, Brasil: Fundação Universidade Federal do Amapá, 78p.
Lemos, L. N., E. G. Deus, D. B. Nascimento, C. R. Jesus-Barros, S. V. Costa-Neto,& R. Adaime. 2017. Species
of Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae), their host plants, and parasitoids in small fruit production areas in
the state of Amapá, Brazil. Florida Entomologist 100:403 410.
Malavasi, A., J. S. Morgante,& R. A. Zucchi. 1980. Biologia de “moscas-das-frutas” (Diptera, Tephritidae). I:
lista de hospedeiros e ocorrência. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 40:9 16.
Manni, M., K. M. Lima, C. R. Guglielmino etal. 2015. Relevant genetic differentiation among Brazilian popu-
lations of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera, Tephritidae). ZooKeys 540:157–173.
Marchiori, C. H., A. M. S. Oliveira, F. F. Martins, F. S. Bossi,& A. T. Oliveira. 2000. Espécies de moscas-
da-fruta (Diptera: Tephritidae) e seus parasitóides em Itumbiara-GO. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical
30:73–76.
Marin Patiño, M. L. 2002. Identicación y caracterización de moscas de las frutas en los Departamentos del
Valle del Cauca, Tolima y Quindío. Dissertation, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de
Caldas, 27p.
Marinho, C. F. 2004. Espécies de parasitóides (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera:
Tephritidae) no estado de São Paulo: caracterização taxonômica, distribuição geogca e percentagem
de parasitismo. MSc Dissertation, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de
São Paulo, 88p.
Marinho, C. F., M. F. Souza-Filho, A. Raga,& R. A. Zucchi. 2009. Parasitóides (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
de Moscas-das-Frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) no Estado de São Paulo: Plantas Associadas e Parasitismo).
Neotropical Entomology 38:321–326.
Marsaro Júnior, A. L. 2014. Novos registros de hospedeiros de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) para
o Rio Grande do Sul. Revista de Agricultura 89:65–71.
Mascarenhas, R. O. 2007. Endossimbionte Wolbachia em moscas-das-frutas do gênero Anastrepha
(Tephritidae) e em vespas parasitóides (Braconidae) associadas. MSc thesis. São Paulo, Brazil: Instituto
de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, 54p.
McPhail, M.,& C. I. Bliss. 1933. Observations on the Mexican fr uity and some related species in Cuernavaca,
Mexico, in 1928 and 1929. Unites States Department of Agriculture Circular 255:1–24.
Molineros, J., J. O. Tigrero,& D. Sandoval. 1992. Diagnóstico de la situación actual del problema de las moscas
de la fruta en el Ecuador. Comisión Ecuatoriana de Energía Atómica, Dirección de Investigaciones, 53p.
Nasca, A. J., J. A. Zamora, L. E. Vergara,& H. E. Jaldo. 1996. Hospederos de moscas de los frutos en el Valle
de Antinaco-Los Colorados, Provincia de La Rioja, República Argentina. Revista de Investigación
10:19 24.
Norrbom, A. L. 2004. Fruit y (Diptera, Tephritidae) host plant database. Available at http://www.sel.barc.
usda.gov:591/diptera/Tephritidae/TephHosts/search.html[last accessed, January10, 2015].
Nunes, A. M., F. Appel Müller, R. S. Gonçalves, M. S. Garcia, V. A. Costa,& D. E. Nava. 2012. Moscas
frugívoras e seus parasitoides nosmunicípios de Pelotas e Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
Ciência Rural 42:6–12.
Nunes, M. Z., I. C. Boff Mari, S. S. Dos Santos Régis etal. 2015. Damage and development of Anastrepha
fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in fruits of two pear cultivars. Agrociencia Uruguay 19:4248.
Núñez Bueno, L. 1981. Contribución al reconocimiento de las moscas de las frutas (Diptera: Tephriridae) en
Colombia. Revista del Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario 16:173 179.
Nuñez Bueno L., R. Gómez Santos, G. Guarín,& G. León. 2004. Moscas de las frutas (Díptera: Tephritidae) y
sus parasitoides asociados con Psidium gujava L. y Coffea arabica L. en tres municipios de la Provincia
de Vélez (Santarder, Colombia). Revista Corpoica 5:5–12.
Olarte Espinosa, W. 1980. Dinámica poblacional de complejo constituido por las moscas de las frutas
Anastrepha striata Schiner y Anastrepha fraterculus Wiedemann en el medio ecológico del sur de
Santander. Dissertation, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Colombia, 69p.
Oroño, L. E., S. Ovruski, A. L. Norrbom, P. Schliserman, C. Colin, & C.B. Martin. 2005. Two new native
host plant records for Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Argentina. Florida Entomologist
88:228–232.
Ovruski, S. 1995. Pupal and larval-pupal parasitoids (Hymenoptera) obtained from Anastrepha spp. and
Ceratitis capitata (Dipt.: Tephritidae) pupae collected in four localities of Tucuman Province, Argentina.
Entomophaga 40:367–370.
Ovruski, S., P. Schliserman,& M. Aluja. 2003. Native and introduced host plants of Anastrepha fraterculus
andCeratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in northwestern Argentina. Journal of Economic
Entomology 96:1108 1118.
119AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
Ovruski, S., P. Schliserman,& M. Aluja. 2004. Indigenous parasitoids (Hymenoptera) attacking Anastrepha
fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in native and exotic host plants in Northwestern
Argentina. Biological Control 29:43 57.
Ovruski, S., P. Schliserman, G. A. van Nieuwenhove, L. P. Bezdjian, S. Núñez-Campero, & P. Albornoz-
Medina. 2010. Occurrence of Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) on
cultivated, exotic fruit species in the highland valleys of Tucuman in Northwest Argentina. Florida
Entomologist 93:277–282.
Ovruski, S., P. Schliserman, L. E. Oroño etal. 2008. Natural occurrence of hymenopterous parasitoids associ-
ated with Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Myrtaceae species in Entre Rios, northeast-
ern Argentina. Florida Entomologist 91:220–227.
Ovruski, S., P. Schliserman, S. R. Nuñez-Campero etal. 2009. Asurvey of hymenopterous larval-pupal para-
sitoids associated with Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting
wild guava (Psidium guajava) and peach (Prunus persica) in the southernmost section of the Bolivian
Yungas forest. Florida Entomologist 92:269–275.
Ovruski, S., R. A. Wharton, P. Schliserman, & M. Aluja. 2005. Abundance of Anastrepha fratercu-
lus (Diptera: Tephritidae) and its associated native parasitoids (Hymenoptera) in “feral” guavas
growing in the endangered Northernmost Yungas forests of Argentina with an update on the taxo-
nomic status of Opiine parasitoids previously reported in this country. Environmental Entomology
34:807818.
Pereira-Rêgo, D. R. G., S. M. Jahnke, L. R. Redaelli, & N. Schaffer. 2011. Morfometria de Anastrepha
fraterculus (Wied.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) relacionada a hospedeiros nativos, Myrtaceae. Arquivos do
Instituto Biológico 78:37–43.
Perre, P. 2016. Utilização diferencial de frutos hospedeiros por Anastrepha sp.1afnis fraterculus (Diptera,
Tephritidae): Aspectos morfológicos e reprodutivos. Dissertation PhD, Instituto de Biociências,
Universidade de São Paulo, 124p.
Pirovani, V. D. 2011. Moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae): Diversidade, hospedeiros e parasitóides em
áreas nativa e cultivadas na região de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil. MSc Dissertation, Universidade
Federal de Viçosa, 66p.
Pirovani, V. D., D. S. Martins, S. A. S. Souza, K. Uramoto, & P. S. F. Ferreira. 2010. Moscas-das-frutas
(Diptera: Tephritidae), seus parasitoides e hospedeiros em Viçosa, Zona da mata mineira. Arquivos do
Instituto Biológico 77:727–733.
Putruele, M. T. G. 1996. Hosts for Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus in the northeastern Province
of Entre Ríos, Argentina. InFruit Fly Pests: AWorld Assessment of Their Biology and Management,
B.A. McPheron,& G. J. Steck (Eds.), pp.343–345. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL.
Querino, R. B., J. B. Maia, G. N. Lopes, C. D. Alvarenga,& R. A. Zucchi. 2014. Fruit y (Diptera: Tephritidae)
community i n guava orchards and adjacent fragm ents of native vegetation in Brazil. Flori da Entomologist
97:778–786.
R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical
Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www. R-project.org/.
Raga, A., D. A. O. Prestes, M. F. Souza Filho etal. 2004. Fruit y (Diptera: Tephritoidea) infestation in Citrus
in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 33:85 89.
Raga, A., M. F. D. Souza-Filho, R. A. Machado, M. E. Sato,& R. C. Siloto. 2011. Host ranges and infesta-
tion indices of fruit ies (Tephritidae) and lance ies (Lonchaeidae) in São Paulo State, Brazil. Florida
Entomologist 94:787–794.
Raga, A., R. A. Machado, M. F. Souza Filho, M. E. Sato,& R. C. Siloto. 2005. Tephritoidea (Diptera) species
from Myrtaceae fruits in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Entomotropica 20:11–14.
Rust, E. W. 1918. Anastrepha fraterculus Wied. (Trypetidae)—Asevere menace to the southern United States.
Journal of Economic Entomology 11:457–467.
Sá, R. F., M. A. Castellani, A. S. do Nacimiento, M. H. T. Silva, A. N. Silva,& R. Pérez-Maluf. 2008. Índice de
infestação e diversidade de moscas-das-frutas em hospedeiros exóticos e nativos no pólo de fruticultura
de anagé, BA. Bragantia 67:401– 411.
Salles, L. A. 1995. Bioecologia e controle da mosca-das-frutas sul-americana EMBRAPA, Centro de Pesquisa
Agropecuária de Clima Temperado, Pelotas, 58p.
Santos, W. S. 2003. Moscas frugívoras (Diptera: Tephritoidea) associadas ao umbu-cajá (Spondias sp.) no
Recôncavo Baiano. MSc Dissertation, Escola de Agronomia. Universidade Federal da Bahia, 50p.
Sarmiento, E. C., H. Aguirre, & J. Martínez. 2012. Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) y sus asociados:
dinámica de emergencia de sus parasitoides en frutos de tres especies de plantas. Boletín Museo de
Entomología de la Universidad del Valle 13:25–32.
120 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Savaris, M., S. Lampert, A. L. Marsaro-Júnior, R. Adaime, & M. F. Souza-Filho. 2013. First record of
Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera, Tephritidae) on Arecaceae in Brazil. Florida
Entomologist 96:1597–1599.
Schliserman, P.,& S. Ovruski. 2004. Incidencia de moscas de la fruta de importancia económica sobre Citrus
aurantium (Rutaceae) en Tucumán, Argentina. Manejo Integrado de Plagas y Agroecología 72:44–53.
Schliserman, P., S. Ovruski, O. R. De Coll,& R. A. Wharton. 2010. Diversity and abundance of hymenopter-
ous parasitoids associated with Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in native and exotic host
plants in Misiones, Northeastern Argentina. Florida Entomologist 93:175–182.
Segura, D. F., M. T. Vera,& J. L. Cladera. 2004. Fluctuación estacional en la infestación de diversos hosped-
adores por la mosca del Mediterráneo, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae), en la provincia de
Buenos Aires. Ecología Austral 14:317.
Segura, D. F., M. T. Vera, C. L. Cagnotti etal. 2006. Relative abundance of Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha
fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in diverse host species and localities of Argentina. Annals of the
Entomological Society of America 99:70 –83.
Selivon, D. 2000. Relaçoes com as plantas hospedeiras. InMoscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no
Brasil. Conhecimento básico e aplicado, A. Malavasi& R.A. Zucchi (Eds.), 87–91. Holos Ed, Riberão
Preto, Brazil.
Selivon, D., A. L. P. Perondini,& J. S. Morgante. 2005a. Agenetic-morphological character ization of two cryp-
tic species of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological
Society of America 98:367–381.
Selivon, D., A. L. P. Perondini,& L. S. Rocha. 2005b. Karyotype characterization of Anastrepha fruit ies
(Diptera: Tephritidae). Neotropical Entomology 34:273–279.
Selivon, D., C. Vretos, L. Fontes,& A. L. P. Perondini. 2004. New variant forms in the Anastrepha frater-
culus complex (Diptera, Tephritidae). InProceedings 6th International Symposium on Fruit Flies of
Economic Importance, B.N. Barnes (Ed.), 253–258. Isteg Scientic Publications, Stellenbosch.
Shaw, J. G. 1947. Hosts and distribution of Anastrepha serpentina in northeastern Mexico. Journal of
Economic Entomology 40:34–40.
Silva, F. F. D., R. N. Meirelles, L. R. Redaelli,& F. K. Dal Soglio. 2006. Diversity of ies (Diptera: Tephritidae
and Lonchaeidae) in organic citrus orchards in the Vale do Rio Caí, Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil.
Neotropical Entomology 35:666–670.
Silva, G. J., V. S. Dutra, M. S. Santos etal. 2010. Diversity of Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) and asso-
ciated braconid parasitoids from native and exotic hosts in Southeastern Bahia, Brazil. Environmental
Entomology 39:1457–1465.
Silva, L. N., M. S. Santos, V. S. Dutra, E. L. Araujo, M. A. Costa,& J. G. Silva. 2011a. First survey of fruit y
(Diptera: Tephritidae) and parasitoid diversity among Myrtaceae fruit across the state of Bahia, Brazil.
Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 33:757–764.
Silva, N. M. 1993. Levantamento e análise faunística de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) em quatro
locais do Estado do Amazonas. Dissertation, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz,”
Universidade do São Paulo, Piracicaba. 155p.
Silva, N. M., S. Silveira Neto, & R. A. Zucchi. 1996. The natural host plants of Anastrepha in the state
of Amazonas, Brazil. In Fruit Fly Pests: A World Assessment of Their Biology and Management,
B.A.McPheron& G. J. Steck (Eds.), 352–357. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL.
Silva, R. A., A. L. Lima, S. L. O. Xavier, W. R. Silva, C. F. Marinho,& R. A. Zucchi. 2011b. Anastrepha
species (Diptera: Tephritidae), their hosts and parasitoids in southern Amapá State, Brazil. Biota
Neotropica 11:429 434.
Silva, W. R.,& R. A. Silva. 2007. Levantamento de moscas-das-frutas e de seus parasitóides no município de
Ferreira Gomes, Estado do Amapá. Ciência Rural 37:265–268.
Souza, S. A. S., A. L. S. Resende, P. C. Strikis, J. R. Costa, M. S. F. Ricci,& E. L. Aguiar-Menezes. 2005.
Infestação Natu ral de Moscas Frugívoras (Diptera: Tephritoidea) em Café Arábica, sob Cultivo Orgânico
Arborizado e a Pleno Sol, em Valença, RJ. Neotropical Entomology 34:639– 648.
Souza-Filho, M. F. 2006. Infestação de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae e Lonchaeidae) relacionada à
fenologia da goiabeira (Psidium guajava L.), nespereira (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) e do pessegueiro
(Prunus persica Batsch). PhD diss. São Paulo, Brazil: Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz,
Universidade de São Paulo. 125p.
Souza-Filho, M. F., A. Raga,& R. A. Zucchi. 2000. Moscas-das-frutas nos estados brasileiros: São Paulo.
In Moscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil. Conhecimento básico e aplicado,
A.Malavasi& R. A. Zucchi (Eds.), 277–283. Holos Ed, Riberão Preto, Brazil.
121AReview of the Natural Host Plants of the Anastrepha fraterculus Complex in the Americas
Souza-Filho, M. F., A. Raga, J. A. Azevedo-Filho, P. C. Strikis, J. A. Guimarães, & R. A. Zucchi. 2009.
Diversity and seasonality of fruit ies (Diptera: Tephritidae and Lonchaeidae) and their parasitoids
(Hymenoptera: Braconidae and Figitidae) in orchards of guava, loquat and peach. Brazilian Journal of
Biology 69:3140.
Souza-Filho, Z. A. 2005. Estudos populacionais de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) em um pomar de
goiaba (Psidium guajava L.) em Una–Bahia. MSc Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz,
60p.
Steck, G. J. 1991. Biochemical systematics and population genetic structure of Anastrepha fraterculus and
related species (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals Entomological Society of America 84:10 28.
Steck, G. J. & A. Malavasi. 1988. Description of immature stages of Anastrepha bistrigata (Diptera:
Tep h r iti dae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 81:1004–1006.
Steck, G. J., L. E. Carroll, H. Celedonio-Hurtado& J. Guillen-Aguilar. 1990. Methods for identication of
Anastrepha larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae), and key to 13species. Proceedings Entomological Society of
Washington 92:333–346.
Stone, A. 1942a. New species of Anastrepha and notes on others. Journal of Washington Academy of Sciences
32:298–304.
Stone, A. 1942b. Thefruities of the genus Anastrepha. United States D epartment of Agri culture Miscellaneous
Publication 439:1–112.
Taira, T. L. 2012. Moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) e seus parasitóides em hospedeiros cultivados
e silvestres no ecótono Cerrado-Pantanal sul-mato-grossense, Brasil. MSc Dissertation, Universidade
Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, 59p.
Taira, T. L., A. R. Abot, J. Nicácio, M. A. Uchôa, S. R. Rodrigues & J. A. Guimarães. 2013. Fruit ies
(Diptera, Tephritidae) and their parasitoids on cultivated and wild hosts in the Cerrado-Pantanal ecotone
in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 57:300–308.
ThePlant List. 2013. Version 1.1. Published on the Internet; http://www.theplantlist.org/ (last accessed July10,
2018).
Tigrero, J. O. 1998. Revisión de especies de moscas de la fruta presentes en el Ecuador. Published by the
author, Sangolquí, Ecuador. 55p.
Tigrero, J. O. 2009. Lista anotada de hospederos de moscas de la fruta presentes en Ecuador. ESPE Serie
Zoológica Boletín Técnico 8:10 7–116.
Torres, C. A. S. 2004. Diversidade de espécies de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) e de seus par-
asitóides em cafeeiro (Coffea arabica L.). MSc Dissertation, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da
Bahia–UESB/Campus de Vitória da Conquista-BA, 71p.
Uchôa-Fernandes, M.A.& J. Nicácio. 2010. New records of Neotropical fruit ies (Tephritidae), lance ies
(Lonchaeidae) (Diptera: Tephritoidea), and their host plants in the South Pantanal and adjacent areas,
Brazil. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 103:723–733.
Uchôa-Fernandes, M. A.,& R. A. Zucchi. 2000. Moscas-das-frutas nosestados brasileiros: Mato Grosso e
Mato Grosso do Sul. InMoscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil. Conhecimento básico
e aplicado, A. Malavasi and R. A. Zucchi (Eds.), 241–245. Holos Ed, Riberão Preto, Brazil.
Uchôa-Fernandes, M. A., I. Oliveira, R. M. S Molina,& R. A. Zucchi. 2002. Species diversity of frugivo-
rous ies (Diptera: Tephritoidea) from hosts in the Cerrado of the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Neotropical Entomology 31:515–524.
Uramoto, K. 2002. Biodiversidade de moscas-das-frutas do gênero Anastrepha (Diptera, Tephritidae) no cam-
pus Luiz de Queiroz. MSc Dissertation, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade
de São Paulo. Piracicaba, Brasil. 85p.
Uramoto, K. 2007. Diversidade de moscas-das- frutas (Diptera, Tephritidae) em pomares comerciais de
papaia e em áreas remanescentes da Mata Atlântica e suas plantas hospedeiras nativas, no município
de Linhares, Espírito Santo. Dissertation PhD, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz,
Universidade de São Paulo. 105p.
Uramoto, K., D. S. Martins,& R. A. Zucchi. 2008. Fruit ies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their asscociations
with native host plants in a remnant area of the highly endangered Atlantic Rain Forest in the State of
Espirito Santo, Brazil. Bulletin of Entomological Research 98:457–466.
Uramoto, K., J. M. M. Walder, & R. A. Zucchi. 2004. Biodiversidade de moscas-das-frutas do gênero
Anastrepha (Diptera, Tephritidae) no campus da ESALQ-USP, Piracicaba, São Paulo. Revista Brasileira
de Entomologia 48:409–414.
Vaníčková, L., V. Hernández-Ortiz, I. S. J. Bravo etal. 2015. Current knowledge of the species complex
Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera, Tephritidae) in Brazil. ZooKeys 540:211–237.
122 Area-Wide Management of Fruit Fly Pests
Vayssières, J. F., J. P. Cayol, P. Caplong etal. 2013. Diversity of fruit y (Diptera: Tephritidae) species in French
Guiana: their main host plants and associated parasitoids during the period 1994–2003 and prospects
for management. Fruits International Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Horticulture 68:219–243.
Veloso, V. R. S., P. M. Fernandes,& R. A. Zucchi. 2000. Moscas-das-frutas nosestados brasileiros: Goiás.
In Moscas-das-frutas de importância econômica no Brasil. Conhecimento básico e aplicado,
A.Malavasi and R.A. Zucchi (Eds.), 247–252. Holos Ed, Riberão Preto, Brazil.
Veloso, V. R. S., G. A. Ferreira, P. M. Fernandes, N. A. Canal Daza,& R. A. Zucchi. 1996. Ocorrência e
índice de infestação de Anastrepha spp. (Dip., Tephritidae) em Pouteria gardneriana Radlk. e Pouteria
ramiora (Mart.) Radlk. (Sapotaceae), noscerrados de Goiás. Anais Escola Agron. Vet. Universidade
Fed. Goias 26:109 120.
Vera, M. T., C. Cáceres, V. Wornoayporn etal. 2006. Mating incompatibility among populations of the South
American fruit y Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society
of America 99:387–397.
White, I. M.,& M. M. Elson-Harris. 1992. Fruit Flies of Economic Signicance: Their Identication and
Bionomics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Wiedemann, C. R. W. 1830. Aussereuropaische zweiugelige Inseckten. Vol. 2. Schulz, Hamm.
Wille, J. E. 1937. Fruities in the Republic of Ecuador. United States Department of Agriculture Bureau of
Entomology and Plant Quarantine Services 130:25–26.
Wille, J. E. 1941. Tres informes de observaciones entomólogicas en la costa en 1940. Informe Estación
Experimental Agrícola L a Molina 53:1–26.
Yepes, R. F.,& A. R. Vélez. 1989. Contribución al conocimiento de las moscas de las frutas (Tephritidae) y
sus parasitoides en el departamento de Antioquia. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellin
42:7398.
Zucchi, R. A. 20 00. Espécies de Anastrepha, sinon ímias, plant as hospedeiras e p arasitóides. InMoscas-das-frutas
de importância econômica no Brasil. Conhecimento básico e aplicado, A. Malavasi& R.A. Zucchi
(Eds.), 41–48. Holos Ed, Riberão Preto, Brazil.
Zucchi, R. A. 2007. Diversidad, distribución y hospederos del género Anastrepha en Brasil. InMoscas de la
fruta en Latinoamérica (Diptera: Tephritidae): Diversidad, Biología y Manejo, V. Hernández-Ortiz
(Ed.), 77–100. SYG Editores, Mexico City.
... • Our results support earlier findings that Wax-BS can remain effective for several months under field conditions. • Recent work by Conway et al. (2020) reported that Wax-BS can even continue to attract and kill fruit flies considerably longer when the protective hat is attached, which reduces the environmental effects on the bait station itself. • A slow acting toxicant, the active ingredient in Wax-BS degrades gradually in the paraffin wax mixture, but retains its potency in this presentation for a longer period of time compared to other Spinosad-based fruit fly control products. ...
Poster
Full-text available
A recently developed bait station used by the USA-Mexico-Guatemala Moscamed Regional Program for suppression of Mediterranean fruit fly, has demonstrated extended field life compared to existing options. The bait station matrix is composed of paraffin wax with yellow/green food coloring added to provide a visual cue, corn syrup and granulated sugar as feeding stimulants, a Spinosad-based toxicant, and the target fruit fly lure attached to the bait station device, allowing for its use against different fruit fly species. Long-term field testing has been conducted in several areas including Guatemala and Texas, U.S.A. to validate the technology. The objective of this field cage study was to determine the efficacy of weathered bait stations compared to fresh ones in relation to mortality and survival of released sterile Medflies under Florida conditions. Our results supported earlier findings that the bait station can remain effective for several months under field conditions. There were no differences in percent mortality for 4-wk and 8-wk old bait stations compared to fresh ones across field cage trial dates. This wax-based bait station has the potential to be a reliable additional tool for use during fruit fly emergency programs in Florida and elsewhere.
Article
Full-text available
Insect pests cause tremendous impact to agriculture worldwide. Species identification is crucial for implementing appropriate measures of pest control but can be challenging in closely related species. True fruit flies of the genus Anastrepha Schiner (Diptera: Tephritidae) include some of the most serious agricultural pests in the Americas, with the Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) complex being one of the most important due to its extreme polyphagy and wide distribution across most of the New World tropics and subtropics. The eight morphotypes described for this complex as well as other closely related species are classified in the fraterculus species group, whose evolutionary relationships are unresolved due to incomplete lineage sorting and introgression. We performed multifaceted phylogenomic approaches using thousands of genes to unravel the evolutionary relationships within the A. fraterculus complex to provide a baseline for molecular diagnosis of these pests. We used a methodology that accommodates variable sources of data (transcriptome, genome, and whole‐genome shotgun sequencing) and developed a tool to align and filter orthologs, generating reliable datasets for phylogenetic studies. We inferred 3031 gene trees that displayed high levels of discordance. Nevertheless, the topologies of the inferred coalescent species trees were consistent across methods and datasets, except for one lineage in the A. fraterculus complex. Furthermore, network analysis indicated introgression across lineages in the fraterculus group. We present a robust phylogeny of the group that provides insights into the intricate patterns of evolution of the A. fraterculus complex supporting the hypothesis that this complex is an assemblage of closely related cryptic lineages that have evolved under interspecific gene flow. Despite this complex evolutionary scenario, our subsampling analysis revealed that a set of as few as 80 loci has a similar phylogenetic resolution as the genome‐scale dataset, offering a foundation to develop more efficient diagnostic tools in this species group.
Article
Thorough and systematic surveys of host associations of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata are lacking in Uruguay. Our aim was to establish the host status in field conditions and the pattern of use of different fruit species in agroecosystems and wild environments in Uruguay. Tephritid monitoring was conducted in citrus and deciduous fruit orchards using McPhail traps baited with four PBX® yeast/borax pellets. A survey of host fruits was conducted by collecting fruits in commercial and non-commercial orchards and wild vegetation. Ceratitis capitata and A. fraterculus were the only two economically important fruit fly species recorded. Ceratitis capitata prevailed in citrus groves and deciduous fruit orchards associated with commercial and disturbed environments whereas A. fraterculus was associated mostly with non-commercial fruits and undisturbed ecosystems. The differences in abundance of C. capitata and A. fraterculus observed in different hosts and ecosystems may be related to factors such as host association, resource competition, environmental conditions and parasitism, among others that are discussed.
Article
Cherimoya is native to southern Ecuador, where it occurs in secondary forests with a high pest incidence, mainly fruit flies. In this research, five McPhail traps baited with Süsbin® 10% were installed in four cherimoya forest, from December 2017 to April 2018, and fruits were collected during the fruition phase to extract the larvae. A total of 1083 Tephritidae individuals and 3613 pupae were obtained from traps and fruits, respectively. Nine species of Anastrepha, one species of Toxotrypana and two parasitoid species were identified. The most abundant species in traps and the only one obtained from fruits was A. fraterculus.
Article
Full-text available
We conducted a survey of frugivorous flies (Diptera: Tephritidae and Lonchaeidae), their host plants, and associated parasitoids in the extreme north of Amapá State, Brazil. Fruit were collected from various plant species between May 2011 and Jul 2013. In total, 218 fruit samples were collected (3,915 fruits, 115.6 kg), from 33 plant species (12 native and 21 introduced) in 22 families. Infestation by fruit flies was observed in 69 samples, representing 17 plant species in 13 families. In total, 3,480 puparia were obtained, from which emerged specimens of Anastrepha Schiner (6 species; Tephritidae), Neosilba McAlpine (4 species; Lonchaeidae), and Bactrocera carambolae Drew & Hancock (Tephritidae), as well as wasp parasitoids in the family Braconidae (3 species). This work adds new records of frugivorous flies in the studied area and establishes new relationships between species of frugivorous flies and host plants in the Brazilian Amazon.
Article
Full-text available
Spinosad (Dow AgroSciences) is a mixture of tetracyclic-macrolide compounds produced by a soil actinomycete and has been classified as a bioinsecticide. Spinosad is highly active against Lepidoptera but is reported to be practically nontoxic to insect natural enemies. We assessed the impact of Spinosad in a granular maize-flour formulation on a selection of insect predators over periods of 2–14 days. In all cases, the quantities of Spinosad used were less than the maximum recommended rates given on the product label. Adults of Aleochara bilineata Gyllenhal (Coleoptera:Staphylinidae) suffered a high prevalence of mortality following consumption of 1000 or 2000 ppm Spinosad active ingredient (a.i.), but little mortality at 200 ppm. Larvae of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae) did not consume the granular formulation and suffered little overall mortality. After 14 days of exposure, the earwig, Doru taeniatum (Dohrn) (Dermaptera:Forficulidae), suffered 48% mortality in the 1.2 ppm Spinosad treatment increasing to 98% in the 1200 ppm Spinosad treatment compared to 20% in controls. Earwigs suffered 86% mortality/intoxication 72 h after feeding on Spinosad-contaminated Spodoptera frugiperda J. E. Smith (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) larvae. A field trial was performed to compare applications of commercial granular chlorpyrifos and Spinosad in maize-flour granules (200 and 2000 ppm a.i.; 4.8–48 g a.i./ha, respectively) or as an aqueous spray (160 ppm a.i.; 48 g a.i./ha) on earwigs held inside gauze bags. Mortality of earwigs on control plants was less than 15% at 2 days postapplication compared to 33% on plants treated with granular chlorpyrifos, 83% on plants sprayed with 160 ppm Spinosad, and 91–95% on plants treated with 200–2000 ppm Spinosad granules, respectively. Further mortality in the 24-h period postsampling ranged from <5% in control treatments, to 9% in the chlorpyrifos treatment, and to 55–65% in the Spinosad spray and granule treatments. We conclude that Spinosad cannot be considered to have an environmental safety profile similar to most established biological insecticides.