PreprintPDF Available

Hydrothermal components in marine sediments: an insight into sea floor mineralization process

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Hydrothermal process is an essential phenomenon for seafloor metallic enrichments and mineral accumulations. The seawater -oceanic crust circulations near all the submarine volcanic structures had led to the production of essential base metals, metallic sulfides and natural hydrogen. The non-renewable, slow growth and accumulation rate of the mineral deposits has made the search for more hydrothermal fields to be of utmost importance. Hydrothermal components in sediments are liable to act as geological records on the reconstruction of: history, intensity, location and environmental conditions of hydrothermal activities, with respect to their unique mineralogy and geochemistry. It further provides essential data for locating active and inactive hydrothermal systems. Here we highlight some of the integrated approach on the applications of isotopes, mineralogical and chemical investigations on hydrothermal influenced sediments from Mid Ocean Ridge System. These investigations on near ridge metalliferous sediments have been used to complement fluids and rock geochemistry, with respect to having an insight into the processes of sea-floor mineralization. This review has further suggested some important methodological approach to the understanding of the near vent marine sediments' fingerprints.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Hydrothermal components in marine sediments: an insight into sea floor mineralization
process
Popoola Samuel Olatunde1*, Unyimadu John Paul 1, Adegbie Adesina Thompson2, Akinnigbagbe Akintoye Edward2,
Ladigbolu Ismail Adejare1, Adekunbi Falilu Olaiwola 1, Ebohon Joy Osiuare 3
Department of Physical and Chemical Oceanography, Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, Lagos, P.M.B, 12729, Nigeria.
Department of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, Lagos, P.M.B, 12729, Nigeria.
Department of Biological Oceanography, Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, Lagos, P.M.B, 12729, Nigeria.
Corresponding author: popoolaos@niomr.gov.ng
Abstract
Hydrothermal process is an essential phenomenon for seafloor metallic enrichments and mineral
accumulations. The sea-water-oceanic crust circulations near all the submarine volcanic structures
had led to the production of essential base metals, metallic sulfides and natural hydrogen. The non-
renewable, slow growth and accumulation rate of the mineral deposits has made the search for
more hydrothermal fields to be of utmost importance. Hydrothermal components in sediments are
liable to act as geological records on the reconstruction of: history, intensity, location and
environmental conditions of hydrothermal activities, with respect to their unique mineralogy and
geochemistry. It further provides essential data for locating active and inactive hydrothermal
systems. Here we highlight some of the integrated approach on the applications of isotopes,
mineralogical and chemical investigations on hydrothermal influenced sediments from Mid Ocean
Ridge System. These investigations on near ridge metalliferous sediments have been used to
complement fluids and rock geochemistry, with respect to having an insight into the processes of
sea-floor mineralization. This review has further suggested some important methodological
approach to the understanding of the near vent marine sediments’ fingerprints.
Keywords: Hydrothermal process; seafloor metallic enrichments; geological records; Mid
Ocean Ridge System; sea-floor mineralization
1.0 Introduction
Marine sediments are generally pelagic and are made up of high constituents of calcareous, or
siliceous ooze, with minor contents of red clay [1]. Whereas, others may be precipitated from sea
water (e.g., authigenic sediments), or as a product of precipitations of hydrothermal fluids,
seawater-sediments interactions (commonly referred to as hydrothermal sediments [2].
Hydrothermal components in marine sediments are often enriched in metal contents termed
‘metalliferous’, with respects to the background pelagic sediments, and are related to the global
Mid Ocean Ridge System (MORS) [3-8]. They are generally adjudged to be derived from two
processes: (1) Mass wasting, slumping, erosion and transportation of sulfide debris from sulfide
mounds. (2) Hydrothermal plume fallouts from neutrally buoyant plume [6, 10-13]. The former
had been related to be deposited in close proximity to the hydrothermal vent [14], and constitutes
<10% of medium-coarse grained enriched hydrothermal particles. Whereas, the latter
constitutes >90% dispersed hydrothermal fluid precipitates deposited distal to the vent [15-18].
The drifting away of hydrothermal plume particles from the Mid Ocean Ridges has led to the
scavenging of Fe - Mn oxyhydroxides, trace elements and Rare Earth Elements as a sink into the
surrounding sediments [19]. The top core characteristics of the Al/ (AI+Fe+Mn) ratio had been
used to reveal Fe and Mn enriched sediments along the MORS, and to effectively delineate the
spreading centres [6, 13, 20]. The metalliferous sediments in the Red Sea were adjudged to
constitute the largest hydrothermal mineral deposit in the world’s oceans, and are liable to provide
a substrate on which the macro and micro fauna live [21].
With the advent of high temperature active black smokers in 1979, at East Paific Ridge (EPR),
near 21°N [22-24]. Concerted efforts and concentrations had been directed to the studies on
hydrothermal fluids, sulfide mounds and chimney structures. Thereby limiting several interests
and research on distal metalliferous sediments [20]. Metalliferous sediments across the ocean
possess a genetic affinity to minerals precipitated in close proximity to the hydrothermal upflow
zones (Gurvich, 2006). They are liable to act as geological records on the reconstruction of: history,
intensity, location and environmental conditions of hydrothermal activities, with respect to their
unique mineralogy and geochemistry [26-27]. It further provides essential data for locating active
and inactive hydrothermal systems [26-27].
This paper, aim to review the previous studies on the use of distinct signatures of sediment
mineralogy and geochemistry to complement fluids, rocks and seawater; as an insight into sea
floor mineralization along the Mid Ocean Ridges. It also focuses on the needed area of research
and directions.
Fig1: Map of confirmed (red symbol) and inferred (yellow symbol) vent sites in the ocean adapted
from [28] and the reference therein.
2.0 Methodology and approach of isolating hydrothermal mineral grains from bulk
sediments
The process begins with the removal of carbonate in the samples either by dilute HCl or acetic
acid. The solution may be centrifuged and repeatedly washed in de-ionized water for the acid
neutralization, then wet-sieve analysis will follow to separate the sand size from the silt and clay
size. The investigation of isolated mineral grain will be focused on the sand size fractions, hence,
concentration will be shifted on this fraction (>63µm). Binocular microscope in conjunction with
Standard Electron Microscope (SEM), attached with Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) wil
further be utilized for qualitative spot investigations. Additionally. Sulfide aliquots with respect to
specific gravity, termed ethanol elutriation can also be used separate the denser minerals (e.g.,
sulfides) from the less dense non sulfide grains (e.g., amorphous silica, and others), [26-27]. Then
the hydrothermal mineral grains of interest such as sulfides (e.g., pyrite, chalcopyrite, bornite,
covellite), sulfate (barite, gypsum, anhydrite), and Fe-oxyhydroxides will be handpicked under the
binocular microscope (Fig.2 and 3). The selected mineral-grains will further be impregnated with
epoxy resin, after the elimination of bubbles, grounded and polished ready for Electron Probe
Micro Analysis (EPMA) and Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (LA-
ICPMS) investigation. The EPMA investigation can give detailed major and minor elements with
minimum detection limit of > 0.01 wt. %, whereas, the LA-ICPMS have the ability to probe further
into the trace elements to ppm level.
Fig. 2. Typical hydrothermal mineral-grains separated from bulk sediments (A) secondary Cu-sulfide
minerals (B) Reddish-brown Fe-oxy-hydroxide minerals (C) pyrite minerals (D) anhydrite minerals,
Source [29].
Fig. 3. Standard Electron Microscope (SEM) image of separated hydrothermal components from
marine sediments in Indian Ocean Ridge Systems, Source [26-27, 29].
3.0 Application of isotopes and REEs signature on hydrothermal sediments
Variability in mineral chemistry, degree of mixing of hydrothermal fluid and sea water,
physicochemical parameters (e.g., pH, Eh, chloride ions), and sea-floor rock interactions has been
highlighted as the triggering factor of different Rare Earth Element (REE) patterns in hydrothermal
vent environments [13, 30-32]. Previous studies have suggested that metalliferous sediments with
hydrothermal components are unlikely to possess positive Cerium (Ce+) anomaly [33-34].
Moreover, the equivalent values of Pb, Nd and Sr isotopes in sediments to the non-radiogenic local
Mid Ocean Ridge Basalt (MORB) or vent-fluid values have been related to the presence of
hydrothermal components [10-11]. Several studies have been conducted on REEs and isotopes,
which few are highlighted in this review.
Ref [35] used sulfur (32S) and oxygen (18O/16O) isotope compositions to suggest a low temperature
depositional conditions of seawater-interaction with basaltic crust from the Central North Pacific
Ocean. Ref [11] used the similarity in the non-radiogenic compositions of Pb isotopes in layered
components of core sediments with local basalts and vent fluid to confirm the proximal
hydrothermal origin of the Trans Adventure Geotraverse (TAG) sediments (Mid Atlantic Ridge),
and its close proximity to the hydrothermal upflow zones. They further used the similarity of the
REE patterns of the layered sediments with vent-fluid patterns to infer a hydrothermal vent fluid-
minimal seawater interactions in the deposition of the TAG metalliferous sediments. Moreover,
[36] used the similarities in the isotopic compositions of Pb with local MORB to suggest a
hydrothermal sourced Pb element in the OBS sediments, 21ºN, in the East Pacific Ridge (EPR).
They further utilized light Rare Earth Element (LREE) enrichment, low REE concentrations,
pronounced Eu/Eu* (2.6-13.3) and negative Ce anomaly (Ce/Ce*) (0.63-0.83) to suggest vent fluid
characteristics. Whereas, the down core enrichment of the REE content was used to infer oxidation
and seawater contributions. Ref [32-33] conducted a sequential analysis on bulk sediments to
discriminate between leached and residual phase components from Rainbow hydrothermal vent
sites. The leached components which consist of biogenic carbonates (e.g., foraminifera and
cocolithopores) and Fe-oxyhydroxides are Heavy Rare Earth Elements (HREE) enriched with
negative Ce/Ce*, which are referred to as seawater related fingerprints. The counterparts in the
residual phase, which are made up of detrital materials (e.g., sulfide and sulfate fractions) exhibit
positive Europium anomaly (Eu/Eu*) and negative Ce/Ce* related to the mixing of hydrothermal
fluid and seawater components, with fragments of MORB and aeolian inputs. Ref [10] integrated
the Pb and Nd isotopic compositions of near vent sediment core of the Logatchev hydrothermal
site, with data from hydrothermal fluids and basalt. The spatial variations in the REE and
neodymium (Nd) concentrations were further used to understand the degree of seawater, vent fluid
and detrital influence on the precipitation of sulfide minerals in the Logatchev hydrothermal site.
[37 used the HREE enrichments in the Pacific sediments to reflect basaltic input into the sediments.
Finally, Ref [38] used seawater REE patterns of negative Ce/Ce* (0.61), negative Eu/Eu* (0.73)
to characterize a low temperature depositional conditions in the Saldanha Hydrothermal Field.
These aforementioned approaches have shown the effectiveness of REEs and isotopic signatures
as tracers in the understanding of the source and environmental conditions of hydrothermal
processes in Mid Ocean Ridges and environments.
4.0. Signatures from mineralogical assemblages and chemical compositions
Different sediment fingerprints are specific to various depositional conditions of precipitations in
Mid Ocean Ridge environments [39], (Table 1). Several studies have been conducted on the
sediments mineralogical and chemical compositions, with a view to the understanding of the
hydrothermal components and depositional conditions in the near vent environments. Few are
highlighted in this review. Ref [35] used the mineral assemblages (e.g., goethite, Fe-
montmorillonite, Mn-oxides/hydroxides) to infer a low temperature depositional conditions of the
sediments from the Central North Pacific Ocean. Ref [36] utilized the distinct enrichments of Fe
(up to 25wt. %); Cu (up to 22wt. %); Zn (up to 13 wt. %); S (up to 30 wt.%) and low Mn (<300ppm)
to distinguish hydrothermal sediments from its pelagic counterparts in the OBS (21°N) vent Field
in the EPR. Ref [38] used nontronite, smectite, amorphous Mn-Mg oxyhydroxides and
manganobrucites mineral assemblages to infer a lower temperature of precipitation in the Mount
Saldanha Hydrothermal Field. Additionally, previous researchers had utilized the Fe/Ti versus
Al/Al+Fe+Mn ratio of < 0.3-0.4 and > 0.4 to indicate the presence of hydrothermal and detrital
components in marine sediments [20, 26-27]. Ref [40] utilized Zn, Cu, Pb enrichments and K, Rb
depletion to identify the hydrothermal components in axial sediments along the Carlsberg Ridge.
They further utilized the U/Fe enrichment, low (Nd/Yb) N and Mn depletion to infer the
characteristics of post-depositional oxidation and the limited fluid dilution into the sediments. Ref
[27] further used isolated mineral grain chemistry (e.g., SEM-EDS and EPMA) to reconstruct the
relative position, temperature and intensity of hydrothermal process in Wocan-1 and Wocan-2
hydrothermal sites, Carlsberg Ridge, Indian Ocean.
Table 1: Mineral assemblages and precipitating conditions
Mineralogical
assemblages
Inference
Goelthite, Fe-rich montmorillonitre and Mn
hydoxide
Evidence of low temperature environment of
precipitation
High Fe, Cu, Zn
and S
The presence of sulfidic
input in sediments
Sulfides, nontronite, smectite, Mn-oxyhydroxides, Mg-
oxyhydroxides, Manganobrucite
Extensive mixing of hydrothermal fluid with
seawater
Enriched Cu, Zn, Fe and low Mn in
sediments
Proximal location of the sampling point to
hydrothermal vent environments
Finally, the sediments-background ratio of Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn and Al and Ti, have been used in
several studies to indicate the enrichment of hydrothermal and detrital fractions in the near Ridge
sediments and hydrothermal vent environments [38-39, 41].
5.0 Conclusion and recommendations
Most of the aforementioned studies had focused on bulk sediments geochemical compositions.
There is a need to look in the direction of selective analysis of a specific group of metalliferous
mineral assemblages, hydrothermal components and the imprints of hydrothermal particulates in
marine sediment [26-27]. This can be achieved through wet-sieve analysis, with respect to the
separation and isolated mineral grains and phases of interest. SEM technique in conjunction with
Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (e.g., SEM-EDX) is an important tool at which variations in
shape, colour, and internal structures such as; zoning, fractures, streaks within a mineral phase can
be carried out to constrain their different mineral abundance and percentages [26-27, 42-44].
There is a need to give more attention to research on the morphological variations and chemical
signatures of near vent marine sediments using single grain geochemical techniques via high
resolution approach such as: Electron Microprobe Analysis (EMPA) and Laser ablation
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (LA-ICPMS) analysis. These suggested
approach, coupled with single grain radiogenic and stable isotopic tracers such as, Nd, Sr, Pb and
sulfur isotopes will further aid in the hydrothermal altered sediment fingerprints and thermo-
tectonic origin [44-45]. It is also liable to aid in the determination of the variations in the chemical
compositions among isolated mineral grains and mineral phases such as Cu, Zn and Pb
precipitations in the near vent sediments. These precipitations can be viewed via optical
microscopes in the form of sulfide mineral phases (e.g., chalcopyrite, pyrite, bornite, marcasite,
chalcocite and covellite). The combined approach is liable to offer more opportunity to supplement
and widen the earlier information on hydrothermal mineral assemblages, and create new findings
on the mode of precipitation and environmental conditions of marine sediments and hydrothermal
processes in Mid Ocean Ridges and its environments [46].
This review has highlighted the previous studies on mineralogy, elemental geochemistry, and
isotope applications on hydrothermal components in marine sediments located in close proximity
to the Mid Ocean Ridge environments. It has further suggested an important methodological
approach to the understanding of the near hydrothermal vent sediments’ fingerprint.
Acknowledgement
The authors acknowledge Professor Han Xiqiu, of the second institute of oceanography for the
opportunity to work on hydrothermal sediments in Carlsberg Ridge, Indian Ocean, and Professor
Ying Ye for his joint supervision on the studies. The staffs and managements of Zhejiang
University, Hangzhou, China and Second institute of oceanography, Hangzhou, China
RERERENCES
1) Karpoff, A. M., Walter A. V, Pflumio, C.. 1988. "Metalliferous Sediments within Lava Sequences
of the Sumail Ophiolite (Oman): Mineralogical and Geochemical Characterization, Origin and
Evolution." Tectonophysics 151, no. 1: 223-245.
2) Lylle, M., 2014. Deep sea sediment. Encyclopedia of marine geosciences. Springer Science +
Business Media Dordrecht.
3) Bender, M., Wallace, B., Vivian, G., Ursula, M., Robert, K., Shine-Soon, S., and Pierre, B., 1971.
"Geochemistry of three cores from the east pacific rise." Earth and Planetary Science Letters 12,
vol. 4, pp. 425-433.
4) Bonatti, E., 1975. Metallogenesis at oceanic spreading centers. In: Annual review of earth and
planetary sciences (F.A. Donath, ed.), Palo Alto. Calif.: Annual Reviews, Inc., pp. 401431.
5) Boström, K. and Peterson, M. N. A., 1969. "The origin of aluminum-poor ferromanganoan
sediments in areas of high heat flow on the east pacific rise." Marine Geology 7, vol. 5, pp. 427-
44.
6) Dymond, J, 1981. Geochemistry of nazca plate surface sediments: An evaluation of hydrothermal,
biogenic, detrital, and hydrogenous sources. Geological Society of America Memoirs 154, pp.
133-174.
7) Dymond, J., Veeh, H. H., 1975. "Metal accumulation rates in the southeast pacific and the origin
of metalliferous sediments." Earth and Planetary Science Letters 28, vol. 1, pp. 13-22.
8) Edmond, J. M., Measures, C., McDuff, R., Chan, L. H., Collier, R., Grant, B., Gordon, L. I., and
Corliss, J. B., 1979. "Ridge-crest hydrothermal activity and the balances of the major and minor
elements in the ocean: The Galapagos data." Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., vol. 46, pp. 1-18.
9) Piper J, David, Z. "Rare earth elements in the sedimentary cycle: A summary." Chemical Geology
14, vol. 4, pp. 285-304.
10) Dias, A.S., Mills, R. A., Taylor, R. N., P., F., and Barriga, F. J. A. S., 2008. "Geochemistry of a
sediment push-core from the lucky strike hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic ridge." Chemical
Geology 247, vol. 3-4, pp. 339-351.
11) German, C. R., Higgs, N. C., Thomson, J., Mills, R., Elderfield, H., Blusztajn, J., Fleer, A. P., and
Bacon, M. P., 1993. "A geochemical study of metalliferous sediment from the tag hydrothermal
mound, 26°08′n, Mid-Atlantic Ridge." Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 98, vol. B6,
pp. 9683-9692.
12) Metz, S., John, H. T., and Terry, A. N., 1988. "History and geochemistry of a metalliferous
sediment core from the mid-atlantic ridge at 26°N." Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 74, vol.
52, pp. 2369-2378.
13) Mills, R. A. and Elderfield, H., 1993. Hydrothermal Activity and the Geochemistry of
Metalliferous Sediment, in Seafloor Hydrothermal Systems: Physical, Chemical, Biological, and
Geological Interactions (Eds S. E. Humphris, R. A. Zierenberg, L. S. Mullineaux and R. E.
Thomson). Washington, D. C.: American Geophysical Union.
14) Dekov, Vesselin, M., Javier, C., George, K. D., Dominik, W., Tim, A., Chandranath, B., and
Pierre, R., 2010. "Metalliferous sediments from the H.M.S. Challenger voyage 18721876."
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 74, vol. 17, pp. 5019-5038.
15) Feely, R. A., Gary, J. M., John, H. T., Edward, T. B., Anthony, J. P., and Geoffrey, T. L., 1994.
"Composition and sedimentation of hydrothermal plume particles from north cleft segment, Juan
de Fuca Ridge." Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 99, vol. B3, pp. 4985-5006.
16) Rona, P. A., 1984. "Hydrothermal mineralization at seafloor spreading centers." Earth-Science
Reviews 20, vol. 1, pp. 1-104.
17) Walter, P. and Stoffers, P., 1985. "Chemical characteristics of metalliferous sediments from eight
areas on the Galapagos Rift and East Pacific Rise between 2°N and 42°S." Mar.Geol., vol. 65, pp.
271287.
18) Liao, S., Chunhui, T., Huaiming, L., Guoyin, Z., Jin, L., Weifang, Y., and Yuan, W., 2018.
"Surface sediment geochemistry and hydrothermal activity indicators in the dragon horn area on
the southwest indian ridge." Marine Geology, vol. 398, pp. 22-34.
19) Wheat, C. G. and MeDuff, R. E., 1994. "Hydrothermal flow through the mariana mounds:
Dissolution of amorphous silica and degradation of organic matter on a mid-ocean ridge flank."
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 58, vol. 11, pp. 2461-2475.
20) Gurvich, E. G., 2006. Metalliferous sediments of the world ocean : Fundamental theory of deep-
sea hydrothermal sedimentation. Berlin: Springer.
21) Fouquet, Y. and Denis, L., 2014. Deep marine mineral resources éditions quæ, 10,78026. France
eBook Versailles cedex.
22) Corliss, J. B., Dymond, J., Gordon, L., Edmond, J. M., von Herzen, R. P., Ballard, R. D., Green,
K., Williams, D., Bainbridge, A., et al., 1979. "Submarine thermal springs on the galápagos rift."
Science, vol. 203, pp. 1073 -1083.
23) Francheteau, J., Needham, H. D., Chouckroune, P., Juteau, T., Seguret, M., Ballard, R. D., Fox, P.
J., Mormark, W., Carranza, A., et al., 1979. "Massive deep sea sulfide-ore deposits discovered on
the east pacific rise." Nature, vol. 277, pp. 523530.
24) Hekinian, R., Fevrier, M., Bischoff, J. L., Picot, P., and Shanks, W. C., 1980. "Sulfide deposits
from the east pacific rise near 21°N,." Science, vol. 207, pp. 1433-1444.
25) Spiess, F. N., Ken, C. M., Atwater, T., Ballard, R., Carranza, A., Cordoba, D., Cox, C., Diaz
Garcia, V. M., Francheteau, J., et al., 1980. "East pacific rise: Hot springs and geophysical
experiments." Science 207, vol. 4438, pp. 1421-1433.
26) Popoola, S. O., Han, X., Wang, Y., Qiu, Z., and Ye, Y., 2019b. "Geochemical Investigations of
Fe-Si-Mn Oxyhydroxides Deposits in Wocan Hydrothermal Field on the Slow-Spreading
Carlsberg Ridge, Indian Ocean: Constraints on Their Types and Origin. Minerals, 9, 19.
27) Popoola, S. O., Han, X., Wang, Y., Qiu, Z., Ye, Y., and Cai, Y., 2019a. "Mineralogical and
geochemical signatures of metalliferous sediments in wocan-1 and wocan-2 hydrothermal sites on
the carlsberg ridge, indian ocean." Minerals, vol. 9, p. 26.
28) Humphris, S. E. and Bach, W., 2005. "On the Sr isotope and REE compositions of anhydrites
from the TAG seafloor hydrothermal system." Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, vol. 69, pp. 1511
1525.
29) Popoola, S. 2019. Comparative study on the mineralogy and geochemistry of metalliferous
sediments in Wocan-1 and Wocan-2 hydrothermal sites, Carlsberg Ridge, Indian Ocean.
Unpublished PhD Thesis, submitted to the Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
30) Alt, J. C., Damon, A. H. T., Tim, B., Wayne, C. S., and Alex, H., 1998. "Alteration and
mineralization of an oceanic forearc and the ophiolite-ocean crust analogy." Journal of
Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 103, vol. B6, pp. 12365-12380.
31) Rimskaya-Korsakova, M. N., and A. V. Dubinin. Rare earth elements in sulfides of submarine
hydrothermal vents of the Atlantic Ocean, Dokl." Earth Sci., vol. 389A, pp. 432436.
32) Zeng, Z., Ma, Y., Yin, X., Selby, D., Kong, F., and Chen, S., 2015. "Factors affecting the rare earth
element compositions in massive sulfides from deep-sea hydrothermal systems." Geochemistry,
Geophysics, Geosystems, vol. 16, pp. 2679-2693.
33) Chavagnac, V., German, C. R., Milton, J. A., and Palmer, M. R., 2005. "Sources of REE in
sediment cores from the Rainbow vent site 36°14′N, MAR." Chemical Geology, vol. 216, pp. 329-
352.
34) Mascarenhas-Pereira, M. B. L. and Nath, B. N., 2010. "Selective leaching studies of sediments
from a seamount flank in the Central Indian Basin: Resolving hydrothermal, volcanogenic and
terrigenous sources using major, trace and rare-earth elements." Marine Chemistry, vol. 121, pp.
49-66.
35) Dymond, Corliss, J. B., Heath, G. R., Field, C. W., Dasch, E. J., and Veeh, H. H., 1973. "Origin
of metalliferous sediments from the pacific ocean." Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol.
84, pp. 3355-3372.
36) German, C. R., Hergt, J., Palmer, M. R., and Edmond, J. M., 1999. "Geochemistry of a
hydrothermal sediment core from the obs vent-field, 21°n east pacific rise." Chemical Geology
155, vol. 1, pp. 65-75.
37) Olivarez, A. M., Owen R.M 1989. ". REE/Fe variations in hydrothermal sediments: Implications
for the ree content of seawater." Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 53, pp. 757-62.
38) Dias, A.S., Barriga, F.J Fernando, J. A. S. B., 2006. "Mineralogy and geochemistry of
hydrothermal sediments from the serpentinite-hosted saldanha hydrothermal field (36°34′n;
33°26′w)." Marine Geology 225, vol. 1, pp. 157-175.
39) Boström, K., 1973. "The origin and fate of ferromanganoan active ridge sediments." Stockholm
Contributions in Geology 27, vol. 2, pp. 149-243.
40) Yu, Z., Li, H., Li, M., and Zhai, S., 2016. "Hydrothermal signature in the axial-sediments from
the carlsberg ridge in the northwest Indian ocean." Journal of Marine Systems, Available:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.11.013.
41) [38] Mills, R. A., 1995. Hydrothermal deposits and metalliferous sediments from TAG, 26°N Mid-
Atlantic Ridge. Geological Society vol. 87. London: Special Publications. pp. 121-132.
42) Lihou, J. C. and Mange-Rajetzky, M. A., 1996. "Provenance of the Sardona flysch, eastern Swiss
Alps: example of high-resolution heavy mineral analysis applied to an ultrastable assemblage.
Sediment." Geol., vol. 105, pp. 141 157.
43) Seyedolali, A., Krinsley, D. H., Boggs, S., O’Hara, P. F., Dypvik, H., and Goles, G. G., 1997.
"Provenance interpretation of quartz by scanning electron microscope-cathodoluminescence fabric
analysis." Geology 25, pp. 787790.
44) Morton, A. C., 1991. "Geochemical studies of detrital heavy minerals and their application to
provenance research. In: Morton, A.C., 10 G.J. Weltje, H. von Eynatten / Sedimentary Geology
171 (2004) 1-11 Kronz, A., Haughton, P.D.W. (Eds.), Developments in Sedimentary Provenance
Studies." Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ., vol. 57, pp. 3145.
45) Von Eynatten, H. and Gaupp, R., 1999. "Provenance of Cretaceous synorogenic sandstones in the
Eastern Alps: constraints from framework petrography, heavy mineral analysis, and mineral
chemistry. Sediment." Geol., vol. 124, pp. 81111.
46) Bogdanov, Y., A., A., Y. L., Maslennikov, V. V., Syaoli, L., and Ul’yanov, A. A., 2008.
"Mineralogical-geochemical features of sulfide ores from the broken spur hydrothermal vent
field." Oceanology 48, vol. 5, p. 679.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, we conduct a comparative study on the mineralogy and geochemistry of metalliferous sediment collected near the active hydrothermal site (Wocan-1) and inactive hydrothermal site (Wocan-2) from Wocan Hydrothermal Field, on the Carlsberg Ridge (CR), northwest Indian Ocean. We aim to understand the spatial variations in the primary and post-depositional conditions and the intensity of hydrothermal circulations in the Wocan hydrothermal systems. Sediment samples were collected from six stations which includes TVG-07, TVG-08 (Wocan-1), TVG-05, TVG-10 (Wocan-2), TVG-12 and TVG-13 (ridge flanks). The mineralogical investigations show that sediment samples from Wocan-1 and Wocan-2 are composed of chalcopyrite, pyrite, sphalerite, barite, gypsum, amorphous silica, altered volcanic glass, Fe-oxides, and hydroxides. The ridge flank sediments are dominated by biogenic calcite and foraminifera assemblages. The bulk sediment samples of Wocan-1 have an elevated Fe/Mn ratio (up to ~1545), with lower U contents (<7.4 ppm) and U/Fe ratio (<~1.8 × 10 −5). The sulfide separates (chalcopyrite, pyrite, and sphalerite) are enriched in Se, Co, As, Sb, and Pb. The calculated sphalerite precipitation temperature (Sph.PT) yields ~278 • C. The sulfur isotope (δ 34 S) analysis returned a light value of 3.0-3.6. The bulk sediment samples of Wocan-2 have a lower Fe/Mn ratio (<~523), with high U contents (up to 19.6 ppm) and U/Fe ratio (up to ~6.2 × 10 −5). The sulfide separates are enriched in Zn, Cu, Tl, and Sn. The calculated Sph.PT is ~233 • C. The δ 34 S returned significant values of 4.1-4.3and 6.4-8.7in stations TVG-10 and TVG-05, respectively. The geochemical signatures (e.g., Fe/Mn and U/Fe ratio, mineral chemistry of sulfides separates, and S-isotopes and Sph.PT) suggest that sediment samples from Wocan-1 are located near intermediate-high temperature hydrothermal discharge environments. Additionally, relatively low δ 34 S values exhibit a lower proportion (less than 20%) of seawater-derived components. The geochemical signatures suggest that sediment samples from Wocan-2 has undergone moderate-extensive oxidation and secondary alterations by seawater in a low-intermediate temperature hydrothermal environments. Additionally, the significant δ 34 S values of station TVG-05 exhibit a higher estimated proportion (up to 41%) of seawater-derived components. Our results showed pervasive hydrothermal contributions into station TVG-08 relative to TVG-07, it further showed the increased process of seafloor weathering at TVG-05 relative to TVG-10.
Article
Full-text available
To reconstruct the evolution of ore-forming fluids and determine the physicochemical conditions of deposition associated with seafloor massive sulfides, we must better understand the sources of rare earth elements (REEs), the factors that affect the REE abundance in the sulfides, and the REE flux from hydrothermal fluids to the sulfides. Here, we examine the REE profiles of 46 massive sulfide samples collected from seven seafloor hydrothermal systems. These profiles feature variable total REE concentrations (37.2–4,092 ppb) and REE distribution patterns (LaCN/LuCN ratios = 2.00–73.8; (Eu/Eu*)CN ratios = 0.34–7.60). The majority of the REE distribution patterns in the sulfides are similar to those of vent fluids, with the sulfides also exhibiting light REE enrichment. We demonstrate that the variable REE concentrations, Eu anomalies, and fractionation between light REEs and heavy REEs in the sulfides exhibit a relationship with the REE properties of the sulfide-forming fluids and the massive sulfide chemistry. Based on the sulfide REE data, we estimate that modern seafloor sulfide deposits contain approximately 280 tons of REEs. According to the flux of hydrothermal fluids at mid-ocean ridges (MORs) and an average REE concentration of 3 ng/g in these fluids, hydrothermal vents at MORs alone transport more REEs (>360 tons) to the oceans over the course of just two years than the total quantity of REEs in seafloor sulfides. The excess REEs (i.e., the quantity not captured by massive sulfides) may be transported away from the systems and become bound in sulfate deposits and metalliferous sediments. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
The fluids found in sulfide-producing hydrothermal vents are rich in ore-forming elements. These elements usually precipitate as solid particles that are dispersed by the plumes and deposited as sediments around the hydrothermal field. To assess how the geochemical features of such sediments may be used in seafloor sulfide exploration, this study analyzed the surface sediment geochemistry in the Dragon Horn area on the Southwest Indian Ridge. The results indicate that the sediments are mainly composed of pelagic material, basalt and ultramafic debris, (Mn,Fe) oxyhydroxides and Mn oxides, hydrothermal components. The debris content in this area is lower than that in sediments found at fast- and medium-spreading mid-ocean ridges, with relatively high amounts of ultramafic components, indicating that ultramafic rock outcrops are present in the study area. Precipitated hydrothermal elements in the sediments exhibit zonation in the spatial distributions of Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn. The sediments proximal to the hydrothermal field display high Cu, Zn, and Fe contents and low Mn contents. Hydrothermal Cu and Zn phases occurred within a limited range of the hydrothermal field, and Zn was found to precipitate earlier than Cu during dispersal from the plume. Hydrothermal Fe distributed similarly with Cu spatially but with a larger dispersion distance. Hydrothermal Mn was able to migrate beyond the ridge valley to precipitate in the ridge flank sediments. Two hydrothermal Cu and Zn anomalies were identified on the south ridge flanks, which suggest the presence of undiscovered hydrothermal field. The sediments in the study area are additionally characterized by relatively low Mn contents and high Fe/Mn molar ratios. The relatively reducing environment of the plume may facilitate the migration of hydrothermal Mn over large distances, which probably accounts for the lower Mn contents in the sediments. The Cu-Cu/Fe molar ratio model was proposed to identify mafic- and ultramafic-related hydrothermal field. The low Cu/Fe molar ratios and REE characteristics of the sediments suggest that ultramafic rocks are likely not the only source of the ore-forming element for hydrothermal mineralization. Low-temperature diffuse flow on the ridge flanks of the study area probably results from serpentinization of ultramafic rocks.
Article
30 sediments grabbed from 24 sites between the equator and 10°N along the Carlsberg Ridge (CR) in the northwest Indian Ocean has been analyzed for bulk chemical compositions. Hydrothermal components in the sediments are identified and characterized. They mainly occur at 6.3°N as sulfide debris and at 3.6°N as both sulfide and high temperature water-rock interaction products. The enrichment of chalcophile elements such as Zn, Cu, Pb and the depletion of alkalis metals such as K and Rb are the typical features of hydrothermal components. High U/Fe, low (Nd/Yb)N and negative Ce anomaly infer the uptake of seawater in the hydrothermal deposits by oxidizing after deposition. However, the general enrichment of Mn in hydrothermal plumed-derived materials is not found in the sediments, which may indicate the limited diffusion of fluids or plumes, at least in the direction along the Carlsberg spreading center. The hydrothermal components show their similarity to the hydrothermal deposits from the Indian Ocean Ridge. At 3.6°N ultramafic rocks or gabbroic intrusions, may be involved in the hydrothermal system.
Article
The monograph describes the distribution, composition and accumulation rates of recent and ancient metalliferous sediments and their components in the oceans and the Red Sea. The processes influencing the formation of composition of metal-bearing matter of the metalliferous sediments, from hydrothermal effluence to accumulation on the ocean floor, are considered, and known patterns in distribution of chemical element contents in the metalliferous sediments are explained. The influence of various natural factors on the formation of metalliferous strata is shown quantitatively. Metalliferous sediments allow the reconstruction of the intensity and position of past hydrothermal activity and associated mineral formation in the ocean. Furthermore, the most probable positions of buried hydrothermal accumulations are reconstructed. The book is aimed at geologists, ore geologists, marine geologists and geochemists, oceanographers including paleo-ceanographers, as well as at undergraduate and graduate students. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006. All rights are reserved.
Article
The relative and absolute concentrations of rare earth elements (REE) in authigenic and biogenic phases of deep-sea sediments are quite different. Competition between these phases for REE has resulted in fractionation from the parent material, the latter consisting predominantly of terrigenous material, but with a contribution from marine volcanism. The strongest feature of this fractionation is a depletion of Ce, relative to La, in CaCO3, opalline silica, phillipsite, phosphorite, barite, and montmorillonitic clays; and a Ce enrichment in Fe/Mn nodules. The distribution of REE in different masses of seawater strongly reflects their fractionation in sediments. Whereas the relative concentration of REE in rivers resembles that of shale, their removal from seawater by authigenic and biogenic phases results in: (1) a decrease of their total concentration; (2) a depletion of Ce; and (3) an enrichment of heavy REE relative to light REE. The order of fractionation for water masses in the Atlantic Ocean is:Antarctic intermediate water > North Atlantic deep water > Antarctic bottom water> shelf water > river water ∼ shale.The shale-normalized pattern for the sum of REE in the authigenic and biogenic phases of pelagic sediment and in seawater resembles that of an admixture of shale and basalt corresponding presumably to the realtive inputs from continents and marine volcanism respectively. The estimated rate of accumulation of each REE in the sediment, however, is approximately 12 times the estimated rate of input of REE from these two sources.
Article
Many heavy mineral species show significant variations in composition that are related to the conditions under which their parent rocks were formed. Thus, as well as giving greater confidence in identification, geochemical analysis of detrital minerals adds precision to the evaluation of the relative contributions of potential source lithologies. Furthermore, by concentrating on stable minerals, geochemical studies avoid, or at least minimize, the problems caused by diagenetic and hydraulic processes. -from Author