A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Journal of Chemical Ecology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Racemic Pheromone Blends Disrupt Mate Location in the Invasive
Swede Midge, Contarinia nasturtii
Elisabeth A. Hodgdon
1
&Rebecca H. Hallett
2
&Kimberly F. Wallin
3,4
&Chase A. Stratton
1
&Yolanda H. Chen
1
Received: 5 February 2019 /Revised: 4 May 2019 /Accepted: 28 May 2019 /Published online: 22 June 2019
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019
Abstract
Swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii Kieffer, is an invasive cecidomyiid pest that causes serious losses of Brassica oilseed and
vegetable crops in the Northeastern U.S. and Canada. Currently, few alternatives to systemic insecticides exist for its manage-
ment. Because a single feeding larva can render heading Brassica crops unmarketable, management strategies that prevent
oviposition are needed urgently. Pheromone-mediated mating disruption is a promising management approach for swede midge
because it prevents mating and subsequent crop damage.While the swede midge pheromone has been identified, one of the major
barriers to using it in mating disruption is the high cost of synthesis. Racemic blends, consisting of natural and non-natural
stereoisomers, could be useful for mating disruption because they are cheaper to produce. However, it is not clear whether
racemic pheromone blends attract males and/or prevent them from locating and mating with females. Here, we studied the
behavior of male swede midge in Y-tube and wind tunnel bioassays to pheromone blends. Specifically, we tested whether males:
(1) are attracted to different doses of pheromone, (2) discriminate between blends comprising natural stereospecific or racemic
components, or a combination thereof, and (3) are able to locate and copulate with females in pheromone-permeated olfactom-
eters. We found that picogram amounts of pheromone attracted males and prevented them from locating females in y-tube
olfactometers. While males were more attracted to stereospecific blends, compared to racemic blends, all blends tested prevented
nearly all males mating with females. Therefore, low dose racemic blends may be promising for pheromone-mediated mating
disruption.
Keywords Pheromone .Mating disruption .Vegetable pest management .Reproduction .Swede midge .Cecidomyiidae
Introduction
Contarinia nasturtii Kieffer (swede midge; Diptera:
Cecidomyiidae) is a small galling fly that is a serious pest of
Brassica spp. (Brassicaceae) vegetable and oilseed crops in
Europe, Eastern Canada and the Northeastern USA (Chen et al.
2011; Hallett and Heal 2001). Larvae feed within the plant mer-
istem, causing deformed and scarred leaves and stems and, in
severe cases, can cause complete loss of heads of broccoli, cau-
liflower, cabbage, and other related Brassica crops. Recently,
vegetable growers in the US states of New York and Vermont
reported up to 100% yield loss of organic kale and broccoli (Y.
Chen, C. Hoepting, pers. comm.). No insecticides that are ap-
proved for certified-organic production are effective in control-
ling the midge (Evans and Hallett 2016;Seamanetal.2014).
Due to the severe economic losses inflicted by this pest, some
small, diversified organic growers in the region now avoid
Brassica production entirely (Y. Chen, pers. obs.).
Several aspects of swede midge biology create difficulty man-
aging this pest. The presence of multiple overlapping generations
and prolonged crop susceptibility to damage necessitates protec-
tion throughout the growing season (Hallett et al. 2009; Stratton
et al. 2018). Further, larvae are protected from foliar insecticides
within the meristem (Wu et al. 2006). Compounding these chal-
lenges is an extremely low damage threshold for vegetables. For
example, Stratton et al. (2018) found that a single larva can
render a cauliflower plant unmarketable. While some growers
use calendar sprays of conventional insecticides to manage
*Elisabeth A. Hodgdon
elisabeth.hodgdon@gmail.com
1
Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, 63
Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT 05405, USA
2
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone
Rd. East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
3
Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, 81
Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT 05405, USA
4
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northern
Research Station, 707 Spear St., South Burlington, VT 05403, USA
Journal of Chemical Ecology (2019) 45:549–558
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-019-01078-0
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.