Bioavailability of Different Vitamin D Oral Supplements in Laboratory Animal Model

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The major cause of vitamin D deficiency is inadequate exposure to sunlight. It is difficult to supplement it with food because sufficient concentrations of vitamin D naturally occur only in a handful of food products. Thereby, deficiency of this vitamin is commonly corrected with oral supplements. Different supplement delivery systems for improved vitamin D stability and bioavailability are proposed. In this study, we compared efficiency of three vitamin D delivery systems: microencapsulated, micellized, and oil-based. Materials and Methods: As a model in this medical testing, laboratory rats were used for the evaluation of bioavailability of different vitamin D vehicles. Animals were divided into three groups: the first one was given microencapsulated vitamin D3, the second—oil-based vitamin D3, and the third—micellized vitamin D3. Test substances were given per os to each animal for 7 days, and vitamin D concentration in a form of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) in the blood was checked both during the vitamin delivery period and later, up to the 24th day. Results: Comparison of all three tested products showed that the microencapsulated and oil-based vitamin D3 vehicles were the most bioavailable in comparison to micellized vitamin D3. Even more, the effect of the microencapsulated form of vitamin D3 remained constant for the longest period (up to 14 days). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the oral vitamin D supplement vehicle has an impact on its bioavailability, thus it is important to take into account how much of the suppled vitamin D will be absorbed. To maximize the full exploit of supplement, the best delivery strategy should be employed. In our study, the microencapsulated form of vitamin D was the most bioavailable.

Full text

Medicina 2019, 55, 265; doi:10.3390/medicina55060265 www.mdpi.com/journal/medicina
Article
Bioavailability of Different Vitamin D Oral
Supplements in Laboratory Animal Model
Egidijus Šimoliūnas
1
, Ieva Rinkūnaitė
1
, Živilė Bukelskienė
2
and Virginija Bukelskienė
1,
*
1
Institute of Biochemistry, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, LT- 10257 Vilnius, Lithuania;
egidijus.simoliunas@gmc.vu.lt (E.Š.); Ieva.rinkunaite@bchi.vu.lt (I.R.)
2
Public Institution Vilnius Centro Outpatient Clinic, LT-01117 Vilnius, Lithuania; zbukelskiene@gmail.com
* Correspondence: virginija.bukelskiene@bchi.vu.lt; Tel.: +370-5-223-4408
Received: 28 March 2019; Accepted: 03 June 2019; Published: 10 June 2019
Abstract: Background and Objectives: The major cause of vitamin D deficiency is inadequate exposure
to sunlight. It is difficult to supplement it with food because sufficient concentrations of vitamin D
naturally occur only in a handful of food products. Thereby, deficiency of this vitamin is commonly
corrected with oral supplements. Different supplement delivery systems for improved vitamin D
stability and bioavailability are proposed. In this study, we compared efficiency of three vitamin D
delivery systems: microencapsulated, micellized, and oil-based. Materials and Methods: As a model
in this medical testing, laboratory rats were used for the evaluation of bioavailability of different vitamin
D vehicles. Animals were divided into three groups: the first one was given microencapsulated vitamin
D
3
, the second—oil-based vitamin D
3
, and the third—micellized vitamin D
3
. Test substances were given
per os to each animal for 7 days, and vitamin D concentration in a form of 25-hydroxyvitamin D
(25(OH)D) in the blood was checked both during the vitamin delivery period and later, up to the
24th day. Results: Comparison of all three tested products showed that the microencapsulated and
oil-based vitamin D
3
vehicles were the most bioavailable in comparison to micellized vitamin D
3
.
Even more, the effect of the microencapsulated form of vitamin D
3
remained constant for the longest
period (up to 14 days). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the oral vitamin D
supplement vehicle has an impact on its bioavailability, thus it is important to take into account how
much of the suppled vitamin D will be absorbed. To maximize the full exploit of supplement, the
best delivery strategy should be employed. In our study, the microencapsulated form of vitamin D
was the most bioavailable.
Keywords: vitamin D; oral supplements; vehicle; bioavailability; vitamin D deficiency
1. Introduction
Vitamin D deficiency is a global health issue that afflicts more than 1 billion children and adults
worldwide. The vitamin D deficiency has been associated with many acute and chronic illnesses,
including preeclampsia, childhood dental caries, periodontitis, autoimmune disorders, infectious
diseases, cardiovascular diseases, various types of cancer, type 2 diabetes, and neurological disorders
[1]. Although vitamin D can be synthesized upon exposure to sun, inadequate amount of sunlight is
one of the major causes for the pandemic of vitamin D deficiency [2,3]. During sun exposure, 7-
dehydrocholesterol, the immediate precursor in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway, absorbs
ultraviolet B radiation (290–315 nm) resulting in breaking of the bond between carbon 9-carbon 10
atoms to produce pre-vitamin D
3
. Once formed, this thermodynamically unstable second steroid
undergoes a rearrangement of its triene system to form the thermodynamically stable vitamin D
3
,
which is then transported to the liver and converted to 25-hydroxyvitamin D 25(OH)D. This
metabolite then re-enters the circulation and travels to the kidneys, where it is converted to the active

Medicina 2019, 55, 265 2 of 8
form 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, also known as calcitriol—the hormonally active metabolite [4,5]
(Figure 1).
Figure 1. Vitamin D
3
sources, biosynthesis and possible factors affecting absorption. Downward
arrows show factors that are associated with decreased vitamin D absorption and synthesis in the
organism.
Vitamin D can also be obtained from diet, however, very few food products naturally contain a
sufficient amount of vitamin D. Among the richest are the following products: oily fish, in particular
salmon, mackerel, and herring; some mushrooms; cod liver oil; eggs; and dairy products [6,7]. Some
and sometimes substantial amounts of vitamin D (25(OH)D) are present in meat, including beef and
pork [8,9]. By adding 25(OH)D into animal feed, an increased amount of vitamin D
3
in poultry, pork,
and beef can be achieved [10].
Multiple factors might affect vitamin D levels: age, being indoors, dark skin, sunscreen use, and
low cholesterol might impede with vitamin D
3
biosynthesis in skin. Dietary vitamin D
3
bioavailability
is greatly reduced upon gallbladder removal; gastrointestinal diseases, such as Crohn’s; cystic
fibrosis; and celiac disease. Low magnesium intake might lead to an insufficient amount of active
vitamin D
3
as magnesium assists in the activation of vitamin D [11]. Correction of vitamin D
insufficiency is commonly achieved using oral vitamin D supplements. The Endocrine Society
guidelines suggest that daily intake of 1500 to 2000 international units (IU) of vitamin D is necessary
to achieve serum 25(OH)D concentrations consistently >30 ng/mL in adults to prevent vitamin D
deficiency [12,13]. Studies using radiolabeled vitamin D
3
showed that its absorption efficiency varies
between 55% to 99%, however, it does not depend upon fat content consumed with food, yet lipid
composition impacts vitamin D bioavailability [14–16]. Long chain fatty acids interfere with vitamin
D absorption [17]. Absorption efficiency of vitamin D is also increased by supplements in which
vitamin D is placed into micelles, microcapsules, or liposomes. Emulsification of drugs or nutrients
and their insertion into micelles or microcapsules have many benefits: higher stability to aggregation
and gravitational separation; higher optical clarity; protection from degradation, light, and oxidation;
and improved bioavailability of water insoluble and difficultly absorbed compounds [18,19]. These
delivery vehicles protect vitamin D from the environment [18]. Encapsulation mimics naturally
occurring process—during digestion, vitamin D is transferred from its food matrix to the mixed
micelles generated by the lipolysis of dietary fat carried out by bile salts [20]. Enterocytes use SR-BI
(scavenger receptor class B type I), CD36, and NPC1L1 (Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1) membrane
transporters to endocytose these particles. Thus, by packing vitamin D in lipid vesicles, active vitamin
D absorption can be exploited and facilitated. In this research, we tested vitamin D bioavailability
dependence to oral supplement delivery system used—micellar and microencapsulated drug
delivery systems were compared to the standard oil-based preparation.

Medicina 2019, 55, 265 3 of 8
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Test Substances
SmartHit IV™ microencapsulated vitamin D
3
is an oral supplement containing 2000 IU/mL
cholecalciferol and natural lecithin composing microcapsule. It is a water-soluble form of vitamin D
where an active substance is loaded in microcapsules.
Micellized vitamin D
3
is an oral supplement containing 15,000 IU/mL cholecalciferol. It contains
macrogolglycerol ricinoleate—a synthetic, nonionic surfactant that stabilizes emulsions of nonpolar
materials in water. It is a water-soluble form of vitamin D that is encapsulated in nanodispersed
micelles.
Oil-based vitamin D
3
is an oral supplement containing 400 IU/drop cholecalciferol. According to
manufacturers, one drop contains 35 uL of volume. It is an oil-based form of vitamin D.
All the test substances were purchased in the local pharmacy. Their descriptions were obtained
from the pharmaceutical instructions.
2.2. Animals
Wistar rats (7–9 weeks old; Vilnius University; Lithuania; License of Animal Ethics Committee
No G2-47, 30 June 2016) weighing 160–200 g were maintained under standard conditions:
Temperature +22 ± 1 °C, humidity 55 ± 3%, and 12 h/12 h light-dark cycle. They were fed and watered
ad libitum with standard commercial rodent feed JE-83004920 (Joniškio grūdai, Ltd., Joniškis,
Lithuania), watered with tap water.
2.3. Experimental Design
The animal experiment was designed in accordance to the requirements stated in 2010/63/EU
Directive and Order of the Lithuanian State Food and Veterinary Service Director No B1-866; 31
December 2012. All procedures were approved by License of Animal Research Ethics Committee
(Lithuania) No G2-47, 2016-06-30. Rats were randomly divided into 3 groups (6 animals per group)
and singly housed in a cage. Following 3 days after grouping, before giving test substances, from
each rat’s tail vein, 500 μL of blood was taken and blood serum was separated. In this way, the control
level (“0 day”) of each animal’s 25(OH)vitamin D concentration was determined. The first group was
given microencapsulated, the second—oil-based, and the third—micellized vitamin D
3
. Test
substances were given per os to each animal for 7 days each morning. Blood samples were collected
before the daily dosing at the 3rd and 7th day starting from the beginning of the experiment (during
the vitamin D
3
feeding period). From the 8th day, the delivery of the test products was terminated,
but the vitamin D
3
concentration in the blood was checked again at the 14th and 24th day (from the
start of the experiment) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. General experimental design. In experiment, rats were randomly divided into three groups
(n = 6) by supplement given. After baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D 25(OH)D blood test, rats were given
vitamin D
3
supplements for 7 consecutive days. Blood was then drawn at the 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 24th
days of the experiment.

Medicina 2019, 55, 265 4 of 8
2.4. Preparation of Test Substances
The test substances were prepared in such a way that each rat per day received 2000 IU/kg
vitamin D3. Oil-based supplement was diluted in olive oil, micellized vitamin D3 was diluted in tap
water, and SmartHit IV™ microencapsulated form was not diluted and was given as originally
presented.
2.5. Preparation and Analysis of Blood Serum
After collection of whole blood, the samples were left undisturbed at room temperature for 3 h.
Then, the emerging clot was separated from the wall of the tube, and the samples were placed into
the refrigerator (+4 °C). After 18 h, the clot was removed by centrifuging for 15 min at 1500 rpm in a
refrigerated centrifuge. The resulting supernatant was the serum (150–200 μL). It was collected into
clean tubes and immediately used for the determination of vitamin D3 concentration. The amount of
25(OH)D in blood serum was analyzed by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) using
Cobas® 6000 modular analyzer (Roche, Indianapolis, USA).
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was performed using the RStudio statistical analysis program (version 1.1.453).
Differences between the levels of vitamin D in animal blood serum on the respective day of the study
were evaluated by a single factor ANOVA. The vitamin D bioavailability was assessed by calculation
of area under the curve (AUC) method. Obtained significant differences were identified using Tukey
LSD post hoc test. Data were considered statistically significantly different if p < 0.05. The data are
shown by boxplot and dotted graphs. Statistically significant differences in the graphs are marked
with asterisks (*); *—when p < 0.05, **—when p < 0.01.
3. Results
According to our data, amounts of vitamin D3 increased in the blood serum of all treated animal
groups in proportion to time, during vitamin supplementation, until the 7th day (Figure 3). As early
as after 3 days of supplementation, microencapsulated and oil-based vitamin D3 increased vitamin
levels in the blood by almost three times: The control level of vitamin D3 in the rat serum ranged from
36.49 ± 4.12 to 40.5 ± 3.05 nmol/L, meanwhile in the microencapsulated and oil-based treatment
groups it got up to 143.35 ± 14.72 and 150.85 ± 35.77 nmol/L, respectively. The highest vitamin D3
concentration in the rat blood serum was registered in the oil-based vitamin D3 group on day 7—the
tested vitamin concentration reached 198.93 ± 51.6 nmol/L. Comparing the duration of the effect of
all vitamin vehicles, microencapsulated SmartHit IV™ supplementation vitamin D3 concentrations
in the blood serum remained constant for the longest time (up to the 14th day).

Medicina 2019, 55, 265 5 of 8
Figure 3. Vitamin D
3
concentration in rat blood serum during 24 days of experiment: rats were
divided into three groups; from the 1st to 7th day, each rat in the group was orally given 2000
international units (IU)/kg vitamin D
3
presented in different forms: microencapsulated SmartHit IV™,
oil-based, and micellized.
AUC analysis confirmed that the least bioavailable delivery system was micellized vitamin D
3
.
It was absorbed almost twice as inefficiently in comparison to microencapsulated vitamin D
3
(Table
1). Additionally, the fat-soluble form of vitamin D
3
was also more bioavailable to rats than micellized
vitamin D
3
. Vitamin D
3
packed in microcapsules was the most bioavailable.
Table 1. Area under the curve pharmacokinetics
Group AUC AUC
x
/AUC
Oil-based
C
Max
Vitamin D
Concentration in Blood
Serum, nmol/L
Day of Maximum
Concentration of
Vitamin D
SmartHit IV™ 2651.00 1.24 335.4 7
Oil-based vitamin D
3
2135.60 1.00 236.1 7
Micellized vitamin D
3
1378.45 0.65 216.4 7
4. Discussion
Vitamin D has the unique property of being synthesized in the skin from the exposure to
sunlight. However, in Northern regions, due to the lack of sunlight, vitamin D deficiency is
widespread among children and adults [2,5,7,10]. This is further worsened by the insufficient vitamin
D-rich food consumption [9,10]. Thus, correction of vitamin D deficiency is commonly achieved using
oral vitamin D supplements [12]. Vitamin D is a fat-soluble molecule, which when ingested, dissolves
in dietary fat, is emulsified by the bile salts, and is absorbed by intestinal enterocytes. The absorption
efficiency or bioavailability depends on lipid composition and food supplement vehicle. Therefore,
there has been an increased interest in optimizing supplementation strategies, especially in
populations at risk of vitamin D insufficiency, such as the elderly; obese individuals; and people with
certain chronic diseases, such as Crohn’s or chronic kidney disease [21,22]. Usually, water-insoluble
nutrients are dissolved in lipid-based solvents. Commercially available solubilized oral formulations
include various natural oils: peanut, corn, soybean, sesame, olive [23]. A systematic review on
vitamin D supplement bioavailability showed that oil-soluble vehicles produce greater increase of
25(OH)D in blood serum when compared to powder- and ethanol-based supplements [24].
Some substances, such as microemulsions, microcapsules, liposomes, and micelle-forming
compounds are used to further improve absorption efficiency of fat-soluble vitamins. Micellization
is a delivery system of fat-soluble nutrients that are micronized into water-soluble micellar spheres

Medicina 2019, 55, 265 6 of 8
using surfactants, such as Polysorbate 80 (also known as Tween 80), citric acid monoglyceride esters,
and polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400). Surfactants self-assemble and form micelles once the
surfactant monomer concentration reaches the critical micelle concentration—a concentration of a
surfactant in a bulk phase, above which micelles start to form. Vitamin D3 used in this study was
micellized using macrogolglycerol ricinoleate, also known as Cremophor EL, which is a synthetic,
non-ionic surfactant used to emulsify and solubilize water-insoluble materials in water [23,25].
Supplement manufacturers recommend using their supplements with food or beverages. Micellized
product contains macrogolglycerol ricinoleate, which ensures micelle stability in water, according to
the supplement leaflet. Micelles must be stable enough to not release a cargo upon oral or systemic
administration and must remain intact long enough to transport nutrients or drugs to the target site.
SmartHit IV™ vitamin D3 microcapsules are composed of natural phospholipid bilayer that
encapsulates a fraction of the surrounding aqueous medium. Due to biphasic nature, microcapsules
can contain both lipid-soluble and water-soluble components. Microcapsules protect the nutrients
from degradation in acidic pH found in the stomach (pH 1.4–4.0), and in turn encapsulated
substances tend to stay inside the microcapsules and thus do not cause stomach irritation [26].
Nutrients that are sensitive to oxygen and sunlight are protected due to microencapsulation
technology. Most importantly, microcapsules improve the absorption and bioavailability of nutrients
up to five times in comparison to their free counterparts [27]. In this study, we compared three
different vehicles—microcapsules, micelles, and lipids. Rats were able to absorb 25% more vitamin
D that was microencapsulated in comparison to the most commonly used oil-based supplementation.
Although some studies show micellar nutrients to be absorbed better than their oil-based, liposomal,
or ethanol dissolved counterparts [24,28], in our study, rats were able to absorb only about 65% of
vitamin D in comparison to the oil-based vehicle, and it also was almost two times less bioavailable
compared to SmartHit IV™ microcapsules.
This pre-clinical in vivo research laid basis for clinical study on human volunteers with vitamin
D deficiency, which would be conducted in the near future. Currently, using animal models is the
best choice for quick comparison of the efficiency of different vitamin D vehicles. It is known that rats
and humans share a majority of their biochemical capabilities at the genome level, which gives an
important role for rats by considering them as a model organism for understanding human biology
and diseases. In terms of the expressions of vitamin D-metabolizing enzymes and vitamin D receptors
in rats, it should be noted that they are similar to those in humans [29]. However, despite an extremely
small number of species-specific differences at the genome level, individual differences at the gene-
level can alter some functions. Therefore, the results of this research provided the basis for further
studies involving human volunteers with vitamin D deficiency.
5. Conclusions
Comparison of three tested products showed that the microencapsulated and oil-based vitamin
D3 supplement delivery systems could be characterized by their better bioavailability in comparison
to micellized vitamin D3. Further, the effect of microcapsulated vitamin D supplement remained
constant for the longest time, even for seven days after supplementation, showing its prolonged
effect. Although all the tested products have increased vitamin D concentration in rats’ blood serum
significantly and could be used to treat or prevent vitamin D deficiency, the most efficient was
SmartHit IV™ microcapsulated vitamin D3 supplement.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, E.Š. and V.B.; methodology, I.R.; software, E.Š.; validation, Ž.B. and
V.B.; formal analysis, E.Š.; investigation, E.Š., V.B. and I.R.; resources, E.Š.; data curation, E.Š. and I.R.; writing—
original draft preparation, E.Š.; writing—review and editing, V.B. and Ž.B.; visualization, E.Š.; supervision, Ž.B.
and V.B.; project administration, V.B.; funding acquisition, V.B.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Dr. Simona Steponkienė for the insights and comments
concerning vitamin D metabolism.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Medicina 2019, 55, 265 7 of 8
References
1. Holick, M.F. The Vitamin D Deficiency Pandemic: Approaches for Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention.
Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2017, 18, 153–165. doi:10.1007/s11154-017-9424-1.
2. Wacker, M.; Holick, M.F. Sunlight and Vitamin D. Dermato-Endocrinology 2013, 5, 51–108.
doi:10.4161/derm.24494.
3. Holick, M.F. Biological Effects of Sunlight, Ultraviolet Radiation, Visible Light, Infrared Radiation and
Vitamin D for Health. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 1345–1356.
4. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D Deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 266–281. doi:10.1056/NEJMra070553.
5. Hossein-nezhad, A.; Holick, M.F. Vitamin D for Health: A Global Perspective. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2013, 88,
720–755. doi:10.1016/J.MAYOCP.2013.05.011.
6. Ross, A.C.; Manson, J.E.; Abrams, S.A.; Aloia, J.F.; Brannon, P.M.; Clinton, S.K.; Durazo-Arvizu, R.A.;
Gallagher, J.C.; Gallo, R.L.; Jones, G.; et al. The 2011 Report on Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and
Vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: What Clinicians Need to Know. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011,
96, 53–58. doi:10.1210/jc.2010-2704.
7. Poskitt, E.M.; Cole, T.J.; Lawson, D.E. Diet, Sunlight, and 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D in Healthy Children and
Adults. Br. Med. J. 1979, 1, 221–223. doi:10.1136/BMJ.1.6158.221.
8. Heaney, R.P.; Armas, L.A.G.; French, C. All-Source Basal Vitamin D Inputs Are Greater Than Previously
Thought and Cutaneous Inputs Are Smaller. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 571–575. doi:10.3945/jn.112.168641.
9. Crowe, F.L.; Steur, M.; Allen, N.E.; Appleby, P.N.; Travis, R.C.; Key, T.J. Plasma Concentrations of 25-
Hydroxyvitamin D in Meat Eaters, Fish Eaters, Vegetarians and Vegans: Results from the EPIC–Oxford
Study. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 340–346. doi:10.1017/S1368980010002454.
10. Schmid, A.; Walther, B. Natural Vitamin D Content in Animal Products. Adv. Nutr. 2013, 4, 453–462.
doi:10.3945/an.113.003780.
11. Uwitonze, A.M.; Razzaque, M.S. Role of Magnesium in Vitamin D Activation and Function. J. Am.
Osteopath. Assoc. 2018, 118, 181–189. doi:10.7556/jaoa.2018.037.
12. Holick, M.F.; Binkley, N.C.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Gordon, C.M.; Hanley, D.A.; Heaney, R.P.; Murad, M.H.;
Weaver, C.M. Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency: An Endocrine Society
Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 1911–1930. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0385.
13. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
14. Davies, M.; Mawer, E.B.; Krawitt, E.L. Comparative Absorption of Vitamin D3 and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3
in Intestinal Disease. Gut 1980, 21, 287–292.
15. Wagner, D.; Sidhom, G.; Whiting, S.J.; Rousseau, D.; Vieth, R. The Bioavailability of Vitamin D from
Fortified Cheeses and Supplements is Equivalent in Adults. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 1365–1371.
doi:10.1093/jn/138.7.1365.
16. Goncalves, A.; Gleize, B.; Roi, S.; Nowicki, M.; Dhaussy, A.; Huertas, A.; Amiot, M.-J.; Reboul, E. Fatty
Acids Affect Micellar Properties and Modulate Vitamin D Uptake and Basolateral Efflux in Caco-2 Cells. J.
Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 1751–1757. doi:10.1016/J.JNUTBIO.2013.03.004.
17. Kanicky, J.R.; Shah, D.O. Effect of Degree, Type, and Position of Unsaturation on the PKa of Long-Chain
Fatty Acids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 256, 201–207. doi:10.1006/JCIS.2001.8009.
18. Joye, I.J.; Davidov-Pardo, G.; McClements, D.J. Nanotechnology for Increased Micronutrient
Bioavailability. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 40, 168–182. doi:10.1016/J.TIFS.2014.08.006.
19. Fox, C.B.; Kim, J.; Le, L.V.; Nemeth, C.L.; Chirra, H.D.; Desai, T.A. Micro/Nanofabricated Platforms for Oral
Drug Delivery. J. Control. Release 2015, 219, 431–444. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.033.
20. Rautureau, M.; Rambaud, J.C. Aqueous Solubilisation of Vitamin D3 in Normal Man. Gut 1981, 22, 393–
397.
21. Dawson-Hughes, B. Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Functional Outcomes in the Elderly. Am. J. Clin.
Nutr. 2008, 88, 537S–540S. doi:10.1093/ajcn/88.2.537S.
22. Lenders, C.M.; Feldman, H.A.; Von Scheven, E.; Merewood, A.; Sweeney, C.; Wilson, D.M.; Lee, P.D.K.;
Abrams, S.H.; Gitelman, S.E.; Wertz, M.S.; et al. Relation of Body Fat Indexes to Vitamin D Status and
Deficiency among Obese Adolescents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 90, 459–467. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27275.
23. Strickley, R.G. Solubilizing Excipients in Oral and Injectable Formulations. Pharm. Res. 2004, 21, 201–230.
doi:10.1023/B:PHAM.0000016235.32639.23.
24. Grossmann, R.E.; Tangpricha, V. Evaluation of Vehicle Substances on Vitamin D Bioavailability: A
Systematic Review. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 1055–1061. doi:10.1002/mnfr.200900578.

Medicina 2019, 55, 265 8 of 8
25. Gelderblom, H.; Verweij, J.; Nooter, K.; Sparreboom, A. Cremophor EL: The Drawbacks and Advantages
of Vehicle Selection for Drug Formulation. Eur. J. Cancer 2001, 37, 1590–1598. doi:10.1016/S0959-
8049(01)00171-X.
26. Aisha, A.F.; Majid, A.M.S.; Ismail, Z. Preparation and Characterization of Nano Liposomes of Orthosiphon
Stamineus Ethanolic Extract in Soybean Phospholipids. BMC Biotechnol. 2014, 14, 23. doi:10.1186/1472-6750-
14-23.
27. Takahashi, M.; Uechi, S.; Takara, K.; Asikin, Y.; Wada, K. Evaluation of an Oral Carrier System in Rats:
Bioavailability and Antioxidant Properties of Liposome-Encapsulated Curcumin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009,
57, 9141–9146. doi:10.1021/jf9013923.
28. Lopes, C.M.; Martins-Lopes, P.; Souto, E.B. Nanoparticulate Carriers (NPC) for Oral Pharmaceutics and
Nutraceutics. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 65, 75–82. doi:10.1691/ph.2010.9338.
29. Rahman, A.; Al-Awadi, A.A.; Khan, K.M. Lead Affects Vitamin D Metabolism in Rats. Nutrients 2018, 10,
264. doi:10.3390/nu10030264.
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open
access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative
Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).