ArticlePublisher preview available

The Fear of Immigrants

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

The presence and growing visibility of racial minority immigrants in the United States and across the globe has triggered a sense of collective anxiety, where dissociative defenses maintain emotional distance and identification with groups perceived to be threatening. Fringe movements and mainstream political parties have framed immigrants and refugees as the major cause of unemployment, crime, and a threat to their cultural and social fabric. Recent policies in the United States, such as those resulting in heightened policing of Black and Brown people and deportation of undocumented immigrants and separation of children from parents, have made explicit the connection between racism and xenophobia. These macrolevel policies and the broader xenophobic and racist sociopolitical climate in which they are implemented have important implications for intrapsychic life and interpersonal relationships. This paper explores psychoanalytic perspectives on the roots of xenophobia, racialized defenses, and their implications for the experiences of racial minority immigrants in the United States. The paper further addresses how the fear of immigrants reflects anxiety in multiple dimensions, involving not only fears of the receiving context or the host country, but also the xenophobia that immigrants carry with them from their countries of origin. The implications of xenophobia and racism are explored in the context of the therapeutic relationship, where the client and the therapist engage in difficult and emotionally charged ways with respect to the current sociopolitical climate. Clinical examples are provided to illustrate transference and countertransference dynamics, and related dilemmas centered on xenophobia and racism that arise in psychoanalytic psychotherapy.
The Fear of Immigrants
Pratyusha Tummala-Narra, PhD
Boston College
The presence and growing visibility of racial minority immigrants in the United States and across the
globe has triggered a sense of collective anxiety, where dissociative defenses maintain emotional distance
and identification with groups perceived to be threatening. Fringe movements and mainstream political
parties have framed immigrants and refugees as the major cause of unemployment, crime, and a threat
to their cultural and social fabric. Recent policies in the United States, such as those resulting in
heightened policing of Black and Brown people and deportation of undocumented immigrants and
separation of children from parents, have made explicit the connection between racism and xenophobia.
These macrolevel policies and the broader xenophobic and racist sociopolitical climate in which they are
implemented have important implications for intrapsychic life and interpersonal relationships. This paper
explores psychoanalytic perspectives on the roots of xenophobia, racialized defenses, and their impli-
cations for the experiences of racial minority immigrants in the United States. The paper further addresses
how the fear of immigrants reflects anxiety in multiple dimensions, involving not only fears of the
receiving context or the host country, but also the xenophobia that immigrants carry with them from their
countries of origin. The implications of xenophobia and racism are explored in the context of the
therapeutic relationship, where the client and the therapist engage in difficult and emotionally charged
ways with respect to the current sociopolitical climate. Clinical examples are provided to illustrate
transference and countertransference dynamics, and related dilemmas centered on xenophobia and racism
that arise in psychoanalytic psychotherapy.
Keywords: xenophobia, racism, immigrants, racial minorities, sociopolitical climate
Xenophobia has been defined as the “fear and hatred of strang-
ers or foreigners or of anything that is strange or foreign,” that is
connected to nationalism and ethnocentrism, or the belief that a
certain nation, state, or community is superior to others (Merriam-
Webster Online Dictionary, n.d.;Yakushko, 2009). Studies con-
cerning majority groups’ contact with immigrants suggest that the
presence of larger numbers of immigrants is associated with fewer
xenophobic attitudes within local contexts, but in broader state and
national contexts, a greater presence of immigrants can exacerbate
xenophobia, due to increased perceptions of threat (Jolly & DiGi-
usto, 2014). In the United States and in other parts of the world the
presence and growing visibility of racial minority immigrants have
triggered a sense of collective anxiety, where dissociative defenses
maintain emotional distance and identification with groups per-
ceived to be threatening (Ainslie, 2009a;Bromberg, 2010).
Rather than carrying a neutral position, xenophobia carries
“discriminatory potential” (Watts, 1996, p. 97) that is linked with
economic, social, and political instability and the perception of
loss of resources (Yakushko, 2009). Importantly, xenophobia is
experienced in intrapsychic life and in interpersonal encounters in
ways that have become increasingly problematic in many parts of
the world, including the United States. This paper explores how
the fear of immigrants reflects anxiety within multiple dimensions.
Specifically, xenophobia involves not only the fears of majority
groups within the receiving context or the host country, but also
fears that immigrants carry with them from their countries of
origin. It further reflects the inevitable loss and disappointment,
traumatic stress, and shifts in identity produced in an immigrant’s
adjustment to living in the new, adoptive country. While the
problems of xenophobia and racism are longstanding and have
always been relevant to the experiences of clients and therapists, it
is critical to better understand the ways in which they manifest in
contemporary U.S. context, as explicit forms of anti-immigrant
sentiment and racist acts increasingly impact the intrapsychic and
interpersonal lives of racial minority immigrants and the broader
social fabric of the United States. This paper examines particular
manifestations of present-day xenophobia and its connection to
racism in the United States, the effects of xenophobia and racism
on the lives of racial minority immigrants, and how psychoanalytic
perspectives can facilitate an understanding of xenophobia in
psychotherapy. Clinical case vignettes offer illustrations of the
ways in which xenophobia and racism pose dilemmas for the client
and therapist in the therapeutic process.
Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy in the Present
Sociopolitical Climate
Many therapists today are struggling with how to address mul-
tiple forms of social injustice, sociocultural trauma, and political
polarization in the United States. Solomonov and Barber (2018),in
a recent study, examined the effects of the U.S. presidential elec-
This article was published Online First May 9, 2019.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Pratyusha
Tummala-Narra, PhD, Department of Counseling, Developmental and
Educational Psychology, Boston College, 319 Campion Hall, 140 Com-
monwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467. E-mail: tummalan@bc.edu
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Psychoanalytic Psychology
© 2019 American Psychological Association 2020, Vol. 37, No. 1, 50– 61
0736-9735/20/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pap0000245
50
... Deportations reached record highs under the Obama administration (432,281 in 2013) and remained elevated under the Trump administration (337,287 in 2018;Gramlich, 2020). Additionally, persistently high rates of racism and discrimination have been directed toward immigrants and particularly toward immigrants who have darker skin tones and limited English language skills (American Psychological Association, 2012; Lopez et al., 2010;Tummala-Narra, 2020). Several researchers have suggested that the nation's deportation efforts are racialized as evidenced by a disproportionate amount of Latinos targeted (e.g., Yoshikawa et al., 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: This study reports on the psychometric properties of a new instrument to assess family fear of deportation in two versions (binary and polytomous response options). Background: The impact of fear of deportation extends beyond foreign-born youth to U.S. citizen children in families with unauthorized members, and negatively affects their academic achievement and their physical, mental, and behavioral health. A measure assessing levels of fear of deportation among youth is lacking. Methods: Participants were first- and second-generation Latino immigrant youth (N = 145 in Study 1 and N = 107 in Study 2). Item response theory (IRT), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), correlation analysis, and reliability tests were used to assess the scale's psychometric properties. Results: The results supported a five-item binary version and a six-item polytomous version of the scale. Both demonstrated excellent model fit, good reliability, and criterion validity. Conclusions: The six-item polytomous version is slightly more parsimonious than the five-item binary version scale, has better internal consistency, and captures a modestly wider range of the construct. The binary version may be preferable for immigrant youth who prefer straightforward response options. Implications: Researchers and practitioners can use either version of the Family Fear of Deportation Scale with confidence to assess deportation-related fear among Latino immigrant youth.
Article
This article reviews the results of a qualitative study of Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC)'s experiences of discrimination in psychoanalytic professional organizations (PPOs) in the USA. The authors used thematic analysis to analyze the transcripts of semi‐structured interviews with n = 10 self‐identified BIPOC with prior experience in PPOs, including psychoanalytically‐oriented graduate programs, psychoanalytic institutes and other training programs, and professional membership organizations across the United States. A key finding is that a significant majority of interviewees ( n = 9) reported experiencing discrimination in these organizations, per their own definitions of the term “discrimination,” and described these experiences in considerable detail. The authors attempt to triangulate the findings of the present study in relation to the findings of the Holmes Commission and other existing literature on BIPOC experiences in psychoanalysis.
Article
Over the past two decades, there have been significant strides towards an improved understanding of race and culture in clinical supervision. Yet, there continues to be less attention directed towards the influence of the contemporary sociocultural context on the lives of supervisees and supervisors. This manuscript explores how race and culture are experienced in supervision amidst ongoing sociocultural traumas and injustice. In particular, I highlight how the key features of psychoanalytic supervision have recently been expanded to include attention to sociocultural dynamics, and then examine how the contemporary sociopolitical context has specific impacts on the lives of supervisees and supervisors. I also underscore the importance of centring the experiences of racial minority supervisees and supervisors, which have remained less visible within scholarship concerning psychodynamic clinical supervision. In an effort to expand prior theorising on racial and cultural dynamics in supervision , I propose further attention to the following areas in psychodynamic supervision: 1) role of unconscious relational processes (e.g. transference, countertransference, and parallel process); 2) the influence of external realities; and 3) the role of vulnerability and humility. The manuscript is a call for a collective mission to integrate race and culture in psychodynamic supervision.
Article
The electoral success of nativist parties in several Western democracies in the last decade surprised many political operators and academics alike, in part due to an insufficient understanding of the confluence of triggers of anti-immigrant sentiments. The extent of knowledge has since improved with notable strides made at the intersection of multiple sources of intolerant attitudes, such as between realistic and symbolic threat, threat perception and belief systems, individual-level and group-level characteristics, and biological and cultural determinants. By contextualizing the literature in the United States, Europe, Canada, and Australia, we highlight region specificity as another consideration for future research. An appreciation for the complex sources of anti-immigrant sentiments should bring a new level of sophistication to diversity management strategies.
Article
Theorizing about the unconscious has been largely based on white, Euro-American notions of the primitive, dismissing the perspectives of nonwhite people and contributing to individual and collective injustice. Importantly, foundational conceptualizations of human development, such as those regarding the concept of dependency, have been shaped through white, Euro-American colonization. This manuscript addresses the complicity of psychoanalysis in colonized narratives of development and the psyche, and the impact of this complicity on racial minorities. It further explores post-colonial perspectives that challenge theoretical assumptions of nonwhite people as dependent and inferior. The process of decolonization in psychoanalysis is examined through recommendations for modifying existing theory, practice, and training.
Article
Full-text available
2011 yılında Suriye’de başlayan iç karışıklıklar ve savaş sonrasında Suriye’den Türkiye’ye göç başlamıştır ve şu an Türkiye’de yaklaşık 3.5 milyon Suriyeli bulunmaktadır. Eğitim sistemi içinde ise büyük oranda Suriyeli öğrenci eğitim görmektedir. Bu çalışmada okul psikolojik danışmanlarının özgecilik ile zenofobi özellikleri arasındaki ilişkide mültecilere karşı hissettikleri duygusal mesafenin aracı rolünün araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda rastgele seçilen 326 okul psikolojik danışmanından veri toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın amacına yönelik olarak yapılan istatistiksel analizler sonucunda özgecilik (bağımsız değişken), zenofobi (bağımlı değişken) ve duygusal mesafe (aracı değişken) arasında anlamlı ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Aracılık analizlerine göre, özgecilik ile zenofobi arasındaki anlamlı ilişki modele duygusal mesafe değişkeni dâhil olunca ortadan kalkmıştır. Bu yüzden modelde duygusal mesafe değişkeni tam aracı role sahiptir.
Article
2011 yılında Suriye’de başlayan iç karışıklıklar ve savaş sonrasında Suriye’den Türkiye’ye göç başlamıştır ve şu an Türkiye’de yaklaşık 3.5 milyon Suriyeli bulunmaktadır. Eğitim sistemi içinde ise büyük oranda Suriyeli öğrenci eğitim görmektedir. Bu çalışmada okul psikolojik danışmanlarının özgecilik ile zenofobi özellikleri arasındaki ilişkide mültecilere karşı hissettikleri duygusal mesafenin aracı rolünün araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda rastgele seçilen 326 okul psikolojik danışmanından veri toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın amacına yönelik olarak yapılan istatistiksel analizler sonucunda özgecilik (bağımsız değişken), zenofobi (bağımlı değişken) ve duygusal mesafe (aracı değişken) arasında anlamlı ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Aracılık analizlerine göre, özgecilik ile zenofobi arasındaki anlamlı ilişki modele duygusal mesafe değişkeni dâhil olunca ortadan kalkmıştır. Bu yüzden modelde duygusal mesafe değişkeni tam aracı role sahiptir.
Article
Full-text available
Immigration is a growing social dynamic in many countries, eliciting a variety of different responses. Proponents of immigration note how the influx of new people into the United States (US) has enhanced the workforce and brought cultural enrichment; others have attributed to immigrants, particularly undocumented, a rise in crime and strains on social services. Consequently, immigrants often contend with discrimination and other unique stressors that increase the likelihood that immigration will be a traumatizing experience. Because scholarly focus on the impact of immigration upon psychological wellbeing typically highlights individual experiences, there is limited attention on the impact on immigrant families, particularly mixed-status families comprised of immigrant parents and children who are US citizens by birth. There is also limited attention on immigrant dynamics in the Southern US. This qualitative, thematic analysis explores the experiences of 71 pairs of Latinx immigrant mothers and their US citizen children, living in the Southern US, utilizing the lens of intergenerational transmission of trauma. Using narrative data taken from trauma assessment instruments, the authors identified the most prevalent themes shared by the mothers and their children as crime victimization, deportation, threats to family health, sexual abuse, and marital conflict.
Article
Full-text available
The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the 2016 United States presidential election and ensuing political climate on patients' experiences in psychotherapy. A sample of 604 self-described Democrat and Republican patients from 50 states participated in the study. Results showed that most therapists disclosed their political stance (explicitly or implicitly) and most patients discussed politics with their therapists. 64% of Clinton supporters and 38% of Trump supporters assumed political similarity with their therapist. Stronger patient-reported alliance levels were found for patients who (a) perceived political similarity; (b) reported implicit therapist political disclosure; and (c) found in-session political discussions helpful. Additionally, Clinton (but not Trump) supporters reported significant pre-post-election decreases in expression of positive emotions and increases in both expression of negative emotions and engagement in discussions about socio-political topics. Our findings suggest that the current political climate infiltrates the therapeutic space and affects therapeutic process and content.
Article
Currently, 15 million Mexican and Central American individuals live in the United States, with this number projected to rise in the next few decades (Lesser & Batalova, 2017; Zong & Batalova, 2017). Research has begun to investigate the impact of the nation’s immigration practices and policies on immigrant Latino/a families and youth. Current immigration policies can create vulnerabilities, including fear and mistrust, discrimination, limited access to services, parent–child separation, and poverty. These experiences increase risk for poor mental health outcomes and may exacerbate prior exposure to traumas in the home country (e.g., violence) and during migration (e.g., extortion). This paper reviews current immigration policies for arriving Mexican and Central American immigrants and links to mental health among documented and undocumented immigrant families and youth. A discussion of positive policies and resources that may mitigate the damaging impact of immigration-related stress is included. Finally, social justice implications for clinicians and researchers are discussed, with culturally sensitive interventions, advocacy, and dissemination of research and policy as primary recommendations.
Article
Communities are "psychic entities" that serve powerful psychological functions for the individuals living within them. They also serve multiple functions, including as a potential space where individuals are "held" and within which individuals "play" in ways akin to Winnicott's formulations regarding how infants "use" the me-not-me zone of experiencing, the potential space created by the gap between symbiotic engagement and the maternal object, in a zone between desire for fusion and fear of disintegrating abandonment. This paper explores the psychic destruction of community and the attempts to reconstruct "usable" community in migration, drawing from Winnicott and other psychoanalytic theorists to help us understand how communities work as psychological spaces and, specifically, to understand the near universal clustering that we see in immigrant communities.
Article
There are many aspects-political, economic, legal, medical, cultural, religious-of the present refugee crisis in Europe. Difficulties at border crossings, settlement programs, life-saving issues, and security measures come to mind immediately, but the refugee crisis also needs to be examined from a psychological angle. This paper outlines psychoanalytic findings on voluntary and forced immigration and human responses to the Other. Change in the twenty-first century is occurring at an unprecedented pace and scale. Globalization, incredible advances in communication technology, fast travel, recourse limitations, terrorist activities, and now the refugee crisis in Europe make psychoanalytic investigation of the Other a necessity.
Article
When a country is engulfed in war, or overrun by a dictator who begins killing, its citizens are forced to flee. In such situations, the only compassionate response is to take people in. With the ongoing mass migration to Europe, these refugees pay smugglers to take them to safety, but there is no safe place to go since nobody wants them. They leave in a rush to save their lives and their families due to political and religious fear, death threats, rape of women, or forced labor. They do not have time to mourn the losses, there is no time for "ideal migration" where destination countries can choose whom they will take in. The initial hope and dream to escape to a safe "haven" is transformed into a nightmare of humiliation and fear. These asylum seekers will be or already are suffering from PTSD due to massive psychic trauma.
Article
After the so-called refugee crisis of 2015–2016 European reactions to foreigners had come to the fore and we are seeing xenophobic political and populist movements become increasingly mainstream. The massive rejection of refugees/asylum seekers taking place has made their conditions before, during and after flight, increasingly difficult and dangerous. This paper relates current xenophobia to historical attitudinal trends in Europe regarding Islam, and claims that a much more basic conflict is at work: the one between anti-modernism/traditionalism and modernism/globalization. Narratives on refugees often relate them to both the foreign (Islam) and to “trauma”. In an environment of insecurity and collective anxiety, refugees may represent something alien and frightening but also fascinating. I will argue that current concepts and theories about “trauma” or “the person with trauma” are insufficient to understand the complexity of the refugee predicament. Due to individual and collective countertransference reactions, the word “trauma” tends to lose its theoretical anchoring and becomes an object of projection for un-nameable anxieties. This disturbs relations to refugees at both societal and clinical levels and lays the groundwork for the poor conditions that they are currently experiencing. Historically, attitudes towards refugees fall somewhere along a continuum between compassion and rejection/dehumanization. At the moment, they seem much closer to the latter. I would argue that today’s xenophobia and/or xeno-racism reflect the fact that, both for individuals and for society, refugees have come to represent the Freudian Uncanny/das Unheimliche.