ArticlePDF Available

Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae , gen. et sp. nov. on Agrimonia (Rosaceae) from China

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

A new rust genus, Quasipucciniastrum, typified by Q. agrimoniae sp. nov., is proposed based on distinct morphological characters and phylogenetic placement. This genus is characterised by its uredinial ostiolar peridial cells with rough surface and sessile, multicellular teliospores with apparently thickened apical wall. Molecular phylogenetic analyses using internal transcribed spacer regions and intervening 5.8S nrRNA gene (ITS) and the large subunit (LSU) rDNA revealed that this genus is sister to the genus Cronartium (Cronartiaceae), but morphologically it is distinct from Cronartium in the sessile teliospores that are divided by vertical septa. Morphologically, Quasipucciniastrum should be compared to Pucciniastrum (Pucciniastraceae) in its multicellular teliospores, but they were phylogenetically distant.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tmyc20
Mycology
An International Journal on Fungal Biology
ISSN: 2150-1203 (Print) 2150-1211 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tmyc20
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae, gen. et sp. nov. on
Agrimonia (Rosaceae) from China
Xiao-Hua Qi, Lei Cai & Peng Zhao
To cite this article: Xiao-Hua Qi, Lei Cai & Peng Zhao (2019): Quasipucciniastrum
agrimoniae, gen. et sp. nov. on Agrimonia (Rosaceae) from China, Mycology, DOI:
10.1080/21501203.2019.1610522
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2019.1610522
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa
UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis
Group.
Published online: 30 Apr 2019.
Submit your article to this journal
View Crossmark data
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae,gen.etsp.nov.onAgrimonia (Rosaceae) from China
Xiao-Hua Qi
a,b
, Lei Cai
a
and Peng Zhao
a
a
State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;
b
University of Chinese Academy
of Sciences, Beijing, China
ABSTRACT
A new rust genus, Quasipucciniastrum, typied by Q. agrimoniae sp. nov., is proposed based on
distinct morphological characters and phylogenetic placement. This genus is characterised by its
uredinial ostiolar peridial cells with rough surface and sessile, multicellular teliospores with
apparently thickened apical wall. Molecular phylogenetic analyses using internal transcribed
spacer regions and intervening 5.8S nrRNA gene (ITS) and the large subunit (LSU) rDNA revealed
that this genus is sister to the genus Cronartium (Cronartiaceae), but morphologically it is distinct
from Cronartium in the sessile teliospores that are divided by vertical septa. Morphologically,
Quasipucciniastrum should be compared to Pucciniastrum (Pucciniastraceae) in its multicellular
teliospores, but they were phylogenetically distant.
ARTICLE HISTORY
Received 31 March 2019
Accepted 17 April 2019
KEYWORDS
Agrimony; Cronartiaceae;
molecular phylogeny;
morphology;
Pucciniastraceae
Introduction
Agrimonia Ldb. species, known as common agri-
mony, are perennial herbaceous owering plants
widely distributed in the temperate regions of the
Northern Hemisphere, and they have been com-
monly planted for ornamentation and medicinal
use (Lu 2001). Common agrimony is economically
and horticulturally important, but their growths
have been frequently threatened by rust diseases.
Hitherto, seven rust species have been recorded on
Agrimonia species (Farr and Rossman 2018), among
which, Pucciniastrum agrimoniae (Dietel) Tranzschel
(Pucciniastraceae) and its synonymies, P. agrimoniae-
eupatoriae (DC.) Lagerh. (Pucciniastraceae),
Thekopsora agrimoniae Dietel (Pucciniastraceae),
Uredo agrimoniae J. Schröt. (Anamorphic genera)
are frequently assigned names (Tai 1979; Zhuang
1983,2001,2005; Guo 1989; Zhang et al. 1997; Cao
and Li 1999; Zhuang and Wei 1999; Cao et al. 2000),
or in fewer cases as Melampsora agrimoniae Dietel
(Melampsoraceae), Puccinia agrimoniae (Arthur)
Arthur (Pucciniaceae) and Uropyxis agrimoniae
Arthur (Uropyxidaceae) (Arthur 1910; Maneval 1937).
During our study on rust fungi in China,
a morphologically distinct species was found on
Agrimonia pilosa. It produces Milesia-type uredinia
and ostiolar peridial cells with rough surface, and
have subglobose teliospores divided by vertical
septa. These characters are to some extent, similar
to Pucciniastrum spp. (Pucciniastraceae), but the
rDNA ITS and LSU sequences showed its close rela-
tionship to genus Cronartium Fr. (Cronartiaceae)
rather than Pucciniastrum. Our critical morphological
and molecular comparisons of this fungus with
Cronartium, Pucciniastrum and other related genera
suggested that this rust fungus represents a new
genus herein described as Quasipucciniastrum agri-
moniae gen. et sp. nov.
Materials and methods
Fungal specimens
A total of 204 dried herbarium specimens on
Agrimonia pilosa were loaned from the Mycological
Herbarium of Institute of Microbiology, CAS, China
(HMAS). Several fresh specimens on Agrimonia spe-
cies were collected from dierent provinces in China
during last three years. Herbarium specimens of
Cronartium and Peridermium (Link) J.C. Schmidt &
Kunze involved in this study were loaned from
University of Florida Herbarium, USA (FLAS), HMAS,
University of Michigan Herbarium, USA (MICH) and
New York Botanical Garden, USA (NY). In this study,
the Roman numerals of II and III referred to uredinial
and telial stages in the rust fungi.
CONTACT Lei Cai cail@im.ac.cn
MYCOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2019.1610522
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Published online 30 Apr 2019
Morphological examinations
Morphological characteristics of all specimens were
observed using a dissecting microscope (DM), the
light microscope (LM) and the scanning electron
microscope (SEM). The methods for morphological
analyses as outlined by Zhao et al. (2013), Zhao et al.
(2014), 2017) were followed. Fifty measurements of
sori and spores from each specimen were recorded,
and morphological characteristics in uredinial and
telial stages, i.e. the position of uredinia and telia,
the ornamentation and dimension of urediniospores,
the dimension and shape of ostiolar cells, the position
and shape of peridial cells, the dimension of telios-
pores, the position and shape of teliospores were
examined.
DNA extraction, amplication and sequencing
For the fungal specimens, several sori from each
specimen were excised and DNA were extracted
from all studied herbarium specimens using Gentra
Puregene Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according
to the manufacturers instructions. From the crude
extracts, 13μl DNA templates were directly used for
the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplication of
the internal transcribed spacer regions and interven-
ing 5.8S nrRNA gene (ITS) and the large subunit (LSU)
rDNA. rDNA ITS regions were amplied using the
primer pairs ITS1F (Gardes and Bruns 1993)/ITS4
(White et al. 1990), Rust2inv (Aime 2006)/ITS4BR
(Feau et al. 2009), and fragment of LSU was amplied
using the primer pairs ITS4BRf/LR6 (Vilgalys and
Hester 1990), LR1R/LR3 and LR3R/LR6 (Vilgalys and
Hester 1990). PCR was performed under the follow-
ing conditions: denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; fol-
lowed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 45 s,
annealing at 55°C for 1 min and elongation at 72°C
for 1 min, nally with an extension step at 72°C for
10 min. Purication and sequencing of PCR ampli-
cons were carried out at the Tianyi Huiyuan
Company, Beijing.
Molecular phylogeny
Full-length ITS and partial LSU regions were
amplied from 23 specimens, and we included 16
specimens from genus Cronartium and Peridermium
for comparable studies because they have high
similarity to rust fungus on Agrimonia in rDNA
sequences. Their herbarium numbers, host plants,
geographical origins and GenBank accession num-
bers are listed in Table 1. Besides, a total of 148
sequences from closely related species were
retrieved from GenBank for phylogenetic comparison
(Table 2). Pileolaria terebinthi (DC.) Castagne was
used as outgroup. In the nal dataset, ITS and LSU
were concatenated and the nal alignment includes
124 specimens with a length of 1836 characters (743
for ITS, 1093 for 28S).
Sequences were manually aligned by using
BioEdit 7.0.9 (Hall 1999), and multiple alignments
were performed using MAFFT 7 (Katoh and
Standley 2013). Gaps were treated as missing data
for all analyses. The Akaike Information Criteria (AIC)
in Modeltest 3.7 (Posada and Crandall 1998) was
used to estimate the best-t substitution models,
and GTR+I + G was selected as the best evolutionary
model. Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses were per-
formed using RAxML 8.0.0 (Stamatakis and Alachiotis
2010), and Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo
(MCMC) analyses were performed by MrBayes 3.1.2
(Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). Supported values
of ML and Bayesian posterior probability (Bpp) were
indicated in the phylogenetic tree.
Results
Molecular phylogeny
The combined ITS and LSU dataset included 106
sequences of ITS and 123 sequence of LSU from 125
rust samples. The dataset comprised aligned length of
1836 characters, of which, 1162 characters are con-
stant, and 640 are variable with 533 parsimony infor-
mative sites. Both ML and Bayesian inference resulted
in a highly concordant topology (Figure 1). Our speci-
mens on Agrimonia pilosa constituted a strongly sup-
ported clade (ML/Bpp = 93/0.98), close to Cronartium,
Endocronartium Y. Hirats. of the family Cronartiaceae.
Genera Hyalopsora Magnus, Melampsorella J. Schröt.,
Melampsoridium Kleb., Milesia F.B. White, Naohidemyces
S. Sato, Katsuya & Y. Hirats., Pucciniastrum, Thekopsora
Magnus and Uredinopsis Magnus from the family
Pucciniastraceae, which produce Milesia-type uredinia
and multicellular teliospores, clustered together but
are phylogenetically distant from our rust specimens
on A. pilosa.
2X.-H. QI ET AL.
Taxonomy
Quasipucciniastrum X.H. Qi, P. Zhao & L. Cai, gen.
nov.
MycoBank no.: MB828669
Etymology
Quasipucciniastrum (Lat.) referring to the morpholo-
gical characters (uredinial and telial stages) similar to
genus Puccinistrum.
Type species
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae X.H. Qi, P. Zhao & L. Cai
Generic diagnosis
Spermogonia and aecia unknown. Uredinia hypo-
phyllous, subepidermal, round, scattered or
crowded in groups, Milesia-type, erumpent with
peridium opening by a pore delimited by well-
developed, globose and verrucose ostiolar cells,
peridialcellssmall,irregular.Urediniosporesborne
singly, no pedicels, ovoid, globoid or ellipsoid,
spore wall colourless, echinulate. Telia hypophyl-
lous, subepidermal, one spore deep, light yellow.
Teliospores subglobose, sessile, multicellular, sepa-
rated by vertical or oblique septa, wall apparently
thickened at apex.
Table 1. Herbarium specimens used for molecular phylogenetic analyses.
GenBank accession no. Collection
Species Host Locality and data of Specimen no.
a
LSU ITS
Cronartium coleosporioides Castilleja linariaefolia Montana USA, 1914 MICH253346 MK208284 MK193824
C. comandrae Comandra umbellata Wisconsin USA, 1955 MICH253364 MK208293 MK193825
C. comandrae C. richardsiana Canda NY00267638 MK208294 MK193826
C. comandrae C. pallida USA NY03106200 MK208295 MK193827
C. accidum Paeonia lactiora Ussuriysk Russia, 2003 HMAS89229 MK208286 MK193819
C. accidum P. lactiora Jilin China, 2003 HMAS89231 MK208289 MK193822
C. accidum Pinus tabulaeformis Inner Mongolia China, 1984 HMAS82784 MK208287 MK193818
C. accidum P.taiwanensis Henan China, 1981 HMAS44164 MK208288 MK193816
C. accidum Quercus aquifolioides Tibet China, 2010 HMAS242642 MK208290 MK193821
C. accidum Q. aquifolioides Tibet China, 2010 HMAS242641 MK208291 MK193820
C. quercuum Q. glandulifera Jiangxi China, 1996 HMAS82717 MK208292 MK193817
C. ribicola Ribes nigrum USA NY00267051 MK208296 MK193828
C. ribicola Pinus strobus Ontario Canada, 1952 NY00267053 MK208298 MK193829
C. ribicola Pedicularis yezoensis Nagano Japan, 1990 HMAS66843 MK208297 MK193830
C. strobilinum Pinus taeda Florida USA, 1982 FLAS-F-53,222 MK208285 MK193823
Peridermium lamentosum Pinus ponderosa Arizona USA, 1957 MICH300081 MK208299 MK193831
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae Agrimonia pilosa Beijing China, 1998 HMAS82312 MK208264 MK193835
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Gansu China, 1992 HMAS67301 MK208261 MK193832
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Gansu China, 1992 HMAS67302 MK208273 MK193844
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Gansu China, 1992 HMAS67306 MK208262 MK193833
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Gansu China, 1992 HMAS67309 MK208263 MK193834
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Gansu China, 2003 HMAS134791 MK208268 MK193839
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Guangxi China, 1997 HMAS77430 MK208271 MK193842
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Guizhou China, 2015 HMAS248096 MK208283 MK193854
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Heilongjiang China, 2003 HMAS89584 MK208277 MK193848
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Heilongjiang China, 2004 HMAS136005 MK208274 MK193845
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Heilongjiang China, 2015 HMAS248094 MK208280 MK193851
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Heilongjiang China, 2015 HMAS248095 MK208281 MK193852
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Inner Mongolia China, 2000 HMAS172175 MK208272 MK193843
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Ningxia China, 2000 HMAS172172 MK208270 MK193841
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Ningxia China, 2000 HMAS172173 MK208265 MK193836
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Sichuan China, 2016 HMAS248093 MK208279 MK193850
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Sichuan China, 1989 HMAS63888 MK208266 MK193837
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Sichuan China, 1989 HMAS63892 MK208275 MK193846
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Sichuan China, 2010 HMAS243033 MK208276 MK193847
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Yunnan China, 2007 HMAS199430 MK208269 MK193840
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Yunnan China, 2011 HMAS248097 MK208282 MK193853
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Tibet China, 2011 HMAAS244481 MK208267 MK193838
Q. agrimoniae A. pilosa Yunnan China, 2016 HMAS248092 MK208278 MK193849
a
FLAS-F: University of Florida Herbarium, USA; HMAS: Fungarium, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; MICH: University of Michigan Herbarium, USA; NY:
New York Botanical Garden, USA.
MYCOLOGY 3
Table 2. Sequence data retrieved from GenBank and used for phylogenetic analyses.
GenBank accession no.
Species Host plants ITS LSU Reference
Chrysomyxa arctostaphyli Arctostaphylos sp. DQ200930.1 AY700192.1 Matheny et al. (2007)
C. chiogenis Gaultheria hispidula GU049452.1 GU049532.1 Feau et al. (2011)
C. ledi Picea abies HM037711.1 HM037707.1 Kaitera et al. (2010)
C. ledicola P. mariana GU049417.1 GU049520.1 Feau et al. (2011)
C. nagodhii Rhododendron groenlandicum GU049431.1 GU049524.1 Feau et al. (2011)
C. neoglandulosi Ledum glandulosum GU049498.1 GU049550.1 Feau et al. (2011)
C. piperiana L. macrophyllum GU049497.1 GU049565.1 Feau et al. (2011)
C. rhododendri L. lapponicum GU049467.1 GU049560.1 Feau et al. (2011)
C. rhododendri Rhododendron ferrugineum GU049471.1 GU049570.1 Feau et al. (2011)
C. vaccinii Vaccinium parvifolium GU049463.1 GU049561.1 Feau et al. (2011)
C. woroninii Ledum groenlandicum GU049462.1 GU049540.1 Feau et al. (2011)
Coleosporium. cacaliae Adenostyles alliariae KY810462.1 KY810462.1 Beenken et al. (2017)
Col. campanulae Campanula rapunculoides KY810465.1 KY810465.1 Beenken et al. (2017)
Col. euphrasiae Rhinanthus alectorolophus KY810469.1 KY810469.1 Beenken et al. (2017)
Col. inulae Inula salicina KY810470.1 KY810470.1 Beenken et al. (2017)
Col. ipomoeae Ipomoea sp MF769624.1 MF769639.1 McTaggart and Aime (2018)
Col. petasitidis Petasites hybridus KY810471.1 KY810471.1 Beenken et al. (2017)
Col. plumeriae Plumeria sp MF769629.1 GU145555.1 McTaggart and Aime (2018) Holcomb and Aime (2010)
Col. senecionis Jacobaea alpina KY810472.1 KY810472.1 Beenken et al. (2017)
Col. senecionis Senecio ovatus KY810473.1 KY810473.1 Beenken et al. (2017)
Col. solidaginis Solidago virgaurea KY810481.1 KY810481.1 Beenken et al. (2017)
Col. solidaginis S. gigantea KY810483.1 KY810483.1 Beenken et al. (2017)
Col. tussilaginis Tussilago farfara KY810485.1 KY810485.1 Beenken et al. (2017)
Cronartium conigenum Pinus leiophylla L76486.1 Vogler and Bruns (1998)
Cro. ribicola DQ533975.1 AF522166.1
Endocronartium harknessii Pinus sp. DQ206982.1 AY700193.1 Matheny et al. (2007)
Hyalopsora polypodii Cystopteris fragilis AF426229.1 Maier et al. (2003)
H. polypodii Deparia petersenii KJ698627.1
Melampsorella caryophyllacearum Caryophyllaceae Cerastium MG907233.1 Aime et al. (2018)
M. caryophyllacearum Abies alba AF426232.1 Maier et al. (2003)
M. betulinum Betula pubescens KF031556.1 KF031539.1 McKenzie et al. (2013)
M. betulinum Alnus cordata KF031559.1 KF031544.1 McKenzie et al. (2013)
M. betulinum Betula nana KF031562.1 KF031549.1 McKenzie et al. (2013)
M. hiratsukanum Alnus incana KF031554.1 KF031541.1 McKenzie et al. (2013)
M. hiratsukanum A. rhombifolia KC313889.1 KC313888.1 Blomquist et al. (2014)
Milesina philippinensis Nephrolepis sp. KM249868.1 McTaggart et al. (2014)
Milesina sp. Pinaceae Abies MG907234.1 Aime et al. (2018)
M. vogesiaca Polystichum aculeatum MG907235.1 Aime et al. (2018)
Naohidemyces vaccinii Vaccinium ovatum DQ354563.1 Aime (2006)
N. vaccinii Vaccinum KJ698628.1 Padamsee et al. (2014)
Peridermium harknessii Pinus contorta L76506.1 Vogler and Bruns (1998)
Pileolaria terebinthi Pistacia atlantica HM639742.1 HM639742.1 Alaei et al. (2012)
P. terebinthi P. atlantica HM639743.1 HM639743.1 Alaei et al. (2012)
Pucciniastrum actinidiae Actinidia arguta AB221446.1 AB221403.1 Liang (2006)
P. actinidiae A. rufa AB221448.1 AB221405.1 Liang (2006)
P. boehmeriae Boehmeria tricuspis AB221450.1 AB221393.1 Liang (2006)
P. boehmeriae B. platanifolia AB221451.1 AB221391.1 Liang (2006)
P. corni Cornus kuosa AB221437.1 AB221409.1 Liang (2006)
P. corni C. kuosa AB221436.1 AB221408.1 Liang (2006)
P. fagi Fagus crenata AB221425.1 AB221378.1 Liang (2006)
P. fagi F. crenata AB221420.1 AB221374.1 Liang (2006)
P. fagi F. crenata AB221424.1 AB221375.1 Liang (2006)
P. fagi F. japonica AB221421.1 AB221376.1 Liang (2006)
P. fagi F. crenata AB221423.1 AB221377.1 Liang (2006)
P. hikosanense Acer runerve AB221441.1 AB221388.1 Liang (2006)
P. hikosanense A. runerve AB221440.1 AB221389.1 Liang (2006)
P. hydrangeae-petiolaris Hydrangea petiolaris AB221438.1 AB221384.1 Liang (2006)
P. hydrangeae-petiolaris H. petiolaris AB221439.1 AB221385.1 Liang (2006)
P. kusanoi Clethra barbinervis AB221429.1 AB221400.1 Liang (2006)
P. kusanoi C. barbinervis AB221426.1 AB221402.1 Liang (2006)
P. kusanoi C.abarbinervis AB221430.1 AB221401.1 Liang (2006)
P. kusanoi C. barbinervis AB221427.1 AB221399.1 Liang (2006)
P. kusanoi Clethra barbinervis AB221428.1 AB221398.1 Liang (2006)
P. miyabeanum Viburnum furcatum AB221443.1 AB221397.1 Liang (2006)
P. miyabeanum V. furcatum AB221442.1 AB221394.1 Liang (2006)
P. styracinum Styrax japonica AB221433.1 AB221417.1 Liang (2006)
P. styracinum S. japonica AB221432.1 AB221418.1 Liang (2006)
P. styracinum S. japonica AB221431.1 AB221416.1 Liang (2006)
P. tiliae Tilia mandshurica AB221455.1 AB221412.1 Liang (2006)
P. tiliae T. japonica AB221453.1 AB221414.1 Liang (2006)
(Continued)
4X.-H. QI ET AL.
Notes
The new genus Quasipucciniastrum is characterised by
its Milesia-type uredinia with well-developed ostiolar
cells, well-developed peridial cells, hypophyllous telia
producing subglobose teliospores which is divided by
vertical and oblique septa under host epidermis. This
genus resembles Pucciniastrum (Pucciniastraceae,
Pucciniales) but diers in producing hypophyllous
telia, subglobose teliospores with apparently thickened
apical wall. Within family Pucciniastraceae, other gen-
era clearly diered from Quasipucciniastrum in uredi-
nial ostiole and teliospores. Genera Calyptospora,
Hyalopsora, Milesina and Uredinopsis dier from this
new genus in the type of ostiole, position of telia and
type of teliospores, while Melampsorella and
Melampsoridium dier from Quasipucciniastrum mainly
in their unicellular teliospores without septa (Cummins
and Hiratsuka 2003). In addition, Melampsorella has
Milesia-type uredinia with discrete ostiole, which also
clearly diers from Quasipucciniastrum. Phylogenetic
results supported the separation of
Quasipucciniastrum from Pucciniastrum, Melampsorella
and other genera in the family Pucciniastraceae
(Figure 1).
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae X.H. Qi, P. Zhao &
L. Cai, sp. nov. (Figure 2)
MycoBank no.: MB828670
Typication
CHINA. HEILONGJIANG: Greater Higgnan Mountains,
Tahe, II, III on A. pilosa, 6 September 2015, P. Zhao
(Holotype designated here, HMAS248095),
GenBank: ITS = MK208281; LSU = MK193852.
Etymology
Named after the host plant of the type specimen.
Description from holotype
Spermogonia and aecia unknown. Uredinia hypophyl-
lous, subepidermal, round, pale-yellow, scattered or
rarely grouped, 0.10.4 mm in diameter, erumpent
with peridium with well-developed ostiolar cells, usually
six to nine, arranged at the apex of uredinia. Peridial cells
small, irregular, walls smooth. Ostiolar cells well-
developed, oblong or ellipsoid, with rough surface.
Urediniospores borne singly, no pedicels, scattered, glo-
boid, ovoid or ellipsoid, 16.522 × 12.517.3 µm, wall
0.72.1 µm thick, evenly echinulate without smooth area
on surface, spinules 0.51.2 µm in length, and the dis-
tance between spinules 1.1 and 2.2 µm, germ bizonated.
Telia hypophyllous, subepidermal, one spore deep, light
yellow. Teliospores consisting of several cells adhering
laterally under the epidermal cells, sessile, subglobose,
18.536.1 × 13.729.9 µm, 26 celled, mainly with verti-
cal septa, walls apparently thickened at apex, up to
4.6 µm.
Additional specimens examined: CHINA. BEIJING:
Dongling Mountain, II, III on Agrimonia pilosa,
16 September 1998, J.Y. Zhuang (HMAS82312);
CHINA. GANSU: Gan Nan, Diebu, II, III on A. pilosa,
10 September 1992, J.Y. Zhuang (HMAS67301);
CHINA. GANSU: Gan Nan, Diebu, II, III on A. pilosa,
12 September 1992, J.Y. Zhuang (HMAS67302);
CHINA. GANSU: Gan Nan, Zhouqu, II, III on A. pilosa,
Table 2. (Continued).
GenBank accession no.
Species Host plants ITS LSU Reference
P. tiliae T. japonica AB221454.1 AB221415.1 Liang (2006)
P. yoshinagai Stewartia monadelphagene AB221435.1 AB221410.1 Liang (2006)
P. yoshinagai S. monadelphagene AB221434.1 AB221411.1 Liang (2006)
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae Agrimonia eupatoria AF426234.1 Maier et al. (2003)
Q. agrimoniae KJ486537.1 KJ725376.1 Yang (2015)
Q. agrimoniae KJ486536.1 KJ725375.1 Yang (2015)
Q. agrimoniae Agrimonia sp. MG907236.1 Aime et al. (2018)
Thekopsora guttata Galium odoratum AF426231.1 Maier et al. (2003)
T. minima Ericaceae Vaccinium MG907243.1 Aime et al. (2018)
T. minima Vaccinium corymbosum KY991374.1 Shands et al. (Unpublished)
T. symphyti Symphytum ocinale AF426230.1 Maier et al. (2003)
Uredinopsis osmundae Dryopteridaceae Athyrium MG907244.1
U. osmundae Osmundaceae Osmunda MG907245.1
U. pteridis Pteridium esculentum KM249869.1 McTaggart et al. (2014)
Uredinopsis sp. ––AF522181.1
(): No information from GenBank.
MYCOLOGY 5
5 September 1992, J.Y. Zhuang (HMAS67306); CHINA.
GANSU: Lan Zhou, Yongdeng, II, III on A. pilosa,
11 October 2003, J.Y. Zhuang (HMAS134791); CHINA.
GANSU: Long Nan, Wenxian, II, III on A. pilosa,
21 September 1992, J.Y. Zhuang (HMAS67309);
CHINA. GUIZHOU: Qian Nan, Maolan, II, III on A. pilosa,
21 June 2015, P. Zhao (HMAS248096); CHINA.
HEILONGJIANG: Greater Higgnan Mountains,
Jiagedaqi District, II, III on A. pilosa, 9 September 2015,
P. Zhao (HMAS248094); CHINA. HEILONGJIANG: Khakan
Nature Reserve, II, III on A. pilosa, 9 August 2003, J.Y.
Zhuang (HMAS89584); CHINA. HEILONGJIANG: Mu Dan
Jiang, II, III on A. pilosa, 9 August 2004, J.Y. Zhuang
(HMAS136005); CHINA. INNER MONGOLIA: Tong Liao,
Horqin, II, III on A. pilosa, 18 September 2000, J.Y.
Zhuang (HMAS172175); CHINA. NINGXIA: Jin Yuan, II,
III on A. pilosa, 31 August 2000, J.Y. Zhuang
(HMAS172172); CHINA. NINGXIA: Jin Yuan, II, III on
0.05
Melampsorella caryophyllacearum on Abies alba AF426232
Coleosporium plumeriae on Plumeria sp. GU145555 MF769629
Naohidemyces vaccinii on Vaccinum KJ698628
Cronartium orientale on Quercus aquifolioides HMAS242642
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS136005
Pucciniastrum styracinum on Styrax japonica AB221418 AB221432
Hyalopsora polypodii on Cystopteris fragilis AF426229
Pucciniastrum miyabeanum on Viburnum furcatum AB221397 AB221443
Coleosporium solidaginis on Solidago gigantea KY810483
Chrysomyxa vaccinii on Vaccinium parvifolium GU049463 GU049561
Pucciniastrum tiliae on Tilia japonica AB221414 AB221453
Cronartium flaccidum on Paeonia lactiflora HMAS89229
Pucciniastrum fagi on Fagus crenata AB221375 AB221424
Cronartium orientale on Quercus aquifolioides HMAS242641
Chrysomyxa ledi on Abies sp. HM037711 HM037707
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa KJ486536 KJ725375
Cronartium flaccidum on Pinus taiwanensis HMAS44164
Pucciniastrum kusanoi on Clethra barbinervis AB221398 AB221428
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS67302
Cronartium ribicola on Pedicularis yezoensis HMAS66843
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS243033
Coleosporium tussilaginis on Tussilago farfara KY810485
Melampsoridium betulinum on Betula pubescens KF031539 KF031556
Pucciniastrum styracinum on Styrax japonica AB221416 AB221431
Pucciniastrum actinidiae on Actinidia rufa AB221405 AB221448
Peridermium filamentosum on Pinus ponderosa MICH300081
Chrysomyxa piperiana on Ledum macrophyllum GU049497 GU049565
Pucciniastrum boehmeriae on Boehmeria tricuspis AB221393 AB221450
Pucciniastrum corni on Cornus kuosa AB221409 AB221437
Coleosporium solidaginis on Solidago virgaurea KY810481
Thekopsora minima on Vaccinium corymbosum KY991374 SKY991375
Pucciniastrum fagi on Fagus japonica AB221376 AB221421
Coleosporium campanulae on Campanula apunculoides KY810465
Pucciniastrum kusanoi on Clethra barbinervis AB221402 AB221426
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS67301
Cronartium ribicola on Ribes nigrum NY00267051
Chrysomyxa woroninii on Ledum groenlandicum GU049462 GU049540
Thekopsora guttata on Galium odoratum AF426231
Cronartium ribicola on Pinus strobus NY00267053
Pucciniastrum boehmeriae on Boehmeria platanifolia AB221391 AB221451
Pucciniastrum yoshinagai on Stewartia monadelphagene AB221410 AB221435
Melampsoridium betulinum on Alnus cordata KF031544 KF031559
Pucciniastrum corni on Cornus kuosa AB221408 AB221436
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS63888
Milesina philippinensis on Nephrolepis sp. KM249868
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS67309
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS63892
Cronartium conigenum on Pinus leiophylla L76486
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS82312
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS244481
Chrysomyxa ledicola on Picea mariana GU049417 GU049520
Coleosporium inulae on Inula salicina KY810470
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS248097
Pucciniastrum hydrangeae on Hydrangea petiolaris AB221384 AB221438
Pucciniastrum tiliae on Tilia japonica AB221415 AB221454
Pucciniastrum styracinum on Styrax japonica AB221417 AB221433
Coleosporium cacaliae on Adenostyles alliariae KY810462
Cronartium quercuum on Quercus glandulifera HMAS82717
Peridermium harknessii on Pinus contorta L76506
Melampsorella caryophyllacearum on Caryophyllaceae Cerastium MG907233
Uredinopsis sp. AF522181
Chrysomyxa rhododendri on Ledum lapponicum GU049467 GU049560
Uredinopsis pteridis on Pteridium esculentum KM249869
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS89584
Pucciniastrum kusanoi on Clethra barbinervis AB221401 AB221430
Cronartium comandrae on Comandra pallida NY03106200
Chrysomyxa neoglandulosi on Ledum glandulosum GU049498 GU049550
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa AF426234
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS248096
Cronartium flaccidum on Pinus tabulaeformis HMAS82784
Thekopsora minima on Ericaceae Vaccinium MG907243
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS199430
Pileolaria terebinthi on Pistacia atlantica HM639743
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS172172
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS248094
Coleosporium petasitidis on Petasites hybridus KY810471
Chrysomyxa rhododendri on Rhododendron ferrugineum GU049471 GU049570
Naohidemyces vaccinii on Vaccinium ovatum DQ354563
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa KJ486537 KJ725376
Cronartium coleosporioides on Castilleja linariaefolia MICH253346
Cronartium comandrae on Comandra richardsiana NY00267638
Melampsoridium hiratsukanum on Alnus rhombifolia KC313889 KC313888
Uredinopsis osmundae on Athyrium sp. MG907244
Uredinopsis osmundae on Osmunda sp. MG907245
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS248095
Melampsoridium alni on Alnus mandshurica KF031534 KF031557
Thekopsora symphyti on Symphytum officinale AF426230
Coleosporium senecionis on Senecio ovatus KY810473
Hyalopsora polypodii on Deparia petersenii KJ698627
Chrysomyxa nagodhii on Rhododendron groenlandicum GU049431 GU049524
Pileolaria terebinthi on Pistacia atlantica HM639742
Pucciniastrum fagi on Fagus crenata AB221374 AB221420
Cronartium ribicola DQ533975 AF522166
Milesina sp. on Abies sp. MG907234
Coleosporium euphrasiae on Rhinanthus alectorolophus KY810469
Pucciniastrum hikosanense on Acer rufinerve AB221389 AB221440
Cronartium flaccidum on Paeonia lactiflora HMAS89231
Pucciniastrum actinidiae on Actinidia arguta AB221403 AB221446
Pucciniastrum fagi on Fagus crenata AB221377 AB221423
Pucciniastrum hydrangeae on Hydrangea petiolaris AB221385 AB22143939
Pucciniastrum fagi on Fagus crenata AB221378 AB221425
Endocronartium harknessii on Pinus sp. DQ206982 AY700193
Cronartium comandrae on Comandra umbeilata MICH253364
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa MG907236
Coleosporium ipomoeae on Pomoea sp. MF769639 MF769624
Pucciniastrum hikosanense on Acer rufinerve AB221388 AB221441
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS172173
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS77430
Pucciniastrum kusanoi on Clethra barbinervis AB221400 AB221429
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS134791
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS172175
Pucciniastrum miyabeanum on Viburnum furcatum AB221394 AB221442
Melampsoridium betulinum on Betula nana KF031549 KF031562
Melampsoridium hiratsukanum on Alnus incana KF031541 KF031554
Milesina vogesiaca on Polystichum aculeatum MG907235
Cronartium strobilinum on Pinus taeda FLAS-F-53222
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS67306
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS248092
Pucciniastrum kusanoi on Clethra barbinervis AB221399 AB221427
Pucciniastrum tiliae on Tilia mandshurica AB221412 AB221455
Chrysomyxa chiogenis on Gaultheria hispidula GU049452 GU049532
Chrysomyxa arctostaphyli on Arctostaphylos sp. DQ200930 AY700192
Coleosporium senecionis on Jacobaea alpina KY810472
Pucciniastrum yoshinagai on Stewartia monadelpha AB221411 AB221434
Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on Agrimonia pilosa HMAS248093
100 1.00
96 1. 00
99 1. 00
91 1. 00
100 -
100 1.00
100 1.00
100 0.95
93 0. 98
100 1.00
80 1. 00
99 1. 00
81 1. 00
100 1.00
99 0. 99
96 1. 00
75 1. 00
100 1.00
92 0. 99
87 1. 00
83 1. 00
95 1. 00
100 1.00
100 1.00
100 1.00
85 1. 00
98 0. 85
87 1. 00
98 0. 98
89 1. 00
100 1.00
99 1. 00
94 1. 00
88 -
100 1.00
100 1.00
100 1.00
100 1.00
79 1. 00
100 0.99
97 0.91
93 1. 00
- 0.90
- 0.9 9
- 0.80
- 0.97
- 0.81
- 0.9 6
- 0.93
- 0.89
- 0.81
- 0.9 8
- 0.9 8
Quasipucciniastrum gen. nov
Figure 1. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree based on concatenated data of rDNA ITS and LSU sequences. Pileolaria
terebinthi was used as outgroup. Values on the branches indicate maximum likelihood bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior
probabilities. Hyphen indicates that bootstrap values were less than 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities less than 0.80.
6X.-H. QI ET AL.
A. pilosa, 1 September 2000, J.Y. Zhuang
(HMAS172173); CHINA. SICHUAN: Liangshan Yi
Autonomous Prefecture, Meigu, II, III on A. pilosa,
8 October 1989, J.Y. Zhuang (HMAS63892); CHINA.
SICHUAN: Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture,
Yanyuan, II, III on A. pilosa, 11 September 2010, J.Y.
Zhuang (HMAS243033); CHINA. SICHUAN: Tibetan
Qiang Autonomous Prefecture of Ngawa, Wolong, II,
III on A. pilosa, 23 September 1989, J.Y. Zhuang & S.X.
Wei (HMAS63888); CHINA. SICHUAN: Yi Bin, Xingwen, II,
III on A. pilosa, 21 June 2016, P. Zhao (HMAS248093);
CHINA. TIBET: Rikaze, Yadong, II, III on A. pilosa,
20 August 2011, J.Y. Zhuang & T.Z. Wei
(HMAS244481); CHINA. YUNNAN: Hong He, Binbian, II,
III on A. pilosa, 19 September 2007, J.Y. Zhuang
(HMAS199430); CHINA. YUNNAN: Hong He, Mengzi, II,
Figure 2. Morphological characters of Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae. A: Uredinia (white arrow) on the hypophyllous leaf surface. B:
No uredinia and telia on eiphyllous leaf surface. C: Uredinium with echinulate ostiolar cells (white arrow) observed by SEM. D:
Urediniospores with echinulate spines observed by SEM. E: Uredinium with well-developed ostiolar cells (black arrow) observed by
LM. F: Uredinium with peridium cell (black arrow). G: Urediniospores observed by LM. H: Vertical section of hypophyllous telia. I:
Subepidermal teliospores with apparently thickened apical wall. J: Subglobose teliospores with vertical or oblique septa. Bars: A,
B = 0.6 mm; C, E, G, H, I, J = 20µm; D, F = 10µm.
MYCOLOGY 7
III on A. pilosa, 14 June 2016, P. Zhao (HMAS248092);
CHINA. YUNNAN: Kun Ming, II, III on A. pilosa,
17 June 2016, P. Zhao (HMAS248097).
Hosts of uredinial and telial stages and geogra-
phical distribution: Agrimonia pilosa China:
Beijing, Gansu, Guangxi, Guizhou, Heilongjiang,
Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Sichuan, Tibet, Yunnan.
Discussion
In this study, we recognised a new genus
Quasipucciniastrum on Agrimonia pilosa, and described
a new species Q. agrimoniae based on morphological
and molecular evidences. Hitherto, rust species in gen-
era Puccinia Pers., Pucciniastrum, Thekopsora, Uredo
Pers. and Uropyxis J. Schröt. have been recorded on
Agrimonia species, but Quasipucciniastrum clearly dif-
fers from above-mentioned genera by its hypophyllous
telia, subepidermal teliospores with subglobose shape,
and multicellular teliospores with thickened apical wall.
rDNA based phylogenies further supported the inde-
pendence of Quasipucciniastrum from these genera,
especially Pucciniastrum and other genera in
Pucciniastraceae, which have similar uredinial and telial
morphologies. Here we conrmed the close relation-
ship of Quasipucciniastrum and Cronartium (Figure 1).
Quasipucciniastrum is currently best placed in
Cronartiaceae, together with Cronartium, although
this should be better conrmed after the examination
of the morphological characters in spermogonial and
aecial stages of Q. agrimoniae.Morphologically,genus
Cronartium owned Milesia-type uredinia that is similar
to Quasipucciniastrum, but its columnar telia and uni-
cellular teliopsores are embedded in a common matrix
(Cummins and Hiratsuka 2003). Hitherto, we are not
successful to obtain the spermogonial and aecial
stages of Q. agrimoniae. Further investigation on its
life cycles and detailed morphological examination of
spermogonia and aecia are necessary.
The rust fungus on Agrimonia pilosa was pre-
viously frequently recognised as Pucciniastrum agri-
moniae due to its ostiolar cells and subepidermal
teliospores divided by vertical septa (Tai 1979;Guo
1989; Zhang et al. 1997; Cao and Li 1999;Zhuang
and Wei 1999; Cao et al. 2000;Zhuang2001,2005).
P. agrimoniae was rst described on A. pilosa from
Western Siberia Borus Mountains, Altai in Russia by
Tranzschel (1895). Based on the original description
of P. agrimoniae from its type specimens and other
Russian materials (Tranzschel 1895;Sydowand
Sydow 1915; Kuprevich and Tranzschel 1957), our
novel species Quasipucciniastrum agrimoniae on
A. pilosa resembles P. agrimoniae in several aspects
but still clearly diers in its 2 to 6 celled and
subglobose teliospores with apparently thickened
apical wall. Similarly P. agrimoniae-like rust on
A. eupatoria was once reported to bear phyloge-
netic anities to Cronartium accidum and
C. ribicola (Cronartiaceae) Maier et al. (2003).
Those specimens used by Maier et al. (2003)have
been shown to be conspecictoQ. agrimoniae in
our study. As for P. agrimoniae,currentlythereis
no type-derived sequence to conrm its phyloge-
netic anities.Sincethetypespecimenof
P. agrimoniae was not obtained from all possibly
deposited herbaria, it might have been lost.
Neotypication is thus needed using a new and
suitable specimen from the original host and
locality.
Hitherto, several genera in Pucciniastraceae
have been delimitated based on morphological
characters in teliospores (Cummins and Hiratsuka
2003), even at generic level, the position of telia
and morphology of teliospores have long been
used as important taxonomic criteria (Hiratsuka
1958; Cummins and Hiratsuka 2003; Liang et al.
2005;Yang2015). Although there have been
much debates concerning the generic classica-
tion based on telial morphologies, recent phylo-
genetic studies and our study supported the
monophyly of all sampled genera in
Pucciniastraceae, thus, supported the eective-
ness of telial morphologies as taxonomic criteria
at generic level. In addition, our morphological
and molecular studies further emphasised the
importance of the uredinial morphology at gen-
eric level because Quasipucciniastrum and
Cronartium with Milesia-type uredinia show
a much closer relationship than those with
Caeoma-type uredinia (e.g.Cronartium,
Chrysomyxa). These overlooked morphological
characters appeared to be very useful in delimit-
ing taxa at generic and suprageneric level. Further
comprehensive studies need to be conducted to
evaluate the eectiveness of these morphological
characters in rust taxonomy.
8X.-H. QI ET AL.
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to Dr. Yi-Jian Yao (State Key
Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, CAS,
Beijing, China), Dr. Matthew E. Smith (University of Florida
Herbarium, USA), Dr. Timothy James (University of Michigan
Herbarium, USA), Dr. Barbara M. Thiers (The New York
Botanical Garden, NY, USA) for providing dried specimens
for this study.
Disclosure statement
No potential conict of interest was reported by the authors.
Funding
This work was nancially supported by National Natural
Science Foundation of China [Grant number 31670017],
[China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars
[Grant number 31725001];National Key R&D Program of
China [[Grant number 2016YFF0203201].
References
Aime MC. 2006. Toward resolving family-level relationships in
rust fungi (Uredinales). Mycoscience. 47:112122.
Aime MC, Bell CD, Wilson AW. 2018. Deconstructing the evo-
lutionary complexity between rust fungi (Pucciniales) and
their plant hosts. Stud Mycol. 89:143152.
Alaei H, Mohammadi AH, Dehghani A. 2012. Molecular char-
acterization of the rDNA-ITS sequence and a PCR diagnostic
technique for Pileolaria terebinthi, the cause of pistachio
rust. Phytopathol Mediterr. 1:488495.
Arthur JC. 1910. New species of Uredineae VII. Bull Torrey Bot
Club. 37:569580.
Beenken L, Lutz M, Scholler M. 2017. DNA barcoding and
phylogenetic analyses of the genus Coleosporium
(Pucciniales) reveal that the North American goldenrod
rust C. solidaginis is a neomycete on introduced and native
Solidago species in Europe. Mycol Prog. 16:10731085.
Blomquist CL, Scheck HJ, Haynes J, Woods PW, BischoJ.
2014. First published report of rust on white alder caused
by Melampsoridium hiratsukanum in the United States.
Plant Dis. 98:155.
Cao ZM, Li ZQ. 1999.. [Rust fungi of Qinling
Mountains]. Beijing (China): China Forestry Publishing
House. Chinese.
Cao ZM, Li ZQ, Zhuang JY. 2000. Uredinales from the Qinling
Mountains. Mycosystema. 19:1323.
Cummins GB, Hiratsuka Y. 2003. Illustrated genera of rust fungi.
3rd ed. St. Paul: Minnesota: American Phytopathological
Society.
Farr DF, Rossman AY. 2018. Fungal databases, systematic
mycology and microbiology laboratory, agricultural
research service, United States department of agriculture.
[accessed 2018 Aug. 10]. http://nt.ars-grin.gov/
fungaldatabases/
Feau N, Vialle A, Allaire M, Maier W, Hamelin RC. 2011. DNA
barcoding in the rust genus Chrysomyxa and its implica-
tions for the phylogeny of the genus. Mycologia.
103:12501266.
Feau N, Vialle A, Allaire M, Tanguay P, Joly DL, Frey P,
Callan BE, Hamelin RC. 2009.Fungalpathogen(mis-)
identications: a case study with DNA barcodes on
Melampsora rusts of aspen and white poplar. Mycol Res.
113:713724.
Gardes M, Bruns TD. 1993.ITS primers with enhanced speci-
city for basidiomycetes-application to the identication of
mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol. 2(2):113118.
Guo L. 1989.. [Uredinales of Shennongjia]. Beijing
(China): World Book Inc. Chinese.
Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence
alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/
98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 41:9598.
Hiratsuka N. 1958. Revision of taxonomy of the Pucciniastreae
with special reference to species of the Japanese
Archipelago. Tokyo (Japan): Kasai Publishing and Printing.
Holcomb GE, Aime MC. 2010. First report of Plumeria spp. rust
caused by Coleosporium plumeriae in Louisiana and
Malaysia and Catheranthus roseus, a new host of this rust.
Plant Dis. 94:272273.
Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: bayesian infer-
ence of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 17:754755.
Kaitera J, Tillman-Sutela E, Kauppi A. 2010.Chrysomyxa ledi,
A new rust fungus sporulating in cone scales of Picea abies
in Finland. Scand J Forest Res. 5(3):202207.
Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence align-
ment software version 7: improvements in performance
and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30(4):772780.
Kuprevich VF, Tranzschel VG. 1957.Rustfungi.1.Family
Melampsoraceae. In: Savich VP, editor. Cryptogamic plants of
the USSR (Vol. 4). Komarova: Botanicheskogo Instituta; p.
423464.
Liang YM. 2006. Taxonomic evaluation of morphologically
similar species of Pucciniastrum in Japan based on com-
parative analyses of molecular phylogeny and morphology.
Ibaraki (Japan): University of Tsukuba.
Liang YM, Tian CM, Hiratsuka K, Kakishima M. 2005. A new
species of Pucciniastrum on Enkianthus campanulatus from
Japan. Mycotaxon. 92:371376.
Lu HS. 2001. Using value of Agrimonia pilosa and its
cultivation. Chinese Wild Plant Resources. S6:4552.
Maier W, Begerow D, Weiss M, Oberwinkler F. 2003.Phylogeny
of the rust fungi: an approach using nuclear large subunit
ribosomal DNA sequences. Can J Bot. 81:1223.
Maneval WE. 1937. A list of the Missouri fungi. Univ of
Missouri Studies. 12(3):1150.
Matheny PB, Wang Z, Binder M, Curtis JM, Lim YW, Nilsson RH,
Hughes KW, Hofstetter V, Ammirati JF, Schoch CL, et al.
2007. Contributions of rpb2 and tef1 to the phylogeny of
mushrooms and allies (Basidiomycota, Fungi). Mol Biol Evol.
43:430451.
MYCOLOGY 9
McKenzie EHC, Padamsee M, Dick M. 2013. First report of rust
on Alnus in New Zealand is Melampsoridium betulinum,
not M. hiratsukanum. Plant Pathol Quar. 3:5965.
McTaggart AR, Aime MC. 2018.ThespeciesofColeosporium
(Pucciniales) on Solidago in North America. Fungal Biol.
122:800809.
McTaggart AR, Geering ADW, Shivas RG. 2014.Uredinopsis
pteridis and Desmella aneimiae, the rst rust fungi
(Pucciniales) reported on ferns (Pteridophyta) in Australia.
Australia Plant Dis Notes. 9(1):149.
Padamsee MMcKenzie EHC. 2014.Anewspeciesofrust
fungus on the new zealand endemic plant, myosotidium,
from the isolated chatham islands. Phytotaxa. 174
(4):223230.
Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model
of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 14:817818.
Stamatakis A, Alachiotis N. 2010.Timeandmemorye-
cient likelihood-based tree searches on phylogenomic
alignments with missing data. Bioinformatics.
26:132139.
Sydow P, Sydow H. 1915. Monographia Uredinearum. III: mel-
ampsoraceae, Zaghouaniaceae, Coleosporiaceae. Leipzig
(Germany): Borntraeger.
Tai FL. 1979.. [Sylloge Fungorum Sinicorum].
Beijing (China): Science Press. Chinese.
Tranzschel WA. 1895. Über die Teleutosporen von Urtlda arc-
ticus, U. Agrimoniae u. Melampsora alni. Script Horti Bot
Univ, Petropolis. 4:299301.
Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identication and
mapping of enzymatically amplied ribosomal DNA from
several Cryptococcus species. Journal of bacteriology.
172:42384246.
Vogler DR, Bruns TD. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among
the pine stem rust fungi (Cronartium and Peridermium spp.).
Mycologia. 90(2):244257.
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJWT, Taylor JL. 1990. Amplication and
direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for
phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and
applications. 18(1): 315322.
Yang T. 2015.广. [Phylogenetic
and taxonomic studies of Pucciniastrum s.l.] [Dissertation].
Beijing (China): Beijing Forestry University. Chinese.
Zhang N, Zhuang JY, Wei SX. 1997.Fungalora of the Daba
Mountains: uredinales. Mycotaxon. 61:4979.
Zhao P, Kakishima M, Wang Q, Cai L. 2017. Resolving the
Melampsora epitea complex. Mycologia. 109(3):
391407.
Zhao P, Tian CM, Yao YJ, Wang Q, Kakishima M, Yamaoka Y.
2014.Melampsora salicis-sinicae (Melampsoraceae,
Pucciniales), a new rust fungus found on willows in China.
Mycoscience. 55:390399.
Zhao P, Tian CM, Yao YJ, Wang Q, Yamaoka Y, Kakishima M.
2013. New records of Melampsora species on willows in
China. Mycotaxon. 123:8189.
Zhuang JY. 1983.. [A provisional list of
Uredinales of Fujian Province, China]. Mycosystema.
2:146158. Chinese.
Zhuang JY, Wei SX. 1999. Fungal ora of tropical Guangxi,
China: a preliminary checklist of rust fungi. Mycotaxon.
72:377388.
Zhuang WY. 2001. Higher Fungi of Tropical China. New York
(NY): Mycotaxon, Ltd.
Zhuang WY. 2005. Fungi of northwestern China. New York
(NY): Mycotaxon Ltd.
10 X.-H. QI ET AL.
... However, several defined families, such as Chaconiaceae, Pucciniaceae, Pucciniastraceae, Pucciniosiraceae and Uropyxidaceae, have been revealed to be poly-or paraphyletic in molecular phylogenetic studies (Maier et al. 2003;Wingfield et al. 2004;Aime 2006). Aime (2006) has roughly divided the order Pucciniales into three suborders based on molecular phylogeny: Melampsorineae, Mikronegeriineae and Uredinineae, but the polyphyly of several morphologically defined families remains unresolved (Maier et al. 2003;Wingfield et al. 2004;Beenken et al. 2012;Beenken and Wood 2015;Qi et al. 2019). Thereafter, Aime and McTaggart (2021) presented a high-rank classification of the Pucciniales, in which the order was divided into seven suborders and 18 families. ...
... We have included sequence data from our previous taxonomic studies on genera in Melampsorineae (Zhao et al. 2014(Zhao et al. , 2015(Zhao et al. , 2016(Zhao et al. , 2017(Zhao et al. , 2020(Zhao et al. , 2021Qi et al. 2019) as well as some newly generated sequence data from our one unpublished paper (under review), and detailed information of specimens, host species and GenBank accession numbers has been listed in Table 1. In addition, rDNA sequence data from previous taxonomic studies on Pucciniales, particularly those in Melampsorineae, were included in the final alignment (Table 1). ...
... The monophylies of several genera in Melampsorineae, i.e. Ceropsora, Chrysomyxa, Coleopuccinia, Cronartium, Coleosporium, Hylospora, Melampsorella, Melampsoridium, Naohidemyces, Quasipucciniastrum, and Thekopsora, were confirmed, in agreement with previous studies (Aime et al. 2018;Qi et al. 2019;Zhao et al. 2020;Aime and McTaggart 2021). Pucciniastrum, the type genus of the Pucciniastraceae, was split into two different clades. ...
Article
Full-text available
Rust fungi in the order Pucciniales represent one of the largest groups of phytopathogens, which occur on mosses, ferns to advanced monocots and dicots. Seven suborders and 18 families have been reported so far, however recent phylogenetic studies have revealed para- or polyphyly of several morphologically defined suborders and families, particularly in Melampsorineae. In this study, a comprehensive phylogenetic framework was constructed based on a molecular phylogeny inferred from rDNA sequences of 160 species belonging to 16 genera in Melampsorineae (i.e. Chrysomyxa, Cerospora, Coleopuccinia, Coleosporium, Cronartium, Hylospora, Melampsora, Melampsorella, Melampsoridium, Milesina, Naohidemyces, Pucciniastrum, Quasipucciniastrum, Rossmanomyces, Thekopsora, Uredinopsis). Our phylogenetic inference indicated that 13 genera are monophyletic with strong supports, while Pucciniastrum is apparently polyphyletic. A new genus, Nothopucciniastrum was therefore established and segregated from Pucciniastrum, with ten new combinations proposed. At the family level, this study further demonstrates the importance of applying morphologies of spore-producing structures (basidia, spermogonia, aecia, uredinia and telia) in higher rank taxonomy, while those traditionally applied spore morphologies (basidiospores, spermatia, aeciospores, urediniospores and teliospores) represent later diverged characters that are more suitable for the taxonomy at generic and species levels. Three new families, Hyalopsoraceae, Nothopucciniastraceae and Thekopsoraceae were proposed based on phylogenetic and morphological distinctions, towards a further revision of Pucciniales in line with the phylogenetic relationships.
... These features have recently been documented for species and sectional delimitation in Milesina (Bubner et al. 2019) but have not been considered in morphological studies of P. epilobii s. lat. (Klebahn 1900(Klebahn , 1914Bisby 1916;Pady 1933) and the rusts on Rosaceae (Ziller 1974;Helfer 2005;Qi et al. 2019). Finally, we carried out a detailed study on the taxonomy and nomenclature of these species with respect to the rules of the current "International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants" (Shenzhen Code, 2018), supplemented by the revised version of Chapter F of the Code, incorporating amendments approved by the Fungal Nomenclature Session of the 11th International Mycological Congress held in San Juan, Puerto Rico, in July 2018 (May et al. 2019). ...
... Recent phylogenetic analyses showed that Pucciniastrum on Agrimonia spp. in Asia must be excluded from Pucciniastrum s. str. Qi et al. (2019) introduced the new genus name Quasipucciniastrum with its type species Q. agrimoniae X.H. Qi, P. Zhao & L. Cai. However, there are two basic problems in the latter publication lying in the missing phylogenetic comparison of the new genus with Pucciniastrum s. str., determined by its type species, P. epilobii, from which the new genus has been segregated, and a missing comparison with sequence data of Pucciniastrum on Agrimonia eupatoria from Europe for which older species names are available. ...
... However, because our own phylogenetic examinations support the conclusion that the former Pucciniastrum/Thekopsora agrimoniae on Agrimonia spp. deserves a genus of its own, we accept Quasipucciniastrum as introduced by Qi et al. (2019). However, the oldest epithet "agrimoniae" (from Caeoma agrimoniae) is also not available in Quasipucciniastrum and preoccupied by the recently introduced Q. agrimoniae, so that the next available name, Coleosporium ochraceaum, takes priority: ...
Article
Full-text available
Using molecular phylogenetic analyses (ITS) and morphological data obtained from light and electron microscopy, some European and North American species and genera placed or formerly placed in the genus Pucciniastrum in the Coleosporiaceae and Pucciniastraceae (Pucciniales) were taxonomically revised. The ITS analyses confirmed recent familiar concepts based on less variable markers except for the genus Hyalopsora. The family Pucciniastraceae is characterized by Abietoideae (Abies, Tsuga) aecial hosts. Pucciniastrum is described as a genus that consists of host-alternating species forming aecia on needles of Abies hosts, with special features of aeciospore morphology, and Onagraceae telial hosts. Other genera in the Pucciniastraceae are Calyptospora, Melampsorella, and additional taxa, which are currently provisionally placed in Pucciniastrum, but must be revised in future studies. Pucciniastrum epilobii (s. lat.), the type species of Pucciniastraceae, represents at least two species with different life cycles and urediniospore characteristics and is lecto-and epitypified. The family Coleosporiaceae, characterized by Pinoideae (Pinus) and Piceoideae (Picea) aecial hosts, contains Rosaceae rusts from three well-supported clades represented by three genera, Thekopsora, Quasipucciniastrum, and Aculeastrum gen. nov. Aculeastrum is characterized by coarsely arcuate ostiolar peridial cells and infects Rubus spp. telial hosts. The following new taxonomic combinations are proposed: Calyptospora ornamentalis comb. nov., Quasipucciniastrum ochraceum comb. nov., Q. potentillae comb. nov, Aculeastrum americanum comb. nov., and A. arcticum comb. nov. The results are discussed with emphasis on future studies in Pucciniastrum and the P. epilobii complex and on nomenclatural changes necessary for rust fungi due to the Shenzhen Code.
... It is difficult, sometimes impossible, to differentiate rust species simply based on morphologies in one or two asexual morphic stages, but the advent of DNA-based phylogenetic approach has facilitated precise identification at both generic and species level. DNA barcodes, particularly the internal transcribed spacer regions and intervening 5.8S nrRNA gene (ITS), the large subunit (LSU) and the small subunit (SSU) rDNA, have supported the identification and classification of rust fungi at different taxonomic levels (Tian et al. 2004;Yang 2015;Zhao et al. 2017a, b;Liu et al. 2019;Qi et al. 2019;Zhao et al. 2020). Meanwhile, molecular phylogenetic approaches have been useful in connecting the telial and aecial stages of rust fungi, and provides additional characters for species recognition (Anikster et al. 2004;Ono et al. 2012;Zhao et al. 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Rust fungi taxonomically belonging to Pucciniales (Basidiomycota) are important phytopathogens that cause many significant diseases to agricultural crops and forest trees. Hitherto, ca. 8000 and 1200 species have been reported from worldwide and China, respectively. To investigate and document the diversity of rust fungi in China, we have sampled from 86 natural reserves and national parks in the past several years, and 6627 specimens have been collected. Our identification using both morphological and molecular data assigned 1654 collections to 337 species in 43 genera of 15 families, as cataloged in this paper. Among them, 34 new species are formally described based on their morphological distinctions and phylogenetic relationships. In addition, three new families Endoraeciaceae, Neophysopellaceae and Uromycladiaceae are proposed based on their morphological distinctions, phylogenetic independences and divergent times. Considering the traditionally morphologically defined families in Pucciniales have been increasing revealed to be discordant with phylogenetic groupings, taxonomic revisions are needed in future study to establish a natural classification system in Pucciniales. We also discussed the importance of morphologies in spermogonia and aecia for the delimitation of Puccinia and related genera. This study presents a significant contribution to the knowledge of rust flora in China. Taxonomic novelties: new families: Endoraeciaceae P. Zhao & L. Cai; Neophysopellaceae P. Zhao & L. Cai; Uromycladiaceae P. Zhao & L. Cai; new species: Chrysomyxa jinghongensis P. Zhao & L. Cai; Coleosporium sichuanense P. Zhao & L. Cai; Coleosporium smilacis P. Zhao & L. Cai; Cystopsora yunnanense P. Zhao & L. Cai; Gerwasia guanganensis P. Zhao & L. Cai; Gerwasia rubus-playfairianus P. Zhao & L. Cai; Hamaspora rubus-pirifolius P. Zhao & L. Cai; Macruropyxis guizhouensis P. Zhao & L. Cai; Macruropyxis paederiae P. Zhao & L. Cai; Melampsora hyperici-sampsonii P. Zhao & L. Cai; Melampsora linearis P. Zhao & L. Cai; Melampsora salicis-delavayanae P. Zhao & L. Cai; Neophysopella vitis-davidii P. Zhao & L. Cai; Phakopsora sophorae P. Zhao & L. Cai; Phragmidium nonapiculatum P. Zhao & L. Cai; Phragmidium kanas P. Zhao & L. Cai; Phragmidium duchesneae-indicae P. Zhao & L. Cai; Pileolaria medogensis P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia amygdalus-iridis P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia aphananthe-aspera P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia microsorus P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia nandina-domestica P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia persicaria-odorata P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia polygonum-aviculare P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia pulverulentus P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia saposhnikoviae P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia sonchus-oleraceus P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia thalictrum-finetii P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia thalictrum-minus P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia xingwenensis P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia xinjiangensis P. Zhao & L. Cai; Puccinia zanthoxyli-chinensis P. Zhao & L. Cai; Uromyces aconiticola P. Zhao & L. Cai; Uromycladium yunnanense P. Zhao & L. Cai; new combinations: Chrysomyxa purpurea (C.J. You & J. Cao) P. Zhao & L. Cai; Neophysopella verannonae (Beenken) P. Zhao & L. Cai.
Article
Full-text available
China has a huge area of diverse landscapes and is believed to conceive incredibly high fungal diversity. To systematically and promptly report Chinese fungal species, we initiate the series of Catalogue of fungi in China here. In the first paper of this series, we focus on plant-inhabiting fungi. A total of 33 new taxa are described all over China. These taxa include two new genera, viz., and N. yoshinagae. The morphological characteristics and phylogenetic evidence are used to support the establishment of these new taxa and the accuracy of their taxonomic placements. We hope that the series of Catalogue of fungi in China will contribute to Chinese fungal diversity and promote the significance of recording new fungal taxa from China. ARTICLE HISTORY
Article
Full-text available
This paper provides an updated classification of the Kingdom Fungi (including fossil fungi) and fungus-like taxa. Five-hundred and twenty-three (535) notes are provided for newly introduced taxa and for changes that have been made since the previous outline. In the discussion, the latest taxonomic changes in Basidiomycota are provided and the classification of Mycosphaerellales are broadly discussed. Genera listed in Mycosphaerellaceae have been confirmed by DNA sequence analyses, while doubtful genera (DNA sequences being unavailable but traditionally accommodated in Mycosphaerellaceae) are listed in the discussion. Problematic genera in Glomeromycota are also discussed based on phylogenetic results.
Article
Full-text available
This paper provides an updated classification of the Kingdom Fungi (including fossil fungi) and fungus-like taxa. Five-hundred and twenty-three (535) notes are provided for newly introduced taxa and for changes that have been made since the previous outline. In the discussion, the latest taxonomic changes in Basidiomycota are provided and the classification of Mycosphaerellales are broadly discussed. Genera listed in Mycosphaerellaceae have been confirmed by DNA sequence analyses, while doubtful genera (DNA sequences being unavailable but traditionally accommodated in Mycosphaerellaceae) are listed in the discussion. Problematic genera in Glomeromycota are also discussed based on phylogenetic results.
Article
Full-text available
Fungi are eukaryotes that play essential roles in ecosystems. Among fungi, Basidiomycota is one of the major phyla with more than 40,000 described species. We review species diversity of Basidiomycota from five groups with different lifestyles or habitats: saprobic in grass/forest litter, wood-decaying, yeast-like, ectomycorrhizal, and plant parasitic. Case studies of Agaricus, Cantharellus, Ganoderma, Gyroporus, Russula, Tricholoma, and groups of lichenicolous yeast-like fungi, rust fungi, and smut fungi are used to determine trends in discovery of biodiversity. In each case study, the number of new species published during 2009–2020 is analysed to determine the rate of discovery. Publication rates differ between taxa and reflect different states of progress for species discovery in different genera. The results showed that lichenicolous yeast-like taxa had the highest publication rate for new species in the past two decades, and it is likely this trend will continue in the next decade. The species discovery rate of plant parasitic basidiomycetes was low in the past ten years, and remained constant in the past 50 years. We also found that the establishment of comprehensive and robust taxonomic systems based on a joint global initiative by mycologists could promote and standardize the recognition of taxa. We estimated that more than 54,000 species of Basidiomycota will be discovered by 2030, and estimate a total of 1.4–4.2 million species of Basidiomycota globally. These numbers illustrate a huge gap between the described and yet unknown diversity in Basidiomycota.
Article
Full-text available
The rust fungi ( Pucciniales ) with 7000+ species comprise one of the largest orders of Fungi , and one for which taxonomy at all ranks remains problematic. Here we provide a taxonomic framework, based on 16 years of sampling that includes ca . 80 % of accepted genera including type species wherever possible, and three DNA loci used to resolve the deeper nodes of the rust fungus tree of life. Pucciniales are comprised of seven suborders – Araucariomycetineae subord. nov. , Melampsorineae , Mikronegeriineae , Raveneliineae subord. nov. , Rogerpetersoniineae subord. nov. , Skierkineae subord. nov. , and Uredinineae – and 18 families – Araucariomycetaceae fam. nov. , Coleosporiaceae , Crossopsoraceae fam. nov. , Gymnosporangiaceae , Melampsoraceae , Milesinaceae fam. nov. , Ochropsoraceae fam. & stat. nov. , Phakopsoraceae , Phragmidiaceae , Pileolariaceae , Pucciniaceae , Pucciniastraceae , Raveneliaceae , Rogerpetersoniaceae fam. nov. , Skierkaceae fam. & stat. nov. , Sphaerophragmiaceae , Tranzscheliaceae fam. & stat. nov. , and Zaghouaniaceae . The new genera Araucariomyces (for Aecidium fragiforme and Ae. balansae ), Neoolivea (for Olivea tectonae ), Rogerpetersonia (for Caeoma torreyae ), and Rossmanomyces (for Chrysomyxa monesis , Ch. pryrolae , and Ch. ramischiae ) are proposed. Twenty-one new combinations and one new name are introduced for: Angiopsora apoda , Angiopsora chusqueae , Angiopsora paspalicola , Araucariomyces balansae , Araucariomyces fragiformis , Cephalotelium evansii , Cephalotelium neocaledoniense , Cephalotelium xanthophloeae , Ceropsora weirii , Gymnotelium speciosum , Lipocystis acaciae-pennatulae , Neoolivea tectonae , Neophysopella kraunhiae , Phakopsora pipturi , Rogerpetersonia torreyae , Rossmanomyces monesis , Rossmanomyces pryrolae , Rossmanomyces ramischiae , Thekopsora americana , Thekopsora potentillae , Thekopsora pseudoagrimoniae , and Zaghouania notelaeae . Higher ranks are newly defined with consideration of morphology, host range and life cycle. Finally, we discuss the evolutionary and diversification trends within Pucciniales .
Article
Full-text available
The rust fungi (Pucciniales) are the most speciose natural group of plant pathogens, members of which possess the most complex lifecycles in Fungi. How natural selection works on the Pucciniales has been the subject of several hypotheses in mycology. This study uses molecular age estimation using sequence data from multiple loci, and cophylogeny reconciliation analyses to test hypotheses regarding how the aecial and telial stages in the lifecycle of rust fungi may have differentially impacted their diversification. Molecular age estimates show that the timing of diversification in the Pucciniales correlates with the diversification of their gymnosperm and angiosperm hosts. Host reconciliation analyses suggest that systematic relationships of hosts from the aecial stage of the Pucciniales lifecycle better reflect the systematic relationships among the Pucciniales. The results demonstrate the relative importance of this stage on the overall evolution of the Pucciniales and supports hypotheses made by Leppik over half a century ago. This study represents the first evaluation of how different life stages in the Pucciniales shape the evolution of these fungi.
Article
Full-text available
Recently, an unknown rust fungus of the genus Coleosporium appeared in Germany and Switzerland on giant goldenrod, Solidago gigantea, an invasive neophyte from North America, and on the indigenous European goldenrod, S. virgaurea. For identification, DNA barcodes were assembled in the course of the German Barcode of Life (GBOL) project and the investigation of neomycetes in Switzerland. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using ITS and LSU sequences of Coleosporium species representing various host plants and geographic regions. These analyses resulted in the first molecular evidence of the North American rust Coleosporium solidaginis in Europe. Coleosporium solidaginis is split into two subclades that are closely related to Coleosporium asterum, a species on Aster s.l., which was formerly synonymized with C. solidaginis. The genus is divided into an American and a Eurasian clade. This phylogenetic pattern indicates that the geographic distribution, rather than the relationship with host plants, played a major role in the evolution of Coleosporium species. This finding particularly applies to the European species, which are genetically uniform according to the ITS and LSU sequences. Taxonomical consequences are discussed. Coleosporium solidaginis is fragmentarily distributed in Europe. The place of its introduction and host shift to S. virgaurea remains uncertain. Life cycle and propagation are mainly restricted to asexual urediniospores. Telia were found only once and the aecial stage was not observed at all on pine trees. The ecological impact of this neomycete is still unknown, but C. solidaginis has the potential to harm wild and cultivated goldenrods in Europe.
Article
Full-text available
Melampsora epitea (Pucciniales, Basidiomycota) has been widely known as the main rust pathogen on willows, but its species boundary has been extremely confusing. Melampsora epitea was often confused with several morphologically similar species, such as M. arctica, M. humilis, and M. epiphylla. Recent DNA-based studies using specimens from North America and Europe suggested that M. epitea was a complex of several phylogenetic species. In this study, we examined the species boundary of M. epitea based on rDNA phylogeny and the general mixed Yule coalescent (GMYC) model from 534 specimens. Twelve distinct species corresponding to 10 known species and 2 new species were recognized from East Asian specimens. We also evaluated the association of morphological characteristics, geographic origins, and host ranges with phylogenetic relationships. Our results revealed that several previously overlooked morphological characters in uredinial and telial stages were informative in delimiting M. epitea and allied species. Two novel species, M. salicis-futurae and M. salicis-triandrae, are described and compared with closely related species. A lectotype for M. epitea and epitypes for M. epitea, M. epiphylla, and M. humilis are designated to stabilize the use of names.
Article
Full-text available
A new species of rust fungus, Pucciniastrum hakkodaense on Enkianthus campanulatus, is described from Japan. This species is characterized by aculeate ostiolar celles of peridia and uniformly echinulate urediniospores.
Article
Species in Cronartium and its anamorphic genus Peridermium form a morphologically homogeneous group of rust fungi that infect stems, branches, and cones of Pinus species in North and Central America, Asia, and Europe. Several species are important forest pathogens, causing severe economic and aesthetic damage to pines in forests and parks throughout the northern hemisphere. Morphological characters have been used to distinguish among these rust fungi, but have proven inadequate for assessing phylogenetic relationships within the group. In this study, we extracted fungal DNA from spores and infected host tissue representing collections of all major North American and Eurasian Cronartium and Peridermium species and of two related rust genera, Chrysomyxa and Pucciniastrum. Using the polymerase chain reaction, we amplified and sequenced the internal transcribed spacer region from the nuclear ribosomal RNA genes, aligned sequences for all taxa, and generated phylogenetic trees using parsimony and neighbor-joining techniques. Parsimony analysis yielded a strict consensus of 24 trees that is congruent with the single tree generated by neighbor-joining analysis. Neighbor-joining was also used to compare trees derived from nucleotide sequences and from isozyme phenotype data from an earlier study; in general, the same species groups were supported in both data sets. Our analyses indicate that the pine stem rust fungi form distinct clades that correlate with telial host families (e.g., Fagaceae and Santalaceae). Close phylogenetic relationships between autoecious, short-cycled Peridermium species and putative heteroecious relatives were confirmed (e.g., P. harknessii with C. quercuum f. sp. banksianae, and P. bethelii with C. comandrae). Nucleotide sequences and isozyme phenotypes were used to identify four undescribed taxa, including: California oak rust, which may be a cone or gall rust that has become isolated from its aecial host; white-spored gall rust from the southwestern U.S., which was thought to be an albino form of orange-spored P. harknessii; a previously undescribed yellow-spored gall rust from California; and stalactiform limb rust of Jeffrey pine, which was thought to be a host-form of C. coleosporioides. In light of these results, a systematic reevaluation of Cronartium and Peridermium morphology and biology is needed.
Article
Species of Coleosporium (Pucciniales) are rust fungi that typically alternate between pines and angiosperms. In North America, species of Coleosporium often infect Solidago (goldenrods), although their taxonomy on these hosts is unresolved. Joseph. C. Arthur and George B. Cummins regarded these as a single species, Coleosporium solidaginis (fide Arthur) or C. asterum (fide Cummins), but later inoculation studies demonstrated the presence of more than one species, distinguishable by their aecial hosts. A more recent taxonomic study of Coleosporium found that specimens on Solidago identified as C. asterum in North America were not conspecific with the type, which is from Japan, prompting the present study. Herein, we conducted a systematic study on ca. 60 collections of Coleosporium infecting species of Asteraceae from North America using regions of ribosomal DNA and morphology of teliospores and basidia. Our data indicate at least three species of Coleosporium occur on Solidago in North America, C. solidaginis, C. montanum comb. nov., which is proposed for the taxon that has commonly been identified as C. asterum in North America, and C. delicatulum, all of which can be differentiated by morphology of their basidia. In addition, the challenges of marker selection for molecular barcoding of rust fungi is discussed.
Article
Sixty-nine rust species are reported from the tropical region of Guangxi Province, China, including a new species, Puccinia stenospora J.Y. Zhuang & S.X. Wei, and a new record in China, Uromyces cucullatus Syd. & P. Syd.