A preview of this full-text is provided by Wiley.
Content available from ChemCatChem
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
Ni/La2O3Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Insights
into the Factors Improving the Catalytic Performance
Luoji Xu+,[a] Wenming Liu+,[a] Xin Zhang,[a] Lele Tao,[a] Lianghui Xia,[a] Xianglan Xu,[a]
Junwei Song,[c] Wufeng Zhou,[d] Xiuzhong Fang,*[a, b] and Xiang Wang*[a]
To understand the structure-reactivity relationship of Ni/La2O3,
and eventually get more applicable catalysts for DRM, glycine
nitrate combustion (GNC), precipitation (PP) and thermal
decomposition (TD) methods have been used to prepare La2O3
supports. Although all the supports possess a hexagonal La2O3
phase, their bulk and surface properties are significantly
changed. By using them as supports, the interactions between
NiO/Ni and La2O3are varied, thus achieving Ni/La2O3catalysts
with different activity, stability and anti-coking ability, which
follow the order of 5Ni/La2O3-GNC >5Ni/La2O3-PP >5Ni/La2O3-
TD. On La2O3having a higher surface area, a catalyst with a
higher active metallic Ni surface area can be achieved. There-
fore, the interfaces between Ni and La2O2CO3can be enlarged,
which effectively facilitates the reaction between carbon
deposits and the La2O2CO3formed during the DRM, thus
preventing the accumulation of both and keeping the catalyst
surface clean, active and stable. In addition, the amount of
surface alkaline and active oxygen sites of the reduced catalysts
obey the order of 5Ni/La2O3-GNC >5Ni/La2O3-PP >5Ni/La2O3-TD,
which is well consistent with the reaction performance. There-
fore, these two factors are also believed to be critical to decide
the reaction performance. It is concluded that Ni/La2O3catalysts
with high activity, stability and potent anti-coking ability for
DRM can be achieved by preparing catalysts with high Ni
dispersion.
Introduction
With the high pace development of modern industry, the
demand for energy is increasing and people are looking for
new green energy source instead of fossil fuels. As a type of
clean and high efficient energy carrier, hydrogen has attracted
much attention. Methane reforming, such as steam reforming,[1]
dry reforming[2] and oxidative steam reforming,[3] is attractive
for larger scale hydrogen production, among which steam
reforming has been successfully industrialized. Over recent
years, dry reforming of methane (DRM) has aroused much
interest since it can convert two strong greenhouse gases into
syngas. Moreover, the H2/CO molar ratio around 1 is promising
for further transformation of the obtained syngas into higher
value chemicals such as liquid fuels by Fischer-Tropsch
process.[4,5] As depicted in Equation (1), DRM is a strong
endothermic reaction, thus high temperature is generally
required to proceed.
CO2þCH4!2CO þ2H2DH298 K ¼ þ247 kJ mol1(1)
Up to date, both noble metals[6] and non-noble metals have
been adopted as the active components for DRM catalysts.[7]
Noble metals such as Pt,[8] Pd,[9] Rh,[10] or Ru[11] exhibit superior
catalytic activity and carbon resistance, but their high cost limits
the widespread industrial applications. Over recent decades, Ni-
based catalysts have been widely used in DRM for syngas and
hydrogen production because of its’ high initial activity and
competitive price. However, severe carbon deposition and Ni
active sites agglomeration at elevated temperature can result in
quick deactivation of the catalysts during DRM processes.[12,13]
On the basis of former studies, in high temperature region (>
550 °C), coke deposition mainly originates from CH4decom-
position [Eq. (2)]:
CH4!Cþ2H2DH298 K ¼ þ75 kJ mol1(2)
Whereas, in low-temperature region, coke deposition mainly
comes from Boudouard reaction [Eq. (3)]:
2CO !CþCO2DH298 K ¼ 172 kJ mol1(3)
To improve both the activity and coke resistance of Ni-based
catalysts, many efforts have been devoted to choosing good
[a] L. Xu,+Prof. Dr. W. Liu,+X. Zhang, L. Tao, L. Xia, X. Xu, Dr. X. Fang,
Prof. Dr. X. Wang
Key Laboratory of Jiangxi Province for Environment and Energy Catalysis
College of Chemistry
Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi 330031 (P.R. China)
E-mail: fangxiuzhong@ncu.edu.cn
xwang23@ncu.edu.cn
Homepage: http://chem.ncu.edu.cn/index.php?c =channel&molds =
szdw&id =39
[b] Dr. X. Fang
College of Environmental and Energy Engineering
Beijing University of Technology
Beijing 100124 (P.R. China)
[c] Dr. J. Song
School of Civil Engineering
Jiangxi University of Technology
Nanchang 330098 (P.R. China)
[d] W. Zhou
Jiangxi Golden Century Advance materials Co.Ltd
Nanchang, 330013 (P.R. China)
[+]These authors contributed equally to this work.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under
https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201900331
Full Papers
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201900331
2887ChemCatChem 2019,11, 2887 – 2899 © 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Wiley VCH Donnerstag, 06.06.2019
1912 / 137336 [S. 2887/2899] 1