Access to this full-text is provided by Pensoft Publishers.
Content available from Mycokeys
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 29
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and
associated rhizosphere
Junmin Liang1,*, Guangshuo Li1,2,*, Shiyue Zhou3, Meiqi Zhao4,5, Lei Cai1,3
1 State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beichen West Road,
Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China 2 College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei Pro-
vince, 071002, China 3 College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,
China 4 College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China 5 Forwardgroup
Turf Service & Research Center, Wanning, Hainan Province, 571500, China
Corresponding author: Lei Cai (cail@im.ac.cn)
Academic editor: I. Schmitt|Received27 November 2018|Accepted 26 February 2019|Published 18 April2019
Citation: Liang J, Li G, Zhou S, Zhao M, Cai L (2019) Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated
rhizosphere. MycoKeys 51: 29–53. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.51.31957
Abstract
Myrothecium sensu lato includes a group of fungal saprophytes and weak pathogens with a worldwide
distribution. Myrothecium s.l. includes 18 genera, such as Myrothecium, Septomyrothecium, Myxospora,
all currently included in the family Stachybotryaceae. In this study, we identied 84 myrothecium-like
strains isolated from turfgrasses and their rhizosphere. Five new species, i.e., Alfaria poae, Alf. humicola,
Dimorphiseta acuta, D. obtusa, and Paramyrothecium sinense, are described based on their morphological
and phylogenetic distinctions. Phylogenies were inferred based on the analyses of sequences from four
DNA loci (ITS, cmdA, rpb2 and tub2). e generic concept of Dimorphiseta is broadened to include a
third type of seta, i.e. thin-walled, straight with obtuse apices.
Keywords
Stachybotryaceae, soil fungi, turfgrass disease, multi-locus phylogeny, cup-shaped sporodochia
Introduction
Myrothecium was rst introduced by Tode (1790) based on M. inundatum. e typical
characters of these fungi are cup-shaped sporodochia covered by a mass of slimy, green
to black conidia. e generic concept of Myrothecium has been emended several times
* ese authors contributed equally to this study.
Copyright Junmin Liang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC
BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.51.31957
http://mycokeys.pensoft.net
A peer-reviewed open-access journal
MycoKeys
Launched to accelerate biodiversity research
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
30
(Link 1809; von Höhnel 1905; Pidoplichko and Kirilenko 1971). Decock et al. (2008)
reported that the genus Myrothecium is not monophyletic based on internal transcribed
spacer regions and the intervening 5.8S rDNA (ITS). Chen et al. (2015) re-evaluated
the phylogeny of Myrothecium based on ITS and elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-α)
gene sequences, suggesting the polyphyly of Myrothecium within Stachybotryaceae.
ese studies did not make taxonomic conclusions accordingly. Lombard et al. (2016)
constructed a backbone tree of Myrothecium s.l. based on a multi-locus phylogeny and
resolved Myrothecium s.l. to 18 genera including 13 new genera introduced. Under
the current concept of Myrothecium sensu stricto, only two species were included, M.
inundatum and M. simplex (Lombard et al. 2016).
Most myrothecium-like species are saprobes in soils (Ellis and Ellis 1985). Many
species were named referring to their substrates such as Alfaria terrestris, Albimbria
terrestris, Simorphiseta terrestris and Parvothecium terrestre. Some species were also re-
ported as weak plant pathogens. For instance, Paramyrothecium roridum (syn. Myrothe-
cium roridum) can infect coee plants, causing bark canker (Tulloch 1972). Albimbria
verrucaria (syn. Myrothecium verrucaria) is pathogenic to mulberry causing leaf spot
(Murakami et al. 2005). In addition, myrothecium-like species are also well-studied
for their natural compounds, which are able to inhibit the activity of liver cancer and
tumors (Pope 1944; Okunowo et al. 2010). Some myrothecium-like species can also
produce a cocktail of secondary metabolites, which have strong antifungal and antibi-
otic activity (Kobayashi et al. 2004; Liu et al. 2006; Ruma et al. 2015). Hereto, more
than 50 of these bioactive compounds have been reported from P. roridum and Alb.
verrucaria (Wagenaar and Clardy 2001).
In a survey of turfgrass diseases from 2017, a number of myrothecium-like strains
were collected from leaves and roots of turfgrasses and their rhizosphere. e aim of
this study was to characterize these strains based on morphology and molecular phy-
logenetic analyses.
Materials and methods
Fungal isolates
From May 2017 to March 2018, turfgrass diseases were investigated on cold-season
species in Beijing and on warm-season species in Hainan Province. Atotal of 130 sam-
ples were collected. Each sample was treated as an underground part of soil sample
and a ground part of diseased grasses. Soil samples were isolated following the modi-
ed dilution plate method (Zhang et al. 2017). Five grams of each soil sample were
suspended in 30 mL sterile water in a 50 mL bioclean centrifuge tube. e suspension
was mixed thoroughly using Vortex-Genie 2 (Scientic Industries, New York) with
maximum speed and then diluted to a series of concentration, i.e., 10-1, 10-2, 10-3 and
10-4. e 100 μL suspensions of each concentration were spread on to antibiotic potato
dextrose agar (PDA, 4 g potato starch, 5 g dextrose and 15 g agar, 50 mgampicillin
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 31
and streptomycin sulfate in 1 L sterile water). e rst few samples suggested that 10-2
was the best-diluted concentration for colony pickup. Diseased samples were isolated
following a tissue isolation protocol (Chen et al. 2015). All plates were incubated at
room temperature (23–25 °C) for 3–4 weeks, and from which all single colonies were
picked up and transferred to clean PDA plates. Puried strains were stored at 4 °C for
further studies. For phylogenetic analysis, associated sequences of 73 myrothecium-
like strains and one outgroup strain were retrieved from GenBank (NCBI, https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/; Table 1).
Morphology and culture characteristics
Descriptions of macromorphological features are based on 7-d old materials incubated
in the dark at room temperature (20–25 °C) and grown on potato dextrose agar (2%
w/w; PDA), oatmeal agar (OA), cornmeal agar (CMA) and synthetic low-nutrient agar
(SNA; Nirenberg 1981). Color description followed the color guide by Kornerup and
Wanscher (1978). Digital images of colonies were made with a Nikon Eclipse 80i light
microscope (Tokyo, Japan) with dierential interference contrast (DIC) illumination
and a LV2000 digital camera (Beijing, China). Slides mounted in clear lactic acid were
also prepared to observe conidiogenesis, conidiophores and conidia.
DNA extraction and PCR amplification
Genomic DNA was extracted from 1–2 weeks’ old cultures grown on potato dextrose
agar (2% w/w; PDA) incubated at room temperature using a modied Cetyltrimethyl
Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) method (Rogers and Bendich 1994). Partial sequenc-
es of four genes, ITS, RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2), β-tubulin
(tub2) and calmodulin (cmdA) gene sequences were amplied using the following pairs
of primers, ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990) for ITS, RPB2-5F2 and RPB2-7cR
(O’Donnell et al. 2007) for rpb2, Bt2a and Bt2b (Glass and Donaldson 1995) for tub2
and CAL-228F (Carbone and Kohn 1999) and CAL2Rd (Groenewald et al. 2013)
for cmdA. Amplication for each locus followed the PCR protocols as described in
Lombard et al. (2016). e PCR was performed in a 25 μL reaction volume including
2.5 μL 10 × PCR Buer (Dingguo, Beijing, China), 2 mM MgCl2, 50 μM dNTPs,
0.1 μM of each primer, 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase and 10 ng genomic DNA. PCR
reactions were conducted in ProFlexTM PCR system (Applied Biosystems, California,
USA) under the following reaction conditions: predenaturation at 94 °C for 5 min,
followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 52 °C (for ITS)
or 54 °C (for rpb2 and cmdA) or 56 °C (for tub2) for 40 s and elongation at 72 °C for
1 min, a nal elongation at 72 °C for 5 min.
e puried PCR products were sequenced in both forward and reverse directions
on an ABI-3730 XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). e se-
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
32
Table 1. Strains and NCBI GenBank accessions used in the phylogenetic analyses.
Species Isolate no. aHost/Substrate Country NCBI accession numbers
cmdA ITS tub2 rpb2
Myrothecium
simplex
CBS 582.93TDecaying agaric Japan KU846439 NR145079 KU846537 –
CBS 100287 Russula nigricans Japan KU846440 KU846457 KU846538 –
M. inundatum
CBS 275.48T = IMI
158855 Russula adusta England KU846435 KU846452 KU846533 –
CBS 116539 Agaric Canada KU846437 KU846454 KU846535 –
Albimbria
lateralis CBS117712TUnknown USA KU845865 KU845881 KU845957 KU845919
Alb. terrestris
CBS 126186T Soil in mopane
woodlands Namibia KU845867 KU845883 KU845959 KU845921
CBS 109378 =
NRRL 31066 Dead hardwood USA KU845866 KU845882 KU845958 KU845920
CBS 127838 Soil Namibia KU845868 KU845884 KU845960 KU845922
LC12196 rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. China MK500260 MK478879 MK500277 –
Alb. verrucaria
CBS 328.52T =
NRRL 2003 =
ATCC 9095
deteriorated baled
cotton USA KU845875 KU845893 KU845969 KU845931
CBS 189.46 = IMI
140060 Solanum tubersum Cyprus KU845872 KU845889 KU845965 KU845927
LC12191 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. China MK500255 MK478874 MK500272 MK500264
LC12192 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp.China MK500256 MK478875 MK500273 MK500265
LC12193 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp.China MK500257 MK478876 MK500274 MK500266
LC12194 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. China MK500258 MK478877 MK500276 MK500267
LC12195 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp.China MK500259 MK478878 MK500275 MK500268
Alb. viridis
CBS 449.71T = BCC
37540 Unknown India KU845879 KU845898 KU845974 KU845936
CBS 127346 Soil USA KU845880 KU845899 KU845975 KU845937
Alfaria. ossiformis CBS 324.54T Prairie soil USA KU845977 KU845984 KU846015 KU846002
Alf. humicola
sp. nov.
CGMCC3.19213T =
LC12143
Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Beijing, China MH885432 MH793291 MH793317 MH818829
LC12144 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Beijing, China MH885434 MH793293 MH793318 MH818830
Alf. poae sp. nov.
CGMCC3.19198T =
LC12140 Leaves of Poa sp. Hainan, China MH885419 MH793278 MH793314 MH818826
LC12141 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Hainan, China MH885420 MH793279 MH793315 MH818828
LC12142 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Hainan, China MH885421 MH793280 MH793316 MH818827
Alf. putrefolia CBS 112037TRotten leaf Brazil –KU845985 KU846016 KU846003
CBS 112038 Rotten leaf Brazil –KU845986 KU846017 KU846004
Alf. terrestris CBS 477.91TSoil Turkey KU845979 KU845988 KU846019 KU846006
Alf. thymi CBS 447.83Tymus serpyllum e Netherlands KU845981 KU845990 KU846021 –
Capitombria
compacta
CBS 111739TDecaying leaf Brazil KU846261 KU846287 KU846404 KU846349
MUCL 50238 Bark Zimbabwe –KU878556 KU878559 KU878558
Dimorphiseta
terrestris CBS 127345TSoil collected in
tallgrass prairie USA KU846284 KU846314 KU846431 KU846375
D. acuta sp. nov.
CGMCC3.19208T =
LC12122
Rhizosphere soils
of Poa pratensis Beijing, China MH885429 MH793288 –MH818815
LC12123
Leaves of
Digitaria
sanguinalis
Beijing, China MH885417 MH793276 MH793300 MH818811
LC12124 Leaves of
Poapratensis Beijing, China MH885418 MH793277 MH793297 MH818812
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 33
Species Isolate no. aHost/Substrate Country NCBI accession numbers
cmdA ITS tub2 rpb2
D. acuta sp. nov.
LC12125 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa pratensis Beijing, China MH885427 MH793286 MH793298 MH818813
LC12126 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa pratensis Beijing, China MH885428 MH793287 MH793299 MH818814
LC12127 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa pratensis Beijing, China MH885430 MH793289 MH793301 MH818820
D. obtusa
sp.nov.
CGMCC3.19206T =
LC12128 Poa pratensis Beijing, China MH885426 MH793285 MH793307 MH818816
LC12129
Rhizosphere
soils of Agrostis
stolonifera
Beijing, China MH885415 MH793274 MH793303 MH818821
LC12130 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa pratensis Beijing, China MH885431 MH793290 MH793308 MH818817
LC12131 rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Beijing, China MH885416 MH793275 MH793304 –
LC12132
Rhizosphere
soils of Festuca
arundinacea
Beijing, China MH885422 MH793281 MH793305 MH818818
LC12133 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa pratensis Beijing, China MH885423 MH793282 MH793306 MH818819
LC12134 Roots of Poa
pratensis Beijing, China MH885424 MH793283 MH793309 –
LC12135 Roots of Poa
pratensis Beijing, China MH885425 MH793284 MH793302 –
Gregatothecium
humicola CBS 205.96T Soil Papua New Guinea KU846285 KU846315 KU846432 KU846376
Peethambara
sundara
CBS 646.77TDead twig India –KU846471 KU846551 KU846509
CBS 521.96 =
MUCL 39093 Dead twig Nepal –KU846470 KU846550 KU846508
Inaequalispora
prestonii
CBS 175.73TForest soil Malaysia KU846286 KU846316 KU846433 KU846377
MUCL 52636 rhizoplane and
roots of plants Ecuador –KY389317 KY366447 KY389355
Myxospora masonii CBS 174.73TLeaves of
Glyceriasp. England KU846445 KU846462 KU846543 KU846500
My. graminicola CBS 116538TDecaying grass
leaf USA KU846444 KU846461 KU846542 KU846499
My. aptrootii CBS 101263T Leaf litter China KU846441 KU846458 KU846539 KU846496
My. musae CBS 265.71TMusa sp. Madagascar –KU846463 KU846544 KU846501
CPC 25150 Tarspot lesion South Africa KU846446 KU846464 KU846545 KU846502
My. crassiseta
CBS 731.83T Dead twig Japan KU846442 KU846459 KU846540 KU846497
CBS 121141 =
NRRL 45891 Pyrenomycete Hawaii KU846443 KU846460 KU846541 KU846498
Paramyrothecium
humicola CBS 127295TSoil collected in
tallgrass prairie USA –KU846295 KU846412 KU846356
P. parvum
CBS 257.35TViola sp. United Kingdom –KU846298 KU846415 KU846359
CBS 142.422= IMI
155923= MUCL
7582
Dune sand France KU846268 KU846297 KU846414 KU846358
P. foeniculicola CBS 331.51T Foeniculum
vulgare leaf sheath e Netherlands –KU846292 KU846409 KU846354
P. nigrum
CBS 116537TSoil Spain KU846267 KU846296 KU846413 KU846357
LC12188 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. China MK500252 MK478871 MK500269 MK500261
P. cupuliforme CBS 127789T Surface soil in
desert Namibia KU846264 KU846291 KU846408 KU846353
P. viridisporum CBS 873.85TSoil Turkey KU846278 KU846308 KU846425 KU846369
CBS 125835 Soil USA KU846280 KU846310 KU846427 KU846371
P. acadiense CBS 123.96TTussilago farfara Canada –KU846288 KU846405 KU846350
P. terrestris CBS 564.86TSoil Turkey KU846273 KU846303 KU846420 KU846364
CBS 566.86 Soil Turkey KU846275 KU846305 KU846422 KU846366
P. tellicola CBS 478.91TSoil Turkey KU846272 KU846302 KU846419 KU846363
P. foliicola CBS 113121T Decaying leaf Brazil KU846266 KU846294 KU846411 –
CBS 419.93 Air Cuba KU846265 KU846293 KU846410 KU846355
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
34
Species Isolate no. aHost/Substrate Country NCBI accession numbers
cmdA ITS tub2 rpb2
P. breviseta CBS 544.75TUnknown India KU846262 KU846289 KU846406 KU846351
P. roridum
CBS 357.89TGardenia sp. Italy KU846270 KU846300 KU846417 KU846361
CBS 212.95 Water e Netherlands KU846269 KU846299 KU846416 KU846360
CBS 372.50 = IMI
140050 Coea sp. Colombia KU846271 KU846301 KU846418 KU846362
P. guiyangense GUCC 201608S01T Soil Guiyang, China KY196193 KY126418 KY196201 –
HGUP 2016-8001 Soil Guiyang, China KY196192 KY126417 KY196200 –
P. verruridum HGUP 2016-8006TSoil Guizhou, China KY196197 KY126422 KY196205 –
P. sinense
sp.nov.
CGMCC3.19212T =
LC12136
Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Beijing, China MH885437 MH793296 MH793313 MH818824
LC12137 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Beijing, China MH885436 MH793295 MH793312 MH818822
LC12138 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Beijing, China MH885433 MH793292 MH793310 MH818823
LC12139 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Beijing, China MH885435 MH793294 MH793311 MH818825
Parvothecium
terrestre CBS 198.89TSoil in virgin
forest Brazil KU846449 KU846468 KU846548 KU846506
Neomyrothecium
humicola CBS 310.96TSoil Papua New Guinea KU846448 KU846467 – KU846505
Gregatothecium
humicola CBS 205.96T Soi Papua New Guinea KU846285 KU846315 KU846432 KU846376
Xepicula crassiseta CBS 392.71T Soil Spain KU847222 KU847247 KU847337 KU847296
X. jollymannii
CBS 276.48T=
MUCL 11830
Nicotiana
tabacum Malawi KU847223 KU847248 KU847338 KU847297
CBS 126168 Soil Namibia KU847224 KU847250 KU847340 KU847298
X. leucotricha
CBS 131.64= IMI
103664= ATCC
16686
Soil India KU847225 KU847251 KU847341 KU847299
CBS 483.78 Soil Colombia KU847228 KU847254 KU847344 KU847302
Smaragdiniseta
bisetosa CBS 459.82TRotten bark India KU847206 KU847229 KU847319 KU847281
Striaticonidium
brachysporum
CBS 513.71 T = IMI
115293 Dune sand Iran KU847209 KU847232 KU847322 KU847284
S. brachysporum
CBS 131.71= IMI
158441= ATCC
22270
Soil Ukrain KU847207 KU847230 KU847320 KU847282
LC12189 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Beijing, China MK500253 MK478872 MK500270 MK500262
LC12190 Rhizosphere soils
of Poa sp. Beijing, China MK500254 MK478873 MK500271 MK500263
S.synnematum CBS 479.85T Palm leaf Japan KU847218 KU847242 KU847332 KU847292
S. cinctum
CBS 932.69TSoil e Netherlands KU847216 KU847239 KU847329 KU847290
CBS 277.48 = IMI
001526 Soil New Zealand KU847213 KU847236 KU847326 KU847288
S. humicola CBS 388.97 Soil Papua New Guinea KU847217 KU847241 KU847331 KU847291
Tangerinosporium
thalictricola
CBS 317.61T = IMI
034815 alictrum avum UK KU847219 KU847243 KU847333 –
Xenomyrothecium
tongaense CBS 598.80T Halimeda sp. Tonga KU847221 KU847246 KU847336 KU847295
Virgatospora
echinobrosa
CBS 110115 eobroma cacao Ecuador KU847220 KU847244 KU847334 KU847293
MUCL 39092 =
ATCC 200437 Trewia nudiora Nepal –KU847245 KU847335 KU847294
Fusarium
sambucinum CBS 146.95 Solanum
tuberosum UK KM231391 KM231813 KM232078 KM232381
† ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, USA; BCC: BIOTEC Culture Collection, National Center for Genetic Engineer-
ing and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), Bangkok, ailand; CBS: CBS-KNAW Fungal Diversity Centre, Utrecht, e Netherlands; CGMCC:
China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center, Beijing, China; GUCC: Guizhou University Culture Collection, Guiyang,
China; HGUP: Herbarium of the Department of Plant Pathology, Guizhou University, China; IMI: International Mycological Institute,
England, UK; LC: Collection of Lei Cai, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; MUCL: Mycothèque de
l’Université Catholique de Louvian, Belgium; NRRL: Northern Regional Research Laboratory, USA.
T Ex-type and ex-epitype cultures.
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 35
quences were checked and manually corrected where necessary. A consensus contig was
assembled with BioEdit v. 7.0.9 (Hall 1999) and the reference sequences were down-
loaded from GenBank (Table 1). Sequences were aligned with MAFFT v. 7 (Kazutaka
and Standley 2013) and manually trimmed to equal length by cutting the unaligned
sequences at both ends.
Phylogenetic analyses
Phylogenetic analyses were based on Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum Likeli-
hood (ML). For BI analysis, the optimal evolutionary model was estimated in Mr-
Modeltest v. 2.3 (Nylander 2004) using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) for
each locus. For the selected substitution models for each locus see Table 2. MrBayes
v. 3.2.1 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) was used to generate tree topology and a
Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm of four chains was started with a
random seed and a burn in of rst 25% trees. e MCMC analysis lasted until the
average standard deviation of split frequencies came below 0.01. e ML analysis was
performed using RAxML servers (http://phylobench.vital-it.ch/raxml-bb/index.php),
with a maximum likelihood bootstrap (LB) of 1,000 replicates, under the GTR-GAM-
MA model (Stamatakis 2006).
Results
In this study, 603 fungal strains were isolated. Based on colony morphologies and
preliminary sequence comparison of ITS via BLASTn in GenBank, 84 myrotheci-
um-like strains were selected. Phylogenetic analyses of above 84 strains were per-
formed on single locus and concatenated datasets (ITS, cmdA, tub2 and rpb2), with
70 strains in Myrothecium s.l. as reference and Fusarium sambucinum (CBS 146.95)
as outgroup. After alignment, the concatenated datasets of four loci contained 569
characters (with gaps) for ITS, 318 for tub2, 732 for cmdA and 724 for rpb2. e
characters of dierent alignments and statistics of phylogenetic analyses were shown
in Table 2. e four single locus trees of all strains showed essentially similar topol-
ogy (Supp. materials1–4), with only minor dierences aecting unsupported nodes
on the trees. e resulting multi-locus ML tree was presented in Fig. 1 together with
BI posterior probability values. Among 84 myrothecium-like strains, 14 strains were
identied as four known species, Albimbria verrucaria (10 strains), Alb. terrestris
(1 strain), Striaticonidium brachysporum (2 strains) and Paramyrothecium nigrum (1
strain). e rest of them were grouped into ve distinct clades with high supported
values. Based on the morphological and phylogenetic distinctions, ve novel species
(i.e. Alfaria humicola, Alf. poae, Dimorphiseta acuta, D. obtusa and Paramyrothecium
sinense) were described in this paper.
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
36
Figure 1. e ML consensus tree inferred from a four-locus concatenated alignment (ITS, cmdA, rpb2
and tub2). Bootstrap values (1,000 replicates) over 70% for ML and posterior probability (PP) over 0.95
are added to the left of a node (ML/PP). e type strains are labeled with “T”. Strains obtained from this
study are in red. e tree is rooted using Fusarium sambucinum (CBS 146.95).
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 37
Table 2. Characteristics of the dierent datasets and statistics of phylogenetic analyses used in this study.
Locus† Number of sites* Evolutionary
model‡
Number of
tree sampled
in B
Maximum-likelihood statistics
Total Conserved Phylogenetically
informative
B unique
patterns
Best tree optimised
likelihood
Tree length
ITS 569 334 193 247 GTR+I+G
7501 -32666.73 5.36
tub2 318 168 140 159 HKY+I+G
cmdA 732 258 381 490 HKY+I+G
rpb2 724 360 367 367 GTR+I+G
† ITS, the internal transcribed spacer regions and 5.8s rRNA gene; tub2, β-tubulin; cmdA, calmodulin; rpb2: RNA polymerase
II second largest subunit.
* B = Bayesian inference.
‡ G: Gamma distributed rate variation among sites. GTR: Generalised time-reverisble. I: Proportion of invariable sites. HKY:
Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano.
Figure 1. Continued.
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
38
Taxonomy
Dimorphiseta L. Lombard & Crous., Persoonia. 36: 188. 2016. emend. J.M.Liang
& L.Cai.
Dimorphiseta terrestris L. Lombard & Crous. Persoonia. 36: 188. 2016. (Type species)
Note. Dimorphiseta was a monotypic genus, introduced based on D. terrestris, which
showed both type I (thin-walled, exuous to circinate, narrowing to a sharp apex) and
type II (thick-walled, straight to slightly curved, narrowing to a sharp apex) setae. Our
study demonstrated that there is a third type of setae (type III: thin-walled, straight,
terminating in an obtuse apex) in the genus.
Dimorphiseta acuta J.M. Liang, G.S. Li & L. Cai, sp. nov.
MycoBank MB 829693
Fig. 2
Type. China, Beijing, isolated from rhizosphere soils of Poa pratensis, 26 Aug 2017,
J.M. Liang, holotype HMAS 247957, dried culture on PDA, ex-holotype culture CG-
MCC3.19208 = LC12122.
Description. Colonies on PDA, CMA and OA approx. 7–8 cm diam. after 7d at
room temperature (approx. 25 °C), mycelium white and abundant, with conidiophores
forming on the aerial mycelium, carrying slimy olivaceous green to black conidial mass-
es, reverse on PDA bu. Conidiomata sporodochial, stromatic, supercial, cupulate to
discoid, scattered, rarely gregarious, irregular in outline, 50–300 μm diam., 60–150 μm
deep, consisting of bundles of parallel, longitudinal, closely compacted hyphae, termi-
nating in whorls of 3–5 conidiogenous cells, covered by an olivaceous green to black
slimy mass of conidia without marginal hyphae. Stroma poorly developed, hyaline,
of a textura angularis. Setae arising from the conidial mass, thick-walled, subhyaline,
smooth, 5–15-septate, tapering to sharp apices, 120–370μm long, 10–13μm wide at
the broadest part, 2–4 μm wide at the apex. Conidiophores macronematous, irregularly,
unbranched, smooth to lightly verrucose, arising from the basal stroma. Conidiogenous
cells phialidic, subcylindrical, hyaline, smooth, 10–20μm long, 2–3 μm wide. Conidia
aseptate, smooth, hyaline, ellipsoidal, rounded at the base, pointed at the apex with a
funnel-shaped appendage, 7–12×2–3 μm (av.10± 0.7 × 3 ± 1.3μm, n = 50).
Distribution. China.
Etymology. Name refers to the setae with tapered and sharp apices.
Additional isolates examined. China, Beijing, from leaves of Digitaria sangui-
nalis, 21 Aug 2017, J.M. Liang, LC12123; China, Beijing, from leaves of Poa prat-
ensis, 21 Aug 2017, J.M. Liang, LC12124; China, Beijing, from rhizosphere soils of
P. pratensis, 21 Aug 2017, J.M. Liang & G.S. Li, LC12125, 21 Jul 2017, J.M. Liang,
LC12126, 25 Jul 2017, J.M. Liang, LC12127.
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 39
Figure 2. Dimorphiseta acuta (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.19208) a–c colony on PDA, CMA, OA
dconidiomata on SNA e conidiophores f conidiogenous cells g setae h–k conidia. Scale bars: 5μm(e, f, h):
50 μm (g); 2 μm (i, j, k).
Notes. e multi-locus phylogenetic analyses indicated that D. acuta formed a
sister clade to D. terrestris, but diers from the latter in the type and size of setae.
Dimorphiseta terrestris produces both types of setae, the thin-walled and circinate
type (Type I) and the thick-walled sharp-edged type (Type II), whereas D. acuta
only produces the type I setae. In addition, the setae of D. acuta are much longer
and wider than that in D. terrestris (120–370 μm × 10–13 μm vs. 70–95 × 3–4 μm)
(Lombard et al. 2016). Morphologically, D. acuta should also be compared with
M. miconiae and M. xigazense, which also produce sharp-edged setae. Myrothecium
miconiae, however, diers from D. acuta in producing 1-septate conidia (Alves et al.
2010), while M. xigazense diers in producing conidia that are truncate at both ends
(Wu et al. 2014).
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
40
Dimorphiseta obtusa J.M. Liang, G.S. Li & L. Cai, sp. nov.
MycoBank MB 829694
Fig. 3
Type. China, Beijing, isolated from rhizosphere soils of P. pratensis, 23 Jun 2017, J.M.
Liang, holotype HMAS 247954, ex-holotype culture CGMCC3.19206 = LC12128.
Description. Colonies on PDA, OA and CMA approx. 5–6 cm diam. after 7
d at room temperature (approx. 25 °C), mycelium white and abundant, with con-
idiophores forming on the aerial mycelium, carrying slimy olivaceous green to black
conidial masses, reverse on PDA pale luteous to bu. Conidiomata sporodochial, stro-
Figure 3. Dimorphiseta obtusa (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.19206) a–c colony on PDA, CMA,OA
dconidioma on SNA e setae f conidiophores g conidiogenous cells h–k conidia. Scale bars: 50μm(e);
10 μm (f, g); 5 μm (h); 2 μm (i, j, k).
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 41
matic, supercial, scattered, rarely gregarious, oval to elongate or irregular in outline,
60–280 μm diam., 40–120 μm deep, with a setose fringe surrounding green to black
slimy mass of conidia. Stroma poorly developed, hyaline, smooth to verrucose, of
textura angularis. Setae arising from the basal stroma, thin-walled, 3–6-septate, un-
branched, hyaline, smooth, 80–250 μm long, 2–4 μm wide at the broadest, terminat-
ing in a blunt apex. Conidiophores macronematous, irregularly, unbranched, smooth
to lightly verrucose, arising from the basal stroma, up to 18 μm long. Conidiogenous
cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth to verrucose, cylindrical, 7–19 × 2–3 μm, becoming
narrowed at the tip with collarette. Conidia aseptate, ellipsoidal or cylindrical, hyaline,
smooth, rounded both ends, with a funnel-shaped apical appendage, 9–11 × 2–4 μm
(av. 10±0.5 × 3 ± 0.3μm, n = 50).
Distribution. China.
Etymology. Named refers the setae with obtuse apices.
Additional isolates examined. China, Beijing, from rhizosphere soils of Agrostis
stolonifera, 24 Jul 2017, J.M. Liang, LC12129; China, Beijing, from rhizosphere soils
of P. pratensis, 25 Aug 2017, J.M. Liang & G.S. Li, LC12130, 19 Jul 2017, J.M. Liang,
LC12133; China, Beijing, from rhizosphere soils of Poa sp., 19 Jul 2017, J.M. Liang,
LC12131; China, Beijing, from rhizosphere soils of Festuca arundinacea, 19 Jul 2017,
J.M. Liang, LC12132; China, Beijing, from leaves of P. pratensis, 23 Jun 2017, J.M.
Liang, LC12134, LC12135.
Notes. Dimorphiseta obtusa formed a highly supported cluster with D. terrestris
and D. acuta, but can be distinguished from the latter two by having setae with erect
and obtuse apices. In addition, D. obtusa is also morphologically similar to two old
un-sequenced Myrothecium taxa, i.e. M. biforme and M. dimorphum, but both of these
two taxa have two types of conidia. Myrothecium biforme produces short cylindrical
and ellipsoidal to navicular conidia (Jiang et al. 2014) and M. dimorphum has ovate
and ellipsoidal conidia (Watanabe et al. 2003).
Alfaria humicola J.M. Liang, G.S. Li & L. Cai, sp. nov.
MycoBank MB 829696
Fig. 4
Type. China, Beijing, Olympic Park, from rhizosphere soil of Poa sp., 13 Dec 2017, S.Y.
Zhou, holotype HMAS 247955, ex-holotype culture CGMCC3.19213 = LC12143.
Description. Colonies on PDA, CMA and OA approx. 7–8 cm diam. after 7d
at 25 °C. Hyphae hyaline, smooth, branched, 1–2 μm wide. Conidiomata sporo-
dochial, stromatic, supercial, cupulate to discoid, scattered to gregarious, oval to
elongate or irregular in outline, 50–200 μm diam., 70–150 μm deep, without setose
hyphae, covered by a green to black agglutinated slimy mass of conidia. Stroma
well-developed, hyaline, of textura globulose or textura angularis. Setae absent. Co-
nidiophores arising from the basal stroma, unbranched or branched, initially hya-
line and smooth, becoming pigmented and verrucose with age, 11–25 μm long.
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
42
Conidiogenous cells phialidic, cylindrical to allantoid, initially hyaline and smooth
becoming pigmented and verrucose with age, 14–33 × 2–3 μm. Conidia aseptate,
smooth, hyaline, elongated ellipsoidal to limoniform, straight, 7–9(–10) × 2–3 μm
(av. 8±0.6×3 ± 0.2 μm, n = 50).
Distribution. China.
Etymology. Name refers the substrate, soil, from which this fungus was isolated.
Additional isolate examined. China, Beijing, Olympic Park, from rhizosphere
soil of Poa sp., 13 Dec 2017, S.Y. Zhou, LC12144.
Notes. Alfaria humicola represents another distinct lineage in Alfaria (Fig. 1). Al-
faria humicola lacks setae, distinguishing it from Alf. caricicola and Alf. thymi. Further-
more, the conidiogenous cells of Alf. humicola (14–33 × 2–3 μm) are much longer than
that of Alf. arenosa (5–10 × 1–2 μm), Alf. ossiformis (5–10 × 2–3 μm) and Alf. terrestris
(5–11 × 1–3 μm). Compared with those old Myrothecium taxa lacking sequences, Alf.
humicola is morphologically similar to M. atrocarreum (Berkeley & Broome, 1877),
M. conicum (Fuckel, 1870), M. ellipsosporum (Fuckel, 1866), M. fragosianum (Sac-
cardo, 1917), M. leucomelas (Höhnel, 1925) and M. oryza (Saccardo, 1917), but Alf.
humicola produces limoniform conidia which makes it distinguishable. In addition,
the conidiogenous cells of Alf. humicola show conspicuous collarettes which were not
described in previous old taxa.
Figure 4. Alfaria humicola (from ex-type CGMCC3.19213) a–c colony on PDA, CMA, OA d conidi-
omata on SNA e sporodochial conidioma, arrows showing branched conidiosphores and conidiogenous
cells f conidia. Scale bars: 10 μm (e); 5 μm (f).
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 43
Alfaria poae J.M. Liang, G.S. Li & L. Cai, sp. nov.
MycoBank MB 829697
Fig. 5
Type. China, Hainan Province, Haikou, isolated from leaves of Imperata cylindrica,
10 Mar 2018, J.M. Liang and L. Cai, holotype HMAS 247953, ex-holotype culture
CGMCC3.19198 = LC12140.
Description. Colonies on PDA, CMA and OA with white aerial mycelium, ap-
prox. 6–7 cm diam. after 7 d at 25 °C, giving rise to dark green or blank sporodochia
scattered or gregarious on the surface, covered by olivaceous green pillars of conidia,
Figure 5. Alfaria poae (from ex-type strain CGMCC3.19198) a–c colony on PDA, CMA, OA d–eco-
nidiomata on SNA f synnematous conidioma g conidiogenous cells, the arrow showing conspicuous col-
larette h aged conidiophores i conidia. Scale bars: 50 μm (f); 5 μm (g); 10 μm (h, i ).
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
44
reverse on PDA sienna. Hyphae hyaline, smooth, branched, 1–2 μm wide. Conidioma-
ta synnematous, solitary, 60–250 μm high, 30–80 μm wide at the base, 60–150μm at
the apex, with setose hyphae surrounding a green agglutinated mass of conidia. Stroma
well developed, hyaline, of textura angularis. Setae absent. Conidiophores arising from
the basal stroma, branched, initially hyaline and becoming pigmented and verrucose
with age covered by an olivaceous green mucoid layer, up to 30 μm long. Conidiog-
enous cell phialidic, clavate to cylindrical, hyaline, smooth, 5–10 × 1–2 μm, becom-
ing pigmented and verrucose with age, with conspicuous collarettes and periclinal
thickenings. Conidia aseptate, smooth, hyaline, ellipsoidal to fusiform, 6–8 ×2–3μm
(av.7±0.4× 2 ± 0.2 μm, n = 50).
Distribution. China.
Etymology. Name refers the host, Poa sp., from which this fungus was isolated.
Additional isolate examined. China, Hainan, from leaves of Imperata cylindrica,
10 Mar 2018, J.M. Liang & Lei Cai, LC12141, LC12142.
Notes. Alfaria poae formed a well-supported clade in Alfaria (Fig. 1). Similar
to Alf. ossiformis and Alf. terrestris, Alf. poae does not produce setae surrounding the
sporodochia, distinguishing it from Alf. caricicola and Alf. thymi. Alfaria poae pro-
duces ellipsoidal to fusiform conidia, which are dierent from the ossiform conidia
produced by Alf. ossiformis (Lombard et al. 2016). e conidia of Alf. terrestris have
basal hilum which was not observed in Alf. poae. In addition, Alf. poae shares mor-
phological characters with several un-sequenced Myrothecium taxa, such as M. atro-
carneum (Berkeley & Broom, 1877), M. conicum (Fuckel, 1870), M. ellipsosporum
(Fuckel, 1866) and M. leucomelas (Höhnel, 1925). Because the descriptions of M.
atrocarneum, M. conicum and M. ellipsosporum were not elaborate enough, these
old species are not distinct from Alf. poae yet. Future comparisons should be made
when these old species are epitypied by fresh collections. Although M. leucomelas
(host: Sumbaviae rotttleroidis; location: Bulacan, Luzon) had a detailed description,
it cannot be epitypied by Alf. Poae, because Alf. poae was collected from a distinct
location and plant host. Taking the above special characters into account, we con-
sidered introducing a new species, Alfaria poae.
Paramyrothecium sinense J.M. Liang, G.S. Li & L. Cai, sp. nov.
MycoBank MB 829698
Fig. 6
Type. China, Beijing, Olympic Park, from rhizosphere soil of Poa sp., 13 Dec 2017, S.Y.
Zhou, holotype HMAS 247956, ex-holotype culture CGMCC3.19212 = LC12136.
Description. Colonies on PDA, CMA and OA approx. 5–6 cm diam. after 7 d
at 25 °C. Hyphae white, hyaline, smooth, branched, 1–2 μm wide, reverse on PDA
pale luteous. Conidiomata sporodochial, stromatic, cupulate, supercial, scattered or
gregarious, oval or irregular in outline, 80–600 μm diam., 50–150 μm deep, with a
white setose fringe surrounding an olivaceous green to black agglutinated slimy mass
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 45
of conidia. Stroma poorly developed, hyaline, of textura angularis. Setae arising from
stroma, thin-walled, hyaline, 1–3-septate, straight to exuous, 45–90 μm long, 1–3
μm wide, tapering to an acutely rounded apex. Conidiophores arising from the ba-
sal stroma, consisting of a stipe and a penicillately branched conidiogenous appara-
tus; stipes unbranched, hyaline, septate, smooth, 20–30 × 2–3 μm; primary branches
aseptate, unbranched, smooth, 13–40 × 2–3 μm; secondary branches aseptate, un-
branched, smooth, 8–15 × 2–3 μm; terminating in a whorl of 3–6 conidiogenous cells;
conidiogenous cell phialidic, cylindrical to subcylindrical, hyaline, smooth, straight to
slightly curved, 7–16 × 1–3 μm, with conspicuous collarettes and periclinal thicken-
ings. Conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, cylindrical, 6–7 × 2–3 μm (av. 7 ± 0.3 × 2 ±
0.2 μm, n = 40), rounded at both ends.
Distribution. China.
Figure 6. Paramyrothecium sinense (from ex-type CGMCC3.19212) a–c colony on PDA, CMA, OA
dconidiomata on SNA e sporodochial conidioma f setae g conidia h conidiogenous cells. Scale bars:
20μm (e, f ); 10 μm (g); 5 μm (h).
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
46
Etymology. Named after the country of collection, China.
Additional isolate examined. China, Beijing, Olympic Park, from rhizosphere
soils of Poa sp., 13 Dec 2017, S.Y. Zhou, LC12137, LC12138, LC12139.
Notes. Lombard et al. (2016) introduced a new genus, Paramyrothecium, based
on an epitype of Myrothecium roridum Tode, 1790. Gams (2016) pointed out that
Myrotheciella catenuligera, the type species of Myrotheciella was listed as a synonym
of P. roridum by Lombard et al. (2016), thus Paramyrothecium is illegitimate and
Myrotheciella should be the correct name for Paramyrothecium. However, the origi-
nal description of Myrotheciella catenuligera suggested that it lacks seta (Spegazzini
1911), thus is clearly dierent from the morphological circumscription of P. roridum.
erefore, we do not agree with the treatment of Lombard et al. (2016) of listing
Myrotheciella catenuligera as a synonym of P. roridum.
Paramyrothecium sinense formed a highly supported distinct clade closely related to
P. humicola. e setae of this species are terminated with obtuse apices, dissimilar to
the acute apices in P. humicola. In addition, the conidiophore stipes (20–30 μm long)
and primary branches (13–40 μm long) of P. sinense are much longer than those of P.
humicola (stipe, 12–22 μm long; primary branches, 7–17 μm long) (Lombard et al.
2016). Among old un-sequenced taxa in Myrothecium, only M. biforme and M. dimor-
phum show seta with obtuse apices, but both taxa produce two types of conidia (Jiang
et al. 2014; Watanabe et al. 2003).
Discussion
e ITS has been shown to be insucient to delineate the myrothecium-like spe-
cies. With the additions of partial sequences of rpb2, cmdA and tub2, phylogenetic
relationships within Stachybotryaceae could be better resolved (Lombard et al. 2016).
In this study, we isolated fungi from rhizosphere soils, leaves and roots of several
turfgrasses, and our phylogenetic analyses based on concatenated four loci together
with the morphological characters supported the recognition of ve novel species in
Stachybotryaceae.
By comparing the topologies of the four single-locus trees, incomplete lineage sort-
ing was discovered in Dimorphiseta. Based on the single-locus trees of ITS and rpb2,
D. acuta, D. obtusa and D. terrestris grouped together (Supp. materials 1, 4). Whereas
in the single-locus phylogenetic analyses based on tub2 and cmdA, D. obtusa grouped
distantly from D. acuta and D. terrestris, but close to Myxospora and Albimbria spe-
cies (Supp. materials 2, 3). ree Dimorphiseta species are similar in the conidial shape
and size (7–19 μm long), which are distinct from the shorter conidia in Albimbria
(4–8 μm long) and Myxospora (4–6 μm long) species (Tulloch 1972; Lombard et al.
2016). Conidia with a funnel-shaped apical appendage are a distinct feature of three
Dimorphiseta species, but they are absent in all Myxospora species and most Albimbria
species (Lombard et al. 2016). Furthermore, the rpb2 and 28S ribosomal DNA com-
bined dataset, which was suggested to delimit generic boundaries of myrothecium-like
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 47
species (Lombard et al. 2016) revealed that the three Dimorphiseta species clustered
together (Supp. material 6: Table S1, Supp. material 5).
In the multi-locus sequence analysis of Myrothecium s.l. by Lombard et al. (2016),
thirteen new genera were introduced including several monotypic genera, such as Dimor-
phiseta, Capitombria, Gregatothecium and Neomyrothecium. In this study, we reported two
new species in Dimorphiseta (D. acuta and D. obtusa). With this addition, the generic con-
cept of Dimorphiseta is slightly expanded for including a third type of setae. Hereto, Di-
morphiseta is the genus with the most variable types of seta among Myrothecium s.l., which
might be useful in the generic delimitation in Myrothecium s.l. (Lombard et al. 2016).
Lombard et al. (2016) narrowed the concept of Myrothecium s.s. to only include
species with sporodochia or mononematous conidiophores producing conidia shorter
than 5 μm in green slimy masses without mucoid appendages. Whether or not a co-
nidial size should be dened in the generic concept remained debatable. Because many
Myrothecium published recently produced much longer conidia, e.g. M. chiangmaiense
(4–7 μm) (Dai et al. 2017), M. uttaraditense (10–15 μm) (Dai et al. 2017), M. thailan-
dicum (6.5–10 μm) (Dai et al. 2017), M. septentrionale (8.5–12 μm) (Tibpromma et
al. 2017), M. variabile (12.5–16.5 μm) (Wu et al. 2014) and M. xigazense (2.5–15μm)
(Wu et al. 2014). ese above species were identied, either based on morphology
only or with a single molecular locus (ITS), and should be better conrmed for their
generic placement when more data are available. Currently, there are 90 records of
Myrothecium in Index Fungorum (Jan 10, 2019), and 25 names have been successively
transferred to other genera, i.e., Capitombria, Melanconis, Striaticonidium, Xepicula
(Lombard et al. 2016), Digitiseta (Gordillo and Decock 2018). Only a limited num-
ber of the remaining species in Myrothecium have available molecular data (Dai etal.
2017; Tibpromma et al. 2017), as most of these taxa have no living cultures. We agree
with Gams (2016) that these unvisited taxa are still important when the original de-
scriptions are suciently clear to recognize a species. ey should be epitypied in
future studies when fresh collections with living cultures are available, and before that,
descriptions of new taxa in this group should be made carefully with the inclusion of
these un-sequenced taxa in morphological comparisons.
Acknowledgements
is study was nancially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of Chi-
na (NSFC 31600405).
References
Alves JL, Barreto RW, Pereira OL, Soares DJ (2010) Additions to the mycobiota of the in-
vasive weed Miconia calvescens (Melastomataceae). Mycologia, 102(1):69–82. https://doi.
org/10.3852/09-070
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
48
Berkeley MJ, Broome CE (1877) Supplement to the enumeration of fungi of Ceylon. Botani-
cal Journal of the Linnean Society. 15: 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1876.
tb00225.x
Carbone I, Kohn LM (1999) A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in la-
mentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91: 553–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/3761358
Chen Q, Zhang KE, Zhang G, Cai L (2015) A polyphasic approach to characterise two nov-
el species of Phoma (Didymellaceae) from China. Phytotaxa 197: 267–281. https://doi.
org/10.11646/phytotaxa.197.4.4
Dai DQ, Phookamsak R, Wijayawardene NN (2017) Bambusicolous fungi. Fungal Diversity
82: 1–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0367-8
Decock C, Huret S, Bivort C (2008) Anamorphic fungi from French Guyana. Septomyrotheci-
um sp. nov. and S. setiramosum comb. nov. (anamorphic Hypocreales, Ascomycota). Cryp-
togamie Mycologie 29: 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcm091
Ellis MB, Ellis JP (1985) Microfungi on Land Plants-An Identication Handbook. Bulletin of
the Torrey Botanical Club 113: 61. https://doi.org/10.2307/2996241
Fuckel L (1866) Fungi Rhenani exsiccati Cent. 12–17 (2), no 1450–1632. Hedwigia. 5: 23–30.
Fuckel L (1870) Symbolae mycologicae. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Rheinischen Pilze. Jahr-
bücher des Nassauischen Vereins für Naturkunde. 23–24: 1–459.
Glass NL, Donaldson G (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with PCR to
amplify conserved genes from lamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Mi-
crobiology 61: 1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.0000/PMID7747954
Gams W (2016) Are old taxa without living authenticated cultures losing their status? IMA
Fungus. 7(2): 72–73.
Gordillo A, Decock C (2018) Myrothecium-like (Ascomycota, Hypocreales) species from tropi-
cal areas: Digitiseta gen. nov. and additions to Inaequalispora and Parvothecium. Mycologi-
cal Progress 17: 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-017-1302-4
Groenewald JZ, Nakashima C, Nishikawa J, Shin HD, Park JH, Jama AN, Groenewald M,
Braun U, Crous PW (2013) Species concepts in Cercospora: spotting the weeds among the
roses. Studies in Mycology 75: 115–170. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim0012
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analy-
sis for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symppsium Series 41: 95–98. https://doi.
org/10.1021/bk-1999-0734.ch008
Höhnel (1925) Mitt. Bot. Inst. Techn. Hochsch. Wien 2(3): 96.
Jiang YL, Wang HF, Pan HQ, Zhang TY (2014) Myrothecium (Hyphomycetes): three new spe-
cies, one new variety and a key to species and varieties of the genus known from soils in
China. Mycosystema, 33(1): 7–14.
Kazutaka K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7:
Improvements in Performance and Usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–
780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
Kobayashi M, Sato I, Abe F, Nitta K, Hashimoto M, Fujie A, Hino M (2004) FR227244, a
novel antifungal antibiotic from Myrothecium cinctum No. 002 I. Taxonomy, fermentation,
isolation and physio-chemical properties. Journal of Antibiotics 57: 780–787. https://doi.
org/10.7164/antibiotics.57.788
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 49
Kornerup A, Wanscher JH (1978) Methuen Handbook of Colour. Methuen.
Krisai-Greilhuber I, Chen Y, Jabeen S, ... Yu JY (2017) Fungal systematics and evolution: FUSE
3. Sydowia, 69: 229–264. https://doi.org/10.12905/0380.sydowia69-2017-0229
Link HF (1809) Observationes in ordines plantarum naturales. Dissertatio I.3: 3–42.
Liu JY, Huang LL, Ye YH, Zou WX, Guo ZJ, Tan RX (2006) Antifungal and new metabo-
lites of Myrothecium sp. Z16, a fungus associated with white croaker Argyromosum ar-
gentatus. Journal of Applied Microbiology 100: 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-
2672.2005.02760.x
Lombard L, Houbraken J, Decock C, Samson R.A, Meijer M, Réblová M, Groenewald JZ,
Crous PW (2016) Generic hyper-diversity in Stachybotriaceae. Persoonia 36: 156–246.
https://doi.org/10.3767/003158516X691582
Murakami R, Kobayashi T, Takahashi K (2005) Myrothecium leaf spot of mulberry caused
by Myrothecium verrucaria. Journal of General Plant Pathology 71: 153–155. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10327-004-0178-8
Nirenberg HI (1981) A simplied method for identifying Fusarium spp. occurring on wheat.
Canadian Journal of Botany 59: 1599–1609. https://doi.org/10.1139/b81-217
Nylander JAA (2004) MrModelTest (program distributed by the author). Evolutionary Biology
Centre, Uppsala University.
O’Donnell K, Sarver BA, Brandt M, Chang DC, Noble-Wang J, Park BJ, Sutton DA, Ben-
jamin L, Lindsley M, Padhye A, Geiser DM, Ward TJ (2007) Phylogenetic diversity and
microsphere array-based genotyping of human pathogenic Fusaria, including isolates from
the multistate contact lens-associated U.S. keratitis outbreaks of 2005 and 2006. Journal of
Clinical Microbiology 45: 2235–2248. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00533-07
Okunowo WO, Gbenle GO, Osuntoki AA, Adekunle AA, Ojokuku SA (2010) Production
of cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes by a phytopathogenic Myrothecium roridum and
some avirulent fungal isolates from water hyacinth. African Journal of Biotechnology 9:
1074–1078. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB09.1598
Pidoplichko NM, Kirilenko TS (1971) On the taxonomy of the genus Myrothecium. In: Pidopli-
chko NM (Ed.) Metabolites of soil micromycetes. Dumka, Naukova, Kiev, Ukrain, 157–171.
Pope S (1944) A new species in Metarrhizium active in decomposing cellulose. Mycologia 36:
343–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/3754750
Rogers SO, Bendich AJ (1994) Extraction of total cellular DNA from plants, algae and fungi. In:
Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA (Eds) Plant Molecular Biology Manual. Springer, Dordrecht,
183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0511-8_12
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed
models. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572–1574. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
Ruma K, Sunil K, Kini KR, Prakash HS (2015) Genetic diversity and antimicrobial activity of
endophytic Myrothecium spp. isolated from Calophyllum apelatum and Garcinia morella.
Molecular Biology Reports 42: 1533–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-015-3884-8
Saccardo PA (1917) Notae mycologicae series XXIII. Fungi Philippinenses. Atti della Acca-
demia Scientica Veneto-Trentino-Istriana. 10: 57–94.
Spegazzini C (1911) Mycetes Argentinenses (Series V). Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia
Natural Buenos Aires. ser. 3, 13: 329–467.
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
50
Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with
thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688. https://doi.org/10.1093/
bioinformatics/btl446
Tibpromma S, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Liu JK, Bhat DJ et al. (2017)
Fungal diversity notes 491–602: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa.
Fungal Diversity 83: 1–261 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-017-0378-0
Tulloch M (1972) e genus Myrothecium Tode ex Fr. Mycological Papers 130: 1–42.
Von Höhnel FV (1905) Über Myrothecium und Formverwandte Gattungen. Annales Myco-
logici 3: 559–560.
Wagenaar MM, Clardy J (2001) Two new roridins isolated from Myrothecium sp. e Journal
of Antibiotics 54: 517. https://doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.54.517
Watanabe T, Watanabe Y, Nakamura K (2003) Myrothecium dimorphum sp. nov. a soil fungus
from beach sand in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands, Japan. Mycoscience, 44(4):283–286.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10267-003-0112-5
White TJ, Burns T, Lee S, Taylor F, White TJ, Lee S-H, Taylor L, Shawe-Taylor J (1990) Ampli-
cation and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis
MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ et al. (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applica-
tions: 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
Wu YM, Jiang YL, Ma YN Zhang TY (2014) Two new species of Myrothecium from the Qinghai-
Tibet Plateau Area, China. Mycotaxon 129: 403–406. https://doi.org/10.5248/122.171
Zhang ZF, Liu F, Zhou X, Liu X.Z, Liu S.J, Cai L (2017) Culturable mycobiota from Karst
caves in China, with descriptions of 20 new species. Persoonia 39: 1–31. https://doi.
org/10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.01
Supplementary material 1
Figure S1. e ML consensus tree inferred based on ITS partial sequence with
bootstrap values for ML (> 70%) and posterior probability (PP) (PP > 0.95) la-
beled to the left of a node (ML/PP)
Authors: Junmin Liang, Guangshuo Li, Shiyue Zhou, Meiqi Zhao, Lei Cai
Data type: phylogenetic data
Explanation note: e type strains were labeled with “T”. Strains obtained from this
study are in red.
Copyright notice: is dataset is made available under the Open Database License
(http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). e Open Database License
(ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and
use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the
original source and author(s) are credited.
Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.51.31957.suppl1
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 51
Supplementary material 2
Figure S2. e ML consensus tree inferred based on tub2 partial sequence with
bootstrap values for ML (> 70%) and posterior probability (PP) (PP > 0.95) la-
beled to the left of a node (ML/PP)
Authors: Junmin Liang, Guangshuo Li, Shiyue Zhou, Meiqi Zhao, Lei Cai
Data type: phylogenetic data
Explanation note: e type strains were labeled with “T”. Strains obtained from this
study are in red.
Copyright notice: is dataset is made available under the Open Database License
(http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). e Open Database License
(ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and
use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the
original source and author(s) are credited.
Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.51.31957.suppl2
Supplementary material 3
Figure S3. e ML consensus tree inferred based on cmdA partial sequence with
bootstrap values for ML (> 70%) and posterior probability (PP) (PP > 0.95) la-
beled to the left of a node (ML/PP)
Authors: Junmin Liang, Guangshuo Li, Shiyue Zhou, Meiqi Zhao, Lei Cai
Data type: phylogenetic data
Explanation note: e type strains were labeled with “T”. Strains obtained from this
study are in red.
Copyright notice: is dataset is made available under the Open Database License
(http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). e Open Database License
(ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and
use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the
original source and author(s) are credited.
Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.51.31957.suppl3
Junmin Liang et al. / MycoKeys 51: 29–53 (2019)
52
Supplementary material 4
Figure S4. e ML consensus tree inferred based on rpb2 partial sequence with
bootstrap values for ML (> 70%) and posterior probability (PP) (PP > 0.95) la-
beled to the left of a node (ML/PP)
Authors: Junmin Liang, Guangshuo Li, Shiyue Zhou, Meiqi Zhao, Lei Cai
Data type: phylogenetic data
Explanation note: e type strains were labeled with “T”. Strains obtained from this
study are in red.
Copyright notice: is dataset is made available under the Open Database License
(http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). e Open Database License
(ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and
use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the
original source and author(s) are credited.
Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.51.31957.suppl4
Supplementary material 5
Figure S5. e ML consensus tree inferred based on LSU and rpb2 partial se-
quences with bootstrap values for ML (> 70%) and posterior probability (PP) (PP
> 0.95) labeled to the left of a node (ML/PP)
Authors: Junmin Liang, Guangshuo Li, Shiyue Zhou, Meiqi Zhao, Lei Cai
Data type: phylogenetic data
Explanation note: e type strains were labeled with “T”. Strains obtained from this
study are in red.
Copyright notice: is dataset is made available under the Open Database License
(http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). e Open Database License
(ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and
use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the
original source and author(s) are credited.
Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.51.31957.suppl5
Myrothecium-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere 53
Supplementary material 6
Table S1. NCBI GenBank accessions of 28S ribosomal DNA large-subunit se-
quences (LSU) used in the phylogenetic analyses
Authors: Junmin Liang, Guangshuo Li, Shiyue Zhou, Meiqi Zhao, Lei Cai
Data type: phylogenetic data
Copyright notice: is dataset is made available under the Open Database License
(http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). e Open Database License
(ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and
use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the
original source and author(s) are credited.
Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.51.31957.suppl6
Content uploaded by Junmin Liang
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Junmin Liang on Apr 29, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.