A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Current Pediatrics Reports
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
NEONATOLOGY (C JULIANO, SECTION EDITOR)
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children with Complex
Congenital Heart Disease
Jennifer Bragg
1
Published online: 17 April 2019
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019
Abstract
Purpose of Review The purpose of this article is to better understand the challenges that children with congenital heart disease
(CHD) face and the elements that put them at higher risk, and also to review existing interventions and discuss how they impact
long-term neurodevelopment.
Recent Findings Approximately 1–2% of all children are born each year with CHD, and survival into adulthood now surpasses
80%. It has thus become increasingly more important to recognize and manage the common complications seen in this popu-
lation. There are a number of factors that contribute to increased risk for adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, including
underlying genetic abnormalities, altered cerebral blood flow, pre- and post-operative factors, sub-optimal nutrition, parental
stress, and socioeconomic considerations. These are important to recognize and address where possible. It is now also apparent
that there is a unique pattern of neurodevelopmental delays seen in this population and they encompass motor, language,
cognitive, executive function, adaptive, behavioral, and autism spectrum disorder parameters.
Summary CHD affects many individuals and the neurodevelopmental impact is not insignificant. Early identification and
management through cardiac neurodevelopmental programs and support through programs such as early intervention are critical
to optimizing the neurodevelopmental outcomes and quality of life of individuals with CHD. Future directions should include
further research into what impacts neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with CHD and how to intervene.
Keywords Congenital heart disease .Neurodevelopment .Outcomes .Intervention
Introduction
Approximately 1–2% of all children are born each year with
congenital heart disease (CHD). Survival into adulthood has dra-
matically improved and now surpasses 80% [1]. With this in-
creased survival, the focus has shifted to identifying long-term
complications associated with CHD, including common
neurodevelopmental challenges, and to improving the quality
of life of affected children. Research now focuses on identifying
specific challenges faced by survivors of CHD and targeting how
best to address them. In the past, neurodevelopmental delays
(NDDs) in children with complex congenital heart disease were
attributed largely to factors such as surgical intervention and
perioperative anesthesia. However, this has been largely
disproven. Research from the Boston Circulatory Trial follows
children with CHD and has collected over 30 years of data.
Interestingly, they found that the surgery itself did not contribute
as significantly as expected to long-term outcomes [2•,3••,4],
but rather, that pre-natal risk factors and post-natal course were
more predictive of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes [5•,
6] than the corrective surgery and anesthesia. The NDDs children
face with CHD are not unique and are commonly found in other
high-risk populations such as children born preterm. However,
the constellation of delays does appear to be unique to children
with complex congenital heart disease (CHD).
What are the most common patterns of delays in CHD?
Children with CHD have similar neurodevelopmental pro-
files, irrespective of cardiac lesion or surgery. This constella-
tion of neurodevelopmental delays is shown in Fig. 1.Most
commonly, delays are seen in the following parameters: motor
function (both fine and gross), executive functioning, adaptive
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neonatology
*Jennifer Bragg
Jennifer.bragg@mssm.edu
1
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 1 Gustave L.
Levy Place, Box 1508, New York, NY 10029, USA
Current Pediatrics Reports (2019) 7:21–26
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-019-00189-2
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.