Conference PaperPDF Available

Optimization of Process Parameters on Kerf Width & Taper Angle on En-8 Carbon Steel by Abrasive Water Jet Machining

Authors:
  • Nalla narasimha reddy group of institutions
  • University College of Engineering Osmania University

Abstract

Abrasive water jet machining is a process where the material is removed by the principle of erosion. In this paper, the cutting of EN-8 carbon steel was carried out by AWJM process where the input parameters are water jet pressure, abrasive flow rate and traverse speed, which are taken into consideration machining. kerf width and the kerf taper angle of EN-8 steel are measured with respect to the above-mentioned input parameters using Taguchi L9 orthogonal array Design of Experiments. In this experiment, it has been observed that the main parameter which affects the experimental values is the abrasive flow rate.
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Special Issue, March 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
3
rd
National Conference on Recent Trends & Innovations In Mechanical Engineering
15
th
& 16
th
March 2019
Available online at www.ijrat.org
281
Optimization of Process Parameters on Kerf Width & Taper Angle on En-8 Carbon Steel by Abrasive Water Jet Machining
1
Lakshmigalla Sunil Kumar,
2
U.Ashok Kumar,
3
P. Laxminarayana
4
P.Vivek Yadav,
4
T.Sachindra Bhushan,
4
P.Saikumar,
4
B..Nagaraju
1
Asst.prof,
4
UG Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering,NNRESGI, Ghatkesar,India
2
Asst.prof.
3
Prof. Mech. Engg., Dept., University College of engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad
Abstract: Abrasive water jet machining is a process where the material is removed by the principle of erosion. In this paper, the
cutting of EN-8 carbon steel was carried out by AWJM process where the input parameters are water jet pressure, abrasive flow
rate and traverse speed, which are taken into consideration machining. kerf width and the kerf taper angle of EN-8 steel are
measured with respect to the above-mentioned input parameters using Taguchi L9 orthogonal array Design of Experiments. In
this experiment, it has been observed that the main parameter which affects the experimental values is the abrasive flow rate.
Keywords: Kerf Width, Kerf Taper Angle, Taguchi L9 Array.
1. INTRODUCTION
Abrasive water jet machining is a mechanical machining
process where the material is removed by the principle of
erosion. In this process, a high velocity stream of water jet
mixed with abrasive is made to impinge on the target
material that is to be machined. Upon the impingement of the
high velocity water and abrasive jet the material from the
target material is removed. In this process the water from the
reservoir is pumped to the intensifier where its pressure
increases up to 4 bars. The intensifier increases the pressure
of water from 4 bar to about 40000 bars and above as per the
requirement. The water from the intensifier is sent to the
accumulator where the pressure fluctuations due to high
pressures are eliminated. Then the pressurized water from
the accumulator is sent to the mixing chamber through
control valves. Before entering the nozzle the water is mixed
with abrasives particles in mixing chamber in a proportionate
ratio. This high pressure of water is converted into kinetic
energy of abrasive water jet in nozzle which is made to
impinge on the material which is to be machined.
2. WORKING
PRINCIPLE
The Abrasive Jet Machining is a non-traditional
machining process involves the application of a high-speed
stream of abrasive particles assisted by the pressurized air on
to the work surface through a nozzle of small diameter.
Material removal takes place by abrading action of abrasive
particles. Water jet machining is an erosion process
technique in which water under high pressure and velocity
precisely cuts through and grinds away minuscule amounts
of material. The addition of an abrasive substance greatly
increases the ability to cut through harder materials such as
steel and titanium. Water jet Machining is a cold cutting
process that involves the removal of material without heat.
This revolutionary technology is an addition to non-
traditional cutting processes like laser and plasma, and is
able to cut through virtually any material. The water jet
process is combined with CNC to precisely cut machine
parts and etch designs. Abrasive water jet uses the
technology of high-pressure water to create extremely
concentrated force to cut stuff. A water cutter pressurizes a
stream of pure water flow (without abrasive) to cut materials
such as foam, rubber, plastic, cloth, carpet and wood.
Abrasive jet cutters mix abrasive garnet to a pressurized
water stream to cut harder materials. Examples are stainless
steel, Titanium, glass, ceramic tile, marble and granite.
Water jet metal cutting machine yields very little heat and
therefore there is no Heat Affected Zone (HAZ). Water jet
machining is also considered as "cold cut" process and
therefore is safe for cutting flammable materials such as
plastic and polymers. With a reasonable cutting speed
setting, the edges resulting are often satisfactory. In Abrasive
Water Jet Machining, the abrasive particles are mixed with
water and forced through the small nozzle at high pressure so
that the abrasive slurry impinges on the work surface at high
velocity. Each of the two components of the jet, i.e., the
water and the abrasive materials have both separate purpose
and a supportive purpose. The primary purpose of the
abrasive material in the jet stream is to provide the erosive
forces. The water in the jet acts as the coolant and carries
both the abrasive and eroded material to clear of the work.
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Special Issue, March 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
3
rd
National Conference on Recent Trends & Innovations In Mechanical Engineering
15
th
& 16
th
March 2019
Available online at www.ijrat.org
Fig :1 Line Diagram of Abrasive Water jet Machining
3.
EXPERIMENTAL
SETUP
Aquajet abrasive water jet machine G3020 German
Engineering was used for the experiment. the input
parameters were taken into consideration with respect to
previous papers i.e. water jet pressure, traverse speed and
abrasive flow rate.
Fig :2. Abrasive Water jet Machining setup used for the Experiment of EN-8
Table:1 Machining Range of parameters of Abrasive Water Jet machine
Condition Range
Water jet pressure(bar) 4000
Abrasive flow rate(gm/min) 700
Traverse speed(mm/min) 1200
Nozzle diameter(mm) 1
Orifice(mm) 0.35
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Special Issue, March 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
3
rd
National Conference on Recent Trends & Innovations In Mechanical Engineering
15
th
& 16
th
March 2019
Available online at www.ijrat.org
283
Water flow rate(liters/min) 4
Abrasive particles(mesh garnet) 80
4.
EXPERIMENTAL
MATERIAL
EN8 carbon steel is a common medium carbon and
medium tensile steel, with improved strength over mild steel,
through-hardening medium carbon steel.EN8 steels are
generally used in the as supplied untreated condition. and
further surface-hardened by induction processes, producing
components with enhanced wear resistance. Material in its
heat treated forms possesses good homogenous metallurgical
structures, giving consistent machining properties. EN-8 is
used in manufacture of general purpose axles, shafts, bolts
etc.
Table:2. Shows the Chemical composition of EN-8 steel.
Element
Carbon
Silicon
Manganese
phosphorous
Sulphur
Composition 0.36 to 0.44% 0.10to 0.40% 0.60to 1.00% 0.050 max 0.050 max
Table:3. Mechanical properties of EN-8 steel.
Property Value
Max stress 700-850 n/mm
2
Yield stress 468 n/mm
2
min
Proof stress 450 n/mm
2
min
Elongation 16% min
Hardness 201-255 Brinell
5.
DESIGN
OF
EXPERIMENT:
The techniques usually performed in Design Of
Experiments to determine the individual and interactive
effects of many factors which could affects the results in
any design models. The shortest way for this experiment
that predicts the outcomes by changing the process
parameters which represents by one or more independent
variables. Main concepts in the experimental design
includes the establishment of validity, reliability, and
replicable of the experiments. These concerns may be
partially addressed by choosing the independent variables,
thus reduction in the risk of measurement errors, and
ensuring the documentation of the method is sufficiently
explained in detail. Related concerns includes achieving
appropriate level of statistical power and sensitivity is
observed and it cannot be manipulated of rewritten without
proper concerns.
To achieve a perfect cut, it requires that the combinations of
the process variables that gives the jet high enough energy
to penetrate through the work piece, which are considered
for machining and also for further performances. In present
study some
process parameters are water jet pressure, traverse speed and
abrasive flow rate were preferred as control factors for the
experiment and for obtaining the results.
Table:4.The initial input parameters for AWJM of EN-8 material
Parameter Level-1 Level-2 Level-3
Water jet pressure 3200 3400 3600
Abrasive flow rate 250 350 450
Traverse speed 154 176 220
Table:5.Experimental Design of Taguchi L9 orthogonal array with parameters for AWJM of EN-8 material cutting
Levels Water jet pressure Abrasive flow rate Traverse speed
1 3200 250 154
2 3200 350 176
3 3200 450 220
4 3400 250 176
5 3400 350 220
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Special Issue, March 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
3
rd
National Conference on Recent Trends & Innovations In Mechanical Engineering
15
th
& 16
th
March 2019
Available online at www.ijrat.org
284
6 3400 450 154
7 3600 250 220
8 3600 350 154
9 3600 450 176
6.
EXPERIMENTAL
OUTCOMES
The outcomes of the experiments are kerf width and kerf
taper angle of the material. Kerf width is the width of the cut made by the abrasive water jet on the target material. it
is measured by the formula given below
Kerf width =
(   )
Where, Top width is the width of the cut on the surface of
the material which is facing the abrasive water jet
Bottom width is the width of the cut at bottom surface
Kerf taper angle is the angle subtended by the kerf taper. It
is the deviation of the cut from the original cut. Kerf taper
angle is given by the formula as given below
Kerf taper angle,
Ɵ
=
tan
 (   )

Where, L is the length of the cut made by the abrasive water
jet
7.
RESULTS
AND
DISCUSSIONS
Table:6 .Results of AWJM of EN-8 material cutting using L9 Taguchi Design of Experiments
Experiments Input Parameters Outcomes
Water jet pressure Abrasive flow rate Traverse speed
Kerf Taper angle
1 3200 250 154 0.473 0.046
2 3200 350 176 0.539 0.012
3 3200 450 220 0.492 0.007
4 3400 250 176 0.448 0.065
5 3400 350 220 0.473 0.005
6 3400 450 154 0.636 0.002
7 3600 250 220 0.447 0.002
8 3600 350 154 0.604 0.005
9 3600 450 176 0.600 0.013
E
FFECT OF
K
ERF
W
IDTH WITH
W
ATER
J
ET
P
RESSURE
,
A
BRASIVR
F
LOW RATE
,
T
RAVERSE
S
PEED
Table:7 . Signal to Noise Ratios of AWJM of EN-8 material
Level Water Jet Pressure Abrasive Flow Rate Traverse Speed
1 6.013 6.827 4.939
2 5.804 5.417 5.59
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Special Issue, March 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
3
rd
National Conference on Recent Trends & Innovations In Mechanical Engineering
15
th
& 16
th
March 2019
Available online at www.ijrat.org
285
3 5.271 4.843 6.557
Delta 0.742 1.984 1.618
Rank 3 1 2
Fig 3:Signal to Noise Graph Kerf width of EN-8 by AWJM Process
EFFECT OF
K
ERF ANGLE
W
ATER
J
ET
P
RESSURE
,
A
BRASIVR
F
LOW RATE
,
T
RAVERSE
S
PEED
Level Water Jet Pressure Abrasive Flow Rate Traverse Speed
1 36.09 45.21 42.35
2 41.25 43.49 33.29
3 45.91 45.91 47.7
Delta 9.82 10.11 14.41
Rank 3 2 1
360034003200
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
450350250 2201 761 54
W
a
t
e
r
J
e
t
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
Mean of SN ratios
A
b
r
a
s
i
v
r
F
l
o
w
r
a
t
e
T
r
a
v
e
r
s
e
S
p
e
e
d
Main Effects Plot for SN ratios
Data Means
Signal-to-noise: Smaller is better
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Special Issue, March 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
3
rd
National Conference on Recent Trends & Innovations In Mechanical Engineering
15
th
& 16
th
March 2019
Available online at www.ijrat.org
286
Fig 4: Means Graph Kerf Taper angle of EN-8 by AWJM Process
8.
CONCLUSIONS
The present work deals with the abrasive water jet
machining of EN-8 Carbon steel materials.the following
results were drawn as follows
The optimum combination for Kerf Width is
A1B1C3 ie(water pressure of 3200 bar,
Abrasive flow rate of 250 gm/min, Traverse
speed of 220mm/min).
The optimum combination for Kerf Taper angle
is A3B3C3 ie(water pressure of 3620 bar,
Abrasive flow rate of 450 gm/min, Traverse
speed of 220mm/min)
REFERENCES
[1]
U Ashok Kumar, G Ajay Kumar, P
Laxminarayana, Influence of Process
Parameters on Surface Roughness Of En31 By
Water Jet Machining , Proceedings of The
International Conference on Technological
Advances In Mechanical Engineering
(ICTAME 2017) ,Page no.217-221
[2]
Chithirai, P. S. M. and S. R. N. Mohanna,
Abrasive Waterjet Cutting Surfaces of
Ceramics - An Experimental Investigation.
International Journal of Applied Science,
Technology and Engineering Research, 2012.
1(3): p. 52-59.
[3]
L.M. Hlavac, I.M. Hlavacova, L. Gembalova, J.
Kalicinsky, S. Fabian, J. Mestanek, J. Kmec, V.
Madr, Experimental method investigation of
the abrasive water jet cutting quality, Journal of
Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009)
6190–6195.
[4]
J. Kechagias, G. Petropoulos, N. Vaxevanidis,
Application of Taguchi design for quality
characterization of abrasive water jet machining
of TRIP sheet steels, Int. J. Adv. Manuf.
Technol. 62 (2012) 635–643.
[5]
U Ashok Kumar, P. Laxminarayana
“Optimization of Electrode Tool Wear in micro
holes machining by Die Sinker EDM using
Taguchi Approach” Materials today:
proceedings 5(1):1824-1831, January 2018,
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.281
[6]
U Ashok Kumar, P. Laxminarayana “Study of
surface morphology on micro machined
surfaces of AISI 316 by Die Sinker EDM”
Materials today: proceedings 4(2):1285-1292.
December 2017,
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.01.149
[7]
U Ashok Kumar, P. Laxminarayana, "Study of
Tool Wear Optimization in Micro Holes
Machining of SS316 by Die Sinker Electrical
Discharge Machining", International Journal of
Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary
Studies, Vol.3, issue.7, pp.1-4, 2017
[8]
U Ashok Kumar, P. Laxminarayana
“Optimization of process parameters of
Material Removal Rate in Micro hole
Machining by Die sinker EDM, IOSR Journal
360034003200
0.575
0.550
0.525
0.500
0.475
0.450
450350250 2201 7 61 54
W
P
Mean of Means
A
F
R
T
S
Main Effects Plot for Means
Data Means
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Special Issue, March 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
3
rd
National Conference on Recent Trends & Innovations In Mechanical Engineering
15
th
& 16
th
March 2019
Available online at www.ijrat.org
287
of Engineering (p): 2278-8719 Vol. 07, Issue
07 (July. 2017), ||V1|| pp. 61-65
[9]
Milan Brozek, “Steel cutting using Abrasive
water jet”, Engineering for rural development,
Jelgava, 24.-26.05.2017
[10]
Natarajan Yuvraj, Murugusen Pradeep Kumar,
“Investigation of process parameters influence
in Abrasive water jet cutting of D2 steel”,
Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 32:2,
151-161,
DOI:10.1080/10426914.2016.1176183
[11]
Piotr Loschner, Krzysztof, Poitr Nieslony,
“Investigation of the effect of cutting speed on
surface quality in Abrasive water jet cutting of
316L stainless steel”, International Conference
on Manufacturing Engineering and Materials,
ICMEM 2016, Procedia Engineering 149
(2016) 276-282.
[12]
Mohammad S.Alsoufi, Dhia K.Suker,
Abdulaziz S.Alsabban, Sufyan Azam,
“Experimental study on surface roughness and
micro-hardness obtained by cutting Carbon
steel with Abrasive water jet and Laser Beam
Technologies”, American Journal of
Mechanical Engineering, 2016, vol. 4, no.5,
173-181, DOI:10.12691/ajme-4-5-2
[13]
R.Kovacevic, “Surface texture in Abrasive
water jet cutting”, Journal of Manufacturing
systems, volume 10/No.1.
[14]
Gaurav D.Sonawane, Radhey M.Bachhav,
“Abrasive water jet machining –A Review”,
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil
Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), e-ISSN:2278-
1684, p-ISSN: 2320-34X, vol:12, issue 4 ver.II
(jul.-Aug.2015), PP 44-52.7
[15]
Wei Zhan, Chuwen Guo, “Topography and
microstructure of the cutting surface machined
with abrasive water jet”, Int J Adv Manuf
Technol (2014) 73:941, DOI 10.1007/s00170-
014-5869-5.
... As was mentioned before, this fact is due to the absorption of kinetic energy by the metal alloy, and is in agreement with Kumar et al. [55]. In this sense, the CFRTP/Steel configuration offers the lowest taper values in both materials, as well as very close results in both materials. ...
Article
Full-text available
The bonding of Carbon Fibre Reinforced ThermoPlastic composites (CFRTP) and steel is of great interest nowadays. Nevertheless, the difference in machinability between dissimilar materials requires a specific machining process. Abrasive water jet machining is a flexible and environmentally friendly technology that can machine dissimilar materials at the same time with good results. However, due to the characteristics of the process and materials, geometrical defects such as taper angle can be caused by the loss of kinetic energy. In this research, the study of the final geometry in abrasive waterjet machining of a hybrid CFRTP/Steel structure. A new methodology for the evaluation of taper angle with high accuracy has been developed through image processing. In addition, the surface quality in terms of Ra and Rz has been assessed. A potential-type trend between taper and hydraulic pressure has been established for both materials. Minimum taper values between 1.5° and 5° have been obtained for both materials and stacking configurations with a combination of a hydraulic pressure of 420 MPa, an abrasive mass flow of 225 g/min and a traverse speed of 50 mm/min.
... Nevertheless, as hydraulic pressure increases, the surface quality is directly influenced by the traverse speed, especially for pressures of 420 MPa. Thus, an increase in pressure and abrasive flow at reduced traverse speeds produces a stable water jet capable of homogeneously machining all composite material [37]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The joining of dissimilar materials in a hybrid structure is a line of research of great interest at present. Nevertheless, the machining of materials with different machinability requires specific processes capable of minimizing defectology in both materials and achieving a correct surface finish in terms of functional performance. In this article, abrasive water jet machining of a hybrid carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastics (CFRTP)/Steel structure and the generated surface finish are studied. A parametric study in two stacking configurations (CFRTP/Steel and Steel/CFRTP) has been established in order to determine the range of cutting parameters that generates the lowest values in terms of arithmetic mean roughness (Ra) and maximum profile height (Rz). The percentage contribution of each cutting parameter has been identified through an ANOVA analysis for each material and stacking configuration. A combination of 420 MPa hydraulic pressure with an abrasive mass flow of 385 g/min and a travel speed of 50 mm/min offers the lowest Ra and Rz values in the CFRTP/Steel configuration. The stacking order is a determining factor, obtaining a better surface quality in a CFRTP/Steel stack. Finally, a series of contour diagrams relating surface quality to machining conditions have been obtained.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Article
Full-text available
This paper presents a study conducted to determine the effect of abrasive waterjet (AWJ) and laser beam (LB) cutting technologies on surface roughness, Ra, and micro-hardness, µ-HV of the carbon steel samples. In this article, there is a brief discussion of the different ways of cutting carbon steel, such as AWJ cutting, as well as LB cutting. These techniques and their comparisons are illustrated in tables to highlight the differences between them regarding technical parameters, equipment, tools and economic performance and to select the best technology for cutting carbon steel. The results indicated that the average value of the surface roughness for the carbon steel sample was Ra = 7.54 µm, ±SD = 2.52 µm (for LB) and it was Ra = 6.34 µm, ±SD = 2.67 µm (for AWJ), for which the thickness was 6 mm. The difference was 1.2 µm. Also, the skewness, Rsk, and kurtosis, Rku, of the carbon steel sample after cutting by laser beam were 0.05 and 2.51, respectively. Whereas, Rsk and Rku of the carbon steel sample after cutting by abrasive waterjet were -0.04 and 2.69, respectively. Besides, the average value of micro-hardness for a carbon steel sample was HV = 548.82, ±SD = 72.4 (for LB) and it was HV = 525.70, ±SD = 72.5 (for AWJ). Surprisingly, the micro-hardness value for both cutting methods start roughly at the same value around 450 HV and then start to increase until the end of the cutting distance is reached. The difference was 23.12 HV. It also should be noted that, the effective case depth was about ~330 µm at 549 HV (for LB), and was about ~320 µm at 525 HV (for AWJ).
Article
Full-text available
This study presents the effect of cutting speed on surface roughness in abrasive water jet cutting of 10mm thick stainless steel samples. Photographs of cut surfaces were taken and roughness parameters were measured in different locations across depth of cut. Differences between obtained surface geometric structures and measured roughness parameter values were presented and discussed. The research has shown a considerable effect of cutting speed on surface roughness, surface quality and presence of machining marks. This effect was especially noticeable in lower parts of examined cut surfaces.
Article
In the present experimental study, abrasive water jet (AWJ) cutting tests were conducted on D2 steel by different jet impingement angles and abrasive mesh sizes. The experimental data was statistically analyzed using the simos-grey relational method and ANOVA test. In addition, the outcome of influencing cutting parameters, namely jet pressure, jet impingement angle and abrasive mesh size on the different response parameters, namely, the jet penetration, material removal rate, taper ratio, roughness and topography, were studied. Micro hardness test and surface morphology analyis were employed to examine the D2 cut surfaces at different AWJ cutting conditions. The chemical element study was performed to determine the abrasive particle contamination in the AWJ kerf wall cut surfaces. The ANOVA test result indicated the jet pressure and jet impingement angle as the influencing process parameters affecting the various performance characteristics of AWJ cutting. The overall AWJ cutting performance of the D2 steel has been improved through proper identification of the optimal process parameter settings, namely jet pressure 225 MPa, abrasive mesh size #100 and jet impingement angle 70° by the simos-grey relational analysis.
Article
When cutting thick material with an abrasive waterjet, the surface area can be characterized by two texture types. At the top of the cut, the surface texture is smooth. At the bottom, the slurry jet exiting the workpiece forms large striations in the surface.An investigation was conducted to experimentally determine the influence of the abrasive waterjet cutting parameters on surface texture.A mathematical model was developed characterizing the correlation between the surface roughness and the abrasive waterjet cutting variables.
Topography and microstructure of the cutting surface machined with abrasive water jet
  • Wei Zhan
  • Chuwen Guo
Wei Zhan, Chuwen Guo, "Topography and microstructure of the cutting surface machined with abrasive water jet", Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2014) 73:941, DOI 10.1007/s00170-014-5869-5.