PosterPDF Available

Memory Tests for the Diagnosis MCI - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors:

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment is regarded as a prodrome to dementia, involving subjective memory complaint, greater forgetfulness than one would expect for age and intact activities of daiy living in a patient not meeting criteria for dementia. Numerous short bedside cognitive tests can be used to assess cognition, and they have varying characteristics. We conducted a systematic review of the literature for ‘MCI’ and ‘diagnosis’ or ‘screening’, seeking studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of a cognitive test for MCI diagnosis as per published criteria compared to a reference standard diagnosis made by psychiatrist/MDT consensus. Risk of bias in each study was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Where a single test had been evaluated in at least 5 published studies, we conducted bivariate random effects meta-analysis to calculate a summary sensitivity and specificity, and summary receiver-operated curves. Eight cognitive tests (ACE-R, CERAD, CDT-Sunderland, IQCODE, Memory Alteration Test, MMSE, MoCA, and Qmci) were considered for meta-analysis. ACE-R, CERAD, MoCA, and Qmci were found to have similar diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity approximately 80%, specificity approximately 75%) while the MMSE had lower sensitivity (66%), but similar specificity to the other tests. Memory Alteration Test had the highest sensitivity (91%) and equivalent specificity to the other tests. The diagnostic accuracies of the CDT-Sunderland and IQCODE were too heterogeneous for quantitative meta-analysis, and we can only comment that their diagnostic accuracy for MCI is unclear. The present meta-analysis suggests that a) MMSE should not be used for MCI diagnosis b) novel cognitive tests aiming to diagnose MCI should not be compared to the MMSE c) Memory Alteration Test, a short test with a more detailed focus on verbal learning and recall, has the highest sensitivity for MCI. Its short duration of administration makes it worthy of further study for further application in primary care. Original Publication doi: 10.1002/gps.5016
Background
MMSE
MoCA
M@T
ACE-R
False Positive Rate
Sensitivity
>10%
1) More than 10% of
MCI patients are
being underdiagnosed
when you use the
MMSE.
2) Clinicians should
avoid using it.
3) MMSE is still
copyrighted.
MCI is regarded as a prodrome to dementia,
involving subjective memory complaint, greater
forgetfulness than one would expect for age and
intact activities of daily living in a patient not
meeting criteria for dementia. Numerous short
bedside cognitive tests can be used to assess
cognition. MMSE is a gold standard diagnostic
validation test.
Faculty of Old Age
Psychiatry Annual
Conference
13-15 March 2019
Nottingham, UK
We conducted a systematic review of the literature for
‘MCI’ and ‘diagnosis’ or ‘screening’, seeking studies
evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of a cognitive test for
MCI diagnosis as per published criteria compared to a
reference standard diagnosis made by psychiatrist/MDT
consensus. Search strategy detected 9823 initial studies
(Fig.1). Where a single test had been evaluated in at least
five published studies (n=59), we conducted bivariate
random effects meta-analysis to calculate a summary
sensitivity and specificity, and SROC curves1.
Methods
Eight cognitive tests were considered for meta-
analysis (Tab.1).
ACE-R, CERAD, MoCA, and Qmci were found to have
similar diagnostic accuracy (sens. approx. 80%,
specif. approx. 75%). The MMSE had lower
sensitivity (66%), but similar specificity to the other
tests (Fig.2). Memory Alteration Test had the
highest sensitivity (91%).
The diagnostic accuracies of the CDT-Sunderland
and IQCODE were too heterogeneous for quantitative
meta-analysis, and diagnostic accuracy is unclear.
Test N Participants
ACE-R 6563
CDT-Sunderland 74263
CERAD 54076
IQCODE 51372
M@T 51485
MoCA 24 4095
MMSE 46 17749
Qmci 51206
1) Memory Alteration
Test2, is a short test
with a more detailed
focus on verbal
learning and recall.
2) M@T has the highest
sensitivity for MCI.
3) QMCI4 is an effective
quick way to screen
for prodromal stage
of dementia
Discussion and Conclusions
1) ACE-R, MOCA and
CERAD have similar
diagnostic
accuracy3,5.
2) Multi-domain tests
are still desirable in
tertiary and memory
clinic settings.
3) ACE-III and MoCa are
copyright free for
clinical use.
Meta-analysis
Tab.1
Fig.2
Fig.1
Results
Memory Tests For The Diagnosis of MCI
A Systematic Review And Meta-analysis
Dr. Alexandre Breton1,2, Dr. Daniel Casey3, Prof. Klaus Ebmeier3,4, Dr. Nikitas Arnaoutoglou5,6
1University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, 2Trinity College, 3University of Oxford, Oxford Health NHS FT,
4Dept of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, 5Cambridgeshire and Peterborough FT, 6Dept of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge
References
1. Breton, A., Casey, D. & Arnaoutoglou, N. A. Cognitive tests for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the prodromal stage of dementia: meta-
analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry (2018). doi:10.1002/gps.5016
2. Rami, L., Bosch, B., Sanchez-Valle, R. & Molinuevo, J. L. The memory alteration test (M@T) discriminates between subjective memory complaints, mild
cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 50, 171174 (2010).
3. Mioshi, E., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Arnold, R. & Hodges, J. R. The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for
dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 21, 10781085 (2006).
4. O’Caoimh, R. et al. Comparison of the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen and the SMMSE in screening for mild cognitive impairment. Age
Ageing 41, 624629 (2012).
5. Nasreddine, Z. S. et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 53, 695699
(2005).
nikitas.arnaoutoglou@cpft.nhs.uk
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
differentiating mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from normal cognition (NC) is difficult. The AB Cognitive Screen (ABCS) 135, sensitive in differentiating MCI from dementia, was modified to improve sensitivity and specificity, producing the quick mild cognitive impairment (Qmci) screen. this study compared the sensitivity and specificity of the Qmci with the Standardised MMSE and ABCS 135, to differentiate NC, MCI and dementia. weightings and subtests of the ABCS 135 were changed and a new section 'logical memory' added, creating the Qmci. From four memory clinics in Ontario, Canada, 335 subjects (154 with MCI, 181 with dementia) were recruited and underwent comprehensive assessment. Caregivers, attending with the subjects, without cognitive symptoms, were recruited as controls (n = 630). the Qmci was more sensitive than the SMMSE and ABCS 135, in differentiating MCI from NC, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 compared with 0.67 and 0.83, respectively, and in differentiating MCI from mild dementia, AUC of 0.92 versus 0.91 and 0.91. The ability of the Qmci to identify MCI was better for those over 75 years. the Qmci is more sensitive than the SMMSE in differentiating MCI and NC, making it a useful test, for MCI in clinical practice, especially for older adults.
Article
Introduction Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is regarded as a prodrome to dementia. Various cognitive tests can help with diagnosis; meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies would assist clinicians in choosing optimal tests. Methods We searched online databases for “mild cognitive impairment” and “diagnosis” or “screening” from 01/01/1999 to 01/07/2017. Articles assessing the diagnostic accuracy of a cognitive test compared with standard diagnostic criteria were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed. Bivariate random‐effects meta‐analysis was used to evaluate sensitivity and specificity. Results Eight cognitive tests (ACE‐R, CERAD, CDT‐Sunderland, IQCODE, Memory Alteration Test, MMSE, MoCA, and Qmci) were considered for meta‐analysis. ACE‐R, CERAD, MoCA, and Qmci were found to have similar diagnostic accuracy, while the MMSE had lower sensitivity. Memory Alteration Test had the highest sensitivity and equivalent specificity to the other tests. Discussion Multiple cognitive tests have comparable diagnostic accuracy. The Memory Alteration Test is short and has the highest sensitivity. New cognitive tests for MCI diagnosis should not be compared with the MMSE.
Article
There is a clear need for brief, but sensitive and specific, cognitive screening instruments as evidenced by the popularity of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE). We aimed to validate an improved revision (the ACE-R) which incorporates five sub-domain scores (orientation/attention, memory, verbal fluency, language and visuo-spatial). Standard tests for evaluating dementia screening tests were applied. A total of 241 subjects participated in this study (Alzheimer's disease=67, frontotemporal dementia=55, dementia of Lewy Bodies=20; mild cognitive impairment-MCI=36; controls=63). Reliability of the ACE-R was very good (alpha coefficient=0.8). Correlation with the Clinical Dementia Scale was significant (r=-0.321, p<0.001). Two cut-offs were defined (88: sensitivity=0.94, specificity=0.89; 82: sensitivity=0.84, specificity=1.0). Likelihood ratios of dementia were generated for scores between 88 and 82: at a cut-off of 82 the likelihood of dementia is 100:1. A comparison of individual age and education matched groups of MCI, AD and controls placed the MCI group performance between controls and AD and revealed MCI patients to be impaired in areas other than memory (attention/orientation, verbal fluency and language). The ACE-R accomplishes standards of a valid dementia screening test, sensitive to early cognitive dysfunction.
Article
This work aimed at establishing the memory alteration test (M@T), which is a memory screening test, capable for discriminating between subjects with subjective memory complaints (SMC) (without objective memory impairment) and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (A-MCI) and with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). The discriminative validity was assessed in a sample of 37 subjects with SMC, 50 patients with A-MCI according to the Petersen-criteria, and 66 patients with mild AD (global deterioration scale: 4 stage) according to the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. M@T mean scores were significantly different among groups: 39.7 + or - 5.1 (+ or - S.D.) in the SMC group, 31.5 + or - 3.9 in the A-MCI group, and 21.8 + or - 4.9 in mild AD. A cut-off score of 37 points had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 70% to differentiate A-MCI from SMC (ABC = 0.88). A cut-off score of 33 points had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 86% to differentiate mild AD from SMC sample (AUC = 0.99). We conclude that the M@T provides efficient and valid discrimination between SMC subjects and A-MCI, and between SMC subjects and mild AD.
Article
To develop a 10-minute cognitive screening tool (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA) to assist first-line physicians in detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a clinical state that often progresses to dementia. Validation study. A community clinic and an academic center. Ninety-four patients meeting MCI clinical criteria supported by psychometric measures, 93 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score > or =17), and 90 healthy elderly controls (NC). The MoCA and MMSE were administered to all participants, and sensitivity and specificity of both measures were assessed for detection of MCI and mild AD. Using a cutoff score 26, the MMSE had a sensitivity of 18% to detect MCI, whereas the MoCA detected 90% of MCI subjects. In the mild AD group, the MMSE had a sensitivity of 78%, whereas the MoCA detected 100%. Specificity was excellent for both MMSE and MoCA (100% and 87%, respectively). MCI as an entity is evolving and somewhat controversial. The MoCA is a brief cognitive screening tool with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting MCI as currently conceptualized in patients performing in the normal range on the MMSE.