Cognition and learning have been widely studied in vertebrates, but not across much phylogenetic breadth. Non-avian reptiles, for example, have been poorly studied. Anecdotal observations and a few previous studies suggest that lizards may have strong cognitive skills owing, in part, to behaviors such as optimal foraging and territoriality. We tested four lizard species, including three species of monitor lizard (Varanus spp.) and one species of beaded lizard (Heloderma), in a longitudinal, repeated-trials experimental design using a puzzle-feeder device to evaluate learning, in the form of latency trends over time. We used a Bayesian multilevel modeling statistical method and incorporated unsuccessful trials as censored data. Collectively, all lizards showed a pattern of decreasing latencies over time. We interpret this pattern as learning among our lizards. Notable individual and inter-specific differences were evident, however, suggesting that learning abilities differed among the lizards. In this case, the monitor lizards exhibited steeper declines in latencies and greatly reduced inter-individual variation in comparison to the beaded lizards. Finally, we found differential use of the claws versus the snout among the lizards, which is consistent with a previously posed hypothesis based on different species than we measured. T HE history of cognitive research in animals is long, but not particularly comparative between species, which has resulted in biases toward model organisms (e.g., rats, pigeons, and some primates; Huber and Wilkinson, 2012). Relatively few studies have considered the non-avian reptiles (see reviews by Wilkinson and Huber, 2012, and Miletto Petrazzini et al., 2017). With regard to non-avian reptiles, there is the often-repeated notion that monitor lizards (Varanidae) are intrinsically intelligent, being top predators in most of the ecosystems they occupy (King and Green, 1999; Burghardt et al., 2002; Bennett, 2004; Pianka and Sweet, 2016). Other reptiles have received scant attention. In this study, we compare cognitive performance in three species of Varanus, the phylogenetically proximal outgroup Heloderma (beaded lizards), and the more distantly related iguanid Cyclura, representing a broad phylogenetic diversity. Our results allow us to make preliminary comments on the generality of cognitive performance across Varanidae, as well as initial outgroup comparisons to allow a broader phylogenetic perspective of cognition in lizards. With only small sample sizes being available for each of our focal species, our aim was to document the relative levels of basic cognitive learning using a simple test. The key literature on varanid cognition includes only a single study (Firth et al., 2003) that compared multiple species using the same design, and no studies that compared both varanid and non-varanid species. Firth et al. (2003) reported that three individuals each of V. albigularis, V. exanthematicus, and V. niloticus showed reduced times to locate food placed, but not hidden, at the opposite end of their enclosure over repeated trials. Gaalema (2011) reported visual discrimination (black vs. white) and reversal learning in two individuals of V. rudicollis. Manrod et al. (2008) reported reduced latencies among eight individuals of V. albigularis over three trials in solving a transparent hinged-door puzzle-feeder device to access living mice within. Loop (1976) reported improved successes over time, but not strictly latencies, of conditioned responses to illumination cues associated with food rewards in four individuals of V. bengalensis. Mendyk and Horn (2011), using two individuals of V. beccarii, described consistent manual reaching, grasping, and retrieval of prey items located in crevices or holes too small to accommodate the head. Finally, an unpublished study on quantitative discrimination by J. Kaufman and A. Phillips and colleagues is often referenced in the varanid lizard literature. These previous studies support the contention that varanid lizards have substantial cognitive abilities. Building on this body of work, we also used varanid lizards as model organisms for our cognitive research and included outgroup comparisons with species of Heloderma (Helodermatidae) and Cyclura (Iguanidae). We used a puzzle-feeder device, somewhat similar to that of Manrod et al. (2008), to measure latencies of successful problem-solving events over repeated trials to compare cognitive performance across three species of Varanus and one each of Heloderma and Cyclura. We used species of Varanus widely distributed phylogenetically within the genus to test the level of generality of our data within the group. Similarly, our outgroup taxa were included in order to compare cognitive performance on a broader scale in squamates.