Content uploaded by Jing Lu
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Jing Lu on Feb 22, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
古 脊 椎 动 物 学 报
VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA
DOI: 10.19615/j.cnki.1000-3118.181031
The posterior cranial portion of the earliest known
Tetrapodomorph Tungsenia paradoxa and the early
evolution of tetrapodomorph endocrania
LU Jing1,2 YOUNG Gavin3 HU Yu-Zhi3,4 QIAO Tuo1,2 ZHU Min1,2,5
(1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate
Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100044, China lujing@ivpp.ac.cn,
zhumin@ivpp.ac.cn)
(2 CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment Beijing 100044, China
(3 Department of Applied Mathematics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University
Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia)
(4 Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia)
(5 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100039)
Abstract Here the posterior cranial portion of the tetrapodomorph Tungsenia from the Lower
Devonian (Pragian, ~409 million years ago) of Yunnan, southwest China, is reported for the
rst time. The pattern of posterior skull roof and the morphology of the otoccipital region of the
neurocranium are described in detail, providing precious insight into the combination of cranial
characters of the earliest known tetrapodomorph to date. The posterior cranium of Tungsenia
displays a mosaic of features previously linked either to basal dipnomorphs such as Youngolepis
(e.g., the well-developed subjugular ridge, the strong adotic process, and the poorly developed
fossa bridgei) or to typical tetrapodomorphs (e.g., the lateral dorsal aortae commenced from
the median dorsal aorta postcranially). The independent ventral arcual plate is also found in the
advanced tetrapodomorph Eusthenopteron. The new endocranial material of Tungsenia further lls
in the morphological gap between Tetrapodomorpha (tetrapod lineage) and Dipnomorpha (lungsh
lineage) and unveils the sequence of character acquisition during the initial diversification of
the tetrapod lineage. The new phylogenetic analysis strongly supports the basalmost position of
Tungsenia amongst the tetrapod lineage.
Key words Yunnan, Early Devonian, Sarcopterygii, Tetrapodomorpha, endocranial character
transition
Citation
Lu J, Young G, Hu Y Z et al., in press. The posterior cranial portion of the earliest
known Tetrapodomorph Tungsenia paradoxa and the early evolution of tetrapodomorph
endocrania. Vertebrata PalAsiatica. DOI: 10.19615/j.cnki.1000-3118.181031
1 Introduction
Tetrapodomorpha, also known as the tetrapod lineage or tetrapod total group, includes
all representatives that are more closely related to living tetrapods than to living lungfishes
国家自然科学基金面上项目(批准号：41872023，41472016)、中国科学院前沿科学重点研究计划
项目(编号：QYZDB-SSW-DQC040)资助。
收稿日期：2018-08-25
Advanced online publication
2
(Ahlberg, 1991). Hitherto, only two undisputed Early Devonian stem-tetrapods were known:
Kenichthys and Tungsenia from Yunnan, China (Chang and Zhu, 1993; Zhu and Ahlberg,
2004; Lu et al., 2012), but the otoccipital region of these two early representatives has never
been described due to the lack of sufcient material (Chang and Zhu, 1993; Zhu and Ahlberg,
2004; Lu et al., 2012). The recent discovery of the oldest known tetrapodomorph fish,
Tungsenia, provides unique information to help improve our understanding of the origin and
early evolution of the tetrapod lineage and additional valuable information based on the well-
preserved anterior cranial region (ethmosphenoid shield), lower jaws, and cheek bones (Lu
et al., 2012). However, our knowledge of the posterior cranial portion (otoccipital shield) of
Tungsenia and the early evolution of this region in the tetrapod lineage remains limited due to
the scarcity of known fossils.
During fieldwork conducted from 2011−2015, we collected more Tungsenia cranial
materials from the same site, including a well-preserved posterior cranial portion (IVPP V
15132.50). The new posterior cranial portion material possesses ne pores on the skull roof
and the size of the posterior cranial portion is comparable with the anterior cranial portion of
Tungsenia. Based on the shared ornamentation and comparable size with the reported anterior
cranial portions, we assigned the new posterior cranial portion to Tungsenia.
After preparation, we found that the posterior cranial portion of Tungsenia is similar to
that of Youngolepis in having a well-developed subjugular ridge and adotic process (Chang,
1982), while other endocranial features are quite close to those of ‘osteolepids’. Such
combination of characters shed light on the early evolution of the tetrapod lineage.
2 Materials and methods
All specimens of Tungsenia are housed in the collections of the Institute of Vertebrate
Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (IVPP).
The specimen was mechanically prepared to remove rock matrix.
High-resolution computed tomography The posterior cranial portion (IVPP V
15132.50) was scanned at IVPP, using 225 kV microCT . The specimen was scanned with
a beam energy of 180 kV and a ux of 100 mA at a detector resolution of 7.4 μm per pixel,
using a 1440° rotation with a step size of 0.25° and an unltered aluminum reection target. A
total of 1440 transmission images were reconstructed in a 2048 × 2048 matrix of 1536 slices.
Scan data was analyzed using Mimics v.18.01 (http://biomedical.materialise.com/mimics;
Materialize).
The CT data, as well as 3D surface les of the posterior cranial portion (V 15132.50),
are available in the IVPP Digital data repository ADMorph <Archives of Digital Morphology,
http://dx.doi.org/10.12112/F.12>
Phylogenetic analysis The phylogenetic analysis was performed on a matrix of 263
characters scored for 38 taxa (see on-line supplementary appendix 3; taxon-by-character
Advanced online publication
3
Lu et al. - posterior cranial portion of Tungsenia and evolution of tetrapodomorph
matrix). All characters were treated as unordered and weighted equally. The resulting data
matrix was subjected to the parsimony analysis in PAUP* (version 4.0b10) (Swofford et al.,
2001) using a heuristic search, with Guiyu, Psarolepis and Achoania (basal osteichthyans)
specied as the outgroup. The analysis generated 24 most parsimonious trees (MPTs) with 581
steps (Consistency index (CI) = 0.5232; Homoplasy index (HI) = 0.4768; Retention index (RI)
= 0.7247; Rescaled consistency index (RC) = 0.3792). All trees show Tungsenia as the most
basal stem-tetrapod. The strict consensus tree highlights the poor phylogenetic resolution of
the lower part of the tetrapodomorph lineage.
3 Systematics
Osteichthyes Huxley, 1880
Sarcopterygii Romer, 1955
Tetrapodomorpha Ahlberg, 1991 (= total group Tetrapoda)
Tungsenia Lu et al., 2012
Tungsenia paradoxa (Lu et al., 2012)
Holotype IVPP V 10687, an anterior cranial portion.
Type locality and horizon Zhaotong, Yunnan Province, China; Posongchong Formation
(Pragian, Early Devonian).
New material IVPP V 15132.50, a posterior cranial portion.
Locality and horizon The same as type locality and horizon.
Diagnosis (emended) The posterior cranial portion (otoccipital or postparietal shield) is
as long as it is wide; W-shaped postparietals extend much further posteriorly than the tabulars;
the tabulars turn down anterolaterally, forming the inner margin of the spiracular slit; the
extratemporals are large; the basicranial fenestra is large; the ventral fenestra is present, with
well-developed subjugular; a notch for the middle process of median extrascapular is present;
the posterior dorsal fontanelle is present; the fossa bridgei is poorly developed.
Description The posterior cranial portion of Tungsenia (IVPP V 15132.50) is well-
preserved except for the broken left anterior part of the shield (Figs. 1−3). The length of the
shield is about 8 mm, and basically equal to its width. In dorsal view, the dermal skull roof
is covered with a continuous layer of cosmine and the sutures between the postparietals,
and the marginal bones of the skull roof (supratemporals, temporals, and tabulars) cannot
be traced. The typical anterolateral overlapped area for the postorbital plate of the anterior
cranial portion in tetrapodomorphs has not be observed due to incomplete preservation. The
posterior edge of the skull roof is well-preserved, showing a curved embayment in the mesial
part of the postparietals and this may indicate the outline of the anterior margin of the median
extrascapular. The tabular and the outer part of the postparietal have a slit in the edge of the
bone, the lip below the slit extends posteriorly to form a shelf for the articulation of the lateral
extrascapulars. A distinct posterolateral protruding corner recalls the presence of extratemporal,
Advanced online publication
4
which is common in ‘osteolepiforms’ (Jarvik, 1948). This extratemporal, if present, is fused
with the tabular and thus highly supports the hypothesis that the extratemporal is part of the
skull table, rather than being an element of hyoid area. The pores of the otic branch of the main
sensory canal indicate that the course of the lateral line canal goes through the marginal bones
of the skull roof. However, it should be noted that the lateral line sensory canal goes through
Fig. 1 Photos of the new postparietal shield (IVPP V 15132.50) in dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views
Abbreviations: bs.fn. basicranial fenestra; cr.par. crista parotica; gr.a.dl. groove for lateral dorsal aorta;
lc, lateral commissure; lcc. main lateral line canal; nc. notochord; ot.sh. otic shelf; r.sub. subjugular ridge;
St. supratemporal; v.ar.pl. ventral arcual plate; v.font. vestibular fontanelle
Fig. 2 Illustrative drawings of the posterior cranial portion (IVPP V 15132.50)
A. dorsal view; B. ventral view;
C. the restoration of the whole shield showing the length proportion of the parietal shield vs the postparietal shield
Abbreviations: c.ju. jugular canal; pr.ad. adotic process
For other abbreviations, see Fig. 1. (C) is not to scale
Advanced online publication
5
Lu et al. - posterior cranial portion of Tungsenia and evolution of tetrapodomorph
the lateral margin of the extratemporal, which differs from other known sarcopterygians in
which the sensory canal passes through the tabular. No pore cluster or pit-line has been found
in the dermal skull roof.
In ventral view, the otoccipital region of Tungsenia is composed of two main elements:
the basicranial fenestra (bs.fn, Figs. 1B, 2B) and the otoccipital ossication (Figs. 1, 2). The
basicranial fenestra is oblong in outline and occupies about a half of the whole length of the
otoccipital region. Anteriorly, it is bounded by the posteroventral parts of the ethmosphenoid
below the notochordal pit. Laterally, the fenestra reaches the medial margin of the
anteroventral articular process of the otoccipital and of the otic shelf (ot.sh, Fig. 2B), while
posteriorly its extension is delimited by the independent ventral arcual plate, which is anterior
to the otoccipital ossication. The ventral margin of the otic shelf is not fully preserved, so
the natural shape of the otic shelf remains unclear. The lateral commissure continues with the
otic shelf, extending laterally to the skull roof. The facets for the hyomandibular articulations
are not well-shown due to the poor preservation. An independent arched ventral arcual plate
is present anterior to the otoccipital, and the suture between the ventral arcual plate and the
otoccipital is well shown. The otoccipital is of a polygonal, symmetrical shape and represents a
single stout basicranial plate right behind the ventral arcual plate. A paired longitudinal groove
for the dorsal aorta (gr.a.dl, Figs. 2B, 3B) at the posterolateral margin is obvious. At the same
level with the ventral arcual plate, a large vestibular fontanelle (v.font, Fig. 2B) is present on
the lateral braincase wall. A well-developed subjugular ridge (r.sub, Figs. 2B, 3) forms the
lateral and posterior boundary for the vestibular fontanelle. The adotic process (pr.ad, Fig.
3) is situated at the end of the subjugular ridge, posterolateral to the otic capsule, like that of
Youngolepis (Chang, 1982). According to the relative position with the vestibular fontanelle,
the subjugular ridge corresponds to the jugular ridge in Eusthenopteron, and the adotic process
could compare to the areas articulating with branchial arches in Eusthenopteron (Jarvik, 1980).
The dorsal margin of the jugular groove is bounded off by a suprajugular ridge, as that in
Youngolepis. Due to the preservation, the foramina for the nerves or vessels in the otoccipital
region are not visible.
In posterior view, the specimen is deformed in the right axis. The dorsomedian part of
the posterior face of otoccipital has a large foramen, which represents the posterior dorsal
fontanelle (pdf, Fig. 3B, D), a structure commonly present in osteichthyans (Chang, 1982; Yu,
1998; Zhu and Yu, 2002; Lu et al., 2016, 2017; Clement et al., 2018). Lateral to the posterior
dorsal fontanelle, there are well-dened paired depressions called fossa tectosynotica (f.tect,
Fig. 3). The poorly developed fossa bridgei (f.br, Fig. 3) is lateral to the fossa tectosynotica.
The fossa bridgei and the fossa tectosynotica are separated by a short ridge. The occipitalis
lateralis ssure, indicating the boundary between the otic and occipital regions, could not be
traced. The suture between the notochordal canal (nc, Fig. 3) and the foramen magnum (fm,
Fig. 3) is not visible.
Advanced online publication
6
Fig. 3 Rendered posterior cranial portion (IVPP V 15132.50)
and comparisons of selected rhipidistian endocrania in posterior view
A. right lateral view of Tungsenia; B. posterior view of Tungsenia; C. the endocranium of Youngolepis in
posterior view, modied from Chang, 1982; D. line drawing of the endocranium of Tungsenia in posterior
view; E. the endocranium of Gogonasus in posterior view, modied from Long et al., 1997
Abbreviations: c.X. canal for vagus nerve; f.br. fossa bridgei; fm, foramen magnum; f.occ.lat, lateral occipital
ssure; f.tect. fossa tectosynotica; pdf. posterior dorsal fontanelle; poc. postotic sensory canal;
pr.pot. postotical process. For other abbreviations, see Figs. 1, 2. Not to scale
4 Discussion
4.1 Phylogenetic implications of the tetrapodomorph evolution
To re-examine the phylogenetic position of Tungsenia in light of the new morphological
data, we conducted phylogenetic analysis using a modied data matrix from Lu et al. 2012 (see
on-line supplementary appendix 1). Our parsimony analysis recovers 12 trees with a length
of 581 steps (Fig. 4) (character optimization for a single MPT given in on-line supplementary
appendix 2). Our result shows Tungsenia is consistently resolved as the basalmost stem
tetrapod and shares with the other tetrapodomorphs the following unambiguous characters:
1. The exit of pituitary vein situated in front of the basipterygoid (Ch. 50, code 0).
represents a derived arrangement for the tetrapod lineage. In other sarcopterygians (e.g.
Styloichthys, Youngolepis), the pituitary vein foramen lies dorsal to the basipterygoid process.
2. In tetrapodomorphs, the accessory fenestration in the otic capsule is absent (Ch. 62,
Advanced online publication
7
Lu et al. - posterior cranial portion of Tungsenia and evolution of tetrapodomorph
code 0). The accessory fenestration is present in Styloichthys, coelacanths, the onychodont
Qingmenodus, and basal dipnomorphs.
3. The parasymphysial tooth whorl is a feature of non-tetrapodomorph sarcopterygians.
In tetrapdomorphs, the parasymphysial plate is either with a tooth pavement or paired tusks (Ch.
139, code 1).
4. In tetrapodomorphs, the anterior mandibular (precoronoid) fossa is widely present (Ch.
161, code 1);
5. The otic and supraorbital canals are in contact in the tetrapod lineage through the
dermal demosphenoid bone (Ch. 183, code 1).
Previous to the discovery of Tungsenia, the tetrapodomorph clade was supported by the
following characters:
1. The absence of internasal pits (Ch. 40). Tungsenia is the only known tetrapodomorph
Fig. 4 Phylogenetic analysis with new codings of Tungsenia paradoxa shown in the strict consensus tree
and one selected shortest tree
A. the strict consensus tree of the 24 shortest trees; B. one selected shortest tree the same as 50% majority-rule
tree showing the apomorphic features at different nodes. More details see on-line supplementary appendix 2
Advanced online publication
8
with paired internasal pits. Usually, there is an unpaired prenasal pit present in the snout region
of tetrapodomorphs.
2. The intracranial joint running through the profundus foramen (Ch. 55). In Tungsenia
and some basal dipnomorphs, such as Powichthys, the profundus foramen is in front of the
intracranial joint.
3. Posttemporal fossae present (Ch. 67). The posttemporal fossa is poorly developed in
Tungsenia and in the basal dipnomorph Youngolepis.
4. The extent of crista parotica not reaching the posterior margin of the tabular (Ch. 68).
5. Parasphenoid slender and splint in shape (Ch. 96). The shape of the parasphenoid in
Tungsenia is quite different compared with other tetrapodomorphs. A broad parasphenoid is
present in Tungsenia and other primitive sarcopterygians.
6. Lateral sides of the parasphenoid converging anteriorly (Ch. 97). The lateral sides of
parasphenoid in Tungsenia are similar to that of Styloichthys and basal dipnomorphs (e.g.,
Youngolepis, Powichthys), which are parallel or slightly diverging anteriorly.
The strict consensus tree shows that the ‘lower part’ of the tetrapodomorph lineage
– formed by a heterogenous group traditionally referred to as ‘osteolepiforms’ – remains
significantly problematic. The evolutionary relationship of the four ‘osteolepiform’ groups
(i.e. osteolepids, megalepids, canowindrids, and tristichopterids) is still in polytomy due
to lack of sufficient information, particularly from key taxa representing early diverging
members of the present groups. Many known ‘osteolepiform’ representatives were entirely
bound to the Middle-Late Devonian. The rhizodonts surveyed in the current analysis look
stable as the second basalmost position of the lineage. However, it is still worthwhile to note
that the anatomical similarities between the rhizodonts and advanced representatives of the
tetrapodomorph lineage should not be underestimated and indicate that the possibility that the
group might occupy a much higher position in the tree still exists (Zhu et al. 2017).
Hitherto, only two undisputed Early Devonian tetrapodomorph shes were known (Chang
and Zhu, 1993; Zhu and Ahlberg, 2004; Lu et al., 2012). This apparent low diversity is now
augmented by the Australian Early Devonian tetrapodomorph ‘Gyroptychius?’ australis (Young
and Gorter, 1981), which shares some unique features with Kenichthys (Chang and Zhu,
1993). In addition, numerous new tetrapodomorph fishes from the Early-Middle Devonian
have been found in Hatchery Creek, New South Wales, Australia, have never been properly
described (Hunt and Young, 2012). Further investigations on the early diverging members
of ‘osteolepiform’ groups are needed and may provide crucial information to resolve taxon
instability in the tetrapod lineage.
4.2 Endocranial evolution in tetrapodomorphs
The endocranium is one of the most important components of the body plan, and more
than 70% of characters in previous phylogenetic analyses are related to cranial features.
However, due to the lack of primitive tetrapodomorph material, our understanding on the
Advanced online publication
9
Lu et al. - posterior cranial portion of Tungsenia and evolution of tetrapodomorph
endocranial evolution in the tetrapod lineage remains obscure. The discovery of Tungsenia, the
basalmost and oldest known tetrapodomorph, provides a unique opportunity to investigate the
endocranial evolution at the initial stage of the tetrapod lineage.
The endocranium of Tungsenia shares many features with Youngolepis (Chang, 1982), as
well as to a lesser extent Styloichthys (Zhu and Yu, 2002) and Powichthys (Jessen, 1980), such
as the ventrally opened anterior nostril; the presence of paired internasal cavities; the elongate
and broad parasphenoid, which is parallel or slightly diverging anteriorly; the vomers separated
by the parasphenoid; the attachment for the basicranial muscle covered by the parasphenoid,
which could not be seen in ventral view; the broad orbital tectum, and the well-developed
basipterygoid.
Furthermore, the typical crista suspendens is poorly developed in Tungsenia, which
is different from the well-developed crista suspendens in other tetrapodomorphs (e.g.,
Kenichthys, Gogonasus, Osteolepis, Meglichthys) (Thomson, 1964; Fox et al., 1995; Lebedev,
1995; Long et al., 1997; Zhu and Ahlberg, 2004; Borgen and Nakrem, 2016). The similarity
between Tungsenia and other tetrapodomorph shes lies in the opening of the pituitary vein,
which is situated at the base of the basipterygoid (Coates and Friedman, 2010). However, the
exit for the profundus nerve in Tungsenia opens in the posterior part of the ethmosphenoid
region, which recalls the condition in Youngolepis. It is worth mentioning that the parasphenoid
in Tungsenia, Styloichthys, Youngolepis, and some basal tetrapodomorphs (e.g., Kenichthys,
and an undescribed Early Devonian tetrapodomorph from Australiaextend posteriorly, reaching
the ventral opening of the notochord canal and covering the attachment for the basicranial
muscle (Chang, 1982; Zhu and Yu, 2002; Zhu and Ahlberg, 2004; Hunt and Young, 2012).
Although a large basicranial fenestra is present in Tungsenia, the general features of
the otoccipital region quite agree with those of Youngolepis, such as the well-developed
subjugular ridge, the strong adotic process situated at the end of the subjugular ridge, and
the poorly developed fossa bridgei (Chang, 1982). On the other hand, Tungsenia agrees with
other tetrapodomorphs in the lateral dorsal aortae emerging from the median dorsal aorta
postcranially, thus the impression for the median dorsal aorta is not preserved on the ventral
side of the occipital unit (Long et al., 1997). An independent ventral arcual plate is also seen in
Eusthenopteron (Jarvik, 1980).
It is remarkable that Tungsenia displays more primitive rather than advanced features in
the endocranium, which indicates that the tertapodomorph endocranium retains the primitive
condition present at the initial stage of tetrapod evolution. The major identical endocranial
modifications of the tetrapod lineage, such as the elongate of the olfactory tract, anterior-
posterior situated pineal and parapineal organs, anteriorly converging sword-like parasphenoid,
well-developed crista suspendens, and well-developed fossa bridgei occurred later after the
Pragian stage of the Devonian period (Jarvik, 1980; Zhu and Ahlberg, 2004).
Advanced online publication
10
Fig. 5 Comparisons of rhipidistian neurocrania in ventral view
A. Youngolepis (after Chang, 1982); B. Gogonasus andrewsi (after Long et al., 1997);
C. Tungsenia paradoxa; D. Eusthenopteron foordi (after Jarvik, 1980)
Abbreviations: art.eth. ethmoid articulation for the palatoquadrate; c.hyp. canal for buccohypophysial duct;
c.ju. jugular canal; f.c.i. foramen for the internal carotid artery; cr.pend, crista suspendens;
fe.exa. fenestra exonarina anterior; fe.v. fenestra ventralis; gr.a.ci, groove for the internal carotid artery;
gr.a.dm. groove for median dorsal aorta; hf.d. dorsal hyomandibular facet; hf.v, ventral hyomandibular facet;
ins.bcm. insertion area for the basicranial muscle; P. parasphenoid; sp. space; te.o. orbital tectum
For other abbreviations, see Figs. 1 and 2. Not to scale
5 Conclusion
The posterior cranial portion of Tungsenia provides unique evidence for the under-
Advanced online publication
11
Lu et al. - posterior cranial portion of Tungsenia and evolution of tetrapodomorph
standing of otoccipital region evolution in the tetrapod lineage, and the new data strongly
supports the basalmost position of Tungsenia among tetrapodomorphs. However, the
phylogenetic relationships of the lower part of the tetrapod lineage are still not well resolved.
Further investigations into the early representatives that occurred from both China and East
Gondwana (Australia-Antarctica) will help to resolve ancestral conditions for tetrapod origins.
Acknowledgments We thank XIONG C-H for specimen preparation. HOU Y-M for CT
scanning. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(41872023, 41472016), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS, Grant No. QYZDB-
SSW-DQC040.
云南昭通早泥盆统四足形类奇异东生鱼后顶甲及脑颅耳枕区化石
兼论早期四足形类脑颅特征演化
卢 静1,2 YOUNG Gavin3 胡雨致3,4 乔 妥1,2 朱 敏1,2,5
(1 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所，中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室 北京 100044)
(2 中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心 北京 100044)
(3 澳大利亚国立大学物理与机械学院应用数学系 堪培拉 ACT 2601)
(4 澳大利亚国立大学地球科学院 堪培拉 ACT 2601)
(5 中国科学院大学 北京 100039)
摘要：首次报道了产于云南昭通早泥盆世布拉格期(约4.09亿年前)最古老的四足形类——
奇异东生鱼(Tungsenia paradoxa)头后半部耳枕区的化石材料。东生鱼的耳枕区特征与早期
的肺鱼形类，如杨氏鱼非常相似(如具发育的颈下脊，向耳突，以及不发育的桥窝等), 同时
也展示出与之后更为进步的四足形类相似的特征(如背侧动脉汇合于颅后，具分离的腹中板
等)。这些特征的镶嵌为厘清早期四足形类脑颅特征的获得序列提供了重要的数据。将新获
得的东生鱼形态数据加入包含主要早期四足形类分类单元及形态特征的矩阵中进行系统发
育分析，结果仍支持东生鱼位于四足动物支系最基干位置。东生鱼耳枕区新材料的发现填
补了对早期四足形类脑颅耳枕区结构认识的空白，为认识四足形类后顶甲膜质骨型式及脑
颅耳枕区的特征演化提供了新的证据。
关键词：云南，早泥盆世，肉鳍鱼类，四足形类，脑颅演化
中图法分类号：Q915.862 文献标识码：A 文章标号：1000–3118(2019)02–0001–12
References
Ahlberg P E, 1991. A re-examination of sarcopterygian interrelationships, with special reference to the Porolepiformes. Zool
J Linn Soc, 103: 241−287
Borgen U J, Nakrem H A, 2016. Morphology, phylogeny and taxonomy of osteolepiform fish. Fossils & Strata, 61:
1−514
Advanced online publication
12
Chang M M, 1982. The braincase of Youngolepis, a Lower Devonian crossopterygian from Yunnan, south-western China.
Ph. D thesis. Stockholm: Department of Geology, University of Stockholm. 1−113
Chang M M, Zhu M, 1993. A new osteolepidid from the Middle Devonian of Qujing, Yunnan. Mem Assoc Aust Palaeontol,
15: 183−198
Clement A M, King B, Giles S et al., 2018. Neurocranial anatomy of an enigmatic Early Devonian sh sheds light on early
osteichthyan evolution. Elife, 7:e34349
Coates M I, Friedman M, 2010. Litoptychus bryanti and characteristics of stem tetrapod neurocrania. In: Elliott D K, Maisey
J G, Yu X B et al. eds. Morphology, Phylogeny and Paleobiogeography of Fossil Fishes. München: Verlag Dr.
Friedrich Pfei. 389−416
Fox R C, Campbell K S W, Barwick R E et al., 1995. A new osteolepiform sh from the Lower Carboniferous Raymond
Formation, Drummond Basin, Queensland. Mem Queensl Mus, 38: 97−221
Hunt J R, Young G C, 2012. Depositional environment, stratigraphy, structure and paleobiology of the Hatchery Creek
Group (Early–?Middle Devonian) near Wee Jasper, New South Wales. Aust J Earth Sci, 59: 355−371
Jarvik E, 1948. On the morphology and taxonomy of the Middle Devonian osteolepid fishes of Scotland. K svenska
Vetenskakad Handl, 25: 1−301
Jarvik E, 1980. Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates, Vol. 1. London: Academic Press. 1−575
Jessen H L, 1980. Lower Devonian Porolepiformes from the Canadian Arctic with special reference to Powichthys
thorsteinssoni Jessen. Palaeontogr Abt A, 167: 180−214
Lebedev O A, 1995. Morphology of a new osteolepidid sh from Russia. Bull Mus Nat Hist Nat C, 17: 287−341
Long J A, Barwick R E, Campbell K S W, 1997. Osteology and functional morphology of the osteolepiform sh Gogonasus
andrewsae Long, 1985, from the Upper Devonian Gogo Formation, Western Australia. Rec West Aust Mus,
53(Suppl): 1−89
Lu J, Zhu M, Long J A et al., 2012. The earliest known stem-tetrapod from the Lower Devonian of China. Nat Commun, 3:
1160
Lu J, Giles S, Friedman M et al., 2016. The oldest actinopterygian highlights the cryptic early history of the hyperdiverse
ray-nned shes. Curr Biol, 26: 1602−1608
Lu J, Giles S, Friedman M et al., 2017. A new stem sarcopterygian illuminates patterns of character evolution in early bony
shes. Nat Commun, 18: 1932
Swofford D L, Waddell P J, Huelsenbeck J P et al., 2001. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice
between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst Biol, 50: 525−539
Thomson K S, 1964. Revised generic diagnoses of the fossil shes Megalichthys and Ectosteorhachis (family Osteolepidae).
Bull Mus Comp Zool, 131: 283−311
Young G C, Gorter J D, 1981. A new sh fauna of Middle Devonian age from the Taemas/Wee Jasper region of New South
Wales. Aust Bur Min Res Geol Geophys Bull, 209: 85−147
Yu X B, 1998. A new porolepiform-like fish, Psarolepis romeri, gen. et sp. nov. (Sarcopterygii, Osteichthyes) from the
Lower Devonian of Yunnan, China. J Vert Paleont, 18: 261−274
Zhu M, Ahlberg P E, 2004. The origin of the internal nostril of tetrapods. Nature, 432: 94−97
Zhu M, Ahlberg P E, Zhao W J et al., 2017. A Devonian tetrapod-like sh reveals substantial parallelism in stem tetrapod
evolution. Nat Ecol Evol, 1: 1470–147
Zhu M, Yu X B, 2002. A primitive sh close to the common ancestor of tetrapods and lungsh. Nature, 418: 767−770
Advanced online publication
