ChapterPDF Available

The changing nature of agricultural production in Ireland

Authors:
  • Atlantic Technological University (ATU)

Abstract

The law of the land When I was a boy my brothers and sisters had to leave the land, because it couldn't support them. Neighbours were scarce. So my father and I, we had our breakfast, dinner, and tea, working in that field without a break in our work. And my mother brought us the meals. One day, my father sensed a drop of rain in the air and got my mother to help us bring in the hay before it was too late. She was working one corner of the field, and I was working in the other. About the third day, I saw her fall back, keel over so to speak.
1
The
changing nature of a
gricultural
production in
Ireland
Dr. Simon Stephens
, Letterkenny Institute of Technology, Donegal, Ireland
The law of the land
Neighbours
were scarce. So my father and I, we had our breakfast, dinner, and tea, working in that field without a break in
our work. And my mother brought us the meals. One day, my father sensed a drop of rain in the air and got my
mother to help us bring
in the hay before it was too late. She was working one corner of the field, and I was
working in the other. About the third day, I saw her fall back, keel over so to speak. I called my father … I run to
her. My father kneeled beside her. He knew she was d
ying. He looked at me, and he said, "Fetch a priest." Fetch
a pries
t
... And I said, "Let's
-
let's bring the hay in first. Let's bring the hay in first." My father looked at me with
tears of pride in his eyes. He knew I'd take care of the land.
The Bull
McCabe in John B Keane’s The Field
Introduction
In Ireland like other OECD cou
ntries economic development has been
characterised by
gradual structural change. In
the
early 1900s the initial stages of economic development
were driven by
agriculture
which
accounted for the bulk of
Gross Domestic Product (
GDP
)
and employment.
Post World War 2 Ireland began to export in great volume and this
development was boosted by Ireland joining the European Union in 1973.
During the
1980
s
industrialisation intensified a
nd
the share of agriculture in economic output
and
employment declined
an
d the manufacturing sector grew as
Multinational Corporations
(
MNCs
)
came to Ireland to
produce
pharmaceuticals, medical devices and IT components.
As
a result
Ireland
has developed
f
rom a largely agricultural economy with many smal
l farms to
a mixed economy. H
owever
,
agriculture remains
important to the Irish economy.
E
uropean
U
nion (EU)
funding and polic
ies have helped
agriculture in Ireland
to develop
and to
embrace
the use of new t
echnologies
and
focus on sustainable agricultural practices.
Although
Ireland is a comparatively small country
(population of circa 4.2million)
it
has a
relatively large presence in EU
food
markets with
a strong reputation for
quality in meat and
2
dairy products.
T
he Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)
h
as supported the modernisation of
farming techniques and increased mechanisation
.
Smyth
et al.
(2012) explain that in recent
decades, the traditional style of extensive farming has been increasingly rep
laced with more
commercial, intensive farming
.
As a result there are now many big
factory
style farms
employing staff rather than the traditional model of one farmer (and their family) farming a
small farm.
Agriculture and food production in Ireland are m
anaged by
the Department of
Agriculture, F
ood and Fisheries (
DAFF
).
As
the
agriculture
sector
has
changed
there has been
an increased focus on
how
agriculture can
protect and enhance the natural environment.
There is also a focus on the potential of agri
-
b
usiness to
provide competitive advantage
driving exports and providing employment (unemployment is currently 14.8%).
Key facts
/statistics
about
Irish agriculture
1.
There are approximately 139,800 family farms in Ireland with an average siz
e of 32.7 hectares per holding
(CSO, Census of Agriculture 2010)
.
2.
The total land area of Ireland is 6.9 million
hectares of which 4.2 million hectares
is used
for agriculture
(DAFF
2011).
3.
Close to 80% of Ireland’s farmland is in pasture, hay and grass silage, 11% is rough grazing and 10% is
used
for
crop production
(DAFF
2011)
.
4.
The agri
-
food sector accounts for 9.8% of Ireland’s exports and 7.5% of em
ployment
(DAFF
2011)
.
5.
In 2011, I
rish agri
-
food and drink exports inc
reased by an estimated 12% to
8.85 b
illio
n (Bord Bia 2011).
6.
The UK was the main destination for Irish agri
-
food and drink exports in 2011 accounting for 41% of all
exports. 34% of exports went to EU markets while the remaining 25% went to international markets
(Bord Bia
2011).
7.
A
verage farm income (excluding o
ff
-
farm income) increased by 46% in 2010 to
17,771
. Full
-
time farms had
an average farm income of
41,624,
while the part
-
time equivalent was
7,554 (
Teagasc, 2010)
.
8.
In
51% of farms the holder an
d/or spouse had an off
-
farm job
.
79% of farmers and/or their spouses had an
off
-
farm source of income
either from employment, pensions or social assistance
(
Teagasc, 2010)
.
9.
In 2012 dairy products and ingredients account for 30% of exports. The export value of prepared foods
represents
17% of Irish agri
-
foods exports
. Beef
represents
20% or
1.8 billion of exports, a 15% increase on
2010, while beverages increased by 6% to represent 14% of agri
-
food exports at
1.2bn (Bord Bia, 2012).
3
The European Union and the Common Agricultural Pol
icy
The origins of the CAP stem from a need for a reliable supply of affordabl
e food for Europe
as well as the need to protect
farming
livelihood
s. The CAP
was originally negotiated
in the
1960s.
Ireland has benefited from the CAP receiving nearly
54 billion between 1973 and
2012.
The
original goal of the CAP was to offer
farmers financial incentives to increase
levels of productivity. This was
to some extent
successful in allowing the EU to move
towards self
-
sufficiency. However,
the CAP was undermined by two
significant problem
s
;
over
-
production and surpluses.
The result was food mountains, wine lakes and general
wastages as farmers produced without quotas. Therefore
,
in 1992 the EU Commissioner
for
Agriculture Ray McSharry
(an Irish politician)
introduced a series of reforms that controlled
the level of production
through a quota system with penalties for farmers who exceeded
their quota
. The impact on small farm owners was significant. In Irelan
d many small farmer
holders became uncompetitive and so began a migration away from the land.
In some cases
larger farmer owners bought up land and where small farms remained their owners took up
additional employment.
Further changes were implemented
unde
r the
Agenda 2000
reform process.
In Agenda 2000 the
emphasis
was
on sustainability and environmental
protection.
These changes challenge the farming community to reduce the use of
pesticides, fertilisers and growth enhancers. The subsequent changes in far
ming practices
have had a positive impact on food quality and helped restore consumers’ perceptions of
the agricultural sector.
At present c
hange
is driven by world food shortages resulting in the end of arable set
-
aside
and
the need for
quotas.
Furthermore
, d
irect payments to farmers
have been
reduced and
the money transferred to the Rural Development Fund
(
www.environ.ie
). The
re
a
llocation
4
of funding will be used to tackle challenges
including climate
change, the need for better
water management, the protection of biodiversity, and the production of green e
nergy.
Ireland currently receives
1.8 billion of the EU’s 59 billion annual agricultural budget
(40% of the total EU budget)
. Irish farmers receive
funding through the Single Payment
Scheme.
Payments to
Irish farmers’
are
higher
than the EU average payment. Indeed
Ireland and the rest of the “
original
” twelve
EU states still benefit disproportionately from
CAP funding. Less than 20% goes to the 'new'
Member States.
The a
gri
-
food sector
in Ireland
Most sectors of the Irish economy have experienced severe contraction during the present
recession. However, one sector has managed to main
tain growth during the downturn;
the
Irish agrifood sector.
The
employment
boom in
Ireland
was driven by
financial services and
the construction sector but post boom
the agrifood sector is now one of the main drivers of
recovery.
The
agrifood sector account
s
for 10% of GDP and employs 160,000 people
(down
from 600,000
in the 1960s)
. The sector has grown from an indigenous
production based
industry into one with a global outlook and customer base
for value added products
. The
sector now accounts for
8 billion in exports (75% within the EU) and over 85% of Irish beef
an
d dairy products are exported. Although the global economic
crisis
has reduced
consumer
spending
the demand for food on global markets remains strong
.
Furthermore, changes to
the CAP mean that
increasing production
is now possible. In this regard
Ireland
has
a natural
advantage
over competitors i.e.
a
low cost grass based seasonal system of production.
DAFF
in
its
Food Harvest 2020 report
optimistically
envisages a 50% increase in production by
2020.
(DAFF
2012, p. 6)
report that t
he international outlook for food availability and prices
is underpinned by the need for global food production to increase by 70% to meet expected
5
population demands by 2050. Global food production is further complicated
by the issue of
climate change and
the transfer of crops to fuel production
.
The food industry sector in
Europe
provides
14% of all the manufacturing jobs in the EU
as well as providing 14.5% of
total manufacturing turnover
. The
industry consists mainly of small and medium sized
enterprise
s (SMEs) which need support to grow and develop
so that they can
compete on
the world market.
The a
gri
-
food sector in
Ireland
can be characterised as being largely primary production
based, with the majority of farmers involved in livestock production or
dairying. Processing
or other forms of value
-
adding
we
re generally regarded as underdeveloped
. This is changing
and
Irish
agri
-
food companies now account f
or 20% of the companies listed on the Irish
stock exchange (
www.ise
.ie
).
The biggest
agri
-
food
group is the Kerry Group
(
www.kerrygroup.com
)
with an annual turnover of
5 billion making it one of the world’s
leading food and ingredient companies. While it has a sizable number of
lea
ding brands
including Denny,
Dairygold
, Galtee and Innocent
it is in ingredients and flavours that
Kerry
Group is
a world leader
.
The Kerry Group has manufacturing facilities in twenty three
countries employing 20,000 people
(the North American location
is Beloit, Wisconsin)
.
Company profiles
1.
C&C
a beverages group
which has seen it’s flagship Magners cider spread to a global audience
(
www.candcgroupplc.com
).
2. Lakeland diaries
which is one of Irelands
largest Farmers co
-
operatives. They employ circa 550
people and process in excess of 700 million litres of milk annually. The vast majority of revenue is
generated from the export of powdered milk (
www.lakeland.ie
).
3. Largo foods
produce a ranges of savoury snacks. The company’s turnover is
90 million. They
export to 20+ countries (
www.largofoods.ie
).
6
4. Coolmore Foods
started in a farmhouse in Co. Cork and now sells it’s ra
nge of c
akes to a global
market. It bega
n by selling direct to delis and upmarket food retailers and now sells 15,000 cakes a
week in the UK
(
www.coolmorefoods.ie
).
5. Connaught Gold
has a diversified business p
ortfolio dealing in Food and Dairy Ingredients,
Agribusiness, Livestock Marketing, Property Management, Timber Processing and local radio
enterprise (
www.connaughtgold.ie
).
Armstrong
et al
. (2005)
propose
that meeting the requirements of consumers
is
central to
developing the agri
-
food sector.
In Ireland
Bord Bia
is
the government agency whose remit it
is to
develop export markets for
Irish food, drink and horticulture suppliers
. The e
xport
performance
of t
hese suppliers
i
s
being boosted by strong
glob
al prices
. 2012 was the third
y
ear in a row
of growth in
export
s
with an overall increa
se of 30
% since 2009.
DAFF (2012, p.
55) report that a
ll major categories rec
orded increased export revenues with the
stron
gest
growth in Dairy, which
increased by
17
%
.
Meat and livestock exports
a
re
up
275 million
since 2009 and
prepared foods
recorded growth of 12%
.
Dairy Co
-
operatives such as
Lakelands and
Connaught
Gold are benefiting from booming global sales and the fact that
Ireland via Pfizer
-
Wyeth, Abbott and Danone now produces 12%
of the
world’s
infant
formula.
Ireland’s beef sector is also growing with producer
s
switching from the export of
commodities to v
alue added products which go st
raight to supermarket shelves.
Bord Bia
and Enterprise Ireland
(government agency responsible for the development of Irish
enterprises in world markets)
are working to help hundreds of small producers to break into
new marke
ts. Among the
growth areas are confectionary; ready meals; and organic food.
DAFF
(2010, p.
31) propose that for the food and drink industry, there is now a clear need to
harness the powerful environmental messages that Irish food and drink products can
convey. Furthermore, DAFF recommend the creation of an umbrella brand for Irish food and
7
drink. For Irish food and drink exporters, the challenge is to develop the level of market
knowledge necessary to build sales in key categories and to maintain a stron
g focus on
meeting emerging customer and consumer needs. The future success of Irish companies in
this sector relies to a large extent on their ability to be part of a market
-
led food retail
sector (DAFF, 2010 p.30). Therefore,
DAFF has funded research int
o the
potential for
development in the agri
-
food sector exploring: consumer awareness; and key influences on
consumer perceptions/attitudes and purchasing behaviour.
Consumers and agri
-
food
The consumer’s lack of understanding of the link between food an
d farming has Duffy
et al.
(2005, p. 18) explains resulted in a mismatch between many people’s perception of the way
food is produced and the realities of modern agriculture, processing and manufacturing
.
T
his disconnectedness is an unintended, but
inescapable, consequence of mass
-
produced
food products and the globalised food ec
onomy (Morris and Buller, 2003). Therefore,
i
mproving the image of
Irish
agriculture and the link between consumers and the food chain
has become a priority for many organisa
tions within the industry.
The t
raceability of food
through
out
the entire
food production chain is essential for a number of reasons: to provide
consumer assurance about the sources and safety of food; to allow identification of the
source of infected or s
ubstandard product; for disease control;
and
to satisfy
labelling
regulations
(Leat
et al.
,
1998)
.
Existing literature on marketing and Irish consumers (McCarthy
et al
.
,
2006; Campbell
et al
.
,
2009; Kelly
et al
.
,
2010) indicates that consumers will only c
hange their purchasing
behaviour if the brand is credible and the message has clarity. DAFF propose
six
key steps
necessary to progress the development of
Brand Ireland
.
The steps are:
8
Research clarifying the consumer relationship with issues including but
not limited to:
quality; trust; transparency; credible; and clarity.
Industry
-
academic development of market knowledge which will help expand market share
in key locations.
Support processors in building strategic partnerships along the supply chain, part
icularly with
retailers.
Investigate possible linkages with tourism agencies in the marketing of the agri
-
food sector.
Identification of target markets and access opportunities.
Develop a strategy to support the integration of current marketing activities (‘Ireland, the
Food Island’, ‘Love Irish Food’, etc.) with the proposed
Brand Ireland
as well as how to avoid
dilution of strong existing brands.
Bell and Shelman, (2010, p
.
8)
explain that h
igh margins in the
agri
-
food
sector
usually come
from innovativ
e products and/or strong brands
. Ireland has very few large global food
brands with Guinness
, Jameson and Baileys
being exception
s
.
Few Irish companies benefit
from branding in ex
port markets. This is
due to the
high level of
investment necessary to
compete through advertising
.
Perhaps
Irish
agri
-
food companies need to consolidate
to aid
the development of strong brands that would have better opportunities
for
success
especially
in
export
s
markets
.
Another
possibility is that
Irish
agri
-
food companies
can
build
on
the
Bord Bia
concept of
Ireland the Food Island
, such as strategy could help distinguish
Irish agri
-
food products in the global marketplace.
9
Looking Forward
Smyth
et al.
(2012)
conducted a large scale survey of the farming community in Ireland.
They found that the majority of older
farmers
in Ireland
feel
there is not enough of an
incenti
ve for young farmers, due to low
incomes and dissatisfaction with the current s
tate
of farming
.
However, most of the
younger
farmers
surveyed
indicated that farming is very
important to them and that they would continue farming the land
.
Boyle (2009) explains
that
in the future Irish agriculture will constitute
two contrasting farm t
ypes: large
-
scale full
-
time
factory
farms and small
-
scale part
-
time farms.
The
majority of Irish farms are family
owned and
so
entry
in
to the industry through channels other than inheritance is rare due to
the limited availability and high cost.
I
n recent
years, Ireland has experienced
unprecedented urbanisation and landscape fragmentation due to
the
construction
boom
driven by the
National Development Plan
(
www.ndp.ie
) and the unprecedented demand for
new housing
. This has
affected open countryside as well as villages and towns in all parts of
the country.
In the future g
rass
-
based dairying will have fewer but generally larger farms
producing twice the volume of high quality milk. Grass will provide the basis for a signific
ant
beef industry. Sheep farming will remain an important enterprise on part
-
time farms and on
some mixed large
-
scale farms and will provide a landscape management function on hills.
Tillage farming will
continue to be
dominated by a relatively small number of large scale
growers.
Given the changing nature of world demand it is likely that more land will be used
for
tillage crops and energy crops
(Boyle, 2009 and Smyth
et al
2012)
.
The prospects fo
r Irish food and drink
exports are
positive
.
There is still strong global
demand for products, but prices have
stabilized and consolidated. DAFF (2012) predict
l
ong
-
term growth in global demand
which will
underpin
the future development of food markets.
10
Irish farmers can expect
further pressure on margins as input costs remain high. A Bord Bia
survey (December 2011) shows continuing optimism in the food and drink sector. 85% of
exporters viewed the prospects for their business in 2012 as good or very good. New
customers and new
markets are among the main reasons given for this optimism.
Indeed
69% of respondents
surveyed by
Smyth
et al.
(2012)
stated that they had increased their
sales forecasts for the year ahead. But
many are finding it increasingly difficult to pa
ss on
increas
es in input costs as c
ustomers are still focusing very much on value for
money.
Chapter s
ummary
1.
Agriculture in Ireland has changed from small labour intensive farming to large
factory style farms with sophisticated mechanisation.
2.
The CAP initial provided income subsidies but limited growth through market
distorting quota and payments.
Changes
to CAP have brought a renewed focus on
sustainability and offer opportunities for growth with the removal of quotas.
3.
The
Celtic Tiger
period
and subsequent housing boom led to people leaving the land
and land being used for economic development. The current recession has resulted
in the return of land to agricultural production.
4.
Agricultural is slowly moving from beef production to tillage and
the lucrative dairy
market.
5.
The agri
-
food sector has emerged as a strong source of employment and exports.
Irish companies have developed international production facilities and customer
bases.
11
Questions for Review
1.
What are the s
trengths and weaknesses
of the a
gricultural sector in Ireland?
2.
What role has the EU and the CAP played in changing the
a
gricultural sector in Ireland?
3.
How significant is changing consumer prefer
ences to the branding of Irish a
gri
-
food
products?
4.
How cab government agencies help Ir
ish food and drink exporters
to develop the
level of market knowledge necessary to build sales
and meet
consumer needs
?
5.
How do the companies
profiled differ from the main a
gri
-
food companies in your
country?
6.
Where will the
a
gricultural sector in Ireland b
e
in twenty years?
References
1.
Aalen, F. Whelan, K., and Matthew Stout (1997),
Atlas of the Irish Rural Landscape
, Cork
University Press, Cork.
2.
Armstrong, G, Farley H. Gray, J. and Durkan, M.
(
2005
),
Marketing
health
-
enhancing
foods: implications from the dairy sector.
Marketing Intelligence and Planning
vol.
23
No.
7,
pp.
705
-
71.
3.
Bell, D.E. and Shelman, M. (2010), ‘Pathways to Growth’: ‘Buildings Ireland’s Largest
Indigenous Industry’
, available from
www.bordbia.ie
4.
Boyle, G. (2009),
The Irish Agriculture Rural Landscape
, The Heritage Council, available at
www.heritage.ie
5.
Campbell, K., B
. Bennett and Stephens, S. (2009),
Utilis
ing minority language to develop
brand identity: an evaluation of current practice using the Irish language.
Irish Marketing
Review
,
Vol. 20 No.
1,
pp.
67
-
72.
6.
CSO (2012)
Census of Agriculture 2012, available online at
www.
cso.ie
7.
Department of Agric
ulture, Fisheries and Food (2006),
Agri Vision 2015: action plan
.
Dublin,
Stationary Office.
12
8.
Department of Agric
ulture, Fisheries and Food (2010),
Food Harvest 2020: a vision for
Irish
Agri
-
food and fisheries
. Dublin, Stationary
Office.
9.
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (2011),
Annual review and Outlook
,
Dublin, Stationary Office available at
www.agriculture.gov.ie
10.
Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment
(2006),
Str
ategy for Science,
Technology
and Innovation 2006
2013
. Dublin, Stationary Office.
11.
Duffy, R., Fearne, A. and Healing, V. (2005),"Reconnection in the UK food chain: Bridging
the communication gap between food producers and consumers",
British Food Journal
,
Vol. 107 No. 1, pp. 17
-
33
12.
Kelly, C. Clerkin, P. Nic Gabh
ainn, S. and Mulvihill, M. (2010),
Food marketing in Irish
schools,
Health Education
Vol.
110
No. 5 pp.
336
-
350.
13.
Leat, P., Marr, P. and Ritchie, C. (1998),"Quality assurance and traceability
-
th
e Scottish
agri
-
food industry's quest for competitive advantage", Supply Chain Management: An
International Journal, Vol. 3, No. 3 pp. 115
-
117.
14.
McCarthy, N. Brennan, M.
Ritson, C. and de Boer, M. (2006),
Food hazard characteristics
and
risk reduction beha
viour: the view of consumers on the island of Ireland.
British
Food Journal
,
Vol. 108
No.
10,
pp.
875
-
891.
15.
Morley, A., Sparkes, A. and Thomas, B. (2000),"Strategic and regional initiatives in the
Agri
-
food industry in Wales", British Food Journal, Vol. 102
No. 4 pp. 274
289.
16.
Morris, C. and Buller, H. (2003), “The local food sector: a preliminary assessment of its
form and impact in Gloucestershire”, British Food Journal, Vol. 105 No. 8, pp. 559
-
66.
17.
Smith, G.F., Bligh, J., Delaney, E., Egan, M. and G. O’Do
novan (2012),
Case Studies on
High Nature Value Farming in Ireland
-
Aran Islands and
North Connemara
. The Heritage
Council available at
www.heritage.ie
18.
Teagasc (2010), National Farm Survey available at
www.teagasc.ie
13
Appendix 1
Agricultural Regions in Ireland
Aalen
et al.
(1997
, p. 18
)
... Subsequent studies reported that the websites of food and drinks businesses were not being used to their full potential (Sturiale and Scuderi, 2016;Cristobal-Fransi et al, 2020). In the case of Ireland, where SMEs account for over 90% of active enterprises (Central Statistics Office (CSO), 2021), there has been limited attention given to the issue of e-Commerce adoption among Agri-food businesses (McNulty, 1985;Stephens, 2014;Renwick et al, 2014). Recent industry reports from Grant Thornton (2020) and the Irish Farm Accounts Co-operative (IFAC) (2020) indicates that digital trends in the sector are less than expected, academic interest in the topic is scant. ...
Article
Full-text available
The debate concerning e-Commerce adoption is an evolving one that in the context of the current COVID-19 Pandemic has come centre stage. Although the shift towards e-Commerce platforms has been an increasing trend in recent years, Curtin (2020) states the current pandemic has accelerated consumers’ shifts toward e-Commerce by five years. As store closures and new enforcements became a reality, it forced many companies to pivot their online strategies overnight (Shadler et al, 2020). Since its inception in the late 90’s, e-Commerce adoption and research has championed the rise and the significant benefits of e-Commerce. Industries as diverse as financial, retail, manufacturing, and hospitality (Josanov, 2011; Kremez et al, 2019; Helper and MacDuffie, 2000; Hua, 2016) have embraced e-Commerce. By contrast, research into the use and level of adoption by Agri-food businesses indicates that this sector has not kept pace with this digital revolution. This is surprising given the importance of this sector worldwide. Indeed, it is one of the most important indigenous industries in Ireland in terms of employment, economic output, and export performance. However, there is scarce research found in the case for Irish Agri-food e-Commerce development, with limited industry reports available. Previous research elsewhere called for government support to encourage the move to online territory (Sparkes and Thomas, 2001; Sturiale and Scuderi, 2016), and the onset of COVID-19 furthered this. Numerous support agencies expanded on their current offerings in relation to digital support, although little is known around Agri-food businesses adoption of these. For this reason, this paper intends to add to the limited studies surrounding this important indigenous industry in Ireland within the widely dynamic topic of e-Commerce platforms. The focus of this paper is directed toward the adoption and integration of these online platforms during COVID-19, the benefits and challenges faced, the role of support agencies and further support suggested by SMEs through survey data. This study has both an academic and industry focus and hence aims to improve our understanding of online activity and digital support within this sector.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Schools are thought to represent a growing marketing opportunity for food advertisers in many countries. Marketing of unhealthy food to children is linked to the increased prevalence of obesity worldwide. This paper aims to explore ways in which schools respond to commercial activity around food marketing. Design/methodology/approach A census survey in the Republic of Ireland was employed to investigate the extent of commercial activity in post‐primary schools in Ireland, with a focus on food marketing. School policies related to commercialism and promoting healthy living to children and respondents' attitudes to these issues were explored. Findings Food sales are a prevalent form of commercial activity in schools with 81.4 per cent operating shops or canteens that sell snacks, 44.7 per cent drinks vending machines and 28.0 per cent snack vending machines. A total of 38 per cent of schools reported that they accept for‐profit sponsorship and the primary reason was inadequate funding for equipment (91.6 per cent), especially sports equipment. The majority (87.3 per cent) agreed with establishing a national voluntary code of practice in relation to industry sponsorship, which is recommended by the Irish National Taskforce on Obesity. Few schools have policies that refer to commercial sponsorship (7.0 per cent), but schools would welcome receiving guidance and support in developing such policies. Practical implications The extent of commercial activity in schools and the possible effect on children and their families need to be disseminated widely. A mechanism for monitoring the type and volume of commercialism, and food marketing in particular, in schools in Ireland is necessary. Originality/value These findings provide a baseline to monitor the future direction of commercialism in Irish schools.
Article
This article examines current practice(s) in relation to the use of the Irish language for branding within the manufacturing and internationally traded services sector. The article identifies the motivations for the use of a minority language [Irish] and the benefits and limitations associated with its use. Data was collected in two stages: firstly, a survey was conducted to examine the views of companies who use the Irish language. Secondly, depth interviews were conducted to explore the key issues arising from the questionnaire. The interviews were conducted with seven companies and an industry expert. The companies believe that although customers do not often use Irish they do believe that consumers value companies who use the Irish language. The respondents indicate that using Irish can promote customer loyalty and help to develop consumer awareness. However, companies need to be cognisant of the potential for alienation and misinterpretation of the company brand by customers who are unfamiliar with the language.
Article
The paper focuses on an explanatory account of the Agri-food Partnership in Wales (including the objectives, structure, participants, funding, decisions and activities); the relationship between the Partnership and other initiatives and bodies in the sector; and this is all set against an overview of the Agri-food sector in Wales (describing the structure and outputs) and the key issues and problems it faces. The paper proceeds with a description of the particular paths of research being pursued by the authors, and concludes with contemplation of the broader, more theoretical questions to be addressed.
Article
“Local food” is attracting considerable policy and public interest, but evidence is lacking about the emerging contours of the local food sector. This paper offers a preliminary assessment of the local food sector in the county of Gloucestershire. Based on interviews with farmers and retailers, it investigates the scope of local food production in the county, assesses the nature of the local food chain and considers the potential of local food production and marketing for adding value for the various actors in the chain, from producer to retailer. Questions are raised in the conclusion about the coherence and sustainability of the local food sector in the county given the differences in the ways in which producers and retailers construct “local” and some unintended consequences of the efforts to promote local food.
Article
This paper summarises how the Scottish agri-food industry has been developing farm and quality assurance activities since the early 1990s as it seeks to strengthen its competitive position. It also outlines the European system of third party certification for quality assurance schemes. The paper is an introduction to a number of “insights from industry” presented to a conference on “Food Traceability - What? Why? How?” which was held in Edinburgh in February 1998.
Article
Purpose This article aims to explore the risk characteristics associated with food hazards on the island of Ireland and to assess how the public deal with perceived risks. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative investigation involving 12 focus groups was conducted on the island of Ireland. Content analysis was undertaken, with the assistance of the qualitative software tool QSR N6. Findings Four hazard categories (lifestyle, (bio)technological, microbiological and farm orientated production) were identified and the risk characteristics and risk relieving strategies associated with these hazards were explored. The risk perceptions of respondents were consistent with those defined by the psychometric paradigm. The risk characteristics of knowledge, control, dread, harm to health, freedom of choice, ease to identify were all mentioned, but their importance differed greatly depending on the hazards. For example, in the case of lifestyle hazards, personalisation of the risk, and thus dread, occurred when the individual had a health scare, while with microbiological hazards, knowledge and familiarity resulted in increased confidence in ability to cope with the hazard in the home. The media was noted as having an influential role in individual risk assessment. Finally, changing lifestyles were seen as contributing to increasing the level of exposure to food risks among the population. Further investigation into the sources and consequences of these changing lifestyles is required to guide future food policy. Research limitations/implications The number of focus group conducted and the qualitative nature of the research limits the degree to which generalised conclusions can be drawn. Originality/value These results provide a deeper qualitative understanding of risk perception issues.
Article
Purpose To assess the potential for development in the agri‐food sector by investigating: consumer awareness of health‐enhancing foods; key influences on their perceptions of and attitudes towards these foods; their relevant purchasing behaviour in the context of the Northern Irish dairy products market. To develop recommendations for future segmentation and positioning strategies for health‐enhancing dairy foods. Design/methodology/approach Northern Ireland is a geographically discrete area of the United Kingdom, which relies heavily on the agri‐food industry in general, and the dairy sector in particular. A consumer questionnaire was adapted from previous studies. After two pilot studies with 30 and 50 consumers, 600 were administered face‐to‐face to a quota sample of male and female shoppers in six key supermarkets across Northern Ireland. Results were collated and analysed by SPSS. Descriptive parametric and non‐parametric statistics re‐reported in findings. Findings There is potential for the agri‐food industry to expand further, particularly in the case of added‐value food products, among which health‐enhancing foods should be treated as an important subset. However, a pre‐requisite is development of enhanced consumer segmentation and product positioning strategies. Research limitations/implications The findings and conclusions derive from one study of one specialist product type in one small national market. Generalisation should be possible, at least informally, but comparative studies are indicated. Practical implications The findings indicated a general lack of awareness of the health‐enhancing food concept and the level of (largely proven) health benefits of such products, which is a barrier to their wider adoption of these products. The key aims goals for marketing planners in this context are thus awareness generation and consumer education. The crucial segments of the general target audience and the core message to be conveyed, are both defined by the findings. Originality/value This study provides a research‐based foundation for a more proactive and informed marketing strategy in a particular context, potentially transferable to other market sectors and locations.
Article
Purpose – This paper reports the findings of a research project that investigated the extent of the information gap that exists between the British agri-food industry and consumers to help assist the industry in its efforts to re-connect with consumers and the wider public. Design/methodology/approach – The first stage involved an information audit to examine the communication activities of the providers of information about food and farming, which was conducted using desk research and personal interviews. The second stage involved qualitative and quantitative primary research to examine the information needs and knowledge amongst consumers, one of the key target groups identified in the first stage of the project. Findings – The review of the communication activities of organisations in the agri-food industry identified an extremely fragmented delivery to consumers and a distinct lack of resources to effectively communicate the information that exists and evaluate its impact on the attitudes, perceptions and behaviour of consumers. The consumer research indicated that, while many are interested in food production issues, the fragmented communication messages that they receive are not giving them a clear reason to consider the implications of their purchases for the British farming industry and the environment. Research limitations/implications – The information audit, whilst comprehensive, was not exhaustive, and so it is likely that some information providers may have been excluded from the review. In addition, the effectiveness of individual organisations' communication activities has not been evaluated and this presents a useful avenue for future research. Practical implications – Owing to the limited communication budgets of individual organisations it is suggested that the industry collaborate and pool its resources to develop a co-ordinated and effective consumer campaign for British agriculture. Originality/value – This paper is of value to participants in the agri-food industry as, since the publication of the Policy Commission inquiry into the future of farming and food, the subject of reconnection in the food chain has become very topical, with both industry and government representatives identifying the poor image of farming and consumers' lack of understanding of the link between food and farming as a significant problem for the industry.
Pathways to Growth': 'Buildings Ireland's Largest Indigenous Industry
  • D E Bell
  • M Shelman
Bell, D.E. and Shelman, M. (2010), 'Pathways to Growth': 'Buildings Ireland's Largest Indigenous Industry', available from www.bordbia.ie
The Irish Agriculture Rural Landscape, The Heritage Council
  • G Boyle
Boyle, G. (2009), The Irish Agriculture Rural Landscape, The Heritage Council, available at www.heritage.ie