ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Lactic acid is one of the most commercially useful hydroxycarboxylic acids. Its applications range from bulk production of products, like Poly Lactic Acid (PLA), in industries to simple household applications such as food containers. Many cheap materials, such as starchy and cellulosic materials, and renewable materials, such as agricultural wastes, can be used as raw materials for lactic acid production. Microorganisms belonging to bacteria and fungi are actively involved in the production of lactic acid from the provided raw materials. This article discusses various raw materials, microorganisms, fermentation methods involved in the production of lactic acid, and also the applications of lactic acid in different fields.
Content may be subject to copyright.
42
Review Article: IJBR
Dec 2018: Volume 1, Issue 1
Industrial production of lactic acid and its applications
Battula Savithra Krishna*, Gantala Sarva Sai Nikhilesh1, Besetty Tarun1,
Narayana Saibaba K V1, R Gopinadh1
Department of Biotechnology, GITAM Institute of Technology, GITAM University
(Received 20 December, 2018 Accepted 26, 2018)
Corresponding author E-mail address: bskrishna1999@gmail.com
Key words: Lactic acid, Solid State Fermentation, Bacteria, Fungi, Renewable raw materials.
Abstract
Lactic acid is one of the most commercially useful hydroxycarboxylic acids. Its applications
range from bulk production of products, like Poly Lactic Acid (PLA), in industries to simple
house hold applications such as food containers. Many cheap materials, such as starchy and
cellulosic materials, and renewable materials, such as agriculture wastes, can be used as raw
materials for lactic acid production. Microorganisms belonging to bacteria and fungi are actively
involved in production of lactic acid from the provided raw materials. This article discusses
various raw materials, microorganisms, fermentation methods involved in production of lactic
acid, and also the applications of lactic acid in different fields.
1. Introduction
Lactic acid is of earnest importance as it is
not only used as a raw material for the
production of various products by
fermentation, but it is also used in food,
pharmaceutical and textile industries
(Young-Jung Wee et al. 2006). It was
initially considered as a milk component by
Scheele when he first discovered it in 1780.
It was later named as Acide lactique by
Lavoisier in 1789 (H. Benninga 1990). CE
Avery was the first person to commercially
produce lactic acid in 1981 in Littleton, MA,
USA (Vickroy 1985).
Besides its applications in food preservation,
pharmaceutical and chemical industries, it is
also a widely used flavoring agent, acidulant
and inhibitor of bacteria. Its water retaining
capacity makes it useful as a moisturizer in
cosmetic formulations. Due to presence of
hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in its
structure, it can be converted into useful
chemicals like esters, bio solvents, etc. (Gao
C et al. 2011). Lactic acid is also used as a
monomer in the production of biodegradable
PLA (Poly Lactic Acid) (Datta et al. 1995)
and it is used for medical purposes as in case
of prostheses, surgical sutures, etc. (Wee et
al. 2006). Due to its versatile applications,
lactic acid is deemed as one of the most
important hydroxycarboxylic acids and it is
in high demand (Lopes MS et al. 2012).
Around 370,000 metric tons of lactic acid
was produced in the year 2017 (C.
Rodrigues et al. 2017) and the demand of
lactic acid is rapidly increasing every year at
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
43
the rate of 5-8% (Yadav et al. 2011;
Jamshidian M et al. 2010).
Various fermentation approaches for the
production of lactic acid include batch, fed-
batch, and continuous batch fermentations.
Batch and fed-batch cultures yield high
concentrations of lactic acid when compared
to continuous cultures. Though continuous
cultures yield low lactic acid concentrations,
the productivity is high (Hofvendahl et al.
2000). Microorganisms that are capable of
production of lactic acid are of two groups:
Bacteria and fungi (Litchfield 1996).
Although fungal fermentation has a slight
advantage over bacterial fermentation as
filamentous fungi need only a simple
medium to produce lactic acid, by the usage
of glucose aerobically (Tay et al. 2002), it
requires vigorous aeration (Yin et al. 1997).
Lactic acid can be also produced by
chemical synthesis. The chemical synthesis
of lactic acid is mainly done by hydrolysis
of lactonitrile by strong acids, which
produces a racemic mixture of L- lactic acid
and D- lactic acid. Various other processes
for production of lactic acid by chemical
synthesis include oxidation of propylene
glycol, nitric acid oxidation of propylene,
etc. But none of the chemical synthesis
processes (except hydrolysis of lactonitrile)
are economically and technically feasible.
The major advantage of fermentation
process over chemical synthesis is that it
requires cheap raw materials like starchy
waste, molasses and other materials rich in
carbohydrates (Anuradha et al. 1999).
The recent trend in usage of lactic acid is in
the production of Poly Lactic Acid (PLA).
PLA could be potential replacement for
fossil fuel based plastics, but its production
cost should be reduced to half of its current
price in order to achieve that (Lopes MS et
al. 2012; Abdel-Rahman et al. 2013). If this
is made possible, the demand of lactic acid
would rise even higher.
2. Raw Materials for lactic acid
production
In order to produce large amount of lactic
acid by fermentation at low cost, cheap raw
materials are required. Besides being cheap,
the raw materials should also have the
properties such as ability to produce high
yield, negligible or no formation of by-
product, high productivity, and less
contamination so that not much pre-
treatment is required (John et al. 2009). The
use of refined materials, such as
carbohydrates, may reduce the product
purification cost considerably, but it is not
economical as it results in high production
costs (K. Hofvendahl et al. 2000). The
following are some of the cheap raw
material sources for the production of lactic
acid: Starchy materials such as corn, potato,
rice, and wheat starch, and cellulosic
materials such as wood, cellulose are mainly
used as raw materials as they are in available
ample amount and cheap (K. Richter et al.
1998; K.V. Venkatesh 1997; C. Åkerberg
and G. Zacchi 2000). Starchy materials have
α (1,4) and α (1,6) linked glucose in the
structure (Richter et al. 1994; K. Hofvendahl
et al. 1997). Cellulosic materials have β
(1,4) glucan, lignin, arabinan, galactan and
xylan (Litchfield et al 1996; Hofvendahl et
al. 2000).
Apart from starchy and cellulosic materials,
renewable sources such as agricultural
residues, which are rich in carbohydrates are
used. Agricultural residues are abundant as
about 3.5 billion tons of agricultural residues
are produced per annum, however,
availability is not the only criteria, price and
purity also matter. The presence of
cellulosic residues in the agricultural
residues results in low protein content and
poor digestibility. So, the utilization of
agricultural residues is limited (John et al.
2007). The following are some of the
agricultural residues used for lactic acid
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
44
production: corn cob (Vickroy 1985),
cassava bagasse (Rojan et al. 2009), beet
molasses (Ch. Kotzamanidis et al. 2002;
Yekta Göksungur, Ulgar Güvenç 1999),
lignocellulose (Karel et al. 1997),
cellulose(K.V. Venkatesh 1997), sugarcane
press mud (S. Xavier,B. K. Lonsane 1994),
and carrot waste(Ashok Pandey et al. 2001).
It is reported that waste paper is a good
source as well (Yáñez et al. 2005; Park et al.
2004).
Whey and molasses, which are industrial
wastes, are commonly used as substrates for
lactic acid production. Whey contains
lactose, protein, fat and mineral salts as it is
a by-product of dairy industry.
Microorganisms such as Lactobacillus
helveticus (A.W. Schepers et al. 2002; U.
Kulozik and J. Wilde 1999) and
Lactobacillus casei are used in production of
lactic acid from whey (A.O. Büyükkilci and
S. Harsa 2004; T. Pauli and J.J. Fitzpatrick
2002). Molasses, on the other hand, contains
large amount of sucrose as it is a waste
product from sugar manufacturing process.
For the production of lactic acid from
molasses, microorganisms like Lactobacillus
delbrueckii and Enterococcus faecalis are
used (Monteagudo et al. 1997; Göksungur
and Güvenç 1999; Wee et al. 2006). For any
fermentation process, it is essential to
provide nutrients to the fermentation media.
Though it results in high production costs,
yeast extract is the most commonly used
nutrient source for the production of lactic
acid (Vickroy 1985; Hofvendahl et al.
2000). H. Oh et al. attempted to use corn
steep liquor as an alternative for yeast
extract as it results in significantly low
production costs and succeeded. Malt sprout
extract, and whey permeates can also be
used as nitrogen sources in lactic acid
production (Suzanne F. Dagher et al. 2010).
3 Microorganisms for lactic acid
production
Microorganisms play a pivotal role in the
production of lactic acid and they must be
readily available and cheap. Lactic acid
producing microorganisms are classified
into bacteria, fungi, and yeast. Most of the
lactic acid production is done industrially by
the use of lactic acid producing bacteria (Cui
et al., 2011; Kleerebezem and van
Loosdrecht, 2007; Nancib et al., 2009).
However, the fungal species of Rhizopus
have their own advantage as they make use
of glucose aerobically to produce lactic acid.
But, the production rate of fungal
fermentation is low due to mass transfer
limitations (Park et al. 1998). The Genetic-
engineering techniques are exploited to
improve the lactic acid yield and optical
purity by various microbial producers
(Okano et al. 2010).
3.1 Bacteria
Lactic acid producing bacteria are classified
into four main categories, which are, Lactic
Acid Bacteria (LAB), Escherichia coli,
Corynebacterium glutamicum, and Bacillus
strains (Litchfield et al. 2009; Budhavaram
and Fan 2009). Out of these, Lactic acid
bacteria are most commonly exploited.
Choosing a proper strain is very important
because factors such as yield, productivity,
purity and nutrition requirements are
dependent on it (Rodrigues et al. 2017).
Some of the limitations of lactic acid
production by bacteria include low yield due
to formation of by-product, requirement of
nutrient rich medium, high risk of cell lysis,
necessity of mixed strains for development
of phage-resistant strains to prevent
bacterio-phage infection (Rodrigues et al.
2017).
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
45
Lactic acid bacteria can produce lactic acid
by anaerobic glycolysis with high yield and
productivity. They are present in dairy
products, meat, and in plants. Different
bacteria grow at different conditions. In
general, the optimal pH range for the growth
of bacteria is 3.59.6 and the optimal
temperature is 545 °C (Rodrigues et al.
2017). Based on the fermentation end
product, Lactic acid bacteria are grouped
into two types: homofermentative and
heterofermentative. Homofermentative
lactic acid bacteria glucose exclusively into
lactic acid by Embden-Meyerhof pathway
(Yun et al. 2003). Hence, homo fermentative
LAB are used in commercial production of
lactic acid. Some of the homo fermentative
lactic acid bacteria used in the production of
lactic acid are Lactobacillus delbrueckii,
Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus casei,
Lactobacillus helveticus, and Lactobacillus
acidophilus (Rojan et al. 2007).
Heterofermentative LAB produce less yield
due to formation of by-products.
Lactobacillus pentosus (Bustos et al. 2004),
Lactobacillus bifermentans, and
Lactobacillus brevis (Cui et al. 2011) are
some of the examples of heterofermentative
bacteria. Enterococcus mundtii (Abdel-
Rahman et al., 2011) and genetically-
engineered Lactobacillus plantarum (Okano
et al., 2009) have the capability to convert
pentose sugars into lactic acid by
homofermentative process. One of the key
reasons for usage of lactic acid bacteria in
industries is because it does not have any
adverse health effects (Rahman et al. 2013).
The properties such as high acid tolerance
and the ability to be engineered for selective
production of D-or L-lactic acid make lactic
acid bacteria commercially useful
(Rodrigues et al. 2017).
3.2 Fungi
Though majority of the lactic acid
production activities are performed by lactic
acid bacteria, some fungal species, such as
Rhizopus, with their amylolytic enzyme
activity, can convert starch into L(+) lactic
acid (Wee et al. 2006). Some other
advantages of fungal fermentation over
bacterial fermentation include low-cost
downstream process, low nutrient
requirements, and formation of fungal
biomass, which is an important by-product
(Zhang et al., 2007). Fungal fermentation
uses chemically defined medium, and so, the
purification of products is simple. This is a
major advantage in food industry (John et al.
2007). Generally, ethanol and fumaric acid
are the common by-products formed by
fungal fermentation (Litchfield, 2009; Vink
et al. 2010). The organisms of genus
Rhizopus are deemed as the best fungal
source for lactic acid production by fungal
fermentation (Rojan et al. 2007). Besides
Rhizopus, other fungi, like, the organisms of
genus Monilia and Mucor are also used in
lactic acid production (Prescott and Dunn,
1959). The main drawback of lactic acid
production by fungi is that the lactic yield is
reduced as the carbon is utilized for the
production of by-products besides lactic
acid. The limitations of production of lactic
acid by fungi also include mass transfer
limitation -which results in low production
rate, and requirement of vigorous aeration as
it is an aerobic process (Wee et al. 2006;
Park et al. 1998).
3.3 Yeasts
All the fermentation processes require
abundant amount of nutrient supply. In
many of the fermentation processes, not
only lactic acid, yeast is used as the key
nutrient source. The major advantages of
using yeast as nutrient source include their
tolerance against low pH (1.5), which
prevents the regeneration of precipitated
calcium lactate, thereby reducing the cost of
neutralization by neutralizing agents such as
calcium carbonate, and their ability to grow
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
46
in mineral media (Rahman et al. 2013). The
yield of lactic acid produced by fermentation
with wild-type yeast as nutrient source is
low. With the advent of genetic engineering,
genetically modified yeasts capable of
producing high yield of lactic acid have
been created and they are being used
successfully (Bianchi MM et al. 2001). The
yeast of species Saccharomyces, Candida,
Zygosaccharomyces, and Pichia are
genetically modified to produce high yield
of lactic acid (Rahman et al. 2013). The
main drawback of using yeast as a nutrient
source is that it leads to increase in
production costs. However, corn steep liquor
(H. Oh et al. 2005), rice bran, and wheat
bran can be used as alternatives for yeast
(Yun et al. 2004).
4. Fermentation methods for lactic acid
production
Fermentation of lactic acid, like any other
fermentation process, is dependent on
factors such as raw materials used, nutrients
present in media, and the microorganisms
used. Three different methods of
fermentation are practiced, namely, Batch
fermentation, Fed-batch fermentation, and
Continuous fermentation.
4.1 Batch fermentation
In batch fermentation, all the required
materials such as carbon source, nitrogen
source and other components are added prior
to beginning of the fermentation process. It
is the most commonly practiced
fermentation process as it is simple to
perform. The major advantage of batch
fermentation is that it prevents
contamination to a good extent when
compared to the other methods as it is a
closed system, and so, high concentrations
of lactic acid is produced (Hofvendahl and
Hägerdal, 2000; Rahman et al. 2013). The
drawbacks of batch fermentation include
low productivity due to substrate inhibition
or product inhibition, and as the amount of
nutrients provided is limited, low cell
concentrations are obtained (Kadam et al.
2006; Yun et al. 2003). Batch fermentation
is mainly of two types, which are, Solid
State Fermentation (SSF) and Separate
Hydrolysis and Fermentation (SHF).
Solid State Fermentation (SSF) is a process
that occurs with no water or negligible
amount of water. Natural raw materials such
as wheat bran, rice bran, barley, fruit pulps,
sugarcane bagasse are used as carbon source
in this process (Pandey and Ashok 2008).
This process is used for the production of
pharmaceutical products, industrial
chemicals, feed, and fuel. Soccol et al.
(1994) were able to produce 137.0 g/l of
lactic acid at the rate of 1.38 g/l/h by using
Rhizopus oryzae by SSF. The usage of in
solid state fermentation process produced
the lactic acid yield of 0.97 g/g of recycled
paper (Marques et al. 2008). The advantages
of using solid state fermentation method
include high productivity, single reaction
vessel, rapid processing time, and less
enzyme loading (Abdel-Rahman et al.,
2011). In separate hydrolysis and
fermentation process, the raw materials are
first pre-treated and the unnecessary
compounds, such as lignin in the case of
lignocellulosic biomass, are eliminated.
Then, the raw materials are subjected to
enzymatic saccharification and the
hydrolysate formed is subjected to
fermentation (J. Choudhary et al. 2016). As
SHF is preceded by such a hefty process for
pre-treatment of raw materials, the real
productivity decreases (Rahman et al. 2013).
It was reported by Marques et al. (2008) that
the same Lactobacillus rhamnosus, which
produced lactic acid yield of 0.97 g/g of
recycled paper by SSF produced only 0.81
g/g when done by SHF method.
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
47
4.2 Fed-batch fermentation
In Fed-batch fermentation, all the required
raw materials such as carbon source,
nitrogen source, and other required
components are added during fermentation
process at regular intervals of time without
removal of fermentation broth (Ding and
Tan, 2006). This type of fermentation is
especially useful to maintain low substrate
concentration by supplying nutrients to the
fermentation culture which in turn reduces
substrate inhibition (Rahman et al. 2011).
Ding and Tan reported that lactic acid
production by Lactobacillus casei using fed-
batch fermentation was found to be more
efficient in production of lactic acid than
other methods. They used 1% yeast extract
and glucose as raw materials and obtained
maximum lactic acid concentration of 210
g/l and L-lactic acid concentration of 180 g/l
at the rate of production 2.14 g/l/h, and the
yield of about 90.3% of L-lactic acid was
obtained. Dong-Mei Bai et al. (2003) used
Lactobacillus lactis for the production of L-
lactic acid and obtained about 97% yield of
L-lactic acid at the rate of 2.2 g/l/h.
4.3 Continuous fermentation
Continuous fermentation involves addition
of fresh medium to the fermenter while
withdrawing the already existing broth at the
same rate. Due to this, the concentrations of
substrates and products is maintained
constant (Rahman et al. 2013). The
advantages of continuous fermentation
include prevention of end-product
inhibition, less frequency to shut down, less
decrease in productivity during lag phase,
inoculation of culture is done once only,
high product yield can be obtained, saves
time and involves less labour work.
Continuous fermentation suffers from a few
drawbacks such as contamination,
requirement of field operator with expertise,
and it is expensive to perform. Shibata et al.
reported the production of lactic acid at the
rate of 1.56 g/l/h using Enterococcus
faecium by continuous fermentation (Shibata
et al. 2007). Ahring et al. reported the
production of lactic acid using Bacillus
coagulans (strain AD) at the productivity of
3.69 g/l/h using continuous fermentation
(Ahring et al. 2016).
5. Applications
Lactic acid is a hydroxycarboxylic acid with
wide range of commercial and household
applications. In the food industry, it is used
as a preservative, flavoring agent, pH
regulator, to increase shelf life, and to
control pathogens, among other applications.
As a food preservative, it inhibits putrefying
bacteria, which prevents spoilage of food.
Lactic acid, in the form of sodium or
potassium lactate, is used to extend the shelf
life of meat, poultry & fish. Due to its mild
acidic taste, lactic acid is used as an
acidulant in pickled vegetables, baked
goods, salads, and beverages. In case of
dairy industry, lactic acid is an excellent
acidification agent due to its natural
presence in dairy products, combined with
the dairy flavour and good antimicrobial
action of lactic acid. It is also used to
enhance savoury flavours. Lactic acid is
used in chocolates and sweets for the
flavour, as well as for obtaining the correct
pH. Other advantages of adding lactic acid
in chocolate and candy production include
ease of handling, low inversion rate, and
production of clear candies (Wee et al. 2006;
Corbion Purac).
In pharmaceutical industry, lactic acid is
used as an electrolyte in various
parenteral/intravenous solutions. These
parenteral solutions are prepared to
supplement bodily fluids. In addition to this,
lactic acid comes into play in pH-regulation,
chiral intermediate and metal sequestration
(Ramzi A et al. 2015). Lactic acid is also
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
48
involved in mineral preparations, tablets,
prostheses, controlled drug delivery system,
surgical sutures, and in preparation of
dialysis solutions for dialysis processes like
Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis
using artificial kidney machines (Wee et al.
2006). Lactic acid, along with its salts, acts
as an intermediate in the manufacture of
pharmaceuticals, to adjust the pH of
preparations. Pharmaceuticals contain L (+)
lactic acid as the D (-) isomer is not
metabolized by the human body. Salts of
lactic acid such as Calcium, iron, sodium,
and other salts are used in pharmaceutical
industry because of their anti-tumour
activity (Ramzi A et al. 2015).
In the chemical industry, lactic acid is used
as neutralizer, cleaning agent, descaling
agent, pH regulator, and antimicrobial agent.
Lactic acid is an excellent remover of
polymer and resins due to its high solvency
power (Wee et al. 2006). Due to presence of
two reactive functional groups, that is, a
carboxylic group and a hydroxyl group,
lactic acid can undergo a variety of chemical
reactions that yield useful chemicals. The
following are the chemicals that lactic acid
gets converted into when it undergoes
various reactions:
Lactic acid has numerous applications in the
field of skin care and cosmetics. Studies
have found that lactic acid plays an essential
role as a skin brightener and it also aids in
removal of brown spots on skin (M Ochi et
al. 2004). Lactic acid acts as a moisturizer,
anti-acne agent, humectants, anti-tartar
agent, pH regulator, skin-lightening agent,
and skin-rejuvenating agent. Lactic acid acts
as a moisturizer due to its water retaining
capacity. Lactic acid promotes collagen
production, and hence it prevents wrinkles
and fine lines on skin and keeps the skin
firm. So, it acts as an anti-aging tool
(Bouwstra and Ponec 2006). Lactic acid also
has applications in manufacture of oral
hygiene products (Martinez et al. 2013). The
recent advent in lactic acid application is
Poly Lactic Acid (PLA). It is a
biodegradable plastic and has numerous
applications in day-to-day activities such as
food packaging, containers, trash bags,
protective clothing, etc. (Södergård and Stolt
2002; Vink et al. 2003).
6. Conclusion:
Lactic acid is widely used in
pharmaceutical, food, chemical and
cosmetic industries due to its easy
availability of raw materials, high
productivity, and low cost of production. It
is commercially produced in batch and
continuous methods. However, batch
fermentation method gives high
concentration, continuous fermentation
gives more productivity. In batch
fermentation lactic acid is produced by
bacterial genus Lactobacillus and fungal
genus Rhizopus. Genetically produced yeast
species Saccharomyces, Candida,
Zygosaccharomyces, and Pichia are found to
produce high yield of lactic acid but cost of
production is high. Batch fermentation is
carried out by Solid State Fermentation
(SSF) is found to be more effective than
Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation
(SHF). Refined starch and cellulose
materials are commonly used as raw
materials for lactic acid production, however
the present trend of research is towards the
use of renewable resources such as
agricultural waste materials: corn cob, corn
stalks, bagasse, beet molasses etc. In this
study it is revealed that Fed-batch
fermentation using lactobacillus produces
high yield of lactic acid compared to other
methods. There is a lot of scope for the
production of lactic acid using renewable
materials as raw material sources.
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
49
Table 1: Raw materials used in lactic acid production by fermentation and their yield
Raw Material
Microorganism
Lactic Acid
Yield
Reference
Corn
Enterococcus faecalis RKY1
63.5 g/L
H. Oh et al 2005
Wheat
Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis ATCC 19435
106.0 g/L
K. Hofvendahl et al. 1997
Enterococcus faecalis RKY1
102.0 g/L
H. Oh et al. 2005
Molasses
Lactobacillus delbrueckii NCIMB 8130
90.0 g/L
C. Kotzanmanidis et al. 2002
Cellulose
Lactobacillus coryniformis ssp. torquens
ATCC 25600
24.0 g/L
R. Yáñez et al. 2003
Whey
Lactobacillus helveticus R211
66.0 g/L
A.W. Schepers et al. 2002
Lactobacillus casei NRRL B-441
46.0 g/L
A.O. Büyükkilci et al. 2004
Rice
Lactobacillus sp. RKY2
129.0 g/L
J.S. Yun et al. 2004
Wood
Lactobacillus delbrueckii NRRL B-445
108.0 g/L
A.B. Moldes et al. 2001
Apple pomace
Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 9595
32.5 g/L
Gullón et al. 2008
Glycerol
E. coli AC- 521
56.8 g/L
Hong et al. 2009
Lignocellulose-
derived sugars
Enterococcus mundtii QU 25
129 g/L
Abdel-Rahman MA et al.
2015
Raw sweet
potato
Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus
coryniformis
198.32 g/L
Nguyen et al. 2013
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
50
Applications
Food industry
Preservatives
Acidulants
pH regulators
Mineral fortification
Bacterial inhibition
Pharmaceutical industry
Dialysis solution
Mineral preparations
Prostheses
Surgical sutures
Controlled drug delivery systems
Parenteral/intravenous solution
Chemical industry
Neutralizers
Chiral intermediates
Green solvents
Cleaning agents
Descaling agents
pH regulators
Cosmetic industry
Moisturizers
Anti-acne agents
Humectants
Anti-tartar agents
pH regulators
Skin-lightening agents
Food containers
Protective clothing
Trash bags
Rigid containers
Table 2: Applications of lactic acid in various fields (modified after Wee et al. 2006; Vink et al. 2003)
Reaction
Chemical produced
Hydrogenation
Propylene oxide
Decarboxylation
Acetaldehyde
Dehydration
Acrylic acid
Reduction
Propanoic acid
Condensation
2,3-pentanedione
Self-esterification
Dilactide
Table 3: Chemicals that lactic acid gets converted into via various reactions (Varadarajan et al. 1999)
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
51
References
Södergård, M. Stolt,(2002) Properties of lactic acid based polymers and their correlation with
composition, Prog. Polym. Sci.
Tay, S.T. Yang (2002), Production of L(+)-lactic acid from glucose and starch by immobilized
cells of Rhizopus oryzae in a rotating fibrous bed bioreactor, Biotechnol. Bioeng.
A.B. Moldes, J.L. Alonso, J.C. Parajó (2001), Strategies to improve the bioconversion of
processed wood into lactic acid by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation, J. Chem.
Technol. Biotechnol.
A.O. Büyükkilci, S. Harsa,(2004) Batch production of L(+)-lactic acid from whey by
Lactobacillus casei (NRRL B-441), J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
A.W. Schepers, J. Thibault, C. Lacroix (2002), Lactobacillus heveticus growth and lactic acid
production during pH-controlled batch cultures in whey permeate/yeast extract medium. Part II:
Kinetic modeling and model validation, Enzyme Microb. Technol.
Abdel-Rahman MA, Tashiro Y, Sonomoto K. (2013) Recent advances in lactic acid production
by microbial fermentation processes. Biotechnology Advances.
Abdel-Rahman MA, Xiao Y, Tashiro Y, Wang Y, Zendo T, Sakai K,( 2015) Fed-batch
fermentation for enhanced lactic acid production from glucose/xylose mixture without carbon
catabolite repression. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering.
Anuradha R, Suresh AK, Venkatesh KV (1999). Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation
of starch to lactic cid. Proc Biochem.
Ashok Pandey, Carlos R. Soccol, Jose A. Rodriguez-Leon, Poonam Nigon (2001), Solid State
Fermentation in Biotechnology: Fundamentals and Applications.
Auras R, Harte B, Selke S (2004). An overview of polylactides as packaging materials.
Macromolecular Bioscience.
Bianchi MM, Brambilla L, Protani F, Liu C, Lievense J, Porro D (2001). Efficient homolactic
fermentation by Kluyveromyces lactis strains defective in pyruvate utilization and transformed
with the heterologous LDH gene. Appl Environ Microbiol ;67: 56215.
Birgitte K. Ahring , Keerthi Srinivas (2016), Continuous fermentation of clarified corn stover
hydrolysate for the production of lactic acid at high yield and productivity; volume 109.
Bouwstra, J. A. and Ponec, M (2006) Biomembranes.
Budhavaram NK, Fan Z (2009) Production of lactic acid from paper sludge using acid-tolerant,
thermophilic Bacillus coagulans strains. Bioresour Technol;100:596672.
Bustos G, Moldes AB, Cruz JM, Dominguez JM (2004). Production of fermentable media from
vinetrimming wastes and bioconversion into lactic acid by Lactobacillus pentosus. Journal of the
Science of Food and Agriculture;84:2105e12.
C. Åkerberg, G. Zacchi (2000), An economic evaluation of the fermentative production of lactic
acid from wheat flour, Bioresour. Technol.
C. Kotzanmanidis, T. Roukas, G. Skaracis (2002), Optimization of lactic acid production from
beet molasses Lactobacillus delbrueckii NCIMB 8130, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
C.Rodrigues, L.P.S.Vandenberghe, A.L.Woiciechowski, J.de Oliveira, L.A.J.Letti, C.R.Soccol
(2017), Production and Application of Lactic Acid.
Castillo Martinez, F. A., Balciunas, E. M., Salgado, J. M., González, J. M. D., Converti A., and
Oliveira, R. P. S. (2013). “Lactic acid properties, applications and production: A review,” Trends
Food Sci. Tech. 30(1), 70-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.11.007.
Ch. Kotzamanidis T. Roukas G. Skaracis (2002) Optimization of lactic acid production from beet
molasses by Lactobacillus delbrueckii NCIMB 8130.
Corbion Purac: Lactic acid safe and natural (http://www.lactic-
acid.com/lactic_acid_in_food.html).
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
52
C. R. SoccolB. MarinM. RaimbaultJ. -M. Lebeault (1994), Potential of solid state fermentation
for production of L(+)-lactic acid by Rhizopus oryzae, , Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 286290.
Cui F, Li Y, Wan C (2011). Lactic acid production from corn stover using mixed cultures of
Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus brevis. Bioresource Technology;102:1831e6.
Ding S, Tan T (2006). L-Lactic acid production by Lactobacillus casei fermentation using
different fed-batch feeding strategies. Process Biochem;41:14514.
Dong-Mei Bai, Qiang Wei, Zhi-Hui Yan, Xue-Ming Zhao, Xin-Gang Li, Shi-Min Xu (2003),
Fed-batch fermentation of Lactobacillus lactis for hyper-production of L-lactic acid.
E.T.H. Vink, K.R. Rábago, D.A. Glassner, P.R. Gruber (2003), Applications of life cycle
assessment to NatureWorksTM polylactide (PLA) production, Polym. Degrad. Stabil.
E.Y. Park, P.N. Anh, N. Okuda (2004), Bioconversion of waste office paper to L(+)-lactic acid by
the filamentous fungus Rhizopus oryzae, Bioresour. Technol.
E.Y. Park, Y. Kosakai, M. Okabe (1998), Efficient production of L(+)-lactic acid using mycelial
cotton-like flocs of Rhizopus oryzae in an air-lift bioreactor, Biotechnol. Progr.
Gao C, Ma C, Xu P (2011). Biotechnological routes based on lactic acid production from
biomass. Biotechnology Advances.
Gullón, B., Yáñez, R., Alonso, J. L., and Parajó, J. C. (2008). “L-lactic acid production from
apple pomace by sequential hydrolysis and fermentation,” Bioresour. Technol. 99(2), 308-319.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.018.
H. Benninga, (1990) A History of Lactic Acid Making, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
Netherlands.
H. Oh, Y.J. Wee, J.S. Yun, S.H. Han, S. Jung, H.W. Ryu (2005), Lactic acid production from
agricultural resources as cheap raw materials, Bioresour. Technol.
Hong, A. C., Tanino, K., Peng, F., Zhou, S., Sun, Y., Liu, C., and Liu, D. H. (2009). “Strain
isolation and optimization of process parameters for bioconversion of glycerol to lactic acid,” J.
Chem. Technol. Biot. 84(10), 1576-1581. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2209.
J. Choudhary, S. Singh, Lata Nain (2016), Thermotolerant fermenting yeast for simultaneous
saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass, Electronic Journal Of
Biotechnology 21(C): 82-92.
J.H. Litchfield (1996), Microbiological production of lactic acid, Adv. Appl. Microbiol.
J.M. Monteagudo, L. Rodríguez, J. Rincón, J. Fuertes (1997), Kinetics of lactic acid fermentation
by Lactobacillus delbrueckii grown on beet molasses, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
J.S. Yun, Y.J. Wee, J.N. Kim, H.W. Ryu (2004), Fermentative production of DL-lactic acid from
amylase-treated rice and wheat brans hydrolyzate by a novel lactic acid bacterium, Lactobacillus
sp., Biotechnol. Lett. 26.
Jamshidian M, Tehrany EA, Imran M, Jacquot M, Desobry S (2010). Poly-lactic acid: production,
applications, nanocomposites, and release studies. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and
Food Safety.
John RP, Nampoothiri KM, Pandey A (2007). Fermentative production of lactic acid from
biomass: an overview on process developments and future perspectives. Applied Microbiology
and Biotechnology.
K. Hofvendahl, B. Hahn-Hägerdal (2000), Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid
production from renewable resources, Enzyme Microb. Technol.
K. Hofvendahl, B. Hahn-Hägerdal (1997), L-lactic acid production from whole wheat flour
hydrolysate using strains of Lactobacilli and Lactococci, Enzyme Microb. Technol.
K. Richter, A. Träger,(1994) L(+)-lactic acid from sweet sorghum by submerged and solid-state
fermentations, Acta Biotechnol.
K. Richter, C. Berthold (1998), Biotechnological conversion of sugar and starchy crops into lactic
acid, J. Agric. Eng. Res. 71.
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
53
K.V. Venkatesh (1997), Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose to lactic
acid, Bioresour. Technol.
Kadam SR, Patil SS, Bastawde KB, Khire JM, Gokhale DV (2006). Strain improvement of
Lactobacillus delbrueckii NCIM 2365 for lactic acid production. Process Biochem ;41:1206.
Kleerebezem R, van Loosdrecht MCM (2007). Mixed culture biotechnology for bioenergy
production. Curr Opin Biotechnol ;18:20712.
Litchfield JH (2009). Lactic acid,microbially produced. In: SchaechterMosel O, editor.
Encyclopedia of microbiology. Oxford: Academic Press;. p. 36272.
Lopes MS, Jardini AL, Filho RM (2012). Poly (lactic acid) production for tissue engineering
applications. Procedia Engineering.
M Ochi; N Adachi; HNobuto; SYanada; Y Ito; MAgung (2004). Artificial Organs.
Marques S, Santos JAL, Girio FM, Roseiro JC (2008). Lactic acid production from recycled
paper sludge by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Biochem Eng J;41:2106.
Melzoch K, Votruba J, Hábová V, Rychtera M.Lactic (1997) acid production in a cell retention
continuous culture using lignocellulosic hydrolysate as a substrate.
Nakano S, Ugwu CU, Tokiwa Y (2012). Efficient production of D-()-lactic acid from broken
rice by Lactobacillus delbrueckii using Ca(OH)2 as a neutralizing agent. Bioresour
Technol;104:7914.
Nancib A, Nancib N, Boudrant J (2009). Production of lactic acid from date juice extract with
free cells of single and mixed cultures of Lactobacillus casei and Lactococcus lactis. World J
Microbiol Biotechnol;25:14239.
Nguyen CM, Choi GJ, Choi YH, Jang KS, Kim J-C (2013). D- and L-lactic acid production from
fresh sweet potato through simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Biochemical
Engineering Journal.
Okano K, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A (2010). Biotechnological production of
enantiomeric pure lactic acid from renewable resources: recent achievements, perspectives, and
limits. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ;85:41323.
P. Yin, N. Nishiya, Y. Kosakai, K. Yahira, Y.S. Park, M. Okabe (1997), Enhanced production of
L(+)-lactic acid from corn starch in a culture of Rhizopus oryzae using an air-lift bioreactor, J.
Ferment. Bioeng.
Pandey, Ashok (2008, June 13). Solid-state fermentation. SciTopics. Retrieved April 18, 2012,
from (http://www.scitopics.com/Solid_state_fermentation.html).
Prescott SC, Dunn CG (1959) Industrial microbiology, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
R. Datta, S.P. Tsai, P. Bonsignore, S.H. Moon, J.R. Frank (1995), Technological and economic
potential of poly(lactic acid) and lactic acid derivatives, FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
R. Yáñez, A.B. Moldes, J.L. Alonso, J.C. Parajó (2003), Production of D()-lactic acid from
cellulose by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using Lactobacillus coryniformis
subsp. torquens, Biotechnol. Lett.
R. Yáñez, J.L. Alonso, J.C. Parajó (2005), D-lactic acid production from waste cardboard, J.
Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
Ramzi A. Abd Alsaheb , Azzam Aladdin , Nor Zalina Othman , Roslinda Abd Malek , Ong Mei
Leng , Ramlan Aziz and Hesham A. El Enshasy (2015), Lactic acid applications in
pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical industries.
Rojan P. John, G.S. Anisha, K. Madhavan Nampoothiri, Ashok Pandey (2009), Direct Lactic acid
fermentation: Focus on simultaneous saccharification and lactic acid production.
Rojan P. John, K. Madhavan Nampoothiri, and Ashok Pandey (2007), Fermentative production of
lactic acid from biomass: an overview on process developments and future perspectives.
S. Varadarajan, D.J. Miller (1999), Catalytic upgrading of fermentation-derived organic acids,
Biotechnol. Progr.
Battula Savithra Krishna et al. / International Journal of Biotech Research (2018)
54
S. Xavier,B. K. Lonsane (1994) Sugar-cane pressmud as a novel and inexpensive substrate for
production of lactic acid in a solid-state fermentation system.
Shibata K, Flores DM, Kobayashi G, Sonomoto K (2007). Direct L-lactic acid fermentation with
sago starch by a newly-isolated lactic acid bacterium, Enterococcus facieum. Enzyme Microb
Tcchnol ;41: 149-55.
Suzanne F. Dagher, Alicia L. Ragout, Faustino Sineriz, Jose M. Bruno-Barcena (2010), Cell
immobilization for production of lactic acid: Biofilms do it naturally.
T. Pauli, J.J. Fitzpatrick (2002), Malt combing nuts as a nutrient supplement to whey permeate for
producing lactic a by fermentation with Lactobacillus casei, Process Biochem.
U. Kulozik, J. Wilde (1999), Rapid lactic acid production at high cell concentrations in whey
ultrafiltrate by Lactobacillus helveticus, Enzyme Microb. Technol.
VickRoy TB (1985) Comprehensive biotechnology. Dic Pergamon, Toronto.
Vink ETH, Davies S, Kolstad JJ (2010). The eco-profile for current Ingeo polylactide production.
Ind Biotechnol ;6:21224.
Y. Göksungur, U. Güvenç (1999), Production of lactic acid from beet molasses by calcium
alginate immobilized Lactobacillus delbrueckii IFO 3202, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
Y.J. Wee, J.N. Kim, J.S. Yun, H.W. Ryu (2004), Utilization of sugar molasses for economical
L(+)-lactic acid production by batch fermentation of Enterococcus faecalis, Enzyme Microb.
Technol.
Yadav AK, Chaudhari AB, Kothari RM (2011). Bioconversion of renewable resources into lactic
acid: an industrial view. Critical Reviews In Biotechnology.
Yekta Göksungur Ulgar Güvenç (1999) Batch and Continuous Production of Lactic Acid from
Beet Molasses by Lactobacillus delbrueckii IFO 3202.
Young-Jung Wee, Jin-nam kim and Hwa-Won Ryu (2006), Biotechnological production of lactic
acid and its recent applications.
Yun JS, Wee YJ, Ryu HW (2003). Production of optically pure L-(+)-lactic acid from various
carbohydrates by batch fermentation of Enterococcus faecalis RKY1. Enzyme Microb
Technol;33:41623.
Zhang ZY, Jin B, Kelly JM (2007). Production of lactic acid from renewable materials by
Rhizopus fungi. Biochem Eng J;35:25163.
... Among them, Lactobacillus delbruckii, L. acidophilus, L. helveticus, L. casei, Lactococcus lactis, and Streptococcus salivarius are mainly used for the synthesis of lactic acid. 16,29 The main disadvantages of LAB strains when used in industry are the complex need for expensive nutrient medium components -animal and bacterial sources of nitrogen (mainly yeast extract, peptone, and some amino acids). In addition, lactic acid bacteria lack enzyme systems capable of breaking down complex carbon sources. ...
... Raw materials for the production of LA by fermentation should have the following characteristics: cheap; with a low level of toxic and polluting substances and by-products; when using this raw material, the producer microorganism must have high values of productivity and output; the ability to ferment with little or no pretreatment; accessible and renewable. 16 Based on literature sources, 11,[13][14][15][16][17] the substrates that can be used for the synthesis of lactic acid in industry can be divided into two main groups: ...
... Raw materials for the production of LA by fermentation should have the following characteristics: cheap; with a low level of toxic and polluting substances and by-products; when using this raw material, the producer microorganism must have high values of productivity and output; the ability to ferment with little or no pretreatment; accessible and renewable. 16 Based on literature sources, 11,[13][14][15][16][17] the substrates that can be used for the synthesis of lactic acid in industry can be divided into two main groups: ...
Article
The article contains comprehensive information on groups of bacteria producing lactic acid, which have high metabolic activity and can be used in industrial production. In addition, an overview of the most common fermentation methods (batch, continuous, multiple), as well as cheap carbon sources: starch and cellulose-containing, industrial and food waste is provided.
... However, only lactic acid synthesis from its derivatives has been commercialized. Though the chemical synthesis of lactic acid is not economically feasible [23], several studies have reported the chemical synthesis of lactic acid using different carbon sources. For example, lactic acid can be chemically synthesized from a petrochemical source. ...
... The selection of fermentation modes varies with respect to the substrate's nature, fermentation broth's viscosity, and microorganisms used and their growth [23,33]. Different fermentation modes used in lactic acid production include batch, fed-batch, repeated, and continuous [30]. ...
... Abdel-Rahman et al. [148] reported the production of 119 g·L −1 L-lactate during batch fermentation of cellobiose using LAB, and 80 g·L −1 D-lactate was produced using hydrolyzed cane sugar in the fermentation medium [149]. The drawbacks of batch fermentation mode include nutrient depletion that limits microbial cell concentration and low productivity due to substrate or product inhibition [23,33]. However, the cell mass, lactic acid production, and productivity were increased when nutrients were added to the broth of Enterococcus mundtii QU 25 during batch fermentation [148]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Lactic acid (LA) has broad applications in the food, chemical, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics industries. LA production demand rises due to the increasing demand for polylactic acid since LA is a precursor for polylactic acid production. Fermentative LA production using renewable resources, such as lignocellulosic materials, reduces greenhouse gas emissions and offers a cheaper alternative feedstock than refined sugars. Suitable pretreatment methods must be selected to minimize LA cost production, as the successful hydrolysis of lignocellulose results in sugar-rich feedstocks for fermentation. This review broadly focused on fermentative LA production from lignocellulose. Aspects discussed include (i). low-cost materials for fermentative LA production, (ii). pretreatment methods, (iii). enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose, (iv). lactic acid-producing microorganisms, including fungi, bacteria, genetically modified microorganisms, and their fermentative pathways, and (v). fermentation modes and methods. Industrial fermentative lactic acid production and purification , difficulties in using lignocellulose in fermentative LA production, and possible strategies to circumvent the challenges were discussed. A promising option for the industrial production and purification of LA that contains enzyme and cell recycling continuous simultaneous saccharification and fermentation coupled with membrane-based separation was proposed. This proposed system can eliminate substrate-, feedback-, and end-product inhibition, thereby increasing LA concentration, productivity, and yield.
... Regarding the use of renewable resources for fermentative LA production, substrates can be liquid (wastes from the dairy industry, juices, and beverages, among others) or solid starch (sugarcane, potato, corn, rice, and wheat residues), lignocellulosic (wood, tree and fruit pruning residues), and rich in simple sugars (fruit processing residues) [2,5]. In this context, residues generated in the wine industry hold significant potential as raw materials for sustainable bioprocesses. ...
... One of the main fields of application is the food industry, representing 24% of the total demand [1]. It has diverse functional properties, such as lowering the pH of meats to inhibit spoilage bacteria, aiding in the manipulation and molding of chocolates and candies, enhancing chocolate flavor, reducing sucrose inversion in candy production, and regulating the pH of dairy, pickles, baked goods, and beverages, among other functions [2]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Lactic acid is widely used in the food industry. It can be produced via chemical synthesis or biotechnological pathways by using renewable resources as substrates. The main challenge of sustainable production lies in reaching productivities and yields that allow for their industrial production. In this case, the application of process engineering becomes a crucial tool to improve the performance of bioprocesses. In this work, we performed the solid-state fermentation of grape stalk using Rhizopus oryzae NCIM 1299 to obtain lactic acid, employing three different temperatures (22, 35, and 40 °C) and a relative humidity of 50%. The Logistic and First-Order Plus Dead Time models were adjusted for fungal biomass growth, and the Luedeking and Piret with Delay Time model was used for lactic acid production, obtaining higher R2 values in all cases. At 40 °C, it was observed that Rhizopus oryzae grew in pellet form, resulting in an increase in lactic acid productivity. In this context, the effect of temperature on the kinetic parameters was evaluated with a polynomial correlation. Finally, using this correlation, a smooth and continuous optimal temperature profile was obtained by a dynamic optimization method, improving the final lactic acid concentration by 53%.
... To reduce the costs of production, several methods have been employed, the three main methods of fermentation include batch, fed-batch, and continuous batch [41]. Batch and fed batch produce significant yields; however, continuous fermentation is the most productive [42]. Microbial lactic acid producers are classified as per microbes used i.e., bacteria, fungi, yeast, cyanobacteria, and algae. ...
... To reduce the costs of production, several methods have been employed, the three main methods of fermentation include batch, fed-batch, and continuous batch [41]. Batch and fed batch produce significant yields; however, continuous fermentation is the most productive [42]. Microbial lactic acid producers are classified as per microbes used i.e., bacteria, fungi, yeast, cyanobacteria, and algae. ...
Article
Full-text available
Organic acids are key to the biological, physical, and chemical functions of the life. These acids naturally occur in animals, foods, and microorganisms. Their molecular configurations drive several physical characteristics imperative to well-being. Organic acids are applied in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, cleaning and food industries. For decades, natural and chemical production of organic acids has thrived, however microbial fermentation has been considered environmentally sustainable approach. Various low-cost substrates are employed as substrate during microbial fermentation. The organic acids production from microbial origin account for the majority of the acids produced on a large industrial basis. Numerous organic acids from bacterial and fungal origin have significance and their biological production offers clear benefits as compared to chemical synthesis in terms of cost. The article illustrates a brief description of the various organic acids in a systematic way along with a survey on the relative production methods.
... Lactic acid is considered a very important chemical compound with numerous applications in food, pharmaceutical and packaging industries [1][2][3]. The economics of pure lactic acid production depends on the raw material (or substrate) and microbial strain used for fermentation and the post-production purification method employed [4][5][6][7]. ...
... It is produced in large-scale chemicals via fermentation using the bacteria belonging to the genera Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Bacillus, and Enterococcus. The majority (approximately 75%) production of lactic acid across the world occurs in Cargill Incorporated, PURAC Corporation, Archer Daniels Midland Company, and Galactic fermentation facilities [30]. Maize, wheat, rice, and potato are agricultural products abundant in starch, which is used as raw material for the production of lactic acid. ...
Article
Full-text available
The developments in science and technology have a remarkable impact on life existing on this planet. With increased interest in the food processing industry increases the amount of agro-industrial by-products generated. Most of these by-products are biodegradable organic matters which on processing can be used as a value-added product. These products are inexpensive materials and can curb environmental pollution which is a major concern worldwide if not handled. Food additives are natural or synthetic compounds added intentionally and not consumed as such includes sweeteners, colorants, antioxidants, anticaking agents, thickener, emulsifiers and stabilizers. It has been widely used to maintain stability in nutritional value, season supplies, sensory attributes and to protect from microbial attack. There is an increased demand for natural additives to replace their synthetic counterpart due to their toxi c effects when consumed in the longer run. This review gives an insight to use of these by-products as food additives and their potential to replace the synthetic counterpart.
Article
Full-text available
This work aimed at producing lactic acid (LA) from sugarcane bagasse after steam explosion at 195 °C for 7.5 and 15 min. Enzymatic hydrolysis was carried out with Cellic CTec3 and Cellic HTec3 (Novozymes), whereas fermentation was performed with Bacillus coagulans DSM2314. Water washing of pretreated solids before enzymatic hydrolysis improved both hydrolysis and fermentation yields. The presence of xylo-oligosaccharides (XOS) in substrate hydrolysates reduced hydrolysis efficiency, but their effect on fermentation was negligible. The presence of fermentation inhibitors in C5 streams was circumvented by adsorption on activated carbon powder with no detectable sugar losses. High carbohydrates-to-LA conversions (Yp/s) of 0.88 g·g−1 were obtained from enzymatic hydrolysates of water-washed steam-exploded materials that were produced at 195 °C, in 7.5 min, and the use of centrifuged-but-never-washed pretreated solids decreased Yp/s by 16%. However, when the detoxified C5 stream was added at a 10% ratio, Yp/s was raised to 0.93 g·g−1 for an LA productivity of 2.55 g·L−1·h−1. Doubling the pretreatment time caused a decrease in Yp/s to 0.78 g·g−1, but LA productivity was the highest (3.20 g·L−1·h−1). For pretreatment at 195 °C for 7.5 min, the elimination of water washing seemed feasible, but the use of longer pretreatment times made it mandatory to eliminate fermentation inhibitors.
Chapter
Lactic acid production and its polymerization to poly-lactide (PLA) using renewable resources have recently gained advancement in the field of biomedical science. It is greeted as a promising alternative to tackle the alarmingly environmental, economical and technological issues raised from excessive use of petroleum-based plastics. PLA due to its good processability and biocompatibility always has fascinated researchers in the clinical sector, yet its high degree of hydrophobicity and absence of reactive groups cause steric hindrance and impeded biofunctionalization of PLA surface for cell attachment. PLA production from renewable resources showed a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and fossil energy use as compared to conventional petrochemical-based polymers, thus reducing the threat of global warming. Although lactic acid production from lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is an illustrious domain, production of the green chemical using fungal biomachineries is yet a domain to be explored. Artificial intelligence (AI), a high-tech next-generation technology, is being adapted in all research fields starting from big data analysis to personalized medicines. AI-based mycology modelling for lactic acid production unlocks new prospects for the researcher. The present article is an attempt to explain the potentials of lactic acid production using fungal machineries for sustainable development.KeywordsLactic acidPoly-lactideFungal biomachineryGreen chemicalAI-ML
Article
Full-text available
Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundant renewable source of energy widely explored as 2nd generation biofuels. Despite more than four decades of research, the process of ethanol production from lignocellulosic (LC) biomass remains economically unfeasible because of high cost of enzymes, end product inhibition of enzymes and the need for cost intensive inputs associated with separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) process. Thermotolerant yeast strains capable of fermentation at more than 40°C are suitable alternative for developing simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process to alleviate the problems associated with SHF. This review describes the various approaches for screening and development of thermotolerant yeasts by genetic and metabolic engineering. The benefits and limitations associated with simultaneous saccharification and fermentation at high temperature are also discussed. A critical insight into the effect of high temperature on yeast morphology and physiology is also included which can provide a better perspective for the development of thermotolerant yeast amenable to the SSF process so that LC ethanol production can become commercially viable.
Article
Full-text available
Tissue engineering is the most fascinating domain of medical technology and has emerged as a promising alternative approach in the treatment of malfunctioning or lost organs where patients are treated by using their own cells, grown on a polymer support so that a tissue part is regenerated from the natural cells. This support is known as scaffold and is needed to serve as an adhesive substrate for the implanted cells and a physical support to guide the formation of the new organs. In addition to facilitating cell adhesion, promoting cell growth, and allowing the retention of differentiated cell functions, the scaffold should be biocompatible, biodegradable, highly porous with a large surface/volume ratio, mechanically strong, and malleable. The scaffold degrades while a new organ or tissue is formed. A number of three-dimensional porous scaffolds fabricated from various kinds of biodegradable materials have been developed. Bioabsorbable polymers have been identified as alternative materials for biomedical applications, since these polymers are degraded by simple hydrolysis to products that can be metabolized by the human body. With their excellent biocompatibility, poly-lactones such as poly-lactic acid (PLA), poly-glycolic acid (PGA), and poly-caprolactone (PCL), as well as their copolymers are becoming the most commonly used synthetic biodegradable polymers as fixation devices materials for biomedical devices. Among the biomaterials (biopolymers) used in the medical field, the poly (lactic acid) (PLA) has received significant attention. Poly-lactic acid (PLA) is at present one of the most promising biodegradable polymers for this purpose and has convincingly demonstrated the proof of concept for using in bioabsorbable polymer as bone fixation devices, owing to its mechanical property profile, thermoplastic possibility and biological properties, such as biocompatibility and biodegradability. It is produced from lactic acid, a naturally occurring organic acid that can be produced by fermentation. The objective of this study was to investigate the synthesis of PLA in a laboratory scale in order to characterize it in accordance with the needs for biomedical use.
Article
Full-text available
Ingeo ® polylactides are biopolymers with varied applications made entirely from annually renewable resources and produced since 2001 by NatureWorks LLC at a 140 000 tonne/yr facility in Blair, Nebraska, USA. NatureWorks' objectives include eliminating nonrenewable energy use and the emissions of greenhouse gases, as well as minimizing nonvaluable co-products and reducing water use. These objectives are being accomplished through continual improvement of the Ingeo production technology. Since 1998, NatureWorks and Cargill Inc. have worked to develop technology improvements, especially in the area of lactic acid production. In December 2008, new lactic acid production technology was implemented that resulted in a reduced environmental footprint. This paper provides the latest cradle-to-polymer-factory-gate life cycle inventory data (also referred to as an eco-profile) for Ingeo as being produced starting in 2009. It also provides a description of the 2009 Ingeo production system and compares the current energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions with previous and future Ingeo production systems. Finally, this study benchmarks the results for these two paramaters, with data valid for a selection of fossil-based polymers.
Article
L (+)-Lactic acid production was investigated using enzymatic hydrolysate of waste office (OA) paper as carbon source in culture of filamentous fungus Rhizopus oryzae. 82.8 g/L of glucose was consumed in 3 d culture, but only 7 g/L of xylose and 3.4 g/L of cellobiose contained in hydrolysate were consumed. From waste OA paper hydrolysate 49.1 g/L of lactic acid was produced with lactic acid yield of 0.53 (g lactic acid/g glucose consumed), which was no more than 67% to that from pure glucose medium To find out the deviation of lactic acid productivity from glucose medium effects of ink-related compounds, pulp type, and additives added in paper manufacturing process were investigated. Hydrolysates from deinked waste OA paper and from filter paper, which did not contain ink-related compounds or additives, showed nearly the saire lactic acid yield from the waste OA paper. However, hydrolysate from cellophane sheet that was made of dissolving pulp produced 77.9 g/L of lactic acid from 100 g/L of glucose, which was similar productivity to the glucose medium Lactic acid yield from xylose that was derived from hemicellulose was 0.56 (g lactic acid/g consumed xylose), but that of cellobiose was 0.81 g/g. Among reducing sugars contained in hydrolysate xylose showed 40% lower lactic acid yield than that of glucose. It demonstrates that the cause of decrease in the lactic acid yield from waste OA paper hydrolysate is not the ink-related compounds and additives contained in hydrolysate, but unknown compounds derived from hemi-or lignocellulose.
Article
Lactic acid, or 2-hydroxypropionic acid (CH3CHOHCOOH) (molecular weight 90.06 kDa), was first manufactured on a commercial scale in the United States by lactic acid bacterial fermentation of sugar substrates in 1883. Since this early work, lactic acid bacteria in the genus Lactobacillus and molds in the genus Rhizopus have been employed in manufacturing lactic acid. Advances in understanding the molecular genetics of both lactic acid bacteria and molds offer opportunities for developing improved cultures for use in commercial scale lactic acid production. Lactic acid bacteria produce either l(+), d(−), or racemic dl lactic acid. Molds produce only l(+) lactic acid. Both batch and continuous processes can be used for producing lactic acid, but commercial scale processes generally are operated in the batch mode. Suitable raw materials include glucose, sucrose, lactose, starch, or waste materials containing them. Lactic acid bacteria require sources of amino acid and B vitamins to meet requirements for growth and lactic acid production while molds utilize inorganic nitrogen sources such as ammonium salts. Production process controls involve computerized control of pH and temperature, and monitoring of substrate utilization and lactic acid production. Lactic acid can be recovered from the fermentation broth after removal of the cells by precipitation as calcium lactate, and extraction and purification by ion exchange, distillation, and continuous counter current extraction. Commercial applications of lactic acid and its salts or esters include foods, cosmetics and personal care products, cleaning agents in electronics and semiconductor manufacturing, and in biodegradable polymers for medical devices or for packaging materials.
Article
Lactic acid can be used not only as a key substance in chemical synthesis, but also as a special agent in agriculture. For microbial production, original products of agriculture such as sweet sorghum stalks and rye grains can be used as raw material. In laboratory experiments, sweet sorghum stalks were milled, steam-treated and pressed. The sugar of the aqueous extract, which amounted to 89% of the total sugar of stalks, was completely converted into lactic acid by fermentation. The yield amounted to 94% (94 g of lactic acid/100 g of sugar consumed). Also in laboratory experiments, rye grains were milled, fractionated and hydrolyzed in a two-step process using commercial enzymes. The optimum temperature and pH value were 82·5°C and 5·8 for starch liquefaction and 51·6°C and 4·0 for saccharification of liquefied starch, respectively. Starch liquefaction was also influenced by particle size, the optimum value of which was 3 mm. For optimum starch saccharification, a process duration of 2 h was necessary. Of the solid starch, 99·6% was liquefied in the first hydrolysis step. In the second step, 97·9% of the liquefied starch was converted into glucose. Bioconversion of the glucose formed by starch hydrolysis into lactic acid also gave a maximum yield of 94%. Various possibilities of process improvement in order to make the whole operation less expensive are discussed, and a flow-sheet of an improved process for manufacturing lactic acid from cereals is presented.
Article
A whole wheat flour containing bran and gluten was hydrolyzed by a commercial mixed-amylase preparation and fermented to lactic acid by two Lactococcus lactis strains and two Lactobacillus delbrueckii strains. All fermentations were kept at a constant pH of 6.0 except for one case in which the initial pH was 5.85 and then was not controlled further, thereby resulting in only 3.3 g l−1 of lactate produced. The yield of lactate based on total sugar was 80–90% for three of the strains whereas the yield for L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus was much lower. The productivities and yields increased with the addition of yeast extract for all strains, but the effect varied. Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis ATCC 19435 showed almost the same productivity (3.0 and 3.3 g l−1 h−1) without and with yeast extract, respectively. All four organisms produced mainly l-lactate. The Lactococci produced 100% l-lactate in the presence of yeast extract and Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis ATCC 19435 produced exclusively l-lactate also in the absence of yeast extract.