Content uploaded by Nicole Gabana
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Nicole Gabana on Feb 01, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rhpe20
International Journal of Health Promotion and Education
ISSN: 1463-5240 (Print) 2164-9545 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhpe20
Multidimensional wellness promotion in the
health and fitness industry
James D Beauchemin, Nicole Gabana, Kirk Ketelsen & Chris McGrath
To cite this article: James D Beauchemin, Nicole Gabana, Kirk Ketelsen & Chris McGrath (2019):
Multidimensional wellness promotion in the health and fitness industry, International Journal of
Health Promotion and Education, DOI: 10.1080/14635240.2018.1559752
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2018.1559752
Published online: 09 Jan 2019.
Submit your article to this journal
View Crossmark data
Multidimensional wellness promotion in the health and
fitness industry
James D Beauchemin
a
, Nicole Gabana
b
, Kirk Ketelsen
c
and Chris McGrath
d
a
Social Work, Boise State University, Boise, USA;
b
College of Education, Florida State University,
Tallahassee, USA;
c
Community and Environmental Health, Boise State University, Boise, USA;
d
Health &
Exercise Science, Long Island University, Brooklyn, USA
ABSTRACT
Current trends in the United States indicate an increase in sedentary
behaviors, obesity, stress and poor diet, contributing to heightened
rates of chronic illness and mortality. These trends illustrate a need
for prioritizing prevention and wellness promotion, and conceptua-
lizing health as a multidimensional construct. The exercise and
fitness industry is uniquely positioned to support individuals in
establishing healthy lifestyle trends that address multiple domains
of wellness. This research study utilized health and fitness profes-
sional survey data to assess relationships between the frequency of
addressing each of the five primary domains of wellness (physical,
social, emotional, intellectual and spiritual), and a number of demo-
graphic variables. Relationships between the frequency of addres-
sing domains of wellness and all demographic variables (e.g.
physical wellness by industry role) were examined using Pearson
Chi Square Tests of Independence. Results indicate differences in
the frequency that unique dimensions of wellness were addressed
with clients, as well as differences based on industry role and
gender. Implications are discussed, including challenges associated
with a consensus organizational definition of wellness, and varia-
bility in training and education requirements of fitness profes-
sionals, that may impact the promotion of wellness domains
beyond the traditional physical focus.
ARTICLE HISTORY
Received 26 March 2018
Accepted 13 December 2018
KEYWORDS
Wellness; multidimensional;
fitness; lifestyle
Introduction
Background
Chronic diseases are the main causes of poor health, disability and death. Chronic
illness is largely driven by lifestyle behaviors, linking factors such as inactivity, diet,
smoking and sustained stress with an increased risk for major illness and death (Smith
et al. 2013). Many adults spend 70% or more of their waking hours sitting (Dietz et al.
2015), which has been associated with negative health outcomes (Biswas et al. 2015).
Conversely, replacing as little as 30 min of sedentary time with light activity has been
found to reduce risk of mortality by as much as 14% (Schmid et al. 2016). The
increasing prevalence of poor diet and unhealthy lifestyle indicates that more than
CONTACT James D Beauchemin jamesbeauchemin@boisestate.edu Social Work, Boise State University, 1910
University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725, USA
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND EDUCATION
https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2018.1559752
© 2019 Institute of Health Promotion and Education
one in three adults, and one in six children are considered to have obesity (U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services 2014), while dietary factors represent
a significant proportion of deaths from heart disease, stroke and Type 2 diabetes
(Micha et al. 2017). In addition, life stress is strongly associated with poor mental
and physical health (Slavich et al. 2010), and accounts for substantial mortality
(Pedersen, Bovbjerg, and Zachariae 2011).
Wellness
Understanding the impact of various lifestyle behaviors on health outcomes is essential
in shaping how chronic illness is addressed. Acceptance of a multidimensional con-
ceptualization of health and wellness has been gradual within the traditional Western
medical model. Historically, the biomedical model of illness has focused exclusively on
biology while ignoring psychological, social and environmental influences on health
and well-being. A change toward a comprehensive understanding of health is supported
by the World Health Organization (WHO), which defines health as a state of complete
physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or
infirmity (WHO 1992). Building on this understanding, focus should be shifted toward
establishing healthy lifestyle trends to improve multiple domains of wellness that result
in wellness promotion, and ultimately decreased chronic illness and death.
Health and fitness industry stakeholders have historically been promoters, innovators
and leaders in assisting individuals in making lifestyle changes leading to improved
health outcomes. The changing paradigm in health and wellness toward inclusion of
domains beyond the traditional physical fitness focus requires a new approach to
wellness promotion among industry leaders to best meet the changing needs of clien-
tele. The research supporting that domains of wellness such as social, spiritual and
emotional can have a profound impact on one’s wellness (e.g. Fry 2000; Raza et al.
2011) necessitates alternative approaches, education, training and promotional efforts
within the industry. For example, spiritual well-being is gaining increased attention in
the health and rehabilitation literature, as researchers have found that spiritual beliefs
can significantly impact quality of life, mental health and physical health, such as injury
rehabilitation and coping with chronic illness (Wilson et al. 2017).
The subjective nature of terminology such as fitness, health and wellness creates
challenges in developing consensus definitions, and consequently, approaches and
interventions that are applicable across models. Within the industry, fitness is generally
accepted as the ability to function well in daily activities without injury, enjoy leisure
time, be healthy, and includes: cardiorespiratory, flexibility, body composition, muscu-
lar strength and endurance components (Mantell 2013). However, the emergence of the
wellness paradigm, generally conceptualized as a multidimensional construct, has
resulted in many different wellness definitions and models. Among the evidence-
based models of wellness are Dunn’s High Level Wellness (Dunn 1977), which inte-
grates body, mind and spirit; Ardell’s Components of Wellness model (1977), which
incorporates three parallel domains that include physical, mental and meaning and
purpose; and Hettler’s Hexagonal Model of Wellness (1980), incorporating social,
spiritual, physical, emotional, occupational and intellectual domains of wellness.
Additionally, the Wheel of Wellness (Witmer and Sweeney 1991), which evolved into
2J. D. BEAUCHEMIN ET AL.
the Indivisible Self Wellness Model (Myers and Sweeney 2004), has a substantial
research base and is measured using the Five Factor Wellness Evaluation of Lifestyle
(5F-WEL). Although there are numerous conceptualizations of wellness evident in the
literature, consistent among them is a multidimensional understanding of the construct.
The most commonly included components of wellness are physical, social, emotional,
intellectual and spiritual (Roscoe 2009), although domain titles may vary depending
upon the model.
Education and training
In order to support individuals in improving multidimensional wellness, counseling
and lifestyle change techniques are needed to inform, engage and empower clients so
they can effectively communicate their needs, and ensure that they are active in change-
related decision-making (Caldwell, Gray, and Wolever 2013). Thus, the integration of
behavior change theory into education and training of health professionals is critical to
the synthesis of physical health with other domains of wellness. There are numerous
models related to lifestyle behavior change including the Theory of Planned Behavior
(Ajzen 1991), Health Belief Model (Rosenstock 1974) and the Transtheoretical Model of
Change (Prochaska and Velicer 1997), which may be beneficial as foundational theories
upon which to base lifestyle change interventions and approaches. In addition to
knowledge related to theoretical underpinnings, advanced understanding of specific
evidence-based strategies to support individuals in moving toward healthy lifestyle
change are essential to adopting a comprehensive approach to wellness within the
industry.
There is evidence that the health and fitness industry is making progress in re-
conceptualizing health and wellness, and developing strategies to facilitate lasting well-
ness-focused lifestyle change. For example, the growing prevalence of health ‘coaching’
models is indicative of efforts to develop brief approaches that focus on lifestyle change.
Coaching can be defined as a means of helping others attain a desired goal (O’Connell,
Palmer, and Williams 2013), and can include models such as Life Coaching, Wellness
Coaching and Executive Coaching, depending on client needs. There are numerous
programs and certifications that focus on health and/or wellness coaching including the
National Society of Health Coaches, Wellcoaches, American Council on Exercise and
the Duke Integrative Health Coach Program. Despite the diversity among the numerous
models, training requirements and definitions of wellness (Smith et al. 2013),
approaches prove consistent in the understanding that wellness is not
a unidimensional construct, and that lifestyle change is a critical factor in attaining
multidimensional health and wellness.
Given the evidence supporting wellness as a multidimensional construct, and the
understanding that domains may have complex, reciprocal relationships with one
another (e.g. poor psychological wellness may impact physical wellness), it is essential
that health and fitness professionals develop expertise in the ways that varied compo-
nents (e.g. emotional wellness) may affect clients’health goals and outcomes, as well as
training in behavior change theory and intervention. To truly support clients in pursuit
of wellness, it should be addressed at both general and domain-specific levels using
behavior-based theory and coaching techniques.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND EDUCATION 3
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency of promotion of lifestyle
change via various domains of wellness among health and fitness professionals.
Additionally, based on a multidimensional model of wellness, the study aimed to
examine relationships between the frequency of addressing each of the five primary
domains of wellness (physical, social, emotional, intellectual and spiritual) and
a number of demographic variables. A survey was utilized to answer the primary
research questions:
Which domains of wellness do health and fitness professionals most often address with
clients?
Is there a relationship between multidimensional wellness promotion and specific demo-
graphic variables (e.g. education, age, industry role, gender, certification type)?
Materials and methods
Procedure
This cross-sectional exploratory study utilized survey data to assess frequency of
promoting multidimensional wellness among health and fitness professionals. Surveys
were administered to voluntary participants at several national health and fitness
conferences between 2015 and 2017. Since anonymous data were gathered for program-
ming and training rather than research purposes, the secondary analysis was deemed
exempt by the affiliated Institutional Review Board (IRB). The survey was developed
and administered by representatives from an industry stakeholder to inform needs
related to future training, education and marketing. The representatives provided
permission for analysis for research purposes.
The study sample consisted of 185 individuals who identified as health and fitness
professionals. A convenience sampling approach was utilized, as all participants were
attendees at national conferences focused on health and fitness. Surveys were adminis-
tered at the beginning of a number of ‘break-out sessions’of varied content throughout
the conferences. An explanation of the survey and purpose was provided by the
stakeholder representative, who emphasized the voluntary and anonymous nature of
the surveys.
Surveys were created to gather sample demographic information, as well as informa-
tion related to the frequency of discussing domains of wellness with clients (Appendix).
Among the demographic variables assessed were: age, education, certifying organiza-
tion, gender and industry role. Although there are numerous models of wellness, this
survey utilized a common factors approach (Roscoe 2009) which includes emotional,
intellectual, physical, spiritual and social wellness domains. Questions about each of the
above-mentioned domains of wellness (e.g. ‘How frequently do you discuss social
wellness with clients?’) were posed using a 5-point Likert scale format (1 = Never;
5 = Very often). An additional item inquired about the frequency of discussing lifestyle
change with clients. Frequencies were calculated for all demographic variables,
4J. D. BEAUCHEMIN ET AL.
providing descriptive statistics for the study sample (Table 1). Response frequencies
based on wellness domains were also calculated to provide insight into fitness profes-
sionals’priorities (Table 2). Finally, to identify relationships between groups based on
category (e.g. physical wellness by industry role), a Pearson Chi Square Test of
Independence was performed (See Tables 3 and 4for Chi Square results). All statistical
analyses were conducted using SPSS 23 software (IBM).
Table 1. Sample characteristics (N= 185).
Frequency (Percent)
Gender
Male 48 (25.9)
Female 136 (73.5)
Other 1 (.5)
Age
20–29 46 (24.9)
30–39 44 (23.8)
40–49 49 (26.5)
50–59 38 (20.5)
60+ 8 (4.3)
Education
High School Diploma 39 (21.1)
Associate’s Degree 3 (1.6)
Bachelor’s Degree 103 (55.7)
Master’s Degree 35 (18.9)
Doctoral Degree 5 (2.7)
Certification
ACE
a
45 (24.3)
ACSM
b
21 (11.4)
NASM
c
46 (24.9)
NSCA
d
5 (2.7)
ISSA
e
6 (3.2)
Other 23 (12.4)
Multiple 39 (21.1)
Role
Personal Trainer 43 (23.2)
Group Instructor 5 (2.7)
Strength Conditioning Coach 1 (.5)
Educator 2 (1.1)
Club owner/manager 2 (1.1)
Researcher 1 (.5)
Two roles 46 (24.9)
Three roles 50 (27.0)
More than Three roles 35 (18.9)
a
American Council on Exercise.
b
American College of Sports
Medicine.
c
National Academy of Sports Medicine.
d
National
Strength and Conditioning Association.
e
International Sports
Sciences Association
Table 2. Wellness domains response frequency (%).
Never Almost never Sometimes Often Very often
Physical 6.5 33.5 60.0
Social 2.2 16.8 38.9 26.5 15.7
Spiritual 10.3 27.6 34.1 14.6 13.5
Emotional 1.1 10.3 28.1 34.1 26.5
Intellectual 6.5 21.6 40.0 20.0 11.9
Lifestyle change 11.4 30.3 58.4
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND EDUCATION 5
Results
Descriptive statistics were calculated for all study participants (N= 185). Results
illustrated that nearly three times as many participants were female (n= 136) than
male (n= 48). Ages of participants were widely dispersed, with each age range (e.g.
30–39) representing more than 20% of the total sample. The majority of participants
had achieved a bachelor’s degree (n= 103), followed by high school diploma (n= 39)
and master’s degree (n= 35). American Council on Exercise (ACE; n= 45) and
National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM; n= 46) were the most common
certifications reported by fitness professionals, followed by American College of
Sports Medicine (ACSM; n= 21). Twenty-three participants reported ‘other’as certi-
fication, while a significant percentage reported having ‘multiple’certifications (n= 39).
Of the specific roles identified by participants, personal trainer was most common
(n= 43); however, the majority of fitness professionals indicated that they assumed two
roles (n= 46), three roles (n= 50) or more than three roles (n= 35). Complete
descriptive statistics are provided in Table 1.
In order to examine potential relationships between the categorical variables, Pearson
Chi Square Tests of Independence were conducted using α= .05 for significance. Results
indicated a number of significant associations between industry role and the frequency of
promoting various domains of wellness. For example, the relationship between industry
role and physical wellness promotion was significant, X
2
(8, N= 185) = 24.34, p< .01, with
a small to medium effect size (d= .27). Of the participants who identified as personal
trainers, 84% indicated ‘often’or ‘very often’in response to frequency of discussion of
physical wellness with clients. Similarly, among those who identified as having multiple
industry roles (three or more), 98% responded ‘often’or ‘very often’.
Chi Square tests also revealed significant relationships between industry role and the
frequency of discussing both emotional wellness, X
2
(16, N= 185) = 30.19, p< .05,
d= .26, and lifestyle change, X
2
(8, 185) = 23.07, p< .01, d= .25). Results indicated that
40% participants who identified as having one industry role reported that they dis-
cussed emotional wellness ‘often’or ‘very often’, in contrast to 72% of those who had
multiple roles. Following a similar trend to the previously discussed domains of
Table 3. Wellness domains by industry role.
df Chi Sq p ES (d)
Social 16 20.53 .197
Physical 8 23.34 .002 .27
Emotional 16 30.19 .017 .26
Intellectual 16 25.76 .057
Spiritual 16 22.43 .130
Lifestyle change 8 23.07 .003 .25
Table 4. Wellness domains by gender.
df Chi Sq p ES (d)
Social 4 3.86 .425
Physical 2 4.01 .135
Emotional 4 12.10 .017 .179
Intellectual 4 2.41 .661
Spiritual 4 3.43 .489
Lifestyle change 2 5.75 .056
6J. D. BEAUCHEMIN ET AL.
wellness, those who identified as having multiple industry roles reported a high fre-
quency of addressing lifestyle change with clients ‘often’or ‘very often’(98%).
In addition, a Chi Square analysis of the frequency of addressing wellness domains
based on gender was conducted. Although no significant results were found for
physical, intellectual, spiritual or social wellness based on gender, a significant relation-
ship was found for gender and emotional wellness, X
2
(4, N= 185) = 12.01, p< .05,
d= .18. Results indicate that female fitness professionals were significantly more likely
to address emotional wellness (‘often’or ‘very often’= 67%) than male fitness profes-
sionals (42%). No significant differences were found for any of the wellness domains
based on type of certification, age or education level.
Discussion
Given the shifting paradigm toward a more comprehensive conceptualization of health
and wellness, there is a clear need for fitness industry professionals to promote health
and lifestyle change from a multidimensional perspective. Findings from the current
study demonstrated differences in addressing wellness concepts with clients across all
health and fitness professionals surveyed. Differences in the frequency of addressing
multiple domains of wellness when working with clients illustrate the current paradigm
focused primarily on physical health, and represent a need for re-conceptualizing health
and wellness as multidimensional constructs within this industry. Although the exercise
science industry has traditionally focused exclusively on physical health, the existing
literature illustrating connections between domains of wellness and the influence on
one’s physical state highlights the importance of using a multidimensional approach to
health and wellness. This study provides evidence that despite the acceptance of
a multidimensional view of wellness, industry professionals continue to promote
a narrow conceptualization of health with their clientele.
Several potential barriers may be impacting multidimensional wellness promotion in
the health and fitness industry. Although multidimensional wellness is emerging as
a paradigm, the traditional western medical model continues to be the dominant approach
to treating illness, and by extension, addressing fitness concerns and challenges. Thus,
conceptualizing health and wellness as a combination of interrelated domains as opposed
to exclusively physically focused has been slow. As a result, training and education
opportunities related to multidimensional wellness promotion may be limited for health
professionals. Training issues are compounded by the number of certifying organizations,
which, while perhaps consistent in their intention to provide training and credentialing for
industry professionals, may have vastly different priorities and utilize differing models of
wellness. The lack of consensus definition of wellness and relevant promotion strategies,
compounded by potential differences in philosophies and training among certifying
organizations, point to barriers to promoting wellness in consistent and inclusive ways.
Industry roles
Wellness promotion within the industry is further compounded by the variability in
fitness professional roles and associated education and training, as evidenced by the
significant differences between roles for wellness domains within this study sample.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND EDUCATION 7
Those with multiple roles (n= 85) consistently scored higher across all domains of
wellness, as opposed to those who reported a single industry role (e.g. personal trainer
or group instructor). It is possible that those with multiple roles had been afforded
opportunities for advanced training, increasing the likelihood of specialized certifica-
tions (e.g. health coach) that integrate more holistic approaches. Single certifications
may not provide a comprehensive foundation of wellness and lifestyle change, whereas
fitness professionals who have multiple roles may gather more integrative training
through multiple outlets.
Results also highlight potential differences between academic education and indus-
try-specific training. Based on the current sample, the hypothesis that advanced educa-
tion results in a more integrated approach to wellness promotion was not supported, as
no significant relationships were found across wellness domains based on education
level. Thus, certification-specific training in integrative approaches may be more influ-
ential than formal academic study. Since there is no minimum formal education
expectation for the majority of fitness professional roles, the responsibility for prepara-
tion in wellness promotion among professionals falls on certifying organizations and
industry leaders.
It is clear from the results related to promoting domains of wellness beyond the
physical, that the training related to multidimensional wellness is inadequate, particu-
larly among individual certification holders. Re-conceptualizing health as a construct
that promotes understanding of the integrated relationships between wellness domains,
as well as the influence of social, spiritual, intellectual and emotional well-being on
physical health, may lead to improved training opportunities for industry professionals.
Thus, more wellness-focused training should be integrated across certifications to
increase accessibility and consistency. For example, those pursuing a personal trainer
certification should have access to information and training on multidimensional well-
ness promotion without having to assume multiple roles and/or certifications.
Additionally, increased continuing education courses and workshops focused on multi-
dimensional wellness promotion, as well as ‘specialization’certificates, could provide
opportunities for professional growth in this area.
Gender
Additional inquiry should be directed toward gender differences in conceptualizations
and promotion of wellness. Although no significant differences were found in education
or role based on gender in this sample, results indicate that female health and fitness
professionals tend to address wellness across domains (beyond physical) more fre-
quently than male professionals. In particular, female professionals were likely to
address emotional wellness significantly more than their male counterparts. This is
consistent with previous research which has found that ‘emotion work’, which involves
promoting the emotional well-being of others, is typically exhibited more often by
women than men (Eichler and Albanese 2007). Furthermore, there seems to be a social
understanding that women are more innately skilled at perceiving and attending to
emotions compared to men (Thomeer, Umberson, and Pudrovska 2013). Notably,
Thomeer, Reczek, and Umberson (2015) recently emphasized the importance of study-
ing gender differences regarding emotion work, especially in relation to physical health.
8J. D. BEAUCHEMIN ET AL.
Future research may examine potential differences in training across gender, as well as
role and approach to working with clients. For example, it is possible that female health
professionals take a more holistic approach, incorporate more emotion work into their
practice or have a higher prevalence of roles that currently incorporate emotional and
lifestyle change wellness concepts (e.g. health coach, yoga instructor). Additional
information regarding training and approach related to multidimensional wellness
among female fitness professionals may inform existing discrepancies and future train-
ing that ensures inclusivity and competency across gender.
Limitations
Several study limitations should be addressed. As this study utilized secondary data
from a sample of health and fitness professionals in attendance at conferences specific
to this industry, there is the possibility that results cannot be generalized beyond
participants. Conference attendance may be representative of increased investment
and training, and may not be representative of fitness professionals who do not seek
professional development opportunities. The study was also limited by the cross-
sectional design and convenience sample, since wellness-related constructs were
assessed at one point in time with a population of volunteer participants.
Additionally, although it is possible to operationalize training, knowledge and applica-
tion by industry role and certifying organization, the quality and extent of training
related to multidimensional wellness was not assessed. Thus, a causal relationship
between training and wellness promotion cannot be definitively assumed. Finally,
although findings indicated that industry professionals who identified as having multi-
ple roles were addressing multiple domains of wellness with more frequency than those
with one role, the inability to discern which roles they employ most frequently is
a major limitation. Future study should include modified data collection methods to
facilitate an analysis of primary industry roles.
Conclusion
Fitness professionals are in a unique position to support clients in not only improving
their physical health, but in developing strategies to improve multiple facets of their
lives. This study demonstrates a continued emphasis on physical wellness among fitness
professionals, and the lack of attention given to other wellness domains within the
health and fitness industry such as spiritual and intellectual wellness. Furthermore, the
results of the current study highlight discrepancies in wellness promotion based on
gender and industry role. The finding that professionals with multiple industry roles
address multidimensional wellness domains with greater frequency than those with
a single role may indicate that with increased roles or certifications, comes more
wellness-related training opportunities. In addition, the lack of relationship between
education level and wellness promotion seems to indicate that training and experience
based on multiple industry roles is more impactful than formal education (i.e. degree
level) in promoting domains of wellness. Training opportunities that emphasize well-
ness promotion for health and fitness professionals regardless of industry role are
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND EDUCATION 9
essential to supporting the shifting paradigm, and ultimately supporting clients in
moving toward optimal wellness across multiple interrelated domains.
The other finding of interest, that women were more likely to address emotional
wellness than men, indicates a need for examining the training experiences in this arena
with consideration of gender-related factors. Given the impact emotional states can
have on physical well-being, this gender discrepancy may require intentional efforts to
ensure inclusivity and address competency issues across training opportunities.
Ultimately, this study provides evidence of a continued lack of emphasis on the multi-
dimensional nature of wellness by industry professionals across roles, education, gen-
der, certification type and age. Despite the increased understanding and acceptance of
the multidimensional wellness model and the potential impact of wellness domains
such as emotional and spiritual on physical health, there appears to be a need for
increased training specific to these domains within the health and fitness industry. In
order to truly promote wellness as a multidimensional construct and foster healthy
lifestyle trends, more empirical and practical attention is needed in this regard.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
References
Ajzen, I. 1991.“The Theory of Planned Behavior.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes 50 (2): 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Ardell, D. B. 1977.“High Level Wellness Strategies.”Health Education 8 (4): 2. doi:10.4278/0890-
1171-11.3.208.
Biswas, A., P. I. Oh, G. E. Faulkner, R. R. Bajaj, M. A. Silver, M. S. Mitchell, and D. A. Alter.
2015.“Sedentary Time and Its Association with Risk for Disease Incidence, Mortality, and
Hospitalization in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.”Annals of Internal
Medicine 162 (2): 123–132. doi:10.7326/m14–1651.
Caldwell, K., J. Gray, and R. Wolever. 2013.“The Process of Patient Empowerment in Integrative
Health Coaching: How Does It Happen?”Global Advances in Health and Medicine 2 (3):
48–57. doi:10.7453/gahmj.2013.026.
Dietz, W. H., L. A. Baur, K. Hall, R. M. Puhl, E. M. Taveras, R. Uauy, and P. Kopelman. 2015.
“Management of Obesity: Improvement of Health-Care Training and Systems for Prevention
and Care.”The Lancet 385 (9986): 2521–2533. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61748-7.
Dunn, H. L. 1977.High-Level Wellness. Thorofare, NJ: Charles B. Slack.
Eichler, M., and P. Albanese. 2007.“What Is Household Work? A Critique of Assumptions
Underlying Empirical Studies of Housework and an Alternative Approach.”The Canadian
Journal of Sociology 32 (2): 227–258. doi:10.2307/20460633.
Fry, P. 2000.“Religious Involvement, Spirituality, and Personal Meaning for Life: Existential
Predictors of Spiritual Wellbeing in Community Residing and Institutional Care Elders.”
Aging & Mental Health 4 (4): 375–387. doi:10.1080/713649965.
Hettler, B. 1980.“Wellness Promotion on a University Campus.”Family & Community Health 3
(1): 77–95. doi:10.1097/00003727-198005000-00008.
Mantell, M. R. 2013.“Introduction to Health Coaching.”In ACE Health Coach Manual, edited
by C. X. Bryant, D. J. Green, and S. Merrill, 1–19. San Diego, CA: American Council on
Exercise.
10 J. D. BEAUCHEMIN ET AL.
Micha, R., J. L. Peñalvo, F. Cudhea, F. Imamura, C. D. Rehm, and D. Mozaffarian. 2017.
“Association between Dietary Factors and Mortality from Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2
Diabetes in the United States.”Jama 317 (9): 912–924. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.0947.
Myers, J. E., and T. J. Sweeney. 2004.“The Indivisible Self: An Evidence-Based Model of
Wellness.”Journal of Individual Psychology 60: 234–244.
O’Connell, B., S. Palmer, and H. Williams. 2013.Solution Focused Coaching in Practice.
New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203111734.
Pedersen, A. F., D. H. Bovbjerg, and R. Zachariae. 2011.“Stress and Susceptibility to Infectious
Disease.”In The Handbook of Stress Science: Biology, Psychology, and Health, edited by
R. J. Contrada and A. Baum, 425–445. New York: Springer.
Prochaska, J. O., and W. F. Velicer. 1997.“The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior
Change.”American Journal of Health Promotion 12: 38–48. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-
12.1.38.
Raza, S., M. Hashmi, Zeeshan, and F. Shaikh. 2011.“Human and Social Capital Development for
Self-Efficacy of University Graduates: Bases for Development of Society.”Asian Social Science
7 (9): 245–254. doi:10.5539/ass.v7n9p244.
Roscoe, L. J. 2009.“Wellness: A Review of Theory and Measurement for Counselors.”Journal of
Counseling & Development 87 (2): 216–226. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2009.tb00570.x.
Rosenstock, I. M. 1974.“Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model.”Health Education
Monographs 2 (4): 328–335. doi:10.1177/109019817400200403.
Schmid, D., C. Ricci, S. E. Baumeister, and M. F. Leitzmann. 2016.“Replacing Sedentary Time
with Physical Activity in Relation to Mortality.”Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 48
(7): 1312–1319. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000000913.
Slavich, G. M., A. O’Donovan, E. S. Epel, and M. Kemeny. 2010.“Black Sheep Get the Blues:
A Psychobiological Model of Social Rejection and Depression.”Neuroscience and
Biobehavioral Reviews 35 (1): 39–45. doi:10.1037/e676252012-082.
Smith, L. L., N. H. Lake, L. A. Simmons, A. Perlman, S. Wroth, and R. Q. Wolever. 2013.
“Integrative Health Coach Training: A Model for Shifting the Paradigm toward
Patient-Centricity and Meeting New National Prevention Goals.”Global Advances in Health
and Medicine 2 (3): 66–74. doi:10.7453/gahmj.2013.034.
Thomeer, M. B., C. Reczek, and D. Umberson. 2015.“Gendered Emotion Work around Physical
Health Problems in Mid- and Later-Life Marriages.”Journal of Aging Studies 32: 12–22.
doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2014.12.001.
Thomeer, M. B., D. Umberson, and T. Pudrovska. 2013.“Marital Processes around Depression:
A Gendered and Relational Perspective.”Society & Mental Health 3: 151. doi:10.1177/
2156869313487224.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2014.“National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey (NHANES), 2013–2014.”https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information
/health-statistics/overweight-obesity
Wilson, C. S., M. Forchheimer, A. W. Heinemann, A. M. Warren, and C. McCullumsmith. 2017.
“Assessment of the Relationship of Spiritual Well-Being to Depression and Quality of Life for
Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.”Disability and Rehabilitation 39 (5): 491–496. doi:10.3109/
09638288.2016.1152600.
Witmer, J. M., and T. J. Sweeney. 1991.“AHolistic Model for Wellness and Prevention over the
Life Span.”Journal of Counseling & Development 71 (2): 140–148. doi:10.1002/j.1556-
6676.1992.tb02189.x.
WHO (World Health Organization). 1992.Basic Documents. 39th ed. Geneva: WHO.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND EDUCATION 11
Appendix
(1) Demographic information:
(2) How would you describe your role in the health and fitness industry? (may check more
than one)
□Personal Trainer
□Group Instructor
□Health Coach
□Strength & Conditioning Coach
□Educator
□Club Manager / Owner
□Sports Coach
□Researcher
□Other
(3) What is your current certification(s) affiliation?
□American Council on Exercise (ACE)
□American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)
□National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM)
□National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA)
□International Sports Sciences Association (ISSA)
□International Health, Racquet & Sportsclub Association (IHRSA)
□Other
(4) How frequently do you discuss physical wellness with clients?
(5) How frequently do you discuss social wellness with clients?
(6) How frequently do you discuss spiritual wellness with clients?
(7) How frequently do you discuss emotional wellness with clients?
Gender
□M
□F
Age
□20–29
□30–39
□40–49
□50–59
□60+
Education
□H.S.
□Bachelor Degree
□Master Degree
□Doctoral Degree
12 345
Never Almost Never Sometimes Often Very Often
12 345
Never Almost Never Sometimes Often Very Often
12 345
Never Almost Never Sometimes Often Very Often
12 345
Never Almost Never Sometimes Often Very Often
12 J. D. BEAUCHEMIN ET AL.
(8) How frequently do you discuss intellectual wellness with clients?
(9) How frequently do you discuss lifestyle change with clients?
12 345
Never Almost Never Sometimes Often Very Often
12 345
Never Almost Never Sometimes Often Very Often
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND EDUCATION 13