ArticlePDF Available

Chelonian Predation by Jaguars (Panthera onca)

Authors:

Abstract

We present a new record of freshwater turtle predation by the jaguar, Panthera onca, in addition to a current review of chelonian predation by this feline. In total, 16 species of chelonians were predated by jaguars: 3 were terrestrial, 8 freshwater, and 5 marine. Our review revealed that jaguars prey on a large number of chelonians, including heavily armored species, such as the Chelonoidis tortoises, and also small freshwater species.
NOTES AND FIELD REPORTS
Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 2018, 17(2): 280–283
Ó2018 Chelonian Research Foundation
Chelonian Predation by Jaguars
(Panthera onca)
ELIZA
ˆNGELA SILVA BRITO
1,*
,
EVERTON MIRANDA
2,3
,AND
FERNANDO RODRIGO TORTATO
3,4
1
Herpetology Laboratory, Biodiversity Centre, Institute of
Biosciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando
Correa da Costa, 2367, 78060-900, Cuiab ´
a, Mato Grosso, Brazil
[eliz.chelidae@gmail.com];
2
IUCN/SSC Boa and Python Specialist Group, Buenos Aires,
Argentina;
3
Postgraduate Program in Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation,
Federal University of Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Correa da Costa,
2367, 78060-900, Cuiab ´
a, Mato Grosso, Brazil
[mirandaebp@gmail.com];
4
Panthera, 8 West 40th Street, 18th Floor, New York, New York
10018 USA [ftortato@panthera.org]
*Corresponding author
ABSTRACT. – We present a new record of freshwater
turtle predation by the jaguar, Panthera onca,in
addition to a current review of chelonian predation by
this feline. In total, 16 species of chelonians were
predated by jaguars: 3 were terrestrial, 8 freshwater,
and 5 marine. Our review revealed that jaguars prey
on a large number of chelonians, including heavily
armored species, such as the Chelonoidis tortoises, and
also small freshwater species.
Predation is acknowledged as one of the main forces
of natural selection. It is involved in the regulation of a
diverse range of evolutionary and ecological processes,
including Cambrian diversity explosion (Bengtson 2002),
top-down population regulation (Orihuela et al. 2014),
landscape-level soil nutrient distribution (Bump et al.
2009), habitat use of a variety of prey species (Preisser et
al. 2005), and natural selection itself (Genovart et al.
2010). Being such a strong selective force, predation has
been responsible for a variety of adaptations in prey
species. A large and continually growing body of research
has focused on this subject (Greene 1988; Caro 2005), and
a general classification of antipredator defenses separates
prey strategies into 2 main classes (Brodie et al. 1991):
predation avoidance by flight, being constantly vigilant
and morphologically adapted to escape via speed (passer-
ines, most monkeys, iguanids), and prey that is able to
confront (peccaries, boars, skunks) or physically resist
predators (armadillos, tortoises).
Among the most remarkable adaptations of physical
resistance to predation are the shells developed by
chelonians. Formed by the fusion of vertebras, ribs, and
sternal bones, this unique development has been the basis
of the group’s evolutionary success. Living chelonians can
be found in nearly every major ecosystem on Earth, except
those of the polar regions (Ernst and Barbour 1989). The
shell is often complemented by spiny scutes on the legs
and has the ability to house the retracted legs and head.
Predators have developed a variety of strategies to
overcome this suite of defensive measures, including
member amputation (Heithaus et al. 2008), dropping
animals from the air or cliffs (Watson 2010), and direct
shell destruction (Salera-Junior et al. 2009). Despite this,
adults of most chelonian species suffer low mortality
(Iverson 1991). However, Panthera onca (jaguar) is well
known for preying on chelonia (Da Silveira et al. 2010).
Their heads show several characteristics relating to
durophagy, including thick canines and large masseter
and temporal muscles (Seymour 1989) and one of the
strongest bites relative to body size in the genus Panthera
(Christiansen and Adolfssen 2005).
Here we review chelonian species preyed on by
jaguars in order to provide to other researchers authors
with a current, single-source review of chelonian predation
by jaguars. We also synthesize information on body size
and reproductive condition of chelonia that are preyed on
by jaguars. In addition, we report the first record of
predation on Acanthochelys macrocephala by jaguar.
A search of the literature concerning interactions
between jaguars and turtles was performed using Google
Scholar. We used the key words jaguar, P. onca, and on¸ca-
pintada combined with diet, feeding habits, food habits,
h´
abitos alimentarios, and dieta. This allowed us to find
published and unpublished information in English,
Portuguese, and Spanish.
In September 2014, we found a dead adult individual
of A. macrocephala on the Transpantaneira Park Road (lat
17816047 00 S, long 56852016 00 W, WGS84), located within
the Brazilian Pantanal wetlands of the Paraguay River
basin. Acanthochelys macrocephala is a medium-sized
freshwater turtle that lives in marshes, wetland areas,
shallow bays, and brackish lagoons (Rhodin et al. 2009).
The individual was found on dry land, with visible bite
marks on the carapace, and jaguar tracks were found at the
site. The distance between canines (.70 mm) marked on
the carapace was consistent with that of a jaguar bite
(Hoogesteijn and Hoogesteijn 2005), confirming the
predator’s identity.
In addition, our search revealed records of jaguar
predation on 15 species of chelonia, totaling 16 with the
addition of A. macrocephala (Table 1). Of these, 3 species
were terrestrial, 8 freshwater, and 5 marine. The latter were
killed during nesting times, as were the large freshwater
species, which usually nest in large numbers on beaches.
Small chelonia, such as A. macrocephala, can be
considered a rare prey of jaguars because this turtle
occasionally moves onto dry land to migrate to other water
bodies, as these bodies of water are not always connected
(Junk et al. 2011). This kind of terrestrial movement is
common in small and midsized freshwater turtles living in
seasonal environments (Bodie and Semlitsch 2000).
Chelonia predation by jaguars has been recorded since
the early days of Neotropical natural history (e.g.,
Humboldt 1877). Topic of durophagy, however, is the
subject of little research (Miranda et al. 2016). Here we
have shown that the jaguar preys on chelonians, including
such heavily armored species as the Chelonoidis tortoises,
and also small species. The study also extends knowledge
of such predation to marine turtles, which are extensively
preyed on during the nesting time. Predation events are
usually higher during peak nesting season and increase as
nesting populations increase (Arroyo-Arce and Salom-
P´
erez 2015). Predation of nesting marine turtle has been
the subject of intense discussion because of the conserva-
tion concern for the species being preyed on (especially as
they are all reproductive females) (Ver´
ıssimo et al. 2012;
Arroyo-Arce and Salom-P´
erez 2015). This behavior is
unique in large Panthera cats, with no other species known
to prey on chelonia to such an extent.
Although chelonians have evolved formidable mor-
phological adaptations to avoid predation, the jaguar’s
mandibular adaptions for durophagy appear to have
surpassed them. Jaguars possess the potential capacity to
kill adults of virtually all chelonian species within their
distribution, and our data indicate that they prey on at least
16 species, including A. macrocephala. They can take
advantage of mass nesting events to transform large
aquatic chelonians into staple food items as well as of
opportunistic predation. Predation on nesting females can
lead to conservation conflicts when the prey species is
considered threatened. We suggest that further research on
jaguars preying on chelonia approach the subject from the
foraging theory point of view (Stephens et al. 2007),
comparing predation with prey abundance.
Acknowledgments. — We would like to thank
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient´
ıfico e
Tecnol´
ogico (CNPq) for grant 130873/2014-4 (E.M.),
Coordena¸c˜
ao de Aperfei¸coamento de Pessoal de N´
ıvel
Superior (CAPES) for the PNPD grant (E.S.B.), and
Panthera Brasil for logistic support. We further thank
Marina Secco, Sˆ
onia Helena Santesso Teixeira de
Mendon¸ca, Rodrigo de Oliveira Lula Salles, Adriano
Lima Silveira, and Vera L ´
ucia Ferreira Luz, who kindly
offered us the data on Acanthochelys radiolata mass.
LITERATURE CITED
ALFARO, L.D., MONTALVO, V., GUIMARAES, F., SAENZ, C., CRUZ, J.,
MORAZAN, F., AND CARRILO, E. 2016. Characterization of attack
events on sea turtles (Chelonia mydas and Lepudochelys
oliv ´
acea) by Jaguar (Panthera onca) in Naranjo Sector, Santa
Table 1. Chelonian species preyed on by the jaguar, including the average mass of each species. An ‘‘ X’’ indicates that the predation
event occurred during nesting.
Species Mass (g) Source Nesting Predation source
Freshwater turtles
Chelidae
Acanthochelys macrocephala 1761 E. Brito (unpubl. data) This work
Acanthochelys radiolata 422 M. Secco et al. ( pers. comm.) Garla et al. (2001)
Platemys platycephala 245 Herrel et al. (2002) Emmons (1989)
Geoemydidae
Rhinoclemmys punctularia 810 E. Brito (unpubl. data) Ch´
avez-Tovar (2010)
Kinosternidae
Kinosternon scorpioides 284 Carvalho et al. (2008) Montalvo et al. (2014)
Podocnemididae
Podocnemis expansa 24,700 Portelinha et al. (2014) X Salera-Junior et al. (2009)
Podocnemis unifilis 5760 Fach´
ın-Ter´
an and Vogt (2004) X Emmons (1989); Salera-Junior et al.
(2009)
Podocnemis vogli 945 Prado (1969) Scognamillo et al. (2003)
Terrestrial turtles
Testudinidae
Chelonoidis carbonarius 6684 Wang et al. (2011) McBride et al. (2010)
Chelonoidis chilensis 1426 Waller et al. (1989) Taber et al. (1997)
Chelonoidis denticulatus 6430 Moskovits (1988) Emmons (1989); Garla et al. (2001)
Marine turtles
Cheloniidae
Caretta caretta 116,000 Rueda-Almonacid et al. (2007) X Arroyo-Arce et al. (2017)
Chelonia mydas 166,300 Hays et al. (2002) X Tro¨
eng (2000); Carrillo et al. (2009);
Ver´
ıssimo et al. (2012); Arroyo-Arce
and Salom-P´
erez (2015); Alfaro et al.
(2016)
Eretmochelys imbricata 82,000 Rueda Almonacid et al. (2007) X Ver´
ıssimo et al. (2012); Arroyo-Arce
and Salom-P´
erez (2015)
Lepidochelys olivacea 35,000 Schulz (1975) X Carrillo et al. (2009); Alfaro et al. (2016)
Dermochelyidae
Dermochelys coriacea 408,100 Georges and Fossette (2006) X Tro¨
eng (2000); Ver´
ıssimo et al. (2012);
Arroyo-Arce and Salom-P´
erez (2015)
NOTES AND FIELD REPORTS 281
Rosa, National Park, Costa Rica. International Journal of
Conservation Science 7:101–108.
ARROYO-ARCE,S.AND SALOM-PE
´REZ, R. 2015. Impacto of jaguar
Panthera onca (Carnivora: Felidae) predation on marine turtle
populations in Tortuguero, Caribbean coast of Costa Rica.
Revista de Biolog´
ıa Tropical 63:815–825.
ARROYO-ARCE, S., THOMSON, I., HARRISON, E., WILMOTT, S., AND
BAKER, G. 2017. First record of jaguar (Panthera onca)
predation on a loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta)in
Tortuguero National Park, Costa Rica. Herpetology Notes 10:
17–18.
BENGTSON, S. 2002. Origins and early evolution of predation.
Paleontological Society Papers 8:289–318.
BODIE, J.R. AND SEMLITSCH, R.D. 2000. Spatial and temporal use
of floodplain habitats by lentic and lotic species of aquatic
turtles. Oecologia 122:138–146.
BRODIE, E.D., JR., FORMANOWICZ, D.R., JR., AND BRODIE, E.D., III.
1991. Predator avoidance and antipredator mechanisms:
distinct pathways to survival. Ethology Ecology and Evolution
3:73–77.
BUMP, J.K., PETERSON, R.O., AND VUCETICH, J.A. 2009. Wolves
modulate soil nutrient heterogeneity and foliar nitrogen by
configuring the distribution of ungulate carcasses. Ecology 90:
3159–3167.
CARO, T. 2005. Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 592 pp.
CARRILLO, E., FULLER, T.K., AND SAENZ, J.C. 2009. Jaguar
Panthera onca hunting activity: effects of prey distribution
and availability. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25:563–567.
CARVALHO, E.A.R., JR., CARVALHO-NETO, C.S., AND PASCHOALINI,
E.L. 2008. Diet of Kinosternon scorpioides in Serra dos Caraj´
as,
Eastern Amazonia. Herpetological Review 39:283–285.
CHA
´VEZ-TOVAR, J. 2010. Ecolog´
ıa y conservaci´
on del jaguar
Panthera onca y puma Puma concolor en la regi´
on de
Calakmul y sus implicaciones para la conservaci ´
on. PhD
Thesis, Universidad Nacional Aut´
onoma de M´
exico, M´
exico
City, M´
exico.
CHRISTIANSEN,P.AND ADOLFSSEN, J.S. 2005. Bite forces, canine
strength and skull allometry in carnivores Mammalia,
Carnivora. Journal of Zoology 266:133–151.
DASILVEIRA, R., RAMALHO, E.E., THORBJARNARSON, J.B., AND
MAGNUSSON, W.E. 2010. Depredation by jaguars on caimans
and importance of reptiles in the diet of jaguar. Journal of
Herpetology 44:418–424.
EMMONS, L. 1989. Jaguar predation on chelonians. Journal of
Herpetology 23:311–314.
ERNST, C.H. AND BARBOUR, R.W. 1989. Turtles of the World.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 313 pp.
FACHI
´N-TERA
´N,A.AND VOGT, R. 2004. Estrutura populacional,
tamanho e raz˜
ao sexual de Podocnemis unifilis (Testudines,
Podocnemididae) no rio Guapor ´
e RO, norte do Brasil.
Phyllomedusa 3:29–42.
GARLA, R.C., SETZ, E.Z.F., AND GOBBI, N. 2001. Jaguar Panthera
onca food habits in Atlantic rain forest of southeastern Brazil.
Biotropica 33:691–696.
GENOVART, M., NEGRE, N., TAVECCHIA, G., BISTUER, A., PARPAL,
L., AND ORO, D. 2010. The young, the weak and the sick:
evidence of natural selection by predation. PLoS One 5:e9774.
GEORGES, J.Y. AND FOSSETTE, S. 2006. Estimating body mass in
the leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea. Marine Ecology
Progress Series 318:255–262.
GREENE, H. 1988. Antipredator mechanisms in reptiles. In: Gans,
C. and Huey, R.B. (Eds.). Biology of the Reptilia. New York:
Alan R. Liss, pp. 11–113.
HAYS, G.C., BRODERICK, A.C., GLEN, F., AND GODLEY, B.J. 2002.
Change in body mass associated with long-term fasting in a
marine reptile: the case of green turtles Chelonia mydas at
Ascension Island. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:1299–
1302.
HEITHAUS, M.R., WIRSING, A.J., THOMSON, J.A., AND BURKHOLDER,
D.A. 2008. A review of lethal and non-lethal effects of
predators on adult marine turtles. Journal of Experimental
Marine Biology and Ecology 356:43–51.
HERREL,A.,OREILLY, J.C., AND RICHMOND,A.M.2002.
Evolution of bite performance in turtles. Journal of Evolu-
tionary Biology 15:1083–1094.
HOOGESTEIJN,R.AND HOOGESTEIJN, A. 2005. Manual sobre
problemas de depredaci´
aon causadas por grandes felinos en
hatos ganaderos. Programa de Extensi ´
on para Ganaderos.
Programa de Conservaci´
on del Jaguar. Campo Grande:
Wildlife Conservation Society, 48 pp.
HUMBOLDT, A. 1877. Personal Narrative of Travels to the
Equinoctial Regions of the New Continent During the Years
1799–1804. New York: AMS Press, 505 pp.
IVERSON, J.B. 1991. Patterns of survivorship in turtles order
Testudines. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:385–391.
JUNK, W.J., NUNES DA CUNHA C., AND DA SILVA, C.J. 2011. The
Pantanal: a large American wetland and its position in
limnological theory. In: Junk, W.J., Silva, C.J., Nunes da
Cunha, C., and Wantzen, K.M. (Eds.). The Pantanal: Ecology,
Biodiversity and Sustainable Management of a Large
Neotropical Seasonal Wetland. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers, pp.
127–141.
MCBRIDE, R., GIORDANO, A., AND BALLARD, W. 2010. Note on the
winter diet of jaguars Panthera onca in the Paraguayan
Transitional Chaco. Bellbird 4:1–12.
MIRANDA, E.B.P., MENEZES, J.F.S., AND RHEINGANTZ, M.L. 2016.
Reptiles as principal prey? Adaptations for durophagy and
prey selection by jaguar (Panthera onca). Journal of Natural
History 50:2021–2035.
MONTALVO, V.H., ALFARO, L.D., SA
´ENZ, C., AND CARRILO,E.
2014. The jaguar as a potential predator of Kinosternon
scorpioides (Linnaeus, 1766). Herpetozoa 27:205–207.
MOSKOVITS, D. 1988. Sexual dimorphism and population
estimates of the two Amazonian tortoises Geochelone
carbonaria and G denticulata in northwestern Brazil.
Herpetologica 44:209–217.
ORIHUELA, G., TERBORGH, J., CEBALLOS, N., AND GLANDER,K.
2014. When top-down becomes bottom up: behaviour of
hyperdense howler monkeys Alouatta seniculus trapped on a
06 ha island. PLoS One 9:e82197.
PORTELINHA, T., MALVASIO, A., PIN
˜A, C., AND BERTOLUCI, J. 2014.
Population structure of Podocnemis expansa (Testudines:
Podocnemididae) in southern Brazilian Amazon. Copeia 4:
707–715.
PRADO, H.A. 1969. Contribuci ´
on al conocimiento de la
morfolog´
ıa, ecolog´
ıa, comportamiento and distribuci´
on geo-
gr´
afica de Podocnemis vogli (Testudinata). Revista de la
Academia Colombiana 13:303–329.
PREISSER, E.L., BOLNICK, D.I., AND BENARD, M.F. 2005. Scared to
death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in
predator-prey interactions. Ecology 86:501–509.
RHODIN, A.G.J., ME
´TRAILER, S., VINKE, T., VINKE, S., ARTNER, H.,
AND MITTERMEIER, R.A. 2009. Acanthochelys macrocephala
(Rhodin, Mittermeier, and McMorris 1984—big-headed
Pantanal swamp turtle, Pantanal swamp turtle. In: Rhodin,
A.G.J., Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A.,
Buhlmann, K.A., Iverson, J.B., and Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.).
Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A
282 CHELONIAN CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGY,Volume 17, Number 2 – 2018
Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwa-
ter Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs
5:040.1–040.8.
RUEDA-ALMONACID, J.V., CARR, J.L., MITTERMEIER, R.A., RODRI
´-
GUEZ-MAHECHA, J.V., MAST, R.B., VOGT, R.C., RHODIN, A.G.J.,
OSSA-VELA
´SQUEZ, J., RUEDA, J.N., AND MITTERMEIER, C.G.
2007. Las tortugas y los cocodrilianos de los pa´
ıses andinos
del Tr´
opico. Bogot´
a: Conservati´
on Internacional, 537 pp.
SALERA-JUNIOR, G., MALVASIO, A., AND PORTELINHA, T.C.G. 2009.
Avalia¸c˜
ao da preda¸c˜
ao de Podocnemis expansa ePodocnemis
unifilis Testudines, Podocnemididae no rio Java´
es, Tocantins.
Acta Amazonica 39:207–213.
SCHULZ, J.P. 1975. Sea turtles nesting in surinam. Zoologische
Verhandelingen 143:1–143.
SCOGNAMILLO, D., MAXIT, I.E., SUNQUIST, M., AND POLISAR,J.
2003. Coexistence of jaguar Panthera onca and puma Puma
concolor in a mosaic landscape in the Venezuelan llanos.
Journal of Zoology 259:269–279.
SEYMOUR, K. 1989. Panthera onca. Mammalian Species 340:1–9.
STEPHENS, D., BROWN, J., AND YDENBERG., R. 2007. Foraging:
Behavior and Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
608 pp.
TABER, A.B., NOVARO, A.J., NERIS, N., AND COLMAN, F.H. 1997.
The food habits of sympatric jaguar and puma in the
Paraguayan Chaco. Biotropica 29:204–213.
TROE
¨NG, S. 2000. Pr´
edation of green Chelonia mydas and
leatherback Dermochelys coriacea turtles. Chelonian Conser-
vation and Biology 3:751–753.
VERI
´SSIMO, D., JONES, D., CHAVERRI, R., AND MEYER, S. 2012.
Jaguar Panthera onca predation of marine turtles: conflict
between flagship species in Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Oryx 46:
340–347.
WALLER, T., MICUCCI, P., AND RICHARD, E. 1989. Preliminary
Results of the Research on Biology, Ecology and Conserva-
tion of the Chelonoidis chilensis (Sensu Lato) Gray, 1870
Tortoise in Argentina. Buenos Aires: Proyecto Tortuga,
Fundaci´
on Vida Silvestre Argentina, 43 pp.
WANG, E., DONATTI,C.I.,FERREIRA,V.L.,RAIZER,J.,AND
HIMMELSTEIN, J. 2011. Food habits and notes on the biology
of Chelonoidis carbonaria Spix 1824 Testudinidae, Chelonia
in the southern Pantanal, Brazil. South American Journal of
Herpetology 6:11–19.
WATSON, J. 2010. The Golden Eagle. Poyser: Bloomsbury
Publishing, 320 pp.
Received: 24 April 2018
Revised and Accepted: 5 July 2018
Published Online: 18 December 2018
Handling Editor: Jeffrey A. Seminoff
NOTES AND FIELD REPORTS 283
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
ABSTRACT We examined the evidence supporting the hypothesis that jaguars (Panthera onca) have morphological and behavioural adaptations to facilitate reptile predation. Jaguars’ head and bite features show adaptations to durophagy (consumption of hard-integumented prey) that are very unusual within the genus Panthera. These include: thick canines, well-developed head muscles and a fatal bite directed to braincase or nape. These characteristics have been previously considered an adaptation for the consumption of rep- tilian prey, whose thick integument poses a challenge to preda- tion. Although causation of any trait as result of natural selection is hard to demonstrate with ecological evidence, its consequences can be suggested and predictions made. Here, through a review of the literature on jaguar predatory habits, we tallied the evidence for saurophagy against environmental characteristics correlated with jaguar predation on reptiles. We offer a new explanation for the presence of those traits, based on the selection patterns, prey abundances and main predation habits over the geographic range of the jaguar. We believe that these features allow jaguars to overcome dangerous and/or armoured prey by dispatching them rapidly through a bite to the head or nape. Reptile consumption is restricted to areas of high reptile abundance while dangerous or armoured prey is consistently preyed upon throughout the jaguar’s distribution, and selected even when their abundance is low. This questions the validity of the saurophagy hypothesis. We believe that these results are relevant to jaguar conservation and management, because some of the main prey species are severely threatened over their range, and because threatened reptiles are also consumed as prey
Article
Full-text available
Little is known about the effects of jaguars on the population of marine turtles nesting in Tortuguero National Park, Costa Rica. This study assessed jaguar predation impact on three species of marine turtles (Chelonia mydas, Dermochelys coriacea and Eretmochelys imbricata) that nest in Tortuguero beach. Jaguar predation data was obtained by using two methodologies, literature review (historical records prior the year 2005) and weekly surveys along the 29 km stretch of beach during the period 2005-2013. Our results indicated that jaguar predation has increased from one marine turtle in 1981 to 198 in 2013. Jaguars consumed annually an average of 120 (SD= 45) and 2 (SD= 3) green turtles and leatherbacks in Tortuguero beach, respectively. Based on our results we concluded that jaguars do not represent a threat to the population of green turtles that nest in Tortuguero beach, and it is not the main cause for population decline for leatherbacks and hawksbills. Future research should focus on continuing to monitor this predator-prey relationship as well as the factors that influence it so the proper management decisions can be taken. Rev. Biol. Trop. 63 (3): 815-825. Epub 2015 September 01.
Article
Full-text available
Here we present data on the morphology and habits of male and female individuals of Chelonoidis carbonaria and on their diet based on scat analysis (n = 21) at Fazenda Rio Negro, Brazilian Pantanal, subregion of Nhecolândia, from January 2004 to April 2007. The tortoises in the Pantanal had an average larger weight than the ones sampled in the Amazon, which could be a result of low local hunting pressure over the species and/or abundant resource availability. For both males and females, fruits represented the highest portion of items consumed, reflecting the importance of fruits in their diet. Because 90% of the seeds found in scat samples were found intact, and considering both the retention time of seeds in the digestive tract and distance traveled while retaining the seeds, tortoises can be considered important seed dispersers in the Pantanal. For instance, we found out that tortoises can be extremely important in the dispersal and recruitment of Syagrus flexuosa, an uncommon palm species in the study area, the seeds of which are not usually found in other frugivores' scats. Also, the tortoise's ability to ingest large-sized seeds that are usually consumed by a limited range of dispersers make tortoises even more important especially in areas where mammals exist in low density or are already extinct.
Article
Full-text available
Detailed studies of the population structure of most species of turtles in the Amazon Basin are lacking throughout their range. We estimated sex ratio, size structure, relative abundance, and recapture index for the Giant South American River Turtle (Podocnemis expansa) in Javae´s River, southern Brazilian Amazon. Field work was conducted between 2004 and 2009, and comprised a total sampling effort of 368 hours in 92 sampling days. Turtles were captured by diving and seining. A total of 645 individuals (156 adult males, 109 adult females, and 380 juveniles) were captured and marked, but only five were recaptured. Carapace length showed a unimodal pattern for males, but no clear pattern for females. The population consisted predominantly of adult males and young females, with a sex ratio of 1.4:1 (M:F). Relative abundance varied from 0–5.5 animals/h depending on the capture method employed. Most animals (73.7%) were concentrated in a single location on the river (1 km out of 40 km sampled) during the study period. Population monitoring on a long-term basis will be necessary to identify the real population structure, evaluate poaching pressure, and to support the conservation project which has been ongoing since 1985 in the area.
Article
Full-text available
Predators are a ubiquitous presence in most natural environments. Opportunities to contrast the behaviour of a species in the presence and absence of predators are thus rare. Here we report on the behaviour of howler monkey groups living under radically different conditions on two land-bridge islands in Lago Guri, Venezuela. One group of 6 adults inhabited a 190-ha island (Danto) where they were exposed to multiple potential predators. This group, the control, occupied a home range of 23 ha and contested access to food resources with neighbouring groups in typical fashion. The second group, containing 6 adults, was isolated on a remote, predator-free 0.6 ha islet (Iguana) offering limited food resources. Howlers living on the large island moved, fed and rested in a coherent group, frequently engaged in affiliative activities, rarely displayed agonistic behaviour and maintained intergroup spacing through howling. In contrast, the howlers on Iguana showed repulsion, as individuals spent most of their time spaced widely around the perimeter of the island. Iguana howlers rarely engaged in affiliative behaviour, often chased or fought with one another and were not observed to howl. These behaviors are interpreted as adjustments to the unrelenting deprivation associated with bottom-up limitation in a predator-free environment.
Article
Full-text available
Predation can be an important driver of population dynamics but can also pose a dilemma to conservation managers if the species interacting are of conservation concern or have a high public profile. For 5 years we conducted regular transect surveys to monitor the spatial and temporal patterns of predation of adult marine turtles by jaguars Panthera onca in Tortuguero National Park, Costa Rica. Predation occurs throughout the study site on Tortuguero Beach although at lower rates at the northern and southern ends, probably because of increased human presence in these areas. There was a marked increase in predation, from an average of < 2 turtles predated per survey in the first season to > 5 predated per survey in the last, with 676 jaguar-predated marine turtles recorded during the study period. With a minimum of 189 individuals predated in the last season, predation of adult turtles has now reached a magnitude never before recorded in a marine turtle rookery. Although the nesting population of marine turtles in Tortuguero is one of the largest in the world and suffers from both direct and indirect anthropogenic pressures, the increase in predation by jaguars makes this ecological interaction relevant to the management of both the jaguar and marine turtle populations. The situation could lead to a potential conflict in conservation strategies that, given the flagship role of the species involved, will need to be addressed both in the context of species management and conservation marketing.
Book
The Prussian naturalist Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859) was one of the most famous explorers of his generation. Charles Darwin called him ‘the greatest scientific traveller who ever lived’. In 1799, Humboldt and the botanist Aimé Bonpland secured permission from the Spanish crown for a voyage to South America. They left from Madrid and spent five years exploring the continent. Humboldt reported his findings in a total of thirty volumes, published in French over a period of more than twenty years beginning in 1805. This English translation by Helen Maria Williams of one important component of Humboldt's account, the Relation historique du voyage (1814-1825), consists of seven volumes and was published in London between 1814 and 1829. Volume 5 (1821) describes Humboldt's travels through the Orinoco basin and across several sets of rapids, and the indigenous people, missionaries, animals and plants he encountered on the journey.