ArticlePDF Available

Floral morphology and micromorphology of selected Maxillaria species (Maxillariinae, Orchidaceae)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The genus Maxillaria s.l. constitutes the core of the subtribe Maxillariinae Benth. It is estimated that ca 56% of the Maxillaria species attract pollinators by 'empty promises'. Among the rest, there are three types of reward: nectar, pseudopollen and wax-like substances. In this paper we present the results of the investigation of lip epidermis of 20 species from 11 sections and one complex. For the study, we used scanning electron microscope (SEM). In all studied species, the presence of the papillae in various shapes has been demonstrated. Obpyriform papillae seem to be the most common and their presence has been noticed on the labellar surface of 15 species from all investigated sections. Conical papillae have been found on the lip surface of 10 species from 8 sections, villiform – in 10 species from 9 sections, clavate papillae – only in 4 species, each from different sections and elliptic papillae have been noticed only in a single species. Trichomes are limited to 7 species. Pseudopollen has been recorded only in species from the Grandiflora-complex. Residues of some kind of secretion were observed on the lip surface of 7 species from different sections. In 5 species papillae occurred also on the outer surface of the lip.
Content may be subject to copyright.
itteilungen des
ärntner otanikzentrums
lagenfurt

ulfenia 25  –
Floral morphology and micromorphology of selected Maxillaria species
(Maxillariinae, Orchidaceae)
onika  ipińska  gnieszka  owalkowska
Summary: he genus Maxillaria s l constitutes the core of the subtribe axillariinae enth t is
estimated that ca  of the Maxillaria species attract pollinators by empty promises mong the
rest there are three types of reward nectar pseudopollen and waxlike substances n this paper we
present the results of the investigation of lip epidermis of  species from  sections and one complex
or the study we used scanning electron microscope  n all studied species the presence of the
papillae in various shapes has been demonstrated bpyriform papillae seem to be the most common
and their presence has been noticed on the labellar surface of  species from all investigated sections
onical papillae have been found on the lip surface of  species from  sections villiform – in 
species from  sections clavate papillae – only in  species each from dierent sections and elliptic
papillae have been noticed only in a single species richomes are limited to  species seudopollen
has been recorded only in species from the Grandioracomplex esidues of some kind of secretion
were observed on the lip surface of  species from dierent sections n  species papillae occurred
also on the outer surface of the lip
Keywords: morphology micromorphology Maxillaria axillariinae rchidaceae
he genus Maxillaria uiz  av constitutes the core of the subtribe axillariinae enth
and the tribe axillarieae tzer rchidaceae uss ts representatives, in the broad sense
are distributed from outh lorida through entral merica and the aribbean slands to
outh merica southern to northern rgentina he genus was rst described by ipólito uiz
ópez and osé ntonio avón iménez in  in Flora Peruviana et Chilensis Prodromus he
publication included a brief description of the genus and an illustration with various views of
the ower and its parts nfortunately the authors did not indicate which of the sixteen species
mentioned in the text is illustrated his oversight resulted in the later taxonomic problems of
the entire subtribe axillariinae
nvestigations conducted since the middle of the th century revealed a great diversity of labellar
epidermises in many groups of orchids uch characters as papillae and trichomes could potentially
be used to serve as taxonomic characters he importance of foliar micromorphology is well known
and has already been utilized in the taxonomy of rchidaceae uss cited in 
 n contrast  studies on labellar epidermis are still quite neglected there is only one
study presented by     he main aim of this paper was the investigation
of the micromorphology of labellar epidermis in selected species of the genus Maxillaria s l
Classification
eneric classication of the subtribe axillariinae has been a challenge for the taxonomists
since its formal description by uiz and avón  et al  or a long time it has
been suspected that it is an assemblage of taxa consisting of morphologically disparate groups of
species  et al  stablishing the exact number of species belonging to the various

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
genera or even the subtribe itself is extremely dicult since it depends mainly on the adopted
classication system and the concept of a genus t is said that Maxillaria s l covers about ⁄of the
species belonging to the subtribe   ccording to various researchers it contains
   to  species   ver the last  years Maxillaria has
been expanded and contracted based on morphological features to embrace or reject a number
of taxa eg         
et al   et al   et al   et al  ore recently
phylogenetic analyses based on molecular techniques have redened this subtribe and realigned
the species genera and sections which it contains avies  pers comm
n the latest classication     suggested another way of classifying
Maxillaria s l hey concluded that narrowly dened genera are often dicult to diagnose
especially when the material is designated only to the genus level hey have decided to merge
all the presently recognized taxa under a megagenus Maxillaria
Morphology
epresentatives of Maxillaria s l vary widely both vegetatively and orally and are characterized
by the wide range of combinations of both set of features lants are usually epiphytic sometimes
lithophytic or terrestrial hey are always herbaceous with monopodial sympodial or dimorphic
growth forms abit may be caespitose or rhizomatous erect or less frequently pendent ome
species are caespitose at the juvenile stage becoming rhizomatous with age oots are glabrous
velamentous and usually branching he stem is rhizomatous mainly branching or erect cane
like and lacking pseudobulbs hen present pseudobulbs are usually ovoid to cylindrical laterally
compressed unifoliate often clustered along the rhizome and subtended by several imbricating
sheaths either foliaceous or not eaves are variable in form conduplicate to semiterete articulate
with the sheaths or with the apex of the pseudobulb hey can be sessile to petiolate oblong
oblongelliptic or often linear subterete elliptic or obovoid acute to obtuse symmetrical to
unequally bilobed at the apex he abscission layer of the apical leaf often projects above the
pseudobulb in a persistent stalk phyllopodium norescences are always singleowered
arising from the base of the pseudobulb or laterally from the nonpseudobulbous stem singly
or fasciculate he peduncle is usually enclosed in equidistant bractlike scales loral bracts
are either similar in size and shape to the peduncle scales larger or much smaller he owers
are minute to large with sepals and petals being free to the base glabrous often ringent he
vascular bundles of the tepals are often elastic brous and very strong he lip is usually much
shorter than the tepals often hinged with the columnfoot or sometimes rigidly attached to it
entire or lobed glabrous or pubescent he gynostemium is stout usually with or occasionally
without a prominent foot our pollinia are superposed in two pairs those of a pair are equal
or unequal attached via sticky caudicles to a distinct often more or less lunate viscidium he
fruit is subglobose to ellipsoid dehiscing laterally or apically
Reproductive biology of Maxillaria s. l.
he main pollinators of Maxillaria are stingless bees eliponini    
  part from them visits of bees from the subtribe uglossini ants from the
subfamily onerinae and hummingbirds have also been observed   ccording to
      Maxillaria etcheriana olfe is pollinated by the bumblebee

    
Bombus volucelloidesMaxillaria rufescens indl M. grandiora unth indl and M. sanderiana
chb f ex ander by Eulaema cingulata and Maxillaria reichenheimiana ndres  chb f by
Trigona testacea and T. amalthea.
t is estimated that as much as  of the Maxillaria species attract pollinators with empty
promises which are the combination of visual tactile and olfactory stimuli  et al 
mong the species which oer some kind of reward there are three types nectar pseudopollen
farina and waxlike substances  et al a t is believed that orchids which secrete
nectar can even double their chances of pollination and thus the formation of the fruits and
seeds ts production however is costly in terms of expended energy and used materials ntil
recently it has been believed that none of the species included in Maxillaria s l produces nectar
otwithstanding it has been found in several taxa eg Ornithidium coccineum acq alisb ex
 r and Maxillaria anceps mes   chweinf  et al  estimate that within the
genus only  of the species produce nectar
n the lip surface of some Maxillaria species there is a whitish mealy coating called pseudopollen
as it resembles real pollen t is produced by fragmentation of the trichomes ccording to many
researchers it is produced in species which do not produce nectar or any other reward arina is
common in the representatives of the M. grandioraM. splendens and M. discolor alliances t is
believed that bees collect it from owers because of the nutrients it contains  et al 
hese include starch oils and proteins       ccording to 
et al   of the taxa studied by them produce pseudopollen and  have trichomes
with a slightly dierent construction but similar function
ewards in form of wax and resinous substances rich in lipids and aromatic amino acids occur
in about  of species  et al  he secretions are produced by oral papillae
and trichomes on the surface of the lip       suggested that these
substances are collected by bees as material for nest building t is probably the correct assumption
but it seems that this may be not the only reason for the insects acquiring waxy substances s
noticed by  et al a due to the nutritional value waxes and resins can also be a
source of food substances hey were found on lip surface of Maxillaria cerifera arb odr
Maxillaria divaricata arb odr ogn and Maxillaria avoviridis arb odr ccording to
various authors the latter two taxa are synonymous with M. cerifera dditional function of
waxy substances is predicted in Maxillaria acuminata alliance hese secretions result in a glossy
surface of the lip which probably is involved in the process of attracting pollinators just like the
speculum in species of the genus Ophrys   et al a
o far there are no records of pseudocopulation for the genus Maxillaria in its narrow sense
  described it for Trigonidium obtusum indl which is classied on molecular
basis by some researchers as representative of Maxillaria s l echanism of pseudocopulation in
this particular case is quite unique as the deposit of pollinia does not occur as a result of insect
mating attempts with one of the elements of the ower but when it tries to get out of the trap
ower he only observed pollinators visiting the owers of T. obtusum were male bees of Plebeia
droryana eliponini t seems that a key stimulus in this case is the smell uring very warm
days the owers of this species emit a sweet scent to some extent reminiscent of the aroma of
lemons   ince the surface of the sepals and petals is covered by a substance similar
to wax landing insects glide and become trapped inside the ower hey spend from  to 

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
seconds in the perianth   o be released they must enter the space between the
gynostemium and lip and receive pollinia resultantly ollination occurs when insect falls into
the trap ower bearing pollinia brought from another ower he fact that ying drones try to
copulate with males that had landed earlier on the tepals led   to prejudge that this
case is actual pseudocopulation 
lowers of species that are pollinated by birds tend to be coloured from red to pink from orange
up to yellow or white rarely reddishpurple or blue hey produce abundant nectar but do not
emit odour or create nectar pathways o far there is no conclusive evidence for ornithophily in
Maxillaria ll reports on this topic are based on a single observation made by   
  who observed the hummingbird Panterpe insignis visiting an unidentied species
of Maxillaria with pink tubular owers ccording to  et al   owers
of Maxillaria coccinea and M. sophronitis in terms of morphology meet a range of criteria
characteristic of the hummingbirdpollinated owers pollinated by birds but dier from those
in the presence of sweet honey scent
Materials and methods
ips from owers of  species classied in Maxillaria s l were studied he owers were preserved
in ew  ethanol   formaldehyde   glycerol   water or openhagen mixtures
 ethanol   glycerine   water and were obtained from otanical ardens eidelberg
annover arburg and ienna and were deposited at the epartment of lant axonomy and
ature onservation of the niversity of dańsk he list of vouchers is presented in able 
loral material preserved in ew or openhagen mixtures was dehydrated using an ethanol series
ollowing criticalpoint drying in a ritical oint ryer mitech  apparatus specimens
were mounted onto  stubs he stubs were coated with gold using a putter oater pi
odule he samples were examined and photographed using a hilips  canning lectron
icroscope
n the  study the terminology of surface characters was used in accordance with previously
published literature eg  et al      
 he scientic names follow the classication of   
Results
Maxillaria section Aggregatae Pfitzer
Maxillaria callichroma chb f onplandia   
Maxillaria callichroma ig  has a lobed lip elliptic in general outline up to  cm long and
 cm wide he lateral lobes are erectincurved obliquely ovate obtuserounded he middle
lobe is elliptic obtuse and distinctly keeled below t is up to  cm long he callus extends from
the lip base to the middle lobe and is broadly obtuserounded in front pubescent throughout
he base of the adaxial lip surface as well as the callus is composed of multicellular trichomes
being in dierent developmental stages ig  – from clavate papillae to single or clustered
liform and clavate trichomes apillae are observed also between the trichomes ig  he
dierence concerns the coverage density and the length of the trichomes he highest density and
length are at the middle lobe base whereas at the top of the callus only few unicellular trichomes

    
have been noticed ig  he surface of the callus is built by polygonal convex cells covered
by the lm of secretory material ig  he median part of the lip consists of clavate and
obpyriform papillae ig – he proximal part is rugose ig  covered by obpyriform
papillae heir accumulation is found near the base of the lip as well as near the apex of the middle
lobe where the shape of these is usually rounded he surface in some places seems to be folded
what can be due to aggregations of idioblasts with raphides in the subepidermis and in the whole
tissue ig  he abaxial outer surface of the lip is also covered by few trichomes ig 
Maxillaria luteoalba indl rchid inden  
Maxillaria luteoalba ig  has a lobed lip elliptic in general outline t is about – cm
long and  – cm wide he sidelobes are erectincurved rectangular and obtuse he middle
lobe is transverse broadly ovate and obtuse he callus is oblong obtuse extending from the base
of the lip to about ⅓ of its length and abruptly elevates at the apex he median part of the lip
base is densely covered adaxially with trichomes ig  t the base dierent developmental
stages of the trichomes occur from obpyriform papillae elongated twocelled trichomes to long
multicellular uniseriate and sometimes dichotomously divided ig   he sidelobes are
glabrous in general view but their margins on the inner adaxial surface ig  are densely
covered with obpyriform papillae and single twocelled trichomes ig 
Table 1.he vouchers list of the materials used for the research
ection pecies ccession umber in  spirit collection
Aggregatae tzer Maxillaria callichroma p
Maxillaria luteoalba p
Arachnites hristenson Maxillaria reichenheimiana p
Cucullatae hristenson Maxillaria cucullata p
Maxillaria praestans p
Ebulbes tzer Maxillaria graminifolia p
Maxillaria ramosa p
Erectae tzer Maxillaria ponerantha p
Maxillaria tenuifolia* p
Multiorae hristenson Maxillaria ochroleuca p
Ornithidium alisb hristenson Maxillaria aurea p p
Maxillaria purpureolabia p
Repentes tzer
Maxillaria marginata p
Maxillaria picta p
Maxillaria cf mosenii* p
Rufescens hristenson Maxillaria rufescens p
Urceolatae hristenson Maxillaria vitelliniora p
Trigonae hristenson Maxillaria pterocarpa* p
randiora omplex Maxillaria molitor* p
Maxillaria striata* p

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
Maxillaria section Arachnites Christenson
Maxillaria reichenheimiana ndrés  chb f ard hron  gric azette  

he lip of Maxillaria reichenheimiana ig  is lobed elliptic sparsely pubescent and about
 – cm long and  – cm wide he lateral lobes are erect and obliquely oblong he middle
lobe is broadly ovate with a thinner margin obtuse he callus ig  is linearoblong and
extends from the base of the lip to above the middle he lip apex is rugose built by obpyriform
papillae ig – ome trichomes are scattered on the lip and callus ig – hey consist
Figure 1. Maxillaria callichroma chb f verview of the owers hoto credit arkus ngler  – multicellular
trichomes  – top of the callus with few unicellular trichomes  – closeup on the callus edge with unicellular
trichomes  – surface of the callus built by polygonal convex cells covered by a lm of secretory material  –median
part of the lip consists of clavate and obpyriform papillae  – surface in some places seems to be folded what can
be due to aggregations of idioblasts with raphides in the subepidermis and in the whole tissue  – proximal part
rugose covered by obpyriform papillae  – abaxial outer surface of lip covered by few trichomes cale bars =  m
 –  m  
    

Figure 2. Maxillaria luteoalba indl – and Maxillaria reichenheimiana ndrés  chb f –  – overview
of the ower hoto credit ohn arigos  – general view of the lip base densely covered adaxially with trichomes
 – dierent stages of trichome development from obpyriform papillae elongated twocelled trichomes to long
multicellular uniseriate trichomes  – elongated twocelled and long multicellular uniseriate trichomes sometimes
dichotomously divided  – overview of the lateral lobe surface  – closeup of the lateral lobe surface obpyriform
papillae and single twocelled trichomes  – overview of the ower hoto credit aniel claren  – closeup of
the midlobe surface with callus scattered trichomes  – rugose lip apex built by obpyriform papillae  – lip surface
rugose built by obpyriform papillae  – closeup of the  or morecelled trichomes scattered on the lip and callus
cale bars = mm   mm    m     m   

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
of  or more cells ig      previously observed bicellular trichomes
on the lip and stated that they morphologically resemble the food hairs of Polystachya ook
described by  et al 
robable pollinators of this species are Trigona testacea and T. amalthea

Maxillaria section Cucullatae Christenson
Maxillaria cucullata indl dwardss ot eg  t  
he lip of Maxillaria cucullata ig  is lobed and from  up to  cm long he side
lobes are erectincurved obliquely elliptic obtuserounded and about ⅓ of the lip length he
middle lobe is elliptic obtuserounded he callus is conspicuous broadly oblong and slightly
shaped in transverse section he lip surface is glabrous papillose only at the callus surface he
conical papillae are in dierent stages of development ig  ccording to 
 M. cucullata indl M. hematoglossa  ich  aleottii and M. lexarzana oto renas 
 hiang all representatives of the Maxillaria cucullata alliance have glabrous labella completely
devoid of papillae hey pointed out that in M. meleagris indl which is thought to be closely
related to the members of discussed alliance the labellum is papillose covered with conical
papillae with pointed tips ince M. cucullata is thought to be a quite variable species this may
cause problems with a correct taxonomic identication ndeed there was a time when nearly all
of the species in the section had been included in the highly variable M. cucullata
 t can be however easily distinguished from similar species by almost wholly unmarked
sepals and petals ig  and this ts the description of the ower used in this research
Maxillaria praestans chb f ard hron ns   
he lip of Maxillaria praestans ig  is lobed and somewhat curved t is about  cm long
he middle lobe is big rounded in general outline he lateral lobes are upcurved he callus is
thick and eshy with raised sides from the base and a smooth surface ig  he lip surface
of M. praestans is papillose foldedrugose near the apex ig   sometimes with celled
trichomes he folds consist of cuboidal cells ig  he lip base is densely covered with
obpyriform to villiform papillae ig  
Maxillaria section Ebulbes Pfitzer
Maxillaria graminifolia unth chb f nn ot yst   
he lip of Maxillaria graminifolia ig  is unlobed and lightly constricted at the middle to
obscurely lobed with the blade narrower above the central constriction n general outline it
is broadly obtuse roundedsubtruncate sometimes slightly notched at the apex and retuse t is
about   cm long and   cm wide he callus is eshy glossy with knoblike apex
he lip surface is papillose densely covered with papillae on both adaxial inner and abaxial
outer surfaces ig  he shape of the papillae varies from obpyriform conical to villiform
ig  ear the median part trichomelike papillae are observed he surface of the callus
is rather glabrous but some multicellular moniliform trichomes are present ig  hey
consist of at least  cells whereas the apical cell seems to be the secretory one ased only on
their morphology they could potentially play a similar role as food hairs esidues of some kind
of secretion are observed on both papillae and trichomes ig 
    

Figure 3. Maxillaria cucullata indl – and Maxillaria praestans chb f –  – overview of the owers
hoto credit ohn arigos  – conical papillae in dierent stages of development  – overview of the ower of
Maxillaria a praestans hoto credit oss ayton  – view of the lip apex and callus  – lip surface papillose
foldedrugose near the apex  – folds consisting of cuboidal cells  – lip base densely covered with obpyriform to
villiform papillae  – closeup of the lip base densely covered with obpyriform to villiform papillae cale bars =  mm
  m  , G  m   m 

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
Figure 4. Maxillaria graminifolia unth chb f – and Maxillaria ramosa uiz  av –  – overview of the
owers hoto credit ric unt  – papillose lip surface covered with papillae on both adaxial inner and abaxial
outer surfaces  – various shapes of the papillae obpyriform conical and villiform  – surface of the callus rather
glabrous with some multicellular moniliform trichomes  – papillae covered with residues of secretion of some
kind  – overview of the ower of Maxillaria a ramosa hoto credit ric unt  – view of the lip  – view of
the lip apex and gynostemium  – closeup of the lip surface somewhat folded built by obpyriform papillae cale
bars = mm    m     m   m 

    
Maxillaria ramosa uiz  av yst eget l eruv hil   
he lip of Maxillaria ramosa ig  is lobed elliptic in general outline t is up to  cm long
and  cm wide he lateral lobes are erect obliquely obovate and obtuserounded he middle
lobe is oblongrectangular obtusesubtruncate he callus ig –  is oblong and extends
from the base of the lip to the base of the middle lobe he lip surface is slightly papillose t is
glabrous rugose and built by obpyriform papillae in its proximal and median parts ig –
o presence of any secretory material has been noticed
Maxillaria section Erectae Pfitzer
Maxillaria ponerantha chb f onplandia   
he lip of Maxillaria ponerantha ig  is unlobed to obscurely lobulate by the suberect
incurved lateral margins and light constriction above the middle of the blade t is obovate in
general outline obtuse and very shallowly notched at the apex he callus is low oblanceolate
Figure 5. Maxillaria ponerantha chb f  – overview of the ower of Maxillaria a ponerantha hoto credit ohn
arigos  – view of the lip and callus  – front view of the glabrous callus and median lip part  – minutely
papillose margins  – closeup of the lip apex with villiform conical and sometimes obpyriform papillae at the margins
oldedrugose surface some of the papillae occur in aggregations of more than  cells forming threedimensional
starlike clusters  – outer surface of the lip is covered by conical papillae cale bars =  mm   mm   m
   m 

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
and extends from the base of the lip ig  to its middle part he callus and median lip part
are glabrous ig  t is  cm long and  cm wide he margins are minutely papillose
ig  – he shapes of the papillae at the margins are villiform and conical sometimes
obpyriform ig  he surface in this region is foldedrugose and some of the papillae occur
in aggregations of more than  cells forming threedimensional starlike clusters ig  he
outer surface of the lip is covered by conical papillae ig  iterature data support at least
partly the results presented above and according to     the lip is clothed
by conical and villiform papillae
Maxillaria tenuifolia indl dwardss ot eg  sub t  
pecies unplaced in any section proposed by hristenson but it seems that it belongs to Maxillaria
section Erectae tzer
he lip of Maxillaria tenuifolia ig  is unlobed to obscurely pandurate by way of a slight
constriction above the middle t is elliptic obtuse – cm long and –  cm wide he
callus is broadly oblong and extends from the base of the lip ig  to about ⅓ of its length
he lip surface including callus ig  is densely papillose ig – covered by villiform
papillae he one occurring near the lip center seem to be longer than the one near the sides he
presence of some remnants of secretion has been noticed ig  – ccording to  
  the lip of Maxillaria tenuifolia is heterogeneous his means that the epidermis
is composed by more than one type of cells     reported that conical
papillae occur on the column and anther cap and the lip surface is covered with villiform papillae
what supports the results presented above s     pointed out the
structure of the labellar epidermis is constant regardless of whether the typical red form or yellow
one is examined
Maxillaria section Multiflorae Christenson
Maxillaria ochroleuca odd ex indl en p rchid l  
he lip of Maxillaria ochroleuca ig  is thick and eshy narrowly rhomboidovate slightly
pubescent above with subcordate base ear the middle it is deeply lobed ateral lobes are
large oblong with rounded apices heir margins are at nonundulate he terminal lobe is
thick broadly ligulate with rounded apices ts margins are undulate and thinly crenulate he
callus is thick ligulate ig  with shortened apex t extends from the base to the middle
part of the lip hort multicellular and uniseriate trichomes are scattered on the lip ig –
hey consist of  to  cells he lip surface of M. ochroleuca is papillose densely covered with
obpyriform and clavate papillae ig – n some places the surface is somewhat folded
rugose ig      and     observed on the
lip the presence of obpyriform papillae and simple uniseriate trichomes consisting of   cells
ccording to  et al  b it is speculated solely on morphological grounds
that these hairs may become detached or fragmented to form pseudopollen ndeed inger has
observed workers of Trigona bees collecting these hairs from the tip of the labellum  inger
pers comm in     e had also reported that they were chewed and stored
in a pastelike form on the corbiculae urthermore inger stated that the bees actually collected
papillae rather than hairs as the labellar papillae of the closely related M. buchtienii chltr are
known to contain starch

    
Figure 6. Maxillaria tenuifolia indl – and Maxillaria ochroleuca odd ex indl –  – overview of the
owers  – overview of the lip apex  – closeup of the lip and callus surface covered by villiform papillae   –
some remnants of secretion visible on papillae  – overview of the ower hoto credit uiz ilipe arella  – view
of the lip base and callus with scattered short multicellular and uniseriate trichomes  – closeup of papillose lip
densely covered with obpyriform and clavate papillae in some places somewhat foldedrugose  – closeup of the
trichomes cale bars = mm    mm   m   m   

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
Maxillaria section Ornithidium (Salisb.) Christenson
Maxillaria aurea oepp  ndl  illiams aldasia   
he lip of Maxillaria aurea ig  is rigid eshy with the margins of the upper part incurved
and wavy giving the appearance of being lobed t is  – cm long and   cm wide when
Figure 7. Maxillaria aurea oepp  ndl  illiams – and Maxillaria purpureolabia  ennett 
hristenson –  – overview of the owers hoto credit urt uzard  – general view of the lip apex  –
papillose lip surface obpyriform mainly in proximal part to conical and villiform papillae  – obpyriform papillae
on the lip surface  – overview of the ower  – overview of the lip  – slightly papillose lip surface  – lip apex
covered with obpyriform and conical papillae cale bars =  mm   mm    m    m 

    
extended he median smooth callus expands on the basal half of the lip length and is oblong
ligulate in general outline ig  he labellum surface is papillose ig  – bpyriform
mainly in proximal part to conical and villiform on margins in lateral parts papillae have been
observed hey are found at both lateral and middle lobes of the lip apillae are obpyriform in
general outline ig – o presence of wax or other secretion could be found
Maxillaria purpureolabia  enn  hristenson c rchid eruv pl  
he lip of Maxillaria purpureolabia ig  is obscurely lobed elliptic in general outline and
it is about  cm long and  cm wide he lateral lobes are erect obliquely oblanceolate and
obtuse he middle lobe is broadly ovate and obtuse he callus ig  is oblongellipsoid
obtusetruncate and extends from the base of the lip to about its middle he lip surface is slightly
papillose ig – he lip apex is covered with obpyriform and conical papillae ig 
he papillae seem to occur on both top and bottom side of the lip
Maxillaria section Repentes Pfitzer
Maxillaria marginata enzl l erres ard urope    –
Maxillaria marginata ig  has a lobed lip elliptic in general outline and it is up to  cm
long and  cm wide he lateral lobes are obliquely obovate and obtuserounded he middle
lobe is oblongelliptic obtuserounded he callus ig  is oblong obtuserounded and
extends from the base of the lip to its middle part below the base of the middle lobe he
lip surface is papillose covered with obpyriform papillae and celled trichomes with clavate
terminal cells ig – esidues of some kind of secretion have been observed on the apex
of the lip ig  orkers of Trigona sp pidae eliponini have been observed during
the pollination of the owers of this species       
 reported that there is no evidence for the presence of trichomes or any food rewards in
the owers of M. marginata what has been clearly undermined by our results
Maxillaria picta ook ot ag  t  
Maxillaria picta ig  has a lobed lip broadly elliptic in general outline t is  cm long
and  cm wide he lateral lobes are erectincurved transversely elliptic and obtuserounded he
middle lobe is ellipticovate obtuserounded and slightly crenulated he lip surface including
the callus is papillose t is densely covered by clavate conical and villiform papillae ig –
he lower part of the callus is almost glabrous with villiform papillae occurring occasionally
ig  ts middle part is densely covered by conical and clavate papillae with strongly rounded
tips scattered between them ome trichomes probably consisting of  or more cells with globose
or elliptic top cells have been observed ig  he owers of M. picta are strongly scented
emitting honeylike fragrance ccording to     they do not produce
nectar or any other reward     reported that its lip is lacking trichomes
but is heavily clothed with villiform papillae M. picta is pollinated by the stingless bee Trigona
spinipes   t is suspected that the papillae produce an intoxicating
fragrance which facilitates pollination by partially anaesthetizing the insect   
 ccording to  et al  and  et al  it is composed mostly of
linalool phenylacetaldehyde and bocimene   investigated the
anatomy of the resinsecreting and putative resinmimic species including M. picta heir research
revealed that the conical villiform or subclavate epidermal papillae located on the adaxial labellar

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
Figure 8. Maxillaria marginata enzl – and Maxillaria picta ook –  – overview of the ower  –
overview of the medial part of the lip  – obpyriform papillae and celled trichomes with clavate terminal cells
 – closeup of the celled trichome with clavate terminal cell and residues of some kind of secretion  – overview of
the ower of Maxillaria a picta  – lip surface densely covered by clavate conical and villiform papillae  – lower
part of the callus almost glabrous with villiform papillae occurring occasionally  – trichomes consisting of at least
two cells with globose or elliptic top cell cale bars = mm  –  m   m   m 

    
surface function as secretory tissue hat is more the presence of the labellar secretion has been
demonstrated based on combined light scanning and transmission electron microscopy and
histochemistry results t is thought to be the fragrance residues
Maxillaria cf mosenii raenzl onigl venska et cad ns   t  f  
pecies unplaced in any of the sections proposed by hristenson but it seems that it belongs to
the section Repentes hristenson
he lip of Maxillaria mosenii ig  is obovate to oblanceolate obscurely lobed and about
 cm long and  cm wide he middle lobe is orbicular with rounded apex which can be retuse
he callus is oblong  – mm long and extends slightly above the ⅓ of the lip length he
adaxial inner surface of the lip base ig  and callus ig  of Maxillaria cf mosenii is
glabrous he surface towards the margins is rugose and at the margins densely covered with
conical papillae which are gathered in threedimensional clusters ig – resembling
somewhat a sea anemone s  et al  reported M. mosenii raenzl has conical
labellar papillae and no presence of trichomes has been demonstrated ccording to the authors
M. mosenii raenzl var hatschbachii chltr oehne possesses conical papillae on the column
anther cap as well as on the lip he papillae contain proteins but neither lipids nor starch
Maxillaria section Rufescens Christenson
Maxillaria rufescens indl dwardss ot eg  sub t 
he lip of Maxillaria rufescens ig  is lobed ellipticovate in general outline t is  cm
long and  cm wide he lateral lobes are erectincurved obliquely ovate acute and about
half of the lip length he middle lobe is rectangular roundedtruncate he callus ig  is
oblong and extends from the base of the lip to below the base of the middle lobe he lip surface
is papillose covered with clavate papillae on the callus and near the central part of the middle
lobe ig  and on the whole surface with obpyriform papillae ig  – he remnants
of secreted material have been observed ig  his observations are strongly supported by
already published data ccording to     the shape of labellar papillae can
be clavate or obpyriform they contain protein lipids and starch he presence of the latter one
is common among other members of this alliance he labellar surface is generally clothed with
obpyriform papillae hose located towards the center of the lip are clavate and much larger by
distended apices     hey stated that these papillae at the center of the lip
often contain more starch than the others t is thought that the papillae produce an intoxicating
fragrance which can partially anaesthetize the insect and thus facilitates pollination  
    reported the vanillin production in M. rufescens hey pointed also to
another theory even in species which at rst sight seem to be rewardless food substances may
be present but located within papillae and are only accessible to gnawing insects owever there
is no direct evidence for this his could be the case in M. rufescens where according to 
 the unicellular hairs have delicate walls and contain aleurone grains and oil droplets
ccording to   no presence of trichomes has been observed n opposite
observation was made by     esearchers observed clusters of tightly
packed short to long unicellular claviform yellowish trichomes on the lip surface mainly in
the middle lobe region esearch conducted by  et al  supported this observation
and revealed that M. rufescens produce some reward trichomes for its pollinators

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
Figure 9. Maxillaria rufescens indl – and Maxillaria mosenii raenzl –  – overview of the ower hoto
credit ddie halen  – view of the lip base  – papillose lip surface covered with clavate papillae on the callus and
near the central part of the middle lobe with visible remnants of secreted material  – closeup of the callus visible
remnants of secreted material and clavate papillae  – lip surface covered with obpyriform papillae  – overview of
the ower hoto credit uis enato  – glabrous adaxial inner surface of the lip base and callus  – adaxial
inner surface of the lip apex and callus rugose towards the margins and at the margins densely covered with conical
papillae gathered in threedimensional clusters  – closeup of conical papillae gathered in threedimensional clusters
cale bars = mm     mm   m   m   m 

    
Maxillara section Urceolatae Christenson
Maxillaria vitelliniora arb odr en p rchid ov   
he lip of Maxillaria vitelliniora ig  is unlobed broadly oblong in general outline
arching with shallowly suberect lateral margins obtuse with minute apical notch t is  cm
long and  cm wide he callus is an indistinct central thickened pad ig  he apex
of the lip is covered with obpyriform papillae ig  he lip surface is partly papillose ts
margins are clothed with conical and villiform papillae ig  he basal and median part
is completely devoid of them o presence of secretion or any other kind of reward has been
observed vailable literature data seem to support presented results ccording to 
  conical and obpyriform papillae occur on the column and anther cap and the
lip is covered with conical papillae s     reported the owers of this
species are rewardless what is upheld by the results presented above
Maxillaria section Trigonae Christenson
Maxillaria pterocarpa arb odr en p rchid ov   
pecies unplaced in any of the sections proposed by hristenson but it seems to belong to
Maxillaria section Trigonae hristenson
he lip of Maxillaria pterocarpa ig  is obscurely lobed elliptic in general outline
up to  cm long and  cm wide with incurved sides he middle lobe is broadly ovate to
suborbicular acute minutely warty with the warts arranged in rows he callus is oblong
somewhat dilated towards the apex obtuserounded t extends from the base of the lip to beyond
its middle reaches about ⅔ of the lip length he lip surface is papillose near the apex and margins
ig – but the median part is glabrous he shape of papillae is villiform he ones near
the edge of the lip are sometimes fused together in pairs ig  he remnants of secretion
are visible on the papillae ig 
‘Grandiflora Complex
Maxillaria molitor chb f ard hron ser    
pecies unplaced in any of the sections proposed by   but it seems that it
belongs to the ‘randiora omplex’
he lip of Maxillaria molitor ig  is unlobed but appears to be lobed due to the folding
t is elliptic in general outline and up to  cm long and  cm wide he lateral margins are
suberect he middle lobe is elliptic obtuse concave with undulate margins he callus is
broadly oblong and extends from the base of the lip to its middle part oth lip surfaces are
papillose he abaxial outer surface is densely covered by elliptical and villiform papillae
sometimes dichotomously divided ig  he adaxial inner surface at the base is formed
by parallel arranged conical papillae with striated cuticle ig – he callus is covered by
obpyriform to globose papillae ig  bundant masses of pseudopollen have been observed
on the adaxial surface of both middle including callus and lateral lobes ig   –
seudopollen grains are lemonshaped attached together in moniliform chains with distended
cuticle and remnants of secreted material ig  n the transverse section large cells most
probably idioblasts were noticed under the single layer of epidermis ig  ccording to

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
    on the lip surface of M. molitor obpyriform papillae and moniliform
trichomes are present urthermore they pointed that wherever pseudopollenforming trichomes
occur labellar papillae tend to be obpyriform he component cells of the pseudopollen are
Figure 10. Maxillaria vitelliniora arb odr – and Maxillaria pterocarpa arb odr –  – overview of
the ower hoto credit uiz ilipe arella  – view of the lip  – view of the lip apex covered with obpyriform
papillae  – lip margins clothed with conical and villiform papillae  – overview of the ower hoto credit ohn
arigos  – view of the lip  – view of the lip apex with visible remnants of secretion on the papillae  – villiform
papillae at the lip apex near the edge of the lip sometimes fused together in pairs cale bars = mm   mm 
 m    

    
lemonshaped and squat in appearance with distinct polar papillae seudopollen contains protein
and starch but no lipid  et al 
Maxillaria striata olfe rchid ev   
pecies unplaced in any section proposed by   according to him it belongs
to the ‘randiora omplex
he lip of Maxillaria striata ig  is obscurely lobed elliptic acute to obtuse t is about
  cm long he lateral lobes are suberect he middle lobe has undulate margins he
callus is oblong and extends to ⅔ of the lip length he lip surface is papillose he base and
the sides of the lip are covered with conical and villiform papillae arranged in rows ig 
he lip surface is covered by obpyriform ig  and conical papillae ig  owards
the median part grains of pseudopollen ig – occur more abundantly reaching a peak
in the middle part of the middle lobe t appears that pseudopollen is formed from obpyriform
papillae ndeed some researchers connect the presence of the latter one with the occurrence of
pseudopollen lmost all papillae and pseudopollen grains are covered with residues of secretion
of some kind ig  – esults presented above are supported by already published literature
data     reported that on the lip surface of Maxillaria striata villiform
papillae occur ccording to  et al  its pseudopollen contain protein but no
starch n their opinion based on light microscopy observations there is slight but unconvincing
evidence for the presence of lipids
Discussion
he results of labellar micromorphology studies of Maxillaria reichenheimiana, M. cucullata,
M. ponerantha, M. tenuifolia, M. ochroleuca, M. marginataM. picta M. rufescensM. mosenii,
M. vitelliniora, M. molitor and M. striata generally conrm those previously obtained by 
and coworkers      et al   et al ab  
    or  and coworkers   
  et al     
Comparison within the sections
Section Aggregatae Pfitzer. p to date  more representatives of section Aggregatae have been
examined Maxillaria robusta and M. parkeri according to     oer no
reward to their pollinators Maxillaria cf setigera possesses conical papillae and simple –celled
trichomes at the column the same type of papillae occurs at the anther cap and obpyriform
papillae with moniliform –celled trichomes at the lip surface have been observed  
  ccording to the same authors both labellar papillae and trichomes contain
starch and protein but no lipids     stated that Maxillaria triloris has
trichomes and papillae with pointed tips and they concentrate at the lip margins those structures
presented therein on the gures  – strongly resemble the ones observed in M. callichroma
in our research ater     examined another specimen of Maxillaria,
this time identied as cf triloris hey have observed obpyriform papillae on the lip surface and
simple –celled trichomes his resemblance between all three specimens of M. callichroma
M. triloris and M. cf triloris may lead to the conclusion that either both species are extremely
similar in respect of their micromorphology or some misidentication has been made what is

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
Figure 11. Maxillaria molitor chb f  – overview of the ower hoto credit ric unt  – villiform papillae
sometimes dichotomous with pseudopollen grain  – adaxial inner surface at the base is formed by parallel arranged
conical papillae  – closeup of the adaxial inner surface at the base with parallel arranged conical papillae with
striated cuticle  – masses of pseudopollen  – lemonshaped pseudopollen grains attached together in moniliform
chains  – lemonshaped pseudopollen grains with distended cuticle and remnants of secreted material 
pseudopollen grains cale bars = mm   m    m   m   

    
quite common in this group t seems that the presence of obpyriform papillae and trichomes is
conservative but not a unique character of this section
Section Arachnites Christenson. o far eight other species from relatively large section Arachnites
have been examined M. buchtienii possesses conical papillae at the column and anther cap and
obpyriform papillae as well as  celled trichomes on the lip surface    
ccording to the same authors labellar papillae contain protein and starch but no lipids these
substances are absent in trichomes ccording to  et al  spherical or obpyriform
epidermal papillae are confined to the distal part of the labellum and the callus in this species
and the uniseriate trichomes found on the lateral parts of the labellum are composed of three
to four elongate cells only n M. fractiexa conical papillae have been observed at the column
and anther cap additionally villiform and  celled trichomes on the lip M. lepidota indl
possesses obpyriform papillae with glands and –celled trichomes on the lip surface similar
structures occur in M. cf arachnites     he authors stated that in the rst
species labellar papillae as previously described by     become modied
into unicellular spherical glands hey observed that those are more abundant on the ventral
Figure 12. Maxillaria striata olfe  – overview of the ower  – conical papillae arranged in rows  – obpyriform
papillae arranged in rows  – papillae covered with residues of some kind of secretion  – masses of pseudopollen
visible residues of some kind of secretion  – single grain of pseudopollen cale bars =  m   m  
 m   m 

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
surface of the labellum than the dorsal ccording to them around the anther and stigmatic
surface papillae may become enlarged or swollen and appear to contain a thin layer of peripheral
cytoplasm and a large vacuole with watery cell sap that occupies most of the cell n many species
eg M. lindleyana chltr another member of the section many of these conical papillae are
replaced by villiform papillae some of which are curved like a scythe    
n the later paper  et al  stateed that in M. lepidota pseudopollen is present on the
adaxial and abaxial surfaces of the lip and is formed by the fragmentation of uniseriate moniliform
trichomes the four to six component cells of these trichomes are interspersed amongst typical
labellar obpyriform papillae between which occur enlarged secretory unicellular obpyriform to
spherical glands M. lindleyana has conical papillae at the column and the anther cap additionally
obpyriform ones occur on the lip surface as well s mentioned before many of these conical
papillae are replaced by villiform papillae        
report clusters of trichomes for this species but this may be as well misnaming of villiform
papillae found by    lc M. longissima has obpyriform papillae and moniliform
trichomes at the lip surface they contain protein and lipids but no starch 
 he same authors stated that solely on morphological grounds these trichomes might be
pseudopollenforming labellar hairs      et al  ab with
the fusiform component cells Maxillaria pseudoreichenheimiana has conical and villiform papillae
at the column obpyriform and villiform ones at the anther cap and obpyriform ones on the lip
surface as well as bicellular trichomes     orphologically these resemble
the food hairs described by  et al  for certain species of Polystachya apillae and
trichomes contain protein and the latter one probably also lipids    
stated that M. bradei another member of the section possess trichomes t seems that the presence
of the trichomes and obpyriform papillae is quite constant in this section the same as in section
Aggregatae
Section Cucullatae Christenson. ntil now two more species of section Cucullatae have been
examined M. hematoglossa and M. lexarzana he rst one possesses conical papillae at the
column surface conical and obpyriform ones at the anther cap and its lip is completely devoid
of any papilla     he same authors observed conical papillae only at
the anther cap of M. lexarzana    pointed out that in M. meleagris
indl which is thought to be closely related to the members of discussed section the labellum
is papillose covered with the conical papillae with pointed tips e have obviously observed
conical papillae on the lip surface in our research which may lead to the conclusion that some
identication errors might have occurred ndeed members of this group are often misidentied
and this may cause problems with correct taxonomic identication n fact there was a time
when nearly all of the species in the section were included in the highly variable M. cucullata
  owever M. cucullata can be easily distinguished from similar species
by almost wholly unmarked sepals and petals and this ts the description of the ower used in
our research hus to resolve this problem further investigations are needed n general and
according to     glabrous labella completely devoid of papillae were
found in M. cucullata, M. hematoglossa and M. lexarzana n M. praestans a species included by
hristenson to discussed section we observed that the lip base is densely covered with obpyriform
to villiform papillae t is therefore possible that a glabrous lip surface is neither a conservative
feature nor characteristic of this section

    
Section Erectae Pfitzer. nly two other members of section Erectae have been investigated n
Maxillaria procurrens indl conical papillae have been observed on the lip surface  
  Maxillaria variabilis has villiform and conical papillae at the column and lip
surface and conical ones at the anther cap     
  et al  onical papillae are most common thus they are not of taxonomic
importance t is worth to mention that species of the discussed section investigated by us have a
more diverse labellar epidermis because we observed for instance also villiform and obpyriform
papillae
Section Multiflorae Christenson. o far only two members of section Multiorae have been
examined M. chlorantha and M. splendens ccording to     members
of the M. splendens alliance have labella with uniseriate relatively fewcelled hairs   as well
as obpyriform papillae and it has been speculated that these hairs may become detached or
fragment to form pseudopollen  et al  ab istochemical analysis however
failed to demonstrate the presence of protein starch or lipids within such hairs in M. buchtienii
evertheless identical hairs occur in M. ochroleuca et al  he presence of
obpyriform papillae and multicellular trichomes seem to be a constant feature for the members
of this section since they have been observed also in M. ochroleuca    
Section Ornithidium (Salisb.) Christenson. nly one other species of section Ornithidium has
been examined to date n M. coccinea conical papillae have been observed at the anther cap and
lip surface although even papillose labella may have some glabrous regions   
 urthermore nectar production has also been demonstrated for this species 
et al 
Section Repentes Pfitzer. ight other species of section Repentes have been examined ccording
to     M. barbosae oefgr ex orto M. chrysantha arb odr
M. consanguinea lotzsch M. gracilis odd M. kautskyi abst M. phoenicanthera arb odr
M. porphyrostele chb f M. ubatubana oehne possess neither papillae nor trichomes 
  reported that in M. chrysantha conical papillae occur at the column and anther
cap he same authors stated that the labellar epidermis of M. chrysantha produces wax upon its
surface and this protects the plant from desiccation ccording to  et al  owers of
both M. picta and M. porphyrostele are highly fragrant and the callus epidermis consists mainly
of cuboidal cells lthough  and  analyses of both species revealed small quantities
of epidermal secretion this unlike other secretions was barely visible using fluorescence
microscopy and may have represented fragrance residues ie that component of the fragrance
that remains after the more volatile constituents have vaporized especially as parenchyma cells
of M. porphyrostele contained droplets of presumed terpenoids as well as cuticular pores similar
to those found in osmophores of Restrepia unth and Scaphosepalum fitzer 
   were occasionally observed  et al     
have also examined a specimen identied as M. cf gracilis hey observed conical papillae at
the column anther cap and lip t the latter one occurred also obpyriform papillae and simple
celled trichomes n the specimen of M. marginata used in our research the lip surface was
papillose covered with obpyriform papillae and celled trichomes with clavate terminal cells e
have also observed residues of some kind of secretion on the apex of the lip   
 reported that there is no evidence for the presence of trichomes or any food rewards in
the owers of M. marginata what clearly has been undermined by our results his may indicate

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
that some identication error might have occurred     reported that the
lip of M. picta is lacking trichomes but it is heavily clothed with villiform papillae  
  revealed that the conical villiform or subclavate epidermal papillae located
on the adaxial labellar surface function as secretory tissue s our research support the result
obtained by them in the case of papillae it does not support it in case of the trichomes since we
have observed some his may be caused either by the limited number of these as in the sample
examined by     they might be skipped or by the incompatibility of
the naming used
n our research the adaxial inner surface of the lip base and callus of Maxillaria cf mosenii is
glabrous he surface towards the margins is rugose and at the margins densely covered with
conical papillae which are gathered in the threedimensional clusters resembling somewhat a
sea anemone s  et al  reported M. mosenii raenzl has conical labellar papillae
and no presence of trichomes has been found ccording to the authors M. mosenii raenzl
var hatschbachii chltr oehne possesses conical papillae at the column anther cap as well as
on the lip he papillae contain proteins but neither lipids nor starch
Section Rufescens Christenson. ntil now six other species of section Rufescens have been
examined herever pseudopollenforming trichomes occur labellar papillae tend to be
obpyriform   owever this type of papilla may occur in the absence of
pseudopollen hairs as in M. rufescens indl M. acutifolia indl M. tenuibulba  hristenson
and M. moralesii arnevali  twood all members of discussed section 
 s     reported the apices of these in particular the larger central
papillae are greatly distended and the papillae obtain a clavate prole except M. hedwigae
amer  odson where the papillae tend to be somewhat fusiform or villiform oreover the
labella of M. acutifolia and M. tenuibulba produce a lipoidal secretion much like that found in
the M. acuminata alliance and some members of the M. discolor alliance  et al ab
n M. acutifolia labellar papillae are conical or obpyriform     with
secretory unicellular clavate papillae and hairs located centrally he latter are coated in secreted
material  et al  ccording to     M. hedwigae amer 
odson possesses fusiform and villiform papillae on the lip surface M. moralesii arnevali 
twood conical obpyriform and clavate ones and M. tenuibulba  hristenson obpyriform
ones at the column and anther cap and conical obpyriform and clavate papillae on the lip 
et al  also mentioned the presence of labellar hairs and a detached cuticle on the papillae
but cuticular pores were absent n M. chacoensis the epidermal papillae were clavate or villiform
and the surface secretion scant  et al  ccording to the same authors in M. richii
the adaxial secretory epidermis comprised unicellular secretory villiform or clavate papillae
or trichomes copiously coated more so than in M. acutifolia with secretion he presence of
obpyriform papillae seem to be constant but again it is not a unique feature of this section
Section Urceolatae Christenson. o date four other members have been of the section Urceolatae
ccording to     M. acicularis erb ex indl and M. juergensii chltr
possess neither papillae nor trichomes n M. seidelii abst conical and obpyriform papillae
occur at the column conical obpyriform and villiform ones at the anther cap and conical ones
on the lip     n M. vernicosa arb odr conical papillae occur at the
column anther cap and lip surface     n M. vitelliniora the apex of
the lip is covered with obpyriform papillae he lip surface is partly papillose ts margins are

    
clothed with conical and villiform papillae vailable literature data seem to support the obtained
results ccording to     conical and obpyriform papillae occur on the
column and anther cap and the lip is covered with conical papillae s   
 reported the owers of this species are rewardless what is upheld by the results presented
above onical papillae are most common he glabrous lip is not common but still not unique
to this section
‘Grandiflora Complex’. o far nine members of the informal complex ‘randiora’ have been
studied M. elegantula olfe possesses conical and villiform papillae at the column obpyriform
papillae and moniliform trichomes on the lip     M. fucata chb f has
obpyriform papillae and moniliform trichomes on the lip surface which consist of fusiform
component cells     n general the lip surface is largely papillose and
trichomes are scanty  et al  n M. huebschii the uniseriate moniliform trichomes
also occur mainly on the adaxial surface of the lip and are composed of up to seven spherical
component cells hose towards the base of the trichome however are elliptical or lemonshaped
 et al  n M. grandis pseudopollen is distributed predominantly on the adaxial
surface of the labellum but some pseudopollen is also present on the abaxial surface 
et al  ccording to  et al  it is formed by fragmentation of hairs arising
from the papillose epidermis ccording to the same authors both moniliform trichomes and
individual component cells or chains of cells are called pseudopollen when they become detached
from the labellum and form farina ach uniseriate pseudopollenforming moniliform trichome
usually consists of five to seven spherical component cells n M. roseola pseudopollenforming
moniliform trichomes arise as tufts from the adaxial papillose labellar epidermis which consists
of rounded to obpyriform papillae he basal cells of each trichome are elongate whereas those
towards the trichome apex are more or less spherical n M. irrorata chb f conical papillae
have been observed at the column and anther cap at the surface of the latter also villiform on
the lip obpyriform papillae and moniliform trichomes were found    
n M. johniana raenzl M cf lehmanii chb f and M. sanderiana chb f obpyriform and
moniliform trichomes were observed on the lip according to the same authors t is clearly
shown that the presence of obpyriform and moniliform trichomes is typical of members of the
‘randiora omplex’ he presence of this particular type of the papillae is not surprising
since wherever pseudopollenforming trichomes occur labellar papillae tend to be obpyriform
    n our research we have found other additional features such as
secretion conical and villiform papillae in both M. striata and M. molitor and elliptical papillae
in M. molitor
Conclusion
labrous labella are not common in Maxillaria and tend to occur mainly in species assigned to
the M. cucullata alliance     s     reported the
upper surface of the lip of M. chartacifolia mes   chweinf is glabrous whereas the lower
is papillose and covered with obpyriform papillae n members of the M. rufescens alliance the
obpyriform papillae have been found on the labellar surface whereas those towards the center
of the lip are clavate and much larger with distended apices     s
    predicted multiseriate trichomes which have been known so far
only in M. camaridii chb f and M. pulchra chltr  illiams ex orrell might be more

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
important as taxonomic characters n recent years avies has become less convinced that the
multiseriate hairs of M. camaridii are trichomes but merely projections from the labellar surface
which migth be the reason why they bear papillae  avies pers comm 
pecies examined in this study have been classied in  formal sections and one complex n all
taxa the presence of the papillae of various shapes has been demonstrated able  he most
common shape of the papillae is obpyriform and those have been noticed on the labellar surface
of  species including M. callichroma and M. luteoalba both from sect Aggregatae tzer
M. reichenheimiana sect Arachnites hristenson M. praestans sect Cucullatae hristenson
M. graminifolia and M. ramosa both placed in sect Ebulbes tzer M. ponerantha sect Erectae
tzer M. molitor probably sect Maxillaria uiz  av M. ochroleuca sect Multiorae
hristenson M. aurea and M. purpureolabia both placed in sect Ornithidium alisb
hristenson M. marginata sect Repentes tzer M. rufescens sect Rufescens hristenson
M. vitelliniora sect Urceolatae hristenson and M. striata ‘randiora omplex’ onical
papillae have been found on the lip surface of  species Maxillaria cucullata sect Cucullatae
M. graminifolia sect Ebulbes M. ponerantha sect Erectae M. molitor probably sect
Maxillaria M. aurea and M. purpureolabia both placed in sect Ornithidium M. picta and
M. cf mosenii both from sect Repentes M. vitelliniora classied most probably in section
Urceolatae hristenson and M. striata ‘randiora omplex’ illiform papillae were observed
also in  species M. praestans sect Cucullatae M. graminifolia sect Ebulbes M. ponerantha
and M. tenuifolia both most probably from sect Erectae M. molitor probably sect Maxillaria
M. aurea sect Ornithidium M. picta sect Repentes M. vitelliniora sect Urceolatae
M. pterocarpa probably sect Trigonae hristenson M. striata ‘randiora omplex’ lavate
papillae have been noted on the lip of only  species Maxillaria callichroma sect Aggregatae
M. ochroleuca sect Multiorae M. picta sect Repentes M. rufescens sect Rufescens lliptical
papillae occurred in one single species M. striata ‘randiora omplex’ richomes seem to
be limited to the species from  sections M. callichroma and M. luteoalba sect Aggregatae
M. reichenheimiana sect Arachnites M. graminifolia sect Ebulbes M. ochroleuca sect
Multiorae M. marginata and M. picta sect Repentes eward in the form of pseudopollen
has been recorded in M. molitor and M. striata both from ‘randiora omplex’ esidues
of some kind of secretion we observed on the lip surface of M. callichroma sect Aggregatae
M. graminifolia sect Ebulbes M. tenuifolia probably sect Erectae M. molitor probably sect
Maxillaria M. marginata sect Repentes M. pterocarpa probably sect Trigonae and M. striata
‘randiora omplex’ apillae occurred also on the outer surface of the lip of M. graminifolia
sect Ebulbes M. molitor probably sect Maxillaria M. aurea and M. purpureolabia both
placed in sect Ornithidium and M. striata ‘randiora omplex’
he papillae of Maxillaria are highly adaptable and full a variety of functions 
  hey play a role as attractants and guides for visiting insects using a combination
of visual olfactory and tactile cues ince some of them are rich in aromatic amino acids they can
provide rewards in the form of nectar or a viscid waxlike material or may be a part of protection
from desiccation and herbivorous insects he exact function of the papillae in a particular species
can only be established for certain by observing how pollinators respond to them in the eld
    ntil such data will be collected morphological studies can only
provide partial answers

    
Table 2. ummary of structures occurring on labellar epidermises of examined species pecies unplaced in any known
section by   
apillae on the
bottom side
seudopollen
ecretion on the
inner surface
richomes
inner surface
apillae inner surface
onical
lavate
bpyriform
lliptical
illiform
ection Aggregatae
Maxillaria callichroma × ×  × × 
Maxillaria luteoalba ××
Maxillaria cf setigera* × × ×
Maxillaria cf triloris* × ×
ection Arachnites
Maxillaria reichenheimiana ××
Maxillaria buchtienii × × ×
Maxillaria fractiexa × × ×
Maxillaria lepidota × ×
Maxillaria lindleyana ×××
Maxillaria longissima × ×
Maxillaria pseudoreichenheimiana × ×
ection Cucullatae
Maxillaria cucullata ×
Maxillaria praestans ××
ection Ebulbes
Maxillaria graminifolia × × × ×  ×  ×
Maxillaria ramosa × 
ection Erectae
Maxillaria ponerantha ×××
Maxillaria tenuifolia* ××
Maxillaria procurrens ×
ection Multiorae
Maxillaria ochroleuca ×××
ection Ornithidium
Maxillaria aurea ××××
Maxillaria purpureolabia ×××
ection Repentes
Maxillaria marginata ×××
Maxillaria picta ××××
Maxillaria cf mosenii* ×
ection Rufescens
Maxillaria rufescens ××
ection Urceolatae
Maxillaria vitelliniora ×××
ection Trigonae
Maxillaria pterocarpa* ××
randiora omplex
Maxillaria striata* ××× × × ×
Maxillaria molitor* ××× × ×××

orphology and micromorphology of Maxillaria
Acknowledgements
he micromorphological studies carried out by the second author were supported by the ational
cience entre in oland grant number  he authors are grateful to r evin
 avies and rof ariusz  zlachetko for their valuable comments and suggestions concerning
this paper and to arkus ngler oss ayton urt uzard ric unt aniel claren uis
enato ddie halen uiz ilipe arella ohn arigos for providing the illustrative pictures
of examined species
References
B M. A., C G., W W. M., S R. B., K S., W N. H., O
I., N K. M. & E L. (2007): eneric realignments in axillariinae rchidaceae
– ankesteriana 7  –
C G. (1991): he cytology and the pollinaria in the axillariinae rchidaceae – t ouis
 niversity of issouri
C M. W., C K. M., B R. L. & F J. V. (2003):  data and rchidaceae
systematics a new phylogenetic classication – n          
 eds rchid conservation   – ota inabalu abah atural istory
ublications
C E. A. (2002): th orld rchid onference – n      
  eds roceedings of the th orld rchid onference  – – ritish olumbia
ancouver rchid ociety
C E. A. (2013): Maxillaria an unnished monograph – ebanon  published by
 arding for  hristenson
D K. L., R D. L. & T M. P. (2002): seudopollen and foodhair diversity in Polystachya
ook rchidaceae – nn ot 90 – 
D K. L. & S M. (2012): omparative labellar anatomy of resinsecreting and putative
resinmimic species of Maxillaria sl rchidaceae axillariinae – ot  inn oc 170
 – 
D K. L., S M. & G A. (2005): ectarsecreting oral stomata in Maxillaria anceps
mes   chweinf rchidaceae – nn ot 96 –
D K. L., S M. & K M. (2013): ual deceit in pseudopollenproducing
Maxillaria ss rchidaceae axillariinae – ot  inn oc 173  –
D K. L. & T M. P. (2004): orphology of oral papillae in Maxillaria uiz  av
rchidaceae – nn ot 93  – 
D K. L., T M. P. & G A. (2003a): ipoidal labellar secretions in Maxillaria uiz  av
rchidaceae – nn ot 91  – 
D K. L., T M. P. & G A. (2003b): typical pseudopollenforming hairs in Maxillaria
rchidaceae – ot  inn oc 143 –
D K. L. & W C. (1998): ltrastructure of the labellar epidermis in selected Maxillaria species
rchidaceae – ot  inn oc 126  –
D K. L., W C. & T M. P. (2000): seudopollen ts structure and development in
axillaria rchidaceae – nn ot 85 – 
D R. L. (1981): he orchids natural history and classication – ambridge  arvard
niversity ress
D R. L. (1993): hylogeny and classication of the orchid family – ortland  ioscorides
ress

    
F A., D R. C., S R. B., K S., M A. J. & A M. C. E. (2004): he
chemistry of pollination in selected razilian axillariinae orchids oral rewards and fragrance
–  hem col 30  –
P O. (1905): eiträge zur ‚histologischen’ lütenbiologie  – esterr ot  55  –
P A. M. & S W. L. (1983): ltrastructure of osmophores in Restrepia rchidaceae – mer
 ot 70  –
P A. M. & S W. L. (1985): smophores of Scaphosepalum rchidaceae – ot az 146
 –
R D. W. (2000): eceptive orchids with eliponini as pollinators – l yst vol 222 –
S A. & C M. (2015):  reappraisal of Maxillaria rchidaceae – hytotaxa 225 –
S K. (2002): Maxillaria rchidaceae un genre chaotique – ichardiana 2  –
S R. B. (2002): he pollination mechanism in Trigonidium obtusum indl rchidaceae
axillariinae exual mimicry and trapowers – nn ot 89 –
S R. B. & C A. A. (1999): ollination mechanisms in four sympatric southern razilian
pidendroideae orchids – indleyana 14 –
S R. B. & K S. (2004): ollinarium morphology and oral rewards in razilian axillariinae
rchidaceae – nn ot 93  –
S R. B., M A. J., F A. & R M. G. (2006): he ecology and chemistry of pollination
in razilian orchids recent advances – n     ed loriculture ornamental
and plant biotechnology  – – sleworth lobal cience ooks
S M., D K.L. & G A. (2004): ectary structure and nectar secretion in Maxillaria
coccinea acq  illiams ex odge rchidaceae – nn ot 93 –
S M., D K.L. & G A. (2009): ectary structure of Ornithidium sophronitis chb f
rchidaceae axillariinae – cta grobot 62  –
S D. L., S M., T P. & M-E J. (2012): axonomy of the subtribe
axillariinae rchidaceae andoideae revised – iodiv es onserv 25  –
W W. M., B M. A., W N. H., K S., C G., S R. B., E L.
& N K. M. (2007): olecular phylogenetics of axillaria and related genera rchidaceae
ymbidieae based on combined molecular data sets – mer  ot 94  –
  P L. & D C. H. (1969): rchid owers heir pollination and evolution – oral
ables lorida niversity of iami ress
ddress of the authors
onika  ipińska corresponding author
epartment of lant axonomy and ature onservation
gnieszka  owalkowska
epartment of lant ytology and mbryology
aculty of iology
niversity of dańsk
ita twosza 
 dańsk
oland
mail monikalipinska@biolugedupl
... They have a short column with an unadorned clinandrum and anther, though the latter may have a slightly thickened apex. The labella of all four of these representative species bear obpyriform papillae and identical simple, 3-4-celled, uniseriate trichomes [8,17,20,35]. Singer and Koehler [22] record that the labellar hairs of M. ochroleuca, M. splendens and M. bradei Schltr. ex Hoehne function as floral rewards. ...
... Our labellar morphology data presented here for M. ochroleuca and M. pauciflora are similar to those previously published for members of the M. splendens alliance such as M. ochroleuca [22,35], M. splendens [17], M. chlorantha [8] and M. buchtienii [8,20]. The labella comprise obpyriform to globose or spherical, unicellular papillae and scattered, simple, uniseriate 1-4-celled trichomes. ...
... Rarely, 5-celled trichomes occur. All these trichomes have somewhat tapering, pointed, rounded or clavate apices, a characteristic combination which appears to be constant for this alliance [8,35]. The labellar micromorphology of M. weberbaueri was also very similar except that the papillae were mainly conical. ...
Article
Full-text available
Citation: Davies, K.L.; Pansarin, E.R.; Stpiczyńska, M. Labellar Structure of the Maxillaria splendens Alliance (Orchidaceae: Maxillariinae) Indicates Floral Polyphenols as a Reward for Stingless Bees. Plants 2023, 12, 921. https://doi. Abstract: Several studies have reported stingless Meliponini bees gathering hairs from the labella of Maxillaria spp., including M. ochroleuca, a member of the M. splendens alliance. Such hairs usually contain food materials and are thought to have nutritional value. The papillose labella of representatives of the Maxillaria splendens alliance, however, bear scattered, simple 1-5-celled uniseriate trichomes (hairs) that lack food materials. By contrast, here, as well as polyphenolic compounds, typical labellar papillae usually contain small quantities of starch, protein, and minute droplets of lipid, the last probably involved in the production of fragrance. Towards the labellum apex occur elevated groups of papillae that lack food materials, but contain volatile compounds, probably fragrance precursors. In the past, the terms 'trichomes' or 'hairs' and 'papillae' have been used interchangeably, causing some confusion. Since the trichomes, however, unlike the papillae, are easily detachable and can fragment, it is most likely they, not the papillae, that have previously been observed being collected by bees, but their poor food content indicates that they do not function as food-hairs. Even so, our field observations of M. ochroleuca reveal that stingless bees scrape polyphenol-rich labellar tissue and possibly use this material to produce a resinous, complex, heterogeneous substance commonly referred to as 'bee glue', used for nest construction and repair.
... In the SEM study, the terminology of surface characters was used in accordance with previously published literature (e.g. [63][64][65]). ...
Article
Full-text available
Encyclia is the second-largest genus in the neotropical subtribe Laeliinae (Orchidaceae) and has more than 150 species, which are characterized by fairly consistent flower morphology. Its taxonomy and species boundaries, however, seem to be still under debate. In the present study, we first examined the lip micromorphology of 61 species of Encyclia sensu stricto. We correlated our results with external flower morphology and phylogenetic analyses performed on a combined dataset that included both nuclear (ITS, Xdh, PhyC) and plastid markers (ycf1, rpl32, and trnL-trnF). Phylogenetic reconstruction showed that Encyclia sensu stricto species form a coherent, monophyletic group. However, it is difficult to determine the relationships between the different groups within one larger clade. The groups all form distinct lineages that evolved from a common ancestor. The UPGMA cluster analysis for the seven qualitative micromorphological features clearly divides the genus into two main groups, the larger of which is further subdivided into two subgroups. None of these, however, overlap with any of the phylogeographic units distinguished in previously published papers or in presented article. It is worth noting that the groups resulting from the UPGMA analysis cannot be defined by macromorphological features. The pattern of similarities between species, taking into account both macro- and micromorphological features, is eminently mosaic in nature, and only a multifaceted approach can explain this enigmatic group.
... Studies conducted since the middle of the 20th century revealed a great diversity of labellar epidermis in many groups of orchids. The first attempts to investigate the micromorphological features in Maxillaria sensu lato were conducted in 1998 [7], and, since then, several dozen papers have been published (e.g., [8][9][10][11][12][13]). Glabrous labella are not common in Maxillaria and tend to occur mainly in species assigned to the M. cucullata alliance [14]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Orchids are widely used in traditional medicine for the treatment of a whole range of different health conditions, and representatives of the Neotropical subtribe Maxillariinae are not an exception. They are utilized, for instance, for their spasmolytic and anti-inflammatory activities. In this work, we analyze the literature concerning the chemical composition of the plant extracts and secretions of this subtribe's representatives published between 1991 and 2022. Maxillariinae is one of the biggest taxa within the orchid family; however, to date, only 19 species have been investigated in this regard and, as we report, they produce 62 semiochemicals of medical potential. The presented review is the first summary of biologically active compounds found in Maxillariinae.
... It can be considered as a substitute reward for real pollen. The presence of obpyriform and moniliform trichomes is typical for members of the Maxillaria grandiflora-complex (Davies and Turner 2004;Lipińska and Kowalkowska 2018) and is not surprising, since wherever pseudopollen-forming trichomes occur, labellar papillae tend to be obpyriform (Davies and Turner 2004). ...
Article
Full-text available
Neotropical genus Maxillaria Ruiz & Pav. belongs to one of the most diverse and species-rich groups of orchids. Several of its representatives are popular, horticultural plants with large and showy flowers, often nicely fragranced. It is not uncommon that some distinctly colored individuals are introduced to the commercial market under names of similar, more or less related species, as informal varieties or color forms, largely causing confusion. While investigating the diversity of Maxillaria in Ecuador, we have encountered plants that were commercially referred to as M. sanderiana xanthina. In the course of conducted morphological and micromorphological analyses, we concluded that it is a new, separate species and hereby, we describe it as M. anacatalinaportillae. CC BY 4.0
Book
Full-text available
Con el fin de representar la diversidad de orquídeas y bromelias andinas, se estableció el Sendero Pedro Ortiz, S.J. en 2017. Dado que estas especies son epífitas (sus raíces no están bajo el suelo), el diseño del sendero se centró en proporcionar las condiciones óptimas para su crecimiento y desarrollo, incluyendo luz, riego, ventilación y temperatura. Además, se llevan a cabo actividades especializadas de horticultura, como fertilización, prevención y control fitosanitario, como parte esencial de los esfuerzos de conservación. En la actualidad, el sendero alberga un total de 19 especies de los géneros Elleanthus, Epidendrum, Gomphichis, Masdevallia, Maxillaria, Pleurothallis, Prescottia, Sobralia y Stelis, incluyendo 4 especies endémicas y 15 especies nativas. Con esta publicación, aspiramos a presentar la riqueza de especies de orquídeas que resguarda el sendero Pedro Ortiz, S.J., con el objetivo de promover una mayor comprensión de esta familia botánica. Nuestra guía brinda información sobre cada especie, incluyendo una descripción, rango altitudinal, hábito, tamaño y distribución geográfica. Nuestra meta es fomentar un mayor conocimiento, apropiación y aprecio por este grupo de plantas, alentando así la difusión del conocimiento sobre las orquídeas en nuestros ecosistemas.
Article
Full-text available
Ornithophily has been long speculated to occur in the subtribe Maxillariinae (Orchidaceae), relying either solely on micromorphological analyses or scarce field observations of undefined species. In Guatemala we were able to observe regular visits of the azure-crowned hummingbirds feeding on flowers of Ornithidium fulgens. These observations have led us to investigation of floral attractants by means of scanning and transmission microscopy, histochemical and chemical analyses (GC–MS). Conducted investigation revealed that the epidermis of basal protuberance of column-foot has features proving the secretory activity and that secreted nectar is sucrose-dominant. Slight secretion on the middle part of the lip is puzzling. The presence of other potential pollinators has not been reported. Based on the results of this study, we confirmed that the flowers of O. fulgens meet all criteria of ornithophily and thus that the hypothesis about bird pollination in the subtribe Maxillariinae is proven. The presented results confirm that the previously described floral features predicting the bird pollination in this group are justified. This strengthens the theory about floral adaptations to different pollinators and gives valid reasons to consider species with flowers with a certain set of traits as ornithophilous, even in the absence of the pollination observation.
Article
Floral morphological adaptations and composition of secretions aim to ensure reproductive success. Maxillariella is part of the largest subtribe of Orchidaceae, and Maxillariella spp. are important components of the orchid flora of the Neotropics. The aim of this paper was to provide a detailed study of the reproductive biology of three morphologically and geographically distinct species: M. sanguinea, M. variabilis and M. vulcanica. For many years, species in this group were considered rewardless, but several studies have revealed that lips of some species may secrete resins. However, most published research has mainly focused on investigating either micromorphology (SEM, TEM, histochemistry) or fragrance composition (GC-MS). In this study, we make the first attempt to investigate Maxillariella flowers in a more comparative manner by combining both aspects. In all investigated species we reported the presence of resins with lipids, sugars and/or proteins, suggesting a potential role as a food reward. Scant quantities of residues indicate that they are produced periodically in small quantities. Chemical analysis revealed significant differences between species, however, the presence of some compounds was constant. Cycloartenal and cycloartenol (main ingredients of resin and wax-like material in some Maxillariinae) were not been found.
Article
Full-text available
The pollination process is reported for the first time in four epidendroid orchids which occur sympatrically in Curitiba, Paraná, southern Brazil. Capanemia thereziae (Maxillarieae: Oncidiinae) is pollinated by Polybia fastidiosuscula (Vespidae) wasps which drink nectar in a shallow nectary on the surface of the lip. Maxillaria picta (Maxillarieae: Maxillariinae) is pollinated by Trigona spinipes (Apidae, Meliponinae) workers which are deceived, as flowers offer no reward. Pleurothallis luteola (Epidendreae: Pleurothallidiinae) is pollinated by Megasellia sp. flies (Phoridae) which apparently obtain nectar on the surface of the lip. A male Tetrapedia diversipes (Anthophoriidae: Tetrapediini) bee was caught at flowers of Onci-dium paranaense (Maxillarieae: Oncidiinae). lt removed pollinaria and gathered oil from the elaiophores on the lateral lobes of the lip.
Chapter
Full-text available
An overview of the recent discoveries concerning the ecology and chemistry of pollination in Brazilian orchids is presented, preceded by a brief summary of orchid systematics, morphology and breeding systems. Floral features promoting cross-pollination are described in detail. Recent discoveries in Brazilian orchids pollinated by Euglossini and oil-gathering bees are discussed and illustrated. Pollination in Brazilian Maxillariinae orchids is described in detail. Fragrance main components in some rewardless species are provided and illustrated. In addition, floral secretions in some reward-offering species are discussed and illustrated in detail. Study cases concerning sexual mimicry, or " pseudo-copulation " , in which morphological and chemical flower features elicit the attraction of sexually-excited insects that promote pollination during copulation attempts with the flowers, are emphasized. We expect that the study of the chemistry and ecology of pollination in Orchidaceae will not only shed light on character evolution, but also be helpful for systematic purposes, by providing non-molecular characters to support or diagnose clades.
Book
Compilation of unfinished manuscript by Eric A. Christenson (1956-2011), published posthumously. Edited by Patrica A. Harding, with assistance by Michael McIllmurray and Mario A. Blanco. 938 pages in two volumes, 21x 28 cm. Published in 2012 by Patricia Ann Harding for Robert Christenson. 39127 Griggs Dr., Lebanon, OR, 97355 USA. patriciaorchids@gmail.com Library of Congress Control Number 2012905747 vol. 1; 2012905748 vol. 2.
Article
Osmophores of the myophilous genus Restrepia (Orchidaceae) were studied developmentally at the ultrastructural level. They are located at petal apices and on the adaxial surface of the dorsal sepal apex. Up to and through anthesis a dense, osmiophilic exudate is synthesized probably in endoplasmic reticulum or in plastids of papillose epidermal cells, and then appears to be transported through the plasmalemma by granulocrine elimination. As the exudate is amassed, the cuticle ruptures to form numerous pores that extend from the cell wall. Mitochondria and amyloplasts are especially abundant at anthesis. From anthesis to post-anthesis, lipid droplets appear in the cytoplasm and vacuoles of epidermal cells, and frequency of cell organelles drops markedly with increasing vacuolation.
Article
It is argued that a broad and expanded circumscription of Maxillaria is to be preferred over a narrower one that necessitates the recognition of many segregate genera. These more narrowly circumscribed genera are often difficult to diagnose, increasing the risk of misidentifications, especially when material is only identified to genus level. The genera of the Maxillaria alliance as recognised in Genera orchidacearum are treated as sections of an expanded genus Maxillaria. Cryptocentrum, Cyrtidiorchis, Mormolyca, Pityphyllum, and Trigonidium are here included in Maxillaria. Criteria for generic delimitation are discussed, the necessary combinations are made, and a key to the sections as well as a provisional checklist of the 634 species of Maxillaria arranged according to section are provided. Maxillaria prolifera is shown to be the correct name for M. pendens. Maxillaria humilis is a new combination for M. gracilis.
Article
Most species of Maxillaria s.l. are rewardless and employ deceit pollination strategies. Some, however, reward pollinators with nectar, resins or pseudopollen (farina). Pseudopollen is yellow–white in colour and is usually composed of food-laden cells formed by detachment or fragmentation of moniliform labellar hairs. As the pollen of epidendroid orchids is bound in pollinia, it is not accessible to pollen-foraging insects. It has thus been proposed that potential insect pollinators, deceived by the resemblance of pseudopollen to the nutritious, powdery pollen of other angiosperms, gather it and feed it to their larvae. Mimicry here, however, may not be as simple as supposed. This study compares the pseudopollen of selected species of Maxillaria s.s., namely Maxillaria grandis, M. grayi, M. huebschii and M. roseola (all members of the M. grandiflora complex), M. lepidota (M. arachnites complex) and M. buchtienii (M. splendens complex), using light microscopy (LM), fluorescence microscopy, histochemistry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and comments on its evolutionary significance. Some members of the M. grandiflora complex produce pseudopollen-forming hairs, the cells of which contain potential food rewards in the form of an intravacuolar protein body and abundant starch grains. Others produce pseudopollen that is devoid of protein bodies, but contains abundant starch, and others produce pseudopollen that lacks protein bodies and contains negligible amounts of starch. Maxillaria lepidota and M. buchtienii fall into the second and third categories, respectively. Lipid droplets, when present, usually occur in minute quantities. These observations suggest that a dual deceit strategy operates in some species, as pseudopollen not only mimics powdery pollen, but in many instances lacks a food reward. Cryptic evolutionary changes to pseudopollen content may confer biological advantage by reducing expenditure of material and energy in food reward production, while trichome micromorphology simultaneously encourages pollinator visits. The presence or absence of particular foods may, in turn, result in pollinator selection. Conversely, in the absence of food rewards, insect behaviour is unlikely to be reinforced, possibly to the detriment of the orchid. © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 173, 744–763.
Article
Flowers of most species formerly included in Maxillaria are rewardless. Some, however, reward pollinators with nectar or pseudopollen, whereas the labella of a relatively small number of taxa produce lipoidal floral rewards that include resins and waxes. To date, the labellar secretory tissues of few species have been examined in detail, and some rewardless species having glossy labella are thought to mimic taxa that produce lipoidal rewards. Here, the labellar anatomy of a range of resin‐secreting, wax‐secreting and putative resin‐mimic species is compared using light microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and histochemistry, in order to investigate how such secretory tissues may have evolved. Comparisons are also made with other resiniferous and wax‐secreting Maxillariinae s.s., and with rewardless control species and the oil‐secreting elaiophores of certain Oncidiinae. The labella of all Maxillariinae species investigated displayed similar anatomy, the differences largely being restricted to the adaxial epidermis and subepidermal layer. The labellar secretory epidermis of resiniferous Maxillariella elatior was composed of epithelial palisade cells, whereas that of other resin‐ and wax‐secreting species investigated consisted of secretory papillae or trichomes. Putative resin‐mimic species also produced resin, albeit in small quantities, and, here, the epidermal cells were cuboidal or rectangular in section. Secreted material on the labellar surface of control species was probably fragrance residues. Resin was often heterogeneous, and fluorescence microscopy revealed that its composition could change throughout the course of anthesis. Although the resiniferous floral tissues of Maxillariinae s.s. may be epithelial or trichomal, and thus closely resemble the epithelial and trichomal elaiophores of oil‐secreting Oncidiinae, they differ in a number of important ways, necessitating the use of more exact descriptive terminology when distinguishing between oil‐, resin‐ and wax‐secreting floral structures. Similarity between the resin‐ or wax‐secreting floral structures of Maxillariinae s.s and the oil‐secreting elaiophores of Oncidiinae is probably a result of parallelism. © 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 170, 405–435.
Article
Histochemical analyses of the pseudopollen of ten species of Maxillaria sectionGrandiflorae revealed that the main storage product is protein, although starch is usually also present. Lipids are rare in pseudopollen and thus do not seem to play an important role in attracting insects. In Maxillaria sanderiana, pseudopollen is formed by the fragmentation of multicellular, uniseriate trichomes, derived by the repeated division of a single, papilla-like, basal secretory cell that contains well-developed dictyosomes, endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. At first, there is continuity of cytoplasm between adjacent component cells of a trichome via plasmodesmata. During maturation, the cytoplasm retracts as the cell volume increases and the plasmodesmata become less obvious. Each component cell of the trichome eventually comprises a large protein body and a small amount of peripheral cytoplasm containing amyloplasts, a few small lipid bodies, mitochondria and a nucleus with nucleolus. Finally, the trichome undergoes fragmentation, forming individual cells or chains of cells of varying lengths. Light microscopy observations indicate a similar sequence in the other species examined. The occurrence of pseudopollen in section Grandiflorae and alliance Splendens may indicate that this character has evolved at least twice in Maxillaria. Copyright 2000 Annals of Botany Company