ArticlePDF Available

The Ketogenic Diet

Authors:
  • Kalpavriksh Healthcare

Abstract and Figures

The ketogenic diet (KD), a well-established treatment for childhood epilepsy, is gradually gaining acceptance as a therapeutic modality for obesity and type 2 diabetes. The perception of ketone bodies as an unhealthy or “sinful” entity has led to concerns and doubts regarding the efficacy and safety of KD in physicians. This article describes the mechanism of action of KD and shares a pragmatic approach to its usage. It highlights the importance of predietary counseling, screening for indications/contraindications, and clinico-nutritional monitoring during therapy. Robust indications for KD are mentioned, to help place KD’s utility in the management of obesity and type 2 diabetes.
Content may be subject to copyright.
TOUCH MEDICAL MEDIA
62
Editorial Diabetes
Print Publication Date: November 19, 2018
The Ketogenic Diet
Sanjay Kalra,1 Rajiv Singla,2 Rahul Rosha,3 Munish Dhawan,4 Deepak Khandelwal,5 and Bharti Kalra6
1. Department of Endocrinology, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, India; 2. Department of Endocrinology, Kalpavriksh Healthcare, New Delhi, India;
3. Department of Nutrition, Novique Healthcare, Pune, India; 4. Department of Pediatrics, Miri Piri Hospital, Shahabad, India; 5. Department of
Endocrinology, Maharaja Agrasen Hospital, New Delhi, India; 6. Department of Gynecology, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, India
The ketogenic diet (KD), a well-established treatment for childhood epilepsy, is gradually gaining acceptance as a therapeutic modality for
obesity and type 2 diabetes. The perception of ketone bodies as an unhealthy or “sinful” entity has led to concerns and doubts regarding
the efficacy and safety of KD in physicians. This article describes the mechanism of action of KD and shares a pragmatic approach to its
usage. It highlights the importance of predietary counseling, screening for indications/contraindications, and clinico-nutritional monitoring during
therapy. Robust indications for KD are mentioned, to help place KD’s utility in the management of obesity and type 2 diabetes.
Keywords
Atkin’s diet, low calorie diet, medical
nutrition therapy, obesity, physiological
ketosis, preketogenic diet counseling, type 2
diabetes, very low calorie diet, weight loss
Disclosures: Sanjay Kalra, Rajiv Singla, Rahul Rosha,
Munish Dhawan, Deepak Khandelwal, and Bharti Kalra have
no conicts of interests to declare in relation to this article.
Review Process: This article is a short opinion piece and
has not been submitted to external peer reviewers,
but was reviewed for accuracy by the editorial board
before publication.
Authorship: All named authors meet the criteria of
the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility
for the integrity of the work as a whole and have
given nal approval for the version to be published.
Open Access: This article is published under the Creative
Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which
permits any non-commercial use, distribution, adaptation
and reproduction provided the original author(s) and
source are given appropriate credit. © The Authors 2018.
Received: July 30, 2018
Accepted: October 10, 2018
Citation: US Endocrinology. 2018;14(2):62–4
Corresponding Author: Sanjay Kalra, Department
of Endocrinology, Bharti Hospital, Kunjpura Road,
Karnal, 132001 India. E: brideknl@gmail.com
Support: No funding was received in
the publication of this article.
Ketogenic diet (KD) is defined as a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet, with adequate protein content,
which makes the body utilize fat, rather than carbohydrate, as a preferred energy substrate. In a
carbohydrate-replete person, this substrate is converted to glucose, which is used as a fuel by all
organs, including the brain. In carbohydrate depletion, ketogenesis is activated in the liver, which
breaks fat into fatty acids and ketone bodies. These ketone bodies are able to cross the blood–brain
barrier and provide energy to the brain. Ketones can also be utilized by other organ systems as an
efficient energy source.
Development
The term ‘ketogenic diet’ was first used by Russel Wilder in 1923 to describe a high-fat,
low-carbohydrate diet that produced ketonemia. He used it as an alternative to fasting (then in vogue
as a therapeutic option) for the management of epilepsy.1
Various forms of KD are now used in clinical practice. The amount of carbohydrates permitted
varies from 20 to 50g/day. This depends upon personal metabolic and weight loss goals, upon
the planned duration of KD, and upon individual health status. The classic therapeutic KD, initially
created for the management of childhood seizures, has a 4:1 ratio of fats to combined protein and
carbohydrates. A medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) variant (the MCT KD) utilized to more ketogenic
MCT (present in coconut oil) to provide half of all consumed calories. The Atkins diet—popular in
lay literature—and the low glycemic index diet are less restrictive variants of KD. Fluid restriction
is not advocated in modern KD, due to the risk of constipation and nephrolithiasis. Vegetarian and
vegan KD are also available.2
Clinical approach
KD is a therapeutic intervention for diabetes and obesity.3,4 Though nonpharmacological in nature, it
has a well-delineated multifactorial mechanism of action (see Table 1). Thus, it should be approached
as a therapeutic intervention, rather than a universal suggestion. KD stands apart from other
weight-lowering options in certain ways. Most drugs that increase energy expenditure also increase
food intake, and thus create a net effect of weight maintenance, rather than loss.5 Drugs that reduce
food intake, such as phentermine, liraglutide, phentermine/topiramate, and buproion/naltrexone,
do not reduce energy expenditure. Maintenance of a lowered body weight leads to compensatory
changes in energy expenditure, which limit the potential for change. These compensatory changes
may account for the poor long-term efficacy of treatments for obesity.6
The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of KD has been studied in preclinical and clinical settings,
including randomized controlled trials. The limitations of KD, such as contraindications, limitations
of sustainability, issues in adherence, and possible adverse events, are known as well (see Tables 2
and 3). In all these matters, KD appears similar to drug therapy and should be studied as such.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/USE.2018.14.2.62
63
The Ketogenic Diet
US ENDOCRINOLOGY
Biochemistry
The absence of adequate dietary carbohydrates leads to a drastic reduction
in insulin levels, which leads to reduced lipogenesis and increased lipolysis,
both of which reduce fat accumulation. Continued carbohydrate starvation
leads to the inability of usual metabolic pathways (the Krebs cycle) to
provide adequate glucose supply to the central nervous system (CNS).7
To maintain CNS health, the liver kick-starts a process of ketogenesis,
producing acetoacetate, which gets converted to β-hydroxybutyrate, the
predominant circulating ketone body. High levels of acetoacetate cannot
be metabolized fast enough by the skeletal muscles and myocardium.
Hence both acetoacetate and β-hydroxy butyrate rise in the circulation,
leading to ketonemia and ketonuria. Excretion of acetone, a volatile ketone
body, through the lungs, causes the sickly-sweet odor of ketosis. Once
ketone bodies achieve a blood concentration similar to that of glucose
(4mmol/l; 80 mg% glucose), they can be transported preferentially, across
the blood brain barrier, into the brain. Here, they are a more efficient
source of energy.8
Mechanism of action
KD acts by inducing a state of physiological ketosis. This is achieved by
consuming minimal carbohydrates, thus creating a state of carbohydrate
starvation. As carbohydrate substrate is minimized, the insulin requirement
comes down. This leads to resolution of insulin resistance and reduction
in insulin secretion, with a concomitant fall in glucagon production (the
islet de-stress hypothesis) (personal communication). Caloric and nutrient
intake is maintained through fats and protein. Fats are preferentially utilized
to produce energy for the body and are burnt up.
KD’s weight reduction is thought to be mediated by a reduction in hunger
(general and protein specific) and an increase in energy expenditure
(resting and postprandial).9,10 Lipogenesis is reduced; lipolysis increased.
Gluconeogenesis, which occurs in KD, has an increased metabolic cost and
leads to use of body fat stores11,12 (see Table 1). KD-induced weight loss is
accompanied by a mitigation in increase of circulating ghrelin. This helps
avoid hunger and cravings and contribute to maintenance of weight loss.13
Pre-intervention assessment
KD must be prescribed and monitored by qualified health care professionals,
who are experienced in KD use.14,15,16 Coordinated team work, between an
endocrinologist, nutritionist, psychologist, and an exercise physiologist,
Table 1: Mechanisms of weight loss/metabolic modulation
with ketogenic diet
Increase in energy expenditure
Increased sympathetic activity due to FGF21
Postprandial thermogenesis
20–30% of protein’s usable energy is needed for metabolism/storage, as
opposed to 5% of carbohydrate
Resting metabolism
Reduction in appetite
Protein-specific appetite suppression
Protein leverage hypothesis (virtuous cycle of protein/calorie intake)
Nonspecific appetite suppression
Reduction in ghrelin
Increase in GLP1
Increase in peptide YY
Directly due to beta hydroxyl butyrate
Due to excessive water drinking, mediated by FGF21
Change in lipid metabolism
Reduction in lipogenesis
Increase in lipolysis
Greater metabolic efficiency in fat consumption
Islet distress hypothesis
Reduction in load on both beta and alpha cell
Reduction in both insulin and glucagon secretion
Enhancement of mood
Increase in will power
Increase in adherence
FGF21 = fibroblast growth factor 21; GLP1 = GLP glucagon like peptide 1.
Table 2: Advantages and limitations of ketogenic diet
Advantages
Psychosocial
A form of lifestyle modification
Encourages self-discipline, self-care and self-management
Prevents “medicalization” of lifestyle disorders
Biomedical
Reduces pharmaceutical burden
Provides comprehensive metabolic control
Offers pleiotropic nonmetabolic benefits
Limitations
Psychosocial
Difficult to adhere to
Requires family and social support
Extremely prone to hearsay
Biomedical
May not be suitable for all persons—can be associated with side effects
(usually transient/self-limiting)
Very long-term effects are not known
Not a balanced diet
Caveats
Requires a team of health care professionals, including a nutritionist,
endocrinologist, psychologist and an exercise physiologist
Should be treated like any pharmacological intervention, with pre-prescription
assessment and counseling, and monitoring during use
Micronutrient supplementation may be required
Table 3: Indications and contraindications of ketogenic diet
Contraindications for ketogenic diet
Specific age group/life stages
Frail elderly people (however KD can be used in the healthy obese elderly)
Children and adolescents
Antenatal and lactating women
Persons at risk of ketoacidosis
Insulin deficiency
Type 1 diabetes
Type 2 diabetes with inadequate insulin supplementation
Dehydration
Past history of ketoacidosis
Persons with symptomatic or complicated diabetes
Catabolic/cachexic state
Osmotic symptoms
Acute medical or surgical comorbidity
Robust indications for ketogenic diet
Lack of efficacy of conventional lifestyle modification and/or pharmacological
therapy
Lack of tolerance of conventional therapy, e.g. weight gain
‘High turnover’ metabolism individuals with high levels of caloric intake, physical
activity and/or drug–dose requirement
KD = ketogenic diet.
64
Editorial Diabetes
US ENDOCRINOLOGY
is required to achieve optimal results. The principles, expected efficacy
and possible side effects17 must be understood. A biopsychosocial
assessment and counseling are mandatory for every patient. Indications and
contraindications of KD must be assessed prior to start. Ample information
must be shared with patients, so that they have a fair idea of what to expect
on a KD (see Table 2).8,15 This discussion should cover both expected benefits
and risks, as well as responsibilities of the patient and her/his family. KD
should be started only in motivated patients. Clarity regarding the purpose
and aim of KD, and its expected duration, must be achieved by shared and
informed decision making and must be documented.
Robust indications
The contraindications and indication for following KD are listed in Table 3.18
Though evidence is tempting19 one cannot propagate KD as a primordial
or primary preventive therapy. However, KD is certainly recommended for
secondary prevention in persons with obesity or type 2 diabetes who do
not respond to conventional dietary and pharmacological measures for
weight loss, hunger control, or glycemic management.
Monitoring
Once KD has been instituted, regular clinical and biochemical monitoring,
are required. This should be coupled with medical and psychological
support as when necessary. The frequency and intensity of monitoring and
support may decrease as the patient gains confidence and takes charge of
her/his diet, lifestyle, and health.2 Troubleshooting may be required when
sudden changes in lifestyle and health status are anticipated, suspected,
or experienced. These may include conditions such as travelling, festivals
and fasts, acute undercurrent illness, and planned or emergency surgery.
At times, temporary discontinuation of KD may be necessary till an acute
episode of illness is resolved.
Persons on glucose-lowering, antihypertensive, or lipid-lowering therapy
may need change in dosage and/or in therapeutic strategies.20 The first few
weeks of ketoadaptation may be accompanied by fluctuations in glycemia
and blood pressure, which should be preempted and managed as required.
Ketoversion (shift from nonketonuria to ketonuria) may be associated with
transient rise in blood pressure.
Side effects
The side effects of KD include those directly related to KD, such as
transient ketoflu, and those related to weight loss in general. Shifting to
KD involves a brief (days to weeks) period of keto-adaptation, during which
the body transitions from carbohydrate- to fat-based energy utilization.17
This period may be marked by ‘ketoflu’, with symptoms such as fatigue,
lethargy, and headache. We have noted that the phase of ketoversion (shift
from aketonuria to ketonuria) may not necessarily overlap the duration of
ketoadaptation, which is marked by ketoflu (personal observation).
Adverse events, in the short term, include constipation, low-grade acidosis,
hypoglycemia, and dyslipidemia.15,17,21 Constipation can be prevented by
adequate fluid intake while dyslipidemia should prompt a shift to a less KD, with
a lower fat:carbohydrate/protein ratio. Hypoglycemia should be anticipated
and prevented by proactive down titration of glucose-lowering medication. A
similar strategy should be employed with antihypertensive therapy.
Dehydration and dyselectrolytemia are other side effects of KD that must
be prevented and managed. These can result in muscle cramps and
arrhythmias.17,21 Supplementation with electrolytes, including magnesium,
and multivitamins, helps minimize these adverse events. KD has neurotropic
effects, which are utilized for management of childhood seizures.1,2 These
neurotropic effects may manifest during the initial days of KD as insomnia,
restless legs syndrome, and altered mood, including hypomania (personal
observation). Empathic explanation regarding the benign and self-limiting
nature of these symptoms is helpful.
Long-term complications include growth retardation in children,
hyperuricemia, kidney stones, and osteoporosis.21 Multivitamins, potassium
citrate supplements, calcium/vitamin D supplements, and adequate
hydration help in preventing these side effects. Rapid weight loss may be
associated with formation of gallstones: this is possible with KD as well.
Duration of ketogenic diet
There is no consensus regarding the optimal duration of KD for management
of obesity or diabetes.22 This decision must be individualized, based upon
therapeutic goals, health status, and ability/willingness of the patient to
conform to the suggested therapeutic diet. Well-conducted studies report
safety over 2 years of use,23 though the diet can be continued for longer to
take advantage of its metabolic benefits.
Conclusion
The review provides an overview of KD as a therapeutic approach in
the management of obesity and diabetes. It discusses the definition
and rationale of KD, its indications and contraindications, and the need
for detailed preprescription screening and counseling. The advantages
and limitations of KD are highlighted, as are its side effects. The KD is a
therapeutic option that may be considered in persons with obesity and
diabetes, under supervision of a qualified and experienced team of nutrition
and endocrine professionals.
1. Wheless JW. History of the ketogenic diet. Epilepsia. 2008;49:3–5.
2. Hartman AL, Vining EP. Clinical aspects of the ketogenic diet.
Epilepsia. 2007;48:31–42.
3. Azar ST, Beydoun HM, Albadri MR. Benefits of ketogenic diet for
management of type two diabetes: a review. J Obes Eat Disord.
2016;2:1–3.
4. Paoli A. Ketogenic diet for obesity: friend or foe? Int J Environ Res
Public Health. 2014;11:2092–107.
5. Xiao C, Goldgof M, Gavrilova O, Reitman ML. Anti‐obesity and
metabolic efficacy of the β3‐adrenergic agonist, CL316243, in mice
at thermoneutrality compared to 22°C. Obesity. 2015;23:1450–9.
6. Leibel RL, Rosenbaum M, Hirsch J. Changes in energy expenditure
resulting from altered body weight. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:621–8.
7. Cahill Jr GF. Fuel metabolism in starvation. Annu Rev Nutr.
2006;26:1–22.
8. Cahill Jr GF, Veech RL. Ketoacids? Good medicine? Trans Am Clin
Climatol Assoc. 2003;114:149.
9. Jornayvaz FR, Jurczak MJ, Lee HY, et al. A high-fat, ketogenic diet
causes hepatic insulin resistance in mice, despite increasing
energy expenditure and preventing weight gain. Am J Physiol
Endocrinol Metab. 2010;299:E808–15.
10. Hall KD, Chen KY, Guo J, et al. Energy expenditure and body
composition changes after an isocaloric ketogenic diet in
overweight and obese men 2. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104:324–33.
11. Paoli A, Rubini A, Volek JS, Grimaldi KA. Beyond weight loss:
a review of the therapeutic uses of very-low-carbohydrate
(ketogenic) diets. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:789.
12. Rudolf MC, Sherwin RS. Maternal ketosis and its effects on the
fetus. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;12:413–28.
13. Sumithran P, Prendergast LA, Delbridge E, et al. Ketosis and
appetite-mediating nutrients and hormones after weight loss.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:759.
14. Sumithran P, Prendergast LA, Delbridge E, et al. Long-
term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss.
N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1597–604.
15. Carroll J, Koenigsberger D. The ketogenic diet: a practical guide
for caregivers. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998;98:316–21.
16. Kossoff EH, Zupec‐Kania BA, Amark PE, et al. Optimal clinical
management of children receiving the ketogenic diet:
recommendations of the International Ketogenic Diet Study
Group. Epilepsia. 2009;50:304–17.
17. Sumithran P, Proietto J. Ketogenic diets for weight loss: a review of
their principles, safety and efficacy. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2008;2:1–3.
18. Haywood CJ, Prendergast LA, Purcell K, et al. Very low calorie
diets for weight loss in obese older adults—a randomized trial.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;73:59–65.
19. Feinman RD, Pogozelski WK, Astrup A, et al. Dietary carbohydrate
restriction as the first approach in diabetes management: critical
review and evidence base. Nutrition. 2015;31:1–3.
20. Hussain TA, Mathew TC, Dashti A, et al. Effect of low calorie
versus low carbohydrate ketogenic diet in type 2 diabetes.
Nutrition. 2012;28:1016–102
21. Freeman JM, Kossoff EH, Hartman AL. The ketogenic diet: one
decade later. Pediatrics. 2007;119:535–43.
22. Kossoff EH. International consensus statement on clinical
implementation of the ketogenic diet: agreement, flexibility, and
controversy. Epilepsia. 2008;49:11–13.
23. Moreno B, Crujeiras AB, Bellido D, et al. Obesity treatment by very
low-calorie-ketogenic diet at two years: reduction in visceral fat
and on the burden of disease. Endocrine. 2016;54:681 90.
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the antidiabetic effect of a ketogenic diet (KD) on sucrose-induced insulin resistance in the fruit fly model. The fruit flies were divided and grouped into four: Group A, B, C, and D, representing the control, high-sucrose diet (HSD), KD, and HSD + KD, respectively. The administration of the various treatments to the groups proceeded for 7 days. The flies were thereafter immobilized, homogenized, and the homogenates used for biochemical parameters determination. This includes glucose concentration, antioxidant status, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and protein concentration. There was a significant increase (p < .05) in weight gain, glucose concentration, TG, HMG-CoA reductase activity, TC, and lipid peroxidation status of the HSD group compared with the control and KD groups. The antioxidant enzymes measured (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and reduced glutathione) and protein concentrations were repressed significantly (p < .05) in the HD groups but significantly elevated (p < .05) in the KD, HSD + KD, and the control groups. The KD improved biochemical parameters altered during the onset of sucrose-induced insulin resistance. With further research on this, KD may emerge as the much-awaited treatment option for diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) with almost reduced toxicity concerns. Practical applications Novel KD are sources of dietary phytocompounds with proven antioxidant activities. The antidiabetic activity of the KD was investigated. The results showed that the KD proves to serve as a better effective antidiabetic option in Drosophila melanogaster. The observed results could provide the potential application of the KD as an alternative therapy for diabetes management.
Article
Pharmacoresistant epilepsy causes serious deleterious effects on the patient’s health and quality of life. For this condition, a ketogenic diet (KD) is a treatment option. The KD is a general term for a set of diets that contain high amounts of fat and low content of carbohydrates. The most prominent KD treatments are classical KD (4:1 ratio of fat to carbohydrate), modified Atkins diet (2:1 to 1:1 ratio), medium-chain triglycerides KD (with medium-chain triglyceride as a part of the fat content), and low glycemic index KD (using low glycemic carbohydrates). KD has been widely prescribed for children with epilepsy but not for adult patients. One of the main concerns about adult use of KD is its cardiovascular risk associated with high-fat and cholesterol intake. Therefore, this narrative review provides comprehensive information of the current literature on the effects of KD on lipid profile, glycemic-control biomarkers, and other cardiometabolic risk factors in adult patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy.
Article
Full-text available
Most of patients with cryptococcal meningitis in China were not HIV victims. Profile of the diseases in patients with non-HIV infection was poorly understood. We summarized the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of cryptococcal meningitis in China. A comprehensive analysis of the reported cases of cryptococcal meningitis in China was conducted, covering publications from 1981 to 2013 from CNKI database. Among the 306 reports and 6514 cases about cryptococcal meningitis, there were 21% patients with HIV infection, 39% with other underlying diseases and 40% without underlying diseases. Main underlying diseases in non-HIV/AIDS patients were tuberculosis (10.46%), liver disease (9.83%), systemic lupus erythematosus (7.00%), diabetes (5.26%), kidney disease (3.16%), lung disease (2.97%), and cancer (2.01%). About 60.8% cases were reported in males. From 1981-2013 total patients of cryptococcal meningitis were increased. Patients who received treatment of amphotericin B (AmB) with 5-flucytosine, AmB with Fluconazole, and the combination of AmB+5-FU+FCZ were 495, 411, 266 persons (total 1501 cases) and got a total efficiency of 70.1%, 70.8%, and 74.8% respectively. The survival rate of cryptococcal meningitis patients without HIV infection is higher than those with HIV infection (p<0.05). The result shows that most patients of cryptococcal meningitis have underlying diseases and there is a connection between cryptococcal meningitis and immunodeficiency in China.
Article
Full-text available
The long-term effect of therapeutic diets in obesity treatment is a challenge at present. The current study aimed to evaluate the long-term effect of a very low-calorie-ketogenic (VLCK) diet on excess adiposity. Especial focus was set on visceral fat mass, and the impact on the individual burden of disease. A group of obese patients (n = 45) were randomly allocated in two groups: either the very low-calorie-ketogenic diet group (n = 22), or a standard low-calorie diet group; (n = 23). Both groups received external support. Adiposity parameters and the cumulative number of months of successful weight loss (5 or 10 %) over a 24-month period were quantified. The very low-calorie-ketogenic diet induced less than 2 months of mild ketosis and significant effects on body weight at 6, 12, and 24 months. At 24 months, a trend to regress to baseline levels was observed; however, the very low-calorie-ketogenic diet induced a greater reduction in body weight (−12.5 kg), waist circumference (−11.6 cm), and body fat mass (−8.8 kg) than the low-calorie diet (−4.4 kg, −4.1 cm, and −3.8 kg, respectively; p < 0.001). Interestingly, a selective reduction in visceral fat measured by a specific software of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)-scan (−600 g vs. −202 g; p < 0.001) was observed. Moreover, the very low-calorie-ketogenic diet group experienced a reduction in the individual burden of obesity because reduction in disease duration. Very low-calorie-ketogenic diet patients were 500 months with 5 % weight lost vs. the low-calorie diet group (350 months; p < 0.001). In conclusion, a very low-calorie-ketogenic diet was effective 24 months later, with a decrease in visceral adipose tissue and a reduction in the individual burden of disease.
Article
Full-text available
The inability of current recommendations to control the epidemic of diabetes, the specific failure of the prevailing low-fat diets to improve obesity, cardiovascular risk, or general health and the persistent reports of some serious side effects of commonly prescribed diabetic medications, in combination with the continued success of low-carbohydrate diets in the treatment of diabetes and metabolic syndrome without significant side effects, point to the need for a reappraisal of dietary guidelines. The benefits of carbohydrate restriction in diabetes are immediate and well documented. Concerns about the efficacy and safety are long term and conjectural rather than data driven. Dietary carbohydrate restriction reliably reduces high blood glucose, does not require weight loss (although is still best for weight loss), and leads to the reduction or elimination of medication. It has never shown side effects comparable with those seen in many drugs. Here we present 12 points of evidence supporting the use of low-carbohydrate diets as the first approach to treating type 2 diabetes and as the most effective adjunct to pharmacology in type 1. They represent the best-documented, least controversial results. The insistence on long-term randomized controlled trials as the only kind of data that will be accepted is without precedent in science. The seriousness of diabetes requires that we evaluate all of the evidence that is available. The 12 points are sufficiently compelling that we feel that the burden of proof rests with those who are opposed. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Article
Full-text available
Obesity is reaching epidemic proportions and is a strong risk factor for a number of cardiovascular and metabolic disorders such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, and also certain types of cancers. Despite the constant recommendations of health care organizations regarding the importance of weight control, this goal often fails. Genetic predisposition in combination with inactive lifestyles and high caloric intake leads to excessive weight gain. Even though there may be agreement about the concept that lifestyle changes affecting dietary habits and physical activity are essential to promote weight loss and weight control, the ideal amount and type of exercise and also the ideal diet are still under debate. For many years, nutritional intervention studies have been focused on reducing dietary fat with little positive results over the long-term. One of the most studied strategies in the recent years for weight loss is the ketogenic diet. Many studies have shown that this kind of nutritional approach has a solid physiological and biochemical basis and is able to induce effective weight loss along with improvement in several cardiovascular risk parameters. This review discusses the physiological basis of ketogenic diets and the rationale for their use in obesity, discussing the strengths and the weaknesses of these diets together with cautions that should be used in obese patients.
Article
Full-text available
Very-low-carbohydrate diets or ketogenic diets have been in use since the 1920s as a therapy for epilepsy and can, in some cases, completely remove the need for medication. From the 1960s onwards they have become widely known as one of the most common methods for obesity treatment. Recent work over the last decade or so has provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of ketogenic diets in many pathological conditions, such as diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, acne, neurological diseases, cancer and the amelioration of respiratory and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The possibility that modifying food intake can be useful for reducing or eliminating pharmaceutical methods of treatment, which are often lifelong with significant side effects, calls for serious investigation. This review revisits the meaning of physiological ketosis in the light of this evidence and considers possible mechanisms for the therapeutic actions of the ketogenic diet on different diseases. The present review also questions whether there are still some preconceived ideas about ketogenic diets, which may be presenting unnecessary barriers to their use as therapeutic tools in the physician's hand.European Journal of Clinical Nutrition advance online publication, 26 June 2013; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2013.116.
Article
Full-text available
Background/objectives: Diet-induced weight loss is accompanied by compensatory changes, which increase appetite and encourage weight regain. There is some evidence that ketogenic diets suppress appetite. The objective is to examine the effect of ketosis on a number of circulating factors involved in appetite regulation, following diet-induced weight loss. Subjects/methods: Of 50 non-diabetic overweight or obese subjects who began the study, 39 completed an 8-week ketogenic very-low-energy diet (VLED), followed by 2 weeks of reintroduction of foods. Following weight loss, circulating concentrations of glucose, insulin, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), leptin, gastrointestinal hormones and subjective ratings of appetite were compared when subjects were ketotic, and after refeeding. Results: During the ketogenic VLED, subjects lost 13% of initial weight and fasting BHB increased from (mean±s.e.m.) 0.07±0.00 to 0.48±0.07 mmol/l (P<0.001). BHB fell to 0.19±0.03 mmol/l after 2 weeks of refeeding (P<0.001 compared with week 8). When participants were ketotic, the weight loss induced increase in ghrelin was suppressed. Glucose and NEFA were higher, and amylin, leptin and subjective ratings of appetite were lower at week 8 than after refeeding. Conclusions: The circulating concentrations of several hormones and nutrients which influence appetite were altered after weight loss induced by a ketogenic diet, compared with after refeeding. The increase in circulating ghrelin and subjective appetite which accompany dietary weight reduction were mitigated when weight-reduced participants were ketotic.
Article
Background Obesity contributes to disability in older adults, and this is offset by weight loss and exercise. Very Low Calorie Diets (VLCDs) achieve rapid weight loss; however, these have not been rigorously evaluated in older people. Methods A randomized trial was conducted from August 2012 through December 2015. The intervention was 12 weeks of thrice weekly exercise combined with either healthy eating advice (Ex/HE), hypocaloric diet (Ex/Diet), or VLCD (Ex/VLCD). Outcomes were physical function, measured by 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and De Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI). Other measures were body composition measured by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, and nutritional parameters (albumin, vitamins B12 and D, ferritin and folate). Results 36, 40, and 41 participants were randomized to Ex/HE, Ex/Diet, and Ex/VLCD, respectively. At 12 weeks, weight was reduced by 3.7, 5.1, and 11.1% (p < .01), respectively. Ex/VLCD had significant reduction in fat (16.8%), lean mass (4.8%), and bone mineral density (1.2%), but increased relative lean mass (3.8%). DEMMI improved by 14.25, 14.25, and 13.75 points in Ex/HE, Ex/Diet, and Ex/VLCD, respectively; however, there was no between-group difference (p = .30). 6MWT improved by 53.1, 64.7, and 84.4 meters in Ex/HE, Ex/Diet, and Ex/VLCD (p = .18). Post hoc stratification for gender and adjustment for initial physical function and type 2 diabetes only revealed significant between-group differences for men in the 6MWT, with improvement by 57.8, 77.8, and 140.3 meters in Ex/HE, Ex/Diet, and Ex/VLCD, respectively (p = .01). Improvements in nutritional parameters were seen in Ex/VLCD, but not in Ex/HE and Ex/Diet. The VLCD was well tolerated. Conclusions VLCDs have potential in the treatment of obesity in older persons; of particular benefit is improvement in nutritional status. The gait speed improvement observed in men warrants further investigation.
Article
Background: The carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity posits that habitual consumption of a high-carbohydrate diet sequesters fat within adipose tissue because of hyperinsulinemia and results in adaptive suppression of energy expenditure (EE). Therefore, isocaloric exchange of dietary carbohydrate for fat is predicted to result in increased EE, increased fat oxidation, and loss of body fat. In contrast, a more conventional view that "a calorie is a calorie" predicts that isocaloric variations in dietary carbohydrate and fat will have no physiologically important effects on EE or body fat. Objective: We investigated whether an isocaloric low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet (KD) is associated with changes in EE, respiratory quotient (RQ), and body composition. Design: Seventeen overweight or obese men were admitted to metabolic wards, where they consumed a high-carbohydrate baseline diet (BD) for 4 wk followed by 4 wk of an isocaloric KD with clamped protein. Subjects spent 2 consecutive days each week residing in metabolic chambers to measure changes in EE (EEchamber), sleeping EE (SEE), and RQ. Body composition changes were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Average EE during the final 2 wk of the BD and KD periods was measured by doubly labeled water (EEDLW). Results: Subjects lost weight and body fat throughout the study corresponding to an overall negative energy balance of ∼300 kcal/d. Compared with BD, the KD coincided with increased EEchamber (57 ± 13 kcal/d, P = 0.0004) and SEE (89 ± 14 kcal/d, P < 0.0001) and decreased RQ (-0.111 ± 0.003, P < 0.0001). EEDLW increased by 151 ± 63 kcal/d (P = 0.03). Body fat loss slowed during the KD and coincided with increased protein utilization and loss of fat-free mass. Conclusion: The isocaloric KD was not accompanied by increased body fat loss but was associated with relatively small increases in EE that were near the limits of detection with the use of state-of-the-art technology. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01967563.
Article
Objective Mice are typically housed at environmental temperatures below thermoneutrality, whereas humans live near thermoneutrality. This difference affects energy physiology and, potentially, anti-obesity drug efficacy. Here β3-adrenergic agonist treatment at thermoneutrality (30°C) versus room temperature (22°C) is compared.Methods Male C57BL/6J mice were singly housed at 30°C or 22°C and treated with vehicle or CL316243, a β3-agonist, for 4 weeks. Food intake, energy expenditure, body and adipose weight, brown adipose activity, white adipose browning, and glucose tolerance were evaluated. CL316243 treatment was studied in both chow- and high-fat diet-fed mice.ResultsMice at 30°C, compared to 22°C, had reduced food intake, metabolic rate, and brown adipose activity, as well as increased adiposity. At both temperatures, CL316243 treatment increased brown adipose activation and energy expenditure and improved glucose tolerance. At 30°C, CL316243 increased energy expenditure disproportionately to changes in food intake, thus reducing adiposity, while at 22°C these changes were matched, yielding unchanged adiposity.ConclusionsCL316243 treatment can have beneficial metabolic effects in the absence of adiposity changes. In addition, the interaction between environmental temperature and CL316243 treatment is different from the interaction between environmental temperature and 2,4-dinitrophenol treatment reported previously, suggesting that each drug mechanism must be examined to understand the effect of environmental temperature on drug efficacy.