ArticlePDF Available

Trend of Pesticides Uses in Nepal

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This paper has attempted to analyze the trend of pesticide import, formulation and consumption in Nepal. Nepal has diverse agro-ecological conditions and different agro-ecological climatic conditions necessitate varieties of approaches to crop cultivation and crop protection. The national use of pesticides in Nepal is 396 a.i./ha with the highest use in the vegetable. This review used relevant secondary data and information. The study found that the fungicides are the major form of Pesticides used in Nepal for the pest control and the trend of pesticides consumption is increasing for agricultural purposes. The Nepal Government has signed different international treaties,made rules and regulations and initiated different types of programs to minimize the use of pesticides.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal
of the
Plant Protection Society
Volume 5 2018
Plant Protection Society Nepal
- 32 -
Review Article
TREND OF PESTICIDE USE IN NEPAL
Kiran Ghimire1 and Arun GC2
ABSTRACT
This paper has attempted to analyze the trend of pesticide import, formulation and
consumption in Nepal. Nepal has diverse agro-ecological conditions and different agro-
climatic conditions necessitate varieties of approaches to crop cultivation and crop
protection. The average national use of pesticides in Nepal is 396g a.i./ha with the highest
use in the vegetable. This review used relevant secondary data, and information. The study
found that the fungicides are the major form of pesticides used in Nepal for the pest
control and the trend of pesticides consumption is increasing for agricultural purposes. The
Nepal Government has signed different international treaties, made rules and regulations
and initiated different types of programs to minimize the use of pesticides.
Key words: Pesticides, fungicides, consumption, Nepal, trend
INTRODUCTION
Agriculture is the main source of income, which contributes 27.76% to the Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) of Nepal (MoF, 2018) and engaging 65.6% people in it (AICC, 2018). The
pesticide uses in Nepal started since after the green revolution i.e. at early1960 (Dahal,
1995). Since then, pesticides became one of the priority input in modern agriculture to raise
production by tackling with ever-growing pests. It is estimated that Nepal losses 35% of
production due to pests’ attack in the field and at the storage condition (Palikhe, 2002; PPD,
2013). Occasionally, the pest outbreaks and epidemics may cause a complete failure of crop
harvest. By reducing these losses, there would be a considerable increase in availability of
food, contributing to the food security.
However, use of pesticides comes along with the adverse effect in the health of people, land
and environment (Padmavathi, 2013; GC and Ghimire, 2018), yield loss due to non-target
pesticide application resulting in pesticide-induced pest resurgence and increasing financial
burden to farmers (Thapa, 2003). Farmers apply chemical pesticides at high dose and
frequency, cocktail spray (Aryal, 2014) because of lack of awareness regarding the harmful
effects such as cancer (Basil et al., 2007) improper fetal development (Wickerham et al.,
1 Plant Quarantine Officer, National Plant Quarantine Program, Hariharbhawan, Nepal
2 Agriculture Extension Officer, Ministry of Agriculture, Land management and Cooperative, Singhdurbar,
Nepal
Email for correspondence: kiran.ghimire17@gmail.com
- 33 -
2012), Parkinson's disease (Yesavage et al., 2004), birth defects (Garry et al., 2002) altered
growth, acute and chronic neurotoxicity (Savage et al., 1998).
Nepal is signatory of several international conventions related to pesticide regulation. The
Basel Convention on the Control of Trans boundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes and
Their Disposal was entered into force on 5 May 1992 (approved on March 22, 1989). Nepal
has ratified the treaty on August 15, 1992. Similarly, the Rotterdam Convention, which
deals with Prior Informed Consent procedures for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticide
in international trade, was came into force on September 11, 1998 (approved on September
11, 1998) and Nepal has ratified it on October 17, 2006. Likewise, the Stockholm
Convention, which deals with Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), was came into force on
May 17, 2004 (approved on May 22, 2001) and Nepal has ratified it on October 17, 2006
(signed on April 5, 2002). These international conventions have laid down several
obligations to Nepal (PRMD, 2016b).
METHODOLOGY
A rigorous desk review was carried-out for the study. The major source of data and
information were accessed from the publications and database of Pesticide Registration and
Management Division (PRMD), which was established in BS 2051 (the name of the office
was Pesticide Registration Office at that time) according to the provision of the Pesticide
Act, 2048 and the Pesticide Regulation, 2050 (PRMD, 2016b). The PRMD is responsible
for registration and deregistration of pesticides in Nepal. Besides publications and database
of PRMD, the published reports and data by other relevant government organizations were
considered as the major sources of data and information. Similarly, several independent
research articles were reviewed for this study. All the available data and information were
analyzed and presented.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Pesticides consumption in Nepal
The national consumption of pesticide in Nepal is 396g a.i./ha (PPD, 2016 ; Sharma, 2015),
which is higher than the previous record of 142g a.i./ha (Thapa, 1997 ; Sharma, 2015).
However, lesser than the other Asian countries like India 0.5 kg/ha, Japan 12 kg/ha and
China 14 kg/ha, Korea 6.6 kg/ha, and other countries like- USA (7.0 kg/ha) and Europe (2.5
kg/ha) (Arora et al., 2011 ; Gupta, 2004).
On the ecological basis, the highest average pesticide used in the Terai region of Nepal i.e.
0.995 a.i. kg/ha followed by valley (0.470 a.i. kg/ha), hill (0.314 a.i. kg/ha) and lowest in the
high hill (0.085 a.i. kg/ha) (PPD, 2015). According to a survey report, heavy pesticide use
was found in the Central Development Region (1.015a.i. kg/ha) followed by Eastern
Development Region (0.616 a.i. kg/ha), Western Development Region (0.276 a.i. kg/ha),
Mid-Western Development Region (0.225 a.i. kg/ha) and least in the Far-Western
- 34 -
Development Region (0.146 a.i.kg/ha) (PRMD, 2014). A similar result was found among
the development regions, the use of chemical pesticides was higher (31.9% of the total use)
in the Central Development Region and the lowest (6.4%) in the Far Western Development
Region in 2001/02 (Sharma et al., 2012).
Fig. 1 : Pesticides use by Country (Source: Arora et al., 2011)
In Nepal, the highest share of pesticide consumption are of insecticides i.e. 1064.07 mt. by
formulation quantity, whereas by total active ingredient (a.i.) fungicides are one of the
highly consumed pesticides i.e. 250.81 mt (PRMD, 2016a).
The uses of pesticides in different crop
The highest share of pesticides is of vegetables. It accounts for 89% of the total pesticide
use followed by cash crops and found least in cereals as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Pesticide use in crops
S.N.
Crops
Quantity a.i.kg/ha
1
Cereals
0.04613
2 Vegetables 1.60469
3
Cash crops
0.18654
4
Pulses
0.05075
5
Fruits
0.02919
(Source: Survey Report on National Pesticide Consumption Statistics in Nepal, 2014 and PPD, 2015)
The proportion of vegetable growers using pesticides increased from 7.1% in 1991/92 to
16.1% in 2001/2002 (CBS, 2006). In the 1980s, one percent of the wheat growers applied
pesticides in their farming operations (CBS, 2006) while less than one percent of the rice,
0.39 0.5
12
14
6.6
7
2.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Nepal
India
China
Korea
USA
Europe
kg a.i./ha
Country
Pesticides in kg a.i./ha
- 35 -
maize, potato and sugarcane growers used pesticides during the same period (Sharma et al.,
2012).
Nepalese crop protection market split
To the date, 2,576 pesticides are registered by their trade name and 139 pesticides by their
common name as mentioned in Table 2. Total 160 firms are registered for pesticide import 5
companies for pesticide formulations and 19 as pesticide applicator in Nepal (PRMD,
2016a). Till 2016, 11,777 licenses have been issued for pesticide resell and 11,159
certificate provided to safe storage and use of pesticides (PRMD, 2016a).
Table 2. Registered Pesticides up to 2016/17
S.N.
Pesticides
Trade Name
Common Name
1 Insecticide 1405 52
2
Acaricide
27
6
3
Fungicide
648
40
4
Bactericide
15
1
5
Herbicide
350
22
6 Rodenticide 33 2
7
Molluscicide
2
1
8
Bio-pesticide
90
12
9
Herbal
6
3
Total
2576
139
(Source: PRMD, 2018)
Table 3. Banned Pesticides in Nepal till 2016
S.N. Pesticides Name
Banned
Year Remarks
WHO
group Hazard level
1 Chlordane 2001 Persistent organic
pollutants
II Moderately Hazardous
2 DDT 2001 Persistent organic
pollutants II Moderately Hazardous
3
Dieldrin
2001
Persistent organic
pollutants
II
Moderately Hazardous
4 Endrin 2001 Persistent organic
pollutants
O Obsolete as pesticide,
not classified
5 Aldrin 2001 Persistent organic
pollutants O Obsolete as pesticide,
not classified
6
Heptachlor
2001
Persistent organic
pollutants
O
Obsolete as pesticide,
not classified
- 36 -
S.N. Pesticides Name
Banned
Year
Remarks
WHO
group
Hazard level
7
Mirex
2001
Persistent organic
pollutants
O
Obsolete as pesticide,
not classified
8 Toxafen 2001 Persistent organic
pollutants
O Obsolete as pesticide,
not classified
9 Lindane 2001 Persistent organic
pollutants
II Moderately Hazardous
10
BHC
2001
II
Moderately Hazardous
11 Phosphamidon 2001 Ia Extremely Hazardous
12
Organo Mercury
Chloride
2001
II
Moderately Hazardous
13 Methyl Parathion 2006 Ia Extremely Hazardous
14
Monocrotophos
2006
Ib
Highly Hazardous
15 Endosulphan 2012 Persistent organic
pollutants II Moderately Hazardous
16
Phorate
2015 is in
grace period
Ia
Extremely Hazardous
(Source: PRMD, 2016a and WHO/ICPS, 2009)
Total 16 pesticides were completely banned in Nepal. Similarly, in India 34 pesticides were
banned as of 15th October 2015 (CIBRC, 2015).
Pesticide imports in Nepal
The trend of pesticide use is increasing in Nepal by about 20% per year and expenses on
pesticide in market-oriented vegetables and fruits production has become a major cost factor
(Jasmine et al., 2008). Different forms of pesticides are imported, and their amount is
increasing day by day in Nepal. According to the latest estimate, the annual import of
pesticides in Nepal is about 562 mt. a.i. (PRMD, 2016a) with 32% insecticides, 44%
fungicides, 23% Herbicides and 1% others. Insecticides (Organochlorines,
Organophosphates, Carbamates, Synthetic-pyrethroids and others/mix) are the major types
of the pesticides. Among them, organophosphates are the major constituents of insecticides
imported in Nepal (Jasmine et al., 2008). The graph shows that the use of insecticides
increased remarkably after 2004/2005 as shown in Figure 2, which may be due to the pest
like Brown planthopper outbreak occurred in Chitwan district and lost almost all the rice
yields Farmers do not want to take risk of crop failure that's why dependency on pesticides
is increasing day by day.
- 37 -
Fig. 2 : Trend of Insecticides (Source: PRMD, 2016)
Around twenty-two percent of the farmers apply pesticides before the incidence of disease
pest, 51% after the incidence of disease pest and 27% at the later stage of disease pest
development (PPD, 2016 ; PRMD, 2014). The studies have shown that more than 90% of
the total pesticides are used in vegetable farming (Atreya and Sitaula, 2010). People are
using pesticides as necessary evil, as there are no effective alternatives available for the pest
control, in wrong way, due to weak monitoring and legal provision, open border situation,
lack of awareness, training and knowledge among people regarding pesticide use and it’s
management, no provision for integrated pest management and organic products
certification, accumulation of date expired pesticides and weak co-ordination and co-
operation among the different governmental organizations are the major cause of increased
pesticide use (PRMD, 2016b).
Fig: 3: Pesticide Import in Nepal in monetary term (Source PRMD, 2016a)
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
a
i
K
g
o
r
L
Organochlorines
Organophosphates
Carbamates
Syntheticpyrethroids
others/mix
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
Pesticide in a.i. (Kg or L)
Amount (Thousand Rs.)
- 38 -
In 1997/98, the pesticide imported and formulated in Nepal was 50,000 kg, which was
soared to about 562,000 kg in 2015/16, which is more than 11 folds increase. Regarding the
expenditure for pesticide import and formulation, in 1997/98, 51 million Nepalese rupees
(NRs.) was spent. This expenditure was rose to more than NRs 679 million in 2015/16.
Likewise, in 2007/08 the amount of organochlorines and other/mix insecticides import was
increased much higher than previous year and continued thereafter. Similarly, in 2008/09
organophosphates and other/mix insecticide amount import was increased. In 2009/10, the
pesticide import was decreased rapidly perhaps due to integrated pest management (IPM)
program running intensively in different districts of Nepal to minimize the harmful effects
of pesticides. But the import of all firms of insecticides such as organochlorines,
organophosphates, carbamates, synthetic-pyrethroids and other/mix were increased in
2010/11 because of no best alternatives available in place of chemical pesticides to control
the pests. This might help in proving the increasing dependency upon the chemical to
increase the agricultural productivity and there are no effective alternatives available to
substitute chemical pesticides in Nepal.
Purposes of pesticide use
Fig. 4 : Pesticide use purposes (Source: PRMD, 2016a)
The pesticides are used not only with agricultural objectives but also with public health and
household purposes (PRMD, 2016a). The maximum amount of pesticides, which includes
insecticides, fungicides, rodenticides, bio-pesticides, acaricides, herbicides, bactericides,
molluscicides and others are used in agriculture sector, mainly to control crop loss by
insects, weeds, plant diseases, rodents, etc. The pesticides in public health purposes are
primarily for vector control of public health diseases, like malaria , dengue, whereas for
household purposes for cleaning, control of rodents, termites, bedbug, etc. The graph shows
- 39 -
the amount of pesticide use in the agricultural sector is increasing as time passes due to pest
resistance to pesticides, a resurgence of pests, elimination of the natural enemies, and
disruption of the ecosystem (Palikhe, 2002). The misuse of the pesticides, especially, the
broad-spectrum ones in Nepal has caused pests to adapt and become resistant to the
pesticides (Yadav and Lian, 2009), the most pesticides are then required at higher doses to
achieve the same level of control. Similarly, the graph shows a significant decrease in the
amount of pesticides use in the public health sector as the level of awareness in people
regarding the harmful effects of the pesticides is increasing.
Summary of date expired pesticides accumulated in Nepal
Nepal had already disposed 74.28 mt. obsolete pesticides and 43 cylinders of methyl
bromide (50kg) with the help of GIZ in 2011.
Table 4. Amount of date expired pesticides disposed in 2011
S.N.
Pesticide group
Amount (Mt)
% of total
1
Mixed (PoP and OC)
23.61
31.79
2
Organochlorine
10.48
14.11
3
POPs
10.05
13.53
4
OM
8.38
11.28
5
OP
7.95
10.70
6
Fungicides
4.45
5.99
7
Rodenticides
2.6
3.50
8
Fumigants
2.52
3.39
9
SP
1.86
2.50
10
Herbicides
1.84
2.48
11
CM
0.54
0.73
Grand Total
74.28
100
(Source: GC, 2011 ; Sharma et al.,2012)
The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) has completed their
collection from Nepal in 2011 and disposal in Germany (Sharma et al., 2012).
Approaches to reduce pesticide use in Nepal
Pesticide Act 2048 and regulations 2050 for efficient handling, use and management
of pesticides.
Nepal is a signatory member of International treaties like Basal convention,
Stockholm convention and Rotterdam convention.
Awareness and campaign regarding "Pesticides are poison, not the medicine".
Adoption of IPM technology to minimize the use of pesticides.
- 40 -
Rapid bioassay of pesticide residue (RBPR) analysis has been established since
June 18, 2014.
Celebrating "No Pesticide Use Week" in every year from 3rd to 10th December
since 2013.
New Act, rules and regulations were made to regulate the misuse of pesticide.
Different trainings like safe storage of pesticides, handling of pesticides and selling
of pesticides were provided to train the pesticide resellers.
Agro-vet, Pesticide reseller licensing processes in related to pesticide sale, storage
and handling has been improved.
Subsidy on the use of bio-pesticides.
Awareness through different media likes - newspaper, television, radio, F.M., etc.
E-plant clinic has been started to help farmers in controlling the pests and haphazard
use of pesticides.
District Agriculture Development Offices (DADOs) under Plant Protection
Directorate (PPD) organize plant clinic every week regularly.
Community IPM resource centers has been established.
Promotion and export of organic products like coffee, an apple from Jumla, honey,
etc.
Regular monitoring from different organization like Department of Food
Technology and Quality Control (DFTQC), Plant Protection Directorate (PPD),
National Plant Quarantine Program (NPQP) to regulate the use of pesticides in
agricultural produce.
CONCLUSION
In Nepal, the consumption of the pesticide is increasing for the agricultural purposes, though
low national average as compared to other countries in the world. However, the risk and the
hazards to the farmers are higher than other countries. Farmers need to be reminded that
pesticides are not the only control measures for pest problems, bio-pesticides are one of the
best alternatives. The proper and the scientific mechanism of pesticide disposal (should be
listed in the Pesticide Act and Regulation) should be made and applied. The strengths of the
Government, I/NGOs and other stakeholders should be utilized fully to check the pesticide
misuse.
LITERATURE CITED
AICC. 2018. Agriculture Diary (in Nepali). Agriculture Information and Communication
Center, Hariharbhawan, Lalitpur.
Arora, S., A.K. Kapoor and O.M. Bambawale. 2011. Pesticides: Latest WHO Ranking,
Regulation and Labels claims in India. National Center for Integrated Pest
- 41 -
Management, Indian Council for Agricultural Research, IARI, Pusa Campus, New
Delhi.
Aryal, S. 2014. Review on pesticide residue works in Nepal. Entomology Division, Nepal
Agricultural Research Council (NARC), Khumaltar, Nepal.
Atreya, K. and B.K. Sitaula. 2010. Mancozeb: Growing risk for agricultural communities.
Himalayan Journal of Sciences 6(8):9-10
Basil, K.L., C. Vakil, M. Sanborn, D.C. Cole, J.S. Kaur and K.J. Kerr. 2007. Cancer health
effects of pesticides, Can. Fam. Physician 53:1712-1720.
CBS. 2006. Agriculture Census Nepal 2001/2002. National Planning Commission
Secretariat, Central Bureau of Statistics, Kathmandu, Nepal.
CIBRC. 2015. List of pesticides which are banned, refused registration and restricted in use
in India. Website:http://www.raitamitra.kar.nic.in/ENG/QCAR/Plant%20protection/
LIST%20OF%20PESTICIDES%20WHICH%20ARE%20BANNED,%20REFUSE
D%20REGISTRATION%20AND%20RESTRICTED%20IN%20USE.pdf
Dahal, L. 1995. A study on pesticide pollution in Nepal. IUCN, Nepal.
MOF. 2018. Economic survey. Ministry of Finance. Singhdurbar, Kathmandu.
Garry, V.F., M.F. Harkins, L.L. Erickson, L.K. Longsimpson, S.E. Holland and B.L.
Borroughs. 2002. Birth defects, season of conception, and sex of children born to
pesticide applicators living in Red River Valley of Minnesota, USA, Environ.
health. perspect 110: 441-449.
GC, A. and K. Ghimire. 2018. Determinants of pesticide application in Nepalese vegetable
farming: An empirical analysis using multivariate probit model. Journal of
Agriculture and Environment. Vol. 19:42-50.
Gupta, P.K. 2004. Pesticide exposure- Indian scene. Toxicology 198: 83-90.
Jasmine, D., T. Prasai, S.R. Pant, and B.L. Jayana. 2008. Study on major pesticides and
fertilizers used in Nepal. Scientific World 6(6):76-80.
Padmavathi, M. 2013. Ecotoxins and their impact on human health. Res. J. Agriculture and
Forestry Sci. 1(4): 10-17.
Palikhe, B.R. 2002. Challenges and options of the pesticide use: In the context of Nepal.
landschaftsokologieund Umweltforschung 38:130-14.
PPD. 2013. Annual Progress Report, Plant Protection Directorate, Hariharbhawan, Lalitpur.
PPD. 2015. Annual Progress Report, Plant Protection Directorate, Hariharbhawan, Lalitpur.
- 42 -
PRMD. 2014. Final report on study on national pesticide consumption statistics in Nepal.
Pesticide Registration and Management Division, Ministry of Agricultural
Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
PRMD. 2016a. Pesticide Statistics (in Nepali). Pesticide Registration and Management
Division, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
PRMD. 2016b. Pesticide:Awareness publication (in Nepali). Pesticide Registration and
Management Division, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
PRMD. 2018. Pesticide Statistics (in Nepali). Pesticide Registration and Management
Division, Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Savage, E.P., T.P. Keefe, L.M. Mounce, R.K. Heaton, J.A. Lewis and B.J. Burcar. 1998.
Chronic neurological sequelae of acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning. Arch
Environment health 43:38-45.
Sharma, D.R. 2015. Use of Pesticides and its residue on Vegetable crops in Nepal. The
Journal of Agriculture and Environment: Vol. 16:
Sharma, D. R., R.B. Thapa, H.K. Manandhar, S.M. Shrestha and S.B. Pradhan. 2012. Use of
pesticides in Nepal and impacts on human health and environment. Journal of
Agriculture and Environment 13: 67-74.
Thapa, R.B. 1997. An overview of pesticides pollution in Nepal. Nepalese Horticulture, J.
Nepalese Horti Soci, 1:30-39.
Thapa, R.B. 2003. Pesticide pollution and integrated pest management. In: F.P. Neupane
(ed.), Integrated Pest Management in Nepal: Proceedings of a National Seminar,
Kathmandu, Nepal, September 25-26, 2002. Himalayan Resource Institute, New
Baneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal. pp. 175-194.
Wickerham, E., B. Lozoff, J. Shao, N. Kaciroti, Y. Xia and J. Meeker 2012. Reduced birth
weight in relation to pesticide mixtures detected in cord blood of full term infants.
Environmental International 47: 80-85.
WHO/ICPS. 2009. The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and
guidelines to classification, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yadav, S.K. and K.K. Lian. 2009. The management of persistent organic pollutant
pesticides in Nepal. MqJICEL 6:217-236.
Yesavage, J. A., J. Sheikh, A. Noda, G. Murphy, R. O’Hara, R. Hierholzer and J.
Tinklenber. 2004. Use of a VA Pharmacy database to screen for areas at high risk
for disease: Parkinson’s disease and exposure to pesticides. Journal of Geriatric
Psychiatry and neurology 17(1): 36-38.
... In Nepal, the consumption average weight of active ingredients of pesticides applied is 396 g/ha [5]. This amount is lower in comparison to other countries (for example, India 0.5 kg/ha, China 14 kg/ha) [6], but due to irrational use and unsafe handling, the issue of pesticide use in agriculture farming is becoming a growing public health concern [7,8]. ...
... This amount is lower in comparison to other countries (for example, India 0.5 kg/ha, China 14 kg/ha) [6], but due to irrational use and unsafe handling, the issue of pesticide use in agriculture farming is becoming a growing public health concern [7,8]. Moreover, its use in Nepal is concentrated in relatively few provinces and also increasing by about 20% per year [5]. Of the total pesticides imported in the country, more than 90% is used in vegetable farming [5]. ...
... Moreover, its use in Nepal is concentrated in relatively few provinces and also increasing by about 20% per year [5]. Of the total pesticides imported in the country, more than 90% is used in vegetable farming [5]. ...
Article
Full-text available
In view of increasing irrational use and unsafe handling of pesticides in agriculture in Nepal, a descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the practice of chemical pesticide use and acute health symptoms experienced by farmers. A total of 790 farmers from the Chitwan district were randomly selected for the study. X2 test, T-test, and Multiple Logistic Regression were used for analysis. Among the farmers, 84% used exclusively chemical pesticide. Farmers with better knowledge on pesticide handling were 8.3 times more likely to practice safe purchasing, four times more likely to practice safe mixing and spraying, and two times more likely to practice safe storage and disposal. Similarly, perception/attitude of farmers about chemical pesticide policy and market management was significantly associated with the practice of farmers during purchasing, mixing and spraying, and storage and disposal. Among the users of chemical pesticides, 18.7% farmers experienced one or more pesticide related acute symptoms of health problems during the previous 12 months. Farmers with unsafe practices of pesticide handling were two times more likely to suffer from acute poisoning. It is concluded that knowledge about pesticide handling and favorable perception/attitude on pesticide policy and market management are the predictors of safe use of pesticide.
... In Nepal, the consumption average weight of active ingredients of pesticides applied per hectare is 396 g/ha [5]. This amount of consumption is lower in comparison to other countries (for example, India 0.5 kg/ha, China 14 kg/ha) [6], but due to irrational use and unsafe handling, the issue of pesticide use in agriculture farming is becoming a growing public health concern [7,8]. ...
... This amount of consumption is lower in comparison to other countries (for example, India 0.5 kg/ha, China 14 kg/ha) [6], but due to irrational use and unsafe handling, the issue of pesticide use in agriculture farming is becoming a growing public health concern [7,8]. Moreover, its use in Nepal is concentrated in relatively few provinces and also increasing by about 20% per year [5]. Of the total pesticides imported in the country, more than 90% is used in vegetable farming [5]. ...
... Moreover, its use in Nepal is concentrated in relatively few provinces and also increasing by about 20% per year [5]. Of the total pesticides imported in the country, more than 90% is used in vegetable farming [5]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background: Irrational use and unsafe handling of pesticides in agriculture farming is a serious public health concern in developing countries including Nepal. This study was conducted to assess the practice of chemical pesticide use and associated factors along with the acute health symptoms experienced by farmers in Chitwan District, Nepal. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study using quantitative methods with 790 farmers from Chitwan district, Nepal selected through systematic random sampling. Scores for knowledge, attitude/perception and practice were calculated by aggregating variables where each variable was scored 1 or 0 based on a right or wrong answer. Further, the practice variable was segregated into three groups namely practice during purchasing, practice during mixing and spraying and practice during storage and disposal. Statistical analysis was performed with X2 test, T-test and Multiple Logistic Regression. Confounder controls were made for age, sex and education. Results: Out of the 790 farmers, 663 (84.0%) were found to use exclusively chemical pesticide. Among them, 62% had no idea about its label. Farmers with better knowledge on pesticide handling were 8.3 times more likely to practice safe purchasing (95% CI=5.0-13.8), four times more likely to practice safe mixing and spraying (95% CI=2.5-5.9) and two times more likely to safe storage and disposal (95% CI=1.6-3.6). Similarly, perception/attitude of farmers about chemical pesticide policy and market management was significantly associated with the practice of farmers during purchasing (95% CI=1.1-2.8), mixing and spraying (95% CI=2.0-4.5) and storage and disposal (95% CI=1.1-2.5). Farmers with unsafe practice of pesticide handling were two times more likely to suffer from acute poisoning (AOR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.3-3.3). Conclusion: There was a high use of pesticide in agriculture farming in Chitwan District. Improving knowledge of farmers on safe handling of pesticides and developing strategies for proper market management would promote the safe handling practices among farmers and reduce the acute pesticide poisoning in Nepal.
... kg/ha) (PPD, 2014). Nepalese people remained at alarming threat of pesticides in their diets and the use of pesticide is increasing every year (Ghimire and GC, 2018;Khanal et al., 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
The increasing use of pesticides has also raised the risk of higher pesticide residues in food. Also, the food commodities imported from India are considered to be very unsafe to consume because of their indiscriminate pesticide applications on crops. Sometime, this situation also occurs in Nepal food commodities. The research was carried to evaluate the residue level of carbamate and organophosphate pesticides in different vegetable commodities of Nepal origin and regularly imported from India. Pesticide residue was evaluated through Rapid Bioassay of Pesticide Residue analysis in 285 samples obtained from Bagmati Province, Lumbini Province and Sudurpaschim Province of Nepal and bordering areas of Koshi, Lumbini and Sudurpaschim Provinces. In laboratory test, most of vegetable crops were found to have pesticide residue in them. In Bagmati province, brinjal (17.29%), capsicum (16.6%), and chilli (18.12%); in Lumbini, brinjal (17%), cauliflower (15.8%), and potato (16.68%); in Sudurpaschim, broadleaf mustard (15.21%) and cauliflower (41.64%) were found relatively higher pesticide residues while potato (18.38%), tomato (29%), bean (32.52%), brinjal (39.25%), bitter gourd (14.37%) imported from India were found relatively higher pesticide residues.
... Regarding the land holding the pesticide is negatively affected by the land ownership but it positively effects on the area allocated for the vegetable farming. According to (GC & Ghimire, 2018) highest share of pesticides is of vegetables. It accounts for 89% of the total pesticide use. ...
Article
Full-text available
Pesticide is one of the major inputs for commercial vegetable farming in Nepal. The study examined pesticides use pattern and farmers' knowledge, perception, awareness about pesticides and the handling practices. The study is based on survey data consisting of 150 samples collected randomly from Parsa district of Nepal. The results show that 54.7% of the cucumber farmers used pesticides as control measure of insect and fungus in Parsa district. Out of which insecticides was found to be applied more i.e.68% followed by the fungicides i.e. 22.33% of total application volume sprayed. Regarding toxicity level farmers were found to use Moderately Hazardous Pesticides (II). The research identified that farmers do 2 times spray as mandatory frequency of application however, nearly half of farmers were found to spray pesticide four to five times. Regarding their knowledge 53% of farmers found to read label on pesticide bottle/packages. More than half (57%) of the farmers has found to receive Integrated Pest Management (IPM) training but only 7% practiced alternative pest control measures. Regarding the disposal only 6% found to bury the empty bottles, packages after use and others throw the containers anywhere. The results show that, in Nepal, pesticide was mostly applied for the vegetable farming. If area under vegetable farming increases by 1% the probability of the pesticide application by household is increased by the 22%. Highlights m Study revealed that 54.7% of the respondents used pesticides. m Insecticides were dominant pesticides in use by volume. m Mostly respondents used Moderately Hazardous Pesticides (II). m Increase in area under cultivation by 1% increased pesticide application by 22%.
... Regarding the land holding the pesticide is negatively affected by the land ownership but it positively effects on the area allocated for the vegetable farming. According to (GC & Ghimire, 2018) highest share of pesticides is of vegetables. It accounts for 89% of the total pesticide use. ...
Article
Pesticide is one of the major inputs for commercial vegetable farming in Nepal. The study examined pesticides use pattern and farmers’ knowledge, perception, awareness about pesticides and the handling practices. The study is based on survey data consisting of 150 samples collected randomly from Parsa district of Nepal. The results show that 54.7% of the cucumber farmers used pesticides as control measure of insect and fungus in Parsa district. Out of which insecticides was found to be applied more i.e.68% followed by the fungicides i.e. 22.33% of total application volume sprayed. Regarding toxicity level farmers were found to use Moderately Hazardous Pesticides (II). The research identified that farmers do 2 times spray as mandatory frequency of application however, nearly half of farmers were found to spray pesticide four to five times. Regarding their knowledge 53% of farmers found to read label on pesticide bottle/packages. More than half (57%) of the farmers has found to receive Integrated Pest Management (IPM) training but only 7% practiced alternative pest control measures. Regarding the disposal only 6% found to bury the empty bottles, packages after use and others throw the containers anywhere. The results show that, in Nepal, pesticide was mostly applied for the vegetable farming. If area under vegetable farming increases by 1% the probability of the pesticide application by household is increased by the 22%.
... Pesticides have shown harmful effects on the nervous system, reproductive system, and endocrine system. They are also considered as the cause of some cancer and many other diseases like congenital disabilities, Parkinson's disease, acute and chronic neurotoxicity (GC & Ghimire, 2018). It also adulterates land-dwelling ecosystem, poison human food, marine food resources, fisheries, and hydroponics (Carvalho, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Nepal is predominately an agrarian country where still the majority of the total population rely on agriculture (Adhikari, 2018). The productivity of agriculture should be augmented to fulfill the increasing demand for food. Despite countless efforts, the agriculture sector could not come across to accomplish the global market for foodstuffs due to climate change. By which, plants will be attacked by various insects, funguses, and microorganisms. To tackle such problems, pesticides are being widely used to defend and block agriculture products from harmful organisms. But due to lack of public awareness, large numbers of farmers have been using pesticides as medicine - a conviction implanted in their mind (Pingali et al., 1995).
Article
Full-text available
Currently, the pesticides are the global core concern because it is a boon to farmers against increasing disease-pest and simultaneously, pesticide residue is the major anxiety regarding human health. For that reason, identification and determination of factors affecting the application of pesticides are essential. To identify and evaluate determinants of pesticides application in Nepal, a household survey of 300 households was carried-out and an empirical analysis was performed using multivariate probit model. Moreover, powder and liquid forms of pesticides were considered for summer and winter season in vegetable farming, which was assigned as outcome variables. Likewise, socioeconomic , demographic, farm-level and perception data were considered as explanatory variables. Use of chemical fertilizers, age and gender of household head, household size and access to weather information were found the most influencing factors. Moreover, forms of pesticides and growing seasons were found complementary to each other. Therefore, devising the policy options accordingly should balance needs of farmers and health of consumers.
Article
Full-text available
In a country where farmers rely on conventional wisdom to make decisions on farming practices and the government lacks clear policies based on solid research, pesticide overuse is emerging as a problem. Mancozeb, the widely applied pesticide in Nepal’s vegetable farming, has both short- and long-term health consequences to people exposed to its unsafe levels. A handful of studies in the hill regions of Nepal suggest that the pesticide is being sprayed to farms at much higher level than recommended. The widespread misuse and dangerous consequences of this pesticide suggest a need for more thorough study, better instruction, and more effective control. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hjs.v6i8.1794 Himalayan Journal of Sciences Vol.6 Issue 8 2010 pp.9-10
Article
Full-text available
The data of Nepal Government shows that nine major pesticides groups with seven subgroups of Insecticides were imported from the year 1997 to 2003. The pesticide use amounts to 142 g/ha which is low compared to other counties. The highest pesticides quantity imported & quantity consumed from the 2056/57 (1999) to 2060/061(2003) were fungicides, bactericides, acaricides & seed treatment. group. For the year 2056/57 (1999) & 2057/58(2000), no import & consumption of biopesticides were done but from the year 2058/59(2001) to 2060/061(2003) no import & consumption of plant regulators was done. The various types of pesticides with 306 trade names and 71 technical names are registered / enlisted and used in Nepal which includes Insecticides, Fungicides, Herbicides, Rodenticides, Acaricides and Others. Moreover, twelve types of pesticides are band in Nepal for its import and use. Similarly, the demand of fertilizers were increased from 1997/98 to 2001/02 and then decreased dramatically with high amount from 2001/02 to 2002/03 and since then again it again increased up to 204/05. This trend is same for Urea and Diammonium Phoshphate whereas Murate of Potash is increasing from 1997/98 to 2004/04. Seven types of fertilizers are being used in Nepal viz. Urea, Diammonium Phosphate (DAP), Murate of Potash (MOP), Ammonium Sulphate (AS), Single Super Phosphate (SSP), Ammonium Phosphate Sulphate (APS) and NPK. These are imported by Public institution like Agricultural Input Corporation (AIC) , Private Institutions and also donated/granted by the Government of Japan called as 2KR (Two Kenny Round). The import of fertilizers shows irregular trend. The import of fertilizers was highest in 1998/99 which amounted to 219038 metric ton and since then it decreased although there showed fluctuations. The distribution of fertilizers was increase from 1997/98 and reached highest in the year 2002/03 and since then it started decreasing. Similarly, the fertilizer consumption was highest in the year 1994/95 which was 30.4kg/ha which declined since then and showed fluctuation. The fertilizer consumption is regularly decreasing in the recent years from the year 2002/03. Key words: Agriculture; Fertilizer; Insecticide; Pest and pesticide. DOI: 10.3126/sw.v6i6.2638 Scientific World, Vol. 6, No. 6, July 2008 76-80
Article
p>Farmer field survey and lab residue analysis studies were carried out to examine the use of pesticide in vegetable fields and its potential effects on human health and environment. Field information were collected using semi-structured questionnaires face to face interview with 200 farmers from three districts (Bara, Dhading and Kavre) of central region of Nepal. The recent study showed that the use of chemical pesticides in Nepal is 0.396Kg a.i./ha. The farmers' field survey showed that 72 percent of the farmers paid attention on acquiring information about the effectiveness of pesticide to control the target pests. While 65 percent of the farmers noticed the expiry date of pesticides, and only a few farmers considered the adverse effects of pesticide on human health and environment. The result showed that majority of them (51.5%) kept the remaining pesticides in their house freely, whereas 23.5 percent farmers destroyed the remaining pesticides; either buried or burnt. It was also found that 22.5 percent of farmers did not care and threw the remaining pesticides outside the house and in the fields. Residues analysis of 75 samples of 13 vegetables indicated that 58%t of the vegetable samples contained no detectable level (NDL) of the monitored pesticides, 38% samples resulted in trace level of the pesticides residue or below the minimum residue level (MRL), while 4% samples showed above MRL (EU Standard). Present study revealed ample scope for improvement on pesticide use and exposure, for which there is need of strong policy implementation, strengthening training, extension services and various awareness programs to farmers and agro-vets for judicious use of pesticides, health safety and environment protection.</p
Article
Majority of the farmers are unaware of pesticide types, level of poisoning, safety precautions and potential hazards on health and environment. According to the latest estimate, the annual import of pesticides in Nepal is about 211t a.i. with 29.19% insecticides, 61.38% fungicides, 7.43% herbicides and 2% others. The gross sale value accounts US $ 3.05 million per year. Average pesticides use in Nepal is 142 g a.i./ha, which is very low as compared to other Asian counties. The focus of this paper is to analyze the use and application status of pesticides in Nepal to aware the society about adverse effects of chemical pesticides in the environment . Pesticidal misuse is being a serious concern mainly in the commercial pocket areas of agricultural production, where farmers are suffering from environmental pollution. Incidence of poisoning is also increasing because of intentional, incidental and occupational exposure. Toxic and environmentally persistent chemicals are being used as pesticides. Many studies showed that the chemical pollution of the environment has long-term effects on human life. It is therefore essential that manufacture, use, storage, transport and disposal of chemical pesticides be strictly regulated. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment Vol:13, Jun.2012, Page 67-72 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/aej.v13i0.7590
Article
As a gesture of its commitment to global environmental protection and sustainable development, Nepal has enacted the Pesticides Act 1994 and Pesticides Regulations 1994. However, the Nepalese government still confronts numerous constraints in terms of lack of qualified and trained personnel as well as the technical capacities in pesticide management. These areas need to be substantially strengthened for the government to effectively regulate the production, importation, distribution and safe use of pesticides. The problem has been compounded by transboundary movement and illegal import of banned pesticides; these issues could be overcome through strong coordination between different stakeholders in agricultural research and development. This requires more efficient policies to improve management programs for persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and update them with the latest knowledge.
Article
Pressure of growing population and lesser options have put enormous burden to meet food needs. Food security is a major concern and challenge in Nepal, where the diverse agro-climatic conditions necessitate different approaches to cultivation and crop protection. It is estimated that Nepal losses around 35% of its crop due to pests and storage. The widespread use and disposal of pesticides by farmers and the general public provide many possible sources of pesticides in the environment. The indiscriminate use of chemical pesticides has resulted in several problems such as pest resistance to pesticides, resurgence of pests, toxic residues in food, water, air and soil, elimination of natural enemies and disruption of ecosystem. In the Nepalese context, one of the issues is misuse and abuse of pesticides in the commercial farmers. Most farmers' do not understand the nature of pesticides as insecticides and fungicides as medicines rather than poisons. Due to ignorance, many accidental poisonings occur annually. The implementation of awareness program on pesticide safe use practices poses challenges and constraints. However, there is a need to uplift the awareness level of the farmers. There is a trans-boundary issue, illegal import of pesticides and banned pesticides over Nepal's boarder are found into local markets. Nepal has a pesticide disposal problem. The best option for the sector is to adopt an optimal crop protection strategy. There are great chances to find several plant species, which grow naturally in abundance and may provide quite effective safe and economical bio-pesticides.
Article
To evaluate the latent neurological effects of organophosphate pesticide poisoning, this epidemiologic study examined 100 matched-pairs of individuals with previous acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning and nonpoisoned controls. No significant difference between poisoned subjects and controls was found on audiometric tests, ophthalmic tests, electroencephalograms, or the clinical serum and blood chemistry evaluations. Of the more than 50 scores from the neurological examination, abnormalities were demonstrated among the cases only on measures of memory, abstraction, and mood, and on one test of motor reflexes. Differences between the two cohorts were much more apparent in the neuropsychological tests. The differences occurred on tests of widely varying abilities including intellectual functioning, academic skills, abstraction and flexibility of thinking, and simple motor skills. Twice as many cases as controls (24 vs. 12) had Halstead-Reitan Battery summary scores in the range characteristic of individuals with cerebral damage or dysfunction. Results from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and the Patient's and Relative's Assessment of Patient Functioning Inventories also revealed greater distress and complaints of disability for the poisoned subjects.