Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND
Content may be subject to copyright.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Bali Medical Journal (Bali Med J) 2018, Volume 7, Number 3: 650-653
P-ISSN.2089-1180, E-ISSN.2302-2914
650 Open access: www.balimedicaljournal.org and ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/bmj
CrossMark
Published by DiscoverSys
1Abant Izzet Baysal University
Hospital, Department of Internal
Medicine, Bolu, Turkey
2Abant Izzet Baysal University
Hospital, Department of General
Surgery, Bolu, Turkey
*authors were at the equal
contribution in generating the
study and this article.
ABSTRACT
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity are two important
disorders which are associated with the enormous amount of morbidity
and mortality. Inflammation plays a crucial role in development and
complications of these diseases.
Aim: We aimed to compare mean platelet volume (MPV) as an
inflammatory marker in well and poorly controlled type 2 diabetic
subjects and to observe its association with obesity indices, body mass
index (BMI) and waist circumference.
Method: Data of type 2 diabetic patients obtained from
institutional database retrospectively analyzed. Patients were
divided into two groups according to the HbA1c level as follows:
HbA1c lower than 7% were classified as well-controlled, and
HbA1c equal to or greater than 7% were classified as poorly
controlled diabetics.
Result: Both MPV, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference
were significantly higher in poorly controlled diabetics compared to
patients with well-controlled type 2 DM.
Conclusion: MPV could be considered as a marker of inflammatory
burden in type 2 DM and obesity. Due to its cost-effective and easy
to assess nature, MPV may be screened periodically in these patients,
along with HbA1c and other measures to keep both physicians and
patients aware of the inflammatory load of these diseases.
Keywords: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, body mass index, obesity, mean platelet volume, inflammation
Cite This Article: Aktas, G., Kocak, M.Z., Duman, T.T., Erkus, E. Atak, B.M., Sit, M., Savli, H. 2018. Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) as an inflammatory
marker in type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. Bali Medical Journal 7(3): 650-653. DOI:10.15562/bmj.v7i3.806
Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) as an inflammatory
marker in type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity
Gulali Aktas,1* Mehmet Z. Kocak,1 Tuba T. Duman,1 Edip Erkus,1
Burcin M. Atak,1 Mustafa Sit,2 Haluk Savli1
INTRODUCTION
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most
important cause of morbidity and mortality around
the world. e uncontrolled disease is associated
with increased morbidity and mortality. Obesity
is another serious condition which has a close
relation to mortal and debilitating diseases, such
as, cardiovascular diseases, type 2 DM, cerebro-
vascular diseases and hypertension. Both type 2
diabetes mellitus and obesity increase the inam-
matory burden and cause a continuous low-grade
inammation. Authors suggest that inammatory
microenvironment in obese and diabetic patients is
responsible for many of the complications of these
disorders.1
While inammation plays a crucial role in the
development of many diseases and their complica-
tions, hemogram parameters, such as mean platelet
volume (MPV) is considered as a novel inam-
matory marker. Mean platelet volume has been
reported to be associated with mortality in critical
care.2 Beside overt inammation, such as inam-
matory bowel disease,3 and rheumatoid arthritis,4 it
has also been found to be associated with low-grade
inammatory conditions.5 Previously, we showed
the association between MPV and type 2 DM.6
In present retrospective study, we aimed to
compare MPV values of the well and poorly
controlled type 2 diabetic subjects and to observe
its association with obesity indices, body mass
index (BMI) and waist circumference.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
We retrospectively screened the computerized data-
base and patient les of our institution and collected
the data from subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Patients with infection or any other inammatory
diseases were excluded. We also did not include
pregnant subjects in the study. General character-
istics, such as age, gender, antidiabetic medications
used, and ndings in physical examination, such as
height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure
(systolic and diastolic) and heart rate were recorded.
We calculated body mass index by the division of
weight by the square of height.
We obtained and recorded the laboratory
parameters from database and patient les. ose
include glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting
plasma glucose (FPG), blood urea, creatinine,
aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine amino-
transferase (ALT), white blood cell count (WBC),
hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Htc), platelet count
(PLT) and MPV. Patients were divided into two
groups according to the HbA1c level. Subjects
*Correspondence to:
Gulali Aktas, Abant Izzet Baysal
University Hospital, Department
of Internal Medicine, Bolu, Turkey
authors were at the equal contri-
bution in generating the study and
this article
draliaktas@yahoo.com
Received: 2017-08-10
Accepted: 2018-6-28
Published: 2018-9-1
Volume No.: 7
Issue: 3
First page No.: 650
P-ISSN.2089-1180
E-ISSN.2302-2914
Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v7i3.806
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
651
Published by DiscoverSys | Bali Med J 2018; 7(3): 650-653 | doi: 10.15562/bmj.v7i3.806
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
with an HbA1c lower than 7% were classied as
well-controlled, and equal to or greater than 7%
were classied as poorly controlled diabetics.
Statistical analyses were conducted by SPSS
software (SPSS 15.0; SPSS Inc., IBM, Chicago,
IL, USA). Homogenous variables were compared
between groups by t-test and expressed as
mean ± SD. Nonhomogenous variables were
compared between groups by Mann-Whitney
U test and expressed as median (min.-max.).
Nonparametric variables were analyzed by
chi-square test. Statistically, significance was
set on the level of a p-value lower than 0.05. We
conducted correlation analyses using Pearson’s
correlation. The significance of correlation was
set on a p-value lower than 0.01. The study was
approved by the institutional directorate.
RESULTS
A total of 115 subjects enrolled in the study, 54 in
well-controlled and 61 in poorly controlled type 2
diabetes mellitus group. Age of the well-controlled
diabetics (64 [35-77] years) was signicantly
advanced than that of the poorly controlled subjects
(58 [25-81] years) (p = 0.02).
While 24 of 54 subjects in well-controlled diabe-
tes group were men and 30 were women, 26 were
men, and 35 were women in poorly controlled
diabetes group. Gender was not statistically dier-
ent between study groups (p=0.84). Systolic and
diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, blood Hb,
Htc, WBC, PLT, urea, creatinine, AST and ALT
levels were not statistically dierent between
well-controlled and poorly controlled subjects
Table 1 General characteristics of the study groups
Characteristics
Well-controlled Poorly controlled
pMedian (Min-Max)
Age (years) 64 (35-77) 58 (25-81) 0.02
Waist circumference (cm) 88 (74-121) 96 (79-110) 0.001
Systolic BP (mmHg) 122 (110-142) 128 (110-141) 0.19
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 80 (68-90) 80 (68-89) 0.96
Mean ± SD
Heart rate (beat per minute) 79 ± 4 78 ± 5 0.45
BMI (kg/m2) 27.3 ± 4.7 29.1 ± 4.3 0.03
Chi-Square test
Gender Men (n) 24 26 0.84
Women (n) 30 35
Metformin usage Ye s 33 25 0.03
No 21 36
Table 2 Laboratory parameters of the study groups
Laboratory parameters
Well-controlled Poorly controlled
pMean ± SD
WBC (u/mm3) 7.3 ± 1.6 7.8 ± 1.7 0.13
Hb (g/dl) 14 ± 1.3 14 ± 1.5 0.92
Htc (%) 42 ± 3.5 42 ± 4 0.98
PLT (u/mm3) 252 ± 77 273 ± 74 0.13
MPV (fL) 7.9 ± 1.3 9.6 ± 1.1 < 0.001
Median (Min-Max)
HbA1c (%) 6.5 (5.5-6.9) 9.3 (7.1-12.5) < 0.001
Urea (mg/dl) 33 (17-51) 28 (15-68) 0.24
Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.81 (0.6-1.5) 0.80 (0.50-1.81) 0.97
AST (IU/L) 19 (10-91) 18 (10-71) 0.55
ALT (IU/L) 20 (8-28) 24 (9-66) 0.21
FPG (mg/dl) 124 (92-134) 190 (104-315) < 0.001
652 Published by DiscoverSys | Bali Med J 2018; 7(3): 650-653 | doi: 10.15562/bmj.v7i3.806
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
(p > 0.05 for all). Waist circumference and BMI
were signicantly higher in poorly controlled
subjects compared to well-controlled diabetics
(p = 0.001 for waist circumference and p = 0.03 for
BMI). Table 1 shows the general characteristics of
the study groups, and table 2 shows the summary
of laboratory data.
Pearson correlation analysis revealed that MPV
was positively and strongly correlated with both
HbA1c (p < 0.001, r = 0.55), fasting plasma glucose
(p < 0.001, r=0.39), waist circumference (p < 0.001,
r = 0.53), and BMI (p < 0.001, r = 0.42). On the
other hand, neither HbA1c (p = 0.13, r = 0.14) nor
fasting plasma glucose (p = 0.49, r = 0.06) were
correlated with BMI.
DISCUSSION
e main nding of the present retrospective anal-
ysis is that MPV could be considered as a marker of
the inammatory burden of glycemic control and
obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Association between obesity and inammation
is well established. Authors found that adipos-
ity caused elevated C-reactive protein levels in
bloodstream.7 Obesity-related chronic low-grade
inammation is now considered as both an under-
lying trigger of the metabolic syndrome and its
complications.8 Reduction in the serum levels of
inammatory indices and improvement in insu-
lin sensitivity could be achieved by weight loss of
the obese subjects.9-11 Inammation is a response
of the body to the noxious stimulants, however, if
the immune cells fail to remove the harmful stim-
uli chronic inammation persists. Recent stud-
ies suggested that perpetual activation of innate
immune cells were responsible for chronic inam-
mation in extremely obese subjects.12 Because
inammation in obesity is unsurpassed and activa-
tion range of the immune cells are not widespread
as seen in infection or autoimmunity, the chronic
inammation in obesity and metabolic syndrome
is called a low-grade inammatory condition,13 or
as meta-inammation,14 or para-inammation.15
Many studies in literature pointed out an associa-
tion between obesity and inammatory indices.16,17
Similar to the literature data, a positive correlation
was demonstrated between MPV and BMI in the
present study.
Association between type 2 DM and activation
of the inammatory system is also well established
since the beginning of the 2000s.18,19 Moreover,
serum c-reactive protein of pregnant women in
the rst trimester who develop gestational DM
subsequently was signicantly increased compared
to pregnant women that remain normoglycemic
during pregnancy.20 Beside the role of inamma-
tion in the pathogenesis and development of the
disease, inammatory markers may also reect the
control level of type 2 DM. A study showed that
aspirin treatment resulted in a reduction in fasting
plasma glucose, and in c-reactive protein levels in
subjects with DM.21 Consistently with the litera-
ture, MPV elevation, as an inammatory marker,
was associated with worse control of the type 2 DM
in the present study.
In literature, the correlation between diabetic
control level and MPV is controversial. Researchers
studied MPV in 265 type 2 diabetic subjects and
compared to those in 151 nondiabetic controls,
and found a signicantly higher MPV in diabetic
subjects than controls. However, they could not
show a correlation between MPV and HbA1c
level.22 On the other hand, in another study in liter-
ature, authors found a strong correlation between
MPV and HbA1c level.23 Similarly, we also found
the correlation between MPV and HbA1c in our
report.
Although MPV tends to increase with age,
well-controlled diabetics with lower MPV were
signicantly older than poorly controlled diabet-
ics. is nding suggests MPV’s strength to state
inammation in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Lack of correlation between HbA1c and BMI
may be explained by small study population of
the present report and a higher percentage of
metformin use in well-controlled diabetic subjects.
ere are two main limitations of this study.
First, relatively small cohort and second, retro-
spective design. However, a strong correlation
between MPV and diabetic regulation and obesity
indices that reported in our study adequately
make our results to be interpreted with the clinical
practice.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, MPV could be considered as a
marker of inammatory burden in type 2 DM and
obesity. Due to its cost-eective and easy to assess
nature, MPV may be screened periodically in these
patients, along with HbA1c and other measures,
to keep both physicians and patients aware of the
inammatory load of these diseases.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
e authors declare that they have no conicts of
interest with the contents of this article. is study
has not been funded by any organizations.
653
Published by DiscoverSys | Bali Med J 2018; 7(3): 650-653 | doi: 10.15562/bmj.v7i3.806
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
REFERENCES
1. Goldberg RB. Cytokine and cytokine-like inammation
markers, endothelial dysfunction, and imbalanced coag-
ulation in development of diabetes and its complications.
e Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
2009;94(9):3171-3182.
2. Karagoz I, Aktas G, Yoldas H, et al. Association
Between Hemogram Parameters and Survival of
Critically Ill Patients. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine.
2017:0885066617703348.
3. Kapsoritakis AN, Koukourakis MI, Sridaki A, etal. Mean
platelet volume: a useful marker of inammatory bowel
disease activity. e American journal of gastroenterology.
2001;96(3):776-781.
4. Gasparyan AY, Sandoo A, Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou A,
Kitas GD. Mean platelet volume in patients with rheu-
matoid arthritis: the eect of anti-TNF-alpha therapy.
Rheumatology international. 2010;30(8):1125-1129.
5. Aktas G, Alcelik A, Tekce BK, Tekelioglu V, Sit M, Savli H.
Red cell distribution width and mean platelet volume in
patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Przeglad gastroen-
terologiczny. 2014;9(3):160.
6. Cakir L, Aktas G, Enginyurt O, Cakir SA. Mean platelet
volume increases in type 2 diabetes mellitus independent
of HbA1c level. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2014;30:425.
7. Welsh P, Polisecki E, Robertson M, et al. Unraveling the
directional link between adiposity and inammation:
a bidirectional Mendelian randomization approach.
e Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
2010;95(1):93-99.
8. Qatanani M, Lazar MA. Mechanisms of obesity-associated
insulin resistance: many choices on the menu.
Genes & development. 2007;21(12):1443-1455.
9. Chen S-B, Lee Y-C, Ser K-H, et al. Serum C-reactive pro-
tein and white blood cell count in morbidly obese surgical
patients. Obesity Surgery. 2009;19(4):461-466.
10. Orea SI, Illán GF, Gonzálvez OM, et al. Soluble intercellular
adhesion molecule-1 and C reactive protein aer bariatric
surgery. Endocrinologia y nutricion: organo de la Sociedad
Espanola de Endocrinologia y Nutricion. 2010;57(3):90-94.
11. Martos R, Valle M, Morales RM, Cañete R, Gascón F,
Urbano MM. Changes in body mass index are asso-
ciated with changes in inammatory and endothelial
dysfunction biomarkers in obese prepubertal children aer
9 months of body mass index SD score loss. Metabolism.
2009;58(8):1153-1160.
12. Nijhuis J, Rensen SS, Slaats Y, Dielen FM, Buurman WA,
Greve JWM. Neutrophil activation in morbid obesity,
chronic activation of acute inammation. Obesity.
2009;17(11):2014-2018.
13. Monteiro R, Azevedo I. Chronic inammation in obesity
and the metabolic syndrome. Mediators of inammation.
2010;2010.
14. Hotamisligil GS. Inammation and metabolic disorders.
Nature. 2006;444(7121):860-867.
15. Medzhitov R. Origin and physiological roles of inamma-
tion. Nature. 2008;454(7203):428-435.
16. Mortensen OH, Nielsen AR, Erikstrup C, et al.
Calprotectin—a novel marker of obesity. PloS one.
2009;4(10):e7419.
17. Bochud M, Marquant F, Marques-Vidal PM, et al.
Association between C-reactive protein and adipos-
ity in women. e Journal of Clinical Endocrinology
& Metabolism. 2009;94(10):3969-3977.
18. orand B, Löwel H, Schneider A, et al. C-reactive pro-
tein as a predictor for incident diabetes mellitus among
middle-aged men: results from the MONICA Augsburg
cohort study, 1984-1998. Archives of internal medicine.
2003;163(1):93-99.
19. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM.
C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing
type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001;286(3):327-334.
20. Wolf M, Sandler L, Hsu K, Vossen-Smirnakis K, Ecker JL,
adhani R. First-trimester C-reactive protein
and subsequent gestational diabetes. Diabetes care.
2003;26(3):819-824.
21. Yuan M, Konstantopoulos N, Lee J, et al. Reversal
of obesity-and diet-induced insulin resistance with
salicylates or targeted disruption of Ikkβ. Science.
2001;293(5535):1673-1677.
22. Papanas N, Symeonidis G, Maltezos E, et al. Mean platelet
volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Platelets.
2004;15(8):475-478.
23. Demirtunc R, Duman D, Basar M, Bilgi M, Teomete M,
Garip T. e relationship between glycemic control and
platelet activity in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of
Diabetes and its Complications. 2009;23(2):89-94.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution