ChapterPDF Available

Bloom’s 2 sigma problem and data-driven approaches for improving student success

Authors:
  • Tannu Tuva

Abstract

Introduction In the section “Data Analytics in Education,” we begin with some examples of how analytics is being used in education to support learners. Just as telescopes and microscopes extend our vision of the natural world, new analytic instruments can reveal learning patterns and trajectories not ordinarily visible to the casual observer or even to the expert practitioner. Understanding these hidden patterns is a prelude to developing new models to support learners, and it includes the ability to detect and correct systematic distortions and inequities that affect at-risk students but also impede the progress of advanced students. In “Grand Challenges in Education” we describe three interrelated grand challenges in higher education: college readiness, college success, and career readiness. A great deal has been written about the challenges students face while they are in college, but a more holistic view of student success requires that we examine the complete college pipeline as a continuous experience, beginning before students enter college, continuing while they are in college, and positioning them to succeed with careers upon graduation. At the beginning of the college pipeline, millions of students enroll each year in open-access colleges and universities, underprepared for college level work and therefore they require some form of remediation. Despite investments of tens of billions of dollars, the problem of developmental education at scale in higher education remains unsolved. In college, students face numerous challenges as they try to navigate their way through a variety of obstacles on their way to graduation. At the end of the college pipeline, the vast majority of students who earn either a degree or a credential at open-access institutions enter the workforce underprepared and therefore are unable to occupy middle-skill or high-skill jobs. In “Mastery Learning” we narrow our focus to instruction and describe novel uses of data in the “learning moment.” Mastery learning is a specific pedagogical theory formulated by the educational psychologist Benjamin S. Bloom. Mastery learning has a rich history, going back to the pioneering work of Carleton Washburne (1922) and his Winnetka Plan, Henry C. Morrison (1926) and his University of Chicago Laboratory School experiments, and John Carroll (1963) and his Model of School Learning. We argue that Bloom’s theory of mastery learning offers the richest theoretical and empirical framework for improving learning outcomes.
... Although adaptive technology facilitates the students' learning process, the successful implementation of adaptive learning still requires human planning, interactions, monitoring, and interventions. The role of an instructor remains crucial (Baker, 2016;Brusco, 2018;Essa, 2016;Essa & Laster, 2017) in adaptive learning because only the instructor can select learning objectives that fit with the overall course learning outcomes and targeted student population, align both online and face-to-face activities and assessment with selected learning objectives, orchestrate learning activities both online and in person, and provide individualized feedback and support for all learners (Essa & Laster, 2017). The instructor organizes various additional class activities around the adaptive practices, sets up course expectations and grading schemes, monitors students' progresses, and answers questions. ...
... Although adaptive technology facilitates the students' learning process, the successful implementation of adaptive learning still requires human planning, interactions, monitoring, and interventions. The role of an instructor remains crucial (Baker, 2016;Brusco, 2018;Essa, 2016;Essa & Laster, 2017) in adaptive learning because only the instructor can select learning objectives that fit with the overall course learning outcomes and targeted student population, align both online and face-to-face activities and assessment with selected learning objectives, orchestrate learning activities both online and in person, and provide individualized feedback and support for all learners (Essa & Laster, 2017). The instructor organizes various additional class activities around the adaptive practices, sets up course expectations and grading schemes, monitors students' progresses, and answers questions. ...
... The use of adaptive learning in higher education is an emergent area for study. While the pedagogical approach is grounded in student-centered mastery learning theories, there is still limited evidence on how adaptive systems improve student performance and/or reduce learning gaps (Anderson, 2019;Dziuban et al., 2017Dziuban et al., , 2018Essa & Laster, 2017;Weber, 2019). Our goal is to document best practices for adaptive implementation from our design and teaching experiences, and we encourage further experimentations to be conducted on the effectiveness of these best practices. ...
Article
Full-text available
While adaptive learning is emerging as a promising technology to promote access and quality at a large scale in higher education (Becker et al., 2018), the implementation of adaptive learning in teaching and learning is still sporadic, and it is unclear how to best design and teach an adaptive learning course in a higher education context. As early adopters, a team of instructors, instructional designers, and administrators at the University of Central Florida (UCF) identified five key design features as an adaptive learning design framework to guide the unique course design process. These five features involve deliberate design and development efforts that could bring significant benefits to student learning. The purpose of this field note is to present a design framework and best practices for teaching from both a systems and a pedagogical approach in the context of implementation at UCF. We also share the rationale and classification framework UCF has adopted to ensure the term “adaptive learning” is universally understood across campus. This paper offers insights into the design, delivery, and implications of utilizing adaptive learning systems in higher education courses at a public research university and attempts to capture the intimacy of lessons learned and best practices gathered since the project’s inception in 2014.
Book
La educación transita tiempos de ebullición. Las plataformas adaptativas, la inteligencia artificial generativa, los simuladores de realidad aumentada y los modelos predictivos, entre otras muchas innovaciones, ponen en crisis a escuelas, institutos superiores y universidades. Una vez más, aflora la pregunta sobre el sentido de la educación tradicional. Los más progresistas auguran el fin de la docencia tal como la conocemos, o su reconversión según el formato del instructor para el uso de plataformas y dispositivos digitales. En el otro extremo, voces más conservadoras se resisten a la transformación digital profunda y promueven la asimilación de novedades tecnológicas para ajustarlas a la liturgia educativa tradicional. Este libro propone superar esta dicotomía estéril.Describe un modelo de educación aumentada basado en la hibridación no sustitutiva entre tecnología y docencia; un modelo que potencia lo irremplazable de la educación personalizada mediante el efecto amplificador de las innovaciones tecnológicas.
Chapter
With a college degree being increasingly important in the modern world, it is necessary to examine the access that different individuals have to higher education. Unfortunately, a vast amount of research has shown that opportunities are not equal for everyone. This is apparent throughout one's experience in higher education. Interestingly, research has shown that inequalities manifest themselves throughout all points of one's relationship with higher education. Inequalities are found from admission to funding/financial aid once accepted, to everyday relationships while at a university (i.e., with professors, administrators, and peers), to graduation and beyond. This chapter will examine the vast amount of research related to these various areas individually and then tie them together to illuminate the inequalities that exist in higher education in general.
Article
Full-text available
El objetivo del presente estudio fue desarrollar una prueba desde el enfoque de aprendizaje adaptativo, que facilite realizar un diagnóstico que deriva en una trayectoria personalizada de actividades de aprendizaje para los estudiantes universitarios en función del nivel de dominio de las competencias para la materia de álgebra. Participaron 3 docentes en el diseño y se aplicó a 46 estudiantes universitarios. La prueba puntuó con una consistencia interna de 0.85. La aplicación permitió diseñar las trayectorias personalizadas con las que los estudiantes debían iniciar y progresar en su desempeño. Los resultados permiten indicar que las trayectorias personalizadas constituyen un apoyo esencial en la aplicación del aprendizaje adaptativo cuando se trabaja en modelos por competencias.
Chapter
The potential of applying image processing tools and artificial intelligence in learning processes is identified. This article presents the development of a digital tutor that helps solve a puzzle. Point cloud technology is used to identify each person’s interaction dynamically in space. The proposed methodology is developed in several stages. The first stage consists of the acquisition and pre-processing system for adquaring the user environment. The second stage consists of recognizing the piece in the puzzle, at this stage it is necessary to develop a database of the particular puzzle. In the identification process, the PCA algorithm is implemented as a complementary strategy to the use of the neural network. The last stage implements a general search algorithm as the core of the decision system. This methodology is presented as an iterative process and evolves over time according to the interaction with the user. The results are presented through confusion matrix which exhibits a performance of 92.7% assertiveness. Finally, the potential of using this methodological structure in different cognitive processes with puzzles with different levels of difficulty is raised.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.