ArticlePDF Available

Fatalities Caused by Hydrometeorological Disasters in Texas

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Texas ranks first in the U.S in number of fatalities due to natural disasters. Based on data culled from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) from 1959 to 2016, the number of hydrometeorological fatalities in Texas have increased over the 58-year study period, but the per capita fatalities have significantly decreased. Spatial review found that non-coastal flooding is the predominant hydrometeorological disaster in a majority of the Texas counties located in “Flash Flood Alley” and accounts for 43% of all hydrometeorological fatalities in the state. Flooding fatalities occur most frequently on “Transportation Routes” followed by heat fatalities in “Permanent Residences”. Seasonal and monthly stratification identifies Spring and Summer as the deadliest seasons, with the month of May registering the highest number of total fatalities dominated by flooding and tornado fatalities. Demographic trends of hydrometeorological disaster fatalities indicated that approximately twice as many male fatalities occurred from 1959-2016 than female fatalities, but with decreasing gender disparity over time. Adults are the highest fatality risk group overall, children are most at risk to die in flooding, and the elderly at greatest risk of heat-related death.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186; doi:10.3390/geosciences8050186 www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences
Article
Fatalities Caused by Hydrometeorological Disasters
in Texas
Srikanto H. Paul *, Hatim O. Sharif and Abigail M. Crawford
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio,
San Antonio, TX 78249, USA; hatim.sharif@utsa.edu (H.O.S.); amc1591@gmail.com (A.M.C.)
* Correspondence: srikanto.paul@utsa.edu; Tel.: +1-210-332-3241
Received: 20 April 2018; Accepted: 15 May 2018; Published: 18 May 2018
Abstract: Texas ranks first in the U.S in number of fatalities due to natural disasters. Based on data
culled from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) from 1959 to 2016, the
number of hydrometeorological fatalities in Texas have increased over the 58-year study period, but
the per capita fatalities have significantly decreased. Spatial review found that non-coastal flooding
is the predominant hydrometeorological disaster in a majority of the Texas counties located in
“Flash Flood Alley” and accounts for 43% of all hydrometeorological fatalities in the state. Flooding
fatalities occur most frequently on “Transportation Routes” followed by heat fatalities in
“Permanent Residences”. Seasonal and monthly stratification identifies Spring and Summer as the
deadliest seasons, with the month of May registering the highest number of total fatalities
dominated by flooding and tornado fatalities. Demographic trends of hydrometeorological disaster
fatalities indicated that approximately twice as many male fatalities occurred from 1959-2016 than
female fatalities, but with decreasing gender disparity over time. Adults are the highest fatality risk
group overall, children are most at risk to die in flooding, and the elderly at greatest risk of heat-
related death.
Keywords: natural hazards; weather disasters; hydrometeorological fatalities; flooding; tornadoes;
extreme temperatures
1. Introduction
Hydrometeorological disasters can result in tremendous damage to infrastructure, significant
loss to the economy, and, very often, loss of life. In terms of the human loss, natural disasters resulted
in approximately 1.7 million fatalities between 1980 and 2016. More than 49% of these fatalities were
due to geophysical events (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic activity), 26% were due to meteorological
events (tropical storm, extratropical storm, convective storm, local storm), 14% were due to
hydrological events (flood, landslides), and 11% were due to climatological events (extreme
temperature, drought, forest fire). Slightly less than 80% of the 16,500 disaster events that caused
fatalities were hydrological or meteorological (39%) [1].
Although more research is beginning to shift to multi-hazard analysis [2,3], much of the available
natural disaster research focuses on a particular type of disaster (e.g., floods, hurricanes, lightning,
earthquakes) or disaster event (e.g., Hurricane Harvey, Northridge Earthquake). The focus on key
disaster events is advantageous in that a deeper dive can benefit the preparation and mitigation
strategies in the affected areas. Flooding is an exemplary disaster type that is responsible for high
fatality rates and has been extensively investigated on a global [47] and national scale including the
U.S. [8], India [9], Pakistan [10], and Australia [11]. It is also of value to focus at the regional level or
the effects of one type of hazard to provide a basis for better allocation of resources to prepare for
high risk hydrometeorological disasters with high probability of impact to a specific region.
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 2 of 22
This study analyzes fatality rates resulting from multiple hydrometeorological disasters that
affect the state of Texas at the county level. Texas has a long history of devastation by natural disaster
(especially hydrometeorological disasters). The most lethal natural disaster in United States history
occurred in Galveston Island, Texas in 1900 in which an estimated 600012,000 people died as a result
of the Great Galveston Hurricane. From January 1960 to December 2016, Texas had the highest
number of fatalities in the nation in which natural disasters killed an average of 40 people per year
[12]. During this period, Texas accounted for 7.4% of all U.S. fatalities (32,289). Flood, heat, and
tornado accounted for 60% of all fatalities in Texas during this period. Texas also ranks highest in
fatalities per capita (15 fatalities per 100,000 people). During this period two Texas counties ranked
in the top ten across all states for the occurrence of disaster events: Harris County (1088 events) and
Tarrant County (1009 events). Dallas County, Texas, ranked eighth in the number of fatalities in the
U.S. Extensive research has been conducted to investigate the quantitative and qualitative aspect of
flooding in the state of Texas [12,13].
Hurricanes are also a critical hydrometeorological disaster that claim many lives in Texas. In
2005, Hurricane Katrina struck the Louisiana coast causing $96 billion in damages and 1833 fatalities.
Two-thirds of the fatalities were directly related to more than fifty breaches of the levee and floodwall
systems [14]. Most recently in August 2017, Hurricane Harvey made the landfall near Port Aransas
on the Gulf Coast as a category-4 storm with wind gusts up to 212 kph (132 mph) and resulted in
$200 billion in damages and 103 confirmed deaths in Texas, primarily due to flooding across 11
counties. Thirty-six of the total 68 direct fatalities caused by the hurricane winds and flooding
occurred in Harris County (Houston Metropolitan area) [15].
Tornadoes were responsible for 14% of the total number of natural disaster-related fatalities in
the U.S. from 1960 to 2015 [16]. Texas leads the nation in the average number of tornadoes between
1991 and 2010 with 155 tornadoes per year followed by Kansas (96), Florida (66) and Oklahoma (62)
[17]. Analysis of tornado-induced fatalities and damage in the U.S. between 1880 and 2005 in 2007
identified 1812 tornado-related fatalities caused by 366 fatal tornado events mostly along the
northeastern border of the state [18]. The normalized fatality rate per tornado event in Texas is in line
with the national normalized averages (2.7 fatalities and 0.54 events).
The impact of disastrous extreme weather to society is a function of both the climatic and local
setting. For example, although both the fatality rate and the extent of damage to infrastructure have
increasing trends from the 1960′s to the present, some studies suggest that population growth and
demographic shifts play a greater role in the degree of increase than the increase in intensity and/or
frequency of the extreme weather that the Earth has been experiencing in the last several decades
[19]. This would suggest that even without any detrimental climate changes, the shifts in U.S.
economic development patterns and growth will result in ever increasing losses caused by
hydrometeorological disasters. Therefore, it is necessary to recognize spatial and temporal trends of
natural disasters to allow for the allocation of resources to the higher risk disasters and their locations.
Supplemental to the intensity of such hazards is the exposure of people in the affected areas. In
the last several decades, the U.S. has experienced steady increases in population shifts in rural and
coastal development patterns, and economic growth, which have positioned more people in disaster-
prone areas [20]. Research on the October 2015 flood event in Columbia, SC, indicated that
considerations for public safety were sometimes secondary to profitable land development [21].
Hurricane research that was published in 2018 analyzed the decision biases of persons affected by
hurricanes and found that temporal band spatial myopia is a major issue that places a lower priority
on long-term decisions (e.g., preparation) than short term routine tasks with the failed intention of
addressing the long term need when the disaster event is closer in time [22].
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the fatality rates caused by hydrometeorological disasters
in Texas for the period 19592016 in an effort to identify counties and metropolitan areas in Texas that
have a greater risk for particular hydrometeorological disasters. The hydrometeorological disasters
were categorized into “Flooding”, “Heat”, “Cold Weather”, “Tornado”, “Lightning”, and “Wind
Events”. Fatalities due to “Tropical Events” (hurricanes and tropical storms) were either classified as
flooding or wind events depending on the cause of fatality. The study examines temporal trends, spatial
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 3 of 22
variations, and demographic characteristics of the victims. The paper concludes with a discussion and
commentary of considerations that may influence the fatality rate with the goal of providing
information and perspectives that would help reduce hydrometeorological disaster fatalities.
2. Materials and Method
2.1. Study Area
Texas is the second largest state in the U.S., both in terms of population and area, with a
population of 27,862,596 and a land area of 695,662 km2. The southeast of Texas shares 591 km (367
miles) of coastline with the Gulf of Mexico and is susceptible to hurricanes and coastal flooding. A
major topographical feature that affects the number of hydrometeorological disasters in Texas is the
Balcones Escarpment that consists of a series of cliffs dropping from the Edwards Plateau to the
Balcones Fault Line. As noted in an article from the Texas Hill Country magazine published in 2016,
This outer rim of the Hill Country is the formation point for many large thunderstorms, which
frequently stall along the uplift and then hover over this region[23]. The “Flash Flood Alley”
includes counties having the fastest population growth rates in Texas.
2.2. Data Source
The Texas hydrometeorological disaster fatality information reviewed in this study was culled
from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Storm Data reports for the
period January 1959 through December 2016 [24]. From 19591995, the data were only available via
PDF files. Disaster data from 19962016 were available via the NOAA searchable database. The data
in the Storm Data Publication relies on self-reporting from individual states and counties and is
dependent upon the verification and validation of the reporting agency. The Storm Data had some
inconsistencies from year to year and county to county in the classification of the causes of fatalities.
For example, deaths by lightning are classified as either electrical deaths or lightning deaths.
Similarly, wild fires or prairie fires are listed under either wind events or wildfire events in the
database. Heat-related deaths from the homeless or illegal immigrants in rural counties also have a
potential to be under-reported since the location of the victims may remain undetected. As an
example of a potential under-reporting condition, the Storm Data indicates that before 2008 there were
no deaths due to heat exposure discovered along the border of Texas and Mexico. This is unlikely
given that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection indicate that 7216 people have died from exposure
attempting to cross the U.S./Mexico border between 1998 and 2017 [25]. In 2005 alone, more than 500
people died attempting to across the U.S./Mexico border [26]. Fatality information was also reviewed
from the Hazards Vulnerability Research Institute (HVRI), U.S Hazard Losses Summary Report
(19602015), to provide perspective for large scale comparisons of trends between Texas and the
national fatality rate [16]. The HVRI data was not used in the numerical analysis of spatial and
temporal trends forming the basis of this paper.
2.3. Methodology
Differences in the terminology exists across varying literature sources as it pertains to the effects
of natural hazards and disasters on people and the land. This study defines a hazard as a natural
event that has the potential to cause harm and a disaster as the effect of the hazard on humanity.
Hydrometeorological disasters are defined as natural processes or phenomena of atmospheric,
hydrological or oceanographic nature [27]. The Texas fatality data used in this study were all caused
by hydrometeorological disasters. If the disaster did not result in at least one fatality it was not
included. The fatalities also did not have to result from a disaster that was classified through a formal
disaster declaration. The definitions of the descriptors and disaster types used in this study for the
database files (1996 onward) and the manually aggregated fatality data prior to 1996 are in agreement
with the NWS Directive 10-1605 [28].
Only fatalities that were classified as being directly caused by the incident are included in the
study. Storm Data lists each incident with the date, time, the number of people who died in the
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 4 of 22
incident, the number of people injured, and a brief description of the event. The descriptive narratives
provided along with each event were used to get information related to the gender, age, activity,
mode of transport, and location of the individual who died. In 1996 and after, the database provided
an accompanying chart of the victims. The chart listed the victim’s age, gender, and location. If there
was a disparity between the description and the accompanying table, the information in the
description was used since the descriptions were often retrieved from the police report that was filed
with the death.
The data analysis includes temporal and spatial trending using linear trendlines and correlation
analysis to verify statistical significance. Moving 10-year averages were also included to in the
temporal distribution to support the linear trending. Spatial analysis by county used the ArcGIS
(v.10.4) (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA) to generate thematic maps. Fatality rates were normalized by
annual population for temporal trends and by the study period median population for the spatial
distribution by county. Percentages were generally rounded to the nearest whole number unless
otherwise necessary for comparative analysis.
3. Results
3.1. Types of Hydrometeorological Disasters
The Storm Data reports 55 disaster event types. For purposes of this study the disaster fatalities
reported in Texas from 1959 to 2016 were categorized into one of the following nine
hydrometeorological disaster types based on the information provided in the incident report or the
NOAA database (Table 1). The definitions are consistent with the general classifications of weather
disasters as defined by the National Weather Service.
Table 1. Definitions of Hydrometeorological Disaster Types.
Disaster Type
Characteristics
Flooding
Floods and flash floods due to extreme rain caused by hurricanes *, tropical storms, or
other rain storm events
** Tornado
Wind event meeting the minimum classification of wind speed and ground contact
Lightning
Natural high voltage electrical discharge from atmosphere striking person or surface in
proximity of person
Heat
Prolonged period of time with extremely high average temperature usually accompanied
by drought
Cold Weather
Blizzards, snow storms, ice storms, and prolonged period of time with extremely low
average temperatures
Wind
Extreme high winds causing damage but not meeting the minimum criteria of hurricanes
or tornados
Other
Hail, water spouts, wildfires, or rain that directly resulted in some major structural
damage (e.g., roof collapse)
Rip Current
Coastal specific disaster that includes people killed (drowned) in rip currents. Rip currents
have only been tracked as of 1997
* The SaffirSimpson hurricane wind scale (SSHWS), classifies hurricanes as Western Hemisphere
tropical cyclones that exceed the intensities of tropical depressions and tropical storms with sustained
winds of at least 74 mph (Category 1). ** The Enhanced Fujita scale (EF) classifies tornadoes based on
wind speed and damage (once they have touch ground) from EF-0 (6585 mph) to EF-5 (>200 mph).
Approximately 80% (205 of the 254) of the counties in Texas reported hydrometeorological
fatalities in at least one year during the 58-year study period. Figure 1 shows the primary type of
disaster that resulted in fatalities for each Texas county. Seventy-seven of the 205 counties that reported
fatalities indicated that flooding was the primary disaster in their county. Thirty-one counties had more
than one predominant cause of fatality and so were not categorized as primary disaster.
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 5 of 22
Counties that reported deaths due to flooding as the predominant hydrometeorological disaster
are clustered towards the central region of the state and extend west towards Mexico/New Mexico in
the region known as Flash Flood Alley. The disasters that caused the greatest number of fatalities
along the Gulf Coast of Texas were wind events and lightning (Figure 1). Heat-related fatality
counties were scattered in 11 counties across Texas and 75% of the cold weather fatality counties were
in the northwest of Texas (Texas Panhandle) above the 34° N latitude. Fatalities due to tropical events
(hurricanes and tropical storms) were all determined to be a result of subsequent flooding and
therefore classified as flood-related fatalities. Death due to heat-related events was predominant in
Harris County, the most populated county in Texas.
Figure 1. Primary disaster resulting in largest number of deaths per county. Dark grey: no one
predominant disaster. Light grey: No hydrometeorological disaster fatalities reported.
A total of 2330 natural disaster-related fatalities occurred in Texas from 1959 to 2016 with 43%
due to flooding (991 fatalities) as shown in Table 2. The second most frequent cause of fatalities was
extreme heat (16%) followed by tornados (14%) and lightning (10%). The single most fatal natural
disaster event during this 58-year period was the tornado of April 1979 that struck Wichita and
Wilbarger counties killing 54 people and injuring 1807. This was an EF-4 (Enhanced Fujita scale)
tornado with a maximum width of 2.5 km that killed four people along it’s northeastern track through
the states of Oklahoma (3 deaths) and Indiana (1 death). Seventy-nine percent (79%) of the total
tropical storm-related fatalities were caused by hurricanes (108 deaths).
Table 2. Hydrometeorological Disaster Fatalities, source: NOAA (National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration) Storm Data [24].
Disaster Type
Fatalities
Flooding *
991
Heat
378
Tornado
333
Lightning
222
Wind
172
Cold Weather
160
Other
43
Rip Current
31
Total
2330
* Includes fatalities due to hurricanes and tropical storms.
0 200 400100 Kilometers
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 6 of 22
3.2. Temporal Distribution
3.2.1. Annual Distribution of Fatalities
An average of 42 fatalities per year occurred in Texas from 1959 to 2016 with a median of 33
fatalities per year and a total of 2330 hydrometeorological fatalities. The difference between the mean
and the median indicates that the annual distribution is positively skewed with long tail in the right
direction (towards higher numbers). Although, the raw number of fatalities exhibits a slight
increasing trend during the study period, the trend has low linearity (R2 = 0.0369, p = 0.233) and the
relationship of fatalities over time is statistically weak (Spearman’s
ρ
= 0.16). The lowest number of
fatalities (6) occurred in 1963 and the highest number of fatalities (118) occurred in 1998 (Figure 2).
Eleven of the 58 years had an annual number of fatalities greater than the 58-year mean plus one
standard deviation (40 ± 24).
Figure 2. Total Fatalities from natural disasters in Texas from 1959 to 2016 with 10 year rolling average
(red dashed line). The solid line represents the linear trend.
The curve of the cumulative annual fatality rate is relatively uniform with two observable spikes
in 19781979 and 1998 driven by high fatalities resulting from heat and flooding events (Figure 3).
Specifically, in 1978 Dallas County had 21 heat-related fatalities and 40 flooding fatalities that
occurred in several counties including Bexar, Kerr, Shackelford, Bandera, and Randall counties. From
May 1997 to August 1998 a severe heat event hit the southern region of the U.S. from Florida through
Texas and into Colorado. Conversely, several flooding events in November 1998 resulted in fatalities
in Bexar, Val Verde, Caldwell, Guadalupe, and Real counties.
Figure 3. Cumulative number of fatalities (all disasters).
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 7 of 22
Normalization of the annual fatality rate by population indicates a decreasing trend with slightly
better linearity (R2 = 0.096, p = 0.006) than the raw trend and a stronger statistically relationship of
fatalities over time (Spearmans
𝜌
= 0.355) which suggests a gradual decrease in the risk of being
killed by hydrometeorological events in Texas over the 58-year study period. The normalized fatality
trend can be seen in (Figure 4), which shows the fatality rate due to hydrometeorological disasters
per 100,000 Texas residents. Public awareness and educational weather safety campaigns in Texas
may have contributed to this reduction of risk [13]. Although the rank order of counties by number
of raw fatalities aligns with the highest populated urban centers, these regions are not necessarily the
most dangerous. This is evidenced in that several of the counties in immediate proximity to the
counties that experienced high fatality have very few fatalities even though the intensity and
durations of the disasters were probably very similar between the counties.
Figure 4. Normalized Fatality Rate from hydrometeorological disasters in Texas from 1959 to 2016.
The solid line represents the linear trend.
For example, Loving County has the highest normalized fatality rate (> 4000 per 100,000) in the
state due to its small and stagnant population and the fact that the county experienced several multi-
fatality events of wind and hailstorm that struck the Red Bluff Lake area killing four persons by
drowning when their boat capsized in the lake during a squall. Similarly, on 11 June 1965, the city of
Sanderson in Terrell county was devastated by a flash flood. As noted by the Texas State Historical
Association, A wall of water washed down Sanderson Canyon into Sanderson, destroying
numerous homes and businesses. Twenty-six people died in the flood. Eleven flood-control dams
were constructed to protect Sanderson against another such catastrophe[29]. The town had a
population of 1500 in 1980 and 1128 in 1990. Reduction of fatality risk in these rural counties will
require an increase in awareness through weather-related emergency educational programs and
resource assistance (financial and physical) to implement safety systems.
The annual fatality rate by disaster type from 1959 to 2016 for six of the eight disaster types is
shown in Figure 5. There seems to be a shift in the number of fatalities at the middle of the study
period, especially for tornadoes and lightning. Splitting the study period into two equal parts (1959
1987 and 19882016) shows the first half having a greater proportion of the total fatalities for all
disasters except for heat-related events. Heat-related events show an increasing trend of 0.45 fatalities
per year (R2 = 0.54) from 1978 to 2016 with no data available prior to 1978. Eighty-nine percent (89%)
of all heat-related fatalities (335 out of 378) occurred after 1994. The increasing trend in heat fatalities
is likely a compounded effect of higher than normal average air temperatures, the urban heat island
effect, and increasing population in the urban regions. The retention of heat due to the abundance of
non-natural building materials results in higher temperatures in the urban center than the
surrounding area. As population increases in urban centers and higher temperatures the result will
be increased heat fatalities especially for the most physically vulnerable such as the elderly. As noted
in Figure 11, heat fatalities occur inside permanent residences about 50% of the time. This statistic is
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 8 of 22
probably a conservative estimate since heat deaths may be under-reported for a variety of reasons.
Exposure to extreme heat can cause cardiac or respiratory issues that can be fatal. Therefore, the
judgment of the medical professional determines the cause of death as exposure to heat or the
underlying medical condition. External factors also may contribute to under-reporting variability of
heat fatalities especially along the U.S./Mexico border counties and in the case of chronically ill
victims where it is unclear the final cause of death. Immigrant deaths along the border are uncertain
due to international policy challenges.
The difference between the early and the latter half of the study period was highest for tornadoes
with 71% in the first half of the study, followed by 68% for wind, 63% for cold weather, 62% for
Lightning, 57% of tropical storms, and 52% for flooding. Not all years of the 58-year study
experienced fatalities from all of the hydrometeorological disasters. Fatalities due to flooding.
lightning and wind events were the most consistent occurring in 57, 56, and 47 of the 58 years
respectively. Fatalities due to tornadoes, cold weather and heat events occurred in 41, 38, 26 of the 58
years respectively. The year 2011 was the only year that had no reported flood-related fatalities and
was also the year that experienced one of the worst droughts in Texas history. Trend analysis over
the entire 58-year period indicates statistically significant change (decreasing) for flooding (R2 = 0.112,
p = 0.0104), wind (R2 = 0.190, p = 0.0006), lightning (R2 = 0.346, p = 1.21 × 106), and an increasing trend
for heat (R2 = 0.087, p = 0.0243). Fatality trends due to tornadoes (R2 = 0.043, p = 0.1190), and cold (R2 =
0.009, p = 0.4770), exhibited slight downward trends but were not statistically significant.
Figure 5. Annual fatality rate in Texas for six disaster types: flooding, wind, tornado, cold, lightning,
and heat: 10-year rolling average (dashed line) and normalized (fatalities per 10 million) trend line
(green solid). Note: Heat fatalities are reported from 1978 to 2016.
Fatalities due to tropical events (hurricanes and tropical storms) were mostly due to drowning
and therefore were integrated into the flooding fatalities unless there was a clear distinction in the
fatality record. Only seven tropical event fatalities occurred during the period 20032007. The disaster
category “Other” includes wildfires and other secondary perils that do not frequently result in death,
such as hail, water spouts, or rain that resulted in roof collapse. The Other” disaster category
indicated 71% of the years (41 out of 58 years) had zero fatalities with a steady increase in the fatality
rate starting in 2004. Eighty-one percent (81%) of fatalities of this category occurred in 13 years
between 2004 and 2016. Rip currents were added to the Storm Data in 1998. The first reported fatalities
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 9 of 22
occurred in 2007 with two total fatalities at 31 deaths from 2007 to 2016 with an average of 3.4 per
year and a high of 8 deaths in 2011. Five of the 8 deaths were Mexican immigrants visiting the coastal
county of Cameron. More years of rip current fatality data is needed to establish any definitive
temporal or spatial trends.
3.2.2. Monthly Distribution of Fatalities
The monthly fatality rate due to hydrometeorological disasters illustrates the seasonal variability
in the number of fatalities for different types of disasters (Figure 6). A distinct peak is noticeable in
May driven by flooding and tornado fatalities, which are responsible for 80% of the fatalities in the
month. During the summer months, most fatalities were due to heat events while spring fatalities
result primarily from flooding. Flooding fatalities were highest in the months of May, June, and
October with 22%, 17%, and 13%, respectively of the total flood-related fatalities. Some disaster-
related fatalities are obviously limited to certain seasons such as cold weather fatalities that occur in
Winter (85% of all cold weather-related deaths occurred in December, January and February).
Seventy one percent (71%) of all fatalities occurred in spring and summer with an even split between
the two seasons.
Figure 6. Monthly distribution of hydrometeorological disaster fatalities (all fatalities).
A grouping of the months into four seasons, Winter (December, January, February); Spring
(March, April, May); Summer (June, July, August) and Fall (September, October, November),
highlights the difference in rolling average fatality rates between the first half of the study period to
the second half (Figure 7). The rolling averages show a slight decrease for spring and winter and
increase in summer and fall with the largest difference observed in summer due primarily to an
increase in heat-related fatalities that occurred between 1998 and 2008. Comparatively, all of the
normalized trends for the four seasons have a decreasing trend winter (m = 0.0008, p = 0.687),
summer (m = 0.0037, p = 0.600), fall (m = 0.0022, p = 0.563) with only the spring fatality trend (m =
0.0211, p = 0.019) having statistical significance.
3.2.3. Distribution of Fatalities by Time of Day
Time of day was provided for 68% of the hydrometeorological fatalities culled from the Storm
Data. Each time of death was assigned to one of the four periods in a day: morning (6 a.m.12 p.m.),
afternoon (12 p.m.6 p.m.), evening (6 p.m.12 a.m.), and night (12 a.m.6 a.m.). Of the fatalities
with known time of death, 36% occurred in the afternoon, 26% in the evening, 21% in the morning,
and 18% at night. Eighty percent (80%) of the fatalities with unknown time of the day were caused
by flooding or heat-related events. Fifty percent (50%) of the total fatalities (562) that occurred in
the afternoon were due to tornadoes and flooding. Detailed analysis shows that flooding events
have a slightly higher chance of causing death at night or in the morning hours. However, tornados
are much more likely to fatally strike in the afternoon/evening hours (Figure 8).
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 10 of 22
Figure 7. (a) Number of total fatalities (rolling 10-year averages) by season; (b) Normalized fatality
rates by season.
Figure 8. Distribution of hydrometeorological disaster fatalities by time of day.
3.3. Spatial Distribution
Most hydrometeorological fatalities occurred in populated counties (Harris (Houston), Bexar
(San Antonio), Dallas and Tarrant (Dallas area), Travis and Williamson (Austin) as well as rural
counties in west Texas with low populations high fatality numbers are noted in the Flash Flood Alley
counties and some coastal counties (Figure 9).
Table 3 provides the ranking of the top 5 counties with the highest number of
hydrometeorological disaster fatalities which combined, account for 32% of the total
hydrometeorological disaster fatalities. Slightly more than 3% of the total reported fatalities did not
include county information. Forty-eight percent (48%) of the fatalities in Harris County were caused
(a)
(b)
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 11 of 22
by heat-related events followed by flooding (33%) and lightning (11%). Heat events also caused the
highest percentage of deaths (50%) in Dallas County followed by flooding (29%). Bexar County
ranked third with 103 fatalities of which 82% were caused by flooding making Bexar the county the
most dangerous in the state for death from flooding (per capita).
Figure 9. Raw number of hydrometeorological disaster fatalities by county.
Table 3. Top 5 Texas counties (Raw Fatality Rate). source: NOAA Storm Data (19592016) [24].
Rank
County
Fatalities
1
Harris
259
2
Dallas
228
3
Bexar
103
4
Tarrant
87
5
Travis
76
The top 5 counties within each hydrometeorological disaster type represent a significant
percentage of the overall fatality rate within each of the category ranging from a high of 76% of all
heat-related fatalities to a low of 28% of all wind event fatalities (Table 4). Dallas County is in the top
five for six of the eight disaster types (heat, flooding, lightning, cold, wind, and others not shown in
table). Harris is the only county that tops the list for more than one type of disaster and ranks number
one for heat, flooding, and lightning fatalities and ranks second in wind fatalities. The top counties
with the highest number of fatalities (and most populated counties) identified in Table 3 also
dominate the top 5 ranking of counties in Table 4 for flooding, lightning and heat fatalities.
Interestingly, although flooding is responsible for 43% of all disaster fatalities in the state, the top five
counties only account for 34% indicating that flooding fatalities are extant over a high number of
counties.
Table 4. Top 5 Texas counties with highest fatality rate (and % of total) by hydrometeorological disaster.
source: NOAA Storm Data (19592016) [24].
Heat (76%)
Tornado (45%)
Wind (28%)
Flooding (34%)
Lightning (31%)
Cold (30%)
Harris
124
Wichita
47
Nueces
16
Harris
85
Harris
29
Dallas
16
Dallas
113
Reeves
30
Harris
10
Bexar
84
Jefferson
12
Potter
12
Tarrant
22
Williamson
29
Dallas
8
Dallas
65
Dallas
11
McLennan
7
Montgomery
16
Lubbock
26
Brazoria
7
Travis
59
Tarrant
9
Tarrant
7
Travis
12
Donley
17
Denton
7
Tarrant
43
Bexar
8
Castro
6
Disaster Fatalities
0 200 400100 Kilometers
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 12 of 22
3.4. Fatalities by Age and Gender
Age was provided for 57% of the total reported deaths (1333 fatalities) in which “Adults” made
up 52%, the “Elderly” 28%, and “Children” 20% of the known age fatalities. In this study, “Children”
are defined as newborns up to 17 years, “Adults” from 18 years to 64 years, and “Elderly” as persons
above 65 years of age. Adults made up 53% and children made up 27% of all flooding fatalities. This
fatality statistic requires more data (age aggregation) and further research into the specifics of the
situation before any defensible conclusions can be drawn. On open conjecture it can be suggested
that flooding is responsible for death of families which typically includes a higher number of children
than adults that either did not evacuate or were killed during the evacuation process on
transportation routes. Comparing the number of fatalities and the number of people in each age
group provides a measure of relative risk of death within each age group. Using the 1990 census
population in each age group: children (4,857,469), adults (10,420,598), and elderly (1,708,443) the
relative risk of fatality for all hydrometeorological disasters during the period covered by this paper
indicates a similar risk between children (0.006%) and adults (0.007%). But the risk of the elderly
dying is more than three times the level at 0.022% due to the much lower elderly population
(approximately 10% of total population). The elderly were mostly at risk for heat events, accounting
for 52% of all heat-related fatalities (Figure 10).
Figure 10. Total natural disaster fatalities considered in this study classified (a) by gender and (b) by
age group
The gender of the victim was provided in 69% of the reported fatalities. Among those, males
made up 68% and females 32% representing an approximate ratio of 9:5. This gender disparity has
also been observed in other research, for example in flood-related fatalities [12,13,30,31] and in
(a)
(b)
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 13 of 22
lightning-related fatalities [3235]. In all cases there was a high male to female ratio of fatalities. For
the current study, the ratio of male to female fatalities is approximately 2:1. The greatest disparity
was found in wind and lightning fatalities that show a 5:1 ratio of male to female fatalities. Rip
currents have only been tracked since 1998 but the data thus far indicates a 30:1 ratio of male to female
fatalities.
3.5. Fatalities by Activity Location
The Storm Data describes 18 potential activity fatality locations. For purposes of this study each
of the disaster events reported in Texas from 1959 to 2016 was categorized within one of the following
nine locations identified in based on the information provided in the incident reports (Table 5).
Table 5. Definitions of Hydrometeorological Disaster Fatality Locations.
Location
Definition
In Water
Streams, river, bayous, oceans, floods, etc. and includes activities such as
swimming, boating, surfing, and working on oil rigs
By Water
Boat docs, levies, beaches or other types of shoreline appurtenances
Temporary or non-
Permanent Shelters
Tents, car ports, trees, and other temporary shelters that do not have a
foundation (excluding umbrellas)
Outside
People who were outside but not in or near water, people standing in lawns, in
construction sites that did not offer shelter, in ball fields, parks, golf courses, etc.
People seeking shelter under umbrellas are also included. People
standing/sitting near or on top of personal vehicles that are not along a
transportation rout are included in outside (e.g., people walking from their
home to their car who died before reaching their vehicle, people sitting on top
of trucks in fields)
Transportation Route
Roadways, freeways or toll ways, parking lots, sidewalks or air travel routes.
People walking along roads who hid behind a vehicle right before the disaster
are categorized under transportation routes. Fatalities in vehicles were not
assumed to be along transportation routes and were classified as unknown
unless the description indicated a transportation route. Exclusion: people hiking
or traveling along non-established routes by foot were not included in this
category, and instead were classified as “outside”
Mobile Home
Standard and double-wide mobile homes
Permanent Residence
Domiciles that have a foundation, including but not limited to brick houses,
frame houses, and apartment buildings
Public and
Permanent Buildings
Schools, restaurants, airports, and other buildings with foundations that are not
residences
Other/Unknown
All other locations not described by any of the other location categories listed or
if the location was not specified
The activity location in which the fatality occurred was provided in 75% of the total fatalities
that were reported in Texas from 1959 to 2016. Figure 11 shows the stratification of fatalities by
location of occurrence and disaster types considered in this study. Fatalities with known locations,
occurred most often (38%) on transportation routes such as roadways, freeways or toll ways, parking
lots, sidewalks or air travel routes. Automobile accidents are not categorized as transportation routes
unless they were specified as such in the report. Eighteen percent (18%) of known location fatalities
occurred in “Permanent Residence”, followed by “Outside” and “In Water” at 16% and 15%,
respectively. The high fatality rate in and around certain activity locations observed in Texas is also
highlighted in research conducted in Switzerland for the period 19462015 [36] in which the
researcher noted the greatest number of natural disaster fatalities occurring on transportation routes
(33%), followed by in or around buildings and open terrain.
Sixty-five percent (65%) of fatalities on transportation routes were caused by flooding. This
percentage is potentially underestimated since 65% of the fatalities in an unknown location were
caused by flooding. As noted in other Texas flooding fatality studies [31] driving into flash flooding
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 14 of 22
conditions is a significant occurrence that would make it very difficult to assign a location with no
clear transportation route known. Also 25% of tornado fatalities are reported with an unknown
location. Forty-eight percent (48%) of heat-related fatalities occurred in permanent residences.
Tornados caused 73% of all hydrometeorological disaster fatalities reported in mobile homes. It must
not be overlooked that the “Other” category included 11 deaths of children as result of being left in a
car unattended and succumbing to heat exposure, a very preventable tragedy.
Figure 11. Hydrometeorological disaster fatalities classified (a) by reported location of occurrence and
(b) by disaster type and location
4. Discussion
The predominant types of natural disasters in Texas that result in fatalities are those initiated
by weather conditions such as flooding, tornadoes, and extreme temperatures. This study did
not analyze the climate conditions or associate global warming to disaster events, but rather its
intent was to analyze the spatial and temporal distribution of fatalities by disaster type.
Regardless of the reasons for changes in frequency or intensity of the hydrometeorological
disaster events, the parametric shifts can challenge the preparedness and resiliency of a region
and in many cases impact the number of fatalities incurred. Analysis of these types of natural
disaster trends based on historic data can enhance predictability and preparedness planning to
reduce the loss of life. Regional mortality and morbidity is also affected by the demographics
and behavior of the people in the region of impact, specifically age, gender, and behavior patterns
(location) have an observable relationship to the fatality rate due to hydrometeorological
disasters.
(b)
(a)
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 15 of 22
4.1. Population and Fatality Rates
Texas exhibits regional variability in the hydrometeorological disaster fatality rate that is weighted
to regions of high population. This suggests that as more people continue to move into populated urban
areas or into regions that are at higher risk for hydrometeorological disasters such as flood plains,
tornado alleys, or coastal regions, fatality rate will likely increase with or without an increase in the
number of disaster events. Highly populated regions are more susceptible to a higher number of natural
disaster fatalities than lower populated regions due to the sheer number of persons per area. As the
population of Texas and the number of hydrometeorological disasters continues to increase, the result
will likely be a continuing increase trend in the number of hydrometeorological fatalities. The current
population growth rate for Texas is 1.8% which is the third in the U.S. According to the Texas
Demographic Center [37], the vast majority of population growth since 1850 has occurred in
metropolitan areas while the population in non-metropolitan counties has declined. This urban
population increase coincides with an increasing trend of the annual fatalities as noted in Section 4.2.1.
The counties with the greatest population density: Harris, Dallas, Bexar, and Travis had the
highest actual fatality rate, but each less than 15 fatalities per 100,000 persons over the study period.
In contrast, some counties with lower populations had much higher per capita fatalities (higher risk
for fatalities) although they were adjacent to the high population counties and experienced similar
hydrometeorological disaster frequency and intensity. For example, Bexar county had 8.7 fatalities
per 100,000 while surrounding county of Comal had 188 fatalities per 100,000 people. Harris county
had 9.5 fatalities per 100,000 and the surrounding counties of Brazoria Chambers had 55 and 40
fatalities per 100,000 respectively. Figure 12 shows that per capita fatality rates are highest in sparsely
populated counties in the southwestern portion of Flash Flood Alley and the Texas Panhandle in the
northwestern part of the state.
Figure 12. Fatalities Normalized by Population (per 100,000).
4.2. Activity Locations for Fatality Occurrences
Twenty-five percent (25%) of the reported fatalities did not include a specific activity location of
occurrence. But even with this uncertainty the available data strongly suggests that transportation
routes are a leading fatality location. Approximately 38% of the total number of hydrometeorological
disaster fatalities that reported a location (1756) identified transportation route as the activity location
in which the fatality occurred. Approximately two-thirds (65%) of the fatalities on transportation
routes were due to flooding which implies that driving into flood conditions is a frequent high-risk
0 200 400100 Kilometers
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 16 of 22
activity that likely contributed to many of these deaths. This conjecture is similar to conclusions
drawn from research conducted in a study of natural hazard fatalities in Switzerland for the period
19462015 [36]. Additionally, research conducted at the University of Texas found that 73% of all
flood fatalities in Texas during the period 1959 to 2008 were vehicle related and 16.5% were due to
people walking into floodwaters from [13]. Further analysis of hydrometeorological fatalities in the
U.S. suggests that flood fatalities are likely underestimated. Sixty-five percent (65%) of fatalities with
an unknown location were due to floods, suggesting probable vehicle related incidents with no
specific transportation route established.
The number of fatalities on transportation routes are directly related to the number of people on
transportation routes which is related to the economic development of the affected region and the
demographics of the people professionally and personally committed to the transportation routes.
Developed economies result in more transportation between place of employment, schools,
commercial and recreational destinations. This skew may be offset since regions of greater wealth
and communication networks are more likely (have the ability) to evacuate out of harm which
reduces the fatality rate when compared to regions of lower wealth and economic development who
are unable or unwilling to evacuate. The employment rate, family structure (dual income/single
income), cultural norms, and habits and behavior of the affected population significantly impacts the
location of individuals at any given time and thereby impacts the number of fatalities experienced by
hydrometeorological disaster events.
4.3. Gender and Age
Although gender and age were not reported for a large number of disaster fatality victims, the
available information indicates more male fatalities than female fatalities. The gender gap in the
hydrometeorological fatality rate exhibited a decreasing trend from the early years of the study to the
more recent years suggesting a change in exposure possibly due to shifting roles and responsibilities
of men and women in society.
Gender and age are two key demographics that differentiate in lifestyle, behavior and risk
tolerance that ultimately affect the fatality rate. Female fatalities due to natural disasters increased
significantly from the first to the second half of the study period. The 10-year rolling average more
than quadrupled from three deaths in 1969 to 13 deaths in 2016. For the male population, the 10-year
rolling average only increased (180%) from 10 deaths to 28 deaths during this same period. If it is
generally accepted that contemporary (2017) societal gender roles and responsibilities are not the
same as they were in 1959, some reasons for this difference may be in changing situational exposure
of the workforce coupled with the level of risk accepted by males versus females. A change in
situational exposure is evident in the recent years which is experiencing more role reversal in
traditional male/female work roles (e.g., outdoor labor/indoor service).
The impact of gender and risk tolerance is most obvious in the rip current fatality numbers albeit
culled from a limited time period (19972016) with a 30:1 ratio of male to female fatalities. Deaths
from rip currents are more likely a factor of the difference in male / female risk tolerance than in a
change of societal roles with more males swimming and pursuing water sports in an area and time
of rip current activity. Tornado fatalities are an outlier to the general trends exhibiting a higher female
to male fatality ratio, but more data is needed since a potential skew may exist with only 50% of all
tornado fatalities reporting gender.
Risk tolerance also changes with age. Within the fatalities that included age (54% of total
fatalities), two high risk groups stand out with the largest number of fatalities; 2029 years. young
adult age group and the 7079 years age group. Changes in priori-ties, family, education, and
responsibilities occur for most in this 50-year span and the accepted risk taking from youthful
invincibility (such is likely the case for this age group that frequently drive into flash flood
conditions), typically progresses to a longer period of more stable (less risky) lifestyle, until the later
years when human vulnerabilities of age-related health limitations and immobility issues results in
an increase potential for succumbing to hydrometeorological disasters. The limited number of fatality
reports that includes age information in this study increases the uncertainty within the trend analysis
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 17 of 22
and is an area that warrants further research. But within the confines of the given data, the elderly
appear to be most susceptible to hydrometeorological disaster fatalities based on the percentage of
total fatalities and taking into account the relatively low overall percentage of the Texas elderly
population. The Texas Demographic Center statistics indicate that Texas population is 27.3% (<18
years, child), 62.4% (1864 years, adult), and 10.3% (≥65 years, elderly) [37]. The age of the national
and state populations overall is increasing and therefore the 2010 census estimates are conservative
when comparing the fatality rates among the age groups from this study taking into account the
much smaller number of elderly population versus younger age groups.
This study identified that the top two locations for elderly fatalities due to hydrometeorological
disaster occurred in permanent residences (45%) and transportation routes (24%) which suggests a
high risk to the homebound elderly segment of the population and to elderly when evacuating a
disaster. Heat events and flooding were the top two disasters killing the elderly accounting for almost
80% of all elderly fatalities. The number of heat related fatalities is on the rise across all age groups
but is particularly evident in the southwest of the U.S. and is usually combined with an extended
drought period. Increasing global temperatures may be a factor in this trend with 2016 having the
highest average temperature on record as well as the highest monthly temperatures in eight of the 12
months (JanuaryMay and JulySeptember) [38]. With heat-related deaths heavily weighted towards
the elderly that sometimes do not have family or social networks to acknowledge and report their
demise, the fatality rate in this age group may be under-reported
The elderly are not only at risk of heat-related fatalities, but are also very vulnerable to flooding
triggered by heavy rains and/or high winds such as exist in hurricane or tropical storm conditions.
The fatality rate due to flooding ranked second for the elderly in the study but 45% of all flooding
fatalities not reporting age of the victim, there is some uncertainty in this statistic. More certain is that
flooding devastates a community on many levels including power interruptions and blockage of
transportation routes. Medical attention is a necessity for many elderly, whether it is within a medical
facility, nursing home or the need to obtain prescription drugs. All these are typically inhibited
during a flooding condition. Although there is debate on whether it is safer to evacuate or shelter the
elderly in place during a flood, improvement strategies to reduce fatalities should not be stalled until
final consensus.
The study also found that flooding was responsible for 53% of the total hydrometeorological
disaster fatalities where the victims were known to be children (<18 years). Young children tend to
outnumber adults in a family unit and are dependent on the care and good decisions of parents or
guardians. If the family guardian makes a decision (e.g., driving into dangerous flood waters) that
result in a fatal outcome it is likely that the number of children will be greater than adult fatalities for
the same incident. Data from this study indicates the top activity location for child flood fatalities is
on transportation routes (38%) and seems to support the conjecture.
4.4. Evacuation or Shelter in Place
In response to a pending flood or hurricane event, unless there is a mandatory evacuation order
given by the city or county jurisdiction, the critical questions to consider is whether it is safer to
evacuate by driving or walking to the evacuation location or if there is less risk of harm to shelter in
place. For example, although flood fatalities are most likely to occur on transportation routes, all 68
fatalities (except one) during Hurricane Harvey occurred inside homes. Several factors should be
considered when deciding to evacuate or shelter in place such as the perceived risk to the specific
area of residence, number of children and elderly in the family, health condition and mobility of each
family member, condition of the shelter residence, condition and availability of transportation, and
evacuation destination distance. The decision to evacuate during a hurricane or flood can be the
difference between life and death.
This decision becomes especially critical with regards to the elderly residing in nursing homes
and long-term care facilities (LTCF). Research conducted in 2017 by Pierce on disaster preparedness
of LTCF [39] found deficiencies in integrated and coordinated disaster planning, staff training,
practical consideration before governments order mandatory evacuations, and accurate assessment
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 18 of 22
of the increased medical needs of LTCF residents following a disaster. Previous research on the
management of nursing home residents [40] found that, “the decision to completely evacuate,
partially evacuate (including transfers of individual residents), or to shelter in place must be based
on the integration of real-time data regarding the disaster event, the facility in question, and the
clinical profiles of the residents at risk”. Similar research by Dosa et al. [41] specific to Hurricane
Katrina and Rita based on a survey of LCTF administrative directors noted a much higher mortality
rate with evacuation actions than with shelter in place that was attributed to lack of governmental
assistance, unsupported technical and physical requirements for transportation, and difficulty in
retaining adequate staff.
4.5. Temporal Distribution
The fatality rate of annual raw fatalities increased from 1959 to 2016 with a maximum of 118
fatalities in 1998 due primarily to heat events in the months of July and August and flooding in
August and October. Stratification of total fatalities by season indicated that the majority (70%) of all
fatalities occurred in spring and summer with floods as the predominant disaster in spring and heat-
related deaths in Summer. Monthly variation indicates the highest risk for flooding and tornado
fatalities in April and May and the highest risk of heat events in August and September. Within the
68% of the hydrometeorological disaster fatalities that reported the time of day, the data in this study
suggests that the afternoon period has the highest risk of fatality from tornado, flooding, or lightning.
Based on the current level of understanding in the relationship between earth sciences and
meteorological conditions there is limited scientific predictability of disaster impacts. Predicting
hydrometeorological disasters is challenging not only from a scientific basis but also because the
fatality rate is not solely a factor of the type of the disaster but is impacted by societal activities of the
region in which the disaster event may occur. In general, hurricanes have some level of temporal
probability and typically make landfall at night when the storm strengthens due to the latent heat
release in the upper and middle atmosphere. Tornadoes also tend to occur in the late afternoon and
early evening hours, when the atmospheric conditions are most ripe for supercell thunderstorms and
are most common from 4 p.m. to 9 p.m. in the evening [42]. Disaster events such as flooding are
dependent on the amount and rate of precipitation and location of adjacent bodies of water (coastal,
riverine, or inland). The resulting impact of such a disaster is a function of the activities occurring in
the community affected at the time of the flood such as transportation density. Other factors include
the level of early warning and evacuation, the time of the day of the flooding to accommodate or
hinder rescue and transport efforts.
Similarly, if tornadoes strike during the day (especially a weekday) more people are at work or
school and are in buildings where there are adequate public shelter facilities that are typically more
disaster resilient than a private residence. Although one quarter of tornado deaths did not include an
activity location, within the known study data, only 12% of the fatalities occurred in
public/permanent buildings to support this conjecture. The study data also identified that more than
80% of lightning fatalities occur outside, in or around water, and temporary shelters. The extent of
fatalities due to lightning is an example of the combined effect of the disaster and the victims location.
Lightning fatalities have decreased significantly on a national and state level in the last several
decades as a result of a decrease in exposure (outdoor labor, agricultural work) and the strengthening
of OSHA (Occupation-al Safety and Health Agency) safety protocols. Children and adults are the
high-risk age groups for lightning fatalities and mitigation efforts to reduce the fatality rate can
include increased public awareness in school and at the workplace to move or stay indoors during
lightning events. This is especially critical for early morning lightning storms which have the greatest
killing potential due to the electric charge build-up overnight [43].
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
This study reviewed the fatality rates due to hydrometeorological disasters in Texas over a 58-
year study period (19592016) with the objective of providing perspectives and information to
enhance public awareness, support investment in infrastructure improvement, and serve as input to
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 19 of 22
state and regional disaster mitigation plans. The ability to reduce the number of hydrometeorological
fatalities in Texas should not be underestimated. Resources are available but require political will to
drive prioritized allocation to ensure weighted coverage in the highest risk areas. Information
gleaned from the review of trends from historic hydro-meteorological disasters analyzed in this study
can assist decision-makers in determining the best allocation of resources to provide maximum
mitigation potential for high risk disasters and regions.
Based on the Storm Data analyzed in this study the normalized fatality rates are decreasing for
all hydrometeorological disasters except for heat fatalities. The overall growth in population and
urban centers plays a key role in the decreasing normalized fatality rates. But population growth
appears to have an increasing effect on heat fatalities. The study results show that heat fatalities have
a strong correlation to counties with high population density as well as disproportionately effecting
the elderly segment of the population. Dedicated financial support can improve emergency
preparedness for the elderly in nursing homes, long-term care facilities and private residences to
ensure backup power, channels of communication, and available transportation to address
immobility issues for the elderly in the case of mandatory evacuation or the necessity to
shelter in place.
In addition to the elderly being susceptible to heat fatalities, they are also vulnerable to flooding.
The main reasons appear to be related to mobility issues and interruption in medical care. Senior
residences and long-term care facilities must have the ability to safely evacuate all their residents if
required or be able to shelter in place with all necessary medical staff, medication and back-up power
for prolonged medical assistance. Adequate early warning and funding to build a preparedness plan
and inventory are vital components to this cause. Requirements for emergency staffing and assistance
must be mandated through policy with preparation and training funded before a disaster strikes.
Flooding is also the leading killer of adults and children in Texas especially on transportation routes.
Adequate road, bridge, and waterway maintenance and improvement to reduce roadway flooding
should be an ongoing approved budget item in lieu of recreational upgrades or other low risk
projects.
Conversely to populated urban centers that have a higher number of actual fatalities, regions
with a low population density exhibit a higher normalized fatality risk. Although the normalized
fatality risk is inversely proportional to the population due to the low number of people, the options
for survival can still be improved through better preparation. Low population counties are typically
rural and do not receive as much funding for road and water management projects. Engineering
building codes also maybe more lax contributing to devastation from tornado or other high wind
events especially on the coast during hurricane season. Coastal land development must be managed
to avoid permanent or non-permanent housing being established in high risk hurricane and storm
surge zones. Rural poverty should not be directly related to the risk of death due to a
hydrometeorological disaster. The county and state should focus disaster preparation awareness and
ensure basic funding is made available to those low population areas with high fatality rates.
Flooding, heat, and tornado events rank as the top three causes of hydrometeorological disaster
fatalities in Texas. Regions that are prone to non-coastal flooding are predominantly in the counties
within the regions known as Flash Flood Alley and incur a high number of fatalities on transportation
routes. Therefore, risk reduction can be supported by investment in roadway flood control
improvement including early warning flash flood signage, establishing alternate routes in case of
emergencies and mandatory evacuation, preemptive emergency public transportation protocols, and
public awareness through educational programs. Tornadoes occur most often in the northeastern
counties of Texas, particularly in the months of April and May, and predominantly affect those in
temporary or non-permanent shelter (e.g., mobile homes). Contingency planning for the segment of
society that is vulnerable to tornadoes can include more frequent public awareness and information
campaigns during these months along with practice drills for what to do and where to go when a
tornado touchdown is likely. Ensuring that emergency shelters in proximity to mobile home
communities are available, accessible, and publicized during these high-risk months also has the
potential to save lives. Similar basic considerations can also reduce the risk of fatalities for cold
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 20 of 22
weather, wind events and other types of natural hazards. It is imperative that research builds on
historic data to better understand the synergy between high risk disasters, regions and vulnerable
segments of society to reduce the risk of hydrometeorological disaster fatalities in Texas.
Author Contributions: A.M.C. provided manual aggregation of fatality data contained in archived pdf files and
electronic files from the NOAA Storm Data repository from 1959 to 2016. H.O.S. provided interim review,
comments, and professional guidance in all aspects of writing this paper. S.H.P. performed the quantitative data
analysis, qualitative interpretation of results and discussion, and wrote this paper
Funding: This research was funded by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Fellowship Grant #NRC-
HQ-60-17-G-0036.
Acknowledgments: We are grateful to the University of Texas at San Antonio for faculty and technical support
and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for financial support of this research.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Munich Re. NatCatSERVICE, Natural Catastrophe Know-how for Risk Management and Research. Natural
Catastrophe Online Tool. Available online: http://natcatservice.munichre.com/ (accessed on 17 May 2018).
2. Hahn, D.; Viaud, E.; Corotis, R. Multihazard Mapping of the United States. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain.
Eng. Syst. A Civ. Eng. 2016, 3, 04016016.
3. Borden, K.; Cutter, S. Spatial patterns of natural disasters mortality in the United States. Int. J. Health Geogr.
2008, 7, 113, doi:10.1186/1476-072X-7-64.
4. Chowdhury, A.; Mushtaque, R.; Bhuyia, A.; Choudhury, A.; Sen, R. The Bangladesh cyclone of 1991: Why
so many people died. Disasters 1993, 17, 291304, doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.1993.tb00503.x.
5. Gerritsen, H. What happened in 1953? The Big Flood in the Netherlands in retrospect. Philos. Trans. R. Soc.
2005, A363, 12711291, doi:10.1098/rsta.2005.1568.
6. Jonkman, S.; Maaskant, B.; Boyd, E.; Levitan, M. Loss of life caused by the flooding of New Orleans after
hurricane Katrina: Analysis of the relationship between flood characteristics and mortality. Risk Anal. Int.
J. 2009, 29, 676698, doi:10.1111/j.15396924.2008.01190.x.
7. Kure, S.; Jibiki, Y.; Quimpo, M.; Manalo, U.; Ono, Y.; Mano, A. Evaluation of the Characteristics of Human
Loss and Building Damage and Reasons for the Magnification of Damage Due to Typhoon Haiyan, Coastal.
Eng. J. 2016, 58, 1640008, doi:10.1142/S0578563416400088.
8. Ashley, S.; Ashley, W. Flood fatalities in the United States. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 2008, 47, 805818,
doi:10.1175/2007JAMC1611.1, 2008.
9. Singh, O.; Kumar, M. Flood events, fatalities and damages in India from 1978 to 2006. Nat. Disasters 2013,
69, 18151834, doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0781-0.
10. Paulikas, M.; Rahman, M. A temporal assessment of flooding fatalities in Pakistan (1950–2012). J. Flood Risk
Manag. 2015, 8, 6270, doi:10.1111/jfr3.12084.
11. FitzGerald, G.; Du, W.; Jamal, A.; Clark, M.; Hou, X. Flood fatalities in contemporary Australia (19972008).
Emerg. Med. Australas. 2010, 22, 180186, doi:10.1111/j.17426723.2010.01284.x.
12. Sharif, H.; Jackson, T.; Hossain, M.; Zane, D. Analysis of Flood Fatalities in Texas. Nat. Disasters Rev. 2014,
16, 04014016, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000145.
13. Sharif, H.; Jackson, T.; Hossain, M.; Bin-Shafique, S.; Zane, D. Motor Vehicle-related Flood Fatalities in
Texas, 19592008. J. Trans. Saf. Secur. 2010, 2, 325335, doi:10.1080/19439962.2010.506596.
14. Fox News. Fox Facts: Hurricane Katrina Damage. 2006. Available online:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/08/29/fox-facts-hurricane-katrina-damage.html (accessed on 2 April
2018).
15. Wikipedia: Hurricane Harvey. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Harvey
(accessed on 02 April 2018).
16. Spatial Disaster Events and Losses Database for the United States (SHELDUS). Hazards and Vulnerability
Research Institute. U.S. Hazard Losses (19602015) Summary Report. 2017. Available online:
http://hvri.geog.sc.edu/SHELDUS/index.cfm?page=reports (accessed on 2 April 2018).
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 21 of 22
17. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. NOAA. U.S. Tornado Climatology. 2017. Available
online: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-information/extreme-events/us-tornado-climatology (accessed
on 2 April 2018).
18. Ashley, W.S. Spatial and temporal analysis of tornado fatalities in the United States: 18802005. Weather
Forecast. 2007, 22, 12141228, doi:10.1175/2007WAF2007004.1.
19. Changnon, A.; Pielke, R.; Changnon, D.; Sylves, R.; Pulwarty, R. Human factors explain the increased losses
from weather and climate extremes. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2000, 81, 437442, doi:10.1175/1520-
0477(2000)081<0437:HFETIL>2.3.CO;2.
20. Cutter, S.L.; Finch, C. Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural disasters. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 23012306, doi:10.1073/pnas.0710375105.
21. Cutter, S.; Emrich, C.; Gall, M.; Reeves, R. Flash Flood Risk and the Paradox of Urban Development. Nat.
Disasters Rev. 2017, 19, 05017005, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000268.
22. Milch, K.; Broad, K.; Orlove, B.; Meyer, R. Decision Science Perspectives on Hurricane Vulnerability:
Evidence from the 20102012 Atlantic Hurricane Seasons. Atmosphere 2018, 9, 32, doi:10.3390/atmos9010032.
23. Sault, S. Why the Hill Country Is A.K.A. ‘Flash Flood Alley’ 2016. Texas Hill Country. Available online:
http://texashillcountry.com/why-the-hill-country-is-a-k-a-flash-flood-alley/ (accessed on 2 April 2018).
24. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). National Centers for Environmental
Information. Storm Events Database 2017. Available online: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/
(accessed on 2 April 2018).
25. Border Patrol. Southwest Border Sectors. 2018. Available online:
https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/documents/2017-
Dec/BP%20Southwest%20Border%20Sector%20Deaths%20FY1998%20-%20FY2017.pdf (accessed on 2
April 2018).
26. Lomonaco, C. U.S. Mexico Border: The Season of Death. PBS Frontline World, 2006. Available online:
https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/blog/2006/06/usmexico_border_1.html (accessed on 02 April 2018).
27. United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Disaster Risk Reduction,
http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/special-themes/disaster-risk-reduction/natural-
hazards/hydro-meteorological-hazards/ (accessed 2 April 2018).
28. National Weather Service (NWS). Storm Events Database. Directives Systems. 2018. Available online:
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/directives/010/010.php (accessed on 2 April 2018).
29. Pitts, Swanya H., Texas State Historical Association (TSHA). Sanderson, Tx. Available on
https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/hjs07 (accessed 02Apr2018)
30. Coates, L. Flood Fatalities in Australia, 17881996. Aust. Geogr. 1999, 30, 391408,
doi:10.1080/00049189993657.
31. Sharif, H.; Hossain, M.; Jackson, T.; Bin-Shafique, S. Person-Place-Time Analysis of Vehicle Fatalities
Caused by Flash Floods in Texas. Geomat. Nat. Disasters Risk 2012, 3, 311323,
doi:10.1080/19475705.2011.615343.
32. Singh, O.; Singh, J. Lightning fatalities over India: 19792011. Meteorol. Appl. 2015, 22, 770778,
doi:10.1002/met.1520.
33. Navarrete-Aldana, N.; Cooper, M.A.; Holle, R.L. Lightning fatalities in Colombia from 2000 to 2009. Nat.
Disasters 2014, 74, 13491362, doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1254-9.
34. Elsom, D. Deaths and injuries caused by Lightning in the United Kingdom: Analyses of two databases.
Atmos. Res. 2001, 56, 325334, doi:10.1016/S0169-8095(00)00083-1.
35. Curran, E.; Holle, R.; Lopez, R. Lightning Casualties and Damage in the United States from 1959 to 1994. J.
Clim. 2001, 13, 34483464.
36. Badoux, A.; Andres, N.; Techel, F.; Hegg, C. Natural Disaster Fatalities in Switzerland from 1946 to 201 5.
Nat. Disasters Earth Syst. Sci. 2016, 16, 27472768, doi:10.5194/nhess-16-2747-2016.
37. Texas Demographic Center. Projections of the Population of Texas and Counties in Texas by Age, Sex and
Race/Ethnicity for 20102050. 2014. Available online: http://txsdc.utsa.edu/Data/TPEPP/Projections/
(accessed on 2 April 2018).
38. Shaftel, H. NASA, Global Climate Change, Vital Signs of the Planet, (2018). Climate Change: How Do We
Know? Available online: https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ (accessed on 2 April 2018).
Geosciences 2018, 8, 186 22 of 22
39. Pierce, J.; Morley, S.; West, T.; Upton, L.; Banks, L. Improving Long-Term Care Facility Disaster
Preparedness and Response: A Literature Review. Disaster Med. Public Health Preparedness 2017, 11, 140
149, doi:10.1017/dmp.2016.59.
40. Dosa, D.; Hyer, K.; Brown, L.; Artenstein, A.; Polivka-West, L.; Mor, V. The controversy inherent in
managing frail nursing home residents during complex hurricane emergencies. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2008,
9, 599604, doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2008.05.007.
41. Dosa, D. To Evacuate or Not to Evacuate: Lessons Learned from Louisiana Nursing Home Administrators
Following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2007, 8, 142149,
doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2006.11.004.
42. Weather Underground. Prepare for a Tornado. Available online:
https://www.wunderground.com/prepare/tornado (accessed on 16 April 2018).
43. Woollaston, V. Lightning is at its most powerful at 8am in the morning but more storms occur in the
afternoon, Daily Mail 2015. Available online: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-
2998781/Lightning-powerful-8am-morning-storms-occur-afternoon.html (accessed on 16 April 2018).
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
... Males in flood are more likely to drive through flood water, more likely to be working as staff of emergency and supporting services, and more likely to exhibit other risk-taking behaviors. The observation that males outnumbered females in flood fatalities can be attributed to many factors including the high involvement of males in driving, the high proportion of males working in emergency services and utility maintenance, males' risk-taking behavior, and more males swimming and pursuing water sports [32,48,49]. ...
... Males in flood are more likely to drive through flood water, more likely to be working as staff of emergency and supporting services, and more likely to exhibit other risk-taking behaviors. The observation that males outnumbered females in flood fatalities can be attributed to many factors including the high involvement of males in driving, the high proportion of males working in emergency services and utility maintenance, males' risk-taking behavior, and more males swimming and pursuing water sports [32,48,49]. Table 6. ...
Article
Full-text available
Flooding is one of the main weather-related disasters that cause numerous fatalities every year across the globe. This study examines flood fatalities reported in the contiguous United States (US) from 1959 to 2019. The last two decades witnessed major flood events, changing the ranking of the top states compared to previous studies, with the exception of Texas, which had significantly higher flood-related fatalities than any other state. The rankings of counties within some states changed as well. The study aims to improve understanding of the situational conditions, demographics, and spatial and temporal characteristics associated with flood fatalities. The analysis reveals that flash flooding is associated with more fatalities than other flood types. In general, males are much more likely to be killed in floods than females. The analysis also suggests that people in the age groups of 10–19, 20–29, and 0–9 are the most vulnerable to flood hazard. Purposely driving or walking into floodwaters accounts for more than 86% of total flood fatalities. Thus, the vast majority of flood fatalities are preventable. The results will help identify the risk factors associated with different types of flooding and the vulnerability of the exposed communities.
... Hydro-meteorological disasters can result in significant damage to human lives and to properties. The statistics show around 80% of the disaster incidents in the world that caused fatalities are hydrological or meteorological disasters (Paul et al., 2018). These hydro-meteorological disasters may result in severe flood situations, landslides, cyclones, droughts, storm surges, extreme temperature events (heat waves and cold spells), heavy snowfalls, hailstorms, avalanches, tornadoes, and tropical cyclones. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper presents a comprehensive seasonal analysis of disaster incidents with their associated weather systems reported in Sri Lanka from 1907 to 2019. Disaster incidents and weather records were collected from different reliable sources and analysed with the observed weather systems to understand the formation and development of those weather systems. According to the observations, frequent hydro-meteorological hazards experienced by the country are extreme winds, floods, and landslides. The seasonal analysis shows that the majority of these hydro-meteorological disasters have occurred during the southwest monsoon, where the weather was mainly dominated by the monsoon winds entering from the southwest of Sri Lanka which creates torrential rainfall mainly in the wet zone of the country. The frequency of formation of depression and deep depression, from 1907 to 2019 shows that most of these are formed in the Bay of Bengal (BoB), North Indian Ocean, from October to January while having the highest frequency in November followed by December. The study will help to understand the possible damages, and thereby help the community to be prepared for such future hazards. The need for a central platform for generating timely impact-based warnings and helping the community to act was also identified. Further, the census block can be suggested as the smallest; Micro-Geographic Incident Response Unit (MG-IRU) to grant the decision-making power and connect the institution and community in the disaster risk management process efficiently.
... Hydro-meteorological disasters can result in significant damage to human lives and properties. The statistics show around 80% of the disaster events in the world that cause fatalities are hydrological or meteorological disasters (Paul et al., 2018). These hydro-meteorological disasters may result in severe flood situations, landslides, cyclones, etc. Daily Incident Updates (DIU) are formal recordings of the facts relating to an incident that requires an immediate response, and a tool used to capture an unexpected occurrence of hazardous incidents (SafetyCulture, 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
During and after any disaster, a Situation Report (SITREP) is prepared, based on the Daily Incident Updates (DIU), as an initial decision support information base. It is observed that the decision support system and best practices are not optimized through the available formal reporting on disaster incidents. The rapidly evolving situation, misunderstood terms, inaccurate data and delivery delays of DIU are challenges to the daily SITREP. Multiple stakeholders stipulated with different tasks should be properly understood for the SITREP to initiate relevant response tasks. To fill this research gap, this paper identifies the weaknesses of the current practice and discusses the upgrading of the incident-reporting process using a freely available software tool, enabling further visualization, and producing a comprehensive timely output to share among the stakeholders. In this case, “Power-BI” (a data visualization software) is used as a 360-degree view of useful metrics—in a single place, with real-time updates while being available on all devices for operational decision-making. When a dataset is transformed into several analytical reports and dashboards, it can be easily shared with the target users and action groups. This article analyzed two sources of data, namely the Disaster Management Center (DMC) and the National Disaster Relief Service Center (NDRSC) of Sri Lanka. Senior managers of disaster emergencies were interviewed and explored social media to develop a scheme of best practices for disaster reporting, starting from just before the occurrence, and following the unfolding sequence of the disasters. Using a variety of remotely acquired imageries, rapid mapping, grading, and delineating impacts of natural disasters, were made available to concerned users.
... The Storm Events database provides detailed information about the flood events (e.g., location and start and end time of the event, property and crop damage, injuries, and fatalities) across the U.S. for the period from 1996 to the present. Despite the limited record length, the Storm Event database is currently the most complete freely available database of flood events in the United States and has been successfully used in previous studies (Ahmadalipour & Moradkhani, 2019;Alipour et al., 2020;Konisky et al., 2016;Lobell et al., 2011;Paul et al., 2018). We acknowledge the Spatial Hazard Events and Losses (SHELDUS) database (CEMHS, 2020) which considered the Storm Events database as the baseline and extended it back to 1960 by integrating hazards information from different sources; however, the access to SHELDUS is not free to the public. ...
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Flooding is one of the most devastating natural disasters causing significant economic losses. One of the dominant drivers of flood losses is heavy precipitation, with other contributing factors such as built environments and socio‐economic conditions superimposed to it. To better understand the risk profile associated with this hazard, we develop probabilistic models to quantify the future likelihood of fluvial flood‐related property damage exceeding a critical threshold (i.e., high property damage) at the state level across the conterminous United States. The model is conditioned on indicators representing heavy precipitation amount and frequency derived from observed and downscaled precipitation. The likelihood of high property damage is estimated from the conditional probability distribution of annual total property damage, which is derived from the joint probability of the property damage and heavy precipitation indicators. Our results indicate an increase in the probability of high property damage (i.e., exceedance of 70th percentile of observed annual property damage for each state) in the future. Higher probability of high property damage is projected to be clustered in the states across the western and south‐western United States, and parts of the U.S. Northwest and the northern Rockies and Plains. Depending on the state, the mean annual probability of high property damage in these regions could range from 38% to 80% and from 46% to 95% at the end of the century (2090s) under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively. This is equivalent to 20%–40% increase in the probability compared to the historical period 1996–2005. Results show that uncertainty in the projected probability of high property damage ranges from 14% to 35% across the states. The spatio‐temporal variability of the uncertainty across the states and three future decades (i.e., 2050s, 2070s, and 2090s) exhibits nonstationarity, which is driven by the uncertainty associated with the probabilistic prediction models and climate change scenarios.
... Other had their injuries through the re/explosion. During disasters, some populations such as the aged, women and children are more vulnerable [24]. As Ghana continues to experience more disasters, the more lives especially the vulnerable ones will be affected [11], [25]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Disasters have become a common threat to many societies across the globe. In developing communities, there is severe impact as disasters tend to wash away the little gains they have made. As much as there are community level effects, disasters leave significant individual impacts that deserve attention. This qualitative study study used the phenomenological approach to explore the lived experiences of 13 victims of the 3 rd June, 2015 flood/fire disaster in Accra, Ghana. It was found that victims perceive the cause of the disaster to include engineering failures and anti-environmental behaviours. Their experiences include biographical disruption such as disfigurement, death and loss of property, and psychological impacts such as anxiety, behavioural changes and mood effects. Participants’ adjustment experiences involve societal, and family level intervention, spiritual support and post disaster vulnerability issues. It is concluded that the struggles of disaster victims in Ghana are real and that there is the need for comprehensive intervention and support for victims. The implications of the findings regarding are discussed.
... The impacts of natural hydrometeorological hazards (HMHs) on human life, infrastructure, habitats and societal and economic activities can be devastating [1]. HMHs are naturally occurring global meteorological (and subsequently) hydrological phenomena and are features of the earth system, including the hydrological cycle and the weather and climate system components [2]. ...
Article
Full-text available
A number of Nature Based Solutions (NBS) are being used around the world in order to address various hydrometeorological hazards as a more environmentally friendly alternative to hard structures. Such a solution has been created in the Spercheios river basin in Central Greece, which is susceptible to heavy rainfall and river bank overflow due to flood water from upstream, in order to mitigate flood and drought impacts under current and future climate conditions. Here a first attempt is made to use actual measurements taken from various sources in the river, including in-situ and satellite data, in order to establish early experimental evidence of the NBS efficiency in the area. The measurements include data from automated hydrological stations from the OpenHi network, satellite remote sensing data and field measurements performed along the Spercheios River basin. For each measurement used, different analysis has been performed based on data availability and pertinence to the NBS efficiency. Preliminary results presented here show that the NBS functions as designed and provides protection against flooding in the area, and can potentially diminish the risk of drought. The results are in agreement with the numerical outputs already presented in our previous work.
... Texas ranks first in the U.S. in the variety and frequency of most natural disasters, such as flooding, wildfires, hurricanes, winter storms, and droughts in a historical context (NASA, 2017). The state has been declaring at least one major disaster per year (Caraway, 2006;Paul et al., 2018). Therefore, addressing the impact of these disasters on different sectors is crucial for the state's economy. ...
Article
Full-text available
Texas ranks first in the United States in the variety and frequency of most natural disasters, such as flooding, wildfires, hurricanes, winter storms, and droughts. In February 2021, the winter storm named Uri caused an abnormal decline in the air temperature in the southcentral United States, notably in Texas. Right before Uri, most of Texas was going through a drought spell. Thus, this study analyzed how Uri influenced the drought severity, soil profile moisture content, and vegetation cover (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, NDVI) across Texas. Data used in this analysis was obtained from the web-based geospatial applications gridMET and Crop-CASMA. The collected datasets include the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), Snow Water Equivalent (SWE), soil moisture, and NDVI at different spatial resolutions. These datasets were aggregated to the county scale using the zonal statistics analysis. The strength of the correlation between SWE and soil moisture was quantified based on the Pearson correlation coefficient. The percentage change in live vegetation cover due to the impact of the frigid temperature and snow coverage across the state was quantified by analyzing the average weekly NDVI before and after the winter storm. There was a reasonably strong correlation between the SWE contribution of Uri and the increase of the rootzone soil moisture (Pearson's r = 0.42). Similarly, the SWE showed a higher correlation with daily rootzone soil moisture with a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.49 on March 1. Furthermore, our results revealed a reduction in the NDVI values to less than 0.60 across Texas during the third week of February. Overall, Texas NDVI values seriously decreased due to Uri. Despite its disruptive effects on the state infrastructures and the economy, Uri snow lessened the drought conditions relatively for a short time.
... Natural hazards have considerable and potentially highly destructive impacts on human societies and ecosystems (Paul et al., 2018). Among the four main types of natural hazards in the world, (1) Geological/geophysical events; (2) meteorological and hydrological events; (3) climatological events; and (4) other events, including biological (i.e., biological epidemics) and extra-terrestrial (i.e., space weather hazards), hydro-meteorological disasters (meteorological, hydrological and climatological events) account for over 87% in terms of the damages including casualties, economic losses, infrastructure damage and disruption to normal life. ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
The purpose of this document is twofold. First, it presents the characterisation of extreme events occurred in the last 30 years (1989-2018) in the OPERANDUM OALs (in Europe and abroad): after a selection of cases, with criteria established according to hazard and site, the analysis is carried on by looking at their meteorological settings, available local data, and satellite products. Secondly, the technical description of the data used for the analysis and made available through the GeoIKP is presented, allowing the prompt us of the collected data to project partners for ongoing OPERANDUM activities and to general public.
... Overall, male pedestrians were more common victims (58.2%), and had higher severe injury proportions, consistent with previous studies [14,15]. However, in pedestrian-at-fault crashes, 67.7% were male, which implies that the male population might be more reluctant to comply with the regulations and/or are more associated with risky behavior [71,72]. When the total population of San Antonio were considered, 25.3% were aged less than 18 years and 11.8% were aged 65 or over [22]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to evaluate the performance of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), a simple Auto-Regressive with eXogenous input (ARX) model, and a gene expression programming (GEP)-based model in one-day-ahead discharge prediction for the upper Kentucky River Basin. Calibration of the models were carried out for the period of 2002–2005 using daily flow at a stream gauging station unaffected by the flow regulation. Validation of the calibrated models were executed for the period of 2008–2010 at the same gauging station along with another station 88 km downstream. GEP provided the best calibration (coefficient of determination (R) value 0.94 and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) value of 0.88) and validation (R values of 0.93 and 0.93, NSE values of 0.87 and 0.87, respectively) results at the two gauging stations. While SWAT performed reasonably well in calibration (R value 0.85 and NSE value 0.72), its performance somewhat degraded in validation (R values of 0.85 and 0.82, NSE values of 0.65 and 0.65, for the two stations). ARX performed very well in calibration (R value 0.92, NSE value 0.82) and reasonably well in validation (R values of 0.88 and 0.92, NSE values of 0.76 and 0.85) at the two stations. Research results suggest that sophisticated hydrological models could be outperformed by simple data-driven models and GEP has the advantage to generate functional relationships that allows investigation of the complex nonlinear interrelationships among the input variables.
Article
Full-text available
Background /Objective: Flooding risk is a global issue, and various approaches have been established to prevent flooding risk around the world. China is one of the heavily flood-affected countries and has been implementing the Sponge City program since 2015 to defend against flooding. Unfortunately, flooding has been common in China in recent years, causing severe health risks to citizens. This research mainly focuses on (a) evaluating the implementation of China's Sponge City program and the associated impacts on human health and (b) exploring the future improvement of the Sponge City program in China. Methods The Interpretive Document Approach was used to explore an inclusive review of the Sponge City program and its implications on human health. Results /Findings: The Sponge City program in China is still insufficient to prevent flooding risks effectively. In the past eight years, 24/34 provinces have recorded flooding, which caused a total of 4701 deaths and over 525.5 billion RMB (around 72.9 billion US$) in economic loss. Till now, only 64/654 cities have promulgated local legislation to manage sponge city construction, although the Sponge City was implemented in 2015. Besides, the completed Sponge City program constructions cannot fully prevent flooding risks, the flood prevention capacity is limited. The Sponge City program is not granted priority, lacking national legislation hinders Sponge City program implementation in China. Conclusions China needs to make national legislation on the Sponge City program and update the Sponge City program technology guidelines. Local governments should implement Sponge City construction according to local geographic environments.
Article
Full-text available
Although the field has seen great advances in hurricane prediction and response, the economic toll from hurricanes on U.S. communities continues to rise. We present data from Hurricanes Earl (2010), Irene (2011), Isaac (2012), and Sandy (2012) to show that individual and household decisions contribute to this vulnerability. From phone surveys of residents in communities threatened by impending hurricanes, we identify five decision biases or obstacles that interfere with residents’ ability to protect themselves and minimize property damage: (1) temporal and spatial myopia, (2) poor mental models of storm risk, (3) gaps between objective and subjective probability estimates, (4) prior storm experience, and (5) social factors. We then discuss ways to encourage better decision making and reduce the economic and emotional impacts of hurricanes, using tools such as decision defaults (requiring residents to opt out of precautions rather than opt in) and tailoring internet-based forecast information so that it is local, specific, and emphasizes impacts rather than probability.
Article
Full-text available
A database of fatalities caused by natural hazard processes in Switzerland was compiled for the period between 1946 and 2015. Using information from the Swiss flood and landslide damage database and the Swiss destructive avalanche database, the data set was extended back in time and more hazard processes were added by conducting an in-depth search of newspaper reports. The new database now covers all natural hazards common in Switzerland, categorised into seven process types: flood, landslide, rockfall, lightning, windstorm, avalanche and other processes (e.g. ice avalanches, earthquakes). Included were all fatal accidents associated with natural hazard processes in which victims did not expose themselves to an important danger on purpose. The database contains information on 635 natural hazard events causing 1023 fatalities, which corresponds to a mean of 14.6 victims per year. The most common causes of death were snow avalanches (37 %), followed by lightning (16 %), floods (12 %), windstorms (10 %), rockfall (8 %), landslides (7 %) and other processes (9 %). About 50 % of all victims died in one of the 507 single-fatality events; the other half were killed in the 128 multi-fatality events. The number of natural hazard fatalities that occurred annually during our 70-year study period ranged from 2 to 112 and exhibited a distinct decrease over time. While the number of victims in the first three decades (until 1975) ranged from 191 to 269 per decade, it ranged from 47 to 109 in the four following decades. This overall decrease was mainly driven by a considerable decline in the number of avalanche and lightning fatalities. About 75 % of victims were males in all natural hazard events considered together, and this ratio was roughly maintained in all individual process categories except landslides (lower) and other processes (higher). The ratio of male to female victims was most likely to be balanced when deaths occurred at home (in or near a building), a situation that mainly occurred in association with landslides and avalanches. The average age of victims of natural hazards was 35.9 years and, accordingly, the age groups with the largest number of victims were the 20–29 and 30–39 year-old groups, which in combination represented 34 % of all fatalities. It appears that the overall natural hazard mortality rate in Switzerland over the past 70 years has been relatively low in comparison to rates in other countries or rates of other types of fatal accidents in Switzerland. However, a large variability in mortality rates was observed within the country with considerably higher rates in Alpine environments.
Article
Full-text available
Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and their residents are especially susceptible to disruptions associated with natural disasters and often have limited experience and resources for disaster planning and response. Previous reports have offered disaster planning and response recommendations. We could not find a comprehensive review of studied interventions or facility attributes that affect disaster outcomes in LTCFs and their residents. We reviewed articles published from 1974 through September 30, 2015, that studied disaster characteristics, facility characteristics, patient characteristics, or an intervention that affected outcomes for LTCFs experiencing or preparing for a disaster. Twenty-one articles were included in the review. All of the articles fell into 1 of the following categories: facility or disaster characteristics that predicted preparedness or response, interventions to improve preparedness, and health effects of disaster response, most often related to facility evacuation. All of the articles described observational studies that were heterogeneous in design and metrics. We believe that the evidence-based literature supports 6 specific recommendations for facilities, governmental agencies, health care communities and academia. These include integrated and coordinated disaster planning, staff training, careful consideration before governments order mandatory evacuations, anticipation of the increased medical needs of LTCF residents following a disaster, and the need for more outcomes research. ( Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness . 2016;page 1 of 10)
Article
Full-text available
Information on fatalities in India as a result of lightning flashes has been extracted from a database on disastrous weather events of the India Meteorological Department (IMD). Records dating from 1979 to 2011 indicate that about 5259 persons have been killed by lightning strikes in India. The maximum number of lightning fatalities was observed in the states of Maharashtra (29%), West Bengal (12%) and Uttar Pradesh (9%). The spatial variation shows that lightning fatalities are higher over west central India. A significant number of males (89%) have been killed by lightning flashes compared to females (5%) and children (6%) in India, which is most likely due to the larger proportion of males working and moving outdoors in lonely conditions. The overall fatality rate is about 0.25 per million population per year in India. The lightning fatalities are significantly more common in the rainy and the summer seasons. Comparisons were also made between the results of the present study and similar studies carried out in different parts of the world. Therefore, this study provides useful information on the risky lightning time in India to indicate a public awareness and lightning safety campaign.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
National lightning fatality information has been gathered and published for several decades over Australia, Canada, Japan, the United States, and Western Europe, but few such studies have taken place and been published in the formal literature during the last decade in other areas. National lightning fatality data are difficult to collect in many countries, especially in tropical regions, despite a high frequency of lightning. To partially fill this gap, the current paper provides the first comprehensive national summary of lightning deaths in Colombia. Data from the National Administrative Department of Statistics were gathered for 2000 through 2009 and were classified according to the number of fatalities by year, month, gender, age, and location of the fatality. These data were assigned to geographic departments to determine the fatality rates per type of population. Comparison was also made with the population percentage in rural areas where the outdoor lightning risk may be greater than in cities due to labor intensive agricultural practices, housing that is unsafe from the lightning threat, lack of access to weather forecasts and lightning safety knowledge, and other factors. Data from an international lightning locating system also were used to determine the annual lightning frequency and monthly totals in Colombia. During the ten study years, 757 deaths were identified. The highest mortality rates were in rural areas with a maximum of 7.69 deaths per million per year in the Vaupes Department of eastern Colombia. The death rate for all of Colombia was 1.78 per million per year during the same period.
Article
This paper traces the historic development of flood risk and the antecedent conditions that contributed to the catastrophic consequences in central South Carolina as the result of the 2015 flash flood. The study draws on archival and contextual research to underscore development paradoxes: the safe development paradox—federal policies aimed at making hazardous areas safer that have resulted in just the opposite—and the local government paradox—local governments permitting development of hazardous areas through lax land-use regulations and zoning while their residents bear the burden of hazards events. These paradoxes are used to illustrate the rapid development of an urban watershed and associated increase in flood risk. A chronology of development patterns from the 1930s with the expansion of the central core urbanized footprint of Columbia shows an increasing level of flood risk exposure as creeks were channelized, ornamental lakes developed, and high-end housing built, all with local government approval. In contrast, the uptake of National Flood Insurance policies remained below national averages for the level of risk in the region especially in the urbanized areas. Unabated hazard exposure and lack of mitigation set the stage for the significant losses incurred in the 2015 flood event and the uneven spatial variability in impacts. Unlike the impacts of Hurricane Katrina or the 2016 Louisiana flash floods, the burden of flood losses fell mostly on residents who could afford to bear the loss. With the exception of the discussion about buy-outs, this catastrophic flash flood event did not lead to a review of or change in land use, building, or zoning ordinances. Instead, the relatively quick residential recovery allowed the community to return to its predisaster state with seemingly few lessons learned.
Article
As natural hazard losses continue to increase, more effective and efficient mitigation techniques need to be implemented to diminish or possibly reverse this trend. A tool that hazard mitigation planners can use is hazard mapping. Although maps for single hazards are common, maps that simultaneously consider different hazards are not as extensively developed. In this paper multihazard maps of the United States are created by mapping multiple hazards together. Using the spatial hazard events and losses database for the United States (SHELDUS) from the Hazard and Vulnerability Research Institute at the University of South Carolina, losses at the county level were gathered and analyzed. In addition to adjusting for inflation, population and wealth changes were also considered. Using the modified hazards loss data, maps based on categories of natural hazards have been determined. Additionally, a map of regions based on similar natural hazards was created. It is widely accepted that visual aids are effective communication tools, and the multihazard maps created here will assist regional mitigation planners in implementing more effective measures to confront natural hazards as well as to better communicate hazard risk to the public.
Article
Super Typhoon Haiyan struck the Philippines on 8 November 2013 and caused catastrophic damage due to its remarkably high wind speeds, storm surges, and waves. In this paper, the characteristics of the human losses and building damage in the coastal region of Leyte, the Philippines, were investigated based on data of observed inundation height/depth, the number of deaths and missing people, and damaged buildings in each barangay. Also, the relationship between human loss and the evacuation environment in each barangay was investigated, based on several questionnaire surveys of barangay captains. As a result, the scale of the human damage caused by Haiyan was found to be similar to that caused by other historical tsunamis, yet it was much larger than that caused by historical storm surge disasters in Japan. Moreover, it was found that there were differences in fatality percentages among neighboring barangays, attributable to several factors. Our questionnaire survey analysis revealed the need for disaster mitigation/prevention education and the importance of leadership by barangay captains in the evacuation of local people. The need for such education should be emphasized widely because some barangay captains still do not understand the meaning of “storm surge” even one year after the Typhoon Haiyan event.
Article
Floods are the leading cause of fatalities connected with natural disasters in Texas. A combination of physiography and precipitation often result in extreme hydrologic conditions that cause floods in the state. This paper reviews flood-related fatalities in Texas between 1959 and 2008. Information on flood-fatality victims and the flood-causing events was obtained from the National Climatic Data Center. The data collected included the date, time, location, and weather conditions and the gender and age of the flood victims. Comparison with other states reveals that the size of the population of Texas is a major factor in the increased number of fatalities. The data also suggest that driving or walking into floodwaters may be responsible for more than 93% of flood fatalities in Texas. Although most high-fatality counties are located in the Texas "Flash Flood Alley" that includes major urban centers, normalization of fatality data shows that the flood-fatality risk is actually higher in other areas of the state. The analysis also indicates that the annual flood-fatality rates are decreasing significantly. A combination of improved hydrometeorological forecasting, educational programs aimed at enhancing public awareness of flood risk and the seriousness of flood warnings, and timely and appropriate action by local emergency and safety authorities will help further reduce flood fatalities in Texas. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.