ArticlePDF Available

Unusual painted anthropomorph in Lembata island extends our understanding of rock art diversity in Indonesia

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

We report new finds of two painted rock art sites in Lembata Island in Indonesia, one depicting a 'boat', the other an anthropomorph. The style of the anthropomorph is quite distinct from the small dynamic painted anthropomorphs common elsewhere in eastern In-donesia. Based on similarities with figures on Moko drums we hypothesise that this painting dates to the last millennium CE. This find extends our knowledge of the diversity of anthro-pomorph figures in Indonesian rock art, and indicates continuity in the expression of relationships and obligations to the ancestors through different mediums in the Sunda Islands.
Content may be subject to copyright.
79
Rock Art Research 2018 - Volume 35, Number 1, pp. 79-84. S. O’CONNOR et al.
KEYWORDS: Indonesia – Lembata – Painted rock art – Anthropomorph – Moko drum
UNUSUAL PAINTED ANTHROPOMORPH IN LEMBATA
ISLAND EXTENDS OUR UNDERSTANDING OF
ROCK ART DIVERSITY IN INDONESIA
Sue O’Connor, Mahirta, Shimona Kealy, Julien Louys,
Hendri A. F. Kaharudin, Antony Lebuan and Stuart Hawkins
Abstract. 

 -

-
      -

Introduction
  

     
   
  
      



   

   


       
Figure 1. Map of Nusa Tenggara with inset of Lembata Island showing location of sites (red triangles) and villages
(black squares).
Rock Art Research 2018 - Volume 35, Number 1, pp. 79-84. S. O’CONNOR et al.
80
     
      
      
  


Location of painting sites
   

 
      
  
  

   
    



Nali rock art site



    
   
   
     
   


        







    






     

   
   



     
    



Figure 2. Overview of the Nali rock art site.
Figure 3. Nali anthropomorph.
81
Rock Art Research 2018 - Volume 35, Number 1, pp. 79-84. S. O’CONNOR et al.
       

Figure 4. Tene Koro site overview showing location of ‘boat’ image.
Figure 5. Tene Koro ‘boat’ with red pigment background and enhancement
showing mast and steering oar in white pigment.
Tene Koro rock art site



   

   
    
     



  


    


    


   

   
   


  
    
    
   
    
     
    

 


  


    

Discussion

    
  
  
    
    
  
  
 
   
       
  
  
 
Rock Art Research 2018 - Volume 35, Number 1, pp. 79-84. S. O’CONNOR et al.
82


      
  
 

   



      
     
  

 

    

  

  
   



     


   


   
  
    





     
      
    
   


     




    terminus post
quem


    
    



    




 

 
Figure 6. Lewohala Moko drum showing anthropomorph with central
protrusion from head.
Figure 7. Lewohala ancestral village with Ilelewotolok volcano in
background.
83
Rock Art Research 2018 - Volume 35, Number 1, pp. 79-84. S. O’CONNOR et al.





   
     
    
 
   


  
     
     
   
  

       
     




         

   
    
     

        
 










      
   

     

Conclusion


 

  




    
      


      
   


Acknowledgements
      
    

 

    
   
       
     

 RAR








sue.oconnor@anu.edu.au














Figure 8. Moko drum and other objects in Lewohala sacred house.
Rock Art Research 2018 - Volume 35, Number 1, pp. 79-84. S. O’CONNOR et al.
84























REFERENCES
      
      
Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde /
Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast
Asia 



Nature

IPPA Bulletin


 State of the art: regional
rock art studies in Australia and Melanesia  
  

       
        
World Archaeology 

Trails of bronze drums across early southeast
Asia: exchange routes and connected cultural spheres

The people of Alor



 . Studies in
Conservation
       
     
Asian Perspectives

  Peta geologi lembar
Lomblen, Nusatenggara Timur 


      
   The
International Journal of Nautical Archaeology


Asian Perspectives 
      
 
    

Cambridge Archaeological Journal
   
      The
Asia Pacic Journal of Anthropology   

 
  
     Sacred darkness: a
global perspective on the ritual use of landscape

RAR 35-1250
... Rock art at the Nali site possesses a distinctive characteristic that is uncommon in the corpus of rock art in East Indonesia and East Timor; this site presents a white-colored static-posed anthropomorphic figure instead of an active-posed human figure drawn with red pigment (Ballard, 1988;Ballard, 1992;O'Connor, 2003). Moreover, this rock art was thought to show similarities to the bronze Dong Son drum (Moko drum) image in an ancestral village in Lewohala, East Flores, East Nusa Tenggara (O'Connor et al., 2018b). ...
... The white pigment is unusual in the corpus of boats in Austronesian rock art and is commonly painted red. Thus, this rock art site exhibits an exception in the pigment used (O'Connor et al., 2018b). ...
... Ca and S are the major constituents of the Nali site samples, as they compose 34% and 54% of the sample composition, respectively. Since the substrate layer of the rock art is composed of volcanic rock, these elements possibly originated from the gypsum minerals (CaSO 4 ·2H 2 O) in the pigment layer (O'Connor et al., 2018b). ...
Preprint
Nali and Tene Koro are Austronesian rock art sites located in Lembata, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. At both sites, rock art images are painted on the surfaces of outcrop boulders. The rock art depicted at the Nali site is characterized by an anthropomorphic grayish-white image, while rock art at the Tene Koro site depicts a white boat equipped with an up-raked stern, a single mast, and a steering paddle. Since it was reported in 2018, information regarding the physicochemical properties of white pigments used at both sites remains unknown. Herein, a combined analytical strategy was employed to understand the physicochemical properties of the pigment used at the Nali and Tene Koro sites. Several characterization methods, including X-ray fluorescence (XRF), optical microscopy, secondary electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), vibrational spec-troscopy (Raman and FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and thermal gravimetric-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), were applied. The results demonstrated that the white pigment at the Nali site consists of gypsum as a major component and other clay minerals incorporated as minor phases as part of the geological formation of gypsum. On the other hand, the white pigment from the Tene Koro site comprises calcite as the main constituent and minor amounts of sulfur-bearing minerals (gypsum) as calcite weathering products. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a physicochemical study of white pigments used in rock art in Indone-sia.
... In addition, rock art images of an anoa hunting scene in Leang Bulu Sipong 4, Pangkep, South Sulawesi, with a minimum age of 43.9 ka (43,836 BP), are the oldest rock art depicting hunting activity in the world (Aubert et al. 2019). The tradition of rock art, which is assumed to exist in the metal age, is exemplified by the discovery of a boat painted with black pigment in Lubang Mardua, Sangkulirang and anthropomorphic rock art images made with white pigment in the Nali and Tenekoro sites, Lembata (Ilmi et al. 2022;Setiawan 2010;Aubert et al. 2018;O'Connor et al. 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Recent research on black pigment rock art reported on various prehistoric image sites globally consisting of carbon compounds and manganese oxides. In this paper, we report the unprecedented use of hematite as a black pigment material in rock art. Combination of scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM–EDS), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction (SR-XRD), X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Raman spectroscopy was able to provide detailed information on the physicochemical characteristics of red, purple and black pigment materials from Jufri Cave, Sangkulirang, East Kalimantan. The results show that the mineral hematite is the main component of all pigment materials. However, the hematite crystals in each pigment possess different properties of crystallinity and octahedral symmetry of the Fe³⁺ ion. The characteristic differences in hematite compounds are possibly due to the high-temperature heating process and could be caused by natural geological or anthropological factors. Besides, the discrepancy of crystallinity and distortion of octahedral symmetry in the hematite structures are presumably responsible for the color variety among hematite crystals in the pigment material. The information on the physicochemical properties obtained from this research certainly adds new insights into the characteristics of pigments in the diversity of rock art in Indonesia.
... Examples of rock art documented in West Timor (O'Connor et al. 2015), Kisar Island (O'Connor et al. 2018a) and Alor Island (O'Connor et al. 2017; Yuwono et al. 2020) have led to question if the APT was only limited to Western Papua. Interestingly, rock paintings found in Lembata Island(O'Connor et al. 2018b) also have affinities to the APT but are likely to be from a much more recent date, within the last millennium.Moluccas: The Maluku Archaeology Centre reported the discovery of a new rock art site in the Kei Islands region on Kaimear Island, consisting of red paintings with sun and boat motifs(Handoko et al. 2018). ...
... This is no doubt in part due to the presence of extensive expanses of limestone terraces containing deep overhangs with surfaces suitable for painting. However, it cannot be solely due to geology as large numbers of limestone caves with suitable surfaces for painting have been recorded during reconnaissance of similar duration and landscape coverage by members of our team, in Timor, Babar, Lembata, Bisa and Obi, with few or no art panels found (Kealy et al. 2018;O'Connor et al. 2018b; SO, SK, M, SH, & LW pers. obs.). ...
Article
Full-text available
We report 40 recently discovered rock art sites from Kisar Island in eastern Indonesia and investigate the commonalities between this art and painted art in other islands of Indonesia and in Timor-Leste. Predominantly painted, the art can be broadly divided into three categories: 1) small figurative motifs including humans, animals, boats and items of material culture, 2) a range of geometrics, both curvilinear and rectilinear, and 3) hand and arm stencils. On the ba-sis of geological features and weathering we suggest that the Kisar paintings span a consider-able period of time, from the Pleistocene through to the Indonesian historic period. We argue that the oldest paintings in the Kisar repertoire are some of the red pigment hand and arm stencils. The small figurative motifs such as the anthropomorphs and some of the geometrics are remarkably similar to those featured in the rock art assemblages of nearby Timor-Leste, and at a number of locations throughout eastern Indonesia. One site with an engraved motif carved into a stalagmite formation was also recorded.
Article
The color change process is among the various threats endangering the preservation of the Maros-Pangkep rock art. It is necessary to be concerned about this issue because it can cause rock art to lose its original hue, fade, obscure, or darken. Among the rock art sites in the Maros-Pangkep Region experiencing the color change of rock art pigments is Leang Tedongnge. The color change process is indicated by several hand stencils with bright red and yellow colors, while others show a dark, dull red hue or a greyish tone. In this work, we aim to assess the mechanism of the color change process by studying the physicochemical properties of the pigment. Here, we employed a combined multi-analytical characterization, including optical microscopy observation, elemental analyzes of X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive electron spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and Raman spectroscopy. The result indicates that the color-change process of the rock art of Leang Tedongnge was due to the formation of a greyish crust layer made up predominantly of gypsum minerals. The layer caused the pigment to become dull, fade or darken and obscured the original color of the rock art. The layer is formed by the reaction between calcium ion dissolved in the seeping of karst water with sulphate ions from the minerals deposited at the rock's surface. Moreover, the reaction might also involve the sulfate ions derived from anthropogenic sulfur emissions produced by post-harvesting straw burning near the rock art site. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first report to present a detailed-physicochemical assessment of pigment material regarding the color change for Indonesian rock art.
Conference Paper
Tulisan bermaksud memutakhirkan narasi akar prasejarah khususnya gambar cadas yang diurai buku Art in Indonesia: Continues and Changes karya apik dari Claire Holt, dengan memberi beberapa catatan tentang: batasan 'art', jenis gambar, dan tradisi gambar prasejarah Indonesia. Uraian pengkelasan gambar cadas prasejarah di daerah Sangkulirang dibagi berdasarkan jenis imajinya, yaitu wimba, citra dan gerigis. Dari cara pembuatan cap tangan Sangkulirang menunjukkan tatarupa yang dipertimbangkan dengan matang sebelum diterakan pada dinding gua, dan sangat jelas dibuat oleh hasrat nirmana sehingga terlihat tertata harmonis dan enak dilihat mata. Pembahasan diakhiri dengan ulasan penentuan tarikh. Penentuan tarikh diawali dengan metode tarikh tak langsung, dan tarikh langsung. Pada metode tarikh tak langsung pada imaji berwarna merah, ungu dan hitam dari hematit, menilik pada imaji alat buru, teknologi untuk hutan terbuka yang merujuk tarikh minimal 8.000 tahun lalu. Imaji tapir sudah punah 6.000 tahun lalu di tanah Kalimantan. Terdapat imaji (diduga) paleo pangolin javanicus, sudah punah 30.000 tahun lalu. Ketika mengunakan metode tarikh langsung uranium thorium, merujuk tarikh 51.800 tahun pada cap tangan; 40.000 tahun pada banteng, dan 13.600 tahun sosok datu-saman. Imaji berwarna hitam arang diurai dengan metode tarikh tak langsung, merujuk budaya bahari. Imaji kano dayung merujuk budaya Austronesian, maksimal 3.000 tahun lalu. Imaji perahu layar Eropa, merujuk masa kolonial bisa sampai 300 tahun lalu. Imaji kapal Phinisi, merujuk sekitar 150 tahun lalu. Imaji kapal uap merujuk teknologi mesin 50-100 tahun lalu. Imaji lir kalpataru, diduga merujuk pengaruh hindu. Imaji hitam arang lain: beberapa sosok manusia berparang, merujuk budaya logam; sosok satwa dengan garis tanah, merujuk budaya meramu hasil hutan masyarakat pencari sarang burung walet.. Kedua metode tarikh di atas menunjukkan bahwa gambar cadas hematit dibuat pada jaman glasial, yang disebut masa pra-Austronesian. Sedang gambar cadas arang dibuat pada jaman kelautan, ada yang merujuk kisah budaya Austronesian, ada yang merujuk kisah Kolonial, ada yang merujuk kisah Kapal Modern, ada yang merujuk Kehidupan masyarakat pencari burung walet.
Conference Paper
Gambar Cadas dengan motif perahu di Indonesia ditemukan dalam jumlah yang cukup melimpah. Situs-situs tersebut terutama ditemukan di wilayah Sulawesi, Kalimantan, dan Maluku. Motif perahu yang ditemukan tersebut memiliki bentuk yang bervariasi. Keberagaman tersebut mendorng penelitian ini untuk mendokumentasikan dan memberikan gambararan mengenai bentuk gambar cadas motif perahu serta persebarannya di wilayah Indonesia. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini diambil melalui penelusuran kepustakaan serta observasi lapangan. Selanjutnya data tersebut dianalis secara spasial dan perbandingan terhadap data motif perahu yang ditemukan di wilayah Indonesia. Dari sebanyak 362 motif yang telah didokumentasikan, terdapat tiga situs yang memiliki karakter motif perahu yang penting sebagai tambahan data motif perahu di Indonesia. Situs-situs tersebut yakni Situs Tebing Ambe dengan motif perahu yang diperkirakan sebuah refleksi kedatangan penduduk awal di wilayah Maros, Situs Gua Ladori dengan motif perahu bercadik, serta Situs Leang Kalibu dengan motif perahu dua dek. Berdasarkan hasil analisis yang dilakukan diketahui bahwa perkembangan teknologi pelayaran yang terjadi di Indonesia telah berlangsung sejak ribuan tahun lalu dengan variasi bentuk perahu yang dihasilkan. Keberagaman bentuk-bentuk perahu tersebut juga memberi isyarat bahwa kemungkinan jenis-jenis perahu yang digambarkan memiliki perbedaan fungsi dan nilai dalam masyarakat pendukungnya. Mengingat keberagaman tersebut, maka dirasa perlu dilakukan studi yang lebih mendalam serta upaya perlindungan bagi situs-situs yang telah ditemukan. Pendahuluan Gambar cadas merupakan salah satu produk kreasi nenek moyang di Indonesia yang digambarkan pada media gua, ceruk, tebing karang, atau bongkahan batu yang umumnya terdapat di kawasan karst termasuk di Indonesia (Arifin, 1992; Widianto et al, 2015). Bentuk-bentuk gambar cadas yang digambarkan antara lain motif figur antropomorfik, motif hewan, motif perahu, motif peralatan (senjata, alat batu, dst), dan bentuk-bentuk geometris. Ilmi et al. (2021) menjelaskan bahwa gambar cadas di Indonesia umumnya menggunakan bahan-bahan yang didapat dari alam sekitar berupa pigmen hematit atau oker yang menghasilkan rentang warna merah, coklat, kuning, oranye, dan ungu yang tentu menggunakan proses pembakaran dan campuran bahan lainnya. Warna hitam bisa juga menggunakan bahan dari mangan atau corengan arang, sedangkan warna putih didapat dari pigmen gipsum batuan karst atau juga kerang-kerangan (Widianto et al, 2015). Gambar cadas di Indonesia pertama kali dilaporkan sejak abad ke-17 di wilayah Indonesia timur, hingga tahun 2021 ini temuan gambar cadas masih banyak dilaporkan temuan situs-situs baru di kawasan karst di Indonesia.
Article
Full-text available
Over the past decades, physicochemical-based analyses have been widely utilized to study many aspects of rock art, including the composition, morphology, topology, optical and electronic properties, and radiometric age. However, these analyses of rock art are still in the initial stages in Indonesia. To the best of our knowledge, studies of rock art in Indonesia have been dominated by work in the fields of anthropology and archeology. Only a few reports have described the physicochemical properties and radiometric data of rock art in Indonesia, despite the diversity and large number of rock art sites in Indonesia. It has been reported that some of the oldest rock art images have been discovered in Indonesia. Hence, extensive study should be devoted to improving our understanding of rock art in Indonesia, especially the physicochemical properties of the rock art. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of rock art studies in Indonesia, especially those related to recent radiometric dating and pigment characterizations. We also briefly summarize several studies on the archaeological and anthropological contexts of the rock art in Indonesia. This work could be the basis for the further development of rock art investigations in Indonesia. Furthermore, the present physicochemical study of rock art in Indonesia is primarily carried out by ex situ analysis, which may damage rock art sites. Therefore, it is recommended to introduce portable instruments for in situ analysis to preserve rock art sites. The analysis of weathering of rock art is also urgently needed to define the weathering process and the appropriate conservation strategy.
Article
Full-text available
Recent archaeological surveys and excavations on the island of Atauro, East Timor, identified several rock shelters with evidence for prehistoric occupation. Well-preserved rock art was found at one of these sites, Aleti Tunu Bibi. Here we present a description of the site and rock art, including the motifs and design elements, and interpret the site within the context of East Timor and the wider Asia-Pacific region. Most of the art was painted in red (likely ochre) or, in a few circumstances, black pigment (likely charcoal). Ochre was found in Pleistocene and early Holocene layers during excavations of the site. The only observed drawing, the outline of a boat in dry black charcoal, may represent a "boat of the dead" similar to those depicted on Dongson drums in the region, one of which was found recently in East Timor. That a boat is depicted in the drawing suggests that it may have been executed sometime after 2000 b.p. The Aleti Tunu Bibi rock art fits within the description of other East Timor painted rock art and shares some attributes with other sites in East Timor. However, the Aleti Tunu Bibi rock art is also distinct from sites on the mainland, and its presence on Atauro Island supports previous hypotheses of substantial local or temporal variation, and possibly indicates a pre-Austronesian origin for this tradition on the island.
Article
Full-text available
In the war-torn and transformed landscape of Timor-Leste, culture is arguably one of the victims and survivors of the quarter-century of Indonesian occupation. In the post-Independence period, with the government and international aid agencies focused upon reinstating such fundamental amenities as health, housing, water, and sanitation, and on redeveloping local economies throughout the countryside, issues of heritage and identity appear to be overlooked or relegated to nonessential status. Yet, throughout Timor-Leste the issue of cultural sovereignty is emerging as one of the new domains of struggle and resistance. Out of the ashes of recent history, and liberated from their common identities as Indonesian citizens, various ethnic groups are increasingly demanding their own cultural space and moral authority within the fedgling nation-state.
Article
Full-text available
Pigment samples from Aboriginal rock art sites, situated mainly in the Napier Range of Western Australia, were characterized by microscopic examination, wet chemical analysis and xray analysis. In the white to grey and black range of colours, the majority of pigments were found to consist of huntite, dolomite, calcite or whewellite (a hydrated calcium oxalate). Colour modifying additives to the basic white pigments are also described. The widespread occurrence of pigment layers composed largely of whewellite is discussed in terms of possible origin: either as a mineral deposit used by the Aboriginal artists as a source of pigment, or as the result of in situ chemical alteration of huntite and/or calcite by acidic solutions containing oxalate ions. It is also postulated that calcite in pigment layers may have formed via the chemical alteration of huntite. Laboratory experiments have confirmed that acid dissolution of huntite in the presence/absence of oxalate and sulphate ions reproduces the same species as observed on material collected at the rock art sites.
Article
Full-text available
Archaeologists have long been puzzled by the appearance in Europe ∼40-35 thousand years (kyr) ago of a rich corpus of sophisticated artworks, including parietal art (that is, paintings, drawings and engravings on immobile rock surfaces) and portable art (for example, carved figurines), and the absence or scarcity of equivalent, well-dated evidence elsewhere, especially along early human migration routes in South Asia and the Far East, including Wallacea and Australia, where modern humans (Homo sapiens) were established by 50 kyr ago. Here, using uranium-series dating of coralloid speleothems directly associated with 12 human hand stencils and two figurative animal depictions from seven cave sites in the Maros karsts of Sulawesi, we show that rock art traditions on this Indonesian island are at least compatible in age with the oldest European art. The earliest dated image from Maros, with a minimum age of 39.9 kyr, is now the oldest known hand stencil in the world. In addition, a painting of a babirusa ('pig-deer') made at least 35.4 kyr ago is among the earliest dated figurative depictions worldwide, if not the earliest one. Among the implications, it can now be demonstrated that humans were producing rock art by ∼40 kyr ago at opposite ends of the Pleistocene Eurasian world.
Article
Full-text available
The ship is the dominant element in the visual culture of the South Scandinavian Bronze Age, appearing in several different media, including rock carvings, decorated metalwork and above-ground monuments. Discussion has divided between those scholars who interpret this imagery in terms of long-distance exchange networks and those who emphasize its more local significance, including its deployment in mortuary ritual. A strikingly similar system is identified in Southeast Asia and part of Melanesia and can be interpreted through archaeological and ethnographic sources, but in this case there is no need to distinguish between 'practical' and 'symbolic' interpretations of the depictions of ships. This paper summarizes the evidence from this region and suggests that it can offer a fruitful source of comparison for archaeologists working in northern Europe.
Article
Full-text available
It is possible that most or all boats and rig-types used in prehistoric times in the South-East Asia-Pacific region have completely disappeared from the record, and that those recorded by Europeans in the 17th century may have been relatively recent innovations. The purpose of this paper is to introduce to the literature a new source of information on ancient boat and rig designs. This source is the information encoded in rock-art depictions of watercraft. This paper provides a technical appraisal of 18 images of watercraft from the Tutuala region of East Timor.© 2007 The Authors
Article
Full-text available
Few rock art sites are known for the islands of Wallacea. This paper reports nine new painted rock art sites located in East Timor during archaeological reconnaissance in 2000 to 2001; bringing the total number of painted rock art sites in East Timor to 15. Both the new and previously known rock art sites in East Timor are reviewed in the context of painted rock art elsewhere in the western Pacific region. They are also evaluated in terms of the criteria used by Ballard (1992) to define the "Austronesian painting tradition" and the relationship between the art, topography, and language groups for the new sites is described. Motif content, motif placement within the sites, and design elements are compared in a preliminary fashion with that of other painting sites known from East Timor and the western Pacific. The East Timor sites are conformable with Austronesian-painted rock art sites elsewhere although they display some features that appear to be locally or regionally distinctive. It is likely that with systematic survey, and thorough inspection of cave and shelter walls, many more sites will be found in East Timor and elsewhere in Island Southeast Asia. The faded and deteriorated condition of many of the East Timor paintings indicates that recording should be undertaken with some urgency. KEYWORDS: painted rock art, East Timor, Island Southeast Asia, Western Pacific, Austronesian painting tradition.
Article
This study seeks to explain how and why elephant tusks and bronze kettledrums came to occupy such an important social and ritual position in certain societies in eastern Indonesia. It argues that these two objects were selected because they came to be associated with ideas of authority and rain/fertility. In making this claim, this study suggests that the ideas and symbolism associated with elephants and bronze drums in both India and Southeast Asia found relevance in, and were thus adopted by, specific societies in eastern Indonesia. Contemporary Dutch East India Company accounts and local traditions provide evidence of the role of the Javanese kingdom of Majapahit and the Makassarese kingdom of Gowa as the principal transmitters of these ideas through an extensive international trade in the highly coveted spices of eastern Indonesia.
Article
In newly independent East Timor, land tenure and land rights are pressing issues. In a recent volume on Land Claims in East Timor, Daniel Fitzpatrick argues that 'cosmological world views' cannot be ignored in constructing a new system of land administration. While previous regimes may have ignored these 'views', throughout East Timor the issue of cosmological sovereignty is emerging as one of the new domains of struggle and resistance. In the Fataluku-speaking district of Tutuala, in the far eastern reaches of the world's newest nation-state, the assertion of sovereign authority is conveyed and sustained through the 'production of locality'. In this paper, I focus upon the 'place-making' efforts of the Portuguese colonial administration in the early part of the twentieth century to explore Fataluku ideas about movement and being in place. In doing so, I hope to throw some light on the cultural status of the many derelict and decaying Portuguese forts and outposts occupying knolls and hill-tops throughout East Timor.