ArticlePDF Available

Editorial: The Advances in Treatment for Coronary Artery Disease, Voices from Interventional Cardiologists at the Fortieth Year of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Authors:
  • Nanjing First Hospital
The Advances in Treatment for Coronary Artery Disease Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2018, Vol. 24, No. 4 379
Editorial
The Advances in Treatment for Coronary Artery Disease, Voices from Interventional Cardiologists at the
Fortieth Year of Percutaneous Coronary Interv ention
In 1977, a 38-year-old patient with an advanced lesion of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery was treated with balloon dila-
tation by Dr. Andreas Grüntzig, which represented the first human case of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [1]. This event was
marked as the birth of interventional cardiology. Dr. Andreas Grüntzig, considered as the father of PCI, demonstrated that doctors could per-
form cardiac “surgery” within coronary arteries in a patient who could be free of painful procedure while being completely awake. Of note,
the novel concept of percutaneous treatment of CAD was immediately recognized as a potential breakthrough in cardiovascular medicine, as
it not only avoided open thoracotomy, but also evolved into the preferred treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Over the past 40 years, the advancement of PCI has gone through four milestones [2]. Based on percutaneous trans-luminal coronary
angioplasty, next came the first generation of stents, bare-metal stents (BMS). Then, with the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) at the
beginning of this century, PCI has become one of the most frequently performed therapeutic treatment for patients with CAD [3].
During the last few years, drug-coated Balloons (DCB) has represented an emerging alternative to DES in specific clinical scenarios.
Without the basis of stent, this local drug system consists of four components: balloon platform, anti-proliferative drugs, excipient and bal-
loon coating process [10]. The primary goal of the system is to transfer the anti-proliferative drugs into coronary lesions to reduce the subse-
quent neo-intima hyperplasia and to restore normal morphology and function of vessels. Foin et al. analyzed the mech anisms of the action
and introduced current and upcoming DCB system along with their clinical applications [10]. Meanwhile, Rigatelli et al. focused on the high-
lights of DCB in certain clinical settings where DCB was demonstrated superior to DES [11].
Moving forward, once believed to be the fourth breakthrough for PCI, bioresorbable stent (BRS) has gained the most attention since in-
vented. In this thematic issue, a comprehensive introduction of BRS given by Mishra firstly retrospected the birth background and philoso-
phic definition of BRS, then focused on the manufacturing process of biodegradable polymers for BRS, including heat deflection temperature,
composition of a polymeric implant, polymer processing, and coating [12]. At last, suggestions were raised according to the limitations of
BRS of the current generation.
Overall, the primary aim of PCI fo r CAD is to restore the perfusion of affected coronary arteries, thereafter to co rrect the imbalance be-
tween oxygen supply and myocardial demand. This concept was primarily implemented in thrombolytic therapy, a method once considered as
the pioneer to kick-start the time of modern cardiology, but largely supplanted by primary PCI in the past few decades. In this special issue,
Leesar, Chatterhee and co-authors discussed the role of thrombolytic therapy in the era of primary PCI with a brief review on the history and
pharmacology of thrombolytics, as well as a summary of its current applications [13].
Notably, in addition to myocardial revascularization with thrombolytics, PCI or coronary artery bypass graft, current strategies for CAD
treatment are multi-dimensional, including but not limited to cardiac risk factor identification, secondary prevention via pharmacolo gic and
nonpharmacologic interventions, and management of symptoms [4]. Advances in second prevention have contributed to increasingly effective
treatmen t and reduced adverse cardiovascular events.
As the key elem ent of arterial atherosclerotic plaques, low density lipo-protein (LDL)-cholesterol has been giving rise to the cholesterol
hypothesis for the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [5]. Moreover, lowering LDL-cholesterol is associated with reduced incidence of adverse
cardiovascular events, and of myocardial revascularization [6, 7]. Statin therapy has been used as a standard antilipemic treatment to control
serum LDL-cholesterol. In this issue, Vavlukis, Kedev and colleagues discussed the effects of high intensity statin therapy for diabetic dyslip-
idemia in CAD patients [14]. In spite of statin th erapy in high intensity , the result of LDL-cholesterol lowering seems not satisfying in certain
patients, particularly those who have an inadequate response or intolerance to statins. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/ kexin type 9 (PCSK9)
inhibitors have emerged as a novel therapeutic agent for reducing LDL-cholesterol treatment. Hoye and co-authors described the development
and the clinical usage of PCSK9 inhibitors [15]. In the review, they concluded that PCSK9 inhibitors represent an important improvement in
consistently reducing LDL cholesterol lev els, especially for patients insensitive to statins.
The main goal of lipid lowering therapy is to block plaque progression, to promote plaque stabilization, to prevent plaque rupture or ero-
sion, and to subsequently reduce adverse cardiovascular events. In terms of plaque stabilization, in our special issue, Wu et a l. examined the
pathophysiologic and experimental basis for therapeutic targeting of the plaque micro-vessels and presented a framework for future preclini-
cal investigation [16].
Apart from stabilizing vulnerable plaques, retarding thrombus propagation with antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents is crucial for reduc-
ing the risk of adverse events. In patients with acute coronary syndrome and receiving PCI, cautions should be stressed in selecting the best
regimen of antiplatelet drugs for optimal efficacy of preventing ischemic events, and minimum risk of bleeding events. In a review by Ro-
dríguez et al., safety and efficacy of three platelet ADP-receptor antagonists (P2Y12 inhibitor), known as clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasu-
grel, were compared with each other on the pharmacological characteristics and the clinical performance in patients with acute coronary syn-
dromes after PCI [17]. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy is always accompanied by increased risks of bleeding, especially in patients
with other comorbidities. Munawar et al. discussed the antiplatelet therapy for CAD in specific conditions such as diabetic mellitus, renal
dysfunction and atrial fibrillation (AF) [18]. In his rev iew, platelet changes and current clinical evidences of antiplatelet treatment in patients
with CAD as well as these comorbidities were reviewed. In another review on the topic of antithrombotics, Pan et al. provided an overview of
the available risk stratification schemes for stroke and bleeding risk, focused on the optimal regimens of oral antiplatelet and anticoagulation
therapy, and sum marized evidence and recommendations related to long-term an tithrombotic therapy for AF patients receiving stent implan-
tations [19].
Although the introduction of PCI remains a milestone for CAD treatment, up to 30% of patients are unsuitable for this procedure, such as
ones with poor heart function or microvascular malfunction [8]. In the scenario of coexistence with CAD and heart failure (HF), left ventricu-
lar dysfunction could diminish the coronary blood flow, further leading to myocardium ischemia [9]. Nguyen and his colleagues presented the
therapeutic mechanisms of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or beta-blockers in fluid mobilization, followed by clarifying the crucial
1873-4286/18 $58.00+.00 © 2018 Bentham Science Publishers
380 Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2018, Vol. 24, No. 4 The Advances in Treatment for Coronary Artery Disease
questions of wh en and how these agents are u sed in patients with CAD and HF [20]. On the other h and, coronary microcirculation dysfunc-
tion or coronary vasospasm was considered as one of the causes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA).
In a review by Bil and Gil, advances in mechanisms and treatment options for MINOCA were overviewed [21]. Additionally, for C AD pa-
tients with contraindications of PCI, therapeutic angiogenesis therapy could be another promising option. In the review by Wu et al, recent
progress on various strategies developed for therapeutic angiogenesis was discussed, including direct administration of potent angiogenic
growth factors, promoting expression of angiogenic genes, or delivery of stem cells or exosomes [16].
At last, Pawlak et al. presented us with an interesting review about the pharmacological therapy for CAD coexisting with viral heart dis-
ease [22]. With guidance of proper diagnosis in this population, antiviral therapy is recommended as its effect of inhibiting plaque inflamma-
tion and promoting plaque stabilization.
Overall, 13 outstanding international experts were invited in this thematic issue to share their magnificent opinions, with perspectives of
interventional cardiologists, for the advance in therapy for CAD. And we sincerely hope hot topics discussed in the theme issue will promote
further discussion among pharmaceutical industry and interventional cardiologists.
As the executive guest editor, I firstly would like to express my appreciation for all the invited authors and co-authors for their marvelous
work. Meanwhile, I would like to thank and acknowledge the experts who made their substantial reviewing efforts and comments advices. In
addition, I would like to express my gratitude to the Bentham Science Publishers for offering me such a wonderful opportunity for participat-
ing in the work of this thematic issue. Last but not least, I must say it is of great pleasure working with the Director Kazim Baig and Editorial
Assistant Aamer M. Khan. And I acknowledge the contributions of others who were responsible for editing and processing the manuscripts to
obtain the best final quality for our thematic issue.
REFERENCES
[1] The Lancet. 40 years of percutaneous coronary intervention: Where next? Lancet 2017; 390: 715.
[2] Stefanini G, Byrne R, Windecker S, Kastrati A. State of the art: Coronary artery stents - past, present and future. EuroIntervention 2017; 13: 706-16.
[3] Stefanini GG, Holmes DR. Drug-eluting coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 254-65.
[4] Braunwald E. Treatment of left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 2284-5.
[5] Silverman MG, Ference BA, Im K, et al. Association between lowering LDL-C and cardiovascular risk reduction among different therapeutic inter-
ventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2016; 316: 1289-97.
[6] Fulcher J, O’Connell R, Voysey M, et al. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: Meta-analysis of individual data from
174 000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2015; 385: 1397-1405.
[7] Rader DJ, Hovingh GK. HDL and cardiovascular disease. Lancet 2014; 384: 618-25.
[8] Kreuger J, Phillipson M. Targeting vascular and leukocyte communication in angiogenesis, inflammation and fibrosis. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2016; 15:
125-42.
[9] Wassmuth R. Heart failure in patients with normal coronary anatomy: Diagnostic algorithm and disease pattern of various etiologies as defined by
cardiac MRI. Cardiovasc Diagn Therapy 2012; 2: 128-37.
[10] Ang H, Lin J, Huang YY, et al. Drug-coated balloons: Technologies and clinical applications. Curr Pharm Des 2018; 24(4): 381-96.
[11] Rigatelli G, Zuin M. Drug-coated balloons applications in interventional cardiology. Curr Pharm Des 2018; 24(4): 397-401.
[12] Mishra S. Structural and design evolution of bio-resorbable scaffolds: The journey so far. Curr Pharm Des 2018; 24(4): 402-13.
[13] Proctor P, Leesar MA, Chatterjee A. Thrombolytic therapy in the current era: Myocardial infarction and beyond. Curr Pharm Des 2018; 24(4): 414-26.
[14] Vavlukis M, Kedev S. Effects of high intensity statin therapy in the treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia in patients with coronary artery disease. Curr
Pharm Des 2018; 24(4): 427-41.
[15] Ali A, Costanzo P, Hoye A. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition in cardiovascular prevention. Curr Pharm Des 2018; 24(4): 442-
50.
[16] Wu W, Li X, Zuo G, et al. The role of angiogenesis in coronary artery disease: A double-edged sword: Intraplaque angiogenesis in physiopathology
and therapeutic angiogenesis for treatment. Curr Pharm Des 2018; 24(4): 451-64.
[17] Rodríguez AE, Rodriguez-Granillo AM, Ascarrunz SD, Peralta-Bazan F, Cho MY. Did Prasugrel and ticagrelor offer the same benefit in patients with
acute coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary interventions compared to clopidogrel? insights from randomized clinical trials, registries and
meta-analysis. Curr Pharm 2018; 24(4): 465-77.
[18] Setiadi BM, Munawar M, Hartono B, et al. Antiplatelet for coronary artery disease in specific condition “No size fits all”. Curr Pharm Des 2018;
24(4): 478-95.
[19] Pan D, Ren X, Hu Z. Antith rombotic strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Curr Pharm Des
2018; 24(4): 496-510.
[20] Nguyen T, Lanh NV, Viet VM, et al. Advanced strategies in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure:
When heart failure causes ischemia and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and betablockers helps in diuresis. Curr Pharm Des 2018; 24(4): 511-
6.
[21] Bil J, Pietraszek N, Pawłowski T, Gil RJ. Advances in mechanisms and treatment options of MINOCA caused by vasospasm or microcirculation dys-
function. Curr Pharm Des 2018; 24(4): 517-31.
[22] Pawlak A, Wiligórska N, Wiligórska D, et al. Viral heart disease and acute coronary syndromes - often or rare coexistence? Curr Pharm Des 2018;
24(4): 532-40.
Dr. Wen Wu
Department of Cardiology,
Nanjing First Hospital,
Nanjing Medical University,
No. 68 Changle road, Nanjing City,
Jiangsu Province,
China
Tel: +86 15195967050
E-mail: timwu1988@126.com
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background: According to ACC/ AHA guidelines, a minimum of 1 year of dual anti- platelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and a platelet ADP-receptor antagonist (P2Y12 inhibitor) is recommended for patients presenting acute coronary syndromes (ACS), regardless of which type of revascularization is performed during the acute event. Methods: The purpose of this presentation was to review the present data either from a direct randomized comparison among the three compounds and also large prospective observational registries and meta-analysis were analyzed in detail. With this aim, we performed an extensive large search from PubMed/Medline Journals identifying studies comparing fashion the new P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with ACS including ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)in direct and indirect manner. Results: Pivotal large randomized clinical trials (RCT) in patients with ACS including STEMI, comparing clopidogrel, a first generation P2Y12 inhibitor against the newer prasugrel and ticagrelor showed major efficacy advantages of the latters although both drugs had more bleeding risk than clopidogrel. Direct comparisons of prasugrel and ticagrelor from large RCT are not yet available, however, several observational registries and meta-analysis reported results from an indirect comparison between both compounds. Major findings and limitations of each of these studies were identified, highlighted and discussed. Conclusion: Prasugrel and ticagrelor are both more effective than clopidogrel to prevent adverse cardiac events in patients with ACS. Compared to ticagrelor, prasugrel appears to be more effective in patients with STEMI , although lack of randomized data didn't allow to draw definitive conclusions.
Article
Full-text available
Angiogenesis is described as a sprouting and growth process of new blood vessels from pre-existing vasculature. The relationship between angiogenesis and coronary artery disease (CAD) is double-sided. On one hand, angiogenesis within plaques is responsible for facilitating the growth and vulnerability of plaques by causing intraplaque hemorrhage and inflammatory cell influx, and overabundance of erythrocytes and inflammatory cells within a plaque probably causes plaque rupture, further leading to acute coronary syndrome. Therefore, inhibiting intraplaque angiogenesis has been considered as a potential therapeutic target for CAD. On the other hand, aiming at improving reperfusion to the ischemic myocardium in patients with CAD, angiogenesis promoting has been utilized as a therapeutic approach to expand myocardial microvascular network. Current strategies include direct administration of angiogenic growth factors (protein therapy), promoting angiogenic genes expression in vivo (gene therapy), and delivering stem cells (cell therapy) or exosomes (cell free therapy). This article will start by clarifying the basic concept of angiogenesis, interpret the mechanism of excessive intraplaque angiogenesis in atherosclerosis, and discuss its role in the growth and vulnerability of plaques. Then we will focus on the four distinct strategies of therapeutic angiogenesis. Despite promising animal studies and smallscale clinical trials of therapeutic angiogenesis in patients with ischemic heart disease, investigations have far not shown definite evidence of clinical efficacy. Hence, while acknowledging future work that remains to be done to validate the clinical results, we reviewed the critical challenges in this arena and highlighted the exciting progress that has occurred recently.
Article
Full-text available
The optimal strategy of antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remains to be a question to be answered. The major challenge in such population is the balance between the benefit of reduced stroke and coronary ischemic events, against the risk of increased bleeding complications. Thus, both thrombotic and bleeding risk assessments should be included into clinical decision-making process for such patients. Currently, there is limited evidence based on randomized trials with adequate power to show the superiority of any strategy in the beneficial profile of safety and efficacy, thus limited recommendations are provided by clinical guidelines. Given the recent advancement in this field, our review provided an overview of the available risk stratification schemes for stroke and bleeding risk for AF patients, discussed the multiple questions in the optimal regimens of oral antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, and summarized evidence and recommendations related to long-term antithrombotic therapy for AF patients receiving stent implications.
Article
Full-text available
The progress and development of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) represents an emerging alternative treatment in peripheral and coronary artery diseases, particularly when a non-stent approach is necessary. Several studies and meta-analyses have evaluated the clinical outcomes of DCBs in different lesions and this review aims to compile the progress and updated clinical data of DCB strategy in both peripheral artery diseases (PAD) and coronary artery diseases (CAD). The review highlights that clinical data encouraged the use of DCB for applications in PAD and in the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). The employment of DCB in side branch treatment of bifurcation lesions has been reported to be feasible and safe, with good angiographic and clinical outcome. The use of DCB for arteriovenous fistula and grafts stenoses is a promising strategy, but more clinical data is required to draw reliable conclusions. The limitations and impact of the current generation of DCBs will be discussed and the clinical development of newer generation of the device is also covered in this review.
Article
Antiplatelet is the cornerstone therapy for patient with coronary artery disease. Several comorbidities can influence the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet agent. Diabetes mellitus is characterized by increased platelet reactivity and reduced response to antiplatelet. Elderly patients have both reduced response to antiplatelet and increased risk of bleeding. Patients with renal dysfunction also had decreased efficacy of antiplatelet accompanied with increased risk of bleeding. In patients with atrial fibrillation, the concomitant use of anticoagulant with antiplatelet poses an increased risk of bleeding. In patients with these comorbidities, caution should be stressed in selecting the best regimen of antiplatelet which translates the most optimal efficacy while minimizing the risk of adverse events. In this review, we will discuss the platelet changes in these comorbidities, current evidence of antiplatelet usage in these group of patients and current recommendation.
Article
Elevated levels of Low Density Lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are directly associated with increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Statins have been used to control serum LDLC and this has translated into reduction in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. However, despite high dose statin therapy, LDL-C control may remain inadequate in some patients, particularly those with familial hypercholesterolemia. A new therapeutic approach has emerged in recent years with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. In this review, we describe the development and the use of this new class of drugs.
Article
Myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a syndrome with underlying many causes. MINOCA incidence is estimated to be between 5% and 25% of all MI. The outcome is extremely variable depending on the MINOCA cause. Clinical history, laboratory tests, echocardiography and coronary angiography are the first line diagnostic investigations. Nevertheless, further tests are frequently necessary (e.g. optical coherence tomography, invasive provocative test with acetylcholine or cardiac magnetic resonance) to establish the exact cause, and allowing the adequate risk stratification and management. This is crucial since many patients, particularly those with angiographically normal coronary arteries, are often labelled as 'non-cardiac', therefore missing the chance for appropriate treatment. And this group of patients characterizes substantially worse outcome than previously it was believed. Here, we have reviewed the pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis, and management of MINOCA caused by coronary vasospasm or coronary microcirculation dysfunction.
Article
Background: Coronary stenting has now become a gold standard to prevent or counteract narrowing and blocking of vessels due to disease or injury. While the use of stents has been successful, they are not without drawbacks and concerns. Restenosis and stent thrombosis after an interventional procedure are the dreaded side effects resulting from the body's natural response to a foreign object in the vasculature. New developments in drug-eluting stents, such as biodegradable materials could mitigate some of the problems like stent thrombosis at least late stent thrombosis. Methods: The goal of this work is to identify how the structural and design components of bio-resorbable scaffolds (BRS) evolved and get translated into clinical outcomes. All the BRS articles were identified by an internet based search and relevant articles identified and included in the review. Results: The evolution of BRS from concept to current form is examined and the possible future course this field might turn discussed. Conclusion: The BRS field has evolved learning from DES terrain but this technology has its own advantages and limitations. Newer generation of bio-resorbable scaffolds will be required to replace current generation of technologically advanced DES.
Article
Background: Diabetic dyslipidemia has specifics that differ from dyslipidemia in patients without diabetes, which contributes to accelerated atherosclerosis equally as dysglycemia. The aim of this study was to deduce the interdependence of diabetic dyslipidemia and cardiovascular diseases (CVD), therapeutic strategies and the risk of diabetes development with statin therapy. Method: We conducted a literature review of English articles through PubMed, PubMed Central and Cochrane, on the role of diabetic dyslipidemia in atherosclerosis, the antilipemic treatment with statins, and the role of statin therapy in newly developed diabetes, by using key words: atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, diabetic dyslipidemia, CVD, statins, nicotinic acid, fibrates, PCSK9 inhibitors. Results: hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia cannot be treated separately in patients with diabetes. It seems that dyslipidemia plays one of the key roles in the development of atherosclerosis. High levels of TG, decreased levels of HDL-C and increased levels of small dense LDL- C particles in the systemic circulation are the most specific attributes of diabetic dyslipidemia, all of which originate from an inflated flux of free fatty acids occurring due to the preceding resistance to insulin, and exacerbated by elevated levels of inflammatory adipokines. Statins are a fundamental treatment for diabetic dyslipidemia, both for dyslipidemia and for CVD prevention. The use of statin treatment with higher intensity is endorsed for all diabetes-and-CVD patients, while a moderate - intensity treatment can be applied to patients without diabetes, having additional risk factors for CVD. Statins alone are thought to possess a small, although of statistical significance, risk of incident diabetes, outweighed by their benefits. Conclusion: As important as hyperglycemia and glycoregulation are in CVD development in patients with diabetes, diabetic dyslipidemia plays an even more important role. Statins remain the cornerstone of antilipemic treatment in diabetic dyslipidemia, and their protective effects in CVD progression overcome the risk of statin- associated incident diabetes.
Article
Backgrounds: Drug coated balloons (DCBs) are new on stented-based anti-proliferative drug delivery systems, recently introduced in interventional cardiology. Their primary aim is to transfer an anti-proliferative drug to reduce the subsequent neo-intima hyperplasia and to maintain the normal vessel diameter and function. Methods: A review of the most recent influential studies about DCBs in all the fields of interventional cardiology has been performed. Results: As demonstrated by different studies, DCBs have different theoretical advantages over drug eluting stents (DESs), especially for the treatment of some endovascular lesions, as in-stent restenosis (ISR), coronary bifurcations, small vessels disease and peripheral artery disease at femoropopliteal and below the knee sites. Conclusion: Despite the need of further studies are needed to elucidate the optimal use of DCBs their current use in interventional cardiology appears promising.