ArticlePDF Available

Rock breaking methods to replace blasting

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The method of breaking rock by blasting has a high efficiency and the cost is relatively low, but the associated vibration, flyrock, production of toxic gases since the 1970's, the Western developed countries began to study the safety of breaking rock. This paper introduces different methods and their progress to safely break rock. Ideally, safe rock breaking would have little vibration, no fly stone, and no toxic gases, which can be widely used in municipal engineering, road excavation, high-risk mining, quarrying and complex environment.
Content may be subject to copyright.
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS
Rock breaking methods to replace blasting
To cite this article: Huisheng Zhou et al 2018 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 322 022014
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
Related content
Single-step fabrication of a microlens array
in sol–gel material by direct laser writing
andits application in optical coupling
M He, X-C Yuan, N Q Ngo et al.
-
I.C. Engine emission reduction by copper
oxide catalytic converter
S.P. Venkatesan, Desai Shubham Uday,
Borana Karan Hemant et al.
-
Defect Functionalization of MoS2
nanostructures as toxic gas sensors: A
review
A.A. Ramanathan
-
This content was downloaded from IP address 181.214.116.188 on 29/03/2018 at 13:55
1
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
1234567890‘’“”
SAMSE IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 322 (2018) 022014 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/322/2/022014
Rock breaking methods to replace blasting
Huisheng Zhou1, Xinghua Xie2,* and Yuqing Feng2
1School of Medicines, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, China
2School of Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, 168
Taifeng St., Huainan 232001, Anhui Provence, China
*Corresponding author e-mail: xxh1963@163.com
Abstract. The method of breaking rock by blasting has a high efficiency and the cost is
relatively low, but the associated vibration, flyrock, production of toxic gases since the
1970’s, the Western developed countries began to study the safety of breaking rock.
This paper introduces different methods and their progress to safely break rock.
Ideally, safe rock breaking would have little vibration, no fly stone, and no toxic gases,
which can be widely used in municipal engineering, road excavation, high-risk mining,
quarrying and complex environment.
1. Introduction
In modern construction, blasting is the predominant method used to break rock [1]. The rock breaking
efficiency is high, the cost is relatively low, but its resulting vibration, possible flyrock, and toxic gas
production makes it a dangerous method from a safety standpoint. Since the 1970’s, Western
developed countries began to study alternative methods to break rock. During the 1980’s, China also
started this re-search, although much progress has been made, due to its late start, the overall
technology is relatively be-hind [2]. By using non-explosive means to break rock, there are several
advantages such as little vibration, no fly stone, no toxic gas, and a high degree of safety [3]. These
methods are widely used in municipal engineering, road excavation, high-risk mining, mountain
quarrying, and complex environmental rock breaking projects [4]. Some of these methods include
mechanical forces, physical chemistry, and electrical stimulus to break the stone.
2. Mechanical methods
2.1. Hydraulic Splitting
Hydraulic splitting machine in the country widely used in stone mining, which has a simple operation,
high security, environmental protection and economic advantages. The hydraulic splitting machine
consists of two parts: the splitter and the power station. The power station includes the pumping
station, the hydraulic cylinder, the hydraulic pipe and the control element. The splitter is a wedge
assembly with mechanical magnification to produce the pump station Longitudinal thrust into
transverse thrust, broken rock.
Hydraulic splitting machine rock breaking process: According to the rock hardness, free surface,
rock breaking degree and the requirements of the direction of rock breaking and other conditions,
drilling with a drilling machine; wedge pressure into the rock, pressurized broken rock. The hydraulic
splitting machine is mainly designed and manufactured using the principle that the tensile strength of
the rock is much smaller than the compressive strength.
2
1234567890‘’“”
SAMSE IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 322 (2018) 022014 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/322/2/022014
Splitting machines are more used in quarries in the United States, and their technology is
developing more. Although China started late, but after decades of development, China in the splitting
machine manufacturing level has reached the international leading level. Splitting machine used in
some precious stone, rare ore mining and a few other projects have a good economic benefits.
2.2. Hydraulic breaker
Hydraulic breaker is mainly used in the second rock broken, municipal engineering transformation,
housing demolition, ice, mountains and other projects. Especially in the municipal engineering, the
hydraulic breaker hammer noise is small, high security and flexibility is a better way to break the rock.
The power source of the hydraulic breaker can be an excavator, loader or pump station, which is
mainly used to drive the hammer with a power source to reciprocate the broken rock. In the past, the
hammer is a piston-type repeated blow, and now the use of hydraulic pressure can drive eccentric gear
rotation centrifugal force, and then drive the broken hammer movement, broken rock, the impact
frequency can reach 1600 ~ 2100 times / min, this high frequency Hydraulic hammer is more efficient,
energy saving, it appears on the hydraulic hammer is an effective complement, can be more detailed
broken construction.
At present, the hydraulic hammer has been applied in China for several decades, through practice
and research of its production process, product quality has been a greater development, but in
equipment research and development, product manufacturing and international advanced level or there
is a certain gap.
2.3. Boring Machine
Boring machine is a kind of machinery and equipment which is mainly used for tunnel excavation and
coal mining. The noise is small, the dust is less safe and efficient. In China, the market prospect of
tunnelling is very good, especially in recent years, traffic road construction, water conservancy project
construction and so on the boring machine demand is very large, and our country has become the
world's largest road header manufacturing and application market.
The boring machine is a complex mechanical structure, including the walking mechanism, working
mechanism, shipping organization, and reprinting mechanism. The walking mechanism is used to
move forward, the working bits of the drill bit are constantly cutting the rock, and then the other
structures will carry the rock away. The efficiency of the tunnelling and the nature of the rock and the
self-stabilization of the working face has a great relationship, and the relative loss is more serious, for
large-scale road boring machine only state-level key projects will be used. Although its high cost,
complex structure, but its unique advantages in coal mining, tunnelling or in the use of a high value.
Abroad in the boring machine manufacturing in a high level of development, although the domestic
manufacturing level can basically meet the domestic demand, but there is a certain gap, especially for
high-quality large-scale road boring machine China still need to import. How to constantly improve,
continuous innovation for the domestic boring machine manufacturing is an important issue.
3. Physical Chemistry Cutting
3.1. Static Expansion
Static expansion agent is mainly used for mining rock, concrete reinforced concrete rupture. This
method is no fly stone, no vibration, no noise, no dust and toxic gases, and simple operation, to carry
transport safety. But it is affected by climate, rock breaking efficiency is low.
Static expansion agent is generally used as a main component of lime, the use of hydration reaction
to release heat, the product is calcium hydroxide, the volume of expansion, relying on the hole to
produce expansion pressure to break the rock or concrete. Ac-cording to experiments show that the
expansion of the pressure generated in the 30 ~ 40Mpa, for the general soft rock and concrete rupture
required 10 ~ 20Mpa fully meet the requirements.
3
1234567890‘’“”
SAMSE IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 322 (2018) 022014 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/322/2/022014
Static expansion agent is a non-explosive pollution-free broken agent, is a physical process, does
not belong to the flammable and explosive dangerous goods, the safety is relatively high. However,
due to the low breaking effect of the expansion agent, cracking time is longer (usually more than 10
hours), low efficiency, so the scope of application is limited.
3.2. Carbon dioxide cracker
Carbon dioxide cracker is a low temperature blasting equipment, in the blasting process without fire,
safety is relatively high, can be widely used in coal mining, quarry and other projects. It is mainly the
use of liquid carbon dioxide heat and gasification when the volume of rapid expansion of high
pressure, so that coal, rock or concrete rupture.
According to the experiment, the carbon dioxide cracker in the use of volume expansion can
become the original volume of 600 times the diffusion radius of up to 10m or more. In coal mines,
because carbon dioxide has the effect of suppressing blasting and flame retardation and at low
temperature conditions, no gas explosion is caused. Ordinary rock fractures, resulting in small
vibration, no throwing, energy control, high security. After blasting, in addition to heaters, gaskets,
fixed shear slices, other components can be reused, which greatly saves the cost.
The United States in 1938 began to study high-pressure gas blasting device, and now this
technology has reached a very mature level abroad, involving mining, concrete, steel, cement and
other industries. China's current production of carbon dioxide cracker manufacturers have a lot, the
overall technology is relatively mature, but there are still some problems.
First, the carbon dioxide cracker is simple to operate, furthermore there are still hidden dangers,
lack of professional personnel operation; then, for different nature of the rock, blasting requirements
do not have a unified standardized construction guidelines; industry technical specifications, industry
standards are not unified, to be further standardized; For a large range of rock breaking lack of
theoretical support and practice.
3.3. Metal Burners
Metal burners generally use metal oxides (such as manganese dioxide, copper oxide, ferric oxide, etc.)
or strong oxidants (such as potassium chlorate, potassium perchlorate, etc.) and metal reducing agents
(such as aluminum powder, magnesium powder, etc.) in accordance with a certain percentage with the
combination.
Metal burner blasting method is mainly the use of the reactants in the rapid deflagration conditions,
the release of a lot of heat to diffuse out, all used to heat the surrounding gas medium and reaction
products, and then the formation of high temperature and high pressure, so as to achieve the purpose
of breaking the rock.
From the reaction rate, the reaction rate is lower than the explosive, and almost no gas. Therefore,
do not produce a strong shock wave, no throwing, and relative.
In the choice of hole depth, hole spacing, hole spacing to take full account of the blasting rock
tensile strength, compressive strength, whether there are cracks, joints, shape size and other factors,
but also consider cutting the rock, or Rock broken. Under normal circumstances, do not consider other
factors, cutting the rock than the amount of broken rock pharmaceutical dosage much smaller.
Generally recommended hole spacing selection of 200 mm ~ 500 mm, row spacing selection for the
300mm ~ 500mm, hole depth selection of 600 mm ~ 1 000 mm, the above is only recommended
parameters, according to the length of the blasting rock, thickness, strength and other specific
requirements Appropriate changes.
When the hole depth, hole spacing, hole spacing to determine circumstances, but also need to
determine the single hole charge. The single hole charge is not only closely related to the parameters
of the hole net-work, but also by the broken rock shape, strength and to the use of explosives higher
4
1234567890‘’“”
SAMSE IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 322 (2018) 022014 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/322/2/022014
safety. But often with lively metal is more prone to danger, and the cost is high, so this method is only
applicable to the precious stone mining
All manuscripts must be in English, also the table and figure texts, otherwise we cannot publish
your paper. Please keep a second copy of your manuscript in your office. When receiving the paper,
we assume that the corresponding authors grant us the copyright to use the paper for the book or
journal in question. Should authors use tables or figures from other Publications, they must ask the
corresponding publishers to grant them the right to publish this material in their paper.
4. Electrical Equipment
Plasma blasting is a method of using electric energy to excite the electrolyte solution into a plasma, so
that the material is oscillating vigorously to produce high temperature and high pressure, forming ion
cluster movement, and rapidly forming shock wave, and then the rock is broken. This method has the
advantages of no toxic gases, no dust, no throwing, low noise and high safety.
Isocratic blasting operation is simple, the specific operation is to have the electrode with the
electrolyte solution into the hole, connected to the circuit, the supply of electricity, the rapid expansion
of electrolyte dissolved rock broken. Plasma blasting need to solve the key technology of power
supply, special switch, electrode three parts. Power supply generally use high-performance capacitors,
requiring storage power, the release of electricity fast; special switch to be able to work in the case of
high voltage and high current, working voltage at least more than kilovolts, requiring power release
rate greater than 200MV / ms. Because only in the case of high voltage and high current, the
electrolyte solution can become a plasma; electrodes generally use composite materials, ordinary
materials easy to damage, the rate of release of electricity may not be enough.
Canada Nolanda Minerals Company for the first time proposed plasma blasting, and carried out the
relevant rock breaking test. In 1997, some domestic scholars have carried out the relevant
experimental study, which uses the NaCl solution, the voltage value of up to 10KV, the test results
prove the feasibility of this method. But after years of development, the domestic has not successfully
developed a mature product. In 2000, South Korea successfully developed a complete set of
equipment and applied for the relevant patents. Plasma blasting has a good application prospects, but
there are still enough equipment to simplify, a burst of limited, power supply cumbersome and other
issues, which is not widely used in the country the main reason. However, with the development of
electronic circuits and the development of related supercapacitor, this method may become the
mainstream of non-blasting rock breaking.
The thermophilic soil is a kind of auxiliary cutting rock method. For rock with large hardness, it
may not be ideal to explode with explosives, and it is more difficult to break the rock with other non-
explosive blasting. Therefore, the development of a foreign thermal splitting method, the first rock
heating, so that the hardness decreased, in the other broken rock method for crushing operations.
General heating methods are two kinds of current heating and microwave heating, according to the
study shows that microwave heating can be rock to 1800 degrees Celsius, and then the hardness of the
rock will drop sharply. This method of auxiliary rock breaking is not common in the country, mainly
because of the limited scope of application, and can replace the method is also more. But it provides
an effective method for rock breaking rock, which is of great significance for the future development
of new methods.
Figure 1. Carbon dioxide fractures
1-Filling valve2- Heating pipe3- Steel Pipe4- Gasket5-Cut slices6-Vent head
5
1234567890‘’“”
SAMSE IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 322 (2018) 022014 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/322/2/022014
5. Conclusions
There are many kinds of non-blasting broken rock way, more selective than blasting method rock
breaking. General mechanical rock breaking rock blasting method is small, high safety, suitable for
part of a rock breaking and secondary rock breaking, especially for rock breaking requirements of the
project, with mechanical rock breaking more, but because of mechanical presence Wear, maintenance
problems, etc., and the efficiency is not as high as the explosives. Materialized work class In addition
to metal combustion, the small range of rock breaking costs are relatively low, for a large range of
rock breaking project, the use of materialization method is not realistic rock. Electrical equipment is
currently a small range of applications, but its development potential is higher, the main energy from
the power to make it more environmentally friendly and energy-saving, with the development of
technology, electrical equipment improvement, which may become the main way to break the rock.
Table 1. Comparison of various non-explosive blasting characteristics
Types
Econo
my
Application
scope
advantage
Mechani
cal
broken
Hydraulic
splitting
machine
normal
Mines,
precious
stones and so
on
Safe, weak
vibration,
environment
al protection
Hydraulic
breaker
normal
Municipal
engineering,
mountain, ice,
demolition
and so on
Safe,
environment
ally friendly
Boring
machine
Higher
Coal mines,
tunnels and so
on
Safety,
environment
al protection,
into Lane
efficient and
good quality
Physical
Chemist
ry acting
Static
expansion
agent
low
Quarries,
concrete and
so on
No fly stone,
no vibration,
environment
al protection
Carbon
dioxide
cracker
low
Quarries, coal
mines,
concrete and
so on
High safety,
small
vibration
Metal
burners
Higher
Precious stone
mining
No throwing,
no toxic gas
Electrica
l
Equipm
ent
Plasma
blasting
normal
Dismantling
Municipal
engineering
High safety,
small
vibration, no
throwing
Heat
splitting
rock
normal
Auxiliary rock
breaking
Hard rock
effect is
significant
6
1234567890‘’“”
SAMSE IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 322 (2018) 022014 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/322/2/022014
6. Looking ahead
After years of development of non-blasting rock burst is showing a diversified development. First of
all, in the choice of broken rock way, often using multiple methods of mutual cooperation. Mechanical
method of rock breaking and physical and chemical work class combination, explosive blasting
method and the combination of non-explosive blasting methods are often used in the project. Many of
the key projects in foreign countries have also adopted a variety of ways to co-break rock.
In the study of the principle of rock breaking and the development of products, there is an
interdisciplinary form, often a rock-breaking method development, may involve mechanical, electrical,
chemical engineering, mathematical calculations, computer simulation and other disciplines, It is also
a huge challenge.
From the current non-bursting rock development direction, the way to break the rock from the
mechanization of information, intelligent, computer modelling will be a good choice. In the country
has been the use of intelligent early warning to non-blasting demolition, and achieved good results.
Abroad in this regard has done a lot of research, such as intelligent rock cutting machine, simulated
pressure measurement, etc., are the domestic scholars of the research work have some reference.
From the current blasting industry, non-blasting method although there are many advantages, but
because of technical and practical reasons it is difficult to do a wide range of use. On the one hand to
increase the existing non-explosive blasting method of improvement, and the development of new
rock breaking method; the other hand, non-explosive blasting rock blasting and explosive blasting
rock combined with the road, more in line with realistic requirements, The division of the area and the
optimization of the rock breaking method, the use of non-explosive blasting detonation of low-
sensitivity explosives is also a good choice. Low-sensitivity explosives than the general explosive
power is relatively small, and more secure, with non-explosive explosive detonation way (such as:
laser, arc), with the feasibility and economy. Similar to the way to take a number of road coordinated
development, blasting industry will be an opportunity to develop.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China coal joint fund key
projects ‘Large section roadway fast driving and supporting basic research (no. 51134012)’ and the
Anhui Provincial Program for the Tackling Key Problem (07010302189) and the Program for the
Provincial Innovation Research and Development of Anhui Military and Civilian Projects (Anhui
Provincial Financial Enterprises [2013] 1202). And the authors are grateful to the Anhui Provincial
Educational Office Key Pro-gram (KJ2010A102).
References
[1] MaÁngeles Fernández, de la Ossa, Discrimination of non-explosive and explosive through
nitrocellulose fingerprints obtained by capillary eletrophoresis, Journal of Chromatography A.
(2103)197~204.
[2] Pradhan, G.K., Pradhan, Manoj, Explosive energy distribution in an explosive column through
use of non-explosive material-case studies, Blasting in Mines New Trends. (2013) 81~89.
[3] Peter Huson, Non-explosive methods for simulating blast loading of structures with complex
geometries, International Journal of Impact Engineering. (2010)546~557.
[4] Antony Chen, Non-explosive simulated blast loading of balsa core sandwich, Composite Beams.
(2011) 2768~2784.
... Many techniques of crushing rocks electrically developed up today [5][6][7][8][9][10] have not gone beyond laboratories; others have successfully passed industrial tests and can be recommended for commercial use. ...
... That is the efficiency of electrothermal destruction is determined by the properties of the rock, the size of the destroyed piece, and the power of the current source [3,[7][8][9][10]. ...
... In contrast to the electrothermal method with a solid substance as a working medium and a low intensity of the energy input process, the electrodynamic method is a way with a gaseous working medium, and it is characterized by a high intensity of energy release, which gives a complete separation of the destroyed rock into several single pieces. The essence of this method is the use of an electrical impulse from a capacitor bank to destroy the rock [7][8][9][10][11]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Kudryavy volcano is the world's only deposit of rare elements in the form of pure rhenium mineralization. The development of the field is hampered by numerous factors: high temperatures of geothermal fields, strong winds, fumarolic activity, where the use of a drilling and blasting method to destroy rocks in a crater can lead to the closure of all fumarole channels, which will lead to the accumulation of enormous energy and further eruption. The article describes the existing electrical methods for the rock destruction, it was found that the current-voltage characteristic of volcanogenic breccia with an increase in the distance between the electrodes more than 50 cm turns into a C-shaped dependence, reducing the current strength from 0.85 A to 0.2 A, forming a full breakdown channel. In this case, the minimum breakdown strength of the electric field is 0.3±0.1 kV/cm, with an increase in this indicator to 3.7 kV/cm, the efficiency of channeling increases to 2%. Around the breakdown channel, a new substance is formed with new conductive properties, different from volcanic breccia, which prevents the formation of the channel along the old trajectory. © 2021 Materials and Energy Research Center. All rights reserved.
... Sensitive blasting technology, commonly known as non-explosive (nonex) rock-breaking methods, are starting to gain attention in hardrock ore mining (Pickering and Young, 2017;Zhou et al., 2018). Although few companies are currently manufacturing sensitive blasting cartridges due to low demand by prominent mining companies, their usage is increasing as evident from trial runs that are being conducted in mining regions such as the Witwatersrand goldfields (Mandela Mining Precinct, 2019). ...
... AngloGold Ashanti's Technology Innovation Consortium build a case study for pilot scale implementation of bore and fill method within the Witwatersrand goldfields (AngloGold Ashanti, 2017). The Table 1 Comparison of several non-explosive blasting methods and their features (modified after Zhou et al., 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
The concept of the 4th industrial revolution is becoming a strategic determinant of sustainability, success and competitiveness in the modern mining sector. The importance of digital transformation in the mining industry has long been debated, hampered in part by the conservative nature of the mining sector. Much of the debate has focused on choosing suitable mining techniques that provide acceptable levels of ore/waste selectivity, the scale of implementation, cost reduction and suitable metallurgical extraction techniques. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of the digital transformation of the minerals and extractive industry with a focus towards energy efficiency and environmental sustainability. We address: (a) geological elements that influence the level of selectivity during mining, and technologies that deal with waste rejection; (b) eco-friendly techniques, such as tunnel-boring machines, or the use of non-explosive techniques that can assist fragmentation of ores, thereby decreasing energy requirements during mineral processing and improving mineral recovery; (c) use of low-water-consumption automated ore-waste sorting systems; (d) selective metal leaching using coarse particle percolation as an alternate method for treating complicated low-grade ores; and (e) assessing new technological boundaries for the mineral sector. A combination of these aforementioned processes will significantly reduce mining waste. Orebody features, mining methods and equipment, desired scales of implementation, alignment with circular strategies, ore extraction efficiency, and socioeconomic factors all play a role in the development and implementation of new technologies and techniques.
... However, it has become apparent that the quality of drill and blast operation has a significant effect on both productivity and the stability of the working environment (MOSH [1]. Higher vibration, possible fly rock, and toxic gas products make blasting a dangerous method from a safety standpoint (Zhou [2]. ...
... Coal production in underground mines is now predominantly excavated using mechanical means while underground hard rock is still broken primarily by explosives. Using non-explosive means to break rock, results in several advantages such as little vibration, no-fly stone, no toxic gas, and a high degree of safety (Zhou [2]. AngloGold Ashanti (AGA) have initiated the Technology Innovation Consortium (ATIC) to search for new mining methods to deal with issues created by drill and blast operation (AGA 2014). ...
Article
With increasing depths of mining, difficult reef geologies, reduced overall mine productivity, as well as the increasing cost lines associated with mining in the narrow tabular property; the current blasting related mining methods prove to be less efficient. This is owing to low efficiency, higher effect on the surrounding rock, possible fly rock, dilution, personnel in danger line and production of toxic gases, etc. These challenges have resulted in a 13.5% (101.3 tonnes) and 2.9% (262.9 tonnes) decrease in gold and platinum production, 14% and 2.6% increase in gold and platinum costs and the rate of change in safety has started to flatten out. Several recent studies emphasize the development and utilization of non-explosive techniques of mechanical rock cutting that are integrated into continuous mining systems, and one of these techniques is reef boring. The work is aimed at determing the most suitable mining method between blasting technique methods (conventional B and P, conventional breast, mechanised B and P, and mechanised breast) and rock cutting technique method (reef boring which involves the drilling of narrow tabular reef and extracting the chippings for processing). The most suitable method is determined through a trade-off study. The trade-off study (mining method evaluation) was conducted through the use of simulations based on BME (Basic Mining Equations) and BFE (Basic Financial Equations) calculations, Risk assessments, Trade-off analysis: weighing, scoring, and comparisons of the mining method. The inputs of the study were derived from the literature survey that was conducted on different mining methods. The background information gathered on these mining methods focussed on ore extraction, material handling, support, labour, equipment, and benefits & challenges of each mining method. Using that background information together with mine benchmarking, a mock mine was created with the following orebody characteristics: thickness of 1.1 m, dipping at 15°, and an average grade of 4.12 g/t at a depth of 1.1 km. This ore deposit was extracted using all five mining methods investigated. The mining parameters for each mining method were based on the literature study information and first principles. The trade-off analysis was based on the selection criteria that includes production, cost, safety, dilution percentage, extraction percentage, flexibility, and automation. Based on the results, reef boring method produces the highest tonnages of 10 651 oz/month, has the highest profit of R303 million/month, highest NPV of R1 423 million, highest IRR of 88%, and highest ROCE of 296%. Due to these factors, the reef boring is the most profitable mining method compared to drilling and blasting methods. Also, it has the least dilution percentage of 2% and the highest extraction percentage of 98%. The reef boring method has the least number of employees on the face (10 people), fewer hazards are associated with the equipment and the reef boring machine causes the least disturbance on the surrounding rock. Hence, it is the safest method with maximised automation. However, even though the reef boring method is more feasible in the paper, practically for high performance the machine should be able to drill 18 h per hole and extract 1000 m and above.
... Hardrock ore mining is beginning to pay more attention to sensitive blasting technology, also referred to as non-explosive (nonex) rockbreaking techniques (Pickering and Young, 2017;Zhou et al., 2018). Due to low demand from major mining companies, only a few companies now produce sensitive blasting cartridges; nevertheless, as can be seen from trials being carried out in mining regions like the Witwatersrand goldfields, their utilization is rising (Mandela Mining Precinct, 2019). ...
Article
The mining industry's value chain is gradually changing in order to manage current assets more effectively and boost production. The nature of mining has not changed much over the years, despite the industry's ups and downs. Rethinking how the mining industry functions is necessary for a breakthrough in efficiency and performance. In light of the significant obstacles that digital transformation must overcome to be successfully implemented in dangerous mine environments, an overview of the significance of digital transformation in the mineral industry with a focus on improved safety, productivity, environmental sustainability, and reduced mining accidents is reviewed. The application of digital technology indicates that technological innovations have improved the productivity of mines because processes are optimized and human error is reduced. This paper has demonstrated that there is a concrete history of technological and digital advancements that, whether on purpose or not, correlate with elements of the 4th industrial revolution and have been effectively applied in discrete domains within the mineral industry. A gap between what can still be done and how it should be done to ensure a sustainable supply of minerals is also revealed by these developments. Overall, this paper identifies various improvement that has taken place over the years in the mining industry that assisted to reduce hazards and risks in working areas due to technological advancement.
... In the mining industry, although the alternative technologies of rock breaking are under consideration [3,4] to replace blasting, the conventional method of drilling and blasting has many advantages from the viewpoint of productivity. On the other hand, there are certain implications due to non-homogeneous geological structures, which resulted in oversized pieces of rocks influencing the rock-breaking hammers' performance and the fuel consumption of machines. ...
Article
Full-text available
Standard hydraulic breaking hammers are widely used for crushing oversized blasted materials and concrete structures demolition in industry. These hammers, installed in on-surface working excavators or stationary manipulators at the dumping points of underground conveyors, provide the required limited sizes of bulk materials and enable the safe operation of other equipment (screens, crushers). In parallel, hydraulic hammers have an alternative—fully electric hammers. This paper aims to review existing linear electric motor (LEM) hammers as an energy-saving and eco-friendly solution in industry. Global market analysis is presented with potential branches of LEM hammers. Several aspects for implementation—design optimization, dynamics simulation, machine control, and performance estimation—are considered. Different case studies for LEM-hammer application are given. The preliminary measurements are demonstrated on the electric hammer of Lekatech Company, which is intended for the mining industry and construction demolition. Experiments showed that depending on the impact frequency, type of rock, and shape of the crushing tool, the time to fracture varies significantly. Optimal parameters exist for every case, for which adjusting requires online hammer control.
... The plasma blasting technology has been tested on cubic concrete blocks (1200 kg) with successful fragmentation using electrical energies of 60-100 kJ. Another series of tests were conducted successfully on hard rock blocks, such as wollastonite, limey quartzite, and skarn (uniaxial compressive strengths of 140 to 350 MPa) with electrical energies of 30-180 kJ [20]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The method of drilling and blasting with explosives is widely used in rock fragmentation applications in underground construction projects, such as tunnels and caverns. However, the use of explosives is associated with rigorous safety and environmental constraints, since blasting creates toxic fumes, ground vibrations, and dust. Because of these constraints, there has been a growing interest in transitioning away from explosives-based rock fragmentation. The use of explosives-free methods could lead to continuous operation by eliminating the need for idle time with additional ventilation required to exhaust the blast fumes. This paper first presents a critical review of various methods that have been developed so far for rock fragmentation without explosives. Such methods include thermal fragmentation, plasma blasting, controlled foam injection, radial-axial splitter, and supercritical carbon dioxide. Thermal fragmentation, as the name implies, uses high heat to spall high-grade ore. However, it requires high heat energy, which requires additional ventilation as compared to normal conditions to cool the work area. Plasma blasting uses a high temperature and pressure plasma to fracture rock in a safe manner. While this method may be environmentally friendly, its usage may significantly slow tunnel development due to the need to haul one or more large energy capacitor banks into and out of the work area repeatedly. Controlled foam injection is another chemical method, whereby foam is the medium for fracturing. Although claimed to be environmentally friendly, it may still pose safety risks such as air blast or flyrock due to its dynamic nature. A radial-axial splitter (RASP) is an instrument specially designed to fracture a borehole in the rock face but only at the pace of one hole at a time. Supercritical carbon dioxide is used with the equipment designed to provide a high-pressure jet stream to fracture rock, and replaces water in these instruments. The method of soundless chemical demolition agents (SCDA) is evaluated in more detail and its merits over others are highlighted, making it a potentially viable alternative to blasting with explosives in underground excavation applications. Future work involves the optimization of SCDA for implementation in underground mines. The discussion compares the key features and limitations, and future work needs are underlined.
Article
A hydraulic splitting method was recently developed to reduce the generation of noise and vibration in urban underground construction. However, research on optimizing the method considering the shape of the hydraulic splitting machine or the rock type has yet to be conducted sufficiently. Herein, experimental and numerical investigations were conducted to identify the crushing performance of six types of bit heads on three kinds of rocks (granite, marble, and sandstone). The uniaxial and triaxial compressive test, Brazilian test, and semicircular bend (SCB) test were conducted to investigate the physical properties of the rocks. Simultaneously, the splitting fracture of the rocks was investigated depending on the shape of the bit head. The test results showed that the failure of the specimens was controlled by the tensile strength of the rock, while the failure mode was governed by the type of the bit heads. Based on the test results, a damage-plasticity model was used to simulate the failure test by introducing double damage variables. Consequently, the numerical simulations effectually replicated the failure modes of the splitting fracture of the rock samples by the different bit heads.
Article
Knowledge gained from anthropogenic resource prospecting can shed light on the theoretical potential of secondary resources stored in anthropogenic systems. Among others, secondary resources accumulated in the built environment account for a big fraction of anthropogenic resources, indicating great potential for urban mining. However, realizing these opportunities and developing urban mining strategies will require a comprehensive understanding of the technical viability of urban mining technologies, and how their implementation will affect the technical, economic, and environmental performance of a construction and demolition waste (C&DW) management system. To address these important issues, this review summarizes (1) current and emerging technologies that can enable the transition from anthropogenic resource prospecting to anthropogenic resource mining, (2) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) results to date on various C&DW management systems, (3) key parameters that govern the technical, economic, and environmental performance of a C&DW management system, and (4) opportunities for improving the methodology of LCAs and LCCAs for future C&DW management. We find that enhancing the utility of extant LCAs and LCCAs in guiding technology deployment and policy decisions can be achieved by considering key parameters governing the techno-economic and environmental performance of C&DW management. In addition, it is critical to adopt and upscale emerging technologies to increase the added value of materials or products recovered from C&DW.
Chapter
Boulders which are generated during primary blasting are required to undergo secondary blasting prior to crusher operation. Hydraulic rock breaker is one of the techniques which is being utilized to break boulders instead of secondary blasting. This study aims to develop an architecture of AI model for rock breakers with autonomous remote operation. Firstly, several technical specifications of various rock breakers mounted on 30 T class hydraulic rock breakers were evaluated. Also, the factors affecting cost and operation were identified and discussed. Later, the autonomous rock breaker installed on the crusher hopper at a site in Australia was reviewed as global technological advancement. Based on the review, a five-stage architecture for developing autonomous hydraulic rock breaker was developed. The factors affecting the cost of hydraulic excavator and rock breaker can be classified into direct and indirect cost. The direct cost includes operational cost such as oil, replacement of chisel and bucket teeth and wages as well as maintenance cost. Meanwhile, the indirect cost is related to site issues such as locating boulder, boulders jamming crusher, waiting dozer to push boulder, etc. Also, the factors influencing operation of hydraulic hammer shall be classified into very important (i.e. oil flow, chisel diameter), important (i.e. elasticity, impact rate) and desirable (i.e. hardness, chisel length). The five stages architecture for developing autonomous hydraulic rock breaker are development, data collection, data pre-processing, model deployment and model testing.
Article
A dynamic loading method for simulating explosive blast was developed using a crushing foam projectile launched by a gas gun at velocities ranging from 30 to 60m/s. The objective of this test method is to dynamically load “small-scale” composite beam specimens so as to allow for the dynamic failure characterization of these materials subject to blast-type loads. Such non-explosive test methods are desirable since they are more easily implemented, less expensive, and safer than actual explosive blast tests. Furthermore, instrumentation and visual documentation of the experiment is more easily achieved in the absence of “spatially extended” blast pressures, fireballs, and other destructive phenomena associated with the use of explosives that obscure observation. This paper focuses on the description of the pressure pulse generating projectile development and the dynamic pressure profiles produced. Control of the pressure pulse is achieved via selection of foam density used as a crushable media in the projectile, developing peak pressures ranging from 3 to 6.5MPa. Application of this projectile onto beam specimens show dramatic rate dependency of the composite compressive failure strain (143% higher for strain rate of 101s−1 relative to quasi-static), whereas the tensile failure strain showed less, yet still significant, increase (29% for 101s−1 strain rate relative to quasi-static) for dynamic loading rates. Sandwich beams all failed in core shear for the configuration tested, with no significant rate dependency for the shear failure strain of the balsa core material.
Article
Characterizing structural responses and applied loads during the entire course of a blast event is problematic due to the harsh conditions of the explosive environment. A procedure for the distribution of blast-like pressures to structures of complex geometries using custom water bladders has been developed using the University of California, San Diego’s (UCSD) Blast Simulator. The methodology was motivated by an effort to test the blast resistance of structures subject to internal, or external, blasts where attention would be focused on areas such as joints, corners, or other areas within occluded geometry.Three series of experiments were conducted in an effort to characterize the use of water bladders for blast simulations. Bladder material, geometry, use of baffles and strapping methods were varied along with Simulator input parameters such as impact velocity and impacting mass geometry. The effects of these variables have been quantified through the comparison of measured pressures, pulse durations and impulses. The experimental methodology demonstrates the ability to tailor load curves to simulate a wide range of blast scenarios.
Ángeles Fernández 2103 Discrimination of non-explosive and explosive through nitrocellulose fingerprints obtained by capillary eletrophoresis
  • Ossa De La
  • Ma
Explosive energy distribution in an explosive column through use of non-explosive material-case studies
  • G K Pradhan
  • Manoj Pradhan
Pradhan, G.K., Pradhan, Manoj, Explosive energy distribution in an explosive column through use of non-explosive material-case studies, Blasting in Mines New Trends. (2013) 81~89.
Discrimination of non-explosive and explosive through nitrocellulose fingerprints obtained by capillary eletrophoresis
  • Maángeles Ferná Ndez
  • La De
  • Ossa
MaÁngeles Ferná ndez, de la Ossa, Discrimination of non-explosive and explosive through nitrocellulose fingerprints obtained by capillary eletrophoresis, Journal of Chromatography A. (2103)197~204.