Content uploaded by Rajan Bhatt
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Rajan Bhatt on Mar 26, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Evaporation trends on intervening period for different
wheat establishments under soils of semi-arid tropics
RAJAN BHATT1* and PARAMJIT SINGH2
Received: 30 December 2017; Accepted: 05 March 2018
ABSTRACT
Tillage methods certainly affect the soil evaporation rate by altering soil surface area. The present
investigation was conducted at a sandy-loam soil of University Seed Farm, Usman, Tarn Taran to delineate
the soil evaporation trends during the intervening period as affected by the residual effect of conventional
(CTW) and zero till wheat plots without straw load (ZTW-SL) during wheat in 2016-2017 from 3 days
after harvesting (DAH) to 7 days before puddling (DBP). CTW plots conserved more moisture than
ZTW-SL plots in upper 30 cm as higher soil evaporation of 10.6% was observed in later plots. Further,
soil moisture in CTW plots was 22.5%, 35.8% and 33% higher in 0-15, 15-30 and 30-45 cm, respectively
compared with the ZTW-SL plots at 7 DBP. Thus, CTW plots retained prolonged and higher sum of
moisture during the intervening period than ZTW-SL plots which might be useful for cultivating short
intervening/fodder/summer moong crop etc. in water-stressed regions of Punjab.
Key words: Intervening period, Soil evaporation, Zero tillage, Soil moisture, Lysimeters
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 17(1): 41-45, January-March 2018
ISSN: 022-457X (Print); 2455-7145 (Online); DOI: 10.5958/2455-7145.2018.00006.1
1Scientist (Soil Science), 2Director, Regional Research Station, Kapurthala, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004,
Punjab
*Corresponding author Email id: rajansoils@pau.edu, rajansoils@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION
Rice-wheat cropping sequence has been greeted
with many sustainability issues (Bhatt et al., 2013,
2016, 2017) which stood in front of the climate-smart
agriculture. Among different resource conservation
technologies (RCTs), zero tillage (with straw load)
is an important resource conservation technology
being propagated in the rice-wheat regions of South
Asia (Beff et al., 2013; Bhatt et al., 2016) for uplifting
declining land and water productivity, and
assumed to be a way to practise climate-smart
agriculture. In rainfed semi-arid regions proper
tillage helps in conserving soil moisture for
succeeding rabi season crops (Arora and Bhatt,
2006, Arora and Gupta, 2014). The positive benefits
of zero tillage (ZT) systems on crop production
(Paccard et al., 2015), water use efficiency (Bhatt,
2015; Guan et al., 2015; Bhatt and Arora, 2015),
carbon sequestration (Zhangliu et al., 2015) and
economic performance (Tripathi et al., 2013) are well
recognized. However, contradictory results
pertaining to significantly higher weed biomass and
lower land productivity were reported by Bhatt and
Kukal (2016) because of better availability of
sunlight and moisture to the surface placed weed
seeds in ZTW plots while in CTW plots, weed seeds
placed deeper depending upon the depth of tillage
implement where sunlight and moisture might not
be available.
Conventional tillage (CT) break macro-
aggregates into micro-aggregates which adversely
affect the soil properties (Das et al., 2014; Kuotsu et
al., 2014; Roper et al., 2013), oxidises soil organic
carbon as CO2 into the atmosphere and contribute
to the global warming while zero tillage with crop
residue (ZT+R) improves soil physical environment
(Paccard et al., 2015; Bhaduri and Purakayastha,
2014), build micro-fauna, improves the soil organic
carbon, infiltration rate, water retention, hydraulic
conductivity, lower soil compaction (Zheng et al.,
2015; Palese et al., 2014; Bhaduri and Purakayastha,
2014). But, the performance of zero tillage if straw
residues are removed is not clear (ZTW-SLR).
Studies on soil moisture dynamics during
intervening period (Bhatt, 2017) (which was of
much importance after wheat due to longer
intervening period) as influenced by divergent
tillage particularly in rice-wheat cropping sequence
are not adequate in literature even at global level,
as scientists are generally busy in analysing the
effect of applied treatments during the main season.
Keeping this breach in mind, current investigation
was planned after wheat 2016-2017 from 3 DAH to
7 DBP to delineate the residual effects of CTW and
ZTW-SL during the intervening period on profile
moisture, soil evaporation and finally on soil
moisture dynamics.
42 BHATT and SINGH [Journal of Soil & Water Conservation 17(1)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Current investigation was carried out in
triplicate at University Seed Farm, Usman, Tarn
Taran between 3 days of harvesting (DAH) of wheat
2016-2017 and 7 days before puddling (DBP) viz.
during the intervening period. The soil of the
studied site is sandy loam, calcareous, mixed,
hyperthermic and Typic Ustochrept. Soils of the
experimental site has normal pH (7.89), EC (0.38
dS/m), medium in organic carbon (0.65%), however,
available N, P and K were 279.8, 20.40 and 242 kg
ha-1, respectively. The treatments included zero
tillage without crop residues (ZTW-SL) and
conventional tillage (CTW) in wheat 2016-17. Wheat
harvested on 22nd April 2016 and last puddling did
on 12th June 2016. The studied period involved
duration of 41 days starting from 25th April 2016 to
5th June 2016. Historical records revealed that
earlier wheat established with conventional tillage
during 2015-16 followed by puddled transplanted
rice (PTR) followed by current experiment viz.
ZTW-SL and CTW during wheat 2016-2017 and
after wheat current investigation carried out. Our
objective was to delineate the effect of much load
on ZT plots even during intervening period by
removing the mulch load from zero till plots viz.
ZTW-SL while in CTW plots there was no mulch
load from the beginning of the crop. Following
parameters were used to delineate the soil moisture
dynamics during the intervening period under the
residual effect of divergent tillage methods.
Soil evaporation (using Mini-lysimeters)
Mini-lysimeters were quite effective in
understanding fluctuating behaviour of
evaporation under different establishment methods
(Carlos et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2009; Bhatt and
Kukal, 2017). Mini-lysimeters framed by using PVC
pipes of 8-inch length and with 2.5 inches diameter.
Mini-lysimeters were filled from both CTW and
ZTW-SL plots, an end cap fixed on one side and
then finally filled and capped mini-lysimeter was
placed inside the outer pipe of a bigger diameter
which was already fixed in the sampled plot (Fig.
1). Daily mini- lysimeters were weighed on the field
using the digital balance to estimate evaporation.
Evaporation is the change of phase of water from
the liquid to the gaseous and is effected by
establishment methods. Further, if this loss occurs
from the open water body or soil surface or from
the plant surface then we referred as “Evaporation
(E)” while if this phase change occurs through the
stomata of the leaf then terminology used for this
process is “Transpiration (T)”. In both cases, water
lost to the atmosphere. Transpiration is the
necessary evil, thereof, total ET water must be
partitioned from the E to T by using different
technologies (Bhatt, 2017). E measurement is the
challenging job while transpiration is estimated by
determining other variables of the equation. The
evaporation from the soil surface (Es) of growing
crop was measured using mini-lysimeter. The mini-
lysimeter consisted of two cylindrical PVC tubes.
The outer tube was 0.16 m in diameter and 0.20 m
long, whereas the inner tube was 0.102 m in
diameter and 0.20 m long. The inner tube was
covered by porous end cap at the bottom end,
whereas the outer was open at both the ends.
Cylindrical auger was used to make a hole of
diameter equivalent to that of the outer PVC tube
which was inserted in the hole of 0.20 m long. Mini-
lysimeters were used (Fig. 1a-d) in CTW and ZTW-
SLR to work out daily mm of water evaporated.
The purpose of the outer cap was to provide a
location where evaporation could be regularly
measured. The above-ground portion of any small
weeds that may have been growing in the mini-
lysimeters was cut at the soil surface and removed.
The mini-lysimeters were carefully removed
without disturbing the soil inside lysimeter, the
bottom was levelled off, the outsides of the
cylinders were cleaned and dried, and a clean
porous cap was fitted to the bottom. Each lysimeter
was weighed (Fig. 1d) and then placed in outer cap
in the experimental plot. During weighing care was
taken to ensure that no damage occurred to the soil
surface.
Fig. 1. Mini-lysimeters for measuring soil evaporation in the
field (a) Fitting of lysimeter, (b) Removal of filled
lysimeter using chain-pulley arrangement, (c) Filled
lysimeter, (d) Weighing of filled lysimeter on daily
basis to have day to day evaporation in differently
established plots (Bhatt, 2015)
EVAPORATION TRENDS ON INTERVENING PERIOD 43January-March 2018]
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
Intervening period from 3 DAH to 7 DBP
Daily soil evaporation (mm)
Averaged ZTW CTW
Fig. 2. Intervening soil evaporation (mm) as influenced by residual effect of divergent tillage methods adopted during Rabi
2016-17 (ZTW: zero tillage in wheat; CTW: conventional tillage in wheat)
Profile moisture variation
Soil profile (at a depth interval of 0-15, 15-30,
30-60, 60-90 and 90-120 cm) moisture distribution
was measured thermo-gravimetrically using post
hole auger at 3 DAH and at 7 DBP under both ZTW-
SL and CTW plots. The moisture content at each
soil depth was expressed in relation to divergent
tillage treatment.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Variation in soil moisture evaporation
Mini-lysimeters were used to study the
cumulative soil evaporation and evaporation rates
in ZTW-SL and CTW plots after wheat harvest
(Bhatt, 2017). The ZTW-SL plots had higher
evaporation losses (9.4%) than the CTW plots (Fig.
2) during intervening periods and that was mainly
because of the continuity of the soil pores in the
ZTW-SL however in the CTW plots continuity of
soil pores broken up by tillage operations. Further,
cumulative soil evaporation during the whole
intervening period of 41 days was observed to be
44.13 mm in CTW as compared to the 48.26 mm in
the ZTW-SL plots (Fig 3). The absence of straw load
in ZTW plots resulting in direct hitting of hot solar
radiations onto the soil surface could result in
raising soil surface temperature which further
increases the vapour pressure gradient. Higher soil
temperature affects the absorption, translocation of
water and nutrients in soil and plants (Moraru and
Rusu, 2012, Bhatt and Khera, 2006). Higher the soil
temperature hastens the phase change from liquid
to gaseous phase and the greater vapour pressure
gradients which finally resulted in greater diffusion
of gaseous water vapours from the soil surface into
the atmosphere (Bhatt and Khera, 2006).
Variation in profile moisture content
In the surface layers of the soil, ZTW-SL plots
had lower soil moisture compared to the CTW plots,
but the trends reversed after 30 cm soil depth (Fig.
4). On an average, over the tillage treatment as a
whole, the soil moisture throughout the profile was
23.1% higher during 3 DAH compared to 7 DBP.
On an average of the soil profile up to 120 cm, CTW
ZTW-SL CTW
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
Intervening period from 3 DAH to 7 DBP
Cumulative soil evaporation, mm
Fig. 3. Cumulative soil evaporation occurred under different
tillage methods during intervening period (DAH:
days after harvesting; DBP: days before puddling)
44 BHATT and SINGH [Journal of Soil & Water Conservation 17(1)
pots had 25.2% higher while ZT-SL plots had 20.6%
higher soil moisture during 3 DAH compared to 7
DBP. Soil moisture in CTW plots was 22.5% and
35.8% higher in 0-15 and 15-30 cm, respectively
compared to the ZTW-SL plots during 7 DBP (Fig.
4). ZTW-SL plots recorded with lower moisture
content during intervening periods from 3 DAH
compared to 7 DBP depicting importance of mulch
load as it hinders direct hitting of solar radiations
on to the bare soil, reduces maximum soil
temperature, vapour pressure gradient, wind speed
and its vapour lifting potential, and finally soil
evaporation (Bhatt and Khera, 2006, Bhatt and
Kukal, 2017). Along with these factors, well-
connected soil pores in ZTW-SL plots resulted in
higher evaporation (E) which clearly indicates that
lesser moisture was available for the transpiration
(T) as the quantity of water used in evapo-
transpiration (ET) is almost similar (Singh et al.,
2011) even under divergent tillage methods. Thus,
higher fraction of ET water partitioned toward
transpiration (T) in CTW plots which directly
improves the inflow of the nutrients in the plants
along with moisture during the intervening period
and finally results in higher land productivity after
minimising evaporation (E), However, a reverse of
this fact was found to be true for the ZTW-SL plots.
Surface soil moisture reported to be on the lower
side as compared to the sub-surface soil moisture
because of lower energy levels as earlier reported
by Bhatt and Khera (2006) and Bhatt (2015). Thus,
lower land productivity is expected in the ZTW-SL
plots as far as intervening crops viz. moong, fodder
crops etc. are concerned.
CONCLUSIONS
Mulching helps in reducing soil temperature,
vapour pressure gradient, wind speed and its
vapour lifting capacity and thus reduces the
evaporation losses from the zero till plots even
during intervening period. But on removing mulch
load from zero till plots viz. ZTW-SL, higher rates
of evaporation losses observed from these plots
which clearly delineates the importance of mulch
load in preserving the soil moisture. Further, higher
fraction of ET water partitioned to T component
which improves the intake of nutrients within the
plants, improves the land as well water productivity
and, finally improving the livelihoods. Without
mulch load, even resource conservation technology
like zero tillage (ZTW) proves to be inferior to
conventional tillage (CTW) in conserving the soil
moisture. This suggests that the overall benefit of
zero tillage depends entirely on mulch loads which
provide surface coverage and partition higher
fraction of ET water to T component. Consequently,
a need to carry out such studies during intervening
periods in texturally divergent soils under different
agro-climatic conditions to establish concrete
conclusion regarding the residual effect of different
tillage techniques on soil evaporation trends during
the intervening periods is there for harvesting
additional income from intervening crop to
improve livelihoods.
Fig. 4. Profile soil moisture (0-120 cm) delineation as affected by residual effect of divergent tillage mods adopted during
Rabi 2016-17
EVAPORATION TRENDS ON INTERVENING PERIOD 45January-March 2018]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The help received from Sh. Harpreet Singh and
Varun Shrivastava in the handling of mini-
lysimeters and profile soil samples during
investigation is fully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
Arora, Sanjay and Bhatt, R. 2006. Effect of in-situ soil
moisture conservation practices on soil moisture
storage and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in a rainfed
foothill region of North-west India. Tropical Agriculture
82(3): 37-42.
Arora, Sanjay and Gupta, R.D. 2014. Soil related constraints
in crop production and their management options in
North Western Himalayas. Journal of Soil and Water
Conservation 13(4): 305-312.
Beff, L., Unther, T.G.B., Vandoorne, Couvreur, V. and
Javaux, M. 2013. Three-dimensional monitoring of soil
water content in a maize field using electrical resistivity
tomography. Hydrology and Earth System Sci.17: 595-609.
Bhaduri, D. and Purakayastha, T.J. 2014. Long-term tillage,
water and nutrient management in rice-wheat cropping
system: Assessment and response of soil quality. Soil
Tillage Res. 144: 83-95.
Bhatt, R. 2015. Soil water dynamics and water productivity of
rice-wheat system under different establishment methods.
Ph.D. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University,
Ludhiana.
Bhatt, R. 2017. Zero tillage impacts on soil environment and
properties. Journal of Environmental & Agricultural Sci.
10: 1-19.
Bhatt, R. and Arora, Sanjay 2015. Impact of tillage on soil
bio-chemical properties, water storage and
environment. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
14(3): 278-282.
Bhatt, R. and Khera, K.L. 2006. Effect of tillage and mode
of straw mulch application on soil erosion in the
submontaneous tract of Punjab, India. Soil Tillage Res.
88: 107-115.
Bhatt, R. and Kukal, S.S. 2017. Tillage and establishment
method impacts on land and irrigation water
productivity of wheat-rice system in North-west India.
Experimental Agriculture 53(2): 178-201. DOI:10.1017/
SOO14479716000272.
Bhatt, R., Arora, Sanjay and Busari, M. 2017. Zero tillage
for sustaining land and water productivity in northern
India. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 16(3): 228-
233. DOI: 10.5958/2455-7145.2017.00031.5.
Bhatt, R., Kukal, S.S. and Arora, Sanjay 2013. Resource
conservation technologies for improving water
productivity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 12(4):
313-320.
Bhatt, R., Kukal, S.S., Busari, M.A., Arora, Sanjay and Yadav,
M. 2016. Sustainability issues on rice-wheat cropping
system. International Soil and Water Conservation Res. 4:
68-83. DOI:10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.12.001.
Carlos, D.S.S., Francisco, A.C.P., Aureo, S.O., João, F.G.J.
and Lucas, M.V. 2013. Design, installation and
calibration of a weighing lysimeter for crop
evapotranspiration studies. Water Resource and
Irrigation Management 2(2): 77-85.
Das, A., Lal, R., Patel, D., Layek, J., Ngachan, S., Ghosh, P.,
Bordoloi, J. and Kumar, M. 2014. Effects of tillage and
biomass on soil quality and productivity of lowland
rice cultivation by small-scale farmers in North Eastern
India. Soil Tillage Res. 143: 50-58.
Guan, D., Zhang, Y., Kaisi, M.M.A., Wang, Q., Zhang. M.
and Li, Z. 2015. Tillage practices effect on root
distribution and water use efficiency of winter wheat
under a rain-fed condition in the North China Plain.
Soil Tillage Res. 146: 286-295.
Kuotsu, K., Das, L., Munda, A.R., Ghosh, G. and Ngachan,
S. 2014. Land forming and tillage effects on soil
properties and productivity of rainfed groundnut
(Arachis hypogaea L.) –rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.)
cropping system in northeastern India. Soil Tillage Res.
142: 15-24.
Moraru, P.I. and Rusu, T. 2012. Effect of tillage systems on
soil moisture, soil temperature, soil respiration and
production of wheat, maize and soybean crops. J. Food
Agri. Environ. 10(2): 445-448.
Paccard, C.G., Chiquinquirá, H., Ignacio, M.S., Pérez, J.,
León, P., González, P. and Espejo, R. 2015. Soil–water
relationships in the upper soil layer in a Mediterranean
Palexerult as affected by no-tillage under excess water
conditions – Influence on crop yield. Soil Tillage Res.
146: 303-312.
Palese, A.M., Vignozzi, N., Celano, G., Agnelli, A.E., Pagliai,
M. and Xiloyannis, M. 2014. Influence of soil
management on soil physical characteristics and water
storage in a mature rainfed olive orchard. Soil Tillage
Res. 144: 96-109.
Roper, M., Ward, P., Keulen, A. and Hil, J. 2013. Under no-
tillage and stubble retention, soil water content and
crop growth are poorly related to soil water repellency.
Soil Tillage Res. 126: 143-150.
Singh, B., Humphreys, E., Eberbach, P.L., Katupitiya, A.,
Singh, Y. and Kukal, S.S. 2011. Growth, yield and water
productivity of zero till wheat as affected by rice straw
mulch and irrigation schedule. Field Crop Res. 121: 209-
225.
Tripathi, R.S., Raju, R. and Thimmappa, K. 2013. Impact of
Zero Tillage on Economics of Wheat Production in
Haryana. Agri. Eco. Res. Review. 26(1): 101-108.
Zhang, X.Y., Chen, S.Y., Sun, H.Y., Wang, Y. and Shao, L.
2009. Root size, distribution and soil water depletion
as affected by cultivars and environmental factors. Field
Crops Res. 114: 75-83.
Zhangliu, Du., Ren, T., Huc.C. and Zhang, Q. 2015.
Transition from intensive tillage to no-till enhances
carbon sequestration in microaggregates of surface
soil in the North China Plain. Soil Tillage Res. 146: 26-
31.
Zheng, L., Wenliang, W., Yongping, W. and Hu, K. 2015.
Effects of straw return and regional factors on spatio-
temporal variability of soil organic matter in a high-
yielding area of northern China. Soil Tillage Res. 145:
78-86.