ResearchPDF Available

Cinderella Complex: Theoretical Roots to Psychological Dependency Syndrome in Women

Authors:

Abstract

Women's dependency has been a widely debated topic around the world. Back in the 60s-80s, women were limited to their household chores, child rearing practices and were financially dependent on men, and the concept of women dependency on men was phenomenological and acceptable. But when 90s arrived with the drive of women empowerment; women education flourished, they became financially independent and balanced work and personal lives. The concept of women dependency then started confusion and displease among the "new independent women". This theoretical article aims to elaborate on the concept of women dependence and its background. Cinderella Complex is a psychological syndrome that states women are unconsciously driven to be dependent on a dominant figure (preferably male). Relational Theory in relation to Cinderella complex marks distinction in emotional development of men and women. It states that women are primarily driven to connect with others. Traditionally, women have not been expected to confront fear and go beyond it. They have been encouraged to avoid what scares them, taught, from the time they were very young, to do only those things that allow them to feel comfortable and secure. In fact women were not trained for freedom at all, they were trained for dependency. Up to a point, dependency needs are quite normal, for men as well as for women. But women have been encouraged since they were children to be dependent; this kind of dependence upbringing is now seen as psychologically unhealthy by the contemporary society. Any woman who looks within knows that she was never trained to feel comfortable with the idea of taking care of herself, standing up for herself, asserting herself. At best she may have played the game of independence, inwardly envying the boys (and later the men) because they seemed so naturally self-sufficient.
The International Journal of Indian Psychology
ISSN 2348-5396 (e) | ISSN: 2349-3429 (p)
Volume 3, Issue 3, No. 8, DIP: 18.01.148/20160303
ISBN: 978-1-365-12176-0
http://www.ijip.in | April - June, 2016
© 2016 I S Saha, T Safri; licensee IJIP. This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Cinderella Complex: Theoretical Roots to Psychological
Dependency Syndrome in Women
Sneha Saha1*, Tanishka S. Safri2
ABSTRACT
Women’s dependency has been a widely debated topic around the world. Back in the 60s-80s,
women were limited to their household chores, child rearing practices and were financially
dependent on men, and the concept of women dependency on men was phenomenological and
acceptable. But when 90s arrived with the drive of women empowerment; women education
flourished, they became financially independent and balanced work and personal lives. The
concept of women dependency then started confusion and displease among the “new
independent women”. This theoretical article aims to elaborate on the concept of women
dependence and its background. Cinderella Complex is a psychological syndrome that states
women are unconsciously driven to be dependent on a dominant figure (preferably male).
Relational Theory in relation to Cinderella complex marks distinction in emotional development
of men and women. It states that women are primarily driven to connect with others.
Keywords: Women, Dependency, Cinderella Complex, Relational Theory, Psychology,
Syndrome.
Traditionally, women have not been expected to confront fear and go beyond it. They have been
encouraged to avoid what scares them, taught, from the time they were very young, to do only
those things that allow them to feel comfortable and secure. In fact women were not trained for
freedom at all, they were trained for dependency. Up to a point, dependency needs are quite
normal, for men as well as for women. But women have been encouraged since they were
children to be dependent; this kind of dependence upbringing is now seen as psychologically
unhealthy by the contemporary society. Any woman who looks within knows that she was never
trained to feel comfortable with the idea of taking care of herself, standing up for herself,
asserting herself. At best she may have played the game of independence, inwardly envying the
boys (and later the men) because they seemed so naturally self-sufficient.
1 Ph.D. Scholar, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shree Ramswaroop Memorial University, Lucknow,
India
2 Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Babu Banarasi Das University, Lucknow, India
*Responding Author
Cinderella Complex: Theoretical Roots to Psychological Dependency Syndrome in Women
© The International Journal of Indian Psychology, ISSN 2348-5396 (e)| ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) | 119
Males are educated for independence from the day they're born. Females are taught that they
have an option-that someday, in some way, they are going to be rescued from independent living.
Women may venture out on their own for a while; they may go away to school, work, and travel;
may even make good money, but underneath there is insecurity towards independence. “Only
hang on long enough, the childhood story goes, and someday someone will come along to rescue
you from the anxiety of authentic living.” (Colette Dowling,1981)
Concept
Cinderella Complex (also known as the Cinderella syndrome), was first coined by New York
therapist Colette Dowling in the early 80s. Basically, it is a complex (or syndrome) that leads
women to believe that they are damsels in distressin need of rescuing from a male suitor.
Women wait for a “man” to come and take over control of their lives, so that they can live
happily and content with standing behind their men. Cinderella Complex is the largely repressed
attitudes and fears that keep women from the full use of their minds and creativity forcing them
to wait for something or someone external to transform their lives.
“Cinderella Complex” finds its name from the fairy tale princess Cinderella, waiting for her
prince charming to rescue her from the evil stepmother and stepsisters. Most modern adaptations
of fairy tales, as well as original versions, place gender expectations on women. Perrault's
Cinderella provides an example of how the heroine of the story must be "rescued" by a man of
princely matter and helped by outwardly forces to achieve recognition and respect. Cinderella
does not bear grudges against her oppressors, the stepsisters and stepmother; she is civil and
kindhearted. Through this plot, a woman is told that in order to overcome such oppression, one
must be patient and virtuous and wait for the day the reward to such endurance arrives in the
form of a man. Thus, young women are trained into dependency. Its story revolves around the
assumption that women should be "beautiful, polite, graceful, industrious, obedient, and
passive". Cinderella operates as a patriarchal instrument, producing and nurturing a
psychological dependence in women. The qualities of feminine beauty and virtue are always
related with that of conscience. For a woman to be virtuous, she must be beautiful, obedient,
patient, sacrificial, and sexually innocent. When a woman lacks any of these feminine qualities,
she feels guilty. Dependence therefore becomes a source of freedom from perceived hardship.
Instead of becoming independent, women rely on a man as a source of protection, identity, and
proof of love.
In Cinderella, the prince validates the womanly qualities through admiration. Her insecurities
and hardships vanish at the site of her prince. With the Cinderella complex internalized so deeply
in their minds, these females believe that their submissiveness and obedience to the wills of
others will help them win a "prince" with whom they would live happily ever after. Therefore,
instead of acting out their own potential, they look for a man to lean on and something external
to give their lives meaning. They see themselves as princesses waiting for a prince to come to
their rescue.
Cinderella Complex: Theoretical Roots to Psychological Dependency Syndrome in Women
© The International Journal of Indian Psychology, ISSN 2348-5396 (e)| ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) | 120
Symptoms of Cinderella Complex
Most doctors believe that women who suffer from this complex usually have other deep-seated
emotional problems such as low self-esteem and dependency issues. Some women who suffer
from the Cinderella complex are unable to accept the men in their lives in a healthy way. Rather
than seeing them as normally flawed individuals, they often idolize them. This type of idolization
often leads to expectations that are unrealistic and impossible to meet. A woman with these
unrealistic expectations may become emotionally wounded by behaviors. For women who suffer
from Cinderella type complexes, dependency and low self-esteem seem to be the root causes of
the problem. Most psychologists believe that in many cases dependency issues may result from
extremely over-protective parenting. In fact, these parents may have escalated normal protective
behavior into abusive controlling, in some cases even punishing the child for displaying signs of
independence. It is also considered likely that women who suffer this complex were humiliated
socially during their formative years, which is often the cause of low self-esteem.
These women do not believe that they have any worth outside that which their Prince has given
them. Victims of the Cinderella Complex will always wait to be rescued from life by their prince,
no one else will do. They need that male figure to do everything for them; they need his care, no
matter what price they wind up paying for it. They will stay in an abusive relationship that
fosters this ideal, because they cannot be on their own, and fear any change that will take them
away from their prince. According to Dowling, psychological effects of Cinderella Complex are
lack of self esteem, lack of confidence, anxiety and inability to function in the work place.
Relational Theory: A Theoretical Explanation to Dependency
Over the past three decades, there has been a recognition and acknowledgement of the
differences between women and men. One difference is the way in which men and women
develop psychologically. Jean Baker Miller posed the question of how women develop in her
1976 book, Toward a New Psychology of Women. Until then, traditional theories of psychology
described development as a climb from childlike dependence to mature independence. A
person’s goal, according to these theories, was to become a self-sufficient, clearly differentiated,
autonomous self. A person would spend his or her life separating and individuating until he or
she reached maturity, at which point the person was equipped for intimacy.
Miller challenged the assumption that separation was the route to maturity. She suggested that
those theories might be describing men’s experience, while a woman’s path to maturity was
different. A woman’s primary motivation, said Miller, is to build a sense of connection with
others. Women develop a sense of self and self-worth when their actions arise out of, and lead
back into, connections with others. Connection, not separation, is the guiding principle of growth
for women.
Previously, theoreticians had treated women’s emphasis on connection as a sign of deficiency.
Working at the same time as Miller, Carol Gilligan, a developmental psychologist, was gathering
Cinderella Complex: Theoretical Roots to Psychological Dependency Syndrome in Women
© The International Journal of Indian Psychology, ISSN 2348-5396 (e)| ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) | 121
empirical data that reflected fundamental gender differences in the psychological and moral
development of women and men (Gilligan, 1982). In her book, In a Different Voice:
Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, Carol Gilligan observed, “The disparity
between women’s experience and the representation of human development, noted throughout
the psychological literature, has generally been seen to signify a problem in women’s
development. Instead, the failure The Stone Center at Wellesley College was created for the
purpose of thinking through the qualities of relationships that foster healthy growth in women
(Jordan, 1984, 1985; Jordan & Surrey, 1986; Kaplan, 1984; Surrey, 1985). The basic assumption
of the Stone Center model is that “connection” is a basic human need, and that this need is
especially strong in women (Jordan, Kaplan, & Miller, 1991). All people need both connection
with others and differentiation from others, but females are more attuned to connection while
males are more attuned to differentiation. Bylington (1997) explained this connection as follows:
Theoretically, girls perceive themselves to be more similar than different to their earliest
maternal caretakers, so they do not have to differentiate from their mothers in order to continue
to develop their identities. This is in contrast to boys, who must develop an identity that is
different from the mother’s in order to continue their development. Thus, women’s psychological
growth and development occur through adding to rather than separating from relationships.
Consequently, defining themselves as similar to others through relationships is fundamental to
women’s identities.
A “connection” in the Stone Center relational model is “an interaction that engenders a sense of
being in tune with self and others, of being understood and valued” (Bylington, 1997, p. 35).
True connections are mutual, empathic, creative, energy-releasing, and empowering for all
participants (Miller, 1986). Such connections are so crucial for women that women’s
psychological problems can be traced to disconnections or violations within relationships—
whether in families, with personal acquaintances, or in society at large.
Growth fostering relationships empower all people involved in them. They are defined by:
1. A sense of zest or well being that comes from connecting with another person;
2. The ability and motivation to take action in the relationship as well as in other situations;
3. Increased knowledge of oneself and the other person;
4. An increased sense of worth;
5. A desire for more connections beyond the particular one.
A Social Experiment
To summarize, both of these well established concepts presume that women dependency is in
built, culturally strengthened and emotionally developed in women. This drive to depend on
someone, limits the self actualization capacity in women. Women try to mould themselves as a
desirable partner for their men. Debate arises when these old theories find their way to this 21st
century women. As a part of writing this paper, a small social experiment was conducted; a room
full of 100-140 Indian women of various age groups was gathered together. Some of these
women were working; some studying and some were housewives. Some of these women were
Cinderella Complex: Theoretical Roots to Psychological Dependency Syndrome in Women
© The International Journal of Indian Psychology, ISSN 2348-5396 (e)| ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) | 122
married and some were single ready to be married. These women were asked about the story of
Cinderella. It was observed that each one of them remembered “Cinderella being rescued by
Prince Charming” more than Evil Step Family and Fairy God Mother. Then these women were
given details about the concept of Cinderella complex in an outline. It was interesting to observe
that almost every working and studying women were in denial. They argued that they work and
study at their own will and decisions. The housewives of the groups were non-verbally
responsive in affirmation to the concept of Cinderella complex. When the working women were
explained in detail about Cinderella complex it was found that they started relating to the
syndrome. Working women realized their financials are closely guarded and guided by their
men, which they are happy and relaxed about. Single women realized they have been reared to
make a good wife one day. Housewives realized they have lost themselves to the concept of
Cinderella complex.
CONCLUSION
This kind of realization in 21st century women shows the lessened yet strong relevance of
dependency in women psyche. It is important to conduct researches on women dependency, as
the review found on this dimension is more than 15years old. As a part of targeted research, this
concept should be thoroughly researched on Indian population, researches on this syndrome has
not been conducted in India as of yet.
REFERENCES
Bylington, D. (1997). Applying relational theory to addiction treatment. Gender and addictions:
Men and women in treatment. S.L.A. Straussner and E. Zelvin (Eds.) Northvale, NJ:
Aronson, pp. 33-45.
Dowling Colette (1981).The Cinderella Complex, Women’s hidden fear of independence, pp.3-
6, Pocket Books, New York
Gilligan, C., Lyons, N. P., and Hanmer, T. J. (Eds.). (1990). Making connections. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Jean Baker Miller, M.D. The Five Good Things
Jordan, J.V., Kaplan, A.G., Miller, J.B., et al. (1991). Women’s growth in connection: Writings
from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, J. B. (1986). What do we mean by relationships? Work in Progress No. 22. Wellesley,
MA: Stone Center, Working Paper Series.
How to cite this article: S Saha, T Safri (2016), Cinderella Complex: Theoretical Roots to
Psychological Dependency Syndrome in Women, International Journal of Indian Psychology,
Volume 3, Issue 3, No. 8, DIP: 18.01.148/20160303, ISBN: 978-1-365-12176-0
... Menurut Saha (2016) Bagi wanita yang menderita Cinderella yang tipe kompleks, ketergantungan dan rendah diri tampaknya menjadi akar penyebab masalah. Kebanyakan psikolog percaya bahwa dalam banyak kasus masalah ketergantungan mungkin akibat dari orangtua sangat over-protektif. ...
Article
Cinderella Complex adalah kecenderungan perempuan untuk tergantung secara psikis, yang ditunjukan dengan adanya keinginan yang kuat untuk dirawat dan dilindungi orang lain terutama laki-laki, serta keyakinan bahwa suatu dari luarlah yang akan menolongnya. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan cinderella complex dalam perspektif psikologi dalam perkembangan sosial dan emosional. Selain itu juga melihat bangaimana faktor-faktor penentu Cinderella Complex. Berdasarkan hasil pengkajian dari berbagai sumber mengenai Cinderella Complex munculnya Cinderella complex pada diri seorang perempuan tidak terlepas dari adanya faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya antara lain: Pola asuh orang tua, Kematangan Pribadi, dan Konsep Diri. Dalam perspektif perkembangan gender, Cinderella Complex pada perempuan dipengaruhi oleh budaya setempat yang mempersepsikan perempuan sebagai makhluk yang lemah dan tidak bisa mandiri.
Article
Women’s dependency has been a widely debated topic around the world. Back in the 60s-80s, women were limited to their household chores, child rearing practices and were financially dependent on men, and the concept of women dependency on men was phenomenological and acceptable. But when 90s arrived with the drive of women empowerment; women education flourished, they became financially independent and balanced work and personal lives. The concept of women dependency then started confusion and displease among the “new independent women”. This theoretical article aims to elaborate on the concept of women dependence and its background. Cinderella Complex is a psychological syndrome that states women are unconsciously driven to be dependent on a dominant figure (preferably male). Relational Theory in relation to Cinderella complex marks distinction in emotional development of men and women. It states that women are primarily driven to connect with others.
Article
The purpose of these colloquia is to provide a place for exploration of new formulations about women's psychological development. I believe that this exploration helps us to understand men's development as well, and therefore enlarges our comprehension of everyone's experience. One of the themes which has run through this series is the examination of the sense of relatedness in women's lives. It is certainly not the only topic we have covered, but it has been one that many of us see as central. To summarize this theme very briefly, it is the view that women's sense of personhood is grounded in the motivation to make and enhance relatedness to others. We observe that women tend to find satisfaction, pleasure, effectiveness and a sense of worth if they experience their life activities as arising from, and leading back into, a sense of connection with others. This view differs in its basic premise from most current psychological theories which tend to center on the development of a more separated sense of self. Over the past few years we have examined women's growth within connections in a number of ways, for example in new delineations of such topics as empathy, dependency, power, anger, depression, models of treatment, and sex of therapists. We have discussed black women's history of living and working within the tradition of close ties to family and community, and the possible implications for women of other minority groups. We have considered women's development at certain ages in life, such as infancy, early childhood, adolescence, early adulthood, and early motherhood. We have also discussed implications of this approach for women in the workplace and for women's intellectual development, at least in the college years. There are many more aspects to be addressed and many questions to be posed. One set of questions which has arisen in our discussions here might be Abstract Using a concrete illustration, this paper explores the characteristics of growth-fostering relationships. It proposes that such relationships lead to an increase in "zest" (or "vitality"), empowerment, knowledge, worth, and sense of connection with others. An examination of the interactions in growth-fostering relationships suggests that the essential feature is the interplay of mutual empathy created by both (or all) participants.
Applying relational theory to addiction treatment
  • D Bylington
Bylington, D. (1997). Applying relational theory to addiction treatment. Gender and addictions: Men and women in treatment. S.L.A. Straussner and E. Zelvin (Eds.) Northvale, NJ: Aronson, pp. 33-45.
Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center
  • Jean Baker Miller
  • M D The Five Good Things Jordan
  • J V Kaplan
  • A G Miller
Jean Baker Miller, M.D. The Five Good Things Jordan, J.V., Kaplan, A.G., Miller, J.B., et al. (1991). Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford Press.