ChapterPDF Available

Part E, Porifera (Revised), vol. 4 & 5, ch. 16, p. 1043–1106

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
PART E, REVISED, VOLUME 4, CHAPTER 19:
SYSTEMATIC DESCRIPTIONS: ARCHAEOCYATHA
F. Debrenne,1 A. Yu. ZhurAvlev,2 and P. D. Kruse3
[113 rue du Long Foin, 91700, Ste Geneviève des Bois, France, francoise.debrenne@gmail.com; 2Área y Museo de Paleontología, Departamento
de Ciencias de la Tierra, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain, ayzhur@mail.ru; 3South Australian Museum, Adelaide, Australia,
archaeo.kruse@gmail.com]
Phylum PORIFERA Grant, 1836
Class ARCHAEOCYATHA
Bornemann, 1884
[nom. correct. vologDin, 1937b, p. 464, pro Archaeocyathinae borne-
mAnn, 1884, p. 706] [=class Archaeocyathinae TAYlor, 1910, p. 105; class
Cyathospongia oKuliTch, 1935, p. 88; class Archaeocyathi R. beDForD
& W. r. beDForD, 1936, p. 9; subphylum Archaeocyatha vologDin,
1937b, p. 464 (Porifera); class Pleospongia oKuliTch, 1943, p. 1; phylum
Archaeocyatha oKuliTch, 1955a, p. 8; phylum Archaeocyathi KrAsnoPe-
evA, 1955, p. 17; subphylum Euarchaeocyatha ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 79,
nom. transl. ZhurAvlev & others in soKolov & ZhurAvlevA, 1983, p. 6,
ex class Euarchaeocyathi ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 79; Salpingidea volog-
Din & YAZmir, 1967, p. 1377; phylum Archaeocyatha hill, 1972, p. 2;
Euarchaeocyatha ZhurAvlevA & mYAgKovA, 1979, p. 521] [equivalent to
superfamily Archaeocyathaceae simon, 1939, p. 5]
Skeleton nonspiculate, calcareous cup
of microgranular microstructure and (with
few exceptions) original magnesium calcite
composition. Cup generally of archaeocya-
than architecture with one or two porous
walls bounding inner or central cavity
respectively; porous to aporose septa, pseu-
dosepta, taeniae, pseudotaeniae, pseudotae-
nial network, dictyonal network, syringes
and/or tabulae may form in intervallum;
a minority are of chaetetid (intervallum
with calicles) or thalamid architecture (cup
consisting of successive chambers). Solitary
or modular. Secondary calcareous skeleton
may be present. [For an explanation of
zonal terms used herein, see Debrenne,
Zhu rAvl ev , & Kru se, 2012, p. 64–65.]
Cambrian (Terreneuvian–Furongian).
Order MONOCYATHIDA
Okulitch, 1935
[nom. correct. oKuliTch, 1955a, p. 9, pro order Monocyathina oKuliTch,
1935, p. 90] [=Archaeolynthida Zhu rAvlevA, 1957, p. 174; =Tectocy-
athida vologDin in vologDin & YAZmir, 1966, p. 948; =suborder Glo-
bosocyathina oKunevA, 1969, p. 74; =suborder Monocyathina Debrenne,
1970a, p. 24; =Tecticyathida vologDin, 1977, p. 93]
Cup one walled, solitary or low modular;
pelta may be present. lower Cambrian
(Tom.1–Bot.3).
Family MONOCYATHIDAE
R. Bedford & W. R. Bedford, 1934
[Monocyathidae R. beDFo rD & W. R. beDForD, 1934, p. 2] [=Rhab-
docnemidae oKuliTch, 1943, p. 45, nom. nov. pro Rhabdocyathidae
vologDin, 1931, p. 52, invalid family-group name based on junior hom-
onym; =Archaeolynthidae ZhurAvlevA, 1949, p. 550; =Monocyathinae
ZhurAvlevA, 1963b, p. 74, nom. transl. ex Monocyathidae R. beDForD &
W. r. beDForD, 1934, p. 2; =Rhabdocyathellidae ZhurAvlevA, 1963b, p.
114; =Capsolynthidae oKunevA, 1969, p. 75; =Crassicyathidae vologDin,
1977, p. 79; =Spinicyathidae vologDin, 1977, p. 103]
Wall with simple pores. lower Cambrian
(Tom.1–Bot.3).
Archaeolynthus TAYl or , 1910, p. 158 [*Monocy-
athus porosus R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD,
1934, p. 2; SD R. beD Fo rD & W. R. beDFor D,
1936, p. 20; lectotype, R. beDForD & W. r.
beDF orD , 1934, fig. 1; Zhur Avle vA, 1963b, fig.
39d; hill, 1965, pl. 2,1; Debrenne , 1969a, pl.
1,3; Debrenne, 1974b, pl. 19,1; SD hill, 1965,
p. 52, NHM S4140, London] [=Ventriculocyathus
vologDin, 1928, p. 31, nom. nud.; =Ventriculo-
cyathus vologDin, 1931, p. 51 (type, V. caulius,
M), for discussion, see hill, 1965, p. 63; =Mono-
cyathus R. beDForD & W. r. beDForD, 1934,
p. 2 (type, M. porosus, SD R. beDForD & W. R.
beD Fo rD , 1936, p. 20; lectotype, hill, 1965,
pl. 2,1; SD hill, 1965, p. 52, S4140, NHM,
London); =Rhabdocnema oKuliTch, 1937a, p.
252, nom. nov. pro Rhabdocyathus v on Toll,
1899, p. 45, non brooK, 1893, cnidarian (type, R.
sibiricus, M), for discussion, see hill, 1965, p. 51;
=Rhabdocyathella vologDin, 1937b, p. 474 (type,
R. lebedevae, M), for discussion, see hill, 1965,
p. 53; =Capsolynthus osADchAYA in ZhurAvlevA &
others, 1967, p. 26 (type, C. helenae, OD); =Corti-
cicyathus vologDin, 1977, p. 46 (type, C. aequi-
porosus, OD); =Crassicyathus vologDin, 1977, p.
79 (type, C. canaliculatus, OD); =Tegminicyathus
vologDin, 1977, p. 98 (type, T. simplex, OD);
=Tytthocyathus vologDin, 1977, p. 98 (type, T.
jenisseicus, OD); =Spinicyathus vologDin, 1977,
p. 103 (type, S. cipis, OD), for discussion, see
Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZ A no v, 1989, p.
94; Debrenne, roZA nov, & Zhu rAvlev , 1990, p.
133]. Wall pores of uniform size. lower Cambrian
(Tom.1–Bot.3): Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan,
Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far East, Australia,
Antarctica, Morocco, Iberia.——Fig. 1,1a–b. *A.
porosus (R. beDForD & W. r. beDForD), Ajax
Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia,
© 2012, The University of Kansas, Paleontological Institute, ISSN 2153-4012
Debrenne, F., A. Yu. Zhuravlev, & P. D. Kruse. 2012. Part E, Revised, Volume 4, Chapter 19: Systematic
descriptions: Archaeocyatha. Treatise Online XX:1–186, 134 fig.
Ed: add vol.
number
2Treatise Online, number XX
Australia, lectotype, NHM S4140; a, external
longitudinal view of cup, ×5 (Hill, 1965); b,
detail of porosity in external tangential view, ×10
(Debrenne, 1974b).
Kyarocyathus Kruse, 1982, p. 144 [*K. duplus; OD;
holotype, Krus e, 1982, fig. 7H–J, AM FT.8240,
8244, Sydney]. Wall pores of two distinct sizes. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2): Mongolia, Australia.——
Fig . 1,2. *K. duplus, Mount Wright Volcanics,
Botoman, Mt. Wright, New South Wales, Australia,
AM FT.8240, FT.8244, oblique transverse section,
AM FT.8240, ×10 (Kruse, 1982).
Family PALAEOCONULARIIDAE
Chudinova, 1959
[Palaeoconulariidae chuDi novA, 1959, p. 53] [=Debrennecyathidae
vologDin in vologDin & YAZmir, 1966, p. 948, invalid family-group
name based on unavailable genus name; =Debrennecyathidae vologDin,
1977, p. 100]
Wall with attached microporous sheath.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3).
Palaeoconularia chuDinovA, 1959, p. 53 [*P. prima;
OD; holotype, chuDinovA, 1959, fig. 1–2, PIN
1577/1, Moscow] [=Laminaecyathus YAZmir in
vologDin & YAZmir, 1966, p. 948 (type, L. trian-
gulatus, OD); =Debrennecyathus vologDin in
volo gD in & YAZ mi r, 1966, p. 948, nom. nud.,
unavailable genus-group name without associated
nominal species; =Debrennecyathus vologDin,
1977, p. 101 (type, D. pulcher, OD), for discussion,
see Debrenne, Zhur Avlev, & roZAn ov, 1989, p.
122; Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p.
154]. Wall with reticulate carcass pores and attached
microporous sheath. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3):
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia.——
Fig. 2,1a–c. *P. prima, Verkhnemonok Formation,
Botoman, Karako l River, western Sayan, Al tay
Sayan, Russia, holotype, PIN 1577/1; a, external
longitudinal view of cup, ×2; b, tangential section
of microporous sheath, ×6; c, tangential section of
carcass pores, ×11 (Chudinova, 1959).
?Butakovicyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1980, p. 175 [*B .
butakovi; OD; holotype, Zhu rAvl evA, 1980, pl.
Archaeolynthus
Kyarocyathus
1a
1b
2
Fig. 1. Monocyathidae (p. 1–2).
Ed: add vol.
number
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 3
Fig. 2. Palaeoconulariidae (p. 2–4).
1a
2
1b
1c
Palaeoconularia
Butakovicyathus
4Treatise Online, number XX
30,1–2, TsSGM 569, Novosibirsk]. Wall carcass
pores of two distinct sizes with attached micro-
porous sheath. [The single available section does
not provide certainty as to wall structure.] lower
Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1): Altay Sayan.——Fig.
2,2. *B. butakovi, Krol Formation, Atdabanian,
Mana River, eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia,
holotype, TsSGM 569, transverse section, ×12
(Zhuravleva, 1980).
Family TUMULIOLYNTHIDAE
Rozanov, 1966
[Tumuliolynthidae roZAnov in roZAnov & missArZhevsKiY, 1966, p. 77]
[=Papulicyathidae vologDin, 1977, p. 62; =Verrucicyathidae vologDin,
1977, p. 63; =Orthocyathidae vologDin, 1977, p. 96]
Wall with simple tumuli. lower Cambrian
(Tom.2–Bot.3).
Tumuliolynthus ZhurAvlevA, 1963b, p. 101 [*Rhab-
docyathus tubexternus vologDin, 1932, p. 64; OD;
holotype, vologDin, 1932, pl. 5,1a, TsNIGRm
209a/2957, St. Petersburg] [=Papulicyathus
vologDin, 1977, p. 62 (type, P. longus, OD);
=Verrucicyathus vologDin, 1977, p. 64 (type,
V. tumefactus, OD), for discussion, see Kru se ,
1982, p. 144; =Isthmocyathus vologDin, 1977,
p. 70 (type, I. articulatus, OD); =Mammaticy-
athus vologDin, 1977, p. 71 (type, M. kyzasicus,
OD ); =Ort h ocya t hus vologDin, 197 7, p. 97
(type, O. bateniensis, OD), non Cyathophyllum
(Orthocyathus) merriAm, 1974, p. 34 (type,
Prismatophyllum flexum sTumm, 1938, p. 483,
OD), cnidarian; for discussion, see Debrenne,
roZAnov, & ZhurAvle v, 1990, p. 165]. Wall with
simple tumuli. lower Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3):
Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia,
Transbaikalia, Far East, Urals, Australia, Antarc-
tica, Morocco, Iberia.——Fi g. 3,1. *T. tubex-
ternus (vologDin), Verkhneynyrga Formation,
Botoman, Lebed’ River, Altay Mountains, Altay
Sayan, Russia, holotype, TsNIGRm 209a/2957,
transverse section, ×3 (Vologdin, 1932).
Family SAJANOLYNTHIDAE
Rozanov, 1989
[Sajanolynthidae roZAnov in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989,
p. 79] [=Sajanolynthidae KAshinA in roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.]
Wall with multiperforate tumuli. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1).
Sajanolynthus vologDin & KAshinA, 1972, p. 152 [*S.
desideratus; OD; holotype, vologDin & KAshinA,
1972, pl. 20,1, KGU 19/1, Krasnoyarsk] [=Pustu-
licyathus vologDin, 1977, p. 94 (type, P. tectus,
OD), for discussion, see Debrenne, Zhur Avlev, &
roZAnov , 1989, p. 129; Debrenne, roZA nov, &
ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 159]. Wall with multiperfo-
rate tumuli. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Altay Sayan,
Far East.——Fig. 3,2. *S. desideratus, Torgashino
Formation, Botoman, Uyar River, eastern Sayan,
Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype, KGU 19/1, transverse
section, ×15 (Vologdin & Kashina, 1972).
Family GLOBOSOCYATHIDAE
Okuneva, 1969
[Globosocyathidae oKunevA, 1969, p. 75] [=Propriolynthidae roZAnov,
1973, p. 85, nom. nud.; =Tumuloglobosidae roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom.
nud.; =?Tecticyathidae vologDin, 1977, p. 93]
Wall with bracts or scales. lower Cambrian
(Atd.2–Bot.1).
Propriolynthus oKunevA, 1967, p. 133 [*Archaeolyn-
thus vologdini YAKovlev, 1956, p. 855; OD; lecto-
type, YAKovlev, 1956, pl. 1,1, SD oKunevA, 1967,
p. 133, not located] [=Globosocyathus oK une vA,
1969, p. 75 (type, G. bellus, OD); =Tumuloglobosus
oKunevA in oKunevA & rePinA, 1973, p. 93 (type,
T. crassus, OD); =Subiculicyathus vologDin, 1977,
p. 49 (type, Archaeolynthus vologdini YA Kov le v,
1956, p. 855, OD); =?Tecticyathus vologDin,
1977, p. 93 (type, Archaeolynthus peltathus mAslov,
1961, p. 121, OD); =Propricyathus oK une vA in
vologDin, 1977, p. 100 (type, P. maritimus,
OD), for discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev,
& ro ZAnov , 1989, p. 125; Debrenne, roZAn ov,
& Zh ur Avl ev , 1990, p. 156]. Wall with pores
bearing downwardly projecting, cupped bracts.
lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Far East.——Fig.
3,3a b. *P. vo log din i (YA K ov le v ), Dmi trievka
Formation, Botoman, Spassk-Chernigovka area,
Far East, Russia, specimen PGU 30-X2; a, oblique
longitudinal section, ×3; b, tangential section, ×15
(Okuneva, 1967).
Melkanicyathus belYAevA, 1969, p. 88 [*M. limitatus;
OD; holotype, belYAevA, 1969, pl. 38,2–3, DVGU
212/5, Khabarovsk] [=Phymatocyathus vologDin,
1977, p. 72 (type, P. orillatus, OD); =Scyphocy-
athus vologDin, 1977, p. 96 (type, Rhabdocnema
operculatum mAsl ov , 1960, p. 1117, OD), for
discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov,
1989, p. 118; Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev,
1990, p. 151]. Wall with pores bearing upwardly
projecting, cupped bracts. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Altay Sayan, Far East.——Fi g. 3,4a–b. *M. limi-
tatus, Ust’toka unit, Botoman, Bol’shoy Mel’kan
River, Dzhagdy Range, Far East, Russia, holotype,
DVGU 212/5; a, oblique transverse section, ×6; b,
longitudinal section, ×6 (Belyaeva, 1969).
Family FAVILYNTHIDAE
Debrenne, 1989
[Favilynthidae Debrenne in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZ Anov, 1989,
p. 79] [=Favilynthidae Debrenne, 1974b, p. 98, nom. nud.]
Wall with canals. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–
Bot.3).
Favilynthus Debrenne in Zhur Avl evA , 1974a, p.
138 [*Monocyathus mellifer R. beDForD & W. R.
beDForD, 1936, p. 12; OD; holotype, R. beDForD &
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 5
Fig. 3. Tumuliolynthidae, Sajanolynthidae, Globosocyathidae, and Favilynthidae (p. 4–6).
Sajanolynthus
2
3a
3b
Melkanicyathus
4a
4b
Favilynthus
5b
5a
Tumuliolynthus
1
6a
6b
Robertiolynthus
Propriolynthus
6Treatise Online, number XX
W. R. beDForD, 1936, fig. 49; ZhurAvlevA, 1963b,
fig. 42; Debrenne, 1974b, pl. 19,5–6, SAM P932-
47, Adelaide]. Wall with horizontal to upwardly
projecting, straight canals. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–
Bot.3): Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Far East,
Australia, Antarctica.——Fig. 3,5a–b. *F. mellifer
(R. beDFo rD & W. r. beDFo rD), Ajax Limestone,
Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia; a,
external transverse view, holotype, SAM P932-47,
×6; b, external longitudinal view, topotype, USNM
PU9, ×6 (Debrenne, 1974b).
Robertiolynthus Zhu r Av l e v in voro n ovA and
others, 1987, p. 19 [*R. handfieldi; OD; holotype,
voronovA & others, 1987, pl. 1,1, GSC 90116,
Ottawa] [=Veolynthus boYArinov & KonYAevA
in ZhurAvlevA & others, 1997a, p. 26 (type, V.
jucundus, OD)]. Wall with horizontal to upwardly
projecting, straight canals bearing supplementary
bracts externally. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2):
Altay Sayan, Canada.——Fig. 3,6a–b. *R. hand-
fieldi Zhu rAv le v, Se kwi Forma tion, Botoma n,
Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories,
Canada; a, holotype, GSC 90116, longitudinal
section, ×19; b, paratype, GSC 90117, transverse
section, ×19 (Voronova & others, 1987).
Order AJACICYATHIDA
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1939
[nom. correct. oKuliTch, 1955a, p. 10, pro order Ajacicyathina R. beDForD
& J. beDForD, 1939, p. 70] [=?order Somphocyathina oKuliTch, 1943,
p. 47, nom. nud.; =Somphocyathida oKuliTch, 1955a, p. 19; =Nocho-
roicyathida ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879; =Dokidocyathida
vologDin, 1957a, p. 178; =Bronchocyathida ZhurAvlevA in vologDin,
1957a, p. 180; =Bosceculida KrAsnoPeevA, 1960, p. 41; =Ethmophyllida
vologDin, 1961, p. 178; =Cyclocyathellida vologDin, 1961, p. 179]
Cup two walled, solitary or low modular;
inner wall of centripetal type of devel-
opment; intervallum with septa, with or
without plate tabulae. lower Cambrian
(Tom.1–Toy.3).
Suborder DOKIDOCYATHINA
Vologdin, 1957
[nom. transl. ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 95, ex order Dokidocyathida volog-
Din, 1957a, p. 178]
Intervallum with septa bearing single
longitudinal pore row. lower Cambri an
(Tom.2–Bot.3).
Superfamily
DOKIDOCYATHOIDEA
R. Bedford & W. R. Bedford, 1936
[nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 80, pro Doki-
docyathacea Debrenne, 1970a, p. 24, nom. transl. ex Dokidocyathidae R.
beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936, p. 12]
Outer wall with simple pores. lowe r
Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3).
Family DOKIDOCYATHIDAE
R. Bedford & W. R. Bedford, 1936
[Dokidocyathidae R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936, p. 12]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3).
Dokidocyathus TAYlo r, 1910, p. 146 [*D. simpli-
cissimus; M; lectotype, TAYl o r, 1910, pl. 16,
photos 91–92; Zhu r Av le vA , Ko nY u sh K ov , &
roZA nov , 1964, pl. 4,2–3; ro ZA nov , 1973, pl.
14,1; Debrenne, 1974b, pl. 20,3; SD Debrenne,
1970a, p. 33, SAM T1589A-B, cups F-G, Adelaide]
[=?Velicyathus Debrenne, 1964, p. 125 (type, V.
levillaini, OD); =Dokidolynthus Debrenne, 1974b,
p. 101 (type, Dokidocyathus lenaicus ro ZAn ov in
ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov, 1964, p.
83, OD); =?Kamyshovaecyathus YAZmir in Zhu rAv-
le vA, 1974a, p. 183, nom. nud. based on type
species not then available; =?Kamyshovaecyathus
YAZmir in YAZmir, DA lm ATov, & YAZmir, 1975,
p. 38 (type, K. immanis, OD), for discussion, see
Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZA no v, 1989, p.
104; Debrenne, roZAnov, & Zhur Avlev , 1990,
p. 141]. Outer and inner walls with simple pores.
lower Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3): Siberian Plat-
form, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia,
Far East, Urals, Australia, Antarctica, Morocco,
Iberia.——Fig. 4,1. *D. simplicissimus, Ajax Lime-
stone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia,
Australia, lectotype, SAM T1589A-B, cups F-G,
oblique transverse view, ×2.5 (Taylor, 1910).
Family DOKIDOCYATHELLIDAE
Debrenne, 1964
[Dokidocyathellidae Debrenne, 1964, p. 112]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1).
Dokidocyathella ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 100 [*D. incog-
nita; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, fig. 73, pl.
5,3, TsSGM 205/8, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with
pores bearing upwardly projecting, S-shaped scales.
lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Far East.——Fig. 4,2. *D. incog-
nita, Pestrotsvet Formation, Atdabanian, Oy-Muran,
Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, holotype, TsSGM
205/8, transverse section, ×10 (Zhuravleva, 1960b).
Incurvocyathus roZ An ov in roZ An ov & missAr-
ZhevsKiY, 1966, p. 50 [*I. voronovae; OD; holotype,
roZAnov & missArZhevsKiY, 1966, pl. 1,4–5, PIN
4597/57, Moscow]. Cup with regular transverse
folds affecting both walls; inner wall with pores
bearing possibly upwardly projecting, S-shaped
scales. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1): Altay Sayan,
Tuva. ——Fi g. 4, 3a–b. *I . voronovae , Shangan
Formation, Botoman, eastern Tannu-Ola Range,
Tuva, Russia, holotype, PIN 4597/57; a, longi-
tudinal section (outer wall to left), ×8; b, detail
of longitudinal section (outer wall to left), ×8
(Rozanov & Missarzhevskiy, 1966).
Dokidocy-
athella: I
changed this
occurrence
of Yakutia
to Sakha
(Yakutia),
okay?
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 7
Dokidocyathus Dokidocyathella
Incurvocyathus
Cordobicyathus
12
3a
3b
4a
4b 4c
Fig. 4. Dokidocyathidae, Dokidocyathellidae, and Cordobicyathidae (p. 6–8).
8Treatise Online, number XX
Family CORDOBICYATHIDAE
Perejón, 1975
[Cordobicyathidae Perejón, 1975a, p. 136]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Atd.2).
Cordobicyathus Perejón, 1975a, p. 136 [*C .
deserti; OD; holotype, Perejón, 1975a,
pl. 3,1–3, CE 3-74-2, Madrid]. Inner wall
with upwardly projecting, S-shaped annuli.
lower Cambrian (Atd.2): Iberia, Germany,
Poland.——Fig. 4,4a–c. *C. deserti, Pedroche
Formation, Atdabanian, Las Ermitas, Cordoba,
Andalusia, Spain, holotype, CE 3-74-2; a,
transverse section, ×6.5 (Perejón, 1975a); b,
oblique section, ×6.5; c, detail of longitudinal
section (outer wall to right), ×15 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Superfamily
KIDRJASOCYATHOIDEA
Rozanov, 1964
[nom. transl. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 80, ex Kidrja-
socyathidae roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov, 1964, p.
95] [=Kidrjasocyathacea roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.]
Outer wall with independent micropo-
rous sheath. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1).
Family KIDRJASOCYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 1964
[Kidrjasocyathidae roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov,
1964, p. 95]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1).
Kidrjasocyathus roZAnov, 1960b, p. 43 [*K. uralensis;
OD; holotype, roZAnov, 1960b, fig. 1, pl. 1,1a–b;
ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & ro ZA no v, 1964,
pl. 10,3, PIN 4297/9, Moscow]. Inner wall with
simple pores. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1): Altay
Sayan, Urals.——Fig. 5a–c. *K. uralensis, Terekla
Formation, Botoman, Kidryassovo, western flank of
Southern Urals, Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/9; a,
transverse section, ×9; b, detail of transverse section
(outer wall to right), ×20 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002); c, sketch of transverse section, ×20
(Rozanov, 1960b).
Superfamily
KALTATOCYATHOIDEA
Rozanov, 1964
[nom. transl. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 80, ex Kalta-
tocyathidae roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov, 1 964,
p. 92] [=Kaltatocyathacea roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.]
Outer wall with simple tumuli. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1).
Family KALTATOCYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 1964
[Kaltatocyathidae roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov,
1964, p. 92]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1).
Kaltatocyathus roZ A no v in ZhurA vl evA , KonY-
ushKov, & roZ Anov, 1964, p. 92 [*K. kaschinae;
OD; holotype, Zhu r Av le vA , Kon Y us h Ko v , &
roZAn ov, 1964, pl. 9,7, PIN 4297/47, Moscow]
[=Aroonacyathus grAve sToc K, 1984, p. 46 (type,
A. gregarius; OD), for discussion, see Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 114; Debrenne,
roZAnov, & Zh urAvlev, 1990, p. 147]. Inner wall
with simple pores. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1):
Altay Sayan, Transbaikalia, Far East, Australia.——
Fig. 6. *K. kaschinae, Bazaikha Formation, Atdaba-
nian, Bazaikha River, eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan,
Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/47, transverse section,
×19 (Zhuravleva, Konyushkov, & Rozanov, 1964).
Superfamily
PAPILLOCYATHOIDEA
Rozanov, 1989
[Papillocyathoidea roZAn ov i n Debrenne, Zhu rAvlev , & roZAnov,
1989, p. 80] [=Papillocyathacea roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.].
Outer wall with multiperforate tumuli.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1).
Family PAPILLOCYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 1989
[Papillocyathidae roZAnov in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989,
p. 80] [=Papillocyathidae roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1).
Papillocyathus roZ An ov in ZhurAvlevA, KonY-
ushKov, & ro ZAnov, 1964, p. 94 [*P. vacuus; OD;
holotype, ZhurAvlevA, KonY ushKov, & roZ Anov,
1964, pl. 10,1–2, PIN 4297/48-2, Moscow]. Inner
wall with simple pores. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–
Bot.1): Altay Sayan.——Fig . 7a–b. *P. vacuus,
Balakhtinson Formation, Botoman, Kazyr River,
eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype, PIN
4297/48-2; a, transverse section, ×20; b, longitu-
dinal section (outer wall to right), ×20 (Zhurav-
leva, Konyushkov, & Rozanov, 1964).
Superfamily SOANICYATHOIDEA
Rozanov, 1964
[nom. transl. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 80, ex Soani-
cyathidae roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov, 1964, p.
97] [=Soanicyathacea roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.]
Outer wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 9
Family SOANICYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 1964
[Soanicyathidae roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZ Anov,
1964, p. 97]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1).
Subtilocyathus vologDin, 1960, p. 422 [*Archaeo-
cyathus subtilis vologDin, 1932, p. 41; OD;
lectotype, vologDin, 1932, fig. 32a–b, pl.
7,7, pl. 8,5b, SD Debrenne, Zhu r Av l e v , &
Kru s e, 2002, p. 1557, TsNIGRm 50a/2957,
St . Pe tersb urg] [ = Soanicyathus ro Z A n o v in
ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & ro ZA nov , 1964,
p. 98 (type, S. admirandus, OD), for discussion,
see Debrenne, Zhur Avl ev , & roZ An ov, 1989,
p. 133; Debrenne, roZ A n ov , & ZhurAvlev,
1990, p. 162]. Outer and inner walls with
pores bearing upwardly projecting, cupped
bracts. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1): Altay
Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia.——Fig . 8,1a–b. *S.
subtilis (vo lo gD in ), Verkhneynyrga Formation,
Botoman, Lebed’ River, Altay Mountains, Altay
Sayan, Russia, lectotype, TsNIGRm 50a/2957;
a, transverse section, ×4; b, detail of transverse
section, ×20 (Vologdin, 1932).
Batschykicyathus ZhurAvlev i n ZhurAvlev,
ZhurAvlevA, & Fonin, 1983, p. 23 [*B. angu-
losus; OD; holotype, Zh u r A v l e v , Zh u r Av -
le vA, & Fonin, 1983, pl. 3,4, PIN 3848/501,
Moscow]. Outer wall regularly bulging in trans-
verse files; outer and inner walls with pores
bearing upwardly projecting, cupped bracts.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4): Siberian Platform.
Fig . 8,2. *B. angulosus, Pestrotsvet Formation,
Atdabanian, Bachyk Creek, Lena River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia, holotype, PIN 3848/501,
oblique longitudinal section, ×10 (Zhuravlev,
Zhuravleva, & Fonin, 1983).
Family ZHURAVLEVAECYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 1989
[Zhuravlevaecyathidae roZAnov in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov,
1989, p. 81] [=Zhuravlevaecyathidae roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1).
Zhuravlevaecyathus roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, KonY -
ushKov, & roZAnov, 1964, p. 98 [*Z. pulchellus; OD;
holotype, ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov ,
1964, pl. 11,5–6, PIN 4297/54, Moscow]. Outer
wall with pores bearing upwardly projecting, cupped
bracts; inner wall with possibly upwardly projecting,
S-shaped annuli. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Altay
Sayan.——Fig. 8,3a–b. *Z. pulchellus, Verkhnemonok
Formation, Botoman, Abakan River, western Sayan,
Altay Sayan, Russia; a, holotype, PIN 4297/54, trans-
verse section, ×4; b, paratype, PIN 4297/55, detail of
transverse section, ×3.5 (Zhuravleva, Konyushkov, &
Rozanov, 1964).
Superfamily
KYMBECYATHOIDEA Debrenne,
Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Kymbecyathoidea Debrenne, ro ZAnov , & ZhurAvlev i n Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 81]
Outer wall with canals. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3).
Family KYMBECYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Kymbecyathidae Debrenne, r oZAnov, & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 81]
Inner wall with simple pores. low e r
Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3).
Fig. 5. Kidrjasocyathidae (p. 8).
a
b
c
Kidrjasocyathus
10 Treatise Online, number XX
Kymbecyathus Debrenne & Kruse, 1986, p. 241 [*K.
avius; OD; holotype, Debrenne & Kru se, 1986,
fig. 6A–B, VU VC9, Wellington]. Outer wall with
horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals;
inner wall with simple pores. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3): Australia, Antarctica.——Fig. 9a–b.
*K. avius, Shackleton Limestone, Botoman, Crack-
ling Cwm, Byrd Glacier, Antarctica, holotype,
VU VC9; a, transverse section, ×3 (Debrenne &
Kruse, 1986); b, oblique longitudinal section, ×3
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Suborder AJACICYATHINA
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1939
[nom. transl. ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 106, ex order Ajacicyathina R.
beDForD & J. beDForD, 1939, p. 70] [=Nochoroicyathina ZhurAvlevA
in vologDin, 1956, p. 879, nom. transl. ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 198, ex
Nochoroicyathida ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879; =Schiderty-
cyathina KrAsn oPeevA, 1969, p. 63; =Boscekulcyathina KrA snoPe evA,
1969, p. 63]
Intervallum with septa; pectinate tabulae
or synapticulae may be present. l o wer
Cambrian (Tom.1–Toy.3).
Superfamily
BRONCHOCYATHOIDEA
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1936
[nom. transl. ZhurAvlev in voronovA & others, 1987, p. 20, ex Broncho-
cyathidae r. beDForD & j. beDForD, 1936, p. 25] [=Ajacicyathoidea r.
beDForD & J. beDForD, 1939, p. 73, nom. correct. Debrenne & Kruse,
1986, p. 242, pro Ajacicyathacea ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 106, nom. transl. ex
Ajacicyathidae r. beDForD & j. beDForD, 1939, p. 73; =Nochoroicyathacea
ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879, nom. transl. ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p.
198, ex Nochoroicyathidae ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879; =Aldano-
cyathacea ZADoroZhnAYA, osADchAYA, & rePinA, 1973, p. 129, nom. transl.
Korshunov, 1983a, p. 96, ex Aldanocyathinae ZADoroZhnAYA, osADchAYA,
& rePinA, 1973, p. 129; =Irinacyathacea ZhurAvlevA in Debrenne, 1972, p.
174, nom. neg.; =Irinaecyathacea ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & elKinA, 1974,
p. 44; =Inessocyathacea ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & elKinA, 1974, p. 45]
Outer wall with simple pores. lowe r
Cambrian (Tom.1–Toy.2).
Family AJACICYATHIDAE
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1939
[Ajacicyathidae R. beDForD & J . beDForD, 1939, p. 73] [=Nochoroicy-
athidae ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879; =Kisasacyathidae KonY-
ushKov, 1972, p. 137; =Aldanocyathidae ZADoroZhnAYA, osADchAYA, &
rePinA, 1973, p. 129]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Tom.1–Toy.2).
Ajacicyathus R. beDFo rD & J. beDFo rD, 1939, p. 73
[*Archaeocyathus ajax TAYlor, 1910, p. 118; OD;
lectotype, TAYlo r, 1910, pl. 1, photo 1a, pl. 7,
photo 39 (below); hill, 1965, pl. 1,6; Debrenne,
1974b, pl. 21,2–4; SD De br e nn e , 1970a, p.
27, SAM T1550A, Adelaide] [=Loculicyathellus
Debrenne, 1969a, p. 310 (type, Archaeocyathus
floreus R. beD Fo rD & W. r. be DFo rD , 1934, p.
2, OD), nom. transl. Debrenne, 1974b, p. 115, ex
Loculicyathus (Loculicyathellus) Debrenne, 1969a, p.
310; =Ajacicyathus (Juricyathus) Debrenne, 1974b,
p. 110 (type, Archaeocyathus aequitriens R. beDForD
& j. beDForD, 1937, p. 35, OD); =Ambistapis
Kruse, 1982, p. 161 (type, A. integer, OD)]. Inner
wall with several rows of simple pores per inter-
sept; stirrup pores may be present; septa aporose
to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Toy.2):
Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia,
Far East, Australia, Antarctica, Sardinia, France,
Canada.——Fig. 10,1a–b. *A. ajax (TAYlor), Ajax
Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia,
Fig. 6. Kaltatocyathidae (p. 8).
Fig. 7. Papillocyathidae (p. 8).
Kaltatocyathus
Papillocyathus
a
b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 11
Australia, lectotype, SAM T1550A; a, oblique
longitudinal view, ×1 (Taylor, 1910); b, detail of
septum and inner wall in longitudinal view (outer
wall to right), ×10 (Debrenne, 1974b).
Davidicyathus Debrenne, roZA nov, & ZhurAvlev,
1990, p. 139 [*?Loculicyathus racemiferus grAve-
sTocK, 1984, p. 48; OD; holotype, grAvesTocK,
1984, fig. 32H, 32L, SAM P21452, Adelaide].
Outer wall with two sizes of pores, the smaller
either isolated or clustered over the larger; inner
wall with several rows of simple pores per inter-
sept; septa completely porous. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4): Australia.——Fig. 10,2a–c. *D. racemiferus
(grAvesTocK); a–b, Wilkawillina Limestone, Atda-
banian, Wilkawillina Gorge, South Australia,
Australia, holotype, SAM P21452, a, transverse
section, ×4; b, longitudinal section, ×9.5 (Grave-
stock, 1984); c, Ajax Limestone, Atdabanian,
Mount Scott Range, South Australia, Australia,
SAM P21455-1, tangential section of outer wall,
×15 (M. Debrenne, new).
Dentatocyathus oKun evA, 1972, p. 57 [*D. mari-
timus; OD; holotype, oK une vA, 1972, pl. 10,7,
PGU 202, Khabarovsk]. Outer wall longitudinally
plicate; inner wall with several rows of simple
pores per intersept; septa completely porous. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1): Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Far
East.——Fig. 11,1a–b. *D. maritimus, Dmitrievka
Fig. 8. Soanicyathidae and Zhuravlevaecyathidae (p. 9).
1a
1b
3a
3b
2
Subtilocyathus
Batschykicyathus
Zhuravlevaecyathus
12 Treatise Online, number XX
Formation, Botoman, Knorring Hill, Spassk-
Chernigovka area, Far East, Russia, holotype, PGU
202; a, transverse section, ×5; b, detail of transverse
section (outer wall to right), ×10 (Okuneva, 1972).
Iljinicyathus ZhurAvl evA, 1972b, p. 155 [*I. ulan-
batoriensis; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA, 1972b,
pl. 21,1–3, TsSGM 755/1, Novosibirsk]. Cup
in which inner wall shows periodic transverse
folds; inner wall with several rows of simple pores
per intersept; septa completely porous; pectinate
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–
Atd.4): Mongolia.——Fig. 11,2a–b. *I. ulanbato-
riensis, formation not known, Atdabanian, northern
Mongolia, holotype, TsSGM 755/1; a, transverse
section, ×4; b, longitudinal section (outer wall to
right), ×5 (Zhuravleva, 1972b).
Kisasacyathus KonYushKov, 1972, p. 137 [*K. micro-
tumulatus; OD; holotype, KonYushKov, 1972, pl.
16,1, PIN 4755/7, Moscow] [=Prethmophyllum
Debrenne, 1974c, p. 174 (type, Archaeocyathus
subacutus R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1934,
p. 2, OD)]. Inner wall with one row of simple
pores per intersept, formed by fluting of inner
edges of septa; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3): Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mongolia, Far East, Australia, Antarctica.——Fig.
11,3a–b. *K. microtumulatus, Verkhnemonok Forma-
tion, Botoman, Kizas River, western Sayan, Altay
Sayan, Russia; a, holotype, PIN 4755/7, oblique
longitudinal section, ×6; b, paratype, PIN 4755/8,
transverse section, ×6 (Konyushkov, 1972).
Nochoroicyathus Zhur Av le vA , 1951, p. 78 [*N.
mirabilis; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA, 1951, fig.
1a–b, PIN 1168, Moscow, not located] [=Ajacicy-
athellus Debrenne, 1958, p. 64 (type, A. hollardi,
M); =Ascocyathus vologDin, 1960, p. 422 (type,
Archaeocyathus arteintervallum vologDin, 1931,
p. 84, OD); =Howellicyathus vologDin, 1961, p.
180, nom. nud.; =Howellicyathus vologDin, 1962a,
p. 126 (type, Coscinocyathus howelli vologDin,
1940b, p. 88, OD); =Pachecocyathus Perejón,
1971, p. 81 (type, P. cabanasi, OD); =Aldanocy-
athus voronin in Debrenne & voronin, 1971,
p. 30 (type, Ajacicyathus sunnaginicus ZhurAvlevA,
1960b, p. 115, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 120; Debrenne,
roZ An ov , & Zh ur Avl ev , 1990, p. 153]. Inner
wall with several rows of simple pores per inter-
sept; septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae
may be present. lower Cambrian (Tom.1–Bot.3):
Siberian Platform, Kolyma, Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far East, Urals, Kazakh-
stan, Tarim, Australia, Morocco, Iberia, France,
Sardinia, Germany, Serbia.——Fig. 11,4a–c. *N.
mirabilis; a, Pestrotsvet Formation, Tommotian,
Nokhoroy Creek, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia),
Russia, holotype, PIN 1168, transverse section,
×6 (Zhuravleva, 1951); b–c, Medvezh’ya Forma-
tion, Tommotian, Kotuy River, Krasnoyarsk region,
Russia; b, TsSGM 205/87, detail of septum in
longitudinal section (outer wall to left), ×6; c,
specimen TsSGM 205/88, detail of transverse
section at inner wall, ×20 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002).
Orbiasterocyathus ZhurAvle vA in rePin A & others,
1964, p. 183 [*O. geri; OD; holotype, reP inA &
others, 1964, pl. 11,6, TsSGM 4272/5, Novosi-
birsk]. Cup in which both walls are longitudinally
folded, resulting in stellate transverse section;
inner wall with several rows of simple pores per
intersept; septa completely porous. lower Cambrian
(Atd.3–Atd.4): Altay Sayan.——Fi g. 11,5. *O .
geri, Adiak Formation, Atdabanian, Terensu River,
Gornaya Shoria, Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype,
TsSGM 4272/5, transverse section, ×4 (Repina &
others, 1964).
Fig. 9. Kymbecyathidae (p. 10).
a
b
Kymbecyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 13
Fig. 10. Ajacicyathidae (p. 10–11).
Orbicyathellus osADchAYA in ZADoroZh nAYA, osAD-
chAYA, & rePin A, 1973, p. 133 [*O. bogradi; OD;
holotype, ZADoroZhnAYA, osADchAYA, & rePinA,
1973, pl. 19,1–2, TsSGM 424/1, Novosibirsk].
Cup in which both walls show periodic, synchro-
nous transverse folds; inner wall with stirrup
pores only; septa aporose to sparsely porous. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.4): Siberian Platform, Altay
Sayan, Mongolia.——Fig. 12,1a–b. *O. bogradi,
Usa Formation, Atdabanian, Bograd, Batenev
Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, holotype, TsSGM
424/1; a, oblique longitudinal section, ×4.5; b,
tangential section of inner wall, ×12 (Zadorozh-
naya, Osadchaya, & Repina, 1973).
Orbicyathus vologDin, 1937b, p. 468 [*O. mongo-
licus; M; holotype, vologDin, 1937b, pl. 2,4,
1a
1b Ajacicyathus
2c
2a
Davidicyathus
2b
you asked me
to transpose
the labels
for views 2a
and 2b, but
according to
the mockup,
2b and 2c
needed to
be switched.
Okay now?
14 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 11. Ajacicyathidae (p. 11–16).
4c
1a
Iljinicyathus
2b
2a
1b
Dentatocyathus
4a
4b
3a
3b
Kisasacyathus
Nochoroicyathus
5
Orbiasterocyathus
Orbicyathus
6b
6a
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 15
Fig. 12. Ajacicyathidae (p. 13–16).
Orbicyathellus
Robustocyathellus
2b
2a
1b
1a
3
Rotundocyathus
5
4b
4a
Sibirecyathus
Stapicyathus Urcyathus
6
1a
16 Treatise Online, number XX
not located]. Cup in which both walls show peri-
odic, synchronous transverse folds; inner wall
with several rows of simple pores per intersept;
septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae may
be present. lower Cambrian (Tom.4–Bot.1): Sibe-
rian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia,
Transbaikalia, Morocco.——Fig. 11,6a–b. *O.
mongolicus, Burgasutay Formation, Atdabanian,
Seer’ Mountains, Ikh nuuruundyn hotgor, western
Mongolia, holotype; a, longitudinal section, ×3;
b, schematic reconstruction of cup, ×2 (Vologdin,
1937b).
Robustocyathellus KonYushKov, 1972, p. 133 [*R.
spinosus; OD; holotype, Ko nYu shKo v, 1972, pl.
13,1, not located]. Inner wall with one row of
simple pores per intersept; septa aporose to sparsely
porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3): Siberian
Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Trans-
baikalia, Far East, Tajikistan, southern China,
Canada.——Fig. 12,2a–b. *R. spinosus, Verkh-
nemonok Formation, Botoman, Kizas River,
western Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype; a,
oblique longitudinal section, ×6; b, longitudinal
section, ×3 (Konyushkov, 1972).
Rotundocyathus vologDin, 1960, p. 422 [*R.
rotaceus; OD; holotype, vologDin, 1960, fig.
1zh, not located]. Inner wall with one row of
simple pores per intersept; septa completely porous;
pectinate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(At d.2–Bot.1): Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan,
Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far East, Tarim,
Morocco, Iberia, France, Sardinia.——Fig . 12,3.
*R. rotaceus, Verkhneynyrga Formation, Botoman,
Lebed’ River, Altay Mountains, Altay Sayan, Russia,
holotype, transverse section, ×1 (Vologdin, 1960).
Sibirecyathus vologDin, 1937b, p. 468 [*S. nale-
tovi; M; holotype not designated, collection not
located]. Inner wall with one row of simple pores
per intersept; septa completely porous, linked by
synapticulae. lower Cambrian (Tom.3–Bot.3): Sibe-
rian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Trans-
baikalia, Far East, southern China, Morocco, Iberia,
France, Sardinia, Germany.——Fig. 12,4a–b.
*S. naletovi, Burgasutay Formation, Botoman,
Seer’ Mountains, Ikh nuuruundyn hotgor, western
Mongolia, a, unlocated syntype, transverse section,
×4; b, unlocated syntype, oblique longitudinal
section, ×4 (Vologdin, 1937b).
Stapicyathus Debrenne, 1964, p. 127, nom. transl.
Debrenne, 1970a, p. 43, ex Archaeocyathellus
(Stapicyathus) Debrenne, 1964, p. 127 [*Archaeo-
cyathus stapipora TAYlor, 1910, p. 118; OD; lecto-
type, TAYlor, 1910, pl. 7, photos 37a, 38D, 38G;
Debrenne, 1974b, pl. 24,1; SD Debrenne, 1970a,
p. 43, SAM T1591, Adelaide] [=Sivovicyathus
KonYus hKov, 1972, p. 134 (type, S. abakanensis,
OD); =Nochoroicyathellus osADchAYA in osADchAYA
& others, 1979, p. 154 (type, N. activus, OD), for
discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov,
1989, p. 132; Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev,
1990, p. 161]. Inner wall with stirrup pores only;
septa aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate tabulae
may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.3):
Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia,
Transbaikalia, Far East, Australia, Antarctica, South
Africa (allochthonous).——Fig. 12,5. *S. stapipora
(TAYlor), Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine,
South Australia, Australia, lectotype, SAM T1591,
oblique longitudinal section, ×4 (Taylor, 1910).
Urcyathus vologDin, 1940b, p. 64 [*U. asteroides;
OD; holotype, vologDin, 1940b, pl. 14,5, not
located] [=Pectenocyathus KAshinA in rePinA &
others, 1964, p. 211 (type, P. torgaschinicus, OD),
for discussion, see Debrenne, Zhur Av le v , &
roZ An ov , 1989, p. 139; Debrenne, roZ An ov ,
& ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 166]. Inner wall longitu-
dinally plicate, with several rows of simple pores
per intersept; septa completely porous; pectinate
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–
Atd.2): Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Iberia,
Germany.——Fig. 12,6. *U. asteroides, Gavr-
ilovskoe Formation, Atdabanian, Gorskino, Salair,
Russia, holotype, oblique transverse section, ×9
(Vologdin, 1940b).
Family DENSOCYATHIDAE
Vologdin, 1937
[Densocyathidae vologDin, 1937b, p. 471] [=Leptosocyathidae volog-
Din, 1961, p. 178; =Tennericyathidae roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, Korshu-
nov, & roZAnov, 1969, p. 34]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3).
Densocyathus vologDin, 1937b, p. 471 [*D.
sanaschticolensis; M; holotype not designated,
collection not located]. Inner wall with several rows
of pores per intersept, bearing upwardly projecting,
S-shaped scales; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3): Altay Sayan.——
Fig. 13,1. *D. sanaschticolensis, Verkhnemonok
Formation, Botoman, Sanashtykgol Spring,
western Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia; unlocated
syntype, transverse section of modular skeleton,
×5 (Vologdin, 1937b).
Cadniacyathus R. be DFor D & J. beDF orD, 1937, p.
36 [*C. asperatus; OD; lectotype, R. beDForD & j.
beDForD, 1937, fig. 152; Debrenne, 1974b, pl. 27,2;
SD Debrenne, 1970a, p. 30, USNM PU86616(1),
Washington, D.C.]. Inner wall with several rows of
pores per intersept, bearing upwardly projecting,
planar fused bracts; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia, ?Antarctica.——
Fig. 13,2. *C. asperatus, Ajax Limestone, Botoman,
Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia, lectotype,
USNM PU86616(1), oblique transverse view, ×3
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Dailycyathus Debrenne, 1970a, p. 32 [*Paranacyathus
margarita R. beDFo rD & J. beD Fo rD , 1937, p.
34; OD; lectotype, R. beDF or D & j. be DF or D,
1937, fig. 138b–c; Debrenne, 1970a, pl. 1,5;
SD Debrenne, 1970a, p. 32, USNM PU87214,
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 17
Fig. 13. Densocyathidae (p. 16–18).
2
1
Densocyathus
Cadniacyathus
3b
3a
Dailycyathus
4b
4a Deceptioncyathus
5
Khirgisocyathus
18 Treatise Online, number XX
specimen 304, Washington, D.C.] [=Joanaecy-
athus grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 53 (type, J. cupu-
losus, OD; =Paranacyathus margarita R. be DFor D
& J. beDF or D, 1937, p. 34), for discussion, see
Debrenne, roZ An ov , & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p.
139]. Inner wall with one row of pores per inter-
sept, bearing upwardly projecting, cupped bracts;
septa aporose to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3): Altay Sayan, Mongolia, southern
China, Australia.——Fig. 13,3a–b. *D. margarita
(r. be D Fo rD & j. beD Fo rD ), Ajax Limestone,
Atdabanian, Paint Mine, South Australia, Australia;
a, lectotype, USNM PU87214, specimen 304,
transverse view near cup base, ×5; b, paralectotype,
USNM PU87215, tangential view of inner wall,
×5 (Debrenne, 1970a).
Deceptioncyathus grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 53 [*D.
synapticulosus; OD; holotype, gr A v es T o c K ,
1984, fig. 34H–J, SAM P21504-1, Adelaide].
Inner wall with one row of pores per intersept,
bearing upwardly projecting cupped bracts; septa
completely porous, linked by synapticulae. lower
Cambrian (Atd.4): Australia.——Fi g. 13,4a–b.
*D. synapticulosus, Ajax Limestone, Atdabanian,
Mount Scott Range, South Australia, Australia,
holotype, SAM P21504-1; a, transverse section,
×2; b, longitudinal section, ×2 (Gravestock,
1984).
Khirgisocyathus voronin, 1988, p. 5 [*K. primus;
OD; holotype, voronin, 1988, pl. 2,1, PIN
3301/511, Moscow]. Inner wall with several rows
of pores per intersept, bearing upwardly projecting
cupped bracts; septa completely porous. lower
Cambrian (Atd.2): Mongolia.——Fig . 13,5. *K.
primus, Ichituin Formation, Atdabanian, Boro-
Khairkhan-Obo Mountain, Khan-Khukhiy Range,
Mongolia, holotype, PIN 3301/511, oblique trans-
verse section, ×9 (Voronin, 1988).
Leptosocyathellus osADchAYA in osADchAYA & others,
1979, p. 119 [*L. mirandus; OD; holotype, osAD-
chAYA & others, 1979, pl. 5,3, VSEGEI 11594,
St. Petersburg]. Inner wall with stirrup pores only,
bearing upwardly projecting, S-shaped scales;
septa completely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–
Atd.4): Altay Sayan, Iberia.——Fig. 14,1a–b. *L.
mirandus; a, Usa Formation, Atdabanian, Krutoy
Log, Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, holo-
type, VSEGEI 11594, transverse section, ×8.5; b,
Usa Formation, Atdabanian, Srednyaya Mountain,
Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, VSEGEI
C-69, oblique longitudinal section, ×8 (Osadchaya
& others, 1979).
Leptosocyathus vologDin, 1937b, p. 470 [*L .
curviseptum; OD; holotype, vologDin, 1937b,
fig. 14, not located; =Leptocyathus curvisep-
tatus vologDin, 1940a, p. 146] [=Leptocyathus
vologDin, 1937b, p. 468, nom. null. pro Leptoso-
cyathus vologDin, 1937b, p. 470; non Leptocyathus
milne-eDWArD s & hAime, 1850, a scleractinian;
=Halysicyathus Debrenne, 1965, p. 144 (type, H.
multifurcus, OD)]. Inner wall with one row of
pores per intersept, bearing upwardly projecting,
S-shaped scales; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far
East, Tajikistan, Australia, Antarctica, Morocco,
Iberia.——Fig. 14,2a–c. *L. curviseptus, Burgasutay
Formation, Botoman, Seer’ Mountains, Ikh nuuru-
undyn hotgor, western Mongolia; a–b, holotype; a,
transverse section, ×1; b, oblique transverse section
of inner wall, ×1 (Vologdin, 1937b); c, topotype,
PIN 3156/3000, transverse section, ×9 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Natalijaecyathus KoTe ln i Kov , 1995, p. 23 [*N.
vadibalaensis; OD; holotype, KoTe lniKov , 1995,
fig. 1d, pl. 2,7, TsNIGRm 12890/4, St. Petersburg].
Inner wall with stirrup pores only, bearing upwardly
projecting, S-shaped scales; longitudinal bars may
be present, bisecting stirrup pores; septa completely
porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.2): Tuva.——Fig .
14,3a–b . *N. va di balae nsis, Ilchir Formation,
Atdabanian, Vadi-Bala Creek, Tapsa River, Tuva,
Russia, holotype, TsNIGRm 12890/4; a, oblique
transverse section, ×5.5; b, detail of oblique trans-
verse section, ×9 (Kotel’nikov, 1995).
Rectannulus Debrenne, 1977a, p. 106 [*R. wille-
fertae; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1977a, pl. 6,2–3,
MNHN M80026, specimen IRH4-2b, Paris]. Inner
wall with stirrup pores only, bearing horizontal
to upwardly projecting, S-shaped scales; scales
may be fused into pseudoannuli; septa sparsely to
completely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1):
Morocco.——Fig . 15,1a–b. *R. willefertae, Issafen
Formation, Botoman, Jbel Irhoud, Morocco, holo-
type, MNHN M80026, specimen IRH4-2b; a,
detail of transverse section, ×5 (Debrenne, 1977a);
b, oblique longitudinal section, ×5 (M. Debrenne,
new).
Tennericyathus roZ A no v in Zhur Avl ev A, Kor s -
hunov, & ro Z An o v , 1969, p. 35 (roZ A n o v
in ro Z A n o v & others, 1969, p. 182, nom.
nud.) [*T. malycanicus; OD; holotype, Zhu rAv-
le vA, Korshunov, & roZA n ov, 1969, pl. 4,5;
roZA nov , 1973, pl. 9,4, PIN 4297/79, Moscow,
not located] [=Memoriacyathus YAZmir in
ZhurAvlevA, 1974a, p. 215, nom. nud.; =Memo-
riacyathus YAZmir in YAZmir, DAl m A To v , &
YAZmir, 1975, p. 47 (type, M. burjaticus, OD);
=Raropectinus Debrenne & ro Z An o v , 1983,
p. 73 5, nom. nov. pr o Ra roc yathu s osA D ch AY A
in os A D c h AY A & oth ers , 1 979, p. 155 , n o n
volo gD in & jAnK Au sK As , 1968, p. 203, cribri-
cyath (type, R. rarus, OD), for discussion, see
Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZA no v, 1989, p.
135; Debrenne, roZA nov , & ZhurAvlev, 1990,
p. 163]. Inner wall with several rows of pores per
intersept, bearing upwardly projecting, S-shaped
scales; septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae
may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1):
Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia,
Transbaikalia, Far East.——Fig . 15,2. *T. maly-
canicus, Pestrotsvet Formation, Atdabanian,
Malykan, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia,
holotype, PIN 4297/79, detail of oblique trans-
verse section, ×15 (Zhuravleva, Korshunov, &
Rozanov, 1969).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 19
Family BRONCHOCYATHIDAE
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1936
[Bronchocyathidae R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1936, p. 25] [=Stillicido-
cyathidae Ting, 1937, p. 367; =Thalamocyathidae ZhurAvlevA, 1954, p.
28; =Cyclocyathellidae ZhurAvlevA, 1960c, p. 74; =Trininaecyathidae De-
brenne, 1964, p. 114; =Compositocyathidae ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAv l evA
& others, 1967, p. 52; =Glaessnericyathidae Debrenne, 1970a, p. 35]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Atd.1–Bot.3).
Thalamocyathus gorDon, 1920, p. 687 [*Archaeo-
cyathus trachealis TAYlor, 1910, p. 125; SD Ting,
1937, p. 368, by elimination; lectotype, TAYlor ,
1910, pl. 8, photo 47(8); hill, 1965, pl. 7,1;
Debrenne, 1973, pl. 1,6; SD Debrenne, 1969b,
p. 262; SAM T1555A, Adelaide] [=Bronchocyathus
R. be DF or D & J. beDFo rD , 1936, p. 25 (type,
Archaeocyathus trachealis TAYlo r, 1910, p. 125,
OD); =Thalamopectinus Debrenne, 1973, p. 8
(type, T. arterialis, OD; =Archaeocyathus trache-
alis TAYl or , 1910, p. 125), for discussion, see
Debrenne & Kruse, 1989, p. 27; =Gordonicyathella
YAZmir in ZhurAvlevA, 1974a, p. 160, nom. nud.;
=Gordonicyathellus YAZmir in YAZmir, DA lmATov,
& YAZmir, 1975, p. 48 (type, G. solidus, OD), for
discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov,
1989, p. 136; Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev,
1990, p. 164]. Inner wall with one pore row per
intersept and upright, V-shaped annuli; septa
aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate tabulae may
be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.3): Altay
Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Australia,
Antarctica, South Africa (allochthonous), ?Falk-
land Islands (allochthonous).——Fi g. 16,1a–b.
*T. trachealis (TAYlor), Ajax Limestone, Botoman,
Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia, lectotype,
SAM T1555A; a, transverse view, ×3.5 (Debrenne,
1973); b, external longitudinal view of cup, ×8
(Taylor, 1910).
Fig. 14. Densocyathidae (p. 18).
1a
Leptosocyathellus
Leptosocyathus
Natalijaecyathus
2b
2a
1b
2c
3a
3b
20 Treatise Online, number XX
Compositocyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 159
[*Thalamocyathus muchattensis ZhurAvlevA in
ZhurAvlevA & Zelenov, 1955, p. 71; OD;
holotype, ZhurAvlevA & Zelenov, 1955, pl.
2,1–2; Zhur Avle vA, 1960b, pl. 10,3–5, TsSGM
205/47a-b, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with one pore
row per intersept and planar annuli bearing short
beams that support supplementary microporous
sheath; septa aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–
Bot.1): Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Transbaikalia.——Fig. 16,2a–b. *C. muchattensis
(ZhurAvlevA), Pestrotsvet Formation, Atdabanian,
Mukhatta River, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia),
Russia; a, holotype, TsSGM 205/47b, longitudinal
section (outer wall to left), ×7 (Zhuravleva &
Zelenov, 1955); b, specimen TsSGM 323, oblique
transverse section, ×7 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002).
Conannulofungia YuAn in Yu An & ZhAng, 1980,
p. 383 [*C. jinshaensis; OD; holotype, Yu A n
& ZhAng, 1980, pl. 2,1af, NIGP 51288,
Nanjing]. Inner wall with one pore row per
intersept and upwardly projecting, S-shaped
annuli linked to septa by ribs; septa completely
porous, linked by synapticulae. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.2): southern China.——Fi g .
17,1a–c. *C. jinshaensis, Minxinsi (Minghs-
in gs su ) Fo rm a ti on , Bo t om an , Ya n ko ng ,
Guizhou, China; a–b, holotype, NIGP 51288;
a, transverse section, ×4; b, longitudinal section
near inner wall, ×4 (Yuan & Zhang, 1980); c,
specimen MNHN M85006, longitudinal section
near inner wall, ×8 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002).
Cyathocricus Debrenne, 1969a, p. 318 [*Archaeo-
cyathus tracheodentatus R. be D Fo r D & W. R.
beDForD, 1934, p. 2; OD; lectotype, R. beDForD &
W. r. beDForD, 1934, fig. 5; Debrenne, 1969a, pl.
5,4–5; SD Debrenne, 1969a, p. 319, NHM S4148,
London; =Ethmophyllum dentatum TAYl or, 1910,
p. 129; lectotype, TAYlor, 1910, pl. 16, photo 89;
Fig. 15. Densocyathidae (p. 18).
2
Tennericyathus
Rectannulus
1b
1a
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 21
Debrenne, 1970a, pl. 1,1; SD Debrenne, 1974b,
p. 132, SAM T1606C-D, Adelaide] [=Cricopectinus
Debrenne, 1970a, p. 32 (type, C. dentulus, OD)].
Inner wall with one pore row per intersept and
commonly horizontally projecting waved annuli
that may mutually coalesce; denticles may be
present on annular rims; septa aporose to sparsely
porous; pectinate tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (?Atd.4–Bot.3): Altay Sayan, Tuva, Far
East, Australia, Antarctica, ?Morocco.——Fig.
17,2a–c. *C. dentatus (TAYlo r), Ajax Limestone,
Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia,
lectotype, SAM T1606C-D; a, transverse view,
×6; b, oblique longitudinal view, ×5 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); c, oblique longitudinal
view, ×4 (Taylor, 1910).
Cyclocyathella vologDin in Zhu r Avl e vA, KrAs-
noPe evA, & chernYshevA, 1960, p. 105 [*Cyclo-
cyathus yakovlevi vologDin, 1931, p. 49; OD;
lectotype, vologDin, 1931, pl. 4,7–8; SD
Debrenne, ZhurAvle v, & Krus e, 2002, p. 1569,
TsNIGRm 44a/2956, St. Petersburg] [=Cyclocyathus
vologDin, 1928, p. 30, nom. nud., non milne-
eDWAr Ds & hAime, 1850, p. liv, scleractinian,
Fig. 16. Bronchocyathidae (p. 19–20).
2a
Compositocyathus
2b
1a
1b
Thalamocyathus
22 Treatise Online, number XX
nec DuncAn & ThomPson, 1867, p. 1, rugose
coral; =Cyclocyathus simon, 1939, p. 27 (type, C.
yakovlevi vologDin, 1931, p. 49)]. Inner wall with
one pore row per intersept and inverted V-shaped
annuli; septa completely porous. lower Cambrian
(Atd.2): Altay Sayan, Tuva, Far East.——Fi g.
18,1a–c. *C. yakovlevi (vologDin), Torgashino
Formation, Atdabanian, Kameshki, eastern Sayan,
Altay Sayan, Russia; a, paralectotype, TsNIGRm
45/2956, transverse section, ×6; b, paralectotype,
TsNIGRm 47a/2956, longitudinal section, ×6; c,
schematic sketch of septum in longitudinal section
(outer wall to left), ×8 (Vologdin, 1931).
Denaecyathus ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & others,
1967, p. 57 [*D. biporosus; OD; holotype, ZhurAv-
levA & others, 1967, pl. 17,5–6, TsSGM 325/17,
Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with several pore rows
per intersept and upright, V-shaped annuli; septa
aporose to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far
East.——Fig . 18,2a–c. *D. biporosus, Shangan
Formation, Botoman, Shivelig-Khem River, eastern
Tannu-Ola Range, Tuva, Russia; a, holotype,
TsSGM 325/17, oblique transverse section, ×5;
b, paratype, TsSGM 325/16, oblique longitudinal
section (outer wall at bottom), ×5; c, holotype,
TsSGM 325/17, oblique transverse section (outer
wall to left), ×5 (Zhuravleva & others, 1967).
Gordonicyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1959, p. 426 [*Thala-
mocyathus gerassimovensis KrAsnoPeevA, 1955, p.
95; OD; holotype not designated, collection not
located] [=Sichotecyathus oKu ne vA in oK une vA
& re PinA, 1973, p. 138 (type, S. orientalis, OD),
for discussion, see Debrenne, Zhur Av le v , &
roZ An ov , 1989, p. 109; Debrenne, roZ An ov ,
& ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 144]. Inner wall with
one pore row per intersept and upright, V-shaped
annuli; septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae
may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3):
Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia,
Transbaikalia, Far East, Australia.——Fig. 18,3.
*G. gerassimovensis (KrAsno PeevA), Verkhnemonok
Formation, Botoman, Gerasimov Spring, Monok
River, western Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, unlo-
cated syntype, oblique transverse section, ×7 (Kras-
nopeeva, 1955).
Gordonifungia roZAnov in rePinA & others, 1964,
p. 193 [*G. batinensis; OD; holotype, rePinA &
others, 1964, pl. 11,1, PIN 4297/24, Moscow].
Inner wall with one pore row per intersept and
upright, V-shaped annuli; septa completely porous,
linked by synapticulae. lower Cambrian (Atd.3–
Bot.1): Altay Sayan, ?Morocco.——Fig. 19,1. *G.
batinensis, Usa Formation, Atdabanian, Verkhnyaya
Erba, Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia,
holotype, PIN 4297/24, oblique transverse section,
×4 (Repina & others, 1964).
Morenicyathus Perejón, 1975b, p. 169 [*M. arru-
zafai; OD; holotype, Perejón, 1975b, pl. 6,5–6;
Perejón, 1975c, pl. 6,8–9, CE 62-14, Madrid;
=Archaeocyathellus (Protocyathus) cordobae simon,
1939, p. 74; holotype, simon, 1939, pl. 2,11,
SM 26-179e, Frankfurt am Main] [=Kellericyathus
roZAnov, 1973, p. 61, nom. nud.; =Denaecyathellus
osA Dc h AY A in osADc h AY A & others, 1979, p.
122 (type, D. makarichus, OD); =Kellericyathus
roZAnov in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev , & roZAnov,
1989, p. 114 (type, K. altaicus, OD)]. Inner wall
with several pore rows per intersept and upright,
V-shaped annuli; septa completely porous. lower
Cambrian (Atd.2–Atd.3): Kolyma, Altay Sayan,
Iberia.——Fig. 19,2a–b. *M. cordobae (simon)
[=M. arruzafai Perejón], Pedroche Formation,
Atdabanian, Las Ermitas, Cordoba, Andalusia,
Spain, holotype, CE 62-14; a, oblique transverse
section, ×4; b, detail of longitudinal section (outer
wall to left), ×8 (Perejón, 1975c).
Pseudotennericyathellus osADchAYA in osADchAYA &
others, 1979, p. 120 [*Tennericyathus latus osAD-
chAYA in ZADoroZhnAYA, osADchAYA, & rePinA,
1973, p. 134; OD; holotype, ZADoroZhnAYA,
osADchAYA, & reP inA, 1973, pl. 19,3; osA DchAYA
& others, 1979, pl. 5,1–2, TsSGM IGiG424,
Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with several pore rows per
intersept and upwardly projecting, S-shaped annuli;
septa completely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–
Atd.4): Altay Sayan, Mongolia.——Fig. 19,3a–b.
*P. latus (osADchAYA), Usa Formation, Atdabanian,
Bograd, Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia,
holotype, TsSGM IGIG424; a, transverse section,
×9; b, longitudinal section (outer wall to left), ×9
(Osadchaya & others, 1979).
Sagacyathus Kruse , 1982, p. 178 [*S. stonyx; OD;
holotype, Kruse, 1982, fig. 15D–H, AM F.83576,
Sydney]. Inner wall with one pore row per intersept
and upright, V-shaped annuli bearing denticu-
late rims; septa aporose to sparsely porous; pecti-
nate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3): Altay Sayan, Mongolia, Far East,
Australia.——Fig. 19,4a–c. *S. stonyx, Cymbric
Vale Formation, Botoman, Mt. Wright, New South
Wales, Australia, holotype, AM F.83576 ; a, trans-
verse section AM FT.8487, ×6; b, oblique longi-
tudinal section AM FT.8486, ×4; c, longitudinal
section AM FT.8490, ×4 (Kruse, 1982).
Stillicidocyathus Ting, 1937, p. 367 [*Coscinocyathus
aulax TAYlor, 1910, p. 139; OD; lectotype, TAYlor,
1910, pl. 10, photo 57; SD Debrenne, 1969b, p.
263, sAm T1605A-B, Adelaide] [=Glaessnericyathus
Debrenne, 1970a, p. 35 (type, Bronchocyathus
sigmoideus R. beDFor D & J. beDF or D, 1936, p.
25, OD), for discussion, see grAvesTocK, 1984, p.
69; Debrenne, ZhurAvlev , & roZAnov, 1989, p.
133; Debrenne, roZAnov, & Zhur Avlev , 1990,
p. 162]. Inner wall with one pore row per intersept
and upwardly projecting, S-shaped annuli; septa
aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate tabulae may
be present. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3): Altay
Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Australia, Antarctica,
Iberia, Sardinia.——Fig. 20,1. *C. aulax (TAYlor),
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 23
2b
2a
2c
Cyathocricus
1a
1b Conannulofungia
1c
Fig. 17. Bronchocyathidae (p. 20–21).
24 Treatise Online, number XX
Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South
Australia, Australia, lectotype, SAM T1605A-B,
longitudinal view, ×7 (Taylor, 1910).
Svetlanocyathus missArZhevsKiY & roZ Anov, 1962,
p. 43 [*S. primus; OD; holotype, missArZhevsKiY
& roZ Anov , 1962, pl. 3,2a–v; roZA nov , 1973,
pl. 1,5, PIN 4297/19-20, Moscow]. Outer wall
with slitlike, simple pores; inner wall with one
pore row per intersept and inverted V-shaped
annuli; septa aporose to sparsely porous. l ower
Cambrian (Bot.1): Altay Saya n, Tuva.—Fig .
20,2. *S. primus, Shangan Formation, Botoman,
Shivelig-Khem River, eastern Tannu-Ola Range,
Tuva, Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/19-20, oblique
transverse view, ×5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Rozanov, 1989).
Taylorcyathus vologDin, 1955, p. 143 [*Cycloc y-
athus subtersiensis vologDin, 1940b, p. 63; OD;
holotype not designated, collection not located]
[=Tersicyathus vologDin, 1955, p. 143 (type,
Cyc locyath us ters ie nsis vologDin, 1931, p. 87,
OD); =Thalamocyathellus osADchAYA in osAD-
chAYA & others, 1979, p. 155 (type, T. inclinatus,
OD), for discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev,
& ro ZAnov , 1989, p. 134; Debrenne, roZAn ov,
& ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 163; =Pospelovicyathus
KonYAevA in ZhurAvlevA & others, 1997a, p.
49 (type, P. gravis, OD)]. Inner wall with one
pore row per intersept and upwardly projecting,
S-shaped annuli; septa completely porous; pecti-
nate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(At d.1–Bot.3): Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan,
Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far East, Australia,
southern China, Iberia, France, Sardinia.——Fig.
20,3. *T. subtersiensis (vologDin), Gavrilovskoe
Formation, Atdabanian, Belaya Gorka, Salair,
Russia, topotype, PIN 4754/50, oblique transverse
section, ×6 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Taylorfungia Perejón, 1989, p. 180 [*Thalamocyathus
synapticulosus Zhu rAv le vA, 1955a, p. 41; OD;
holotype, ZhurAvlevA, 1955a, pl. 5,1, PIN 495,
Moscow, not located]. Inner wall with one pore row
per intersept and upwardly projecting, planar-to-S-
shaped annuli; septa completely porous, linked by
synapticulae. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Atd.3): Altay
Sayan.—Fi g. 20,4. *T. synapticulosa (ZhurAv-
levA), Usa Formation, Atdabanian, Bol’shaya Erba
(Potekhino), Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau,
Russia, holotype, PIN 495, oblique transverse
section, ×8 (Zhuravleva, 1955a).
Trininaecyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 218 [*T.
macroporus; OD; holotype not located; paratypes,
ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, pl. 18,6–8, fig. 122, TsSGM
205/100, 205/101, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with
one pore row per intersept and upwardly projecting,
S-shaped annuli bearing denticulate rims; septa
aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate tabulae may
be present. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Siberian Plat-
form.——Fig . 20,5. *T. macroporus, Perekhod
Formation, Botoman, Botoma River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia, paratype, TsSGM 205/100,
oblique transverse section, ×8 (Zhuravleva, 1960b).
Family ETHMOCYATHIDAE
Debrenne, 1969
[Ethmocyathidae Debrenne, 1969a, p. 322] [=Ethmopectinidae De-
brenne, 1970a, p. 25; =Diplocyathidae Debrenne, 1974b, p. 123;
=Zonacyathellidae ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & elKinA, 1974, p. 65;
=Baikalocyathinae ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & elKinA, 1974, p. 68;
=Inessocyathidae ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & elKinA, 1974, p. 106;
=Hyptocyathidae Kruse, 1978, p. 29; =Gnaltacyathidae Kruse, 1982, p.
166; =Baikalopectinidae grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 66]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3).
Ethmocyathus R. beDForD & W. R. beDF orD, 1934,
p. 2 [*E. lineatus; M; holotype, R. beDForD &
W. R. beDForD, 1934, fig. 8; hill, 1965, pl. 4,2;
Debrenne, 1969a, pl. 5,1–3; Debrenne, 1974b,
pl. 27,1; NHM S4149, M, London] [=Ethmopec-
tinus Debrenne, 1970a, p. 34 (type, E. walteri;
OD), for discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, &
roZAnov , 1989, p. 106; Debrenne, roZAn ov, &
ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 142]. Inner wall with one row
of horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals
per intersept, formed by flexure of inner edges of
septa; supplementary screen of planar rings on
central cavity side; septa aporose to sparsely porous;
pectinate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Bot.3): Australia, Antarctica.——Fi g. 21,1a–b.
*E. lineatus, Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine,
South Australia, Australia, holotype, NHM S4149;
a, longitudinal view of inner wall, ×7; b, oblique
longitudinal view of inner wall (to left) and septa
(to right), ×15 (Debrenne, 1969a).
Afiacyathus voronin, 1962, p. 26 [*A. lativallum;
OD; holotype, voronin, 1962, pl. 4,4–5, PIN
1914/74-80a, Moscow, not located] [=Axiculifungia
F. Debrenne & M. Debrenne in F. Debrenne,
M. Debrenne, & roZ Anov , 1976, p. 102 (type,
Ajacicyathus compositus Debrenne, 1961, p. 9,
OD)]. Inner wall with one row of horizontal to
upwardly projecting, straight canals per intersept;
septa completely porous, linked by synapticulae.
lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1): Tuva, Morocco,
Iberia, Sardinia, ?Poland.——Fig. 21,2a–b. *A .
lativallum, Shangan Formation, Botoman, Shivelig-
Khem River, eastern Tannu-Ola Range, Tuva,
Russia, holotype, PIN 1914/74-80a; a, oblique
transverse view, ×2; b, oblique longitudinal view,
×2 (Voronin, 1962).
Baikalocyathus YAZmir in ZhurAvlevA, 1974a, p. 55
[*Ethmophyllum rossicum Zhur AvlevA, 1960b, p.
164; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, pl. 11,2,
TsSGM 205/51, Novosibirsk] [=Nochoroicyathella
Korshunov, 1983b, p. 110 (type, N. fragilis, OD);
=Baikalopectinus grAvesTo cK, 1984, p. 66 (type,
B. capulus, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAn ov, 1989, p. 95; Debrenne,
roZAnov, & Zh urAvlev, 1990, p. 134]. Inner wall
with one row of downwardly projecting, straight
canals per intersept, bearing supplementary bracts
on central cavity side; septa completely porous;
pectinate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Atd.1–Bot.1): Siberian Platform, Kolyma, Altay
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 25
Fig. 18. Bronchocyathidae (p. 21–22).
3
2b
2a
2c
Denaecyathus
Gordonicyathus
1a
1b
1c
Cyclocyathella
26 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 19. Bronchocyathidae (p. 22).
4a
Pseudotennericyathellus
Sagacyathus
2a
2b
Morenicyathus
1Gordonifungia
3a
4b 4c
3b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 27
2
3
4
5
Svetlanocyathus
Taylorcyathus
Taylorfungia
Trininaecyathus
1Stillicidocyathus
Fig. 20. Bronchocyathidae (p. 22–24).
28 Treatise Online, number XX
Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far East,
Australia, ?Morocco.——Fig. 21,3a–b. *B. rossicus
(ZhurAvl evA); a, Pestrotsvet Formation, Atdaba-
nian, Oy-Muran, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia),
Russia, holotype, TsSGM 205/51, detail of longi-
tudinal section of septum (outer wall to left),
×10 (Zhuravleva, 1960b); b, Pestrotsvet Forma-
tion, Atdabanian, Mukhatta River, Lena River,
Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, paratype, TsSGM 205/52,
oblique longitudinal section, ×6 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002 ).
Carpicyathus osADc hAYA in Zhu rAvl evA & others,
1967, p. 51 [*C. mysticus; OD; holotype, ZhurAv-
levA & others, 1967, pl. 14,3–6, VSEGEI 9594,
St. Petersburg]. Inner wall with several rows of
horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals
per intersept, bearing supplementary bracts on
central cavity side; septa completely porous. lower
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.2): Altay Sayan, Tuva, Trans-
baikalia, Morocco.——Fig. 21,4a–b. *C. mysticus,
Shangan Formation, Shivelig-Khem River, eastern
Tannu-Ola Range, Tuva, Russia, holotype, VSEGEI
9594; a, transverse section, ×1.5; b, longitudinal
section, ×3.5 (Zhuravleva & others, 1967).
Degeletticyathus ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA, Kors-
hunov, & roZ Anov, 1969, p. 36 [*Ethmophyllum?
galuschkoi ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 169; OD;
holotype, Zhu rAvl evA, 1960b, pl. 11,7, TsSGM
205/56, Novosibirsk] [=Degeletticyathellus ZhurAv-
levA in ZhurAvlevA & elKinA, 1974, p. 66 (type,
D. lebedevae, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZA nov, 1989, p. 103]. Inner wall
with horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight
stirrup canals only; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Tajiki-
stan, Morocco.——Fig. 22,1a–b. *D. galuschkoi
(Zhur AvlevA), Oy-Muran reef massif, Botoman,
Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia; a, specimen
TsSGM 323/40, transverse section, Oy-Muran,
×5 (Zhuravleva, Korshunov, & Rozanov, 1969);
b, holotype, TsSGM 205/56, longitudinal section
of septum (outer wall to left), Mukhatta River, ×5
(Zhuravleva, 1960b).
Diplocyathellus Debrenne, 1977b, p. 1222, nom. nov.
pro Diplocyathus Debrenne, 1974b, p. 124, non
AllmAn, 1888, p. 16, cnidarian [*Archaeocyathus
retezona TAYlo r, 1910, p. 121; OD; lectotype,
TAYlor, 1910, pl. 6, photo 31; Debrenne, 1974b,
pl. 26,4–5; SD Debrenne , 1974b, p. 124, SAM
T1577A, Adelaide]. Inner wall with horizontal
to upwardly projecting, straight stirrup canals
only, canals branching toward central cavity; septa
aporose to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.3):
Australia.——Fig. 22,2. *D. retezona (TAYlo r),
Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South
Australia, Australia, paralectotype, SAM T1591,
longitudinal view, ×4 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002).
Frinalicyathus Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlevA in
ZhurAvlevA & elKinA, 1974, p. 73 [*Leptosocyathus
altaicus roZAnov in rePinA & others, 1964, p. 190;
OD; holotype, rePi nA & others, 1964, pl. 4,2,
PIN 4297/21, Moscow] [=Pseudodegeletticyathellus
osADchAYA in osADc hAYA & others, 1979, p. 123
(type, P. ladae, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne,
roZAnov, & Zh urAvlev, 1990, p. 143]. Inner wall
with downwardly projecting, straight stirrup canals
only, bearing supplementary scales on central cavity
side; septa completely porous. lower Cambrian
(Atd.1–Atd.4): Altay Sayan, Mongolia.——Fig .
22,3. *F. al tai c us (roZA n ov ), Verkhneyn yrga
Formation, Atdabanian, Tyrga River, Altay Moun-
tains, Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/21,
transverse section, ×2.5 (Repina & others, 1964).
Gnaltacyathus Kruse, 1982, p. 166 [*G. nodus; OD;
holotype, Krus e, 1982, pl. 3,2–4, AM FT.8453,
8454, 8495b, Sy dney]. Inner wal l wit h hor i-
zontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals,
each canal spanning several intersepts; septa
completely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3):
Tuva, ?Mongolia, Australia.——Fig. 22,4a–b. *G.
nodus, Cymbric Vale Formation, Botoman, Mt.
Wright, New South Wales, Australia, holotype,
AM FT.8453, 8454, 8495b; a, transverse section,
AM FT.8495b, ×8; b, longitudinal section, AM
FT.8454, ×8 (Kruse, 1982).
Hyptocyathus Kruse, 1978, p. 30 [*H. licinus; OD;
holotype, Kru se , 1978, fig. 2–3, AM F.83402,
Sydney]. Inner wall with downwardly projecting,
straight stirrup canals only, bearing upwardly
projecting, branching canals on central cavity
side; septa aporose to sparsely porous. lo wer
Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia.——Fi g. 23,1a–c.
*H. licinus, Cymbric Vale Formation, Botoman,
Mt. Wright, New South Wales, Australia, holo-
type, AM F.83402; a, oblique transverse section,
AM FT.14171, ×4; b, longitudinal section, AM
FT.14173, ×4; c, tangential section of inner wall,
AM FT.14174, ×15 (Kruse, 1978).
Inessocyathellus belYAevA in ZhurAvlevA & elKinA,
1974, p. 78 [*I. synapticulosus; OD; holotype,
ZhurAvlevA & elKinA, 1974, pl. 7,3, DVGU,
Khabarovsk]. Inner wall with one row of horizontal
to upwardly projecting, straight canals per intersept;
septa aporose to sparsely porous, linked by synap-
ticulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Far East.——Fig .
23,2a–b. *I. synapticulosus, Ust’toka unit, Botoman,
Verkhneurminsk Spring, Dzhagdy Range, Far East,
Russia, holotype, DVGU, Khabarovsk; a, transverse
section, ×10; b, oblique longitudinal section, ×10
(Zhuravleva & Elkina, 1974).
Inessocyathus Debrenne, 1964, p. 143 [*Archaeocy-
athus spatiosus bornemAnn, 1886, p. 59; OD; lecto-
type, bornemAnn, 1886, pl. 15,1a; SD Debrenne,
1964, p. 143, not located; topotype, Debrenne,
1964, pl. 9,1–2, MNHN M84074, specimen
SPi-13, Paris] [=Voroninicyathus ZhurAvl evA in
ZhurAvle vA & elKinA, 1974, p. 79 (type, Inesso-
cyathus karakolicus voronin, 1969, p. 103, OD);
=Rowanpectinus grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 67 (type,
R. clarus, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 112; Debrenne,
roZAnov, & Zh urAvlev, 1990, p. 146]. Inner wall
with one row of horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight canals per intersept; septa completely
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 29
Fig. 21. Ethmocyathidae (p. 24–28).
2b
2a
4b
3b
Aacyathus
Baikalocyathus
1a
1b
Ethmocyathus
4a
Carpicyathus
3a
30 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 22. Ethmocyathidae (p. 28).
3
2
4b
Diplocyathellus
Frinalicyathus
Gnaltacyathus
1a
1b
4a
Degeletticyathus
I had to
reduce
view 3
from X3.5
to X2.5 to
fit the two
new views.
Is this
okay? If
not, please
suggest
crop lines
or reduc-
tions for
other views
on the
plate.
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 31
Fig. 23. Ethmocyathidae (p. 28–32).
1b
3a
1c
1a
3b
2b
2a
Hyptocyathus
Inessocyathellus
Inessocyathus
32 Treatise Online, number XX
porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3): Siberian
Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Far East,
Australia, southern China, Morocco, Iberia, France,
Sardinia, Germany.——Fig. 23,3a–b. *I. spatiosus
(bornemAnn), Matoppa Formation, Botoman,
San Pietro, Sardinia, Italy; a, lectotype, transverse
section, ×2.5 (Bornemann, 1886); b, topotype,
MNHN M84074, specimen SPi-13, longitudinal
section, ×2.5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse,
2002).
Mackenziecyathus hAnDFielD, 1971, p. 43 [*M .
bukryi; OD; holotype, hAnDFielD, 1971, pl.
5,1a–d, GSC 25334, Ottawa] [=Ussuricyathus
oKu nevA in oK un evA & re Pi nA , 1973, p. 113
(type, U. kropotkini, OD)]. Inner wall with hori-
zontal to upwardly projecting straight stirrup canals
only, bearing supplementary scales on central cavity
side; septa aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Far East, Canada,
United States.——Fig . 24,1a–c. *M. bukryi,
unnamed Sekwi Formation equivalent (map unit
5 of hAnDFielD, 1971), Botoman, Coal River,
Yukon Territory, Canada, holotype, GSC 25334;
a, transverse section, ×4; b, longitudinal section
(outer wall to right), ×4; c, tangential section of
inner wall, ×4 (Handfield, 1971).
Rasetticyathus Debrenne, 1971, p. 193 [*R. igle-
siensis; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1971, fig. 1–2,
not located; =Archaeocyathus acutus bornemAnn,
1886, p. 50; holotype not designated; for discus-
sion, see Debrenne, roZA no v, & ZhurAvlev,
1990, p. 157]. Inner wall with one row of hori-
zontal to upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals
per intersept; septa aporose to sparsely porous;
synapticulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.2): southern China, Morocco, Iberia,
Sardinia.——Fig. 24,2. *R. iglesiensis, Matoppa
Formation, Botoman, Monte Cuccurinu, Sardinia,
Italy, holotype, transverse section, ×16 (Debrenne,
1972).
Terraecyathus ZhurAvlevA in Zhur AvlevA & elKinA,
1974, p. 104 [*T. lathentis; OD; holotype,
Zhur Avl evA & elKinA, 1974, pl. 23,2, TsSGM
442/37, 38, Novosibirsk] [=Sericyathus voronin,
1988, p. 7 (type, S. tartsinicus, OD)]. Inner
wall with several rows of horizontal to upwardly
projecting, straight canals per intersept; septa
completely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1):
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Morocco.——Fig.
24,3a–b. *T. lathentis; a, Adiak Formation, Atda-
banian, Tom’ River, Gornaya Shoria, Altay Sayan,
Russia, holotype, TsSGM 442/37, transverse
section, ×5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse,
2002); b, Usa Formation, Botoman, Bograd,
Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, paratype,
TsSGM 442/38, longitudinal section of septum
(outer wall to left), ×5 (Zhuravleva & Elkina,
1974).
Ussuricyathellus voronin, 1988, p. 6 [*U. bellus;
OD; holotype, voronin, 1988, pl. 1,4, PIN 3175-
920/a-2, Moscow]. Inner wall with several rows of
horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals
per intersept; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Mongolia.——Fig. 24,4.
*U. bellus, Burgasutay Formation, Botoman, Seer’
Mountains, Ikh nuuruundyn hotgor, western
Mongolia, holotype, PIN 3175-920/a-2, transverse
section, ×5 (Voronin, 1988).
Zonacyathellus ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & elKinA,
1974, p. 66 [*?Zonacyathus monoporosus Zhur Av-
levA in ZhurAvlevA & others, 1967, p. 66; OD;
holotype, Zhu rAvl evA & others, 1967, pl. 23,2;
ZhurAvlevA & elKinA, 1974 , pl. 3,2, TsSGM
325/35, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with one row of
horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals
per intersept; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Tuva.——Fig. 24,5. *Z.
monoporosus (Zhu rAvl evA), Shangan Formation,
Botoman, Shivelig-Khem River, eastern Tannu-Ola
Range, Tuva, Russia, holotype, TsSGM 325/35,
longitudinal section, ×5 (Zhuravleva & others,
1967).
Family SAJANOCYATHIDAE
Vologdin, 1956
[Sajanocyathidae vologDin, 1956, p. 879] [=Formosocyathidae ZhurAvlevA,
1957, p. 175; =Irinacyathidae ZhurAvlevA in Debrenne, 1972, p. 173, nom.
neg.; =Irinaecyathidae ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & elKinA, 1974, p. 67]
Inner wall with communicating canals.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Toy.2).
Sajanocyathus vologDin, 1940b, p. 81 (vologDin,
1937b, p. 471, nom. nud.) [*S. ussovi; OD; lecto-
type, vologDin, 1940b, pl. 22,8; SD Zhu rAvlev,
2001a, p. 92, PIN 4754/2, Moscow] [=Sayanocy-
athus vologDin, 1937b, p. 479, nom. nud. (type,
Sayanocyathus ussovi vologDin, 1937b, p. 479,
M)]. Inner wall with several rows of anastomosing,
horizontal to upwardly and laterally projecting,
waved canals per intersept; septa aporose to sparsely
porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.2): Siberian
Platform, Altay Sayan, ?Antarctica, ?northeastern
China (Hinggan), ?Sardinia, Canada, United
States.——Fig. 25,1. *S. ussovi, Verkhnemonok
Formation, Botoman, Sanashtykgol River, western
Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, lectotype, PIN
4754/2, transverse section of modular skeleton,
×8 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Chakassicyathus ZhurAvlevA & osADchAYA in ZhurAv-
levA & elKinA, 1974, p. 93 [*Ethmophyllum pseudo-
ratum ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & others, 1967,
p. 62; OD; holotype, Zhu rAvlevA & others, 1967,
pl. 21,2, TsSGM 325/28b, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall
with one row of downwardly projecting, straight
porous canals per intersept, bearing supplementary
bracts or annuli on central cavity side; septa aporose
to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Altay
Sayan, Tuva.——Fig. 25,2. *C. pseudoratus (ZhurAv-
levA), Shangan Formation, Botoman, Shivelig-Khem
River, eastern Tannu-Ola Range, Tuva, Russia, holo-
type, TsSGM 325/28b, longitudinal section, ×5.5
(Zhuravleva & others, 1967).
Formosocyathus vologDin, 1940b, p. 90 (vologDin,
1937b, p. 471, nom. nud.) [*F. bulynnikovi; OD;
Chakas-
sicyathus:
should this
be "longi-
tudinal
sections"
to describe
views a and
b??
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 33
1b
3a
1a
2
3b
Mackenziecyathus
Rasetticyathus
Terraecyathus
Ussuricyathellus
5 Zonacyathellus 4
Fig. 24. Ethmocyathidae (p. 32).
1c
34 Treatise Online, number XX
holotype not designated, collection not located].
Inner wall with one row of anastomosing, hori-
zontal to upwardly and laterally projecting, waved
canals per intersept; supplementary spines, annular
structures, and/or microporous sheath may be
present on central cavity side; septa completely
porous; pectinate tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.2): Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mongolia, Transbaikalia.——Fig. 25,3a–b. *F.
bulynnikovi, Verkhnemonok Formation, Botoman,
Sanashtykgol River, western Sayan, Altay Sayan,
Russia, unlocated syntype; a, transverse section
(outer wall at top), ×6; b, longitudinal section
(outer wall to left), ×6 (Vologdin, 1940b).
Irinaecyathus ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & elKinA,
1974, p. 87 [*Ethmophyllum grandiperforatum
vologDin, 1940a, p. 160; OD; lectotype,
vologDin, 1940a, fig. 75, pl. 46,1, SD Zhu rAv-
levA & elKinA, 1974, p. 88, collection not located]
[=Kandatocyathus KAshinA in osADchAYA & others,
Fig. 25. Sajanocyathidae (p. 32–34).
3a
2
1
3b
Sajanocyathus
Chakassicyathus
Formosocyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 35
1979, p. 156 (type, K. kalleganovi; OD), for
discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov,
1989, p. 112; Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev,
1990, p. 146]. Inner wall with one row of down-
wardly projecting, straight porous canals per inter-
sept, bearing supplementary bracts or annuli on
central cavity side; septa sparsely to completely
porous; pectinate tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.2): Siberian Platform, Altay
Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far East,
southern China.——Fig. 26,1. *I. grandiperforatus
(vologDin), Burgasutay Formation, Botoman,
Seer’ Mountains, Ikh nuuruundyn hotgor, western
Mongolia, topotype, PIN 4327/24-2042/5, trans-
verse section, ×5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse,
2002).
Kiwicyathus Debrenne & Kru se, 1986, p. 250 [*K.
nix; OD; holotype, Debrenne & Kruse , 1986, fig.
15A–B, VU VC19, Wellington]. Inner wall with
horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight porous
stirrup canals only; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Antarctica.——Fig. 26,2.
*K. nix, Shackleton Limestone, Botoman, Mt.
Egerton, Byrd Glacier, Antarctica, holotype, VU
VC19, transverse section, ×6 (Debrenne & Kruse,
1986).
Palmericyathus hAnDFielD, 1971, p. 44 [*Eth mo-
phyllum lineatum greggs, 1959, p. 66; OD; holo-
type, greggs, 1959, pl. 14,2, GSC 14315, Ottawa;
=Ethmophyllum americanum oKuliTch in co oPer
& others, 1952, p. 30; holotype, cooPer & others,
1952, pl. 7,3–4, USNM 111816, Washington, D.C.
Fig. 26. Sajanocyathidae (p. 34–37).
3a
1
2
3b
Irinaecyathus
Kiwicyathus
Palmericyathus
3c
36 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 27. Sajanocyathidae (p. 37).
1a
2c
1b
Zonacyathus
2a
2b
Siderocyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 37
(for discussion, see Debrenne, 1987, p. 270)]. Inner
wall with anastomosing, horizontal to upwardly and
laterally projecting, waved stirrup canals only;
septa aporose to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1): Canada, United States, Mexico.——Fig.
26,3a–c. *P. americanus (oKuliTch); a–b, Puerto
Blanco Formation, Botoman, Caborca, Sonora,
Mexico, holotype, USNM 111816; a, transverse
section, ×8; b, detail of transverse section (outer
wall at bottom), ×25 (Cooper & others, 1952); c,
[=P. lineatus (greggs)], Laib Formation, Botoman,
Salmo, British Columbia, Canada, holotype, GSC
14315, transverse section (outer wall at top), ×6
(Greggs, 1959).
Siderocyathus Debrenne & gAngloFF in Debrenne,
gAnDin, & gAngloFF, 1990, p. 87 [*S. duncanae;
OD; holotype, Debrenne, gAnDin, & gAngloFF,
1990, pl. 1,7, USNM 443555, specimen IR1-3,
Washington, D.C.]. Inner wall with one row of
short, noncommunicating, horizontal to upwardly
projecting canals per intersept, continuing into
central cavity as communicating waved canals
bearing supplementary bracts on central cavity
side; septa aporose to sparsely porous, linked by
synapticulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Unit ed
States.——Fig. 27,1a–b. *S. duncanae, Valmy
Formation, Botoman, Iron Canyon, Nevada,
United States, holotype, USNM 443555, spec-
imen IR1-3; a, transverse section, ×5; b, longi-
tudinal section, ×5 (Debrenne, Gandin, &
Gangloff, 1990).
Zonacyathus R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1937, p.
36 [*Archaeocyathus retevallum R. be DF or D &
W. R. beDForD, 1934, p. 2; OD; holotype, R.
beDF orD & W. R. beD For D, 1934, fig. 6; hill,
1965, pl. 4,3; Debrenne, 1969a, pl. 4,4; NHM
S4147, M, London]. Inner wall with one row of
horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals
per intersept, canals branching and becoming
porous toward central cavity; septa sparsely to
completely porous. lower Cambrian (?Bot.1,
Bot.2–Bot.3): ?Siberian Platform, Australia.——
Fig . 27,2a–c. *Z. retevallus (R. beDForD & W.
r. beDForD), Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax
Mine, South Australia, Australia; a–b, holotype,
NHM S4147; a, oblique longitudinal view,
×5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b,
tangential view of inner wall, ×5 (Hill, 1965);
c, paratype, USNM PU86606, longitudinal view
(outer wall to right), ×5 (Debrenne, 1974b).
Family BIPALLICYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev 1989
[Bipallicyathidae Debrenne, ro ZAn ov, & ZhurAv lev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 82]
Inner wall with attached microporous
sheath. lower Cambrian (Atd.2).
Bipallicyathus ZhurAvlev in voronin & others, 1982,
p. 78 [*B. manifestus; OD; holotype, voronin
& others, 1982, pl. 15,6a–b, PIN 3302/3305,
Moscow] [=Kashinaecyathus YAroshevich, 1990,
p. 25 (type, K. salairicus; OD), for discussion, see
Debrenne & Zhur Avle v, 1992b, p. 173]. Inner
wall with one pore row per intersept and attached
microporous sheath; septa completely porous. lower
Cambrian (Atd.2): Altay Sayan, Mongolia.——Fig.
28,1a–c. *B. manifestus, Salaany Gol Formation,
Atdabanian, Khasagt-Khayrkhan Range, Tsagaan
Oloom province, western Mongolia; a, paratype,
PIN 3302/3006, oblique transverse section, ×8;
b–c , holotype, PIN 3302/3305; b, longitudinal
section, ×7; c, detail of inner wall, ×17 (Voronin
& others, 1982).
?Heckericyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 220
[*Ethmophyllum heckeri ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAv-
le vA & Zelenov, 1955, p. 69; OD; holotype,
PIN 1161, Moscow, not located; paratypes,
ZhurAvlevA & Zelenov, 1955, pl. 1,3–4,
TsSGM 205/102, 205/103, Novosibirsk] [=Heck-
erocyathus Zhu r Av l evA in vologDin, 1957a,
p. 180, nom. nud.]. Inner wall with one pore
row per intersept and independent microporous
sheath, each micropore bearing a supplementary
bract; septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae
may be present. [Inner wall bears supplementary
elements atypical of other members of family.]
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.4): Siberian Plat-
form, Transbaikalia, Far East.——Fig . 28,2a–c.
*H. heckeri (Zhur Av le vA ), Pestrotsvet Forma-
tion, Atdabanian, Oy-Muran, Lena River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia; a, paratype, TsSGM 205/102,
transverse section, ×8 (Zhuravleva & Zelenov,
1955); b–c, paratype, TsSGM 205/103; b, detail
of septum in longitudinal section (outer wall to
right), ×16; c, detail of inner wall in oblique
longitudinal section, ×16 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002).
Superfamily
PRETIOSOCYATHOIDEA
Rozanov, 1969
[nom. c orrect. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, herein, pro Pre tiosocy-
athacea roZAnov, 1969, p. 112]
Outer wall with independent micropo-
rous sheath. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.2).
Family ROBERTOCYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 1969
[Robertocyathidae roZAnov, 1969, p. 112]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1).
Robertocyathus roZAnov , 1969, p. 112 [*R. polaris;
OD; holotype, roZA nov, 1969, pl. 42,1–2, PIN
4297/96, Moscow]. Inner wall with several rows
of simple pores per intersept; septa completely
porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3): Sibe-
rian Platform, Altay Sayan, Australia, Morocco,
Iberia.——Fig. 29,1. *R. polaris, Erkeket Forma-
tion, Botoman, Khorbusuonka River, Olenek Basin,
38 Treatise Online, number XX
Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/96,
transverse section, ×7 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002).
Mattajacyathus roZAn ov in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev,
& roZAnov , 1989, p. 118 (roZAnov, 1973, p. 61,
nom. nud.; roZ An ov in Debrenne & ro ZA nov ,
1983, p. 735, nom. nud.) [*Robertocyathus arduus
roZAnov, 1969, p. 113; OD; holotype, roZA nov,
1969, pl. 42,3–4; roZA nov , 1973, pl. 5,1, PIN
4297/97, Moscow]. Cup in which both walls show
periodic, synchronous transverse folds; inner wall
with several rows of simple pores per intersept;
septa completely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Siberian Platform.——Fig. 29,2a–b. *M. arduus
(roZAn ov), Erkeket Formation, Botoman, Khor-
busuonka River, Olenek Basin, Sakha (Yakutia),
Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/97; a, longitudinal
section, ×7; b, detail of outer wall in tangential
section, ×15 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse,
2002).
Fig. 28. Bipallicyathidae (p. 37).
2c
2b
Heckericyathus
1c
1a
1b
Bipallicyathus
2a
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 39
1
3
2a
4
5
2b
6
Robertocyathus
Mattajacyathus
Urcyathella
Pretiosocyathus
Jangudacyathus
Loculicyathopsis
Fig. 29. Robertocyathidae and Pretiosocyathidae (p. 37–40).
40 Treatise Online, number XX
Urcyathella Zhu rAv l e vA in musA To v & others,
1961, p. 25 [*U. tercyathoides; OD; holotype,
mus AT ov & others, 1961, pl. 3,8–9, TsS GM
264/26, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall longitudi-
nally plicate, with several rows of simple pores
per intersept; septa completely porous. low er
Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1): Altay Sayan.——Fig.
29,3. *U. tercyathoides, Balakhtinson Forma-
tion, Atdabanian, Kazyr River, eastern Sayan,
Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype, TsSGM 264/26,
transverse section, ×7 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002).
Family PRETIOSOCYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 1969
[Pretiosocyathidae roZAnov, 1969, p. 112]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1).
Pretiosocyathus roZA nov in roZ Ano v & missAr-
ZhevsKiY, 1966, p. 55 [*P. subtilis; OD ;
holotype, ro ZA n ov & missArZhevsKiY, 1966,
pl. 4,4; roZA nov , 1973, pl. 11,3, PIN 4297/65,
Moscow] [=Cosmocyathus YAZmir in Zhu rAvle vA,
1974a, p. 96, nom. nud.; =Cosmocyathus YAZmir
in YAZmir, DAl mAT ov, & YAZmir, 1975, p. 63
(type, C. perforatus, OD); =Pretiosocyathellus
osA Dc h AY A in osADc h AY A & others, 1979, p.
133 (type, P. toltschiensis, OD); =Grandicyathus
Korshunov, 1983b, p. 109 (type, G. lectus; OD),
for discussion, see Debrenne, Zh ur Av l ev , &
roZA nov, 1989, p. 125; Debrenne, ro ZAn ov, &
ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 156]. Inner wall with hori-
zontal to upwardly projecting, straight stirrup
canals only; septa completely porous; pecti-
nate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(At d.1–Bot.1): Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan,
Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Tajikistan.——
Fig . 29,4. *P. subtilis, Usa Formation, Atdaba-
nian, Bol’shaya Erba, Batenev Range, Kuznetsk
Alatau, Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/65, trans-
verse section, ×7 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002).
Jangudacyathus YAZmir in YAZmir, DAl mAT ov, &
YAZmir, 1975, p. 62 (YAZmir in Zhur Av le vA ,
1974a, p. 180, nom. nud.) [*J. simplex; OD;
holotype, YAZmir, DAlmATov, & YAZmir, 1975, pl.
23,5, BGU 0138/21, Ulan-Ude]. Inner wall with
several rows of horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight canals per intersept; septa aporose to
sparsely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Trans-
baikalia.——Fig. 29,5. *J. simplex, Uran Forma-
tion, Botoman, Yanguda River, Vitim Highlands,
Transbaikalia, Russia, holotype, BGU 0138/21,
transverse section, ×7 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002).
Loculicyathopsis boY A r in o v in Zh u rA v le vA &
others, 1997a, p. 61 [*L. septospinosus; OD;
holotype, Zh u r Av l e vA & others, 1997a, pl.
11,9, ZSGGU 2329/62, Novokuznetsk]. Inner
wall with one row of horizontal to upwardly
projecting, straight canals per intersept; septa
completely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.2):
Altay Sayan.——Fig. 29,6. *L. septospinosus, Usa
Formation, Atdabanian, Malaya Belokamenka
River, Kiya River, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia,
holotype, ZSGGU 2329/62, oblique transverse
section, ×5 (Zhuravleva & others, 1997a).
Superfamily
ERBOCYATHOIDEA
Vologdin & Zhuravleva, 1956
[nom. correct. Debrenne & Kruse , 1986, p. 251, p ro Erbocyathacea
ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 187, nom. transl. ex Erbocyathidae vologDin
& ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879] [=Bosceculcyathacea KrAs-
noPeevA, 1959, p. 7, nom. transl. hill, 1972, p. 77, ex Bosceculcyathidae
KrAsnoPeevA, 1959, p. 7; =Kordecyathoidea missArZhevsKiY, 1961, p.
21, nom. trans l. missArZhevsKiY in rePinA & others, 1964, p. 218, ex
Kordecyathidae missArZhevsKiY, 1961, p. 21, nom. correct. pro Kordecy-
athacea Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev,
& roZAnov, 1989, p. 82]
Outer wall with attached microporous
sheath. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Toy.3).
Family ERBOCYATHIDAE
Vologdin & Zhuravleva, 1956
[Erbocyathidae vologDin & ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879,
nom. nov. pro Polycyathidae vologDin, 1928, p. 35, invalid name based
on junior homonym] [=Ladaecyathidae Debrenne, 1964, p. 114]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.1–Toy.3).
Pluralicyathus oKuliTch, 1950c, p. 503, nom. nov. pro
Polycyathus vologDin, 1928, p. 32, non DuncAn,
1876, p. 433, cnidarian] [*Polycyathus heterovallum
vologDin, 1928, p. 36; SD simon, 1939, p. 34;
lectotype, vologDin, 1928, pl. 2,1,2,4,5; SD
Debrenne, ZhurAvle v, & Kruse, 2002, p. 1586,
TsNIGRm 1/a-t/2617, St. Petersburg] [=Erbocyathus
Zhur Avle vA, 1950, p. 857, nom. nud.; =Erbocy-
athus ZhurAvlevA, 1955a, p. 44, nom. nov. pro
Polycyathus vologDin, 1928, p. 32 (type, Polycy-
athus heterovallum, SD simon, 1939, p. 34), non
DuncAn, 1876, p. 433, cnidarian; application by
Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse (2003) to suppress
Pluralicyathus and conserve Erbocyathus rejected
by ICZN (2005); =Neocyathus vologDin, 1960,
p. 422 (type, Archaeocyathus laevus vologDin,
1940b, p. 57, OD)]. Inner wall with several rows of
simple pores per intersept; septa aporose to sparsely
porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.3): Siberian
Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Far East,
Uzbekistan.——Fig. 30,1a–b. *P. heterovallum
(vologDin); a, Torgashino Formation, Toyonian,
Uyar River, eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, unlo-
cated specimen, transverse section, ×8.5 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b, Khomustakh Forma-
tion, Toyonian, Amga River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia,
specimen TsSGM 205/71, section of modular skel-
eton, ×1 (Zhuravleva, 1960b).
Ladaecyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960a, p. 43 [*Tegerocy-
athus limbatus Zhu rAv le vA, 1955a, p. 46; OD;
holotype, ZhurAvlevA, 1955a, pl. 5,3–4, PIN 494,
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 41
Moscow, not located]. Inner wall with several rows of
simple pores per intersept; septa completely porous;
pectinate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3): Siberian Platform, Kolyma, Altay
Sayan, Transbaikalia, Far East, Australia, Antarctica,
Morocco.——Fig. 30,2a–b. *L. limbatus (Zh urAv-
levA), Usa Formation, Botoman, Mt. Martyukhina,
Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia; a, holotype,
PIN 494, transverse section, ×6.5 (Zhuravleva,
1955a); b, TsSGM 273/4d, longitudinal section of
septum (outer wall to left), ×7 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002).
Milaecyathus Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 2000, p. 49
[*Ladaecyathus melnikovae ZhurAvlev in voronin
& others, 1982, p. 79; OD; holotype, voronin &
others, 1982, pl. 16,2,5, PIN 3302/300v, Moscow].
Inner wall with stirrup pores only; septa completely
porous; pectinate tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.2): Altay Sayan, Mongolia.——
Fig. 30,3a–b. *M. melnikovae (ZhurAvlev), Salaany
Gol Formation, Atdabanian, Salaany-Gol River,
Khasagt-Khairkhan Range, Tsagaan Oloom prov-
ince, western Mongolia, holotype, PIN 3302/300v;
a, transverse section, ×5 (Voronin & others, 1982);
b, detail of outer wall in tangential section, ×25
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Family PEREGRINICYATHIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1967
[Peregrinicyathidae ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & others, 1967, p. 74]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.2).
Peregrinicyathus ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA &
others, 1967, p. 75 [*P. dorotheae; OD; holotype,
Zhu rAv le vA & others, 1967, pl. 28,1, TsSGM
325/54, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with one pore row
per intersept and upright, V-shaped annuli; septa
completely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2):
Altay Sayan, Tuva.——Fig. 31,1a–b. *P. dorotheae,
Shangan Formation, Botoman, Shivelig-Khem River,
eastern Tannu-Ola Range, Tuva, Russia; a, holotype,
TsSGM 325/54, transverse section, ×4.5 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b, paratype, TsSGM
325, specimen 1, thin section 1, sample 314-7,
OR-64, detail of oblique transverse section (outer
wall to left), ×8 (Zhuravleva & others, 1967).
Family VOLOGDINOCYATHIDAE
Yaroshevich, 1957
[Vologdinocyathidae YAroshevich, 1957, p. 1015] [=Bosceculcyathidae
KrAsno PeevA, 1959, p. 7; =Kordecyathidae missArZhevsKiY, 1961, p.
21; =Schidertycyathidae KrAsn oPeevA, 1969, p. 63; =Gumbycyathidae
Debrenne & Kruse, 1986, p. 253]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.2).
Vologdinocyathus YAroshevich, 1957, p. 1015 [*V.
erbiensis; OD; holotype, YAroshevich, 1957, fig.
1a–v, TsSGM 499/1a-b, Novosibirsk] [=Tegero-
cyathella KonYushKov, 1967, p. 109 (type, T.
borovikovi, OD); =Larecyathus KAshinA, 1979, p.
46, nom. nud.; =Larecyathus KAshinA in osAD-
chAYA & others, 1979, p. 145 (type, L. infinitus,
OD), for discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, &
roZAnov , 1989, p. 139; Debrenne, roZA nov, &
ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 167]. Inner wall with one row
of horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals
per intersept; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Bot.3–Toy.2): Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Antarctica,
Greenland.——Fig. 31,2a–b. *V. erbiensis, Usa
Formation, Toyonian, Bol’shaya Erba, Batenev
Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Altay Sayan, Russia,
holotype, TsSGM 499/1a-b; a, detail of trans-
verse section, ×30; b, detail of septum in longitu-
dinal section (outer wall to left), ×50 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Gumbycyathus Kruse, 1982, p. 168 [*G. pythoni; OD;
holotype, Kru se, 1982, pl. 4,1–5, AM F.83930,
Sydney]. Inner wall with several rows of horizontal
to upwardly projecting, straight canals per intersept,
bearing supplementary bracts on central cavity side;
septa completely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–
Bot.3): Mongolia, Australia.——Fig. 32,1a–d. *G.
pythoni, Cymbric Vale Formation, Botoman, Mt.
Wright, New South Wales, Australia, holotype, AM
F.83930; a, transverse section (outer wall to right),
AM FT.8457, ×6; b, detail of longitudinal section
(outer wall to left), AM FT.8455, ×8; c, detail of
outer wall in tangential section, AM FT.8458, ×8;
d, detail of inner wall in tangential section, AM
FT.8456, ×8 (Kruse, 1982).
Inacyathella Debrenne, 1977a, p. 109 [*I. pulchra;
OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1977a, pl. 8,3–4,
MNHN M80037, Paris]. Inner wall with one row
of horizontal to upwardly projecting, S-shaped
canals per intersept; septa completely porous. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1): Morocco.——Fi g. 31,3a–b. *I.
pulchra, Issafen Formation, Botoman, Jbel Irhoud,
Morocco, holotype, MNHN M80037; a, oblique
transverse section, ×3.5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002); b, detail of septum in longitu-
dinal section (outer wall to left), ×10 (Debrenne,
1977a).
Kordecyathus missArZhevsKiY, 1961, p. 21 [*K.
shiveligensis; OD; holotype, missArZhevsKiY,
1961, pl. 1,3, PIN 1914/73M/1, Moscow, not
located]. Inner wall with one row of horizontal to
upwardly projecting, straight canals per intersept,
bearing downwardly projecting cupped bracts
on central cavity side; septa completely porous;
pectinate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.2): Tuva, Mongolia.——Fig. 31,4a–b.
*K. shiveligensis, Shangan Formation, Botoman,
Shivelig-Khem River, eastern Tannu-Ola Range,
Tuva, Russia, holotype, PIN 1914/73M/1; a,
detail of transverse section (outer wall at top), ×8
(Missarzhevskiy, 1961); b, oblique longitudinal
section, ×3 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Sanarkophyllum Debrenne & Kr us e , 1986 , p.
254 [*Formosocyathus antarcticus hill, 1964c, p.
616; OD; holotype, hill, 1964c, fig. 1(4a), An
62/1B/p, not located]. Inner wall with one row
42 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 30. Erbocyathidae (p. 40–41).
1a
3a
2a
1b
3b
2b
Pluralicyathus
Ladaecyathus
Milaecyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 43
of downwardly projecting, straight canals per
intersept, bearing supplementary bracts on central
cavity side; septa aporose to sparsely porous. lower
Cambrian (Bot.3): Antarctica.——Fig. 32,2a–d.
*S. antarcticum (hill), Shackleton Limestone,
Botoman; a, Plunket Point, Beardmore Glacier,
Antarctica, holotype, An 62/1B/p, oblique trans-
verse section, ×2 (Hill, 1964c); b–d, Holyoake
Range, Nimrod Glacier, Antarctica, specimen GNS
MG509; b, transverse section, ×4; c, oblique longi-
tudinal section, ×3.5; d, detail of repeated longi-
tudinal section (outer wall to left), ×6 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Syringocyathus vologDin, 1940b, p. 82 (vologDin,
1937b, p. 471, nom. nud.) [*S. aspectabilis;
OD; lectotype, vologDin, 1940b, pl. 23,3; SD
ZhurAvle v, 2001a, p. 92, PIN 4754/3, Moscow]
[=Schidertycyathus KrAsnoPeevA, 1959, p. 3
(type, S. borucaevi, M); =?Bosceculcyathus KrAs-
noP eevA , 1959, p. 7 (type, B. agyrekensis, OD);
=?Boscekulcyathus KrA sno PeevA, 1959, p. 7, nom.
null.; =Schidertycyathellus KonYushKov, 1967, p.
108 (type, S. borukaevi, OD); =Syringocyathellus
KAsh in A in os AD ch AYA & others, 1979, p. 149
(type, S. kazachstani, OD), for discussion, see
Debrenne, roZA no v, & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p.
162]. Inner wall with several rows of horizontal to
upwardly projecting, straight canals per intersept;
septa completely porous, linked by interseptal
plates. lower Cambrian (Bot.3–Toy.2): Altay Sayan,
Tuva, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan.——Fig. 32,3. *S.
aspectabilis, Verkhnemonok Formation, Botoman,
Abakan River, western Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia,
lectotype, PIN 4754/3, oblique transverse section,
×5 (Vologdin, 1940b).
Family TEGEROCYATHIDAE
Krasnopeeva, 1972
[Tegerocyathidae KrAsnoPeevA, 1972, p. 145]
Inner wall with communicating canals.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.3).
Tegerocyathus KrAsnoPeevA, 1955, p. 90 (KrAs-
noP ee vA, 1953, p. 52, 56, nom. nud.) [*Ethmo-
phyllum abakanensis vologDin, 1 940b, p.
69; holotype not designated, collection not
located; Zh ur Avl evA , 1960b, p. 192, invalidly
nominated Ethmophyllum edelsteini vologDin,
1931, p. 47, as type species] [=Tegerocoscinus
KrAsnoPeevA, 1972, p. 145 (type, T. tchesno-
kovensis, OD); =Alexandricyathus KAshinA in
osA D ch AY A & others, 1979, p. 142 (type, A .
ultrus, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne,
Zh u r Av l e v , & ro Z A n o v , 1989, p. 134;
Debrenne, roZA no v, & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p.
163]. Inner wall with one row of horizontal
to upwardly projecting, straight porous canals
per intersept; septa sparsely to completely
porous; pectinate tabulae may be present. lowe r
Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.3): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan, Mongolia, Uzbekistan, Antarctica,
Greenland, United States.——Fig . 33,1a–b. *T.
abakanensis (vologDin), Verkhnemonok Forma-
tion, Botoman, Abakan River, western Sayan,
Altay Sayan, Russia, unlocated syntype; a ,
transverse section, ×5; b, longitudinal section,
×5 (Vologdin, 1940b).
Krasnopeevaecyathus ro Z A n ov in reP i n A &
others, 1964, p. 208 [*K. tyrgaensis; OD; holo-
type, rePinA & others, 1964, pl. 21,3–4 ),
PIN 4297/26-27, Moscow] [=Krishnanicyathus
vologDin, 1964b, p. 358 (type, K. elegans,
OD); =Ethmosyringocyathus Ko nYu shK ov, 1972,
p. 138 (type, E. primus, OD)]. Inner wall longi-
tudinally plicate, with several rows of anasto-
mosing, horizontal to upwardly projecting, waved
canals per intersept; septa completely porous.
lower Cambrian (Bot.2): Altay Sayan, United
States.——Fig . 33,2. *K. tyrgaensis, Verkh-
neynyrga Formation, Botoman, Tyrga River,
Altay Mountains, Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype,
PIN 4297/26-27, oblique transverse section,
×3.5 (Repina & others, 1964).
Superfamily
TUMULOCYATHOIDEA
Krasnopeeva, 1953
[nom. correct. ZhurAvlev & roZAnov in voronovA & others, 1987, p.
21, pro Tumulocyathacea Debrenne, 1964, p. 113, nom. transl. ex Tumu-
locyathidae KrAsnoPeevA, 1953, p. 56] [=Geocyathacea Debrenne, 1964,
p. 114, nom. nud., nom. transl. roZAnov, 1973, p. 86 ex Geocyathidae
Debrenne, 1964, p. 114 ]
Outer wall with simple tumuli. lower
Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3).
Family TUMULOCYATHIDAE
Krasnopeeva, 1953
[Tumulocyathidae KrAsnoPeevA, 1953, p. 56] [=Kotuyicyathidae roZAnov
in roZAnov & others, 1969, p. 186, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3).
Tumulocyathus vologDin, 1937b, p. 470 [*T. pustulatus;
M; holotype not designated, collection not located]
[=Kotuyicyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 226 (type,
K. kotuyikensis, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 138; Debrenne,
roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 165; =Tumulocy-
athoides boYArinov & KonYAevA in ZhurAvlevA &
others, 1997b, p. 123 (type, T. kiyaensis, OD)]. Inner
wall with one row of simple pores per intersept; septa
completely porous; pectinate tabulae may be present.
lower Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.1): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Australia.——Fig. 34,1.
*T. pustulatus; Salaany Gol Formation, Atdabanian,
Salaany Gol, Khasagt-Khayrkhan Range, Tsagaan
Oloom province, western Mongolia, specimen PIN
44 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 31. Peregrinicyathidae and Vologdinocyathidae (p. 41).
4a
2a
1b
4b
2b
Peregrinicyathus
Vologdinocyathus
1a
3a
3b
Inacyathella
Kordecyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 45
1a
2b
1d
2d
2c
2a
1b
1c
3
Sanarkophyllum
Gumbycyathus
Syringocyathus
Fig. 32. Vologdinocyathidae (p. 41–43).
46 Treatise Online, number XX
3302/710, oblique transverse section, ×7 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Isiticyathus Korshunov, 1972, p. 60 [*?Tumulifungia
ultra Korshunov in Zh urAvlevA, Korshunov, &
roZA nov , 1969, p. 38; OD; holotype, Zhur Av-
levA , Korshunov, & roZAn ov, 1969, pl. 10,2;
Korshunov, 1972, pl. 8,6, TsSGM 323/45, Novo-
sibirsk]. Inner wall with one row of simple pores
per intersept; septa completely porous, linked by
synapticulae. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1): Sibe-
rian Platform, Transbaikalia.——Fig. 34,2a–b. *I.
ultra (Korshunov), Oy-Muran reef massif, Atda-
banian, Oy-Muran, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia),
Russia, holotype, TsSGM 323/45; a, transverse
section, ×8 (Zhuravleva, Korshunov, & Rozanov,
1969); b, detail of transverse section (outer wall
at bottom), ×13 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse,
2002).
Kotuyicyathellus osADchAYA in osADchAYA & others,
1979, p. 157 [*K. minus; OD; holotype, osAD-
chAYA & others, 1979, pl. 25,5, VSEGEI 11594,
St. Petersburg] [=Borocyathus voronin, 1988,
p. 8 (type, B. khairkhanicus, OD)]. Inner wall
with several rows of simple pores per intersept;
septa aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate tabulae
may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1):
Sib erian Platform, Altay Sayan, Mongolia, Far
East.——Fig. 34,3. *K. minus, Usa Formation,
Atdabanian, Krutoy Log, Batenev Range, Kuznetsk
Alatau, Russia, holotype, VSEGEI 11594, trans-
verse section, ×15 (Osadchaya & others, 1979).
Plicocyathus vologDin, 1960, p. 424 [*P. krassnyi; OD;
holotype, vologDin, 1960, fig. 1m, PIN 4754/45,
Moscow] [=Tumulocyathellus Zhur AvlevA, 1960b,
p. 174, nom. transl. rePinA & others, 1964, p. 194,
ex Tumulocyathus (Tumulocyathellus) ZhurAvle vA,
1960b, p. 174 (type, Tumulocyathus admirabilis
vologDin, 1940b, p. 72, OD); for discussion, see
Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 123;
Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 155;
=Torosocyathellus osADchAYA in osADchAYA & others,
1979, p. 128 (type, T. torosus, OD)]. Outer wall
longitudinally plicate; inner wall with stirrup pores
only; septa aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate
2
1b
1a Tegerocyathus
Krasnopeevaecyathus
Fig. 33. Tegerocyathidae (p. 43).
I did not
separate
these two
genera into
two separate
figures, as
that would
necessitate
renumbering
from here
to the end,
both the
figures and
the text.
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 47
Fig. 34. Tumulocyathidae (p. 43–47).
2a
3
1
4b
2b
4c
4a
Tumulocyathus
Isiticyathus
Kotuyicyathellus
Plicocyathus
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–
Bot.3): Siberian Platform, Kolyma, Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far East, Morocco, Iberia,
Canada, United States, Mexico.——Fig. 34,4a–c. *P.
krassnyi; a, Ust’toka unit, Botoman, Gerbikan River,
Dzhagdy Range, Far East, Russia, holotype, PIN
4754/45, sketch of transverse section, ×5 (Vologdin,
1960); b–c, Ust’toka unit, Botoman, Onnetok River,
Dzhagdy Range, Far East, Russia, specimen DVGU
6M; b, transverse section, ×10; c, oblique transverse
section, ×10 (Belyaeva & others, 1975).
Family SANARKOCYATHIDAE
Hill, 1972
[Sanarkocyathidae hill, 1972, p. 79] [=Sanaricyathidae roZAnov, 1969,
p. 107, name based on invalid generic name Sanaricyathus roZA nov,
1969, p. 108, nom. null. pro Sanarkocyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1963a, p. 118]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Atd.3–Bot.1).
Sanarkocyathus Zhu rAv le vA , 1963a, p. 118 [*S.
mamaevi; OD; holotype, Zh ur Av le vA, 1963a,
48 Treatise Online, number XX
fig. 2, TsSGM 99/1, Novosibirsk] [=Sanaricyathus
roZAnov, 1969, p. 108, nom. null. pro Sanarkocy-
athus ZhurAvlevA, 1963a, p. 118]. Inner wall with
one row of pores per intersept, bearing possibly
upwardly projecting, S-shaped scales; septa aporose
to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Urals,
Altay Sayan.——Fig. 35,1. *S. mamaevi, Sanarka
Formation, Botoman, Sanarka River, eastern flank
of southern Urals, Russia, holotype, TsSGM 99/1,
oblique transverse section, ×6 (Zhuravleva, 1963a).
Neokolbicyathus KonYAevA in ZhurAvlevA & others,
1997b, p.131 [*N. azhuravlevi; OD; holotype,
Zhur Avl evA & others, 1997b, pl. 4,3, ZSGGU
2329/83, Novokuznetsk]. Inner wall with stirrup
pores only, bearing upwardly projecting, S-shaped
scales; septa aporose to sparsely porous. l ower
Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1): Altay Sayan, Far East,
Canada.——Fig . 35,2. *N. azhuravlevi, Usa
Formation, Atdabanian, Malaya Belokamenka
River, Kiya River, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, holo-
type, ZSGGU 2329/83, oblique transverse section,
×8 (Zhuravleva & others, 1997b).
Ringifungia Korshunov in ZhurAvlevA, Korshunov,
& roZ Anov, 1969, p. 38 [*R. vavilovi; OD; holo-
type, Zh ur Av l evA , Kor sh u n ov , & ro ZA n ov ,
1969, pl. 10,4–5, TsSGM 323/47, Novosibirsk].
Inner wall with one row of pores per intersept,
bearing upwardly projecting, S-shaped scales; septa
completely porous, linked by synapticulae. lower
Cambrian (Atd.3): Siberian Platform.——Fig .
35,3. *R. vavilovi, Perekhod Formation, Atdaba-
nian, Ulakhan-Taryng Creek, Lena River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia, holotype, TsSGM 323/47,
oblique transverse section, ×8 (Zhuravleva, Kors-
hunov, & Rozanov, 1969).
Family GEOCYATHIDAE
Debrenne, 1964
[Geocyathidae Debrenne, 1964, p. 114] [=Jakutocyathidae Korshunov,
1972, p. 65; =Eladicyathidae Perejón, 1977, p. 550]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Atd.1–Bot.1).
Geocyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 234 [*Thalamocy-
athus botomanensis ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA &
Zelenov, 1955, p. 71; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA
& Zelenov, 1955, pl. 2,3–4, TsSGM 205/115a-b,
Novosibirsk; =T. botomaensis Zhu rAvlevA, 1960b,
p. 234, nom. null.] [=Jakutocyathus (Jakutocyathus)
Zhur Avle vA, 1960b, p. 230 (type, J. (J.) latini,
OD); =Eladicyathus Perejón, 1977, p. 550 (type,
E. beticus, OD); for discussion, see Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 108; Debrenne,
roZ An ov , & Zh ur Avl ev , 1990, p. 144]. Inner
wall with one pore row per intersept and upwardly
projecting, S-shaped annuli; septa completely
porous; pectinate tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1): Siberian Platform, Altay
Sayan, Transbaikalia, Far East, Iberia.——Fig .
35,4a–b. *G. botomanensis (ZhurAvlevA), Perekhod
Formation, Atdabanian, Botoma River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia, holotype, TsSGM 205/115a-b;
a, transverse section, ×15; b, longitudinal section,
×15 (Zhuravleva & Zelenov, 1955).
Family KONJUSCHKOVICYATHIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 2000
[Konjuschkovicyathidae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 2000, p. 49]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Konjuschkovicyathus Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 2000,
p. 49 [*Jakutocyathus spinosus KonYushKov, 1972,
p. 140; OD; holotype, Ko nY us hK ov, 1972, pl.
14,6, not located; paratypes, KonYushKov, 1972,
pl. 14,5, PIN 4755/5; Ko n Yu sh Kov , 1972, pl.
16,3, PIN 4755/6, Moscow]. Inner wall with
downwardly projecting, straight stirrup canals only,
bearing supplementary bracts on central cavity side;
septa aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate tabulae
may be present. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3):
Altay Sayan, Transbaikalia.——Fig. 35,5a–b. *K.
spinosus (KonYushKov), Verkhnemonok Formation,
Botoman, Malyy Karakol River, western Sayan,
Altay Sayan, Russia; a, holotype, transverse section,
×10; b, paratype, PIN 4755/6, oblique longitu-
dinal section, ×10 (Konyushkov, 1972).
Superfamily LENOCYATHOIDEA
Zhuravleva, 1956
[nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAno v, 1989, p. 83, pro
Lenocyathacea ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 224, nom. transl. ex Lenocyathidae
ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879] [=Rewardocyathacea roZAnov,
1973, p. 86, nom. nud.]
Outer wall with multiperforate tumuli.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1).
Family TOROSOCYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002
[Torosocyathidae Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, 2002, p. 1594] [=Re-
wardocyathidae roZAnov, 1973, p. 86, nom. nud.; =Rewardocyathidae
roZAnov in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 83, nom. nud.,
based on unavailable genus-group name]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1).
Torosocyathus KAshinA in vologDin & KAshinA,
1972, p. 153 [*T. provisus; OD; holotype, vologDin
& KAshinA, 1972, pl. 20a,1, KGU 19/729a, Kras-
noyarsk] [=Rewardocyathus roZAnov, 1973, p. 59,
75, 161, nom. nud.]. Inner wall with stirrup pores
only; septa completely porous. lower Cambrian
(Atd.1–Bot .1): Altay Sayan, Mongolia.——F ig .
36,1. *T. provisus, Balakhtinson Formation, Atda-
banian, Uyar River, eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan,
Russia, holotype, KGU 19/729a, detail of trans-
verse section, ×12 (Vologdin & Kashina, 1972).
Torosocyathella KoTelni Kov, 1995, p. 27 [*T. osad-
chajae; OD; holotype, KoTelni Kov, 1995, pl. 2,5,
TsNIGRm 12890/9, St. Petersburg]. Inner wall
with several rows of simple pores per intersept;
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 49
Fig. 35. Sanarkocyathidae, Geocyathidae, and Konjuschkovicyathidae (p. 47–48).
2
5a
5b
1
4b
3
4a
Sanarkocyathus
Neokolbicyathus
Ringifungia
Geocyathus Konjuschkovicyathus
50 Treatise Online, number XX
septa completely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.2):
Tuva.——Fig . 36,2. *T. osadchajae, Il’chir Forma-
tion, Atdabanian, Vadi-Bala, Tapsa River, Tuva,
Russia, holotype, TsNIGRm 12890/9, transverse
section, ×20 (Kotel’nikov, 1995).
Family JAPHANICYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 1989
[Japhanicyathidae roZAnov in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989,
p. 83] [=Japhanicyathidae roZAnov, 1973, p. 86, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Atd.2–Bot.1).
Japhanicyathus Korshunov i n Zh u r Av l e v A ,
Korshunov, & roZAnov, 1969, p. 45 [*J. genu-
rosus; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA, Korshunov, &
roZAnov, 1969, pl. 17,1–2, TsSGM 323/67, Novo-
sibirsk]. Inner wall with one pore row per intersept
and upright, V-shaped annuli; septa completely
porous; pectinate tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1): Siberian Platform, Far
East.——Fig. 36,3. *J. genurosus, Oy-Muran reef
massif, Atdabanian, Oy-Muran, Lena River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia, holotype, TsSGM 323/67, trans-
verse section, ×8 (Zhuravleva, Korshunov, &
Rozanov, 1969).
Family LENOCYATHIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1956
[Lenocyathidae ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1).
Lenocyathus ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & Zelenov,
1955, p. 73 (Zh u rAv l evA , 1954, p. 12, nom.
nud.) [*L. lenaicus; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA &
Zelenov, 1955, pl. 2,5–6, TsSGM 205/117, Novo-
sibirsk]. Inner wall with one row of horizontal to
upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals per intersept;
septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae may be
present. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1): Siberian
Platform, Far East, Morocco.——Fig. 36,4a–b. *L.
lenaicus, Pestrotsvet Formation, Atdabanian, Yudyay,
Botoma River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, holotype,
TsSGM, 205/117; a, longitudinal section, ×7; b,
detail of transverse section (outer wall at top), ×20
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Superfamily
ANNULOCYATHOIDEA
Krasnopeeva, 1953
[nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 83, pro Annu-
locyathacea ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 171, nom. transl. ex Annulocyathidae
KrAsnoPeevA, 1953, p. 56]
Outer wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3).
Family TUMULIFUNGIIDAE
Rozanov, 1989
[Tumulifungiidae roZAnov in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989,
p. 83] [=Tumulifungiidae roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3).
Tumulifungia ZhurAvlevA in DATsenKo & others,
1968, p. 144 (Zh u rAv l ev A in Zhur Av l ev A &
others, 1967, p. 68, nom. nud.) [*T. datzenkoi;
OD; holotype, DATs en Ko & others, 1968, pl.
4,2–3, TsSGM 277/30, Novosibirsk]. Outer wall
with upwardly projecting cu pp ed bracts; inner
wall with one row of simple pores per intersept;
septa completely porous, linked by synapticulae.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Far East, Morocco,
Iberia.——Fig . 37,1. *T. datzenkoi, Shum noy
Formation, Botoman, Sukharikha River, Kras-
noyarsk region, Russia, holotype, TsSGM 277/30,
transverse section, ×11 (Datsenko & others, 1968).
Sclerocyathus vologDin, 1960, p. 424 [*S. scrofu -
losus; OD; holotype, vologDin, 1960, fig. 1z-i,
PIN 4754/1, Moscow]. Outer wall with upwardly
projecting, cupped bracts; inner wall with one row
of simple pores per intersept; septa completely
porous. lower Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.1): Siberian
Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Far East,
Iberia.——Fig. 37,2a–b. *S. scrofulosus, Bayan-Kol
Formation, Atdabanian, Yenisey River, Shagonar
Mountains, Tuva, Russia, holotype, PIN 4754/1;
a, transverse section, ×4; b, detail of transverse
section, ×8 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Subtumulocyathellus osADchAYA in osADchAYA &
others, 1979, p. 129 [*S. vulgaris; OD; holotype,
osA Dc hAY A & others, 1979, pl. 11,1, VSEGEI
11594, St. Petersburg] [=Arturocyathus ro ZAnov ,
1973, p. 61, 162, nom. nud. ; =Arturocyathus
roZAnov in Debrenne, ZhurAvle v, & ro ZAnov ,
1989, p. 95 (type, A. borisovi ro ZAno v, 1973, p.
162, OD)]. Outer wall with upwardly projecting,
cupped bracts; inner wall with stirrup pores only;
septa aporose to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian
(At d.1–Bot.1): Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan,
Tuva, Mongolia, Far East.——Fig . 37,3 . *S.
vulgaris, Usa Formation, Atdabanian, Krutoy Log,
Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, holotype,
VSEGEI 11594, oblique transverse section, ×10
(Osadchaya & others, 1979).
Tologoicyathus voronin, 1988, p. 9 [*T. ichituin-
icus; OD; holotype, voronin, 1988, pl. 2,3, PIN
3301/516, Moscow]. Outer wall with upwardly
projecting, cupped bracts; inner wall with several
rows of simple pores per intersept; septa completely
porous. lower Cambrian (Tom.4–Bot.1): Mongolia,
Far East. —F i g. 37,4. *T. ich ituin icu s, Ichi-
tuin Formation, Atdabanian, Boro-Khairkhan-
Obo Mountain, Khan-Khukhiy Range, Mongolia,
paratype, PIN 3301/515, transverse section, ×5
(Voronin, 1988).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 51
Fig. 36. Torosocyathidae, Japhanicyathidae, and Lenocyathidae (p. 48–50).
2
1
4b
3
4a
Torosocyathus
Torosocyathella
Japhanicyathus
Lenocyathus
52 Treatise Online, number XX
Family ANNULOCYATHIDAE
Krasnopeeva, 1953
[Annulocyathidae KrAsnoPeevA, 1953, p. 56]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Atd.2–Bot.3).
Annulocyathus vologDin, 1937b, p. 468 [*A. pulcher;
M; lectotype, Debr en ne, Zhu rAvl ev, & Kru se,
2002, fig. 32E; SD Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, &
Krus e, 2002, p. 1597, PIN 4754/5, Moscow].
Oute r wa ll with upwardly proje cti ng, cup ped
bracts; inner wall with one pore row per intersept
and upright V-shaped annuli; septa completely
porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Altay Sayan, Far
East.——Fig. 38,1a–b. *A. pulcher, Verkhnemonok
Formation, Botoman, Sanashtykgol River, western
Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, lectotype, PIN 4754/5;
Fig. 37. Tumulifungiidae (p. 50).
Sclerocyathus
2a
4
1
2b
3
Tumulifungia
Subtumulocyathellus
Tologoicyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 53
a, transverse section, ×11 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002); b, sketch of longitudinal section
(outer wall to left), ×5.5 (Vologdin, 1937b).
Annulocyathella vologDin, 1962a, p. 123 [*Annulo-
cyathus lavrenovae KrAsnoPeevA, 1955, p. 99; OD;
holotype, KrAsnoPeevA, 1955, pl. 3,2; vologDin,
1962a, fig. 86, not designated; =Anulocyathus lavre-
novi KrAsnoPeevA, 1937, p. 33; holotype, KrAsnoP-
eevA, 1937, pl. 4,38–39,41,43–44; pl. 16,109; pl.
19,118, not designated]. Outer wall with upwardly
projecting, cupped bracts; inner wall with one
pore row per intersept and upwardly projecting,
S-shaped annuli; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3): Altay Sayan.——
Fig. 38,2a–b. *A. lavrenovae (KrA sno PeevA), Usa
Formation, Botoman, Bol’shaya Erba, Batenev
Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia; a, unlocated
syntype, oblique transverse section, ×8; b, unlo-
cated syntype, sketch of longitudinal section (outer
wall to left), ×8 (Krasnopeeva, 1955).
Annulofungia KrAsnoPeevA, 1955, p. 99 (KrAs-
noPe evA, 1953, p. 56, nom. nud.) [*Anulocyathus
taylori KrA snoPe evA, 1937, p. 34; OD; holotype,
KrAsnoPe evA, 1937, pl. 4,46–47; pl. 18,115–116;
pl. 22,130; pl. 24,137, not designated, collection
not located] [=Kiyafungia boYArinov in ZhurAv-
levA & others, 1997b, p. 130 (type, K. concinna,
OD)]. Outer wall with upwardly projecting,
cupped bracts; inner wall with one pore row per
intersept and upright, V-shaped annuli; septa
completely porous, linked by synapticulae. lower
Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1): Altay Sayan.——Fig.
38,3a–b. *A. taylori (KrA sn oPee vA), Usa Forma-
tion, Botoman, Mt. Aydachikha, Batenev Range,
Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, unlocated specimen; a,
longitudinal section, ×6; b, transverse section, ×6
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Hemithalamocyathus Ting, 1937, p. 367 [*Archaeo-
cyathus sibiricus Toll, 1899, p. 40; M; lectotype,
Toll, 1899, pl. 6,5; SD Debrenne, Zh urAvlev, &
Kruse, 2002, p. 1598, TsNIGRm 24a/11533, St.
Petersburg]. Outer wall with upwardly projecting,
cupped bracts; inner wall with several pore rows
per intersept and upright, V-shaped annuli; septa
completely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1):
Altay Sayan.——Fig . 38,4. *H. sibiricus (Toll),
Torgashino Formation, Torgashino, Krasnoyarsk
region, eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, unnum-
bered paralectotype, oblique longitudinal section
(outer wall to left), ×10 (Toll, 1899).
Family JAKUTOCARINIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Jakutocarinidae Debrenne, roZAnov , & ZhurAvl ev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 83]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3).
Jakutocarinus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 232 [*Jakuto-
cyathus (Jakutocarinus) jakutensis; OD; holotype,
Zhur Avle vA, 1960b, pl. 20,2, TsSGM 205/113,
Novosibirsk]. Outer wall with upwardly projecting,
cupped bracts; inner wall with several rows of
downwardly projecting, straight canals per inter-
sept, bearing supplementary bracts on central cavity
side; septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae may
be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1): Siberian
Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Trans-
baikalia.——Fig. 39,1. *J. jakutensis, Pestrotsvet
Formation, Atdabanian, Mukhatta River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia, holotype, TsSGM 205/113,
detail of oblique transverse section (outer wall at
top), ×15 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Kosticyathus Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 2000, p. 49
[*Porocyathus sheglovi KonYush Kov, 1972, p. 138;
OD; holotype, KonYushKov, 1972, pl. 16,4–5,
PIN 4755/9, Moscow]. Outer wall with upwardly
projecting, cupped bracts; inner wall with one
row of downwardly projecting, straight canals
per intersept, bearing supplementary bracts on
central cavity side; septa completely porous. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3): Altay Sayan.——Fig .
39,2. *K. sheglovi (KonYushKov), Verkhnemonok
Formation, Botoman, Malyy Karakol River, western
Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype, PIN 4755/9,
longitudinal section, ×6 (Konyushkov, 1972).
Kruseicyathus boYAr ino v & Kon YAevA in Zhu rAv-
levA & others, 1997b, p. 134 [*K. notabilis; OD;
holotype, ZhurAvlevA & others, 1997b, pl. 4,5,
ZSGGU 2329/86, Novokuznetsk]. Outer wall
with upwardly projecting, cupped bracts; inner wall
with horizontal to upwardly projecting, S-shaped
canals, each canal spanning several intersepts;
septa completely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Altay Sayan.——Fig. 39,3a–b. *K. notabilis, Usa
Formation, Botoman, Malaya Belokamenka River,
Kiya River, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia; a, paratype,
ZSGGU 2329/85, transverse section, ×10; b,
holotype, ZSGGU 2329/86, oblique longitudinal
section, ×10 (Zhuravleva & others, 1997b).
Rossocyathella Zhu rAv l evA , 1960b, p. 178 [*R.
ninaekosti; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, pl.
12,5, PIN 1038, Moscow, not located]. Outer wall
with upwardly projecting, cupped bracts; inner wall
with one row of downwardly projecting, straight
canals per intersept, bearing supplementary bracts
on central cavity side; septa aporose to sparsely
porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan, Tuva.——Fig. 39,4a–b. *R. ninaekosti,
Perekhod Formation, Botoman, Botoma River,
Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, holotype, PIN 1038; a,
sketch of longitudinal section (outer wall to left),
×40; b, detail of transverse section (outer wall at
bottom), ×15 (Zhuravleva, 1960b).
?Russocyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1955b, p. 628 [*R. basa-
ichensis; OD; holotype, Zhu rAvle vA, 1955b, fig.
1E, 2v; rePinA & others, 1964, pl. 19,2, PIN 1039,
Moscow, not located]. Outer wall with probable
upwardly projecting, cupped bracts; inner wall
with one row of probable horizontal to upwardly
projecting, S-shaped canals per intersept; septa
aporose to sparsely porous. [Limited type material
does not provide certainty as to orientation of cup
and hence as to presence or absence of canals and/
54 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 38. Annulocyathidae (p. 52–53).
3a
3b
2b
2a
Annulocyathella
Annulofungia 4Hemithalamocyathus
1b
1a
Annulocyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 55
Fig. 39. Jakutocarinidae and Gagarinicyathidae (p. 53–56).
2
5
3b
4a
4b
6
1
3a
Jakutocarinus
Kosticyathus
Kruseicyathus
Rossocyathella
Russocyathus Gagarinicyathus
56 Treatise Online, number XX
or bracts in walls.] lower Cambrian (Atd.3–Bot.1):
Altay Sayan, Tuva.——Fig. 39,5. *R. basaichensis,
Torgashino Formation, Atdabanian, Torgashino,
Krasnoyarsk region, eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan,
Russia, holotype, PIN 1039, sketch of oblique
longitudinal section, ×20 (Zhuravleva, 1955b).
Family GAGARINICYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Gagarinicyathidae Debrenne, ro ZAnov, & ZhurAvlev, in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 84]
Inner wall with communicating canals.
lower Cambrian (Atd.3–Bot.1).
Gagarinicyathus ZhurAvlevA in DATsen Ko & others,
1968, p. 146 [*G. ethmophylloides; OD; holotype,
DATsenKo & others, 1968, pl. 5,1, TsSGM 277/36,
Novosibirsk]. Outer wall with upwardly projecting,
cupped bracts; inner wall with one row of horizontal
to upwardly projecting, straight porous canals per
intersept; septa completely porous. lower Cambrian
(Atd.3–Bot.1): Siberian Platform.——Fig. 39,6. *G.
ethmophylloides, Shumnoy Formation, Botoman,
Sukharikha River, Krasnoyarsk region, Russia, holo-
type, TsSGM 277/36, oblique longitudinal section,
×4.5 (Datsenko & others, 1968).
Superfamily
ETHMOPHYLLOIDEA
Okulitch, 1937
[nom. transl. ZhurAvlev in voronovA & others, 1987, p. 23, ex Ethmo-
phyllidae oKuliTch, 1937b, p. 358] [=Carinacyathoidea KrAsnoPeevA,
1953, p. 52, nom. transl. ZhurAvlev in voronovA & others, 1987, p.
23, ex Carinacyathidae ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 240, nom. correct. pro Ca-
rinocyathidae KrAsnoPeevA, 1953, p. 52; =Fansycyathacea Korshunov &
roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, Korshunov, & roZAnov, 1969, p. 46; =Hupe-
cyathelloidea roZAnov, 1969, p. 111, nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev,
& roZAnov, 1989, p. 84, pro Hupecyathellacea roZAnov, 1969, p. 111]
Outer wall with canals. lower Cambrian
(Atd.1–Toy.1).
Family FALLOCYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 1969
[Fallocyathidae roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, Korshunov, & roZAnov, 1969,
p. 47] [=Sekwicyathidae roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2).
Fallocyathus roZAnov in ZhurAvlevA, Korshunov, &
roZAnov, 1969, p. 47 [*F. dubius; OD; holotype,
Zhu rAv l evA , Korshunov, & roZA no v, 1969,
pl. 18,5–6; pl. 19,2, PIN 4297/84, Moscow].
Outer wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight canals, bearing supplementary bracts exter-
nally (imparting overall inverted V-shaped appear-
ance to outer wall); inner wall with several rows of
simple pores per intersept; septa completely porous;
pectinate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1): Siberian Platform, Iberia.——Fig. 40,1.
*F. dubius, Oy-Muran reef massif, Atdabanian,
Oy-Muran, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia,
holotype, PIN 4297/84, oblique transverse section,
×12 (Zhuravleva, Korshunov, & Rozanov, 1969).
Sekwicyathus hAnDFielD, 1971, p. 34 [*S. nahan-
niensis; OD; holotype, hAnDFielD, 1971, p. 34,
pl. 2,5, GSC 25317, Ottawa; ?=Archaeocyathus
nevadensis oKuliTch, 1935, p. 101]. Outer wall
with subspherical chambered canals each with base
commencing in intervallum, canals subdivided
by stipules (imparting overall inverted V-shaped
appearance to outer wall); inner wall with several
rows of simple pores per intersept; septa aporose
to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2):
Altay Sayan, Iberia, Canada, United States.——
Fig. 40,2a–c. *S. nahanniensis; a, Sekwi Forma-
tion, Botoman, Mackenzie Mountains, North-
west Territories, Canada, holotype, GSC 25137,
oblique longitudinal section, ×15 (Handfield,
1971); b, Atan Group, Botoman, Gataga River,
British Columbia, Canada, specimen GSC 69260,
transverse section, ×10 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002); c, Sekwi Formation, Botoman, Mack-
enzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada,
specimen GSC 90132, longitudinal section, ×10
(Voronova & others, 1987).
Yukonocyathus hAnDFielD, 1971, p. 51 [*Y. francesi;
OD; holotype, hAnDFielD, 1971, pl. 8,1a–c, GSC
25351, Ottawa]. Outer wall with horizontal to
upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals, bearing
supplementary bracts externally (imparting overall
inverted V-shaped appearance to outer wall); inner
wall with one row of simple pores per intersept,
formed by fluting of inner edges of septa; septa
aporose to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Canada, United States.——Fig. 40,3a–b. *Y. fran-
cesi, Sekwi Formation, Botoman, Frances Lake,
Yukon Territory, Canada, holotype, GSC 25351;
a, transverse section, ×6; b, longitudinal section
(outer wall to left), ×6 (Handfield, 1971).
Family GLORIOSOCYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 1969
[Gloriosocyathidae roZAnov, 1969, p. 108]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1).
Gloriosocyathus roZ A n o v , 1969, p. 108 [*G .
permultus; OD; holotype, ro ZA no v, 1969, pl.
40,3, PIN 4297/95, Moscow]. Outer wall with
horizontal to upwardly projecting, S-shaped
canals; inner wall with one row of pores per inter-
sept, bearing upwardly projecting, S-shaped scales;
septa completely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Siberian Platform, Iberia.——Fi g . 41,1. *G.
permultus, Erkeket Formation, Botoman, Khor-
busuonka River, Olenek Basin, Sakha (Yakutia),
Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/95, oblique transverse
section, ×10 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse,
2002).
Gandinocyathus F. Debrenne & M. Debrenne in
gAnDin, F. Debrenne, & M. Debrenne, 2007, p.
41 [*G. gravestocki, OD; holotype, F. Debrenne,
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 57
Yukonocyathus
Fig. 40. Fallocyathidae (p. 56).
2a
3b
2c
2b
1
3a
Fallocyathus
Sekwicyathus
58 Treatise Online, number XX
gAnDin, & m. Debrenne, 1993, pl. 3,1, MNHN
M84234, Paris]. Outer wall with horizontal to
upwardly projecting, straight canals, bearing
supplementary bracts externally (imparting overall
inverted V-shaped appearance to outer wall);
inner wall with one row of pores per intersept,
bearing upwardly projecting, cupped bracts;
septa completely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Sardinia.——Fig. 41,2. *G. gravestocki, Matoppa
Formation, Botoman, Matoppa Valley, Sardinia,
Italy, holotype, MNHN M84234, oblique longi-
tudinal section, ×10 (F. Debrenne, Gandin, & M.
Debrenne, 1993).
Nalivkinicyathus boYArinov & osADchAYA in osAD-
chAYA & gAn Ac hK ovA , 1986, p. 170 [*Porocy-
athellus cyroflexus boY Ar i nov & osA Dc hA YA in
osADchAYA & others, 1979, p. 132; OD; holotype,
osADchAYA & others, 1979, pl. 8,1–2; osAD chAYA
& gAnAchKovA, 1986, pl. 18,1–2, VSEGEI 11594,
St. Petersburg] [=Nalivkinicyathus osADchAYA in
Debrenne & roZAnov, 1983, p. 735, nom. nud.,
nom. nov. pro Porocyathellus boYArin ov & osAD-
chAYA in osADc hAYA & others, 1979, p. 131, non
Debrenne, 1977a, p. 107, archaeocyath]. Outer
wall with downwardly projecting, straight canals,
bearing supplementary bracts externally (imparting
overall upright V-shaped appearance to outer wall);
inner wall with one row of pores per intersept,
bearing upright, V-shaped scales; septa completely
porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1): Altay Sayan,
Iberia.——Fig. 41,3a–b. *N. cyroflexus (boYA -
rinov & osADchAYA), Usa Formation, Atdabanian,
Krutoy Log, Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau,
Russia, holotype, VSEGEI 11594; a, transverse
section, ×4; b, detail of septum in longitudinal
section (outer wall to right), ×12 (Osadchaya &
others, 1979).
Family KIJACYATHIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1964
[Kijacyathidae ZhurAvl evA in rePinA & others, 1964, p. 195] [=Fan-
sycyathidae Korshunov & roZAnov in ZhurAvle vA, Korshunov, &
roZAnov, 1969, p. 47]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Atd.2–Bot.3).
Kijacyathus ZhurAvl evA, 1959, p. 424 [*K. chomen-
tovskii; OD; holotype, Zh ur Avl evA , 1959, fig.
2b–g, PIN 1431, Moscow, not located]. Outer
wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting,
S-shaped canals; inner wall with on e pore row
per intersept and upright, V-shaped annuli; septa
completely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.3–
Bot.1): Altay Sayan, Mongolia, Far East.
Fig. 42,1a–b. *K. chomentovskii, Usa Formation,
Atdabanian, Kiya River, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia,
holotype, PIN 1431; a, transverse section, ×8
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b, detail
of septum in longitudinal section (outer wall to
left), ×13 (Zhuravleva, 1959).
Aporosocyathus Krus e , 1978, p. 32 [*A. mucro-
porus; OD; holotype, Kru s e, 1978, fig. 4A–B,
AM FT.15203, 15204, Sydney]. Outer wall with
horizontal to upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals,
bearing supplementary bracts externally (imparting
overall inverted V-shaped appearance to outer wall);
inner wall with one pore row per intersept and
upright, V-shaped annuli; septa aporose to sparsely
porous; pectinate tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Bot.2–Bot.3): ?Mongolia, Australia,
Antarctica, ?Canada.——Fig. 42,2a–b. *A. mucro-
porus, Cymbric Vale Formation, Botoman, Mt.
Wright, New South Wales, Australia, holotype, AM
FT.15203, 15204; a, oblique transverse section,
AM FT.15204, ×8 (Kruse, 1978); b, detail of longi-
tudinal section (outer wall to right) AM FT.15203,
×6 (Kruse, 1982).
Fansycyathus Korshunov & roZ An ov in Zh urAv-
le vA , Korshunov, & ro ZA n o v, 1969, p. 48
[*F. lermontovae; OD; holotype, Zh u rAv l evA ,
Korshunov, & roZ A n o v , 1969, pl. 17,7 ;
roZAnov, 1973, pl. 20,2, PIN 4297/83, Moscow].
Outer wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting,
S-shaped canals, bearing supplementary bracts
externally (imparting overall inverted V-shaped
appearance to outer wall); inner wall with one
pore row per intersept and upright, V-shaped
annuli; septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae
may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1):
Siberian Platform.——Fig. 42,3. *F. lermontovae,
Oy-Muran reef massif, Atdabanian, Oy-Muran,
Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, holotype,
PIN 4297/83, longitudinal section, ×12 (Zhurav-
leva, Korshunov, & Rozanov, 1969).
Flexanulus Debrenne, 1975, p. 335 [*F. oosthui-
zeni; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1975, fig. 3a–b,
SAM(C) K4495 B-12a, Cape Town]. Outer wall
with horizontal to upwardly projecting, S-shaped
canals, each with base commencing in inter-
vallum, bearing supplementary bracts externally
(imparting overall inverted V-shaped appearance
to outer wall); inner wall with one pore row per
intersept and upwardly projecting, S-shaped
annuli; septa aporose to sparsely porous. l ower
Cambrian (Bot.3): Antarctica, South Africa
(allochthonous).——Fig . 43,1a–b. *F. oosthui-
zeni, Dwyka Subgroup, Botoman (allochthonous
in Permian), Zwartskraal, South Africa, holotype,
SAM(C) K4495 B-12a; a, transverse section,
×10; b, longitudinal section, ×10 (Debrenne,
1975).
Protocyathus ForD, 1878, p. 124 [*P. rarus; M; holo-
type, ForD, 1878, fig. 1a–b, NYSM 52, Albany].
Outer wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight stirrup canals only; inner wall with stirrup
pores only, bearing horizontal planar to waved
annuli, one per several horizontal pore files; septa
aporose to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–
Bot.2): Canada, United States.——Fig. 43,2a–b.
*P. rarus, Brown’s Pond Formation, Botoman, Troy,
New York, United States, holotype, NYSM 52; a,
detail of septum and inner wall in longitudinal
view (outer wall to left), ×15; b, longitudinal
view of outer wall, ×15 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 59
Yudjaicyathus ZhurAvlev in ZhurAvlev, ZhurAvlevA,
& Fonin, 1983, p. 25 [*Y. astashkini; OD; holo-
type, Zhu rAv lev , Zh ur Avle vA, & Fonin, 1983,
pl. 4,1, PIN 3848/505, Moscow]. Outer wall
with horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight
canals, bearing supplementary bracts externally
(imparting overall inverted V-shaped appearance
to outer wall); inner wall with one pore row per
intersept and upwardly projecting, S-shaped annuli;
septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae may be
present. lower Cambrian (Atd.3–Atd.4): Siberian
Platform.——Fig. 43,3. *Y. astashkini, Pestrotsvet
Formation, Atdabanian, Bachyk Creek, Lena River,
Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, holotype, PIN 3848/505,
oblique longitudinal section, ×14 (Zhuravlev,
Zhuravleva, & Fonin, 1983).
2
3b
1
3a
Gloriosocyathus
Gandinocyathus
Nalivkinicyathus
Fig. 41. Gloriosocyathidae (p. 56–58).
60 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 42. Kijacyathidae (p. 58).
1a
3
2b
1b
Kijacyathus
Aporosocyathus
Fansycyathus
I reduced view
2a to X8 and
changed the text
too. Is that what
you requested?
2a
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 61
1a
2a
3
1b
Flexanulus
Protocyathus
Yudjaicyathus
2b
Fig. 43. Kijacyathidae (p. 58–59).
62 Treatise Online, number XX
Family CARINACYATHIDAE
Krasnopeeva, 1953
[nom. correct. ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 240, pro Carinocyathidae KrAsnoPe-
evA, 1953, p. 56] [=Porocyathidae ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1957a, p.
179; Hupecyathellidae roZAnov, 1969, p. 111]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3).
Carinacyathus vologDin, 1932, p. 37 [*C. loculatus;
M; holotype, vologDin, 1932, fig. 28, pl. 10,5;
M; vologDin, 1940b, fig. 77, pl. 27,7, TsNIGRm
45a/2957, St. Petersburg] [=Carinocyathus
vologDin, 1937b, p. 471, nom. null.; =Porocyathus
ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1957a, p. 179, nom. nud.;
=Porocyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 180 (type, P.
pinus, OD); =Fossilicyathus Korshunov, 1983b,
p. 111 (type, F. evidens, OD), for discussion, see
Debrenne, Zh urAvlev, & roZAnov , 1989, p. 98;
Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 136].
Outer wall with downwardly projecting, straight
canals, bearing supplementary bracts externally
(imparting overall upright V-shaped appearance to
outer wall); inner wall with one row of downwardly
projecting, straight canals per intersept, bearing
supplementary bracts on central cavity side; septa
completely porous; pectinate tabulae may be present.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3): Siberian Platform,
Kolyma, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbai-
kalia, Far East.——Fi g. 44,1a–b. *C. loculatus,
Verkhneynyrga Formation, Botoman, Lebed’ River,
Altay Mountains, Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype,
TsNIGRm 45a/2957; a, transverse section (outer
wall at top), ×10; b, longitudinal section (outer wall
to right), ×10 (Vologdin, 1932).
Hupecyathellus roZA no v in DATs en Ko & others,
1968, p. 149 [*H. schuberti; OD; holotype,
DATsenKo & others, 1968, pl. 14,1–3; roZA nov,
1973, pl. 7,1, PIN 4297/75, Moscow]. Outer wall
with downwardly projecting, S-shaped canals,
bearing supplementary independent microporous
sheath externally; inner wall with several rows
of horizontal to upwardly projecting, S-shaped
canals per intersept; septa completely porous.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Siberian Platform.——
Fig. 44,2a–c. *H. schuberti, Shumnoy Formation,
Botoman, Sukharikha River, Krasnoyarsk region,
Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/75; a, oblique longi-
tudinal section, ×5; b, detail of septum in longi-
tudinal section (outer wall to right), ×7; c, detail
of outer wall in tangential section, ×17 (Datsenko
& others, 1968).
Porocyathellus Debrenne, 1977a, p. 107 [*P. bouddi;
OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1977a, pl. 6,1, MNHN
M80025, IRH 2 1aL, Paris]. Outer wall with
horizontal to upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals;
inner wall with several rows of horizontal to
upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals per intersept;
septa completely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Morocco.——Fig. 44,3. *P. bouddi, Issafen Forma-
tion, Botoman, Jbel Irhoud, Morocco, holotype,
MNHN M80025, IRH 2 1aL, oblique longitudinal
section, ×10 (Debrenne, 1977a).
Vologdinocyathellus KonY ushKov , 1972, p. 136 [*V.
schischlovi; OD; holotype, KonYushKov , 1972, pl.
15,2, not located]. Outer wall with horizontal to
upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals; inner wall
with one row of horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight canals per intersept; septa completely
porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Altay Sayan.——
Fig . 44,4a–b. *V. schischlovi, Verkhnemonok
Formation, Botoman, Bol’shoy Karakol River,
western Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia; a, holotype,
transverse section, ×4; b, unnumbered paratype,
oblique longitudinal section, ×4 (Konyushkov,
1972).
Family ETHMOPHYLLIDAE
Okulitch, 1937
[Ethmophyllidae oKuliTch, 1937b, p. 358] [=Archaeocyathellidae simon,
1939, p. 73; =Dupliporocyathidae YAZmir in YAZmir, D AlmATov, &
YAZmir, 1975, p. 58; =Kolbicyathidae Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev
in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1988, p. 97]
Inner wall with communicating canals.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Toy.1).
Ethmophyllum meeK, 1868a, p. 64 [*E. whitneyi;
OD; lectotype, oKuliTch, 1943, pl. 3,15; hill,
1965, pl. 4,1; SD oKuliTch, 1943, p. 66, USNM
15307 1,1b, thin sections A, Washington, D.C.].
Outer wall with subspherical, chambered canals,
each with base commencing in intervallum,
canals subdivided by stipules (imparting overall
inverted V-shaped appearance to outer wall);
inner wall with one row of anastomosing, hori-
zontal to upwardly and laterally projecting, waved
canals per intersept, arising from fluted inner
edges of septa; septa aporose to sparsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.2): Canada, United
States.——Fig . 45,1a– c. *E. whitneyi, Poleta
Formation, Botoman, Silver Peak, Nevada, United
States; a–b, lectotype, USNM 15307 1,1b, thin
sections A; a, longitudinal section, ×5; b, trans-
verse section, ×5; c, topotype, MCZ 9314, detail
of septum in longitudinal section (outer wall to
left), ×9 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Angaricyathus ZhurAvle vA, 1965, p. 7 [*A. cyrenovi;
OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA, 1965, pl. 2,1, TsSGM
215, specimen 2, thin section 1, Novosibirsk].
Outer wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight canals, bearing supplementary bracts
externally (imparting overall inverted V-shaped
appearance to outer wall); inner wall with one
row of anastomosing, horizontal to upwardly
and laterally projecting, straight to waved canals
per intersept; septa completely porous; pectinate
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian (Toy.1):
Transbaikalia, ?Sardinia.——Fig . 45,2a–b. *A.
cyrenovi, Kacha Formation, Toyonian, Kookta
River, Transbaikalia, Russia; a, holotype, TsSGM
215, specimen 2, oblique longitudinal section,
×6; b, paratype, TsSGM 215, specimen 4, trans-
verse section, ×6 (Zhuravleva, 1965).
Aulocricus Debrenne, 1987, p. 270 [*A. arellani;
OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1987, pl. 1,7, USNM
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 63
Fig. 44. Carinacyathidae (p. 62).
4a
Carinacyathus
Porocyathellus
Vologdinocyathellus
1b
3
1a
2b
2c
Hupecyathellus
4b
2a
64 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 45. Ethmophyllidae (p. 62–65).
2b
2a
Angaricyathus
Ethmophyllum
1a
1c
3a
3b
Dupliporocyathus
1b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 65
111823, Washington, D.C.]. Outer wall with
horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals,
bearing supplementary bracts externally (imparting
overall inverted V-shaped appearance to outer
wall) and subdivided by stipules; inner wall with
anastomosing, horizontal to upwardly and laterally
projecting, straight stirrup canals only, bearing
supplementary planar annuli on central cavity side;
septa aporose to sparsely porous. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1): Canada, United States, Mexico.——Fig.
46,1a–b. *A. arellani, Puerto Blanco Formation,
Botoman, Caborca, Sonora, Mexico; a, holotype,
USNM 111823, transverse section, ×10; b, para-
type, USNM 414812, longitudinal section, ×10
(Debrenne, 1987).
Cordilleracyathus hAnDFielD, 1971, p. 49 [*C. blus-
soni; OD; holotype, hAnDFielD, 1971, pl. 7,2,
GSC 25345, Ottawa]. Outer wall with horizontal
to upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals, subdi-
vided by stipules and bearing supplementary bracts
externally (imparting overall inverted V-shaped
appearance to outer wall); inner wall with one
row of anastomosing, horizontally to upwardly
and laterally projecting, S-shaped canals per inter-
sept, formed by fluting of inner edges of septa,
bearing supplementary scales on central cavity
side; septa aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–
Bot.2): Koryakia, Canada, United States, Mexico,
?Greenland.——Fig. 46,2a–c. *C. blussoni, Sekwi
Formation, Botoman, Caribou Pass, Northwest
Territories, Canada; a, holotype, GSC 25345,
detail of tangential section (outer wall at bottom,
inner wall at top), ×12; b, paratype, GSC 25348,
transverse section, ×10; c, paratype, GSC 25347,
detail of longitudinal section (outer wall to right),
×12 (Handfield, 1971).
?Dupliporocyathus YAZmir in YAZmir, DAlm ATov ,
& YAZmir, 1975, p. 59 (YAZmir in Zhur AvlevA ,
1974a, p. 119, nom. nud.) [*D. tumulosus; OD;
holotype, YAZmir, DAlmATo v, & YAZmir, 1975,
pl. 21,5–7, BGU 0138/17, Ulan-Ude]. Outer wall
longitudinally plicate, canal shape and orientation
uncertain; inner wall with one row of downwardly
projecting, straight canals per intersept, bearing
supplementary bracts on central cavity side; septa
aporose to sparsely porous. [Limited type material
does not provide certainty as to inner wall struc-
ture: canals with supplementary bracts, or V-shaped
scales.] lower Cambrian (Atd.4): Transbaikalia.——
Fig. 45,3a–b. *D. tumulosus, Oldyndy Formation,
Atdabanian, Ul’dzuytuy Creek, Vitim Highlands,
Transbaikalia, Russia, holotype, BGU 0138/17;
a, transverse section, ×10; b, oblique longitudinal
section, ×10 (Yazmir, Dalmatov, & Yazmir, 1975).
Kolbicyathus ZhurAvl ev in Debrenne, Zhur Avlev,
& roZ An o v , 1988, p. 97 [*Vologdinocyathus
kolbiensis Zhur AvlevA, 1959, p. 425; OD; holo-
type, Zhu rAvle vA, 1959, fig. 2d; TsSGM 282/2,
Novosibirsk]. Outer wall with horizontal to
upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals, bearing
supplementary bracts externally (imparting overall
inverted V-shaped appearance to outer wall);
inner wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight stirrup canals only, bearing supplementary
bracts on central cavity side; septa completely
porous; pectinate tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1): Altay Sayan, Mongolia.——
Fig. 47,1a–b. *K. kolbiensis (Zh ur Avl evA), Usa
Format ion , Boto man , Pe trov ka, Kiya River,
Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, holotype, TsSGM 282/2;
a, transverse section, ×5; b, detail of same, ×15
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Parethmophyllum Debrenne, 1987, p. 270 [*Ethmo-
phyllum cooperi oKuliTch in cooPer & others,
1952, p. 29; OD; holotype, co oPe r & others,
1952, pl. 7,1–2; Debrenne, 1987, pl. 1,2,4, USNM
111814, Washington, D.C.]. Outer wall with hori-
zontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals; inner
wall with one row of anastomosing, horizontal
to upwardly and laterally projecting, straight to
waved canals per intersept, formed by fluting of
inner edges of septa, bearing supplementary bracts
on central cavity side; septa aporose to sparsely
porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): United States,
Mexico.——Fig. 47,2a–c. *P. cooperi (oKuliTch),
Puerto Blanco Formation, Botoman, Caborca,
Sonora, Mexico; a, paratype, USNM 1118 13,
oblique longitudinal section, ×6 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b–c, holotype, USNM
111814; b, transverse section, ×6; c, longitudinal
section, ×6 (Debrenne, 1987).
Squamosocyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 183 [*S.
taumatus; OD; holotype, Zhur AvlevA, 1960b, pl.
13,5a–b, TsSGM 205/66a-b, Novosibirsk]. Outer
wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting straight
canals, bearing supplementary bracts externally
(imparting overall inverted V-shaped appearance to
outer wall); inner wall with one row of horizontal
to upwardly projecting, straight porous canals per
intersept; septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae
may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.3–Bot.1):
Siberian Platform, ?Altay Sayan.——Fig. 46,3a–c.
*S. taumatus, Perekhod Formation, Atdabanian;
a, Botoma River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, para-
type, TsSGM 205/67, longitudinal section, ×6
(Zhuravleva, 1960b); b–c, Yudyay, Lena River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia; b, holotype, TsSGM 205/66a-b,
detail of septum in longitudinal section (outer wall
to left), ×12 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002);
c, paratype, TsSGM 205/68, transverse section, ×6
(Zhuravleva, 1960b).
Stephenicyathus ZhurAvlev in vo ronovA & others,
1987, p. 26 [*S. rowlandi; OD; holotype, voronovA
& others, 1987, pl. 6,1, GSC 90145, Ottawa]. Outer
wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight
canals, bearing supplementary bracts externally
(imparting overall inverted V-shaped appearance
to outer wall) and subdivided by stipules; inner
wall with one row of anastomosing, horizontal to
upwardly projecting, waved canals per intersept,
formed by fluting of inner edges of septa; septa
aporose to sparsely porous; pectinate tabulae may
be present. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Canada, United
States.——Fig. 47,3a–b. *S. rowlandi, Sekwi Forma-
tion, Botoman, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest
66 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 46. Ethmophyllidae (p. 62–65).
2a 2b
2c
Cordilleracyathus
1a
1b Aulocricus
3a
3c
Squamosocyathus
3b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 67
Fig. 47. Ethmophyllidae (p. 65–68).
3a 3b
Stephenicyathus
2a
2b 2c
Parethmophyllum
1a
1b Kolbicyathus
68 Treatise Online, number XX
Territories, Canada; a, paratype, GSC 90146, longitu-
dinal section, ×12; b, holotype, GSC 90145, oblique
longitudinal section, ×5 (Voronova & others, 1987).
Superfamily TERCYATHOIDEA
Vologdin, 1939
[nom. correct. Debrenne & Kruse, 1986, p. 256, pro Tercyathacea ZhurAv-
levA, 1960b, p. 184, nom. transl. ex Tercyathidae vologDin in simon,
1939, p. 11] [=Piamaecyathacea ZhurAvlevA, 1960a, p. 44, nom. transl.
ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 50, ex Piamaecyathidae ZhurAvlevA, 1960a, p. 44]
Outer wall clathrate. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Toy.1).
Family PIAMAECYATHELLIDAE
Rozanov, 1974
[Piamaecyathellidae roZAnov in boroDinA, 1974, p. 157] [=Piamaecy-
athellidae roZAnov, 1973, p. 86, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.2).
Piamaecyathellus roZAnov in rePinA & others, 1964,
p. 217 [*P. simplex; OD; holotype, rePinA & others,
1964, pl. 23,5, PIN 4297/28, Moscow]. Inner wall
with several rows of simple pores per intersept; septa
completely porous; pectinate tabulae may be present.
lower Cambrian (Bot.2): Altay Sayan.——Fig. 48,1.
*P. simplex, Verkhneynyrga Formation, Botoman,
Kyzyl-Tash, Bol’shaya Isha River, Altay Mountains,
Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/28, trans-
verse section, ×5 (Repina & others, 1964).
Family BOTOMOCYATHIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1955
[Botomocyathidae ZhurAvlevA, 1955b, p. 628] [=Botomacyathidae
ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879, nom. null.]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3).
Botomocyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1955b, p. 629 (ZhurAv-
levA, 1954, p. 12, nom. nud.) [*B. zelenovi; OD;
holotype, Zh ur Avl evA , 1955b, fig. 2e, TsSGM
205/69, Novosibirsk] [=Botomacyathus ZhurAvlevA
in vologDin, 1956, p. 879, nom. null.]. Inner wall
with one pore row per intersept and upright, V-shaped
annuli; septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae
may be present. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1):
Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Far East.——Fi g.
48,2a–c. *B. zelenovi, Perekhod Formation, Botoman,
Botoma River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia; a–b, holotype,
TsSGM 205/69; a, oblique longitudinal section,
×6; b, detail of outer wall in tangential section,
×16; c, paratype TsSGM 205/70, detail of longitu-
dinal section (outer wall to right), ×10 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Clathrithalamus Debrenne & Kr use, 1986, p. 256
[*C. mawsoni; OD; holotype, Debrenne & Kruse,
1986, fig. 21A–C, GNS MG511, Lower Hutt]. Inner
wall with one pore row per intersept and upright,
V-shaped annuli; septa aporose to sparsely porous;
pectinate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Bot.3): Antarctica.——Fig. 48,3a–c. *C. mawsoni,
Shackleton Limestone, Botoman, Holyoake Range,
Nimrod Glacier, Antarctica, holotype, GNS MG511;
a, transverse section, ×5 (Debrenne & Kruse, 1986);
b, detail of outer wall in tangential section, ×16
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); c, detail
of oblique longitudinal section, ×7 (Debrenne &
Kruse, 1986).
Family OLGAECYATHIDAE
Borodina, 1974
[Olgaecyathidae boroDinA, 1974, p. 158]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Bot.2).
Olgaecyathus boroDinA, 1974, p. 158 [*O. fistu-
losus; OD; holotype, bor oDi nA, 1974, pl. 16,8,
TsSGM 429/2, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with
one row of horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight canals per intersept; septa completely
porous; pectinate tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Bot.2): Altay Sayan.——Fig. 49. *O.
fistulosus, Verkhnemonok Formation, Botoman,
Kazly River, western Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia,
holotype, TsSGM 429/2, oblique longitudinal
section, ×8 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse,
2002).
Family TERCYATHIDAE
Vologdin, 1939
[Tercyathidae vologDin in simon, 1939, p. 11] [=Tercyathidae volog-
Din, 1937b, p. 459, nom. nud., invalid family-group name based on
unavailable genus name; =Piamaecyathidae ZhurAvlevA, 1960a, p. 44]
Inner wall with communicating canals.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.1).
Tercyathus vol o g D i n in si m o n , 1939, p. 40
(vologDin, 1932, p. 55, nom. nud., without desig-
nated type species) [*T. duplex vologDin, 1932, p.
56; OD; lectotype, vologDin, 1932, pl. 13,2; SD
boroDin A, 1974, p. 154, TsNIGRm 71a-g/2957,
St. Petersburg] [=Piamaecyathus ZhurAvlevA,
1960a, p. 45 (type, P. sajanicus, OD), for discus-
sion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZA no v,
1989, p. 135; Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev,
1990, p. 164; =Rugocyathus vologDin, 1962d,
p. 13 (type, R. venustus, M), nom. nud.]. Inner
wall with one row of anastomosing, horizontal
to upwardly and laterally projecting, straight to
waved canals per intersept; supplementary spines,
annular structures and/or microporous sheath may
be present on central cavity side; septa sparsely
to completely porous; pectinate tabulae may be
present. lower Cambr ian (B o t.1 Toy.1 ): Altay
Sayan.——Fig. 50,1a–c. *T. duplex, Verkhneynyrga
Formation, Botoman, Lebed’ River, Altay Moun-
tains, Altay Sayan, Russia; a, lectotype, TsNIGRm
71a-g/2957, longitudinal section of inner wall
(central cavity to right), ×6 (Vologdin, 1932); b,
unlocated specimen, longitudinal section, ×6; c,
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 69
Fig. 48. Piamaecyathellidae and Botomocyathidae (p. 68).
1
3a
3b
3c
2a
2b
2c
Piamaecyathellus
Botomocyathus
Clathrithalamus
70 Treatise Online, number XX
unlocated specimen, transverse section, ×6 (Repina
& others, 1964).
Clathricyathellus boroDinA, 1974, p. 150 [*Clath-
ricyathus robustus vologDin, 1932, p. 53; OD;
lectotype, vologDin, 1932, pl. 12,6; SD boroDinA,
1974, p. 151, TsNIGRm 68a/2957, St. Petersburg]
[=Lebedicyathus boroDinA, 1974, p. 164 (type,
L. duplicatus, OD)]. Inner wall with one row of
downwardly projecting, straight porous canals per
intersept; supplementary spines, annular struc-
tures, and/or microporous sheath may be present
on central cavity side; septa completely porous;
pectinate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Bot.3): Altay Sayan.——Fig. 50,2a–b. *C. robustus
(vologDin), Verkhneynyrga Formation, Botoman,
Lebed’ River, Altay Mountains, Altay Sayan, Russia;
a, lectotype, TsNIGRm 68a/2957, oblique transverse
section, ×4; b, paralectotype, TsNIGRm 69a/2957,
longitudinal section, ×4 (Vologdin, 1932).
Clathricyathus vologDin in simon, 1939, p. 25
(VologDin, 1932, p. 50, nom. nud., without
designated type species) [*C. firmus vologDin,
1932, p. 50; OD; lectotype, vologDin, 1932, pl.
10,12; SD boroDi nA, 1974, p. 150, TsNIGRm
65, 65a-v/2957, St. Petersburg] [=Clathrocyathus
vologDin, 1937b, p. 469, nom. null.]. Inner
wall with one row of amalgamating, downwardly
projecting, straight canals per intersept, continuing
into larger, horizontal to upwardly projecting,
confluent canal system on central cavity side;
septa completely porous; pectinate tabulae may be
present. lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Altay Sayan.——
Fig. 51,1a–b. *C. firmus, Verkhneynyrga Forma-
tion, Botoman, Lebed’ River, Altay Mountains,
Altay Sayan, Russia, lectotype, TsNIGRm 65,
65a-v/2957; a, transverse section, ×7; b, oblique
longitudinal section, ×7 (Vologdin, 1932).
Tercyathellus boroDinA, 1974, p. 155 [*T. capisterium;
OD; holotype, boroDinA, 1974, fig. 13, pl. 10,3,
TsSGM 429/1, Novosibirsk] [=Kazlycyathus boro-
DinA, 1974, p. 163 (type, K. flexuosus, OD), for
discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov,
1989, p. 135; Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev,
1990, p. 164]. Inner wall with several rows of anas-
tomosing, horizontal to upwardly and laterally
projecting, straight to waved canals per intersept,
continuing into larger, horizontal to upward ly
projecting, confluent canal system on central cavity
side; septa sparsely to completely porous; pectinate
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian (Bot.2):
Altay Sayan.——Fig. 51,2. *T. capisterium, Verkh-
nemonok Formation, Botoman, Kazly River, western
Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype, TsSGM 429/1,
oblique transverse section, ×8 (Borodina, 1974).
Superfamily
SIGMOCYATHOIDEA
Krasnopeeva, 1953
[nom. correct. Debrenne & Kruse, 1986, p. 255, pro Sigmocyathacea
Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25, nom. transl. ex Sigmocyathidae KrAsnoPeevA,
1953, p. 56, as Sygmocyathidae nom. null.]
Outer wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Bot.3).
Family SIGMOCYATHIDAE
Krasnopeeva, 1953
[nom. correct. ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 49, pro Sygmocyathidae KrAsnoPe-
evA, 1953, p. 56, nom. null., based on erroneous spelling of generic name]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Bot.3).
Sigmocyathus R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1936,
p. 23 [*Coscinocyathus didymoteichus TAY lo r ,
1910, p. 140; OD; lectotype, TAYlo r, 1910, pl.
10, photo 58; Debrenne & roZAno v, 1972, pl.
43,1,3; roZ Ano v, 1973, pl. 4,3; SD Debrenne,
1970a, p. 42, SAM T1606B-D, Adelaide]
[=Hemistillicidocyathus Ting, 1937, p. 368 (type,
Coscinocyathus didymoteichus TAY lo r, 1910, p.
140, OD)]. Outer wall with upwardly projecting,
S-shaped annuli; inner wall with one pore row
Fig. 49. Olgaecyathidae (p. 68).
Olgaecyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 71
1a
1b
1c
Tercyathus
2b
2a Clathricyathellus
Fig. 50. Tercyathidae (p. 68–70).
72 Treatise Online, number XX
per intersept and upwardly projecting, S-shaped
annuli; septa aporose to sparsely porous. l ower
Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia, ?Antarctica.——Fig.
52a–c. *S. didymoteichus (TAYlo r), Ajax Lime-
stone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia,
Australia, lectotype, SAM T1606B-D; a, longi-
tudinal view of septum (outer wall to left), ×8;
b, external view of outer wall, ×8 (Debrenne &
Rozanov, 1972); c, transverse view, ×7 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Didymocyathus Debrenne & ro ZA no v, 1972, p.
236 [*D. hillae; OD; holotype, Debrenne &
roZ Ano v, 1972, pl. 42,2–3; pl. 43,2; pl. 44,1,
USNM PU299, Washington, D.C.]. Outer wall
with upwardly projecting, S-shaped annuli;
inner wall with one pore row per intersept and
upwardly projecting, S-shaped annuli; septa
completely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.3):
Australia, ?Antarctica.——Fig. 53a–c. *D. hillae,
Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South
Australia, Australia; a, holotype, USNM PU299,
longitudinal view of septum (outer wall to left),
×5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b–c,
topotype, USNM PU296; b, longitudinal view of
outer wall, ×5; c, longitudinal view of inner wall,
×5 (Debrenne & Rozanov, 1972).
Family WRIGHTICYATHIDAE
Kruse, 1978
[Wrighticyathidae Kruse, 1978, p. 34]
Inner wall with communicating canals.
lower Cambrian (Bot.3).
Wrighticyathus Kruse, 1978, p. 34 [*W. nexus; OD;
holotype, Krus e, 1978, fig. 7A–E, AM F.83298,
Sydney]. Outer wall with upwardly projecting,
S-shaped annuli; inner wall with one row of hori-
zontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals
per intersept; septa completely porous. low er
Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia.——Fig . 54a–c. *W.
nexus, Cymbric Vale Formation, Botoman, Mt.
Wright, New South Wales, Australia, holotype,
AM F.83298; a, transverse section, AM FT.8268,
Fig. 51. Tercyathidae (p. 70).
2
1a
1b
Clathricyathus
Tercyathellus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 73
×4 (Kruse, 1978); b, longitudinal section, AM
FT.8265, ×4 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse,
2002); c, detail of outer wall in longitudinal
section, AM FT.8264, ×10 (Kruse, 1978).
Suborder ERISMACOSCININA
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev,
1989
[Erismacoscinina Debrenne, r oZAnov, & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 85] [?=Erismacoscinina ZhurAvlev ,
1988, p. 105, nom. nud.]
Intervallum with septa and plate tabulae;
synapticulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Tom.2–Bot.3).
Superfamily
SALAIROCYATHOIDEA
Zhuravleva, 1956
[nom. transl. ZhurAvlev, 1988, p. 105, ex Salairocyathidae ZhurAvlevA in
vologDin, 1956, p. 879] [=Erismacoscinacea Debrenne, 1964, p. 166,
nom. transl. Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25, ex Erismacoscinidae Debrenne,
1964, p. 166]
Outer wall with simple pores. lowe r
Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3).
Family ASTEROCYATHIDAE
Vologdin, 1956
[Asterocyathidae vologDin, 1956, p. 879] [=Erismacoscinidae Debrenne,
1964, p. 166; =Syringocoscinidae vologDin & YAZmir, 1967, p. 1375]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3).
Asterocyathus vologDin, 1940b, p. 92 [*A. salairicus;
OD; holotype not designated, collection not
located]. Inner wall longitudinally plicate, with
several rows of simple pores per intersept; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.2): Altay Sayan,
Tuva, Mongolia.——Fig . 55,1. *A. salairicus,
Gavrilovskoe Formation, Atdabanian, Belaya
Gorka, Gorskino, Salair, Russia, unlocated syntype,
oblique transverse section, ×5 (Vologdin, 1940b).
Antoniocoscinus ZhurAvlev in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev,
& roZAnov, 1988, p. 98 [*Coscinocyathus vsevolodi
Korshunov in Zhu r Av l e vA , Korshunov, &
roZA nov , 1969, p. 51; OD; holotype, Zhur Av-
levA, Korshunov, & ro ZAnov , 1969, pl. 20,2,4;
Korshunov, 1972, pl. 15,5; pl. 16,5), TsSGM
323/84, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with one row
of simple pores per intersept; septa completely
porous; tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3): Siberian Platform, Tuva, Transbai-
kalia, Morocco, Iberia, Sardinia.——Fig. 55,2a–b.
Fig. 52. Sigmocyathidae (p. 70–72).
b
a
c
Sigmocyathus
74 Treatise Online, number XX
*A. vsevolodi (Korshunov), Oy-Muran reef massif,
Botoman, Oy-Muran, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia),
Russia, holotype, TsSGM 323/84; a, transverse
section, ×4 (M. Debrenne, new); b, detail of
longitudinal section (outer wall to left), ×10 (Kors-
hunov, 1972).
Erismacoscinus Debrenne, 1958, p. 65 [*E. marocanus;
M; holotype, Debrenne, 1958, pl. 3,12,14–16;
Debrenne, 1964, pl. 20,1–2, MNHN M80139,
specimen H2, Paris] [=Pluralicoscinus Debrenne,
1963b, p. 135 (type, P. alanisensis, OD); =Syrin-
gocoscinus YAZmir in vologDin & YAZmir, 1967,
p. 1376 (type, S. angulatus, OD), for discussion,
see Debrenne, Zhur Avlev, & roZAn ov, 1989, p.
105; Debrenne, roZAnov, & Zhur Avlev , 1990,
p. 141; =Churanocyathus sun DuKov , 1984, p. 14
(type, C. aculeatus, OD)]. Inner wall with several
rows of simple pores per intersept; septa completely
b
a
c
Didymocyathus
Fig. 53. Sigmocyathidae (p. 72).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 75
porous; tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian
(Tom.2–Bot.3): Siberian Platform, Kolyma, Altay
Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far East,
Urals, Tajikistan, Australia, Antarctica, Tarim,
southern China, Morocco, Iberia, France, Sardinia,
Germany.——Fig. 55,3a–b. *E. marocanus, Amou-
slek Formation, Atdabanian, Jbel Taïssa, Morocco,
holotype, MNHN M80139, specimen H2; a,
longitudinal section (outer wall to left), ×4; b,
transverse section, ×4 (Debrenne, 1958).
Ichnusocyathus Debrenne, 1977a, p. 103 [*Archaeo-
cyathus ichnusae meneghini, 1881, p. 201; OD;
lectotype, bornemAnn, 1886, pl. 13,3–4; SD
Debrenne, 1964, p. 129, not located]. Inner
wall with several rows of simple pores per inter-
sept; septa aporose to sparsely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Morocco, Sardinia.——Fig. 56a–b. *I. ichnusae
(meneghini), Matoppa Formation, Botoman,
Monte Gloria, Canal Grande, Sardinia, Italy;
a, lectotype, oblique section, ×4 (Bornemann,
1886); b, topotype, MNHN M84258, specimen
RFB 14/1, transverse section, ×4 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Retecoscinus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 247 [*Coscino-
cyathus retetabulae vologDin, 1931, p. 75; OD;
lectotype, vologDin, 1931, pl. 22,1e; SD Debrenne,
ZhurAvl ev, & Krus e, 2002, p. 1617, TsNIGRm
94a/2956, St. Petersburg]. Inner wall with several
rows of simple pores per intersept; septa completely
porous; tabulae with slitlike pores. lower Cambrian
(Tom.3–Bot.1): Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Far
East, Morocco, Iberia, France, Germany.——Fig.
57,1a–b. *R. retetabulae (vologDin), Usa Formation,
Atdabanian, Nizhnyaya Ters’ River, Kuznetsk Alatau,
Russia, lectotype, TsNIGRm 94a/2956; a, transverse
section, ×2; b, unlocated specimen TsNIGRm, sketch
of oblique transverse section, ×2.5 (Vologdin, 1931).
Rozanovicoscinus Debrenne, 1970a, p. 41 [*R. fonini;
OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1970a, pl. 2,1, USNM
PU86614, Washington, D.C.]. Outer wall longi-
tudinally plicate; inner wall with several rows of
simple pores per intersept; septa aporose to sparsely
porous; tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3): Australia.——Fig. 57,2. *R. fonini,
Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South
Australia, Australia, holotype, USNM PU86614,
transverse view, ×5 (Debrenne, 1970a).
Fig. 54. Wrighticyathidae (p. 72–73).
a
b
c
Wrighticyathus
76 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 55. Asterocyathidae (p. 73–75).
2a
1
3a 3b
2b
Asterocyathus
Antoniocoscinus
Erismacoscinus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 77
Family RUDANULIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Rudanulidae Debrenne, roZA no v, & ZhurAv le v in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 85]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Rudanulus Debrenne in ZhurAvlevA, 1974b, p.
79 [*Coscinocyathus petersi R. beDForD & W. R.
beDForD, 1934, p. 3; OD; holotype, r. beDForD
& W. r. beDForD, 1934, fig. 13; Debrenne, 1969a,
pl. 10,4–5; M, NHM S4158, London]. Outer wall
longitudinally plicate; inner wall with several rows
of pores per intersept, bearing upwardly projecting,
S-shaped scales; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3):
Australia, southern China.——Fi g. 58,1a–c. *R.
petersi (R. beD F or D & W. r. beD Fo r D), Ajax
Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia,
Australia, holotype, NHM S4158; a, transverse view,
×8 (Debrenne, 1969a); b, longitudinal view, ×8; c,
detail of transverse view, ×16 (M. Debrenne, new).
Pilodicoscinus Debrenne & jiAng, 1989, p. 826
[*P. yuani; OD; holotype, Debrenne & j iAng,
1989, pl. 2,6, MNHN M85002, specimen 2-13,
Paris]. Cup in which outer wall shows periodic
transverse folds; inner wall with several rows of
pores per intersept, bearing upwardly projecting,
cupped bracts; septa aporose to sparsely porous;
Fig. 56. Asterocyathidae (p. 75).
a
b
Ichnusocyathus
78 Treatise Online, number XX
tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.3):
southern China.——Fig . 58,2. *P. yuani, Tsang-
langpu Formation, Botoman, Yangchang, Yunnan,
China, holotype, MNHN M85002, specimen
2-13, longitudinal section, ×7.5 (Debrenne &
Jiang, 1989).
Yhecyathus belY Ae vA & Yu An , 1995, p. 140 [*Y.
futchinensis; OD; holotype, be lYA evA & YuA n,
1995, fig. 1d, NIGP NF6H1, Nanjing]. Cup with
regular transverse folds affecting both walls; inner
wall with several rows of pores per intersept,
bearing upwardly projecting, cupped bracts; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1): southern China.——Fig .
58,3. *Y. futchinensis, Xiannudong Formation,
Botoman, Fuchin, Shaanxi, China, holotype, NIGP
NF6H1, oblique longitudinal section, ×2 (Belyaeva
& Yuan, 1995).
Family SALAIROCYATHIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1956
[Salairocyathidae ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Atd.2–Bot.1).
Salairocyathus vologDin, 1940b, p. 89 [*S .
zenkovae; OD; holotype not designated, collec-
tion not located] [=Rimotabulocyathus YA ro -
shevich, 1990, p. 26 (type, R. bulynnikovi,
OD)]. Inner wall with one pore row per
intersept and upright V-shaped annuli; septa
completely porous; tabulae with slitlike pores.
lower Cambrian (Atd.2): Altay Sayan.——Fi g.
59,1. *S. zenkovae, Gavrilovskoe Formation,
Atdabanian, Belaya Gorka, Salair, Russia, unlo-
cated syntype, oblique longitudinal section, ×6
(Vologdin, 1940b).
Kotuyicoscinus sunDuKov, 1983, p. 16 [*K. minaevae;
OD; holotype, sunDuKov, 1983, pl. 1,7, SNIIG-
GiMS 1580/2, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with several
pore rows per intersept and upwardly projecting,
S-shaped annuli; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Atd.3):
Siberian Platform.——Fig. 59,2a–b. *K. minaevae,
Kyndyn Formation, Chomp-Yurekh Creek, Kotuy
River, Krasnoyarsk region, Russia; a, holotype,
SNIIGGiMS 1580/2, oblique longitudinal section,
×9; b, paratype, SNIIGGiMS 1580/1, longitudinal
section, ×16 (Sundukov, 1983).
Polystillicidocyathus Debrenne, 1959a, p. 14 [*P.
erbosimilis; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1959a,
fig. 1; Debrenne, 1964, pl. 17,1–2, MNHN
M80166, specimen Ki140, Paris]. Inner wall with
one pore row per intersept and upright, V-shaped
annuli; septa completely porous; tabulae with
normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Altay Sayan,
Morocco.——Fig . 59,3a–b. *P. erbosimilis, Issafen
Formation, Botoman, Tizi Oumeslema, Morocco;
holotype, MNHN M80166, specimen Ki140,
modular skeleton; a, oblique transverse view, ×4;
b, longitudinal view, ×3 (Debrenne, 1964).
2Rozanovicoscinus
1a
1b
Retecoscinus
Fig. 57. Asterocyathidae (p. 75).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 79
Fig. 58. Rudanulidae (p. 77–78).
2
3
Pilodicoscinus
Yhecyathus
1a
1b
1c
Rudanulus
80 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 59. Salairocyathidae (p. 78).
3a 3b
Polystillicidocyathus
2a
2b
Kotuyicoscinus
1
Salairocyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 81
3
Crucicyathus
Dentatocoscinus
2a
2b
1Crassicoscinus
Fig. 60. Crassicoscinidae (p. 82).
82 Treatise Online, number XX
Family CRASSICOSCINIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1988
[Crassicoscinidae Debrenne, r oZAnov, & Zhu rAvlev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1988, p. 98]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1).
Crassicoscinus ro Z A n o v & Zh u r A v l e v in
Debrenne, Zhu r A v l e v , & roZ A n o v , 1988,
p. 98 [*Coscinocyathellus vulgaris ro Z An ov in
reP i n A & othe rs, 1964, p. 227 ; O D; holo -
ty pe, rePi n A & others, 1964, pl. 24,2, PIN
4297/29, Moscow]. Inner wall with several rows
of horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight
canals per intersept; septa completely porous;
tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.1): Altay Sayan.——Fi g. 60,1. *C.
vulgaris (ro Z An o v), Uba Formation, Atdaba-
nian, Verkhnyaya Tyrga River, Altay Mountains,
Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/29,
transverse section, ×8 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002).
Crucicyathus gr Av e s T o c K , 1984, p. 74 [*C .
repandus; OD; holotype, gr Ave s To c K , 1984,
fig. 42A–B, D, SAM P21585, Adelaide].
Outer wall longitudinally plicate; inner wall
with several rows of horizontal to upwardly
projecting, S-shaped canals per intersept; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4): Australia.——Fig .
60,2a–b. *C. repandus, Ajax Limestone, Atda-
banian, Mount Scott Range, South Australia,
Australia, holotype, SAM P21585; a, longitu-
dinal section, ×3.5; b, transverse section, ×3
(Gravestock, 1984).
Dentatocoscinus ZhurAvlev i n Debrenne,
Zhur Avl ev , & roZAn ov, 1988, p. 98 [*Astero-
tumulus sektensis Korshunov & ZhurAvlevA,
1967, p. 10; OD; holotype, Korshunov &
ZhurAvlevA, 1967, pl. 2,5, TsSGM 247/11,
Novosibirsk]. Outer wall longitudinally plicate;
inner wall with several rows of horizontal to
upwardly projecting, straight canals per inter-
sept, bearing supplementary bracts on central
cavity side; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Siberian Platform.——Fi g. 60,3. *D. sektensis
(Korshunov & ZhurAvlevA), Sekten Forma-
tion, Botoman, Tuora-Sis Range, Lena River,
Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, holotype, TsSGM
247/11, detail of oblique transverse section, ×9
(Korshunov & Zhuravleva, 1967).
Superfamily KASYRICYATHOIDEA
Zhuravleva, 1961
[nom. transl. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, 2002, p. 1620, ex Kasyri-
cyathidae ZhurAvlevA in musATov & others, 1961, p. 29]
Outer wall with independent micropo-
rous sheath. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3).
Family AGYREKOCYATHIDAE
Konyushkov, 1967
[Agyrekocyathidae KonYushKov, 1967, p. 110]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1).
Agyrekocyathus Kon Yu sh Ko v, 1967, p. 110 [*A.
malovi; OD; holotype, KonYushKov, 1967,
pl. 1,1 0, TsNIGRm 8722/6, St. Petersburg]
[= Mennericyathus Debrenne & roZ An o v in
ZhurAvlevA, 1974a, p. 216 (type, Tomocyathus
kundatus ro Z A n ov in ro Z A n o v & missAr-
ZhevsKiY, 1966, p. 63, OD)]. Inner wall with
several rows of simple pores per intersept; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan, Mongolia, Far East, Kazakhstan,
Tajikistan, Australia, Antarctica, Morocco, Iberia,
Sardinia.——Fig. 61,1. *A. malovi, Boshchekul’
Formation, Atdabanian, Agyrek Mountains,
northern Kazakhstan, holotype, TsNIGRm
8722/6, transverse section, ×5 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Family XESTECYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Xestecyathidae Debrenne, roZAn ov, & Zh urAv lev i n Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 86]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Bot.3).
Xestecyathus Kru s e, 1982, p. 193 [*X. zigzag;
OD; holotype, Kru se , 1982, pl. 14,1–7, AM
F.83405, Sydney]. Inner wall with several rows of
pores per intersept, bearing upwardly projecting,
S-shaped scales; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.3):
Australia.——Fig. 62a–c. *X. zigzag, Cymbric
Vale Format ion , Bo tom an, Mt. Wrig ht, New
South Wales, Australia, holotype, AM F.83405; a,
tangential section of inner wall, AM FT.8526, ×5;
b, transverse section, AM FT.8527, ×5; c, longitu-
dinal section, AM FT.12793, ×5 (Kruse, 1982).
Family KASYRICYATHIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1961
[Kasyricyathidae ZhurAvlevA in musATov & others, 1961, p. 29]
Inner wall with communicating canals.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1).
Kasyricyathus Zhu rAvl evA in mus ATov & others,
1961, p. 30 [*K. schirokovae; OD; holotype,
mus AT ov & others, 1961, pl. 6,3–4, TsS GM
264/36, Novosibirsk]. Inner wall with one row of
horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals
per intersept; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Altay
Sayan.——Fig. 61,2. *K. schirokovae, Balakhtinson
Formation, Botoman, Kazyr River, eastern Sayan,
Please make
a short
note at the
order level
explaining
that super-
families and
families are
not in alpha
order but
(roughly) in
order of wall
type.
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 83
2
Membranacyathus
Kasyricyathus
3a
3b
Agyrekocyathus
1
Fig. 61. Agyrekocyathidae, Kasyricyathidae, and Membranacyathidae (p. 82–83).
Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype, TsSGM 264/36,
transverse section, ×8 (Musatov & others, 1961).
Family MEMBRANACYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002
[Membranacyathidae Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, 2002, p. 1622]
Inner wall with microporous sheath. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.2).
Membranacyathus roZA no v, 1960a, p. 664 [*M.
repinae; OD; holotype, roZ A no v , 1960a, fig.
1zh-z; roZ An ov, 1973, pl. 13,2, PIN 4297/15,
Moscow]. Inner wall with several rows of pores per
intersept and continuous microporous sheath; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.2): Altay Sayan.——
Fig . 61,3a–b. *M. repinae, Adiak Formation,
Atdabanian, Mrassu River, Gornaya Shoria, Altay
Sayan, Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/15; a, oblique
transverse section, ×4.5 (Rozanov, 1960a); b, detail
of longitudinal section (outer wall to left), ×8
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Superfamily
POLYCOSCINOIDEA
Debrenne, 1964
[nom. transl. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, 2002, p. 1623, ex Polycoscinidae
Debrenne, 1964, p. 194] [=Anaptyctocyathoidea Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25, nom.
correct. Debrenne & Kruse, 1986, p. 260, pro Anaptyctocyathacea Debrenne,
1970a, p. 25; Lunulacyathacea Debrenne, 1973, p. 18, nom. nud.; Lunula-
cyathoidea Debrenne in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 87]
Outer wall with attached microporous
sheath. lower Cambrian (Atd.3–Bot.3).
84 Treatise Online, number XX
a
c
b
Xestecyathus
Fig. 62. Xestecyathidae (p. 82).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 85
Family ANAPTYCTOCYATHIDAE
Debrenne, 1970
[Anaptyctocyathidae Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3).
Anaptyctocyathus Debrenne, 1969a, p. 340, nom.
transl. Debrenne, 1970a, p. 28, ex Alataucyathus
(Anaptyctocyathus) Debrenne, 1969a, p. 340
[*Coscinocyathus cribripora R. beDForD & W. R.
beDForD, 1934, p. 3; OD; lectotype, R. beDForD
& W. r. beD F or D , 1934, fig. 15; Debrenne,
1969a, pl. 11,1,3; Debrenne, 1973, pl. 2,6 ;
SD Debrenne, 1969a, p. 340, NHM S4160,
London]. Inner wall with several rows of simple
pores per intersept; septa completely porous;
tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3): Australia, Antarctica.——Fi g .
63a–c. *A. cribripora (R. be D F o rD & W. r.
beDFo rD), Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine,
South Australia, Australia, lectotype, NHM
S4160; a, longitudinal view, ×5; b, transverse
view, ×5; c, detail of outer wall, ×15 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Family POLYCOSCINIDAE
Debrenne, 1964
[Polycoscinidae Debrenne, 1964, p. 194] [=Lunulacyathidae Debrenne,
1973, p. 18, nom. nud.; =Lunulacyathidae Debrenne in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 87]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Atd.3–Bot.3).
Polycoscinus R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1937, p.
37 [*P. contortus; OD; holotype, R. beDForD &
J. beD ForD , 1937, fig. 157; Debrenne, 1973, pl.
3,7; M; USNM PU87217, specimen 222, Wash-
ington, D.C.] [=Erugatocyathus Debrenne, 1969a,
p. 334 (type, Coscinocyathus papillatus R. beDFor D
& W. R. beDForD, 1934, p. 3; OD), nom. transl.
Debrenne, 1970a, p. 33, ex Tomocyathus (Erugatocy-
athus) Debrenne, 1969a, p. 334)]. Inner wall with
several rows of pores per intersept, bearing down-
wardly projecting, cupped bracts; septa sparsely
to completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Atd.3–Bot.3): Australia, Antarc-
tica.——Fig. 64a–c. *P. contortus, Ajax Limestone,
Atdabanian, Paint Mine, South Australia, Australia,
holotype, USNM PU87217, specimen 222; a,
transverse view of modular skeleton, ×3; b, detail
Anaptyctocyathus
c
a
b
Fig. 63. Anaptyctocyathidae (p. 85).
86 Treatise Online, number XX
of inner wall, tangential view, ×9; c, detail of outer
wall, tangential view, ×15 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002).
Lunulacyathus Debrenne, 1973, p. 17 [*Coscinocy-
athus minimiporus R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1937,
p. 37; OD; lectotype, R. beDForD & J. beDForD,
1937, fig. 155; Debrenne, 1973, pl. 4,6; SD
Debrenne, 1973, p. 17, USNM PU86705, Wash-
ington, D.C.]. Outer wall with attached micro-
porous sheath and supplementary cupped bracts;
inner wall with several rows of pores per intersept,
bearing downwardly projecting, cupped bracts;
septa completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia.——Fig. 65a–c.
*L. minimiporus (R. beDForD & j. be DForD), Ajax
Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia,
Australia, lectotype, USNM PU86705; a, transverse
view, ×8; b, detail of outer wall in longitudinal
view, ×30 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002);
c, longitudinal view (outer wall to right), ×8 (M.
Debrenne, new).
Family VERONICACYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002
[Veronicacyathidae Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, 2002, p. 1625]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3).
Veronicacyathus Debrenne, 1973, p. 19 [*V. fron -
deus Debrenne, 1973, p. 20; OD; holotype,
Debrenne, 1973, pl. 2,4–5; pl. 3,1 ; pl. 4,8,
USNM PU86731, specimen 200, Washington,
D.C.; =Coscinocyathus tatei eTheriDge, 1890,
p. 18; lectotype, eTheriDge, 1890, pl. 3,2–4;
Debrenne, ZhurAv l ev , & grAve sT oc K, 1993,
fig. 3–4; SD Debrenne, Zhu rAvl ev , & gr Ave-
sTo cK, 1993, p. 182, choice following elimina-
tion of all other specimens by TAT e , 1892, p.
188, SAM T1245, Adelaide]. Inner wall with
several rows of horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight canals per intersept, bearing spines
projecting radially across orifice to form screen;
c
a
bPolycoscinus
Fig. 64. Polycoscinidae (p. 85–86).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 87
septa aporose to sparsely porous; tabulae with
normal pores. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3):
Australia, Antarctica.——Fig. 66,1a–b. *V. tatei
(eTheriDge), Parara Limestone, Botoman, Pavy
Gully, Ardrossan, South Australia, Australia,
lectotype, SAM T1245; a, transverse section,
×3; b, longitudinal section (outer wall to left),
×3 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Gravestock, 1993).
Bractocyathus Kru se , 1978, p. 41 [*B. labiosus;
OD; holotype, Kru se , 1978, fig. 11A–E, AM
F.83335, Sydney]. Inner wall with several rows
of horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight
canals per intersept; upwardly projecting, planar
bract arises within each canal, supporting
spines projecting radially to form screen; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3): Australia, Antarc-
tica.——Fig. 66,2a–d. *B. labiosus, Cymbric Vale
Formation, Botoman, Mt. Wright, New South
Wales, Australia; a– b, holotype, AM F.83335
; a, transverse section, AM FT.8302, ×4; b,
longitudinal section, AM FT.8303, ×4 (Kruse,
1978); c, paratype AM F.83278, detail of outer
wall, tangential section, AM FT.8317, ×10; d,
topotype, detail of inner wall, tangential section,
AM FT.10077, ×6 (Kruse, 1982).
Family ZONACOSCINIDAE
Debrenne, 1971
[Zonacoscinidae Debrenne, 1971, p. 194]
Inner wall with communicating canals.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1).
Zonacoscinus Debrenne, 1971, p. 194 [*Z. tumu-
losus; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1971, fig. 3;
Debrenne, 1972, pl. 4,5–6, MNHN M84037,
specimen Ci 15U 21-2, Paris]. Inner wall with
several rows of horizontal to upwardly projecting,
b
Lunulacyathus
a
c
Fig. 65. Polycoscinidae (p. 86).
88 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 66. Veronicacyathidae (p. 86–87).
1a
2d
2c
2b
1b
Veronicacyathus
2a Bractocyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 89
straight canals per intersept, canals branching
toward central cavity; septa completely porous;
tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Sardinia.——Fig. 67,1. *Z. tumulosus, Matoppa
Formation, Botoman, Monte Cuccurinu, Sardinia,
Italy, holotype, MNHN M84037, specimen Ci
15U 21-2, transverse section (outer wall at top),
×10 (Debrenne, 1972).
Orienticyathus be lY A e v A , 1969, p. 95 [*O .
mamontovi; OD; holotype, be lY A e vA , 1969,
pl. 36,1–2, DVGU 6M, Khabarovsk]. Inner
wall with several rows of upright, V-shaped
canals per intersept; septa completely porous;
tabulae with normal pores; synapticulae may be
present. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Far East.
Fig . 67,2a– b . *O. mam onto vi, Ust’t oka uni t,
Botoman, Gerbikan River, Dzhagdy Range, Far
East, Russia; a, holotype, DVGU 6M/K8/3-3,
detail of transverse section (outer wall to right),
×13; b, paratype, DVGU 6M/K8/3-2, detail of
longitudinal section (outer wall to right), ×13
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Superfamily
ETHMOCOSCINOIDEA
Zhuravleva, 1957
[nom. transl. Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne, ZhurAv-
lev , & roZAn ov, 1989, p. 87, ex Ethmocoscinidae Zh urAv levA i n
vologDin, 1957a, p. 181] [=Tumulocoscinacea ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p.
265, nom. nud., nom. transl. roZAnov, 1973, p. 86, ex Tumulocoscininae
ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 265; =Tumulocoscinoidea ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p.
265, nom. transl. roZAnov in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989,
p. 86, ex Tumulocoscininae ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 265]
Outer wall with simple tumuli. lower
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.3).
Fig. 67. Zonacoscinidae (p. 87–89).
1Zonacoscinus
Orienticyathus
2a
2b
90 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 68. Tumulocoscinidae (p. 90–91).
23
4a
1a
1b
4b
Tumulocoscinus
Orbicoscinus
Retetumulus
Asterotumulus
Family TUMULOCOSCINIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1960
[nom. transl. Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25, ex Tumulocoscininae ZhurAvlevA,
1960b, p. 265]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1).
Tumulocoscinus Zhu rAv levA , 1960b, p. 265 [*T.
atdabanensis; OD; holotype, Zhur AvlevA, 1960b,
pl. 3,3b; pl. 23,10, PIN 1161, Moscow, not
located]. Inner wall with several rows of simple
pores per intersept; septa aporose to sparsely
porous; tabulae with normal pores. l ower
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.1): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan.——Fig . 68,1a–b. *T. atdabanensis,
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 91
Perekhod Formation, Atdabanian; a , Yudyay,
Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, holotype,
PIN 1161, transverse section, ×12 (Zhuravleva,
1960b); b, Achagyy-Taryng Creek, Lena River,
Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, specimen TsSGM 323/91,
oblique longitudinal section, ×15 (Zhuravleva,
Korshunov, & Rozanov, 1969).
?Asterotumulus KAshinA in rePinA & others, 1964, p.
229 [*A. receptori; OD; holotype, rePinA & others,
1964, pl. 15,3, TsSGM KGU1313/61, Novosi-
birsk]. Outer wall with probable tumuli; inner
wall longitudinally plicate, with several rows of
simple pores per intersept; septa completely porous;
tabulae with normal pores. [Limited type material
does not provide certainty as to which wall is outer
and which inner, thereby creating uncertainty as to
whether accepted outer wall bears tumuli or bracts.]
lower Cambrian (Atd.3–Bot.1): Altay Sayan.——
Fig. 68,2. *A. receptori, Bazaikha Formation, Atda-
banian, Bazaikha River, eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan,
Russia, holotype, TsSGM KGU1313/61, transverse
section, ×7 (Repina & others, 1964).
Orbicoscinus Debrenne, 1977a, p. 111 [*O. schaerti;
OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1977a, pl. 10,4, MNHN
M80045, specimen IRH24-1c, Paris]. Cup in
which both walls show periodic, synchronous
transverse folds; inner wall with one row of simple
pores per intersept; septa completely porous;
tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Moro cco .——Fig . 68,3. *O. schaerti, Issafen
Formation, Botoman, Jbel Irhoud, Morocco, holo-
type, MNHN M80045, specimen IRH24-1c,
longitudinal section, ×5 (Debrenne, 1977a).
Retetumulus Debrenne, 1977a, p. 112 [*R. dutuiti;
OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1977a, pl. 10,1, MNHN
M80042, specimen IRH34-3f, Paris]. Inner wall
with several rows of simple pores per intersept;
septa completely porous; tabulae with slitlike
pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Morocco.——Fi g.
68,4a–b. *R. dutuiti, Issafen Formation, Botoman,
Jbel Irhoud, Morocco, holotype, MNHN M80042,
specimen IRH34-3f; a, detail of outer wall (at top)
in transverse section, ×20 (Debrenne, 1977a);
b, oblique transverse section, ×6 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Family ETHMOCOSCINIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1957
[Ethmocoscinidae ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1957a, p. 181]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Bot.3).
Ethmocoscinus simon, 1939, p. 28 [*Coscinocy-
athus papillipora R. beD For D & W. R. beDForD,
1934, p. 4; OD; holotype, R. beD Fo r D & W.
R. beD Fo rD, 1934, fig. 18; hill, 1965, pl. 8,7;
Debrenne, 1969a, pl. 3,3, NHM S4164, M,
London]. Inner wall with one row of horizontal
to upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals per inter-
sept; septa aporose to sparsely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.3):
Australia.——Fig. 69,1a–b. *E. papillipora (R.
beD Fo rD & W. r. beDF or D ), Ajax Limestone,
Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia,
holotype, NHM S4164; a, detail of outer wall
in longitudinal view, ×7; b, transverse view, ×4
(Hill, 1965).
Superfamily
COSCINOPTYCTOIDEA
Debrenne, Rozanov, &
Zhuravlev, 1989
[Coscinoptyctoidea Debrenne, roZ Anov, & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 86]
Outer wall with multiperforate tumuli.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3).
Family GEYERICOSCINIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 2000
[Geyericoscinidae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 2000, p. 50]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1).
Geyericoscinus Debrenne & Zhu rAvl ev, 2000, p.
50 [*Coscinocyathus equiporus Debrenne, 1959b,
p. 8; OD; lectotype, De br enn e, 1959b, pl. 1,4;
Debrenne, 1964, pl. 28,4; SD Debrenne, 1963a,
p. 23, MNHN M80081, specimen TAI 1-5-4T,
Paris]. Inner wall with several rows of simple pores
per intersept; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–
Bot.1): Morocco.——Fig. 69,2a–b. *G. equiporus
(Debrenne), Amouslek Formation, Atdabanian,
Jbel Taïssa, Morocco, lectotype, MNHN M80081,
specimen TAI 1-5-4T; a, transverse section, ×5
(Debrenne, 1959b); b, detail of transverse section
(outer wall at bottom), ×15 (Debrenne, 1964).
Family COSCINOPTYCTIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Coscinoptyctidae Debrenne, ro ZAnov , & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 86]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Bot.3).
Coscinoptycta broili, 1915, p. 121 [*Coscinoptycha
convoluta TAY lo r , 1910, p. 141; SD simon,
1939, p. 26; lectotype, TAYl or , 1910, fig. 7–8,
pl. 11, photo 60; SD Debrenne, Zh ur Avlev , &
Kruse , 2002, p. 1630, SAM T1594-6, Adelaide]
[=Coscinoptycha TAY lo r , 1910, p. 141 (type,
C. convoluta, SD simon, 1939, p. 26), non
meYricK, 1881, p. 700, insect]. Cup in which
both walls show synchronous transverse folds;
inner wall with several rows of pores per inter-
sept, bearing probably downwardly projecting,
cupped bracts; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.3):
92 Treatise Online, number XX
Australia, Antarctica.——Fi g . 70a–c. *C .
convoluta ( TAYl or ), Ajax Limestone, Botoman,
Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia, lectotype,
SAM T1594-6; a, detail of outer wall in tangen-
tial section, ×7; b, transverse section (outer wall
at bottom), ×4; c, detail of transverse section
(outer wall at top), ×9 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002).
Family JEBILETICOSCINIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Jebileticoscinidae Debrenne, r oZAnov, & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 86]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Bot.1).
Fig. 69. Ethmocoscinidae and Geyericoscinidae (p. 91).
2a
2b
Geyericoscinus
1a Ethmocoscinus
1b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 93
Jebileticoscinus Debrenne, 1977 a, p. 114 [*J.
huvelini; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1977a, pl.
11,2, MNHN M80048, specimen IRH4-1d, Paris]
[=Pachycoscinus Debrenne, 1977a, p. 117 (type, P.
hollardi, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne,
Zhu r Av le v , & Kru s e , 2002, p. 1630]. Inner
wall with several rows of horizontal to upwardly
projecting, straight canals per intersept; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Morocco.——Fig. 71,1.
*J. huvelini, Issafen Formation, Botoman, Jbel
Irhoud, Morocco, holotype, MNHN M80048,
specimen IRH4-1d, longitudinal section, ×4
(Debrenne, 1977a).
Irhoudicoscinus Debrenne, 1977a, p. 117 [*I. destom-
besi; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1977a, pl. 12,3–4,
MNHN M80052, specimen IRH2-1a, Paris].
Inner wall with one row of horizontal to upwardly
projecting, straight canals per intersept; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Morocco.——Fig. 71,2.
*I. destombesi, Issafen Formation, Botoman, Jbel
Irhoud, Morocco, holotype, MNHN M80052,
specimen IRH2-1a, oblique transverse section, ×4
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Superfamily
SIGMOCOSCINOIDEA
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1939
[nom. correct. Debrenne & Kruse, 1986, p. 264, pro Sigmocoscinacea
Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25, nom. transl. ex Sigmocoscinidae R. beDForD &
J. beDForD, 1939, p. 76]
Outer wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Family SYLVIACOSCINIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Sylviacoscinidae Debrenne, r oZAnov, & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 87]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Sylviacoscinus Debrenne in Zhur Avl evA , 1974b,
p. 119 [*Coscinocyathus sylvia R. beDF or D & J.
beDForD, 1937, p. 37; OD; holotype, R. beD ForD
& J. beDForD, 1937, fig. 156, USNM PU86706,
specimen 221, M, Washington, D.C.]. Outer wall
with upwardly projecting, denticulate, curved
Fig. 70. Coscinoptyctidae (p. 91–92).
b
a
c
Coscinoptycta
94 Treatise Online, number XX
scales; inner wall with one row of simple pores
per intersept; septa aporose to sparsely porous;
tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.3):
Australia.——Fig. 72a–c. *S. sylvia (R. beDFo rD
& j. beDFor D), Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax
Mine, South Australia, Australia, holotype, USNM
PU86706, specimen 221; a, detail of outer wall,
longitudinal view, ×15; b, transverse view, ×7; c,
detail of inner wall, internal longitudinal view, ×9
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Family SIGMOCOSCINIDAE
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1939
[Sigmocoscinidae R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1939, p. 76]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Bot.3).
Sigmocoscinus R. be DFor D & J. beDF orD, 1936, p.
24 [*S. sigma; OD; lectotype, R. beDF or D & J.
beDFo rD, 1936, fig. 98; SD hill, 1965, p. 111,
USNM PU86686, specimen 235, Washington,
D.C.]. Outer wall with upwardly projecting,
S-shaped scales; inner wall with one pore row per
intersept and upwardly projecting, S-shaped annuli;
septa completely porous; tabulae with normal
pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia, Antarc-
tica.——Fig. 73,1a–d. *S. sigma, Ajax Limestone,
Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia,
lectotype, USNM PU86686, specimen 235; a,
transverse view, ×8; b, detail of inner wall, internal
longitudinal view, ×11; c, detail of outer wall,
longitudinal view, ×11; d, longitudinal view, ×8
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
?Statanulocyathus Debrenne, 1975, p. 342 [*S.
oosthuizeni; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1975, fig.
7a–b, SAM(C) K44945, Cape Town]. Outer wall
with upwardly projecting, cupped bracts; inner
wall with one row of pores per intersept, bearing
upwardly projecting, cupped bracts; upwardly
projecting, arcuate annuli at each tabula; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
[Inner wall structure comprises bracts together
with unusual, hypertrophied annuli, the appro-
priate taxonomic treatment of which is uncer-
tain.] lower Cambrian (Bot.3): South Africa
(allochthonous).——Fig . 73,2. *S. oosthuizeni,
Dwyka Subgroup, Botoman (allochthonous in
Permian), Zwartskraal, South Africa, holotype,
SAM(C) K44945, oblique longitudinal section,
×10 (Debrenne, 1975).
Fig. 71. Jebileticoscinidae (p. 93).
2
Jebileticoscinus
1
Irhoudicoscinus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 95
Superfamily
POROCOSCINOIDEA
Debrenne, 1964
[nom. transl. Debrenne, Zh urAvlev, & Kruse, 2002, p. 1633, ex Poro-
coscinidae Debrenne, 1964, p. 190] [=Rozanovicyathacea Korshunov in
ZhurAvlevA, Korshunov, & roZAnov, 1969, p. 54; =Schumnyicyathoidea
Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 87, nom. transl. Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, 2002, p. 1635, ex Schumnyicyathidae Debrenne, ro-
ZAnov, & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 87]
Outer wall with canals. lower Cambrian
(Atd.1–Bot.3).
Family ROZANOVICYATHIDAE
Korshunov, 1969
[Rozanovicyathidae Korshunov in ZhurAvlevA, Korshunov, & ro ZA-
nov, 1969, p. 54]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.1).
Rozanovicyathus Korshunov in Zhu r Av l e vA ,
Korshunov, & roZAnov, 1969, p. 54 [*R. alexi; OD;
holotype, Zhur AvlevA, Korshunov, & roZ Anov,
1969, pl. 23,1,3, TsSGM 323/93, Novosibirsk].
Outer wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting,
S-shaped canals, bearing supplementary bracts exter-
nally (imparting overall inverted V-shaped appearance
to outer wall); inner wall with one row of simple pores
per intersept; septa completely porous; tabulae with
slitlike pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Siberian Plat-
form.——Fig. 74,1. *R. alexi, Mukhatta Formation,
Botoman, Mukhatta River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia,
holotype, TsSGM 323/93, transverse section, ×5
(Zhuravleva, Korshunov, & Rozanov, 1969).
Family TATIJANAECYATHIDAE
Korshunov, 1976
[Tatijanaecyathidae Korshunov, 1976, p. 149] [=Schumnyicyathidae
Debrenne, roZ Anov, & ZhurAvlev i n Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & ro-
ZAnov, 1989, p. 87]
Inner wall with annuli. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1).
Muchattocyathus roZ An ov in F. Debrenne, M.
Debrenne, & roZ Anov, 1976, p. 103 (roZ Anov,
1973, p. 61, nom. nud.) [*M. sibiricus; OD; holo-
type, F. Debrenne, M. Debrenne, & ro ZA nov ,
1976, pl. 1,5, PIN 4597/142, Moscow] [=Tatijan-
aecyathus Korshunov, 1976, p. 149 (type, T. laetus,
OD), for discussion, see Debrenne, Zhur Avlev, &
roZAnov , 1989, p. 120; Debrenne, roZAn ov, &
ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 152]. Outer wall with down-
wardly projecting, straight canals, bearing supple-
mentary bracts externally (imparting overall upright
V-shaped appearance to outer wall); inner wall with
one pore row per intersept and upwardly projecting,
S-shaped annuli; septa completely porous, linked
by synapticulae; tabulae with normal pores. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1): Siberian Platform.——Fig. 74,2.
*M. sibiricus, Oy-Muran reef massif, Botoman,
Oy-Muran, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia,
holotype, PIN 4597/142, oblique transverse section,
×7 (F. Debrenne, M. Debrenne, & Rozanov, 1976).
Schumnyicyathus ZhurAvlevA in DATsenKo & others,
1968, p. 164 [*S. validus; OD; holotype, DATsenKo &
Fig. 72. Sylviacoscinidae (p. 93–94).
Sylviacoscinus
b
a
c
96 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 73. Sigmocoscinidae (p. 94).
Statanulocyathus
1d
1c
1a
1b
Sigmocoscinus
2
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 97
others, 1968, pl. 9,3, TsSGM 278/72, Novosibirsk].
Outer wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting,
S-shaped canals and supplementary attached micro-
porous sheath; inner wall with several pore rows per
intersept and upwardly projecting, S-shaped annuli;
septa completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Siberian Platform.——Fig.
74,3 a–b. *S. validus, Shumnoy Formation, Botoman,
Sukharikha River, Krasnoyarsk region, Russia; a,
holotype, TsSGM 278/72, transverse section, ×12;
b, paratype, TsSGM 278/73, oblique longitudinal
section, ×12 (Datsenko & others, 1968).
Family POROCOSCINIDAE
Debrenne, 1964
[Porocoscinidae Debrenne, 1964, p. 190]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Atd.3–Bot.3).
Porocoscinus Debrenne, 1964, p. 190 [*P. flexi-
bilis; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1964, pl. 28,1–3,
MNHN M84108, specimen S Sc 5-4b, Paris]
[=Coscinoteichus Debrenne, 1964, p. 180 (type,
C. minimiporus, OD); =Chengkoucyathus YuA n,
1974, p. 81 (type, C. shabaensis, OD); =Flexicy-
athus Kruse, 1978, p. 40 (type, F. rudens, OD), for
discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov,
1989, p. 124; Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev,
1990, p. 155; Debrenne, ZhurAvle v, & Kru se,
2002, p. 1635]. Outer wall with horizontal to
upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals, bearing
supplementary bracts externally (imparting overall
inverted V-shaped appearance to outer wall); inner
wall with several rows of inverted V-shaped canals
per intersept; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3):
Australia, Antarctica, southern China, Iberia,
Sardinia.——Fig. 75,1a–b. *P. flexibilis, Matoppa
Formation, Botoman, Serra Scoris, Sardinia,
Italy, holotype, MNHN M84108, specimen S Sc
5-4b; a, transverse section (outer wall at top), ×8
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b, longi-
tudinal section (outer wall to left), ×8 (Debrenne,
1964).
Geniculicyathus Debrenne, 1960, p. 118 [*G. varius;
M; holotype, Debrenne, 1960, fig. A, MNHN
M80154, specimen HD40, Paris]. Outer wall with
horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight canals,
bearing supplementary bracts externally (imparting
overall inverted V-shaped appearance to outer wall);
inner wall with several rows of horizontal to upwardly
projecting, S-shaped canals per intersept; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores. lower
Cambrian (Atd.3): Morocco.——Fig. 75,2a–b. *G.
varius, Amouslek Formation, Atdabanian, Jbel Taïssa,
Morocco, holotype, MNHN M80154, specimen
HD40; a, transverse section, ×4; b, longitudinal
section, ×4 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Tubicoscinus Debrenne in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, &
roZAn ov, 1989, p. 137 (Tubicoscinus Debrenne,
1970b, p. 207, nom. nud., proposed conditionally,
ICZN Art. 15) [*Coscinocyathus tuba bornemAnn,
1884, p. 704; OD; holotype, bornemAnn, 1886,
pl. 15,2a; Debrenne, 1964, pl. 18,1–2, GML 930,
Halle]. Outer wall with horizontal to upwardly
projecting, straight canals, bearing supplemen-
tary bracts externally (imparting overall inverted
V-shaped appearance to outer wall); inner wall
with one row of horizontal to upwardly projecting,
slightly S-shaped canals per intersept; septa
completely porous; tabulae with normal pores.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Iberia, Sardinia.——Fig.
75,3a–b. *T. tuba (bornemAnn), Matoppa Forma-
tion, Botoman, San Pietro, Sardinia, Italy, holotype,
GML 930; a, longitudinal section, ×7 (Borne-
mann, 1886); b, detail of same, ×14 (Debrenne,
1964).
Superfamily
MOOTWINGEECYATHOIDEA
Kruse, 1982
[nom. transl. Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne, ZhurAv-
lev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 87, ex Mootwingeecyathidae Krus e, 1982,
p. 194]
Outer wall clathrate. lower Cambrian
(Bot.3).
Family MOOTWINGEECYATHIDAE
Kruse, 1982
[Mootwingeecyathidae Kruse, 1982, p. 194]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Bot.3).
Mootwingeecyathus Kru se , 1982, p. 195 [*M .
mootwingeensis; OD; holotype, Kr us e , 1982,
fig. 20–21, pl. 15,4–11, AM F.83344, Sydney].
Inner wall with several rows of pores per inter-
sept, bearing upwardly projecting, S-shaped
scales; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.3):
Australia.——Fig. 76a–d. *M. mootwingeensis,
Cymbric Vale Formation, Botoman, Mt. Wright,
New South Wales, Australia, holotype, AM
F.83344; a, oblique longitudinal section, AM
FT.14162, ×8; b, detail of outer wall in tangen-
tial section, AM FT.8175, ×30; c, transverse
section, AM FT.14163, ×7; d, detail of inner
wall, transverse section, AM FT.14163, ×3 0
(Kruse, 1982).
Order PUTAPACYATHIDA
Vologdin, 1961
[Putapacyathida vologDin, 1961, p. 177]
Intervallum with plate tabulae;
redimiculi may be present on intervallum
side of either or both walls. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.3).
98 Treatise Online, number XX
Superfamily
PUTAPACYATHOIDEA
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1936
[nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, 2002, p. 1638, pro Puta-
pacyathacea Debrenne, 1970a, p. 24, nom. transl. ex Putapacyathidae R.
beDForD & J. beDForD, 1936, p. 24] [=Alphacyathoidea R. beDForD &
J. beDForD, 1939, p. 72, nom. transl. Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev
in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & ro ZAnov, 1989, p. 88, ex Alphacyathidae
R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1939, p. 72; =Aptocyathacea KonYushKov
in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZ Anov , 1964, p. 102, nom. nud .,
nom. transl. roZ Anov, 1973, p. 85, ex Aptocyathidae KonYushKov in
ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov, 1964, p. 102]
Outer wall with simple pores. lowe r
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Family ALPHACYATHIDAE
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1939
[Alphacyathidae R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1939, p. 72] [=Aptocyathidae
KonYushKov in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov, 1964, p. 102]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Alphacyathus R. beDF or D & J. beDF or D, 1939,
p. 72 [*Dictyocyathus annularis R. beD Fo r D &
W. R. beDF or D , 1936, p. 13; OD; lectotype,
R. be DF or D & W. R. beD F or D, 1936, fig. 55;
ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & ro ZA nov , 1964,
fig. 53; SD Debrenne, 1969a, p. 305, SAM
P942, Adelaide; =Dictyocyathus simplex TAYlo r,
Fig. 74. Rozanovicyathidae and Tatijanaecyathidae (p. 95–97).
Schumnyicyathus
3a
3b
2Muchattocyathus
Rozanovicyathus 1
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 99
3a
3b
Geniculicyathus
2a
2b
Tubicoscinus
1a
1b
Porocoscinus
Fig. 75. Porocoscinidae (p. 97).
100 Treatise Online, number XX
1910, p. 144; lectotype, TAYl or , 1910, fig. 34;
SD Debrenne, Zhu rAv le v, & Kru se , 2002, p.
1638, SAM T1598A, B, Adelaide]. Inner wall
with stirrup pores at each tabula and one file of
simple, intertabular pores; tabulae with normal
pores; longitudinal lintels form septumlike plates
in some intertabulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.3):
Australia.——Fig. 77,1a–c. *A. simplex (TAYlor),
Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South
Australia, Australia; a, lectotype, SAM T1598,
longitudinal view, ×12; b, paralectotype, USNM
PU86714, specimen 225, transverse view, ×12
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); c, para-
lectotype, NHM S4822, longitudinal view, ×12
(M. Debrenne, new).
Aptocyathus vologDin, 1937b, p. 471 [*A. gordoni;
M; lectotype, SD ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, &
roZ An ov , 1964, p. 106, collection IK Bazhe-
nova, spec ime n 28-40 48, thi n sec tion 3/10 ,
not located] [=Aptocyathella Kon Y u sh K ov in
ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & ro ZA nov , 1964,
p. 111 (type, A. prima, OD); =Galinaecyathus
KonYushKov in Zhur Avl evA , KonYushKov, &
roZ A n ov , 1964, p. 102 (type, G. lebedensis,
OD); =Arthrocyathus vo lo g Di n , 1977, p. 61
(type, A. articulatus, OD)]. Inner wall with
several files of simple pores per intertabulum;
tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.2): Altay Sayan, Urals, Australia,
Iberia, Sardinia.——Fi g . 77,2a–b. *A .
gordoni, Verkhnemonok Formation, Botoman,
Sanashtykgol River, western Sayan, Altay Sayan,
Russia; a, topotype, possibly of type series, PIN
4754/42, transverse section of modular skeleton,
×10 (Vologdin, 1940b); b, unlocated syntype,
sketch of transverse and longitudinal sections of
modular skeleton, ×10 (Vologdin, 1937b).
Family PUTAPACYATHIDAE
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1936
[Putapacyathidae R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1936, p. 24]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Bot.3).
Putapacyathus R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1936, p.
24 [*P. regularis; OD; holotype, R. beDForD & J.
beDForD, 1936, fig. 97; ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov,
& roZ Ano v, 1964, fig. 68; hill, 1965, pl. 9,1,
USNM PU86699-115, M, Washington, D.C.].
Inner wall with several files of pores per intertab-
ulum, bearing upwardly projecting cupped bracts;
tabulae with normal pores; sporadic septa may be
present. lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia.——Fig.
78a–c. *P. regularis, Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax
Mine, South Australia, Australia, holotype, USNM
Fig. 76. Mootwingeecyathidae (p. 97).
Mootwingeecyathus
d
c
a
b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 101
PU86699-115; a, transverse view, ×6; b, oblique
longitudinal view, ×6 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002); c, internal longitudinal view of inner
wall, ×4.5 (Hill, 1965).
Superfamily HUPECYATHOIDEA
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev,
1990
[Hupecyathoidea Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 121]
Outer wall with canals. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4).
Family HUPECYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1990
[Hupecyathidae Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 121]
Inner wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Atd.4).
Hupecyathus Debrenne, 1964, p. 198 [*H. sphinc-
toides; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1964, pl. 15,7,
MNHN M80258, specimen Ki135, Paris]. Outer
wall with horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight canals, bearing supplementary bracts
externally (imparting overall inverted V-shaped
appearance to outer wall); inner wall with several
files of pores per intertabulum, bearing upwardly
projecting, cupped bracts; tabulae with normal
pores, linked by pillars. lower Cambrian (Atd.4):
Morocco.——Fig . 79a–b. *H. sphinctoides, Amou-
slek Formation, Atdabanian, Ouijane, Morocco,
holotype, MNHN M80258, specimen Ki135; a,
transverse section, ×6; b, detail of longitudinal
section (outer wall to right), ×13 (Debrenne ,
1964).
Superfamily
CHABAKOVICYATHOIDEA
Rozanov, 2002
[Chabakovicyathoidea roZAn ov i n Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse,
2002, p. 1639] [=Chabakovicyathacea roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.]
Outer wall pustular. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1).
Alphacyathus
2a
2b
1c
Aptocyathus
1a
1b
Fig. 77. Alphacyathidae (p. 98–100).
102 Treatise Online, number XX
Putapacyathus
a
b
c
Fig. 78. Putapacyathidae (p. 100–101).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 103
Family CHABAKOVICYATHIDAE
Rozanov, 2002
[Chabakovicyathidae roZA nov in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev , & Kruse,
2002, p. 1639] [=Chabakovicyathidae roZAnov, 1973, p. 85, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.1).
Chabakovicyathus Kon Yu s hK ov in Zh ur Av le vA ,
Kon Yu s hK ov , & roZA n ov , 1964, p. 114 [*C.
tumulatus; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA, KonY-
ushKov, & roZAnov, 1964, pl. 14,6, not located].
Inner wall with several files of simple pores per
intertabulum; tabulae with normal pores. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1): Urals.——Fig . 80a–b. *C.
tumulatus, Terekla Formation, Botoman, Terekla
River, western flank of Southern Urals, Russia; a,
longitudinal section, specimen PIN 4327/80, ×16
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b, holo-
type, oblique transverse section, ×28 (Zhuravleva,
Konyushkov, & Rozanov, 1964).
Order CAPSULOCYATHIDA
Zhuravleva, 1964
[nom. transl. ZhurAvle v & roZ Anov in voronovA & others, 1987, p.
29, ex Capsulocyathina Zhu rAvlevA in ZhurAvl evA, Ko nYus hKov, &
roZAnov , 1964, p. 59] [=Coscinocyathida Zhu rAvlevA, 1955a, p. 10;
=Clavicyathida vologDin, 1977, p. 110]
Thalamid cup, single- or multichambered;
inner wall of invaginal type of development;
septa and/or plate tabulae may be present in
intervallum of multichambered cups. lower
Cambrian (Tom.1–Bot.3).
Suborder CAPSULOCYATHINA
Zhuravleva, 1964
[Capsulocyathina ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov,
1964, p. 59] [?=Uralocyathina Debrenne, 1964, p. 113]
Cup single chambered and subspherical,
or multichambered without septa. lower
Cambrian (Tom.1–Bot.3).
Family CRYPTOPOROCYATHIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1960
[Cryptoporocyathidae ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 92] [=Cryptaporocyathidae
ZhurAvlevA, 1963b, p. 117, nom. null.; =Capsulocyathidae ZhurAvlevA in
ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov, 1964, p. 60; =Gerbicanicyathidae
belYAevA, 1969, p. 90; =Vasicyathidae vologDin, 1977, p. 104; =Clavicyathidae
vologDin, 1977, p. 110; ?=Complicatocyathidae YAroshevich, 1990, p. 23]
Outer wall with simple pores. lowe r
Cambrian (Tom.1–Bot.3).
Cryptoporocyathus Zhur AvlevA, 1960b, p. 92 [*C.
junicanensis; OD; holotype, Zhu rAvlevA, 1960b,
pl. 4,9; ZhurAvlevA, 1963b, pl. 12,3), not located;
paratype, TsSGM 205/6, Novosibirsk] [=Crypta-
porocyathus Zhu rAv l evA , 1963b, p. 117, nom.
null.]. Cup single chambered; outer wall pores
of two distinct sizes; inner wall simple. l ow er
Cambrian (Tom.1–Tom.4): Siberian Platform.——
Fig . 81,1a–b. *C. junicanensis; a, Medvezh’ya
Formation, Tommotian, Moyero River, Krasnoyarsk
region, Russia, holotype, oblique section, ×20; b,
Pestrotsvet Formation, Tommotian, Aldan River,
Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, paratype, TsSGM 205/6,
section of outer wall (inner cavity at bottom), ×16
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Hupecyathus
a
b
Fig. 79. Hupecyathidae (p. 101).
104 Treatise Online, number XX
Capsulocyathus vologDin in Zh u r A v l e vA ,
KonYushKov, & roZAnov, 1964, p. 61 (vologDin,
1962c, p. 75 (type, C. capsulifer, OD), nom. nud.,
not described, figured or separately diagnosed
until vologDin, 1977, p. 76, fig. 44, wherein a
holotype was invalidly nominated from material
other than type or topotype material) [*C. subcal-
losus ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, &
roZAnov, 1964, p. 62; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA,
KonYushKov, & roZAnov, 1964, pl. 1,8(3), TsSGM
283/5, Novosibirsk] [=Capsulicyathus vologDin,
1977, p. 75 (type, C. capsulifer, OD), nom. van.;
=Mesocyathus vologDin, 1977, p. 95 (type, M.
plasticus, OD); =Vasicyathus vologDin, 1977, p. 104
(type, V. urniformis, OD); =Clavicyathus vologDin,
1977, p. 110 (type, C. clavellatus, OD), for discus-
sion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989,
p. 97; Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p.
135]. Cup single chambered; outer and inner walls
with simple pores. lower Cambrian (Tom.3–Bot.3):
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far
East, Urals, Morocco, Iberia, Sardinia.——Fig. 81,2.
*C. subcallosus, Bazaikha Formation, Atdabanian,
Bazaikha River, eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia,
holotype, TsSGM 283/5, longitudinal section, ×6
(Zhuravleva, Konyushkov, & Rozanov, 1964).
?Complicatocyathus YAroshevich, 1990, p. 23 [*C.
rozanovi; OD; holotype, YAroshevich, 1990,
pl. 12,1, TsSGM 901/5a, Novosibirsk]. Cup
with regular transverse folds affecting both walls,
forming empty multichambered cups; outer and
inner walls with simple pores. [Limited type mate-
rial does not provide certainty as to whether cup is
multichambered.] lower Cambrian (Atd.2): Altay
Sayan.——Fig. 81,3. *C. rozanovi, Gavrilovskoe
Formation, Atdabanian, Gavrilovskoe, Salair,
Russia, holotype, TsSGM 901/5a, longitudinal
section, ×4 (Yaroshevich, 1990).
Gerbicanicyathus belYAevA, 1969, p. 90 [*G. emili;
OD; holotype, belYAevA, 1969, pl. 37,1, DVGU
55/68, Khabarovsk]. Cup multichambered; outer
and inner walls with simple pores. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.2): Far East.——Fig . 82,1. *G. emili,
Ust’toka unit, Botoman, Gerbikan River, Dzhagdy
Range, Far East, Russia, holotype, DVGU 55/68,
oblique longitudinal section, ×8 (Belyaeva, 1969).
Mirandocyathus belYAevA, 1974, p. 121 [*M. artus;
OD; holotype, belYA evA, 1974, pl. 3,8, DVGU
13M/572/3, Khabarovsk]. Cup multichambered;
outer wall with simple pores; inner wall with pores
bearing downwardly projecting, cupped bracts.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Far East.——Fig . 82,2.
*M. artus, Ust’toka unit, Botoman, Gerbikan River,
Dzhagdy Range, Far East, Russia, holotype, DVGU
13M/572/3, longitudinal section, ×7 (Belyaeva,
1974).
Polythalamia Debrenne & Woo D , 1990, p. 436
[*P. americana; OD; holotype, Debrenne &
WooD , 1990, fig. 1B, USNM 434924, specimen
GA5.18F, Washington, D.C.]. Cup multicham-
bered, globose chambers propagating linearly or
glomerately; outer wall with few or no pores;
inner wall with simple pores. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.2): Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia,
United States.——Fig . 82,3. *P. americana,
Valmy Formation, Botoman, Galena Canyon,
Nevada, United States, holotype, USNM 434924,
specimen GA5.18F, longitudinal section, ×20
(Debrenne & Wood, 1990; copyright Cambridge
University Press).
Fig. 80. Chabakovicyathidae (p. 103).
Chabakovicyathus
a
b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 105
Family URALOCYATHELLIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1964
[Uralocyathellidae ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA, KonYushKov, & roZAnov,
1964, p. 72]
Outer wall with independent micropo-
rous sheath. lower Cambrian (Bot.1).
Rhabdolynthus Zhu r Av le vA , 1960b, p. 91 [*R.
conicus; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, pl.
4,8; ZhurAvlevA, 1963b, pl. 9,11–12, TsSGM
205/5, Novosibirsk] [=Uralocyathella ZhurAvlevA
in Zhu rAv levA , KrAsn oP eevA , & ch er nY sh evA,
1960, p. 99 (type, U. repinae, OD); =Miricyathus
vologDin, 1977, p. 88 (type, M. aseptatus, OD),
for discussion, see Debrenne, Zhu r Av le v , &
roZAn ov, 1989, p. 127; Debrenne, ro ZAnov , &
ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 157]. Cup single chambered;
outer wall with independent microporous sheath;
inner wall with simple pores. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1): Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan.
Fig. 82,4a–b. *R. conicus, Perekhod Formation,
Botoman, Atdaban, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia),
Russia, holotype, TsSGM 205/5; a, longitudinal
section, ×4; b, detail of wall in longitudinal
section (inner cavity to right), ×7.5 (Zhuravleva,
1963b).
Family TYLOCYATHIDAE
Zhuravlev, 1988
[Tylocyathidae ZhurAvlev, 1988, p. 106]
Outer wall with attached microporous
sheath. lower Cambrian (Tom.4–Bot.3).
Tylocyathus vologDin, 1977, p. 102 (vologDin in
vologDin & YAZmir, 1966, p. 948, nom. nud.)
[*T. inaequilateralis vologDin, 1977, p. 102; OD;
holotype, vologDin, 1977, pl. 1,7, PIN 1924-41,
Moscow; =Uralocyathella bullata Zh urAv levA in
Fig. 81. Cryptoporocyathidae (p. 103–104).
Capsulocyathus
3
Cryptoporocyathus
Complicatocyathus
1a
1b
2
106 Treatise Online, number XX
musATov & others, 1961, p. 19; OD; holotype,
musATov & others, 1961, pl. 1,7, TsSGM 264/7,
Novosibirsk]. Cup single chambered; outer wall
with attached microporous sheath, each micro-
pore bearing a supplementary bract; inner wall
with simple pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3):
Altay Sayan, Far East.——Fi g. 83,1. *T. bullatus
(ZhurAvlevA), Balakhtinson Formation, Botoman,
Kazyr River, eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia,
holotype, TsSGM 264/7, oblique longitudinal
section, ×5.5 (Musatov & others, 1961).
Korshunovicyathus ZhurAvlev in Debrenne,
Zhur Avle v, & roZAno v, 1988, p. 99 [*Crypta-
porocyathus melnikovi Korshunov & Zh urAvlevA,
1967, p. 5; OD; holotype, Korshunov & ZhurAv-
levA, 1967, pl. 1,1, TsSGM 247/1, Novosibirsk].
Cup single chambered; outer wall with attached
microporous sheath; inner wall with simple pores.
lower Cambrian (Tom.4–Atd.1): Siberian Plat-
form.——Fig. 83,2a–b. *K. melnikovi (Korshunov
& ZhurAvlevA); a, Tyuser Formation, Atdabanian,
Ulakhan-Ald’arkhay Creek, Lena River, Tuora-Sis
Range, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia, holotype, TsSGM
247/1, detail of transverse section, ×20 (Korshunov
& Zhuravleva, 1967); b, Pestrotsvet Formation,
Atdabanian, Isit’, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia),
Fig. 82. Cryptoporocyathidae and Uralocyathellidae (p. 104–105).
Rhabdolynthus
2
3
4a
4b
1
Polythalamia
Mirandocyathus
Gerbicanicyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 107
3b
Fig. 83. Tylocyathidae and Fransuasaecyathidae (p. 105–108).
Korshunovicyathus
4c
3a
4a
4b
2b
1
Yukonensis
Fransuasaecyathus
Tylocyathus
2a
108 Treatise Online, number XX
Russia, specimen PIN 4220/117, transverse section,
×8 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Rozanov, 1988).
Family FRANSUASAECYATHIDAE
Debrenne, 1964
[Fransuasaecyathidae Debrenne, 1964, p. 113] [=Acanthopyrgidae
hAnDFielD, 1971, p. 31]
Outer wall with simple tumuli. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3).
Fransuasaecyathus Zhu rA vl e vA , 1960b, p. 103
[*F. subtumulatus; OD; holotype, Zh ur Avl evA ,
1960b, pl. 5,5, TsSGM 205/10, Novosibirsk]
[=Bullicyathus vologDin, 1977, p. 105 (type,
B. pyxidatus, OD); =Marginicyathus vologDin,
1977, p. 107 (type, M. cardiosimilis, OD)]. Cup
single chambered; outer wall with simple tumuli;
inner wall with simple pores. lower Cambrian
(Atd.1–Bot.3): Siberian Platform, Mongolia,
Transbaikalia, Far East.——Fi g. 83,3a–b. *F.
subtumulatus, Perekhod Formation, Atdabanian,
Yudyay, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia,
holotype, TsSGM 205/10; a, detail of wall in
oblique longitudinal section, ×20; b, oblique
longitudinal section, ×8(Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002).
Yukonensis ÖZDiKmen, 2009, p. 216, n om. nov.
pr o Acanthopyrgus hAnDFielD, 1967, p. 209,
non DescAmPs & WinTreberT, 1966, p. 28
(type, Geloius finoti bolivAr, 1905, p. 285,
OD), insect [*Acanthopyrgus yukonensis hAnD-
FielD, 1967, p. 209; OD; holotype, hAnDFielD,
1967, pl. 23,1,4, GSC 21059, Ottawa]. Cup
multichambered with a tabula of rods linked by
synapticulae and an external thorny corolla at
each chamber junction; outer wall with simple
tumuli; inner wall with simple pores. l owe r
Cambrian (Bot.1): Canada, United States.
Fig. 83,4a–c. *Y. yukonensis (hAnDFielD); a –b,
Adams Argillite, Botoman, Tatonduk River,
Alaska, United States; a , transverse section,
specimen USGS 5156-CO (A1), ×6 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b , transverse
section, specimen USGS 5156-CO (A4), ×10
(Nitecki & Debrenne, 1979); c, Sekwi Forma-
tion, Botoman, Mackenzie Mountains, Yukon
Territory, Canada, holotype, GSC 21059, longi-
tudinal section, ×4.5 (M. Debrenne, new).
Family TUBERICYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Tubericyathidae Debrenne, roZ Anov , & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvl ev, & roZAnov , 1989, p. 89] [=Tubericyathidae vologDin,
1977, p. 31, nom. nud.]
Outer wall with bracts or scales. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1).
Tubericyathus vologDin, 1977, p. 90 [*T. clath-
ratus; OD; holotype, vologDin, 1977, fig. 57,
pl. 13,9, PIN 1924/38, Moscow] [=Arminocyathus
vologDin, 1977, p. 113 (type, A. fungiformis,
OD)]. Cup single chambered; outer wall with pores
bearing upwardly projecting, cupped bracts; inner
wall with simple pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Altay Sayan, Mongolia.——Fig . 84a–b. *T. clath-
ratus, Usa Formation, Botoman, Sukhie Solontsy
Valley, Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia;
a, holotype, PIN 1924/38, oblique longitudinal
section, ×10; b, paratype, PIN 1924/39, oblique
transverse section, ×10 (Vologdin, 1977).
Suborder COSCINOCYATHINA
Zhuravleva, 1955
[nom. transl. ZhurAvlevA, 1 960b, p. 245 , ex order Coscin ocyath ida
ZhurAvlevA, 1955a, p. 25]
Cup multichambered; intervallum with
septa. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3).
Fig. 84. Tubericyathidae (p. 108).
b
aTubericyathus
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 109
Fig. 85. Coscinocyathidae, Mawsonicoscinidae, and Coscinocyathellidae (p. 110).
Coscinocyathus
32a
2b
Coscinocyathellus
1a
1b
Mawsonicoscinus
I had to crop
view b on the
top (now the
rigtht side)
to make it fit.
Okay? Also,
do you have a
higher resolu-
tion file? This
one is only
100 dpi!!
110 Treatise Online, number XX
Superfamily
COSCINOCYATHOIDEA
Taylor, 1910
[nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 89, pro Coscino-
cyathacea ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 245, nom. transl. ex Coscinocyathidae TAY-
lor, 1910, p. 137] [=Mawsonicoscinoidea Debrenne & Kruse, 1986, p. 258]
Outer wall tabular with simple pores.
lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.3).
Family COSCINOCYATHIDAE
Taylor, 1910
[Coscinocyathidae TAYlor, 1910, p. 137] [=Poletaevacyathidae vologDin,
1962a, p. 125].
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.3).
Coscinocyathus bor n em A nn , 1884, p. 704 [*C.
dianthus; SD by exercise of ICZN plenary powers
by melville, 1974, p. 155, following application
by Debr enn e, 1970b, p. 207, negating SD of C.
tuba bornemAnn, 1884, p. 704 by Ting, 1937,
p. 360 (now type of Tubicoscinus Debrenne in
Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZA no v, 1989, p.
137); lectotype, bornemAnn, 1886, pl. 17,2–7;
Debrenne, 1964, pl. 21,1–2; SD Debrenne,
1964, p. 169, GML An597, Halle] [=Poletaevacy-
athus vologDin, 1959b, p. 88 (type, P. obrutchevi,
M)]. Inner wall with several rows of simple pores
per intersept; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Bot.3):
Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia,
Transbaikalia, Far East, Tajikistan, Morocco,
Iberia, Sardinia.——Fig. 85,1a–b. *C. dianthus,
Matoppa Formation, Botoman, Canal Grande,
Sardinia, Italy, lectotype, GML An597; a, trans-
verse section, ×4; b, longitudinal section, ×4
(Bornemann, 1886).
Family MAWSONICOSCINIDAE
Debrenne & Kruse, 1986
[Mawsonicoscinidae Debrenne & Kruse, 1986, p. 258]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Bot.3).
Mawsonicoscinus Debrenne & Krus e, 1986, p.
259 [*M. sigmoides; OD; holotype, Debrenne
& Kruse , 1986, fig. 22, GNS MG513, Lower
Hutt]. Inner wall with one row of horizontal
to upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals per
intersept; septa completely porous; tabulae with
normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Antarc-
tica.——Fig . 85,2a b. *M. sigmoides, Sh ack -
leton Limestone, Holyoake Range, Nimrod
Glacier, Antarctica, holotype, GNS MG513;
a, longitudinal section (outer wall to right),
×3.5; b, transverse section, ×3.5 (Debrenne &
Kruse, 1986).
Family COSCINOCYATHELLIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1956
[Coscinocyathellidae ZhurAvlevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879]
Inner wall with communicating canals.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Coscinocyathellus vologDin, 1940b, p. 91 (vologDin,
1937b, p. 471, nom. nud.) [*C. parvus; OD; lectotype,
vologDin, 1940b, pl. 29,1; SD ZhurAvlev, 2001a,
p. 92, PIN 4754/4, Moscow]. Inner wall with several
rows of horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight to
waved canals per intersept; septa completely porous;
tabulae with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–
Bot.3): Altay Sayan.——Fig. 85,3. *C. parvus, Verkh-
nemonok Formation, Botoman, Sanashtykgol River,
western Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, lectotype, PIN
4754/4, oblique longitudinal section, ×8 (Vologdin,
1940b).
Superfamily
CALYPTOCOSCINOIDEA
Debrenne, 1964
[nom. correct. Debrenne, roZA nov , & Zh ur Av lev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 89, pro Calyptocoscinacea Debrenne,
1964, p. 115]
Outer wall tabular with independent micro-
porous sheath. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1).
Family TOMOCYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Tomocyathidae Debrenne, roZA nov , & ZhurAvl ev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 89]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.3).
Coscinocyathella vologDin, 1959b, p. 87–88
(vologDin, 1957d, p. 699, nom. nud.) [*C. nikitini;
M; holotype, vologDin, 1957d, fig. 1(11), PIN
1800/1,1a, M, Moscow] [=Tomocyathus roZAnov,
1960a, p. 664 (type, T. operosus, OD), for discussion,
see Debrenne, Zhu rAvlev, & roZA nov, 1989, p.
100; Debrenne, roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p.
138]. Inner wall with several rows of simple pores
per intersept; septa completely porous; tabulae with
normal pores. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.3): Altay
Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia.——Fig. 86a–b. *C. nikitini,
Usa Formation, Atdabanian, Kiya River, Kuznetsk
Alatau, Russia, holotype, PIN 1800/1,1a; a, transverse
section, ×4; b, longitudinal section, ×4.5 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Family CALYPTOCOSCINIDAE
Debrenne, 1964
[Calyptocoscinidae Debrenne, 1964, p. 115]
Inner wall with independent microporous
sheath. lower Cambrian (Bot.1).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 111
Coscinocyathella
a
b
Fig. 86. Tomocyathidae (p. 110).
Calyptocoscinus Debrenne, 1964, p. 196 [*Coscino-
cyathus cornucopiae bornemAnn, 1884, p. 704;
OD; lectotype, bornemAnn, 1886, pl. 16,1; SD
Debrenne, 1964, p. 196, GML block B, Halle,
requires restudy]. Inner wall with several rows
of pores per intersept and independent micro-
porous sheath; septa completely porous; tabulae
wi th nor mal pores . low e r C amb ria n (Bo t .1):
Sardinia.——Fig. 87a–e. *C. cornucopiae (borne-
mAnn), Matoppa Formation, Botoman, Monte
Gloria, Canal Grande, Sardinia, Italy, topotype,
MNHN M84106; a, oblique transverse section,
×6; b, transverse section, ×7; c, detail of inner
wall, longitudinal section (central cavity to right),
×30; d, detail of transverse section (outer wall
at bottom), ×10; e, longitudinal section, ×5
(Debrenne, 1964).
Superfamily
ALATAUCYATHOIDEA
Zhuravleva, 1955
[nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & ro ZAn ov, 1989, p. 89 pr o
Alataucyathacea ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 264, nom. transl. ex Alataucyathi-
dae ZhurAvlevA, 1955b, p. 626] [=Mrassocyathoidea vologDin, 1960,
p. 130, nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 85,
pro Mrassucyathacea ZhurAvlevA & roZAnov in rePinA & others, 1964,
p. 230, nom. transl. ex Mrassocyathidae vologDin in ZhurAvlevA, KrAs-
noPeevA, & chernYshevA, 1960, p. 130, as Mrassucyathidae nom. null.]
Outer wall tabular with multiperforate
tumuli. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.2).
Family ALATAUCYATHIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1955
[Alataucyathidae ZhurAvlevA, 1955b, p. 626] [=Mrassocyathidae volog-
Din, 1956, p. 879, nom. nud.; =Alataucyathinae Zhur AvlevA, 1955b,
p. 626, nom. transl. Zhur AvlevA , 1960b, p. 264, ex Alataucyathidae
ZhurAvlevA, 1955b, p. 626; =Mrassocyathidae vologDin in ZhurAvlevA,
KrAsnoPeevA, & chernYshevA, 1960, p. 130, nom. correct. Debrenne,
roZAnov, & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989,
p. 86 pro Mrassucyathidae vologDin in ZhurAvle vA, KrAs noPeevA, &
chernYshevA, 1960, p. 130]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.2).
Alataucyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1955b, p. 626 [*A. jaros-
chevitschi; OD; holotype, Zhur AvlevA, 1955b, fig.
1a, 2g–d, PIN 1040, Moscow, not located] [=Mras-
socyathus KrAsnoPeevA in vologDin, 1956, p. 879,
nom. nud.; =Mrassocyathus Kr Asn oP ee vA, 1960,
p. 43 (type, M. micropora, OD); =Mrassucyathus
KrAsnoPeevA in ZhurAvlevA, KrAsnoPeevA, & cher-
nYshevA, 1960, p. 130 (type, M. schoriensis, OD),
nom. null.]. Inner wall with several rows of simple
pores per intersept; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.2):
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia.——Fig. 88a–b. *A.
jaroschevitschi; a, Usa Formation, Atdabanian, Mt.
Martyukhina, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, holotype,
PIN 1040, oblique longitudinal section, ×4; b, Usa
Formation, Atdabanian, Sukhie Solontsy Valley,
Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, unlocated
specimen, neither the holding institution nor the
collection number are known, transverse section, ×4
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Superfamily
CLATHRICOSCINOIDEA
Rozanov, 1964
[nom. correct. ZhurAvlev, 1988, p. 105, pro Clathricoscinacea Debrenne,
1964, p. 115, nom. transl. ex Clathricoscinidae roZAnov in rePinA &
others, 1964, p. 223]
Outer wall tabular and pseudoclathrate.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.1).
Family CLATHRICOSCINIDAE
Rozanov, 1964
[Clathricoscinidae roZAnov in rePinA & others, 1964, p. 223]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.1).
112 Treatise Online, number XX
Calyptocoscinus
a
c
b
d
e
Fig. 87. Calyptocoscinidae (p. 111).
Clathricoscinus Zh u r Av l e vA , 1955b, p. 627
[*Coscinocyathus infirmus vologDin in ZhurAv-
le vA, 1955b, p. 627; OD; holotype, ZhurAv-
levA, 1955b, fig. 2a, PIN 1040, Moscow; collec-
tion not located] [=Asterocyathellus vologDin,
1962a, p. 126 (type, A. compositus, OD), for
discussion, see Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, &
roZ A no v, 1989, p. 99; Debrenne, roZ An o v,
& ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 136]. Inner wall with
several rows of simple pores per intersept;
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 113
septa completely porous; tabulae with normal
pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.1): Kolyma,
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia,
Far East, southern China.——Fig . 89,1a–b.
*C. infirmus (vologDin), Usa Formation,
Botoman, Bol’shaya Erba, Batenev Range,
Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, syntype, PIN 1040; a,
transverse section, ×10; b, tangential section of
outer wall (at top), ×10 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002).
Family LANICYATHIDAE
Debrenne, Rozanov, & Zhuravlev, 1989
[Lanicyathidae Debrenne, roZA nov , & ZhurAvlev in Debrenne,
ZhurAvlev, & roZAnov, 1989, p. 90]
Inner wall with noncommunicating
canals. lower Cambrian (Bot.1).
Lanicyathus belYAevA in belYAevA & others, 1975, p.
87 [*L. albus; OD; holotype, belYA evA & others,
1975, pl. 19,3; pl. 37,2–3, PIN DVIMS5157/6,
Moscow]. Inner wall with several rows of horizontal
to upwardly projecting, straight to waved canals
per intersept; septa completely porous; tabulae
with normal pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Far
East.——Fig. 89,2a–b. *L. albus, Ust’toka unit,
Botoman, Lan River, Dzhagdy Range, Far East,
Russia, holotype, PIN DVIMS5157/6; a, longi-
tudinal section, ×7; b, transverse section, ×7
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Order ARCHAEOCYATHIDA
Okulitch, 1935
[nom. correct. Zhu rAvle vA, 1955a, p. 11, pro order Archaeocyathina
oKuliTch, 1935, p. 90] [=Anthomorphida oKuliTch, 1935, p. 90,
nom. correct. oKuliTch, 1955a, p. 18, pro order Anthomorphina
oKuliTch, 1935, p. 90; =Syringocnemidida oKuliTch, 1935, p. 90,
nom. correct. Debrenne, 1964, p. 117, pro order Syringocnemina
oKuliTch, 1935, p. 90; =Spirocyathida R. beDForD & W. R. beD-
ForD , 1936, p. 13, nom. correct. hill, 1972, p. 103, pro ord er Spiro -
cyathina R. beDForD & W. R. be DFor D, 1936, p. 13; =Metacyathida
R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936, p. 16, nom. correct. oKuliTch,
1955a, p. 14, pro order Metacyathina R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD,
1936, p. 16; =order Dictyocyanthina (sic) R. beDForD & J. beDForD,
1937, p. 37, nom. nud., proposed conditionally; =Archaeosyconida
ZhurAv levA , 1955a, p. 12; =superorder Loculicyathina ZhurAvle vA,
1955a, p. 9, nom. transl. vologDin, 1962a, p. 118, ex order Locu-
licyathida Zhur Avle vA, 1955a, p. 9, nom. correct. vologDin, 1961,
p. 178, pro Loculocyathida ZhurAvlevA, 1955a, p. 9, invalid name
based on nom. null.; =Rhizacyathida ZhurAvlevA, 1955b, p. 629, for
discussion, see hill, 1972, p. 103, 133; =Bicyathida vologDin 1956,
p. 878; =Syringocnematida ZhurAvl evA in Zhu rAvlevA, K rAsnoPeevA,
& chernYshevA, 1960, p. 139; =Thalassocyathida vologDin, 1961,
p. 177; =Tersiida vologDin, 1961, p. 181; = superorder Bicyathina
vologDin, 1962a, p. 117; =Archaeopharetrida Debrenne, 1970a,
p. 25; =Metaldetida Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25; =Paranacyathida
Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25; =Paracoscinida Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25,
for discussion, see Debrenne & ZhurAvle v, 1992b, p. 111; =Meta-
coscinida Debrenne, 1974a, p. 187]
Cup two walled, of solitary or low- to
high-modular organization, with septal
type of development; inner wall of centrip-
etal type; intervallum with taeniae, pseu-
dosepta, pseudotaenial network, dictyonal
network, calicles, or syringes; segmented
or independent (membrane and plate)
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Tom.1–Toy.3), middle Cambrian, upper
Cambrian (Furongian).
Alataucyathus a
b
Fig. 88. Alataucyathidae (p. 111).
114 Treatise Online, number XX
Lanicyathus
2a
2b
Clathricoscinus
1a
1b
Fig. 89. Clathricoscinidae and Lanicyathidae (p. 112–113).
Suborder LOCULICYATHINA
Zhuravleva, 1955
[nom. transl. Debrenne, 1991, p. 219, ex superorder Loculicyathina
ZhurAvlevA, 1955a, p. 9, nom. transl. vologDin, 1962a, p. 118, ex order
Loculicyathida vologDin, 1961, p. 178, nom. correct. pro Loculocyathida
ZhurAvlevA, 1955a, p. 9, invalid name based on nom. null.]
Cup modular (pseudocolonies formed by
interparietal budding) or rarely solitary; inter-
vallum with pseudosepta; synapticulae and
plate tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Tom.1–Bot.3), upper Cambrian (Furongian).
Superfamily
LOCULICYATHOIDEA
Zhuravleva, 1954
[nom. transl. et correct. Debrenne & Zhur Avle v, 1992b, p.112, e x
Loculocyathidae Zhu rAvl evA, 1954, p. 27, invalid name based on
nom. null.]
Outer wall simple, with pores
of cambroid type. lower Cambrian
(Tom.1–Bot.3); upper Cambrian
(Furongian).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 115
Family LOCULICYATHIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1954
[nom. correct. ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p.107, pro Loculocyathidae ZhurAvl-
evA, 1954, p. 27, invalid name based on nom. null.] [=Robustocyathidae
Debrenne, 1964, p. 113; =Paranacyathidae Debrenne, 1970a, p. 38, nom.
nud.; =Ardrossacyathidae grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 109]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Tom.1–Bot.3), upper Cambrian
(Furongian).
Loculicyathus vologDin, 1931, p. 54 (vologDin,
1928, p. 30, nom. nud.) [*L. tolli; M; lecto-
type, vologDin, 1931, pl. 19,1; SD Debrenne,
ZhurAvl ev, & Krus e, 2002, p. 1651, TsNIGRm
58a/2956, St. Petersburg] [=Loculocyathus
vologDin, 1937b, p. 468, nom. null.]. Inner wall
with one row of simple pores per intersept; pseudo-
septa finely porous. lower Cambrian: (Atd.2–Bot.3):
Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia,
Transbaikalia, Far East, Urals, Australia, Iberia,
Sardinia, United States, Mexico.——Fig. 90,1a–b.
*L. tolli, Torgashino Formation, Atdabanian,
Kameshki, eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia; a,
lectotype, TsNIGRm 58a/2956, transverse section,
×8.5; b, paralectotype, TsNIGRm 57a/2956, longi-
tudinal section, ×6 (Vologdin, 1931).
?Antarcticocyathus Debrenne, roZ A n o v , &
Webers, 1984, p. 298 [*A. webersi; OD; holo-
type, Debrenne, roZ Anov, & Webers, 1984, fig.
5.1–5.2, 6.3, USNM 333901, specimen Ant-1,
Washington, D.C.]. Outer wall pores in irregular,
undulating quasitransverse (or less commonly
quasilongitudinal) rows over entire wall plate; inner
wall with one row of simple pores per intersept;
pseudosepta coarsely porous. [Genus is otherwise
typical of suborder, but bears a continuous outer
wall of distinctive porosity, the appropriate taxo-
nomic treatment of which is uncertain.] upper
Cambrian (Furongian: Paibian): Antarctica.——
Fig . 90,2a–b. *A. webersi, Minaret Formation,
Furongian: Paibian, Springer Peak, Heritage Range,
Ellsworth Mountains, Antarctica; a, holotype,
USNM 333901, specimen Ant-1, longitudinal
section, ×4.5 (Debrenne, Rozanov, & Webers,
1984); b, paratype, USNM 333906, specimen
Ant-2, oblique transverse section, ×4 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Ardrossacyathus R. beD ForD & J. beDForD , 1937, p.
31 [*A. endotheca; OD; holotype, R. beDFo rD &
J. beDFor D, 1937, fig. 125, M, USNM PU86766,
specimen 354, Washington, D.C.] [=Met a l -
detimorpha R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1937,
p. 31 (type, M. yorkei, OD), for discussion, see
ZhurAvlev & grAvesTocK, 1994, p. 31; =Dzhag-
dycyathus belYAevA in belYAevA & others, 1975, p.
102 (type, D. crinitus, OD); =Egiinocyathus Fonin,
1983, p. 12 (type, E. ornatus, OD), for discus-
sion, see Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 121;
Zhur Avle v & gr Ave sTo cK, 1994, p. 31]. Inner
wall with several rows of simple pores per intersept;
pseudosepta finely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–
Bot.3): Mongolia, Far East, Australia.——Fig .
90,3. *A. endotheca, Botoman, Parara Limestone,
Ardrossan, South Australia, Australia, topotype,
SAM P32041, tangential section of outer wall, ×7
(Zhuravlev & Gravestock, 1994).
Cambrocyathellus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 284 [*C.
tschuranicus; OD; holotype, ZhurAvlevA, 1960b,
pl. 28,3, PIN 1161, Moscow, not located] [=Robus-
tocyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 133 (type, Archaeo-
cyathus robustus vologDin, 1937a, p. 25, OD);
=Ramuscyathus (Ramuscyathus) Fonin in voronin &
others, 1982, p. 101 (type, Loculocyathus tuberculatus
vologDin, 1940a, p. 87, OD; =R. (R.) artus Fonin
in voronin & others, 1982, p. 102; =Ramuscyathus
(Parvuscyathus) Fonin in voronin & others, 1982,
p. 103 (type, R. (P.) pannonicus, OD), for discus-
sion, see Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 122].
Outer wall pores restricted to interseptal areas;
inner wall with one row of simple pores per inter-
sept; pseudosepta coarsely porous. lower Cambrian
(Tom.1–Atd.4): Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mongolia, Far East, Kazakhstan, Australia.——
Fig. 91,1a–b. *C. tschuranicus, Pestrotsvet Forma-
tion, Tommotian; a, Churan, Lena River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia, holotype, PIN 1161, transverse
section, ×5.5; b, Krestyakh, Lena River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia, specimen PIN 1161, longitudinal
section of modular skeleton (outer wall to right), ×4
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Mikhnocyathus mAslov, 1957, p. 307 [*M. zolaensis;
OD; lectotype, mAslo v, 1957, fig. 2; Debrenne
& Zhu rAvle v, 1992b, pl. 5,6; SD Debrenne &
Zhu rAv l ev , 1992b, pl. 5, fig. 6 caption, PIN
2038(1), Moscow] [=Zolacyathus vologDin,
1962d, p. 10 (type, Z. loculosus, M)]. Inner wall
with several rows of simple pores per intersept;
pseudosepta coarsely porous; rare plate tabulae.
lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Atd.3): Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mongolia, Transbaikalia, ?Sardinia.Fi g .
91,2a–b. *M. zolaensis, Bystraya Formation, Atda-
banian, Zola Valley, Transbaikalia, Russia, lecto-
type, PIN 2038(1); a, transverse section, ×3.5; b,
longitudinal section, ×3.5 (Maslov, 1957).
Neoloculicyathus voronin, 1974, p. 134 [*N. primus;
OD; holotype, voronin, 1974, pl. 6,4; voronin,
1979, pl. 12,5; Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, pl.
1,5, PIN 2742/4, Moscow]. Inner wall with several
rows of simple pores per intersept; pseudosepta
coarsely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.1):
Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia,
Transbaikalia, Far East, Urals, Australia, Morocco,
Iberia, Germany.——Fig. 91,3a–b. *N. primus,
Bazaikha Formation, Atdabanian, Bazaikha River,
eastern Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia; a, paratype, PIN
2742/3, longitudinal section, ×6; b, holotype, PIN
2742/4, longitudinal section, ×4 (Voronin, 1974).
Okulitchicyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 281 [*Ajaci-
cyathus discoformis ZhurAvl evA in Zhur AvlevA &
Zelenov, 1955, p. 68; OD; holotype, Zh urAvlevA
& Zelenov, 1955, pl. 1,1, PIN 100(1), Moscow, not
located] [=Lermontovaecyathus Korshunov, 1972,
p. 59 (type, L. isiti, OD; =Ajacicyathus discoformis
ZhurAvlevA in ZhurAvlevA & Zelenov, 1955, p. 68,
for discussion, see Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b,
116 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 90. Loculicyathidae (p. 115).
3
2a
2b
Antarcticocyathus
Loculicyathus
1a
Ardrossacyathus
1b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 117
2a
2b
Cambrocyathellus
Neoloculicyathus
1a Mikhnocyathus
1b
Fig. 91. Loculicyathidae (p. 115).
3a 3b
118 Treatise Online, number XX
p. 128); =Alconeracyathus Perejón, 1973, p. 185
(type, A. melendezi, OD; =Archaeocyathellus (Archaeo-
fungia) andalusicus simon, 1939, p. 76); =Anda-
lusicyathus Perejón in Debrenne, 1975, p. 352,
nom. nud.; =Andalusicyathus Perejón, 1976, p. 17
(type, Archaeocyathellus (Archaeofungia) andalusicus
simon, 1939, p. 76, OD); =Urdacyathus Perejón &
moreno, 1978, p. 201 (type, U. pradoanus, OD),
for discussion, see Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b,
p. 119]. Inner wall with several rows of simple
pores per intersept; pseudosepta coarsely porous;
plate tabulae and synapticulae may be present.
lower Cambrian (Tom.1–Atd.4): Siberian Platform,
Mongolia, Kazakhstan, ?Australia, Iberia.——Fig .
92,1a–b. *O. discoformis (ZhurAvlevA), Pestrotsvet
Formation, Tommotian; a, Aldan River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia, specimen PIN 1162, external
view of inner wall, ×6 (Zhuravleva, 1960b); b,
Churan-Zhurinskiy Mys area, Lena River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia, specimen MNHN M810058,
transverse section (outer wall at top), ×6 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Paranacyathus R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1937, p.
34, nom. nov. pro Paracyathus R. beDForD & W.
R. beDForD, 1936, p. 17, non milne- eD WAr Ds
& hAime, 1848, p. 318 (type, P. procumbens, SD
milne-eDWArDs & hAime, 1850, p. xv), cnidarian
[*Paracyathus parvus R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD,
Fig. 92. Loculicyathidae (p. 115–119).
2a
2b
Okulitchicyathus
Paranacyathus
1a
1b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 119
1936, p. 17; OD; holotype, R. be DF or D & W.
r. beDForD, 1936, fig. 76; Debrenne, 1974c, pl.
19,1–4; Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, pl. 1,6),
SAM P992-134, -135, M, Adelaide]. Inner wall with
one, rarely two rows of simple pores per intersept;
pseudosepta finely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–
Bot.3): ?Altay Sayan, ?Canada, Australia, Antarctica,
Morocco.——Fig. 92,2a–b. *P. parvus (R. beDForD
& W. r. beDForD), Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax
Mine, South Australia, Australia, holotype, SAM
P992; a, detail of intervallum, longitudinal view
(outer wall to left), ×10 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002); b, external longitudinal view of outer
wall, ×6 (Debrenne, 1974c).
Family EREMITACYATHIDAE
Debrenne, 1992
[Eremitacyathidae Debrenne in Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 112]
[=Eremitacyathidae ZAmArreño & Debrenne, 1977, p. 55, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with canals. lower Cambrian
(Atd.2).
Eremitacyathus ZAmArreño & Debrenne, 1977,
p. 55 [*E. fissus; OD; holotype, ZAmArreño
& Debrenne, 1977, pl. 5a–b; Debrenne &
Zhu rAv le v, 1992b, pl. 3,4, MNHN M84016,
specimen Spe 10-1a, Paris]. Inner wall with
one canal-like opening per intersept, longitu-
dinall y cont inuous along entire cup, bounded
by longitudinal plates bearing denticulate rims
and lacking transverse partitions; pseudosepta
coarsely porous; synapticulae may be present.
lower Cambrian (Atd.2): Iberia.——Fig . 93a–b.
*E. fissus, Pedroche Formation, Atdabanian, Las
Ermitas, Cordoba, Andalusia, Spain, holotype,
MNHN M84016, specimen Spe 10-1a; a, trans-
verse section, ×2.5; b, longitudinal section, ×2.5
(Zamarreño & Debrenne, 1977).
Superfamily
SAKHACYATHOIDEA
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1990
[nom. transl. Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 112, ex Sakhacyathidae
Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 302]
Outer wall pustular. lower Cambrian
(Tom.2–Atd.2).
Eremitacyathus
a
b
Fig. 93. Eremitacyathidae (p. 119).
120 Treatise Online, number XX
Family SAKHACYATHIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1990
[Sakhacyathidae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 302]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Tom.2–Atd.2).
Sakhacyathus Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1990,
p. 302 [*Paranacyathus subartus Zhu r Avl e vA ,
19 60b, p. 291; OD; holoty pe, ZhurAvlevA,
1960b, pl. 28,6, TsSGM 205/149, Novosibirsk]
[= Orbiparanocyathus be lY Ae vA , 1996, p. 109
(type, O. zolaensis, OD)]. Inner wall with one,
rarely two rows of simple pores per intersept;
pseudosepta finely porous. lower Cambrian
(Tom.2–Atd.2): Siberian Platform, Altay Sayan,
Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia.——Fi g. 94a–b.
*S. subartus (Zhur Avl ev A), Pestrotsvet Forma-
tion, Atdabanian, Mukhatta River, Sakha
(Yakutia), Russia; a, holotype, TsSGM 205/149,
longitudinal section (outer wall to left), ×7
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b ,
transverse section, specimen PIN 4451/9, ×15
(Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992b; copyright
Publications Scientifiques du Muséum national
d’Histoire naturelle, Paris).
Superfamily
CHANKACYATHOIDEA
Yakovlev, 1959
[nom. transl. Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 112, ex Chankacyathidae
YAKovlev, 1959, p. 93]
Outer wall with canals. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3).
Family CHANKACYATHIDAE
Yakovlev, 1959
[Chankacyathidae YAKovlev, 1959, p. 93]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Chankacyathus YAKov lev , 1959, p. 91, fig. 1 [*C.
strachovi; OD; nom. correct. oKu ne vA, 1969, p.
82, pro C. strachovii; holotype not designated,
collection not located]. Outer wall with horizontal
to upwardly projecting, straight canals, bearing
supplementary bracts externally (imparting overall
inverted V-shaped appearance to outer wall); inner
wall with one row of simple pores per intersept;
pseudosepta finely porous. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–
Bot.3): Far East, ?Australia.——Fig . 95,1a–b.
*C. strachovi, Dmitrievka Formation, Botoman,
Kar’ernaya, Far East, Russia, specimen PGU 202
133/52; a, transverse section of modular skeleton,
×7; b, longitudinal section, ×6.5 (Okuneva, 1969).
Family TCHOJACYATHIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992
[Tchojacyathidae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 113]
Inner wall with canals. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4).
Tchojacyathus roZAn ov, 1960b, p. 46 [*T. validus;
OD; holotype, roZAnov , 1960b, pl. 1,3 (non fig.
2); ZhurAvlevA, Ko nYushKov, & roZ Anov, 1964,
pl. 11,1, PIN 4297/11, Moscow]. Outer wall with
horizontal to upwardly projecting, S-shaped canals;
inner wall with one row of horizontal to upwardly
projecting, S-shaped canals per intersept; pseu-
dosepta coarsely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.4):
Sakhacyathus
a
b
Fig. 94. Sakhacyathidae (p. 120).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 121
Altay Sayan.——Fig . 95,2a–b. *T. validus, Uba
Formation, Atdabanian, Tyrga River, Altay Moun-
tains, Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype, PIN 4297/11;
a, longitudinal section (outer wall to left), ×6; b,
transverse section, ×6 (Rozanov, 1960b).
Suborder ANTHOMORPHINA
Okulitch, 1935
[nom. transl. Debrenne, 1991, p. 219, ex Anthomorphida oKuliTch,
1955a, p. 18, nom. correct. pro order Anthomorphina oKuliTch, 1935,
p. 90] [=subclass Anthocyatha oKuliTch, 1943, p. 46; =Araneocyathida
vologDin, 1961, p. 182]
Cup solitary or modular (pseudocolonies
formed by external budding); intervallum
with pseudosepta and membrane tabulae.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1).
Superfamily
ANTHOMORPHOIDEA
Okulitch, 1935
[nom. transl. Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 113, ex Anthomorphidae
oKuliTch, 1935, p. 97]
Outer wall simple, with pores of anthoid
type; microporous membranes of similar
structure to tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1).
Fig. 95. Chankacyathidae and Tchojacyathidae (p. 120–121).
Tchojacyathus
2a
2b
Chankacyathus
1a
1b
122 Treatise Online, number XX
Family ANTHOMORPHIDAE
Okulitch, 1935
[Anthomorphidae oKuliTch, 1935, p. 97] [=Anthomorphinae oK u-
liTch, 1 935, nom. transl. Fonin, 1 985, p . 121, ex Anthomorphidae
oKuliTch, 1935, p. 97; =Araneocyathidae vologDin, 1956, p. 878;
=Serligocyathidae vologDin, 1959a, p. 670; =Rudicyathinae Fonin
in Zhur Avlev, ZhurAv levA, & Fonin, 1983, p. 26; =Vertocyathinae
Fonin, 1985, p. 110]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.1).
Anthomorpha bor n e m A n n , 1884, p. 705 [*A .
margarita; M; lectotype, bornemAnn, 1886,
pl. 28,1a,4–6; Debrenne, 1964, pl. 45,1; SD
Debrenne, 1964, p. 233, GML 897a, Halle]. Inner
wall with one row of simple pores per intersept;
pseudosepta aporose even in early ontogenetic
stages; membrane tabulae may be present. lowe r
Cambrian (Bot.1): Tuva, ?Far East, Morocco, Iberia,
France, Sardinia.——Fig. 96,1a–b. *A. margarita,
Matoppa Formation, Botoman; a, Cuccuru Contu,
Sardinia, Italy, lectotype, GML 897a, transverse
section, ×4 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002);
b, Gonnesa, Sardinia, Italy, paralectotype, MNHN
M84133, specimen C GON 3-7, longitudinal
section, ×3 (Debrenne, 1964).
Tollicyathus chernYshevA, 1960, p. 77 [*T. ishensis;
OD; holotype, chernYshevA, 196 0, pl. 4,1,
ZSGGU 503/1, Novokuznetsk] [=Nellicyathus
Fonin in rePinA & others, 1964, p. 247 (type, N.
nelliae, OD); =Rudicyathus Fonin in Zhur Avlev,
ZhurAvlevA, & Fonin, 1983, p. 26 (type, R. tersus,
OD); =Vertocyathus Fonin, 1985, p. 110 (type, V.
reduncus, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne &
ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 67]. Inner wall with one
row of simple pores per intersept; pseudosepta
with pores restricted to outer wall area, but coarsely
porous in early ontogenetic stages; membrane
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia.——Fig. 96,2a–b.
*T. ishensis, Verkhneynyrga Formation, Botoman,
Bol’shaya Isha River, Altay Mountains, Altay Sayan,
Russia, holotype, ZSGGU 503/1; a, longitudinal
section, ×5; b, transverse section, ×5 (Cherny-
sheva, 1960).
Family SHIVELIGOCYATHIDAE
Fonin, 1983
[nom. transl. Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 113, ex Shiveligocy-
athinae Fonin, 1983, p. 12]
Inner wall with canals. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1).
Shiveligocyathus missArZhevsKiY, 1961, p. 19 [*S.
vesiculoides; OD; holotype, missArZhevsKiY, 1961,
pl. 1,1, PIN 1914/75M/44, Moscow, not located]
[=Voznesenskicyathus roDionovA in Zhu rAvl evA
& others, 1967, p. 99 (type, V. florens, OD), for
discussion, see Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p.
130]. Inner wall with several rows of horizontal to
upwardly projecting, straight communicating canals
per intersept; pseudosepta finely porous; membrane
tabulae may be present. lower Cambrian (Bot.1):
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia.——Fig. 97 a–b.
*S. vesiculoides, Shangan Formation, Botoman,
Shivelig-Khem River, eastern Tannu-Ola Range,
Tuva, Russia, paratype, PIN 1914/75M/00; a,
longitudinal section, ×2 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002); b, oblique transverse section, ×2
(Missarzhevskiy, 1961).
Suborder ARCHAEOCYATHINA
Okulitch, 1935
[nom. transl. ZhurAvle vA, 1960b, p. 271, ex Archaeocyathida Zhu rAv-
levA, 1955a, p. 17, nom. correct. pro order Archaeocyathina oKuliTch,
1935, p. 90] [=Archaeosyconina ZhurAvlevA, 1955a, p. 12, nom. transl.
ZhurAv levA, 1960b, p. 303, ex order Archaeosyconida Zhu rAvle vA,
1955a, p. 12, nom. correct. Debrenne, 1964, p. 117, pro Archaeosyconiina
ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 303; =Dictyocyathina vologDin, 1956, p. 878,
nom. transl. Fonin in voronin & others, 1982, p. 83, ex Dictyocyathida
vologDin, 1956, p. 878; =Chouberticyathina Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25,
nom. transl. Fonin in voronin & others, 1982, p. 83, ex Chouberticy-
athida Debrenne, 1970a, p. 25]
Cup solitary or modular (latter by external
budding and/or longitudinal subdivision;
encrusting forms develop by addition of
new central cavities); intervallum with
taeniae, pseudosepta, or pseudotaenial or
dictyonal network; segmented tabulae may
be present. lower Cambrian (Tom.2–Toy.3),
middle Cambrian.
Superfamily
DICTYOCYATHOIDEA
Taylor, 1910
[nom. transl. WooD, evAns, & Zhu rAvlev, 1992, p. 492, ex Dictyocy-
athidae TAYlor, 1910, p. 111]
Outer wall simple, either rudimentary (of
marginal intervallar elements only) or basic
(of marginal intervallar elements with addi-
tional linking lintels); segmented tabulae may
be present. lower Cambrian (Tom.2–Toy.1),
middle Cambrian.
Family DICTYOCYATHIDAE
Taylor, 1910
[Dictyocyathidae TAYlor, 1910, p. 111] [=subfamily Dictyocyathinea
hernánDeZ-sAmPelAYo, 1933, p. 159; =Prismocyathidae Fonin, 1960, p.
725; =Paracoscinidae Debrenne, 1970a, p. 38, nom. nud.; =Paracoscinidae
Debrenne, 1974a, p. 252; =Chouberticyathidae Debrenne, 1974a, p. 192;
=Graphoscyphiidae Debrenne, 1974a, p. 204, nom. correct. Kruse, 1982,
p. 196, pro Graphoscyphidae Debrenne, 1974a, p. 204]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Tom.2–Toy.1), middle Cambrian.
Dictyocyathus bor ne m An n , 1891a, p. 500 [*D.
tenerrimus; M; lectotype, bornemAnn, 1891a, pl.
42,5; pl. 43,4–6; SD Debrenne, 1964, p. 200, not
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 123
located; =Coscinocyathus verticillus bornemAnn,
1886, p. 65; lectotype, bornemAnn, 1886, pl.
15,3g; Debrenne, 1964, pl. 34,5; SD Debrenne,
1964, p. 205, GML 899c, Halle] [=Prismocyathus
Fonin, 1960, p. 725 (type, P. praesignis, OD);
=Spongiosicyathus ZhurAvlevA in DAT se nK o &
others, 1968, p. 174 (type, Dictyocyathus translu-
cidus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 275, OD); =Prismo-
cyathellus Fonin, 1990, p. 152 (type, Prismocyathus
verisimilis Fonin, 1960, p. 726, OD; =Prismocy-
athus praesignis Fonin, 1960, p. 725)]. Outer wall
basic; inner wall with one row of simple pores
per intersept; dictyonal network. lower Cambrian
(Tom.2–Bot.1), middle Cambrian (Guzhangian):
Siberian Platform, Kolyma, Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mongolia, Far East, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Iberia,
Sardinia, Germany, Tom.2–Bot.1; Antarctica,
Guzhangian.——Fig . 98,1a–b. *D. verticillus
(bornemAnn), Matoppa Formation, Botoman,
Cuccuru Contu, Sardinia, Italy; a, topotype,
Tollicyathus
Anthomorpha
2a
2b
1a
1b
Fig. 96. Anthomorphidae (p. 122).
124 Treatise Online, number XX
MNHN M84248, specimen CCC 9-1a, oblique
longitudinal section, ×6 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002); b, lectotype, GML 899c, transverse
section, ×6 (Debrenne, 1964).
Cellicyathus Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 300
[*Maturocyathus ornatus Fonin, 1985, p. 118; OD;
holotype, Fon in, 1985, pl. 22,2, PIN 1915/280,
Moscow]. Outer wall basic, tabular; inner wall
tabular, with one row of simple pores per intersept;
taeniae coarsely porous; synapticulae and simply
porous segmented tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Bot.2–Toy.1): Siberian Platform, Altay
Sayan, Tuva.——Fig. 98,2a–b. *C. ornatus (Fonin),
Shangan Formation, Botoman, Ulug-Shangan River,
eastern Tannu-Ola Range, Tuva, Russia; a, holotype,
PIN 1915/280, transverse section, ×5; b, paratype,
PIN 1915/300, longitudinal section (outer wall to
right), ×3.5 (Fonin, 1985).
Chouberticyathus Debrenne, 1964, p. 208 [*C.
clatratus; OD; holotype, Debrenne, 1964, pl.
32,1–3, MNHN M80272, specimen Ki 140 P-6,
Paris]. Outer wall imperforate (possibly rudi-
mentary); inner wall with one row of simple
pores per intersept; taeniae coarsely porous. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1): southern China, Morocco,
Iberia, Sardinia.——Fig. 98,3a–b. *C. clatratus,
Issafen Formation, Botoman, Tizi Oumeslema,
Morocco, holotype, MNHN M80272, specimen
Ki 140 P-6; a, transverse view, ×6; b, longitu-
dinal view, ×6 (Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992b;
copyright Publications Scientifiques du Muséum
national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris).
Graphoscyphia Debrenne in ZhurAvlevA, 1974a, p.
164 [*Protopharetra graphica R. beDF orD & W. R.
beDForD, 1934, p. 4; OD; lectotype, R. beDForD
& W. r. beDForD, 1934, fig. 22; Debrenne, 1969a,
pl. 12,5; SD Debrenne, 1969a, p. 346, NHM
S4170, London]. Outer wall basic; inner wall with
one row of simple pores per intersept; pseudosepta
coarsely porous, linked by synapticulae. l ower
Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3): Altay Sayan, Australia,
Antarctica, Mexico.——Fig. 98,4a–b. *G. graphica
(R. beDFo rD & W. r. beDFor D), Ajax Limestone,
Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia,
lectotype, NHM S4170; a, internal longitudinal
view of inner wall, ×6; b, transverse view, ×6
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Molybdocyathus Debrenne & gAngloFF i n
Debrenne, gAnDin, & gAngloFF, 1990, p. 92
[*M. juvenilis; OD; holotype, Debrenne, gAnDin,
& gAngloFF, 1990, pl. 2,13, USNM 443573,
specimen IR 23.7a’, Washington, D.C.]. Outer
wall rudimentary; inner wall with one row of
simple po re s per inters ept; dictyona l network.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2): Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mo ngolia , Unit ed States. ——F i g . 99,1ab.
*M. juvenilis, Valmy Formation, Botoman, Iron
Canyon, Nevada, United States; a, holotype,
USNM 443573, specimen IR 23.7a’, transverse and
and longitudinal sections of modular skeleton, ×8;
b, paratype, USNM 443568, specimen IR 14.2,
and longitudinal section of modular skeleton, ×8
(Debrenne, Gandin, & Gangloff, 1990).
Paracoscinus R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936,
p. 18 [*P. mirabile; OD; holotype, R. beDForD &
W. r. beDForD, 1936, fig. 85; Debrenne, 1974a,
fig. 37a–b, SAM P988-169, -170, -171, Adelaide].
Outer wall basic, tabular; inner wall with one row
of simple pores per intersept, each pore subdivided
by median longitudinal rod; pseudosepta finely
porous; segmented tabulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.3–
Toy.1): Altay Sayan, Australia.——Fig. 99,2a–d. *P.
mirabile, Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine,
South Australia, Australia; a, holotype, SAM P988-
169, -170, -171, transverse view, ×6 (Debrenne &
Zhuravlev, 1992b; copyright Publications Scienti-
fiques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle,
Paris); b, paratype, USNM PU86680, specimen
241A, external view of outer wall, ×6 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); c–d, holotype, SAM
P988-169, -170, -171; c, longitudinal view, ×4; d,
internal view of inner wall, ×7 (Debrenne, 1974a).
?Retilamina Debrenne & jAmes, 1981, p. 370
[*R. amourensis; OD; holotype, Debrenne &
jAmes, 1981, pl. 54,4, GSC 62128, specimen
169-5acT1, Ottawa]. Encrusting, domelike cup;
Fig. 97. Shiveligocyathidae (p. 122).
Shiveligocyathus
a
b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 125
Fig. 98. Dictyocyathidae (p. 122–124).
Chouberticyathus
Graphoscyphia
Cellicyathus
Dictyocyathus
3a
3b
4a 4b
2a
2b
1a
1b
126 Treatise Online, number XX
Fig. 99. Dictyocyathidae (p. 124).
Molybdocyathus
Paracoscinus 2c
2a
2b
1a
1b
2d
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 127
upper wall (interpreted as outer) with pores
regularly arranged but not at each intertaenia;
pores commonly produced as chimneys; lower
(possibly inner) wall rudimentary; dictyonal or
more probably pseudotaenial network. [Atypical
cup shape does not provide certainty as to which
wall is outer and which inner, and nature of inter-
vallar elements and accepted inner wall remain
uncertain.] lower Cambrian (Bot.2): Canada,
United States, Mexico.——Fig. 100. *R. amou-
rensis, Forteau Formation, Botoman, Mount St.
Margaret, Newfoundland, Canada, holotype, GSC
62128, specimen 169-5acT1, oblique section, ×6
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Family CLARUSCOSCINIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992
[Claruscoscinidae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 114] [=Clarus-
coscinidae Debrenne i n Debrenne, gAnDin, & roWlA nD, 1989, p.
167, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with bracts, fused bracts, or
pore tubes. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.1).
Claruscoscinus hAnDFielD, 1971, p. 74 [*Eucyathus
billingsi vologDin, 1940b, p. 48; OD; holotype
not designated, collection not located] [=Monstri-
cyathus vologDin, 1977, p. 60 (type, M. tubi-
formis, OD); =Arisacyathus KAshinA in osA DchAYA
& others, 1979, p. 166 (type, A. diligens, OD;
=Eucyathus billingsi vologDin, 1940b, p. 48);
=Maturocyathus Fonin, 1985, p. 114 (type, M.
makarovi, OD; =Eucyathus billingsi vologDin,
1940b, p. 48); =Costocyathus Fonin, 1985, p.
119 (type, C. mactus, OD), for discussion, see
Debrenne & Zh urAvl ev, 1992b, p. 123]. Outer
wall basic, tabular; inner wall with one row of pores
per intersept, bearing upwardly projecting, straight
to S-shaped pore tubes; pseudosepta finely porous;
segmented tabulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Toy.1):
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far
East, Canada, United States.——Fig. 101,1a–c. *C.
billingsi (volog Din ), Verkhnemonok Formation,
Botoman, Berezovaya River, Abakan River, western
Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia; a, unlocated syntype,
longitudinal section, ×4 (Vologdin, 1940b); b,
transverse section, syntype, specimen PIN 4754/6,
×5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); c, unlo-
cated syntype, longitudinal section, ×4 (Vologdin,
1940b).
Fenestrocyathus hAnDFielD, 1971, p. 72 [*F.
complexus; OD; holotype, hAnDFielD, 1971, pl.
14,5; pl. 15,1, GSC 25388, Ottawa]. Outer wall
basic; inner wall with one row of pores per inter-
sept, bearing upwardly projecting, S-shaped bracts
or fused bracts; dictyonal network. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.2): Altay Sayan, Mongolia, Canada,
United States.——Fig. 101,2. *F. complexus, Sekwi
Formation, Botoman, Mackenzie Mountains,
Northwest Territories, Canada, holotype, GSC
25388, transverse section of modular skeleton, ×5
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Landercyathus Debrenne & gAngloFF in Debrenne,
gAnDin, & gAngloFF, 1990, p. 91 [*L. lewandowskii;
OD; holotype, Debrenne, gAnDin, & gAngloFF,
1990, pl. 1,13, USNM 443571, specimen IR 23a,
Washington, D.C.]. Outer wall simple; inner wall
with one row of horizontal to upwardly projecting,
straight to waved canals per intersept; canals may
penetrate intervallum forming astrorhizae; dictyonal
network. lower Cambrian (Bot.2): United States.——
Fig. 101,3. *L. lewandowskii, Valmy Formation,
Botoman, Iron Canyon, Nevada, United States,
holotype, USNM 443571, specimen IR 23a, oblique
longitudinal section, ×4 (Debrenne, Gandin, &
Gangloff, 1990).
Stevocyathus Debrenne in Debrenne, gAnDin, &
roWlAnD, 1989, p. 166 [*S. elictus; OD; holotype,
Retilamina
Fig. 100. Dictyocyathidae (p. 124–127).
128 Treatise Online, number XX
Landercyathus
Stevocyathus Fenestrocyathus
4a
4b
2
3
Claruscoscinus
1c
1a
1b
Fig. 101. Claruscoscinidae (p. 127–129).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 129
Debrenne, gAnDin, & roWlAnD , 1989, pl. 12,1,
MNHN M83100, specimen CR2-8, Paris]. Outer
wall basic; inner wall with one row of pores per
intersept, bearing upwardly projecting, S-shaped
bracts or fused bracts; taeniae coarsely porous,
linked by synapticulae; simple segmented tabulae
may be present. lower Cambrian (Bot.2): United
States, Mexico.——Fig. 101,4a–b. *S. elictus, Puerto
Blanco Formation, Botoman, Caborca, Sonora,
Mexico; a, paratype, MNHN M83107, specimen
CR2*1-8, transverse section, ×6 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b, holotype, MNHN
M83100, specimen CR2-8, oblique longitudinal
section, ×6 (Debrenne, Gandin, & Rowland, 1989).
Family PYCNOIDOCOSCINIDAE
Debrenne, 1974
[Pycnoidocoscinidae Debrenne, 1974a, p. 256] [=Pycnoidocoscinidae
Debrenne, 1970a, p. 40, nom. nud.]
Inner wall compound. lower Cambrian
(Bot.3).
Pycnoidocoscinus R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936,
p. 19 [*P. pycnoideum; OD; lectotype, R. beDForD &
W. r. beDForD, 1936, fig. 87; SD Debrenne, 1970a,
p. 40, SAM P990-175, -176, -177, Adelaide]. Outer
wall basic; inner wall compound consisting of wall
carcass and additional microporous sheath formed by
tabulae; pseudosepta finely porous; segmented tabulae.
lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia, ?Canada.——Fig.
102a–b. *P. pycnoideum, Ajax Limestone, Botoman,
Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia, lectotype,
SAM P990-175, -176, -177; a, transverse view (outer
wall at top), ×4; b, tangential view of inner wall, ×6
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Superfamily
ARCHAEOCYATHOIDEA
Hinde, 1889
[nom. correct. ZhurAvle v in vor ono vA & oth ers, 1987, p. 32, p ro
Archaeocyathacea simon, 1939, p. 6, nom. transl. ex Archaeocyathidae
TAYlor, 1910, p. 105, nom. correct. pro family Archaeocyathinae hinDe,
1889, p. 141] [=Flindersicyathoidea R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1939, p.
78, nom. correct. Debrenne & Kruse, 1986, p. 268, pro Flindersicyathacea
grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 115, nom. transl. ex Flindersicyathidae R. beDForD
& J. beDFor D, 1939, p. 78; =Vadimocyathacea KAshinA in os ADchAYA
& others, 1979, p. 160]
Outer wall concentrically porous. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Toy.3).
Family ARCHAEOPHARETRIDAE
R. Bedford & W. R. Bedford, 1936
[Archaeopharetridae R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936, p. 17] [=Dic-
tyocoscinidae R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936, p. 14, for discussion,
see ZhurAvlev & grAvesTocK, 1994, p. 34; =Protopharetridae vologDin,
1957a, p. 182; =Flindersicoscinidae Debrenne, 1974a, p. 246; =Salanycy-
athidae Fonin in voronin & others, 1982, p. 95; =Hawkercyathidae
grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 115]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3).
Archaeopharetra R. beDF or D & W. R. beD F or D,
1936, p. 17 [*A . typica; OD; holotype, R.
beD F o r D & W. R. beD F or D , 1936, fig. 75;
Zhur Avle vA, 1963b, fig. 67a; Debrenne, 1974a,
fig. 3b; SD hill, 1965, p. 115, SAM P969,
Adelaide; =Dictyocyathus irregularis TAY l o r,
1910, p. 145; lectotype, TAY l o r , 1910, pl.
12, photo 66; SD Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, &
Krus e, 2002, p. 1665, SAM T1590, Adelaide]
[=Dictyocoscinus R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD,
19 36, p. 14 (ty pe, D. bel tana , OD; =Di cty o -
cyathus irregularis TAYl o r, 1910, p. 145, for
discussion, see ZhurAvlev & grAvesTocK,
1994, p. 34); =Tubocyathus vologDin, 1937b,
p. 473 (type, T. smolianinovae, M); =Tubicy-
athus vologDin, 1940a, p. 114, nom. null.;
=Tubulocyathus vologDin, 1956, p. 880, nom.
null.; =Flindersicoscinus Debrenne, 1970a, p.
34 (type, Flindersicyathus tabulatus R. beDF or D
& J. beD F or D , 1937, p. 29, OD); =Salanycy-
athus Fonin in voronin & others, 1982, p.
95 (type, S. marginatus, OD); =Hawkercy-
athus gr Av e s T o c K , 1984, p. 115 (type, H.
insculptus, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne
& ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 120]. Inner wall
with one row of simple pores per intersept;
pseudotaeniae coarsely porous; concentrically
porous segmented tabulae may be present.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3): Altay Sayan,
Tuva, Mongolia, Far East, Australia, Antarc-
tica, South Africa (allochthonous), southern
China, ?Iberia.——Fi g. 103,1a–b. *A. irregu-
laris (TAYl or ), Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax
Mine, South Australia, Australia; a, lectotype,
Pycnoidocoscinus
a
b
Fig. 102. Pycnoidocoscinidae (p. 129).
130 Treatise Online, number XX
Markocyathus
2a
2b
Archaeopharetra
1a
1b
Fig. 103. Archaeopharetridae (p. 129–133).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 131
Spirocyathella
2c
2a
2b
Dictyosycon
1
Fig. 104. Archaeopharetridae (p. 132–133).
132 Treatise Online, number XX
Protopharetra
c
a
b
Fig. 105. Archaeopharetridae (p. 133).
SAM T1590, oblique longitudinal view, ×5
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b, (=A.
typica R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD), holotype,
SAM P969, longitudinal view, ×8 (Debrenne,
1974a).
Dictyosycon Zhu r Av le vA , 1960b, p. 307, nom.
transl. Debrenne & Zh ur Avl ev, 1992b, p. 124,
ex Sphinctocyathus (Dictyosycon) ZhurAvlevA,
1960b, p. 307 [*Sphinctocyathus (Dictyosycon)
gravis; OD; holotype, Zhu rAv l evA , 1960b, pl.
31,7, TsSGM 205/169, Novosibirsk]. Inner
wall with one row of simple pores per intersept;
dictyonal network; simple or concentrically
porous segmented tabulae may be present. lower
Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.4): Siberian Platform,
Altay Sayan, Tuva, Iberia.——Fig. 104,1. *D.
gravis, Pestrotsvet Formation, Atdabanian,
Oy-Muran, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia), Russia,
holotype, TsSGM 205/169, oblique longitudinal
section, ×4 (Zhuravleva, 1960b).
Markocyathus Debrenne in Debrenne, gAnDin, &
roWl An D, 1989, p. 165 [*M. clementensis; OD;
holotype, Debrenne, gAnDin, & roW l A n D ,
1989, pl. 11,1–2, MNHN M83096, specimen
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 133
CL-1e, Paris]. Inner wall with several rows of
simple pores per intersept; taeniae coarsely
porous; concentrically porous segmented
tabulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.2): Canada,
Mexico.——Fig. 103,2a–b. *M. clementensis,
Puerto Blanco Formation, Botoman, Caborca,
Sonora, Mexico, holotype, MNHN M83096,
specimen CL-1e; a, detail of inner wall in
tangential section, ×12 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002); b, transverse and longitudinal
sections of modular skeleton, ×3 (Debrenne,
Gandin, & Rowland, 1989).
Protopharetra bornemAnn, 1884, p. 705 (borne-
mAnn, 1883, p. 274, nom. nud.) [*P. polymorpha
bornemAnn, 1886, p. 46; SD simon, 1939,
p. 34; lectotype, bornemAnn, 1886, pl. 5,
fig. 4 bottom; SD simon, 1939, p. 35, not
located; topotypes, MNHN M84120, speci-
mens CGR3/3, GLA3.3, GLC10.II.1b, Paris]
[=Volvacyathus Debrenne, 1960, p. 118 (type,
V. proteus, OD), for discussion, see Debrenne
& Zhu rAv lev , 1992b, p. 128]. Inner wall with
one row of simple pores per intersept; taeniae
coarsely porous, linked by rare synapticulae.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.3): Altay Sayan,
Tuva, Far East, Tajikistan, Canada, United
States, southern China, Morocco, Iberia, France,
Sardinia, Germany.——Fig. 105a–c. *P. poly-
morpha, Matoppa Formation, Botoman, Canal
Grande, Sardinia, Italy; a, topotype, MNHN
M84120, transverse section of modular skeleton,
×3 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b,
lectotype, transverse section, ×3 (Bornemann,
1886); c, topotype, MNHN M84120, detail of
outer wall in tangential section, ×7 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Spirocyathella vologDin, 1939, p. 227 [*S. kyzlar-
tauensis; OD; holotype not designated, collec-
tion not located] [=Aruntacyathus Kr u se in
WAlTer, 1980, chart, nom. nud.; =Amaded-
cyathus Kru s e in WAlTer, 1980, chart, nom.
nud.; =Aruntacyathus Kru se in Krus e & Wes T,
1980, p. 172 (type, A. toddi, OD); =Spi roc y-
athellus Fonin in voronin & others, 1982, p.
98, lapsus calami pro Spirocyathella vologDin,
1939, p. 227, for discussion, see Debrenne &
ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 131]. Inner wall with
several rows of simple pores per intersept; pseu-
dotaenial network coarsely porous; concentri-
cally porous segmented tabulae. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.2): Altay Sayan, Urals, Canada,
United States, Mexico, Australia, Antarctica,
South Africa (allochthonous), France.——Fig .
104,2a–c. *S. kyzlartauensis, Terekla Forma-
tion, Botoman, Mt. Kizlar-Tau, western flank
of southern Urals, Russia; a, topotype, PIN
4451/26, longitudinal section, ×8 (Debrenne
& Zhuravlev, 1992b; copyright Publications
Scientifiques du Muséum national d’Histoire
naturelle, Paris); b–c, unlocated syntype, 4-M,
thin section 4; b, transverse section, ×6; c,
longitudinal section, ×6 (Vologdin, 1939).
Family ARCHAEOCYATHIDAE
Hinde, 1889
[nom. correct. TAYlor, 1910, p. 105, pro family Archaeocyathinae hinDe,
1889, p. 141] [=Spirocyathidae TAYlor, 1910, p. 112; =Archaeocyathinae
hernánDeZ-sAmPelAYo, 1933, p. 158, nom. correct. Fonin, 1985, p. 69,
pro Archaeocyathinea hernánDeZ-sAmPelAYo, 1933, p. 158; =Sigmofungi-
idae R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936, p. 16, nom. correct. Debrenne,
1970a, p. 42, pro Sigmofungidae R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936, p.
16; =Flindersicyathidae R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1939, p. 78; =Flinder-
sicyathinae R. beDForD & J . beDForD, 1939, p. 78, nom. transl. Fonin,
1985, p . 93, ex Fli ndersicyathidae R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1939, p.
78; =Pycnoidocyathidae oKuliTch, 1950b, p. 394; ?=Protocyclocyathidae
vologDin, 1956, p. 878; ?=Protocyclocyathellidae vologDin, 1956, p.
878, lapsus calami Debrenne & jAmes, 1981, p. 366, pro Protocyclocy-
athidae vologDin, 1956, p. 878; =Syringsellidae KrAsnoPeevA, 1961, p.
248; =Archaeofungiidae vologDin, 1962c, p. 90, nom. correct. hill, 1965,
p. 58, pro Archaeofungidae vologDin, 1962c, p. 90; =Vadimocyathidae
KAshinA in osADchAYA & others, 1979, p. 161; =Claruscyathinae Fonin
in ZhurAvlevA & Fonin, 1983, p. 49]
Inner wall with bracts, fused bracts, or
pore tubes. lower Cambrian (?Atd.4, Bot.2–
Toy.3).
Archaeocyathus billings, 1861, p. 3 [*A. atlanticus
billings, 1861, p. 5; SD WA lcoTT , 1886, p. 75;
holotype, billings, 1861, fig. 5; hinDe, 1889,
pl. 5,8–10; oKuliTch, 1943, pl. 5,1–2, GSC
369, Ottawa] [Original spelling was Archeocy-
athus billings; subsequent authors have used the
diphthong] [=Spirocyathus hinDe, 1889, p. 136
(type, Archeocyathus atlanticus billings, 1861,
p. 5, M); =Retecyathus vologDin, 1932, p. 20,
nom. nud.; =Claruscyathus vologD in, 1932, p. 25
(type, C. cumfundus, M); =Eucyathus vologDin,
1937b, p. 466, nom. nud.; =Flindersicyathus R.
beDForD & J. beDForD, 1937, p. 28, nom. nud.;
=Flindersicyathus R. beDF o rD & J. beDF o rD ,
1939, p. 78 (type, F. decipiens, OD);=Eucyathus
vologDin in simon, 1939, p. 29 (type, Clarus-
cyathus cumfundus vologDin, 1932, p. 25, OD);
=Retecyathus vologDin i n simon, 1939, p. 36
(type, R. laqueus vologDin, 1932, p. 20, OD,
=Claruscyathus cumfundus vologDin, 1932, p.
25); =Syringsella KrAsnoPee vA, 1961, p. 248 (type,
S. ynyrgensis, OD); =Batenevia KrAsnoPeevA,
1961, p. 249 (type, B. pellisi, OD); =Sanxiacyathus
YuAn & ZhAng, 1977, p. 8 (type, S. hubeiensis,
OD); =Bijacyathus Kr As n oP e evA , 1978, p. 81
(type, Archaeocyathus regularis KrAsnoPeevA in
ZhurAvlevA, KrAsnoPeevA, & chernYshevA,
1960, p. 135, M, =Retecyathus kusmini vologDin,
1932, p. 21); =Retecyathus (Pararetecyathus) YuAn
& ZhAng, 1978, p. 139 (type, R. (P.) curvatus,
OD); =Vadimocyathus KAsh inA in osA Dch AYA &
others, 1979, p. 161 (type, V. chikinevae, OD), for
discussion, see Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p.
120]. Inner wall with one row of pores per inter-
sept, bearing upwardly projecting, straight pore
tubes; pseudotaenial network coarsely porous;
concentrically porous segmented tabulae. l ower
Cambrian (?Atd.4, Bot.2–Toy.3): Siberian Plat-
form, Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Transbaikalia,
Far East, Uzbekistan, Canada, United States,
Mexico, Australia, Antarctica, southern China,
134 Treatise Online, number XX
Iberia, Sardinia.——Fig . 106,1a–b. *A. atlan-
ticus, Forteau Formation, Botoman, Anse au
Loup, Labrador, Canada, holotype, GSC 369; a,
longitudinal section, ×2.5 (Okulitch, 1943); b,
transverse section, ×3 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002).
Arrythmocricus Debrenne & jAmes, 1981, p. 366 [*A.
kobluki; OD; holotype, Debrenne & jAmes, 1981,
pl. 53,3–4, GSC 62123, Ottawa]. Inner wall with
one row of pores per intersept, bearing upwardly
projecting, S-shaped bracts or fused bracts; pseu-
dotaenial network coarsely porous. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.3): Canada, United States, Mexico.——
Fig. 106,2a–b. *A. kobluki, Forteau Formation,
Botoman, Fox Cove, Labrador, Canada, holotype,
GSC 62123; a, longitudinal section of modular
skeleton, ×5; b, longitudinal section (inner wall at
top), ×5 (Debrenne & James, 1981).
Archaeocyathus
Arrythmocricus
2a
2b
1a
1b
Fig. 106. Archaeocyathidae (p. 133–134).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 135
Pycnoidocyathus
c
a
b
Fig. 107. Archaeocyathidae (p. 135–136).
Pycnoidocyathus TAYlor , 1910, p. 131 [*P. synap-
ticulosus; SD R. beDF or D & J. beDFor D, 1939,
p. 78; lectotype, TAYlo r, 1910, pl. 12, photo 69;
Debrenne, 1974a, fig. 13a–b; SD Debrenne,
1970a, p. 40, SAM T1587A,B,C, Adelaide]
[=Archaeofungia TAYlor , 1910, p. 131 (type, A.
ajax, M); =Batenevicyathus YAroshevich, 1962,
p. 117, 122 (type, B. zhuravlevae, OD), for
discussion, see Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b,
p. 129]. Inner wall with one row of pores per
136 Treatise Online, number XX
intersept, bearing upwardly projecting, straight
pore tubes; taeniae coarsely porous, linked at base
by synapticulae; during ontogeny, taeniae become
progressively less porous, more planar and
without synapticulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.2–
Toy.3): Altay Sayan, Tuva, Mongolia, Far East,
Australia, Antarctica, southern China, Iberia,
Sardinia, Greenland, Canada, United States,
Mexico.——Fig . 107a–c. *P. synapticulosus,
Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine, South
Australia, Australia, lectotype, SAM T1587A–C;
a, transverse view, ×1; b, longitudinal view, ×1;
c, detail of outer wall in tangential view, ×4
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Sigmofungia R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936,
p. 16 [*S. flindersi; M; lectotype, R. beDForD
& W. r. beDForD, 1936, fig. 82; hill, 1965,
pl. 6,1–2; Debrenne, 1974a, fig. 30a–b; SD
hill, 1965, p. 89, SAM P963-115, -116,
Adelaide] [=Palmericyathellus Debrenne, 1970a,
p. 37 (type, Sigmofungia tabularis R. beD Fo rD
& j. be DF or D, 1937, p. 29, OD, =Sigmofungia
flindersi R. beDFo rD & W. r. beDF or D, 1936, p.
16), for discussion, see Debrenne & Zhu rAvle v,
1992b, p. 130; =Palmericyathus Debrenne in
ZhurAvle vA, 1974b, p. 15, nom. null., non hAnD-
FielD, 1971, p. 44 (type, Ethmophyllum lineatus
greggs, 1959, p. 66, OD), archaeocyath]. Inner
wall with one row of pores per intersept, bearing
upwardly projecting, S-shaped pore tubes; taeniae
finely porous, linked by synapticulae; concentri-
cally porous, segmented tabulae. lower Cambrian
(Bot.2–Bot.3): Australia, Antarctica, Mexico.——
Fig . 108a–c. * S. flindersi, Ajax Limestone,
Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia,
lectotype, SAM P963-115, -116; a, transverse
and longitudinal views, ×3 (Hill, 1965); b, detail
of inner wall in oblique view, ×11 (Debrenne,
1974a); c, detail of outer wall in tangential view,
×10 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Family ARCHAEOSYCONIDAE
Zhuravleva, 1954
[Archaeosyconidae ZhurAvlevA, 1954, p. 30]
Inner wall compound. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.3).
Archaeosycon TAYlor, 1910, p. 111 [*Archaeocyathus
billingsi WAl co TT , 1886, p. 74; M; holotype,
WAl co TT , 1886, pl. 3,3a–c; oKuliTch, 1943,
pl. 14,2–3, USNM 15302, Washington, D.C.]
[=Pustulacyathellus Debrenne & gAngloFF in
voronovA & others, 1987, p. 42 (type, P. copulatus,
OD), for discussion, see Debrenne & Zhur Avlev,
1992b, p. 121]. Outer wall tabular; inner wall
compound, comprising wall carcass and tabulae;
taeniae coarsely porous; concentrically porous
segmented tabulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3):
Canada, United States.——Fig. 109a–b. *A. bill-
ingsi (WAl coT T), Forteau Formation, Botoman,
Anse au Loup, Labrador, Canada, holotype, USNM
15302; a, longitudinal section, ×3; b, transverse
section, ×3 (Okulitch, 1943).
Superfamily METACYATHOIDEA
R. Bedford & W. R. Bedford, 1934
[nom. correct. Debrenne & Kruse, 1986, p. 266, pro Metacyathacea Fonin,
1983, p. 11, nom. transl. ex Metacyathidae R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD,
1934, p. 5] [=Spirillicyathacea grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 111]
Outer wall compound. lower Cambrian
(Tom.2–Bot.3).
Family COPLEICYATHIDAE
R. Bedford & J. Bedford, 1937
[Copleicyathidae R. beDFor D & J. beDForD, 1937, p. 29] [=Tabulacy-
athellidae Fonin in voronin & others, 1982, p. 86; =Spirillicyathidae
grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 111].
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Tom.2–Bot.3).
Copleicyathus R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1937, p.
29 [*C. confertus; OD; holotype, R. beDForD &
J. beDFo rD, 1937, fig. 116; hill, 1965, pl. 10,4;
Debrenne, 1974a, fig. 27, USNM PU86741-783,
Washington, D.C.]. Outer wall compound with
completely subdivided pores; inner wall with several
rows of simple pores per intersept; pseudotaenial
network coarsely porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.3–
Atd.4): Australia.——Fig. 110a–b. *C. confertus,
Ajax Limestone, Atdabanian, Paint Mine, South
Australia, Australia, holotype, USNM PU86741-
783; a, transverse view, ×5; b, longitudinal view,
×5 (Hill, 1965).
Agastrocyathus Debrenne, 1964, p. 209 [*Proto-
pharetra gregaria Debrenne, 1961, p. 21; OD;
holotype, Debrenne, 1961, pl. 2,5–6, MNHN
M80138, HD71, Paris]. Outer wall compound
with incipient subdivision of intervallar cells; inner
wall with one row of simple pores per intersept;
taeniae coarsely porous, linked by synapticulae.
lower Cambrian (Atd.2–Atd.4): Morocco,
Iberia.——Fig. 111a–c. *A. gregarius (Debrenne),
Amouslek Formation, Atdabanian, Jbel Taïssa,
Morocco, holotype, MNHN M80138, HD71; a,
longitudinal section of modular skeleton, ×3; b,
transverse section of modular skeleton, ×4; c, detail
of outer wall in tangential section, ×10 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Gabrielsocyathus Debrenne, 1964, p. 248 [*Meta-
coscinus gabrielsensis oKuliTch, 1955b, p. 61;
OD; holotype, oKuliTch, 1955b, pl. 1,1,2,5,
GSC 12357, Ottawa]. Outer wall compound with
completely subdivided pores; inner wall with several
rows of simple pores per intersept; taeniae finely
porous, linked by synapticulae; simple segmented
tabulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.2): Canada, United
States.——Fig . 112,1a–c. *G. gabrielsensis
(oKuliTch), Atan Group, Botoman, McDame
Lake, British Columbia, Canada, holotype, GSC
12357; a, transverse section, ×2.5; b, longitudinal
section, ×2.5; c, transverse section (outer wall at
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 137
Sigmofungia
c
a
b
Fig. 108. Archaeocyathidae (p. 136).
138 Treatise Online, number XX
bottom), ×2.5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse,
2002).
Metacyathellus Debrenne & Zhur Avle v, 1990, p.
302 [*Metaldetes? caribouensis hAnDFielD, 1971,
p. 64; OD; holotype, hAnDFielD, 1971, pl. 11,2,
GSC 25367, Ottawa]. Outer wall compound with
completely subdivided pores; inner wall with one
to two rows of simple pores per intersept; taeniae
coarsely porous; compound segmented tabulae.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3); Australia, Antarctica,
Canada, United States.——Fig. 112,2a–c. *M. cari-
bouensis (hAnDFielD), Sekwi Formation, Botoman; a,
Caribou Pass, Northwest Territories, Canada, holo-
type, GSC 25367, transverse section, ×4 (Hand-
field, 1971; reproduced with the permission of the
Minister of Public Works and Government Services
Canada, 2006 and courtesy of Natural Resources
Canada, Geological Survey of Canada); b, Mackenzie
Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada, spec-
imen GSC 90187, detail of outer wall in tangential
section, ×10 (Voronova & others, 1987); c, Caribou
Pass, Northwest Territories, Canada, holotype, GSC
25367, longitudinal section, ×6 (Handfield, 1971;
reproduced with the permission of the Minister of
Public Works and Government Services Canada,
2006 and courtesy of Natural Resources Canada,
Geological Survey of Canada).
Spinosocyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 276 [*S. maslen-
nikovae; OD; holotype, Zhu rAvl evA, 1960b, pl.
25,1b, TsSGM 205/134, Novosibirsk]. Outer wall
compound with incipient pore subdivision; inner
wall with one row of simple pores per intersept;
pseudotaenial network coarsely porous; compound
segmented tabulae. lower Cambrian (Tom.2–Atd.2):
Siberian Platform, Mongolia, Iberia.——Fig .
113,1a–b. *S. maslennikovae, Pestrotsvet Formation,
Tommotian, Churan, Lena River, Sakha (Yakutia),
Russia; a, holotype, TsSGM 205/134, transverse
section (outer wall at bottom), ×8 (Zh ura v-
leva, 1960b); b, oblique longitudinal section of
modular skeleton, specimen TsSGM 144-32/4, ×3
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Spirillicyathus R. beDFo rD & J. beD Fo rD , 1937,
p. 30 [*S. tenuis; OD; holotype, R. beDForD &
J. beDForD, 1937, fig. 118; Debrenne, 1974a,
fig. 10, USNM PU493967, specimen 358, Wash-
ington, D.C.] [=Spiralicyathus R. beDForD & J.
beDForD, 1937, fig. 118 caption, nom. null.]. Outer
wall compound with completely subdivided pores;
inner wall with one to two rows of simple pores per
intersept; pseudotaenial network coarsely porous.
lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.1): Australia, southern
China.——Fig. 113,2a–c. *S. tenuis, Ajax Lime-
stone, Atdabanian, Paint Mine, South Australia,
Australia; a–b, holotype, USNM PU493967, spec-
imen 358; a, transverse view, ×9; b, longitudinal
view, ×9 (Debrenne, 1974a); c, Wilkawillina Lime-
stone, Atdabanian, Wilkawillina Gorge, South
Australia, Australia, specimen SAM P21741, tangen-
tial section of outer wall, ×10 (Gravestock, 1984).
Tabulacyathellus missArZhevsKiY in rePinA & others,
1964, p. 249 [*T. bidzhaensis; OD; holotype,
rePinA & others, 1964, pl. 7,4–6, PIN 4297/22,
Moscow]. Outer wall compound with completely
subdivided pores; inner wall tabular with several
rows of simple pores per intersept; pseudotaenial
network coarsely porous; compound segmented
tabulae. lower Cambrian (Atd.2): Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mongolia.——Fig. 114a–c. *T. bidzhaensis, Usa
Formation, Atdabanian, Sukhie Solontsy Valley,
Batenev Range, Kuznetsk Alatau, Russia, holotype,
PIN 4297/22; a, tangential section of outer wall,
×5; b, longitudinal section (outer wall to left), ×5;
c, transverse section, ×5 (Repina & others, 1964).
Family JUGALICYATHIDAE
Gravestock, 1984
[Jugalicyathidae grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 114]
Inner wall with bracts, fused bracts
or pore tubes. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–
Bot.2).
Fig. 109. Archaeosyconidae (p. 136).
Archaeosycon
a
b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 139
Jugalicyathus grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 114 [*J. tardus;
OD; holotype, grAvesTocK, 1984, fig. 56H–I, SAM
P21747, Adelaide]. Outer wall compound with
incipient subdivision of intervallar cells; inner wall
with one row of pores per intersept, bearing upwardly
projecting, straight pore tubes; pseudosepta finely
porous. lower Cambrian (Atd.4): Australia.——Fig.
115,1a–b. *J. tardus; a, Wilkawillina Limestone,
Atdabanian, Wilkawillina Gorge, South Australia,
Australia, paratype, SAM P21749, oblique transverse
section, ×8 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002);
b, Ajax Limestone, Atdabanian, Mount Scott Range,
South Australia, Australia, holotype, SAM P21747,
longitudinal section, ×1 (Gravestock, 1984).
Alaskacoscinus Debrenne, gAngloFF, & Zhu rAvlev
in Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 300 [*A.
tatondukensis; OD; holotype, De b r e n n e &
ZhurAvlev, 1990, pl. 1,5, UAM UA2534, 2535,
Fairbanks]. Outer wall tabular, compound with
completely subdivided pores; inner wall tabular
with one row of pores per intersept, bearing
upwardly projecting, S-shaped pore tubes; pseu-
dosepta finely porous; segmented tabulae with
subdivided pores. lower Cambrian (Bot.2): United
States.——Fig. 115,2a–b. *A. tatondukensis, Adams
Argillite, Botoman, Tatonduk River, Alaska, United
States; a, holotype, UAM UA2534, longitudinal
section (outer wall to right), ×4; b, paratype, UAM
UA2536, longitudinal section, ×5 (Debrenne &
Zhuravlev, 1990).
Family METACYATHIDAE
R. Bedford & W. R. Bedford, 1934
[Metacyathidae R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1934, p. 5] [=Metacos-
cinidae R. beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1936, p. 18; =Cambrocyathidae
oKuliTch, 1937a, p. 251; =Cambrocyathinae oKuliTch, 1937a, p. 251,
nom. transl. Debrenne, 1964, p. 218, ex Cambrocyathidae oKuliTch,
1937a, p. 251; =Metaldetinae Debrenne, 1964, p. 218; =Metafungiidae
Debrenne, 1974a, p. 216]
Inner wall compound. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3).
Metaldetes TAYlor , 1910, p. 151 [*M. cylindricus;
M; holotype, TAYlor, 1910, pl. 15, photo 86–88,
fig. 11, 37, 38; Debrenne, 1974a, fig. 21a–b,
M, SAM T1592A, Adelaide] [=Metafungia R.
beDForD & W. R. beDForD, 1934, p. 5 (type,
M. reticulata, M); =Metacyathus R. beDF or D &
W. R. be DFor D, 1934, p. 5 (type, M. taylori, M,
=Archaeocyathus dissepimentalis TAY lo r, 1910,
Copleicyathus
a
b
Fig. 110. Copleicyathidae (p. 136).
140 Treatise Online, number XX
p. 128); =Metacoscinus R. beDForD & W. R.
beDForD, 1934, p. 6 (type, M. reteseptatum, M,
=Archaeocyathus retesepta TAYlor, 1910, p. 120);
=Cambrocyathus oKuliTch, 1937a, p. 251 (type,
Archaeocyathus profundus billings, 1861, p. 4,
OD); =Metethmophyllum oKuliTch, 1943, p. 78
(type, Ethmophyllum meeki WA lc oT T, 1889, p.
34, OD); =Bedfordcyathus vologDin, 1957a, p.
182 (type, Metacyathus irregularis R. beDForD &
W. R. be DFo rD, 1934, p. 6, M, =Archaeocyathus
dissepimentalis TAYlor, 1910, p. 128); =Praefungia
Debrenne in ZhurAvlevA, 1974b, p. 42, nom.
correct. Debrenne, 1974a, p. 227, pro Pruefungia,
lapsus calami (type, Metaldetes superbus R. beDForD
& W. R. beDForD, 1936, p. 18, OD), for discus-
sion, see Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 127].
Outer wall compound with completely subdivided
pores; inner wall compound with several rows of
completely subdivided pores per intersept; taeniae
coarsely porous, linked by synapticulae in early
ontogenetic stages but rarely so in mature cups;
compound segmented tabulae. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3): Far East, Australia, Antarctica,
Canada, United States, Mexico.——Fig. 116a–e.
*M. cylindricus, Wilkawillina Limestone, Botoman,
Wilson, South Australia, Australia, holotype, SAM
T1592A; a, transverse section, ×4; b, detail of inner
wall in transverse section, ×8; c, detail of outer
wall in transverse section, ×8; d, detail of taenia
in longitudinal section, ×8; e, longitudinal section
Agastrocyathus
c
a
b
Fig. 111. Copleicyathidae (p. 136).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 141
Fig. 112. Copleicyathidae (p. 136–138).
Gabrielsocyathus
Metacyathellus
2c
2b
1c
1a
1b
2a
I had to
rotate view
c to make
the figures
fit--if this
is not okay,
please mark
crop lines
on either
views c or a
so I can fit
them side
by side.
Thanks!
142 Treatise Online, number XX
of modular skeleton, ×4 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002).
Changicyathus Debrenne & Zhu rAvl ev , 1990, p.
301 [*Cambrocyathellus tenuicaulus ZhAng &
YuA n, 1985, p. 523; OD; holotype, ZhAng &
YuAn , 1985, pl. 2,6; Debrenne & ZhurAvlev,
1990, pl. 1,7, NIGP 82277, specimen 17f(10-
14), Nanjing]. Outer wall compound with
completely subdivided pores; inner wall
compound with incipient pore subdivision;
taeniae coarsely porous; compound segmented
tabulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): ?Tajikistan,
southern China.——Fi g. 117. *C. tenuicaulus
(ZhAng & Yu A n ), Xiannudong Formation,
Spinosocyathus
Spirillicyathus 2c
2a
2b
1a
1b
Fig. 113. Copleicyathidae (p. 138).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 143
Botoman, Nanzhen, Sichuan, China, holotype,
NIGP 82277, specimen 17f(10-14), oblique
longitudinal section of modular skeleton, ×6
(Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1990).
Superfamily
NAIMARKCYATHOIDEA
Wrona & Zhuravlev, 1996
[Naimarkcyathoidea WronA & ZhurAvlev, 1996, p. 28]
Outer wall pustular. lower Cambrian (Bot.3).
Family NAIMARKCYATHIDAE
Wrona & Zhuravlev, 1996
[Naimarkcyathidae WronA & ZhurAvlev, 1996, p. 29]
Inner wall with bracts, fused bracts or
pore tubes. lower Cambrian (Bot.3).
Naimarkcyathus WronA & Zh urAvle v, 1996, p. 29
[*N. elenae; OD; holotype, WronA & ZhurAvl ev,
19 96, pl. 7,2, ZPAL Ac. I/M1 0DI, Wars aw].
Inner wall with one row of pores per intersept,
bearing upwardly projecting, straight pore tubes;
pseudotaenial network coarsely porous. l owe r
Cambrian (Bot.3): Antarctica.——Fig. 118a–b.
*N. elenae, Polonez Cove Formation (allochtho-
nous), Botoman, Mazurek Point, King George
Island, southern Shetland Islands, Antarctica; a,
holotype, ZPAL Ac.I/M10DI, transverse section,
×5; b, paratype, ZPAL Ac.I/M10CI, longitudinal
section, ×5 (Wrona & Zhuravlev, 1996).
Superfamily
WARRIOOTACYATHOIDEA
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992
[Warriootacyathoidea Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 115]
Outer wall with canals. lower Cambrian
(Atd.3–Atd.4).
Family WARRIOOTACYATHIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992
[Warriootacyathidae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 115]
Inner wall with bracts, fused bracts or
pore tubes. lower Cambrian (Atd.3–Atd.4).
Warriootacyathus grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 126
[*W. wilkawillinensis; OD; holotype, gr Av e-
sT o cK , 1984, fig. 62A,D–F, SAM P21806-1,
Adelaide]. Outer wall with horizontal to
upwardly projecting, straight canals; inner wall
with one row of pores per intersept, bearing
upwardly projecting, straight to waved pore
tubes; pseudosepta coarsely porous. l o w e r
Cambrian (Atd.3–Atd.4): Australia.——Fig .
119a–c. *W. wilkawillinensis, Wilkawillina
Limestone, Atdabanian, Wilkawillina Gorge,
South Australia, Australia, holotype, SAM
P21806-1; a, tangential section of outer wall,
×7; b, tangential section of inner wall, ×3; c,
longitudinal section of septum (outer wall to
right), ×3 (Gravestock, 1984).
Fig. 114. Copleicyathidae (p. 138).
Tabulacyathellus
c
a
b
144 Treatise Online, number XX
Alaskacoscinus
2a
2b
Jugalicyathus
1a 1b
Fig. 115. Jugalicyathidae (p. 139).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 145
Fig. 116. Metacyathidae (p. 139–142).
Metaldetes
c
d
e
a
b
146 Treatise Online, number XX
Superfamily
BELTANACYATHOIDEA
Debrenne, 1974
[nom. correct. Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 115, pro Beltanacyatha-
cea grAvesTocK, 1984, p. 123, nom. transl. ex Beltanacyathidae Debrenne,
1974a, p. 243] [=Beltanacyathidae Debrenne, 1970a, p. 30, nom. nud.]
Outer wall with subdivided canals. lower
Cambrian (Atd.3–Bot.3).
Family MAIANDROCYATHIDAE
Debrenne, 1974
[Maiandrocyathidae Debrenne, 1974a, p. 235]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.3).
Maiandrocyathus Debrenne in Zhur AvlevA, 1974a,
p. 209 [*Metacoscinus insigne R. beDFo rD & W. R.
beDForD, 1936, p. 18; OD; holotype, R. beD ForD
& W. R. beDForD, 1936, fig. 84; Debrenne, 1974a,
fig. 28, M, SAM P986-167, -168, Adelaide]. Inner
wall with one to two rows of simple pores per
intersept; taeniae coarsely porous. lower Cambrian
(Bot.3): Australia.——Fig. 120,1a–b. *M. insigne
(R. beDFo rD & W. r. beDFor D), Ajax Limestone,
Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia,
holotype, SAM P986-167, -168; a, tangential view
of outer wall, ×3; b, longitudinal view of septum
and exocyathoid buttress (outer wall to right), ×3
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Ataxiocyathus Debrenne in Zhu rAv l evA , 1974a,
p. 5 2 [*Paranacyathus grandis R . beDForD
& J. beDForD, 1937, p. 34; OD; holotype,
R. be D F o r D & j. beD F o r D , 1937, fig. 140;
Debrenne, 19 7 4 c, pl . 20 , 3 4 , M, US NM
PU86821, specimen 311, Washington, D.C.].
Inner wall with one row of simple pores per
intersept; pseudosepta finely porous. l owe r
Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia.——Fig. 120,2a–c.
*A. grandis (R. beDForD & j. beDForD) ,
Ajax Limestone, Botoman, Ajax Mine,
South Australia, Australia, holotype, USNM
PU86821, specimen 311; a, transverse view,
×5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b,
longitudinal view of septum (outer wall to left),
×6 (M. Debrenne, new); c , tangential view of
outer wall, ×6 (Debrenne, 1974c).
Family BELTANACYATHIDAE
Debrenne, 1974
[Beltanacyathidae Debrenne, 1974a, p. 243] [=Beltanacyathidae De-
brenne, 1970a, p. 30, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with bracts, fused bracts,
or pore tubes. lower Cambrian (Atd.3–
Atd.4).
Beltanacyathus R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1936,
p. 23 [*B. ionicus; OD; lectotype, R. beD Fo rD
& j. beD ForD , 1936, fig. 95–96; hill, 1965, pl.
6,3; SD hill, 1965, p. 89, USNM PU86716-
271, Washington, D.C.; =Archaeocyathus wirri-
alpensis TAYlor, 1910, p. 124; holotype, TAY lor,
1910, pl. 8, photo 43–44; Debrenne, 1974a, fig.
33b; M, SAM T1581A-E, Adelaide] [=Fridaycy-
athus grAve sT oc K, 1984, p. 125 (type, F. bise-
rialis, OD); =Bayleicyathus grAvesTocK, 1984,
p. 131 (type, B. bowmani, OD), for discussion,
see Debrenne & Zh u rAv l ev , 1992b, p. 122].
Inner wall with one row of pores per intersept,
bearing upwardly projecting, straight pore tubes;
pseudosepta finely porous; segmented tabulae.
Changicyathus
Fig. 117. Metacyathidae (p. 142–143).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 147
lower Cambrian (Atd.3–Atd.4): Australia.——Fig.
121a–d. *B. wirrialpensis (TAYlor); a–b, holotype,
Wilkawillina Limestone, Atdabanian, Wirrealpa
Mine, South Australia, Australia, SAM T1581A-E;
a, transverse section (outer wall at top), ×2; b,
longitudinal section (outer wall to left), ×2.5
(Taylor, 1910); c–d, [=B. ionicus], lectotype,
Ajax Limestone, Atdabanian, Paint Mine, South
Australia, Australia, USNM PU86716-271; c ,
transverse view, ×2; d, longitudinal view, ×2
(Hill, 1965).
Superfamily
TABELLAECYATHOIDEA
Fonin, 1963
[nom. transl. Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 116, ex Tabellaecyathidae
Fonin, 1963, p. 15] [=Taeniaecyathellacea KonYushKov, 1972, p. 141]
Outer wall tabellar. lower Cambrian
(Bot.2–Bot.3).
Family TABELLAECYATHIDAE
Fonin, 1963
[Tabellaecyathidae Fonin, 1963, p. 15] [=Taeniaecyathellidae
Kon Yu s hK ov , 1972, p. 142; =Karakolocyathidae Kon Y us hK ov ,
1972, p. 142]
Inner wall with bracts, fused bracts or
pore tubes. lower Cambrian (Bot.2–Bot.3).
Taeniaecyathellus ZhurAvlevA, 1960a, p. 45 [*T.
semenovi; OD; holotype, Zh ur Av le vA , 1960a,
fig. 1i–k, TsSGM 273/7, Novosibirsk] [=Tabel -
laecyathus Fonin, 1963, p. 15 (type, T. totus, OD);
=Cambronanus Fonin, 1963, p. 19 (type, C. multi-
cavitatus, OD); =Karakolocyathus KonY us hKov ,
1972, p. 142 (type, K. loculatus, OD; =Tabellae-
cyathus totus Fonin, 1963, p. 16), for discussion,
see Debrenne & Zh u rAv l ev , 1992b, p. 131].
Inner wall with several rows of pores per intersept,
bearing upwardly projecting, straight pore tubes;
dictyonal network. lower Cambrian (Bot.2–Bot.3):
Altay Sayan.——Fig. 122a–b. *T. semenovi, Verkh-
nemonok Formation, Botoman, Malyy Karakol
River, western Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia, holotype,
TsSGM 273/7; a, oblique longitudinal section, ×5;
b, detail of outer wall in tangential section, ×21
(Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Suborder DICTYOFAVINA
Debrenne, 1991
[Dictyofavina Debrenne, 1991, p. 219]
Skeleton solitary or modular, latter
as branching or massive pseudocolonies
(both by intercalicular budding); inter-
vallum with calicles. lower Cambrian
(Atd.1–Bot.2).
Naimarkcyathus
a
b
Fig. 118. Naimarkcyathidae (p. 143).
Superfamily
USLONCYATHOIDEA
Fonin, 1966
[nom. transl. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, 2002, p. 1679, ex Uslon-
cyathidae Fonin in vologDin & Fonin, 1966, p. 187] [=Dictyofavoidea
Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992a, p. 596]
Outer wall simple. lower Cambrian
(Atd.1–Bot.2).
148 Treatise Online, number XX
Family USLONCYATHIDAE
Fonin, 1966
[Usloncyathidae Fonin in vologDin & Fonin, 1966, p. 187] [=Dictyo-
favidae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992a, p. 596]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.1–Bot.2).
Usloncyathus Fonin in vologDin & Fonin, 1966,
p. 188 [*U. miculus; OD; holotype, vologDin
& Fonin, 1966, fig. 1a, PIN 2486/143, Moscow]
[=Falsocyathus Fonin in vologDin & Fonin, 1966,
p. 189 (type, F. vastulus, OD; =U. miculus Fonin in
vologDin & Fonin, 1966, p. 188); =Nostrocyathus
Fonin in vologDin & Fonin, 1966, p. 189 (type,
N. aculeatus, OD; =U. miculus Fonin in vologDin
& Fonin, 1966, p. 188); =Cavocyathus Fonin in
vologDin & Fonin, 1966, p. 189 (type, C. pusilus;
OD; =U. miculus Fonin in vologDin & Fonin,
1966, p. 188), for discussion, see Debrenne &
Zhur Avlev , 1992b, p. 132; =Dictyofavus gr Ave-
sTocK, 1984, p. 98 (type, D. obtusus, OD)]. Outer
and inner walls rudimentary; calicles hexagonal
in cross section with several pore rows per facet.
lower Cambrian (Atd.1–Atd.4): Altay Sayan, Tuva,
Mongolia, Transbaikalia, Far East, Australia.——
Fig . 123,1. *U. miculus, Bystraya Formation,
Atdabanian, Uslon Valley, Transbaikalia, Russia,
holotype, PIN 2486/143, longitudinal section, ×8
(Vologdin & Fonin, 1966).
Kechikacyathus Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992a, p.
598 [*K. natlaensis; OD; holotype, Debrenne &
ZhurAvlev, 1992a, pl. 1,3, GSC 90166, Ottawa].
Outer wall basic; inner wall rudimentary; calicles
hexagonal in cross section with one pore row per
facet. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2): Canada.——
Fig. 123,2a–b. *K. natlaensis, Sekwi Formation,
Botoman; a, Kechika River, British Columbia,
Canada, paratype, GSC 103939, GAM-78-G,
detail of outer wall in tangential section, ×10; b,
Natla, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territo-
ries, Canada, holotype, GSC 90166, longitudinal
section, ×5 (Debrenne & A. Zhuravlev, 1992a).
Zunyicyathus Debrenne, Kru se , & ZhAng, 1991,
p. 286 [*Agastrocyathus grandis YuA n & ZhAng,
1980, p. 387; OD; nom. correct. Debrenne, Krus e
& ZhAng, 1991, p. 286, pro Agastrocyathus grandus
YuAn & ZhAng, 1980, p. 387; holotype, YuAn &
ZhAng, 1980, pl. 1,3, NIGP 56292, Nanjing].
Outer and inner walls rudimentary; calicles tetrag-
onal in cross section with one pore row per facet.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2): Tajikistan, southern
China, United States.——Fig . 124. *Z. grandis
(YuAn & ZhAng), Jindingshan (Chintingshan)
Formation, Botoman, Jindingshan, Guizhou,
China, specimen MNHN 85103, longitudinal
section of modular skeleton, ×5 (Debrenne, Kruse,
& Zhang, 1991).
Superfamily
KERIOCYATHOIDEA
Debrenne & Gangloff, 1992
[Keriocyathoidea Debrenne & gAngloFF in Debrenne & ZhurAvlev,
1992a, p. 598]
Outer wall concentrically porous. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2).
Family KERIOCYATHIDAE
Debrenne & Gangloff, 1992
[Keriocyathidae Debrenne & gAngloFF in Debrenne & ZhurAvlev ,
1992a, p. 598] [=Keriocyathidae Debrenne & gAngloFF in Debrenne,
gAnDin, & gAngloFF, 1990, p. 93, nom. nud.]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2).
Keriocyathus Debrenne & gAngloFF in Debrenne,
gAnDin, & gAngloFF, 1990, p. 93 [*K. arachnaius;
OD; holotype, Debrenne, gAnDin, & gAngloFF,
1990, pl. 1,9, USNM 443557, specimen IR24.10,
Warriootacyathus
c
a
b
Fig. 119. Warriootacyathidae (p. 143).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 149
Washington, D.C.]. Inner wall basic; calicles tetrag-
onal in cross section with one pore row per facet.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2): Altay Sayan, Far
East, United States.——Fig . 125a–b. *K. arach-
naius, Valmy Formation, Botoman, Iron Canyon,
Nevada, United States; a, holotype, USNM 443557,
specimen IR24.10, transverse section, ×7.5; b, para-
type, USNM 443572, longitudinal section, ×7.5
(Debrenne, Gandin, & Gangloff, 1990).
Superfamily
GATAGACYATHOIDEA
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992
[Gatagacyathoidea Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992a, p. 598]
Outer wall compound. lower Cambrian
(Bot.2).
Fig. 120. Maiandrocyathidae (p. 146).
Maiandrocyathus
2c Ataxiocyathus
2a
2b
1a
1b
150 Treatise Online, number XX
Beltanacyathus
c
d
a
b
Fig. 121. Beltanacyathidae (p. 146–147).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 151
Taeniaecyathellus
a
b
Fig. 122. Tabellaecyathidae (p. 147).
Family GATAGACYATHIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992
[Gatagacyathidae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992a, p. 598]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.2).
Gatagacyathus Debrenne & Zhur Avlev , 1992a, p.
598 [*G. mansyi; OD; holotype, Debrenne &
ZhurAvlev, 1992a, pl. 1,4, GSC 103942, specimen
GAM76.8G.XI.3L, Ottawa]. Outer wall compound
with incipient pore subdivision; inner wall rudi-
mentary; calicles hexagonal in cross section with
one pore row per facet. lower Cambrian (Bot.2):
Canada, United States.——Fig. 126. *G. mansyi,
Rosella Formation, Botoman, Kechika River,
British Columbia, Canada, holotype, GSC 103942,
specimen GAM76.8G.XI.3L, longitudinal section,
×3.5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Suborder SYRINGOCNEMINA
Okulitch, 1935
[nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, herein, pro Syringicnemi-
dina KrAsnoP eevA, 1980, p. 159, nom. transl. ex order Syringocnemina
oKuliTch, 1935, p. 90] [=Syringocyathina Debrenne, 1991, p. 219]
Skeleton solitary or modular, latter as
branching pseudocolonies (by longitudinal
fission); intervallum with syringes. lower
Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3).
Superfamily
AULISCOCYATHOIDEA
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992
[Auliscocyathoidea Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 117]
Outer wall simple. lower Cambrian
(Atd.4–Bot.3).
Family AULISCOCYATHIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992
[Auliscocyathidae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 117]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3).
Auliscocyathus Debrenne in ZhurAvlevA, 1974a, p.
53 [*Spirocyathus multifidus R. beDForD & W. R.
beDForD, 1936, p. 14; OD; lectotype, R. beDForD
& W. R. beDForD, 1936, fig. 65; Debrenne, 1974a,
fig. 8a; SD Debrenne, 1974a, p. 199, SAM P950-
81, Adelaide]. Outer and inner walls rudimentary;
syringes tetragonal in cross section with one pore
row per facet. lower Cambrian (Atd.4–Bot.3): Tuva,
Australia, Antarctica.——Fig. 127a–c. *A. multifidus
(R. beDFo rD & W. r. beDFo rD), Ajax Limestone,
Botoman, Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia,
lectotype, SAM P950-81; a, longitudinal view, ×5
(Debrenne, 1974a); b, oblique longitudinal view,
×5; c, detail of syringes in longitudinal intervallar
view, ×8 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Superfamily
SYRINGOCNEMOIDEA
Taylor, 1910
[nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse , herein, pro Syrin -
gocnemidoidea Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 117, nom. transl. e x
Syringocnemidae TAYlor, 1910, p. 113]
Outer wall concentrically porous. lower
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Family TUVACNEMIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1990
[nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, herein, pro Tuvacnemidi -
dae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 300]
Inner wall with simple pores. l o wer
Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
152 Treatise Online, number XX
Tuvacnema Debrenne & Zhur Av l e v , 1990, p.
301 [*Syringocnema tannuolensis roDionovA in
ZhurAvlevA & others, 1967, p. 106; OD; holotype,
ZhurAvlevA & others, 1967, pl. 58,4, VSEGEI
9594, St. Petersburg, not located]. Inner wall with
several rows of pores per syrinx; syringes hexagonal
in cross section with several pore rows per facet.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3): Tuva.——Fig. 128.
*T. tannuolensis (roDionovA), Shangan Formation,
Botoman, Shivelig-Khem River, eastern Tannu-Ola
Range, Tuva, Russia, holotype, VSEGEI 9594,
transverse section, ×7 (Zhuravleva & others, 1967).
Family SYRINGOCNEMIDAE
Taylor, 1910
[Syringocnemidae TAYlor, 1910, p. 113] [=Syringocnematidae vologDin,
1928, p. 31; =Syringocnemitidae Ting, 19 37, p. 370 ; =Syringo cnemi-
didae Debrenn e, 1964, p. 117; =Pseudosyringocnemididae De brenne,
1975, p. 355]
Inner wall with bracts, fused bracts, or
pore tubes. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Syringocnema TAYlor, 1910, p. 153 [*S. favus; M;
holotype, TAYlo r, 1910, pl. 14, photos 78–79,
M, SAM T1597A,B,E, Adelaide]. Inner wall with
one row of pores per syrinx, bearing upwardly
projecting, S-shaped pore tubes; syringes hexagonal
in cross section with several pore rows per facet.
lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia, Antarctica.——
Fig. 129a–d. *S. favus, Ajax Limestone, Botoman,
Ajax Mine, South Australia, Australia; a–c, holo-
type, SAM T1597A,B,E; a, transverse view, ×3;
b, oblique longitudinal view, ×3.5; c, detail of
syringes in longitudinal view (outer wall to left),
×5; d, paratype, SAM T1558, detail of syringes in
oblique transverse view, ×5 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev,
& Kruse, 2002).
Pseudosyringocnema hAnDF ie lD, 1971, p. 76 [*P.
uniporum; OD; holotype, hAnDFielD, 1971,
pl. 15,3, GSC 25392, Ottawa]. Inner wall with
one row of pores per syrinx, bearing upwardly
projecting, S-shaped pore tubes; syringes hexag-
onal in cross section with one pore row per
transverse facet and several pore rows per lateral
Fig. 123. Usloncyathidae (p. 148).
Kechikacyathus
Usloncyathus
2b
1
2a
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 153
facet. lower Cambrian (Bot.2–Bot.3): Altay
Sayan, Antarctica, Canada, United States.——
Fig . 130,1a–b. *P. uniporum, unnamed Sekwi
Formation equivalent (map unit 5 of hAnDFielD,
1971), Botoman, Coal River, Yukon Territory,
Northwest Territories, Canada, holotype, GSC
25392; a, longitudinal section, ×4 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b, oblique longitu-
dinal section, ×4 (Handfield, 1971; reproduced
with the permission of the Minister of Public
Works and Government Services Canada, 2006
an d courte sy of Natural Resourc es Ca nada,
Geological Survey of Canada).
Syringothalamus Debrenne, gAngloFF, & ZhurAvlev
in Debrenne & Zhu rAv le v, 1990, p. 301 [*S.
crispus; OD; holotype, Debrenne & Zhu rAvle v,
1990, pl. 1,1, UCMP D6610, Berkeley]. Inner wall
with one row of pores per syrinx, bearing upwardly
projecting, S-shaped fused bracts; syringes hexag-
onal in cross section with one pore row per facet.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1): United States.——Fig.
130,2a–c. *S. crispus, Poleta Formation, Botoman,
Lida, Palmetto Mountains, Nevada, United States;
a, holotype, UCMP D6610, detail of outer wall in
tangential section, ×11 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, &
Kruse, 2002); b, paratype, UCMP D6620, trans-
Zunyicyathus
Fig. 124. Usloncyathidae (p. 148).
154 Treatise Online, number XX
(Bot.1–Bot.2): Canada, United States.——Fig .
131a–c. *W. colvillensis (greggs); a, Sekwi Forma-
tion, Botoman, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest
Territories, Canada, specimen GSC 90169, trans-
verse section, ×7 (Voronova & others, 1987); b,
Maitlen Formation, Botoman, Colville, Washington,
United States, holotype, GSC 14317, transverse
section, ×7.5 (Greggs, 1959); c, Sekwi Formation,
Botoman, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territo-
ries, Canada, GSC 90170, oblique transverse section,
×7.5 (Voronova & others, 1987).
Superfamily
KRUSEICNEMOIDEA
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1990
[nom. correct. Debrenne, Zh urAvl ev, & Kruse , herein, pro Kruseic-
nemidoidea Debrenne & ZhurAvlev , 1992b, p. 117, nom. transl. ex
Kruseicnemididae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 301]
Outer wall pustular. lower Cambrian (Bot.3).
Family KRUSEICNEMIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1990
[nom. correct. Debrenne, ZhurAvlev, & Kruse, herein, pro Kruseicnemi-
didae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1990, p. 301]
Inner wall with bracts, fused bracts or
pore tubes. lower Cambrian (Bot.3).
Kruseicnema Debrenne, grAvesTocK, & ZhurAvlev
in Debrenne & ZhurAvlev , 1990, p. 301 [*Syrin-
gocnema gracilis gorDon, 1920, p. 699; OD;
holotype, gorDon, 1920, pl. 4,43,46, NHM
S10412, London]. Outer wall pustules bearing
supplementary multiperforate tumuli; inner wall
with one row of pores per syrinx, bearing upwardly
projecting, S-shaped pore tubes; syringes hexagonal
in cross section with several pore rows per facet.
lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Australia, Antarctica,
South Africa (allochthonous), Falkland Islands
(allochthonous).——Fig. 132,1a– b. *K. gracilis
(gorDon), allochthonous, Botoman, Weddell Sea,
Antarctica, holotype, NHM S10412; a, oblique
Keriocyathus
b
Fig. 125. Keriocyathidae (p. 148–149).
Fig. 126. Gatagacyathidae (p. 151).
Gatagacyathus
a
verse section, ×5; c, holotype, UCMP D6610,
oblique longitudinal section, ×5 (Debrenne &
Zhuravlev, 1990).
Williamicyathus ZhurAvlev in voronovA & others,
1987, p. 34 [*Syringocnema colvillensis greggs,
1959, p. 72; OD; holotype, greggs, 1959, pl. 13,6,
GSC 14317, Ottawa]. Inner wall with one row
of pores per syrinx, bearing upwardly projecting,
planar, fused bracts; syringes hexagonal in cross
section with one pore row per transverse facet and
several pore rows per lateral facet. lower Cambrian
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 155
longitudinal section, ×9; b, transverse section, ×9
(Gordon, 1920).
Superfamily
FRAGILICYATHOIDEA
Belyaeva, 1975
[nom. transl. Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 117, ex Fragilicyathidae
belYAevA in belYAevA & others, 1975, p. 117]
Outer wall with canals. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1).
Family FRAGILICYATHIDAE
Belyaeva, 1975
[Fragilicyathidae belYAevA in belYAevA & others, 1975, p. 117]
Inner wall with bracts, fused bracts, or
pore tubes. lower Cambrian (Bot.1).
Fragilicyathus belYAe vA, 1969, p. 98 [*F. zhurav-
levae; OD; holotype, be lYAe vA, 1969, pl. 37,7,
DVGU 6M/212/15-3, Khabarovsk]. Outer wall
with horizontal to upwardly projecting, straight
canals; inner wall with one row of pores per syrinx,
bearing upwardly projecting, S-shaped pore tubes;
syringes hexagonal in cross section with several
pore rows per facet. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Far
East.——Fig . 132,2. *F. zhuravlevae, Ust’to ka
unit, Botoman, Gerbikan River, Dzhagdy Range,
Far East, Russia, holotype, DVGU 6M/212/15-3,
oblique longitudinal section, ×5.5 (Debrenne,
Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002).
Order
KAZACHSTANICYATHIDA
Konyushkov, 1967
[Kazachstanicyathida KonYushKov, 1967, p. 105]
Cup multichambered, solitary or
modular, with massive modular types by
individualization of modules around new
central cavities; development of thalamid
type, with stromatoporoid growth pattern;
chambers of subspherical to laterally
c
a
b
Auliscocyathus
Fig. 127. Auliscocyathidae (p. 151).
156 Treatise Online, number XX
elongate shape, with pillars. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.3).
Suborder
KAZACHSTANICYATHINA
Konyushkov, 1967
[nom. transl. Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 118, ex Kazachstanicy-
athida KonYushKov, 1967, p. 105] [=Kazakhstanicyathida hill, 1972, p.
130, nom. null.; =Korovinellina Debrenne, 1991, p. 219]
Initial chambers hollow and elongate;
pillars developed in subsequent chambers;
inner wall invaginal. lower Cambrian (Bot.1–
Bot.3).
Family KOROVINELLIDAE
Khalfina, 1960
[Korovinellidae KhAlFinA, 1960, p. 80] [=Kazachstanicyathidae KonYush-
Kov, 1967, p. 106; =Kazakhstanicyathidae hill, 1972, p. 130, nom.null.]
Outer and inner walls with simple pores.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.3).
Korovinella rADugin i n KhAlFinA, 1960, p. 80
[*Clathrodictyon sajanicum YAvorsKY, 1932, p.
614; OD; holotype, YAvorsKY, 1932, fig. 4–5, M,
TsNIGRm 4a,b/4070, St. Petersburg] [=Kazach-
stanicyathus KonYu shKov, 1967, p. 106 (type, K.
fistulatus, OD); =Kazakhstanicyathus hill, 1972,
p. 130, nom. null.]. Outer and inner walls tabular;
chambers of simple segmented tabulae and pillars.
lower Cambrian (Bot.3): Altay Sayan, Kazakh-
stan.——Fig. 133,1a–b. *K. sajanica (YAvorsKY),
Verkhnemonok Formation, Botoman, Sanashtykgol
Spring, western Sayan, Altay Sayan, Russia; a,
oblique transverse section, topotype, PIN 4754/10,
×10 (Debrenne, Zhuravlev, & Kruse, 2002); b,
holotype, TsNIGRm 4a,b/4070, transverse section
of modular skeleton, ×10 (Yavorsky, 1932).
Bicoscinus Debrenne, 1977a, p. 127 [*B. sdzuyi; OD;
holotype, Debrenne, 1977a, pl. 14,2, MNHN
M80058, specimen IRH13-1d, Paris]. Outer wall
aporose (possibly rudimentary); inner wall simple;
tabulae. lower Cambrian (Bot.1): Morocco.——Fig.
133,2. *B. sdzuyi, Issafen Formation, Botoman, Jbel
Irhoud, Morocco, holotype, MNHN M80058,
specimen IRH13-1d, oblique longitudinal section,
×5 (Debrenne, 1977a).
Suborder ALTAICYATHINA
Debrenne, 1991
[Altaicyathina Debrenne, 1991, p. 219]
Initial chambers subspherical; pillars
present in initial and subsequent chambers.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2).
Family ALTAICYATHIDAE
Debrenne & Zhuravlev, 1992
[Altaicyathidae Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 118]
Outer and inner walls with simple pores.
lower Cambrian (Bot.1–Bot.2).
Altaicyathus vologDin, 1932, p. 26 [*A. notabilis; M;
lectotype, vologDin, 1932, pl. 1,5; SD Debrenne
& ZhurAvlev, 1992b, p. 48, TsNIGRm 290/2957,
St. Petersburg] [=Praeactinostroma KhAlFinA, 1960,
p. 81 (type, Actinostroma vologdini YAv or s KY ,
1932, p. 613, OD); =Cambrostroma vlAs ov, 1961,
p. 29 (type, C. rossicum, OD); =Abakanicyathus
KonYushKov in Zhur Avl evA , KonYushKov, &
roZAnov, 1964, p. 127 (type, A. karakolensis, OD),
for discussion, see Debrenne & ZhurAvlev, 1992b,
p. 119; =Altaicyathus notabilis vologDin, 1932,
p. 26)]. Outer and inner walls tabular; chambers
of simple segmented tabulae and pillars; exaules
and astrorhizae may be present. lower Cambrian
(Bot.1–Bot.2): Altay Sayan, Mongolia, Far East,
United States.——Fig. 134. *A. notabilis, Verkh-
neynyrga Formation, Botoman, Lebed’ River,
Altay Mountains, Altay Sayan, Russia, lectotype,
TsNIGRm 290/2957, longitudinal section, ×9
(Vologdin, 1932).
NOMINA DUBIA
Adaecyathus Fonin in Zhu rAvl ev, Zh urAv levA, &
Fonin, 1983, p. 28 (Fonin in KrAsnoPe evA, 1978,
p. 81, nom. nud.) [*A. gravis; OD].
Tuvacnema
Fig. 128. Tuvacnemidae (p. 152).
Korovinella: I
deleted comma
from simple
segmented
here too, okay?
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 157
Syringocnema
c
a
b
d
Fig. 129. Syringocnemidae (p. 152).
158 Treatise Online, number XX
Syringothalamus
2c
2a
Pseudosyringocnema
1a
1b
Fig. 130. Syringocnemidae (p. 152–154).
2b
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 159
Araneocyathus vologDin in simon, 1941, p. 5
(vologDin, 1937b, p. 466, nom. nud.) [*A. curvus
vologDin, 1940a, p. 64; SD simon, 1941, p. 5].
Archaeocyathellus ForD, 1873b, p. 135 [*Archaeocy-
athus? rensselaericus ForD, 1873a, p. 211; M].
ARCHAEOCYATHOSPONGIA vo logDi n, 1940a,
p. 27 (class).
Archaeofungiella ZhurAvlevA in ZhAuTiKov & others,
1976, p. 137 [*A. chingisiensis; OD].
ARCHAEOPHYLLIDA oKuliTch, 1943, p. 46, nom.
correct. oKuliTch, 1955a, p. 10, pro order Archaeo-
phyllina oKuliTch, 1943, p. 46]
ARCHAEOPHYLLIDAE vologDin, 1940b, p. 97
[=Archaeophyllidae vologDin, 1931, p. 60, nom.
nud.].
Archaeophyllum vologDin in simon, 1939, p.
21 (vologDin, 1931, p. 61, nom. nud.) [*A.
edelsteini vologDin, 1931, p. 62; SD simon,
1939, p. 21].
BACATOCYATHIDAE ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 268,
nom. correct. hill, 1965, p. 116, pro Batchatocy-
athidae ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 268].
Bacatocyathus vologDin, 1940b, p. 95, nom. correct.
hill, 1965, p. 116, pro Bačatocyathus vologDin,
1940b, p. 95 [*B. kazakevici; OD] [=Batschatocy-
athus vologDin, 1956, p. 878, nom. null.; =Batcha-
tocyathus ZhurAvlevA, 1960b, p. 268, nom. null.].
Beticocyathus simon, 1939, p. 73 [*B. beticus; OD].
BICYATHIDAE vologDin, 1937b, p. 472.
Bicyathus vologDin, 1939, p. 235 (vologDin,
1937b, p. 472, nom. nud.) [*B. angustus; OD].
Butovia vologDin, 1931, p. 63 [*B. serrata; M].
CROMMYOCYATHINA R. beDForD & J. beDForD,
1939, p. 79 (order).
Dendrocyathus oKuliTch & rooTs, 1947, p. 44 [*D.
unexpectans; M].
Echinocyathus H. Termier & G. Termier, 1950, p.
47 [*E. goundafensis; OD] [=Dictyocyathus (Echino-
cyathus) H. Termier & G. Termier, 1950, p. 47,
nom. transl. Debrenne, 1964, p. 207, ex Echino-
cyathus H. Termier & G. Termier, 1950, p. 47].
Echinocyathus vologDin, 1960, p. 424, non H.
Termier & G. Termier, 1950, p. 47 (type, E.
goundafensis; OD) [*E. bilateralis; OD].
ETHMOLYNTHIDAE ZhurAvlevA, 1963b, p. 112,
nom. transl. hill, 1972, p. 51, ex Ethmolynthinae
ZhurAvlevA, 1963b, p. 112.
Ethmolynthus ZhurAvlevA, 1963b, p. 112 [*E. rosa-
novi; OD].
EXOCYATHA oKuliTch, 1943, p. 42 (subclass).
EXOCYATHIDAE R. beDFor D & J. beDForD, 1939,
p. 82.
Exocyathus R. beDForD & J. beDForD, 1937, p. 32
[*E. australis; OD].
Gorskinocyathus vologDin, 1960, p. 422 [*Archaeo-
cyathus gorskinensis vologDin, 1940b, p. 60; OD].
Kameschkovia vologDin, 1957a, p. 183 (vologDin,
1956, p. 880, nom. nud.) [*Labyrinthomorpha perfo-
rata vologDin, 1940b, p. 40; M].
LABYRINTHOCYATHIDAE YAroshevich, 1962,
p. 117.
Labyrinthocyathus YAroshevich, 1962, p. 117 [*L.
grandiporosus; M].
Labyrinthomorpha vologDin, 1931, p. 35 [*L. tolli;
M] [=Labirinthomorpha vologDin, 1928, p. 32,
nom. nud.].
LABYRINTHOMORPHIDA vologDin, 1961, p.
180 (order).
Fig. 131. Syringocnemidae (p. 154).
Williamicyathus
c
a
b
160 Treatise Online, number XX
LABYRINTHOMORPHIDAE vologDin, 1962a, p.
125 [=Labirinthomorphidae vologDin, 1928, p.
32, nom. nud.].
LABYRINTHOMORPHINA vologDin, 1961, p.
180 (superorder), nom. transl. vologDin, 1962a,
p. 125, ex order Labyrinthomorphida vologDin,
1961, p. 180].
LEECYATHIDAE vologDin, 1957c, p. 495 [=Leecy-
athidae vologDin, 1956, p. 879, nom. nud.].
Leecyathus vologDin, 1957c, p. 495 [*Archaeocyathus
yavorskii vologDin, 1931, p. 86; OD] [=Zeecyathus
vologDin, 1956, p. 879, nom. nud., lapsus calami
pro Leecyathus].
Leiocyathus vologDin, 1959a, p. 671 [*L. inaequi-
taenialis; OD].
Nevadacyathus oKuliTch, 1943, p. 59 [*Archaeocy-
athus septaporus oKuliTch, 1935, p. 101; M].
Pinacocyathus R. beDFor D & W. R. beDF orD, 1934,
p. 4 [*P. spicularis; M].
Potekhinocyathus vologDin, 1957d, p. 699 [*P.
bateniensis; M].
Protocyclocyathus vologDin, 1955, p. 142 [*Cyclo-
cyathus irregularis vologDin, 1940b, p. 62; M].
RHIZACYATHIDAE R. beD Fo rD & J. beD Fo rD ,
1939, p. 69.
Rhizacyathus R. beD ForD & J. beDF orD, 1939, p. 69
[*Protopharetra radix R. beDF orD & J. beD For D,
1937, p. 28; OD].
Salopicyathus vologDin, 1962c, p. 86 [*S. compla-
natoporosus; OD].
Fragilicyathus
Kruseicnema
1a
1b
2
Fig. 132. Kruseicnemidae and Fragilicyathidae (p. 154–155).
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 161
Bicoscinus
Korovinella
1a
1b 2
Septocyathus vologDin, 1937b, p. 468 [*S .
pedaschenkoi; M].
Serligocyathus vologDin, 1959a, p. 671 [*S. luka-
shevi; OD].
SOMPHOCYATHIDAE oKuliTch, 1935, p. 98.
Somphocyathus TAYl or , 1910, p. 134 [*S. coral-
loides; M].
Sphinctocyathus (Sphinctocyathus) Zhu r Avl evA ,
1960b, p. 304 [*S. (S.) oimuranicus; OD].
Squamella vologDin, 1977, p. 75,non borY De sAinT-
vincenT, 1826, p. 90 (type, S. limulina; M), rotifer
[*S. prima; OD] [=Squamellicyathus vologDin,
1977, p. 22, nom. nud.].
TAB ULACY ATHI DA vologDin, 1956, p. 878
(order), nom. correct. hill, 1972, p. 121 pro Tabu-
locyathida vologDin, 1956, p. 878, lapsus calami.
TABULACYATHIDAE vologDin, 1956, p. 878,
nom. correct. hill, 1972, p. 123, pro Tabulath-
yathidae vologDin in rePin A & others, 1964, p.
249, nom. correct. pro Tabulocyathidae vologDin,
1956, p. 878, lapsus calami.
Tabulacyathus vologDin, 1932, p. 30 [*T. taylori;
M] [=Tabulocyathus vologDin, 1937b, p. 471,
nom. null.]
TABULOIDEA vologDin, 1957a, p. 183 (class).
TANNUOLACYATHIDAE Debrenne, 1964, p. 188.
Tannuolacyathus vologDin, 1957c, p. 496 [*T.
multiplex; OD].
TEREKTIGOCYATHIDAE vologDin, 1962b, p.
419.
Terektigocyathus vologDin, 1962b, p. 420 [*T.
primus; OD].
Tersia vologDin, 1931, p. 70 [*T. filiforma; M].
Tersiella vologDin, 1962a, p. 129 [*Tersia nodosa
vologDin, 1940a, p. 34; OD].
THALASSOCYATHIDAE vologDin, 1962a, p. 116.
Fig. 133. Korovinellidae (p. 156).
Thalassocyathus vologDin, 1957d, p. 699 [*T.
acutatus; M].
Torgaschinocyathus vologDin, 1957d, p. 699 [*T.
spinosus; M].
Turgidocyathus vologDi n, 1960, p. 422 [*T. ippoli-
tovensis; OD].
Altaicyathus
Fig. 134. Altaicyathidae (p. 156).
162 Treatise Online, number XX
Tuvacyathus volog Din , 1940a, p. 112 (volog Din ,
1937b, p. 471, nom. nud.) [*T. mollimurus; M].
URALOCYATHIDAE vologDin & ZhurAvlevA
in vologDin, 1956, p. 878 [=Vacuocyathidae
vologDin, 1962c, p. 77].
Vacuocyathus oKuliTch, 1950a, p. 392, nom . nov.
pro Coelocyathus vologDin, 1939, p. 237, non
sArs, 1857, p. 126, cnidarian, nec schlüTer,
1886, p. 899, cnidarian [*Coelocyathus kidrjass-
ovensis vologDin, 1939, p. 237, OD; =Coelocyathus
kidrjassovensis vologDin, 1937b, p. 478, nom.
nud.] [=Uralocyathus ZhurAvl evA, 1960b, p. 102
(type, Coelocyathus kidrjassovensis vologDin, 1939,
p. 237, OD), nom. nov. pro Coelocyathus vologDin,
1939, p. 237, archaeocyath].
VESICULOIDA vologDin, 1956, p. 878 (order).
VESICULOIDAE vologDin, 1931, p. 34, invalid
family-group name based on unavailable genus
name.
REFERENCES
Alexander, E. M., & D. I. Gravestock. 1990. Sedimen-
tary facies in the Sellick Hill Formation, Fleurieu
Peninsula, South Australia. In J. B. Jago & P. S.
Moore, eds., The Evolution of a Late Precambrian-
Early Palaeozoic Rift Complex: The Adelaide Geo-
syncline. Geological Society of Australia, Special
Publication 16:269–289, 12 fig.
Allman, G. J. 1888. Report on the Hydroida dredged by
H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-76. Part II.
The Tubularinae, Corymorphinae, Campanularinae,
Sertularinae, and Thalamophora. Report on the Voy-
age of H.M.S. Challenger, Zoology 23(3), no. 70:lxix
+ 90 p., 39 pl., 2 tables, map.
Álvaro, J. J., & Sébastien Clausen. 2008. Paleoenvi-
ronmental significance of Cambrian hiatal shell ac-
cumulations in an aborted intra-cratonic rift, Atlas
Mountains, Morocco. In B. R. Pratt & C. Holmden,
eds., Dynamics of Epeiric Seas. Geological Association
of Canada, Special Paper 48:39–54, 7 fig.
Álvaro, J. J., Olaf Elicki, Gerd Geyer, A. W. A. Rushton,
& J. H. Shergold. 2003. Palaeogeographical controls
on the Cambrian trilobite immigration and evolu-
tionary patterns reported in the western Gondwana
margin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palae-
oecology 195:5–35, 6 fig.
Álvaro, J. J., Eric Monceret, Sylvie Monceret, Gérard
Verraes, & Daniel Vizcaïno. 2010. Stratigraphic re-
cord and palaeogeographic context of the Cambrian
Epoch 2 subtropical carbonate platforms and their
basinal counterparts in SW Europe, West Gondwana.
Bulletin of Geosciences, Czech Geological Survey,
Prague 85:573–584, 4 fig.
Astashkin, V. A., T. V. Pegel’, L. N. Repina, G. V.
Belyaeva, N. V. Esakova, A. Yu. Rozanov, A. Yu.
Zhuravlev, D. V. Osadchaya, & N. N. Pakhomov.
1995. The Cambrian System of the foldbelts of Rus-
sia and Mongolia. Correlation chart and explanatory
notes. International Union of Geological Sciences,
Publication 32:ii + 132 p., 5 fig., 3 tables, chart.
Astashkin, V. A., T. V. Pegel’, L. N. Repina, A. Yu.
Rozanov, Yu. Ya. Shabanov, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, S. S.
Sukhov, & V. M. Sundukov. 1991. The Cambrian
System on the Siberian Platform. Correlation chart
and explanatory notes. International Union of
Geological Sciences, Publication 27:133 p., 1 fig.,
4 tables, chart.
Ayling, A. L. 1980. Patterns of sexuality, asexual repro-
duction and recruitment in some subtidal marine de-
mosponges. Biological Bulletin 158:271–282, 4 fig.
Babcock, L. E., R. A. Robison, M. N. Rees, Peng Shan-
chi, & M. R. Saltzman. 2007. The Global Boundary
Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Drumian
Stage (Cambrian) in the Drum Mountains, Utah,
USA. Episodes 30:85–95, 9 fig.
Balsam, W. L., & Steven Vogel. 1973. Water move-
ment in archaeocyathids: Evidence and implications
of passive flow in models. Journal of Paleontology
47:979–984, 4 fig.
Barskov, I. S. 1984. Paleontological aspects of biomin-
eralization. Proceedings of the 27th International
Geological Congress, Moscow, vol. 2, Palaeontology.
VNU Science Press. Utrecht. p. 1–12.
Basahel, A. N., Ahmed Bahafzallah, Sayed Omara,
& Ulrich Jux. 1984. Early Cambrian carbonate
platform of the Arabian Shield. Neues Jahrbuch
für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatschefte
1984:113–128, 5 fig.
Bayfield, H. W. 1845. On the junction of the transition
and primary rocks of Canada and Labrador. Geologi-
cal Society of London, Quarterly Journal 1:450–459.
Beadle, S. C. 1988. Dasyclads, cyclocrinitids and recep-
taculitids: Comparative morphology and paleoecol-
ogy. Lethaia 21:1–12, 5 fig.
Bedford, R., & J. Bedford. 1936. Further notes on
Cyathospongia (Archaeocyathi) and other organ-
isms from the Lower Cambrian of Beltana, South
Australia. Kyancutta Museum, Memoirs 3:21–26,
fig. 88–105, pl. 21–26.
Bedford, R., & J. Bedford. 1937. Further notes on
Archaeos (Pleospongia) from the Lower Cambrian
of South Australia. Kyancutta Museum, Memoirs
4:27–38, fig. 106–159, pl. 27–41.
Bedford, R., & J. Bedford. 1939. Development and
classification of Archaeos (Pleospongia). Kyancutta
Museum, Memoirs 6:67–82, fig. 160–212, pl. 42–52.
Bedford, R., & W. R. Bedford. 1934. New species of
Archaeocyathinae and other organisms from the
Lower Cambrian of Beltana, South Australia. Kyan-
cutta Museum, Memoirs 1:1–7, fig. 1–36, pl. 1–6.
Bedford, R., & W. R. Bedford. 1936. Further notes on
Archaeocyathi (Cyathospongia) and other organ-
isms from the Lower Cambrian of Beltana, South
Australia. Kyancutta Museum, Memoirs 2:9–20, fig.
37–87, pl. 7–20.
Belyaeva, G. V. 1969. Novye arkheotsiaty khrebta
Dzhagdy (Dal’niy Vostok) [New archaeocyaths from
the Dzhagdu Range (Far East)]. In I. T. Zhuravleva,
ed., Biostratigrafiya i Paleontologiya Nizhnego Kem-
briya Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka [Lower Cambrian
Biostratigraphy and Paleontology of Siberia and
the Far East]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 86–98, 1 fig., pl.
34–38.
Belyaeva, G. V. 1974. Tumulovye arkheotsiaty [Tu-
mulose archaeocyaths]. In I. T. Zhuravleva & A.
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 163
Yu. Rozanov, eds., Biostratigrafiya i Paleontologiya
Nizhnego Kembriya Evropy i Severnoy Azii [Lower
Cambrian Biostratigraphy and Paleontology of
Europe and Northern Asia]. Nauka. Moscow. p.
113–123, pl. 3–5.
Belyaeva, G. V. 1985. Eshche o kribritsiatakh [More
on cribricyaths]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Si-
birskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
632:33–38, 1 fig., pl. 15–18.
Belyaeva, G. V. 1987. Biogeografiya rannego kembriya
Dal’nego Vostoka [Early Cambrian biogeography
of the Far East]. In E. V. Krasnov, ed., Evolyutsiya
Geologicheskikh Protsessov Dal’nego Vostoka [Evo-
lution of Geological Processes of the Far East]. Dal-
nevostochnyy Nauchnyy Tsentr, Akademiya Nauk
SSSR. Vladivostok. p. 92–109, 2 fig., 1 table.
Belyaeva, G. V. 1988. Kembriy Vostoka SSSR. Strati-
grafiya [Cambrian of the USSR East. Stratigraphy].
Nauka. Moscow. 136 p., 5 fig., 17 tables.
Belyaeva, G. V. 1996. Novye taksony arkheotsiat iz
Zabaykal’ya [New archaeocyathan taxa from Trans-
baikalia]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 1:109–111,
1 fig.
Belyaeva, G. V., V. A. Luchinina, B. B. Nazarov, L. N.
Repina, & L. P. Sobolev. 1975. Kembriyskaya fauna
i flora khrebta Dzhagdy (Dal’niy Vostok) [Cambrian
fauna and flora of the Dzhagdy Range (Far East)].
Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie,
Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 226:208 p., 14 fig.,
51 pl.
Belyaeva, G. V., & Yuan Kexing. 1995. Novye tak-
sony arkheotsiat iz nizhnego kembriya tsentral’nogo
Kitaya [New archaeocyathan taxa from the Lower
Cambrian of central China]. Paleontologicheskiy
Zhurnal 2:140–143, 1 fig.
Belyaeva, G. V., & I. T. Zhuravleva. 1990. Stadiynost’
v razvitii cribr i svyaz’ ikh s arkheotsiatami [Stages
in the development of cribras and their connection
with archaeocyaths]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki,
Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
783:13–18, 3 fig., pl. 7–10.
Bengtson, Stefan, & Hou Xianguang. 2001. The
integument of Cambrian chancelloriids. Acta Palae-
ontologica Polonica 46:1–22, 13 fig.
Bergquist, P. R. 1985. Poriferan relationship. In Si-
mon Conway Morris, J. D. George, R. Gibson, &
H. M. Platt, eds., The Origins and Relationships
of Lower Invertebrates. Systematics Association,
Special Volume 28. Clarendon Press. Oxford. p.
14–27, 2 fig.
Bergström, Jan, & Per Ahlberg. 1981. Uppermost
Lower Cambrian biostratigraphy in Scania, Sweden.
Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar
103:193–214, 14 fig., 1 table.
Białek, Dawid, Paweł Raczyński, Przemysław Sztajner,
& Dominik Zawadzki. 2007. Archeocjaty wapieni
wojcieszowskich. Przegląd Geologiczny 55:1112–
1116, 6 fig.
Billings, Elkanah. 1861. New Species of Lower Silurian
Fossils: On Some New or Little Known Species of
Lower Silurian Fossils from the Potsdam Group
(Primordial Zone). Geological Survey of Canada.
Montreal. 24 p., 25 fig.
Billings, Elkanah. 1865. Paleozoic Fossils, vol. 1.
Geological Survey of Canada. Dawson Brothers.
Montreal. 426 p., 401 fig.
Bolivar, Ignacio. 1905. Notas sobre los Pirgamórfidos
(Pyrgamorphidae). Boletín de la Real Sociedad Es-
pañola de Historia Natural 5:278–289.
Bordonaro, O. L. 1992. El Cambrico de Sudamerica. In
J. G. Gutierrez Marco, J. Saavedra, & I. Rabano, eds.,
Paleozoico Inferior de Ibero-America. Universidad de
Extramadura. Madrid. p. 69–84, 6 fig.
Bornemann, J. G. 1883. Paleontologische aus dem
Cambrischen Gebiete von Canalgrande in Sardi-
nien. Deutsche Geologische Gesellschaft, Zeitschrift
35:270–274.
Bornemann, J. G. 1884. Bericht über die Fortsetzung
seiner Untersuchungen cambrischer Archaeocyathus-
Formen und verwandter Organismen von der Insel
Sardinien. Deutsche Geologische Gesellschaft,
Zeitschrift 36:702–706.
Bornemann, J. G. 1886. Die Versteinerungen des
cambrischen Schichtensystems der Insel Sardinien
nebst vergleichenden Untersuchungen über analoge
Vorkommnisse aus andern Ländern. Erste Abt. iii.
Archaeocyathinae. Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae
Leopoldino-Carolinae Germanicae Naturae Curio-
sorum 51(1):28–78, pl. 5–33.
Bornemann, J. G. 1891a. Die Versteinerungen des cam-
brischen Schichtensystem der Insel Sardinien. Zweite
Abteilung. Nachschrift, III. Archaeocyathinae. Nova
Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae
Germanicae Naturae Curiosorum 56(1):495–500
(71–76), pl. 42–43.
Bornemann, J. G. 1891b. Die Versteinerungen des
cambrischen Schichtensystem der Insel Sardinien.
Zweite Abteilung. Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae
Leopoldino-Carolinae Germanicae Naturae Curioso-
rum 56(3):424–525 (1–101), pl. 35–40.
Borodina, N. P. 1974. Arkheotsiaty s reshetchatoy na-
ruzhnoy stenkoy [Archaeocyaths with clathrate outer
wall]. In I. T. Zhuravleva & A. Yu. Rozanov, eds.,
Biostratigrafiya i Paleontologiya Nizhnego Kembriya
Evropy i Severnoy Azii [Lower Cambrian Biostra-
tigraphy and Paleontology of Europe and Northern
Asia]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 138–166, 16 fig., pl. 8–18.
Borodina, N. P., K. N. Konyus hkov, D. V. Osad-
chaya, G. V. Belyaeva, & O. G. Okuneva. 1973.
Raschlenenie sanashtykgol’skogo gorizonta nizhnego
kembriya Sayano-Altayskoy skladchatoy oblasti i
ego analogov v geosinklinal’nykh oblastyakh na
territorii SSSR (po arkheotsiatam) [(Subdivision of
the Lower Cambrian Sanashtykgol Horizon of the
Sayan Altay Foldbelt and its analogues in the geo-
synclinal regions in the territory of the USSR (based
on archaeocyaths)]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki,
Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
49:100–119.
Bory de Saint-Vincent, J. B. G. M. 1826. Essai d’une
classification des animaux microscopiques. Mme
Veuve Agasse. Paris. xi + 104 p.
Boyajian, G. E., & M. LaBarbera. 1987. Biomechanical
analysis of passive flow of stromatoporoid—Mor-
phologic, paleoecologic and systematic implications.
Lethaia 20:223–229, 4 fig.
164 Treatise Online, number XX
Boyarinov, A. S. 1962. O rodakh Szecyathus Vol. i
Lucyathus Vol. [On the genera Szecyathus Vol. and
Lucyathus Vol.]. In L. N. Kraevskiy & A. R. Anan’ev,
eds., Novye Dannye po Paleontologii i Stratigrafii
Zapadnoy Sibiri [New Data on the Paleontology
and Stratigraphy of Western Siberia]. Materialy po
Geologii Zapadnoy Sibiri 63. Tomskiy Universitet.
Tomsk. p. 14–15.
Boyko [Boiko], E. V. 1984. Mikrostruktura kell-
oveyskikh stromatoporat Pamira [Microstructure of
Callovian stromatopores of Pamir]. Institut Geologii
i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Trudy 597:67–72, pl. 36–40.
Boyko [Boiko], E. V., G. V. Belyaeva, & I. T. Zhurav-
leva. 1991. Sfinktozoa Fanerozoya Territorii SSSR
[Phanerozoic Sphinctozoans from the Territory of
the USSR]. Nauka. Moscow. 224 p., 35 fig., 64 pl.
Brangulis, A., A. Murnieks, A. Nalge, & A. Friedrih-
sone. 1986. Sredne-pribaltiyskiy fatsial’nyy profil’
venda i kembriya [Middle Baltic facies profile of the
Vendian and Cambrian]. In E. A. Pirrus, ed., Fatsii
i Stratigrafiya Venda i Kembriya Zapada Vostochno-
Evropeyskoy Platformy [Facies and Stratigraphy
of the Vendian and Cambrian of the western East
European Platform]. Akademiya Nauk Estonskoy
SSR. Tallinn. p. 24–33, 1 fig.
Brasier, M. D. 1976. Early Cambrian intergrowths of
archaeocyathids, Renalcis, and pseudostromatolites
from South Australia. Palaeontology 19:223–245,
6 fig., pl. 35–37.
Brasier, M. D., R. M. Corfield, L. A. Derry, A. Yu.
Rozanov, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1994. Multiple d13C
excursions spanning the Cambrian explosion to the
Botomian crisis in Siberia. Geology 22:455–458,
2 fig.
Brock, G. A., M. J. Engelbretsen, J. B. Jago, P. D.
Kruse, J. R. Laurie, J. H. Shergold, G. R. Shi, &
J. E. Sorauf. 2000. Palaeobiogeographic affinities
of Australian Cambrian faunas. Association of
Australasian Palaeontologists, Memoir 23:1–61,
19 fig., 8 tables.
Broili, Ferdinand. 1915. Archaeocyathinae. In K. von
Zittel, Grundzüge der Paläontologie, 4th ed. Olden-
bourg. München, Berlin. p. 121.
Brook, George. 1893. The genus Madrepora. In Cata-
logue of Madreporian Corals, British Museum (Natu-
ral History) 1. British Museum (Natural History).
London. vii + 212 p., 36 pl.
Burne, R. V., & L. S. Moore. 1987. Microbialites:
Organosedimentary deposits of benthic microbial
communities. PALAIOS 2:241–254, 10 fig.
Camoin, Gilbert, Françoise Debrenne, & Anna Gandin.
1989. Premières images des communautés micro-
biennes dans les écosystèmes cambriens. Académie
des Sciences, Paris, Comptes Rendus (série II)
308:1451–1458, 2 pl.
Campbell, K. S. W., D. J. Holloway, & W. D. Smith.
1974. A new receptaculitid genus, Hexabactron, and
the relationships of the Receptaculitaceae. Palaeon-
tographica (Abt. A) 146:52–77, 12 fig., pl. 12–17.
Cawood, P. A. 2005. Terra Australis Orogen: Rodinia
breakup and development of the Pacific and Iapetus
margins of Gondwana during the Neoproterozoic
and Paleozoic. Earth-Science Reviews 69:249–279,
9 fig.
Chen Nanshen, Yang Xuizhen, Liu Dehan, Xiao Xue-
jun, Fan Delian, & Wang Lianfang. 1982. Lower
Cambrian black argillaceous rocks series in South
China and its associated stratiform deposits. Mineral
Deposits 1:39–51, 2 fig., 1 pl., 9 tables.
Chernysheva, S. V. 1960. Tollicyathus–novyy rod
arkheotsiat [Tollicyathus—A new genus of archaeo-
cyaths]. Sibirskiy Nauchno-Issledovatel’skiy Institut
Geologii, Geofiziki i Mineral’nogo Syr’ya, Trudy
8:77–78, pl. 4.
Chudinova, I. I. 1959. O nakhodke konulyarii v ni-
zhnem kembrii Zapadnykh Sayan [On the find of a
conulariid in the Lower Cambrian of western Sayan].
Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 2:53–55, 2 fig., pl. 1.
Cocks, L. R. M., & T. H. Torsvik. 2007. Siberia, the
wandering northern terrane, and its changing geog-
raphy through the Palaeozoic. Earth-Science Reviews
82:29–74, 15 fig., 1 table.
Coney, P. J., D. L. Jones, & J. W. H. Monger. 1980.
Cordilleran suspect terranes. Nature 288:329–333,
1 fig.
Cook, P. J. 1988. Palaeogeographic Atlas of Australia,
vol. 1, Cambrian. Australian Government Publishing
Service. Canberra. 9 p., 16 charts.
Cooper, G. A., A. R. V. Arellano, J. H. Johnson, V. J.
Okulitch, Alexander Stoyanow, & Christina Loch-
man. 1952. Cambrian stratigraphy and paleontol-
ogy near Caborca, northwestern Sonora, Mexico.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 119(1):vi +
184 p., 7 fig., 31 pl.
Copper, Paul. 2001. Evolution, radiations, and extinc-
tions in Proterozoic to mid-Paleozoic reefs. In G. D.
Stanley, Jr., ed., The History and Sedimentology of
Ancient Reef Systems. Kluwer Academic/Plenum
Publishers. New York. p. 89–119, 6 fig.
Courjault-Radé, Pierre, Françoise Debrenne, & Anna
Gandin. 1992. Palaeogeographic and geodynamic
evolution of the Gondwana continental margins
during the Cambrian. Terra Nova 4:657–667,
7 fig.
Cowen, Richard. 1988. The role of algal symbiosis
in reefs through time. PALAIOS 3:221–227, 2 fig.
Culver, S. J., J. E. Repetski, John Pojeta, Jr., & David
Hunt. 1996. Early and Middle(?) Cambrian meta-
zoan and protistan fossils from West Africa. Journal
of Paleontology 70:1–6, 5 fig.
Dalziel, I. W. D., L. H. Dalla Salda, & L. M. Gahagan.
1994. Paleozoic Laurentia-Gondwana interaction
and the origin of the Appalachian-Andean system.
Geological Society of America Bulletin 106:243–252,
4 fig., 1 table.
Datsenko, V. A., I. T. Zhuravleva, N. P. Lazarenko,
Yu. N. Popov, & N. E. Chernysheva. 1968. Bio-
stratigrafiya i fauna kembriyskikh otlozheniy severo-
zapada Sibirskoy Platformy [Biostratigraphy and
fauna of the Cambrian deposits of the northwestern
Siberian Platform]. Nauchno-Issledovatel’skii Institut
Geologii Arktiki, Trudy 155:213 p., 23 pl.; Atlas:
47 fig., 13 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1958. Sur quelques Archaeocy-
atha du Jebel Taïssa (Anti-Atlas occidental). Service
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 165
des Mines et de Carte Géologique du Maroc, Notes
et Mémoires 16(143):59–67, 2 fig., 3 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1959a. Un nouveau genre
d’Archaeocyatha du Cambrien marocain. Société
Géologique de France, Comptes Rendus Sommaires
des Séances 1959(1):14–15, 1 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1959b. Archaeocyatha des len-
tilles calcaires de Tazemmourt (Anti-Atlas). Service
des Mines et de Carte Géologique du Maroc, Notes
et Mémoires 18(147):7–26, 5 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1960. Deux nouveaux genres
d’Archaeocyathidés du Cambrien marocain. Société
Géologique de France, Comptes Rendus Sommaires
des Séances 1960(5):118, 2 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1961. Nouvelles données sur
la faune d’Archaeocyatha du Jebel Taissa (Anti-
Atlas occidental). Service des Mines et de Carte
Géologique du Maroc, Notes et Mémoires
20(152):7–37, 6 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1963a. Archaeocyatha du Maroc.
Genres et espèces-types des collections étudiées de
1958 à 1962. Service des Mines et de Carte Géolo-
gique du Maroc, Notes et Mémoires 23(172):21–23.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1963b. Archaeocyatha d’Espagne.
Etude des collections allemandes. In F. Debrenne &
F. Lotze, Die Archaeocyatha des spanischen Kambri-
ums. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur,
Mainz, Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Naturwis-
senschaftlichen Klasse 1963(2):123–143, 5 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1964. Archaeocyatha—
Contribution à l’étude des faunes cambriennes
du Maroc, de Sardaigne et de France. Service des
Mines et de Carte Géologique du Maroc, Notes
et Mémoires 179: vol. 1, 265 p., 69 fig., 26 tables;
vol. 2, 52 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1965. Halysicyathus, nouveau
genre d’Archéocyathe du Cambrien marocain. So-
ciété Géologique de France, Comptes Rendus Som-
maires des Séances 1965(4):143–144, 2 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1969a. Lower Cambrian Archaeo-
cyatha from the Ajax Mine, Beltana, South Australia.
British Museum (Natural History), Bulletin, Geology
17(7):295–376, 15 fig., 18 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1969b. Archaeocyatha. Ques-
tions de nomenclature. Société Géologique de
France, Comptes Rendus Sommaires des Séances
1969(7):262–263.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1970a. A revision of Australian
genera of Archaeocyatha. Royal Society of South
Australia, Transactions 94:21–48, 2 pl., 1 table.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1970b. Coscinocyathus Borne-
mann, 1884 (Archaeocyatha): Proposed designa-
tion of a type-species under the plenary powers.
Z.N.(S.) 1924. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature
27:207–208.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1971. Nouvelles données sur
la faune d’Archéocyathes de Sardaigne. Société
Géologique de France, Comptes Rendus Sommaires
des Séances 1971(34):193–194, 3 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1972. Nouvelle faune
d’Archéocyathes de Sardaigne. Annales de Paléon-
tologie (Invertébrés) 58:169–188, 1 fig., 5 pl., 2
tables.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1973. Modifications de la porosité
primaire de la muraille externe chez les archéocyathes
réguliers. Annales de Paléontologie (Invertébrés)
59:3–24, 9 fig., 4 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1974a. Les archéocyathes irré-
guliers d’Ajax Mine (Cambrien inférieur, Australie
du Sud). Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire
Naturelle (série 3) 195:185–258, 39 fig., 3 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1974b. Anatomie et systématique
des archéocyathes réguliers sans plancher d’Ajax Mine
(Cambrien inférieur, Australie du Sud). Géobios
7:91–138, 3 fig., pl. 19–28.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1974c. K revizii roda Paranacy-
athus Bedford R. et W. R., 1937 [On the revision of
the genus Paranacyathus Bedford R. et W. R., 1937].
In I. T. Zhuravleva & A. Yu. Rozanov, eds., Biostrati-
grafiya i Paleontologiya Nizhnego Kembriya Evropy i
Severnoy Azii [Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy and
Paleontology of Europe and Northern Asia]. Nauka.
Moscow. p. 167–178, 2 fig., pl. 19–22.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1975. Archaeocyatha provenant
de blocs erratiques des Tillites de Dwyka (Afrique
du Sud). Annals of the South African Museum
67:331–361, 11 fig., 1 table.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1977a. Archéocyathes du Jbel
Irhoud (Jebilets–Maroc). Société Géologique et Mi-
néralogique de Bretagne, Bulletin (série C) 7:93–136,
8 fig., 14 pl., 3 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1977b. Diplocyathellus new name
for the archaeocyathid Diplocyathus Debrenne, 1974,
not Allman, 1888. Journal of Paleontology 51:1222.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1983. Archaeocyathids: Morphol-
ogy and affinity. In T. W. Broadhead, ed., Sponges
and Spongiomorphs. Notes for a Short Course.
University of Tennessee, Department of Geological
Sciences, Studies in Geology 7. University of Tennes-
see. Knoxville. p. 178–190, 6 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1987. Archaeocyatha from
Mexico in the Smithsonian Institution. New data
from recent collectings. Géobios 20:267–273, 1 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1991. Morphogenèse et systé-
matique des Archaeocyatha (spongiaires, Cambrien
inférieur). Géobios 13:217–222, 3 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise. 1996. Bornemann and the ar-
chaeocyath world. Terra Nostra, Vortrage, Tagung
der Paläontologischen Gesellschaft 66:35.
Debrenne, Françoise, & Pierre Courjault-Radé. 1994.
Répartition paléogéographique des archéocyathes et
délimitation des zones intertropicales au Cambrien
inférieur. Société Géologique de France, Bulletin
165:459–467, 4 fig., 1 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise, & Max Debrenne. 1995. Ar-
chaeocyaths of the Lower Cambrian of Morocco. Ber-
ingeria Special Issue 2:121–145, 3 fig., 4 pl., 4 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise, Max Debrenne, & A. Yu. Ro-
zanov. 1976. On the simultaneous presence of
synapticulae and tabulae in regular archaeocyathids.
Géobios 9:101–105, 1 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise, & Anna Gandin. 1985. La
formation de Gonnesa (Cambrian, SW Sardaigne):
Biostratigraphie, paléogéographie, paléoecologie des
archéocyathes. Société Géologique de France, Bul-
letin 8:531–540, 2 fig., 2 pl.
166 Treatise Online, number XX
Debrenne, Françoise, Anna Gandin, & Max Debrenne.
1993. Calcaires à archéocyathes du Membre da la
Vallée de Matoppa (Formation de Nebida), Cam-
brien inférieur du sud-ouest de la Sardaigne (Italie).
Annales de Paléontologie (Vertébrés-Invertébrés)
79:77–118, 4 fig., 6 pl., 1 table.
Debrenne, Françoise, Anna Gandin, & R. A. Gangloff.
1990. Analyse sédimentologique et paléontologie
de calcaires organogènes du Cambrien inférieur
de Battle Mountain (Nevada, U.S.A.). Annales de
Paléontologie (Vertébrés-Invertébrés) 76:73–119, 5
fig., 3 pl., 12 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise, Anna Gandin, & G. L. Pillola.
1989. Biostratigraphy and depositional setting of
Punta Manna Member type-section (Nebida Forma-
tion, Lower Cambrian, SW Sardinia, Italy). Rivista
Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 94:483–514,
6 fig., pl. 52–56.
Debrenne, Françoise, Anna Gandin, & S. M. Row-
land. 1989. Lower Cambrian bioconstructions in
northwestern Mexico (Sonora). Depositional setting,
paleoecology and systematics of archaeocyaths. Géo-
bios 22:137–195, 13 fig., 12 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise, Anna Gandin, & Andrey
Zhuravlev. 1991. Palaeoecological and sedimen-
tological remarks on some Lower Cambrian sedi-
ments of the Yangtse platform (China). Société
Géologique de France, Bulletin 162:575–583, 6
fig., 3 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise, R. A. Gangloff, & A. Yu. Zhurav-
lev. 1990. Archaeocyatha from the Krol-Tal succes-
sion (Lesser Himalaya): An invalid record. Geological
Magazine 127:361–362, 1 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, & D. I. Gravestock. 1991. Ar-
chaeocyatha from the Sellick Hill Formation and
Fork Tree Limestone on Fleurieu Peninsula, South
Australia. In J. B. Jago & P. J. Moore, eds., The
Evolution of a Late Precambrian-Early Palaeozoic
Rift Complex: the Adelaide Geosyncline. Geological
Society of Australia, Special Publication 16:290–309,
9 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, & N. P. James. 1981. Reef-
associated archaeocyathans from the Lower Cam-
brian of Labrador and Newfoundland. Palaeontology
24:343–-378, 6 fig., pl. 48–55.
Debrenne, Françoise, & Jiang Zhiwen. 1989. Archaeo-
cyathan fauna from the Lower Cambrian of Yunnan
(China). Société Géologique de France, Bulletin
5:819–828, 3 fig., 2 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise, & P. D. Kruse. 1986. Shackleton
Limestone archaeocyaths. Alcheringa 10:235–278,
35 fig., 4 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise, & P. D. Kruse. 1989. Cam-
brian Antarctic archaeocyaths. In J. A. Crame,
ed., Origins and Evolution of the Antarctic Biota.
Geological Society Special Publication 47:15–28,
5 fig., 1 table.
Debrenne, Françoise, P. D. Kruse, & Zhang Sengui.
1991. An Asian compound archaeocyath. Alcheringa
15:285–291, 5 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, & J. G. Lafuste. 1979. Buschman-
nia roeringi (Kaever & Richter, 1976) a so-called
archaeocyatha, and the problem of the Precambrian
or Cambrian age of the Nama System (S.W. Africa).
Geological Magazine 116:143–144, 2 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise, I. D. Maidanskaya, & A. Yu.
Zhuravlev. 1999. Faunal migrations of archaeocy-
aths and Early Cambrian plate dynamics. Société
Géologique de France, Bulletin 170:189–194, 3 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, & Joachim Reitner. 2001. Spong-
es, cnidarians, and ctenophores. In A. Yu. Zhuravlev
& R. Riding, eds., The Ecology of the Cambrian
Radiation. Columbia University Press. New York.
p. 301–325, 7 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Rozanov. 1972. O
kol’tsevykh strukturakh naruzhnykh stenok arkheot-
siat [On annular structures in archaeocyathan outer
walls]. In I. T. Zhuravleva, ed., Problemy Biostrati-
grafii i Paleontologii Nizhnego Kembriya Sibiri
[Problems of Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy
and Paleontology of Siberia]. Nauka. Moscow. p.
235–237, pl. 42–44.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Rozanov. 1978. Asso-
ciations et interactions organiques chez les archéo-
cyathes (Cambrien inférieur). Société Géologique
de France, Comptes Rendus Sommaires des Séances
1978(5):235–237, 6 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Rozanov. 1983. Paleo-
geographic and stratigraphic distribution of regular
Archaeocyatha (Lower Cambrian fossils). Géobios
16:727–736, 1 table.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Rozanov. 1985. O rode
Dokidocyathus Taylor [On the genus Dokidocyathus
Taylor]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 3:111–112,
1 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, A. Yu. Rozanov, & G. F.
Webers. 1984. Upper Cambrian Archaeocyatha
from Antarctica. Geological Magazine 121:291–
299, 6 fig.
Debr enne, Franço ise , Al exi s Roza nov, & Andrey
Zhuravlev. 1990. Regular Archaeocyaths. Éditions
du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique,
Cahiers de Paléontologie. Paris. 218 p., 68 fig., 32
pl., 9 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise, Henri Termier, & Geneviève
Termier. 1970. Radiocyatha. Une nouvelle classe
d’organismes primitifs du Cambrien inférieur. So-
ciété Géologique de France, Bulletin 12:120–125,
pl. 4–6.
Debrenne, Françoise, Henri Termier, & Geneviève
Termier. 1971. Sur de nouveaux représentants de
la classe des Radiocyatha. Essai sur l’évolution des
métazoaires primitifs. Société Géologique de France,
Bulletin 13:439–444, pl. 29–30, 2 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise, & Jean Vacelet. 1984. Archaeo-
cyatha: Is the sponge model consistent with their
structural organisation? Palaeontographica Ameri-
cana 54:358–369, 2 pl., 3 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise, & Yu. I. Voronin. 1971. Znach-
enie poristosti peregorodok dlya klassifikatsii ayats-
itsiatid [The significance of septal porosity for the
classification of ajacicyathids]. Paleontologicheskiy
Zhurnal 3:26–31, 2 fig., 1 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise, & Rachel Wood. 1990. A new
Cambrian sphinctozoan sponge from North America,
its relationship to archaeocyaths and the nature of
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 167
early sphinctozoans. Geological Magazine 127:435–
443, 5 fig., 1 table.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1990. New
irregular archaeocyath taxa. Géobios 23:299–305,
1 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1992a. Les
calicules, structure intervallaire chaetétide chez les
archéocyathes irréguliers. Géobios 25:595–598, 1
fig., 1 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1992b. Ir-
regular Archaeocyaths. Éditions du Centre National
de la Recherche Scientifique, Cahiers de Paléontolo-
gie. Paris. 212 p., 52 fig., 38 pl., 9 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1994. Ar-
chaeocyathan affinities: How deep can we go into
the systematic affiliation of an extinct group? In R.
W. M. van Soest, T. M. G. van Kempen, & J. C.
Braekman, eds., Sponges in Time and Space. A. A.
Balkema. Rotterdam. p. 3–12, 6 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1996.
Archaeocyatha, palaeoecology: A Cambrian sessile
fauna. In A. Cherchi, ed., Autecology of Selected Fos-
sil Organisms: Achievements and Problems. Societa
Paleontologia Italiana, Bolletino, Special Volume
3:77–85, 3 fig., 1 pl.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1997. Cam-
brian food web: A brief review. Géobios 20:181–188,
1 table.
Debrenne, Françoise, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 2000. New
Cambrian archaeocyath taxa. Géobios 33:49–50.
Debrenne, Françoise, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, & D. I. Grave-
stock. 1993. Etheridge collection: Systematic revi-
sion of some of the first archaeocyaths discovered
in Australia. Alcheringa 17:179–183, 4 fig., 1 table.
Debrenne, Françoise, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, & P. D. Kruse.
2002. Class Archaeocyatha Bornemann, 1884.
Bibliography of Class Archaeocyatha. In J. N. A.
Hooper & R. W. M. van Soest, eds., Systema Po-
rifera. A Guide to the Classification of Sponges, vol.
2. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. New York.
p. 1539–1699, 75 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, & P. D. Kruse.
2003. Erbocyathus Zhuravleva, 1955 (Archaeocy-
atha): Proposed conservation. Bulletin of Zoological
Nomenclature 60:12–15.
Debrenne, F., A. Yu. Zhuravlev, & P. D. Kruse. 2012.
Part E, Revised, Volume 4, Chapter 18: General
features of the Archaeocyatha. Treatise Online
38:1–102, 34 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, & A. Yu. Ro-
zanov. 1988. Novye rody pravil’nykh dnishchevykh
i odnokamernykh arkheotsiat iz nizhnego kembriya
Sibiri [New genera of regular tabulate and single-
chambered archaeocyaths from the Lower Cambrian
of Siberia]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 4:97–99,
1 fig.
Debrenne, Françoise, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, & A. Yu.
Rozanov. 1989. Pravil’nye arkheotsiaty [Regular
archaeocyaths]. Paleontologicheskiy Institut, Aka-
demiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 233:199 p., 70 fig., 32
pl., 7 tables.
Debrenne, Françoise, I. T. Zhuravleva, & A. Yu. Ro-
zanov. 1973. Grebenchatye dnishcha u arkheotsiat
i ikh sistematicheskoe znachenie [Pectinate tabulae
in archaeocyaths and their systematic significance].
In I. T. Zhuravleva, ed., Problemy Paleontologii i
Biostratigrafii Nizhnego Kembriya Sibiri i Dal’nego
Vostoka [Problems of Lower Cambrian Paleontology
and Biostratigraphy of Siberia and the Far East].
Nauka. Novosibirsk. p. 33–38, 6 fig.
Descamps, M., & D. Wintrebert. 1966. Révue et diag-
nose preliminaire de quelques Pyrgomorphidae et
Acrididae de Madagascar (Orth. Acridoidea). Bulle-
tin de la Société Entomologique de France 71:24–34.
Duncan, P. M. 1876. Notices of some deep-sea and
littoral corals from the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean,
Indian, New-Zealand, Persian Gulf, and Japanese
&c. seas. Zoological Society, London, Proceedings
44:428–442, pl. 38–41.
Duncan, P. M., & James Thomson. 1867. On Cyclo-
cyathus, a new genus of the Cyathophyllidae with
remarks on the genus Aulophyllum. Geological Soci-
ety, London, Proceedings 170:1. Also published in
Geological Magazine 4:416–417.
Dyatlova, I. N., & R. F. Sycheva. 1999. Novye dannye
po biostratigrafii nizhnego kembriya Vostochnogo
Sayana [New data on Lower Cambrian biostratigra-
phy of eastern Sayan]. Stratigrafiya Geologicheskaya
Korrelyatsiya 7(4):3–13, 4 fig.
Dzik, Jerzy. 1994. Evolution of ‘small shelly fos-
sils’ assemblages. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
39:247–313, 37 fig.
Elicki, Olaf. 1995. Lower Cambrian faunas from
Germany—Ages and relations. In G. Geyer & E.
Landing, eds., Morocco ’95. The Lower-Middle
Cambrian standard of western Gondwana. Beringeria
Special Issue 2:165–167, 3 fig.
Etheridge, Robert, Jr. 1890. On some Australian spe-
cies of the family Archaeocyathinae. Royal Society
of South Australia, Transactions 13:10–22, pl. 2–3.
Fenninger, A., & G. Flajs. 1974. Zur Microstructur
rezenter und fossiler Hydrozoa. Biomineralisation
7:69–99, 4 fig., 10 pl.
Finks, R. M. 1983. Pharetronida: Inozoa and Sphinc-
tozoa. In T. W. Broadhead, ed., Sponges and Spon-
giomorphs. Notes for a Short Course. University of
Tennessee, Department of Geological Sciences, Stud-
ies in Geology 7. University of Tennessee. Knoxville.
p. 55–69, 4 fig.
Flajs, G. 1977. Die Ultrastrukturendes Kalkalgenskel-
etts. Palaeontographica (Abt. B) 160:69–128, 16
fig., 17 pl., 1 table.
Flügel, Erik, & I. B. Singh. 2003. Stromatoporoid-
grade and other sponge fossils from the Upper
Krol Formation of the Lesser Himalaya (India):
Implications for the biotic evolution around the
Precambrian-Cambrian boundary interval. Facies
49:351–372, 2 fig., pl. 61–66, 1 table.
Fomichev, V. D. 1953. Korally Rugosa i Stratigrafiya
Sredne-i Verkhne kam menougol’nykh i Permskikh
Otlozheniy Donetskogo Basseyna [Rugose Corals and
Stratigraphy of Middle and Upper Carboniferous and
Permian Deposits of the Donets Basin]. Vsesoyuzniy
Nauchno-Issledovatel’skiy Geologicheskiy Institut,
Trudy. Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo Geologicheskoy
Literatury. Moscow. 622 p., 44 pl., atlas.
168 Treatise Online, number XX
Fomin, Yu. M. 1963. O nakhodke arkheotsiato-
podovnykh organismov v srednedevonskikh ot-
lozheniyakh vostochnogo sklona yuzhnogo Urala
[On the discovery of archaeocyath-like organisms
in Middle Devonian deposits of the eastern slope
of the southern Urals]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal
2:17–19, 2 fig.
Fon in, V. D. 19 60. O novo m semeyst ve kem bri-
yskikh metatsiatid—Prismocyathidae Fonin, fam.
n. [On a new family of Cambrian metacyathides—
Prismocyathidae Fonin, fam. n.]. Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Doklady 135:725–727, 1 fig.
Fonin, V. D. 1963. K poznaniyu tenial’nykh arkheotsiat
Altae-Sayanskoy skladchatoy oblasti [Contribution to
knowledge of taenial archaeocyaths from the Altay-
Sayan fold region]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal
4:14–29, 8 fig., pl. 3.
Fonin, V. D. 1981. Nekotorye itogy izucheniya
dictional’nykh arkheotsiat [Some results of the
study of dictyonal archaeocyaths]. Moskovskoe
Obshchestvo Ispytatelei Prirody, Byulleten', seriya
geologicheskaya 56(5):116.
Fonin, V. D. 1983. Novye nepravil’nye arkheotsiaty
iz nizhnekembriyskikh otlozheniy severo-zapadnoy
Mongolii [New irregular archaeocyaths from the
Lower Cambrian deposits of northwestern Mon-
golia]. Sovmestnaya Sovetsko-Mongol’skaya Pale-
ontologicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, Trudy 20:11–14,
pl. 2.
Fonin, V. D. 1985. Tenial’nye arkheotsiaty Altae-
Sayanskoy skladchatoy oblasti [Taenial archaeocyaths
of the Altay-Sayan fold region]. Paleontologicheskiy
Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 209:144 p.,
24 fig., 32 pl., 2 tables.
Fonin, V. D. 1990. Prizmotsiatidy nizhnego kembriya
Tuvy [Prismocyathids of the Lower Cambrian of
Tuva]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdele-
nie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 765:147–158, 4
fig., pl. 19–23.
Ford, S. W. 1873a. On some new species of fossils
from the Primordial or Potsdam Group of Rensselaer
county, N.Y. (Lower Potsdam). American Journal of
Science and Arts (series 3) 5:211–215, 3 fig.
Ford, S. W. 1873b. Remarks on the distribution of fos-
sils in the Lower Potsdam rocks at Troy, N.Y., with a
description of four new species. American Journal of
Science and Arts (series 3) 6:134–140, 2 fig.
Ford, S. W. 1878. Descriptions of two new species of
Primordial fossils. American Journal of Science and
Arts (series 3) 15:124–127, 1 fig.
Fredericks, Georgiy. 1925. Ussuriskiy verkhniy pa-
leozoy. II. Permskie brakhiopody s mysa Kaluzina
[Ussuri Upper Paleozoic. II. Permian brachiopods
of Cape Kaluzin]. Materialy po Geologii i Poleznym
Iskopaemym Dal’nego Vostoka 40:1–30, 4 pl.
Fritz, W. H., M. P. Cecile, B. S. Norford, D. Morrow,
& H. H. J. Geldsetzer. 1991. Cambrian to Middle
Devonian assemblages. In H. Gabrielse & C. J.
Yorath, eds., Geology of Canada 4. Geology of the
Cordilleran Orogen in Canada. Geological Survey of
Canada. Ottawa. p. 151–218, 49 fig.
Gandin, Anna, & Françoise Debrenne. 1984. Lower
Cambrian bioconstructions in southwestern Sardinia
(Italy). Géobios, Mémoir spécial 8:231–240, 1 fig.,
1 pl., 1 table.
Gandin, Anna, & Françoise Debrenne. 2010. Distri-
bution of archaeocyath-calcimicrobial bioconstruc-
tions on the Early Cambrian shelves. Palaeoworld
19:222–241, 12 fig., 1 table.
Gandin, Anna, Françoise Debrenne, & Max De-
brenne. 2007. Anatomy of the Early Cambrian
‘La Sentinella’ reef complex, Serra Scoris, SW Sar-
dinia, Italy. In J. J. Álvaro, Markus Aretz, Frédéric
Boulvain, Axel Munnecke, Daniel Vachard, & Em-
manuelle Vennin, eds., Palaeozoic Reefs and Bioac-
cumulations: Climatic and Evolutionary Controls.
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
275: 29–50, 16 fig., 1 table.
Gandin, Anna, Nello Minzoni, & Pierre Courjault-
Radé. 1987. Shelf to basin transition in the Cambri-
an-Lower Ordovician of Sardinia (Italy). Geologische
Rundschau 76:827–836, 2 fig.
Gangloff, R. A. 1990. An unusual archaeocyath as-
semblage from Alaska, tectonic and paleogeographic
implications for the Lower Cambrian of western
North America. In L. N. Repina & A. Yu. Zhurav-
lev, eds., Tretiy Mezhdunarodnyy Simpozium po
Kembriyskoy Sisteme, 1-9 avgusta 1990 g., SSSR, g.
Novosibirsk. Tezisy Dokladov [Third International
Symposium on the Cambrian System, 1-9 August
1990, Novosibirsk, USSR. Abstracts]. Institut Ge-
ologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya
Nauk SSSR. Novosibirsk. p. 97.
Geyer, Gerd, Ed Landing, & Wolfram Heldmaier.
1995. Faunas and depositional environments of the
Cambrian of the Moroccan Atlas regions. Beringeria,
Special Issue 2:47–119, 26 fig.
Geyer, Gerd, & J. H. Shergold. 2000. The quest for
internationally recognized divisions of Cambrian
time. Episodes 23:188–195, 1 table.
Glaessner, M. F. 1980. Pseudofossils from the Precam-
brian, including ‘Buschmannia’ and ‘Praesolenopora.’
Geological Magazine 117:199–200.
Glass, L. M., & D. Phillips. 2006. The Kalkarindji con-
tinental flood basalt province: A new Cambrian large
igneous province in Australia with possible links to
faunal extinctions. Geology 34:461–464, 3 fig., 1 table.
Golonka, Jan. 2002. Plate-tectonic maps of the Pha-
nerozoic. In Wolfgang Kiessling, Erik Flügel, & Jan
Golonka, eds., Phanerozoic Reef Patterns. SEPM
Special Publication 72:21–75.
González, P. D., M. F. Tortello, & S. E. Damborenea.
2011. Early Cambrian archaeocyathan limestone
blocks in low-grade meta-conglomerate from El
Jagüelito Formation (Sierra Grande, Río Negro,
Argentina). Geologica Acta 9:159–173, 8 fig.
Gordienko, I. V., A. V. Filimonov, O. R. Minina, M. A.
Gornova, A. Ya. Medvedeva, V. S. Klimuk, A. L. Elbaev,
& O. Tomurtogoo. 2007. Dzhida island-arc system in
the Paleoasian Ocean: Structure and main stages of
Vendian-Paleozoic geodynamic evolution. Russian Ge-
ology and Geophysics 48(1):91–106, 10 fig., 3 tables.
Gordon, W. T. 1920. Scottish National Antarctic
Expedition 1902–1904: Cambrian organic remains
from a dredging in the Weddell Sea. Royal Society
of Edinburgh, Transactions 52:681–714, 2 fig., 7 pl.
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 169
Gozalo, Rodolfo, Eladio Liñán, M. E. Dies, J. A. Gámez
Vintaned, & Eduardo Mayoral. 2007. The Lower-
Middle Cambrian boundary in the Mediterranean
subprovince. In U. Linnemann, R. D. Nance, P.
Kraft, & G. Zulauf, eds., The Evolution of the Rheic
Ocean: From Avalonian-Cadomian Active Margin to
Alleghenian-Variscan Collision. Geological Society of
America, Special Paper 423:359–373, 6 fig.
Grant, R. E. 1836. Animal Kingdom. In R. B. Todd, ed.,
The Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology, vol. 1.
Sherwood, Gilbert, & Piper. London. p. 107–118.
Gravestock, D. I. 1983. Structure and function of the
exothecal tissue of Somphocyathus coralloides Taylor and
allied regular Archaeocyatha. Association of Australasian
Palaeontologists, Memoir 1:67–74, 5 fig., 1 table.
Gravestock, D. I. 1984. Archaeocyatha from lower parts
of the Lower Cambrian carbonate sequence in South
Australia. Association of Australasian Palaeontolo-
gists, Memoir 2:139 p., 64 fig., 1 table.
Gravestock, D. I., E. M. Alexander, Yu. E. Demidenko,
N. V. Esakova, L. E. Holmer, J. B. Jago, Lin Tianrui,
L. M. Mel’nikova, P. Yu. Parkhaev, A. Yu. Rozanov,
G. T. Ushatinskaya, Zang Wenlong, E. A. Zhegallo,
& A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 2001. The Cambrian biostratig-
raphy of the Stansbury Basin, South Australia. Palae-
ontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Transactions 282:1–344, 26 fig., 54 pl., 2 tables.
Greggs, R. G. 1959. Archaeocyatha from the Colville
and Salmo areas of Washington and British Colum-
bia. Journal of Paleontology 33:63–75, pl. 11–14.
Hamdi, Bahaeddin. 1995. Treatise on the Geology of
Iran. Vol. 20, Precambrian-Cambrian Deposits in
Iran. Geological Survey of Iran. Tehran. 535 + 11
p., 30 fig., 68 pl.
Hancock, J. L. 1913. Studies of Tetriginae (Acrydiinae)
from the Sarawak Museum, Borneo. The Sarawak
Museum Journal 1(3):39–54.
Handfield, R. C. 1967. A new Lower Cambrian Ar-
chaeocyatha? Journal of Paleontology 41:209–212,
1 fig., pl. 23, 1 table.
Handfield, R. C. 1971. Archaeocyatha from the Mack-
enzie and Cassiar Mountains, Northwest Territories,
Yukon Territory and British Columbia. Geological
Survey of Canada, Bulletin 201:119 p., 11 fig., 16
pl., 6 tables.
Handfield, R. C., & R. H. Hansman. 1967. The genus
Tunkia Bedford & Bedford. Journal of Paleontology
41:1002–1003, 1 fig.
Hartman, W. D. 1983. Modern and ancient Scle-
rospongiae. In T. W. Broadhead, ed., Sponges
and Spongiomorphs. Notes for a Short Course.
University of Tennessee Department of Geologi-
cal Sciences, Studies in Geology 7. Knoxville. p.
116–129, 10 fig.
Hedberg, H. D., ed. 1976. International Stratigraphic
Guide. A Guide to Stratigraphic Classification,
Terminology, and Procedure. Wiley-Interscience.
New York, London, Sydney, Toronto. xvii + 200 p.,
14 fig., 3 tables.
Hernández-Sampelayo, P. 1933. El Cambriano en
España. XVI Congreso Geológico Internacional,
Instituto Geológico i Minero de España, Memoria,
Gráficas Reunidas. Madrid. 200 p., 19 fig., 6 pl.
Hicks, Melissa, & S. M. Rowland. 2009. Early Cam-
brian microbial reefs, archaeocyathan inter-reef
communities, and associated facies of the Yangtze
Platform. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Pal-
aeoecology 281:137–153, 18 fig., 2 tables.
Hill, Dorothy. 1964a. Archaeocyatha from the Shack-
leton Limestone of the Ross System, Nimrod Glacier
area, Antarctica. Transactions of the Royal Society
of New Zealand, Geology 2:137–146, 1 fig., 2 pl.
Hill, Dorothy. 1964b. The phylum Archaeocyatha.
Biological Reviews 39:232–258, 6 fig., 1 pl., 1 table.
Hill, Dorothy. 1964c. Archaeocyatha from loose
material at Plunket Point at the head of Beardmore
Glacier. In R. J. Adie, ed., Antarctic Geology. North-
Holland. Amsterdam. p. 609–622, 4 fig.
Hill, Dorothy. 1965. Archaeocyatha from Antarctica
and a review of the phylum. Trans-Antarctic Expe-
dition 1955–1958, Scientific Reports 10 (Geology
3):151 p., 25 fig., 12 pl.
Hill, Dorothy. 1972. Archaeocyatha. In C. Teichert,
ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part E,
revised, vol. 1. The Geological Society of America
& The University of Kansas. Boulder, Colorado &
Lawrence, Kansas. xxx + 158 p., 107 fig., 3 tables.
Hinde, G. J. 1889. On Archaeocyathus, Billings, and on
other genera, allied to or associated with it, from the
Cambrian strata of North America, Spain, Sardinia,
and Scotland. Geological Society, London, Quarterly
Journal 45:125–148, pl. 5.
Holland, C. H., ed. 1971. Cambrian of the New
World. J. Wiley & Sons. London. 456 p., 97 fig.,
4 pl., 18 tables.
Holland, C. H., ed. 1974. Cambrian of the British Isles,
Norden and Spitsbergen. J. Wiley & Sons. London.
300 p., 45 fig., 4 pl.
Hoppe, W. F. 1988. Reproductive patterns in three spe-
cies of large coral reef sponges. Coral Reefs 7:47–50,
3 fig., 1 table.
Hough, M. L., G. A. Shields, L. Z. Evins, H. Strauss,
R. A. Henderson, & S. Mackenzie. 2006. A major
sulphur isotope event at c. 510 Ma: A possible
anoxia-extinction-volcanism connection during
the Early–Middle Cambrian transition? Terra Nova
18:257–263, 3 fig., 1 table.
ICZN (International Commission on Zoological No-
menclature). 1999. International Code of Zoological
Nomenclature, 4th ed. International Trust for Zoo-
logical Nomenclature. London. 306 p.
ICZN (International Commission on Zoological No-
menclature). 2005. Erbocyathus Zhuravleva, 1955
(Archaeocyatha): not conserved; priority maintained
for Pluralicyathus Okulitch, 1950. Bulletin of Zoo-
logical Nomenclature 62:154–155.
Ilan, M., & Y. Loya. 1990. Ontogenetic variation in
sponge histocompatibility responses. Biological Bul-
letin 179:279–286, 3 fig., 1 table.
James, N. P., & D. I. Gravestock. 1990. Lower Cambri-
an shelf and shelf margin buildups, Flinders Ranges,
South Australia. Sedimentology 37:455–480, 16 fig.
James, N. P., & C. F. Klappa. 1983. Petrogenesis of
Early Cambrian reef limestones, Labrador, Canada.
Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 53:1051–1096,
22 fig., 2 tables.
170 Treatise Online, number XX
James, N. P., & D. R. Kobluk. 1978. Lower Cambrian
patch reefs and associated sediments: Southern Lab-
rador, Canada. Sedimentology 25:1–35, 12 fig., 1
table.
James, N. P., D. R. Kobluk, & C. F. Klappa. 1989. Early
Cambrian patch reefs, southern Labrador. In H. H. J.
Geldsetzer, N. P. James, & G. E. Tebbutt, eds., Reefs,
Canada and Adjacent Area. Canadian Society of
Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 13:141–150, 10 fig.
Jankauskas, T. V. 1964. O nekotorykh problem-
aticheskikh organicheskikh ostatkakh iz nizhnego
kembriya Vostochnogo Sayana [On some problemat-
ic organic fossils from the Lower Cambrian of eastern
Sayan]. In V. A. Ivaniya, ed., Materialy po Geologii
i Poleznym Iskopaemym Zapadnoy Sibiri. Doklady
Konferentsii, Posvyashchennoy 100-letiyu so Dnya
Rozhdeniya Akad. V. A. Obrucheva i 80-letiyu so
Dnya Rozhdeniya Akad. M. A. Usova [Materials
on the Geology and Natural Resources of Western
Siberia. Reports of the Conference Dedicated to the
100th Anniversary of Academician V. A. Obruchev
and 80th Anniversary of Academician M. A. Usov].
Tomskiy Universitet. Tomsk. p. 56–59, 1 pl.
Jankauskas, T. V. 1965. Pterotsiatidy—novyy otryad
kribritsiat [Pterocyathids—A new order of cribricy-
aths]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady 162:438–
440, 1 fig.
Jankauskas, T. V. 1969. Pterotsiatidy nizhnego kem-
briya Krasnoyarskogo kryazha (Vostochnyy Sayan)
[Pterocyathids from the Lower Cambrian of the
Krasnoyarsk Range (eastern Sayan)]. In I. T. Zhurav-
leva, ed., Biostratigrafiya i Paleontologiya Nizhnego
Kembriya Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka [Lower Cam-
brian Biostratigraphy and Paleontology of Siberia
and the Far East]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 114–157, 29
fig., pl. 43–50.
Jankauskas, T. V. 1972. Kribritsiaty nizhnego kembriya
Sibiri [Cribricyaths of the Lower Cambrian of Sibe-
ria]. In I. T. Zhuravleva, ed., Problemy Biostratigrafii
i Paleontologii Nizhnego Kembriya Sibiri [Problems
of Biostratigraphy and Paleontology of the Lower
Cambrian of Siberia]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 161–183,
19 fig., pl. 22–29.
Jankauskas, T. V. 1973. Opyt izucheniya kribritsiat
kembriya SSSR [Essay on the study of cribricyaths
from the Cambrian of the USSR]. Institut Geologii
i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Trudy 49:45–53, 2 fig.
Janussen, Dorte, Michael Steiner, & Zhu Maoyan.
2002. New well-preserved scleritomes of Chancel-
loriidae from the Early Cambrian Yuanshan Forma-
tion (Chengjiang, China) and the Middle Cambrian
Wheeler Shale (Utah, USA) and paleobiological im-
plications. Journal of Paleontology 76:596–606, 7 fig.
Jones, W. C. 1979. The microstructure and genesis of
sponge biominerals. In C. Lévi & N. Boury-Esnault,
eds., Biologie des Spongiaires. Colloques Interna-
tionaux du C.N.R.S. 291:425–447, 2 fig., 1 table.
Kaever, Matthias, & Peter Richter. 1976. Buschmannia
roeringi n. gen., n. sp. (Archaeocyatha) aus der Nama-
Gruppe Südwestafrikas. Paläontologische Zeitschrift
50:27–33, 1 fig., pl. 4.
Kashina, L. N. 1979. Morfologiya i sistematika arkheot-
siat nadsemeystva Erbocyathacea [Morphology and
systematics of archaeocyaths of the superfamily
Erbocyathacea]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Si-
birskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
406:40–57, 4 fig., pl. 3–10, 9 tables.
Kashina, L. N., & T. V. Jankauskas. 1973. K stratigrafii
i korrelyatsii nizhnekembriyskikh otlozheniy Mansk-
ogo progiba (Vostochnyy Sayan) [On the stratigraphy
and correlation of the Lower Cambrian deposits of
the Mana Depression (eastern Sayan)]. Institut Ge-
ologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Trudy 49:177–186, 2 fig., 1 table.
Kennard, J. M. 1991. Lower Cambrian archaeocyathan
buildups, Todd River Dolomite, northeast Ama-
deus Basin, central Australia: Sedimentology and
diagenesis. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology
and Geophysics, Australia, Bulletin 236:195–225,
28 fig., 3 tables.
Kerner, Adeline, Régine Vignes-Lebbe, & Françoise
Debrenne. 2011. Computer-aided identification
of the Archaeocyatha genera now available online.
Carnets de Géologie/Notebooks on Geology, Letter
2011/02(CG2011_L02):99–102, 2 fig.
Khain, E. V., E. V. Bibikova, E. B. Salnikova, A. Kröner,
A. S. Gibsher, A. N. Didenko, K. E. Degtyarev, &
A. A. Fedotova. 2003. The Paleo-Asian ocean in the
Neoproterozoic and Early Palaeozoic: New geochro-
nologic data and palaeotectonic reconstructions.
Precambrian Research 122:329–358, 13 fig., 3 tables.
Khalfina, V. K. 1960. Stromatoporoidei iz kembri-
yskikh otlozheniy Sibiri [Stromatoporoids of the
Cambrian deposits of Siberia]. Sibirskiy Nauchno-
Issledovatel’skiy Institut Geologii, Geofiziki i
Mineral’nogo Syr’ya, Trudy 8:79–83, pl. 5–7.
Kheraskova, T. N., A. N. Didenko, V. A. Bush, & Yu. A.
Volozh. 2003. The Vendian–Early Paleozoic history
of the continental margin of eastern Paleogondwana,
Paleoasian Ocean, and Central Asian Foldbelt. Rus-
sian Journal of Earth Sciences 5:165–184, 10 fig.
Khomentovskiy, V. V., & G. A. Karlova. 1986. O nizh-
ney granitse pestrotsvetnoy svity v basseyne r. Aldan
[On the lower boundary of the Pestrotsvet Formation
in the Aldan River basin]. In V. V. Khomentovskiy,
ed., Pozdniy Dokembriy i Ranniy Paleozoy Sibiri.
Sibirskaya Platforma i Vneshnyaya Zona Sayano-
Altayskoy Skladchatoy Oblasti [Late Precambrian
and Early Paleozoic of Siberia. Siberian Platform
and the Outer Zone of the Sayan-Altay Fold Belt].
Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie,
Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Novosibirsk. p. 3–22, 3 fig.
Kiessling, Wolfgang, Erik Flügel, & Jan Golonka.
2003. Patterns of Phanerozoic carbonate platform
sedimentation. Lethaia 36:195–226, 17 fig., 3 tables.
Kirschvink, J. L. 1992. A paleogeographic model for
Vendian and Cambrian time. In J. W. Schopf &
C. Klein, eds., The Proterozoic Biosphere. A Mul-
tidisciplinary Study. Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne. p. 567–581, fig.
12.1–12.11, table 12.1.
Kirschvink, J. L., R. L. Ripperdan, & D. A. Evans. 1997.
Evidence for a large-scale reorganization of Early Cam-
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 171
brian continental masses by inertial interchange true
polar wander. Science 277:541–545, 3 fig.
Kobluk, D. R., & N. P. James. 1979. Cavity-dwelling
organisms in Lower Cambrian patch reefs from
southern Labrador. Lethaia 12:193–218, 17 fig.
Koltun, V. M. 1988. Razvitie individual’nosti i stanovle-
nie individa u gubok [The development of individu-
ality and the becoming of the individual in sponges].
In V. M. Koltun & S. D. Stepan’yants, eds., Gubki
i Knidarii. Sovremennoe Sostoyanie i Perspektivy
Issledovaniy [Porifera and Cnidaria. Modern Status
and Perspectives of Investigation]. Zoologicheskiy
Ins titut, Akademiya Nauk SSS R. Leningrad. p.
24–36, 2 fig.
Konyushkov, K. N. 1967. Novye dannye po arkheot-
siatam gor Agyrek severo-vostochnogo Kazakhstana
[New data on the archaeocyaths of the Agyrek Moun-
tains in northeastern Kazakhstan]. Vsesoyuzniy
Nauchno-Issledovatel’skiy Geologicheskiy Institut,
Trudy, novaya seriya 129:104–113, 1 fig., pl. 1.
Konyushkov, K. N. 1972. Novye dannye po biostrati-
grafii kembriya i arkheotsiatam Zapadnogo Sayana
[New data on Cambrian biostratigraphy and archaeo-
cyaths of western Sayan]. In I. T. Zhuravleva, ed.,
Problemy Biostratigrafii i Paleontologii Nizhnego
Kembriya Sibiri [Problems of Lower Cambrian Bio-
stratigraphy and Paleontology of Siberia]. Nauka.
Moscow. p. 124–143, pl. 11–17, 1 table.
Konyushkov, K. N. 1978. Istoricheskoe razvitie
arkheotsiat i nekotorye voprosy ikh biologii [His-
torical development of archaeocyaths and questions
of their biology]. Ezhegodnik Vsesoyuznogo Pale-
ontologicheskogo Obshchestva 21:12–21, 12 fig.
Korde, K. B. 1959. Problematicheskie ostatki iz kembri-
yskikh otlozheniy yugo-vostoka Sibirskoy Platformy
[Problematic fossils from Cambrian strata of the
southeastern Siberian Platform]. Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Doklady 125:625–627, 1 fig.
Korde, K. b. 1975. Kembriyskie tselenteraty [Cam-
brian coelenterates]. In B. S. Sokolov, ed., Drevnie
Cnidaria [Ancient Cnidaria]. Nauka. Novosibirsk.
p. 53–56, 2 fig., 2 pl.
Korde, K. B. 1979. Novoe rodovoe nazvanie Yakovlevites
dlya arkheotsiat [A new genus name Yakovlevites for
archaeocyaths]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 3:126.
Korshunov, V. I. 1968. Gonamispongia—novyy rod
gubok semeystva Chancelloriidae [Gonamispongia
New sponge genus of the family Chancelloriidae].
Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 3:127–129, 1 fig.
Korshunov, V. I. 1972. Biostratigrafiya i Arkheotsiaty
Nizhnego Kembriya Severo-Vostoka Aldanskoy
Anteklizy [Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy and
Archaeocyaths of the Northeastern Aldan Anteclise].
Yakutskoe Knizhnoe Izdatel’stvo. Yakutsk. 128 p., 5
fig., 24 pl.
Korshunov, V. I. 1976. Novye predstaviteli podo-
tryada Coscinocyathina iz nizhnego kembriya yuga
Sibirskoy Platformy [New representatives of the
suborder Coscinocyathina from the Lower Cambrian
of the southern Siberian Platform]. Institut Geologii
i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Trudy 296:149–150, pl. 13.
Korshunov, V. I. 1983a. Arkheotsiaty nizhney chasti
atdabanskogo yarusa stratotipicheskogo razreza reki
Leny [Archaeocyaths of the lower Atdabanian stage in
the River Lena stratotype section]. Institut Geologii
i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Trudy 541:94–108, pl. 19–22.
Korshunov, V. I. 1983b. Novye arkheotsiaty iz otlo-
zheniy nizhnego kembriya basseyna r. Leny [New
archaeocyaths from the Lower Cambrian deposits
of the R. Lena basin]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki,
Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
541:108–112, pl. 23.
Korshunov, V. I., & I. T. Zhuravleva. 1967. Novye
vidy arkheotsiat iz nizhnego kembriya Yakutii [New
archaeocyath species from the Lower Cambrian of
Yakutia]. In A. B. Ivanovskiy & B. S. Sokolov, eds.,
Novye Dannye po Biostratigrafii Nizhnego Paleo-
zoya Sibirskoy Platformy [New Data on the Lower
Paleozoic Biostratigraphy of the Siberian Platform].
Nauka. Novosibirsk. p. 3–11, 2 fig., pl. 1–2.
Kotel’nikov, D. V. 1995. Novye vidy arkheotsiat nizh-
nekembriyskogo Vadi-Balinskogo organogennogo
kompleksa (tsentral’naya Tuva) [New archaeocyath
species from the Lower Cambrian of the Vadi-Bala
organogenic complex (central Tuva)]. Paleonto-
logicheskiy Zhurnal 2:21–29, fig. 1, pl. 2.
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1937. Vodorosli i arkheotsiaty
drevneyshikh tolshch Potekhinskogo plansheta
Khakassii [Algae and archaeocyaths from the oldest
formations of the Potekhino quadrangle of Khakas-
sia]. In M. A. Usov, ed., Materialy po Geologii
Krasnoyarskogo Kraya [Materials on the Geol-
ogy of the Krasnoyarsk Region]. Zapadno-Sibirskiy
Geologicheskiy Trest’, Tomsk 3:1–51, 8 fig., 8 pl.,
3 tables.
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1953. Osobennosti kameshkovskogo
kompleksa arkheotsiat v fatsii effuzivno-osadochnykh
otlozheniy na primere arkheotsiat zapadnoy chasti
Tuvy [Features of the Kameshki archaeocyathan as-
semblage in the facies of effusive-sedimentary deposits
exemplified by the archaeocyaths of the western part of
Tuva]. Tomskiy Gosudarstvenniy Universitet, Trudy,
seriya geologicheskaya 124:51–62, 4 pl., 1 table.
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1955. Tip Archaeocyathi. Arkheot-
siaty [Phylum Archaeocyatha. Archaeocyaths]. In
L. L. Khalfina, ed., Atlas Rukovodyashchikh Form
Iskopaemykh Fauny i Flory Zapadnoy Sibiri, Tom 1
[Atlas of the Index Forms of Fossil Fauna and Flora of
Western Siberia, vol. 1]. Gosudarstvennoe Nauchno-
Tekhnicheskoe Izdatel’stvo Literatury po Geologii
i Okhrane Nedr. Moscow. p. 17–21, 74–102, fig.
1–15, 117–156, pl. 1–10, table 2.
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1959. Arkheotsiaty gor Agyrek Pavl-
odarskoy oblasti Kazakhskoy SSR [Archaeocyaths of
the Agyrek Mountains, Pavlodar region of the Kazakh
SSR]. Akademiya Nauk Kazakhskoy SSR, Izvestiya,
seriya geologicheskaya 3(36):3–10, 3 fig., 2 pl.
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1960. K voprosu o sistematiches-
kom polozhenii arkheotsiat [On the question of
the systematic position of archaeocyaths]. Tomskiy
Gosudarstvenniy Universitet, Trudy, seriya geo-
logicheskaya 146:37–44, 6 pl.
172 Treatise Online, number XX
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1961. Novye arkheotsiaty iz ob-
ruchevskogo gorizonta Altae-Sayanskoy oblasti
[New archaeocyaths from the Obruchev Horizon
of the Altay-Sayan region]. Sibirskiy Nauchno-
Issledovatel’skiy Institut Geologii, Geofiziki i
Mineral’nogo Syr’ya, Trudy 5:247–253, 1 fig., 4 pl.
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1969. Osnovnye osobennosti mor-
fologii arkheotsiat [Basic features of the morphology
of archaeocyaths]. In I. T. Zhuravleva, ed., Biostrati-
grafiya i Paleontologiya Nizhnego Kembriya Sibiri i
Dal’nego Vostoka [Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy
and Paleontology of Siberia and the Far East]. Nauka.
Moscow. p. 60–65, pl. 26–29.
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1972. Nekotorye novye okamenelosti
kembriya zapadnoy Sibiri [Some new fossils from the
Cambrian of western Siberia]. In I. T. Zhuravleva,
ed., Problemy Biostratigrafii i Paleontologii Nizh-
nego Kembriya Sibiri [Problems of Lower Cambrian
Biostratigraphy and Paleontology of Siberia]. Nauka.
Moscow. p. 144–146, pl. 18–19.
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1978. Printsipy estestvennoy klas-
sifikatsii arkheotsiat (trubchatye arkheotsiaty) [Prin-
ciples of the natural classification of archaeocy-
aths (tubulose archaeocyaths)]. In A. R. Anan’ev,
ed., Stratigrafiya i Paleontologiya Sibiri i Urala
[Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Siberia and the
Urals]. Tomskiy Universitet. Tomsk. p. 76–84, 3 pl.
Krasnopeeva, P. S. 1980. Arkheotsiaty s trubkami v
intervallyume. Klass Syringoidea Krasnopeeva, 1953
[Archaeocyaths with tubules in the intervallum. Class
Syringoidea Krasnopeeva, 1953]. In I. T. Zhuravleva,
ed., Kembriy Altae-Sayanskoy Skladchatoy Oblasti
[Cambrian of the Altay Sayan Fold Belt]. Nauka.
Moscow. p. 151–160, 1 fig., pl. 21–22.
Krautter, Manfred. 1994. Observations on Eudea cla-
vata Lamouroux (Calcarea) from the Upper Jurassic
of Portugal. In R. W. M. van Soest, T. M. G. van
Kempen, & J. C. Braekman, eds., Sponges in Time
and Space. Balkema. Rotterdam. p. 29–34, 12 fig.
Kruse, P. D. 1978. New Archaeocyatha from the Early
Cambrian of the Mt. Wright area, New South Wales.
Alcheringa 2:27–47, 12 fig., 8 tables.
Kruse, P. D. 1982. Archaeocyathan biostratigraphy
of the Gnalta Group at Mt. Wright, New South
Wales. Palaeontographica (Abt. A) 177:129–212,
21 fig., 16 pl.
Kruse, P. D. 1991a. Are archaeocyaths sponges, or are
sponges archaeocyaths? In J. B. Jago & P. J. Moore,
eds., The Evolution of a Late Precambrian–Early
Palaeozoic Rift Complex: The Adelaide Geosyncline.
Geological Society of Australia, Special Publication
16:310–323, 9 fig.
Kruse, P. D. 1991b. Cyanobacterial-archaeocyathan-
radiocyathan bioherms in the Wirrealpa Limestone of
South Australia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
28:601–615, 14 fig., 2 tables.
Kruse, P. D., & Françoise Debrenne. 1989. Review
of archaeocyath microstructure. Association of
Australasian Palaeontologists, Memoir 8:133–141,
5 fig.
Kruse, P. D., Anna Gandin, Françoise Debrenne, &
Rachel Wood. 1996. Early Cambrian bioconstruc-
tions in the Zavkhan Basin of western Mongolia.
Geological Magazine 133:429–444, 10 fig., 1 table.
Kruse, P. D., & P. W. West. 1980. Archaeocyatha of the
Amadeus and Georgina Basins. BMR Journal of Aus-
tralian Geology and Geophysics 5:165–181, 13 fig.
Kruse, P. D., A. Yu. Zhuravlev, & N. P. James. 1995.
Primordial metazoan-calcimicrobial reefs: Tom-
motian (Early Cambrian) of the Siberian Platform.
PALAIOS 10:291–321, 13 fig., 2 tables.
Lafuste, Jean, & Françoise Debrenne. 1970. Observa-
tion en lames ultra-minces de la microstructure
d’Archéocyathes. Société Géologique de France,
Comptes Rendus Sommaires des Séances 6:224–225,
1 fig.
Lafuste, Jean, & Françoise Debrenne. 1977. Présence
de deux types de microstructure chez Archaeocyathus
atlanticus Billings (Cambrien inférieur, Labrador,
Canada). Géobios 10:103–107, 2 fig., 1 pl.
Lafuste, Jean, & Françoise Debrenne. 1982. Différences
microstructurales entre formes à une seule muraille
et formes à deux murailles chez les archéocyathes
réguliers: Faut-il “couper” les Monocyathida des Ar-
chaeocyatha? Société Géologique de France, Réunion
Annuelle des Sciences de la Terre 9:350, 2 fig.
Landing, Ed. 1998. Cambrian subdivisions and cor-
relations: Introduction. Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences 35:321–322.
Landing, Ed. 2011. No Late Cambrian shoreline ice in
Laurentia. GSA Today 21:e19.
Landing, Ed, & K. E. Bartowski. 1996. Oldest shelly
fossils from the Taconic Allochthon and late Early
Cambrian sea-levels in eastern Laurentia. Journal of
Paleontology 70:741–761, 11 fig., 1 table.
Landing, Ed, & B. A. MacGabhann. 2010. First evi-
dence for Cambrian glaciations provided by sections
in Avalonian New Brunswick and Ireland: Additional
data for Avalon-Gondwana separation by the earli-
est Palaeozoic. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology 285:174–185, 7 fig.
Landing, Ed, G. M. Narbonne, Paul Myrow, A. P.
Benus, & M. M. Anderson. 1988. Faunas and
depositional environments of the Upper Precam-
brian through Lower Cambrian, southeastern New-
foundland. In E. Landing, G. M. Narbonne, & P.
Myrow, eds., Trace Fossils, Small Shelly Fossils and
the Precambrian-Cambrian Boundary. Proceedings,
August 8–18, 1987, Memorial University. New York
State Museum, Bulletin 463:18–52, 33 fig.
Lang, W. D., & Stanley Smith. 1939. Some new generic
names for Palaeozoic corals. Annals and Magazine of
Natural History (series 11) 3:152–156, pl. 4.
Lasemi, Yaghoob, & Hadi Amin-Rasouli. 2007. Ar-
chaeocyathan buildups within an entirely siliciclastic
succession: New discovery in the Toyonian Lalun
Formation of northern Iran, the Proto-Palaeotethys
passive margin of northern Gondwana. Sedimentary
Geology 201:302–320, 12 fig.
Lieberman, B. S. 1997. Early Cambrian paleogeography
and tectonic history: A biogeographic approach.
Geology 25:1039–1042, 3 fig.
Lowenstam, H. A. 1981. Minerals formed by organ-
isms. Science 211(4487):1126–1131, 3 fig.
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 173
Luo Huilin, Jiang Zhiwen, Wu Xiche, Song Xueliang,
Ouyang Lin, & others. 1982. [The Sinian-Cambrian
Boundary i n E aster n Yunn an, China]. Peo ple’s
Publishing House. Kunming. 265 p., 14 fig., 22
pl., 8 tables.
Mansy, J.-L., Françoise Debrenne, & A. Yu. Zhurav-
lev. 1993. Calcaires à archéocyathes du cambrien
inférieur du nord de la Colombie Britannique (Can-
ada). Implications paléogéographiques et précisions
sur l’extension du continent Américano-Koryakien.
Géobios 26:643–683, 11 fig., 7 pl., 2 tables.
Maslov, A. B. 1957. O novom predstavitele semeystva
Ethmophyllidae Okulitch, 1943 iz kembriya Chitins-
koy oblasti s sokhranivshimsya vnutrennim organom
[On a new representative of the family Ethmophyl-
lidae Okulitch, 1943 from the Cambrian of the Chita
region with preserved internal organ]. Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Doklady 117:307–309, 2 fig.
Maslov, A. B. 1960. Novyy vid roda Rhabdocnema Oku-
litch, 1943, s pel’toy v verkhney chasti kubka [A new
species of the genus Rhabdocnema Okulitch, 1943,
with pelta at the upper part of the cup]. Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Doklady 130:1117–1119, 1 fig.
Maslov, A. B. 1961. O novykh nakhodkakh arkheot-
siat s pel’tami v verkhney chasti kubkov [On new
discoveries of archaeocyaths with peltae at the upper
part of the cup]. Moskovskoe Obshchestvo Ispy-
tatelei Prirody, Byulleten’, seriya geologicheskaya
36(6):121–122.
Matthew, G. F. 1886. IV. Illustrations of the fauna of
the St. John group continued, no. III—Descriptions
of new genera and species (including a description
of a new species of Solenopleura by J. W. Whiteaves).
Royal Society of Canada, Transactions, 1885, 3, sec-
tion 4:29–84, pl. 5–7.
McCollum, L. B., & D. M. Miller. 1991. Cambrian
stratigraphy of the Wendover area, Utah and Nevada.
United States Geological Survey, Bulletin 1948:1–43,
17 fig.
McKerrow, W. S., C. R. Scotese, & M. D. Brasier. 1992.
Early Cambrian continental reconstructions. Journal
of the Geological Society, London 149:599–606, 3
fig., 1 table.
McMenamin, M. A. S., Françoise Debrenne, & A.
Yu. Zhuravlev. 2000. Early Cambrian Appalachian
archaeocyaths: Further age constraints from the
fauna of New Jersey and Virginia, U.S.A. Géobios
33:693–708, 6 fig.
Meek, F. B. 1868a. Preliminary notice of a remarkable
new genus of corals, probably typical of a new family.
American Journal of Science (series 2) 45:62–64.
Meek, F. B. 1868b. Note on Ethmophyllum and Ar-
chaeocyathus. American Journal of Science (series
2) 46:144.
Meert, J. G., & B. S. Lieberman. 2008. The Neopro-
terozoic assembly of Gondwana and its relationship
to the Ediacaran-Cambrian radiation. Gondwana
Research 14:5–21, 8 fig.
Meglitskiy, N. G. 1851. Geognostische Bemerkungen
aus einer Reise in Ost-Sibirien im Jahre 1850.
Russisch-Kaiserliche Mineralogische Gesellschaft zu
St Petersburg, Verhandlungen 1851:118–162, 8 fig.
Mehl, Dorte. 1996. Organization and microstruc-
ture of chancelloriid skeleton: Implications for the
biomineralization of the Chancelloriidae. Bulletin
de l’Institut Océanographique de Monaco, Numero
Special 14(4):377–385, 2 fig.
Mel’nikov, N. V., V. A. Astashkin, L. I. Kilina, & B.
B. Shishkin. 1989. Paleogeografiya Sibirskoy plat-
formy v rannem kembrii [Paleogeography of the
Siberian Platform in the Early Cambrian]. In R. G.
Matukhin, ed., Paleogeografiya Fanerozoya Sibiri
[Paleogeography of the Phanerozoic of Siberia]. Si-
birskiy Nauchno-Issledovatel’skiy Institut Geologii,
Geofiziki i Mineral’nogo Syr’ya. Novosibirsk. p.
10–17, 4 fig.
Mel’nikov, B. N., A. Yu. Rozanov, M. V. Susov, & V.
D. Fonin. 1986. Pervye arkheotsiaty iz nizhnego
kembriya tsentral’nogo Irana [First archaeocyaths
from the Lower Cambrian of central Iran]. Aka-
demiya Nauk SSSR, Izvestiya, seriya geologicheskaya
7:134–138, 4 fig.
Melville, R. V. 1974. Opinion 1007. Coscinocyathus
Bornemann, 1884 (Archaeocyatha): Designation of
a type-species under the plenary powers. Bulletin of
Zoological Nomenclature 30:155–156.
Meneghini, G. 1881. Nuovi trilobiti di Sardinia. Atti
Societa Toscanà Scienze Naturali, Processi verbali,
volume 2 (1879–1881). Pisa. p. 199–202.
Merriam, C. W. 1974 (imprint 1973). Middle Devo-
nian rugose corals of the central Great Basin. United
States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 799:iv
+ 53 p., 14 pl.
Metelkin, D. V., & A. Yu. Kazanskiy. 2002. Paleomag-
nito-tektonicheskaya kharakteristika kembriyskikh
kompleksov Batenevskogo kryazha [Paleomagnetic-
tectonic characteristics of the Cambrian complexes
of the Batenev Range]. In A. K. Gapeev, ed., Paleo-
magnetizm i Magnetizm Gornykh Porod: Teoriya,
Praktika, Eksperiment. Materialy Seminara. Borok
19–22 Oktyabrya 2002 g. [Paleomagnetism and
Magnetism of Rocks: Theory, Practice, Experiment.
Materials for the Seminar. Borok 19–22 October
2002]. GEOS. Moscow. p. 58–60.
Meyen, S. V. 1988. Nomothetical plant morphol-
ogy and the nomothetical theory of evolution:
The need for cross-pollination. Acta Biotheoritica
27(7):21–36, 2 fig.
Meyrick, E. 1881. Descriptions of Australian micro-
Lepidoptera. Linnean Society of New South Wales,
Proceedings 1(6):629–706.
Mikhal’tsev, N. E., A. Yu. Kazanskiy, & N. V. Sen-
nikov. 2002. Peresekala li Tuva paleoekvator? [If Tuva
crossed the paleoequator?]. In A. K. Gapeev, ed., Pa-
leomagnetizm i Magnetizm Gornykh Porod: Teoriya,
Praktika, Eksperiment. Materialy Seminara. Borok
19–22 Oktyabrya 2002 g. [Paleomagnetism and
Magnetism of Rocks: Theory, Practice, Experiment.
Materials for the Seminar. Borok 19–22 October
2002]. GEOS. Moscow. p. 63–65.
Milne-Edwards, Henri, & Jules Haime. 1848. Recher-
ches sur les polypiers. Mémoire 2, Monographie
des turbinolides. Annales des Sciences Naturelles,
Zoologie (série 3) 9:211–344, pl. 7–10.
174 Treatise Online, number XX
Milne-Edwards, Henri, & Jules Haime. 1850. A mono-
graph of the British fossil corals, Pt. 1, Introduction:
Corals from the Tertiary and Cretaceous formations.
Palaeontographical Society, Monograph 3(7):lxxxv +
72 p., 11 pl.
Missarzhevskiy, V. V. 1961. Rannekembriyskie arkheot-
siaty basseyna reki Shivelig-Khem [Early Cambrian
archaeocyaths from the River Shivelig-Khem basin].
Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 4:19–23, 1 fig., 1 pl.
Missarzhevskiy, V. V., & A. Yu. Rozanov. 1962. K mor-
fologii naruzhnykh stenok pravil’nykh arkheostiat
[On the morphology of the outer wall of regular ar-
chaeocyaths]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 2:34–44,
6 fig., pl. 3.
Moores, E. M. 1991. Southwest U.S.-East Antarc-
tic (SWEAT) connection: A hypothesis. Geology
19:425–428, 3 fig.
Moreno-Eiris, Elena. 1987. Los montículos arrecifales
de Algas y Arqueociatos del Cámbrico inferior de
Sierra Morena, I: Estratigrafía y facies. Boletín
Geológico y Minero 98(3):295–317, 12 fig., 2 pl.
Moreno-Eiris, Elena. 1994. Lower Cambrian reef
mounds of Sierra Morena (SW Spain). Courier
Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 172:185–192,
fig. 7.
Morgan, N. 1976. The Montenegro bioherms: Their
paleoecology, relation to other archaeocyathid bio-
herms and to Early Cambrian sedimentation in the
White and Inyo Mountains, California. In J. N.
Moore & A. E. Fritsche, eds., Depositional Environ-
ments of Lower Paleozoic Rocks in the White-Inyo
Mountains, Inyo County, California. Pacific Coast
Paleogeography Field Guide 1. Society of Economic
Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section.
Los Angeles. p. 13–17.
Mount, J. F., & P. W. Signor. 1992. Faunas and facies—
Fact and artifact. Paleoenvironmental controls on the
distribution of Early Cambrian faunas. In J. H. Lipps
& P. W. Signor, eds., Origin and Early Evolution of
the Metazoa. Plenum Press. New York & London. p.
27–51, 4 fig., 3 tables.
Musatov, D. I., V. N. Nemirovskaya, E. V. Shirokova,
& I. T. Zhuravleva. 1961. Sretenskiy opornyy razrez
nizhnego kembriya v Vostochnom Sayane [Sretenka
reference section of the Lower Cambrian in eastern
Sayan]. In A. V. Kryukov, ed., Materialy po Geologii
i Poleznym Iskopaemym Krasnoyarskogo Kraya 2
[Materials on Geology and Natural Resources of
the Krasnoyarsk Region 2]. Krasnoyarsk Publishing
House. Krasnoyarsk. p. 3–49, 1 fig., 7 pl., 2 tables.
Myagkova, E. I. 1985. Tip Receptaculita [Phylum
Receptaculita]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Si-
birskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
632:44–51, pl. 21.
Naimark, E. B., & A. Yu. Rozanov. 1997. Zakono-
mernosti razvitiya regional’nykh faun pravil’nykh
arkheotsiat [Regularities in the development of
regional faunas of regular archaeocyaths]. Strati-
grafiya, Geologicheskaya Korrelyatsiya 5:67–78, 6
fig., 10 tables.
Nitecki, M. H. 1972. North American Silurian recep-
taculitid algae. Fieldiana, Geology 28:xii + 108, 45
fig., 1 table.
Nitecki, M. H., & Françoise Debrenne. 1979. The
nature of radiocyathids and their relationship to recep-
taculitids and archaeocyathids. Géobios 12:5–27, 5 pl.
Nit ecki, M. H., & H. Mutvei. 1996. Nature and
mineralogy of receptaculitid skeleton. Bulletin de
l’Institut Océanographique de Monaco, Numero
Special 14(4):287–294, 3 fig.
Nitecki, M. H., H. Mutvei, & D. V. Nitecki. 1999.
Receptaculitids. A Phylogenetic Debate on a Prob-
lematic Fossil Taxon. Kluwer Academic/Plenum
Publishers. New York. xvii + 241 p., 81 fig.
Nitecki, M. H., & D. F. Toomey. 1979. Nature and
classification of receptaculitids. Centre de Recherche
et d’Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine, Bulletin
3:725–732.
Nitecki, M. H., I. T. Zhuravleva, E. I. Myagkova, &
D. F. Toomey. 1981. Skhodstvo Soanites bimuralis
s arkheotsiatami i retseptakulitami [Similarity of
Soanites bimuralis to archaeocyaths and receptacu-
litids]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 1:5–9, 1 fig.
Okulitch, V. J. 1935. Cyathospongia—A new class
of Porifera to include the Archaeocyathinae. Royal
Society of Canada, Transactions (series 3, section 4)
29:75–106, 3 fig., 2 pl.
Okulitch, V. J. 1937a. Some changes in nomenclature
of Archaeocyathi (Cyathospongia). Journal of Pale-
ontology 11:251–252.
Okulitch, V. J. 1937b. Changes in nomenclature of
Archaeocyathi (Cyathospongia). Proceedings of the
Geological Society of America 1936:358.
Okulitch, V. J. 1940. Revision of type Pleospongia from
eastern Canada. Royal Society of Canada, Transac-
tions (series 3, section 4) 34:75–87, 3 pl.
Okulitch, V. J. 1943. North American Pleospongia.
Geological Society of America, Special Paper 48:vii
+ 112 p., 19 fig., 18 pl., 1 table.
Okulitch, V. J. 1950a. Vacuocyathus a new name for
Coelocyathus Vologdin, 1933. Journal of Paleontol-
ogy 24:392–393.
Okulitch, V. J. 1950b. Nomenclatural notes on pleo-
sponge genera Archaeocyathus, Spirocyathus, Flindersi-
cyathus, Pycnoidocyathus and Cambrocyathus. Journal
of Paleontology 24:393–395.
Okulitch, V. J. 1950c. Pluralicyathus, new name for
Polycyathus Vologdin, 1928 not Duncan, 1876.
Journal of Paleontology 24:503.
Okulitch, V. J. 1955a. Archaeocyatha. In R. C. Moore,
ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part
E. Geological Society of America & University of
Kansas. New York & Lawrence. p. 1–20, fig. 1–13.
Okulitch, V. J. 1955b. Archaeocyatha from the Mc-
Dame area of northern British Columbia. Royal
Society of Canada, Transactions (series 3, section 4)
49:47–64, 3 pl.
Okulitch, V. J., & M. W. de Laubenfels. 1953. The
systematic position of Archaeocyatha (Pleosponges).
Journal of Paleontology 27:481–485.
Okulitch, V. J., & E. F. Roots. 1947. Lower Cambrian
fossils from the Aiken Lake area, British Columbia.
Royal Society of Canada, Transactions (series 3, sec-
tion 4) 41:37–46, pl. 1.
Okuneva, O. G. 1967. Novyy podrod monotsiatid iz
nizhnego kembriya Primor’ya [A new subgenus of
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 175
monocyathids from the Lower Cambrian of Primo-
rye]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 1:132–135, 2 fig.
Okuneva, O. G. 1969. K biostratigrafii nizhnego kem-
briya Primor’ya (Spasskiy i Chernigovskiy rayony)
[On the biostratigraphy of the Lower Cambrian of
Primorye (Spassk and Chernigovka regions)]. In I.
T. Zhuravleva, ed., Biostratigrafiya i Paleontologiya
Nizhnego Kembriya Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka [Lower
Cambrian Biostratigraphy and Palaeontology of Si-
beria and the Far East]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 66–85,
2 fig., pl. 30–33.
Okuneva, O. G. 1972. Novyy predstavitel’ rannekem-
briyskikh arkheotsiat Primor’ya [A new representative
of Early Cambrian archaeocyaths from Primorye].
In I. E. Zanina, ed., Novye Vidy Drevnikh Rasteniy
i Bespozvonochnykh SSSR [New Species of Plants
and Invertebrates of the USSR]. Nauka. Moscow.
p. 57–58, pl. 10.
Okuneva, O. G., & L. N. Repina. 1973. Biostratigrafiya
i Fauna Kembriya Primor’ya [Biostratigraphy and
Fauna of the Cambrian of Primorye]. Institut Geolo-
gii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Trudy 37:284 p., 104 fig., 46 pl., 10 tables.
Omara, Sayed. 1972. An early Cambrian outcrop
in southwestern Sinai, Egypt. Neues Jahrbuch für
Mineralogie und Paläontologie, Monatschefte 5:306–
314, 3 fig.
Öpik, A. A. 1975. Cymbric Vale fauna of New South
Wales and Early Cambrian biostratigraphy. Bureau
of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics,
Australia, Bulletin 159:iv + 78 p., 14 fig., 7 pl.
Osadchaya, D. V. 1979. Biogeograficheskoe ray-
onirovanie Altae-Sayanskogo morskogo rannekem-
briyskogo basseyna v sanashtykgol’skoe vremya
(po arkheotsiatam) [Biogeographic division of
the Altay-Sayan marine Early Cambrian basin in
Sanashtykgol time (according to archaeocyaths)].
In O. A. Betekhtina & I. T. Zhuravleva, eds., Sreda
i Zhizn’ v Geologicheskom Proshlom. Voprosy
Ekostratigrafii [Environment and Life in the Geo-
logical Past. Problems of Ecostratigraphy]. Institut
Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Trudy 431:76–86, 1 fig., 2 tables.
Osadchaya, D. V., & T. Yu. Ganachkova. 1986. Neko-
torye arkheotsiaty Atdabanskogo yarusa Altae-Sayan-
skoy skladchatoy oblasti [Some archaeocyaths from
the Atdabanian stage of the Altay-Sayan fold region].
Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie,
Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 669:169–183, pl.
18–24.
Osadchaya, D. V., L. N. Kashina, I. T. Zhuravleva, N.
P. Borodina, & A. S. Boyarinov. 1979. Stratigrafiya
i Arkheotsiaty Nizhnego Kembriya Altae-Sayanskoy
Oblasti [Lower Cambrian Stratigraphy and Archaeo-
cyaths of the Altay-Sayan Region]. Nauka. Moscow.
215 p., 20 fig., 28 pl., 9 tables.
Osadchaya, D. V., & D. V. Kotel’nikov. 1998. Archaeo-
cyathids from the Atdabanian (Lower Cambrian)
of the Altay-Sayan Foldbelt, Russia. Geodiversitas
20:5–18, 11 fig.
Ott, Ernst. 1974. Phragmocoelia n. g. (Sphinctozoa),
ein segmentierter Kalkschwamm mit neuem Fül-
lgewebetyp aus der Alpinen Trias. Neues Jahr-
buch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatschefte
12:712–723, 4 fig.
Özdikmen, Hüseyin. 2009. Substitute names for eight
sponge genus group names (Porifera). Munis Ento-
mology & Zoology 4:212–218.
Palmer, A. R. 1998. Why is intercontinental correla-
tion within the Lower Cambrian so difficult? Revista
Española de Paleontología, numero extraordinario,
Homenaje al Prof. Gonzalo Vidal. Sociedad Española
de Paleontología. Oviedo. p. 17–21, 4 fig.
Palmer, A. R., & N. P. James. 1980. The Hawke Bay
event: A circum-Iapetus regression near the Lower-
Middle Cambrian boundary. In D. R. Wones, ed.,
Proceedings, Caledonides in the U.S.A. Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and State Department of Geo-
logical Sciences, Memoirs 2:15–18, 2 fig.
Palmer, A. R., & L. N. Repina. 1993. Through a glass
darkly: Taxonomy, phylogeny, and biostratigraphy
of the Olenellina. University of Kansas Paleonto-
logical Contributions (new series) 3:1–35, 13 fig.,
2 tables.
Palmer, A. R., & A. J. Rowell. 1995. Early Cambrian
trilobites from the Shackleton Limestone of the
central Transantarctic Mountains. Paleontological
Society, Memoir 45:1–28, 18 fig.
Parrish, J. T., A. M. Ziegler, C. R. Scotese, R. G. Hum-
phreville, & J. L. Kirschvink. 1986. Proterozoic and
Cambrian phosphorites—Specialist studies: Early
Cambrian palaeogeography, palaeoceanography and
phosporites. In P. J. Cook & J. H. Shergold, eds.,
Phosphate Deposits of the World, vol. 1, Proterozoic
and Cambrian Phosphorites. Cambridge University
Press. Cambridge. p. 280–294, 5 fig., 2 tables.
Paulsen, T. S., J. Encarnación, A. M. Grunow, P. W.
Layer, & M. Watkeys. 2007. New age constraints for
a short pulse in Ross Orogen deformation triggered
by East-West Gondwana suturing. Gondwana Re-
search 12:417–427, 8 fig.
Pegel, T. V. 2000. Evolution of trilobite biofacies in
Cambrian basins of the Siberian Platform. Journal
of Paleontology 74:1000–1019, 15 fig.
Pel’man, Yu. L., V. V. Ermak, A. B. Fedorov, V. A.
Luchinina, I. T. Zhuravleva, L. N. Repina, V. I.
Bondarev, & Z. V. Borodaevskaya. 1990. Novye
dannye po stratigrafii i paleontologii verkhnego
dokembriya i nizhnego kembriya r. Dzhandy (pravyy
pritok r. Aldan) [New data on Upper Precambrian
and Lower Cambrian stratigraphy and paleontology
of the Dzhanda River (right tributary of the Aldan
River)]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Ot-
delenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 765:3–32,
2 fig., pl. 1–3.
Peng Shanchi, & L. E. Babcock. 2011. Continuing
progress on chronostratigraphic subdivision of the
Cambrian System. Bulletin of Geosciences, Czech
Geological Survey 86:391–396, 1 fig.
Perejón, Antonio. 1971. Pachecocyathus, nuevo género
de Archaeocyáthidos del Cámbrico español. Estudios
geológicos 27:81–83, 1 pl.
Perejón, Antonio. 1973. Contribución al conocimiento
de los Arqueociátidos de los yacimientos de Alconera
(Badajoz). Estudios geológicos 29:179–206, 2 fig.,
7 pl., 8 tables.
176 Treatise Online, number XX
Perejón, Antonio. 1975a. Arqueociatos de los sub-
órdenes Monocyathina y Dokidocyathina. Real So-
ciedad Española de Historia Natural, Boletín, sección
geológica 73:125–145, 3 pl., 4 tables.
Perejón, Antonio. 1975b. Arqueociatos Regulares del
Cámbrico inferior de Sierra Morena (SW de España).
Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural, Boletín,
sección geológica 73:147–193, 7 pl., 4 tables.
Perejón, Antonio. 1975c. Nuevas faunas de Arqueo-
ciatos del Cámbrico inferior de Sierra Morena (I).
Tecniterrae 8:8–29, 3 fig., 4 pl., 7 tables.
Perejón, Antonio. 1976. Nuevos datos sobre los Ar-
queociatos de Sierra Morena. Estudios geológicos
32:5–33, 6 pl., 2 tables.
Perejón, Antonio. 1977. Arqueociatos con túmulos en
el Cámbrico inferior de Córdoba (Sierra Morena ori-
ental). Estudios geológicos 33:545–555, 4 fig., 2 pl.
Perejón, Antonio. 1984. Bioestratigrafía de los Ar-
queociatos en España. Cuadernos de Geología Ibérica
9:213–265, 8 tables.
Perejón, Antonio. 1989. Arqueociatos del Ovietense en
la sección del Arroyo Pedroche. Sierra de Córdoba,
España. Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural,
Boletín, sección geológica 84:143–247, 6 fig., 13
pl., 9 tables.
Perejón, Antonio. 1994. Palaeogeographic and biostrati-
graphic distribution of Archaeocyatha in Spain. Cou-
rier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 172:341–354,
7 fig., 1 table.
Perejón, Antonio, Michael Fröhler, Thilo Bechstädt,
Elena Moreno-Eiris, & Maria Boni. 2000. Archaeo-
cyathan assemblages from the Gonnesa Group, Lower
Cambrian (Sardinia, Italy) and their sedimentologic
context. Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Itali-
ana 39:257–291, 5 fig., 6 pl.
Perejón, Antonio, & Elena Moreno. 1978. Nuevos
datos sobre la fauna de Arqueociatos y las facies
carbonatadas de la serie de Los Campillos (Urda,
Montes de Toledo orientales). Estudios geológicos
34:193–204, 8 fig., 1 pl.
Perejón, Antonio, & Elena Moreno-Eiris. 2006. Biostra-
tigraphy and paleobiogeography of the archaeocyaths
on the southwestern margin of Gondwana. Deutsche
Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften, Zeitschrift
157:611–627, 5 fig.
Pickett, John. 1985. Vaceletia, a living archaeocyathid.
Hornibrook Symposium, Christchurch. New Zea-
land Geological Survey, Record 9:468.
Pickett, John, & J. K. Rigby. 1983. Sponges from
the Early Devonian Garra Formation, New South
Wales. Journal of Paleontology 57:720–741, 9 fig.,
1 table.
Pillola, G. L., F. Leone, J. A. Gámez-Vintaned, E.
Liñán, M. P. Dabard, & J.-J. Chauvel. 1994. The
Lower Cambrian ichnospecies Astropolichnus his-
panicus: Palaeoenvironmental and palaeogeographic
significance. In R. Matteucci, M. G. Carboni, & J. S.
Pignatti, eds., Studies on Ecology and Paleoecology
of Benthic Communities. Bollettino della Società
Paleontologica Italiana, special volume 2:253–267,
6 fig., 2 pl.
Pratt, B. R., B. R. Spincer, R. A. Wood, & A. Yu.
Zhuravlev. 2001. Ecology and evolution of Cam-
brian reefs. In A. Yu. Zhuravlev & R. Riding, eds.,
The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia
University Press. New York. p. 254–274, 4 fig.
Radugin, K. V. 1962. O rannikh formakh arkheotsiat
[On early forms of archaeocyaths]. In L. N. Kraevskiy
& A. R. Anan’ev, eds., Novye Dannye po Paleontolo-
gii i Stratigrafii Zapadnoy Sibiri [New Data on the
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Western Siberia].
Materialy po Geologii Zapadnoy Sibiri 63. Tomskiy
Universitet. Tomsk. p. 7–10, 1 fig.
Radugin, K. V. 1964. O novoy gruppe drevneyshikh
zhivotnykh [On a new group of the oldest animals].
Geologiya i Geofizika 1:145–149, 1 fig., 1 pl.
Radugin, K. V. 1966. Problema Pozdnego Protero-
zoya (Materialy k Izucheniyu Geologii Pozd-
nego Dokembriya Sibiri). Chast’ 1: Primitivnye
Arkheotsiaty Pozdnego Proterozoya [The Problem
of the Late Proterozoic (Materials for the Study
of the Geology of the Late Precambrian of Sibe-
ria). Part 1: Primitive Archaeocyaths of the Late
Proterozoic]. Tomskiy Universitet. Tomsk. 140
p., 7 pl.
Raymond, P. E. 1931. The systematic position of the
Archaeocyathinae. Museum of Comparative Zoology,
Bulletin 55:172–177, 2 pl.
Rees, M. N., B. R. Pratt, & A. J. Rowell. 1989. Early
Cambrian reefs, reef complexes, and associated litho-
facies of the Shackleton Limestone, Transantarctic
Mountains. Sedimentology 36:341–361, 22 fig.
Reiswig, H. M. 1971. In situ pumping activities of
tropical Demospongiae. Marine Biology 9:38–50,
14 fig.
Reitlinger, E. A. 1948. Kembriyskie foraminifery Yaku-
tii [Cambrian foraminifers of Yakutia]. Moskovskoe
Obshchestvo Ispytatelei Prirody, Byulleten’, Otdel
geologicheskiy 23(2):77–81, 1 pl.
Reitner, Joachim. 1991. Phylogenetic aspects and new
descriptions of spicule-bearing hadromerid sponges
with a secondary calcareous skeleton (Tetractinomor-
pha, Demospongiae). In J. Reitner & H. Keupp, eds.,
Fossil and Recent Sponges. Springer-Verlag. Berlin
& Heidelberg. p. 179–211, 15 fig.
Reitner, Joachim. 1992. “Coralline Spongien.” Der
Versuch einer phylogenetisch-taxonomischen Anal-
yse. Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen E
1:352 p., 90 fig., 62 pl.
Reitner, Joachim, & Theo Engeser. 1985. Revision
der Demospongier mit einem Thalamiden, aragoni-
tischen Basalskelett und trabeculärer Internstruktur
(“Sphinctozoa” pars). Berliner Geowissenschaftliche
Abhandlungen A 60:151–193, 10 fig., 6 pl.
Reitner, Joachim, & T. S. Engeser. 1987. Skeletal
structures and habitats of Recent and fossil Acantho-
chaetetes (subclass Tetractinomorpha, Demospongiae,
Porifera). Coral Reefs 6:13–18, 15 fig.
Reitner, Joachim, & Dorte Mehl. 1995. Early Paleozoic
diversification of sponges: New data and evidences.
Geologica Paläontologica Mitteilungen Innsbruck
20:335–347, 1 fig., 2 pl.
Repina, L. N., V. V. Khomentovskiy, I. T. Zhuravleva,
& A. Yu. Rozanov. 1964. Biostratigrafiya Nizhnego
Kembriya Sayano-Altayskoy Skladchatoy Oblasti
[Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy of the Sayan-Altay
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 177
Fold Belt]. Nauka. Moscow. 365 p., 56 fig., 48 pl.,
20 tables.
Riding, Robert. 1975. Girvanella and other algae as
depth indicators. Lethaia 8:173–179.
Riding, Robert. 2001. Calcified algae and bacteria. In A.
Yu. Zhuravlev & Robert Riding, eds., The Ecology of
the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia University Press.
New York. p. 445–473, 3 fig., 1 table.
Riding, Robert, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1995. Struc-
ture and diversity of oldest sponge-microbe reefs:
Lower Cambrian, Aldan River, Siberia. Geology
23:649–652, 4 fig.
Rietschel, Siegfried. 1977. Receptaculitids are calcare-
ous algae, but not dasyclads. In E. Flügel, ed., Fossil
Algae. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Heidelberg, New
York. p. 212–214.
Rigby, J. K., Fan Jiasong, & Zhang Wei. 1989.
Sphinctozoan sponges from the Permian reefs of
South China. Journal of Paleontology 63:404–439,
20 fig.
Rigby, J. K., & R. A. Gangloff. 1987. Phylum Archaeo-
cyatha. In R. S. Boardman, A. H. Cheetham, & A.
J. Rowell, eds., Fossil Invertebrates. Blackwell. Palo
Alto. p. 107–115, 10 fig.
Rigby, J. K., & M. H. Nitecki. 1975. An unusually
well preserved heteractinid sponge from the Penn-
sylvanian of Illinois and a possible classification and
evolutionary scheme for the Heteractinida. Journal
of Paleontology 49:329–339, 3 fig., 1 pl.
Rigby, J. K., & A. W. Potter. 1986. Ordovician sphinc-
tozoan sponges from the eastern Klamath Mountains,
northern California. Paleontological Society, Memoir
20:1–47, 11 fig., 1 table.
Riisgard, H. U. 1993. Fluid motion and particle reten-
tion in the gills of Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology
116:61–71, 13 fig.
Rino, S., Y. Kon, W. Sato, S. Maruyama, M. San-
tosh, & D. Zhao. 2008. The Grenvillian and
Pan-African orogens: World’s largest orogenies
through geologic time, and their implications on
the origin of superplume. Gondwana Research
14:51–72, 15 fig.
Romanenko, E. V. 1968. Kembriyskie gubki otryada
Heteractinellida Altaya [Cambrian sponges of the
order Heteractinellida from the Altay]. Paleonto-
logicheskiy Zhurnal 2:134–137, 3 fig.
Rowland, S. M. 1981. Archaeocyathid reefs of the
southern Great Basin, western United States. In M.
E. Taylor, ed., Short papers for the Second Interna-
tional Symposium on the Cambrian System 1981.
United States Geological Survey, Open-File Report
81-743:193–197, 3 fig.
Rowland, S. M. 1984. Were there framework reefs in
the Cambrian? Geology 12:181–183, 4 fig.
Rowland, S. M. 2001. Archaeocyaths—A history of
phylogenetic interpretation. Journal of Paleontology
75:1065–1078, 7 fig.
Rowland, S. M., & R. A. Gangloff. 1988. Structure and
paleoecology of Lower Cambrian reefs. PALAIOS
3:111–135, 18 fig.
Rowland, S. M., & R. S. Shapiro. 2002. Reef patterns
and environmental influences in the Cambrian and
earliest Ordovician. Society of Economic Paleon-
tologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication
72:95–128, 15 fig.
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1960a. Novye dannye ob arkheot-
siatakh Gornoy Shorii [New data on the archaeocy-
aths of the Mountainous Shoria]. Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Doklady 131:663–666, 1 fig.
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1960b. O novykh predstavitelyakh
arkheotsiat semeystva Dokidocyathidae [On new
representatives of the archaeocyathan family Doki-
docyathidae]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 3:43–47,
2 fig., 1 pl.
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1969. Nekotorye voprosy sistema-
tiki arkheotsiat (Novye dannye ob arkheotsiatakh
Olenyokskogo podnyatiya) [Some problems in the
systematics of archaeocyaths (New data on archaeo-
cyaths of the Olenyok Uplift)]. In I. T. Zhuravleva,
ed., Problemy Paleontologii i Biostratigrafii Nizhnego
Kembriya Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka [Problems of
Lower Cambrian Paleontology and Biostratigraphy
of Siberia and the Far East]. Nauka. Novosibirsk. p.
106–113, 1 fig., pl. 40–42, 3 tables.
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1973. Zakonomernosti morfologiches-
koy evolyutsii arkheotsiat i voprosy yarusnogo
raschleneniya nizhnego kembriya [Regularities in
the morphological evolution of archaeocyaths and
problems of Lower Cambrian stage division]. Geo-
logicheskiy Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
241:164 p., 142 fig., 22 pl., 11 tables.
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1974. Homological variability of
archaeocyathans. Geological Magazine 111:107–120,
7 fig., 2 tables.
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1979. Nekotorye problemy izucheniya
drevneyshikh skeletnykh organizmov [Some prob-
lems in the study of the oldest skeletal organisms].
Moskovskoe Obshchestvo Ispytatelei Prirody, Byul-
leten’, Otdel geologicheskiy 54(3):62–69, 2 fig.
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1980. Tsentry proiskhozhdeniya
kembriyskikh faun [Centers of origin of Cambrian
faunas]. In B. S. Sokolov & A. I. Zhamoida, eds.,
Mezhdunarodnyy Geologicheskiy Kongress, XXVI
Sessiya. Doklady Sovetskikh Geologov. Paleontologi-
ya. Stratigrafiya [International Geological Congress,
26th Session. Papers of Soviet Geologists. Paleontol-
ogy. Stratigraphy]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 30–34, 2 fig.
Rozanov, A. Yu. 1984. Some aspects of studies on bio-
and paleogeography of the Cambrian. In Proceed-
ings of the 27th International Geological Congress,
Moscow 4–14 August 1984. Volume 2, Palaeontol-
ogy. VNU Science Press. Utrecht. p. 143–157, 3 fig.
Rozanov, A. Yu., & Roland Gangloff. 1979. O nekoto-
rykh sluchayakh patologicheskikh izmeneniy skeleta
u arkheotsiat [On some cases of pathological skeletal
development in archaeocyaths]. Institut Geologii
i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Trudy 406:57–58, pl. 11–12.
Rozanov, A. Yu., & K. Łydka, eds. 1987. Palaeogeogra-
phy and Lithology of the Vendian and Cambrian of
the Western East-European Platform. Wydawnictwa
Geologiczne. Warsaw. 114 p., 34 fig., 5 pl.
Rozanov, A. Yu., & V. V. Missarzhevskiy. 1966. Bio-
stratigrafiya i fauna nizhnikh gorizontov kembriya
[Biostratigraphy and fauna of the lower horizons of
the Cambrian]. Geologicheskiy Institut, Akademiya
178 Treatise Online, number XX
Nauk SSSR, Trudy 148:126 p., 68 fig., 13 pl., 2
tables.
Rozanov, A. Yu., V. V. Missarzhevskiy, N. A. Volkova,
L. G. Voronova, I. N. Krylov, B. M. Keller, I. K. Ko-
rolyuk, K. Lendzion, R. Mikhnyak, N. G. Pykhova,
& A. D. Sidorov. 1969. Tommotskiy yarus i prob-
lema nizhney granitsy kembriya [The Tommotian
stage and the Cambrian lower boundary problem].
Geologicheskiy Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR,
Trudy 206:380 p., 79 fig., 55 pl., 15 tables.
Rozanov, A. Yu., & T. A. Sayutina. 1982. Microstruc-
ture of certain algae, archaeocyathids and cribri-
cyathids. Proceedings of the 3rd North American
Paleontological Convention 2:453–455.
Rozanov, A. Yu., & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1992. The Lower
Cambrian fossil record of the Soviet Union. In J. H.
Lipps & P. W. Signor, eds., Origin and Early Evolu-
tion of the Metazoa. Plenum Press. New York. p.
205–282, 27 fig.
Sars, M. 1857. Bidrag til Kundskaben om Middelhavets
Littoral-Fauna, Reisebemaerkningen fra Italien. Nyt
Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne 9(2):110–164, 2 pl.
Savarese, Michael. 1992. Functional analysis of archaeo-
cyathan skeletal morphology and its paleobiological
implications. Paleobiology 18:464–480, 8 fig., 1
table.
Savarese, Michael. 1995. Functional significance of
regular archaeocyathan central cavity diameter: A
biomechanical and paleoecological test. Paleobiology
21:356–378, 9 fig., 6 tables.
Sayutina, T. A. 1985. K revizii rody Yakovlevites Korde,
1979 [On revision of the genus Yakovlevites Korde,
1979]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Ot-
delenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 632:70–74,
2 fig., pl. 26–27.
Schlüter, Clemens. 1886. Archaeocyathus in russischem
Silur? Deutsche Geologische Gesellschaft, Zeitschrift
38:899–909.
Schlüter, Clemens. 1889. Anthozoen des rheinischen
Mittel-Devon. Abhandlungen zur Geologischen
Specialkarte von Preussen und den Thüringischen
Staaten 8(4):259–465, 16 pl. Reprint pagination:
p. i–ix + 1–207.
Scotese, C. R., & W. S. McKerrow. 1990. Revised
World maps and introduction. In W. S. McKerrow &
C. R. Scotese, eds., Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and
Biogeography. Geological Society, Memoir 12:1–21,
22 fig., 1 table.
Seguenza, G. 1864. Disquisizione paleontologiche
intorno ai corallarii fossili delle rocce terziarie del
distretto di Messina. Memorie della Reale Accademia
delle Scienze di Torino (series 2) 21:399–560, 15 pl.
Seilacher, Adolf, & E. Seilacher-Drexler. 1986.
Sekundäre Weichbodenbewohner unter den Cir-
ripediern. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 60:75–92,
9 fig.
Selg, M. 1986. Algen als Faziesindikatoren: Bioherme
und Biostrome im Unter-Kambrium von SW-
Sardinien. Geologische Rundschau 75:693–702, 4
fig., 2 tables.
Sennikov, N. V., A. Yu. Kazansky, K. Iwata, O. T.
Obut, Y. Sugai, V. A. Zybin, & T. V. Khlebnikova.
2004. Comparative position of Bateny and Biya-
Katun’ terrains (Altai Sayan Folded Area, Russia) in
Cambrian based on combined paleomagnetic, litho-
logic and paleontological data. Gondwana Research
7:833–841, 4 fig.
Senowbari-Dar yan, Baba. 1990. Die systematische
Stellung der thalamiden Schwämme und ihre Be-
deutung in der Erdgeschichte. Münchner Geowis-
senschaftliche Abhandlungen A 21:1–326, 70 fig.,
63 pl., 18 tables.
Senowbari-Daryan, Baba, & J. K. Rigby. 1988. Upper
Permian segmented sponges from Djebel Tebaga,
Tunisia. Facies 19:171–250, 15 fig., pl. 22–40.
Senowbari-Daryan, Baba, & P. Schäfer. 1986. Sphinc-
tozoen (Kalkschwämme) aus den norischen Riffen
von Sizilien. Facies 14:235–284, 9 fig., pl. 44–54,
6 tables.
Shergold, J. H., & Gerd Geyer. 2003. The Subcom-
mission on Cambrian Stratigraphy: The status quo.
Geologica Acta 1:5–9, chart.
Shergold, J. H., J. B. Jago, R. A. Cooper, & J. R. Laurie.
1985. The Cambrian System in Australia, Antarctica
and New Zealand. Correlation Charts and Explana-
tory Notes. International Union of Geological Sci-
ences, Publication 19:1–85, 4 fig., 8 charts.
Signor, P. W., Michael Savarese, & M. D. Denny. 1989.
Archaeocyathans as cantilevers: Some thoughts on
the functional morphology of regular archaeocya-
thans. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with
Programs 21(6):A287.
Simon, Wilhelm. 1939. Archaeocyathacea. I. Kritische
Sichtung der Superfamilie. II. Die Fauna im Kam-
brium der Sierra Morena (Spanien). Senckenber-
gische Naturforschende Gesellschaft, Abhandlungen
448:1–87, 8 fig., 5 pl.
Simon, Wilhelm. 1941. Archaeocyathacea. III. Ergän-
zungen zur Taxonomie aus neueren Arbeiten. Senck-
enbergiana 23(1):1–19.
Smith, A. G. 2001. Paleomagnetically and tectonically
based global maps for Vendian to mid-Ordovician
time. In A. Yu. Zhuravlev & R. Riding, eds., The
Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia
University Press. New York. p. 11–46, 5 fig., 1 table.
Soest, R. W. M. van. 1984. Deficient Merlia normani
Kirkpatrick,1908, from the Curaçao Reefs, with a
discussion on the phylogenetic interpretation of scle-
rosponges. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 54:211–219,
7 fig., 1 table.
Sokolov, B. S., & I. T. Zhuravleva, eds., 1983. Yarus-
noe raschlenenie nizhnego kembriya Sibiri. Atlas
okamenelostey [Stage subdivision of the Early Cam-
brian. Atlas of fossils]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki,
Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
558:1–216, 72 pl., 1 table.
Soshkina, E. D. 1937. Korally verkhnego silura i nizh-
nego devona vostochnogo i zapadnogo sklonov Urala
[Corals of the Upper Silurian and Lower Devonian
of the eastern and western slopes of the Urals]. Pa-
leozoologicheskiy Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR,
Trudy 6(4):1–155, 21 pl., 1 table.
Spizharski, T. N., I. T. Zhuravleva, L. N. Repina, A.
Yu. Rozanov, N. Ye. Tchernysheva, & G. H. Ergaliev.
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 179
1986. The stage scale of the Cambrian System. Geo-
logical Magazine 123:387–392, 1 table.
Spizharskiy, T. N., G. Kh. Ergaliev, I. T. Zhuravleva, L.
N. Repina, A. Yu. Rozanov, & N. E. Chernysheva.
1983. Yarusnaya shkala kembriyskoy sistemy [The
stage scale of the Cambrian System]. Sovetskaya
Geologiya 1983(8):57–72, chart.
Stepanova, M. V. 1986. Zavisimost’ sistematicheskogo
sostava vodoroslevykh soobchestv ot fatsial’nykh
obstanovok na primere stratotipicheskogo ra-
zreza nizhnego kembriya Sibirskoy platformy
[Dependence of the taxonomic composition of
algal communities on facies environments on the
example of the Lower Cambrian stratotype section
of the Siberian Platform]. In V. D. Krasnov, ed.,
Paleoekologicheskiy i Litologo-Fatsial’nyy Analizy
dlya Obosnovaniya Detal’nosti Regional’nykh
Stratigraficheskikh Skhem [Paleoecological and
Lithological-Facies Analyses as Grounds for Scru-
tiny of Regional Stratigraphic Charts]. Sibirskiy
Nauchno-Issledovatel’skiy Institut Geologii, Geo-
fiziki i Mineral’nogo Syr’ya. Novosibirsk. p. 22–30,
1 table.
Stone, P., & M. R. A. Thomson. 2005. Archaeocya-
than limestone blocks of likely Antarctic origin in
Gondwanan tillite from the Falkland Islands. In A.
P. M. Vaughan, P. T. Leat, & R. J. Pankhurst, eds.,
Terrane Processes at the Margins of Gondwana.
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
246:347–357, 5 fig.
Storey, B. C. 1993. The changing face of late Precam-
brian and early Palaeozoic reconstructions. Journal of
the Geological Society, London 150:665–668, 3 fig.
Stumm, E. C. 1938. Upper Middle Devonian rugose
corals of the Nevada Limestone. Journal of Paleontol-
ogy 12:478–485, pl. 58–59.
Sukhov, S. S. 1997. Cambrian depositional history
of the Siberian craton: Evolution of the carbonate
platforms and basins. Sedimentary Facies and Palaeo-
geography 17:27–39, 4 fig.
Sundukov, V. M. 1983. Novye arkheotsiaty iz nizhnego
kembriya Leny i Kotuya [New archaeocyaths from
the Lower Cambrian of the Lena and Kotuy]. Pale-
ontologicheskiy Zhurnal 4:13–17, 1 pl.
Sundukov, V. M. 1984. Novye vidy arkheotsiat nizh-
nego kembriya yugo-vostoka Sibirskoy Platformy
[New archaeocyath species from the Lower Cam-
brian of the southeastern Siberian Platform]. In V.
S. Surkov, ed., Novye Vidy Drevnikh Bespozvo-
nochnykh i Rasteniy Neftegazonosnykh Provintsiy
Sibiri [New Species of Ancient Invertebrates and
Plants of the Oil and Gas Provinces of Siberia]. Si-
birskiy Nauchno-Issledovatel’skiy Institut Geologii,
Geofiziki i Mineral’nogo Syr’ya. Novosibirsk. p.
10–15, pl. 2–3.
Sundukov, V. M., & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1989. Pervaya
nakhodka kribritsiat v nizhnem kembrii Sibirskoy
platformy [First find of cribricyaths in the Lower
Cambrian of the Siberian Platform]. Paleonto-
logicheskiy Zhurnal 3:101–102, 1 fig.
Surge, D. M., Michael Savarese, J. R. Dodd, & K.
C. Lohmann. 1997. Carbon isotopic evidence for
photosynthesis in Early Cambrian oceans. Geology
25:503–506, 3 fig.
Talent, J. A. 1988. Organic reef-building: Episodes of
extinction and symbiosis? Senckenbergiana Lethaea
69:315–368, 1 fig.
Tate, Ralph. 1892. The Cambrian fossils of South Aus-
tralia. Royal Society of South Australia, Transactions
15:183–189, pl. 2.
Taylor, T. G. 1910. The Archaeocyathinae from the
Cambrian of South Australia with an account of the
morphology and affinities of the whole class. Royal
Society of South Australia, Memoirs 2:55–188, 51
fig., 16 pl., chart.
Termier, Henri, & Geneviève Termier. 1950. Paléon-
tologie marocaine. Invertébrés de l’Ere Primaire
(foraminifères, spongiaires, coelentérés). Service des
Mines et de Carte Géologique du Maroc, Notes et
Mémoires 73(2, fascicule 1):218 p., 51 pl.
Theokritoff, G. 1982. Correlation of the Elliptocephala
asaphoides fauna of eastern New York. Northeastern
Geology 4:131–133, 2 fig.
Ting, T. H. 1937. Revision der Archaeocyathinen.
Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie, Mineralogie und
Paläontologie (Abt. B) 78:327–379, 12 fig., pl.
9–14.
Toll, Eduard von. 1899. Beiträge zur Kenntniss des
sibirischen Cambrium. I. Académie Impériale des
Sciences, St. Pétersbourg, Mémoires (série 8, Classe
Physico-Mathématique) 8(10):1–57, 9 fig., 8 pl.,
3 tables.
Tomes, R. F. 1887. On two species of Palaeozoic Madre-
poraria hitherto not recognised as British. Geological
Magazine (new series, decade 3) 4:98–100, 2 fig.
Torsvik, T. H., M. A. Smethurst, J. G. Meert, Rob
van der Voo, W. S. McKerrow, M. D. Brasier, B.
A. Sturt, & H. J. Walderhaug. 1996. Continental
break-up and collision in the Neoproterozoic and
Palaeozoic—A tale of Baltica and Laurentia. Earth-
Science Reviews 40:229–258, 16 fig., 2 tables.
Vacelet, Jean. 1964. Etude monographique de l’éponge
calcaire pharétronide de Méditerranée, Petrobiona
massiliana Vacelet et Levi. Les pharétronides actuelles
et fossiles. Recueil des travaux de la Station Marine
d’Endoume 34(50):1–125, 158 fig., 3 pl.
Vacelet, Jean. 1975. Etude en microscopie électronique
de l’association entre bactéries et spongiaires du genre
Verongia (Dictyoceratida). Journal de Microscopie et
de Biologie Cellulaire 23:271–288, 7 pl.
Vacelet, Jean. 1977. Une nouvelle relique du Secon-
daire: Un représentant actuel des Eponges fossiles
Sphinctozoaires. Académie des Sciences, Paris,
Comptes Rendus (série D) 285:509–511, 1 pl.
Vacelet, Jean. 1979. Description et affinités d’une
éponge sphinctozoaire actuelle. In C. Lévi & N.
Boury-Esnault, eds., Biologie des Spongiaires. Col-
loques Internationaux du C.N.R.S. 291:483–493,
20 fig.
Vacelet, Jean. 1983. Les éponges calcifiées et les récifs
anciens. Pour la Science 68:14–22, 7 fig.
Vacelet, Jean. 1985. Coralline sponges and the evolu-
tion of Porifera. In S. Conway Morris, J. D. George,
R. Gibson, & H. M. Platt, eds., The origins and
180 Treatise Online, number XX
relationships of lower invertebrates. Systematics As-
sociation, Special Volume 28:1–13, 2 fig., 2 tables.
Vacelet, Jean. 1991. Recent Calcarea with a reinforced
skeleton (“pharetronids”). In J. Reitner & H.
Keupp, eds., Fossil and Recent Sponges. Springer-
Verlag. Berlin & Heidelberg. p. 252–265, 3 fig.,
1 table.
Vacelet, Jean, J. P. Cuif, Pascale Gautret, M. Massot,
B. Richer de Forges, & H. Zibrowius. 1992. Un
spongiaire Sphinctozoaire colonial apparenté aux
constructeurs de récifs triasiques survivant dans le
bathyal de Nouvelle-Calédonie. Académie des Sci-
ences, Paris, Comptes Rendus (série 3) 314:379–385,
1 pl.
Varlamov, A. I., N. V. Grigor’yeva, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, I.
T. Zhuravleva, L. N. Repina, A. Yu. Rozanov, & Yu.
Ya. Shabanov. 1984. Opisanie razrezov [Description
of sections]. In A. Yu. Rozanov & B. S. Sokolov,
eds., Yarusnoe Raschlenenie Nizhnego Kembriya.
Stratigrafiya [Lower Cambrian Stage Subdivision.
Stratigraphy]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 20–93, fig. 6–30,
table 2–3.
Vavilov, N. I. 1922. The law of homologous series
in variation. Journal of Genetics 12:47–89, 2 pl.,
1 table.
Vennin, Emmanuelle, J. J. Álvaro, Elena Moreno-Eiris,
& Antonio Perejón. 2003. Early Cambrian coelobi-
ontic community in tectonically unstable crevices de-
veloped in Neoproterozoic andesites, Ossa-Morena,
southern Spain. Lethaia 36:53–65, 8 fig.
Vidal, Gonzalo, Małgorzata Moczydłowska, & V. R.
Rudavskaya. 1995. Constraints on the early Cam-
brian radiation and correlation of the Tommotian
and Nemakit-Daldynian regional stages of eastern
Siberia. Journal of the Geological Society, London
152:499–510, 9 fig.
Vlasov, A. N. 1961. Kembriyskie stromatoporoidei
[Cambrian stromatoporoids]. Paleontologicheskiy
Zhurnal 3:22–32, 1 table, 1 pl.
Vlasov, A. N. 1962. O morfologicheskoy terminolo-
gii u arkheotsiat [On morphological terminology
in archaeocyaths]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal
3:3–9.
Vologdin, A. G. 1928. O novykh svoeobraznykh for-
makh arkheotsiat iz kembriya Sibiri [On new and
unusual forms of archaeocyaths from the Cambrian
of Siberia]. Ezhegodnik Russkogo Paleontologichesk-
ogo Obshchestva 7:25–46, 11 fig., pl. 2.
Vologdin, A. G. 1931. Arkheotsiaty Sibiri. Vypusk 1.
Fauna i Flora Izvestnyakov Rayona D. Kameshki
i Ul. Bey-Buluk Minusinsko-Khakasskogo Kraya
i Okamenelosti Izvestnyakov s R. Nizhney Tersi
Kuznetskogo Okruga [Archaeocyaths of Siberia.
Volume 1. Fauna and Flora of the Limestones in the
Vicinity of Kameshki Village and Bey-Buluk Ulus in
the Minusinsk-Khakassiya Region and Fossils of the
Limestones in the Lower Ters’ River of the Kuznetsk
District]. Geologicheskoe Izdatel’stvo Glavnogo
Geologo-Razvedochnogo Upravleniya. Moscow,
Leningrad. 119 p., 44 fig., 2 tables, 24 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1932. Arkheotsiaty Sibiri. Vypusk 2.
Fauna Kembriyskikh Izvestnyakov Altaya [Archaeo-
cyaths of Siberia. Volume 2. Fauna of the Cam-
brian Limestones of the Altay]. Gosudarstvennoe
Nauchno-Tekhnicheskoe Geologo-Razvedochnoe
Izdatel’stvo. Moscow, Leningrad. 106 p., 46 fig., 14
pl., 3 tables.
Vologdin, A. G. 1936. Istoriya issledovaniya, mor-
fologiya i stratigraficheskoe znachenie arkheotsiat
[History of investigation, morphology and strati-
graphic significance of archaeocyaths]. Problemy
Sovetskoy Geologii 10:917–918.
Vologdin, A. G. 1937a. Arkheotsiaty i vodorosli yuzh-
nogo sklona Anabarskogo Massiva [Archaeocyatha
and algae of the southern slope of the Anabar Mas-
sif]. Arkticheskiy Institut, Trudy 91:9–66, 13 fig.,
3 tables, 12 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1937b. Arkheotsiaty i rezul’taty ikh
izucheniya v SSSR [Archaeocyaths and the results
of their study in the USSR]. Problemy Paleontologii
2–3:453–500, 24 fig., 4 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1939. Arkheotsiaty i vodorosli sred-
nego kembriya yuzhnogo Urala [Middle Cambrian
archaeocyaths and algae of the southern Urals].
Problemy Paleontologii 5:209–276, 12 fig., 12 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1940a. Arkheotsiaty i vodorosli kem-
briyskikh izvestnyakov Mongolii i Tuvy, Chast’ 1
[Archaeocyaths and algae of the Cambrian limestones
of Mongolia and Tuva, Part 1]. Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Trudy Mongol’skoy Komissii 34:268 p., 83
fig., 1 table, 54 pl.
Vologdin, A. G., ed. 1940b. Atlas Rukovodyash-
chikh Form Iskopaemykh Faun SSSR. Tom 1,
Kembriy [Atlas of Characteristic Forms of the
Fossil Faunas of the USSR. Volume 1, Cambrian].
Gosgeolizdat. Moscow, Leningrad. 194 p., 94 fig.,
4 tables, 49 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1955. O kol’chatykh bezdnishchevykh
arkheotsiatakh kembriya severnoy Azii [On the an-
nulate, atabulate archaeocyaths of the Cambrian of
northern Asia]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady
103:141–143, 3 fig.
Vologdin, A. G. 1956. K klassifikatsii tipa Archaeo-
cyatha [On the classification of the phylum Ar-
chaeocyatha]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady
111:877–880.
Vologdin, A. G. 1957a. Arkheotsiaty i ikh stratigra-
ficheskoe znachenie [Archaeocyaths and their strati-
graphic significance]. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica
5:173–222, 22 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1957b. Kembriy Sovetskogo Soyuza
[The Cambrian of the Soviet Union]. Acta Pal-
aeontologica Sinica 5:223–282, 8 fig., 7 tables,
chart.
Vologdin, A. G. 1957c. O neskol’kikh vidakh plankton-
nykh i benticheskikh arkheotsiat [On some species
of planktic and benthic archaeocyaths]. Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Doklady 116:493–496, 4 fig.
Vologdin, A. G. 1957d. Ob ontogeneze arkheotsiat [On
the ontogeny of archaeocyaths]. Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Doklady 117:697–700, 13 fig.
Vologdin, A. G. 1959a. Verkhne-kembriyskiy arkheot-
siato-korallovyy tsenoz, khr. Tannu-Ola, Tuva [Upper
Cambrian archaeocyath-coral coenosis, Tannu-Ola
Range, Tuva]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady
129:670–673, 4 fig.
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 181
Vologdin, A. G. 1959b. K onto-filogenezu arkheotsiat
[On the ontophylogeny of archaeocyaths]. Institut
Morfologii Zhivotnykh, Trudy 27:79–90, 11 fig.
Vologdin, A. G. 1960. O rode Ajacicyathus Bedford
et Bedford, 1939 i sem. Ajacicyathidae Bedford et
Bedford, 1939 [On the genus Ajacicyathus Bedford et
Bedford, 1939 and the fam. Ajacicyathidae Bedford
et Bedford, 1939]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady
130:421–424, 1 fig.
Vologdin, A. G. 1961. Arkheotsiaty i ikh strati-
graficheskoe znachenie [Archaeocyaths and their
stratigraphic significance]. In Mezhdunarodnyy
Geologicheskiy Kongress. XX Sessiya, Meksika.
Kembriyskaya Sistema, ee Paleogeografiya i Problema
Nizhney Granitsy. Tom 3. Zapadnaya Evropa, Afrika,
SSSR, Aziya, Amerika. [International Geological
Congress. XX Session, Mexico. The Cambrian
System, its Paleogeography and Lower Boundary
Problem. Volume 3. Western Europe, Africa, USSR,
Asia, America]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Moscow. p.
173–199, 2 fig., 3 tables, 1 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1962a. Tip Archaeocyatha. Arkheot-
siaty [Phylum Archaeocyatha. Archaeocyaths]. In
Yu. A. Orlov, ed., Osnovy Paleontologii. Tom 2,
Gubki, Arkheotsiaty, Kishechnopolostnye, Chervi
[Fundamentals of Paleontology. Volume 2, Sponges,
Archaeocyaths, Coelenterates, Worms]. Akademiya
Nauk SSSR. Moscow. p. 89–142, 128 fig., 9 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1962b. Novyy rod odnostennykh
arkheotsiat s lozhnym intervallyumom [A new genus
of one-walled archaeocyaths with a false intervallum].
Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady 145:419–421,
1 fig.
Vologdin, A. G. 1962c. Arkheotsiaty i vodorosli kem-
briya Baykal’skogo nagor’ya [Archaeocyaths and algae
of the Cambrian of the Baikal Highlands]. Paleonto-
logicheskiy Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
93:118 p., 21 fig., 2 tables, 21 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1962d. K anatomii arkheotsiat [On
the anatomy of archaeocyaths]. Paleontologicheskiy
Zhurnal 2:9–20, 5 fig., 2 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1963. Pozdnesrednekembriyskie
arkheotsiaty basseyna reki Amgi (Sibirskaya platfor-
ma) [Late Middle Cambrian archaeocyaths from the
Amga River basin (Siberian Platform)]. Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Doklady 151:946–949, 3 fig.
Vologdin, A. G. 1964a. Kribritsiaty—novyy klass
arkheotsiat [Cribricyaths—A new class of archaeocy-
aths]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady 157:1391–
1394, 1 fig.
Vologdin, A. G. 1964b. O slozhnoperegorodochnykh
arkheotsiatakh verkhnemonokskoy svity kembriya
Zapadnogo Sayana [On complexly septate archaeocy-
aths from the Verkhnemonok Suite of the Cambrian
of western Sayan]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady
159:357–360, 2 fig.
Vologdin, A. G. 1966. Kribritsiaty kembriya SSSR
[Cribricyaths of the Cambrian of the USSR]. Pa-
leontologicheskiy Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR,
Trudy 109:64 p., 30 fig., 3 pl.
Vologdin, A. G. 1977. Monotsiaty Kembriya SSSR
[Monocyaths of the Cambrian of the USSR]. Nauka.
Moscow. 156 p., 78 fig., 25 pl.
Vologdin, A. G., & V. D. Fonin. 1966. Novye odnosten-
nye tenial’nye arkheotsiaty Priargun’ya [New one-
walled taenial archaeocyaths of Priargunye]. Aka-
demiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady 167:187–190, 1 fig.
Vologdin, A. G., & T. V. Jankauskas. 1968. Novye
kribritsiaty kembriya Sibiri [New cribricyaths from
the Cambrian of Siberia]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR,
Doklady 183:200–203, 1 fig.
Vologdin, A. G., & L. N. Kashina. 1972. Novye
original’nye formy arkheotsiat s bugorchatymi tu-
mulami [New original forms of archaeocyaths with
multiperforate tumuli]. In I. T. Zhuravleva, ed.,
Problemy Biostratigrafii i Paleontologii Nizhnego
Kembriya Sibiri [Problems of Lower Cambrian Bio-
stratigraphy and Paleontology of Siberia]. Nauka.
Moscow. p. 152–154, pl. 20–20a.
Vologdin, A. G., & M. M. Yazmir. 1966. K otkrytiyu
u arkheotsiat kembriya troynoy ocevoy simmetrii
[On the discovery of triaxial symmetry in Cambrian
archaeocyaths]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady
166:947–950, 3 fig.
Vologdin, A. G., & M. M. Yazmir. 1967. Novoe
semeystvo arkheotsiat s shestigrannymi lokulyami
v intervallyum [A new family of archaeocyaths with
hexagonal loculi in the intervallum]. Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Doklady 175:1375–1377, 2 fig.
Vologdin, A. G., & I. T. Zhuravleva. 1947. Morfologiya
pravil’nykh arkheotsiat [Morphology of regular ar-
chaeocyaths]. In Referaty Nauchno-Issledovatel’shikh
Rabot za 1945 [Abstracts of Scientific Research
for 1945]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Otdel Bio-
logicheskikh Nauk. Moscow, Leningrad. p. 227–228.
Voronin, Yu. I. 1962. Novye arkheotsiaty (ayats-
itsiatidy) iz kembriya Tuvy [New archaeocyaths
(ajacicyathids) from the Cambrian of Tuva]. Paleon-
tologicheskiy Zhurnal 3:24–28, pl. 4.
Voronin, Yu. I. 1963. O stereoplazmaticheskikh obra-
zovniyakh septal’nykh arkheotsiat [On stereoplasmat-
ic structures of septate archaeocyaths]. Moskovskoe
Obshchestvo Ispytatelei Prirody, Byulleten’, Otdel
geologicheskiy 38(5):149.
Voronin, Yu. I. 1969. Sistematicheskoe polozhenie
roda Cadniacyathus Bedford R. et J., 1937 i roda
Inessocyathus Debrenne, 1964 [The systematic posi-
tion of the genus Cadniacyathus Bedford R. et J.,
1937 and the genus Inessocyathus Debrenne, 1964].
In I. T. Zhuravleva, ed., Problemy Biostratigrafii i
Paleontologii Nizhnego Kembriya Sibiri [Problems
of Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy and Paleon-
tology of Siberia]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 99–105, 3
fig., pl. 39.
Voronin, Yu. I. 1974. Sistematika semeystva Ajacicy-
athidae Bedford R. et J., 1939 [Systematics of the
family Ajacicyathidae Bedford R. et J., 1939]. In
I. T. Zhuravleva & A. Yu. Rozanov, eds., Biostrati-
grafiya i Paleontologiya Nizhnego Kembriya Evropy i
Severnoy Azii [Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy and
Paleontology of Europe and Northern Asia]. Nauka.
Moscow. p. 124–137, 2 fig., pl. 6–7, 1 table.
Voronin, Yu. I. 1979. Ayatsitsiatidy SSSR [Ajacicy-
athids of the USSR]. Paleontologicheskiy Institut,
Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 176:1–148, 27 fig.,
14 pl., 13 tables.
182 Treatise Online, number XX
Voronin, Yu. I. 1988. Novye septal’nye arkheotsiaty
[New septate archaeocyaths]. Sovmestnaya Sovetsko-
Mongol’skaya Paleontologicheskaya Ekspeditsiya,
Trudy 33:5–10, pl. 1–2.
Voronin, Yu. I., L. G. Voronova, N. V. Grigor’yeva, N.
A. Drozdova, E. A. Zhegallo, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, A.
L. Ragozina, A. Yu. Rozanov, T. A. Sayutina, V. A.
Sysoyev, & V. D. Fonin. 1982. Granitsa dokembriya
i kembriya v geosinklinal’nykh oblastyakh (opornyy
razrez Salany-Gol, MNR) [The Precambrian-
Cambrian boundary in the geosynclinal areas (Sa-
laany Gol reference section, MPR)]. Sovmestnaya
Sovetsko-Mongol’skaya Paleontologicheskaya Eks-
peditsiya, Trudy 18:150 p., 25 fig., 40 pl.
Voronova, L. G., N. A. Drozdova, N. V. Esakova,
E. A. Zhegallo, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, A. Yu. Rozanov,
T. A. Sayutina, & G. T. Ushatinskaya. 1987.
Iskopaemye nizhnego kembriya Gor Makkenzi
(Kanada) [Lower Cambrian fossils of the Mack-
enzie Mountains (Canada)]. Paleontologicheskiy
Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 224:88
p., 7 fig., 32 pl., 2 tables.
Vyver, G. van de, & M. Buscema. 1985. Diversity of
immune reactions in the sponge Axinella polyploides.
In K. Rützler, ed., New Perspectives of Sponge Biol-
ogy. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington,
D.C. p. 96–101, 8 fig.
Walcott, C. D. 1886. Second contribution to the
studies on the Cambrian faunas of North America.
United States Geological Survey, Bulletin 30:1–369
(731–1095), 10 fig., 33 pl., 8 tables.
Walcott, C. D. 1889. Descriptive notes of new genera
and species from the Lower Cambrian or Olenellus
zone of North America. United States National
Museum, Proceedings 12:33–46.
Walcott, C. D. 1894. The fauna of the Lower Cambrian
or Olenellus zone. United States Geological Survey,
10th Annual Report. Washington, D.C. p. 599–602.
Walter, M. R. 1980. Adelaidean and Early Cambrian
stratigraphy of the southwestern Georgina Basin:
Correlation chart and explanatory notes. Bureau
of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics,
Australia, Report 214:21 p., chart.
Wendt, Jobst. 1979. Development of skeletal forma-
tion, microstructure, and mineralogy of rigid cal-
careous sponges from the late Palaeozoic to Recent.
In C. Lévi & N. Boury-Esnault, eds., Biologie des
Spongiaires. Colloques Internationaux du C.N.R.S.
291:449–457, 2 fig., 1 table.
Wendt, Jobst. 1980. Calcareous sponges. Development
through time. In W. D. Hartman, J. W. Wendt, & F.
Wiedenmayer, eds., Living and fossil sponges. Notes
for a short course. Comparative Sedimentology Labo-
ratory, Division of Marine Geology and Geophys-
ics, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric
Science, University of Miami, Miami. Sedimenta
8:169–178, 5 fig.
Wendt, Jobst. 1984. Skeletal and spicular mineralogy,
microstructure and diagenesis of coralline calcareous
sponges. Palaeontographica Americana 54:326–336,
2 fig., 2 pl.
West, R. R., & G. R. Clark II. 1983. Chaetetids. In T.
W. Broadhead, ed., Sponges and Spongiomorphs.
Notes for a Short Course. University of Tennes-
see, Department of Geological Sciences, Studies in
Geology 7. University of Tennessee. Knoxville. p.
130–140, 6 fig.
West, R. R., & G. R. Clark II. 1984. Palaeobiology
and biological affinities of Palaeozoic chaetetids. Pa-
laeontographica Americana 54:337–348, 3 fig., 2 pl.
Wilkinson, C. R., & D. A. Evans. 1989. Sponge distri-
bution across Davies Reef, Great Barrier Reef, relative
to location, depth and water movement. Coral Reefs
8:1–7, 5 fig.
Wolfart, Reinhard. 1983. The Cambrian System in
the Near and Middle East. Correlation chart and
explanatory notes. International Union of Geological
Sciences, Publication 15:72 p., 1 fig., chart.
Wood, Rachel. 1987. Biology and revised systematics of
some late Mesozoic stromatoporoids. Special Papers
in Palaeontology 37:1–89, 31 fig., 7 tables.
Wood, Rachel. 1990. Reef-building sponges. American
Scientist 78:224–235, 10 fig.
Wood, Rachel. 1991. Non-spicular biomineralization
in calcified demosponges. In J. Reitner & H. Keupp,
eds., Fossil and Recent Sponges. Springer-Verlag.
Berlin & Heidelberg. p. 322–340, 9 fig., 2 tables.
Wood, Rachel. 1993. Nutrients, predation and the
history of reef-building. PALAIOS 8:526–543, 3
fig., 2 tables.
Wood, Rachel. 1995. The changing biology of reef-
building. PALAIOS 10:517–529, 5 fig., 2 tables.
Wood, Rachel. 1999. Reef Evolution. Oxford Univer-
sity Press. Oxford. xi + 414 p.
Wood, R. A., K. R. Evans, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1992.
A new post-early Cambrian archaeocyath from Ant-
arctica. Geological Magazine 129:491–495, 3 fig.
Wood, Rachel, & Joachim Reitner. 1988. The Upper
Cretaceous “chaetetid” demosponge Stromatoaxinella
irregularis n. g. (Michelin) and its systematic impli-
cations. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläon-
tologie, Abhandlungen 177:213–224, 9 fig., 1 table.
Wood, Rachel, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, & Anaaz Chimed
Tseren. 1993. The ecology of Lower Cambrian
buildups from Zuune Arts, Mongolia: Implications
for early metazoan reef evolution. Sedimentology
40:829–858, 16 fig., 2 tables.
Wood, Rachel, A. Yu. Zhuravlev, & Françoise De-
brenne. 1992. Functional biology and ecology of Ar-
chaeocyatha. PALAIOS 7:131–156, 21 fig., 3 tables.
Wrona, Ryszard, & A. Yu. Zhuravlev. 1996. Early
Cambrian archaeocyaths from glacial erratics of
King George Island (South Shetland Islands),
Antarctica. Palaeontologica Polonica 55:9–36, 4
fig., pl. 1–8.
Yakovlev, V. N. 1956. O nekotorykh nepodcherknutykh
osobennostyakh stroeniya Archaeolynthus Taylor i ego
vozmozhnoy rodstvennoy svyazi s iglokozhimi [On
some unemphasized peculiarities in the structure of
Archaeolynthus Taylor and its possible relationships
with the echinoderms]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR,
Doklady 109:855–857, 1 fig.
Yakovlev, V. N. 1959. Chankacyathus strachovii gen.
et sp. nov.—pervyy predstavitel’ novogo semeystva
nizhnekembriyskikh arkheotsiat [Chankacyathus
strachovii gen. et sp. nov.—First representative of
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 183
a new family of Lower Cambrian archaeocyaths].
Dal’nevostochnyy Filial, Sibirskoe Otdelenie,
Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Soobshcheniya 10:91–93,
1 fig.
Yang Aihua, Zhu Maoyan, Françoise Debrenne,
Yuan Kexing, Jean Vannier, Zhang Junming, & Li
Guoxiang. 2005. Early Cambrian archaeocyathan
zonation of the Yangtze Platform and its biostrati-
graphic implications. Acta Micropalaeontologica
Sinica 22(supplement):205–210.
Yang Aihua, Zhu Maoyan, Yuan Kexing, & Françoise
Debrenne. 2007. Lower Cambrian archaeocyathan
zonation of the Yangtze Platform and biostratigraphic
implications. New York State Museum Bulletin
510:91.
Yaroshevich, V. M. 1957. Novye predstaviteli arkheot-
siat kembriya vostochnogo sklona Kuznetskogo
Ala-Tau [New representatives of archaeocyaths in the
Cambrian of the eastern flank of the Kuznetsk Ala-
Tau]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady 116:1015–
1017, 1 fig.
Yaroshevich, V. M. 1962. Stratigrafiya siniyskikh i kem-
briyskikh otlozheniy Batenevskogo kryazha, khrebta
Azyr-Tal i basseyna reki Belyy Iyus (vostochnyy sklon
Kuznetskogo Alatau) [Stratigraphy of the Sinian and
Cambrian strata of the Batenev Range, Azyr-Tal
Range and Belyy Iyus River basin (eastern flank of
the Kuznetsk Alatau)]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki,
Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
17:1–188, 70 fig.
Yaroshevich, V. M. 1966. Ob’yem roda Archaeocyathus
i semeystva Archaeocyathidae [Extent of the genus
Archaeocyathus and the family Archaeocyathidae].
Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 1:19–27, pl. 1.
Yaroshevich, V. M. 1990. O zhivom veshchestve
arkheotsiat [On the living matter of archaeocyaths].
Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie,
Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 783:18–28, 3 fig.,
pl. 11–14, 4 tables.
Yavorsky [Yaworsky], B. 1932. Ein Stromatoporenfund
im Cambrium. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geolo-
gie und Paläontologie (Abt. B) 12:613–616, 5 fig.
Yazmir, M. M., B. A. Dalmatov, & I. K. Yazmir. 1975.
Atlas Fauny i Flory Paleozoya i Mezozoya Buryatskoy
ASSR. Paleozoy [Atlas of Fauna and Flora of the Pa-
leozoic and Mesozoic of the Buryat ASSR. Paleozoic].
Nedra. Moscow. 181 p.,15 fig., 34 pl.
Yuan Kexing. 1974. Archaeocyatha. In Nanjing In-
stitute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia
Sinica, eds., A Handbook of the Stratigraphy and
Palaeontology in Southwest China. Science Press.
Beijing. p. 80–82, pl. 29–30.
Yuan Kexing, & Zhang Sengui. 1977. Archaeocyatha.
In Institute of Geological Sciences, Hubei Province
and Bureaux of Geology, Honan, Hubei, Hunan and
Guangdong Provinces and Guangxi Autonomous
Region, eds., Atlas of Palaeontology in Central and
Southern China. Part 1, Lower Palaeozoic. Geologi-
cal Publishing House. Beijing. p. 4–8, 4 fig., pl. 1–2.
Yuan Kexing, & Zhang Sengui. 1978. Archaeocyatha.
In Three Yangtze Gorges Geological Research Unit,
Geological Bureau of Hubei Province, eds., Stratig-
raphy and Palaeontology of Sinian to Permian in
the Eastern Part of the Yangtze Gorge. Geological
Publishing House. Beijing. p. 138–141, pl. 16–17.
Yuan Kexing, & Zhang Sengui. 1980. Lower Cambrian
Archaeocyatha of central and southwestern China.
Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 19:380–391, 4 pl.
Yuan Kexing, & Zhang Sengui. 1981. Lower Cambrian
archaeocyathid assemblages of central and southwest-
ern China. Geological Society of America, Special
Paper 187:39–53, 2 fig., 4 pl., 2 tables.
Yuan Kexing, Zhu Maoyan, Zhang Junming, & H.
van Iten. 2001. Biostratigraphy of archaeocyathan
horizons in the Lower Cambrian Fucheng section,
south Shaanxi province: Implications for regional
correlations and archaeocyathan evolution. Acta
Palaeontologica Sinica 40(supplement):115–129,
3 fig., 3 pl.
Zadorozhnaya, N. M., D. V. Osadchaya, & L. N. Re-
pina. 1973. Novye dannye po biostratigrafii nizhnego
kembriya okrestnostey pos. Bograd (Batenevskiy
kryazh) [New data on the Lower Cambrian bio-
stratigraphy of the environs of Bograd settlement
(Batenev Range)]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki,
Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
49:119–151, 2 fig., pl. 19–24, 3 tables.
Zamarreño, I. 1977. Early Cambrian algal carbonates
in southern Spain. In E. Flügel, ed., Fossil Algae.
Springer-Verlag. Berlin & Heidelberg. p. 360–365,
3 fig.
Zamarreño, I., & Françoise Debrenne. 1977. Sédimen-
tologie et biologie des constructions organogènes
du Cambrien inférieur du Sud de l’Espagne. Bureau
de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Mémoire
89:49–61, 1 fig., 5 pl., 1 table.
Zhang Sengui, & Yuan Kexing. 1985. Discovery of the
genus Cambrocyathellus in China. Acta Palaeonto-
logica Sinica 24:518–527, 7 fig., 3 pl.
Zhautikov, T. M., L. N. Klenina, I. T. Zhuravleva, &
S. S. Rodionov. 1976. Novye dannye ob arkheot-
siatakh nizhnego kembriya khrebta Chingiz [New
data on Lower Cambrian archaeocyaths of the
Chingiz Range]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Si-
birskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
296:127–141, 3 fig., pl. 5–7.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1985. Sovremennye arkheotsiaty?
[Recent archaeocyaths?]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki,
Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
632:24–33, 1 fig., pl. 14.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1986a. Evolution of archaeocyaths
and palaeobiogeography of the Early Cambrian.
Geological Magazine 123:377–385, 3 fig.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1986b. Radiocyathids. In A. Hoff-
man & M. H. Nitecki, eds., Problematic Fossil Taxa.
Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics
5:35–44, 6 fig.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1988. Arkheotsiaty nizhnego kem-
briya kraynego severo-vostoka SSSR [Lower Cam-
brian archaeocyaths of the extreme northeast of
the USSR]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe
Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR 720:97–110, 1
fig., pl. 8–12.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1989. Poriferan aspects of archaeo-
cyathan skeletal function. Association of Australasian
Palaeontologists, Memoir 8:387–399, 12 fig.
184 Treatise Online, number XX
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1990. Sistema arkheotsiat [Sys-
tematics of archaeocyaths]. In V. V. Menner, ed.,
Sistematika i Filogeniya Bespozvonochnykh. Kriterii
Vydeleniya Vyshchikh Taksonov [Systematics and
Phylogeny of Invertebrates. Criteria for Definition
of Higher Taxa]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 28–54, 6 fig.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1993. A functional morphological
approach to the biology of the Archaeocyatha. Neues
Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhand-
lungen 190:315–327, 6 fig.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1995. Preliminary suggestions on the
global Early Cambrian zonation. Beringeria, Special
Issue 2:147–160, 2 tables.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1996. Reef ecosystem recovery after
the Early Cambrian extinction. In M. B. Hart, ed.,
Biotic Recovery from Mass Extinction Events. Geo-
logical Society, Special Publication 102:79–96, 5 fig.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1998. Early Cambrian archaeo-
cyathan assemblages of Mongolia. In P. Ahlberg, M.
Eriksson, & I. Olsson, eds., IV Field Conference of
the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group,
Sweden, 24–31 August 1998. Lund Publications in
Geology 142:24–25.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1999. Modul’nost’ i stanovlenie
kembriyskoy rifovoy ekosistemy [The modularity
and establishment of the Cambrian reef ecosystem].
Zhurnal Obshchey Biologii 60:29–40, 4 fig., 2 tables.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 2001a. O nekotorykh kollektsiyakh
arkheotsiat iz Paleontologicheskogo Instituta RAN
[On some archaeocyath collections housed at the
Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy
of Sciences]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 6:91–94.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 2001b. Osobennosti raznoobraziya
organizmov v kembrii [Features of the diversification
of organisms in the Cambrian]. In A. G. Ponoma-
renko, A. Yu. Rozanov, & M. A. Fedonkin, eds.,
Ekosistemnye Perestroyki i Evolyutsiya Biosfery.
Vypusk 4 [Ecosystem Restructures and the Evolu-
tion of the Biosphere. Issue 4]. Paleontologicheskiy
Institut, Rossiyskaya Akademiya Nauk. Moscow. p.
174–183, 2 fig.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 2001c. Paleoecology of Cambrian
reef ecosystems. In G. D. Stanley, Jr., ed., The His-
tory and Sedimentology of Ancient Reef Systems.
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. New York. p.
121–157, 11 fig., 2 tables.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., Françoise Debrenne, & Jean Lafuste.
1993. Early Cambrian microstructural diversification
of Cnidaria. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg
164:365–372, 3 fig.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., Françoise Debrenne, & R. A. Wood.
1990. A synonymized nomenclature for calcified
sponges. Geological Magazine 127:587–589, 1 fig.,
1 table.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., & D. I. Gravestock. 1994. Archaeo-
cyaths from Yorke Peninsula, South Australia and
archaeocyathan Early Cambrian zonation. Alcheringa
18:1–54, 13 fig., 4 tables.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., & I. D. Maidanskaya. 1998. Skhod-
stvo faun i dinamika plit v rannem kembrii [Faunal
similarity and plate dynamics in the Early Cam-
brian]. In V. A. Koroteev, ed., Paleogeografiya Venda-
Rannego Paleozoya Severnoy Evrazii [Paleogeography
of the Vendian–Early Paleozoic in Northern Eurasia].
Rossiyskaya Akademiya Nauk, Ural’skoe Otdelenie.
Ekaterinburg. p. 166–171, 2 fig., 1 table.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., & E. B. Naimark. 2005. Alpha, beta,
or gamma: Numerical view on the Early Cambrian
world. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeo-
ecology 220:207–225, 3 fig., 5 tables.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., & M. H. Nitecki. 1985. O
sravnitel’noy morfologii arkheotsiat i retseptakulitov
[On the comparative morphology of archaeocyathids
and receptaculitids]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal
4:121–122.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., & Robert Riding. 2001. Introduc-
tion. In A. Yu. Zhuravlev & R. Riding, eds., The
Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia
University Press. New York. p. 1–7, 2 tables.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., & T. A. Sayutina. 1985. Radiotsiaty
Mongolii. K revizii “klassa” Radiocyatha [Radiocy-
aths of Mongolia. On revision of the “class” Radio-
cyatha]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Ot-
delenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 632:52–62,
2 fig., pl. 22–24.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., & Rachel Wood. 1995. Lower
Cambrian reefal cryptic communities. Palaeontology
18:443–470, 9 fig., 3 pl., 3 tables.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., & Rachel Wood. 1996. Anoxia as
the cause of the mid-Early Cambrian (Botomian)
extinction event. Geology 24:311–314, 4 fig.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., & R. A. Wood. 2008. Eve of biomin-
eralization: Controls on skeletal mineralogy. Geology
36:923–926, 2 fig.
Zhuravlev, A. Yu., I. T. Zhuravleva, & V. D. Fonin.
1983. Arkheotsiaty iz nizhnego kembriya Sibiri [Ar-
chaeocyaths from the Lower Cambrian of Siberia].
Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 2:22–30, 1 fig., pl. 3–4.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1949. Nekotorye dannye o stroenii
kubka u predstaviteley roda Rhabdocyathus Toll
[Some data on the structure of the cup in represen-
tatives of the genus Rhabdocyathus Toll]. Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Doklady 67:547–550, 2 fig.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1950. O nakhodke v kembriyskikh
otlozheniyakh Tuvy arkheotsiata s kolonial’nym skel-
etom [On the find in Cambrian deposits of Tuva of
an archaeocyath with colonial skeleton]. Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Doklady 75:855–858, 3 fig.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1951. O novom rode arkheotsiat s gre-
benchatymi dnishchami v kembriyskikh izvestnyakakh
Sibiri [On a new archaeocyathan genus with pectinate
tabulae from the Cambrian limestones of Siberia].
Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady 81:77–80, 3 fig.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1954. Nastavlenie po Sboru i Izucheni-
yu Arkheotsiat [Manual for the Collection and Study
of Archaeocyaths]. Paleontologicheskiy Institut,
Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Moscow. 46 p., 25 fig., 4 pl.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1955a. Arkheotsiaty kembriya
vostochnogo sklona Kuznetskogo Ala-Tau [Cambrian
archaeocyaths of the eastern flank of the Kuznetsk
Ala-Tau]. Paleontologicheskiy Institut, Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Trudy 56:5–56, 6 fig., pl. 1–6, 1 table.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1955b. K poznaniyu arkheotsiat Sibiri
[Toward knowledge of the archaeocyaths of Siberia].
Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady 104:626–629,
2 fig.
Systematic Descriptions of the Archaeocyatha 185
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1957. Arkheotsiaty, ikh razvitie i
sratigraficheskoe znachenie [Archaeocyaths, their
development and stratigraphic significance]. Mos-
kovskoe Obshchestvo Ispytatelei Prirody, Byulleten’,
Otdel geologicheskiy 32:174–175.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1959. Arkheotsiaty bazaikhskogo gori-
zonta r. Kii [Archaeocyaths of the Bazaikha Horizon
of the R. Kiya]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Doklady
124:424–427, 2 fig.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1960a. Novye dannye ob arkheot-
siatakh sanashtykgol’skogo gorizonta [New data on
the archaeocyaths of the Sanashtykgol Horizon].
Geologiya i Geofizika 2:42–46, 1 fig.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1960b. Arkheotsiaty Sibirskoy Plat-
formy [Archaeocyaths of the Siberian Platform].
Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Moscow. 344 p., 147 fig.,
33 pl., 26 tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1960c. Arkheotsiaty [Archaeocyaths].
Sibirskiy Nauchno-Issledovatel’skiy Institut Geologii,
Geofiziki i Mineral’nogo Syr’ya, Trudy 19:73–82,
fig. 2–15, table 6.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1963a. Novye dannye ob arkheot-
siatakh vostochnogo sklona yuzhnogo Urala [New
data on the archaeocyaths of the eastern flank of
the southern Urals]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal
4:116–118, 2 fig.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1963b. Arkheotsiaty Sibiri. Odnosten-
nye Arkheotsiaty (Otryady Monocyathida i Rhi-
zacyathida) [Archaeocyaths of Siberia. One-walled
Archaeocyaths (Orders Monocyathida and Rhizacy-
athida)]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Moscow. 139 p.,
68 fig., 12 pl., 22 tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1965. Arkheotsiaty verkhnego podot-
dela nizhnego kembriya severa Baykal’skogo nagor’ya
(solontsovskiy i obruchevskiy gorizonty) [Archaeocy-
aths of the upper subdivision of the Lower Cambrian
of the northern Baikal Highlands (Solontsy and
Obruchev Horizons)]. In B. S. Sokolov, ed., Strati-
grafiya i Paleontologiya Paleozoya Aziatskoy Chasti
SSSR [Paleozoic Stratigraphy and Paleontology of
the Asian Part of the USSR]. Nauka. Moscow. p.
3–12, 5 fig., 2 pl.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1966. Rannekembriyskie organogen-
nye postroyki na territorii Sibirskoy Platformy [Early
Cambrian organogenic buildups on the territory of
the Siberian Platform]. In R. F. Gekker, ed., Orga-
nizm i Sreda v Geologicheskom Proshlom [Organism
and Environment in the Geological Past]. Nauka.
Moscow. p. 61–84, 17 fig., 2 tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1970. Porifera, Sphinctozoa, Ar-
chaeocyathi—Their connections. Symposia of the
Zoological Society, London 25:41–59, 8 fig., 1 table.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1972a. Rannekembriyskie fatsial’nye
kompleksy arkheotsiat (r. Lena, srednee techenie)
[Early Cambrian facies assemblages of archaeocy-
aths (middle Lena River)]. In I. T. Zhuravleva, ed.,
Problemy Biostratigrafii i Paleontologii Nizhnego
Kembriya Sibiri [Problems of Lower Cambrian Bio-
stratigraphy and Paleontology of Siberia]. Nauka.
Moscow. p. 31–109, 37 fig., pl. 3–8, 46 tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1972b. O novom rode Iljinicyathus
iz nizhnego kembriya Mongolii [On the new genus
Iljinicyathus from the Lower Cambrian of Mongolia].
In I. T. Zhuravleva, ed., Problemy Biostratigrafii i
Paleontologii Nizhnego Kembriya Sibiri [Problems
of Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy and Paleontol-
ogy of Siberia]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 155–156, pl. 21.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1974a. Katalog Rodov Arkheotsiat.
Chast’ 1 [Catalogue of Archaeocyath Genera. Part
1]. Nauka. Novosibirsk. 228 p., 69 fig.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1974b. Katalog Rodov Arkheotsiat.
Chast’ 2 [Catalogue of Archaeocyath Genera. Part
2]. Nauka. Novosibirsk. 215 p., 49 fig.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1974c. Biologiya arkheotsiat [Biol-
ogy of archaeocyaths]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki,
Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
276:107–124, 7 fig., 4 pl., 2 tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1980. O nakhodke novoy formy
odnostennykh arkheotsiat s dopolnitel’no poristym
karkasom (Butakovicyathus butakovi gen. et sp. nov.)
[On the discovery of a new form of one-walled
archaeocyath with supplementary porous carcass
(Butakovicyathus butakovi gen. et sp. nov.)]. In I. T.
Zhuravleva, ed., Kembriy Altae-Sayanskoy Skladcha-
toy Oblasti [Cambrian of the Altay-Sayan Fold Belt].
Nauka. Moscow. p. 174–176, pl. 30.
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1981. Paleobiogeografiya rannego
kembriya [Paleobiogeography of the Early Cam-
brian]. In G. Ya. Krymgol’ts & K. V. Simakov, eds.,
Paleontologiya, Paleobiogeografiya i Mobilizm
[Paleontology, Paleobiogeography and Mobilism].
Vsesoyuznyy Paleontologicheskiy Obshchestvo,
Trudy, 21-ya Sessiya. Magadanskoe Knizhnoe
Izdatel’stvo. Magadan. p. 43–52, 3 fig.
Zhuravleva, I. T., & V. N. Elkina. 1974. Arkheotsiaty
Sibiri. Etmofilloidnye Arkheotsiaty [Archaeocyaths
of Siberia. Ethmophylloid archaeocyaths]. Institut
Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Trudy 230:167 p., 33 fig., 29 pl., 15
tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T., & V. D. Fonin. 1983. Klass Irregu-
laria [Class Irregularia]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki,
Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
558:47–53, pl. 17–20.
Zhuravleva, I. T., I. A. Konyaeva, D. V. Osadcha-
ya, & A. S. Boyarinov. 1997a. Biostratigraphy of
the Kiya River section. Early Cambrian archaeo-
cyaths and spicular sponges from the Kiya River
section (Kuznetsk Alatau). Annales de Paléontologie
(Vertébrés-Invertébrés) 83:3–92, 1 fig., 12 pl., 2 tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T., I. A. Konyaeva, D. V. Osadchaya,
& A. S. Boyarinov. 1997b. Biostratigraphy of the
Kiya River section. Early Cambrian archaeocyaths
and spicular sponges from the Kiya River section
(Kuznetsk Alatau). Annales de Paléontologie
(Vertébrés-Invertébrés) 83:115–200, 1 fig., 14
pl., 1 table.
Zhuravleva, I. T., K. N. Konyushkov, & A. Yu. Rozanov.
1964. Arkheotsiaty Sibiri. Dvustennye Arkheotsiaty
[Archaeocyaths of Siberia. Two-walled Archaeocy-
aths]. Nauka. Moscow. 132 p., 75 fig., 16 pl., 12
tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T., V. I. Korshunov, & A. Yu. Rozanov.
1969. Atdabanskiy yarus i ego obosnovanie po
arkheotsiatam v stratotipicheskom razreze [The
Atdabanian stage and its justification based on the
186 Treatise Online, number XX
archaeocyaths of the stratotype section]. In I. T.
Zhuravleva, ed., Biostratigrafiya i Paleontologiya
Nizhnego Kembriya Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka [Lower
Cambrian Biostratigraphy and Paleontology of Sibe-
ria and the Far East]. Nauka. Moscow. p. 5–59, 1 fig.,
pl. 1–25, 3 tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T., P. S. Krasnopeeva, & S. V. Cher-
nysheva. 1960. Tip Archaeocyathi. Arkheotsiaty
[Phylum Archaeocyathi. Archaeocyaths]. Sibirskiy
Nauchno-Issledovatel’skiy Institut Geologii, Geo-
fiziki i Mineral’nogo Syr’ya, Trudy 19:97–140, fig.
19–38, pl. Cm1–Cm12.
Zhuravleva, I. T., & E. I. Myagkova. 1972. Archaeata—
novaya gruppa organismov paleozoya [Archaeata—A
new group of Paleozoic organisms]. Mezhdunar-
odnyy Geologicheskiy Kongress, XXIV Sessiya,
Doklady Sovetskikh Geologov 7:7–14, 1 fig., 2 pl.
Zhuravleva, I. T., & E. I. Myagkova. 1974.
Sravnitel’naya kharakteristika Archaeata i Stro-
matoporoidea [Comparative characteristics of Ar-
chaeata and Stromatoporoidea]. In B. S. Sokolov,
ed., Drevnie Cnidaria, Tom 1 [Ancient Cnidaria,
Vol. 1]. Nauka. Novosibirsk. p. 63–70, 10 fig., 2 pl.
Zhuravleva, I. T., & E. I. Myagkova. 1979. Comparai-
son entre les Archaeata et les Porifera. In C. Lévi &
N. Boury-Esnault, eds., Biologie des Spongiaires.
Colloques Internationaux du C.N.R.S. 291:521–
526, 4 fig.
Zhuravleva, I. T., & E. I. Myagkova. 1981. Materialy k
izucheniyu Archaeata [Materials for the study of Ar-
chaeata]. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Ot-
delenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 481:41–74,
17 fig., pl. 13–40, 1 table.
Zhuravleva, I. T., & E. I. Myagkova. 1987. Nizshie
mnogokletochnye fanerozoya [Lower multicellular
organisms of the Phanerozoic]. Institut Geologii i
Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk
SSSR, Trudy 695:223 p., 79 fig., 32 pl., 6 tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T., & O. G. Okuneva. 1981. O prirode
kribritsiat [On the nature of cribricyaths]. Institut
Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya
Nauk SSSR, Trudy 481:23–30, 5 fig., pl. 3–5.
Zhuravleva, I. T., L. N. Repina, & V. V. Khomen-
tovskiy. 1967. Skhema biostratigraficheskogo ras-
chleneniya nizhnego kembriya Sayano-Altayskoy
skladchatoy oblasti [Scheme for the Lower Cam-
brian biostratigraphic subdivision of the Sayan-Altay
Fold Belt]. In B. M. Keller, D. I. Musatov, & B. S.
Sokolov, eds., Stratigrafiya Dokembriya i Kembriya
Sredney Sibiri [Stratigraphy of the Precambrian and
Cambrian of Central Siberia]. Krasnoyarsk Press.
Krasnoyarsk. p. 131–136.
Zhuravleva, I. T., L. N. Repina, B. V. Yaskovich, T. I.
Khayrullina, I. A. Poniklenko, & V. A. Luchinina.
1970. K Poznaniyu Rannego Kembriya Yuzhnogo
Tyan’-Shanya [On the Study of the Early Cambrian
in Southern Tien Shan]. FAN Publishing House.
Tashkent. 53 p., 8 fig., 35 pl., 3 tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T., N. M. Zadorozhnaya, D. V. Osadchaya,
N. V. Pokrovskaya, N. M. Rodionova, & V. D. Fonin.
1967. Fauna Nizhnego Kembriya Tuvy (Opornyy Raz-
rez R. Shivelig-Khem) [Fauna of the Lower Cambrian
of Tuva (Key Section, River Shivelig-Khem)]. Nauka.
Moscow. 181 p., 39 fig., 70 pl., 13 tables.
Zhuravleva, I. T., & K. K. Zelenov. 1955. Biogermy
pestrotsvetnoy svity Reki Leny [Bioherms of the
Pestrotsvet Suite of the River Lena]. Paleonto-
logicheskiy Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy
56:57–77, 8 fig., 2 pl., 2 tables.
Ziegler, Bernhard, & Siegfried Rietschel. 1970. Phylo-
genetic relationships of fossil calcisponges. Symposia
of the Zoological Society, London 25:23–40, 4 fig.
Zonenshain, L. P., M. I. Kuzmin, & M. V. Kononov.
1985. Absolute reconstructions of the Paleozoic
oceans. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 74:103–
116, 9 fig., 2 tables.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
The Archaeocyatha were marine organisms developing mineral skeletons and using calcium carbonate for this purpose. Remains of their cups are found in carbonate shelfs and reef environments of the Early Cambrian seas. Few representatives of the family Archaeocyathidae are found through the Middle Cambrian to the Upper Cambrian (Debrenne, Rozanov and Webers, in press).
Article
Sclerosponges secrete a basal crystalline and aspicular skeleton of calcium carbonate, either aragonite or calcite, above which lies a thin layer of living tissue which also secretes siliceous spicules and collagenous fibers. The tripartite skeleton of sclerosponges distinguishes them from all other sponges and also from all other multicellular animals, no one of which has an abundant quantity of two disparate minerals helping to make up its skeleton. The cell types and their organization as well as what little is known about their development indicate that the sclerosponges are related to the demosponges. Sclerosponges are inhabitants of shaded crevices, caves and tunnels on coral reefs in both the Caribbean and Indo-Pacific regions. The range of only one species, Merlia normani Kirkpatrick, extends from the tropics into the warm temperate waters of the Mediterranean Sea.
Chapter
First published in 1992, The Proterozoic Biosphere was the first major study of the paleobiology of the Proterozoic Earth. It is a multidisciplinary work dealing with the evolution of the Earth, the environment and life during the forty percent of Earth's history that extends from the middle of the Precambrian eon (2500 Ma) to the beginning of the Paleozoic era (550 Ma). The book includes a vast amount of data on Proterozoic organisms and their analogs. Prepared by the Precambrian Paleobiology Research Group, a multidisciplinary consortium of forty-one scientists from eight countries, this monograph was a benchmark in the development of the science of the biochemistry and the organic chemistry of Proterozoic sediments. The study aimed to generate data and analyses based on the re-examination of previous studies and on newer investigations and to build towards the future by placing special emphasis on neglected aspects of paleobiologic study and unsolved problems in the field.
Article
We document and describe the trilobite faunas of the Lower Cambrian Shackleton Limestone. The faunas include taxa of Atdabanian, Botomian and possible Toyonian ages and have affinities with those known previously from Gondwana or peri-Gondwana terranes. The geographic distribution of these organisms reveals a large measure of faunal connectedness around the margin of this vast supercontinent in Early Cambrian time. This connectedness extended even to taxa that inhabited shallow-water carbonate shelf environments, because the Shackleton Limestone accumulated in a variety of shallow subtidal and peritidal settings along the ocean-facing margin of the East Antarctic craton, subsequent to a Neoproterozoic rifting event. Although the fossilized Shackleton Limestone fauna is dominated by archaeocyathans, trilobites are common locally. We describe the remains of 35 trilobite taxa from 32 collecting localities. One species, H. granulosa , is assigned to the new genus Holyoakia; the remaining new species are Pagetides (Discomesites) spinosus, Lemdadella antarcticae, Kingaspis (?) convexus, Yunnanocephalus longioccipitalis , and Onchocephalina (?) spinosa.
Article
The archaeocyath fauna collected in the lower Cambrian of Yang Chang section (Yunnan) is studied in the light of a recent revision of the Chinese collections. The composition of the fauna shows that 1) the two fossiliferous levels belong to one assemblage, 2) the distribution of species is homogeneous through SW and central China, 3) the archaeocyaths are Botomian in age<>9d\and no Tommotian archaeocyaths are known in China, 4) paleogeographic relationships exist between China, Altai Sayan and Southwestern Europe and possibly with Australia. -Authors