ArticlePDF Available

Whither the Bone Marrow Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma?

Authors:

Abstract

Received: November 06, 2017 Accepted: January 23, 2018 Published online: February 14, 2018 Issue release date: Published online first
Editorial Comment
Acta Haematol 2018;139:131–131
Whither the Bone Marrow
Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma?
Guillermo J. Ruiz-Argüelles
Centro de Hematología y Medicina Interna, Clínica Ruiz, Puebla, Mexico
Received: November 6, 2017
Accepted after revision: January 23, 2018
Published online: February 14, 2018
Guillermo J. Ruiz-Argüelles, MD, FRCP (Glasg), MACP, DSc (hc)
Centro de Hematología y Medicina Interna, Clinica Ruiz
8B Sur 3710
Puebla 72530 (Mexico)
E-Mail gruiz1 @ hsctmexico.com
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
E-Mail karger@karger.com
www.karger.com/aha
DOI: 10.1159/000487121
Bone marrow transplantation has become an accepted
and important medical intervention and a routine part of
medical practice. However, its utility in a number of dis-
eases has been questioned recently on the basis that there
are better nontransplant therapeutic options. The ques-
tion of whether these moves to eradicate bone marrow
transplantation as an option stem from purely scientific
reasons has been raised [1]. Front-line treatment of high-
dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation
(ASCT) has improved the prognosis of patients with mul-
tiple myeloma (MM). We and others have shown that the
cost-benefit ratio of ASCT as front-line treatment for pa-
tients with MM is considerably better than that of front-
line treatment with novel antimyeloma drugs [2], and this
observation is particularly critical in underprivileged cir-
cumstances. On the other hand, the capability to carry out
ASCT procedures in MM on an outpatient basis has re-
sulted in substantial decreases in the cost of autografting
patients with this disease [3, 4]. The paper by Muta et al.
[5] in the last issue of Acta Haematologica supports the
role of ASCT as a salvage treatment for patients with re-
lapsed MM, in turn supporting the usefulness of this pro-
cedure in another setting of the disease.
In an era when research on the treatment of patients
with MM relies mainly and dangerously on the assess-
ment of novel, extremely expensive antimyeloma drugs
such as the new proteasome inhibitors, IMID and mono-
clonal antibodies, this type of refreshing paper is welcome
indeed; the benefit of the patients was and should always
be considered over other non-strictly scientific or ethical
reasons in therapeutic choices for individuals with MM
[6]. The observation made in a well-developed country
such as Japan might turn out to be even more useful in
circumstances of economic restraint.
References
1 Ruiz-Arguelles GJ: Whither the bone marrow
transplant. Hematology 2010; 15: 1–3.
2 López-Otero A, Ruiz-Delgado GJ, Ruiz-Ar-
güelles GJ: A simplified method for stem cell
autografting in multiple myeloma: a single
institution experience. Bone Marrow Trans-
plant 2009; 44: 715–719.
3 Karduss-Urueta A, Ruiz-Argüelles GJ, Perez
R, Ruiz-Delgado GJ, Cardona AM, Labastida-
Mercado N, Gómez LR, Galindo-Becerra S,
Reyes P, Alejo-Jiménez J: Cell-freezing devic-
es are not strictly needed to start an autolo-
gous hematopoietic transplantation program:
non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem
cells can be used to restore hematopoiesis af-
ter high dose chemotherapy – a multicenter
experience in 268 autografts in patients with
multiple myeloma or lymphoma. Study on
behalf of the Latin-American Bone Marrow
Transplantation Group (LABMT). Blood
2014,124: 849.
4 Gale RP, Ruiz-Argüelles GJ: The big freeze
may be over. Bone Marrow Transplant, in
press.
5 Muta T, Miyamoto T, Kamimura T, Kanda Y,
Nohgawa M, Ueda Y, Iwato K, Sasaki O, Mori
T, Uchida N, Iida S, Fukuda T, Atsuta Y, Su-
nami K: Significance of salvage autologous
stem cell transplantation for relapsed multi-
ple myeloma: a nationwide retrospective
study in Japan. Acta Haematol 2018; 139: 35–
44.
6 Ruiz-Argüelles GJ, Steensma DP: Staunching
the rising costs of haematological health care.
Lancet Haematol 2016; 3: 10.
Downloaded by:
Univ. of California Santa Barbara
128.111.121.42 - 2/15/2018 3:35:41 PM
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) has become an accepted and important medical intervention which has become a routine part of medical practice. Its utility has, however, been questioned recently in a number of diseases in which its role has been clearly established on the basis that there are better non-transplant therapeutic options. The suspicion that these moves to eradicate BMT as an option may not stem from purely scientific reasons has prompted the preparation of these personal reflections. I will focus this discussion only on two diseases in which BMT has been shown to be useful: chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and multiple myeloma (MM).
Article
Full-text available
In a 14-year period in a single institution 31 autografts were performed in 26 patients with multiple myeloma (MM), using a simplified and affordable autografting procedure: conducting the grafts on an outpatient basis and avoiding stem cell freezing. Autografts were started on an outpatient basis in all instances, but four patients were admitted to the hospital. Median time to achieve more than 0.5 x 10(9)/l granulocytes was 27 days, whereas median time to recover above 20 x 10(9)/l plts was 37 days. CR was achieved in 19 cases and a very good partial response in 6 cases. The 100-day mortality was 9.6%. The overall median post-transplant survival has not been reached, being above 76 months, whereas the 76-month survival is 80%. The median cost of each procedure was US$ 15 000. Survival results were substantially better than those of historical control in a group of patients treated in the same institution with melphalan/prednisone. It is concluded that high-dose therapy rescued with a simplified autologous stem cell graft is a valid, useful and affordable therapeutic option for patients with MM, even with economical restraints.
Article
Storage of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) at 4ºC is a simple and inexpensive alternative to cryopreservation for preserving the clonogenic capacity of progenitors cells in the autologous transplant setting, however it has been perceived as unsafe and has deserved little attention. We present the experience of two Latin-American centers using refrigerated, non-cryopreserved stem cells after conditioning with high dose melphalan, CBV or BEAM in a large group of lymphoma and myeloma patients Materials and Methods PBSC were mobilized with filgrastim 5 mg/kg/BID for three to six days.One to three apheresis procedure were employed; the cells were stored at 4ºC for 5 to 6 days in patients who received BEAM or CBV and for 3 days in those given melphalan. All of the conditioning regimens were administered preserving the full intensity of dose (Table 1). After the autograft all patients received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim Table 1 BEAM D-5 D-4 D-3 D-2 D-1 BiCNU 300 mgs/m2 X Etoposide 200-400 mgs/m2 X X X X Citarabine 300-400 mgs/m2 X X X Melphalan 140 mgs/m2 X CBV BiCNU 300 mgs/m2 13 patients received carboplatin 900 mgs/m2 instead BiCNU X Etoposide 300 mgs/m2 X X X Ciclophosphamide 2.000 mgs/m2 X X X Melphalan Melphalan 200 mgs/m2 X Melphalan 100 mgs/m2 X X Results 102 lymphoma patients: 48 Hodgkin`s lymphoma (HL) and 54 non-Hodgkin´s lymphoma (NHL) received BEAM (71) or CBV (31). A median of 3.3 millions/kg of CD34 was infused; the median viability of the cells after 5-6 days of refrigeration (trypan blue exclusion) was 82%. 101 out of 102 patients engrafted, median time to achieve 500/ul neutrophil or more was 12 days, 100 were evaluable for thrombopoiesis, 99 of them had a self- sustained platelet count of 20.000 or more at a median of 17 days. The OS at 5 years was 59% and 42% for patients with Hodgkin and lymphoma respectively 151 patients with multiple myeloma received melphalan 200 mgs/m2. After 72 hours of refrigeration, a median of 2.6 millions/kg of CD34 cells were infused, the viability in all cases being > 90%. Three patients were not evaluable because early death. Median time to achieve 500 neutrophil or more and 20.000 platelets was 12 (9-50) and 15 (7-50) days. The OS at 5 years was 50% 21 patients with NHL and HL received as conditioning regimen melphalan 200 mgs/m2. After 72 hours of storage, a median of 1.75 millions/kg of CD34 cells were transplanted, 100% of them engrafted, median time to 500 neutrophils and 20.000 platelets was 11.9 and 15 days respectively There were no cases of secondary engraftment failure in any of the three groups Conclusion In this series of 268 patients, we have shown that autologous PBSC can be kept at 4ºC in a conventional blood bank refrigerator for up to six days and use them to rescue high-dose chemotherapy in both multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients. Avoiding freezing procedures results in substantial cost savings. The availability of freezing devices for hematopoietic stem cells is not anymore an obstacle to start a an autologous transplantation program This observation is critical in areas of underprivileged economic circumstances, where more than 50% of the inhabitants of the world live. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Article
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been employed for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) after up-front ASCT. The present retrospective study aimed to examine the survival benefit from salvage ASCT. Among 446 patients with relapsed MM after up-front single ASCT, 70 patients received salvage ASCT, the employment of which reduced the risk of mortality after relapse (p = 0.041). Using the parameters before initial ASCT, the advantage of salvage ASCT compared to standard therapy was confirmed in the subgroup with an international staging system stage of I or II (p = 0.040), good performance status (PS; p = 0.043), or no/mild renal comorbidity (p = 0.029). The advantage of salvage ASCT was also confirmed in the subgroup excluding those with early relapse within 7 months after initial ASCT (p = 0.026). Among patients who received salvage ASCT, a favorable prognosis is apparent for those with a time to relapse after initial ASCT of longer than 24 months. The overall survival after salvage ASCT was favorable excluding patients with the following factors: early relapse, poor PS, moderate/severe renal comorbidity, and progressive disease (p < 0.001). In conclusion, our results reinforced the evidence for encouraging salvage ASCT for eligible patients.
The big freeze may be over
  • Rp Gale
  • Gj Ruiz-Argüelles
Gale RP, Ruiz-Argüelles GJ: The big freeze may be over. Bone Marrow Transplant, in press.
Staunching the rising costs of haematological health care Downloaded by: Univ. of California Santa Barbara 128
  • Gj Ruiz-Argüelles
  • Dp Steensma
Ruiz-Argüelles GJ, Steensma DP: Staunching the rising costs of haematological health care. Lancet Haematol 2016; 3: 10. Downloaded by: Univ. of California Santa Barbara 128.111.121.42-2/15/2018 3:35:41 PM