ArticlePDF Available

Adult leaf beetles of the subfamily Cassidinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) preyed on by the digger wasp Cerceris albofasciata (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) in Japan

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Leaf beetles of the subfamily Cassidinae Gyllenhal, 1813 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) exhibit various external morphologies in all life stages, and these may be anti-predator adaptations. We revealed the predator-prey relationship between Cassidinae and their specific predator Cerceris albofasciata (Rossi, 1790) (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae: Philanthinae) in Japan. We collected the beetle prey from hunting Cerceris females and larval cells at two study sites. We collected 11 Cassidinae species belonging to four genera (Aspidimorpha indica, Aspidimorpha transparipennis, Cassida fuscorufa, Cassida japana, Cassida nebulosa, Cassida piperata, Cassida versicolor, Thlaspida biramosa, Thlaspida lewisii, Dactylispa angulosa, and Dactylispa subquadrata), and species other than C. nebulosa and C. piperata were new prey records. Species with explanate margins or short spines were prey for C. albofasciata, but the long-spined species D. higoniae was not, despite its occurrence in the same habitat around the nesting site. These results give insight into the origin of morphological diversity in the subfamily Cassidinae. Kurzzusammenfassung Blattkäfer der Unterfamilie Cassidinae Gyllenhal, 1813 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) weisen in allen Entwicklungsstadien verschiedentliche Bildungen der äußeren Morphologie auf, die möglicherweise Anti-Prädator-Anpassungen darstellen. Wir haben die Pädator-Beute-Beziehungen zwischen Cassidinae und ihrem spezifischen Prädator Cerceris albofasciata (Rossi, 1790) (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae: Philanthinae) in Japan un-tersucht. Wir sammelten die erbeuteten Käfer von jagenden Cerceris Weibchen und Larvenzellen in zwei Untersuchungsgebieten. Wir sammelten 11 Arten von Cassidinae aus vier Gattungen (Aspidimorpha indica, Aspidimorpha transparipennis, Cassida fuscorufa, Cassida japana, Cassida nebulosa, Cassida piperata, Cassida versicolor, Thlaspida biramosa, Thlaspida lewisii, Dactylispa angulosa, and Dactylispa subquadrata), außer C. nebulosa und C. piperata neue Meldungen von Beute. Arten mit verbreiterten Körperrändern oder kurzen Stacheln waren Beute von C. albo-fasciata, die langstachelige Art D. higoniae jedoch nicht, obwohl sie im selben Habitat und um die Neströhren herum vorkam. Diese Ergebnisse erlauben Erkenntnisse über den Ursprung morphologischer Vielfalt in der Unterfamilie Cassidinae.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Ent. Bl. Col. (2017) 113 (1): 213 - 218 ISSN 0013-8835
Entomologische Blätter und Coleoptera
© Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Peks
Adult leaf beetles of the subfamily Cassidinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
preyed on by the digger wasp Cerceris albofasciata
(Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) in Japan
Tadashi Shinohara* & Yasuoki Takami
*corresponding author
Abstract
Leaf beetles of the subfamily Cassidinae Gyllenhal, 1813 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) exhibit various external morphologies in all life stages,
and these may be anti-predator adaptations. We revealed the predator-prey relationship between Cassidinae and their specic predator Cerceris
albofasciata (Rossi, 1790) (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae: Philanthinae) in Japan. We collected the beetle prey from hunting Cerceris females and
larval cells at two study sites. We collected 11 Cassidinae species belonging to four genera (Aspidimorpha indica, Aspidimorpha transparipennis,
Cassida fuscorufa, Cassida japana, Cassida nebulosa, Cassida piperata, Cassida versicolor, Thlaspida biramosa, Thlaspida lewisii, Dactylispa
angulosa, and Dactylispa subquadrata), and species other than C. nebulosa and C. piperata were new prey records. Species with explanate margins
or short spines were prey for C. albofasciata, but the long-spined species D. higoniae was not, despite its occurrence in the same habitat around the
nesting site. These results give insight into the origin of morphological diversity in the subfamily Cassidinae.
Kurzzusammenfassung
Blattkäfer der Unterfamilie Cassidinae Gyllenhal, 1813 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) weisen in allen Entwicklungsstadien verschiedentliche
Bildungen der äußeren Morphologie auf, die möglicherweise Anti-Prädator-Anpassungen darstellen. Wir haben die Pädator-Beute-Beziehungen
zwischen Cassidinae und ihrem spezischen Prädator Cerceris albofasciata (Rossi, 1790) (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae: Philanthinae) in Japan un-
tersucht. Wir sammelten die erbeuteten Käfer von jagenden Cerceris Weibchen und Larvenzellen in zwei Untersuchungsgebieten. Wir sammelten
11 Arten von Cassidinae aus vier Gattungen (Aspidimorpha indica, Aspidimorpha transparipennis, Cassida fuscorufa, Cassida japana, Cassida
nebulosa, Cassida piperata, Cassida versicolor, Thlaspida biramosa, Thlaspida lewisii, Dactylispa angulosa, and Dactylispa subquadrata), außer
C. nebulosa und C. piperata neue Meldungen von Beute. Arten mit verbreiterten Körperrändern oder kurzen Stacheln waren Beute von C. albo-
fasciata, die langstachelige Art D. higoniae jedoch nicht, obwohl sie im selben Habitat und um die Neströhren herum vorkam. Diese Ergebnisse
erlauben Erkenntnisse über den Ursprung morphologischer Vielfalt in der Unterfamilie Cassidinae.
Key words: predator-prey relationship, eld observation, specialist predator, prey, defensive morphology, predation avoidance, anti-predator
adaptation
Introduction
Predator-prey interactions are one of the major driv-
ing forces in the evolution of the morphology and be-
havior of organisms (
Dawkins
&
krebs
1979;
Vermeij
1994, 2002), and anti-predator adaptations may play
an important role in the remarkable morphological
diversication in insects. The family Chrysomelidae
(leaf beetles) is one of the most speciose animal fam-
ilies with nearly 40,000 described species (
Lawrence
1982;
joLiVet
&
Verma
2002). This diversity is reect-
ed in their morphological and ecological characteris-
tics. Cassidinae s.l. (about 6,000 species) is the second
largest subfamily after Galerucinae s.l. (about 12,800
species) among Chrysomelidae (
joLiVet
&
Verma
2002;
chaboo
2007). The adults of Cassidinae (tor-
toise and leaf-mining beetles) exhibit various peculiar
external morphologies, such as spines on the dorsal
surface and explanate margins of the pronotum and
elytra. These external morphologies are hypothesized
to be anti-predator adaptations (
Deroe
&
PasteeLs
1982;
oLmsteaD
1996;
joLiVet
&
Verma
2002;
cha
-
boo
2007). Although previous studies reported many
kinds of leaf beetle predators (e.g.
ohno
1955;
cox
1996;
oLmsteaD
1996;
nogueira-De-sá
&
Vascon
-
ceLLos-neto
2003), predator-prey relationships in
Cassidinae are still poorly understood. Thus, elucida-
tion of predator and prey species in the eld is vital
to test the hypothesis that the external morphological
features of Cassidinae are anti-predator adaptations.
Tadashi shinohara* & Yasuoki Takami
214
Cerceris Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Crabroni-
dae) is distributed worldwide and contains 910 spe-
cies (
terayama
&
suDa
2016). They hunt specic
prey groups (Coleoptera and Hymenoptera,
tsuneki
1965) and have a special ability to locate prey species
(e.g. Cerceris fumipennis, Marshall et al. 2005). Ow-
ing to this property, Cerceris fumipennis Say, 1837 has
been utilized to document the hidden biodiversity of
buprestid beetles in a given region. In three days in a
park in Ontario, C. fumipennis collected 12 bupres-
Fig. 1. Cerceris albofasciata, a specialist predator of Cassidinae, and its prey. A: a female wasp carrying her prey to the nest
(photo by Y. Tanaka); B: beetles stored in a larval cell.
tid species belonging to ve genera, three of which
were new species records for Canada (
marshaLL
et al.
2005). In addition, C. fumipennis has recently gained
attention as a ‘biosurveillance’ tool for the efcient
detection of pest buprestid beetles (
careLess
2009;
careLess
et al. 2009). Thus, clarifying the prey of Cer-
ceris digger wasps can reveal the diversity of certain
groups of insects and can provide crucial information
related to the ecology and evolution of predator-prey
relationships.
Cerceris albofasciata (Rossi, 1790) (Fig. 1A) is a soli-
tary digger wasp (
katayama
1933) distributed in the
trans-Palearctic region (
Lee
et al. 2008). This wasp
exclusively hunts adult in the subfamily Cassidinae
(
katayama
1933;
tsuneki
1942, 1965), carries the
prey by grasping the insect venter to venter, holding
its body from both their legs (
tsuneki
1942, 1965),
and stores prey which has been immobilized (
Fabre
1914) in its nests for larval food (Fig. 1B). Eleven prey
species in three cassidine genera have been reported in
previous studies (
roth
1923;
giorDani
soika
1932;
katayama
1933;
koLossoV
1934;
tsuneki
1942, 1965;
shkuratoV
2001;
ZetteL
et al. 2008), including ten
tortoise beetles, Cassida denticollis Suffrian, 1844, C.
viridis Linnaeus, 1758 (reported as C. equestris Fabri-
cius, 1787, which is currently treated as a synonym
of C. viridis), C. lineola Creutzer, 1799, C. murraea
Linnaeus, 1767, C. nebulosa Linnaeus, 1758, C. nobilis
Linnaeus, 1758, C. piperata Hope, 1842, C. rubiginosa
Muller, 1776, C. vibex Linnaeus, 1767, Hypocassida
subferruginea (Schrank, 1776), and one hispine bee-
tle, Dicladispa testacea (Linnaeus, 1767) (reported as
Hispa testacea), with long spines. These records indi-
cate that tortoise beetles, especially those in the genus
Cassida, are the main prey species for this wasp, while
spined Dicladispa beetles are rare and based on a sin-
gle record (
roth
1923).
The goal of the current study is to document the di-
versity of Cassidinae species preyed on by C. albofas-
ciata in Japan to evaluate the hypothesis that diversity
in external morphologies in Cassidinae is a result of
anti-predator adaptations. Here, we characterized the
prey of C. albofasciata in Hyogo and Chiba prefec-
tures based on surveys in two and one reproductive
seasons, respectively.
Materials and methods
Study sites
Field surveys were performed in Sanda City, Hyogo
Prefecture (Sanda site, 34.9205° N 135.2750° E) from
July to August 2014–2015 and in Yachiyo City, Chiba
Prefecture (Yachiyo site, 35.7348° N 140.1107° E) in
July 2015, when the wasps were actively provisioning
their nests. These study sites were approximately 450 km
apart. C. albofasciata females nested on a patch of open,
disturbed bare ground with hard-packed soil. About
20–30 female wasps were seen in both sites in all seasons.
Adult leaf beetles of the subfamily Cassidinae
215
Cassidines around nesting sites
We searched Cassidinae species around the nesting
site of the wasp to determine the fauna of its prey can-
didates. We walked around in the surrounding areas of
nesting sites (within about 200 m radius from a nesting
site), and almost all of host plants on which Japanese
cassidine can feed were investigated by sweeping, beat-
ing and looking.
Sampling from hunting females
Three techniques were used to collect Cassidinae
prey from hunting female wasps. First, female wasps
returning to the nest with prey (e.g. Fig. 1A) were
captured using a sweep net, from which the prey was
collected, and the wasp was released. Second, female
wasps occasionally dropped their prey in response to
disturbances and the prey item was collected. Third,
prey left near the entrance of the nest were collected. A
female wasp returning to the nest usually lays the prey
near the entrance, enters the burrow head rst, turns
around immediately, protrudes its anterior body from
the nest opening, grasps the prey with its mandibles,
and pulls it into the nest (
katayama
1933;
tsuneki
1965). This behavior is specic to C. albofasciata and
is not found in other Cerceris species (
tsuneki
1965).
To investigate the number of hunting wasps, captured
females were marked using waterproof paint in 2015
at both sites.
Prey sampling from larval cells
To estimate the number and composition of prey spe-
cies stored in each larval cell, wasp nests were excavat-
ed using a hoe in July 2015 at the Sanda site and prey
items were collected. As the cells are usually located
at 10–15 cm underground (
katayama
1933;
tsune
-
ki
1965), digging was performed down to 15 cm. All
stored prey items were collected, including pieces of
broken prey. This investigation was restricted to a clus-
ter of ve nests at the Sanda site in 2015 to avoid dam-
age to the nesting habitat.
Species determination
Prey species were identied based on the classication
system of
kimoto
&
takiZawa
(1994), except for Cas-
sida japana Baly, 1874 and Thlaspida biramosa (Bo-
heman, 1855), which were treated as synonyms of C.
piperata and T. cribrosa (Boheman, 1855) at the time,
respectively. Partial fragments of prey collected from
larval cells were identied based on morphological
characteristics of the elytra. All collected beetles, in-
cluding partial fragments, were successfully identied.
Specimens of beetles and wasps are preserved in the
rst author’s collection for ongoing study.
Results and Discussion
We detected novel prey species of C. albofasciata in
Japan, including many tortoise beetles and hispine
beetles with short spines. Eleven species representing
four genera in three tribes of Cassidinae were collect-
ed as prey of C. albofasciata in Japan in 2014 and 2015
(Table 1). Of these, nine species are new prey records
for C. albofasciata: Aspidimorpha indica Boheman,
1854, A. transparipennis (Motschulsky, 1860), Cassida
fuscorufa Motschulsky, 1866, C. japana, C. versicolor
(Boheman, 1855), Thlaspida biramosa, T. lewisii (Baly,
1874), Dactylispa angulosa (Solsky, 1872), and D.
subquadrata (Baly, 1874). The last two species belong
to the genus Dactylispa and have the dorsum of the
elytra with short spines. (Fig. 2). These species with
explanate margins are spineless, and those with short
spines lack explanate margins. Thus, C. albofasciata
can hunt Cassidinae species with multiple external
morphology types. The wasp did not hunt any prey
other than adult cassidines. Chemical defense (
gómeZ
et al. 1999) or fecal shield (
bLum
1994) of larvae may
hinder predation by the wasp.
Fig. 2. Morphology of prey leaf beetles. A: species with explanate margin (T. biramosa); B: species with short spines (D.
subquadrata); and C: species with long spines (D. higoniae), which was not preyed on by the wasp. Scale bar, 1 mm.
Tadashi shinohara* & Yasuoki Takami
216
At the Sanda site, 23 of 31 observed female wasps
carried prey in 2015. Although we did not identify
individual females in 2014, we observed a similar
number (i.e., about 30 females). We found four larval
cells below the cluster of ve nest entrances in 2015.
In total, we collected eight prey species belonging to
four genera (Aspidimorpha transparipennis, Cassida
fuscorufa, C. japana, C. versicolor, Thlaspida biramo-
sa, T. lewisii, Dactylispa angulosa, and D. subquadra-
ta) (Table 1). Of these, we collected A. transparipennis
and C. fuscorufa from hunting females only, and we
collected D. angulosa (one left elytron) from a larval
cell only. We collected T. lewisii (32.2%) and C. versi-
color (42.1%) most frequently in 2014 and 2015, re-
spectively. Although we recorded six species in larval
cells, most specimens were partial fragments. There-
fore, the number of prey individuals per cell was un-
clear, and we estimated the minimum number of in-
Table 1. Prey species composition and abundance for hunting females (F) and larval cells (L) of Cerceris albofasciata. The
number of observed hunting females is shown in parentheses (- not observed). * = new prey record for C. albofasciata.
dividuals based on the composition of the fragments.
Only one of the four cells was lled with six paralyzed
C. versicolor, a relatively small tortoise beetle species
in Japan (Fig. 1B, cell A in Table 1). In the remaining
three cells (B–D), we detected nine, 12, and 20 beetles
(Table 1). It was difcult to identify correspondence
between the four cells and the ve nest entrances ini-
tially observed, each of which may be owned by a
single female, because the tunnels of the nests are ir-
regularly bent and fairly compactly packed with soil
(
tsuneki
1965).
tsuneki
(1965) and
katayama
(1933)
revealed that each nest includes at least six cells and
each cell is stocked with 6–17 and 5–7 prey individu-
als, respectively. Nests were still provisioned by female
wasps when excavated in both the present and previ-
ous studies, indicating that the numbers of prey per
cell and cells per nest may be underestimates.
At the Yachiyo site, 14 of 23 female wasps carried
prey in 2015. Compared with the Sanda site, we re-
corded fewer prey species at the Yachiyo site, i.e., four
prey species belonging to two genera (Aspidimorpha
indica, Cassida japana, C. nebulosa, and C. piperata),
from hunting females. We collected C. japana (56.0%)
most frequently, which was the only prey species ob-
served at both study sites. The differences between
sites may be explained by a difference in survey meth-
ods, time spent for the survey, and the number of ob-
served female wasps. Additionally, the difference in
prey species composition may be inuenced by the
geographical distribution of beetles, host plant di-
versity in the vicinity of nests, foraging behavior of
wasps, and the degree of human activity around the
nest.
Most Cassidinae species observed around the
nesting sites were preyed on, but certain species were
underrepresented. Although we detected the hispine
beetle Dactylispa higoniae (Lewis, 1896) with dense
long spines at the Sanda site, this species was not
preyed on by the wasp. Since D. higoniae shares host
plants Callicarpa spp. (Verbenaceae) with the prey
species T. biramosa, the wasp could detect both spe-
cies while hunting. Six possible reasons can explain
this underrepresentation: (1) developed spines of D.
higoniae have a defensive function against the wasp,
(2) long spines are unsuitable for larval food and
avoided, (3) D. higoniae have another type of defense
(e.g., chemical, but see
Deroe
&
PasteeLs
1982), (4)
D. higoniae is infrequent around the nesting site, (5)
D. higoniae adults have not yet emerged during the re-
productive seasons of the wasp, or (6) D. higoniae is
much smaller than T. biramosa and unsuitable as prey.
Further studies are necessary to quantify non-random
prey hunting by the wasp and to examine the factors
Adult leaf beetles of the subfamily Cassidinae
217
allowing certain beetle species to avoid predation by
the wasp.
Acknowledgments
We always admired the work of the late Manfred
Döberl and dedicate this contribution to his memory.
We wish to express our sincere thanks to Y. Tanaka
and H. Yoshimura for their help in locating the nest-
ing sites and providing information about wasp prey.
We also thank the editor and two anonymous review-
ers for their constructive suggestions. This study was
nancially supported by a Sasakawa Scientic Re-
search Grant from The Japan Science Society (no. 27-
515).
References
bLum
, M. S. 1994: Antipredatory devices in larvae of
Chrysomelidae: a unied synthesis for defensive
ecleticism. in:
joLiVet
, P. H,
cox
, M. L. &
Petit
-
Pierre
, E. (Eds.): Novel aspects of the biology of
Chrysomelidae. Series Entomologica 50: 277–288.
– Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
careLess
, P. D. 2009: Biosurveillance: utilizing the
beetle hunting wasp (Cerceris fumipennis, Hyme-
noptera: Crabronidae) to detect infestations of
Emerald Ash Borers (Agrilus planipennis, Coleop-
tera: Buprestidae). – Master’s thesis, Department
of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph.
(http://www.cerceris.info/literature.html)
careLess
, P. D.,
marshaLL
, S. A.,
giLL
, B. D.,
aPPLe
-
ton
, E.,
FaVrin
, R. &
kimoto
, T. 2009: Cerceris
fumipennis: a biosurveillance tool for emerald ash
borer. – Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Otta-
wa, Canada. (http://www.cerceris.info/literature.
html)
chaboo
, C. S. 2007: Biology and phylogeny of the
Cassidinae Gyllenhal sensu lato (tortoise and
leaf-mining beetles) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).
– Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural
History 305: 1-250.
cox
, M. L. 1996: Insect predators of Chrysomelidae. –
Pp. 23-91 in:
joLiVet
, P. H. A. &
cox
, M. L. (Eds.):
Chrysomelidae Biology: Ecological Studies. Vol-
ume 2. – SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam.
Dawkins
, R. &
krebs
, J. R. 1979: Arms races between
and within species. – Proceedings of the Royal So-
ciety of London B: Biological Sciences 205: 489-
511.
Deroe
, C. &
PasteeLs
, J. M. 1982: Distribution of
adult defense glands in chrysomelids (Coleoptera:
Chrysomelidae) and its signicance in the evolu-
tion of defense mechanisms within the family. –
Journal of Chemical Ecology 8 (1): 67-82.
Fabre
, J. H. 1914: Souvenirs Entomologiques (Pre-
mière Série). – Delagrave, Paris, vii + 375 pp.
giorDani soika
, A. 1932: Secondo contributo alla
conoscenza degli Imenotteri del Lido di Venezia. –
Bollettino della Società Entomologica Italiana 64:
20-24.
gómeZ
, N. E.,
witte
, L. &
hartmann
, T. 1999:
Chemical defense in larval tortoise beetles: essen-
tial oil composition of fecal shields of Eurypedus
nigrosignata and foliage of its host plant, Cordia
curassavica. – Journal of Chemical Ecology 25(5):
1007-1027.
joLiVet
, P. &
Verma
, K. K. 2002: Biology of leaf bee-
tles. – Intercept Publishers, Andover, 332 pp.
katayama
, H. 1933: Ecological notes on Cerceris navi-
tatis Smith. – The Transactions of the Kansai En-
tomological Society 4: 38-42. (In Japanese)
kimoto
, S. &
takiZawa
, H. 1994: Leaf beetles
(Chrysomelidae) of Japan. – Tokai University
Press, Tokyo, 539 pp.
koLossoV
, J. 1934: K voprosu o pishche lichinok os
roda Cerceris. – Izvestiya Ural’skogo Lesotekh-
nicheskogo Instituta 2: 103-104.
Lawrence
, J.F. 1982: Coleoptera. – Pp. 482–553 in:
Parker
S. P. (Ed): Synopses and classication of
living organisms. Volume 2. – McGraw-Hill, New
York.
Lee
, J. S.,
Lee
, S. G. &
kim
, J. K. 2008: Two unrecord-
ed Korean species of the genus Cerceris (Hyme-
noptera: Philanthidae), with a checklist of Kore-
an Philanthidae. – Animal Systematics, Evolution
and Diversity 24 (1): 59-68.
marshaLL
, S. A.,
Paiero
, S. M., &
buck
, M. 2005:
Buprestid sampling at nests of Cerceris fumipennis
(Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) in southern Ontario:
the rst Canadian records of three buprestids (Co-
leoptera: Buprestidae). – The Canadian Entomol-
ogist, 137 (4): 416-419.
nogueira-De-sá
, F., &
VasconceLLos-neto
, J. 2003:
Natural enemies of Neotropical Cassidinae (Cole-
optera: Chrysomelidae) and their phenology. – Pp.
161-174 in:
Furth
D. G. (Ed): Special topics in leaf
beetle biology. Proceedings of the Fifth Interna-
tional Symposium on the Chrysomelidae – Pensoft
Publishers, Soa.
ohno
, M. 1955: Notes on the predacious insects at-
tacking Chrysomelidae in Japan. – Akitu 4 (3): 60-
65. (In Japanese)
oLmsteaD
, K. L. 1996: Cassidine defenses and natural
enemies. – Pp. 3-21 in:
joLiVet
, P. H. A. &
cox
,
M. L. (Eds.): Chrysomelidae Biology: Ecological
Studies. Volume 2. – SPB Academic Publishing,
Amsterdam.
roth
, P. 1923: Capture en France de Cerceris luctuosa
Costa (Hym. Sphegidae) et de sa proie. – Bulletin
de la Société Entomologique de France 1923: 143-
144.
shkuratoV
, A. V. 2001: K vidovomu sostavu dobychi
royushchikh os (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) nizh-
Tadashi shinohara* & Yasuoki Takami
218
nego i srednego Dona i Primanychskikh stepey.
– Ministerstvo Obrazovaniya Rossiyskoy Feder-
atsii. Rostovskiy Gosudarstvennyi Universitet.
Nauchnaya Konferentsiya Aspirantov i Soiskate-
ley (Tezisy Dokladov, 2000 g.). Izdatel’stvo Ros-
tovskogo Universiteta, Rostov-na-Donu.
terayama
, Y. &
suDa
, H. 2016: A Guide to the Ac-
uleate wasps of Japan. – Tokai University press,
Tokyo, 772pp. (in Japanese)
tsuneki
, K. 1942: On the nesting habits of Cerceris
navitatis Smith. – The entomological world 10
(96): 130-132. (In Japanese)
tsuneki
, K. 1965: The biology of East-Asiatic Cerce-
ris (Hym., Sphecidae) with special reference to the
peculiar social relationships and return to the nest
in Cerceris hortivaga Kohl. – Etizenia 9: 1-46.
Vermeij
, G. J. 1994: The evolutionary interaction
among species: selection, escalation, and coevolu-
tion. – Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
25: 219-236.
Vermeij
, G. J. 2002: Evolution in the consumer age:
predators and the history of life. – Palaeontologi-
cal Society Special Papers 8: 375-393.
ZetteL
, H.,
Zimmermann
, D.,
wiesbauer
, H. &
schuh
,
R. 2008: Schildkäfer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae:
Cassidinae) als Beute der seltenen Knotenwespe
Cerceris albofasciata (Rossi, 1790) (Hymenoptera:
Crabronidae: Philanthinae) in Österreich. – Beit-
räge zur Entomofaunistik 9: 167-174.
Author’s addresses
taDashi shinohara
Graduate School of Human Development & Envi-
ronment
Kobe University
3-11 Tsurukabuto, Nada
Kobe 657-8501
Japan
E-Mail: shinohara@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp
yasuoki takami
Graduate School of Human Development & Envi-
ronment
Kobe University
3-11 Tsurukabuto, Nada,
Kobe 657-8501
Japan
E-Mail: takami@people.kobe-u.ac.jp
... Some Cassidinae species are abundant on their host plants and may encounter not only the wasp but also generalist predators searching for prey on such plants. However, Cerceris albofasciata females store numerous prey individuals (adults) in a single larval cell during the provisioning period (Tsuneki, 1965;Shinohara & Takami, 2017). Therefore, predation by Cerceris albofasciata is expected to impact on Cassidinae species living near to the wasp nesting site and contribute to the evolution of their phenotypes. ...
... Cassidinae prey was collected from the wasps by three methods, as described by Shinohara & Takami (2017), as follows: (1) the wasps were captured as they returned to their nests with prey; (2) the prey was picked up after being dropped by the wasp on the ground in response to disturbance; and (3) prey laid near the nest entrance by the wasps was collected. Beetles obtained from the wasps were collected at 10.00-16.00 ...
... h, covering the time of active provisioning. The raw data of the numbers of hunted prey and the wasps collected in 2015 were reported by Shinohara & Takami (2017), and the techniques used for their collection were same as those used in the present study. Hunted prey surveys were performed over periods of 6 and 5 days in 2015 and 2016 at the Sanda site, respectively, and 6 and 3 days in 2015 and 2016 at the Yachiyo site, respectively. ...
Article
The prey preference of a predator can impose natural selection on prey phenotypes, including body size. Despite evidence that large body size protects against predation in insects, the determinants of body size variation in Cassidinae leaf beetles are not well understood. We examined the prey preference of the digger wasp Cerceris albofasciata, a specialist predator of adult Cassidinae leaf beetles, and found evidence for natural selection on prey body size. The wasp hunted prey smaller than the size of their nest entrance. However, the wasp preferred larger prey species among those that could be carried into their nest. Thus, the benefits of large prey and the cost associated with nest expansion might determine the prey size preference. As expected from the prey species preference, the wasp preferred small individuals of the largest prey species, Thlaspida biramosa, and large individuals of the smallest prey species, Cassida piperata, resulting in natural selection on body sizes. In intermediate-sized prey species, however, there was no evidence for selection on body size. Natural selection on body size might explain the variation of prey morphologies that increase body size, such as explanate margins, in this group.
... Adults of Cassidinae (Insecta, Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) leaf beetles exhibit various external morphologies, such as spines on the dorsal surface of the body and explanate margins surrounding the body, which are hypothesized defensive traits (Chaboo, 2007;Deroe & Pasteels, 1982;Jolivet & Verma, 2002;Olmstead, 1996;Shinohara & Takami, 2017). Species with spines or explanate margins are expected to encounter predators more frequently than species without such morphologies because the former are more likely to use an open habitat (perching on leaf surfaces; Shinohara et al., in revision). ...
... Thus, they are exposed to different environments, probably including different predators. In addition, Shinohara and Takami (2017) have shown that a Cassidinae species with long dorsal spines is not hunted by the digger wasp Cerceris albofasciata, a specialist predator occurring around the wasp's nests, indicating that the spines may contribute to defense against the specialist predator. However, the functions of diverse morphological defenses are largely unclear in Cassidinae, especially the functions against generalist predators found on their host plants. ...
Article
Full-text available
Predator–prey interactions may be responsible for enormous morphological diversity in prey species. We performed predation experiments with morphological manipulations (ablation) to investigate the defensive function of dorsal spines and explanate margins in Cassidinae leaf beetles against three types of predators: assassin bugs (stinger), crab spiders (biter), and tree frogs (swallower). There was mixed support for the importance of primary defense mechanisms (i.e., preventing detection or identification). Intact spined prey possessing dorsal spines were more likely to be attacked by assassin bugs and tree frogs, while intact armored prey possessing explanate margins were likely to avoid attack by assassin bugs. In support of the secondary defense mechanisms (i.e., preventing subjugation), dorsal spines had a significant physical defensive function against tree frogs, and explanate margins protected against assassin bugs and crab spiders. Our results suggest a trade‐off between primary and secondary defenses. Dorsal spines improved the secondary defense but weakened the primary defense against tree frogs. We also detected a trade‐off in which dorsal spines and explanate margins improved secondary defenses against mutually exclusive predator types. Adaptation to different predatory regimes and functional trade‐offs may mediate the diversification of external morphological defenses in Cassidinae leaf beetles. We revealed defensive function of dorsal spines and explanate margins in Cassidinae leaf beetles and detected functional trade‐offs. These results suggest that adaptation to different predatory regimes and functional trade‐offs contribute to the diversification of external morphologies in herbivorous insects.
Article
Full-text available
Cerceris rubida and C. verhoeffi are reported from Korea for the first time with detailed redescriptions. We also provide a checklist of Korean Philanthidae including 24 species.
Article
Full-text available
Three buprestid species, Actenodes acornis (Say, 1836), Dicerca asperata (Laporte et Gory, 1837), and Dicerca lepida LeConte, 1857, are newly recorded from Canada on the basis of a collection of 57 buprestid specimens taken from females of the crabronid wasp Cerceris fumipennis Say, 1837 in Rondeau Provincial Park, Chatham-Kent region, Ontario, in July 2004. Nine additional buprestid species were taken from wasps that were intercepted as they approached their nests, demonstrating the effectiveness of C. fumipennis nest sites as sampling stations for buprestid beetles. We suggest that this sampling method could be applied to efficiently monitor the spread of the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in eastern North America.
Article
Three properties of predation make this form of consumption an important agency of evolution: universality (all species have predators), high frequency (encounters of prey with predators test both parties often), and imperfection (many predatory attacks fail, enabling antipredatory selection to take place). On long time scales, predators have two principal effects: they influence their victims' phenotypes, and prey species that are highly vulnerable to all phases of predatory attacks are evolutionarily restricted to environments where predators are rarely encountered. Although predator and prey can affect each other's behavior and morphology on timescales commensurate with individual lifespans, predators have the evolutionary upper hand over the long run, especially in the expression of sensory capacities, locomotor performance, and the application of force. Only in passive defenses (armor, toxicity, large body size) does escalation favor the prey. In a review of methods for inferring predation in the geological past, I argue against the use of whole assemblages, which combine species of contrasting adaptive type. Instead, I strongly favor species-level and clade-level approaches (including examples of clade replacement) in which comparisons among places and among time intervals are made within the same adaptive types and the same physical environments. The available evidence, much of which comes from studies of shell drilling and shell breakage, points to temporal increases in both predator power and prey defenses. Escalation between species and their enemies, including predators, has proceeded episodically against a backdrop of generally increasing productivity and increasing top-down evolutionary control by high-energy predators during the Phanerozoic, the consumer age.
Article
Defense glands were examined in the adults of 65 species belonging to 10 different subfamilies. They were found in the pronota and elytra of members of the subfamilies Criocerinae, Chrysomelinae, Galerucinae, and Alticinae. It is suggested that these glands appeared monophyletically in the course of evolution and that the absence of glands in several species of the two most evolved subfamilies is a secondary event, explained by the presence of alternative efficient defensive behaviors: reflex bleeding in the Galerucinae and escape mechanism of jumping in the flea beetles. It is also suggested that a large distribution of the glands at the surface of the beetles is a primitive condition and that in the course of evolution only the glands most efficiently located along the edges of the pronotum and elytra were maintained. Such evolution has occurred several times. Alternative and complementary defensive mechanisms are also listed and discussed.
Article
The hypothesis of escalation states that enemies-competitors, predators, and dangerous prey-are the most important agents of natural selection among individual organisms, and that enemy-related adaptation and responses brought about long-term evolutionary trends in the morphology, behavior, and distribution of organisms over the course of the Phanerozoic. In contrast to this top-down view of the role of organisms in determining the directions of evolution, the hypothesis of coevolution holds that two interacting species or groups of species change in response to each other. I review and evaluate these hypotheses in the light of criticisms about the existence of evolutionary trends and the role of interactions of species in evolution. Models describing the evolutionary effects organisms have on each other have been based largely on population dynamics and on cost-benefit analyses of the net outcome of interactions between species. Yet, the hypotheses of escalation and coevolution are statements about the nature, frequency, causes, and role of selection. Although these models have provided valuable insights and have forced some modifications in the hypotheses of escalation studies seeking to distinguish between escalation and coevolution will require empirical observations and cost-benefit evaluations of the discrete events of interaction that collectively constitute organism-caused selection.
Article
Larvae of the tortoise beetle Eurypedus nigrosignata construct fecal shields using cast skins and fecal strands. Survival of larvae with intact shields was higher in the field than for larvae with shields removed. In the laboratory, E. nigrosignata feculae had a deterrent effect on feeding in the ant Myrmica rubra as did an extract of the host plant, Cordia curassavica. Three chemical types were identified in the host-plant foliage and were named -terpinene, -pinene, and sabinene, depending on their mono- and sesquiterpene composition. This is the first report of lower terpenes (essential oils) in foliage of Cordia. Fecal shields of E. nigrosignata displayed the same terpene pattern as larval host-plant leaves. The absolute concentration of mono- and sesquiterpenes in the dorsal fecal shield depended on the plant chemical type and tended to decrease with larval age. No oxidation or detoxification products of ingested terpenes were detected in the larval fecula, indicating that the chemical composition of the larval fecal shield is influenced primarily by the host-plant secondary chemistry.
Article
An adaptation in one lineage (e.g. predators) may change the selection pressure on another lineage (e.g. prey), giving rise to a counter-adaptation. If this occurs reciprocally, an unstable runaway escalation or 'arms race' may result. We discuss various factors which might give one side an advantage in an arms race. For example, a lineage under strong selection may out-evolve a weakly selected one (' the life-dinner principle'). We then classify arms races in two independent ways. They may be symmetric or asymmetric, and they may be interspecific or intraspecific. Our example of an asymmetric interspecific arms race is that between brood parasites and their hosts. The arms race concept may help to reduce the mystery of why cuckoo hosts are so good at detecting cuckoo eggs, but so bad at detecting cuckoo nestlings. The evolutionary contest between queen and worker ants over relative parental investment is a good example of an intraspecific asymmetric arms race. Such cases raise special problems because the participants share the same gene pool. Interspecific symmetric arms races are unlikely to be important, because competitors tend to diverge rather than escalate competitive adaptations. Intraspecific symmetric arms races, exemplified by adaptations for male-male competition, may underlie Cope's Rule and even the extinction of lineages. Finally we consider ways in which arms races can end. One lineage may drive the other to extinction; one may reach an optimum, thereby preventing the other from doing so; a particularly interesting possibility, exemplified by flower-bee coevolution, is that both sides may reach a mutual local optimum; lastly, arms races may have no stable and but may cycle continuously. We do not wish necessarily to suggest that all, or even most, evolutionary change results from arms races, but we do suggest that the arms race concept may help to resolve three long-standing questions in evolutionary theory.
Insect predators of Chrysomelidae
  • M L Cox
cox, M. L. 1996: Insect predators of Chrysomelidae. -Pp. 23-91 in: joLiVet, P. H. A. & cox, M. L. (Eds.): Chrysomelidae Biology: Ecological Studies. Volume 2. -SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam.
Biology of leaf beetles.-Intercept Publishers, Andover, 332 pp. katayama, H. 1933: Ecological notes on Cerceris navitatis Smith.-The Transactions of the Leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae) of Japan
  • P Jolivet
  • K K Verma
  • S Takizawa
joLiVet, P. & Verma, K. K. 2002: Biology of leaf beetles.-Intercept Publishers, Andover, 332 pp. katayama, H. 1933: Ecological notes on Cerceris navitatis Smith.-The Transactions of the Kansai Entomological Society 4: 38-42. (In Japanese) kimoto, S. & takiZawa, H. 1994: Leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae) of Japan.-Tokai University Press, Tokyo, 539 pp. koLossoV, J. 1934: K voprosu o pishche lichinok os roda Cerceris.-Izvestiya Ural'skogo Lesotekhnicheskogo Instituta 2: 103-104.