Content uploaded by Silvana NR Birchenough
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Silvana NR Birchenough on Nov 03, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
CARIBBEAN MARINE CLIMATE CHANGE REPORT CARD: SCIENCE REVIEW 2017
Science Review 2017: pp 40-51.
Impacts of Climate Change on Biodiversity in the Coastal and
Marine Environments of Caribbean Small Island Developing States
(SIDS)
Silvana N.R. Birchenough
Cefas Marine Climate Change Centre. The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft,
NR33 0HT, UK.
Introduction
The Caribbean region has been recognised to be a hot-spot for
biodiversity worldwide (UNEP, 2009; Myers et al., 2000). This
report card summarises the current evidence and expected
future climate change effects on important marine habitats and
species. The topics considered in this review are seagrasses
and turtles, mammals, plankton and invasive species. Whilst it
is acknowledged that other habitats and species are also
contributing towards the overall biodiversity (e.g. coral, fish and
shellfish, and mangroves) in these areas, these habitats and
species have been covered as individual (‘hot topic’) reports.
However, this review has also included a brief section where
these important species and habitats have been considered
because they are key contributors to the overall Caribbean
biodiversity. In this short summary, we have indicated the likely
expected climate change effects. The observed effects of
climate change and expected future changes will act differently
across species and habitats. Some SIDS are already
experiencing some of these changes and in some cases there
will be some site-specific effects across these areas.
This review has collated information on all countries in the
Caribbean Region, however, the main emphasis is on the
following Small Island Development States (SIDS): Antigua &
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The current and future available evidence (based on AR5 scenarios) suggests that small islands will be vulnerable to sea
level rise (SLR) and increased sea surface temperature (SST). Extent of coastal vegetated wetlands is also expected to
decrease;
The impact of increased SST on seagrass and mangroves beds in the Caribbean is uncertain, but some studies suggests
that the photosynthetic mechanism of tropical seagrasses could become damaged at very high temperatures;
Shellfish and fisheries are important food and economic resources for SIDS. These may be directly and indirectly affected
under climate change effects, further research is needed to fully understand and minimise these expected effects;
Some evidence suggests that increased temperatures and low winds could be favouring the appearance of Sargassum
natans and Sargassum fluitans introduction in the Caribbean region;
Coral bleaching could become an annual or biannual event in the next 30 to 50 years or sooner, without an increase in
thermal tolerance of corals of 0.2 to 1.0°C;
In the Caribbean, there is a 0.5 m SLR projected which is likely to cause a decrease in turtle nesting habitat by up to 35%;
Recent research has shown that the invasion of the Caribbean Sea by the successful predator the Indo-Pacific lionfish
(Pterois volitans) has contributed to an increase in algal dominance in coral and sponge communities in the Caribbean
region. Presence of the predator may reduce the resilience of reef communities to climate stressors, and vice versa;
Plans and some actions to mitigate the effects of climate change on biodiversity are already being developed in some SIDS,
but this work is still in its infancy.
41
Barbuda; Belize; Dominica; Grenada; Guyana; Jamaica; Saint
Lucia; Saint Vincent & Grenadines (Figure 1). This section on
key impacts has integrated knowledge on i) what is already
happening? and ii) what could happen in the future? A detailed
overview is provided on seagrasses and specific species. It is
expected that the effects of climate change on biodiversity will
have synergistic interactions with other human activities (e.g.
fishing, recreational sports, tourisms, sewage discharges) and
will have repercussions for the ecology and ecosystems
distributed in these areas. Climate change effects may have
interactions with many other stressors as documented
elsewhere (Birchenough et al., 2015; Day 2009).
Figure 1. Overview of the maritime area of the Small Island
Developing States (SIDS) in the Caribbean.
Key topics
Some of the main issues for corals, mangroves, fish and shellfish
key topics are briefly included in the sections below. However, a
dedicated review can be found in the full research papers
concentrating on these topics see (see Wilson, 2017 mangroves;
Oxenford and Monnereau, 2017 -fish and shellfish; McField,
2017 corals). The topic research papers have included sections
on: key messages, what is already happening, what could
happen in the future, the confidence levels based on our current
understanding as well as knowledge gaps and socio-economic
impacts.
What is Already Happening?
Corals
Coral reefs are important habitats as they provide shoreline
protection from extreme events such as storms and hurricanes.
Their role also contributes to the provision of medicines, food,
and recreational activities. Their overall estimated global value
of 172 billion U.S. dollars per year (EurekAlert-AAAS, 2009). A
study assessing Belize’s coral reef and coastal mangroves
estimated their overall value to be $395 - $559 million U.S.
dollars per year, considering all of the direct benefits and wider
ecosystem services (Cooper et al, 2009). Corals also host much
of the biodiversity of the oceans as well as providing critical
protection against erosion and wave-induced damages resulting
from tropical storms and hurricanes, safeguarding properties and
lives. To date, evidence suggests that climate change is
impacting coral reefs through coral bleaching, disease
outbreaks, ocean acidification and dedicated physical damage
from frequent hurricanes. Additionally, an increase in sea
temperature is clearly having an impact on the coral reef
ecosystem health globally (McField, 2017 for further details).
Meta-analyses have indicated that global climate change could
increase the frequency of coral bleaching threating the long-term
integrity of coral reefs. These results were based on the
projecting outputs from an atmosphere–ocean general
circulation models (GCMs), with regards to the local conditions
found across representative coral reefs. The overall work is a
comprehensive global assessment of coral bleaching, based on
the work conducted by the NOAA Coral Reef Watch bleaching
prediction method, with a low- and high-climate sensitivity GCM.
The overall results were site-specific, very dependent of the
geographic variability observed over thermal adaptation.
Research suggest that bleaching could become an annual or
biannual event for the majority of the world's coral reefs in the
next 30–50 years without an increase in thermal tolerance of
0.2–1.0°C per decade. The work conducted was based on
available model and emissions scenarios, suggesting that for
some coral reefs, the expected effects resulting from climate
change will vary across regions (Donner et al., 2005).
Overall, the Caribbean SIDS have not yet experienced the global
widespread degree of bleaching-induced mass mortality
compared effects observed elsewhere (e.g. areas in the Pacific).
However, some clear events have been recently observed in
certain areas (e.g. Belize) (McField, 2017). Furthermore, the
resulting effects on coral integrity resulting from diseases have
been underestimated. Maynard et al. (2016) postulated that
bleaching is the likely cause of coral mortality in the future and
that further consideration needs to be included in management
and monitoring of these areas. The increase in sea temperature
is also contributing to the declines in coral reproductive success
(Baird et al., 2009), metabolic rates (Munday et al., 2009), and
shifts in geo-graphic ranges (Hughes et al., 2012). Overall, the
combined effects of climate change with overfishing and
pollution could exacerbate the effects on coral reefs over recent
decades (Game et al., 2005). There is a need to climate proof
the current conservation strategies to protect, restore and
manage these important habitats.
Mangroves
Mangroves cover approximately 137,760 km2 – 152,360km2 of
the world’s surface (Kainuma et al., 2013), these habitats are
highly threatened worldwide (Spalding et al., 2010). There are
four mangrove species—Rhizophora mangle, Avicennia
germinans, Laguncularia racemose and Conocarpus erectus—
found throughout the Wider Caribbean. Studies show that the
loss of mangroves worldwide has been severe over the last
several decades. Mangrove habitats are important as they
provide numerous ecosystem services for human wellbeing (Van
Bochove et al., 2014; Friess, 2016) and climate change could be
also adding an additional pressure to these species. Mangroves
are important as they enhance coastal fisheries, sequester
42
carbon, provide provisions to local inhabitants, filter nutrients and
sediment, support tourism and protect coastlines and coastal
communities from waves and storms among other values
(Mukherjee et al., 2014). In the Caribbean, particularly in SIDS,
mangroves provide numerous commercial and subsistence
goods, serve as a natural form of coastal protection and
resilience, and support a range of marine and coastal tourism
enterprises (Brown et al., 2007).
Studies have demonstrated that mangroves across the
Caribbean have declined by approximately 24% over the last
quarter-century (Polidoro et al., 2010). The main human
activities which are considered to be drivers of mangrove
destruction and/or degradation are mainly resulting from land
use activities along the coastal zone (Spalding et al., 2010; Van
Bochove et al, 2014). Studies have listed the primary and
emergent anthropogenic threats to mangroves. These are
outlined below:
• Coastal development (e.g. roads, ports, urban
growth and tourism accommodations)
• Agriculture and aquaculture
• Pollution and environmental degradation
• Local exploitation (e.g. wood for cooking or
building)
• Rising seas due to climate change
The 5th Assessment Report prepared by the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-AR5), contains a section on
small islands. This work indentified main climate and pressures
that are expected to impact mangrove ecosystems in Caribbean
SIDS (Nurse et al., 2014). These include the following:
• Variations in air and ocean temperatures
• Ocean chemistry
• Rainfall
• Wind strength and direction
• Sea levels and wave climate (especially extremes such
as hurricanes, drought and storm surges)
Furthermore, a recent review of climate change impacts on
mangrove ecosystems (Alongi, 2015; McKee 2011 and Krauss
et al., 2013) conducted a comprehensive review of the SLR issue
as these effects are directly related to mangroves (McIvor,
2012). This work showed that the presence of deep peat
deposits, provides evidence that in some Caribbean locations in
the past, landward migration of mangroves continue to shift with
SLR. Additional studies have also shown some limits in which
mangroves cannot keep pace with SLR, demonstrating the
degration of these habitats (Alongi, 2015).
Fish and shellfish
Fish and shellfish are important economic and food resources in
the SIDS. Some of the shellfish and fish are already experiencing
climate change effects. For example, measurements of across
the entire Caribbean Sea have shown an overall increase in
SST; with an increase in the frequency of occurrence of
anomalous ‘hotspots’ (e.g. greater than 1°C above mean
monthly maximum SST), as well as an increase in the
occurrence of periods of deleterious ‘heating stress’ (greater
than 8 degree heating weeks), and an increase in the frequency
of category 4 and 5 hurricanes. It is clear that warmer SSTs are
having a direct impact on Caribbean fish and shellfish
metabolism since they are poikilothermic ectotherms (‘cold
blooded’). This impact is likely to be largely negative, given that
many species are already likely to be close to their critical
maximum temperature and minimum oxygen tolerances, at least
during the summer months. Changing temperatures will have
already impacted species’ phenologies and early life history
development times with the likely result of less successful
recruitment (population replenishment). However, again there
are no studies that have examined likely changes in, for
example: metabolic rate, growth, development of early life
history stages, phenologies, or mortality from anoxia in
Caribbean species from any of the commercially important
groups in the wild, over time-scales long enough to detect
change that can be attributed to climate-induced changes in
SST.
However, increasing SSTs and associated changes have had
measurable negative impacts across the Caribbean on the
essential habitats of fish and shellfish, especially coral reefs
since the 1980s, through mass coral bleaching and mortality
events, increased incidences of coral and other invertebrate
diseases, and greater physical destruction. These climate
change stressors have exacerbated the on-going chronic
degradation of these habitats from other anthropogenic stressors
including deteriorating water quality (from land-based activities
along the coast and within watersheds), physical destruction
(from coastal development and marine construction), and
chronic over-harvesting. The evidence is clear in the changing
composition of the foundational reef species, the decline in live
coral cover and architectural complexity (rugosity) of reef
structural framework; as well as in the loss of mangrove and
seagrass habitat.
The indirect impacts of the climate-induced changes to essential
habitats (including the open ocean) on the fish and shellfish
resources have not been widely monitored or reported, and are
indeed difficult to separate from the whole level of changes
occurring within these habitats that have been largely caused by
other anthropogenic stressors. However, there are several
studies providing evidence on the decline in live coral cover,
caused largely by temperature-induced mass coral bleaching, as
well as decline in herbivorous reef fish biomass across the
Caribbean.
Climate change impacts on commercially important fish and
shellfish will have a wide array of social and economic
implications in Caribbean SIDS including impacts on: (1)
consumers and value of the food as a resource with potential
repercussions for food and job security for the fisheries; (2)
recreational diving (e.g. SCUBA and snorkelling) in these areas
with potential reduction in revenue; and 3) the ecological
functions provided by fish and shellfish, mainly on the regulation
of ecosystem services (more details are provided in Oxenford
and Monnereau, 2017).
Furthermore, studies to date have not shown direct evidence of
reduced calcification by Caribbean fish or shellfish, although
there is worldwide evidence of potential observed effects on
43
some of these species elsewhere from laboratory and field
studies that may help to inform these stocks.
Seagrasses
Seagrasses are considered to be ecologically important
environments as they host and provide a range of ecosystem
goods and services (Guannel et al., 2016; Waite et al., 2014; de
Goot et al., 2012; Polidoro et al., 2010; Waycott et al., 2009;
Cooper et al., 2009; Constanza et al., 2008). These habitats
contribute significantly to the well-being of small island
communities. These ecosystems are generally distributed along
the coast in shallow water where sunlight penetration is
adequate to allow photosynthesis. Their location leaves them
highly susceptible to run-off from land-based activities and to
stressors arising from water sports. Seagrasses play a
significant role in stabilising the seabed and for providing habitat
to juvenile fishes and importantly commercial species (e.g.
conch and lobster) which are consider to be ecosystem
components. Their contribution is mainly as primary producers
in the food chain of the reef community, with their production of
4000 g C/m2/yr. Seagrasses also actively contribute to: i)
nitrogen fixation; ii) habitat provision (mainly for feeding,
breeding and recruitment for juveniles and adults) of reef
organisms (e.g. commercial species and the culturally important
sea egg urchin (Tripneustes ventricosus)); iii) reduction in
sediment movement in nearshore waters and removing
sediments from the water column; iv) decreasing turbidity of the
water; and vi) stabilizing and protecting the coastline during
storms (Guannel et al., 2016;).
These habitats help to maintain ocean clarity, helping to support
tourism and recreation (e.g. snorkelling). Some of the non-
climate change effects on these habitats can be expected from
siltation (arising from shore construction) as well as pollution
sources, smothering and damaging the blades of the
seagrasses. Some of the general evidence presented in the
Caribbean area states that potential expected effects of climate
change can result from sea level rise, ocean acidification,
intensified storms and increased sea surface temperature. Some
specific information is described below for individual SIDs.
In Anguilla, there is limited evidence on the effects of climate
change on seagrasses. However, climate change remains to be
a relatively new threat to these ecosystems. Therefore, there
have been limited studies on distinct climate change impacts on
seagrasses. Nevertheless, some of the potential threats
identified may arise from SLR, changes in localised salinity,
increased SST and effects from extreme weather events.
Generally, as it is expected for coral reefs, similar effects may
arise from SLR, which will reduce the sunlight and could also
have repercussions for the integrity of seagrass beds. In Antigua
& Barbuda and Saint Lucia the main identified potential impacts,
are associated with an increased SST and could affect seagrass
beds in this area. However, there is a limited understanding on
what could be the magnitude of these effects on these habitats.
Some available evidence has suggested that the photosynthetic
mechanism of tropical seagrasses could become damaged at
very increased temperatures (see Campbell et al., 2006).
In the Bahamas, seagrass beds are well-known for their
significant role as seabed stabilizers and in habitat provision to
juvenile fishes and commercial species (mainly conch and
lobster) (Caribsave report-The Bahamas, 2011). The Bahamas
has recognised the importance of these habitats and adopted
strict control and regulation on Environmental Impact
Assessments. These considerations are applicable with regards
to several tourism expansions and take account how these
developments will be likely to affect several habitats (including
mangroves, seagrass beds and coral reefs). In Barbados and the
Dominican Republic, four species of seagrasses have been
identified, these are: Thalassia testudinum (turtle grass),
Syringodium filiforme (manatee grass), Halodule wrightii (shoal
grass) and Halophila spp. (Caribsave report- Barbados, 2011;
Caribsave report- The Dominican Republic, 2011). The majority
of the seagrass beds in the Dominican Republic lie within
protected areas, although some of these coastal ecosystems are
still subjected several threats. These are mainly sedimentation
from river outflows, agro-chemical pollution, and pressures from
coastal developments. Furthermore, the effects resulting from
overfishing and destructive fishing practices are also damaging
these seagrass habitats. Seagrasses are very sensitive to
changes in the surrounding water so they are considered to be
important “indicator species” of the general health of coastal
ecosystems. In Belize, seagrass beds (such as T. testudinum
and S. filiforme) are distributed throughout the entire length of
Belize (Caribsave- Belize, 2011). These beds support large
populations of manatees, which are an important eco-tourism
attraction in the tourism centres of San Pedro, Caye Caulker and
Placencia.
In Grenada seagrass beds are found along the east central and
southern coasts in the Telescope area and within the barrier type
reef extending from Grenville Bay to Prickly Bay in the south.
Most of the reefs and seagrasses continue to be negatively
impacted by tourism activities and over-fishing. In Jamaica, there
is limited evidence on climate change impacts on seagrass beds,
although recent evidence suggests that the proximity of
seagrass beds to coral reefs exposes them to similar climatic
change impacts. As with corals, SLR may reduce the available
sunlight to seagrass beds and hence reduce their productivity.
While there is no consensus amongst the models as to whether
the frequencies and intensities of rainfall on the heaviest rainfall
days will increase or decrease in the region (Simpson, et al.,
2010), increased rainfall could mean localised decreased salinity
and thus decreased productivity of seagrass habitats. At Nevis,
some effects on seagrasses were observed in the 1990s. It is
generally conceded that seagrasses around Nevis, especially
around Charlestown, were "slowly disappearing" (Robinson,
1991). There is clear evidence that some factors have
contributed to the degradation of coral reefs and seagrasses; a
result of anchor damage and sedimentation, shipping-related
pollution and land-based run-off. These effects have caused
physical damage to seagrasses and reduced the quality of
coastal water (Eckert & Honebrink, 1992). Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines (SVG) possess a wide range of seagrasses beds,
these are found along the shoreline in shallow water where
sunlight penetration is adequate to allow photosynthesis. There
44
has been very little mapping and monitoring of these ecosystems
on the main island of St Vincent. Some maps are available on
the Marsis website (see
http://www.grenadinesmarsis.com/Files_and_Maps.html) for the
Grenadines and these seagrass beds tend to be relatively small
and isolated. Overall, most of the information available has
helped to document seagrass distribution and effects from a
wide range of human activities. However, the current knowledge
on climate change effects on these habitats is limited and mostly
speculative from other habitats (e.g. corals and mangroves).
Overall, the effects of climate change on seagrasses remain
largely uncertain. Potential threats may arise from SLR, changes
in localised salinity, increased SST and intensity of extreme
weather events. As with corals, SLR may reduce the sunlight
available to seagrass beds and hence reduce their productivity
(Nurse et al., 2014). While there is no consensus amongst the
models as to whether the frequencies and intensities of rainfall
on the heaviest rainfall days will increase or decrease in the
region, increased rainfall could mean a localised decrease in
salinity and resulting decrease in productivity of seagrass
habitats. On the other hand, CO2 enrichment of the ocean may
have a positive effect on photosynthesis and growth. The
photosynthetic activity of dense seagrass stands have been
shown to increase local pH potentially balancing a decreased pH
from projected ocean acidification (Bjork & Beer, 2009). An
increase of CO2 levels may also increase the production and
biomass of epiphytic algae on seagrass leaves, which may
adversely impact seagrasses by causing shading; thus changes
may occur in the competition between seagrass species and
between seagrasses and algae (Beer and Koch 1996).
Seagrasses are sensitive to thermal discharges and can only
accept temperatures up to 2-3°C above summer temperatures
(Anderson, 2000). However, the impact of increased SST on
seagrass beds in the Caribbean is uncertain, since studies have
suggested that the photosynthetic mechanism of tropical
seagrasses becomes damaged at temperatures as high as 40-
45°C indicating that they may be able to tolerate temperature
increases above some climate change model projections
(Campbell, et al. 2006).
Turtles-nesting beaches
A vulnerability analysis of CARICOM nations to SLR and
associated storm surge indicated that large areas of the
coastlines in the Caribbean are highly susceptible to erosion.
The beaches have clearly experienced accelerated erosion in
recent decades. Some specific calculations tend to suggest that
beach nesting sites for sea turtles are at significant risk to beach
erosion (Simpson, et al., 2010). Overall, the expected effects of
climate change on nesting sea turtles tend to indicate that there
are potential expected effects on these habitats. Building,
coastal infrastructure and the removal of vegetation from
beaches is leading to erosion of sand and loss of nesting sites.
Beach erosion in several countries, including Tobago, St Lucia,
Grenada, Jamaica and others, is being exacerbated by illegal or
unregulated sand mining. These activities further undermine the
quality and quantity of turtle nesting sites.
Climate change impacts on the biodiversity of beaches may also
be seen as warmer average daily temperatures affect marine
turtles. Incubation temperature influences the sex of baby turtles.
Therefore, it is expected that warmer temperatures may skew
sex ratios in developing eggs and thereby reduce the
reproductive capacity of sea turtles. Such impacts will mean a
further threat to species that are already critically endangered
and a loss of potential revenue for the country’s expanding
tourism industry with an overall disruption of the marine
ecosystem balance.
The following section highlights impacts of climate change on
turtle nesting sites, as well as measures to reduce impacts at a
SIDs level.
A dedicated vulnerability assessment conducted in St Lucia
with regards to SLR, have demonstrated that that newly
adopted measures to minimise SLR effects will have direct
effects on turtle nesting beaches (Murray and Tulsie, 2011).
Some of these species will be also at significant risk to beach
erosion associated with SLR, with 51% significantly affected by
erosion from 1 m SLR and 62% by erosion associated with 2 m
SLR (Simpson et al., 2010).
In Dominica, St. Lucia and Grenada there are documented
impacts of tropical cyclones between 1979 and 1995 which show
the severe erosion that these weather systems have caused to
beaches. In Dominica, in most instances large amounts of sand
were removed and in the cases of Scott’s Head Beach, Rock-a
way Beach and Toucarie Beach, have been replaced with
boulders. Beach profile monitoring has revealed that although
beaches in Dominica have shown signs of recovery after
extreme weather events, they had not yet returned to pre-
hurricane conditions by the time of reporting in 2011 (Caribsave
Report-Dominica, 2011.). An example of an extreme event was
during the struck of Hurricane Lenny struck Grenada in 1999
severely eroding the Grand Anse beach so that the shoreline
retreated inwards by 6 m (Caribsave Report-Grenada, 2011).
Subsequently, Hurricane Ivan in 2005 also reported major
damage to beaches. The following year Hurricane Emily struck
the island and although the damage was less severe than that
experienced by Ivan, the overall impacts reversed any progress
that had been initially made.
In Belize, the Belize Turtle Watch Program was launched in
March 2011 by ECOMAR, in partnership with the Belize
Fisheries Department, with support from World Wide Fund
(WWF) and Protected Areas Conservation Trust (PACT). The
aim is to increase the level of knowledge on sea turtles in
Belize and to establish a baseline data set on abundance and
nesting beach activity so that changes over time, specifically
those caused by climate change, can be measured.
Non-native or Invasive Alien Species
There is limited information for some of the SIDS regarding the
threat of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) and the risks that these
species will pose to the native biodiversity. Invasive species can
out-compete native species for food and space and may even
prey on native species, thus disrupting ecosystems, particularly
those that have already been disturbed and affected as a
consequence of human activities.
45
Since 2011, during July and August some of the islands (e.g.
Anguilla, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Barbados, St
Lucia, Antigua) have experienced exceptionally large
accumulations of Sargassum seaweed Sargassum fluitans
(Figure 2). Since this seaweed has been washed ashore and it
is not originally form these Islands, it is considered to be an
introduced species. These large quantities of the seaweed are
causing concerns among visitors and residents. Although these
events are not confirmed as climate change related effects, the
phenomenon is thought to be as a direct result of the gyre in
the Atlantic off Brazil (see Sargasso sea (Doyle and Franks,
2015). These floating mats of vegetation arrive in the
Caribbean region annually, but over recent years they appear
to be doing so in unusually large quantities. Fishers have
complained that their nets and lines become entangled in the
Sargassum and this has almost shut down the entire fishing
sector. There is also concern over the risk of disease and
invasive species that may accompany the seaweed. The large
volume and weight of seaweed washed up on some beaches is
unsightly and poses a problem for the tourism industry as well
as a major expense and logistical challenge for governments
who opt to collect and dispose of the Sargassum. If this event is
indeed related to cyclonic storms that have formed in the
Atlantic since the 2011 hurricane season, then coastal and
marine environmental managers should prepare for the
likelihood of these events occurring with increased frequency in
the near future.
In Saint Lucia and Nevis the invasive Indo‐Pacific lionfish
(Pterois volitans), has been sighted (recorded since November
2010) in neighbouring territories as close as Guadeloupe and
Venezuela (Figure 3). The lionfish has been observed in the
Western Atlantic, Caribbean and in the Gulf of Mexico (Atkins et
al., 2012; Green et al., 2012; Atkins et al., 2012). The lionfish
have no apparent natural predators in the Caribbean and this
has allowed the species to spread very rapidly throughout the
region from both northern and southern ends of the Caribbean
Basin. The fish feeds not only on reef fish such as parrotfish,
which are important to maintaining reef health, but also on the
juveniles of commercially important species. The St Lucia’s
Fisheries Division and Coastal Zone Management Unit are
greatly concerned about the threat this could pose for the
country’s fishing industry. Some regional research on lionfish is
increasing and should be monitored closely for management
recommendations. (see
http://www.gcfi.org/Lionfish/Lionfish.html for further additional
information). Although there is no evidence that the lionfish
invasion is climate-related, the concern is that when combined
with pre-existing stress factors the natural resilience of
Caribbean reef communities will decrease (Green et al., 2012;
Albins and Hixon, 2013), making them more susceptible to
climate change.
An overall threat to Jamaica’s reefs and fisheries is the voracious
predator lionfish. As of 2010 almost every reef of Jamaica has
uncounted numbers of this invasive species which could wipe
out the already depleted fishing industry (Neufville, 2010).
Overall, there is limited information on invasive species in some
of the islands and the information available is still in its infancy.
There is a need to document sightings and distribution of these
species. Furthermore, it is also important to assess the
ecological trade-off that the invasive species will have over the
native fauna to gain an understanding on the overall
repercussions for biodiversity effects in these areas.
Image 2. Large accumulations of Sargassum fluitans, known as
'the sargassum seaweed' in the Caribbean. (image
©H.Oxenford extracted from Doyle and Franks, 2015).
Image 3. The invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans.
(©Peter Randall, Cefas)
There is clear concern on the risks to small islands from climate
change effects, which could be originating well beyond the
borders of specific countries and/or islands. These
transboundary processes could have a negative impact on small
islands with strong evidence that this may be the case. For island
communities, the risks associated with existing and future
invasive species and human health challenges are projected to
grow under climate change effects (Nurse et al., 2014). The
effects of climate change may act as a multiplier of existing
46
health conditions. Other broader effects may affect the health of
the country's fisheries, tourism sector, as these activities are
directly interlinked with the overall health of its marine
environment, whose vulnerability is likely to be exacerbated by
the anticipated effects of climate change” (see more details on a
vulnerability report by Murray and Tulsie, 2011).
Marine mammals
Marine mammals are spotted in most of the islands (e.g. The
Bahamas, Saint Lucia, Belize, Dominica, Granada, Jamaica and
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines). The majority of species are
dolphins (e.g. the common bottlenose, Atlantic spotted and the
spinner). There are also 4 species of migratory whales: minke,
sperm, beaked shortfin and humpback, which are often sighted.
Sperm whales appear to be sighted in greater numbers from the
months of October to January and humpback whales are seen
migrating only between January and April. Dolphins and whales
contribute to recreational tourism in the area, bringing a number
of tourists over the years and creating jobs and business
opportunities in the area. For example, the whale watching
industry in Saint Lucia grew rapidly over a 10-year period from
65 whale watchers in 1998 to over 16,600 in 2008. Whale
watching tours are now offered by different operators on the
islands with a total of US $1,577,010 in direct and indirect
expenditure in 2008 (O’Connor et al., 2009). The number of stay
over, as well as cruise ship tourists to the region continues to
increase annually, offering a good prospect for expansion of the
market for these tours.
Climate change impacts on the chemical and physical
characteristics of marine waters will have negative
consequences for prey items. Therefore, whale feeding patterns
and distribution may be altered. The whale distribution changes
(e.g. following food over different areas) may have repercussion
for watch tour operators. Information on the biology of many
cetaceans is limited and this makes it difficult to predict the
consequences that climate change may have on them.
Nevertheless, it is likely that changes in global temperature, sea
levels, sea‐ice extent, ocean acidification and salinity, rainfall
patterns and extreme weather events will decrease the range of
many marine mammals (Elliot and Simmonds, 2007). Current
evidence suggests that the migration patterns, distribution and/or
abundance of cetaceans are likely to alter in response to
continued changes in sea surface temperature with global
climate change (Lambert et al., 2010).
In SVG there are twelve species of cetaceans which include
humpback whales, sperm whales, pilot whales, bottlenose
dolphins and spinner dolphins. Bequia is the second largest
island in the Grenadines and is one of the few locations where
whale hunting is still permitted by the International Whaling
Commission due to aboriginal subsistence hunting (Mills, 2001).
In Saint Lucia, the short-finned pilot whale is also distributed and
harvested (Murray pers.comm.).
The decrease in the population of sperm whales documented by
Gero and Whithead (2016) in the Eastern Caribbean of -4.5%
per year in unit size started in about 2010, with numbers being
fairly stable until then. There are several natural and
anthropogenic threats, but no well-substantiated cause for the
decline. It is possible that changes in ocean curents and
temperatures associated with climate change may have been
associated with this decline. The available migratory evidence
suggests that marine mammals will be likely affected by climate
change during some stage in their life-cycles. However, there is
not distinct evidence that will imply at what specific stage or how
these effects may be further influenced by other environmental
stressors. There is a clear expectation that climate change
effects may increase abundance or distribution range.
Additionally, climate change could also contribute to higher risks
of extinction for some of the most vulnerable species. One of the
most critical effects resulting from climate change have been
associated with oceanographic changes, which could have
severe repercussions for food availability (mainly fish and
plankton) for marine mammals.
Plankton
The available evidence for most of the islands (e.g. Anguilla
Belize, Grenada, Dominica, Saint Lucia, The Dominican
Republic, Nevis and SVG), and the overall Caribbean area, is
based on the available evidence via the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change- IPCC (A4 and A5 assessments- Nurse et
al., 2014 and IPCC, 2007). Overall, there is an indication that
shifts in plankton abundance will be likely to be affected by rising
water temperatures, changes in ice cover, salinity, acidification,
oxygen levels and circulation, as well as other species (e.g.
algae and fish abundance). Recent studies conducted in the
southern Caribbean areas, showed decreasing levels of
plankton production, from the result of a reduction in ocean
upwelling, whereby nutrients crucial for plankton production are
brought from the sea floor to the surface. The decrease in
upwelling has, in turn, been driven by changes in wind patterns
and wind strength, themselves driven by global climate change,
which may have repercussions for the sardine fisheries. Most of
the available information on plankton and the likely
consequences resulting from climate change effects are based
on wider information from regional assessments (Nurse et al.,
2014). Whilst, this information is accurate, there are no clear
future plankton predictions or expected effects observed in
Caribbean islands. However, the perception is that climate
change will modify oceanographic conditions and therefore
plankton distribution may be affected in the future, with potential
repercussions for higher trophic levels.
Responding to impacts – what is
already happening?
Most Caribbean islands have a great economic dependence on
tourism. Coastal resources including beaches, coral reefs,
seagrass beds, and mangroves offer important protection to
tourism infrastructure as well having aesthetic value, visited
every year by many tourists. Some of the areas have
experienced severe tropical storms, hurricanes and storm surge
damage to these natural resources in the past. There are some
efforts to adopt structural protection (e.g. defences and seawalls)
in some of the areas, but these developments have sometimes
47
been to the expense of further degradation of many valuable
natural areas. Caribbean societies and economies, the
comprehensive integration of poverty, gender and livelihood
issues into climate change impact and vulnerability assessment
and planning processes is much needed to support the
development of community-specific adaptation strategies. These
activities could help to achieve the sustainable and effective
responses to climate change required from wider Caribbean
societies.
Local knowledge is key to identify where the main resources are
distributed in the area. Furthermore, the current lack of
awareness of where further changes will be expected in the
Caribbean region are of concern. Particularly when there are
clear gaps in the seasonal variability and specific areas where
these species may be distributed and are likely to move (e.g.
depending on their maximum range) as the effects of climate
change may start to become more pronounced. It is necessary
that management, protection and awareness measures are
clearly implemented to safeguard the biodiversity of these areas.
Clearly, there is already ongoing local actions taking place, with
some countries having collectively (e.g. OECS Member States)
developed draft (model and harmonised scenarios) laws since
2006 to manage and safeguard these resources. Some further
support from the local authorities, ensuring that the promulgation
of these local laws can be actively enforced will be
advantageous. There are already some initiatives in place with
regards to Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk
Management in Fisheries and Aquaculture in the CARICOM
Region under the Strategy and Action Plan”. This strategy and
action plan integrates important policy documents. The regional
policy context is primarily based on the ‘Regional Framework for
Achieving Development Resilient to Climate Change’
(considering a Regional Framework), including CARICOM’s
strategy on climate change. The CARICOM Heads of
Government endorsed the Regional Framework at their July
2009 meeting in Guyana and issued the Liliendaal Declaration,
outlining the key climate change aims and interests of CARICOM
Member States. The Liliendaal Declaration is the Implementation
Plan (IP) for the Regional Framework. The CCCCC Regional
Framework is based on five strategy elements and twenty goals.
Overall, these goals do cover aspects of fisheries and
aquaculture under an ecosystem approach. The IP is developed
under the heading of coastal and marine issues. Further
initiatives are looking at improving the outlook for Caribbean
Coral Reefs: A Regional Plan of Action 2013-2018 (e.g. "Coral
reef action plan"). The plan covers components of Strategic
Elements 1: Mainstream CC Adaptation Strategies to
sustainable Development / Agendas of CARICOM Member
States and Strategic Elements 2: Promote the Implementation of
Specific Adaptation Measures to Address Key Vulnerabilities in
the Region of the Regional Framework’s Implementation Plan as
well as other on-going coral reef related initiatives within the
Caribbean region. The key actions can assist coral reef
managers, activities in the coastal zone area, and fisheries
managers and local communities to improve the resilience of
coral reef ecosystems.
Further ongoing work to understand the impacts of climate
change across sectors is the CARIBSAVE Climate Change Risk
Atlas (CCRA) project (several references where used in this
review). The CCRA project synthesise the current evidence-
based, cover several habitats, species and a series of sectors,
which are under threat or may be vulnerable. The report also
included a section on how these different sectors could adjust
their practices and adapt to climate change to enable the
sustainable development of these areas whilst still protecting the
overall biodiversity and equally supporting the economic
development of the Caribbean SIDS. Dedicated effort to
document and illustrate the challenges associated with climate
change on species and habitats, with likely consequences for
biodiversity has been also addressed by governments of Antigua
and Barbuda (CARIBSAVE, 2011a). Grenada is also actively
committed to adapting to climate change, they have also
produced the Strategic Program for Climate Resilience which
includes practices and actions for adaptation and mitigation of
climate change impacts to this island (CARIBSAVE, 2011d). The
Belize Climate Change Adaptation Policy aims to encourage all
government agencies to incorporate climate change aspects in
their activities and overall policies. One of the most important
aspects is to create public awareness and education to support
biodiversity conservation (CARIBSAVE, 2011b).
An example of a climate change initiative in Saint Lucia is the
Pilot Project on “Climate Resilience”. In the health sector, there
are a number of ongoing climate related initiatives. One example
is the need to “Facilitate the design and/or upgrading and
implementation of national programmes for pest and disease
control”, which deals with the areas of vector and water borne
disease monitoring as well as pest and disease monitoring
including invasive species. Another specific project has been
designed to address issues relating to water quality through the
project entitled “Enhancing the Water Quality Surveillance
Programme of the Department of Environmental Health”. This
will be affected through training, as well as the procurement of
equipment for water testing. One final multifaceted project
entitled “Mitigating the Mental Health Impacts of Climate Change
and Climate Variability in Saint Lucia” aims to identify the key
mental health impacts related to climate change events on the
island and assess their implications, as well as to identify ways
to help individuals and communities mitigate and adapt to this
social problem (MFEAND, 2011).
Further development of
understanding to support
adaptation
This review has demonstrated that the majority of the current and
future expects climate change effects are based on broad
information available in the Caribbean Region. However, for
some species and habitats covered in this review there is already
some available evidence, but this is still limited. It is important to
highlight that climate change effects are still perceived as a new
48
emerging threat in some of these areas. One of the clear
challenges is to disentangle the direct effects resulting from
climate change with other human pressures (e.g. overfishing,
waste treatment, habitat degradations, pH changes, etc.). Some
of the SIDS have made a start and attempted to develop effective
management practices, to protect these valuable species and
ecosystems. Some tangible actions are needed to document
how the extent and distribution of biodiversity is being explored
or developed in these areas. In the sections below, there are
some recommendations that may be useful to set as priorities to
ensure the biodiversity of these islands is preserved and where
necessary restored:
• Adoption of mapping strategies to ensure there is a
baseline of the distribution and extent of these
resources (e.g. seagrasses, sea mammals, invasive
species). This type of information can help to develop a
robust management strategy to protect and monitor
climate change effects.
• Development of an annual monitoring plan
(including water quality, sedimentation rates, fauna,
setting etc.) can help to undertake consistent
assessments to identify cause-effect disturbances
associated with climate change on these habitats and
species. For example, in some areas of the Caribbean
there is The Coral Reef Early Warning Systems
Network (CREWS), with a suite of meteorological and
air-based sensors including air temperature, wind
speed and direction, barometric pressure,
photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) and
ultraviolet radiation (UVR). The basic suite of
oceanographic sensors measure salinity, sea
temperature, PAR (at 1m nominal) and UVR (at 1m
nominal) (for more information visit:
http://www.caribbeanclimate.bz/general/coral-reef-
early-warning-system-crews.html)
• Protection and adoption of ‘No take zones’ as
Marine Protected Areas, helping to provide protection
and refugia for species that may be under threat and to
preserve native socks, and where applicable to enable
recovery of dedicated areas.
• Caribbean Challenge Initiative, some islands have
actively engaged in this ongoing initiative, where there
are dedicated actions to protect 20% of the Caribbean
marine and coastal ecosystems by 2020
(http://caribbeanchallengeinitiative.org/).
• Multidisciplinary research is clearly needed for the
development of more effective conservation strategies.
Networks of Protected Areas (NPAs) are seen as
critically important to the conservation of biodiversity,
but their management is often inadequate or non-
existent. Creating successful NPAs will require the
input of ecologists, social scientists, and economists in
order to develop effective management regimes and
secure the input and support of local communities.
• Consideration of restoration strategies are a type of
approach which could help to enhance areas where
there has been a disturbance or decline of a particular
habitat type. Adequate planning to support
translocation trials could help to repopulate the
damaged habitats (e.g. seagrasses or corals).
• Promotion of knowledge transfer and awareness:
organise dissemination workshops to cascade the
current understanding of climate change effects, and
the importance of preserving habitats and species,
targeted at the general public, conservation end-users,
and policy makers.
• Creating awareness and investment over targeted
projects to understand and disentangle climate and
environmental effects (via monitoring work) in small
islands. There is a clear gap in the lack of empirical data
sets available to understand the present and future
climate change impacts. Climate and environmental
monitoring data is needed to design and implement
management practices to safeguard these areas
(Nurse et al.,2014).
• Investment and development of ‘fit for purpose’
climate change-related projections, which build on
the current work conducted on temperature and sea
level. The available climate-model projections of
temperature and sea level have been useful, but there
is clearly a need to develop projections for other
variables (pH changes, wind direction, tropical storms,
etc.), which are important to small islands.
Citation
Please cite this document as:
Birchenough, S.N.R. (2017) Impacts of Climate Change on
Biodiversity in the Coastal and Marine Environments of
Caribbean Small Island Developing States (SIDS), Caribbean
Marine Climate Change Report Card: Science Review 2017, pp
40-51.
The views expressed in this review paper do not represent the
Commonwealth Marine Economies Programme, individual
partner organisations or the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
References
Albins, M.A. and M.A. Hixon, (2008). Invasive Indo-Pacific
lionfish Pterois volitans reduce recruitment of Atlantic coral-
reef fishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 367, 233-238.
Alongi, D.M. (2015). The impact of climate change on mangrove
forests. Current Climate Change Reports, 1(1), 30-39.
Atkins, J.L. (2012). Education and outreach. Building support
and expertise. Invasive Lion fish: A guide to control and
management. Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute. Special
49
publication Series. Number 1 Marathon Florida. USA, Page 15-
23. 113 pp.
Baird, A.H., Guest, J.R., Willis, B.L. (2009) Systematic and
biogeographical patterns in the reproductive biology of
scleractinian corals. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and
Systematics, 40,551–71.
Beer, S. and Koch, E. (1996). Photosynthesis of seagrasses vs.
marine macroalgae in globally changing CO2 environments.
Marine Ecology Progress Series 141: 199-204.
Birchenough, S.N.R., Degraer, S, Reiss, H, et al., (2015) Climate
change and marine benthos: A review of existing research and
future directions. WIREs Climate Change, 6: 203–223. doi:
10.1002/wcc.330.
Bjork, M., and S. Beer, (2009): Ocean acidification: could dense
seagrass meadows resist? Seagrass Watch, 37, 2-4.
Brown, Nicole, Tighe Geoghegan, and Yves Renard. (2007). A
situation analysis for the wider Caribbean. Gland, Switzerland:
IUCN: 52.
Campbell, S. J., McKenzie, L. J., & Kerville, S. P. (2006).
Photosynthetic responses of seven tropical seagrasses to
elevated seawater temperature. Journal of Experimental
Marine Biology and Ecology, 330 (2), 455-468.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Climate change risk profile for Angilla Report.
197pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Final Draft Country Profile Report Antigua and
Barbuda. 215pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Climate change risk profile for The Bahamas
Report. 14pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Climate change risk profile for Barbados Report.
207pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Climate change risk profile for The Belize Report.
22 pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Final Draft Country Profile Report Antigua and
Barbuda. 215pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Final Draft Country Profile Report Dominica. 229pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Final Draft Country Profile Report Dominica
Republic. 229pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Final Draft Country Profile Report Grenada. 18pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Final Draft Country Profile Report Jamaica. 238pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Final Draft Country Profile Report Nevis. 213pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Final Draft Country Profile Report Saint Lucia.
224pp.
Caribsave (2011). The Caribsave climate change risk atlas
(CCCRA): Final Draft Country Profile Report Saint Vincent and
the Grenadines. 216pp.
Cooper, E., Burke, L.,Bood, N. (2009) Coastal Capital: Belize.
The Economic Contribution of Belize’s Coral Reefs and
Mangroves. WRI Working Paper. World Resources Institute,
Washington DC. 53 pp. Available online at
http://www.wri.org/publications
Dierssen, H.M., Zimmerman, R.C., Drake, L.A., Burdige, D.
(2010) Benthic ecology from space: optics and net primary
production in seagrass and benthic algae across the Great
Bahama Bank. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 411:1-15
Donner, S. D., Skirving, W. J., Little, C. M., OppenheimeR, M.
and Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2005), Global assessment of coral
bleaching and required rates of adaptation under climate
change. Global Change Biology, 11: 2251–2265.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01073.x
Costanza R., Pérez-Maqueo, O., Martinez, M.L., Sutton, P.,
Anderson, S.J. and Mulder, K. (2008). The Value of Coastal
Wetlands for Hurricane Protection. Ambio Vol. 37, No. 4: 241-
248.
Cooper, E.,Burke, E., and Bood, N. (2009). “Coastal Capital:
Belize. The Economic Contribution of Belize’s Coral Reefs and
Mangroves.” WRI Working Paper. World Resources Institute,
Washington DC. 53 pp. Available online at
http://www.wri.org/publications
De Groot,R., Brander,L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R.,
Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N., Ghermandi,
A., Hein,L., Hussain, S., Kumar, P., McVittie, A., Portela, R.,
Rodriguez,L.C., ten Brink, P., van Beukering, P. (2012). Global
estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in
monetary units. Ecosystem Services 1: 50–61
Doyle, E. and J. Franks. (2015). Sargassum Fact Sheet. Gulf
and Caribbean Fisheries Institute.
Elliott, W., & Simmonds, M. (2007). Whales in hot water? The
impact of a changing climate on whales, dolphins and
porpoises: a call for action. Gland Switzerland, Chippenham
UK: WWF-International WDCS.
EurekAlert-AAAS (2009) What are coral reef services worth?
130,000 to 1.2 million per hectare, per year: experts. Oct-2009.
Friess, D.A. (2016). Ecosystem services and disservices from
Mangrove Forests: Insights from historical colonial
observations. Forests, 7(9), 183.
Game, E.T., Watts, M.E., Wooldridge, S., Possingham, H.P.
(2008) Planning for persistence in marine reserves: a question
50
of catastrophic importance. Ecological Applications, 18(3),
670–80. PMID: 18488626
Gero S, Whitehead H (2016). Critical Decline of the Eastern
Caribbean Sperm Whale Population. PLoS ONE 11(10):
e0162019. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162019
Green, S.J., J.L. Akins, A. Maljković, and I.M. Côté, 2012:
Invasive lionfish drive Atlantic coral reef fish declines. PLoS
ONE, 7(3), e32596, doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0032596.
Hughes, T.P., Baird, A.H., Bellwood, D.R., Card, M., Connolly,
S.R., Folke, C., et al. (2003) Climate change, human impacts,
and the resilience of coral reefs. Science, 301(5635), 929–33.
IPCC. (2007a). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science
Basis. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge. University
Press.
Kainuma, Mami, et al. (2013). Current Status of Mangroves
Worldwide. Middle East 624: 0-4.
Krauss, K.W., McKee, K.L., Lovelock, C.E., Cahoon, D.R.,
Saintilan, N., Reef, R., and Chen, L. (2014). How mangrove
forests adjust to rising sea level. New Phytologist, 202(1), 19-
34.
Lambert E., Hunter, C., Pierce, J.G., MacLeod, C.D. et al, 2010
Sustainable whale watching tourism and climate change.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 18: (3) 409-427.
Maynard, J., van Hooidonk, R., Eakin, C.M., Puotinen, M.,
Garren, M., Williams, G., Heron, S.F., Lamb, J., Weil, E., Willis,
B., Harvell, C.D. (2015b) Nature Climate Change, 5, 688–694
doi:10.1038/nclimate2625
McField, M. (2016-2017) The impacts of climate change on
corals in coastal and marine environments of Caribbean Small
Island Developing States (SIDs)
McIvor, A.L., Iris Moller, Tom Spencer, and Mark Spalding.
(2012). Reduction of wind and swell waves by mangroves. The
Nature Conservancy and Wetlands International.
McKee, K.L. (2011). Biophysical controls on accretion and
elevation change in Caribbean mangrove ecosystems.
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 91(4), 475-483.
Murray P.A and Tulsie B. (2011). Government of Saint Lucia.
Second National Communication to the UNFCCC.
Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment Synthesis Report for
Saint Lucia. Second National Communication Project of Saint
Lucia. Sustainable Development and Environment Division,
Ministry of Physical Development and the Environment, 115
pp.
Mukherjee N., Sutherland, Dicks, Huge, Koedam and Dahdouh-
Guebas. (2014). Ecosystem Service Valuations of Mangrove
Ecosystems and Future Valuation Exercises. PLOS One, Vol.
9, Issue 9.
Mendoza P. (2011a). Strategic Programme for Climate
Resilience. Saint Vincent And The Grenadines Phase On. Part
Two Proposed Investment Program Components for PPCR
Funding
Mendoza P. (2011b). Strategic Programme for Climate
Resilience. Saint Vincent And The Grenadines. Phase Two
Proposal. Resources Documents. ANNEXES
Munday, P.L., Crawley, N.E., Nilsson, G.E. (2009) Interacting
effects of elevated temperature and ocean acidification on the
aerobic performance of coral reef fishes. Marine Ecology
Progress Series, 388, 235– 42.
Neufville, Z., (2010): Invasive Lionfish Go from Predator to Prey.
From Interpress Service News Agency.
Nurse, L.A., R.F. McLean, J. Agard, L.P. Briguglio, V. Duvat-
Magnan, N. Pelesikoti, E. Tompkins, and A. Webb, 2014: Small
islands. In: Climate Change (2014): Impacts, Adaptation, and
Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of
Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Barros, V.R.,
C.B. Field, D.J. Dokken, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, T.E.
Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B.
Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R.
Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
pp. 1613-1654.
O’Connor, S., R. Campbel, H. Cortez and T. Knowles, (2009):
Whale Watching Worldwide: tourism numbers, expenditures
and expanding economic benefits, a special report from the
International Fund for Animal Welfare. Economist at Large,
Yarmouth, MA.
Oxenford, H. A.,and Monnereau, I. (2016-2017). Impacts of
climate change on fish and shellfish in coastal and marine
environments of Caribbean Small Island Developing States
(SIDS).
Polidoro, B.A., Carpenter, K.E., Collins, L. Duke, N.C., Ellison,
A.M., Ellison, J.C., … and Livingstone, S.R. (2010). The loss
of species: mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of
global concern. PloS One, 5(4), e10095.
Spalding, Mark. (2010). World atlas of mangroves. Routledge.
Scott, D., Peeters, P., &Gössling, S. (2010). Can tourism 'seal
the deal' of its mitigation commitments? The challenge of
achieving 'aspirational'emission reduction targets. Journal of
Sustainable Tourism, 18 (2).
Simpson, M. C., Scott, D., Harrison, M., Silver, N., O’Keeffe, E.,
Harrison, S., et al. (2010). Quantification and Magnitude of
Losses and Damages Resulting from the Impacts of Climate
Change: Modelling the Transformational Impacts and Costs of
Sea Level Rise in the Caribbean. Barbados: United Nations
Development Programme.
Robinson, D. 1991. A Coastal Monitoring Project for Nevis.
Prepared for the UNDP (Project #INT/88/003) by the Nevis
Historical and Conservation Society.
51
Van Bochove, J., E. Sullivan, and T. Nakamura. (2014). The
importance of mangroves to people: A call to action. United
Nations Environment Programme.
Wilson, R. (2016-2017). The impacts of climate change on
mangrove ecosystems in coastal and marine environments of
Caribbean Small Island Developing States (SIDs).
© Crown Copyright (2017)