Content uploaded by Siam Oottamasathien
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Siam Oottamasathien on Jan 23, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
Transl Androl Urol 2017;6(5):943-950tau.amegroups.com© Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
Historical medical uses of amniotic membrane
The medical uses of the human placenta probably date back
centuries, with the first description of its use in a treatise
in 1593 by a Chinese clinician Li Shi-Zhen (1). The first
mention of the medical use of amniotic membrane in
the Western literature appeared in 1910 by Davis, who
reported on a series of cases where it was used as a skin
graft in a large case series at Johns Hopkins Hospital (2).
This was shortly followed by Drs. Stern and Sabella,
collaborators who separately published studies using this
material in wounds and burns (3,4). Through the rest of
the 20th century the medical use of the placenta, and more
specifically the amniotic membrane, was described in a
number of medical indications including; but not limited
to, the following types of cases: (I) skin grafting; (II) lower
extremity diabetic ulcers (5); (III) lower extremity venous
leg ulcers (6); (IV) general wounds (7); (V) conjunctival
surgery and repair (8); (VI) burns (9,10); (VII) periodontal
disease and dentistry (11,12); (VIII) vaginal reconstruction
and OB/GYN applications (13); (IX) neurosurgical
applications including spine surgery (14,15); (X) orthopedic
surgery applications (16).
Properties and function of amniotic tissues
While amniotic membrane was originally used because of
its recognized ability to substitute as a skin like tissue with
healing properties, the underlying physiologic, biochemical
and cytological properties of the tissue are reported to
confer a number of additional properties, in addition to
simply performing as a skin substitute. These properties
include: (I) contains essential growth factors (17); (II)
modulation of inflammation (18); (III) reduction of scar
tissue formation (18); (IV) barrier properties (14); (V)
immunologically privileged tissue (19); (VI) enhancement
of wound healing (20); (VII) reduction of pain in burns
and wounds; (VIII) innate antibiotic properties (21). There
Review Article
Amniotic therapeutic biomaterials in urology: current and future
applications
Siam Oottamasathien1,2, James M. Hotaling1,3, James R. Craig1,3, Jeremy B. Myers1,3, William O. Brant1,3
1Department of Surgery and Section of Pediatric Urology, 2Primary Children’s Hospital, 3Department of Surgery and Division of Urology Section of
Men’s Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: All authors; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: All
authors; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: All authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII)
Final approval of manuscript: All authors.
Correspondence to: Siam Oottamasathien, MD. University of Utah, 100 North Mario Capecchi Drive, Suite 3550, Salt Lake City, Utah 84113, USA.
Email: siam.oottamasathien@hsc.utah.edu.
Abstract: To examine the rationale and applications of amniotic tissue augmentation in urological surgery.
Published literature in English-language was reviewed for basic science and clinical use of amniotic or
amnion-chorionic tissue in genitourinary tissues. Basic science and animal studies support the likely benet
of clinical applications of amnion-derived tissues in a variety of urologic interventions. The broad number
of properties found in amniotic membrane, coupled with its immunologically privileged status presents a
number of future applications in the urological surgical realm. These applications are in their clinical infancy
and suggest that further studies are warranted to investigate the use of these products in a systematic fashion.
Keywords: Amnion; chorion; dehydrated membranes; hypospadias; urethral reconstruction
Submitted Aug 04, 2017. Accepted for publication Aug 30, 2017.
doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.09.01
View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.09.01
950
944 Oottamasathien et al. Amniotic therapeutic biomaterials in urology: current and future applications
Transl Androl Urol 2017;6(5):943-950tau.amegroups.com© Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
are varying degrees of documentation of each of the above
properties, but these attributes appear regularly in the
literature.
The underlying bimolecular mechanisms responsible
for the above properties are becoming increasingly well
characterized, in a growing, robust literature (1,17,22-24)
(Table 1). Briey, active participation of mesenchymal and
circulating stem cells, activated by a wide array of growth
factors and cytokines, and the provision of a collagen based
architecture present a unique structure that promotes
healing and regeneration of tissues in which the amniotic
membrane and its components are applied (22).
Preclinical urologic applications of amniotic
tissue products
The general history of the use of amniotic membrane
products and the more recent understanding of the
underlying mechanism of action behind their properties
suggested a number of urologic applications. Preclinical
work has explored a number of urogenital applications.
The use of amniotic membrane as a potential material
for bladder repair extends back to the early 1980s (25).
More recently, Iigma and others demonstrated that
transplantation of preserved human amniotic membrane
could successfully be used for bladder augmentation in
rats, with resulting regeneration of a number of tissues
in the bladder being demonstrated as early as 3 months
postoperatively (26).
Salehipour et al. have evaluated the use of human
amniotic membrane in the reconstruction of long ureteral
defects in dogs (27). In this study, the use of human
amniotic membrane for the reconstruction of ureteral
defects in a canine model was studied. The authors used
chorion prepared and properly treated for surgical insertion
into dogs with circumferentially cut defects, and while they
did not believe the approach to be useful for long (3 cm)
defects, they speculated that use of the amniotic membrane
might be studied for shorter defects or as a patch graft.
Shakeri et al. looked at the use of amniotic membrane
as a xenograft for urethroplasty in rabbits. The authors
concluded that amniotic membrane technology was
an inexpensive, easy, and biodegradable graft yielding
very little antigen effect and a viable option in surgical
urethroplasty approaches (28).
Wang et al. looked at a variation of this idea, namely
using the collagen scaffolding of amniotic membrane
as a potential regenerative material in urethroplasty,
and obtained preliminary success in that approach (29).
The author’s concluded that tissue-engineered denuded
human amniotic scaffold (dHAS) created by separating the
basement membrane layer of amniotic membrane minimizes
potential rejection and maximizes the biocompatibility of
amniotic membrane, making it a potential ideal xenograft
for urethral reconstruction. This concept was also explored
by Gunes and others, who compared the use of buccal
mucosa and amniotic membrane for urethroplasty in a
rabbit model (30). The group examined whether buccal
mucosa, amniotic membrane, or both might be useful
in urethroplasty using epithelial transformation as the
experimental endpoint, noting highest efficacy in the
combined tissue application. After 8 weeks, the best
epithelial transformations were observed in the combined
group.
In another study, Shakeri also noted that amniotic
membrane maybe a substitute for transitional epithelium
of the bladder in dogs. The authors concluded that grafts
remained in place in all cases, except in one of the dogs in
the augmentation group that developed patch perforation,
urine leakage and nally peritonitis. In others, histological
examinations revealed evidence of regeneration of normal-
appearing urothelium, lamina propria, neovascularization,
retracting placental patch, and reconstitution of a normal-
appearing and functioning bladder. This suggests that
placental membranes, because of their low antigenic
properties, easy availability and tolerability by the host
urinary tract, could provide an excellent graft material for
urinary tract reconstructions (31).
Comparison of amniotic membrane with other materials
in preclinical work was conducted by Sharifiaghdas
et al. (32). They examined the use of poly lactic-co-
glycolic acid (PLGA), PLGA/collagen and human amniotic
membrane (hAM) for human urothelial and smooth muscle
cell engineering. The authors demonstrated significant
improvement of cell attachment and growth achieved by
collagen coating (PLGA/collagen) compared to PLGA and
hAM. hAM was a weaker matrix for bladder engineering
purposes.
Human amniotic uid and isolates prepared from human
amniotic membrane derived mesenchymal stem cells have
also had some preliminary scientific work performed on
their inherent biological properties. Human amniotic
membrane mesenchymal stem cells were interestingly noted
to have a suppressive effect on prostate cancer cells (33).
Sedrakyan et al. found that amniotic uid stem cells seemed
to reduce the formation of renal brosis in a mouse model
945
Translational Andrology and Urology, Vol 6, No 5 October 2017
Transl Androl Urol 2017;6(5):943-950tau.amegroups.com© Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
Table 1 Regulators of wound healing and inflammation found in dHACM
(17,22)
Regulators of wound healing and inflammation found in dHACM
Regulators of soft tissue healing in dHACM
Cytokines
Angiogenin (Ang)
Angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2)
Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)
Beta nerve growth factor (β-NGF)
Bone morphogenetic protein 5 (BMP-5)
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
Endocrine gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor
(EG-VEGF)
Epidermal growth factor (EGF)
Fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF-4)
Growth hormone (GH)
Heparin binding egf-like growth factor (HB-EGF)
Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)
Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I)
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1)
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP-2)
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3)
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4 (IGFBP-4)
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6 (IGFBP-6)
Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF/FGF-7)
Placental growth factor (PlGF)
Platelet-derived growth factor AA (PDGF-AA)
Platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB)
Transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α)
Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1)
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
Vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D)
Matrix metalloproteinases
Matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1)
Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2)
Matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3)
Matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP-8)
Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9)
Matrix metalloproteinase 10 (MMP-10)
Matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP-13)
Table 1 (continued)
Table 1 (continued)
Protease inhibitors
Alpha 1 antitrypsin (α1AT)
Alpha 2 macroglobulin (α2M)
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1)
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2)
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 4 (TIMP-4)
Regulators of inflammation in dHACM
Cytokines
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF)
Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)
Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15)
Interferon gamma (IFNγ)
Interleukin 1 alpha (IL-1α)
Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β)
Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA)
Interleukin 4 (IL-4)
Interleukin 5 (IL-5)
Interleukin 6 (IL-6)
Interleukin 7 (IL-7)
Interleukin 10 (IL-10)
Interleukin 12 p40 (IL-12p40)
Interleukin 12 p70 (IL-12p70)
Interleukin 15 (IL-15)
Interleukin 17 (IL-17)
Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF)
Osteoprotegerin (OPG)
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)
Chemokines
B lymphocyte chemoattractant (BLC/CXCL13)
Chemokine ligand 1 (I-309/CCL1)
Eotaxin 2
Interleukin 8 (IL-8)
Interleukin 16 (IL-16)
Macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (MIP-1α/CCL3)
Macrophage inflammatory protein 1 beta (MIP-β1/CCL4)
Macrophage inflammatory protein 1 delta (MIP-1δ/MIP-5/
CCL15)
Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1/CCL2)
Monokine induced by gamma interferon (MIG/CXCL9)
Regulated on activation, normal t-cell expressed and
secreted (RANTES/CCL5)
dHACM, dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane.
946 Oottamasathien et al. Amniotic therapeutic biomaterials in urology: current and future applications
Transl Androl Urol 2017;6(5):943-950tau.amegroups.com© Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
of acute tubular necrosis (34).
Amniotic membrane has also been used as a supportive
scaffold for other procedures. For example, Burgers et al.
used nerve grafts, nerve growth factor and a supportive
scaffold made from amniotic membrane to repair surgically
induced erectile dysfunction in rats. In this study, the use
of fetal amniotic membrane as an alternative growth factor
matrix was used to improve the regeneration of ablated
cavernous nerves in rats as a model to study surgically
damaged nerves. The use of membrane as an alternative
nerve growth matrix improved electrically stimulated
erections and mating behavior in these mice (35).
The underlying logic in many of these preclinical studies
focuses on both the structural and regenerative properties
of amniotic membrane. In the first case, the underlying
structure of the membrane, created by various collagen
types, forms an architecture or scaffold that assists in
the re-creation of normal tissue. In the second case, the
biologically active growth factors, cytokines and other
biomolecules initiate and modulate the regenerative process
that involves the recruitment and activation of stem cells
and broblasts in the area under consideration.
Clinical urological applications of amniotic
tissues in humans
The broadly recognized ability of amniotic tissues to help
in healing and regenerative repair of tissues suggested a
number of other direct clinical applications. Preclinical
work and initial evaluation of these tissues have been
attempted in a number of urogenital indications. Koziak
et al. built on the previous preclinical work described above
and investigated the use of amniotic membrane in the
reconstruction of long ureteral strictures in 11 patients
(36,37). Several reports of the use of amniotic membrane
to repair vesicovaginal stulas have also been reported. In
each case, successful use of the material has permitted a
less aggressive operative or non-operative approach to this
problem (38).
Most recently, the use of an amniotic membrane
protective layer in the surgical eld of patients undergoing
robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy as a means of
protecting adjacent nerve bundles from scarring has been
advanced by a number of clinicians (39,40). The notion that
amniotic membrane might be useful in preventing adhesions
at the surgical site in DaVinci robot prostatectomies was
initially developed and evolved across a number of sites.
Patel et al. published a retrospective series of these patients
demonstrating improvement in both urinary incontinence
and erectile function in the short-term post-operative
period (41). For completeness, it is worth noting that
amniotic membrane has found numerous applications in
OB/GYN surgery as well, with applications in the repair
of various abnormalities of the vagina, uterus and related
structures in patients (42-49).
At our institutions, we have applied amniotic membrane
technology in the following four realms of adult and
pediatric urology: (I) proximal and redo-hypospadias
repairs; (II) complex penile reconstruction in Peyronie’s
disease; (III) microsurgical cord denervation procedures;
(IV) posterior urethroplasty in the male with a history of
pelvic radiation.
In the eld of hypospadias surgery, proximal hypospadias
comprises most of the severe cases and results in higher
surgical complication rates (50). Between 6–20% of
hypospadias patients are diagnosed with proximal
hypospadias (51,52). Hypospadias is corrected surgically
with the goal of improving cosmetic appearance as well as
normalizing erectile function and voiding. Surgery creates
a straight phallus, with the meatus residing at the tip of the
glans, with a proper and symmetrical appearance of both
the glans and penile shaft. For more severe hypospadias,
specifically for proximal hypospadias, a variety of surgical
techniques can be employed. Unfortunately, even the most
skilled surgeons cannot guarantee a positive outcome.
Complications from proximal hypospadias repair range
from 6–30% depending on the severity of the defect,
the surgical technique utilized, and the experience of the
surgeon (53). Surgical results are also poorer in re-operative
cases. Common complications include urethrocutaneous
fistulas (UCF), urethral stricture, urethral diverticulum,
and persistent ventral curvature (54). UCF, or a reopening
of the surgical site, can occur in 13–33% of patients,
depending on the different surgical techniques utilized
(50-52,55-58). Current data suggests that an experienced
pediatric urologist successfully can close fistulas in 71%,
72%, 77%, 100%, and 100% of patients after stula repairs
1 to 5, respectively (59). With these high reoperation
rates, there is a significant need to investigate innovative
approaches to reduce complication rates. One such
approach is the potential application of dehydrated human
amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM). The underlying
premise is to provide a barrier layer with a robust source
of tissue and vascular growth factors and provide a local
anti-inammatory environment, thus optimizing soft tissue
healing of the surgical site (20,41,60-62).
947
Translational Andrology and Urology, Vol 6, No 5 October 2017
Transl Androl Urol 2017;6(5):943-950tau.amegroups.com© Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
In the eld of Peyronie’s disease, surgical correction of
curvature with either permanent plication sutures or graft
material usually requires full or partial mobilization of
the deep dorsal neurovascular bundle to allow for proper
placement of surgical material as well as to avoid potentially
devastating complications such as glans numbness and
ischemia. Typically, the neurovascular bundle is placed
back in its anatomical position and in most cases, it will
overly the site of surgical curvature correction. The
inflammatory response associated with healing and the
subsequent formation of fibrotic tissue and neuroma has
been theorized as the cause for post-operative pain with
the associated graft material or suture knots. The use of
dHACM has been postulated to be used as an interposition
graft in between the plication knots or graft material and
the neurovascular bundle in an effort to reduce brosis and
neuroma formation and therefore improve pain outcomes.
Anecdotally, we have noticed diminished postoperative pain
and more rapid recovery, and are currently studying, in a
more formal manner, the utility of using this interposition
graft in these cases.
In the eld of chronic orchialgia, management strategies
are aimed at identifying specic etiologies of the pain and
managing those directly (i.e., varicocelectomy, vasectomy
reversal, epididymectomy). When a specific etiology
cannot be identied, the individual has failed conservative
management, or has failed surgical management and
spermatic cord denervation may be discussed. Methods that
have been employed to improve outcomes of spermatic cord
denervation include the use of a provocative pre-operative
spermatic cord block and the intraoperative use of the
operating room microscope. Even with these improvements
in pre-operative screening and surgical techniques the
success rate of the procedure is still not 100% (current
studies success rates range from 70–90%) and there is a
reported orchiectomy rate of 10–20% after the surgery due
to persistent pain (63,64). The utilization of dHACM as a
wrap at the site of denervation has been theorized to reduce
the formation of brosis and neuroma and therefore reduce
persistent pain post-operatively (63).
In the eld of posterior urethral contracture in the male
with a history of pelvic radiation, surgical management is
aimed at resecting the affected scarred or infected tissue,
achieving a watertight tension free anastomosis, and
providing a healthy bed of tissue to allow for good wound
healing. However, even with these surgical tenants, necrosis
and reformation of scar tissue still may occur even in the
most skilled hands. The use of dHACM as a wrap at the
site of urethral anastomosis has been theorized to recruit
healthy tissue ingrowth and improve surgical outcomes.
Clinical outcomes are currently being evaluated.
Potential future applications of human amniotic
tissues
The broad number of properties found in amniotic
membrane, coupled with its immunologically privileged
status presents a number of future applications, particularly
given the historical preclinical and clinical uses described
above. New applications continue to be proposed, and the
potential for combining amniotic membrane allografts with
other biomaterials expands this horizon further.
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to Dr. Donald E. Fetterolf for
providing critical suggestions to this review surrounding
amnion/chorion technology.
Footnote
Conicts of Interest: William O. Brant: proctor, consultant,
and grant recipient, Boston Scientic; Siam Oottamasathien:
scientic advisory consultant, GlycoMira Therapeutics Inc.
The other authors have no conicts of interest to declare.
References
1. Silini AR, Cargnoni A, Magatti M. The Long Path of
Human Placenta, and Its Derivatives, in Regenerative
Medicine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2015;3:162.
2. Davis JW. Skin transplantation with a review of 550 cases
at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Johns Hopkins Medical
Journal 1910;15:307-96.
3. Stern M. The grafting of preserved amniotic membrane
to burned and ulcerated surfaces, substituting skin grafts.
JAMA 1913;60:973-4.
4. Sabella N. Use of fetal membranes in skin grafting. Med
Records NY 1913;83:478-80.
5. Zelen CM, Serena TE, Snyder RJ. A prospective,
randomised comparative study of weekly versus biweekly
application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion
membrane allograft in the management of diabetic foot
ulcers. Int Wound J 2014;11:122-8.
6. Serena TE, Carter MJ, Le LT. A multicenter, randomized,
controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of dehydrated
948 Oottamasathien et al. Amniotic therapeutic biomaterials in urology: current and future applications
Transl Androl Urol 2017;6(5):943-950tau.amegroups.com© Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
human amnion/chorion membrane allografts and
multilayer compression therapy vs. multilayer compression
therapy alone in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.
Wound Repair Regen 2014;22:688-93.
7. Forbes J, Fetterolf DE. Dehydrated amniotic membrane
allografts for the treatment of chronic wounds: a case
series. J Wound Care 2012;21:290,292,294-6.
8. Asoklis RS, Damijonaityte A, Butkiene L. Ocular surface
reconstruction using amniotic membrane following
excision of conjunctival and limbal tumors. Eur J
Ophthalmol 2011;21:552-8.
9. Adly OA, Moghazy AM, Abbas AH. Assessment of
amniotic and polyurethane membrane dressings in the
treatment of burns. Burns 2010;36:703-10.
10. Kesting MR, Wolff KD, Hohlweg-Majert B. The role of
allogenic amniotic membrane in burn treatment. J Burn
Care Res 2008;29:907-16.
11. Chen E, Tofe A. A literature review of the safety and
biocompatibility of amnion tissue. J Imp Adv Clin Dent
2010;2:67-75.
12. Holtzclaw D, Toscano N. Amnion chorion allograft
barrier: indications and techniques update. J Imp Adv Clin
Dent 2012 4:25-38.
13. Sarwar I, Sultana R, Nisa RU. Vaginoplasty by using
amnion graft in patients of vaginal agenesis associated with
Mayor-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. J Ayub Med
Coll Abbottabad 2010;22:7-10.
14. Tao H, Fan H. Implantation of amniotic membrane to
reduce postlaminectomy epidural adhesions. Eur Spine J
2009;18:1202-12.
15. Subach BR, Copay AG. The use of a dehydrated
amnion/chorion membrane allograft in patients who
subsequently undergo reexploration after posterior lumbar
instrumentation. Adv Orthop 2015;2015:501202.
16. Demirkan F, Colakoglu N, Herek O. The use of amniotic
membrane in exor tendon repair: an experimental model.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;122:396-9.
17. Koob TJ, Rennert R, Zabek N. Biological properties
of dehydrated human amnion/chorion composite graft:
implications for chronic wound healing. Int Wound J
2013;10:493-500.
18. Tseng SC, Li DQ, Ma X. Suppression of transforming
growth factor-beta isoforms, TGF-beta receptor type
II, and myobroblast differentiation in cultured human
corneal and limbal broblasts by amniotic membrane
matrix. J Cell Physiol 1999;179:325-35.
19. Hao Y, Ma DH, Hwang DG. Identication of
antiangiogenic and antiinammatory proteins in human
amniotic membrane. Cornea 2000;19:348-52.
20. Zelen CM, Serena TE, Denoziere G. A prospective
randomised comparative parallel study of amniotic
membrane wound graft in the management of diabetic
foot ulcers. Int Wound J 2013;10:502-7.
21. Stock SJ, Kelly RW, Riley SC. Natural antimicrobial
production by the amnion. Am J Obstet Gynecol
2007;196:255.e1-6.
22. Lim JJ. A Primer on Amniotic Membrane Regenerative
Healing. Grand Rapids: MiMedx Group 2015.
23. Parolini O, Caruso M. Review: Preclinical studies on
placenta-derived cells and amniotic membrane: an update.
Placenta 2011;32 Suppl 2:S186-95.
24. Parolini O, Solomon A, Evangelista M. Human Term
Placenta as a Therapeutic Agent: From the rst clinical
applications to future perspectives. In: Berven E, ed.
Human Placenta: Structure and Development. Hauppauge,
NY: Nova Science 2010:1-48.
25. Norris MA, Cohen MS, Warren MM. Bladder
reconstruction in rabbits with glutaraldehyde-stabilized
amniotic membranes. Urology 1982;19:631-5.
26. Iijima K, Igawa Y, Imamura T. Transplantation of
preserved human amniotic membrane for bladder
augmentation in rats. Tissue Eng 2007;13:513-24.
27. Salehipour M, Mohammadian R, Jahanbini S. Is amniotic
membrane a suitable biomaterial for reconstruction
of long ureteral defects? Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl
2013;24:135-8.
28. Shakeri S, Haghpanah A, Khezri A. Application of
amniotic membrane as xenograft for urethroplasty in
rabbit. Int Urol Nephrol 2009;41:895-901.
29. Wang F, Liu T, Yang L. Urethral reconstruction with
tissue-engineered human amniotic scaffold in rabbit
urethral injury models. Med Sci Monit 2014;20:2430-8.
30. Güneş M, Altok M, Güneş A. A Novel Approach to Penile
Augmentation Urethroplasty Using Buccal Mucosa and
Amniotic Membrane: A Pilot Study in a Rabbit Model.
Urology 2016;87:210-5.
31. Shakeri S, Masoudi P, Yazdani M. Evaluation of human
amniotic membrane as a substitute for transitional
epithelium of bladder in dog. J Appl Anim Res
2008;33:55-59.
32. Shariaghdas F, Naji M, Sarhangnejad R. Comparing
supportive properties of poly lactic-co-glycolic acid
(PLGA), PLGA/collagen and human amniotic membrane
for human urothelial and smooth muscle cells engineering.
Urol J 2014;11:1620-8.
33. Rolfo A, Giuffrida D, Giuffrida MC. New perspectives
949
Translational Andrology and Urology, Vol 6, No 5 October 2017
Transl Androl Urol 2017;6(5):943-950tau.amegroups.com© Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
for prostate cancer treatment: in vitro inhibition of
LNCaP and PC3 cell proliferation by amnion-derived
mesenchymal stromal cells conditioned media. Aging Male
2014;17:94-101.
34. Sedrakyan S, Da Sacco S, Milanesi A. Injection of amniotic
uid stem cells delays progression of renal brosis. J Am
Soc Nephrol 2012;23:661-73.
35. Burgers JK, Nelson RJ, Quinlan DM. Nerve growth
factor, nerve grafts and amniotic membrane grafts restore
erectile function in rats. J Urol 1991;146:463-8.
36. Koziak A, Marcheluk A, Dmowski T. Reconstructive
surgery of male urethra using human amnion membranes
(grafts)--rst announcement. Ann Transplant 2004;9:21-4.
37. Koziak A, Salagierski M, Marcheluk A. Early experience
in reconstruction of long ureteral strictures with allogenic
amniotic membrane. Int J Urol 2007;14:607-10.
38. Barski D, Gerullis H, Ecke T. Repair of a vesico-vaginal
stula with amniotic membrane - Step 1 of the IDEAL
recommendations of surgical innovation. Cent European J
Urol 2015;68:459-61.
39. Razdan S. Protective patch linked to erectile function
recovery: 90% of patients receiving membrane during
robotic RP regain function at 3 months. Available online:
http://urologytimes.modernmedicine.com/urology-
times/news/protective-patch-linked-erectile-function-
recovery?page=full
40. Razdan S. First in the world use of amniotic membrane
in robotic prostatectomy for early return of erections.
Available online: https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=osfAIT6QTws
41. Patel VR, Samavedia S, Bates AS. Dehydrated Human
Amnion/Chorion Membrane Allograft Nerve Wrap
Around the Prostatic Neurovascular Bundle Accelerates
Early Return to Continence and Potency Following
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Propensity Score-
matched Analysis. Eur Urol 2015;67:977-80.
42. Amer MI, Abd-El-Maeboud KH, Abdelfatah I. Human
amnion as a temporary biologic barrier after hysteroscopic
lysis of severe intrauterine adhesions: pilot study. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:605-11.
43. Amer MI, Abd-El-Maeboud KH. Amnion graft following
hysteroscopic lysis of intrauterine adhesions. J Obstet
Gynaecol Res 2006;32:559-66.
44. Ashworth MF, Morton KE, Dewhurst J. Vaginoplasty
using amnion. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:443-6.
45. Chou CT, Lee C, Hwang JL. Amniotic membrane used
for vulvar adhesion treatment. Arch Gynecol Obstet
2001;265:223-4.
46. Fotopoulou C, Sehouli J, Gehrmann N, et al. Functional
and anatomic results of amnion vaginoplasty in young
women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.
Fertil Steril 2010;94:317-23.
47. Mhaskar R. Amniotic membrane for cervical
reconstruction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005;90:123-7.
48. Zafar M, Saeed S, Kant B. Use of amnion in vaginoplasty
for vaginal atresia. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak
2007;17:107-9.
49. Price DT, Price TC. Robotic repair of a vesicovaginal
stula in an irradiated eld using a dehydrated amniotic
allograft as an interposition patch. J Robot Surg
2016;10:77-80.
50. Steven L, Cherian A, Yankovic F. Current practice in
paediatric hypospadias surgery; A specialist survey. J
Pediatr Urol 2013;9:1126-30.
51. Duckett JW, Baskin L. Hypospadias In: Adult and
Pediatric Urology. 3rd. St. Louis: Mosby 1996.
52. Schneuer FJ, Holland AJ, Pereira G. Prevalence, repairs
and complications of hypospadias: an Australia population-
based study. Arch Dis Child 2015;100:1038-43.
53. Bhat A, Mandal AK. Acute postoperative complications of
hypospadias repair. Indian J Urol 2008;24:241-8.
54. Retik AB, Atala A. Complications of hypospadias repair.
Urol Clin North Am 2002;29:329-39.
55. Huang LQ, Ge Z, Tian J. Retrospective analysis of
individual risk factors for urethrocutaneous stula after
onlay hypospadias repair in pediatric patients. Ital J Pediatr
2015;41:35.
56. Pippi Salle JL, Sayed S, Salle A. Proximal hypospadias: A
persistent challenge. Single institution outcome analysis of
three surgical techniques over a 10-year period. J Pediatr
Urol 2016;12:28.e1-7.
57. Snodgrass W, Bush N. Tubularized incised plate proximal
hypospadias repair: Continued evolution and extended
applications. J Pediatr Urol 2011;7:2-9.
58. Snodgrass WT, Granberg C, Bush NC. Urethral strictures
following urethral plate and proximal urethral elevation
during proximal TIP hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol
2013;9:990-4.
59. Waterman BJ, Renschler T, Cartwright PC. Variables
in successful repair of urethrocutaneous stula after
hypospadias surgery. J Urol 2002;168:726-30.
60. Fetterolf D, Savage R. Dehydrated human amniotic tissue
improves healing time, cost of care. Today's Wound Clinic
2013:19-20.
61. Group M. Products: AmnioFix 2016. Available online:
http://www.mimedx.com
950 Oottamasathien et al. Amniotic therapeutic biomaterials in urology: current and future applications
Transl Androl Urol 2017;6(5):943-950tau.amegroups.com© Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
62. Sheikh ES, Sheikh ES, Fetterolf DE. Use of dehydrated
human amniotic membrane allografts to promote healing
in patients with refractor non-healing wounds. Int Wound
J 2014;11:711-7.
63. Craig JR, Hotaling JM, Brant WO. Use of Dehydrated
Amniotic Membrane Allograft at the Time of Microscopic
Denervation of the Spermatic Cord for Chronic Orchialgia
Improves Outcomes 2016 Annual Fall Scientic Meeting
of SMSNA. Scottsdale, AZ: Sexual Medicine Society of
North America, 2016.
64. Strom KH, Levine LA. Microsurgical denervation of the
spermatic cord for chronic orchialgia: long-term results
from a single center. J Urol 2008;180:949-53.
Cite this article as: Oottamasathien S, Hotaling JM, Craig
JR, Myers JB, Brant WO. Amniotic therapeutic biomaterials in
urology: current and future applications. Transl Androl Urol
2017;6(5):943-950. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.09.01