ArticlePDF Available

The Role of Managers in Organizations: Psychological Aspects

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
Business Ethics and Leadership, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2017
20
The Role of Managers in Organizations: Psychological Aspects
Gayane Tovmasyan
PhD, Researcher at “AMBERD” Research Center of the Armenian State University of Economics, Profes-
sor at the Public Administration Academy, the Republic of Armenia
Abstract
Management is the integrating force of the activities carried out in the organization. Management is the
whole process of management functions such as planning, organizing, motivating and controlling, which is
performed to accomplish the main objectives of the organization by the use of people and other resources.
Managers play a decisive role in all management process. They set goals, plan and organize the activities,
motivate people and monitor the activities. They are also responsible for themselves and the staff. That is
why it is crucial to analyze and discuss the role of managers, their psychological traits and its influence on
management process. The article presents the essence of management, the roles of managers by
H. Mintzberg. The main skills of managers are discussed. Also, the psychological aspects such as tempera-
ment types of managers and psychological types by Carl Jung are analyzed. In order to find out the role of
managers and the influence of their psychology on management process, we have carried out a research by
survey and interview among employees and managers of different spheres. The results of the survey are
analyzed in the article and it is obvious that the effectiveness of management and decision-making process
depends on many factors including the psychology of managers. Besides, we have processed and offered a
model of manager, which shows the links between the main traits of managers and management process.
The main results may be used for further studies in this sphere, also for improving the management process
in organizations.
Keywords: management, manager, role, psychology, temperament, personality, model, survey.
JEL Classification: M1, M12, D91, C83.
© The Author, 2017. This article is published with open access at ARMG Publishing.
Introduction
Management is a uniting force, when two or more people work together for a common goal, their activities
should be coordinated. Manager is the one who sets goals, plans and organizes the activities, motivates hu-
man resources and controls the overall procedures. In management process managers have several roles. The
study on manager's roles by Mintzberg is discussed in the article. Besides, the main skills and psychological
traits of managers impact the quality and efficiency of management. That is why it is of high importance to
analyze the psychological aspects of management process, which is carried out in the article.
Literature review and discussion
According to Mc Farland, Management is defined for conceptual, theoretical and analytical purposes as
that process by which managers create, direct, maintain and operate purposive organization through system-
atic, coordinated co-operative human effort”.
As Henry Fayol defines, To mange is to forecast and plan, to organize, to compound, to co-ordinate and to
control”.
Harold Koontz says, Management is the art of getting things done through and within formally organized
group”.
Mary Parker Follett defines management as the art of getting things done through people”. A manager is
one who contributes to the organization’s goals indirectly by directing the efforts of others - not by perform-
ing the task himself. On the other hand, a person who is not a manager makes his contribution to the organi-
zation’s goals directly by performing the task himself.
George R. Terry defines management as a process consisting of planning, organizing, actuating and con-
trolling, performed to determine and accomplish the objectives by the use of people and other resources.
Thus, management is the sum-total of all those activities that:
determine objectives, plans, policies and programmes;
Business Ethics and Leadership, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2017
21
secure men, material, machinery cheaply
put all these resources into operations through sound organization
direct and motivate the men at work,
supervise and control their performance (Pal, Bansal).
Managers are responsible for setting and achieving the firm’s goals with and through other people. There
have been a number of studies on what managers actually do, the most famous of which conducted by Pro-
fessor Henry Mintzberg in the early 1970s (Mintzberg, 1973). After following managers around for several
weeks, Mintzberg concluded that managers assume multiple roles. A role is an organized set of behaviors,
and Mintzberg identified ten roles, which he divided into three groups: interpersonal, informational, and
decisional. The informational roles link all managerial work together. The interpersonal roles ensure that
information is provided. The decisional roles make significant use of the information (Carpenter, Bauer,
Erdogan, 2012).
1. Interpersonal roles are the following:
Figurehead Managers have social, ceremonial and legal responsibilities. They are a source of inspira-
tion. People look up to them as a person with authority, and as a figurehead.
Leader Manager provides leadership for the team, organization, and manages the performance and
responsibilities of everyone in the group.
Liaison Managers communicate with internal and external contacts.
2. Informational roles are:
Monitor Managers regularly seek out information related to the organization and industry, looking for
relevant changes in the environment. They also monitor the team, in terms of both their productivity and
their well-being.
Disseminator Managers communicate potentially useful information to the colleagues and the team.
Spokesperson Managers represent and speak for their organization. They are responsible for transmit-
ting information about their organization and its goals to the people outside it.
3. Decisional roles are:
Entrepreneur Manager creates and controls change within the organization. This means solving prob-
lems, generating new ideas and implementing them.
Disturbance Handler When an organization or team hits an unexpected roadblock, it is the manager
who must take charge.
Resource Allocator Managers need to determine where organizational resources are best applied. This
involves allocating funding, as well as assigning staff and other organizational resources.
Negotiator Managers take part in, and direct important negotiations within the team, department, or
organization (Mintzberg's Management Roles).
Performing these roles is the basis of a manager's job.
The effectiveness of management depends on managers’ skills. Robert Katz identifies three critical skill sets
for successful management professionals: technical skills, human skills, and conceptual skills (Managerial
skills).
We have summed up the most important skills for management:
Leadership skills;
Influencing, delegating abilities;
Communication skills;
Critical thinking skills;
Collaboration and negotiation skills;
Project management skills;
Human resources management skills;
Time management skills;
Forecasting skills.
Managers should be fast at planning, should be able to organize and delegate work, motivate people, control
the performance, collaborate with others. They should be energetic and goal-oriented, creative and initiator,
flexible in new situations, responsible, etc. They should have critical thinking, communication skills, deci-
Business Ethics and Leadership, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2017
22
sion making methods and techniques, teamwork skills, broad and non-standard thinking, self-development
and personal growth needs, psychological ability to influence people, etc.
As the traditional ways of managing have changed, nowadays the managers, instead of traditional planning,
organizing, measuring and controlling, should create vision and empower, align the web of relations, inspire
and coach and be focused on creating a value.
As the psychological factors have huge impact on management, here we shall analyze the temperament and
psychological aspects of managers.
Temperament is the combination of inborn traits that subconsciously affect man's behavior. These traits are
arranged genetically on the basis of nationality, race, sex, and other hereditary factors. Such factors will
determine if we are outgoing and extroverted or shy and introverted as a person (Cantrell, 2001).
According to a great Greek philosopher Empedocles (495-425 BC), the four primary elements that were
used to describe the human temperaments were: fire (that could be warm and dry), air (that could be warm
and moist), earth (that could be dry and cold) and water (that could be moist and cold). Another great phi-
losopher who came after Empedocles was Hippocrates (460-377 BC) who developed and seemingly ex-
panded the former's evaluation on human personality and temperaments by using four corresponding body
fluids sometimes called humors: blood, yellow bile, black bile and phlegm. According to Hippocrates, the
human health depends on the proper balancing of these four humors. After Hippocrates, came Plato (427-
347 BC) who claimed that humors really had a great contribution into one's behavior. For example, madness
of a person was as a result of morbid humors contacting a person's mortal soul. Aristotle (384-322 BC) who
was a student of Plato, also embraced the explanations of other great gurus who studied the personality and
temperaments of humans. He argued that the shape of the body to some extent reflected the activities of the
soul as well and he associated warm and thick blood with strength, and cold and thin blood with intelli-
gence. Though Empedocles used four elements of fire, air, earth and water to describe human personality
and temperaments, on the other hand Hippocrates, Plato and even Aristotle looked at the body fluids to cat-
egorize some human behaviors. In the later years the theory was then developed by Claudius Galen from
Pergamum (131-200 AD) who though recognized the humors or body fluids in order to categorize human
personalities and temperaments, also looked into the physiological reasons as the main cause of such human
behaviors, moods and emotions. The scholar categorized these behaviors as hot and cold, dry and wet. These
were later developed into four temperaments technically referred to as sanguine, phlegmatic, choleric and
melancholic. The scholar concluded that if you are a sanguine in which you are influenced by blood then
you become cheerful, hearty, outgoing, sturdy/strong, fearless, optimistic and interested in physical pleas-
ures. If you are phlegmatic then you are influenced by phlegm (thick white material that we cough when we
have cold) then you become cold, aloof, unemotional, uninvolved, dependable and a trifle dull. If you are
choleric then you produce yellow bile from the liver hence you exhibit traits such as anger, hate and have
fits of temper (giving in to most bad impulses). If you are described as melancholic then you are driven by a
worse black bile from liver hence you are always depressed, unhappy and suicidal (Okal, Ambuyo, Amu-
kowa, 2012).
The temperament type influences the behavior of a manager in the organization.
Managers with sanguine temperament are impulsive, warm-hearted, pleasant, lively and optimistic, sociable
and charismatic. They enjoy social gatherings, making new friends. They are usually quite creative, sensi-
tive, compassionate, talkative, not shy and romantic. The negative is that they are chronically late, and tend
to be forgetful and sometimes a little sarcastic. Often, when they pursue a new hobby, they lose interest as
soon as it ceases to be engaging or fun. They have no lack of confidence.
Managers with choleric temperament are fundamentally ambitious, they have a lot of aggression, energy.
They are task oriented people and are focused on getting a job done efficiently. They can dominate people
and become dictatorial. Many great charismatic military and political figures were choleric. They like to be
in charge of everything and are good at planning, as they often can immediately see a practical solution to a
problem. However, they can quickly fall into deep depression or moodiness when failures befall them.
The melancholic temperament is introverted, considerate and very cautious. They are organized and sched-
ule oriented. Melancholics can be highly creative in activities such as poetry, art. Because of their sensitivity
and thoughtfulness they are susceptible to depression and moodiness. Often they are perfectionists. Their
caution enables them to prevent problems. Melancholics prefer to avoid much attention and prefer to remain
in the background.
Business Ethics and Leadership, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2017
23
The phlegmatic temperament is relaxed and quiet. Phlegmatics tend to be content with themselves and are
kind. Phlegmatics are consistent, they can be relied upon as steady and faithful friends. They are affection-
ate, make friends easily. They tend to be good diplomats. Phlegmatics prefer to observe and to think on the
world around them while not getting involved. They may try to inspire others to do the things which they
themselves think about doing. They may be shy and often prefer stability to uncertainty and change. They
are consistent, relaxed, calm, rational, curious, and observant, qualities that make them good administrators
(Educational leadership).
Carl Jung, who was a Swiss psychologist and psychotherapist best known for his founding of analytical
psychology and his work “Psychological Types”, has built his original typology on:
two personality attitudes: extroversion and introversion;
four functions (or modes of orientation): thinking, sensation, intuition, and feeling.
The four functions are divided into what Jung called rational (or judging) and irrational (or perceiving) func-
tions. Thinking and feeling are rational, according to Jung, while intuition and sensations are irrational.
Introversion, according to him, is one’s focus on inner world, while extroversion is one’s focus on the out-
side world (Jung, 1971).
Methods
For the analysis, we have carried out a sociological survey among employees and managers. The survey was
done by questionnaires with open and closed questions, and by interview method. 200 people participated in
the survey, 60% of which were workers. Besides the method of analysis and synthesis was used.
Results
The aim of the above mentioned survey was to find out how workers and managers think about the role of
managers in organization and whether the psychology of managers influence management process.
To the question what skills managers should have, participants have answered:
Communication skills 57.97%;
Decision-making abilities 75.36%;
Professional knowledge and practice 76.81%;
Time management skills 55.07%;
Skills for negotiating and influencing people 66.22%;
Leadership skills 69.57%;
Forecasting and planning skills 55.07 %;
Ability to work with teams 63.77%;
Organizing and monitoring skills 75.36%.
Here we see, that the most important skills according to our participants are: professional knowledge and
practice, decision-making abilities, organizing and monitoring skills.
Besides, people have also mentioned the following skills:
to have moral description;
to have clearly developed mechanisms of encouragement and punishment;
to have life experience;
to be able to find non-standard solutions;
to be friendly and humanistic;
to understand the psychology of employees and, accordingly, to show each a specific approach in order
to increase the efficiency of work;
to be aware of the working conflicts and to solve them;
to be an example for others.
According to the results of the survey, the best manager is the one who is loved and respected by workers.
The 93% of the participants thinks so, and the other 7% thinks that employees must be afraid of the manager
(Figure 1, see Appendix).
Besides, here are some interesting opinions of our participants worth presenting:
Business Ethics and Leadership, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2017
24
Love and fear is not important, the most important is that the manager fits the position and in that case
the staff will obey him.
The best manager is the one who works very seriously and professionally and provokes both love and
fear when needed.
The love and fear do not happen in real life. Few people really assess the manager during his work. The
most important is the respect towards the manager.
The best manager is the one who is reliable.
Both fear and respect are important.
To the question, whether psychological traits of the manager influence the efficincy and quality of
management process, people have answered:
Yes 73.53% of the participants think so;
No 0% of the participants think so;
Partly 22.06 % of the participants think so;
I don't know 4.41 % of the participants think so.
According to the results of the survey, the best manager must have Phlegmatic (66.67% of participants think
so) and Sanguine (50.72% of participants think so) temperaments. 2.90% of the participants mentioned
Choleric and nobody mentioned Melancholic.
According to the opinion of 80% of the participants, the best managers are extroverts, and 20% of partici-
pants think, that the best managers' personality type must be introvert. However, some people mention, that
it depends on the sphere. According to them, the traits of business sphere managers and that of state security
are different.
According to the survey, the work efficiency depends on:
Workers, as they are performers 1% of participants think so.
Managers, as they plan, organize, motivate and supervise 16% of participants think so.
Both, workers and managers 83%.
According to the participants, the features of the best managers in the 21th century are as follows:
Honest 34.78 % of participants think so;
Fair 47.83 % of participants think so;
Kind 23.19% of participants think so;
Clever 69.57% of participants think so;
Far-sighted 72.46% of participants think so;
Cunning 26.09% of participants think so;
Flexible 71.01% of participants think so;
Measured 56.52% of participants think so;
Balanced 59.42 % of participants think so;
Orator 30.43% of participants think so.
So, the most important features of managers encompass being far-sighted, flexible and clever. Besides, as
participants have mentioned, the manager must be able to collaborate with employees, work with teams and
groups, involve groups in decision-making process, use the methods of participative management.
Thus, the results of our survey show, that the psychological aspects of managers greatly influence manage-
ment process and in order to improve the management quality, it is crucial to analyze these factors.
Based on the analysis, we have suggested an integrated model of manager, including the above mentioned
skills as a whole (Figure 2, see Appendix).
The model is an integrated approach for evaluating the role of managers in the organization. The model
shows the set of links between the main skills of managers' and the management process, the results of man-
agerial work. Besides, we have also feedback, complaints and suggestions during and after the management
process, which lets us improve the performance during the whole process: in the beginning, in the middle
and at the end.
Business Ethics and Leadership, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2017
25
Conclusion
Concluding, we may say, that management activity is the result of a person's mental activity and many fac-
tors influence the efficiency of that activity, such as: the role of the manager, the professionalism and
knowledge of the manager, his leadership, decision-making and communication skills, his personality and
temperament type, psychological aspects, etc. Our survey revealed many essential aspects that might be
useful for improving the quality of management process. As managers are humans, they have psychology
and it is of high priority to take into account the psychological aspects of management in organizations.
References
1. Cantrell, P. (2001). A study of temperament, Pennsylvania, p. 7.
2. Carpenter, M., Bauer, T., Erdogan B. (2012). Principles of Management, p. 15. Retrieved from:
https://2012books.lardbucket.org/pdfs/management-principles-v1.0.pdf.
3. Educational leadership. Retrieved from: http://teachingteacher.weebly.com/four-temperaments.html.
4. Jung, C. (1971). Collected Works of C. G. Jung, 6, 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, pp. 330-407.
5. Managerial skills 3 types of skills each manager will need. Retrieved from:
http://www.entrepreneurshipinabox.com/202/managerial-skills/.
6. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.
7. Mintzberg's Management Roles, Identifying the Roles Managers Play. Retrieved from:
https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/management-roles.htm.
8. Okal, B. O., Ambuyo, B. A., Amukowa, D. N. (2012). The Functionality of Four Temperaments and
Communication Theories towards the Realization of Peaceful General Elections in Kenya. Journal of
Sociological Research, 3(1), 57-58.
9. Pal, K., Bansal, H. (2012). Management Concepts and Organizational Behaviour, pp. 3-9. Retrieved
from: http://www.ddegjust.ac.in/studymaterial/mcom/mc-101.pdf.
Appendix
Figure 1
Business Ethics and Leadership, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2017
26
Figure 2
... These roles are grouped under three main headings. These are interpersonal relations, information gathering and sharing, and execution of decisionmaking processes (Koçel, 2015;Tovmasyan, 2017). The fact that the manager is the most important employee in the organisation requires these different roles to be carried out in coordination (Şimşek and Çelik, 2018). ...
... Evaluating the information obtained from certain sources and designing the activities of central government in the light of this information is one of the most (Tovmasyan, 2017). The manager must carefully determine the ways of collecting and sharing information for the effectiveness of management activities. ...
Article
Full-text available
In today's organisational management, the weight of western-based management theories and related practices is felt strongly. In this context Henry Mintzberg established the most significant role classification in terms of the responsibilities of managers. Although it is not included much in the literature, the work entitled 'Siyasat-nama', written by Nizam al-Mulk, undertook the task of a guide for statesmen and administrator candidates of its period. In this study, it is planned to reveal the hidden aspects of the management issues in the text, by examining the Siyasat-nama using a content analysis technique, and to explain these findings in an objective and systematic way within the framework of Mintzberg's managerial roles. When the work is examined with a holistic approach, it is seen that contemporary management scientists make suggestions for all managerial roles on which they agree. In addition, it has been determined that Nizam al-Mulk relates directly the subjects he describes in the Siyasat-nama to justice, merit and organisational continuity. One of the most important findings obtained as a result of this study is the fact that the principles of providing information, producing information and acting according to information have never lost their importance.
... The psychology of managers and their personalities influence the effectiveness of management and the decision-making process (Tovmasyan, 2017). The four types of temperament (Sanguine (talker), Choleric (doer), Melancholic (thinker), and Phlegmatic (watcher)) play significant roles in management (Mahusay-Baria, 2015). ...
... The research results are supported by a literature review. In particular, the results indicate that psychological features, cognitive biases and dissonance affect work performance and decision making, and similar results were obtained by , Tovmasyan (2017), Mahusay-Baria (2015), Salimi et al. (2011), Yan et al. (2020, Rasmussen & Jeppesen (2006), Gozali (2022), Caputo (2013), Gimpel (2008), Ramalakshmi et al. (2018), etc. Managers should be aware of the psychological features, assumptions, and biases employed in working performance and decision making, as mentioned by Das & Teng (1999). ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper outlines the viewpoints and opposing perspectives in the scientific discourse on the issue of the impact of psychological factors on the working environment. The analysis of the literature proves that the efficiency of work performance and decision making in organizations also depends on psychological factors. The main goal of the paper is to explore whether psychological factors, cognitive biases and cognitive dissonance affect work performance and decision making․ Understanding the impact of psychological factors on the working environment is important for organizations and decision-making processes, as based on the results, innovative solutions may be applied for better management and HR policies. Methodological instruments are based on a survey and Pearson chi-square analysis. This empirical study presents survey results among 100 participants. According to the results, 83% of respondents think that the most effective managers/employees are calm and balanced people (phlegmatic). Cognitive biases and dissonance hinder work performance, although sometimes people do not realize it. Based on the situations that were frequent among participants, the most frequent cognitive biases are choice-supportive bias, groupthink, authority bias, ostrich effect, IKEA effect, optimism bias, confirmation bias, anchoring bias, etc. However, 90% do nothing to overcome cognitive biases, as many of them do not realize that they have biases. Similarly, 75% mentioned that they have experienced cognitive dissonance in their behavior, but they do nothing to overcome it. The study empirically and theoretically validates that cognitive biases and dissonance can affect decision-making, communications and interactions with other people. The results of the Pearson chi-square analysis showed that mainly phlegmatic people have experienced the influence of cognitive biases and cognitive dissonance on their work experience. Additionally, mainly choleric and phlegmatic people try to overcome cognitive biases, while sanguine people try to do something to overcome cognitive dissonance. The analysis may be useful for organizations, managers, and workers to understand the hindering factors that may affect decision making and work performance. Additionally, the paper recommends using innovative methods of group decision making, developing critical and innovative thinking skills among employees, adjusting HR policies, applying innovative forms and styles of leadership and participative management, etc.
... Organizational leadership is the perception of members of the TB control team on the role of the leader, namely the Head of the Public Health Center in providing support and strategic direction to the TB control team. Organizational leadership is a unit to set goals, plans, and regulate activities, and motivates human resources and regulates all procedures for carrying out a task (Tovmasyan, 2017). Based on PerMenKes No. 75 of 2015 concerning the Public Health Center article 33 paragraph 3 states that the Head of the Public Health Center is responsible for all activities at the Public Health Center. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Leadership is central in a team to carry out the task with optimal results. The Tuberculosis (TB) control team's average achievement in Surabaya from 2015 to 2018 was still below the target (78,23%). Purpose: To conducted to analyze the influence of organizational leadership's perception on the cohesion of the TB control team. Methods: This study was observational with a cross-sectional design and implemented in 43 TB control teams at Surabaya Primary Health Center. The number of informants was 319 team members. The data was obtained with a questionnaire that was processed descriptively and linear regression analysis with SPSS version 25.0. Results: The result showed that organizational leadership had no significant influence on the cohesion of TB control team (p-value 0,124 > α = 0,05). Conclusion: organizational leadership had no significant influence on the cohesion of the TB control team.
... Meanwhile, a manager is defined as "the one who sets goals, plans and organizes the activities, motivates human resources, and controls the overall procedures." (Tovmasyan, 2017). Another important player in the organizational structure is the supervisor. ...
Article
Full-text available
Personality relates to employment status. Previous studies have mainly compared the difference between entrepreneurs and managers. It remains unknown how personalities differ in entrepreneurs, managers, supervisors, and employees. In this research, we answer the questions by analyzing data from Understanding Society: the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) that consisted of 2,415 entrepreneurs, 3,822 managers, 2,446 supervisors, and 10,897 employees. By using a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and ANOVA, we found that employment status has a significant multivariate effect on personality traits (F(5, 17,159) = 172.51, p < 0.001) after taking account into demographics. Moreover, there were also significant univariate effects for Neuroticism (F(3,19502) = 16.61, P < 0.001), Openness (F(3,19502) = 3.53, P < 0.05), Agreeableness (F(3,19502) = 66.57, P < 0.001), Conscientiousness (F(3,19502) = 16.39, P < 0.001), and Extraversion (F(3,19502) = 31.61, P < 0.001) after controlling for demographics. Multiple comparisons revealed that entrepreneurs are characterized by low Neuroticism, high Openness, high Conscientiousness, and high Extraversion while managers had low Neuroticism, low Agreeableness, high Openness, high Conscientiousness, and high Extraversion. Finally, supervisors are associated with high Conscientiousness. Implications and limitations are discussed.
... The effectiveness of management and the decision-making process depends on many factors, including the psychology of managers, and their personality (Tovmasyan, 2017). The personality differences relate to culture, gender, psychology, motivation, etc. Personality is important for harmonizing a job and an employee. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper summarizes the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on the issue of the influence of skills, personality factors, and psychology on management and decision-making processes. The systematization of literature on the problem of managerial decision-making has shown the impact of a significant number of internal factors on the effectiveness of corporate governance. The main purpose of the research is to determine whether personality impacts management processes in organizations. The object of the study is 25 managers and 60 employees of companies working in different spheres. The analysis in the paper is carried out in the following logical sequence: at the first stage, the literary sources containing the results of previous studies on this topic were analyzed; based on the obtained results, a survey of managers and employees of companies was conducted, and appropriate conclusions were made. Methodological tools of the research include survey, interview, and statistical methods: cross tabulation with Pearson Chi-square testing. The paper presents the results of an empirical analysis, which shows that most employees and managers think that the efficient managers are the ones who are loved by employees. According to the managers and employees, these are the best skills that an efficient manager should have: communication skills, leadership skills, decision-making skills, professional knowledge and practice. Both employees and managers think that the best managers are extroverts, ambitious and leader-like. According to the managers and employees, the most efficient managers are analytical, active, social, wise and enthusiastic. According to managers, the most efficient managers are characterized as the thinker (melancholic) and socially useful, and according to employees, the most efficient manager is characterized as the doer (choleric) and socially useful. According to managers and employees, a good decision-maker is analytical and wise. The results may be useful for organizations, also for studies in management, HR, psychology, personal development, etc.
... Management is the power that holds the organization's activities together. Management refers to the whole system of management roles, such as preparing, coordinating, motivating, and regulating that are used to achieve the organization's key goals by using people and other resources (Tovmasyan, 2017). ...
... These roles setting tactics and making choices at all levels of the organization. They can be connected to the instructive jobs, for it is with assembled and shared data that the manager decides (Tovmasyan, 2017). The decisional roles categories are closely linked with the organization processes in the level of analysis. ...
Article
Full-text available
The operation theater is a very critical area, and everything needs to be done in an ordinate manner to maintain efficacy. However, managers are needed to maintain the functionality of the OT suite. An OR manager is responsible for many things, like scheduling OT but most importantly, OT efficiency. An OR manager faces different challenges during management of an OR suite. These vary from organization to organization. The most common types of diversity found in OT are cultural diversity, religious diversity, organizational and environmental diversity, and so on. An OR manager should manage these diversities ethically and professionally to overcome an ethical dilemma. OR managers should encourage ethical behavior to improve OT efficacy and effectiveness, but change may reduce or hinder OT effectiveness due to resistance to change. Ideally, the OR manager should manage sustainability to reduce resistance to change without compromising OT efficacy or inducing socio-ethical conflicts among the OR team. For this, OR teams are managed in such a way to facilitate high-quality teamwork and promote good communication skills. However, many barriers hinder communication, which may cause misconceptions and compromise efficacy. Many tactics and strategies are used to reduce these conflicts peri-operatively and OT performance indicators are used to determine the efficiency. To increase productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness as needed while lowering personnel costs, an OR manager organizes and schedules the OT.
Conference Paper
Процес прийняття управлінських рішень забезпечується не тільки різними технологічними засобами, але й значною мірою залежить від моральних та особистісних якостей управлінця чи керівника. Значна кількість організацій та підприємств є достатньо складними системами, а тому потребують багато уваги від людей, які є частиною цих систем. На процес прийняття рішення впливають ряд факторів, серед яких значну роль відіграють психологічні характеристики особистості...
Article
Full-text available
The paper focuses on the general analysis and functionality of both the four temperaments and communication theories in an attempt to comprehend the process, nature and reality of politics, campaigns and general elections in Kenya. Temperaments theory classifies human personalities into four major categories: sanguine, choleric, melancholic and phlegmatic. The paper proposes to highlight how having clear knowledge of these personalities in the political contexts may help the general public in electing peacemakers. The paper also puts into focus how aspects of communication theory especially speech event and speech act theories may be used in understanding our political scenes. The speech event has been used to summarize the nature of politics in Kenya while speech act theory shows how political utterances can be misjudged by the audience hence fuelling untold violence, hate and even mass action. May be psychologists and discourse experts can play a key role in describing personalities, temperaments of the leaders and analyze their utterances in order to realize peaceful general elections in Kenya that can be emulated by other African leaders in the East African community. Remember, a peaceful country is very important for any citizen towards realization of its goals so as to uplift the social, political and economic sectors. However, a country cannot have peaceful atmosphere if the populace seems to be divided into ethnic lines, jobs given through nepotism and general national developments lopsided. It is a common phenomenon in Kenya that before, during and after general elections, violence generally occurs. Is it temperaments of the leaders or their utterances during campaigns that contribute to violence?
A study of temperament
  • P Cantrell
Cantrell, P. (2001). A study of temperament, Pennsylvania, p. 7.
Principles of Management
  • M Carpenter
  • T Bauer
  • B Erdogan
Carpenter, M., Bauer, T., Erdogan B. (2012). Principles of Management, p. 15. Retrieved from: https://2012books.lardbucket.org/pdfs/management-principles-v1.0.pdf.
Collected Works of C
  • C Jung
Jung, C. (1971). Collected Works of C. G. Jung, 6, 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, pp. 330-407.