Available via license: CC BY
Content may be subject to copyright.
diseases
Article
Rising Rates of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Leading to
Liver Transplantation in Baby Boomer Generation
with Chronic Hepatitis C, Alcohol Liver Disease,
and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis-Related
Liver Disease
George Cholankeril 1, Eric R. Yoo 2ID , Ryan B. Perumpail 3, Andy Liu 4, Jeevin S. Sandhu 1,
Satheesh Nair 5, Menghan Hu 6and Aijaz Ahmed 1, *
1
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305,
USA; gcholankeril@gmail.com (G.C.); jsandhu@oxy.edu (J.S.S.)
2
Department of Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128, USA; eric.r.yoo@gmail.com
3Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA;
rperumpail@gmail.com
4Department of Medicine, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94114, USA;
andyeliu@gmail.com
5Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis,
TN 38163, USA; snair@uthsc.edu
6Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA;
menghan_hu@brown.edu
*Corresponding: aijazahmed@stanford.edu; Tel.: +1-650-498-6091
Received: 28 August 2017; Accepted: 25 September 2017; Published: 26 September 2017
Abstract:
We aim to study the impact of the baby boomer (BB) generation, a birth-specific cohort
(born 1945–1965) on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-related liver transplantation (LT) in patients
with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), alcoholic liver disease (ALD), and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
(NASH). We performed a retrospective analysis using the United Network for Organ Sharing
(UNOS)/Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) database from 2003 to 2014 to compare
HCC-related liver transplant surgery trends between two cohorts—the BB and non-BB—with
a secondary diagnosis of HCV, ALD, or NASH. From 2003–2014, there were a total of 8313 liver
transplant recipients for the indication of HCC secondary to HCV, ALD, or NASH. Of the total, 6658
(80.1%) HCC-related liver transplant recipients were BB. The number of liver transplant surgeries for
the indication of HCC increased significantly in NASH (+1327%), HCV (+382%), and ALD (+286%)
during the study period. The proportion of BB who underwent LT for HCC was the highest in
HCV (84.7%), followed by NASH (70.3%) and ALD (64.7%). The recommendations for birth-cohort
specific HCV screening stemmed from a greater understanding of the high prevalence of chronic HCV
and HCV-related HCC within BB. The rising number of HCC-related LT among BB with ALD and
NASH suggests the need for increased awareness and improved preventative screening/surveillance
measures within NASH and ALD cohorts as well.
Keywords:
baby boomer; hepatitis C virus; alcoholic liver disease; non-alcoholic steatohepatitis;
liver transplantation
1. Introduction
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been rising at an alarming rate with over
half a million new cases diagnosed annually worldwide [
1
]. In the United States (U.S.), HCC is the
Diseases 2017,5, 20; doi:10.3390/diseases5040020 www.mdpi.com/journal/diseases
Diseases 2017,5, 20 2 of 5
most rapidly rising cause of cancer and cancer-related deaths with an incidence that has tripled over
the last decade [
2
]. This rise in HCC incidence is largely due to the high prevalence of chronic hepatitis
C virus (HCV) infection, which has recently surpassed 3 million people [3].
The incidence of HCV has shown a disproportionate birth specific-cohort effect, with up to 80%
of HCV infection seen in baby boomers (BB), Americans born between 1945 and 1965 [
4
]. Due to
their long-standing chronic HCV infection, this aging birth specific-cohort has a higher likelihood for
developing HCC [
5
,
6
]. With an otherwise dismal prognosis, select HCC patients may be candidates
for liver transplantation (LT). The number of HCV-infected BB with HCC awaiting LT has already
increased nearly four-fold over the last two decades [
7
,
8
]. However, the impact of HCC LT among BB
within other leading liver disease etiologies, such as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and alcoholic
liver disease (ALD), has yet to be determined. We aim to study the impact of the BB birth-specific
cohort on LT recipients with HCV-related HCC, ALD-related HCC, and NASH-related HCC.
2. Methods
We utilized the registry data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)/Organ
Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) database to compare HCC LT trends in all adults (
age ≥18
)
from 2003 to 2014. Birth cohort-specific disparities in HCC LT were evaluated by categorizing patients
into two cohorts: BB and non-BB (non-baby boomers—born pre-1945 or post-1965). The underlying
etiology of HCC was determined by secondary diagnosis coding of liver disease etiology among
patients with HCC undergoing LT. Liver disease etiologies were categorized into HCV, ALD, or NASH.
In addition to using patients listed with a secondary diagnosis of NASH with HCC, we estimated
the number of patients with NASH in cryptogenic cirrhosis or cirrhosis due to unknown etiology
categories on a body mass index based on previously defined criteria [8].
We studied the proportion of HCC-related liver transplant surgeries according to their secondary
etiology and analyzed the annual trends in these breakdowns from 2003 and 2014. Additionally,
we compared demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity), and clinical comorbidities including hepatic
encephalopathy (HE), ascites, and diabetes within these two cohorts using chi-square testing for
categorical variables. Statistical significance was met using a two-tailed pvalue < 0.05. Post-transplant
survival was analyzed with Kaplan–Meier methods. All statistical analyses were performed with Stata
(Version 10; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).
3. Results
From 2003 to 2014, there were a total of 8313 HCC-related liver transplant surgeries for HCC
secondary to HCV, ALD, or NASH. HCV-related HCC had the highest proportion of LT (n= 6034,
72.6%) followed by NASH-related HCC (n= 1350, 16.2%) and ALD- related HCC (n= 929, 11.2%).
The BB cohort constituted 6658 (80.1%) of all HCC-related liver transplant recipients. From 2003 to 2014
the number of HCC-related liver transplant recipients increased nine-fold in NASH (+905%) and more
than doubled in HCV (+268%) and ALD (+208%). In a similar fashion, the number of liver transplant
surgeries for HCC among BB rose significantly in NASH (+1327%), HCV (+382%), and ALD (+286%).
The overall annual trends in HCC-related LT among BB for HCV, NASH, and ALD are depicted in
Table 1. The proportion of BB who underwent LT for HCC was the highest in HCV (84.7%), followed
by NASH (70.3%), and ALD (64.7%). The highest annual increment in BB proportion of HCC-related
LT was noted in NASH (+3.5%), followed by HCV (+2.6%), and ALD (+2.1%).
Demographic and clinical characteristics between BB and non-BB cohorts undergoing LT for HCC
among HCV, NASH, and ALD are outlined in Table 2. Compared to non-BB, HCC-related LT in BB
also had a higher prevalence of males in HCV (BB, 80.3% vs. non-BB, 66.1%, p< 0.01) and NASH (BB,
73.0% vs. non-BB, 65.1%, p< 0.01) (Table 2). The BB HCC cohort also had a higher prevalence of other
complications of end-stage liver disease including HE (BB, 40.2% vs. non- BB, 34.8%, p< 0.01) and
ascites (BB, 50.9% vs. non-BB, 46.8%, p< 0.01).
Diseases 2017,5, 20 3 of 5
Table 1.
Baby Boomer HCC Liver Transplantation Annual Trends with HCV, ALD, and NASH;
UNOS 2003–2014.
HCV NASH ALD
BB †Overall Percent BB Overall Percent BB Overall Percent
2003 149 216 69.0% 11 19 57.9% 22 37 59.5%
2004 167 224 74.6% 20 38 52.6% 16 33 48.5%
2005 218 297 73.4% 22 47 46.8% 28 59 47.5%
2006 271 351 77.2% 37 71 52.1% 36 75 48.0%
2007 373 461 80.9% 54 90 60.0% 38 85 44.7%
2008 427 505 84.6% 80 124 64.5% 48 79 60.8%
2009 460 540 85.2% 96 151 63.6% 56 76 73.7%
2010 492 585 84.1% 101 132 76.5% 45 66 68.2%
2011 567 632 89.7% 91 128 71.1% 81 107 75.7%
2012 619 707 87.6% 127 168 75.6% 77 106 72.6%
2013 646 722 89.5% 153 191 80.1% 69 92 75.0%
2014 719 794 90.6% 157 191 82.2% 85 114 74.6%
Total 5108 6034 84.7% 949 1350 70.3% 601 929 64.7%
APC
‡+2.6% +3.5% +2.1%
†BB = Baby Boomer; ‡APC = Annual Percent Change.
Table 2.
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics in HCC Liver Transplant Recipients among Baby
Boomers versus Non-Baby Boomers; UNOS 2003–2014.
HCV NASH ALD
BB
n= 5108
Non-BB
n= 926 pBB
n= 949
Non-BB
n= 401 pBB
n= 601
Non-BB
n= 328 p
Age, median 57 66 <0.01 59 67 <0.01 58 67 <0.01
Gender
Male 80.3% 66.1% <0.01 73.0% 65.1% <0.01 90.5% 89.6% 0.67
Ethnicity
White 67.7% 59.1% <0.01 75.9% 77.6% 0.50 69.6% 78.7% <0.01
Black 13.3% 11.1% 0.07 5.4% 3.7% 0.20 3.8% 1.2% 0.02
Hispanic 13.6% 17.6% <0.01 14.7% 14.5% 0.93 14.7% 14.5% 0.14
Asian 4.1% 11.1% <0.01 2.6% 2.2% 0.67 3.0% 1.2% 0.89
Other 9.9% 1.1% <0.01 1.4% 2.0% 0.49 8.9% 4.4% <0.05
HE 40.2% 34.8% <0.01 43.4% 41.4% <0.50 50.3% 43.9% 0.09
Diabetes 23.6% 28.4% <0.01 47.7% 47.7% <0.01 35.1% 33.5% 0.63
Ascites 50.9% 46.8% <0.05 55.2% 55.2% 0.84 68.6% 62.5% 0.06
There was no statistical difference (p> 0.05) in short-term (one-year) post-transplant survival rate
among BB vs. non-BB HCC-related LT in HCV (BB, 76.1% vs. non-BB, 77.2%), NASH (BB, 76.0% vs.
non-BB, 75.6%), or ALD (BB, 77.4% vs. non-BB, 79.0%). However, when comparing post-transplant
survival in BB within the three liver disease etiologies, post-transplant survival was highest in ALD,
followed by NASH and HCV (Figure 1).
Diseases 2017,5, 20 4 of 5
Diseases 2017, 5, 20 4 of 5
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier Survival Curves in HCC Post-Liver Transplantation among Baby Boomers
with HCV, ALD, and NASH.
4. Discussion
Since the implementation of the Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) for liver allocation,
the number of HCC patients who underwent LT has risen significantly. While previous studies have
attributed this rising trend in HCC incidence and surgical intervention to BB cohort, these studies
only evaluated its impact on HCV-related HCC [9]. Although HCV continues to be the leading liver
disease etiology for HCC-related LT, there is a significant rise in NASH-related HCC and ALD-
related HCC leading to LT. Our analysis suggests that the BB cohort has influenced the rise in overall
HCC-related LT in all three liver disease etiologies. Aside from the birth specific-cohort effect, our
current allocation policy has also influenced the dramatic rise in the number HCC-related LT.
Candidates with HCC awaiting LT are eligible to receive a MELD exception resulting in higher
priority and increased likelihood of undergoing liver transplant surgery [10].
As the BB generation age, they have an increased risk of developing and suffering from chronic
health conditions and present a complicated challenge for healthcare providers in the future.
Therefore, there will be an increasing demand to allocate resources on policies highlighting
preventative health in the BB cohort. The 2012 guideline set by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, the 2013 guideline set by the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF),
and the 2014 guideline set by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) in
conjunction with the Infectious Disease Society of America have highlighted the increasing evidence
of the benefits of age-based HCV testing [1,11]. The recommendations for birth-cohort specific HCV
screening stemmed from a greater understanding of the high prevalence of chronic HCV and HCV-
related HCC within the BB generation. However, the rising number of HCC-related LT among BB
generation with ALD and NASH suggests the need for increased awareness and improved
preventative screening/surveillance for HCC in these sub-cohorts.
Author Contributions: George Cholankeril—study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and
interpretation of data, and drafting of the initial and final manuscript; Eric R. Yoo—study concept and design,
interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript; Ryan B. Perumpail—
study concept and design, interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the
manuscript; Andy Liu—study concept and design, interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical
revision of the manuscript; Jeevin S. Sandhu—study concept and design, interpretation of data, drafting of the
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier Survival Curves in HCC Post-Liver Transplantation among Baby Boomers
with HCV, ALD, and NASH.
4. Discussion
Since the implementation of the Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) for liver allocation,
the number of HCC patients who underwent LT has risen significantly. While previous studies have
attributed this rising trend in HCC incidence and surgical intervention to BB cohort, these studies only
evaluated its impact on HCV-related HCC [
9
]. Although HCV continues to be the leading liver disease
etiology for HCC-related LT, there is a significant rise in NASH-related HCC and ALD-related HCC
leading to LT. Our analysis suggests that the BB cohort has influenced the rise in overall HCC-related
LT in all three liver disease etiologies. Aside from the birth specific-cohort effect, our current allocation
policy has also influenced the dramatic rise in the number HCC-related LT. Candidates with HCC
awaiting LT are eligible to receive a MELD exception resulting in higher priority and increased
likelihood of undergoing liver transplant surgery [10].
As the BB generation age, they have an increased risk of developing and suffering from chronic
health conditions and present a complicated challenge for healthcare providers in the future. Therefore,
there will be an increasing demand to allocate resources on policies highlighting preventative health
in the BB cohort. The 2012 guideline set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the 2013
guideline set by the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF), and the 2014 guideline
set by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) in conjunction with the
Infectious Disease Society of America have highlighted the increasing evidence of the benefits of
age-based HCV testing [
1
,
11
]. The recommendations for birth-cohort specific HCV screening stemmed
from a greater understanding of the high prevalence of chronic HCV and HCV-related HCC within the
BB generation. However, the rising number of HCC-related LT among BB generation with ALD and
NASH suggests the need for increased awareness and improved preventative screening/surveillance
for HCC in these sub-cohorts.
Diseases 2017,5, 20 5 of 5
Author Contributions:
George Cholankeril—study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and
interpretation of data, and drafting of the initial and final manuscript; Eric R. Yoo—study concept and design,
interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript; Ryan B. Perumpail—study
concept and design, interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript;
Andy Liu—study concept and design, interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of
the manuscript; Jeevin S. Sandhu—study concept and design, interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript,
and critical revision of the manuscript; Satheesh Nair—study concept and design, interpretation of data, drafting
of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript; Menghan Hu—study concept and design, interpretation
of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript; Aijaz Ahmed—study concept and
design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript,
and study supervision.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. El-Serag, H.B. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011,365, 1118–1127. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Altekruse, S.F.; McGlynn, K.A.; Reichman, M.E. Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival
trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009,27, 1485–1491. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.
Chung, R.T.; Baumert, T.F. Curing chronic hepatitis C—The arc of a medical triumph. N. Engl. J. Med.
2014,370, 1576–1578. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Hepatitis C Fact Sheet. Available online: http://www.hhs.
gov/opa/reproductive-health/stis/hepatitis-c/ (accessed on 17 July 2016).
5. Wray, C.M.; Davis, A.M. Screening for hepatitis C. JAMA 2015,313, 1855–1856. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6.
Fattovich, G.; Stroffolini, T.; Zagni, I.; Donato, F. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Incidence and risk
factors. Gastroenterology 2004,127 (Suppl. 1), S35–S50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.
Biggins, S.W.; Bambha, K.M.; Terrault, N.A.; Inadomi, J.; Shiboski, S.; Dodge, J.L.; Gralla, J.; Rosen, H.R.;
Roberts, J.P. Projected future increase in aging hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant candidates:
A potential effect of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transplant. 2012,18, 1471–1478. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Wong, R.J.; Cheung, R.; Ahmed, A. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the most rapidly growing indication for
liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the U.S. Hepatology
2014
,59, 2188–2195.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.
Yan, M.; Ha, J.; Aguilar, M.; Bhuket, T.; Liu, B.; Gish, R.G.; Cheung, R.; Wong, R.J. Birth cohort-specific
disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma stage at diagnosis, treatment, and long-term survival. J. Hepatol.
2016,64, 326–332. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.
Northup, P.G.; Intagliata, N.M.; Shah, N.L.; Pelletier, S.J.; Berg, C.L.; Argo, C.K. Excess mortality on the liver
transplant waiting list: Unintended policy consequences and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)
inflation. Hepatology 2015,61, 285–291. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11.
Moyer, V.A. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in adults:
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann. Intern. Med.
2013
,159, 349–357.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
©
2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).