Due to its unique pattern and different goals, Machine-to-Machine (M2M) traffic necessitates new traffic models. The real challenge is striking a balance between model accuracy and dealing with a massive number of M2M devices that must all work in unison. On the one hand, due to their reliability, "Source traffic models" have a competitive advantage over "Aggregated traffic models". But on the other hand, their complexity is expected to make managing the exponential growth of M2M devices difficult. In this paper, we propose a Markov Modulated Poisson Processes (MMPP) framework for studying M2M heterogeneous traffic effects as well as Human-to-Human (H2H) traffic using MMPP. To characterize the H2H/M2M coexistence, Markov chains were used as a stochastic process tool. Once using the traditional evolved Node B (eNodeB), our simulation results show that the network's service completion rate will suffer significantly. In the worst-case scenario, when an accumulative storm of M2M requests tries to access the network at the same time, the degradation reaches 8%. However, by leasing 72 resources reserved for M2M traffic and using our "Coexistence of Heterogeneous traffic Analyzer and Network Architecture for Long term evolution" (CHANAL) solution, we can achieve a completion rate of 96%. 1 Introduction Machine to Machine (M2M) communications and Human-to-Human (H2H) communications are expected to play a major role in any future wireless network. Although M2M communications and H2H communications have complementary goals in different fields (e.g., civil transportation, electrical power network, medical treatment, industrial automation, etc.), but M2M communications as a proxy for replacing/limiting numerous human interventions through the Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) intelligent systems [1]. Taking into account the fact that M2M features should meet rejuvenating technology requirements, the differences in H2H and M2M traffic features can distract LTE-A unprecedented development. The coexistence of H2H and M2M traffics involves many challenges that could arise in a common network that reduces its effectiveness as result of the incompatibility of H2H and M2M patterns. Contrary to H2H traffic, M2M traffic is highly homogeneous because it uses small chunks of data along with small transfer rates, usually with predictable times and durations of communication [2]. But with M2M synchronization behavior and a variety of applications with different payloads, times and data rates, accumulative traffic from different sources is expected to be received, which forms heterogeneous traffic that very rapidly saturates the network bandwidth. The problem of saturation inevitably has a remarkable impact on traffic, services and applications in both M2M and H2H [3]. Cellular systems (smart sensors, mobile telephones, basic stations, satellite systems, etc.) have recently spread and pushing the existing technologies to their maximum [4] in terms of the complexity of their processing algorithms. Mobile operators spend $20 billion per year to overcome network failure and service degradations, according to Heavy Reading [5]. As a result, one of the most challenges for mobile operators, researchers and the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) community is the efficient radio communication strategy [6]. In this context, the main performance of homogenic M2M traffic and H2H traffic is characterized mathematically in our previous work [7]. We used a mathematical model called "Coexistence Analyzer and Network Architecture for Long term evolution" (CANAL) to mathematically characterize the key performance of homogeneous M2M traffic as well as H2H traffic. 2 Traffic modelling Traffic modelling can be described by processes of stochastics that match the behavior of the measured data traffic for physical quantities [8]. The models of traffic are classified as the Source traffic models (e.g., voice, video and data) and Aggregated traffic models (e.g., high-speed links, backbone networks and internet). The source traffic simulation (e.g., SimuLTE simulator [9], OPtimized Network Engineering Tool (OPNET) [10], Objective Modular NeTwork (OMNeT) [11], etc.) generate packets that reflect real traffic behavior at sizes and intervals. In [12], the OPNET modeler is used to analyze a number of typical sources of traffic models, including two-state MMPP, ON/OFF and Interrupted Poisson Process (IPP) models. Our previous work in [13] focused on M2M traffic load in disastrous situations. The ability of an evolved Node B (eNodeB) to deal with a fixed number of H2H traffics with an increasing number of M2M requests attempting to access a LTE-A network simultaneously is examined in all scenarios using a source traffic simulator such as SimuLTE. When we consider that, according to [14], it is expected to have more than 52000 devices per cell trying to send their payloads at the same time during a disaster, we realize that source traffic models become extremely heavy to be executed in such cases, which necessitates the use of aggregated traffic modelling. The goal of aggregated traffic models (i.e., Simulink simulator [15]) is to find a good approximation of the arrival process of multiple devices while maintaining a good balance between accuracy and simulation efficiency [16]. For example, in [7], we studied the mutual impact of H2H and M2M traffic in dense areas and emergency situations. We also run several simulations based on the proposed architecture in [15], assuming a single LTE-A network with average arrival rates (λ1; λ2) and service rates (µ1; µ2) for H2H and M2M traffics. According to the simulation results, a prioritized LTE-A system could handle more requests in less time for both M2M and H2H traffics.