ArticlePDF Available

Impact of Peer Tutoring on Learning of Students

Authors:

Abstract

The study attempts to investigate the concept of peer tutoring and its impact on learning. Peer tutoring can be applied among the students of the same age group or students from different age groups. The students learn from each other in an organized way through the process. It is a well-organized and beneficial learning experience in which one-student acts as the tutor or teacher and the other one serves as the tutee or learner. Peer tutoring creates an opportunity for the students to utilize their knowledge and experience in a meaningful way. In this process the tutors reinforce their own learning through reviewing and reformulating their knowledge. On the other hand, the learner or tutee gets one on one attention. Peer tutoring enables both tutor and tutee to gain self-confidence, the tutor by observing self-competence in his or her capability to help someone and the tutee by gaining positive reinforcement from the peers. Therefore, peer tutoring has a very positive impact on the process of learning.
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/index.php/JSMaP
e
-
ISSN: 23
95
-
0463
Volume 01 Issue 02
March 2015
Available online: http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/ P a g e | 61
Impact of Peer Tutoring on Learning of Students
Najabat Ali*
1,
Muhammad Anwer
2
, Jaffar Abbas
3
1
Research Scholar, Hamdard Institute of Education and Social Sciences, Hamdard University,
Main Campus, Karachi, PAKISTAN.
2
Faculty Member, Special Education Department, Gilgit, Gilgit Baltistan, PAKISTAN
3
PhD Scholar, Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, West Yan’an Road
1882, Shanghai Post Code 200051 China.
Email: alinajabat@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
The study attempts to investigate the
concept of peer tutoring and its impact on
learning. Peer tutoring can be applied
among the students of the same age group
or students from different age groups. The
students learn from each other in an
organized way through the process. It is a
well-organized and beneficial learning
experience in which one-student acts as the
tutor or teacher and the other one serves as
the tutee or learner. Peer tutoring creates
an opportunity for the students to utilize
their knowledge and experience in a
meaningful way. In this process the tutors
reinforce their own learning through
reviewing and reformulating their
knowledge. On the other hand, the learner
or tutee gets one on one attention. Peer
tutoring enables both tutor and tutee to
gain self-confidence, the tutor by observing
self-competence in his or her capability to
help someone and the tutee by gaining
positive reinforcement from the peers.
Therefore, peer tutoring has a very positive
impact on the process of learning.
Key Words: Peers, Peer Tutoring, Learning,
Teaching, Education; Peer Tutoring, Peers,
Tutors, Learning, Students, Education,
Teaching
INTRODUCTION
Peer learning is a broad learning strategy. It
covers a wide range of activities through
which people learn through different
techniques. These activities ranged from a
traditional proctor model in schools to the
more innovative learning groups in colleges
and universities. In proctor model the
senior students act as tutors and junior
students as tutees. On the other hand in
innovative learning groups students of the
same age group or same level help each
other by forming partnerships. (Griffiths,
Housten and Lazenbatt, 1995). There are
some other models which include
discussions, seminars, private study groups,
counseling, peer-assessment schemes,
collaborative project or laboratory work,
workplace mentoring and community
activities. (Boud, 1988).
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/index.php/JSMaP
e
-
ISSN: 23
95
-
0463
Volume 01 Issue 02
March 2015
Available online: http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/ P a g e | 62
As peer learning involves a large range of
activities but here the study analyzes a two-
way, reciprocal learning activity. Peer
learning should have mutual benefits and
involve the sharing of knowledge, ideas and
experience between the participants. Peer
learning can be termed as a technique of
moving beyond independent to
interdependent or mutual learning (Boud,
1988).
Through this the students learn to a great
extent by elaborating their views to others.
They also participate in such kind of
activities in which they are able to learn
from their peers. (Kaufman, Felder and
Fuller, 1999). Peer learning enables the
students to develop their skills to organize
and plan learning activities, working in
collaboration with others, giving and
receiving feedback about their work and
finally evaluation of their own learning.
Nowadays the importance of peer learning
is increasing and it has become the part of
many courses in a wide range of contexts
and disciplines in many countries of the
world. (Boud, 1988).
Students usually learn effectively through
peer learning especially at a time when
university resources are insufficient and the
demand of staff is higher. Peer learning
creates the opportunity for the students to
learn from each other by utilizing their own
skills. It enables students to have more
practice than traditional teaching. Students
take more responsibility in peer learning
and learn how to learn effectively. (Johnson
and Holubec, 1993)
LITERATURE REVIEW
The history of peer learning goes back as far
as the period of Aristotle. (Wagner, 1982).
Throughout the history there have been
many developments in peer learning,
working in different contexts. The
monitorial system developed by Joseph
Lancaster in 1800s is another type of peer
learning in which monitors or proctors learn
from their teachers and then passed it to
other children. (Gerber and Kauffman,
1981).
The term peer tutoring is used for various
tutoring activities but mostly it is referred
to the students who usually study or learn
in pairs in order to help each other. Peer
tutoring usually leads to better
understanding of the academic concepts
but it is more fruitful when the students
having different ability levels work with
each other. (Kunsch, Jitendra, & Sood,
2007).
Formal peer learning is far more
instrumental strategy in which advanced
students act as teachers or tutors and often
they require some form of remuneration
from their students who learn from them.
In many universities it is a well established
practice, whereas reciprocal learning is
considered to be incidental. (Brookfield and
Preskill, 1999).
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/index.php/JSMaP
e
-
ISSN: 23
95
-
0463
Volume 01 Issue 02
March 2015
Available online: http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/ P a g e | 63
Peer tutoring is one of the important
techniques which has been used by the
teachers to raise the assurance and
confidence level of their students. Through
this method the learners are divided in pairs
in which one acts as a tutor and the other
as tutee or learner. (Rosewal et al. 1995)
The students who learn in cooperative
learning groups acquire more knowledge
and they take their responsibilities in a
better way as compared to others.
(Fernandez-Santander, 2008)
There are numerous advantages for
teachers, students and the students being
tutored, by using the programs of peer
tutorial. Many research have been
completed for the support of statement
that several students feel very comfort,
and therefore can focus well on the subject
problem, with a peer tutor relatively than a
qualified teacher (Ehly et. al.,). There are
different forms of academic peer tutoring in
colleges; especially in large universities the
students of graduate level are assigned the
responsibility of teaching courses of
undergraduate level. (Goodlad and Hurst,
1989).
There is proctoring program which is
another example of peer learning in which
the senior students teach or guide their
juniors. In this kind of peer learning the
students who are ahead of others teach the
students who need help. So we can realize
that peer tutoring is equally advantageous;
equally for student and tutor attitude to
achieve something. So, peer tutoring is also
beneficial for the teachers who do not have
so much time to occupy with every student
individually. (Topping, 1998)
TYPES OF PEER TUTORING
There are three main types of peer tutoring.
(I) RECIPROCAL PEER TUTORING (RPT)
In this type of peer tutoring the peers learn
from each other by changing their status
from tutor to student. Both peers take turns
at being the tutor while the other one acts
as the student or learner. This strategy
provides a very good opportunity to every
student to act as a tutor which enhances his
confidence level. (Goodwin, 2001; Goodwin
& Watkinson, 2000)
(II) CLASS-WIDE PEER TUTORING (CWPT)
Class-wide peer tutoring breaks the whole
class into smaller groups. It is one of the
important types of peer tutoring in which all
the students of the classroom very actively
learn from each other for an extended time
period. They act as tutors as well as
students or learners. So every student of
the class involves himself in the assigned
activities and learns in a very good way.
(Greenwood, Carta and Hall 1988)
CROSS-AGE PEER TUTORING (CAPT)
In this type of tutoring the elder student act
as tutor and they teach the young students.
The tutors have a higher academic
background as compared to their students
or learners in cross-age peer tutoring. This
approach is valuable for the students
because they get effective individual
instructions and feedback from their tutors.
On the other hand the tutor gets valuable
teaching experience. (Lieberman,
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/index.php/JSMaP
e
-
ISSN: 23
95
-
0463
Volume 01 Issue 02
March 2015
Available online: http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/ P a g e | 64
Newcomer, McCubbin, and Dalrymple
1997).
IMPACT OF PEER TUTORING ON
STUDENTS’ LEARNING
Peer tutoring has a very positive impact on
learning of students. In this type of tutoring
the students are usually less hesitant to ask
questions from their tutors. They don’t feel
uncomfortable with a peer as they might
feel with a teacher. This really helps
learners that they feel the tutor is on the
same level and if he can do it, they can also
do it. So peer tutoring is very beneficial for
learning purposes.
Organized peer tutoring can give greater
results as compared to unorganized peer
tutoring. So for a teacher this activity can be
an important responsibility. The teachers
can obtain better results by making good
pairs of students. The training of tutors
plays an important role in the productivity
and efficiency of peer tutoring. Proper and
sufficient training of tutors leads to better
results in learning. The proper evaluation of
peer tutoring process can also make
improvement in learning activities. Peer
tutoring does not benefit only tutees or
learners but also tutors because it is a two
way street process which helps both tutor
and the learner. By tutoring the learners the
tutees enhance their own understanding,
abilities and skills. So the students do not
help themselves only but also help their
tutors by providing them opportunity to
teach them. In fact it is equally beneficial
for tutors and the tutees or learners. Hence
peer tutoring has an enormous impact on
the learning of tutors and students or
learners.
BENEFITS OF PEER TUTORING
There are many benefits of peer tutoring as
discussed earlier in the study. Some main
benefits of peer tutoring which have a
considerable impact on learning include the
following.
It provides opportunity to the students to
interact directly with each other which is
helpful to promote learning activities
among the students.
Students usually do not get sufficient time
and individual attention from their
teachers, so peer tutoring is a very good
solution for this problem which provides
individual attention to the students.
By tutoring the students or learners, the
tutors reinforce and revise whatever they
have studied before. So it directly benefits
both tutor and the learner.
Peer tutoring is an enjoying way of learning
where the peers do not get bore but they
learn by entertaining themselves.
Peer tutoring is a beautiful way to learn
something out of the school, college or
university.
Students or learners are more open and
comfortable with their tutor in peer
tutoring. So the learners learn without any
sort of hesitation from their tutor in this
kind of environment.
Due to peer tutoring, the teachers in the
schools, colleges and universities get more
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/index.php/JSMaP
e
-
ISSN: 23
95
-
0463
Volume 01 Issue 02
March 2015
Available online: http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/ P a g e | 65
time for lesson planning and to focus on
their next lessons.
The important thing about peer tutoring is
that it is a financially efficient alternative
to hiring more staff members in a school,
college or university.
Peer tutoring develops interpersonal and a
communication skill in the tutor and it also
enhances the confidence level of the tutor.
It develops sense of responsibility,
dedication, commitment and pride in the
tutor because he is able to help the peers.
CONCLUSION
Peer tutoring is a highly effective way for
the students to learn from each other. It
does not only benefit the students in
academically but also helps the students in
developing their communication and
interpersonal skills. Through peer tutoring
the students can enhance their confidence
level and they become self motivated. Peer
tutoring is a two way process and it is
equally beneficial for the tutors and the
learners. Organized peer tutoring can be
proved more effective and beneficial for the
peers as compared to unorganized peer
tutoring activities. Hence it is concluded
that peer tutoring is a very effective
strategy for learning. Therefore it should be
utilized within the premises of the
educational institutions as well as outside.
REFERENCES
Anderson, G. & Boud, D. (1996). Extending
the Role of Peer Learning in University
Courses. Research and Development
in Higher Education, 19, pp. 15-19.
Burnish, Fuchs & Fuchs (2005). Peer-
assisted learning strategies: An evidence-
based practice to promote reading
achievement. Learning Disabilities
Research & Practice, 15(2), 85-91.
Burns, E. (2006). ‘Pause, Prompt and Praise-
Peer Tutored Reading for Pupils with
Learning Difficulties', British Journal
of Special Education, 33 (2), 62-67.
Ehly, Stewart W., and Stephen C. Larsen.
Peer Tutoring for Individualized Instruction.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1980.
Fuchs, L.S, Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L. & Powell, S.
R. (2002). Enhancing first-grade children’s
mathematical development with peer-
assisted learning strategies. School
Psychology Review, 31. 569-584.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Burish, P.
(2000).Peer-assisted learning strategies: An
evidence-based practice to
promote reading achievement.
Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,
15(2), 85–91.
Fulk, B. M., & King, K. (2001). Classwide
peer tutoring at work. Teaching Exceptional
Children, 34(2)
Greenwood, C. R. (2002). Class-wide peer
tutoring programs. In M. R. Shinn, H. M.
Walker, & G. Stoner Eds.), Interventions
for academic and behavior problems: 2.
Preventative and remedial programs (pp.
Journal for Studies in Management and Planning
Available at http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/index.php/JSMaP
e
-
ISSN: 23
95
-
0463
Volume 01 Issue 02
March 2015
Available online: http://internationaljournalofresearch.org/ P a g e | 66
611– 649). Washington, DC: National
Association of School Psychologists.
Goodlad, S., & Hirst, B. (1989). Peer
tutoring. A guide to learning by teaching.
New York: Nichols Publishing. ED 311
006.Greenwood, C. R. (1981). Peer-oriented
behavioral technology and ethical issues. In
P. S. Strain (Eds.), The utilization of
classroom peers as behavior change agents
(pp. 327-360). New York: Plenum Press.
Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., & Hall, R.V.
(1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies
in classroom management and
education instruction. School
Psychology Review, 17, 258-275.
Hooper, H., & Bowler, D. (1991). Peer
tutoring of manual signs by adults with
mental handicaps. Mental Handicap
Research, 4, 207-215.
Johnson, M., & Bailey, J. S. (1974). Cross-
age tutoring: Fifth graders as arithmetic
tutors for kindergarten children.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,
7, 223–232
Kunsch, C., Jitendra, A., & Sood, S. (2007).
The effects of peer-mediated instruction in
mathematics for students with learning
problems: A research synthesis. Learning
Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 1-12.
Mc. Master, K. L., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S.
(2006). Research on peer-assisted learning
strategies: The promise and limitations of
peer-mediated instruction. Reading and
Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning
Difficulties, 22, 5 –25.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., &
Berkeley, S. L. (2007). Peers helping
peers. Educational Leadership, 64(5),
54–58.
Rosewal, G. M., Mims, A. A., Evans, M. D.,
Smith, B., Young, M., Burch, M., Croce, R.,
Horvat, M. A., & Block, M. (1995). Effects
of collaborative peer tutoring on urban
seventh graders. The Journal of Educational
Research, 88(5), 275-279.
Topping, K. (2001). Peer assisted learning.
Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Topping, K., & Elhy, S. (Eds.). (1998). Peer
assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Topping, K. J., Peter, C., Stephen, P., &
Whale, M. (2004). Cross-age tutoring of
science in the primary school:
Influence on scientific language and
thinking. Educational Psychology, 24: 57-75
VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi,
T., & Baggett, W. (2003). Why do only some
events cause learning during human
tutoring? Cognition and Instruction, 21(3),
209–249
Webb, N., Nemer, K., & Ing, M. (2006).
Small-group reflections: Parallels between
teacher discourse and student-
behavior in peer-directed groups.
Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 63–
119.
... Peer tutoring has been introduced and applied for decades in many different contexts to support teachers in monitoring each student with the help of tutors. Peer tutoring programs cover a wide range of activities that are applied according to the needs of the students (Ali et al., 2015). Some relevant studies are used as guidelines to support this study. ...
... Academic impact on learners' worries on topic mastery, including improving problem formulation, conceptual understanding, and memorizing. Meanwhile, tutoring requires tutors to learn twice by revising and reinforcing prior knowledge (Ali et al., 2015). Thus, the instructor may have a more substantial academic effect. ...
... As a result, pupils may reduce their anxiety about participating in the teaching and learning process (Falchikov, 2001). Meanwhile, the tutor may enhance their confidence level and sense of responsibility because they must support the tutees (Ali et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Peer tutoring in academic writing is a kind of peer-assisted teaching-learning strategy that provides the opportunity for students to facilitate other students in a collaborative way of learning writing. In pairs or groups, the student may learn not only academic, but social, behavioral, and functional skills as well. Many different ways to pair students, such as by ability level, skills mastered, or age. Indeed, to help each student with their particular writing issues, peer tutoring is necessary as an opportunity to offer extra lessons. Up-to-date, the Coronavirus pandemic's extensive effects have led to more and more educational institutions offering training and instruction online. Most schools and higher institutions in West Kalimantan use digital technology in their instructional program. However, because online sessions are usually held in big groups and have internet limitations, it might be difficult for the lecturer to keep track of all of their students. Incorporating peer tutoring via digital means can be an alternative to meet the student’s needs in online learning
... In this sense, peer tutoring has gained recognition as a form of collaborative learning in the writing center community and played a crucial role in assisting student learning across disciplines (Ali et al., 2015;Dowse & van Rensburg, 2015;Scharold, 2017;Shiely & McCarthy, 2019). In general, there are three common types of peer tutoring: Reciprocal Peer Tutoring, Class-Wide Peer Tutoring, and Cross-Age Peer Tutoring, each of which offers unique benefits (Ali et al., 2015). ...
... In this sense, peer tutoring has gained recognition as a form of collaborative learning in the writing center community and played a crucial role in assisting student learning across disciplines (Ali et al., 2015;Dowse & van Rensburg, 2015;Scharold, 2017;Shiely & McCarthy, 2019). In general, there are three common types of peer tutoring: Reciprocal Peer Tutoring, Class-Wide Peer Tutoring, and Cross-Age Peer Tutoring, each of which offers unique benefits (Ali et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Plain Language Summary This qualitative study explores an alternative approach to teaching writing that involves collaboration between writing tutors and discipline-specific writing instructors. Thematic analysis was conducted on the interviews of students, in-class writing tutors, and writing instructors from two discipline-specific writing courses to gain insight into their perceptions of the collaborative teaching mode. The findings highlighted the perceived benefits of this collaborative teaching method, specifically the role of discipline-specific tutors as the “pedagogical bridge” to overcome language teachers’ insufficiency of disciplinary content knowledge. However, the study also reveals pedagogical challenges such as writing variations within the same discipline and students’ needs for linguistic knowledge instead of discipline-specific content knowledge. The study concludes by discussing pedagogical implications for effective training of discipline-based tutor collaboration and future implementation of discipline-based writing curricula across different academic disciplines. The findings underscore the importance of collaborative teaching approaches for effective learning outcomes in writing instruction, and can inform the implementation of writing center tutoring programs in non-English speaking countries, particularly in Asia.
... In a study conducted in one of the public universities in South Africa, Faroa (2017) found that tutor teams comprising postgraduate students played a key role in improving the academic performance of at-risk students. In a related study conducted in Pakistan, it was observed by Ali et al. (2015) that peer tutoring enabled students (both the tutor and tutee) to gain selfconfidence, thereby leading to better performance outcomes. This then implies that there is a need to provide support to NSFAS-funded students to ensure they are able to succeed academically. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article aims to understand how access, equity and redress challenges are addressed at South Africa's public universities based on their current funding frameworks. Relying on a pragmatic research approach combining desk‐research literature review and secondary data analysis, government funding and tuition fees were found to be the primary sources of funding in most universities, while third stream income from universities' own commercial activities lagged far behind. Secondary data from the public universities' audited annual financial statements for the period 2015 to 2020 further revealed that investment source income superseded third‐stream income in most universities. There is consensus in literature on the pivotal role of equity‐based funding mechanisms such as the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) in providing tuition cover and living expenses for students from poor households. Based on the agency theory, government funding is used to influence public universities to pursue transformation goals. The general trends observed in various countries is the inclusion of equity‐based indicators in a funding model to ensure that students are not denied the opportunity for university education solely based on their poor backgrounds. It is argued in this paper that the NSFAS remains an appropriate vehicle to achieve South Africa's transformational goals in its public universities. Context and implications Rationale for the study The rationale for this article is to provide exploratory evidence on the link between funding and transformation at public universities. Why the new findings matter The new findings matter because public universities cannot escape the imperative to address the challenges of transformation in developing countries with a history of unequal distribution of financial resources. Implications for policy makers, university management, funders and students Policy makers can use the findings from this article to inform how the National Student Financial Aid Scheme can be streamlined to ensure it continues to achieve its mandate. Based on the findings of this study, university management can develop more interventions to assist at‐risk students, particularly those from disadvantaged families succeed in their study. Funders can use the findings of this study to budget for and direct funding to academically deserving at‐risk students. Finally, students could benefit from these findings as the study identifies challenges to academic success as well as relevant interventions.
... Topping (1996) affirms that peer tutoring has been adopted extensively by many educators, particularly in undergraduate educational institutions since it is an alternative teaching technique that further enhances the skills of active language learners. In addition, many benefits of peer tutoring experienced by teachers, learners and administrators have been identified by various scholars (Beasley, 1997;Bonwell & Eison, 1991;Boudouris, 2005;Eggers, 1995;Najabat et al., 2015;Sadovi, 2008;Tong, 2004). Greenwood et al. (1988) proposed three main components which can positively assist high proficiency students and low proficiency students. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper aims to explore how higher proficiency students delivered peer tutoring programs to help improve lower proficiency students’ speaking ability and build up their confidence in English speaking due to limited research studies on peer tutoring, especially in Thailand. Three groups of fourth-year undergraduates, each consisting of a high proficiency user of English as a tutor and three lower proficiency users, participated in the study. Video recordings of each tutoring session, the tutors’ record forms, semi-structured interviews and speaking tests were implemented as research instruments. All data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively through thematic analysis. The findings showed that a peer tutoring program can enhance the tutees’ speaking ability and assist them in gaining more confidence in speaking. Also, the results revealed that the tutees could obtain higher scores in the post-test by applying some of the tutor’s techniques. The tutoring sessions helped them learn how to form full sentences and anticipate possible test content, and encouraged them to be willing to speak. This paper suggests that peer tutoring can be promoted either inside or outside the classrooms so as to improve the speaking ability and confidence for low proficiency students
... This cooperative learning method was supported by John Dewey in the late nineteenth century against the traditional way of learning (Martin & Edwards, 1998;Sharan & Sharan, 1992). It is considered a useful tool for learners and teachers as it enhances skills, that may not be obtained from official curricula, such as self-confidence and communication skills for peers, teaching and leadership skills for those students who take the role of facilitators (Ali et al., 2015;Gamlath, 2022;Gottlieb et al., 2017;Ten Cate & Durning, 2007;Topping, 1996). PL helps students to share their weaknesses with their peers rather than to the official educational staff. ...
... This assertion is in agreement with Alade (2011), who proposed a necessary paradigm shifts from the conventional or traditional mode of imparting knowledge by the teacher to that of knowledge construction by the learner. In agreement, Ali, Anwer and Jaffar, (2015) pointed out that some need-based learning activities to be used such as discussion, group work, private tuition, mentoring and peer tutoring. These methods tend to foster critical thinking, creative thinking and collaborative problem-solving (Adekoya and Olatoye, 2011). ...
... Therefore, learning activities should be designed that can accommodate the needs of students. Considering this reality, it is a teacher's duty to incorporate activities that promote learning in their students (that could be involving students in discussion, assign group-oriented tasks, or learning from a fellow student (Ali, Anwer, & Abbas, 2015). Students learn better when they learn from their peers; such teaching method is known as peer tutoring (PT) (Comfort & McMahon, 2014), in which a slow learner is paired with an active learner (Hott & Walker, 2014) who plays the role of a tutor (Gucciardi, Mach, & Mo, 2017;Ullah, Tabassum, & Kaleem, 2018) to get maximum benefits in learning from each other (Nawaz & Rehman, 2017). ...
Research
Full-text available
Abstract This action research aimed to assess the effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in improving Grade 10 students' mathematical knowledge, addressing the negative perception that Mathematics is difficult. The study sought to answer three key questions: the pre-peer tutoring mean percentage score of Grade 10 tutees in Mathematics, the post-peer tutoring mean percentage score, and whether a significant difference exists between the pre- and post-tutoring scores. Using purposive sampling, Grade 10 students with grades below 75% were selected. Informed consent was obtained from both students and parents, and quantitative data were collected through a validated 20-item assessment administered before and after peer tutoring sessions conducted in person. Data analysis included calculating Mean Percentage of Scores and applying a paired sample t-test, revealing a substantial improvement from a pre-test mean of 53.60 to a post-test mean of 78.00, with a significant t-value of 14.43 (p<.05). The study's weaknesses include a single-group design and reliance on quantitative data, limiting a comprehensive understanding of the intervention's impact. However, the potential applications highlight the positive effects of peer tutoring on academic performance, emphasizing its role in creating a less intimidating learning environment and fostering social skills among students. What makes this study unique is its focus on addressing negative perceptions of Mathematics through peer tutoring, contributing to the existing literature on the positive impact of this strategy. Key words: Peer Tutoring, Mathematics, Academic Performance, Intervention, Perception
Article
Full-text available
Speaking sebagai salah satu keterampilan berbahasa yang produktif sangat penting untuk dikuasai oleh para pembelajar bahasa Inggris. Akan tetapi, pengajaran bahasa Inggris dalam konteks dimana bahasa Inggris diajarkan sebagai bahasa asing (English as a Foreign Language/EFL) memiliki beberapa tantangan. Selain dari minimnya exposure siswa akan bahasa Inggris, salah satu tantangan utamanya adalah sangat sedikitnya kesempatan yang tersedia bagi para siswa untuk berlatih bercakap-cakap dengan menggunakan bahasa Inggris. Untuk itu, maka SMA Kristen Kalam Kudus Sukoharjo mengadakan kegiatan English Conversation Club (ECC) dengan menggandeng Prodi PBI UKSW Salatiga dengan melibatkan dosen sebagai instruktur dan mahasiswa sebagai speaking buddies. Kegiatan ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berbahasa Inggris siswa. Metode peer tutoring digunakan dalam kegiatan ini dengan melibatkan mahasiswa sebagai peer tutors atau disebut sebagai speaking buddies dalam kegiatan ECC ini. Kegiatan ECC ini dilakukan sebanyak 8 pertemuan secara online melalui Zoom Meeting. Hasil pengamatan terhadap peran speaking buddies selama 8 kali pertemuan menunjukkan bahwa permasalahan yang sering dihadapi para siswa ketika berlatih berbicara dalam bahasa Inggris dapat sedikit teratasi. Hal ini tentunya tidak lepas dari peran para speaking buddies dalam berbagai sesi kegiatan, baik sebagai organizer, resource, controller, prompter, dan juga (language) model.
Article
Full-text available
Developers of intelligent tutoring systems would like to know what human tutors do and which activities are responsible for their success in tutoring. We address these questions by comparing episodes where tutoring does and does not cause learning. Approximately 125 hr of tutorial dialog between expert human tutors and physics students are analyzed to see what features of the dialog are associated with learning. Successful learning appears to require that the student reach an impasse. When students were not at an impasse, learning was uncommon regardless of the tutorial explanations employed. On the other hand, once students were at an impasse, tutorial explanations were sometimes associated with learning. Moreover, for different types of knowledge, different types of tutorial explanations were associated with learning different types of knowledge.
Article
The purpose of this article is to discuss peer tutoring strategies as an effective class of peer-mediated procedures for both classroom behavior management and direct instruction. In this article, we discuss the need for alternative classroom procedures, review relevant research, discuss recent advances in procedures, and identify implications.
Chapter
The ethical and philosophical implications of behavioral technology applied to human affairs has been a controversial topic from its earliest formulation as a deterministic psychology (Watson, 1963, pp. 164-165), and recently as a result of Skinner’s writings (1948, 1966a, 1966b, 1971). Adding to this over the last 10 years, undercurrents in American society have created the impetus for methods guaranteeing against misuse of behavioral control. Perhaps the foremost contributing factor has been the proliferation of behaviorally based programs and methodology to nearly every facet of society (Goodall, 1972). For example, behaviorally trained psychologists are using the techniques in schools, homes, businesses, prisons, mental-health settings, vocational settings, rehabilitation settings, medical settings, and so on, touching the lives of literally thousands of individuals. This proliferation undoubtedly is related to the effectiveness of the technology for solving relevant social and behavioral problems. Thus, it seems that legal, legislative, and professional-group policies to control and monitor the quality of behavioral treatments are increasingly being forced upon practitioners as society reexamines the nature of its institutions.
Article
The effects of a collaborative peer tutor teaching program on the self-concept and school-based attitudes of seventh-grade students at a large urban junior high school were explored. Many of the students in the sample had been previously identified to be at risk by traditional school identification strategies. The study consisted of the 282 subjects enrolled in the seventh grade at F.C. Hammond Junior High School in Alexandria, Virginia. The Piers-Harris Self-Concept Scale was used to measure self-concept in subjects. The Demos D (Dropout) Scale was used to measure student tendency to drop out of school. Data were collected at two points during the 16-week period (immediately before program onset and immediately after program completion. A post hoc analysis revealed that students in the collaborative peer tutor teaching program demonstrated significant improvement in dropout scores compared with students in both the traditional class using group learning activities and the traditional class using individual learning activities. There were no significant differences between the traditional class groups. The results of this study indicate that a collaborative peer tutor teaching program can be effective in eliciting improvements in self-concept and attitudes toward school in seventh-grade urban students.
Article
The development of deeper understanding and transferable skills in science requires continuous interactive discussion and feedback and extended practice in various contexts for generalisation. In primary schools, these desiderata are difficult to supply through direct teacher instruction, but might be feasible through interactive peer tutoring. This study aimed to evaluate cognitive and affective gains from cross-age peer tutoring for both tutees and tutors in science, using the “paired science” programme. For the first time this programme was used to focus on peer rather than parent tutoring and on junior school rather than early years pupils, and for the first time an objective measure of cognitive gain in science was used. Experimental peer tutees were a whole class (n=32) of seven- to eight-year-olds; tutors a whole class (n=33) of eight- to nine-year-olds in the same school. A parallel composite class of seven- to nine-year-olds (n=24) served as controls for tutees and tutors. A peer tutoring paired science intervention was implemented for two 30-minute sessions per week for eight weeks. Video and observational data indicated implementation integrity was satisfactory. Pre- and post-project assessments of understanding of scientific concepts and keywords of a random sample of tutees, tutors and their respective controls (4×n=10) were conducted. Additionally, the attitudes of all the tutees, tutors and their teachers towards their experiences were explored by post hoc questionnaire. On pre-post assessments of understanding of scientific concepts and keywords, the experimental group made significant gains while the control group made no gains, yielding effect sizes greater than one. Tutees made greater gains than tutors. The attitudes of the paired scientists and their teachers towards their experiences were generally very positive. It was concluded that cross-age peer tutoring of science using the paired science programme offers an effective pedagogical strategy, with both cognitive and affective benefits for both tutors and tutees. Recommendations for future research are made.