Environmental crimes refer to those behaviours that put natural resources and the environment at risk and which, due to their particular seriousness, are subject to the greatest social and legal
reproach, and have therefore been included in national criminal legislations, being the most severe penalties, such as imprisonment, applied for some of these behaviours. These measures are intended to restore the damage caused, to deter potential offenders and to protect the legal asset
at stake.However, this reactive approach cannot be considered in isolation and needs to be accompanied by awareness-raising and communication measures to promote understanding and compliance with the rules, as well as measures to reintegrate offenders. The comprehensive prevention of environmental crime ultimately aims to reduce or eliminate the likelihood of the criminal act being committed. Thus, to ensure the success of any preventive measure, it is necessary to start gaining a detailed knowledge of the problem, i.e., the causes and circumstances that give rise to it. This is the main objective of this paper – analysing the motivations that lead to committing environmental crimes. It is focused on Spain and Portugal, although some of the chapters provide a universal analysis of the motivation for environmental crime.
The first chapter explores the published scientific literature on the subject, with a special focus on crimes against wildlife, such as illegal hunting and trade in protected species, possession and
release into the wild of alien species, illegal waste management and habitat destruction, in particular through forest fires (issues such as illegal urban development, which is mainly
economically motivated and has not been the subject of any scientific study, are not analysed here).
Therefore, this is an unprecedented summary of information collected on the environmental problems caused, the cultural origin of the offences, if applicable, and the common motivations
for committing them after depersonalising the events.
The second chapter analyses, through a general population survey, the social perception in Spain and Portugal of wildlife and environmental crimes and their different elements (subject, object and context), as well as the actions taken by different entities and organisations to detect, prevent and respond to them.
The third chapter presents the results of the analysis of more than 250 judgments given for environmental crimes in Spain. The main connections found between the species concerned, the
methods used in the crimes, the geographical location, the general profile of the offenders who committed the crimes using the available data and the decisions taken are presented.
In the fourth chapter, we surveyed law enforcement officers in charge of investigating several of these crimes (illegal hunting, illegal buying and selling of species and destruction of nests of
protected species), both in Spain and Portugal. The motivations these officers attribute to offenders are shown in the results, as well as their views and experiences regarding the
effectiveness of the legal system and penalties and the changes they would propose to make it more effective.
After presenting some conclusions on all the above in chapter five, the last chapter contains some final considerations and proposes future lines of action based on the findings of this analysis as a
whole. These lines of action follow two fundamental approaches, which must necessarily be interconnected: research of the various psychological, social and legal factors that interact with each other and intervention, both for specific populations and for the general population.
In order to make reading and understanding easier, the information in each of these chapters will be structured according to the specific table of contents at the beginning of each chapter, with an initial summary and final conclusions.
This report was prepared within the framework of LIFE Nature Guardians (Action A4), a project funded by the European Union's LIFE programme, which aims to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of actions aimed at fighting crimes against nature. It is coordinated by SEO/BirdLife and its beneficiary partners are the Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Sustainable Development
Department of the Autonomous Government of Andalusia, the Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves (SPEA) and the Nature Protection Service (SEPRONA) of the General Directorate
of the Civil Guard.