ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract and Figures

Several dermatoses are routinely associated with diabetes mellitus, especially in patients with chronic disease. This relationship can be easily proven in some skin disorders, but it is not so clear in others. Dermatoses such necrobiosis lipoidica, granuloma annulare, acanthosis nigricans and others are discussed in this text, with an emphasis on proven link with the diabetes or not, disease identification and treatment strategy used to control those dermatoses and diabetes. Keywords: Dermatology; Diabetes mellitus; Skin manifestations
Content may be subject to copyright.
Continuing mediCAl eduCAtion
Diabetes mellitus and the skin*
AdrianaLuciaMendes1 HelioAmanteMiot2
VidalHaddadJunior2
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20175514
Abstract:Severaldermatosesareroutinelyassociatedwithdiabetesmellitus,especiallyinpatientswithchronicdisease.This
relationshipcanbeeasilyproveninsomeskindisorders,butitisnotsoclearinothers.Dermatosessuchnecrobiosislipoidi-
ca,granulomaannulare,acanthosisnigricansandothersarediscussedinthistext,withanemphasisonprovenlinkwiththe
diabetesornot,diseaseidenticationandtreatmentstrategyusedtocontrolthosedermatosesanddiabetes.
Keywords: Dermatology; Diabetes mellitus; Skin manifestations
s
8
Received on 17.12.2015.
ApprovedbytheAdvisoryBoardandacceptedforpublicationon29.06.2016.
* Study conducted at the Departments of Dermatology and Clinical Medicine of the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio
deMesquitaFilho”(UNESP)–Botucatu(SP),Brazil.
Financial support: none.
 Conictofinterest:none.
1 DepartmentofClinicalMedicine-FaculdadedeMedicinadeBotucatu-UniversidadeEstadualPaulista“JúliodeMesquitaFilho”(UNESP)–Botucatu(SP),
Brazil.
2 DepartmentofDermatologyandRadiotherapy-FaculdadedeMedicinadeBotucatu-UniversidadeEstadualPaulista“JúliodeMesquitaFilho”(UNESP)–
Botucatu(SP),Brazil.
 ©2017byAnaisBrasileirosdeDermatologia
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
INTRODUCTION
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered a modern epidemic
diseasethataffectsabout8.3%ofadults,whichaccountsfor382mil-
lionpeopleoftheglobalpopulation,and46%ofcasesareestimated
to be currently undiagnosed.1
Theincreasingurbanizationwithdietarychanges,reduced
physicalactivity,andchangesinotherlifestylepatterns,inaddition
to the increasing rates of obesity contributes to the greater preva-
lence of DM.
Besidesthe severe renal, vascularandophthalmiccompli-
cations,theskin maybe compromisedbyvariousdiseasesdirectly
related to diabetes or with associations not yet fully proven. The
mainonesarediscussed in this text,withanemphasisonproven
linkwithdiabetesornot,diseaseidenticationandtreatmentstrat-
egy used to control these dermatoses and diabetes.
ACANTHOSIS NIGRICANS
Acanthosisnigricans(AN) ischaracterizedbyskinthicken-
ing with hyperchromic and a velvety aspect that occurs mainly in
thefolds,especiallyinthearmpits(Figure1).Currently,itispostu-
latedthatis causedby hyperinsulinemia,whichpromotesthesyn-
thesisoftype1insulingrowthfactor(IGF1)thatleadstoepidermal
FIgure 1:
Armpitsarea
classic location
of acanthosis
nigricans. Note
the thickening
and hyperchro-
mia of the skin
Photo: De-
partment of
Dermatology,
Botucatu
MedicalSchool,
UNESP
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 9
FIgure 2:
Bullosis diabet-
icorum blisters
are asymptom-
atic and exhibit
mildinamma-
tion
Photo: De-
partment of
Dermatology,
Botucatu
MedicalSchool,
UNESP
acanthosis.2Furthermore,AN can be associated to skin tags (ach-
rocordons)andacralpapilosis,whichcanhelpinscreeninginsulin
resistance among general population.
The disease may also be associated with certain malignan-
cies such as gastric cancer and high doses of niacinamide, but in
mostcases the patienthasalsotypeAinsulin resistance,although
adrenal and thyroid disease may be associated.3-5
Inobesepatients,AN seems to evolve in association with
the metabolic syndrome. The most affected sites are the armpits,
neck,areolas,umbilicusandelbows.Topicaltreatmentusingemol-
lients with basis of urea and oral metformin can be used (due to
insulinresistance), buttheonlyeffective measuresareweight loss
andphysicalexercises,which reverses the metabolic disturbances
that causes cutaneous manifestations.
BULLOSIS DIABETICORUM
Bullosis diabeticorum (BD),bullousdisease of diabetes or
diabetic blisters occurs in approximately 0.5% of diabetic patients.6
Itwasrstdescribedin1930,butonlyin1967thetermbullosisdia-
beticorum was proposed.7,8Eventhoughuncommon,itcanbecon-
sidered a distinct marker of DM and it is manifested in patients with
long history of evolution of diabetes or those who have complica-
tionssuchasnephropathyorneuropathy,althoughtherearereports
of concomitant appearance to the initial presentation of DM.8
BD has been reported in patients aged 17 to 80 years with
alarger proportion in males (2:1). The preferred locations are the
extremities,especiallylegsandfeet(Figure2).9
Pathophysiology of the BD bullae is still unknown. The
blisters are large, tense and characterized by suddenand sponta-
neous onset in acral regions.9,10 The diameter of the blisters varies
between0.5and5cm,theyareoftenbilateral,withaninammatory
base,and containaclear,sterile,nonserouscontent.10 Other affect-
ed places are the back and side of the hands and the arms.10 These
blisters are usually painless and non-pruritic and disappear sponta-
neously without scarring in 2 to 5 weeks.10,11
Outbreaks may occur, but risk factors are radiation and
trauma, blood glucose changes, magnesium and calcium alter-
ations,vasculardiseaseormicroangiopathyandkidneyfailure.9,11-15
Diagnosis is made on clinical basis and should be remem-
beredwhentherearelargeblisterswithoutapparentinammation
in longstanding diabetic patients or those with chronic complica-
tions of the disease.
Histologically, the blisters are manifested in three different
types based on the level of cleavage. The most common type shows
an subepidermal cleavage at the level of the lamina lucida without
acantholysis, which appear and disappear spontaneously, without
scarring.8,14 Blisters present hyaline content and are located at the
tipsofthetoesandlessfrequentlyinthedorsalsurfacesofthefeet.
Patients with these clinical manifestations have good circulation in
the affected limb and tend to present diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
The second type is rarer and involves lesions that may be
hemorrhagic including resolution with scars and atrophy.16 The
cleavageplaneisbelowthedermoepidermaljunction,withdestruc-
tionofanchoringbrils.17,18Athirddescribedtypeconsistsofmul-
tiple blisters associated with sun exposure and markedly tanned
skin.It affectsfeet, legs andarmsand mustbedistinguished from
porphyria cutanea tarda. 18
The differential diagnosis includes pemphigus, bullous
pemphigoid,contactdermatitis,insectbites,epidermolysisbullosa,
blisters by trauma, burns, bullous erysipelas, bullous drug erup-
tions and porphyria cutanea tarda.8,9,19
DIABETIC DERMOPATHY
Diabetic dermopathy (DD) is the most common specic
skin lesion in patients with diabetes. 20,21Thediseasewasrstde-
scribedbyHansMelinintheearly60s, ascircumscribedbrownish
lesions located in the lower limbs of diabetic patients and named as
diabeticdermopathybyBinkley(1965),whoconsidereditacutane-
ous manifestation of diabetic microangiopathy. 22,23
Its incidence may range from 7% to 70% of diabetic pa-
tients.5,20,2225DDisseenmoreofteninolderpatients,agedmorethan
50years,andinthosewithalonghistoryof diabetes.18,20Also,itis
morecommoninmen(2:1).20,22,26,27 There is some controversy as to
DD be a pathognomonic sign for diabetes since there are studies
thathaveshownitsinvolvementinnon-diabeticsubjects.6,27
The origin of DD is unknown and there is no relation with
decreased local perfusion.28Anotherpossibleexplanationisdueto
mild traumas that do not compromise wound healing.29,30 There
is also degeneration of subcutaneous nerves in patients with neu-
ropathy.31However,themostacceptableexplanationistherelation
between DD and microvascular complications of diabetes. Studies
haveshownstrongassociationwithDD,nephropathy,retinopathy
or neuropathy.20,30
Shemer et al.20 observed increased incidence of DD in 52-
81% when associated with such complications. Another study
showed that 42.9% of patients presented neuropathy associated
withDD(p<0.01)6 although about 21% of patients with DD showed
no evidence of microangiopathy. 20
The association between DD and cardiovascular disease has
alsobeenidentiedbasedonECGchanges,historyofcoronaryar-
10 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
terydiseaseorboth.About53%ofpatientswithtype2diabetesand
DD had coronary artery disease.6DDassociation withneuropathy,
nephropathy,retinopathyandcoronaryarterydiseasemayindicate
a severity marker of the evolution of diabetes.31
AsDDtendstooccuroverbonyprominences,itissuggest-
ed that occur in response to sudden trauma.11,14,20,31 The association
betweentraumaandDDlesionsisfurtherconfusedbythefrequent
presence of peripheral neuropathy.31 Nevertheless, some studies
have failed to induce DD in vivo.32
DD consists of small, well-dened surface, brownish de-
pressions,with atrophicappearance,resemblingscars. Commonly
the lesions measure less than 1cm in diameter and present round-
edshape (Figure3). They canoccasionallyextend andreachup to
2.5cm. Depressions are smooth and hyperpigmented and intensity
of the pigment is related to the degree of atrophy. Generally asymp-
tomatic,itdoesnotcausepainoritchingandistypicallylocatedbi-
laterally in pretibial regions and distributed asymmetrically.21 More
rarely,DDoccursonthethighs,trunkandlowerabdomen.6,21,22 The
location and atrophic appearance causes many patients to consider
DD as scars resulting from a possible trauma.21,22 The appearance of
DDatthebeginningishardlydocumented,beinganunderreported
disease.
The progression of DD is variable and does not appear to
be affected by glycemic control.5,24,25Individual lesions may persist
onaveragefor18-24months and may stay indenitely.When the
diseaseregresses,the process is slow can be solved completely or
maintain pigmentation without atrophy. Cyclically, older lesions
disappear and new ones continuously evolve.21,22,23,32
The diagnostic is clinically based: after careful history and
physicalexamination,diagnosisofDDbecomesevident.Thepres-
ence of multiple, hyperpigmented, sharply demarcated atrophic
scars in the lower leg of a patient with diabetes is highly sugges-
tive of DD. The presence of four or more typical lesions in diabetic
patients is also characteristic of DD.10 Biopsy is not routinely per-
formed,sincethehistologyisnotspecicanditisinterestingavoid
trauma to the lower extremities in these individuals. However,
atypical features or unusual locations may hinder the diagnosis and
recommend the histopathological examination.31,32
Histologicndingsincludeatrophyofthedermalpapillae,
variablepigment at basal cells, thickening of the supercial blood
vesselsintima,hypertrophyandhyalinizationofthedeepestarteri-
oles,extravasatederythrocytes,hemosiderindepositionandamild
lymphocyticinltration.19,21,24Thereistelangiectasia,edema,and-
broblast proliferation at the papillary dermis.
The differential diagnosis of DD includes many diseases.
Early lesions of DD can be mistaken with fungal infection.23,While
typical brownish atrophic scars may require differentiation of
Schamberg’sdisease (progressivepigmented purpuric dermatitis),
purpura annularis telangiectasica, purpuric lichenoid dermatitis,
pigmentedstasisdermatitis,scarringlesions,papulonecrotictuber-
culids,factitious dermatitisandabrasions.23 Many of these entities
canbe differentiated by distribution, appearance and natural his-
tory.
Treatment of DD is not recommended and is little effective.30
Lesions are asymptomatic and can persist indenitely or make
spontaneous regression without treatment.21Nevertheless,thecon-
ditions associated with DD require attention. Patients should be
evaluatedforthediagnosisofDM,whichwhen is not conrmed,
shouldrequirefurtherinvestigations.Onceconrmedthepresence
of diabetes, attention should be focused on prevention, detection
andcontrolof associated complications. As with all patients with
diabetes,glycemiccontroliscritical.
SCLERODERMIFORM DISORDERS
Patients with diabetes may have thickening and hardening
oftheskinofthedorsalregionofthengeraswellastheskinover-
lyingthe jointsofthe hand andngers.The sclerosiscaneven ex-
tend these places. These changes are more common in type 1 diabe-
tes and occur in up to 50% of the patients. The cause seems to be the
glicosylation of proteins that appears to cause hardening of the skin.
Anotherform of skin sclerosisis associated with diabetes
isthe scleredema adultorum of Buschke (SAB), where sclerosis is
diffuse,butlocatedpreferablyontheback,havinganerythematous
appearance,and which maycompromisethe neck,shoulders,and
even other regions. It is more common in men over 40 years with
insulin dependent or multiple complications.
SABisararebromucinousconnectivetissuediseaseofun-
known etiology resistant to therapy and without spontaneous reso-
lution.33-35Itischaracterizedbysymmetricalanddiffusethickening
withhardeningoftheskinaffectingmainlytheface,trunk,neckand
upperlimbs, sparingthehands andfeet(Figure 4).36,37 The disease
presents no race, gender or age group preferences,however, it is
more common in middle-aged men. DM is associated with about
50% of cases.38 Its prevalence varies between 2.5 and 14% in diabetic
patients,butit isnoteworthy thatmostofthecasesareunderdiag-
nosed. 35,39,40
SAB has an insidious, asymptomatic, onset with progres-
sive loss of skin natural marks. In severe cases it can lead to neck
and back pain.41 Mobility is reduced and may lead to a restrictive
respiratory syndrome due to the skin thickening.42 The affected area
is painless and can present decreased sensitivity to touch.41Viscer-
FIgure 3: Diabetic dermopathy consists of small brownish-colored
depressionsin the skin surface, of atrophic appearance, which look
like scars
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 11
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
alinvolvementis rare,affectingeyes,tongue,pharynx, esophagus,
musculoskeletal tissue, joints, heart (pericardial and pleural effu-
sion)andhepatosplenomegaly.40,42,43
SABbelongsto thegroupofcutaneousmucinosesandcan
beassociatedwithbacterial,viral,hematologicaldisorders,diabe-
tes and other endocrine disorders.37,44 Three scleredema variants are
classically described.45
Type1-Occursmostofteninmiddle-agedwomen,children
andyoungpeople,presentsacuteonsetandisassociatedwithafe-
brilerespiratory illness, mostcommonlystreptococcalor viral (in-
uenza,chickenpox,measles,cytomegalovirusandHIV).46,47 This
variant has self resolution after several months or years.
Type 2 - There is no relation with infections, it is slow-
ly progressive and is associated with monoclonal gammopathy.48
This type tends to persist for years and may be at increased risk
formultiplemyeloma,beingassociatedwithotherdiseasessuchas
amyloidosis,rheumatoidarthritis, Sjögren’ssyndrome,obstructive
sleepapnea,primaryhyperparathyroidism,pituitaryadenomaand
adrenocortical disease. 40,44,49,50
Type3-associatedtodiabetes,whichcanbeeitheroftype
1 and type 2.33,51-54 It occurs generally in obese patients with long
standing diabetes and poor metabolic control, microangiopathy
and need for insulin.35,38,40 It affects middle-aged men with history
of longtime DM. This type also tends to persist and there is no clear
relation to prognosis or glycemic control.55
ThediagnosisofSABisclinical,butdiagnosticimaging(e.g.
ultrasonographyandmagneticresonance)canhelpinassessingthe
extent or disease activity.56,57 Due to the lack of skin elasticity and the
skinthickeningin scleredema, incisional biopsy is usually recom-
mendedtoconrmthediagnosis.36
Histopathology shows marked thickening of the reticular
dermis (2 to 3 times) with caliber collagen bundles separated by
bands of hyaline deposit mucin or hyaluronic acid best evidenced
at toluidine blue staining. The glycosaminoglycan deposit histologi-
cally corresponds to an hyperintensity on magnetic resonance.58
Clinically, the differential diagnosis must be established
withscleroderma,eosinophilicfasciitisandscleromyxedema.59
InSAB,the main mechanism of accumulationofextracel-
lular matrix components appears to be represented by an abnormal
geneexpression of extracellular protein(collagentype1,bronec-
tin,andtype3)ontheskininsteadofdecreasingclearingprocesses.
ThisderegulatedgeneisobservedinSABregardlessofthepresence
ofdiabetes.Themediatorsofbroblastactivationarestillunknown.
40Althoughdisappointingresponsetotreatment,varioustherapeu-
tic modalities are used: immunosuppressants (e.g. cyclosporine and
methotrexate), pentoxifylline, prostaglandin E1, intravenous im-
munoglobulin, penicillamine, antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids,
andintralesional,factorXIII,aminobenzoate,colchicineandDMSO
gel,radiotherapy,photochemotherapywith psoralenandultravio-
letA(PUVA),andrecently,tamoxifenandirradiationwithelectron
beam.36,41,42,50,59,60The therapymaybeeffective,probablydue to the
upregulationofcollagenasesynthesisbybroblastsandsubsequent
degradationofcollagenbers.33,60,61
Ingeneral,the disease has a good prognosis, and in most
cases is self-limited; however, there are severe cases with rapid
progression,anditishardtodetermine thebesttreatmentforcon-
trollingthediseaseandanalyzingthecostbenetratio.
It is noteworthy that its chronicity can cause alterations in
movement of the shoulders and impaired respiratory function.40
GRANULOMA ANNULARE
Granulomaannulare(GA) is arare,benign andself-limit-
ed dermatitis of the pre tibial regions and the extensor surfaces of
the limbs. The cutaneous lesions are similar to necrobiosis lipoidica
diabeticorum,but without causing atrophy of the epidermis.62,63 It
ischaracterized by papules thatoftenassumean annular congu-
ration.63
Its etiology is unknown, but appears to be involved with
responsetoinfectionssuchasHIV,hepatitisC,toxicagents,thyroid
diseases and malignancy.64,65GAassociationwithdiabetesiscontro-
versial and has been extensively studied. Samlaska et al.(1992), in
acasecontrolstudy, revealed no statisticallysignicantcorrelation
betweenGAandtype2DM,whileinaretrospectivestudy12% of
patientswithGAhad diabetes. Otherstudies have associated GA
with DM also in about 12% of the patients.66 68
GAaffects twice as many women thanmenand the most
commonlyaffectedareasarethoseexposedtotrauma,suchasbacks
ofthehandsandfeet,ngers,elbow,armsandlegs; sometimes the
scalpmaybeaffected(Figures5and 6).63When GAisgeneralized,
the trunk is affected in almost all cases. 64Inmostcasestheplaques
areasymptomatic,butmay presentmildand occasionalitchingor
a burning sensation.69
The lesions begin as rm, skincolored dermal papules,
whichexpandgraduallyinacentrifugalway.Theformatisannular,
witha central hyperpigmentation, and sometimes the papules are
franklyerythematous,becomingerythematous-brownishposterior-
ly.70 The papules of annular shape grow slowly and can measure
from 0.5 to 5.0cm.63
GAaffects mainly children and young people withoutdi-
FIgure 4: Buschke’sscleredemaischaracterizedbysymmetricaland
diffusethickening, with hardening of the skin mainly on the face,
cervical region and upper limbs
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
12 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
abetes but, in adults with diabetes, a disseminated form can occur,
which is expressed in about 0.5% to 10% of these patients. 63,64,66 The
generalized perforating form is characterized by umbilicated pap-
ules of about 4mm located at the extremities and it is most common-
ly seen in children and young adults.
The probable pathophysiology is a stimulus that triggers
the release of lymphokines by previously activated lymphocytes.
These lymphokines stimulate the synthesis and activity of collage-
nase, producing an inammatory reaction that modulates the for-
mation of granulomas.63
The duration of the disease is highly variable. Many le-
sions disappear spontaneously, without scarring, but it can last for
months to years. Disappeared lesions have about 40% chance to re-
appear.63 The lack of symptoms, scaling or blistering associated to
GA helps to differentiate it from other skin diseases such as tinea
corporis, pityriasis rosea, psoriasis, or annular erythema. Rarely, a
biopsy is needed to conrm the diagnosis. 66
Histologically, GA appears as a focal degeneration of collagen
in the upper and middle layers of the dermis, accumulation of histio-
cytes and multinucleated giant cells arranged in fence/ palisade.14
Although histology is very similar to that observed in necrobiosis
lipoidica, prominent mucin deposits in GA helps to differentiate it.
GA has a poor therapeutic response. Treatment usually is not
necessary because most of its injuries remit spontaneously within two
years.69 If the lesions become an unpleasant problem, the available
options include high-dose topical steroids, intralesional injection of
corticosteroids, PUVA, cryotherapy, or drugs such as niacinamide, in-
iximab, dapsone and topical calcineurin inhibitors. 69,70 Oral isotreti-
noin can be effective in symptomatic patients and the improvement of
lesions occurs in 90% of those with decreased itching and erythema,
even in resistant lesions associated with few adverse events compared
with other drugs. 11 Moreover, this treatment provides good aesthetic
response with a considerable improvement in patient quality of life.
NECROBIOSIS LIPOIDICA DIABETICORUM
Necrobiosis lipoidica (NL) is an idiopathic dermatosis of
unknown origin, occurring mainly in patients with diabetes. While
most diabetics do not develop this disease, its incidence ranges from
0.3% to 1.6% of these patients per year.71
Two thirds of diabetics with NL are insulin dependent.72
NL is not exclusive to diabetics because up to a third of cases occur
in non-diabetic subjects.73,74 Over the years, however, about 90% of
these will develop some degree of glucose intolerance or at least
will present a positive family history for diabetes.75,76,77 These facts
suggest that as soon as the diagnosis of the dermatosis is conrmed,
the research for diabetes should be initiated.
NL predominates in women (80% of cases), white, and it
manifests at any age, but prevails between the fourth and sixth de-
cades.75 A retrospective study from the Mayo Clinic showed that the
conrmed diagnosis of diabetes, abnormal plasma glucose or a fam-
ily history of diabetes occurred in 90% of patients.75
The glycated hemoglobin levels were not associated with
the appearance of lesions, indicating that hyperglycemia is not nec-
essary for the development of NL. Among yuastdua diabetes, type
1 patients have the earliest manifestations of NL.76
Multiple lesions are common, and are usually observed in
both legs (Figures 7 and 8).77 Approximately 35% of the lesions prog-
ress to ulceration.78 Patients occasionally present itching or burning
sensations in areas where they were asymptomatic and pain arises
after ulceration. Some patients report partial or complete anesthesia
at affected sites, due to probable local neural dysfunction.79 More than
half of diabetic patients with NL have neuropathy or microangiopa-
Figure 5:
Granuloma
annulare man-
ifests by ery-
thematous and
rm dermal
papules that ex-
pand gradually,
with central
hyperpigmen-
tation
Photo: Depart-
ment of Derma-
tology, Botucatu
Medical School,
UNESP
Figure 6: Detail of the granuloma annulare, showing inltration at
the edges of the lesion
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 13
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
thy. Spontaneous resolution is observed in 10% to 20% of cases.
Histopathologyshowsdisorganization and degeneration of
collageninbasementmembranethickeningandinammationofthe
underlying subcutaneous fat. NL pathophysiology is still unclear. The
primary cause of collagen degeneration appears to be an immune-
mediated vasculitis (autoimmune vasculitis). The presence of anti-
bodiesandC3atthedermoepidermaljunctionandaroundtheblood
vesselvasculitislesionssupportthis,butotherhistologicalfeaturesof
leukocytoclastic vasculitis were not observed. 80 Other studies suggest
thatNLisprimarilyacollagendiseasewithsecondaryinammation,
81-83and the presence of brin lesionsassociated with histiocytes in
palisades suggests delayed hypersensitivity reaction.84
Typical lesions of NL start in the pretibial areas with non scaly
erythematous papules that gradually enlarge and coalesce into large
plaques.85The plaques resultfromthe conuence of yellowishpap-
ules and often develop atrophic center that corresponds to the dermal
andepidermalatrophyassociatedwithsupercialtelangiectasias.86
Gradual expansion and variable erythema occur at the edg-
es,whichareoftenelevated.Itsshapeiselliptical,withserpiginous
margins.Theadjacentskinisreddishviolet,whilethecenteris yel-
low,indicating accumulation of lipids.77,78,87 The size of the lesion
may range from a few millimeters to several centimeters. When the
lesions become chronic, the sclerosis is well marked with porcel-
aneous aspect. The metabolic control appears to have no proven ef-
fectinthecourseofthedisease,althoughthereisareportthattight
glucose control reduces the incidence of NL.88,89
Thelesionsmayoccasionallyappearinotherareas,suchas
thethighs,poplitealregionandfeet.Othersitesareinvolvedin15%
ofcases and include abdomen, upperlimbs(especiallyhandsand
forearms)andscalp,where NLcan causeatrophyandalopecia.In
theface, thediseasemay harmtheeyelids andnose.In rarecases,
lesions were observed in the heel and penis.89 NL also can develop
inposttraumascars, old lesionsofsclerodermaand atthescarsof
BCG vaccine.79Whenlesionsariseonotherpartsofthebody,gener-
ally the lower limbs are affected too.
Diagnosis is made by clinical examination. Histopathologi-
calexaminationmayberequiredinearlylesionsorinpatientswith-
outadiagnosisofdiabetes.Sarcoidosis,granulomaannulare,lichen
sclerosus et atrophicus and stasis dermatitis may be differential di-
agnosis of NL. Ulcerated lesions can resemble pyoderma gangreno-
sum,tertiarysyphilisandcutaneousmycobacteriosis.
Patients should be advised to avoid potentially traumatic sit-
uations,suchascontactsports.Theyshouldtheadvisedtowearsocks
up to the knee or foam pads for protection.79In general, drugtreat-
ment has little effect and should be reserved for symptomatic relief.
Drugsusedwithvariableefcacyareintralesionalinjectionandoral
useofcorticosteroidsortopicalthreadsunderocclusion,clofazimine,
acetylsalicylicacid,dipyridamole,pentoxyphilineandchloroquine.
When the lesions are at, use of emollients is indicated.
Rhodes(1980) reported success with brinolytic therapy (derived
fromnicotinicacidandinositolnicotinate)in24of30cases; redness
and warmth are important adverse events.75
Morerecently,anti-TNFtherapieshavebeenused,although
therearenostudiesthat demonstrate decisivetherapeuticefcacy
yet.90 Strict glycemic control remains controversial in improving NL.
When the plaques become ulcerated, the treatment must involve
the prevention of secondary infection with systemic antibiotics and
dressings. 82,91,92
DIABETIC FOOT
Thediabeticfootis acomplexanddisablingentity,caused
byvarious factors, and it should betreatedby various specialties
such as general surgery, vascular surgery, orthopedics, endocri-
nologyanddermatology.Itburdenspatients’qualityoflife,public
health system and social security.
Classically,theso-calleddiabeticfootisachroniculcerthat
evolves after trauma or over a callus caused by changes in points
withalteredsensitivityduetodiabetesneuropathy(6070%)(Figure
9).Amuchsmallerproportionislinkedtoperipheralvascularisch-
emia(about15%).
The causes can coexist and about 25% of diabetics may pres-
ent foot ulcers during the development of the disease. 4,93
FIgure 7: Typical lesions of necrobiosis lipoidica begin in the pretib-
ial regions with non-squamous papules that gradually grow and
groupintolargeplaques
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
FIgure 8: Detailoflesionsofnecrobiosislipoidica,showingcentral
atrophy
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
Ulcersaredifcultto healduetotheunderlyingimmuno-
suppressionof the disease, hyperkeratotic borders and sometimes
ischemia.IntheUS,thediabeticfootisresponsiblefor70%oflower
limb amputations annually. 4,94
The treatment is performed according to the etiology. If the
pulsesarepalpable,energetictherapeuticmeasuressuchasthede-
bridement and dressing usually heal the wound in few weeks. On
theotherhand,nomeasuresareeffectiveinthepresenceofischemia
and surgical revascularization is crucial to the treatmentin these
cases. Secondary infections and osteomyelitis are factors that com-
plicate the approach and systemic antibiotics should be evaluated
in all cases.
There are specic guidelines to manage diabetic foot in a
multidisciplinary approach that surpass the scope of this text. 95
MISCELLANEOUS
Anichthyosiformaspectmayarisefromchangesoftheskin
in diabetes; it appear frequently in young subjects with insulin-
dependent diabetes and appear associated with microangiopathy
and duration of disease. Keratosis pilaris can also be observed and
both appear to be associated with skin xerosis seen in these patients.
Rubeosis is a vascular erythema on the face and neck pres-
entinupto60%ofpatientswithdiabetes,probablylinkedtothe
loss of the vasoconstrictor tone. It usually reects poor glycemic
controlandisassociatedtoperipheralneuropathy.Inthesepatients,
hyperglycemia can lead to a change in the microcirculation. It be-
comes clinically evident by facial venous dilatation. Rubeosis means
microangiopathy, anditis prudent toassesspatientsfor othermi-
croangiopathy such as retinopathy and nephropathy. Tight glucose
control is the mainstay of treatment for this disease.
Yellowskinorcarotenodermiaisalsorelatedtoinadequate
glycemic control, which occurs either by carotenemia, as well as
by increasing the glycosylation of collagen and dermal proteins.20
There is no treatment for this phenomenon.
FIgure 9: Diabetic foot may present a chronic ulcer on callus caused
by changes in sensitivity associated with diabetic neuropathy and
occasional ischemia
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
Other conditions not necessarily related to the presence of
diabetes are the eruptive xanthomas.94 These lesions are observed
when there is a marked exacerbation of triglyceride levels (greater
than700mg/dL)causedbysometriggeringfactor,amongthemone
of the most common causes is the lack of DM control. The character-
isticlesionsmayappearaspapulesindiscreteorconuentdomes,
with waxy yellow centers and an erythematous base. Lesions may
developrapidlyoverthebuttocks,elbows,andknees.Theycan be
itchy and even painful. Eruptive xanthomas should be faced as a
lifethreatingdisorderleadingtoacutepancreatitisthatcanbequick-
ly resolved with proper correction of hypertriglyceridemia.83
Diabetes causes several changes in immunologic system,
but especially the decrease in leukocyte chemotaxis and phagocy-
tosis,inaddition,impairmentinvascularreactionleadstoasigni-
cantdeciencyofimmuneresponsethatfavorsinfectionsanddelay
their resolution.96
The most common fungal infections is candidiasis, espe-
ciallyvulvovaginal,balanopreputial,andangularstomatitis.These
may be the rst demonstration of the indirect presence of diabe-
tes. Vulvovaginalcandidiasis is almost universal among diabetic
women in the long term and is a common cause of vulvar itching
during periods of glycosuria. It comes with vulvar erythema and
sometimes with white discharge. Treatment involves glycemic con-
trolin additiontotopical or systemictreatmentfor specic fungal
infection.81
Othercommonsupercial mycoses in diabetics are exten-
sive pityriasis versicolor and dermatophytoses (e.g. tinea corporis),
which are associated to microangiopathy and poor glycemic con-
trol. Several opportunistic fungi infections are described in diabetics
withpoorglycemiccontrol.Averyseriouscondition,howeverrare,
ismucormycosis,causedbyZygomycetes,fromtheorderof Muco-
rales, which causes necrotic processes usually in the center of the
facewitharapidprogression,andwithahighmortalityrate.Early
identicationisessentialforsurvival.97
Bacterial infections may be varied and severe as those
caused by Staphylococcus or Pseudomonas. The infection may be mild
orsevereandmaymanifestasboils,abscessesorcarbuncles.Recur-
renterysipelasmayalsooccur,asnecrotizing/bullouserysipelasare
common among diabetics. External otitis by Pseudomonas is also a
seriousconditionindiabeticsandmayleadtomastoiditis,osteomy-
elitisofthetemporalbone,damagetonervesandmeninges,witha
high mortality rate.77 Infections in diabetics have to be considered
carefullyand requirehospitalizationdue to the sever compromise
of immune response.
As autoimmune disorders are associated among them-
selves,diabetes (especiallytype1 DM)canbe associatedtolupus
erythematosus,alopeciaareataandhalonevus.
VLTILIGO
Vitiligoisachronicdiseaseofautoimmuneetiologythatcan
manifest itself or,in most cases, associated with type 1 DM. It is
characterizedbyanabsenceordysfunctionofmelanocytesandap-
pears as hypo/ achromic spots surrounded by healthy skin whose
sizerangesfromafewmillimeterstolargeextensions,oftenlocated
aroundholes,extensorregions,chestandabdomen.98
14 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
With an autosomal inheritance, it is estimated that vitili-
go is manifested among 1% to 7% of all diabetic patients and only
0.2% to 1% of the general population.74Althoughitspathogenesisis
notentirelyunderstood,itis suggested thatitscause is polygenic,
multifactorial,oracombinationofautoimmune,geneticandneuro-
humoral factors due to the impairment of nerve cells release toxic
substancesharmfultomelanocytes,leadingtodestructionofthese
cells while the pigment is forming.99Environmentalfactors,suchas
infectionor damage to the skin (Koebner phenomenon), may also
contribute to the appearance of lesions.99
Moretti et al.95 found that the epidermis of vitiligo has a sig-
nicantamount of cytokines in comparison with the healthy sur-
roundingskin,suggestingthattheproductionofthesecytokinesare
involved in apoptosis of melanocytes process and depigmentation
of the skin.96,99
Vitiligo can coexist with other disorders of autoimmune
etiology, especially hormonal disorders (thyroiditis, adrenal insuf-
ciency and hipoparatathyreoidism) as part of the polyglandular
autoimmune syndrome whose clinical manifestations may appear
infourdifferentways.Thetype1isthemostcommon(1:20,000in-
dividuals)andprogresseswithadrenalinsufciency,thyroiditisand
type1DM,aswellasatrophicgastritis,perniciousanemia,alopecia
areata,celiacdisease,myastheniagravisandhypogonadism.97,98So,
whendiagnosing vitiligo, physicians should be alert to the emer-
genceofotherautoimmunediseases,particularlytype1DM.100-102
Althoughvitiligoisasymptomatic,theunpleasantdiscom-
fort and psychological stress can be considerable.11 Cosmetic treat-
mentisanoptiontoimprovethequalityoflife.103Skincamouage
andmicropigmentationcanbeconsidered,asthetreatmentofvitil-
igo is unsatisfactory in general. Patients should be advised to avoid
sun exposure and use broad spectrum sunscreens. In small and lo-
calizedlesionstopicalcorticosteroidsaretherstchoicetreatment,
whileforwidespreadvitiligo,treatmentwithnarrowbandultravio-
let light B is more effective. 81
PSORIASIS
Psoriasisisachronicrecurrentimmunemediatedinamma-
torydisease,withstronggeneticcomponentthataffects23%ofthe
Caucasian population.104It can occuratanyage, although in most
cases it develops before 40 years of age and is rare in children.105
Its emergence or worsening can often be triggered by emo-
tionalfactors.Somestudieshavelinkedpsoriasiswithpoorerqual-
ityoflife, reducedlife expectancy,bad employment and nancial
problems for the patient and family.106,107
Theextent ofskininvolvement is variable,rangingfrom a
fewlocatedplaquestowidespreadinvolvement.Whentheinvolve-
mentismoderatetosevere(>10%oftheirbodysurfacearea)itis
often associated with psoriatic arthritis and metabolic syndrome,
which is a set of risk factors for cardiovascular disease whose uni-
fyingfactorisinsulinresistance,conferringapro-inammatoryand
prothrombotic state.108-110
Several studies have evidenced the association of psoria-
sis with cardiovascular diseases and components of the metabolic
syndrome (hypertension, obesity, dysglycemia or type 2 diabetes,
dyslipidemia, fatty liver disease) and chronic kidney disease.107,110
Psoriasis patients often are overweight or obese in greater propor-
tion.111-11 4 Furthermore, it was also observed highermortalitythan
the general population.115
Severaltheorieswerehypothesizedtoassociatetheconcur-
renceofthecomponentsofmetabolicsyndrome,prematureathero-
sclerosisandpsoriasis.Oneofthesesuggeststhatcommoninam-
matorypathwaysareinvolved in the pathophysiology of both, as
thecytokineproleandthe inammatory cell inltrate of T cells,
macrophages and monocytes are observed in both conditions.114-116
Thediagnosis ofpsoriasisis usuallyclinical,based onhis-
toryand physical examination, but may be conrmed by the his-
topathological examination, which will reveal very characteristic
aspects of the disease.107
Treatment of psoriasis depends on the clinical manifesta-
tionspresented,varyingfromthesimpleapplicationoftopicalmed-
ications in mild cases to more complex treatments for more severe
cases. The response to treatment also varies greatly from one patient
to another and the emotional component should not be overlooked.
Ahealthylifestyle,avoidingstress,willcontribute totheimprove-
ment. Moderate sun exposure is of great help as keeping the skin
well hydrated.
Although some drugs can negatively affect metabolic ho-
meostasis by increasing cardiovascular risk, nonpharmacological
interventions,such as nutrition education, smoking cessationand
practice of physical activity associated with weight loss, can im-
prove the response to treatments for psoriasis as well as reduce car-
diovascular risk.
Evenwithoutcompleteremissionofthedisease,properdis-
ease control promotes social rehabilitation of patients, improving
theability towork,and probablydecreasingtheriskof comorbid-
ities.107
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
Severalcutaneousdiseasesarecausedormaybeinuenced
bysystemicdisordersandthis knowledge is of major importance
for the general practitioner.
DMisahighlyprevalentsystemicmetabolicdisease,whose
cutaneous manifestations can help in the early diagnosis of the dis-
ease,thusreectingglycemiccontrol,systemicimpairmentorover-
all prognosis of the disease.
Adequateglycemiccontrolandprimarypreventionofspe-
cicdamagetointernalorgansshouldbepromotedandreinforced
by dermatologists, although many dermatological manifestations
associated with DM are not necessarily related to glycemic levels
nordenitelyassociatedtothedisease.q
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: to the students Josiane Monção
Andrella(MedicalSchoolofBotucatu–UNESP)andMichelRaineri
Haddad(MedicalSchoolofSãoJosédoRio Preto–FAMERP)for
their help at various stages of the preparation of the manuscript.
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 15
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
16 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
REFERENCES
1. Idf.org [Internet]. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th ed. [cited 2015 Jul 15]. Available from:
http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/update2014.
2. Callen JP, Jorizzo JL, Bolognia JL, Piette WW, Zone JJ, editors. Dermatological
Signs of Internal Disease. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
3. Barbato MT, Criado PR, Silva AK, Averbeck E, Guerine MB, Sá NB. Association
of acanthosis nigricans and skin tags with insulin resistance. An Bras Dermatol.
2012;87:97-104.
4. Tamega Ade A, Aranha AM, Guiotoku MM, Miot LD, Miot HA. Association between
skin tags and insulin resistance. An Bras Dermatol. 2010;85:25-31.
5. Papa CM. Niacinamide and acanthosis nigricans. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:1281.
6. Romano G, Moretti G, Di Benedetto A, Giofrè C, Di Cesare E, Russo G, et al. Skin
lesions in diabetes mellitus: prevalence and clinical correlations. Diabetes Res Clin
Pract. 1998;39:101-6.
7. Kramer DW. Early or warning signs of impending gangrene in diabetes. Med J Rec.
1930;132: 338-42.
8. Cantwell AR Jr, Martz W. Idiopathic bullae in diabetics. Bullosis diabeticorum. Arch
Dermatol. 1967;96:42-4.
9. Mendes AL, Haddad Jr V. Caso para diagnostico. Bullosis Diabeticor um. An Bras
Dermatol. 2007;82:94-6.
10. Basarab T, Munn SE, McGrath J, Russell Jones R. Bullosis diabeticorum. A case
report and literature review. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1995;20:218-20.
11. Paron NG, Lambert PW. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Prim Care.
2000;27:371-83.
12. Rocca FF, Pereyra E. Phlyctenar lesions in the feet of diabetic patients. Diabetes.
1963;12:220-2.
13. Allen GE, Hadden DR. Bullous lesions of the skin in diabetes (bullosis
diabeticorum). Br J Dermatol. 1970;82:216-20.
14. Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Aggarwal AK, Gupta M, Bhattacharya SN, Verma
P. Noninsulindependent, type II diabetes mellitusrelated dermatoses: part II.
Skinmed. 2011;9:302-8.
15. Lipsky BA, Baker PD, Ahroni JH. Diabetic bullae: 12 cases of a purportedly rare
cutaneous disorder. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39:196-200.
16. Kurwa A, Roberts P, Whitehead R. Concurrence of bullous and atrophic skin
lesions in diabetes mellitus. Arch Dermatol. 1971;103:670-5.
17. Bernstein JE, Medenica M, Soltani K, Griem SF. Bullous er uption of diabetes
mellitus. Arch Dermatol. 1979;115:324-5.
18. Parex, I. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes mellitus. J Am Acad Dermatol.
1994;30:519-31.
19. Goodfield MJ, Millard LG, Harvey L, Jeffcoate WJ. Bullosis diabeticorum. J Am
Acad Dermatol. 1986;15:1292-4.
20. Shemer A, Bergman R, Linn S, Kantor Y, Friedman-Birnbaum R. Diabetic
dermopathy and internal complications in diabetes mellitus. Int J Dermatol.
1998;37:113-5.
21. Houck GM, Morgan MB. A reappraisal of the histologic findings of pigmented
pretibial patches of diabetes mellitus. J Cutan Pathol. 2004;31:141-4.
22. Melin H. An atrophic circumscribed skin lesion in the lower extremities of
diabetics. Acta Med Scand. 1964;176:1-75.
23. Binkley GW. Dermopathy in the diabetic syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 1965;92:625-
34.
24. Mahajan S, Koranne RV, Sharma SK. Cutaneous manifestation of diabetes
mellitus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003;69:105-8.
25. A Abdollahi A, Daneshpazhooh M, Amirchaghmaghi E, Sheikhi S, Eshrati B,
Bastanhagh MH. Dermopathy and retinopathy in diabetes: is there an association?
Dermatology. 2007;214:133-6.
26. Danowski TS, Sabeh G, Sarver ME, Shelkrot J, Fisher ER. Skin spots and diabetes
mellitus. Am J Med Sci. 1966;251:570-5.
27. Lithner F. Cutaneous reactions of the extremities of diabetics to local thermal
trauma. Acta Med Scand. 1975;198:319-25.
28. Wigington G, Ngo B, Rendell M. Skin blood flow in diabetic dermopathy. Arch
Dermatol. 2004;140(:1248-50.
29. Kiziltan ME, Benbir G, Akalin MA. Is diabetic dermopathy a sign for severe
neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus? Nerve conduction studies and
symptom analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1862-9.
30. Jelinek JE. Skin disorders associated with diabetes mellitus. In: Rifkin H, Porte D,
editors. Ellenberg and Rifkin’s diabetes mellitus, theory and practice. New York:
Elsevier; 1990: p. 838-49.
31. Gouterman IH, Sibrack LA. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes. Cutis.
1980;25:45-54.
32. Stulberg DL, Clark N, Tovey D. Common hyperpigmentation disorders in adults,
part II: melanoma, seborrheic keratoses, acanthosis nigricans, melasma, diabetic
dermopathy, tinea versicolor, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Am Fam
Physician. 2003;68:1963-8.
33. Kroft EB, de Jong EM. Scleredema diabeticorum case series: successful treatment
with UVA1. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:947-8.
34. Kobayashi T, Yamasaki Y, Watanabe T. Diabetic scleredema: a case report and
biochemical analysis for glycosaminoglycan. J Dermatol. 1997;24:100-3.
35. Cole GW, Headley J, Skowsky R. Scleredema diabeticorum: a common and
distinct cutaneous manifestation of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1983;6:189-
92.
36. Gervini RL, Lecompte SM, Pineda RC, Ruthner FG, Magnabosco EM, Silva LM.
Escleredema de Buschke: relato de dois casos. An Bras Dermatol. 2002; 77:465-
72.
37. Emedicine.com [Internet]. PappasTaffer LK, Wer th VP, Vinson RP, Libow LF, Elston
DM. Scleredema. [cited 2015 Nov 01]. Available from: www.emedicine.com/
derm/topic385.htm.
38. Pitarch G, Torrijos A, Martínez-Aparicio A, Vilata JJ, Fortea JM. Escleredema
de Buschke associado a diabetes mellitus. Estudio de cuatro casos. Actas
Dermosifiliogr. 2005; 96:46-9.
39. Sattar MA, Diab S, Sugathan TN, Sivanandasingham P, Fenech FF. Scleredema
diabeticorum: a minor but often unrecognized complication of diabetes mellitus.
Diabet Med. 1988;5:465-8.
40. Meguerditchian C, Jacquet P, Béliard S, Benderitter T, Valéro R, Carsuzza F, et
al. Scleredema adultorum of Buschke: an under recognized skin complication of
diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2006;32:481-4.
41. Carvalho JC, Costa TN, De Moura HH, Quintella LP, Carneiro S, Ramos-e-Silva M.
Scleredema Adultorum of Buschke. Skinmed. 2014;12:337-40.
42. Barde C, Masouyé I, Saurat JH, Le Gal FA. Scleroedema adultorum Buschke in
a diabetic subject: intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Ann Dermatol Venereol.
2009;136:360-3.
43. Mokta J, Sharma B, Patial RK, Prasher BS, Prasher N. Systemic manifestations in
scleredema of Buschke. J Assoc Physicians India. 2001;49:1033-4.
44. Oyama N, Togashi A, Kaneko F, Yamamoto T. Two cases of scleredema with
pituitaryadrenocortical neoplasms: an underrecognized skin complication. J
Dermatol. 2012;39:193-5.
45. Parmar RC, Bavdekar SB, Bansal S, Doraiswamy A, Khambadkone S. Scleredema
adultorum. J Postgrad Med. 2000;46:91-3.
46. Mattos e Dinato SM, Costa GL, Dinato MC, Sementilli A, Romiti N. Escleredema de
Buschke associado ao diabetes melito tipo 2: relato de caso e revisão da literatura.
Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2010;54: 852-5.
47. Kövary PM, Vakilzadeh F, Macher E, Zaun H, Merk H, Goerz G. Monoclonal
gammopathy in scleredema: observations in three cases. Arch Dermatol.
1981;117:536-9.
48. Angeli-Besson C, Koeppel MC, Jacquet P, Andrac L, Sayag J. Electronbeam therapy
in scleredema adultorum with associated monoclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia.
Br J Dermatol. 1994;130:394-7.
49. Turchin I, Adams SP, Enta T. Answer to dermacase. Can Fam Physician.
2003;49:1089, 1093.
50. Ray V, Boisseau-Garsaud AM, Ray P, Pont F, Lin L, Hélénon R, et al. Obesity
persistent scleredema: study of 49 cases. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2002;129:281-
5.
51. Graff R. Discussion of scleredema adultorum. Arch Derm. 1968;98:319-20.
52. Ulmer A, Schaumburg-Lever G, Bauer J, Kötter I, Fierlbeck G. Scleredema
adultorum Buschke. Case report and review of the literature. Hautarzt.
1998;49:48-54.
53. Cron RQ, Swetter SM. SM. Scleredema revisited. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1994;33:606-
10.
54. Martín C, Requena L, Manrique K, Manzarbeitia FD, Rovira A. Scleredema
diabeticorum in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Case Rep Endocrinol.
2011;2011:560273.
55. Horger M, Fierlbeck G, Kuemmerle-Deschner J, Tzaribachev N, Wehrmann M,
Claussen CD, et al. MRI findings in deep and generalized morphea (localized
scleroderma). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:32-9.
56. Cole GW, Handler SJ, Burnett K. The ultrasonic evaluation of skin thickness in
scleredema. J Clin Ultrasound. 1981;9:501-3.
57. Kurihara Y, Kokuba H, Furue M. Case of diabetic scleredema: diagnostic value of
magnetic resonance imaging. J Dermatol. 2011;38:693-6.
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 17
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
58. Conde Fernandes I, Sanches M, Velho G, Lobo I, Alves R, Selores M..
Scleromyxedema vs scleredema: a diagnostic challenge. Eur J Dermatol.
2011;21:822-3.
59. Gruson LM, Franks A Jr. Scleredema and diabetic sclerodactyly. Dermatol Online
J. 2005;11:3.
60. Thumpimukvatana N, Wongpraparut C, Lim HW. Scleredema diabeticorum
successfully treated with ultra¬violet A1 phototherapy. J Dermatol. 2010;37:1036-
9.
61. Alsaeedi SH, Lee P. Treatment of scleredema diabeticorum with tamoxifen. J
Rheumatol. 2010;37:2636-7.
62. Dahl MV. Granuloma annulare. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austin KF,
Goldsmith LA, Katz SL, editors. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 5th
ed. New York: McGrawHill; 1999. p. 1152-7.
63. Dabski K, Winkelmann RK. Generalized granuloma annulare. Clinical and
laboratory findings in 100 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;20:39-47.
64. Cohen PR. Granuloma annulare associated with malignancy. South Med J.
1997;90:1056-9.
65. Studer EM, Calza AM, Saurat JH. Precipitating factors and associated diseases
in 84 patients with granuloma annulare: a retrospective study. Dermatology.
1996;193:364-8.
66. Erkek E, Karaduman A, Bükülmez G, Sentürk N, Ozkaya O. An unusual form of
generalized granuloma annulare in a patient with insulindependent diabetes
mellitus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2001;81:48-50.
67. Buendía-Eisman A, Ruiz-Villaverde R, Blasco-Melguizo J, Serrano-Ortega
S. Generalized annular granuloma: response to isotretinoin. Int J Dermatol.
2003;42:321-2.
68. Cyr PR. Diagnosis and management of granuloma annulare. Am Fam Physician.
2006;74:1729-34.
69. Sahin MT, Türel-Ermertcan A, Oztürkcan S, Türkdogan P. Generalized granuloma
annulare in a patient with type II diabetes mellitus: successful treatment with
isotretinoin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:111-4.
70. Muller SA. Dermatologic disorders associated with diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin
Proc. 1966;41:689-703.
71. Lowitt MH, Dover JS. Necrobiosis lipoidica. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;25:735-
48.
72. Muller SA, Winkelmann RK. Necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum: a clinical and
pathological investigation of 171 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1966;93:272-81.
73. Yosipovitch G, Hodak E, Vardi P, Shraga I, Karp M, Sprecher E. The prevalence of
cutaneous manifestations in IDDM patients and their association with diabetes risk
factors and microvascular complications. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:506-9.
74. Garza-Elizondo MA, Diaz-Jouanen E, Franco-Casique JJ, Alarcón-Segovia D. Joint
contractures and sclerodermalike skin changes in the hands of insulindependent
juvenile diabetes. J Rheumatol. 1983;10:797-800.
75. Jelinek JE. The skin in diabetes. Diabet Med. 1993;10:201-13.
76. Van Hattem S, Bootsma AH, Thio HB. Skin manifestations of diabetes. Cleve Clin
J Med. 2008;75:772, 774, 776-7.
77. Sibbald RG, Landolt SJ, Toth D. Skin and diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North
Am. 1996 Jun;25(2):463-72.
78. Petzelbauer P, Wolff K, Tappeiner G. Necrobiosis lipoidica: treatment with systemic
corticoids. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126:542-5.
79. Oumeish YO. Skin disorders in patients with diabetes. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26:235-
42.
80. Dahl MV, Ullman S, Fisher I. Direct immunofluorescence of granuloma annulare
and necrobiosis lipoidica. Clin Res. 1976;24:95a.
81. Quimby SR, Muller SA, Schroeter AL. The cutaneous immunopathology of
necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:1364-71.
82. Ullman S, Dahl MV. Necrobiosis lipoidica. An immunofluorescence study. Arch
Dermatol. 1977;113:1671-3.
83. Beattie PE, Dawe RS, Ibbotson SH, Ferguson J. UVA1 phototherapy for treatment
of necrobiosis lipoidica. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2006;31:235-8.
84. Nieboer C, Kalsbeek GL. Direct immunofluorescence studies in granuloma
annulare, necrobiosis lipoidica and granulomatosis disciformis Miescher.
Dermatologica. 1979;158:427-32.
85. Dwyer CM, Dick D. Ulceration in necrobiosis lipoidica: a case report and study.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1993;18:366-9.
86. Bauer M, Levan NE. Diabetic dermangiopathy. A spectrum including pretibial
pigmented patches and necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum. Br J Dermatol.
1970;83:528-35.
87. Ahmed I, Goldstein B. Diabetes mellitus. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24:237-46.
88. Ferringer T, Miller F 3rd. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Dermatol
Clin. 2002;20:483-92.
89. Cohen O, Yaniv R, Karasik A, Trau H. Necrobiosis lipoidica and diabetic control
revisited. Med Hypotheses. 1996;46:348-50.
90. Tokura Y, Mizushima Y, Hata M, Takigawa M. Necrobiosis lipoidica of the glans
penis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:921-4.
91. Nguyen K, Washenik K, Shupack J. Necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum treated
with chloroquine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:S34-6.
92. Alexis AF, Strober BE. Offlabel dermatologic uses of antiTNFa therapies. J Cutan
Med Surg. 2005;9:296-302.
93. Tabor CA, Parlette EC. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes. Signs of poor
glicemy control or newonset disease. Postgrad Med. 2006;119:38-44.
94. Ngo BT, Hayes KD, DiMiao DJ, Srinivasan SK, Huer ter CJ, Rendell MS. Cutaneous
manifestations of diabetic microangiopathy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6:225-37.
95. Frykberg RG, Zgonis T, Armstrong DG, Driver VR, Giurini JM, Kravitz SR, et al.
American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Diabetic foot disorders. A clinical
practice guideline (2006 revision). J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45:S1-66.
96. Geerlings SE, Hoepelman AI. Immune dysfunction in patients with diabetes
mellitus (DM). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1999;26:259-65.
97. Arnáiz-García ME, Alonso-Peña D, González-Vela Mdel C, García-Palomo
JD, Sanz-Giménez-Rico JR, Arnáiz-García AM. Cutaneous mucormycosis:
report of five cases and review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
2009;62:e434-41.
98. Passeron T, Or tonne JP: Physiopathology and genetics of vitiligo. J Autoimmun.
2005;25:63-8.
99. Moretti S, Spallanzani A, Amato L, Hautmann G, Gallerani I, Fabiani M, et al. New
insights into the pathogenesis of vitiligo: imbalance of epidermal cytokines at sites
of lesion. Pigment Cell Res. 2002;15:87-92.
100. Olasode A. Why vitiligo in diabetes? Egypt Dermatol Online J. 2005;1:8.
101. Huang CL, Nordlund JJ, Boissy R. Vitiligo: a manifestation of apoptosis? Am J Clin
Dermatol. 2002;3:301-8.
102. Dittmar M, Kahaly GJ. Polyglandular autoimmune syndromes: Immunogenetics
and longterm followup. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:2983-92.
103. Forschner T, Buchholtz S, Stockfleth E. Current state of vitiligo therapyevidencebased
analysis of the literature. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007;5:467-75.
104. Tsoi LC, Spain SL, Knight J, Ellinghaus E, Stuart PE, Capon F, et al. Identification
of 15 new psoriasis susceptibility loci highlights the role of innate immunity. Nat
Genet. 2012 Dec;44(12):1341-8.
105. Gisondi P, Galvan A, Idolazzi L, Girolomoni G. Management of moderate to severe
psoriasis in patients with metabolic comorbidities. Front Med (Lausanne). 2015
Jan 21;2:1.
106. Gisondi P, Girolomoni G. Impact of TNFα antagonists on the quality of life in
selected skin diseases. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2013;148:243-8.
107. Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. Consenso Brasileiro de Psoríase 2012.
Guias de Avaliação e Tratamento. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Sociedade Brasileira de
Dermatologia; 2012.
108. Grundy SM, Brewer HB Jr, Cleeman JI, Smith SC Jr, Lenfant C; American Hear t
Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Definition of metabolic
syndrome: report of the National Hear t, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart
Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation.
2004;109:433-8.
109. Gisondi P, Girolomoni G. Cardiometabolic comorbidities and the approach to
patients with psoriasis. Actas Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2009;100:14-21.
110. Sommer DM, Jenisch S, Suchan M, Christophers E, Weichenthal M. Increased
prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in patients with moderate to severe
psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2006;298:321-8.
111. Armstrong AW, Harskamp CT, Armstrong EJ. The association between psoriasis
and obesity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies. Nutr
Diabetes. 2012 Dec 3;2:e54.
112. Setty AR, Curhan G, Choi HK. Obesity, waist circumference, weight change,
and the risk of psoriasis in women: nurses’ health study II. Arch Intern Med.
2007;167:1670-5.
18 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
How to cite this article: MendesAL,MiotHA,HaddadJuniorV.Diabetesmellitusandtheskin.AnBrasDermatol.
2017;92(1):8-20.
Mailing address:
Vidal Haddad Junior
Departamento de Dermatologia
Caixa Postal 557
18618 970 Botucatu, SP.
Tel: 14 3880 1259
Email: haddadjr@fmb.unesp.br
113. Gelfand JM, Troxel AB, Lewis JD, Kurd SK, Shin DB, Wang X, et al. The risk of
mortality in patients with psoriasis: results from a populationbased study. Arch
Dermatol. 2007;143:1493-9.
114. Davidovici BB, Sattar N, Prinz J, Puig L, Emery P, Barker JN, et al. Psoriasis and
systemic inflammatory diseases: potential mechanistic links between skin disease
and comorbid conditions. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:1785-96.
115. Boehncke WH, Boehncke S, Tobin AM, Kirby B. The ‘psoriatic march’: a concept
of how severe psoriasis may drive cardiovascular comorbidity. Exp Dermatol.
2011;20:303-7.
116. Hansson GK, Hermansson A. The immune system in atherosclerosis. Nat
Immunol. 2011;12:204-12.
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 19
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
Questions
s
1. Diabetes mellitus is considered a modern epidemic. The dis-
ease affects about:
a) 1.2% of adults
b) 8.3% of adults
c) 34.2% of adults
d) 9.4% of adults
2. Acanthosis nigricans is not associated with:
a) certain malignancies such as gastric cancer
b) high doses of niacinamide
c) typeAinsulinresistance
d) nodular melanoma
3. Regarding bullosis diabeticorum, select the wrong answer:
a) diabetic blisters occurs in approximately 0.5% of diabetic pa-
tients
b) the preferredlocalizationaretheback and side of the hands
and the arms
c) the diagnosis is made on clinical basis
d) the blisters are usually painless and non pruritic
4. Diabetic dermopathy is (select the wrong answer):
a) themostcommonspecicskinlesioninpatientswithdiabetes
b) associated with cardiovascular disease
c) a pathognomonic sign for diabetes
d) typically located bilaterally in pretibial regions and distributed
asymmetrically
5. The differential diagnosis of diabetic dermopathy includes (se-
lect the wrong answer):
a) Schamberg’sdisease(progressivepigmentedpurpuricderma-
titis)
b) stasispigmenteddermatitis,scarringlesions
c) factitious dermatitis
d) atopic dermatitis
6. Buschke´s scleredema (select the wrong answer):
a) is characterized by symmetrical and diffuse thickening with
hardening of the skin
b) affectsmainlytheface,trunk,neckandupperlimbs
c) is common in middle-aged men
d) is associated with diabetes mellitus in about 90% of cases.
7. Granuloma annulare is a benign and self-limited dermatitis
that (select the wrong answer):
a)is characterized by papules which often assume an annular
conguration
b) affects twice as many men than women
c) the generalized perforating form is characterized by umbili-
cated papules of about 4mm most commonly seen in children
and young adults
d) disappeared lesions have about 40% chance to reappear
8.Necrobiosislipoidicadiabeticorum(selectthewronganswer):
a) is not exclusive to diabetics because up to a third of cases occur
in nondiabetic patients
b) approximately 35% of the lesions progress to ulceration
c) typical lesions start up in the pretibial areas
d)conrmeddiagnosisofdiabetes,abnormalplasmaglucoseora
family history of diabetes occur in 40% of patients
9. The diabetic foot is a severe complication that (select the wrong
answer):
a) should be treated only by the dermatologist
b) is a chronic ulcer that evolves after trauma or over a callus
caused by changes in points with altered sensitivity caused by
diabetes neuropathy
c) In the US, is responsible for 70% of lower limb amputations
annually
d) if the pulses are palpable, energetic therapeutic measures as
the debridement and dressing usually heal the wound in a few
weeks
10. Rubeosis is a vascular erythema on the face and neck that (se-
lect the wrong answer):
a) is observed in up to 60% of patients with diabetes
b) reectspoorglycemiccontrol
c) becomes clinically evident by facial venous dilatation
d) the tight glucose control is not important for the treatment of
the disease
11. The eruptive xanthomas (select the wrong answer):
a) are observed when there is a marked exacerbation of triglycer-
idelevels(greaterthan700mg/dL)
b) appearaspapules in discreteor conuent domes,withwaxy
yellow centers and an erythematous base
c) thelesionsmaydeveloprapidlyoverthebuttocks,elbows,and
knees
d) do not resolve with proper correction of hypertriglyceridemia.
12. The most common fungal infections in diabetes mellitus (se-
lect the wrong answer):
a) is candidiasis, especially vulvovaginal, balanopreputial, and
angular stomatitis
b) vulvovaginal candidiasis is almost universal among diabetic
women in the long term and is a common cause of vulvar itch-
ing during periods of glycosuria
c)treatmentdoesnotneedglycemiccontrol,onlytopicalorsys-
temic treatment for Candida sp.
d)other common supercial mycoses indiabetics are extensive
pityriasis versicolor and dermatophytoses
20 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
13. Which disease is not associated with diabetes mellitus?
a) lupus erythematosus
b) alopecia areata
c) acne conglobata
d) lichen planus
14.Vitiligo can coexist with other disorders of autoimmune etiol-
ogy, especially:
a) thyroiditis
b) type 2 diabetes
c) hipoparatathyreoidism
d) alopecia areata
15. Patients with diabetes may have thickening and hardening of
the skin (select the wrong answer):
a) of the dorsal region of the toes as well as the epidermis overly-
ingthejointsofthefootandtoes
b) these changes are more common in type 1 patients
c) occur in up to 50% of the patients
d) the cause seems to be the glicosylation of proteins
16. The etiology of the granuloma annulare is unknown, but ap-
pears that is not involved with:
a) infectionssuchasHIV
b) thyroid diseases
c) psoriasis
d) malignancy
17. Which body site is not compromised by the necrobiosis
lipoidica diabeticorum?
a) foot
b) oral mucosa
c) abdomen
d) penis
18. Bacterial infections in diabetes may be varied and severe.
Mark the wrong option:
a) are mainly caused by Staphylococcus or Pseudomonas
b) recurrent erysipelas may also occur, as necrotizing/bullous
erysipelas are commoner among diabetics.
c) External otitis by Pseudomonas is a mild condition in diabetics
d) the bacterial infections in diabetics have to be considered care-
fullyandrequirehospitalizationduetothesevercompromise
of immune response
19. Which drug is not used in the treatment of the necrobiosis li-
poidica diabeticorum?
a) intralesionalinjectionandoraluseofcorticosteroidsortopical
threads under occlusion
b) clofazimine
c) tamoxifen
d) acetylsalicylic acid
20. Select the correct answer:
a) Diabetes mellitus is a high prevalent systemic metabolic disor-
der whose cutaneous manifestations can help in early diagno-
sis,asreecteither theglycemiccontrol,organiccompromise
or overall disease prognosis.
b) Proper glycemic control and primary prevention of organ-
specicdamageshouldbereinforcedbydermatologists
c) many dermatologic manifestations during diabetes are not re-
latedtoglycemiclevelsnordenitelyassociatedtothedisease
d) all the statements are correct
Answer key
Palmar hyperhidrosis: clinical, pathophysiological, diagnostic
andtherapeuticaspects..2016;91(6):716-25.
1- C
2- B
3- D
4- D
5- A
6- D
7- B
8- C
9- D
10- C
11- B
12- A
13- B
14- C
15- C
16- C
17- B
18- D
19- B
20- B
Papers
Informationforallmembers: TheEMC-D questionnaire
isnow available atthehomepage of theBrazilianAnnals of
Dermatology: www.anaisdedermatologia.org.br. The dead-
lineforcompletingthequestionnaireis30daysfromthedate
of online publication.
... In addition, the correlation between glycation and increased collagen stiffness highlights the potential for impaired tissue elasticity and function. In people with DM, this can manifest as reduced joint mobility, reduced skin elasticity and increased susceptibility to injury (Mendes et al., 2017;David et al., 2023). Glycation-induced changes in collagen could also affect the progression of chronic wounds, a common and serious complication of diabetes, by altering the wound healing environment through changes in the mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (Liao et al., 2009;Patel et al., 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
The interplay between diabetes mellitus and the structural integrity of collagen has significant implications for tissue functionality and disease progression. The aim of this study was to empirically investigate the effects of ribose-induced glycation on the biomechanical properties of collagen fibrils, using atomic force microscopy for precise measurements. Methodology. We used collagen fibrils from the common digital extensor (CDE) and superficial digital flexor (SDF) tendons of an adult bovine model to mimic the glycation processes that occur in diabetic pathology. The samples underwent controlled glycation by incubation with ribose for 24 hours and 14 days compared to phosphate buffered saline treated controls. A Bioscope Catalyst atomic force microscope (Bruker, USA) was used for all atomic force microscopy imaging in this study. Scientific novelty. Our results show a marked increase in the elastic modulus of collagen fibrils after ribose treatment, indicating stiffening with glycation. Notably, SDF fibrils showed a greater increase in stiffness after 24 hours of ribose exposure compared to CDE fibrils, suggesting variations in glycation rates relative to fibril anatomy. Statistical analyses confirmed the significance of these findings and provided a model for understanding similar processes in human diabetes. Conclusions. The different response to glycation observed between CDE and SDF fibrils prompts further investigation into the role of anatomical and structural factors in glycation susceptibility. Identification of tissues at higher risk of glycation-induced damage could lead to the development of targeted prevention strategies for diabetic complications. In addition, the potential for pharmacological intervention to inhibit glycation processes or enhance advanced glycation end products (AGEs) degradation offers a promising avenue for mitigating the progression of diabetes-related complications. The results of this study highlight the potential of ribose-induced changes in collagen as a model for diabetes-related tissue changes and propose a mechanistic framework that could guide the development of interventions aimed at mitigating the effects of collagen-related diabetic complications.
... A IDF (International Diabetes Federation), em 2017, estimou que 424,9 milhões de pessoas entre 20 e 79 anos de idade no mundo, vivem com diabetes, e que em 2045 cerca de 628 milhões de pessoas viverão com a doença. Isso indica que uma parcela considerável apresenta riscos de progressão para complicações metabólicas, como as dermatopatias (Mendes et al., 2017). ...
Article
Objective: To carry out an integrative review of the literature on the prevalence of dermatological diseases in individuals with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) types 1 and 2. Methods: this integrative literature review Result: Dermatophytosis was the skin lesion most frequently associated with DM, types 1 and 2, with a 48% prevalence in the studies analyzed. Conclusion: there is a clear need for early diagnosis of injuries and subsequent adequate treatment, in addition to proper adherence to glycemic control, so that systemic complications do not occur.
... One study reported the coexistence of T1D and SSc when a 14-year-old T1D patient was found to have developed SSc upon the diagnosis of cheiroarthropathy, which is characterized by the thickening of dorsal and palmar surfaces of the skin due to long-standing uncontrolled diabetes [26]. Positive autoantibodies, aberrant nailfold capillaroscopy with scleroderma patterns, interstitial lung disease, and cardiac involvement were all detected after a thorough work-up of the case, which confirmed the diagnosis of SSc in the patient [27][28][29]. On the other hand, T H17 cells and IL-17 molecules were found to be involved in the pathogenesis of both PSR and SSc [30,31]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Autoimmunity is defined as the inability to regulate immunological activities in the body, especially in response to external triggers, leading to the attack of the tissues and organs of the host. Outcomes include the onset of autoimmune diseases whose effects are primarily due to dysregulated immune responses. In past years, there have been cases that show an increased susceptibility to other autoimmune disorders in patients who are already experiencing the same type of disease. Research in this field has started analyzing the potential molecular and cellular causes of this interconnectedness, bearing in mind the possibility of advancing drugs and therapies for the treatment of autoimmunity. With that, this study aimed to determine the correlation of four autoimmune diseases, which are type 1 diabetes (T1D), psoriasis (PSR), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), by identifying highly preserved co-expressed genes among datasets using WGCNA. Functional annotation was then employed to characterize these sets of genes based on their systemic relationship as a whole to elucidate the biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions of the pathways they are involved in. Lastly, drug repurposing analysis was performed to screen candidate drugs for repositioning that could regulate the abnormal expression of genes among the diseases. A total of thirteen modules were obtained from the analysis, the majority of which were associated with transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational modification processes. Also, the evaluation based on KEGG suggested the possible role of TH17 differentiation in the simultaneous onset of the four diseases. Furthermore, clomiphene was the top drug candidate for regulating overexpressed hub genes; meanwhile, prilocaine was the top drug for regulating under-expressed hub genes. This study was geared towards utilizing transcriptomics approaches for the assessment of microarray data, which is different from the use of traditional genomic analyses. Such a research design for investigating correlations among autoimmune diseases may be the first of its kind.
... The potential linkages between diabetes mellitus (DM) and potential skin problems are well documented [120][121][122]. Because of this connection, some studies have attempted to use TDC measurements to assess certain features of skin in persons with DM. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tissue dielectric constant (TDC) values assess certain skin properties that are dependent on multiple factors but mainly on the relative amount of water content within a locally measured tissue volume. Because of the non-invasive nature of these measurements and their ease of use, the method has been widely used in various medically related applications. The goal of this paper was to review and describe the uses and findings of such TDC measurements, considering and including the wide array of medical applications. The review is in part based on information derived from an analysis of published material obtained via literature searches of four major electronic databases and, in part, based on the author’s experience with the TDC measurement methods and their various applications and his professional experiences. The databases searched were PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL Complete. Based on the initial search criteria, a total of 1257 titles were identified. After removing duplicates and filtering according to relevancy, 160 remained for detailed further review. In some cases, the bibliography of these retrieved articles provided additional sources. The findings demonstrate multiple research and medical uses and applications of TDC measurements, focusing on detecting and quantifying localized edema and lymphedema in multiple target sites. These include the upper and lower extremities, breasts, and trunk as regions involved in medical conditions causing lymphedema. In addition, the findings suggest that TDC evaluations are a convenient, non-invasive method to study and evaluate other conditions impacting skin, including diabetes mellitus and skin wounds or ulcers. Its ability to detect aspects of tissue changes simply and rapidly at almost any anatomical location makes it a useful tool for investigating multiple dermatological conditions and their treatment as future applications of this method.
... Além das complicações macrovasculares e microvasculares desencadeadas pela diabetes, a pele pode ser comprometida por algumas alterações metabólicas da DM e por algumas doenças diretamente relacionadas ao DM. Embora a associação de algumas alterações da pele com a diabetes não seja clara, há uma grande prevalência de dermatoses em pacientes diabéticos (MENDES AL, et al., 2017). ...
Article
Objetivo: Avaliar a prevalência de dermatoses em pacientes diabéticos atendidos pelos serviços ambulatoriais de dermatologia e endocrinologia em um ambulatório do estado de Minas Gerais Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo transversal, baseado em arquivos de prontuários eletrônicos. A amostra foi de pacientes atendidos pelas especialidades de dermatologia e endocrinologia entre março e julho de 2021. Resultados: Os resultados se mostraram coerentes com as informações presentes na literatura, uma vez que as dermatoses foram mais prevalentes entre os pacientes diabéticos do sexo feminino e naqueles com mais de 60 anos. As condições mais frequentes, em ambos os sexos, masculino e feminino, foram respectivamente: Acantose Nigricans (18 casos), hiperceratose plantar (14 casos), Onicomicose (15 casos) e xerose cutânea (20 casos) Conclusão: Conclui-se que acantose nigricans, hiperceratose plantar, onicomicose e xerose cutânea foram as manifestações cutâneas mais prevalentes nos pacientes diabéticos desse ambulatório, o que torna imprescindível que seja dada maior ênfase dessas condições durante as consultas ambulatoriais.
... Newly diagnosed diabetic patients, in particular, face an increased risk of developing skin issues due to altered blood circulation, compromised immune response, and nerve damage. These skin problems can lead to discomfort, delayed wound healing, and an elevated risk of infections, significantly impacting patients' overall quality of life [1,2]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by elevated blood glucose levels, affecting millions worldwide. Among the various complications associated with diabetes, skin-related problems represent a significant concern, particularly for newly diagnosed patients. Altered blood circulation, compromised immune responses and nerve damage increase the risk of skin issues in this vulnerable population. Effective nursing interventions are crucial in managing and preventing diabetes-related skin problems. A nursing skin care protocol tailored to the unique needs of newly diagnosed diabetic patients has the potential to reduce the incidence and severity of skin complications, leading to improved patient outcomes and enhanced quality of life. This study aims to assess the efficacy of a nursing skin care protocol in preventing skin-related problems among newly diagnosed diabetic patients. By analyzing the impact of the protocol on patient outcomes and exploring the significance of early intervention and patient education, this research seeks to provide valuable insights into the importance of proactive skin care management in diabetes care. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital in India to evaluate the efficacy of a nursing skin care protocol in preventing skin problems among newly diagnosed diabetic patients. The study included 30 patients who met specific inclusion criteria and excluded those with critical illness or undergoing skin treatment. Data was collected using a questionnaire and standardized tools. Statistical analysis demonstrated the protocol's effectiveness in reducing skin-related issues. The results highlight the importance of early intervention and personalized nursing care in diabetic management, promoting better patient outcomes and overall well-being. Results The results of the study demonstrate the efficacy of the nursing skin care protocol in reducing pruritus and dry skin problems among newly diagnosed diabetic patients. The experimental group showed a substantial improvement, with higher efficacy gains for both pruritus (66.70%) and dry skin (86.70%) compared to the control group (pruritus: 26.70%, dry skin: 33.30%). These findings highlight the potential benefits of implementing the nursing skin care protocol to alleviate skin-related issues in this patient population. The study supports the importance of early intervention and tailored nursing care in managing diabetic skin problems, which could improve patient outcomes and overall well-being. Conclusion In conclusion, the nursing skin care protocol effectively prevented and reduced skin-related problems among newly diagnosed diabetic patients. The experimental group showed significant improvements in pruritus and dry skin compared to the control group. Early intervention and personalized nursing care are crucial in managing diabetic skin issues and enhancing patient well-being. Implementing the nursing skin care protocol can lead to a better quality of life for diabetic patients by addressing skin concerns. Further research and application of this protocol hold promise for managing skin-related complications in diabetes effectively.
Chapter
Diabetes mellitus is a widespread and debilitating disease affecting all organ systems including the skin. Lifetime prevalence of cutaneous complications of diabetes mellitus has been estimated to range between 30% and 70%. Various dermatologic manifestations have been linked with diabetes mellitus that can vary in severity from benign to life-threatening. Necrobiosis lipoidica, scleredema adultorum, and granuloma annulare are common non-infectious cutaneous diseases associated with diabetes. Bacterial, viral and fungal infections are also frequent in people with diabetes. Complication of diabetes such as neuropathy and angiopathy can lead to diabetic dermopathy, diabetic foot syndrome, rubeosis facies, palmar erythema and other cutaneous manifestations. Furthermore, antidiabetic medications can also lead to cutaneous adverse effects. Insulin can cause local reactions like lipohypertrophy, lipoatrophy, and immediate and delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. Oral hypoglycemic agents have been associated with development of bullous pemphigoid, erythema multiforme, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, drug reactions, and photosensitivity. Some of these may occur before the diagnosis of diabetes; thus, play an important role in the recognition of underlying diabetes mellitus. Skin lesions can also offer an insight into patients’ glycemic control, prompting better disease control. Early recognition and management of these skin conditions are essential for improving patients’ quality of life and decreasing morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes.
Article
Full-text available
This article reviews the dermatological manifestations that frequently arise in endocrine disorders, encompassing conditions such as diabetes mellitus, acromegaly, polycystic ovary syndrome, hypothyroidism, Addison’s disease, among others. It explores the interactions between the endocrine system and the skin, highlighting how hormonal imbalances can result in a variety of skin symptoms. With a comprehensive approach, it offers important clinical insights for dermatologists and endocrinologists, aiming at a better understanding and an accurate diagnosis of these conditions.
Chapter
This chapter reviews acquired changes in dermal connective tissue during normal ageing and in disease processes, including photodamage. Corticosteroids are a potent cause of dermal atrophy, which may also be congenital or induced by inflammatory disorders related to morphoea. Enzymatic degradation of elastic tissue results in localised or generalised skin laxity, which resembles genetic disorders such as pseudoxanthoma elasticum and cutis laxa. In contrast, some disorders are characterised by excessive deposition of collagen or elastic tissue. Fibrosis is associated with contracture, which causes deformity and restricted movement as in palmoplantar fibromatosis. Several chemical environmental triggers induce diffuse fibrosis resembling systemic sclerosis. Keloids represent an abnormal scarring response to trauma. Finally, dermal connective tissue components may be extruded via the epidermis in perforating disorders such as elastosis perforans serpiginosa.
Article
Full-text available
To gain further insight into the genetic architecture of psoriasis, we conducted a meta-analysis of 3 genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and 2 independent data sets genotyped on the Immunochip, including 10,588 cases and 22,806 controls. We identified 15 new susceptibility loci, increasing to 36 the number associated with psoriasis in European individuals. We also identified, using conditional analyses, five independent signals within previously known loci. The newly identified loci shared with other autoimmune diseases include candidate genes with roles in regulating T-cell function (such as RUNX3, TAGAP and STAT3). Notably, they included candidate genes whose products are involved in innate host defense, including interferon-mediated antiviral responses (DDX58), macrophage activation (ZC3H12C) and nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling (CARD14 and CARM1). These results portend a better understanding of shared and distinctive genetic determinants of immune-mediated inflammatory disorders and emphasize the importance of the skin in innate and acquired host defense. © 2012 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.
Article
A 51-year-old man presented with a ten-year history of thickening of his skin on the back, neck and shoulders. There had been no previous infection, but the patient had a history of almost twenty years of diabetes mellitus, non-insulin dependent. He also had suffered a myocardial infarction. On examination we found a non-pitting induration of his back, neck and shoulders. The skin elsewhere was unaffected. The mobility of his neck and shoulders was severely limited. The histological examination showed a thickened broad dermis with mucine between thickened collagen bundles. We diagnosed scleredema diabeticorum, confirmed by histology. The patient was treated with UVA-1 therapy 70 J/cm2 five days a week for four weeks. The durometer was used as an objective measurement of the hardness of his skin. In this patient a fast and extensive improvement of scleredema diabeticorum was achieved by UVA-1 therapy. UVA-1 may prove to be a promising therapy for patients with this often disabling therapy resistant disease.
Article
• Twelve female patients with necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum (six with diabetes and six without) had a 5-mm punch biopsy of the skin lesion performed. The tissue was processed for dermatopathologic examination in 12 cases and for direct immunofluorescence in 11. Vasculopathy with inflammation and thickening of vessel walls, at times leading to occlusion, was found in lesional skin in all 12 cases. Vessels contained deposits of immunoreactants in the involved skin in 11 cases. This included IgM in six, C3 in nine, fibrin in ten, IgG in one, and IgA in two. Vessels contained deposits of immunoreactants in uninvolved skin in seven patients (C3 in four, IgM in three, fibrin in three, C4 in one, and IgA in one), three of whom had type I diabetes. (Arch Dermatol 1988;124:1364-1371)
Article
The National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel III report (ATP III)1 identified the metabolic syndrome as a multiplex risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) that is deserving of more clinical attention. The cardiovascular community has responded with heightened awareness and interest. ATP III criteria for metabolic syndrome differ somewhat from those of other organizations. Consequently, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, in collaboration with the American Heart Association, convened a conference to examine scientific issues related to definition of the metabolic syndrome. The scientific evidence related to definition was reviewed and considered from several perspectives: (1) major clinical outcomes, (2) metabolic components, (3) pathogenesis, (4) clinical criteria for diagnosis, (5) risk for clinical outcomes, and (6) therapeutic interventions. ATP III viewed CVD as the primary clinical outcome of metabolic syndrome. Most individuals who develop CVD have multiple risk factors. In 1988, Reaven2 noted that several risk factors (eg, dyslipidemia, hypertension, hyperglycemia) commonly cluster together. This clustering he called Syndrome X , and he recognized it as a multiplex risk factor for CVD. Reaven and subsequently others postulated that insulin resistance underlies Syndrome X (hence the commonly used term insulin resistance syndrome ). Other researchers use the term metabolic syndrome for this clustering of metabolic risk factors. ATP III used this alternative term. It avoids the implication that insulin resistance is the primary or only cause of associated risk factors. Although ATP III identified CVD as the primary clinical outcome of the metabolic syndrome, most people with this syndrome have insulin resistance, which confers increased risk for type 2 diabetes. When diabetes becomes clinically apparent, CVD risk rises sharply. Beyond CVD and type 2 diabetes, individuals with metabolic syndrome seemingly are susceptible to other conditions, notably polycystic ovary syndrome, fatty liver, cholesterol gallstones, asthma, sleep disturbances, and some …
Article
Bullous eruption of diabetes is a cutaneous sign of diabetes mellitus. Patients with this disorder manifest a sudden onset of intraepidermal or subepidermal bullae, which are primarily confined to the extremities and heal within several weeks without scarring. Our patient had severe diabetes and experienced two episodes of bullae associated with intense, ultraviolet light exposure. Negative immunofluorescence, early disappearance of anchoring filaments and half-desmosomes between cell membrane and basal lamina, and the absence of urinary uroporphyrins separate this entity from certain similarappearing conditions. Cation imbalance, precipitated by renal failure, could be a possible causal factor. (Arch Dermatol 115:324-325, 1979)