Content uploaded by Vidal Haddad Junior
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Vidal Haddad Junior on Mar 02, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Vidal Haddad Junior
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Vidal Haddad Junior on Mar 02, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Continuing mediCAl eduCAtion
Diabetes mellitus and the skin*
AdrianaLuciaMendes1 HelioAmanteMiot2
VidalHaddadJunior2
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20175514
Abstract:Severaldermatosesareroutinelyassociatedwithdiabetesmellitus,especiallyinpatientswithchronicdisease.This
relationshipcanbeeasilyproveninsomeskindisorders,butitisnotsoclearinothers.Dermatosessuchnecrobiosislipoidi-
ca,granulomaannulare,acanthosisnigricansandothersarediscussedinthistext,withanemphasisonprovenlinkwiththe
diabetesornot,diseaseidenticationandtreatmentstrategyusedtocontrolthosedermatosesanddiabetes.
Keywords: Dermatology; Diabetes mellitus; Skin manifestations
s
8
Received on 17.12.2015.
ApprovedbytheAdvisoryBoardandacceptedforpublicationon29.06.2016.
* Study conducted at the Departments of Dermatology and Clinical Medicine of the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio
deMesquitaFilho”(UNESP)–Botucatu(SP),Brazil.
Financial support: none.
Conictofinterest:none.
1 DepartmentofClinicalMedicine-FaculdadedeMedicinadeBotucatu-UniversidadeEstadualPaulista“JúliodeMesquitaFilho”(UNESP)–Botucatu(SP),
Brazil.
2 DepartmentofDermatologyandRadiotherapy-FaculdadedeMedicinadeBotucatu-UniversidadeEstadualPaulista“JúliodeMesquitaFilho”(UNESP)–
Botucatu(SP),Brazil.
©2017byAnaisBrasileirosdeDermatologia
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
INTRODUCTION
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered a modern epidemic
diseasethataffectsabout8.3%ofadults,whichaccountsfor382mil-
lionpeopleoftheglobalpopulation,and46%ofcasesareestimated
to be currently undiagnosed.1
Theincreasingurbanizationwithdietarychanges,reduced
physicalactivity,andchangesinotherlifestylepatterns,inaddition
to the increasing rates of obesity contributes to the greater preva-
lence of DM.
Besidesthe severe renal, vascularandophthalmiccompli-
cations,theskin maybe compromisedbyvariousdiseasesdirectly
related to diabetes or with associations not yet fully proven. The
mainonesarediscussed in this text,withanemphasisonproven
linkwithdiabetesornot,diseaseidenticationandtreatmentstrat-
egy used to control these dermatoses and diabetes.
ACANTHOSIS NIGRICANS
Acanthosisnigricans(AN) ischaracterizedbyskinthicken-
ing with hyperchromic and a velvety aspect that occurs mainly in
thefolds,especiallyinthearmpits(Figure1).Currently,itispostu-
latedthatis causedby hyperinsulinemia,whichpromotesthesyn-
thesisoftype1insulingrowthfactor(IGF1)thatleadstoepidermal
FIgure 1:
Armpitsarea
classic location
of acanthosis
nigricans. Note
the thickening
and hyperchro-
mia of the skin
Photo: De-
partment of
Dermatology,
Botucatu
MedicalSchool,
UNESP
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 9
FIgure 2:
Bullosis diabet-
icorum blisters
are asymptom-
atic and exhibit
mildinamma-
tion
Photo: De-
partment of
Dermatology,
Botucatu
MedicalSchool,
UNESP
acanthosis.2Furthermore,AN can be associated to skin tags (ach-
rocordons)andacralpapilosis,whichcanhelpinscreeninginsulin
resistance among general population.
The disease may also be associated with certain malignan-
cies such as gastric cancer and high doses of niacinamide, but in
mostcases the patienthasalsotypeAinsulin resistance,although
adrenal and thyroid disease may be associated.3-5
Inobesepatients,AN seems to evolve in association with
the metabolic syndrome. The most affected sites are the armpits,
neck,areolas,umbilicusandelbows.Topicaltreatmentusingemol-
lients with basis of urea and oral metformin can be used (due to
insulinresistance), buttheonlyeffective measuresareweight loss
andphysicalexercises,which reverses the metabolic disturbances
that causes cutaneous manifestations.
BULLOSIS DIABETICORUM
Bullosis diabeticorum (BD),bullousdisease of diabetes or
diabetic blisters occurs in approximately 0.5% of diabetic patients.6
Itwasrstdescribedin1930,butonlyin1967thetermbullosisdia-
beticorum was proposed.7,8Eventhoughuncommon,itcanbecon-
sidered a distinct marker of DM and it is manifested in patients with
long history of evolution of diabetes or those who have complica-
tionssuchasnephropathyorneuropathy,althoughtherearereports
of concomitant appearance to the initial presentation of DM.8
BD has been reported in patients aged 17 to 80 years with
alarger proportion in males (2:1). The preferred locations are the
extremities,especiallylegsandfeet(Figure2).9
Pathophysiology of the BD bullae is still unknown. The
blisters are large, tense and characterized by suddenand sponta-
neous onset in acral regions.9,10 The diameter of the blisters varies
between0.5and5cm,theyareoftenbilateral,withaninammatory
base,and containaclear,sterile,nonserouscontent.10 Other affect-
ed places are the back and side of the hands and the arms.10 These
blisters are usually painless and non-pruritic and disappear sponta-
neously without scarring in 2 to 5 weeks.10,11
Outbreaks may occur, but risk factors are radiation and
trauma, blood glucose changes, magnesium and calcium alter-
ations,vasculardiseaseormicroangiopathyandkidneyfailure.9,11-15
Diagnosis is made on clinical basis and should be remem-
beredwhentherearelargeblisterswithoutapparentinammation
in longstanding diabetic patients or those with chronic complica-
tions of the disease.
Histologically, the blisters are manifested in three different
types based on the level of cleavage. The most common type shows
an subepidermal cleavage at the level of the lamina lucida without
acantholysis, which appear and disappear spontaneously, without
scarring.8,14 Blisters present hyaline content and are located at the
tipsofthetoesandlessfrequentlyinthedorsalsurfacesofthefeet.
Patients with these clinical manifestations have good circulation in
the affected limb and tend to present diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
The second type is rarer and involves lesions that may be
hemorrhagic including resolution with scars and atrophy.16 The
cleavageplaneisbelowthedermoepidermaljunction,withdestruc-
tionofanchoringbrils.17,18Athirddescribedtypeconsistsofmul-
tiple blisters associated with sun exposure and markedly tanned
skin.It affectsfeet, legs andarmsand mustbedistinguished from
porphyria cutanea tarda. 18
The differential diagnosis includes pemphigus, bullous
pemphigoid,contactdermatitis,insectbites,epidermolysisbullosa,
blisters by trauma, burns, bullous erysipelas, bullous drug erup-
tions and porphyria cutanea tarda.8,9,19
DIABETIC DERMOPATHY
Diabetic dermopathy (DD) is the most common specic
skin lesion in patients with diabetes. 20,21Thediseasewasrstde-
scribedbyHansMelinintheearly60s, ascircumscribedbrownish
lesions located in the lower limbs of diabetic patients and named as
diabeticdermopathybyBinkley(1965),whoconsidereditacutane-
ous manifestation of diabetic microangiopathy. 22,23
Its incidence may range from 7% to 70% of diabetic pa-
tients.5,20,2225DDisseenmoreofteninolderpatients,agedmorethan
50years,andinthosewithalonghistoryof diabetes.18,20Also,itis
morecommoninmen(2:1).20,22,26,27 There is some controversy as to
DD be a pathognomonic sign for diabetes since there are studies
thathaveshownitsinvolvementinnon-diabeticsubjects.6,27
The origin of DD is unknown and there is no relation with
decreased local perfusion.28Anotherpossibleexplanationisdueto
mild traumas that do not compromise wound healing.29,30 There
is also degeneration of subcutaneous nerves in patients with neu-
ropathy.31However,themostacceptableexplanationistherelation
between DD and microvascular complications of diabetes. Studies
haveshownstrongassociationwithDD,nephropathy,retinopathy
or neuropathy.20,30
Shemer et al.20 observed increased incidence of DD in 52-
81% when associated with such complications. Another study
showed that 42.9% of patients presented neuropathy associated
withDD(p<0.01)6 although about 21% of patients with DD showed
no evidence of microangiopathy. 20
The association between DD and cardiovascular disease has
alsobeenidentiedbasedonECGchanges,historyofcoronaryar-
10 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
terydiseaseorboth.About53%ofpatientswithtype2diabetesand
DD had coronary artery disease.6DDassociation withneuropathy,
nephropathy,retinopathyandcoronaryarterydiseasemayindicate
a severity marker of the evolution of diabetes.31
AsDDtendstooccuroverbonyprominences,itissuggest-
ed that occur in response to sudden trauma.11,14,20,31 The association
betweentraumaandDDlesionsisfurtherconfusedbythefrequent
presence of peripheral neuropathy.31 Nevertheless, some studies
have failed to induce DD in vivo.32
DD consists of small, well-dened surface, brownish de-
pressions,with atrophicappearance,resemblingscars. Commonly
the lesions measure less than 1cm in diameter and present round-
edshape (Figure3). They canoccasionallyextend andreachup to
2.5cm. Depressions are smooth and hyperpigmented and intensity
of the pigment is related to the degree of atrophy. Generally asymp-
tomatic,itdoesnotcausepainoritchingandistypicallylocatedbi-
laterally in pretibial regions and distributed asymmetrically.21 More
rarely,DDoccursonthethighs,trunkandlowerabdomen.6,21,22 The
location and atrophic appearance causes many patients to consider
DD as scars resulting from a possible trauma.21,22 The appearance of
DDatthebeginningishardlydocumented,beinganunderreported
disease.
The progression of DD is variable and does not appear to
be affected by glycemic control.5,24,25Individual lesions may persist
onaveragefor18-24months and may stay indenitely.When the
diseaseregresses,the process is slow can be solved completely or
maintain pigmentation without atrophy. Cyclically, older lesions
disappear and new ones continuously evolve.21,22,23,32
The diagnostic is clinically based: after careful history and
physicalexamination,diagnosisofDDbecomesevident.Thepres-
ence of multiple, hyperpigmented, sharply demarcated atrophic
scars in the lower leg of a patient with diabetes is highly sugges-
tive of DD. The presence of four or more typical lesions in diabetic
patients is also characteristic of DD.10 Biopsy is not routinely per-
formed,sincethehistologyisnotspecicanditisinterestingavoid
trauma to the lower extremities in these individuals. However,
atypical features or unusual locations may hinder the diagnosis and
recommend the histopathological examination.31,32
Histologicndingsincludeatrophyofthedermalpapillae,
variablepigment at basal cells, thickening of the supercial blood
vesselsintima,hypertrophyandhyalinizationofthedeepestarteri-
oles,extravasatederythrocytes,hemosiderindepositionandamild
lymphocyticinltration.19,21,24Thereistelangiectasia,edema,and-
broblast proliferation at the papillary dermis.
The differential diagnosis of DD includes many diseases.
Early lesions of DD can be mistaken with fungal infection.23,While
typical brownish atrophic scars may require differentiation of
Schamberg’sdisease (progressivepigmented purpuric dermatitis),
purpura annularis telangiectasica, purpuric lichenoid dermatitis,
pigmentedstasisdermatitis,scarringlesions,papulonecrotictuber-
culids,factitious dermatitisandabrasions.23 Many of these entities
canbe differentiated by distribution, appearance and natural his-
tory.
Treatment of DD is not recommended and is little effective.30
Lesions are asymptomatic and can persist indenitely or make
spontaneous regression without treatment.21Nevertheless,thecon-
ditions associated with DD require attention. Patients should be
evaluatedforthediagnosisofDM,whichwhen is not conrmed,
shouldrequirefurtherinvestigations.Onceconrmedthepresence
of diabetes, attention should be focused on prevention, detection
andcontrolof associated complications. As with all patients with
diabetes,glycemiccontroliscritical.
SCLERODERMIFORM DISORDERS
Patients with diabetes may have thickening and hardening
oftheskinofthedorsalregionofthengeraswellastheskinover-
lyingthe jointsofthe hand andngers.The sclerosiscaneven ex-
tend these places. These changes are more common in type 1 diabe-
tes and occur in up to 50% of the patients. The cause seems to be the
glicosylation of proteins that appears to cause hardening of the skin.
Anotherform of skin sclerosisis associated with diabetes
isthe scleredema adultorum of Buschke (SAB), where sclerosis is
diffuse,butlocatedpreferablyontheback,havinganerythematous
appearance,and which maycompromisethe neck,shoulders,and
even other regions. It is more common in men over 40 years with
insulin dependent or multiple complications.
SABisararebromucinousconnectivetissuediseaseofun-
known etiology resistant to therapy and without spontaneous reso-
lution.33-35Itischaracterizedbysymmetricalanddiffusethickening
withhardeningoftheskinaffectingmainlytheface,trunk,neckand
upperlimbs, sparingthehands andfeet(Figure 4).36,37 The disease
presents no race, gender or age group preferences,however, it is
more common in middle-aged men. DM is associated with about
50% of cases.38 Its prevalence varies between 2.5 and 14% in diabetic
patients,butit isnoteworthy thatmostofthecasesareunderdiag-
nosed. 35,39,40
SAB has an insidious, asymptomatic, onset with progres-
sive loss of skin natural marks. In severe cases it can lead to neck
and back pain.41 Mobility is reduced and may lead to a restrictive
respiratory syndrome due to the skin thickening.42 The affected area
is painless and can present decreased sensitivity to touch.41Viscer-
FIgure 3: Diabetic dermopathy consists of small brownish-colored
depressionsin the skin surface, of atrophic appearance, which look
like scars
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 11
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
alinvolvementis rare,affectingeyes,tongue,pharynx, esophagus,
musculoskeletal tissue, joints, heart (pericardial and pleural effu-
sion)andhepatosplenomegaly.40,42,43
SABbelongsto thegroupofcutaneousmucinosesandcan
beassociatedwithbacterial,viral,hematologicaldisorders,diabe-
tes and other endocrine disorders.37,44 Three scleredema variants are
classically described.45
Type1-Occursmostofteninmiddle-agedwomen,children
andyoungpeople,presentsacuteonsetandisassociatedwithafe-
brilerespiratory illness, mostcommonlystreptococcalor viral (in-
uenza,chickenpox,measles,cytomegalovirusandHIV).46,47 This
variant has self resolution after several months or years.
Type 2 - There is no relation with infections, it is slow-
ly progressive and is associated with monoclonal gammopathy.48
This type tends to persist for years and may be at increased risk
formultiplemyeloma,beingassociatedwithotherdiseasessuchas
amyloidosis,rheumatoidarthritis, Sjögren’ssyndrome,obstructive
sleepapnea,primaryhyperparathyroidism,pituitaryadenomaand
adrenocortical disease. 40,44,49,50
Type3-associatedtodiabetes,whichcanbeeitheroftype
1 and type 2.33,51-54 It occurs generally in obese patients with long
standing diabetes and poor metabolic control, microangiopathy
and need for insulin.35,38,40 It affects middle-aged men with history
of longtime DM. This type also tends to persist and there is no clear
relation to prognosis or glycemic control.55
ThediagnosisofSABisclinical,butdiagnosticimaging(e.g.
ultrasonographyandmagneticresonance)canhelpinassessingthe
extent or disease activity.56,57 Due to the lack of skin elasticity and the
skinthickeningin scleredema, incisional biopsy is usually recom-
mendedtoconrmthediagnosis.36
Histopathology shows marked thickening of the reticular
dermis (2 to 3 times) with caliber collagen bundles separated by
bands of hyaline deposit mucin or hyaluronic acid best evidenced
at toluidine blue staining. The glycosaminoglycan deposit histologi-
cally corresponds to an hyperintensity on magnetic resonance.58
Clinically, the differential diagnosis must be established
withscleroderma,eosinophilicfasciitisandscleromyxedema.59
InSAB,the main mechanism of accumulationofextracel-
lular matrix components appears to be represented by an abnormal
geneexpression of extracellular protein(collagentype1,bronec-
tin,andtype3)ontheskininsteadofdecreasingclearingprocesses.
ThisderegulatedgeneisobservedinSABregardlessofthepresence
ofdiabetes.Themediatorsofbroblastactivationarestillunknown.
40Althoughdisappointingresponsetotreatment,varioustherapeu-
tic modalities are used: immunosuppressants (e.g. cyclosporine and
methotrexate), pentoxifylline, prostaglandin E1, intravenous im-
munoglobulin, penicillamine, antibiotics, systemic corticosteroids,
andintralesional,factorXIII,aminobenzoate,colchicineandDMSO
gel,radiotherapy,photochemotherapywith psoralenandultravio-
letA(PUVA),andrecently,tamoxifenandirradiationwithelectron
beam.36,41,42,50,59,60The therapymaybeeffective,probablydue to the
upregulationofcollagenasesynthesisbybroblastsandsubsequent
degradationofcollagenbers.33,60,61
Ingeneral,the disease has a good prognosis, and in most
cases is self-limited; however, there are severe cases with rapid
progression,anditishardtodetermine thebesttreatmentforcon-
trollingthediseaseandanalyzingthecostbenetratio.
It is noteworthy that its chronicity can cause alterations in
movement of the shoulders and impaired respiratory function.40
GRANULOMA ANNULARE
Granulomaannulare(GA) is arare,benign andself-limit-
ed dermatitis of the pre tibial regions and the extensor surfaces of
the limbs. The cutaneous lesions are similar to necrobiosis lipoidica
diabeticorum,but without causing atrophy of the epidermis.62,63 It
ischaracterized by papules thatoftenassumean annular congu-
ration.63
Its etiology is unknown, but appears to be involved with
responsetoinfectionssuchasHIV,hepatitisC,toxicagents,thyroid
diseases and malignancy.64,65GAassociationwithdiabetesiscontro-
versial and has been extensively studied. Samlaska et al.(1992), in
acasecontrolstudy, revealed no statisticallysignicantcorrelation
betweenGAandtype2DM,whileinaretrospectivestudy12% of
patientswithGAhad diabetes. Otherstudies have associated GA
with DM also in about 12% of the patients.66 68
GAaffects twice as many women thanmenand the most
commonlyaffectedareasarethoseexposedtotrauma,suchasbacks
ofthehandsandfeet,ngers,elbow,armsandlegs; sometimes the
scalpmaybeaffected(Figures5and 6).63When GAisgeneralized,
the trunk is affected in almost all cases. 64Inmostcasestheplaques
areasymptomatic,butmay presentmildand occasionalitchingor
a burning sensation.69
The lesions begin as rm, skincolored dermal papules,
whichexpandgraduallyinacentrifugalway.Theformatisannular,
witha central hyperpigmentation, and sometimes the papules are
franklyerythematous,becomingerythematous-brownishposterior-
ly.70 The papules of annular shape grow slowly and can measure
from 0.5 to 5.0cm.63
GAaffects mainly children and young people withoutdi-
FIgure 4: Buschke’sscleredemaischaracterizedbysymmetricaland
diffusethickening, with hardening of the skin mainly on the face,
cervical region and upper limbs
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
12 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
abetes but, in adults with diabetes, a disseminated form can occur,
which is expressed in about 0.5% to 10% of these patients. 63,64,66 The
generalized perforating form is characterized by umbilicated pap-
ules of about 4mm located at the extremities and it is most common-
ly seen in children and young adults.
The probable pathophysiology is a stimulus that triggers
the release of lymphokines by previously activated lymphocytes.
These lymphokines stimulate the synthesis and activity of collage-
nase, producing an inammatory reaction that modulates the for-
mation of granulomas.63
The duration of the disease is highly variable. Many le-
sions disappear spontaneously, without scarring, but it can last for
months to years. Disappeared lesions have about 40% chance to re-
appear.63 The lack of symptoms, scaling or blistering associated to
GA helps to differentiate it from other skin diseases such as tinea
corporis, pityriasis rosea, psoriasis, or annular erythema. Rarely, a
biopsy is needed to conrm the diagnosis. 66
Histologically, GA appears as a focal degeneration of collagen
in the upper and middle layers of the dermis, accumulation of histio-
cytes and multinucleated giant cells arranged in fence/ palisade.14
Although histology is very similar to that observed in necrobiosis
lipoidica, prominent mucin deposits in GA helps to differentiate it.
GA has a poor therapeutic response. Treatment usually is not
necessary because most of its injuries remit spontaneously within two
years.69 If the lesions become an unpleasant problem, the available
options include high-dose topical steroids, intralesional injection of
corticosteroids, PUVA, cryotherapy, or drugs such as niacinamide, in-
iximab, dapsone and topical calcineurin inhibitors. 69,70 Oral isotreti-
noin can be effective in symptomatic patients and the improvement of
lesions occurs in 90% of those with decreased itching and erythema,
even in resistant lesions associated with few adverse events compared
with other drugs. 11 Moreover, this treatment provides good aesthetic
response with a considerable improvement in patient quality of life.
NECROBIOSIS LIPOIDICA DIABETICORUM
Necrobiosis lipoidica (NL) is an idiopathic dermatosis of
unknown origin, occurring mainly in patients with diabetes. While
most diabetics do not develop this disease, its incidence ranges from
0.3% to 1.6% of these patients per year.71
Two thirds of diabetics with NL are insulin dependent.72
NL is not exclusive to diabetics because up to a third of cases occur
in non-diabetic subjects.73,74 Over the years, however, about 90% of
these will develop some degree of glucose intolerance or at least
will present a positive family history for diabetes.75,76,77 These facts
suggest that as soon as the diagnosis of the dermatosis is conrmed,
the research for diabetes should be initiated.
NL predominates in women (80% of cases), white, and it
manifests at any age, but prevails between the fourth and sixth de-
cades.75 A retrospective study from the Mayo Clinic showed that the
conrmed diagnosis of diabetes, abnormal plasma glucose or a fam-
ily history of diabetes occurred in 90% of patients.75
The glycated hemoglobin levels were not associated with
the appearance of lesions, indicating that hyperglycemia is not nec-
essary for the development of NL. Among yuastdua diabetes, type
1 patients have the earliest manifestations of NL.76
Multiple lesions are common, and are usually observed in
both legs (Figures 7 and 8).77 Approximately 35% of the lesions prog-
ress to ulceration.78 Patients occasionally present itching or burning
sensations in areas where they were asymptomatic and pain arises
after ulceration. Some patients report partial or complete anesthesia
at affected sites, due to probable local neural dysfunction.79 More than
half of diabetic patients with NL have neuropathy or microangiopa-
Figure 5:
Granuloma
annulare man-
ifests by ery-
thematous and
rm dermal
papules that ex-
pand gradually,
with central
hyperpigmen-
tation
Photo: Depart-
ment of Derma-
tology, Botucatu
Medical School,
UNESP
Figure 6: Detail of the granuloma annulare, showing inltration at
the edges of the lesion
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 13
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
thy. Spontaneous resolution is observed in 10% to 20% of cases.
Histopathologyshowsdisorganization and degeneration of
collageninbasementmembranethickeningandinammationofthe
underlying subcutaneous fat. NL pathophysiology is still unclear. The
primary cause of collagen degeneration appears to be an immune-
mediated vasculitis (autoimmune vasculitis). The presence of anti-
bodiesandC3atthedermoepidermaljunctionandaroundtheblood
vesselvasculitislesionssupportthis,butotherhistologicalfeaturesof
leukocytoclastic vasculitis were not observed. 80 Other studies suggest
thatNLisprimarilyacollagendiseasewithsecondaryinammation,
81-83and the presence of brin lesionsassociated with histiocytes in
palisades suggests delayed hypersensitivity reaction.84
Typical lesions of NL start in the pretibial areas with non scaly
erythematous papules that gradually enlarge and coalesce into large
plaques.85The plaques resultfromthe conuence of yellowishpap-
ules and often develop atrophic center that corresponds to the dermal
andepidermalatrophyassociatedwithsupercialtelangiectasias.86
Gradual expansion and variable erythema occur at the edg-
es,whichareoftenelevated.Itsshapeiselliptical,withserpiginous
margins.Theadjacentskinisreddishviolet,whilethecenteris yel-
low,indicating accumulation of lipids.77,78,87 The size of the lesion
may range from a few millimeters to several centimeters. When the
lesions become chronic, the sclerosis is well marked with porcel-
aneous aspect. The metabolic control appears to have no proven ef-
fectinthecourseofthedisease,althoughthereisareportthattight
glucose control reduces the incidence of NL.88,89
Thelesionsmayoccasionallyappearinotherareas,suchas
thethighs,poplitealregionandfeet.Othersitesareinvolvedin15%
ofcases and include abdomen, upperlimbs(especiallyhandsand
forearms)andscalp,where NLcan causeatrophyandalopecia.In
theface, thediseasemay harmtheeyelids andnose.In rarecases,
lesions were observed in the heel and penis.89 NL also can develop
inposttraumascars, old lesionsofsclerodermaand atthescarsof
BCG vaccine.79Whenlesionsariseonotherpartsofthebody,gener-
ally the lower limbs are affected too.
Diagnosis is made by clinical examination. Histopathologi-
calexaminationmayberequiredinearlylesionsorinpatientswith-
outadiagnosisofdiabetes.Sarcoidosis,granulomaannulare,lichen
sclerosus et atrophicus and stasis dermatitis may be differential di-
agnosis of NL. Ulcerated lesions can resemble pyoderma gangreno-
sum,tertiarysyphilisandcutaneousmycobacteriosis.
Patients should be advised to avoid potentially traumatic sit-
uations,suchascontactsports.Theyshouldtheadvisedtowearsocks
up to the knee or foam pads for protection.79In general, drugtreat-
ment has little effect and should be reserved for symptomatic relief.
Drugsusedwithvariableefcacyareintralesionalinjectionandoral
useofcorticosteroidsortopicalthreadsunderocclusion,clofazimine,
acetylsalicylicacid,dipyridamole,pentoxyphilineandchloroquine.
When the lesions are at, use of emollients is indicated.
Rhodes(1980) reported success with brinolytic therapy (derived
fromnicotinicacidandinositolnicotinate)in24of30cases; redness
and warmth are important adverse events.75
Morerecently,anti-TNFtherapieshavebeenused,although
therearenostudiesthat demonstrate decisivetherapeuticefcacy
yet.90 Strict glycemic control remains controversial in improving NL.
When the plaques become ulcerated, the treatment must involve
the prevention of secondary infection with systemic antibiotics and
dressings. 82,91,92
DIABETIC FOOT
Thediabeticfootis acomplexanddisablingentity,caused
byvarious factors, and it should betreatedby various specialties
such as general surgery, vascular surgery, orthopedics, endocri-
nologyanddermatology.Itburdenspatients’qualityoflife,public
health system and social security.
Classically,theso-calleddiabeticfootisachroniculcerthat
evolves after trauma or over a callus caused by changes in points
withalteredsensitivityduetodiabetesneuropathy(6070%)(Figure
9).Amuchsmallerproportionislinkedtoperipheralvascularisch-
emia(about15%).
The causes can coexist and about 25% of diabetics may pres-
ent foot ulcers during the development of the disease. 4,93
FIgure 7: Typical lesions of necrobiosis lipoidica begin in the pretib-
ial regions with non-squamous papules that gradually grow and
groupintolargeplaques
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
FIgure 8: Detailoflesionsofnecrobiosislipoidica,showingcentral
atrophy
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
Ulcersaredifcultto healduetotheunderlyingimmuno-
suppressionof the disease, hyperkeratotic borders and sometimes
ischemia.IntheUS,thediabeticfootisresponsiblefor70%oflower
limb amputations annually. 4,94
The treatment is performed according to the etiology. If the
pulsesarepalpable,energetictherapeuticmeasuressuchasthede-
bridement and dressing usually heal the wound in few weeks. On
theotherhand,nomeasuresareeffectiveinthepresenceofischemia
and surgical revascularization is crucial to the treatmentin these
cases. Secondary infections and osteomyelitis are factors that com-
plicate the approach and systemic antibiotics should be evaluated
in all cases.
There are specic guidelines to manage diabetic foot in a
multidisciplinary approach that surpass the scope of this text. 95
MISCELLANEOUS
Anichthyosiformaspectmayarisefromchangesoftheskin
in diabetes; it appear frequently in young subjects with insulin-
dependent diabetes and appear associated with microangiopathy
and duration of disease. Keratosis pilaris can also be observed and
both appear to be associated with skin xerosis seen in these patients.
Rubeosis is a vascular erythema on the face and neck pres-
entinupto60%ofpatientswithdiabetes,probablylinkedtothe
loss of the vasoconstrictor tone. It usually reects poor glycemic
controlandisassociatedtoperipheralneuropathy.Inthesepatients,
hyperglycemia can lead to a change in the microcirculation. It be-
comes clinically evident by facial venous dilatation. Rubeosis means
microangiopathy, anditis prudent toassesspatientsfor othermi-
croangiopathy such as retinopathy and nephropathy. Tight glucose
control is the mainstay of treatment for this disease.
Yellowskinorcarotenodermiaisalsorelatedtoinadequate
glycemic control, which occurs either by carotenemia, as well as
by increasing the glycosylation of collagen and dermal proteins.20
There is no treatment for this phenomenon.
FIgure 9: Diabetic foot may present a chronic ulcer on callus caused
by changes in sensitivity associated with diabetic neuropathy and
occasional ischemia
Photo: Department of Dermatology, Botucatu Medical School,
UNESP
Other conditions not necessarily related to the presence of
diabetes are the eruptive xanthomas.94 These lesions are observed
when there is a marked exacerbation of triglyceride levels (greater
than700mg/dL)causedbysometriggeringfactor,amongthemone
of the most common causes is the lack of DM control. The character-
isticlesionsmayappearaspapulesindiscreteorconuentdomes,
with waxy yellow centers and an erythematous base. Lesions may
developrapidlyoverthebuttocks,elbows,andknees.Theycan be
itchy and even painful. Eruptive xanthomas should be faced as a
lifethreatingdisorderleadingtoacutepancreatitisthatcanbequick-
ly resolved with proper correction of hypertriglyceridemia.83
Diabetes causes several changes in immunologic system,
but especially the decrease in leukocyte chemotaxis and phagocy-
tosis,inaddition,impairmentinvascularreactionleadstoasigni-
cantdeciencyofimmuneresponsethatfavorsinfectionsanddelay
their resolution.96
The most common fungal infections is candidiasis, espe-
ciallyvulvovaginal,balanopreputial,andangularstomatitis.These
may be the rst demonstration of the indirect presence of diabe-
tes. Vulvovaginalcandidiasis is almost universal among diabetic
women in the long term and is a common cause of vulvar itching
during periods of glycosuria. It comes with vulvar erythema and
sometimes with white discharge. Treatment involves glycemic con-
trolin additiontotopical or systemictreatmentfor specic fungal
infection.81
Othercommonsupercial mycoses in diabetics are exten-
sive pityriasis versicolor and dermatophytoses (e.g. tinea corporis),
which are associated to microangiopathy and poor glycemic con-
trol. Several opportunistic fungi infections are described in diabetics
withpoorglycemiccontrol.Averyseriouscondition,howeverrare,
ismucormycosis,causedbyZygomycetes,fromtheorderof Muco-
rales, which causes necrotic processes usually in the center of the
facewitharapidprogression,andwithahighmortalityrate.Early
identicationisessentialforsurvival.97
Bacterial infections may be varied and severe as those
caused by Staphylococcus or Pseudomonas. The infection may be mild
orsevereandmaymanifestasboils,abscessesorcarbuncles.Recur-
renterysipelasmayalsooccur,asnecrotizing/bullouserysipelasare
common among diabetics. External otitis by Pseudomonas is also a
seriousconditionindiabeticsandmayleadtomastoiditis,osteomy-
elitisofthetemporalbone,damagetonervesandmeninges,witha
high mortality rate.77 Infections in diabetics have to be considered
carefullyand requirehospitalizationdue to the sever compromise
of immune response.
As autoimmune disorders are associated among them-
selves,diabetes (especiallytype1 DM)canbe associatedtolupus
erythematosus,alopeciaareataandhalonevus.
VLTILIGO
Vitiligoisachronicdiseaseofautoimmuneetiologythatcan
manifest itself or,in most cases, associated with type 1 DM. It is
characterizedbyanabsenceordysfunctionofmelanocytesandap-
pears as hypo/ achromic spots surrounded by healthy skin whose
sizerangesfromafewmillimeterstolargeextensions,oftenlocated
aroundholes,extensorregions,chestandabdomen.98
14 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
With an autosomal inheritance, it is estimated that vitili-
go is manifested among 1% to 7% of all diabetic patients and only
0.2% to 1% of the general population.74Althoughitspathogenesisis
notentirelyunderstood,itis suggested thatitscause is polygenic,
multifactorial,oracombinationofautoimmune,geneticandneuro-
humoral factors due to the impairment of nerve cells release toxic
substancesharmfultomelanocytes,leadingtodestructionofthese
cells while the pigment is forming.99Environmentalfactors,suchas
infectionor damage to the skin (Koebner phenomenon), may also
contribute to the appearance of lesions.99
Moretti et al.95 found that the epidermis of vitiligo has a sig-
nicantamount of cytokines in comparison with the healthy sur-
roundingskin,suggestingthattheproductionofthesecytokinesare
involved in apoptosis of melanocytes process and depigmentation
of the skin.96,99
Vitiligo can coexist with other disorders of autoimmune
etiology, especially hormonal disorders (thyroiditis, adrenal insuf-
ciency and hipoparatathyreoidism) as part of the polyglandular
autoimmune syndrome whose clinical manifestations may appear
infourdifferentways.Thetype1isthemostcommon(1:20,000in-
dividuals)andprogresseswithadrenalinsufciency,thyroiditisand
type1DM,aswellasatrophicgastritis,perniciousanemia,alopecia
areata,celiacdisease,myastheniagravisandhypogonadism.97,98So,
whendiagnosing vitiligo, physicians should be alert to the emer-
genceofotherautoimmunediseases,particularlytype1DM.100-102
Althoughvitiligoisasymptomatic,theunpleasantdiscom-
fort and psychological stress can be considerable.11 Cosmetic treat-
mentisanoptiontoimprovethequalityoflife.103Skincamouage
andmicropigmentationcanbeconsidered,asthetreatmentofvitil-
igo is unsatisfactory in general. Patients should be advised to avoid
sun exposure and use broad spectrum sunscreens. In small and lo-
calizedlesionstopicalcorticosteroidsaretherstchoicetreatment,
whileforwidespreadvitiligo,treatmentwithnarrowbandultravio-
let light B is more effective. 81
PSORIASIS
Psoriasisisachronicrecurrentimmunemediatedinamma-
torydisease,withstronggeneticcomponentthataffects23%ofthe
Caucasian population.104It can occuratanyage, although in most
cases it develops before 40 years of age and is rare in children.105
Its emergence or worsening can often be triggered by emo-
tionalfactors.Somestudieshavelinkedpsoriasiswithpoorerqual-
ityoflife, reducedlife expectancy,bad employment and nancial
problems for the patient and family.106,107
Theextent ofskininvolvement is variable,rangingfrom a
fewlocatedplaquestowidespreadinvolvement.Whentheinvolve-
mentismoderatetosevere(>10%oftheirbodysurfacearea)itis
often associated with psoriatic arthritis and metabolic syndrome,
which is a set of risk factors for cardiovascular disease whose uni-
fyingfactorisinsulinresistance,conferringapro-inammatoryand
prothrombotic state.108-110
Several studies have evidenced the association of psoria-
sis with cardiovascular diseases and components of the metabolic
syndrome (hypertension, obesity, dysglycemia or type 2 diabetes,
dyslipidemia, fatty liver disease) and chronic kidney disease.107,110
Psoriasis patients often are overweight or obese in greater propor-
tion.111-11 4 Furthermore, it was also observed highermortalitythan
the general population.115
Severaltheorieswerehypothesizedtoassociatetheconcur-
renceofthecomponentsofmetabolicsyndrome,prematureathero-
sclerosisandpsoriasis.Oneofthesesuggeststhatcommoninam-
matorypathwaysareinvolved in the pathophysiology of both, as
thecytokineproleandthe inammatory cell inltrate of T cells,
macrophages and monocytes are observed in both conditions.114-116
Thediagnosis ofpsoriasisis usuallyclinical,based onhis-
toryand physical examination, but may be conrmed by the his-
topathological examination, which will reveal very characteristic
aspects of the disease.107
Treatment of psoriasis depends on the clinical manifesta-
tionspresented,varyingfromthesimpleapplicationoftopicalmed-
ications in mild cases to more complex treatments for more severe
cases. The response to treatment also varies greatly from one patient
to another and the emotional component should not be overlooked.
Ahealthylifestyle,avoidingstress,willcontribute totheimprove-
ment. Moderate sun exposure is of great help as keeping the skin
well hydrated.
Although some drugs can negatively affect metabolic ho-
meostasis by increasing cardiovascular risk, nonpharmacological
interventions,such as nutrition education, smoking cessationand
practice of physical activity associated with weight loss, can im-
prove the response to treatments for psoriasis as well as reduce car-
diovascular risk.
Evenwithoutcompleteremissionofthedisease,properdis-
ease control promotes social rehabilitation of patients, improving
theability towork,and probablydecreasingtheriskof comorbid-
ities.107
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
Severalcutaneousdiseasesarecausedormaybeinuenced
bysystemicdisordersandthis knowledge is of major importance
for the general practitioner.
DMisahighlyprevalentsystemicmetabolicdisease,whose
cutaneous manifestations can help in the early diagnosis of the dis-
ease,thusreectingglycemiccontrol,systemicimpairmentorover-
all prognosis of the disease.
Adequateglycemiccontrolandprimarypreventionofspe-
cicdamagetointernalorgansshouldbepromotedandreinforced
by dermatologists, although many dermatological manifestations
associated with DM are not necessarily related to glycemic levels
nordenitelyassociatedtothedisease.q
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: to the students Josiane Monção
Andrella(MedicalSchoolofBotucatu–UNESP)andMichelRaineri
Haddad(MedicalSchoolofSãoJosédoRio Preto–FAMERP)for
their help at various stages of the preparation of the manuscript.
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 15
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
16 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
REFERENCES
1. Idf.org [Internet]. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th ed. [cited 2015 Jul 15]. Available from:
http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/update2014.
2. Callen JP, Jorizzo JL, Bolognia JL, Piette WW, Zone JJ, editors. Dermatological
Signs of Internal Disease. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
3. Barbato MT, Criado PR, Silva AK, Averbeck E, Guerine MB, Sá NB. Association
of acanthosis nigricans and skin tags with insulin resistance. An Bras Dermatol.
2012;87:97-104.
4. Tamega Ade A, Aranha AM, Guiotoku MM, Miot LD, Miot HA. Association between
skin tags and insulin resistance. An Bras Dermatol. 2010;85:25-31.
5. Papa CM. Niacinamide and acanthosis nigricans. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:1281.
6. Romano G, Moretti G, Di Benedetto A, Giofrè C, Di Cesare E, Russo G, et al. Skin
lesions in diabetes mellitus: prevalence and clinical correlations. Diabetes Res Clin
Pract. 1998;39:101-6.
7. Kramer DW. Early or warning signs of impending gangrene in diabetes. Med J Rec.
1930;132: 338-42.
8. Cantwell AR Jr, Martz W. Idiopathic bullae in diabetics. Bullosis diabeticorum. Arch
Dermatol. 1967;96:42-4.
9. Mendes AL, Haddad Jr V. Caso para diagnostico. Bullosis Diabeticor um. An Bras
Dermatol. 2007;82:94-6.
10. Basarab T, Munn SE, McGrath J, Russell Jones R. Bullosis diabeticorum. A case
report and literature review. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1995;20:218-20.
11. Paron NG, Lambert PW. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Prim Care.
2000;27:371-83.
12. Rocca FF, Pereyra E. Phlyctenar lesions in the feet of diabetic patients. Diabetes.
1963;12:220-2.
13. Allen GE, Hadden DR. Bullous lesions of the skin in diabetes (bullosis
diabeticorum). Br J Dermatol. 1970;82:216-20.
14. Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Aggarwal AK, Gupta M, Bhattacharya SN, Verma
P. Noninsulindependent, type II diabetes mellitusrelated dermatoses: part II.
Skinmed. 2011;9:302-8.
15. Lipsky BA, Baker PD, Ahroni JH. Diabetic bullae: 12 cases of a purportedly rare
cutaneous disorder. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39:196-200.
16. Kurwa A, Roberts P, Whitehead R. Concurrence of bullous and atrophic skin
lesions in diabetes mellitus. Arch Dermatol. 1971;103:670-5.
17. Bernstein JE, Medenica M, Soltani K, Griem SF. Bullous er uption of diabetes
mellitus. Arch Dermatol. 1979;115:324-5.
18. Parex, I. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes mellitus. J Am Acad Dermatol.
1994;30:519-31.
19. Goodfield MJ, Millard LG, Harvey L, Jeffcoate WJ. Bullosis diabeticorum. J Am
Acad Dermatol. 1986;15:1292-4.
20. Shemer A, Bergman R, Linn S, Kantor Y, Friedman-Birnbaum R. Diabetic
dermopathy and internal complications in diabetes mellitus. Int J Dermatol.
1998;37:113-5.
21. Houck GM, Morgan MB. A reappraisal of the histologic findings of pigmented
pretibial patches of diabetes mellitus. J Cutan Pathol. 2004;31:141-4.
22. Melin H. An atrophic circumscribed skin lesion in the lower extremities of
diabetics. Acta Med Scand. 1964;176:1-75.
23. Binkley GW. Dermopathy in the diabetic syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 1965;92:625-
34.
24. Mahajan S, Koranne RV, Sharma SK. Cutaneous manifestation of diabetes
mellitus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003;69:105-8.
25. A Abdollahi A, Daneshpazhooh M, Amirchaghmaghi E, Sheikhi S, Eshrati B,
Bastanhagh MH. Dermopathy and retinopathy in diabetes: is there an association?
Dermatology. 2007;214:133-6.
26. Danowski TS, Sabeh G, Sarver ME, Shelkrot J, Fisher ER. Skin spots and diabetes
mellitus. Am J Med Sci. 1966;251:570-5.
27. Lithner F. Cutaneous reactions of the extremities of diabetics to local thermal
trauma. Acta Med Scand. 1975;198:319-25.
28. Wigington G, Ngo B, Rendell M. Skin blood flow in diabetic dermopathy. Arch
Dermatol. 2004;140(:1248-50.
29. Kiziltan ME, Benbir G, Akalin MA. Is diabetic dermopathy a sign for severe
neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus? Nerve conduction studies and
symptom analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1862-9.
30. Jelinek JE. Skin disorders associated with diabetes mellitus. In: Rifkin H, Porte D,
editors. Ellenberg and Rifkin’s diabetes mellitus, theory and practice. New York:
Elsevier; 1990: p. 838-49.
31. Gouterman IH, Sibrack LA. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes. Cutis.
1980;25:45-54.
32. Stulberg DL, Clark N, Tovey D. Common hyperpigmentation disorders in adults,
part II: melanoma, seborrheic keratoses, acanthosis nigricans, melasma, diabetic
dermopathy, tinea versicolor, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Am Fam
Physician. 2003;68:1963-8.
33. Kroft EB, de Jong EM. Scleredema diabeticorum case series: successful treatment
with UVA1. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:947-8.
34. Kobayashi T, Yamasaki Y, Watanabe T. Diabetic scleredema: a case report and
biochemical analysis for glycosaminoglycan. J Dermatol. 1997;24:100-3.
35. Cole GW, Headley J, Skowsky R. Scleredema diabeticorum: a common and
distinct cutaneous manifestation of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1983;6:189-
92.
36. Gervini RL, Lecompte SM, Pineda RC, Ruthner FG, Magnabosco EM, Silva LM.
Escleredema de Buschke: relato de dois casos. An Bras Dermatol. 2002; 77:465-
72.
37. Emedicine.com [Internet]. PappasTaffer LK, Wer th VP, Vinson RP, Libow LF, Elston
DM. Scleredema. [cited 2015 Nov 01]. Available from: www.emedicine.com/
derm/topic385.htm.
38. Pitarch G, Torrijos A, Martínez-Aparicio A, Vilata JJ, Fortea JM. Escleredema
de Buschke associado a diabetes mellitus. Estudio de cuatro casos. Actas
Dermosifiliogr. 2005; 96:46-9.
39. Sattar MA, Diab S, Sugathan TN, Sivanandasingham P, Fenech FF. Scleredema
diabeticorum: a minor but often unrecognized complication of diabetes mellitus.
Diabet Med. 1988;5:465-8.
40. Meguerditchian C, Jacquet P, Béliard S, Benderitter T, Valéro R, Carsuzza F, et
al. Scleredema adultorum of Buschke: an under recognized skin complication of
diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2006;32:481-4.
41. Carvalho JC, Costa TN, De Moura HH, Quintella LP, Carneiro S, Ramos-e-Silva M.
Scleredema Adultorum of Buschke. Skinmed. 2014;12:337-40.
42. Barde C, Masouyé I, Saurat JH, Le Gal FA. Scleroedema adultorum Buschke in
a diabetic subject: intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Ann Dermatol Venereol.
2009;136:360-3.
43. Mokta J, Sharma B, Patial RK, Prasher BS, Prasher N. Systemic manifestations in
scleredema of Buschke. J Assoc Physicians India. 2001;49:1033-4.
44. Oyama N, Togashi A, Kaneko F, Yamamoto T. Two cases of scleredema with
pituitaryadrenocortical neoplasms: an underrecognized skin complication. J
Dermatol. 2012;39:193-5.
45. Parmar RC, Bavdekar SB, Bansal S, Doraiswamy A, Khambadkone S. Scleredema
adultorum. J Postgrad Med. 2000;46:91-3.
46. Mattos e Dinato SM, Costa GL, Dinato MC, Sementilli A, Romiti N. Escleredema de
Buschke associado ao diabetes melito tipo 2: relato de caso e revisão da literatura.
Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2010;54: 852-5.
47. Kövary PM, Vakilzadeh F, Macher E, Zaun H, Merk H, Goerz G. Monoclonal
gammopathy in scleredema: observations in three cases. Arch Dermatol.
1981;117:536-9.
48. Angeli-Besson C, Koeppel MC, Jacquet P, Andrac L, Sayag J. Electronbeam therapy
in scleredema adultorum with associated monoclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia.
Br J Dermatol. 1994;130:394-7.
49. Turchin I, Adams SP, Enta T. Answer to dermacase. Can Fam Physician.
2003;49:1089, 1093.
50. Ray V, Boisseau-Garsaud AM, Ray P, Pont F, Lin L, Hélénon R, et al. Obesity
persistent scleredema: study of 49 cases. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2002;129:281-
5.
51. Graff R. Discussion of scleredema adultorum. Arch Derm. 1968;98:319-20.
52. Ulmer A, Schaumburg-Lever G, Bauer J, Kötter I, Fierlbeck G. Scleredema
adultorum Buschke. Case report and review of the literature. Hautarzt.
1998;49:48-54.
53. Cron RQ, Swetter SM. SM. Scleredema revisited. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1994;33:606-
10.
54. Martín C, Requena L, Manrique K, Manzarbeitia FD, Rovira A. Scleredema
diabeticorum in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Case Rep Endocrinol.
2011;2011:560273.
55. Horger M, Fierlbeck G, Kuemmerle-Deschner J, Tzaribachev N, Wehrmann M,
Claussen CD, et al. MRI findings in deep and generalized morphea (localized
scleroderma). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:32-9.
56. Cole GW, Handler SJ, Burnett K. The ultrasonic evaluation of skin thickness in
scleredema. J Clin Ultrasound. 1981;9:501-3.
57. Kurihara Y, Kokuba H, Furue M. Case of diabetic scleredema: diagnostic value of
magnetic resonance imaging. J Dermatol. 2011;38:693-6.
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 17
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
58. Conde Fernandes I, Sanches M, Velho G, Lobo I, Alves R, Selores M..
Scleromyxedema vs scleredema: a diagnostic challenge. Eur J Dermatol.
2011;21:822-3.
59. Gruson LM, Franks A Jr. Scleredema and diabetic sclerodactyly. Dermatol Online
J. 2005;11:3.
60. Thumpimukvatana N, Wongpraparut C, Lim HW. Scleredema diabeticorum
successfully treated with ultra¬violet A1 phototherapy. J Dermatol. 2010;37:1036-
9.
61. Alsaeedi SH, Lee P. Treatment of scleredema diabeticorum with tamoxifen. J
Rheumatol. 2010;37:2636-7.
62. Dahl MV. Granuloma annulare. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austin KF,
Goldsmith LA, Katz SL, editors. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 5th
ed. New York: McGrawHill; 1999. p. 1152-7.
63. Dabski K, Winkelmann RK. Generalized granuloma annulare. Clinical and
laboratory findings in 100 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;20:39-47.
64. Cohen PR. Granuloma annulare associated with malignancy. South Med J.
1997;90:1056-9.
65. Studer EM, Calza AM, Saurat JH. Precipitating factors and associated diseases
in 84 patients with granuloma annulare: a retrospective study. Dermatology.
1996;193:364-8.
66. Erkek E, Karaduman A, Bükülmez G, Sentürk N, Ozkaya O. An unusual form of
generalized granuloma annulare in a patient with insulindependent diabetes
mellitus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2001;81:48-50.
67. Buendía-Eisman A, Ruiz-Villaverde R, Blasco-Melguizo J, Serrano-Ortega
S. Generalized annular granuloma: response to isotretinoin. Int J Dermatol.
2003;42:321-2.
68. Cyr PR. Diagnosis and management of granuloma annulare. Am Fam Physician.
2006;74:1729-34.
69. Sahin MT, Türel-Ermertcan A, Oztürkcan S, Türkdogan P. Generalized granuloma
annulare in a patient with type II diabetes mellitus: successful treatment with
isotretinoin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:111-4.
70. Muller SA. Dermatologic disorders associated with diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin
Proc. 1966;41:689-703.
71. Lowitt MH, Dover JS. Necrobiosis lipoidica. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;25:735-
48.
72. Muller SA, Winkelmann RK. Necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum: a clinical and
pathological investigation of 171 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1966;93:272-81.
73. Yosipovitch G, Hodak E, Vardi P, Shraga I, Karp M, Sprecher E. The prevalence of
cutaneous manifestations in IDDM patients and their association with diabetes risk
factors and microvascular complications. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:506-9.
74. Garza-Elizondo MA, Diaz-Jouanen E, Franco-Casique JJ, Alarcón-Segovia D. Joint
contractures and sclerodermalike skin changes in the hands of insulindependent
juvenile diabetes. J Rheumatol. 1983;10:797-800.
75. Jelinek JE. The skin in diabetes. Diabet Med. 1993;10:201-13.
76. Van Hattem S, Bootsma AH, Thio HB. Skin manifestations of diabetes. Cleve Clin
J Med. 2008;75:772, 774, 776-7.
77. Sibbald RG, Landolt SJ, Toth D. Skin and diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North
Am. 1996 Jun;25(2):463-72.
78. Petzelbauer P, Wolff K, Tappeiner G. Necrobiosis lipoidica: treatment with systemic
corticoids. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126:542-5.
79. Oumeish YO. Skin disorders in patients with diabetes. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26:235-
42.
80. Dahl MV, Ullman S, Fisher I. Direct immunofluorescence of granuloma annulare
and necrobiosis lipoidica. Clin Res. 1976;24:95a.
81. Quimby SR, Muller SA, Schroeter AL. The cutaneous immunopathology of
necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:1364-71.
82. Ullman S, Dahl MV. Necrobiosis lipoidica. An immunofluorescence study. Arch
Dermatol. 1977;113:1671-3.
83. Beattie PE, Dawe RS, Ibbotson SH, Ferguson J. UVA1 phototherapy for treatment
of necrobiosis lipoidica. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2006;31:235-8.
84. Nieboer C, Kalsbeek GL. Direct immunofluorescence studies in granuloma
annulare, necrobiosis lipoidica and granulomatosis disciformis Miescher.
Dermatologica. 1979;158:427-32.
85. Dwyer CM, Dick D. Ulceration in necrobiosis lipoidica: a case report and study.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1993;18:366-9.
86. Bauer M, Levan NE. Diabetic dermangiopathy. A spectrum including pretibial
pigmented patches and necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum. Br J Dermatol.
1970;83:528-35.
87. Ahmed I, Goldstein B. Diabetes mellitus. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24:237-46.
88. Ferringer T, Miller F 3rd. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Dermatol
Clin. 2002;20:483-92.
89. Cohen O, Yaniv R, Karasik A, Trau H. Necrobiosis lipoidica and diabetic control
revisited. Med Hypotheses. 1996;46:348-50.
90. Tokura Y, Mizushima Y, Hata M, Takigawa M. Necrobiosis lipoidica of the glans
penis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:921-4.
91. Nguyen K, Washenik K, Shupack J. Necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum treated
with chloroquine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:S34-6.
92. Alexis AF, Strober BE. Offlabel dermatologic uses of antiTNFa therapies. J Cutan
Med Surg. 2005;9:296-302.
93. Tabor CA, Parlette EC. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes. Signs of poor
glicemy control or newonset disease. Postgrad Med. 2006;119:38-44.
94. Ngo BT, Hayes KD, DiMiao DJ, Srinivasan SK, Huer ter CJ, Rendell MS. Cutaneous
manifestations of diabetic microangiopathy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6:225-37.
95. Frykberg RG, Zgonis T, Armstrong DG, Driver VR, Giurini JM, Kravitz SR, et al.
American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Diabetic foot disorders. A clinical
practice guideline (2006 revision). J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45:S1-66.
96. Geerlings SE, Hoepelman AI. Immune dysfunction in patients with diabetes
mellitus (DM). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1999;26:259-65.
97. Arnáiz-García ME, Alonso-Peña D, González-Vela Mdel C, García-Palomo
JD, Sanz-Giménez-Rico JR, Arnáiz-García AM. Cutaneous mucormycosis:
report of five cases and review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
2009;62:e434-41.
98. Passeron T, Or tonne JP: Physiopathology and genetics of vitiligo. J Autoimmun.
2005;25:63-8.
99. Moretti S, Spallanzani A, Amato L, Hautmann G, Gallerani I, Fabiani M, et al. New
insights into the pathogenesis of vitiligo: imbalance of epidermal cytokines at sites
of lesion. Pigment Cell Res. 2002;15:87-92.
100. Olasode A. Why vitiligo in diabetes? Egypt Dermatol Online J. 2005;1:8.
101. Huang CL, Nordlund JJ, Boissy R. Vitiligo: a manifestation of apoptosis? Am J Clin
Dermatol. 2002;3:301-8.
102. Dittmar M, Kahaly GJ. Polyglandular autoimmune syndromes: Immunogenetics
and longterm followup. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:2983-92.
103. Forschner T, Buchholtz S, Stockfleth E. Current state of vitiligo therapyevidencebased
analysis of the literature. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007;5:467-75.
104. Tsoi LC, Spain SL, Knight J, Ellinghaus E, Stuart PE, Capon F, et al. Identification
of 15 new psoriasis susceptibility loci highlights the role of innate immunity. Nat
Genet. 2012 Dec;44(12):1341-8.
105. Gisondi P, Galvan A, Idolazzi L, Girolomoni G. Management of moderate to severe
psoriasis in patients with metabolic comorbidities. Front Med (Lausanne). 2015
Jan 21;2:1.
106. Gisondi P, Girolomoni G. Impact of TNFα antagonists on the quality of life in
selected skin diseases. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2013;148:243-8.
107. Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. Consenso Brasileiro de Psoríase 2012.
Guias de Avaliação e Tratamento. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Sociedade Brasileira de
Dermatologia; 2012.
108. Grundy SM, Brewer HB Jr, Cleeman JI, Smith SC Jr, Lenfant C; American Hear t
Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Definition of metabolic
syndrome: report of the National Hear t, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart
Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation.
2004;109:433-8.
109. Gisondi P, Girolomoni G. Cardiometabolic comorbidities and the approach to
patients with psoriasis. Actas Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2009;100:14-21.
110. Sommer DM, Jenisch S, Suchan M, Christophers E, Weichenthal M. Increased
prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in patients with moderate to severe
psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2006;298:321-8.
111. Armstrong AW, Harskamp CT, Armstrong EJ. The association between psoriasis
and obesity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies. Nutr
Diabetes. 2012 Dec 3;2:e54.
112. Setty AR, Curhan G, Choi HK. Obesity, waist circumference, weight change,
and the risk of psoriasis in women: nurses’ health study II. Arch Intern Med.
2007;167:1670-5.
18 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
How to cite this article: MendesAL,MiotHA,HaddadJuniorV.Diabetesmellitusandtheskin.AnBrasDermatol.
2017;92(1):8-20.
Mailing address:
Vidal Haddad Junior
Departamento de Dermatologia
Caixa Postal 557
18618 970 Botucatu, SP.
Tel: 14 3880 1259
Email: haddadjr@fmb.unesp.br
113. Gelfand JM, Troxel AB, Lewis JD, Kurd SK, Shin DB, Wang X, et al. The risk of
mortality in patients with psoriasis: results from a populationbased study. Arch
Dermatol. 2007;143:1493-9.
114. Davidovici BB, Sattar N, Prinz J, Puig L, Emery P, Barker JN, et al. Psoriasis and
systemic inflammatory diseases: potential mechanistic links between skin disease
and comorbid conditions. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:1785-96.
115. Boehncke WH, Boehncke S, Tobin AM, Kirby B. The ‘psoriatic march’: a concept
of how severe psoriasis may drive cardiovascular comorbidity. Exp Dermatol.
2011;20:303-7.
116. Hansson GK, Hermansson A. The immune system in atherosclerosis. Nat
Immunol. 2011;12:204-12.
Diabetes mellitus and the skin 19
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
Questions
s
1. Diabetes mellitus is considered a modern epidemic. The dis-
ease affects about:
a) 1.2% of adults
b) 8.3% of adults
c) 34.2% of adults
d) 9.4% of adults
2. Acanthosis nigricans is not associated with:
a) certain malignancies such as gastric cancer
b) high doses of niacinamide
c) typeAinsulinresistance
d) nodular melanoma
3. Regarding bullosis diabeticorum, select the wrong answer:
a) diabetic blisters occurs in approximately 0.5% of diabetic pa-
tients
b) the preferredlocalizationaretheback and side of the hands
and the arms
c) the diagnosis is made on clinical basis
d) the blisters are usually painless and non pruritic
4. Diabetic dermopathy is (select the wrong answer):
a) themostcommonspecicskinlesioninpatientswithdiabetes
b) associated with cardiovascular disease
c) a pathognomonic sign for diabetes
d) typically located bilaterally in pretibial regions and distributed
asymmetrically
5. The differential diagnosis of diabetic dermopathy includes (se-
lect the wrong answer):
a) Schamberg’sdisease(progressivepigmentedpurpuricderma-
titis)
b) stasispigmenteddermatitis,scarringlesions
c) factitious dermatitis
d) atopic dermatitis
6. Buschke´s scleredema (select the wrong answer):
a) is characterized by symmetrical and diffuse thickening with
hardening of the skin
b) affectsmainlytheface,trunk,neckandupperlimbs
c) is common in middle-aged men
d) is associated with diabetes mellitus in about 90% of cases.
7. Granuloma annulare is a benign and self-limited dermatitis
that (select the wrong answer):
a)is characterized by papules which often assume an annular
conguration
b) affects twice as many men than women
c) the generalized perforating form is characterized by umbili-
cated papules of about 4mm most commonly seen in children
and young adults
d) disappeared lesions have about 40% chance to reappear
8.Necrobiosislipoidicadiabeticorum(selectthewronganswer):
a) is not exclusive to diabetics because up to a third of cases occur
in nondiabetic patients
b) approximately 35% of the lesions progress to ulceration
c) typical lesions start up in the pretibial areas
d)conrmeddiagnosisofdiabetes,abnormalplasmaglucoseora
family history of diabetes occur in 40% of patients
9. The diabetic foot is a severe complication that (select the wrong
answer):
a) should be treated only by the dermatologist
b) is a chronic ulcer that evolves after trauma or over a callus
caused by changes in points with altered sensitivity caused by
diabetes neuropathy
c) In the US, is responsible for 70% of lower limb amputations
annually
d) if the pulses are palpable, energetic therapeutic measures as
the debridement and dressing usually heal the wound in a few
weeks
10. Rubeosis is a vascular erythema on the face and neck that (se-
lect the wrong answer):
a) is observed in up to 60% of patients with diabetes
b) reectspoorglycemiccontrol
c) becomes clinically evident by facial venous dilatation
d) the tight glucose control is not important for the treatment of
the disease
11. The eruptive xanthomas (select the wrong answer):
a) are observed when there is a marked exacerbation of triglycer-
idelevels(greaterthan700mg/dL)
b) appearaspapules in discreteor conuent domes,withwaxy
yellow centers and an erythematous base
c) thelesionsmaydeveloprapidlyoverthebuttocks,elbows,and
knees
d) do not resolve with proper correction of hypertriglyceridemia.
12. The most common fungal infections in diabetes mellitus (se-
lect the wrong answer):
a) is candidiasis, especially vulvovaginal, balanopreputial, and
angular stomatitis
b) vulvovaginal candidiasis is almost universal among diabetic
women in the long term and is a common cause of vulvar itch-
ing during periods of glycosuria
c)treatmentdoesnotneedglycemiccontrol,onlytopicalorsys-
temic treatment for Candida sp.
d)other common supercial mycoses indiabetics are extensive
pityriasis versicolor and dermatophytoses
20 Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad Jr V
An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92(1):8-20.
13. Which disease is not associated with diabetes mellitus?
a) lupus erythematosus
b) alopecia areata
c) acne conglobata
d) lichen planus
14.Vitiligo can coexist with other disorders of autoimmune etiol-
ogy, especially:
a) thyroiditis
b) type 2 diabetes
c) hipoparatathyreoidism
d) alopecia areata
15. Patients with diabetes may have thickening and hardening of
the skin (select the wrong answer):
a) of the dorsal region of the toes as well as the epidermis overly-
ingthejointsofthefootandtoes
b) these changes are more common in type 1 patients
c) occur in up to 50% of the patients
d) the cause seems to be the glicosylation of proteins
16. The etiology of the granuloma annulare is unknown, but ap-
pears that is not involved with:
a) infectionssuchasHIV
b) thyroid diseases
c) psoriasis
d) malignancy
17. Which body site is not compromised by the necrobiosis
lipoidica diabeticorum?
a) foot
b) oral mucosa
c) abdomen
d) penis
18. Bacterial infections in diabetes may be varied and severe.
Mark the wrong option:
a) are mainly caused by Staphylococcus or Pseudomonas
b) recurrent erysipelas may also occur, as necrotizing/bullous
erysipelas are commoner among diabetics.
c) External otitis by Pseudomonas is a mild condition in diabetics
d) the bacterial infections in diabetics have to be considered care-
fullyandrequirehospitalizationduetothesevercompromise
of immune response
19. Which drug is not used in the treatment of the necrobiosis li-
poidica diabeticorum?
a) intralesionalinjectionandoraluseofcorticosteroidsortopical
threads under occlusion
b) clofazimine
c) tamoxifen
d) acetylsalicylic acid
20. Select the correct answer:
a) Diabetes mellitus is a high prevalent systemic metabolic disor-
der whose cutaneous manifestations can help in early diagno-
sis,asreecteither theglycemiccontrol,organiccompromise
or overall disease prognosis.
b) Proper glycemic control and primary prevention of organ-
specicdamageshouldbereinforcedbydermatologists
c) many dermatologic manifestations during diabetes are not re-
latedtoglycemiclevelsnordenitelyassociatedtothedisease
d) all the statements are correct
Answer key
Palmar hyperhidrosis: clinical, pathophysiological, diagnostic
andtherapeuticaspects..2016;91(6):716-25.
1- C
2- B
3- D
4- D
5- A
6- D
7- B
8- C
9- D
10- C
11- B
12- A
13- B
14- C
15- C
16- C
17- B
18- D
19- B
20- B
Papers
Informationforallmembers: TheEMC-D questionnaire
isnow available atthehomepage of theBrazilianAnnals of
Dermatology: www.anaisdedermatologia.org.br. The dead-
lineforcompletingthequestionnaireis30daysfromthedate
of online publication.