Content uploaded by Edvárd Mizsei
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Edvárd Mizsei on Feb 01, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Accepted by H. Zaher: 24 Nov. 2016; published: 1 Feb. 2017
ZOOTAXA
ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)
ISSN
1175-5334
(online edition)
Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press
Zootaxa 4227 (1): 075
–
088
http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/
Article
75
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4227.1.4
http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:02913469-1D04-4A2E-A816-993C2FD1731E
Nuclear markers support the mitochondrial phylogeny of Vipera ursinii–renardi
complex (Squamata: Viperidae) and species status for the Greek meadow viper
EDVÁRD MIZSEI
1,10,*
, DANIEL JABLONSKI
2,*
, STEPHANOS A. ROUSSOS
3,4
, MARIA DIMAKI
5
,
YANNIS IOANNIDIS
6
, GÖRAN NILSON
7
& ZOLTÁN T. NAGY
8,9
1
Department of Evolutionary Zoology & Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
2
Department of Zoology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
3
Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, 79409-3131, USA
4
Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, 76203, USA
5
Goulandris Natural History Museum, 100 Othonos St., 145 62 Kifissia, Greece
6
Biosphere, Aidiniou 40, 172 36 Ymittos, Greece
7
Göteborg Natural History Museum, Box 7283, SE-402 35 Göteborg, Sweden
8
Joint Experimental Molecular Unit, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
9
Museum für Naturkunde, Invalidenstr. 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
10
Corresponding author. E-mail: edvardmizsei@gmail.com
*
These authors contributed equally to this work
Abstract
Meadow vipers (Vipera ursinii–renardi complex) are small-bodied snakes that live in either lowland grasslands or mon-
tane subalpine-alpine meadows spanning a distribution from France to western China. This complex has previously been
the focus of several taxonomic studies which were based mainly on morphological, allozyme or immunological characters
and did not clearly resolve the relationships between the various taxa. Recent mitochondrial DNA analyses found unex-
pected relationships within the complex which had taxonomical consequences for the detected lineages. The most surpris-
ing was the basal phylogenetic position of Vipera ursinii graeca, a taxon described almost 30 years ago from the
mountains of Greece. We present here new analyses of three nuclear markers (BDNF, NT3, PRLR; a first for studies of
meadow and steppe vipers) as well as analyses of newly obtained mitochondrial DNA sequences (CYT B, ND4).Our
Bayesian analyses of nuclear sequences are concordant with previous studies of mitochondrial DNA, in that the phyloge-
netic position of the graeca clade is a clearly distinguished and distinct lineage separated from all other taxa in the com-
plex. These phylogenetic results are also supported by a distinct morphology, ecology and isolated distribution of this
unique taxon. Based on several data sets and an integrative species concept we recommend to elevate this taxon to species
level: Vipera graeca Nilson & Andrén, 1988 stat. nov.
Key words: Albania, Balkan Peninsula, endemic, Greece, nDNA, Pindos mountains, snake, subspecies
Introduction
Meadow vipers (Vipera ursinii–renardi complex) are small-bodied vipers that live in either lowland grasslands or
montane subalpine-alpine meadows. Most of these taxa have highly fragmented distributions, spanning from
eastern France to western China (Nilson & Andrén 2001). European members of the V. ursinii–renardi complex are
among the most endangered species of the European herpetofauna and their systematics and evolutionary histories
have been in the focus recently (see Nilson & Andrén 2001 for review and Tuniyev et al. 2010; Ferchaud et al.
2012; Gvoždík et al. 2012; Zinenko et al. 2015). Based on an extensive analysis of morphology, three groups have
been detected within the V. ursinii–renardi complex (Nilson & Andrén 2001); the ursinii group (“meadow vipers”:
ursinii, macrops, graeca, moldavica, rakosiensis), the “Transcaucasian–Turkish” group (anatolica, ebneri,
eriwanensis, lotievi), and the renardi group (“steppe vipers”: renardi, altaica, tienshanica, parursinii). Over the
past two decades, some of the formerly recognized subspecies within these groups were elevated to full species
MIZSEI ET AL.
76
·
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
status based on morphological, allozyme or immunological differences (e.g. V. eriwanensis Nilson et al. 1993, V.
renardi Kotenko et al. 1999; Nilson & Andrén 2001, V. anatolica and V. e b n e r i Nilson & Andrén 2001).
The molecular phylogeny of meadow and steppe vipers has not been fully resolved due to limited knowledge
on certain taxa or inadequate sampling in analyses, although great strides have been made and clarified several
evolutionary relationships (Kalyabina-Hauf et al. 2004; Ferchaud et al. 2012; Gvoždík et al. 2012; Zinenko et al.
2015). According to the latest mitochondrial phylogeny, the most recent common ancestor of the complex has
Pliocene origin, located presumably in the region between the eastern Mediterranean and the former Paratethys
(Zinenko et al. 2015). Members of the major mitochondrial clades probably radiated in the Anatolian-
Transcaucasian region (renardi clade) and on the Balkan Peninsula (ursinii clade) with subsequent colonization
patterns to the western and eastern parts of central Europe forming the present geographic distributions (Ferchaud
et al. 2012; Zinenko et al. 2015).
Based on these most recent studies, there is a need for taxonomical investigation and reassessments for taxa
with unexpected phylogenetic positions in the whole genus; or more specifically the V. ursinii–renardi complex
(see Ferchaud et al. 2012; Zinenko et al. 2015). In such a case, nuclear DNA loci (nDNA) could help corroborate
the pattern and be used to better resolve the evolutionary relationships and taxonomy of meadow vipers, but this
has yet to be done.
A member of the genus with a surprising phylogenetic placement is the Greek meadow viper, Vipera ursinii
graeca Nilson & Andrén, 1988, which is a rare taxon described three decades ago. The species lives in high
elevation meadows (1600–2300 m) of the central and southwestern Hellenides mountain range (Dimitropoulos
1985; Nilson & Andrén 1988; Korsós et al. 2008; Mizsei et al. 2016). According to the phylogenetic study of
Ferchaud et al. (2012), V. u. graeca is sister to all other clades of ursinii and renardi in the V. ursinii–renardi
complex and forms a distinct, divergent clade sister to the others, isolated in fragmented habitats in the Pindos
mountains. Similar results have been reported by Zinenko et al. (2015) who also included samples from Vi pera
anatolica, and a seemingly relict population of Vipera kaznakovi which is highly divergent. As there is fairly strong
consensus between taxonomic units in reptiles using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analyses (Joger et al. 2007),
Ferchaud et al. (2012) proposed V. u . graeca as a possible candidate for full species status. However, taking a
multilocus approach, in this day and age, is the most widely used and strongly supported data and results when
discerning species and implementing taxonomic assessments (Torstrom et al. 2014). Using molecular methods,
taxonomy is currently experiencing a new boom with many re-evaluated or newly described reptile taxa also in
such well-known region as is Europe (e.g. Dinarolacerta, Malpolon; Carranza et al. 2006; Ljubisavljević et al.
2007 and Speybroeck et al. 2010 for review). Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyse nDNA loci in the V.
ursinii-renardi complex, to see if the results concur with previous mtDNA studies, and resolve the taxonomic
status and phylogenetic placement of V. u. graeca.
Material and methods
Geographic and taxon sampling. Two samples of V. u . graeca from Albania were included in this study (Mizsei
et al. 2016), both representing the same mtDNA haplotype as the published sequences from Greece in previous
studies (CYT B, ND4; Ferchaud et al. 2012). Other specimens investigated were samples representing montane
populations of Vipera ursinii macrops (Albania, Montenegro), V. u. ursinii (Italy), V. ursinii ssp. (an undescribed
lineage from Croatia), lowland vipers V. u. moldavica (Romania) and V. u. rakosiensis (Hungary, Romania), V.
renardi (Crimea) as well as three subspecies of the common adder V. berus; berus (Hungary), bosniensis (Albania)
and nikolskii (Romania) (see Fig. 1 and Table 1 for details) as outgroup taxa.
DNA extraction and sequencing. We selected two mitochondrial markers (CYT B, ND4) and three nuclear
markers (BDNF, NT3, PRLR) shown to be successful in discriminating on various divergence levels among several
reptile species (Joger et al. 2007; Townsend et al. 2008). We used the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and the
NucleoSpin Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel) for extracting total genomic DNA. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
conditions for amplifying mitochondrial CYT B and ND4 genes were followed protocols outlined in Ferchaud et al.
(2012). The genes were amplified using the primers shown in Table 2. PCR conditions for PRLR and BDNF were
as follows; 180 seconds at 94°C, followed by 40 steps of 94°C (40s), 50°C (30s), 72°C (60s) and a final elongation
step of 7 min at 72°C. PCR conditions for NT3 were 180 seconds at 94°C, followed by 40 steps of 94°C (40s),
48°C (30s), 72°C (60s) and a final elongation step of 7 min at 72°C.
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
·
77
GREEK MEADOW VIPER TAXONOMY
TABLE 1. List of samples used in this study and GenBank accession numbers of sequenced markers.
Taxon ID in this study Country Population mitochondrial DNA nuclear DNA
CYT B ND4 PRLR BDNF NT3
Vipera berus berus Vbbe-HU Hungary Zemplén JN204721 † ** LT220998 ● LT221007 ● LT220962 ● LT220980 ●
Vipera berus bosniensis Vbbo-AL Albania Prokletije LT220959 ● LT220999 ● LT221008 ● LT220963 ● LT220981 ●
Vipera berus nikolskii Vbni-RO Romania Iaşi - LT221005 ● LT221018 ● LT220973 ● LT220991 ●
Vipera ursinii ursinii Vuur-IT Italy Camerino FR727041 ‡ * LT221006 ● LT221024 ● LT220979 ● LT220997 ●
Vipera ursinii ssp. Vurs-HR1 Croatia Velebit FR727052 ‡ FR726984 ‡ LT221009 ● LT220964 ● LT220982 ●
Vipera ursinii ssp. Vurs-HR2 Croatia Velebit FR727053 ‡ FR726985 ‡ LT221010 ● LT220965 ● LT220983 ●
Vipera ursinii macrops Vumc-AL1 Albania Korab LT220961 ● LT221000 ● LT221013 ● LT220968 ● LT220986 ●
Vipera ursinii macrops Vumc-MN1 Montenegro Bjelasica FR727058 ‡ * LT221001 ● LT221014 ● LT220969 ● LT220987 ●
Vipera ursinii macrops Vumc-MN2 Montenegro Bjesalica FR727059 ‡ * LT221002 ● LT221015 ● LT220970 ● LT220988 ●
Vipera ursinii rakosiensis Vura-HU1 Hungary Nagypuszta FR745956 ‡ FR745905 ‡ LT221019 ● LT220974 ● LT220992●
Vipera ursinii rakosiensis Vura-RO Romania Csengerpuszta FR745989 ‡ FR745901 ‡ LT221020 ● LT220975 ● LT220993 ●
Vipera ursinii rakosiensis Vura-HU2 Hungary Fűzfa-szigetek FR745959 ‡ FR745900 ‡ * LT221021 ● LT220976 ● LT220994 ●
Vipera ursinii moldavica Vuml-RO1 Romania Iaşi JN204699 † * LT221003 ● LT221016 ● LT220971 ● LT220989 ●
Vipera ursinii moldavica Vuml-RO2 Romania Iaşi JN204700 † * LT221004 ● LT221017 ● LT220972 ● LT220990 ●
Vipera renardi Vren-CM1 Ukraine Crimea FR745991 ‡ * FR745893 ‡ * LT221022 ● LT220977 ● LT220995 ●
Vipera renardi Vren-CM2 Ukraine Crimea FR745992 ‡ * FR745894 ‡ * LT221023 ● LT220978 ● LT220996 ●
Vipera graeca stat. nov. Vgre-AL1 Albania Dhëmbel LT220960 ● LN835177 ♦ LT221011 ● LT220966 ● LT220984 ●
Vipera graeca stat. nov. Vgre-AL2 Albania Trebeshinë HG940677 ● * HG940672 ♦ LT221012 ● LT220967 ● LT220985 ●
†Gvoždík et al. 2012; ‡Ferchaud et al. 2012; ♦Mizsei et al. 2016; ●present study;
* not the same individual as for nDNA sequencing, but same population;
** not the same individual as for nDNA sequencing, but same taxon; - missing sequence.
MIZSEI ET AL.
78
·
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
TABLE 2. Primers used in this study.
FIGURE 1. Sampled localities inside the approximate distribution area of Vipera ursinii–renardi complex in Europe. Circles
indicate sampling localities of Vipera ursinii–renardi complex, and triangles show the sampling of outgroup taxa. A diamond
indicates the type locality of Vipera graeca stat. nov. This figure is published in colour in the online version, the colour of the
patches corresponds to the colour of mitochondrial lineages in Fig. 2A.
PCR products were purified with High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche) or on NucleoFast 96 PCR
plates (Macherey-Nagel) using vacuum filtering. DNA sequencing was performed using BigDye v1.1 (Life
Technologies) for cycle sequencing reaction and DNA sequencing was performed on an ABI 3130xl capillary
sequencer (Life Technologies).
Phylogenetic analyses. Sequences were assembled and aligned using CodonCode Aligner v5 (CodonCode
Corp.) and chromatograms were checked visually in order to clean the sequences. Coding gene fragments were
Primer Gene Reference Sequence
L14724Vb CYT B Ursenbacher et al. 2006 5'-GATCTGAAAAACCACCGTTG-3'
H15914Vb CYT B Ursenbacher et al. 2006 5'-AAATAGAAAGTATCATTCTGGTTTAAT-3'
ND4 ND4 Arevalo et al. 1994 5'-CACCTATGACTACCAAAAGCTCATGTAGAAGC-3'
H12763V ND4 Wüster et al. 2008 5'-TTCTATCACTTGGATTTGCACCA-3'
BDNFf BDNF Townsend et al. 2008 5'-GACCATCCTTTTCCTKACTATGGTTATTTCATACTT-3'
BDNFr BDNF Townsend et al. 2008 5'-CTATCTTCCCCTTTTAATGGTCAGTGTACAAAC-3'
NT3-F3 NT3 Noonan & Chippindale 2006 5'-ATATTTCTGGCTTTTCTCTGTGGC-3'
NT3-R4 NT3 Noonan & Chippindale 2006 5'-GCGTTTCATAAAAATATTGTTTGACC-3'
PRLR_f1 PRLR Townsend et al. 2008 5'-GACARYGARGACCAGCAACTRATGCC-3'
PRLR_r3 PRLR Townsend et al. 2008 5'-GACYTTGTGRACTTCYACRTAATCCAT-3'
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
·
79
GREEK MEADOW VIPER TAXONOMY
trimmed and translated into amino acids; no stop codons were observed. For this study, a complete dataset of two
mitochondrial and three nuclear markers was analysed for all samples/localities, except the Vipera berus nikolskii
specimen where CYT B sequence was missing and the gap was replaced by “N” in the analysis.
Heterozygous positions in nuclear genes were manually identified based on the presence of double peaks in
chromatograms. Identified heterozygous loci were coded according to the IUPAC ambiguity codes.
For the purpose of allele network construction, sequences with more than one heterozygous position (detected
in the presence of two peaks of approximately equal height at a single nucleotide site of BDNF, NT3, PRLR) were
resolved in PHASE 2.1.1 (Stephens et al. 2001) for which the input data for PHASE were prepared in SeqPHASE
(Flot 2010). PHASE was run under default settings except the probability threshold, which was set to 0.7.
Haplotype networks of the three nuclear markers (BDNF, NT3, PRLR) were drawn using TCS 1.21 (Clement et al.
2000) with 95% connection limit. New sequences were deposited in the GenBank (Table 1).
The best-fit codon-partitioning schemes and the best-fit substitution models for phylogenetic analyses were
selected using PartitionFinder v1.1.1. (Lanfear et al. 2012) separately for each dataset and methodological
approach (i.e. models available in the used software) with the following parameters: Bayesian approach (BA) -
linked branch length; all models; BIC model selection; greedy schemes search; data blocks by codons for each used
marker. The best partitioning scheme and models of nucleotide substitutions were: 1
st
position of CYT B (TrN), 2
nd
position of CYT B (HKY + I), 3
rd
position of CYT B (HKY), 1
st
+ 3
rd
positions of ND4 (HKY + I), 2
nd
position of
ND4 (HKY + G), BDNF (K80), NT3 (K80), PRLR (TrN). A Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis following the
same procedure as above (the best model in this case was the GTR+G+I with a single partition). The number of
variable (V) and parsimony informative (Pi) sites were calculated in DnaSP 5.10 (Librado & Rozas 2009).
To resolve phylogenetic relationships we analysed the own obtained dataset consisting of mitochondrial (1788
bp) and nuclear (1715 bp) sequence data. To show and confirm relationships based on the mtDNA (full sequences
for all taxa of ursinii–renardi complex were available only for CYT B; 1116 bp) we recalculated dataset of
Ferchaud et al. (2012) together with a Vipera anatolica sequence of Zinenko et al. (2015) and our new graeca
sequences. Mitochondrial phylogenetic trees were inferred using the BA performed with MrBayes 3.2.1 (Ronquist
et al. 2012) and ML analysis performed with RAxML 8.0 (Stamatakis 2014). Each codon position treated
separately was selected as the best-fit partitioning scheme for BA (see above). The BA analysis was set as follows;
two separate runs, with four chains for each run, 10 million generations with trees sampled every 100
th
generation.
First 20% of trees were discarded as the burn–in after inspection for stationarity of log–likelihood scores of
sampled trees in Tracer 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2013; all parameters had effective sample sizes of > 200). A majority–
rule consensus tree was drawn from the post–burn–in samples and posterior probabilities were calculated as the
frequency of samples recovering any particular clade. The same procedure was performed with the concatenated
dataset of all genes with a final length of 3503 bp. Sequences of nuclear genes were not phased and partitioned by
genes due to low level of divergence. Both protein-coding genes (CYT B, ND4) were partitioned by codon position.
Nodes with posterior probability (pp) values ≥ 0.95 were considered as strongly supported. The ML clade support
was assessed by 1000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates.
The NeighborNet algorithm (Bryant & Moulton 2004) implemented in the software SplitsTree 4.10 (Huson &
Bryant 2006) was used to generate a phylogenetic network of the phased dataset. To assess the support for the
observed structure, bootstrap analysis was performed with 1000 pseudoreplicates. Nodes were considered strongly
supported if they received bootstrap values > 70%. This phylogenetic analysis is a powerful tool for visualizing
conflicting and consistent information present in the dataset (Huson & Bryant 2006).
Species tree estimation. Coalescent-based species tree estimation (STE) was performed with *BEAST v.1.8.0
(Drummond et al. 2012a) with the same dataset used in the phylogenetic network analysis. Because *BEAST
assumes no recombination within loci (Heled & Drummond 2010), we tested for the presence of recombination
within all nuclear loci analysed using RDP4 (Martin et al. 2010). Alignments of both mtDNA and all four nDNA
genes were imported independently into BEAUti 1.7.5 (Drummond et al. 2012a). Nuclear genes were phased prior
to analysis as described above. Three individual runs were performed for 5 × 10
7
generations with a sampling
frequency of 5000. Appropriate substitution models are specified as above and priors applied are as follows
(otherwise by default): Coalescence–Yule process of speciation; random starting tree, substitution rate fixed to 1;
strict clock; base substitution Uniform (0, 100); alpha Uniform (0, 100); initial = 0.5; clock rate Uniform (0, 1).
Parameter values both for clock and substitution models were unlinked across partitions and trees for the mtDNA
partitions were linked. Each run of STE was analysed in Tracer v.1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2013) to confirm that
MIZSEI ET AL.
80
·
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
stationarity, convergence and effective sample sizes (ESS) were sufficient for all parameters (posterior ESS values
> 300). LogCombiner and TreeAnnotator (both available in *BEAST package) were used to infer the ultrametric
tree after discarding 10% of the samples from each run and the production of the chronogram. A maximum clade
credibility tree from the sampled trees was produced using TreeAnnotator. Apart from producing a maximum clade
credibility tree of the full dataset (mtDNA + nDNA), we visualized all post burn-in sampled trees from all three
runs (27 000 trees) using DensiTree 2.1.11 (Bouckaert 2010), which allows superimposing all the sampled trees.
Nodes were considered strongly supported if they received posterior probability (pp) values > 0.95.
Results
Our dataset included 18 specimens of the genus Viper a; three samples of Vipera berus for outgroup (subspecies
berus, bosniensis and nikolskii) as a species phylogenetically very close to the Vipera ursinii–renardi complex, two
samples of Vipera renardi complex and 13 samples of Vipera ursinii complex (subspecies graeca, macrops,
moldavica, rakosiensis, ursinii and ursinii ssp. from Croatia; see Ferchaud et al. 2012, Zinenko et al. 2015 for
details about mitochondrial phylogeny). The dataset included mitochondrial gene fragments of CYT B (1043 bp, V
= 142, Pi = 107) and ND4 (747 bp, V = 101, Pi = 80) and nuclear gene fragments of BDNF (663 bp, V = 5, Pi = 4),
NT3 (497 bp, V = 14, Pi = 10) and PRLR (553 bp, V = 17, Pi = 15) totalling to 3503 bp (Table 1). No evidence of
recombination was detected within the nuclear loci.
Phylogenetic reconstructions and allele networks. Phylogenetic analyses (BA, ML) and phylogenetic
network (Fig. 2) constructed from the mitochondrial as well as from the concatenated dataset resulted in a topology
concordant with main clades as observed in the mtDNA phylogeny of Ferchaud et al. (2012) and Zinenko et al.
(2015) (Fig. 2). High Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥ 0.95; Fig. 2A, 2B) and bootstrap support values (> 70; Fig.
2A,B,C) were noted for the graeca clade as well as for most of other included clades (Fig. 2). Concatenated
mtDNA + nDNA data set revealed four deeply divergent clades within the ursinii–renardi complex, with a high
degree of structure corresponding to divergent lineages (see Fig. 2). There is strong support for the graeca clade
and for clade covering the V. u. moldavica, V. u. rakosiensis and V. u. macrops subclades. Similarly to mtDNA tree,
a clade covering V. u. ursinii and V. ursinii ssp. was not supported by BA analysis. The clade covering Vi per a
renardi–eriwanensis subclades is not supported in concatenated dataset probably due to missing data of
eriwanensis subclade.
The networks constructed for the phased haplotypes of the full length nuclear markers BDNF (6 unique
haplotypes), NT3 (9 haplotypes) and PRLR (12 haplotypes) are presented in Fig. 3. A very low level of haplotype
variability was detected for the BDNF marker. The NT3 marker was more variable with five haplotypes within the
ursinii group. The most variable marker was the PRLR with six haplotypes in the ursinii group. This marker shows
Vumc-MN1b allele among two alleles of Croatian population probably due to incomplete lineage sorting (=
ancestral polymorphism). Alleles of the graeca clade belong to distinct haplotypes in all three nuclear loci,
however, they share a haplotype of BDNF with Italian V. u. ursinii. These results indicate that alleles of NT3 and
PRLR are clearly unique for graeca, and in case of NT3, the haplotype of graeca is highly diverged from all other
taxa by six mutation steps (Fig. 3). Furthermore, alleles of the graeca lineage always represent one particular
haplotype which support evolutionary distinction among the taxa analysed including V. b e r u s.
Species tree. All three independent *BEAST runs converged, ESS values of all parameters in all runs
exceeded 200, a critical value suggested by the *BEAST manual (Drummond et al. 2012b) indicating adequate
mixing of the MCMC analyses. The ESS of the likelihoods was > 4000. The topology inferred from the maximum
clade credibility species tree based on the mitochondrial and nuclear loci was the same as the mtDNA gene tree of
Ferchaud et al. (2012), and similar to the topology Zinenko et al. (2015) (Fig. 2A). The graeca lineage is sister to
all other members of the ursinii–renardi group, and V. renardi is the sister lineage to the ursinii group. Within the V.
ursinii group, the montane vipers of V. u. ursinii and V. ursinii ssp. from Croatia form a clade sister to a lowland-
montane clade of V. u. rakosiensis, V. u. moldavica and V. u. macrops. Most relationships were highly supported (>
0.95) except the relationship between V. u. ursinii and V. ursinii ssp.. Considering the focus of this study, the graeca
lineage was confirmed as a highly supported and basal lineage within the V. ursinii–renardi complex according to
the *BEAST analysis (Fig. 4, pp = 1.00).
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
·
81
GREEK MEADOW VIPER TAXONOMY
FIGURE 2. (A) Current mitochondrial Bayesian phylogenetic hypothesis of Vipera ursinii–renardi complex based on CYT B
dataset of Ferchaud et al. (2012) and Zinenko et al. (2015); (B) Phylogenetic reconstruction of the concatenated dataset
(mtDNA+nDNA genes) obtained in MrBayes/Maximum likelihood (see Table 1). Sequences of Vipera berus (Vbbe-HU,
Vbbo-AL, Vbni-RO) included as outgroup are not shown. Bayesian posterior probabilities/bootstrap pseudoreplicates are
shown at nodes; (C) SplitsTree phylogenetic network (Huson & Bryant 2006) of the dataset for five mitochondrial and nuclear
loci sequenced in the present study using the neighbornet algorithm. Asterisks in Fig. 2C indicate both phased sequences in one
branch. Numbers along the edges are the bootstrap support values from 1000 replicates. The scale bar indicates one substitution
per one hundred nucleotide positions. Taxon names of the phylogenetic network correspond with the Table 1. Inset shows a
male Greek Meadow Viper from Dhëmbel Mountains, Albania.
MIZSEI ET AL.
82
·
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
FIGURE 3. Nuclear allele networks of the three analysed nuclear loci. Circle sizes are proportional to the number of samples/
sequences, small black circles indicate hypothetical haplotypes (alleles). This figure is published in colour in the online version,
the colour of the circles in the network corresponds to the colour of mitochondrial lineages in Fig. 2A.
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
·
83
GREEK MEADOW VIPER TAXONOMY
FIGURE 4. Species tree of the Vipera ursinii–renardi complex (with V. berus as outgroup) as inferred in *BEAST based on
two mitochondrial and three nuclear loci (A); species-tree cloudogram of the complex based on 27 000 post-burn-in trees
resulting from 3 runs of *BEAST, each producing 10,000 trees from which 10% was discarded as burn-in. Higher colour
densities represent higher levels of certainty. Maximum clade credibility tree is superimposed upon the cloudogram in bold
violet (B). Values of posterior probabilities are given. This figure is published in colour in the online version, the colours of the
branches correspond with the colour of mitochondrial lineages in Fig. 2A.
Systematics
In accordance with the evolutionary (Wiley 1978), general lineage (de Queiroz 1998), integrative taxonomic
(Miralles et al. 2010), phylogenetic (Cracraft 1983) and genetic species concepts (i.e. genetic species is a group of
genetically compatible interbreeding natural populations that is genetically isolated from other such groups; Baker
& Bradley 2006), we propose a full species rank for the Greek Meadow Viper to resolve the polyphyly in the
Vipera ursinii–renardi complex. This is supported by morphology, distribution, ecology and genetics (i.e.
multilocus approaches) as is described below.
MIZSEI ET AL.
84
·
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
Vipera graeca Nilson & Andrén, 1988 stat. nov.
Greek meadow viper
Vipera ursinii graeca Nilson & Andrén, 1988
Vipera macrops graeca Welch, 1994: 123
Holotype. Göteborg Natural History Museum, GNM Re. ex. 4942. Leg. Nilson & Andrén 1988.
Paratypes. GNM Re. ex. 6823 (six newborn), GNM Re. ex. 6849 (ZIG 146), GNM Re. ex. 6850 (ZIG 147),
GNM Re. ex. 6851 (ZIG 142) + GNM ZIG 145. Leg. Nilson & Andrén 1988.
Terra typica. Peristeri, Lakmos Mountains in the central Pindos mountain range, 1900 m altitude, Greece
(Nilson & Andrén 1988).
Morphological Diagnosis. This taxon differs from all other members of V. ursinii–renardi complex by having
the following combination of morphological characters (Nilson & Andrén 1988; Nilson & Andrén 2001; Mizsei et
al. 2016): small body size (for males a snout to vent length (SVL) max. 40.6 cm, and tail length is 5.4 cm, and for
females a SVL max. 44.3 cm, and tail length is 4.1 cm); non-bilineate body ground colour pattern; white or bright
brownish-grey ventral colour; no dark spots on labial, lateral and dorsal sides of head except occipital and
postorbital stripes; dorsal zigzag pattern tagged with pointed corners at windings, or consisting of a narrow
vertebral line only; 45–58 dorsal windings; nasal divided into two plates or united with nasorostralia; rostral as
high as broad; 2–8 loreals; 13–20 circumoculars; upper preocular not separated from nasal; 7–20 crown scales;
more fragmented parietals; 12–15 supralabials (sum of right and left sides); first three supralabials two times larger
than the following ones; third supralabial below orbit; 14–19 sublabials (sum of right and left sides); 3–5 mental
scales; early dorsal scale row reduction; 120–129 ventrals for males, 119–133 ventrals for females; lowest number
of subcaudals in the complex: 21–29 subcaudals for males, 13–26 subcaudals for females.
Molecular Diagnosis. The works of Ferchaud et al. (2012) and Zinenko et al. (2015) showed divergence of
Vipe ra graeca stat. nov. based on mtDNA datasets. Its distinction is supported by phylogenetic position (basal
taxon for all other species of the ursinii-renardi complex), time of divergence (the Middle Pliocene) and value of
uncorrected pairwise p–distances (4.5% in view of ursinii clade) as is defined by Ferchaud et al. (2012). All our
analyses based both on mitochondrial and nuclear loci support these results. Specimens in the study of Ferchaud et
al. (2012) originated from Stavros area in the Vardoussia Mts., Greece), but in the present study we used samples
from Albania. The specimens used here share the same CYT B and ND4 haplotypes as the previously analysed
Greek samples of Ferchaud et al. (2012). A single ND4 haplotype is presented by the southernmost (Stavros area,
Vardoussia Mts., Greece) and the northernmost populations (Tomorr Mts., Albania; Mizsei et al. 2016). Therefore,
a single haplotype is very likely to be present throughout most of the distribution area of this species. Because the
sequence variability of the nDNA regions is, in general, much less variable than mtDNA (Townsend et al. 2008),
we could use specimens originated from another locality than the type locality as they represent the same
phylogenetic pattern and position.
Distribution. The species occurs in the subalpine meadows of the Hellenides mountain system of southern
Albania and central Greece (Dimitropoulos 1985; Nilson & Andrén 1988; Nilson & Andrén 2001; Korsós et al.
2008; Mizsei et al. 2016). These localities are Koziakas, Lakmos (Peristeri; type locality), Metsovon, Oiti, Tsouka
Karali, Tzoumerka (Athamanika), Tymfristos, Vardoussia (including Stavros area) mountains in Greece, and
Dhëmbel, Llofiz, Lunxhërisë, Griba, Nemerçkë (crossborder mountain, called Nemertzika in Greek), Shëndelli,
Tomorr and Trebeshinë mountains in Albania. The entire distribution is extremely fragmented and each mountain
population is completely isolated by a large matrix of unsuitable habitat for the taxon consisting of deep valleys
and plains.
Ecology and habitats. A mosaic of open or closed grass and shrub communities formed on limestone
characterizes the main habitats of the taxon. Annual mean temperatures are about ~6°C, and the meadows are
partially covered by snow until early summer (May-June. South-facing slopes are usually more open and rocky
than north-facing slopes. Different species of Festuca, Poa and Sesleria dominate the open grasslands, and
characteristic shrubs are Juniperus sabina, Daphne oleoides and Astragalus creticus. Most of the observed vipers
were found close to shrubs or stone piles in south-facing habitat patches. The diet of the species consists mainly of
Orthoptera (97%) species, of which Stenobothrus rubicundulus, Platycleis sp., Decticus verrucivorus is the most
frequent prey (Mizsei et al. in prep.). The abundance of Orthopterans is high from June to September (Lemonnier-
Darcemont et al. 2015.). Known predators of the species are Vulpes vulpes, Falco tinnunculus and Circaetus
gallicus.
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
·
85
GREEK MEADOW VIPER TAXONOMY
Discussion
Our results of analysing two mitochondrial and three nuclear gene fragments support the distinct position of Vi per a
graeca stat. nov. first observed by the mtDNA results of Ferchaud et al. (2012). This was found in all four
analytical approaches used, i.e. gene phylogenetic reconstruction, phylogenetic network, allele (haplotype)
networks and coalescent species tree. Furthermore, the results support the uniqueness of the taxonomically
unrecognized meadow viper lineage from Croatia, which needs a formal description and further investigation. The
amendation of the subspecies status for V. graeca stat. nov. may influence the taxonomy of other taxa within V.
ursinii–renardi complex, and call to attention the revision of the taxonomic entities in this geographically and
evolutionary polytypic complex. It is important to use multiple loci in molecular approaches, and/or integrate other
morphological approaches to taxonomical assessments (e.g. using hemipenes or skull morphology) to resolve
complex relationships among taxa of meadow vipers.
The meristic morphology of V. graeca stat. nov. is very similar to V. u. macrops, as well as to other montane
populations of V. u r s i n i i s. l. Therefore it is not surprising that it was first described as a subspecies of V. ursinii
when it was discovered (Nilson & Andrén 1988). Albeit morphological characteristics function for the
determination of the taxon V. graeca stat. nov., there is a conflict between morphological and molecular evidence
(compare Nilson & Andrén 2001 and Ferchaud et al. 2012). Among European reptiles, incongruence between
morphological and molecular data is common in their phylogeny (see Pisani et al. 2007; Assis 2009; Gvoždík et al.
2010; Kindler et al. 2013 and references therein). Based on the hypothesis if suggested colonization and
diversification of the V. ursinii–renardi complex (Ferchaud et al. 2012; Zinenko et al. 2015), the shifts of steppe
like grassland habitats following climatic oscillations were not only latitudinal dispersion, but in the Hellenides
mountain complex also vertical (altitudinal) shifts. Thus, the meadow viper ancestors in the Balkans dispersed less
compared to other lineages, and the morphological similarity could be explained by the presence and higher
prevalence of plesiomorphic characteristics in taxa close to the radiation centre.
The extant distribution of V. graeca stat. nov. is severely fragmented (Mizsei et al. 2016), because the
populations are currently in interglacial refugial “sky-islands” of the Pindos mountains, surrounded by a sea of
coniferous/deciduous forests that make up the unsuitable habitat in the deep valleys below. This viper is threatened
because populations are completely isolated from each other in small patches, intentionally killed by local people
and are at risk over extinction vortices. Populations are probably very small due to microhabitat preferences, highly
susceptible to inbreeding depression and genetic drift. Climate change is a contemporary concern as warming
temperatures in the Mediterranean threaten the species’ habitat by tree encroachment and/or secondary
submediterranean grasslands (Kunstler et al. 2007). Following the IUCN Red List criteria the conservation status
of this taxon should be Endangered (B2abiii). Most suitable habitats are used as sheep, goat or cattle pastures, and
overgrazing has a direct negative effect on habitat structure in these meadows (Papanastasis et al. 2002). Our study
not only helped resolve some uncertainties within the V. ursinii–renardi complex but significantly contributes to
assessing the conservation status of V. graeca stat. nov., laying a platform for which future conservation efforts
may be initiated for this region.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank B. Halpern (Hungary), O. Zinenko (Ukraine), D. Jelić (Croatia), J. Crnobrnja-
Isailović (Serbia), and A. Strugariu (Romania) for providing tissue samples. Many thanks are given to J. Šmíd
(Czech Republic) for his kind comments to the analyses and to Z. Varga (Hungary) and G. Kardos (Hungary) for
their suggestions to the manuscript. Financial support of EM was provided by the Balassi Institute, Hungary (B2/
1SZ/12851) and DJ was supported by the Comenius University grants UK/20/2014, UK/37/2015 and by the Slovak
Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-0147-15. We are grateful to the three anonymous
referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.
References
Arevalo, E., Davis, S.K. & Sites, J.W. (1994) Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships among
eight chromosome races of the Sceloporus grammicus complex (Phrynosomatidae) in central Mexico. Systematic Biology,
MIZSEI ET AL.
86
·
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
43 (3), 387–418.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/43.3.387
Assis, L.C.S. (2009) Coherence, correspondence, and the renaissance of morphology in phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics,
25 (5), 528–544.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00261.x
Baker, R.J. & Bradley, R.D. (2006) Speciation in Mammals and the Genetic Species Concept. Journal of Mammalogy, 87 (4),
643–662.
https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1
Bouckaert, R.R. (2010) DensiTree: making sense of sets of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 26 (10), 1372–1373.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq110
Bryant, D. & Moulton, V. (2004) NeighborNet: an agglomerative algorithm for the construction of planar phylogenetic
networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21 (2), 255–265.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh018
Carranza, S., Arnold, E.N. & Pleguezuelos, J.M. (2006) Phylogeny, biogeography, and evolution of two Mediterranean snakes,
Malpolon monspessulanus and Hemorrhois hippocrepis (Squamata, Colubridae), using mtDNA sequences. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution, 40 (2), 532–546.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.028
Clement, M., Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology,
9 (10), 1657–1659.
https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x
Cracraft, J. (1983) Species concepts and speciation analysis. In: Johnston, R.F. (Ed.), Current Ornithology. Vol. 1. Springer US,
Boston, pp. 159–187.
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4615-6781-3_6
de Queiroz, K. (1998) The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual
unification and terminological recommendations. In: Howard, D.J. & Berlocher, S.H. (Eds.), Endless Forms: Species and
Speciation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 57–75.
Dimitropoulos, A. (1985) First records of Orsini’s viper, Vipera ursinii (Viperidae) in Greece. Annales Musei Goulandris, 7,
319–323.
Drummond, A.J., Suchard, M.A., Xie, D. & Rambaut, A. (2012a) Bayesian Phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7.
Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29 (8), 1969–1973.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss075
Drummond, A.J., Xie, W. & Heled, J. (2012b) Bayesian Inference of Species Trees from Multilocus Data using *BEAST.
Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/tutorials (accessed 20 December 2016)
Ferchaud, A.-L., Ursenbacher, S., Cheylan, M., Luiselli, L., Jelić, D., Halpern, B., Major, Á., Kotenko, T., Keyan, N.,
Crnobrnja-Isailović, J., Tomović, L., Ghira, I., Ioannidis, Y., Arnal, V. & Montgerald, C. (2012) Phylogeography of the
Vipera ursinii complex (Viperidae): mitochondrial markers reveal an east–west disjunction in the Palaearctic region.
Journal of Biogeography, 39 (10), 1836–1847.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02753.x
Flot, J.F. (2010) Seqphase: A web tool for interconverting phase input/output files and fasta sequence alignments. Molecular
Ecology Resources, 10 (1), 162–166.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02732.x
Gvoždík, V., Jandzik, D., Lymberakis, P., Jablonski, D. & Moravec, J. (2010) Slow worm, Anguis fragilis (Reptilia: Anguidae)
as a species complex: Genetic structure reveals deep divergences. Molecular Phylognetics and Evolution, 55 (2), 460–472.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.007
Gvoždík, V., Jandzik, D., Cordos, B., Rehák, I. & Kotlík, P. (2012) A mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of the endangered vipers
of the Vipera ursinii complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 62 (3), 1019–1024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.001
Heled, J. & Drummond, A.J. (2010) Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Molecular Biology and
Evolution, 27 (3), 570–580.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp274
Huson, D.H. & Bryant, D. (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and
Evolution, 23 (2), 254–267.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj030
Joger, U., Fritz, U., Guicking, D., Kalyabina-Hauf, S.A., Nagy, Z.T. & Wink. M. (2007) Phylogeography of western Palaearctic
reptiles – Spatial and temporal speciation patterns. Zoologischer Anzeiger – A Journal of Comparative Zoology, 246 (4),
293–313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2007.09.002
Kalyabina-Hauf, S.A., Schweiger, S., Joger, U., Mayer, W., Orlov, N. & Wink, M. (2004) Phylogeny and systematics of adders
(Vipera berus complex). In: Joger, U. & Wollesen, R. (Eds.), Mertensiella. Vol. 15. Verbreitung, Ökologie und Schutz der
Kreuzotter (Vipera berus [Linnaeus, 1758]). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Herpetologie und Terrarienkunde, pp. 7–16.
Kindler, C., Böhme, W., Corti, C., Gvoždík, V., Jablonski, D., Jandzik, D., Metallinou, M. Široký, P. & Fritz, U. (2013)
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
·
87
GREEK MEADOW VIPER TAXONOMY
Mitochondrial phylogeography, contact zones and taxonomy of grass snakes (Natrix natrix, N. megalocephala). Zoologica
Scripta, 42 (5), 458–472.
https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12018
Korsós, Z., Barina, Z. & Pifkó, D. (2008) First record of Vipera ursinii graeca in Albania (Reptilia: Serpentes, Viperidae). Acta
Herpetologica, 3 (2), 167–173.
https://doi.org/10.13128/Acta_Herpetol-2683
Kotenko, T., Morozov-Leonov, S.Y. & Mezhzherin, S.V. (1999) Biochemical genetic differentiation of the steppe viper (Vipera
ursinii group) in Ukraine and Romania. In: 10
th
Ordinary General Meeting of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica.
Natural History Museum of Crete, Irakleio. pp. 88–90.
Kunstler, G., Chaduf, J., Klein, E.K., Curt, T., Bounchaud, M. & Lepart, J. (2007) Tree colonization of sub-Mediterranean
grasslands: effects of dispersal limitation and shrub facilitation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37 (1), 103–115.
https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-225
Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S.Y.W. & Guindon, S. (2012) PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and
substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29 (6), 1695–1701.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss020
Lemonnier-Darcemont, M., Puskás, G. & Darcemont, C. (2015) First overview of the south Albanian Orthoptera fauna.
Articulata, 30, 63–80.
Librado, P. & Rozas, J. (2009) DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics,
25 (11), 1451–1452.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187
Ljubisavljević, K., Arribas, O., Džukić, G. & Carranza, S. (2007) Genetic and morphological differentiation of Mosor rock
lizard, Dinarolacerta mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886), with the description of a new species from the Prokletije
Mountain Massif (Montenegro) (Squamata: Lacertidae). Zootaxa, 1613, 1–22.
Martin, D.P., Lemey, P., Lott, M., Moulton, V., Posada, D., & Lefeuvre, P. (2010) RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program
for analysing recombination. Bioinformatics, 26 (19), 2462–2463.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq467
Miralles, A., Vasconcelos, R., Perera, A., Harris, D.J. & Carranza, S. (2010) An integrative taxonomic revision of the cape
Verdean skinks (Squamata, Scincidae). Zoologica Scripta, 40 (1), 16–44..
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00453.x
Mizsei, E., Üveges, B., Vági, B., Szabolcs, M., Lengyel, S., Pfliegler, W.P., Nagy, Z.T. & Tóth, J.P. (2016) Species distribution
modelling leads to the discovery of new populations of one of the least known European snakes, Vipera ursinii graeca, in
Albania. Amphibia-Reptilia, 37 (1), 55–68.
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-00003031
Nilson, G. & Andrén, C. (1988) A new subspecies of the subalpine meadow viper, Vipera ursinii (Bonaparte) (Reptilia,
Viperidae), from Greece. Zoologica Scripta, 17 (3), 311–314.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1988.tb00106.x
Nilson, G. & Andrén, C. (2001) The Meadow and Steppe Vipers of Europe and Asia - The Vipera (Acridophaga) ursinii
complex. Acta Zoologica, 47 (2–3), 87–267.
Nilson, G., Andrén, C. & Joger, U. (1993) A re-evaluation of the taxonomic status of the Moldavian steppe viper based on
immunological investigations, with a discussion of the hypothesis of secondary intergradation between Vipera ursinii
rakosiensis and Vipera (ursinii) renardi. Amphibia-Reptilia, 14 (1), 45–57.
https://doi.org/10.1163/156853893x00183
Noonan, B.P. & Chippindale, P.T. (2006) Dispersal and vicariance: The complex evolutionary history of boid snakes.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 40 (2), 347–358.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.010
Papanastasis, V.P., Kyriakakis, S. & Kazakis, G. (2002) Plant diversity in relation to overgrazing and burning in mountain
mediterranean ecosystems. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology, 3 (2–3), 53–63.
Pisani, D., Benton, M.J. & Wilkinson, M. (2007) Congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies. Acta Biotheoretica,
55 (3), 269–281.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-007-9015-8
Rambaut A., Suchard, M.A., Xie, W. & Drummond, A.J. (2013) Tracer v1.6. 796 the BEAST site. Available from: http://
beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer (accessed 20 December 2016)
Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D.L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M.A. &
Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model
space. Systematic Biology, 61 (3), 539–542.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
Speybroeck, J., Beukema, W. & Crochet, P.A. (2010) A tentative species list of the European herpetofauna (Amphibia and
Reptilia) – an update. Zootaxa, 2492, 1–27.
Stamatakis, A. (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies.
Bioinformatics, 30, 1312–3.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
MIZSEI ET AL.
88
·
Zootaxa 4227 (1) © 2017 Magnolia Press
Stephens, M., Smith, N.J. & Donnelly, P. (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data.
American Journal of Human Genetics, 68 (4), 978–989.
https://doi.org/10.1086/319501
Torstrom, S.M., Pangle K.L. & Swanson, B.J. (2014) Shedding subspecies: The influence of genetics on reptile subspecies
taxonomy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 76, 134–143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.03.011
Townsend, T.M., Alegre, R.E., Kelley, S.T., Weins, J.J. & Reeder, T.W. (2008) Rapid development of multiple nuclear loci for
phylogenetic analysis using genomic resources: an example from squamate reptiles. Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution, 47 (1), 129–142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.01.008
Tuniyev, B., Nilson, G. & Andrén, C., (2010) A new species of viper (Reptilia, Viperidae) from the Altay and Saur Mountains,
Kazakhstan. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 17 (2), 110–120.
Ursenbacher, S., Carlsson, M., Helfer, V., Tegelström, H. & Fumagalli, L. (2006) Phylogeography and Pleistocene refugia of
the adder (Vipera berus) as inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Molecular Ecology, 15 (11), 3425–3437.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03031.x
Welch, K.R.G. (1994) Snakes of the world. A Checklist I. Venomous snakes. KCM Books, Somerset, 135 pp.
Wiley, E.O. (1978) The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Systematic Zoology, 27 (1), 17–26.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2412809
Wüster, W., Peppin, L., Pook, C.E. & Walker, D.E. (2008) A nesting of vipers: Phylogeny and historical biogeography of the
Viperidae (Squamata: Serpentes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 49 (2), 445–459.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.08.019
Zinenko, O., Stümpel, N., Mazanaeva, L., Bakiev, A., Shiryaev, K., Pavlov, A., Kotenko, T., Kukushkin, O., Chikin, Y.,
Duisebayeva, T., Nilson, G., Orlov, N.L., Tuniyev, S., Ananjeva, N.B., Murphy, R.W. & Joger, U. (2015) Mitochondrial
phylogeny shows multiple independent ecological transitions and northern dispersion despite of Pleistocene glaciations in
meadow and steppe vipers (Vipera ursinii and Vipera renardi). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 84, 85–100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.12.005