Access to this full-text is provided by Taylor & Francis.
Content available from Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
© 2017 Atoum and Alzoughool. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.
php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work
you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For
permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
Breast Cancer - Targets and Therapy 2017:9 45–49
Breast Cancer - Targets and erapy Dovepress
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress 45
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
open access to scientific and medical research
Open Access Full Text Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S125652
Reduction in breast cancer susceptibility due
to XbaI gene polymorphism of alpha estrogen
receptor gene in Jordanians
Manar Fayiz Atoum
Foad Alzoughool
Department of Medical Laboratory
Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health,
Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
Abstract: Breast cancer is a global health concern among women worldwide. Estrogen recep-
tor alpha (ERα) mediates diverse polymorphic effects in breast tissues that may relate to breast
cancer susceptibility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of −397 PvuII (T/C) and
−351 XbaI (A/G) restriction fragment length polymorphism within intron 1 of ERα, and its
effect on breast cancer susceptibility. A total of 156 women who were histopathologically diag-
nosed with breast cancer and 142 healthy Jordanian women were enrolled in this case–control
study. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole peripheral blood, and the desired fragment was
amplified using polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction digestion with PvuII and XbaI
restriction enzymes. The results showed no significant association between PvuII polymorphism
and breast cancer risk. However, a significant association was found between XbaI polymorphism
and reduction in breast cancer risk within the “x” allele of heterozygotes (odds ratio [OR] 0.199,
95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09–0.044) and heterozygotes (OR 0.208, 95% CI 0.09–0.047).
The combined analysis of PvuII and XbaI polymorphisms revealed a synergistic effect of Pp/
Xx and pp/xx genotypes and a significant reduction in breast cancer risk with these genotypes.
The results also showed no statistical differences among PvuII or XbaI polymorphisms based on
stage, ER, progesterone receptor and expression of hormone receptor such as human epidermal
growth factor receptor 2. This case–control study showed that XbaI polymorphism of alpha
estrogen gene modified and reduced breast cancer susceptibility among Jordanians.
Keywords: breast cancer, gene polymorphism, XbaI
Introduction
Breast cancer is a serious life-threatening condition affecting women worldwide.1 It
ranks second among various causes of cancer death in women.2 In Jordan, 42.9% of
cancers diagnosed in women are breast cancers.3 Understanding the pathogenesis of
breast cancer is important in the innovative therapies for breast cancer diagnosis and
treatment. One of the most important risks of breast cancer is endogenous hormone
level. The genes of estrogen receptor (ER) pathway may influence breast cancer risk by
two possible mechanisms: 1) ER-mediated stimulation of breast cell proliferation with
a concomitant enhanced rate of mutations and 2) metabolism of estradiol to genotoxic
metabolites with a resulting increase in DNA mutations.4
Estrogen is a steroid hormone that is essential for the development of female
secondary sexual characters.4 Under normal conditions, it affects the growth, differen-
tiation and function of breast,5 uterus, vagina, ovary, testis, epididymis and prostate.6
However, under abnormal conditions, exposure to estrogen predisposes females to a
risk of developing breast cancer. Current hormonal therapies have benefited breast
Correspondence: Manar Fayiz Atoum
Department of Medical Laboratory
Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health,
Hashemite University, Zarqa 13115, Jordan
Tel +962 79 973 3894
Email manar@hu.edu.jo
Journal name: Breast Cancer - Targets and Therapy
Article Designation: Original Research
Year: 2017
Volume: 9
Running head verso: Atoum and Alzoughool
Running head recto: XbaI gene polymorphism in breast cancer reduction
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S125652
This article was published in the following Dove Press journal:
Breast Cancer - Targets and Therapy
24 January 2017
Number of times this article has been viewed
Breast Cancer - Targets and Therapy 2017:9
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
46
Atoum and Alzoughool
cancer patients. However, their success is often limited to
patients whose tumors express ERα, but entirely ineffective
in ER-negative breast cancers.7
ERs are of special interest as their expression is always
affected in malignant cancer cells.8 ERs are nuclear recep-
tor proteins that have an estrogen-binding domain and a
DNA-binding domain.9 There are two types of ERs: 1)
ERα that is localized on 6q25.1 and associated with breast
cancer and 2) ERβ that is located on chromosome 14q22-
24 and functions as a tumor suppressor.10 Polymorphisms
in the ER genes may determine the biosynthetic activity of
circulating estrogen.
Nearly over half of all types of breast cancers overex-
press ERα and ~70% of these respond to anti-estrogen.11
Elevated levels of ERα in benign breast epithelium indicate
an increased risk of breast cancer.12 ERα status is essential in
making decisions about endocrine therapy with anti-estrogen
since ERα (+) status correlates with improved prognosis and
better overall survival.9
ERα is regarded as one of the significant prognostic
factors for breast, ovarian and lung cancers,13 miscarriage
and endometriosis. Single nucleotide polymorphisms were
associated with increased risk of cancers.14 The most char-
acterized single nucleotide polymorphisms of ERα located
in the first intron are the c454-397T>C- and c454-351A>G-
site polymorphisms. These polymorphisms are 397 and 351
base pairs upstream of exon 2 and are detected by restriction
enzymes PvuII or XbaI, respectively.15 These polymorphisms
were correlated with breast cancer incidence.16 PvuII altered
protein expression by interfering with ERα mRNA splicing,
but the mechanism of action of XbaI is still unknown.
Genetic studies on cancer are scarce in Jordan and only
few studies have screened gene polymorphism in breast
cancer.17–20 To our knowledge, no studies have determined
the role of ERα PvuII and XbaI polymorphisms in breast
cancer susceptibility among Jordanians. Therefore, the aim
of this study was to determine the frequency of ERα PvuII
and XbaI genotypes and the possible involvement of these
polymorphisms in breast cancer susceptibility among Jorda-
nian women with breast cancer.
Materials and methods
This study enrolled 156 women who were histologically and
clinically diagnosed with breast cancer and 142 age-matched
controls with no previous family history of any cancer from
Al-Basheer Hospital (2013–2015). International review
board approval was obtained from the Hashemite University
international review board committee and signed consent
forms were obtained from all patients. All clinical samples
were staged according to Atoum et al.21
Genomic DNA was extracted from all blood samples
using Wizard extraction kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA)
and was stored at −80°C. Polymerase chain reaction was
carried out to amplify intron 1–exon 2 region of ERα gene
in three steps with annealing at 60°C in a thermal cycler
(Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) in 25 μL reaction volume.
Each reaction mixture contained 10 pmol of each primer,
3 mM of MgCl2, 100 nM of each deoxynucleotide tri-
phosphate, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase and 100 ng of
genomic DNA. Primer sequences are as follows: forward
primer: 5′ AGG GTT ATG TGG CAA TGA CG 3′; reverse
primer: 5′ CCT GCA CCA GAA TAT GTT ACC T 3′. The
amplified fragment of 1374 base pairs was then digested
with PvuII and XbaI. The presence of PvuII restriction
site on both alleles (pp) was identified by two fragments
(850, 450), while the presence of XbaI on both alleles
(xx) was identified by two fragments (900, 400). Digested
fragments were then electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel
with ethidium bromide.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software. The
distribution of genotypes in cancer patients and controls was
evaluated by the Chi-square test. Odds ratio (OR) and 95%
confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the relative
risk. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Genotypic distribution of ERα PvuII and XbaI is shown in
Table 1. With reference to PP genotype, no significant asso-
ciations were found between the variations of breast cancer
risk and P alleles in homozygotes or heterozygotes. There was
no statistical difference in the prevalence of P allele between
Table 1 Frequency of estrogen receptor alpha polymorphism
PvuII and XbaI among breast cancer patients and controls
Genotype Cases
n=156, n (%)
Controls
n=142, n (%)
OR 95% CI p-value
PP 24 (15.4) 19 (13.4) 1 NA NA
Pp/pp 132 (84.6) 123 (86.6) 1.18 0.61–2.25 0.62
Pp 87 (55.8) 82 (57.7) 1.19 0.61–2.33 0.61
pp 45 (28.8) 41 (28.9) 1.15 0.55–2.40 0.71
XX 39 (25) 9 (6.3) 1 NA NA
Xx/xx 117 (75) 133 (93.7) 0.203 0.09–0.43 0.0001
Xx 71 (45.5) 82 (57.7) 0.199 0.09–0.44 0.0001
xx 46 (29.5) 51 (35.9) 0.208 0.09–0.47 0.0002
Note: Signicant p-value <0.05.
Abbreviations: CI, condence interval; OR, odds ratio; NA, not available.
Breast Cancer - Targets and Therapy 2017:9 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
47
XbaI gene polymorphism in breast cancer reduction
cases (84.6%) and controls (86.6%). Nearly 15.4% of the
patients and 13.4% of the controls were homozygous for P
allele. About 55.8% of the patients and 57.7% of the controls
were heterozygous for this allele. No significant association
was found between breast cancer risk and P allele in het-
erozygotes (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.61–2.33) or homozygotes
(OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.55–2.40). A statistical difference was
observed in the prevalence of X allele between cases (75%)
and controls (93.7%). XbaI polymorphism in x allele was
more prevalent among controls (35.9%) compared to patients
with breast cancer (29.5%), (OR 0.208, 95% CI 0.09–0.47).
Combined analysis of PvuII and XbaI genotypes revealed
a synergistic effect of Pp/Xx (OR 0.11, 95% CI 1.19–9.66,
p = 0.03) and pp/xx (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02–0.58, p = 0.01)
as carriers of these genotypes showed reduced risk of breast
cancer (Table 2).
Table 3 shows the histological subtypes of different PvuII
and XbaI genotypes among women with breast cancer. No
statistical difference was found within either PvuII or XbaI
genotypes (p = 0.83, 0.81, respectively) among different
breast cancer stages.
No statistical differences were found among PvuII or
XbaI polymorphisms based on ER, progesterone receptor and
expression of hormone receptor such as human epidermal
growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (Table 4).
Discussion
This case–control study was conducted to analyze the asso-
ciation between PvuII and XbaI polymorphisms and breast
cancer risk among Jordanian females. No association between
the variation of breast cancer risk and pp genotype was found
Table 2 Breast cancer risk in relation to PvuII and XbaI
combination genotypes
Genotype Cases Control OR 95% CI p-value
PP/XX 8 2 1 NA NA
PP/Xx 10 8 0.31 0.05–1.90 0.20
PP/xx 6 14 0.107 0.01–0.66 0.16
Pp/XX 23 4 0.70 1.19–29.66 0.70
Pp/Xx 35 52 0.11 1.19–9.66 0.03
Pp/xx 29 31 0.28 0.04–1.19 0.08
pp/XX 8 3 0.67 0.08–5.12 0.69
pp/Xx 26 2 3.25 0.39–26.91 0.27
pp/xx 11 26 0.11 0.02–0.58 0.01
Note: Signicant p-value <0.05.
Abbreviations: CI, condence interval; OR, odds ratio; NA, not available.
Table 3 Breast cancer patient stages among PvuII and XbaI
genotypes
p-valueTotalStage IVStage IIIStage IIStage ICancer
genotype
0.832451171PP
872935221Pp
451121121pp
0.8139919110XX
711237202Xx
46923140xx
Note: Signicant p-value <0.05.
Table 4 Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and hormone
receptor HER2 among breast cancer cases
p-valueHER2
positive
PR positiveER positiveCancer
genotype
0.1991713PP
115148Pp
132821pp
339682Total
0.4371511XX
125053Xx
102623xx
299187Total
Abbreviations: ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human
epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
105
100
95
90
Survival (%)
85
80
246810 12
Months
xx genotype Non-xx genotype
14 16 18 20 22 24
Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier survival plot showing differences in survival probability among xx breast cancer genotype compared to non-xx genotype.
Breast Cancer - Targets and Therapy 2017:9
submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
48
Atoum and Alzoughool
compared to PP genotype, but a significant association was
found between reduced breast cancer risk and xx genotype
compared to XX genotype. Also no association was found
between the variation of breast cancer risk and PvuII or XbaI
genotypes based on breast cancer stages, presence of ER,
progesterone receptor and expression of hormone receptor
HER2 among breast cancer females. The results of this study
are in contrast with those of a Chinese study that analyzed
PvuII and XbaI for breast cancer risk. A significant associa-
tion was found between Pp and pp genotypes and increased
breast cancer risk, whereas no significant association was
found between Xx and xx genotypes and increased breast
cancer risk.22 The results of this study are also in contrast
with the results of another Chinese study that was conducted
among another Chinese group23; the results showed no effect
of PvuII and XbaI polymorphisms on breast cancer risk.
This study showed a significant association between reduced
breast cancer risk and xx genotype, in contrast to the results
of a study on Pakistani breast cancer patients,24 and similar
to the results of a study on Portuguese population where xx
genotype was associated with decreased breast cancer risk.16
This contradiction may be due to the large and different
biological processes where alpha estrogens and their recep-
tors are involved. The possible mechanisms by which PvuII
and XbaI polymorphisms affect breast cancer are still not
known. The position of PvuII and XbaI polymorphisms in the
intron near the promoter may contain regulatory sequences
like enhancers that affect the expression of alpha receptor
gene. Intronic enhancers act as regulatory sequences that
control transcriptional regulation.25 Nowadays, ERα has been
signaled as a possible marker for many diseases, including
different cancers and immunological diseases.
Conclusion
The results of this case–control study showed a significant
reduction in breast cancer risk in women carrying xx geno-
type. So further studies are needed with larger sample size
among different populations to clarify how ERα and XbaI
may modify an individual’s susceptibility to breast cancer
risk.
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge the Hashemite University for the financial
support to this project and the workers at Al-Basher Hospitals
for their help in sample collection.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures [webpage on the Internet]. American Cancer
Society. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-
statistics/breast-cancer-facts-figures.html. Accessed January 19, 2017.
2. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/detailedguide/breast-
cancer-key-statistics. Accessed December 1, 2016.
3. Jordanian Ministry of Health, 2008. Available from: http://www.breast-
cancer.org. Accessed December 1, 2016.
4. Santen RJ, Yue W, Wang JP. Estrogen metabolites and breast cancer.
Steroids. 2015;99(Pt A):61–66.
5. Lluch A, Eroles P, Perez-Fidalgo JA. Emerging EGFR antagonists for
breast cancer. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2014;19(2):165–181.
6. Shao R, Shi J, Liu H, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and
estrogen receptor α mediated epithelial dedifferentiation mark the devel-
opment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate. 2014;74(9):970–982.
7. Reeder-Hayes KE, Carey LA, Sikov WM. Clinical trials in triple nega-
tive breast cancer. Breast Dis. 2010;32(1–2):123–136.
8. Izadi P, Mehrdad N, Foruzandeh F, Reza NM. Association of poor prog-
nosis subtypes of breast cancer with estrogen receptor alpha methylation
in Iranian women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):4113–4117.
9. Heger Z, Rodrigo MA, Krizkova S, et al. Identification of estrogen
receptor proteins in breast cancer cells using matrix-assisted laser
desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (Review). Oncol
Lett. 2014;7(5):1341–1344.
10. Nakamura Y, Felizola SJ, Kurotaki Y, et al. Cyclin D1 (CCND1) expres-
sion is involved in estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) in human prostate
cancer. Prostate. 2013;73(6):590–595.
11. Santos-Martínez N, Díaz L, Ordaz-Rosado D, et al. Calcitriol restores
antiestrogen responsiveness in estrogen receptor negative breast can-
cer cells: a potential new therapeutic approach. BMC Cancer. 2014;
14:230.
12. Ali S, Coombes RC. Estrogen receptor alpha in human breast cancer:
occurrence and significance. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia.
2000;5(3):271–281.
13. Kuo LC, Cheng LC, Lin CJ, Li LA. Dioxin and estrogen signal-
ing in lung adenocarcinoma cells with different aryl hydrocarbon
receptor/estrogen receptor α phenotypes. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol.
2013;49(6):1064–1073.
14. Darabi H, Czene K, Wedrén S, et al. Genetic variation in the androgen
estrogen conversion pathway in relation to breast cancer prognosticators.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127(2):503–509.
15. Araújo KL, Rezende LC, Souza LC, et al. Prevalence of estrogen recep-
tor alpha PvuII(c454-397T>C) and XbaI (c454A>G) polymorphisms in
a population of Brazilian women. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2011;54(6).
16. Ramalhinho AC, Marques J, Fonseca-Moutinho JA, Breiten-
feld L. Genetic polymorphims of estrogen receptor alpha -397
PvuII(T>C) and -351 XbaI (A>G) in a portuguese population:
prevalence and relation with breast cancer susceptibility. Mol Biol Rep.
2013;40(8):5093–5103.
17. Atoum MF, Tanashat RQ, Mahmoud SA. Negative association of the
HLA-DQB1*02 allele with breast cancer development among Jorda-
nians. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(11):7007–7010.
18. Atoum MF, Tchoporyan MN. Association between circulating vitamin D,
the Taq1 vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and colorectal can-
cer risk among Jordanians. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(17):
7337–7341.
19. Atoum MF, AlKateeb D, AlHaj Mahmoud SA. The Fok1 vitamin D
receptor gene polymorphism and 25(OH) D serum levels and prostate
cancer among Jordanian men. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(6):
2227–2230.
20. Atoum MF. ACC interleukin-10 gene promoter haplotype as a breast
cancer risk factor predictor among Jordanian females. Onco Targets
Ther. 2016;9:3353–3357.
21. Atoum MF, Hourani HM, Shoter A, Al-Raheem SN, Al Muhrib TK.
TNM staging and classification (familial and nonfamilial) of breast
cancer in Jordanian females. Indian J Cancer. 2010;47(2):194–198.
Breast Cancer - Targets and Therapy 2017:9 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
Dovepress
Dovepress
Breast Cancer - Targets and erapy
Publish your work in this journal
Submit your manuscript here: https://www.dovepress.com/breast-cancer---targets-and-therapy-journal
Breast Cancer - Targets and Therapy is an international, peer-
reviewed open access journal focusing on breast cancer research,
identification of therapeutic targets and the optimal use of preven-
tative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved
outcomes, enhanced survival and quality of life for the cancer patient.
The manuscript management system is completely online and includes
a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit
http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from
published authors.
Dovepress
49
XbaI gene polymorphism in breast cancer reduction
22. Cai Q, Shu XO, Jin F, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in the estrogen recep-
tor alpha gene and risk of breast cancer: results from the Shanghai breast
cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(9):853–859.
23. Shen Y, Li DK, Wu J, Zhang Z, Gao E. Joint effects of the CYP1A1 MspI,
ERalpha PvuII, and ERalpha XbaI polymorphisms on the risk of breast
cancer: results from a population-based case-control study in Shanghai,
China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(2):342–347.
24. Javed S, Ali M, Sadia S, et al. Combined effect of menopause age and
genotype on occurrence of breast cancer risk in Pakistani population.
Maturitas. 2011;69(4):377–382.
25. Park SG, Hannenhalli S, Choi SS. Conservation in first introns is
positively associated with the number of exons within genes and the
presence of regulatory epigenetic signals. BMC Genomics. 2014;
15:526.
Content uploaded by Manar Atoum
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Manar Atoum on Jan 25, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.