ArticlePublisher preview available

Is there a Sunk Cost Effect in Committed Relationships?

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

The sunk cost effect occurs when a prior investment in one option leads to a continuous investment in that option, despite not being the best decision. The aim of the present paper was to study the role of the sunk cost effect in committed relationships. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 902) were presented with an unhappy relationship scenario in which they needed to make a choice: to stay or end the relationship. Results showed that the likelihood of participants staying in the relationship was higher when money and effort, but not time, had been previously invested in that relationship. In Experiment 2, the time investment was manipulated and the sunk cost was evaluated using a different methodology. Specifically, instead of having a dichotomous decision, participants (N = 275) choose how much time they would be willing to invest in the relationship. Results revealed a sunk time effect, that is, participants were willing to invest more time in a relationship in which more time had already been invested.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Is there a Sunk Cost Effect in Committed Relationships?
Sara Rego
1
&Joana Arantes
1
&Paula Magalhães
1
Published online: 29 November 2016
#Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016
Abstract The sunk cost effect occurs when a prior investment
in one option leads to a continuous investment in that option,
despite not being the best decision. The aim of the present
paper wasto study the role of the sunk cost effect in committed
relationships. In Experiment 1, participants (N=902)were
presented with an unhappy relationship scenario in which they
needed to make a choice: to stay or end the relationship.
Results showed that the likelihood of participants staying in
the relationship was higher when money and effort, but not
time, had been previously invested in that relationship. In
Experiment 2, the time investment was manipulated and the
sunk cost was evaluated using a different methodology.
Specifically, instead of having a dichotomous decision, partic-
ipants (N= 275) choose how much time they would be willing
to invest in the relationship. Results revealed a sunk time effect,
that is, participants were willing to invest more time in a rela-
tionship in which more time had already been invested.
Keywords Sunk cost effect .Time .Effort .Money .
Committed relationships
Every day individuals have to make decisions about a variety
of issues and, in many of these choice situations, deliberate in
terms of costs and benefits. Imagine that you have decided to
go to the cinema to watch a movie, about which you had high
expectations, and you paid $6 for the ticket. However, mid-
way through the movie you are increasingly bored and, even
though you have made a great effort to stay for the last hour,
the movie is not what you expected. Would you leave the
movie theater? The answer is probably BNo^. We could argue
that his choice was being influenced by your past investment
in terms of money, time, and effort watching the movie, there-
fore biasing your decision to stay until the end. This dilemma
is called the sunk cost effect (Arkes 1996; Arkes and Ayton
1999; Arkes and Blumer 1985). What about if you were in an
unhappy committed relationship? Would you leave or would
you stay? The aim of the present study is to understand wheth-
er the sunk cost effect influences this decision.
The sunk cost effect occurs when a prior investment of
money, effort, or time leads to a continuous investment in a
failing path of action when the logical response would be to
stop investing (Arkes and Blumer 1985). This is considered an
irrational economic behavior because only future costs and
benefits, not past costs, should influence decision making
(Bornstein and Chapman 1995) because past investments can-
not be undone. In the situation described above, the rational
behavior would be to leave the movie theater and use the time
for a walk, or other more pleasant activity, instead of staying
until the end of the movie due to the previous investment.
This effect has been documented in several studies with
humans (Arkes and Blumer 1985; Bornstein et al. 1999;
Coleman 2009; Cunha and Caldieraro 2009;Moon2001;
Navarro and Fantino 2007,2009; Staw and Fox 1977)and
nonhuman animals (Macaskill and Hackenberg 2012;
Magalhães and White 2013,2014; Navarro and Fantino
2005). The sunk cost effecthas also been observed in a variety
of contexts and with different methodologies, as well as in
laboratory (Keasey and Moon 2000;Moon2001) and field
settings (Arkes and Blumer 1985; Staw and Hoang 1995).
As evidenced by the literature, the sunk cost effect is a very
pervasive phenomenon and several explanatory theories to
explain it have arisen over the years. For example, according
*Paula Magalhães
pmagalhaes@psi.uminho.pt
1
Department of Basic Psychology, School of Psychology, University
of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
Curr Psychol (2018) 37:508519
DOI 10.1007/s12144-016-9529-9
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Važno je naglasiti da je greška uloženih sredstava sveprisutna u životu ljudi, te da se ona ne odnosi samo na novčana ulaganja, već i na ulaganje vremena, truda, kao i emocionalna investiranja u određen interpersonalni odnos (Rego et al., 2018), čak iako pojedinci nekad toga nisu svjesni. Glavni doprinos ovog istraživanja se vidi u tome da je pokazano da na prostorima gdje kultura nije ni pretežno individualistička, ni pretežno kolektivistička (Klarin et al., 2012), žene češće čine grešku uloženih sredstava. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The sunk cost fallacy is a form of cognitive bias that emerges when one decides to continue investing in activities where they have already invested many resources, despite diminished benefits. Recent findings allude to the fact that certain gender differences appear susceptible to this bias, that different professions are equally susceptible, and that the con- tinuation of investment emerges more often if several resources had been previously funded. This research aimed to investigate which determinants of the sunk cost fallacy are crucial for students who live in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The sample included 503 students (386 females) of different academic levels and faculties. Students were given several hypothetical situations where they could choose either to cease the investment (no-fallacy condition) or to continue the investment (fallacy condition). Continuation of investment was considered the fallacy-condi- tion since it emphasized that previously funded resources would not be returned even if they continued investing. The cessation of investments was considered the no-fallacy condition, as it suggested that respondents did not dwell on earlier failed investments. Determinants that were accounted for when studying the presence of the fallacy were students’ gender, academ- ic level, students’ monthly income, scientific field, and parental education level. A log-linear analysis indicated that only gender was a statistically significant predictor of susceptibility to the fallacy: women were more susceptible. An analysis of hypothetical situations showed that the susceptibility to the fallacy was most prominent when monetary stakes were the largest.
... Methods-wise, Rego et al. (2018) showed that although participants are more likely to stay in an unhealthy relationship when money, but not time, was invested, the effect of sunk time costs was stronger when the outcome was measured on a continuum scale (amount of time willing to invest in an unhappy relationship) rather than as a binary choice (whether or not to invest time). ...
Article
Full-text available
The sunk cost effect is the tendency for an individual’s decision making to be impacted by unrecoverable previous investments of resources. Soman (2001) found that sunk cost effect is weaker for time than for money (Studies 1 and 2) and that the facilitation of money-like accounting strengthens the sunk cost effect for time (Study 5). We conducted a Registered Report of a close, high-powered replication and extension of Soman’s (2001) Studies 1 and 2 and a conceptual replication of his Study 5 with an online sample of US American Amazon Mechanical Turk (N = 821). We found support for differences between sunk money costs and sunk time costs in Study 1 (original: ϕc = .61 [.43, .78]; replication: ϕc = .38 [.31, .45]), yet not in Study 2, in which we found sunk cost effects for both money and time (original: money – ϕc = .32 [.12, .52], time – ϕc = .02 [.00, .18]; replication: money – ϕc = .23 [.14, .33], time – ϕc = .32 [.23, .42]). In Study 5, we found no support for facilitation of money-like accounting as strengthening the sunk time cost effect. Materials, data, and code are available on: https://osf.io/pm264/.
... In the process, sunk costs are costs that have occurred in the past and are no longer relevant in the future but still influence decision-making to continue investing using stock applications [7][8][9]. The impact of perceived need will provide benefits for the basic needs of individual and cultural differences, so everyone needs to get satisfaction from needs fulfilled on contextual events such as problems that must be studied more deeply [10,11]. ...
Conference Paper
The presence of a digital stock investment application is an innovation in financial services. Because the implementation of this application is relatively new in Indonesia, service providers need to understand how their consumers behave. Therefore, this study aims to explore inertia, sunk costs, and perceived need that affect the sustainability of using digital stock investment application services and the effect of inertia on perceived need. This study targets 180 stock investment application users using a purposive sampling technique. Questionnaires were distributed online through social media. The Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) statistical technique was used to answer the research hypothesis. The study's results prove that all hypotheses are accepted: sunk cost, inertia, and perceived need have a positive and significant effect on continuance intention, and inertia has a positive and significant effect on perceived need. Finally, the perceived need positively and significantly affects continuing intention to use stock investment applications. This research provides a signal to service providers in developing digital investment application features and services to provide a good investment experience for each of its users
... Another factor in delaying the breakup was sunk cost bias, defined as when people continue the investment despite unfavourable outcomes due to time, money, or another resource invested. An experimental study on couples confirmed that participants were willing to invest more time in a relationship where more time had already been invested even at an unfavourable outcome (Rego et al., 2016)-WKs illusion of control accounts for the sunk cost bias in their relationship in addition to the time, energy, and compromises made for the relationship. ...
Article
Full-text available
White knights are individuals who enter into romantic relationships with damaged and vulnerable partners, hoping that love will transform their partner’s behaviour or life. Existing literature on white knight is limited to a handful of studies, primarily based on Western population. The present research aimed at developing a substantive theory on white knight syndrome in an Indian setting. The study follows a qualitative paradigm and the research design is grounded theory approach to be specific. Participants for the study were screened using Lamia’s white knight checklist. Data has been collected from eighteen young adults aged 18–25 years through semi-structured interviews. The data was analyzed using Strauss and Corbin grounded theory analysis. The study identified six phases—pre-relationship phase, needs exploration phase, shining white knight phase, drained white knight phase, golden realization phase, and finally delayed breakup. Along with the phases, the study identified factors, characteristics, and types of white knight. The study has implications in the clinical and counselling field in identifying and understanding white knight tendencies. Additionally, the theory is applicable in the Indian setting highlighting the intricate interaction between culture, norms, roles, and the recent social factors.
... The sunk-cost fallacy refers to the tendency to continue the endeavor following an investment of significant yet irreversible resources (Arkes & Blumer, 1985;Staw, 1976). It is a cognitive bias in decision-making whose influence is observed in various domains such as professional sports (Staw & Hoang, 1995), long-term memberships (Dick & Lord, 1998), human relationships (Rego et al., 2018), or animal behavior (Pattison et al., 2012). The fallacy is fundamental in that even objective information or feedback cannot completely eliminate it (Keefer, 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
The sunk‐cost fallacy is a well‐documented cognitive bias in the decision‐making literature. Although the emerging literature on childhood socioeconomic status suggests that early‐life environments shape individuals' decision strategies and have a long‐lasting impact on their decisions, little is known about the impact of childhood socioeconomic status on the sunk‐cost fallacy. Using two different scenarios and an actual choice task, we provide converging evidence that individuals who grew up in resource‐scarce environments (those with lower childhood socioeconomic status) are reluctant to abandon inferior choices merely because they have already invested substantial resources in them, resulting in the sunk‐cost fallacy. This fallacy occurs because individuals with lower childhood socioeconomic status tend to perceive the loss of their prior investments as more wasteful than those with higher childhood socioeconomic status.
... In relation to age, some previous research has indicated that older adults are less susceptible to the sunk-cost fallacy than younger adults (de Bruin et al., 2014;Strough et al., 2016). However, others have found the opposite (Rego et al., 2016). Baron et al. (1993) found that younger people were likely to commit the sunk-cost fallacy but that the likelihood of committing the fallacy did not differ across ages. ...
Article
Full-text available
A general economic principle is that when evaluating the costs of a decision, sunk costs should not be considered and that the decision-maker should consider only those costs that are incurred as a result of making that decision. However, both anecdotal and empirical evidence has shown that when making decisions, people are influenced by sunk costs, thereby committing the sunk-cost fallacy. A corpus of research has established that this fallacy occurs among different nations and cultures to differing extents or degrees. However, none of the previous research was conducted on Nigerians. This study, therefore, investigates whether Nigerians, too, commit this fallacy and then identifies factors that affect Nigerians’ susceptibility to the fallacy. Employing a binary logit model, it was found that about 49 per cent of the respondents to questions based on a decision-making vignette committed the sunk-cost fallacy. The results also showed that locus of cost responsibility (whether the cost was borne by the decision maker or another person on behalf of the decision maker) and ethnicity (whether the decision maker is Yoruba or not) were significant determinants of susceptibility to sunk-cost fallacy. This suggests that in Nigeria sunk-cost fallacy is intrapersonal and more prevalent among the Yorubas than among the Hausas or the Igbos. Therefore, the sunk-cost fallacy is ubiquitous and more likely in personal decisions than decisions made on behalf of others.
... Methods-wise, Rego et al. (2018) showed that although participants are more likely to stay in an unhealthy relationship when money, but not time, was invested, the effect of sunk time costs was stronger when the outcome was measured on a continuum scale (amount of Sunk cost effects for time versus money: Replication Registered Report of Soman (2001) 8 time willing to invest in an unhappy relationship) rather than as a binary choice (whether or not to invest time). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
The sunk cost effect is the tendency for an individual's decision-making to be impacted by unrecoverable previous investments of resources. Soman (2001) found that sunk cost effect is weaker for time than for money (Studies 1 and 2) and that the facilitation of money-like accounting strengthens the sunk cost effect for time (Study 5). We conducted a Registered Report of a close, high-powered, replication and extension of Soman (2001)’s Studies 1 and 2 and a conceptual replication of his Study 5 with an online sample of US American Amazon Mechanical Turk (N = 821). We found support for differences between sunk money costs and sunk time costs in Study 1 (original: φc = .61 [.43, .78]; replication: φc = .38 [.31, .45]), yet not in Study 2 in which we found sunk cost effects for both money and time (original: money - φc = .32 [.12, .52], time - φc = .02 [.00, .18]; replication: money - φc = .23 [.14, .33] , time - φc = .32 [.23, .42]). In Study 5, we found no support for facilitation of money-like accounting as strengthening the sunk time cost effect. Materials, data, and code are available on: https://osf.io/pm264/
Article
Statüko etkisi, mevcut ya da süregelen bir durumun, sadece öyle süregelmekte olduğu için tercih edilmesine yönelik bir bilişsel yanlılık olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Farkında olsak da olmasak da hayatlarımızın büyük bir kısmını etkilemektedir. Hayat boyu verdiğimiz binlerce kararda düşünsel zahmetten kurtulmak adına mevcut durumu veya süregelen tercihleri sürdürmeye meyletmekteyiz. Bu eğilim bizi çok enerji tüketen rasyonel düşünme zahmetine katlanmaktan alıkoyarken, irrasyonel kararlar almamıza da zemin hazırlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı bizi çoğu zaman eylemsizliğe iten bu yanlılığı açıklayacak teorik bir model önermektir. Literatür taraması sonucu statüko etkisinin açıklayanları kişisel özellikler ve başka bazı bilişsel yanlılıklar olarak ele alınmıştır. Bu yanlılıklar batık maliyet yanlılığı, kayıptan kaçınma ve ihmal yanlılığıdır. Öte yandan pişmanlıktan kaçınma davranışı da statüko etkisini doğrudan açıklama potansiyeli olan değişkenlerden biri olarak ele alınmıştır. Bilişsel yansıma değişkeni ise, insanların ikinci sistemlerini kullanabilme yeteneklerinin bir ölçüsü olarak, bütün bilişsel yanlılıkların temelinde olabileceği fikrinden hareketle modele dahil edilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Davranışsal İktisat, Statüko Yanlılığı, Bilişsel Yansıma, Batık Maliyet, İhmal Yanlılığı.
Article
Previous research has found that a negative life event is a main risk factor for hopelessness, which in turn is considered to be a proximal cause of major depression disorder and a suicide risk factor. Unfortunately, very little attention has been paid to the role of decision-making constructs between negative life events and hopelessness. To fill this gap, the present study aims to test the moderation role of sunk cost propensity in this relationship, which is an over-generalized tendency to persist, based on past investment. A total of 495 university students completed assessment of their resistance to sunk cost propensity, whereas the negative life events, hopelessness, mental health state (depression, anxiety) and big-five personality traits were measured by various questionnaires. Participants’ tendency to resist sunk cost propensity moderated the relationship between negative life events and hopelessness. Individuals who tended to resist sunk cost bias are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of negative life events. This effect is still significant, even after controlling for individuals’ psychological well-being (depression, anxiety) and big-five personality traits. The current findings provide preliminary evidence that resistance to sunk cost propensity may be an important characteristic associated with an individual’s hopelessness when exposed to a negative life event.
Thesis
Full-text available
Presented paper captures the issue of close relationships from the perspective of behaviorism, that is the philosophy of science on which behavior analysis is based. Therefore, it is a theoretical interpretation of the functioning and evolution of intimate relationships rather than a direct extrapolation of results from scientific research. The issues discussed relate to basic learning laws that govern human behavior and what results from them for close romantic relationships. The author makes a critical reinterpretation of the main theories explaining the genesis and functioning of romantic relationships, indicating that the core of dynamically occurring changes in the relationship, partner selection, as well as feelings and emotions occurring in close relationships are simple learning mechanisms that occur over time cumulatively.
Article
Full-text available
Reasoning and decision-making are fraught with systematic errors in thinking. One key example is sunk cost, a past investment that cannot be recovered, that influences ongoing decisions. A sunk cost bias occurs when previous choices affect present decisions. Sunk cost decision-making has been primarily studied in Western, individualistic cultures although some attention has been focused on comparing its prevalence in collectivist cultures such as Japan and China. We evaluated the influence of individualist and collectivist cultures, perceived control and the role of self. In Study 1 Americans and Indians were primed with cultural values and then presented with sunk cost decision scenarios. Results indicated Americans made more sunk cost decision errors than Indians and personal decisions were associated with more bias than decisions made on behalf of others. Cultural differences on sunk cost bias were consistent with self-justification theory. In Study 2 a new set of sunk cost scenarios varied environmental use and sustainability themes. Results indicated particular situations influenced error, although country of origin and perceived behavioral control were also effective at predicting sunk cost bias.
Article
Full-text available
Using data from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, we examined children's internalizing and externalizing behavior problems from age 5 to 15 years in relation to whether they had experienced a parental divorce. Children from divorced families had more behavior problems compared with a propensity-score-matched sample of children from intact families, according to both teachers and mothers. They exhibited more internalizing and externalizing problems at the first assessment after the parents' separation and at the last available assessment (age 11 years for teacher reports, or 15 years for mother reports). Divorce also predicted both short-term and long-term rank-order increases in behavior problems. Associations between divorce and child behavior problems were moderated by family income (assessed before the divorce) such that children from families with higher incomes prior to the separation had fewer internalizing problems than children from families with lower incomes prior to the separation. Higher levels of predivorce maternal sensitivity and child IQ also functioned as protective factors for children of divorce. Mediation analyses showed that children were more likely to exhibit behavior problems after the divorce if their postdivorce home environment was less supportive and stimulating, their mother was less sensitive and more depressed, and their household income was lower. We discuss avenues for intervention, particularly efforts to improve the quality of home environments in divorced families. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
We investigated the effect of prior investment on choice in pigeons, namely, the sunk cost effect, which is a tendency to continue an endeavor once a prior investment has been made, despite a better option being available. In a concurrent-chains procedure, pigeons chose between left and right keys in the choice phase leading to different work requirements in the outcome phase. Within each session, two components were signaled by red or green keys in the choice phase. Components were identical, except that in red components, the choice was preceded by a prior investment of 20 pecks on the left key, whereas in green components, the investment of 20 pecks was on the right key. Preference for the key with the prior investment was studied in a series of experiments in which we manipulated the absence or presence of the investment (Experiments 1a and 1b) and size of the investment (Experiments 2 and 3). We also investigated whether the bias observed was a result of carryover effects or of the sunk cost effect (Experiment 4). Overall, the results showed that choice was biased toward the alternative associated with the prior investment, consistent with the sunk cost effect, an effect that can be understood in terms of within-trial contrast and the delay-reduction hypothesis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Previous research has shown that individuals are most likely to escalate the amount of resources committed to a course of action when they have been personally responsible for negative consequences. The present study examined the process of escalation over three points in time and under four experimental conditions. A 2 X 2 X 3 factorial experiment was conducted in which personal responsibility, efficacy of resources, and time were the independent variables, and commitment of resources to a course of action was the dependent variable. The results replicated the escalation effect over an immediate time period, but showed that investment of resources in a course of action was not stable over time. Although there were immediate effects of personal responsibility and efficacy of resources upon escalation behavior, these two variables interacted with the time factor.
Book
This distinctive volume expands our understanding of couple resilience by identifying and exploring specific mechanisms unique to intimate relationships that facilitate positive adaptation to life challenges. Committed partnerships represent a unique form of relational alliance that offers an opportunity and challenge to go beyond the self - to develop as individuals and as a relationship. The contributors to this volume represent a range of perspectives that integrate conventional relationship science and innovative empirical and theoretical work on the importance of meaning-making, narrative construction, intersubjectivity, forgiveness, and positive emotion in couple life. The volume also offers a unique anchor point - We-ness as it relates to the intersection between shared, personal identity and well-being. Under-examined relational contexts such as resilience among LGBT partners and sexual resilience during illness adds further refinement of thought and application.
Conference Paper
Study participants rated the quality of several arguments for continuing an original plan in sunk cost situations in order to (a) avoid wasting resources, (b) learn to make better decisions, (c) punish poor decision making, and (d) appear consistent. The lesson-learning argument was perceived as most appropriate when adult teachers taught lessons to others, the original decision was carelessly made, or if it consumed comparatively more resources. Ratings of the lesson-learning argument were higher for teacher-learner than for adult-alone situations, regardless of whether the learner was a child or an adult. The implications for improving decision making and judging whether the sunk cost effect is a bias are discussed.
Article
Using retrospective survey data collected in the Netherlands in 2012, the author examined how childhood circumstances moderate the effect of an early parental divorce on relationships between fathers and adult children. Using adult children's reports about the frequency of contact and the quality of the relationship, he found strong negative effects of parental divorce. These effects are moderated by 3 childhood conditions. The more fathers were involved in childrearing during marriage, the less negative the divorce effect on father–child relationships. Father's resources also moderated the effect, with a smaller divorce effect for more highly educated fathers. Finally, high levels of interparental conflict reduce the impact of divorce as well, generalizing the stress relief effect to a new outcome. In general, the study shows that the impact of divorce is heterogeneous; that childhood circumstances play an important role in this; and that, under specific conditions, there is virtually no negative effect of parental divorce.
Article
This study represents one of the first quantitative field tests of the sunk-cost effect. We tested whether the amount teams spent for players in the National Basketball Association (NBA) influenced how much playing time players got and how long they stayed with NBA franchises. Sunk costs were operationalized by the order in which players were selected in the college draft. Draft order was then used to predict playing time, being traded, and survival in the NBA. Although one might logically expect that teams play and keep their most productive players, we found significant sunk-cost effects on each of these important personnel decisions. Results showed that teams granted more playing time to their most highly drafted players and retained them longer, even after controlling for players' on-court performance, injuries, trade status, and position played. These results are discussed in terms of their implications for both sunk-cost research and the broader literature on managerial decision making.