Article

CAT-score is a predictor for mortality in COPD

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Background: CAT (COPD Assessment Test) is a validated 8-item questionnaire designed to evaluate symptoms in COPD patients. Our study aimed to evaluate COPD symptoms as a marker for mortality, measured in total CAT-score as well as individual symptom scores. Methods: We included 285 patients with an established COPD diagnosis, admitted with COPD-exacerbation to several hospitals in Western Norway, using data from the Norwegian COPD Registry. All patients completed a CAT questionnaire before discharge, in addition, the patients performed a spirometry, arterial blood gas sampling, and had their BMI and co-morbidities evaluated. The patients were followed for up to 5 years. Mortality was evaluated using cox-regression, adjusting for sex, age, FEV1, BMI and blood gas analysis (hyperkapnia). Results: 118 of 285 patients died within follow up. Median CAT score at discharge was 24 of maximum 40 points. Increasing CAT score was significantly associated with higher mortality, HR 1.02 (1.01-1.04, p<0.01) for one point increase, or 1.24 (1.05-1.37, p<0.01) for 8 point (one fifth) increase, adjusted values. For the individual symptoms, breathlessness at stair walking, HR 1.31 (1.06-1.63, p<0.01) or domestic activity limitations, HR 1.35 (1.11-1.65, p<0.01) for 1 point (one fifth) increase, were both significantly associated with higher mortality (adjusted values). Other factors significantly associated with mortality were age, male sex, FEV1<30% of predicted, three or more comorbidities and hypercapnia. Conclusion: Increasing CAT score is associated with higher mortality, however, simply asking about breathlessness at stair walking or domestic activity limitations may give a better indication of mortality risk.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... The CAT is used to assess disease progression, decline in functional status, and gauge effectiveness of PR programs. CAT scores (scores 0 to 5, higher scores indicate higher impact) have been shown to correlate with mortality [74] as well as patient-reported symptom improvement [75]. The difference of two points is considered clinically important [72]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: To compare the role of low dose Theophylline and Tiotropium rotacap in improving the lung functions and day to day life of patients suffering from COPD. Study Design and Setting: A Clinical trial study was conducted at Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, BMSI in association with Department of Chest Medicine, JPMC. Methodology: This study was planned as an open label and parallel clinical trial study. A total of 168 patients of COPD were selected for this study and only 161 patients completed the 3 months duration of the study. The enrolled patients were grouped into 2, namely A and B. Tab. Theophylline 350 mg was given to Group A in two divided doses while Tiotropium rotacap18µg through rotahaler was given to group B once a day. Results: Mean FEV1 ± SD was improved by 0.04 ± 0.02 in Theophylline therapy group while by 0.07 ± 0.01 in the Tiotropium therapy treated group and a significant difference between the changes in the two treatment groups was evident. There was a percentage improvement in PEFR of 8.9 ± 5.8 in the Theophylline therapy treated group and of 13.2 ± 4.7 in Tiotropium therapy treated group. When Tiotropium group was compared with Theophylline group for improvement in percentage change in PEFR from day 0, a significant difference was evident between the two groups. There was a significant improvement from day 0 in CAT score in Tiotropium treated groups versus Theophylline group after 3 months of therapy. Conclusion: Tiotropium rotacap was more effective as compared to low dose Theophylline in improving pulmonary functions and CAT score in patients with COPD
Article
Objective Exacerbations in patients with COPD may still be unpredictable, although the general risk factors have been well defined. We aimed to determine the role of a novel parameter, area under flow-volume loop, in predicting severe exacerbations. Methods In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, 81 COPD patients over 40 years of age with high grade of dyspnea (having a CAT score of ≥10) and a history of ≥1 moderate exacerbation in the previous year were included. Area under flow-volume curve (AreaFE%) was obtained from pulmonary function test graph and calculated from Matlab programme. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent risk factors of the severe exacerbation. Results Patients with severe exacerbation (n = 70, 86.4%) were older. They had lower FEV1%, FVC%, 6MWD, AreaFE% and higher CAT score than patients without exacerbation. After performing multivariate analysis, high CAT score and low AreaFE% value were found to be independent risk factors for severe exacerbation (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.065–1.724; p = 0.01 and OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.732- 0.974; p = 0.02). Conclusions We found that a low AreaFE% value was an independent risk factor in addition to a high CAT score and these both have an excellent discriminative ability in predicting the risk of severe exacerbation
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.