Conference PaperPDF Available

GASOLINE C MADE WITH HYDROUS ETHANOL

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The consumption of ethanol fuel is increasing due to the higher costs of petrol and the increased participation of flex-fuel vehicles in the Brazilian passenger vehicle fleet. This paper presents some literature information, that Hydrous Ethanol (AEHC, or E100) can be used to make Gasoline C (E22) without water phase separation under typical Brazilian climate. This might present important improvement in ethanol production energy efficiency, less emission of Green House Gases (GHG), extra electrical energy to sell during the production periods and lower capital investments for the building of new plants. In Brazil two types of ethanol are used as automotive fuel: AEAC " Anhydrous Ethanol Fuel " with a maximum water content of 0.4% in volume; and AEHC " hydrous Ethanol Fuel " (E100) with a maximum water content of 4.9% in volume. The AEAC is mixed with about 22% in volume with Gasoline A (E0), to make Gasoline C (E22). The actual AEAC content in gasoline C is determined by legislation. Hydrous ethanol is produced by distillation of the fermented sugar-cane juice, up to a certain point, called the azeotropic point (about 95.6%), when water and alcohol can no longer be separated by fractional distillation. In order to produce AEAC about the same amount of energy used by the distillation is used by additional processes, the later equipment being of the Molecular Sieve type.
Content may be subject to copyright.
GASOLINE C MADE WITH HYDROUS ETHANOL
Orlando Volpato Filho
Delphi South America Technical Center – Brazil
orlando.volpato.filho@delphi.com
ABSTRACT
The consumption of ethanol fuel is increasing due to the higher costs of petrol and the increased
participation of flex-fuel vehicles in the Brazilian passenger vehicle fleet.
This paper presents some literature information, that Hydrous Ethanol (AEHC, or E100) can be used to
make Gasoline C (E22) without water phase separation under typical Brazilian climate.
This might present important improvement in ethanol production energy efficiency, less emission of
Green House Gases (GHG), extra electrical energy to sell during the production periods and lower capital
investments for the building of new plants.
In Brazil two types of ethanol are used as automotive fuel: AEAC “Anhydrous Ethanol Fuel” with a
maximum water content of 0.4% in volume; and AEHC “hydrous Ethanol Fuel” (E100) with a maximum
water content of 4.9% in volume. The AEAC is mixed with about 22% in volume with Gasoline A (E0),
to make Gasoline C (E22).
The actual AEAC content in gasoline C is determined by legislation. Hydrous ethanol is produced by
distillation of the fermented sugar-cane juice, up to a certain point, called the azeotropic point (about
95.6%), when water and alcohol can no longer be separated by fractional distillation.
In order to produce AEAC about the same amount of energy used by the distillation is used by additional
processes, the later equipment being of the Molecular Sieve type.
INTRODUCTION
In the quest for diminishing its dependence on foreign petrol, along with its vast agricultural capabilities,
Brazil launched the “Pró-Alcool” program giving tax Incentives to alcohol vehicles, after the first petrol
cost boom in the 70s.
Nowadays there are two fuel types available at the fuel station for passenger vehicles: E100 (AEHC) that
is the derived from simple distillation process and have about 4.9% water content in it [1] and Gasoline C
or E25, which is a mixture of 75% Gasoline A and 25% [2] in volume of anhydrous ethanol (AEAC) with
a maximum of 0.4% of water.
For emissions tests purposes it is used E22 [2] which has 78% Gasoline A and 22% of AEAC. The
gasoline C is made with anhydrous ethanol in order to have a very low temperature for phase separation of
less than -30 degrees Celsius.
Figure 1: Phase Separation Graph for Gasoline-Ethanol-Water
Water and ethanol are completely miscible with each other forming a stable substance at any temperature.
The same apply to gasoline-ethanol mixtures [12]. But water is not miscible with gasoline, although the
addition of ethanol makes gasoline miscible with water at some extent. As shown by the Gibbs Ternary
Fuel Diagram shown in figure 1 [12][14][18].
Figure 2: Water tolerance for Gasoline-Ethanol-Water mixtures.
Early studies of ethanol substitution of Lead tetraethyl and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) showed
that gasoline-ethanol-water mixtures are prone to phase separation at low temperatures [14]. See Figure 2,
above.
Climatic conditions in Brazil are such that the lowest recorded temperatures are around -5 degrees Celsius
[4]. In fact the last record occurred in São Joaquim (SC) on June 16
th
, 2008 when the lowest temperature
reached -5.4 degrees Celsius. See figure 3. Other low temperatures occurred on June 26
th
, 2004 in
Campos do Jordão (SP) when it reached -5.0 degrees Celcius [4]. . See figure 4.
Figure 3: Low temperature record for São Joaquim (SC) in 2008.
Figure 4: Low temperature record for Campos do Jordão (SP) in 2004.
These low temperatures happen only once a year for only a few hours. Cold chamber simulation of
Campos do Jordão low temperature record shows that the fuel line keep 1 or 2 degrees higher than the
external temperature due to the bad temperature conduction of fuel. . See figure 5.
Figure 5: Low temperature simulation in cold chamber.
As the charts show, the low temperatures happen only at specific spots in the country.
This paper will show that it is possible to use gasoline C made with hydrated ethanol (AEHC) with
minimum risk of phase separation due to Brazilian climate conditions.
Some advantages of using hydrated ethanol in the formulation of gasoline will explained in the next
chapter.
1. ETHANOL PRODUCTION ENERGY
Ethanol is produced by the bacterial fermentation of sugar-cane most up to the point of about 8.5%
ethanol concentration [5][11].
Using normal distillation techniques, the produced “beer” can only be purified to approximately 96%
which is known as the azeotropic point for water-ethanol distillation. See figure 6.
Once at a 96.4% ethanol/water concentration the vapor from the boiling mixture is also 96.4%. Further
distillation is therefore ineffective. This process uses about 2.7 MJ/l of ethanol.[5][13][18]
On the average 1 ton of sugar cane produces about 90 liters of hydrous ethanol (AEHC) and 85 liters of
anhydrous ethanol (AEAC). [5]
Every ton of sugar-cane has about 280 Kg of bagasse with 50% moisture and 280 Kg of leaves. They have
on the average a 7.5 MJ/Kg Lower Heat Value. [8][9][10]
In order to produce anhydrous ethanol, to be used as a gasoline additive more complex processes are used.
Figure 6. Distillation of ethanol-water mixture.
The most common processes are: a) azeotropic distillation using ciclo-hexane; b) extractive distillation
using Mono-ethilene Glicol (MeG) and c) molecular Sieves.
The dehydration using ciclo-hexane is used by about 85% of the ethanol plants and uses about 3.1 MJ/l of
anhydrous ethanol. .[5][13][18]
The extractive distillation using Mono-ethilene Glicol (MeG) is used by about 10% of the ethanol plants
and uses about 1.4 MJ/l of anhydrous ethanol. [5]
The dehydration using molecular sieves uses a zeolite that is pervious to the water molecules but not for
the ethanol molecules. It is used by about 5% of ethanol pants and uses about 1.6 MJ/l of energy. [18]
Considering the weighted average of these three methods the energy consumption to produce AEAC from
AEHC is 2.9 MJ/l which compares with the energy needed to produce AEHC.
The saved energy could be used to produce excess electricity which is sold by about R$140,00 per MWh.
Or the saved bagasse could be sold by R$13,00/ton.
2. GREEN HOUSE GASES EMISSIONS (GHG)
Regarding Green House Gases emissions for the production of ethanol [5] shows that the production of
anhydrous ethanol (AEAC) produces about 436 KgCO2eq/m-3 of ethanol and processed and hydrous
ethanol (AEHC) produces 417 KgCO2eq/m-3.
In order to grow one ton of sugar cane it takes from the atmosphere about 1556 KgCO2eq/m-3.
The current yearly production of AEAC to be used for the production of gasoline C is 4.5 billion liters.
Using AEHC the additional avoided GHG emissions could be 85.5 billion KgCO2eq. per year.
3. LABORATORY TESTS
Gasoline C was formulated using hydrated ethanol (AEHC) and the phase separation temperature was
measured using a low temperature bath.
E22 was produced by the mixture of 770.9 ml of gasoline A (E0) with 229.1 ml of AEHC. The ethanol as
put in becker and the gasoline was poured into it up to the total volume of 1000 ml at 20 degrees Celsius.
This fuel was called EH22. As the current ethanol percentage in fuel is 25% EH25 was produced with
260.3 ml of AEHC and 739.7 ml of gasoline A. This mixture was called EH25.
As there are some formulations that use some heavier alcohols to reduce the temperature where phase
separation occurs [14][18] it was also produced a EHi22 that is made of 770.9 ml of gasoline A (E0) ,
224.1 ml of AEHC and 5 ml of iso-propanol.
Figure 7: Gasoline, ethanol and water percentages for Exx and EHxx fuels.
Figure 8: detail of figure 7 above showing water concentrations for Exx and EHxx fuels.
The volume percentage variation of pure ethanol, gasoline and water for a blend between gasoline C (E20
or EH20) and Ethanol (E100) are shown in figure 7. The Figure 8 is the same as figure 7 showing the
detail of water percentage. One can see that for the gasoline made using anhydrous ethanol (AEAC) the
water content is very low. Also from this figure, one can see that the Gasoline C made with hydrated
ethanol (AEHC) has a water content slightly above 1%.
For the sake of reducing the phase separation temperature other alcohols can be isobutanol or tert-butanol
(TBA). The phase separation temperature was measured in laboratory per ASTM D 6422 – 99 standards.
The results are shown in table 1 below. As can be seen the EH25 mixture has a phase separation
temperature of -7 degrees Celsius which is lower than the -5 degrees that sometimes happen in Brazil.
Nowadays there is no denaturant, a substance that is added to make the ethanol fuel tastes bad for human
consumption, is added to the ethanol, there are some studies to use TBA or isopropanol as denaturant
[ANP].
Table 1: Phase separation temperature of some EHxx mixtures.
The addition of 1% TBA or isobutanol makes an EH15 mixture have a phase separation temperature
lower than -20 degrees Celsius [18].
4. FUTURE WORK
In the near future it would be interesting to measure and compare the pollutant emissions using E22 and
EH22 in order to assess the potential NOx reduction due to increased water content.
Further research of ethanol production energy balance and GHG emissions could lead to better understanding of
advantages of using AEHC for the production of Gasoline.
CONCLUSION
The paper showed the feasibility of producing gasoline C using hydrous ethanol for the particular climate
in Brazil.
The addition of 0.5-1% of isopropanol, isobutanol or TBA could push the phase separation temperature
for EH25 from -7 degrees Celsius to -10 or -20 degrees Celsius.
The avoided energy used for dehydration of hydrous ethanol for the production of anhydrous ethanol
could be used to produce electrical energy.
All this point to a cheaper gasoline C and Green House Gases emissions advantages.
REFERENCES
1. PANP 002/2002, "PORTARIA Nº 2, DE 16 DE JANEIRO DE 2002". http://www.anp.gov.br
2. PANP 309/2001, "PORTARIA Nº 309, DE 27 DE DEZEMBRO DE 2001". http://www.anp.gov.br
3. ASTM D 6422 99, "Standard Test Method for Water Tolerance (Phase Separation) of Gasoline-
Alcohol Blends"
4. INMET - Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia (www.inmet.gov.br)
5. Macedo IC, Seabra JEA, Silva JEAR. Green house gases emissions in the production and use of
ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: The.... Biomass and Bioenergy(2008),
doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.006
6. Carvalho, Luiz C.C. "COMPETITIVIDADE DO ETANOL BRASILEIRO" SEMINÁRIO BNDES,
25/08/03
7. Nogueira, Luiz A.H. "Balanço energético da produção de etanol de cana de açúcar" UNIFEI 2004
8. Heck, Joaquim. "Cogeração eletricidade a partir bagaço da cana"
9. Ribeiro, José E. "Bioeletricidade: A Segunda Revolução Energética da Cana de Açúcar". Rio de
Janeiro. 2005
10. Pessine, Roberto T. "Cogeração: IMPACTOS POSITIVOS E ADVERSOS NO MEIO AMBIENTE",
IEE-USP. São Paulo, 2008
11. Kvaalen, Eric, et al."AE-117: ALCOHOL DISTILLATION: BASIC PRINCIPLES, EQUIPMENT,
PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIPS, AND SAFETY" Purdue University
12. Bortolozzo, Glauco, et al. "Miscibilidade de Álcool Etílico, Gasolina e Água". VII Simpósio de
Engenharia Automotiva. Vol.2 pp.136-143. 1993
13. Meirelles, A.J.A. "Expansão da Produção de Bioetanol e Melhoria Tecnológica da Destilação
Alcoólica". Workshop Produção de Etanol. USP. 2006
14. Sijben, Johannes. PCT/NL/L2006/000298. "Motor Fuel Based on Gasoline and Ethanol"
15. Gil, I.D. et al. "SIMULATION OF ETHANOL EXTRACTIVE DISTILLATION WITH A GLYCOLS
MIXTURE AS ENTRAINER". 2nd. Mercosur Congress on Chemical Engineering. Rio de Janeiro. 2005
16. Rhys T. Dale and Wallace E. Tyner. "ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF ETHANOL
DRY MILLING: MODEL DESCRIPTION". Staff Paper: 06-04 April 2006. Purdue University
17. Karaosmanoglu, Filiz. SAE-932771 "Unleaded gasoline-azeotropic ethanol blends as fuels for spark
ignition engines" 1993
18. Keuken, Hans. "Hydrous Ethanol in Gasoline: A More Sustainable and Cost Effective Solution" HE
Blends BV 2007 (www.e15blends.com)
19. Daggett, Dave, et al. SAE-2004-01-3108 "Water Injection: Disruptive Technology to Reduce Airplane
Emissions and Maintenance Costs"
20. Hountalas, Dimitrios T. et al.SAE-2006-01-1414. "Use of Water Emulsion and Intake Water Injection
as NOx Reduction Techniques for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines "
21.
Hutchingame, Eric. "Reducing Exhaust Emissions W ith An On Demand System For Water in Fuel
Emulsification" Sea to Sky Pollution Solutions Corporation. 2006.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Water injection is an old aviation technology that was previously used to generate increased engine power during takeoff. If water injection were now to be used without increasing thrust, it could result in large reductions in takeoff NOx emissions and would most likely enable longer engine life and reduced operator costs. Due to the cooling action of evaporating water, a large temperature reduction will be experienced at the point where the water is injected into the engine. This could improve combustion emissions, such as temperature-sensitive NOx, and help reduce temperatures throughout the turbine section of the engine. The two current preferred methods of water injection are: (1) direct injection into the combustor, and (2) misting of the conditioned water before the engine's compressor. Combustor injection could achieve up to 90% NOx reduction and offer few implementation challenges as it has been used in aero-derivative industrial engines for over 30 years. For compressor water misting, the rate of water flow is limited to about 3% of the core air flow iii , and so could only achieve slightly more than 50% NOx reduction level but would offer larger reductions in turbine inlet temperature. Newer high bypass ratio (i.e. low fan pressure ratio) engines experience a higher thrust lapse rate as airplane altitude increases. This results in a longer period of time that the engine is operating at high core temperatures. In order to reduce these temperatures and improve engine life, both water injection systems were evaluated for use all the way to top of climb. Although the water misting system showed better engine performance results, the best solution may be the combustor injection method when used for takeoff only. This configuration results in minimal airplane payload weight penalties because it uses less than half the water of the compressor water misting method. The combustor water injection method reduces the turbine inlet temperature just enough during takeoff that it would greatly improve engine hot section life which would reduce engine maintenance costs. Any airplane costs and inconvenience associated with water injection are anticipated to be more than offset by engine maintenance savings. These savings may generate enough market demand that water injection could be developed as an optional airplane emissions reduction technology.
Article
Full-text available
This work presents the evaluation of energy balance and GHG emissions in the production and use of fuel ethanol from cane in Brazil for 2005/2006 (for a sample of mills processing up to 100 million tons of sugarcane per year), and for a conservative scenario proposed for 2020. Fossil energy ratio was 9.3 for 2005/2006 and may reach 11.6 in 2020 with technologies already commercial. For anhydrous ethanol production the total GHG emission was 436 kg CO2 eq m−3 ethanol for 2005/2006, decreasing to 345 kg CO2 eq m−3 in the 2020 scenario. Avoided emissions depend on the final use: for E100 use in Brazil they were (in 2005/2006) 2181 kg CO2 eq m−3 ethanol, and for E25 they were 2323 kg CO2 eq m−3 ethanol (anhydrous). Both values would increase about 26% for the conditions assumed for 2020 mostly due to the large increase in sales of electricity surpluses.A sensitivity analysis has been performed (with 2005/2006 values) to investigate the impacts of the huge variation of some important parameters throughout Brazilian mills on the energy and emissions balance. The results have shown the high impact of cane productivity and ethanol yield variation on these balances (and the impacts of average cane transportation distances, level of soil cultivation, and some others) and of bagasse and electricity surpluses on GHG emissions avoidance.
Conference Paper
Diesel engine manufacturers are currently intensifying their efforts to meet future emission limits that require a drastic reduction of NOx and particulate matter compared to present values. Even though several after-treatment techniques have been developed for tailpipe NOx reduction in heavy duty diesel engines, the in-cylinder control of NOx formation still remains of utmost importance. Various methods have been used to control NOx formation in diesel engines such as retarded injection timing and EGR providing each one of them very promising results. However, use of these techniques is accompanied by penalties in specific fuel consumption and exhaust soot. A promising technology for NOx reduction especially for heavy-duty diesel engines and mainly large scale ones is the addition of water to the combustion chamber to reduce peak combustion temperature that obviously affects NOx formation. This method has been applied mainly for marine and stationary diesel engines due to the requirement of minor modifications on engine infrastructure. However, up to now, its true potential for diesel engines remains uncertain due to the limited theoretical and experimental knowledge. For this reason, it is examined herein the possibility to use this method to reduce NOx emissions in direct injection heavy-duty diesel engines. Two different technologies are examined for the addition of water into the combustion chamber: use of a water-fuel emulsion or injection of water into the intake manifold. Various percentages of injected water are examined for both technologies. This is attained using a multi-zone simulation model appropriately modified to simulate the use of water/fuel emulsion or injection of water into the intake manifold. The analysis provides information concerning the actual effect of water on the combustion and pollution formation mechanisms. It is revealed a significant reduction of NOx with both techniques compared to conventional engine operation. The reduction is higher when using water-fuel emulsion compared to water injection in the intake manifold for the same water percentage. Information is derived concerning the penalty on fuel consumption, which is a dominating parameter especially in large diesel engines. Furthermore it is examined the effect of water usage on soot formation since in some cases a reduction of soot can be observed due to the dissociation of water, the production of OH radicals and improvement of the air fuel mixing process. Thus, the simulation model is used to estimate the correlation between water percentage, NOx relative reduction and the associating penalty on engine bsfc and soot. The results can be utilized to define an optimum water/fuel ratio, which will provide the maximum reduction of NOx at an acceptable fuel penalty. The results of the present investigation can be used as a pilot for the application of this method on different diesel engine types and sizes.
Article
Extractive distillation is an alternative for alcohol dehydration processes that has shown to be more effective than azeotropic distillation and, in close proximity, to be very competitive against the process that uses molecular sieves. Glycols have shown be the most effective solvents in extractive distillation, mainly ethylene glycol and glycerol. In this work, an extractive distillation column was simulated with the ASPEN PLUS software platform, using the RadFrac module for distillation columns, to investigate the effect of the ethylene glycol and glycerol composition, the entrainer feed entry stages, the entrainer split stream feed, and the azeotropic feed temperature on the separation. The NRTL model was used to calculate the phase equilibrium of these strongly polar mixtures, and the thermodynamics of the system was verified by using the Aspen Split simulator to determine equilibrium diagrams. A rigorous simulation of the extractive distillation column finally established was also performed, including a secondary recovery column for the mixture of solvents and recycle loop, to simulate an industrially relevant situation. This simulation allowed establishing complete parameters to dehydrate ethanol and more energetically efficient operating conditions for each one of the columns through a pinch analysis preliminary.
Hydrous Ethanol in Gasoline: A More Sustainable and Cost Effective Solution" HE Blends BV
  • Hans Keuken
Keuken, Hans. "Hydrous Ethanol in Gasoline: A More Sustainable and Cost Effective Solution" HE Blends BV 2007 (www.e15blends.com)
Miscibilidade de Álcool Etílico
  • Glauco Bortolozzo
Bortolozzo, Glauco, et al. "Miscibilidade de Álcool Etílico, Gasolina e Água". VII Simpósio de Engenharia Automotiva. Vol.2 pp.136-143. 1993
  • De Janeiro De Dezembro De
PANP 002/2002, "PORTARIA Nº 2, DE 16 DE JANEIRO DE 2002". http://www.anp.gov.br 2. PANP 309/2001, "PORTARIA Nº 309, DE 27 DE DEZEMBRO DE 2001". http://www.anp.gov.br
Balanço energético da produção de etanol de cana de açúcar
  • Luiz A H Nogueira
Nogueira, Luiz A.H. "Balanço energético da produção de etanol de cana de açúcar" UNIFEI 2004
Bioeletricidade: A Segunda Revolução Energética da Cana de Açúcar
  • José E Ribeiro
Ribeiro, José E. "Bioeletricidade: A Segunda Revolução Energética da Cana de Açúcar". Rio de Janeiro. 2005