ArticlePDF Available

Capillary refill time in sick children: a clinical guide for general practice

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Capillary refill time (CRT) is a simple and quick test requiring minimal equipment or time to perform. Prolonged CRT is a ‘red flag’ feature, identifying children with increased risk of significant morbidity or mortality.1–4 Although national and international guidelines, including National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, recommend the use of CRT as part of the initial assessment of unwell children,1,2 it is infrequently measured in general practice.5 As there is no evidence for a relationship between CRT and blood pressure,6 CRT should not be used as a surrogate for blood pressure in children. There is, however, limited evidence to support a relationship between CRT and arterial blood flow, as well as other invasive cardiovascular parameters, such as superior vena cava oxygenation and core–peripheral temperature gap.6 Therefore, CRT is likely to have some value as a measure of peripheral perfusion. The choice of site (for example, finger, hand, foot, or chest) at which CRT is measured can result in significantly different values. CRT can also be affected by the duration of pressure, and the ambient and skin temperatures, with longer duration of pressure and lower temperatures resulting in longer CRTs.6 The use of a timer to measure CRT is associated with greater …
Content may be subject to copyright.
Capillary refill time in sick children:
a clinical guide for general practice
Susannah Fleming, Peter J Gill, Ann Van den Bruel and Matthew Thompson
Clinical Intelligence
British Journal of General Practice, November 2016 587
INTRODUCTION
Capillary refill time (CRT) is a simple and
quick test requiring minimal equipment or
time to perform. Prolonged CRT is a ‘red flag’
feature, identifying children with increased
risk of significant morbidity or mortality.1–4
Although national and international
guidelines, including National Institute for
Health and Care Excellence guidelines,
recommend the use of CRT as part of the
initial assessment of unwell children,1,2 it is
infrequently measured in general practice.5
WHAT DOES CRT MEASURE?
As there is no evidence for a relationship
between CRT and blood pressure,6 CRT
should not be used as a surrogate for blood
pressure in children. There is, however,
limited evidence to support a relationship
between CRT and arterial blood flow, as well
as other invasive cardiovascular parameters,
such as superior vena cava oxygenation
and core–peripheral temperature gap.6
Therefore, CRT is likely to have some value
as a measure of peripheral perfusion.
HOW SHOULD CRT BE MEASURED?
The choice of site (for example, finger, hand,
foot, or chest) at which CRT is measured can
result in significantly different values. CRT can
also be affected by the duration of pressure,
and the ambient and skin temperatures,
with longer duration of pressure and lower
temperatures resulting in longer CRTs.6
The use of a timer to measure CRT is
associated with greater inter-observer
reliability.6 Because a timer (for example, a
watch) is required for measurement of other
vital signs such as heart rate and respiratory
rate, it seems reasonable to recommend
its use in the measurement of CRT. A
consistent method of CRT measurement
should be adopted to ensure that repeated
measurements are comparable. We
recommend applying moderate pressure for
5 seconds on the finger (Figure 1), a technique
that is used in much of the existing literature.
We also suggest that clinicians understand
the upper limit of normal in healthy children.
Measurements of CRT should ideally be
documented as a precise time, for example,
‘4 seconds’, rather than using ambiguous
terminology such as ‘normal’ or ‘prolonged’.
Where a cut-off is used, we recommend the
use of inclusive textual descriptions, such as
‘2 seconds or less’ or ‘3 seconds or more’.
The use of mathematical inequality symbols
such as <2s’ or 3s’ can lead to confusion as
measurements are made in whole seconds;
this terminology should be avoided (Box 1).
Susannah Fleming, MEng, DPhil, quantitative
researcher; Ann Van den Bruel, MD, PhD,
associate professo r, Nuffield Department of
Primary Care Health Sciences, University of
Oxford, Oxford. Peter J Gill, MD, DPhil, MSc,
paediatric resident, Department of Pediatrics,
the Hospital for Sick Children, University of
Toronto, Toronto. Matthew Thompson, MBChB,
DPhil, interim chair, Department of Family
Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Address for correspondence
Susannah Fleming, Nuffield Department of
Primary Care Health Sciences, University
of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter,
Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
E-mail: susannah.fleming@phc.ox.ac.uk
Submitted: 11 February 2016; final acceptance:
18 February 2016.
©British Journal of General Practice 2016;
66: 587–588.
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687925
Figure 1. Measuring capillary refill time on the finger. © Nazir Hamid.
WHAT IS THE NORMAL RANGE OF CRT IN
CHILDREN?
Data on normal ranges of CRT in children
are complicated by variations in site and
pressing time.6 In healthy children, a CRT of
2 seconds or less should be expected when
measured on the finger. If the foot or chest
is used for assessment, CRTs of 4 seconds
or less should be considered normal. CRTs
in neonates (up to 7 days of age) may be
longer than in older infants and children,
with the upper limit of normal ranging from
5–7 seconds.6
There is no evidence that CRT varies
significantly with age after the neonatal
period. Studies suggest that core
temperature does not have a clinically
relevant effect on CRT; no correction
is required to take account of fever or
hypothermia.
WHAT IS THE DIAGNOSTIC AND
PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CRT?
Studies assessing the diagnostic and
prognostic value of CRT in children typically
use cut-offs of between 2 and 3 seconds
to define a ‘prolonged’ measurement. This
is consistent with our suggested cut-off
of 3 seconds or more to define ‘abnormal’
CRT in infants and children over 7 days
of age. Despite widespread use of CRT in
primary care, there is very little evidence on
the diagnostic or prognostic value of CRT in
the primary care setting; recommendations
were largely generalised from data obtained
in emergency or secondary care.
Studies of children attending emergency
departments with vomiting and diarrhoea
show that prolonged CRT has high specificity
of between 88% and 94% for identifying
children with moderate dehydration (5% or
more).4 In addition, several studies show
that prolonged CRT has high specificity for
predicting a variety of serious conditions in
children, including meningitis, sepsis, and
hypoxia, along with the need for hospital
admission. Odds ratios of 2–5 are reported
for urinary tract infections and pneumonia,
supporting the suggestion that a prolonged
CRT is a red flag for serious illness in
children, but, importantly, a normal CRT
does not make a serious illness less likely.4
Although studies from settings with high
mortality (low income or high acuity) show
that prolonged CRT is predictive of death,
with a specificity of 92% (95% confidence
interval = 89 to 95%), we do not know if
these results apply to children in lower-
acuity settings.4 Again, sensitivity was low
(35%), meaning that a normal CRT should
not be used for reassurance.
CONCLUSION
A normal CRT test should not be used
to rule out serious illness in children.
However, a CRT of 3 seconds or more
should be considered a ‘red flag’, indicating
that a child is at higher risk of serious
illness, because the test has high specificity
and positive likelihood ratios for a variety of
serious outcomes. As there remain some
uncertainties around the reliability of CRT
measurements, it is appropriate to repeat
the measurement of an unexpectedly
abnormal CRT, paying particular attention
to ensure that it is measured correctly.
Funding
Ann Van den Bruel was supported by the
NIHR Diagnostic Evidence Cooperative
(DEC) Oxford.
Provenance
Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Competing interests
The authors have also published two
systematic reviews on the validity, normal
ranges, and diagnostic value of capillary
refill time in children, which were funded by
the European Union Seventh Framework
Programme.
Discuss this article
Contribute and read comments about
this article: bjgp.org/letters
Box 1. Recommended measurement method for CRT in children
Use the finger as the preferred measurement site.
Press for 5 seconds using moderate pressure.
Ideally, measure at room temperature (20–25°C) irrespective of the child’s body temperature. Allow
time for skin temperature to acclimatise if the child has recently been moved from a warmer or colder
environment.
Use a timer (for example, a watch) to count the seconds it takes for the finger to regain its original colour.
An abnormal CRT in infants and children over 7 days of age is 3 seconds or more; a normal CRT is
2 seconds or less. A CRT measurement of between 2 and 3 seconds may be considered ‘borderline
abnormal’, but some healthy children may have CRT as long as 2.5 seconds.
Record measurements using the actual number of seconds (for example, ‘4 seconds’ or ‘2 seconds or
less’) rather than using terms such as ‘prolonged’ or mathematical symbols.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization, Department
of Child and Adolescent Health and
Development.
Management of the child with
a serious infection or severe malnutrition:
guidelines for care at the first-referral level in
developing countries
. Geneva: WHO, 2000.
2. National Institute for Health and Care
Excellence.
Fever in under 5s: assessment
and initial management
.
CG160
. London:
NICE, 2013. https://www.nice.org.uk/
guidance/cg160 (accessed 4 Oct 2016).
3. Van den Bruel A, Haj-Hassan T, Thompson
M,
et al
. European Research Network on
Recognising Serious Infection investigators.
Diagnostic value of clinical features at
presentation to identify serious infection in
children in developed countries: a systematic
review.
Lancet
2010; 375(9717): 834–845.
4. Fleming S, Gill P, Jones C,
et al.
The
diagnostic value of capillary refill time for
detecting serious illness in children: a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS
One
2015; 10(9): e0138155.
5. Blacklock C, Haj-Hassan TA, Thompson MJ.
When and how do GPs record vital signs
in children with acute infections? A cross-
sectional study.
Br J Gen Pract
2012; DOI:
10.3399/bjgp12X656810.
6. Fleming S, Gill P, Jones C,
et al.
Validity and
reliability of measurement of capillary refill
time in children: a systematic review.
Arch Dis
Child
2015; 100(3): 239–249.
588 British Journal of General Practice, November 2016
... Capillary refill time measurement requires visual inspection of blood returning to the distal capillaries after having been emptied by applying pressure (6). The site selected for measuring CRT (for example, the finger, hand, foot or chest) may lead to significantly different values (16). To assess CRT in healthy children, moderate pressure should be applied to the index finger for 5-10 s, using a timer to measure CRT and provide greater reliability (Figure 3) (16). ...
... In newborns (up to seven days old), the upper limit of normal may be 5-7 s (16), which is related to their skin immaturity. With these limits, a sensitivity of 55% and a specificity of 81% have been reported for detecting low blood flow (22)(23)(24). ...
... With these limits, a sensitivity of 55% and a specificity of 81% have been reported for detecting low blood flow (22)(23)(24). In healthy children, a normal CRT of approximately two seconds or less has been recorded when measured on the index finger, or four seconds or less if measured on the foot or chest (16). Studies in adults have found a wider variation, with an average time of 1.9 s (95th percentile 3.5 s) (21), 7% lower in men than women, and an average 3.3% increase in seconds per decade of life (6, 21) ( Table 2). ...
Article
Full-text available
The international sepsis guidelines emphasize the importance of early identification along with the combined administration of fluids, antibiotics and vasopressors as essential steps in the treatment of septic shock in childhood. However, despite these recommendations, septic shock mortality continues to be very high, especially in countries with limited resources. Cardiovascular involvement is common and, in most cases, determines the outcomes. Early recognition of hemodynamic dysfunction, both in the macro and microcirculation, can help improve outcomes. Capillary refill time (CRT) is a useful, available and easily accessible tool at all levels of care. It is a clinical sign of capillary vasoconstriction due to an excessive sympathetic response which seeks to improve blood redistribution from the micro- to the macrocirculation. An important reason for functionally evaluating the microcirculation is that, in septic shock, the correction of macrocirculation variables is assumed to result in improved tissue perfusion. This has been termed “hemodynamic coherence.” However, this coherence often does not occur in advanced stages of the disease. Capillary refill time is useful in guiding fluid resuscitation and identifying more seriously affected sepsis patients. Several factors can affect its measurement, which should preferably be standardized and performed on the upper extremities. In this review, we seek to clarify a few common questions regarding CRT and guide its correct use in patients with sepsis.
... CRT is measured by the time it takes for color to return to an external capillary bed after pressure is applied to cause blanching, and the CRT is usually 2 seconds or less in healthy people. 9,10,18 Severe plasma leakage is the main cause of dengue shock syndrome, which is a form of hypovolemic shock, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). 2,9,12 Severe bleeding was diagnosed with clinical symptoms, such as gastrointestinal bleeding (blood in vomit, melena) or severe vaginal bleeding, with decreasing levels of hematocrit and hemoglobin, and shock status without recovery after crystalloid resuscitation. ...
... To confirm the diagnosis of ARDS, pulmonary edema and respiratory distress were identified by wheezing or crepitation on pulmonary examination, besides the respiratory rate measurements and chest radiography findings. 9,18 Although the criteria were not clearly set, acute liver failure was diagnosed by an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels of ≥1,000U/L with jaundice symptom, increase in total bilirubin with coagulopathy, and hepatic encephalopathy with no evidence of prior liver disease. The symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy included movement disorder, change in mood or personality, and, in the advanced stage, coma. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to describe the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of dengue inpatients at a provincial hospital, and to identify factors associated with severe dengue. This is a retrospective study involving 402 dengue patients admitted to the Savannakhet Provincial Hospital, Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), between January 2018 and April 2019. Socio-demographic factors, clinical signs and laboratory data on admission, final diagnosis, use of health care services before admission, admission date, and hospitalization period were collected from patient records. The number of dengue inpatients was higher in the rainy season than in the dry season. Of the 402 patients, 205 patients (51.0%) were finally diagnosed with severe dengue. Children aged <15 years had more symptoms, higher proportion of severe dengue (69.8% vs. 35.9%), and longer hospitalization (3.5 days vs. 3.0 days) than adults aged ≥15 years. In multivariable analyses, factors associated with severe dengue were nausea on admission (adjusted odds ratio=3.57, 95% CI=1.05-12.09, P=0.04) in children and persistent vomiting on admission (adjusted odds ratio=3.82, 95% CI=1.23-11.92, P=0.02) in adults. In adults, the creatinine level on admission was significantly higher in patients with a final diagnosis of severe dengue compared to the others. The proportion of severe dengue in our study was higher than that in other countries. Nausea and persistent vomiting on admission were suggested to be predictive factors for severe dengue. To reduce the incidence of severe dengue in Lao PDR, improvements in access to health care, referral system, and training of health care workers are needed.
... Children account for a considerable percentage of all emergency cases, and compared to adults, their clinical evaluation and vital sign monitoring may be more complex [1]. For example, evaluating capillary refill time-a measure that may be obtained simply by pressing on the skin over the forehead or sternum-is a common step in assessing volume shortage in pediatric age groups [2]. However, gaining venous access in healthy children, especially neonates and infants, might be difficult, requiring punctures at specific locations such as the scalp, forehead, medial surface of the ankle, or the dorsum of the hand or foot [3]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of Review This review examines the state of pediatric emergency care in low-resource settings (LRS), highlighting significant gaps, particularly in resources and infrastructure. Recent Findings Recent assessments of pediatric emergency care in various low-resource settings reveal stark differences in resources and capabilities. For instance, the situation in Rwanda’s district hospitals illustrates disparities in numbers and resources. Similarly, Nigeria faces challenges stemming from institutional deficiencies, inadequate human resources, and insufficient training, necessitating urgent adjustments in training programs, resource allocation, and working conditions. In conflict-ridden Yemen, providing pediatric emergency care is further complicated by conflict-related obstacles, hindering prompt and efficient interventions. Despite these challenges, promising developments include improved metrics for pediatric emergency care services (PECS), strengthened emergency medical services (EMS), and advancements in healthcare professional training. Summary Addressing the ongoing challenges in pediatric emergency care in low-resource settings requires targeted strategies. These may include enhancing preparedness for emergencies, overcoming barriers to service provision, and providing comprehensive support and training to medical professionals. Recognizing these constraints and translating them into actionable recommendations are crucial for establishing a pathway towards sustainable long-term improvements in pediatric emergency care services within LRS.
... however, in contrast to in adults, hypotension is a late sign of pediatric septic shock. several studies have shown that prolonged capillary refill time (cRt) and increased heart rate (hR) can be a marker of sepsis and can predict the severity of organ dysfunction and the risk of death [11,12]. in the United Kingdom, the alert, Voice, Pain, Unresponsive (aVPU) scale is the usual assessment of neurologic status in pediatric emergency departments [13]. Blood lactate levels provide a valuable indirect marker of inadequate tissue perfusion, with a mortality rate of 32.0% in children with hypotension requiring vasopressors with lactate greater than 2 mmol/l and a mortality rate of 16.1% in children with lactate less than or equal to 2 mmol/l in the PicU study. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose was to investigate how well age-adjusted modified quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores paired with blood glucose and lactate levels predict the outcomes of septicemic children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). One hundred children who were diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock in the PICU of Henan Children’s Hospital were eligible, and other 20 patients in the same hospital at different times were selected as a validation set. Respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), capillary refill time (CRT), and Alert, Voice, Pain, Unresponsive (AVPU) scale were included in the age-adjusted modified qSOFA scoring criteria for scoring. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The predictive values were evaluated by the ROC curve. In the sepsis group, 50 patients were male, and 50 patients were female. The 28-day all-cause mortality rate was 52%. Fifty-one patients with age-adjusted modified qSOFA scores >1. The serum lactate level was 2.4 mmol/L, and the blood glucose level was 9.3 mmol/L. The AUCs for the age-adjusted modified qSOFA score, serum lactate and blood glucose levels for the prediction of 28-day all-cause mortality in children with sepsis were 0.719, 0.719 and 0.737, respectively. The cut-off values were one point, 3.8 mmol/L and 10 mmol/L, respectively. The AUC of the age-adjusted modified qSOFA score for the validation set of was 0.925. When the three indices were combined, the AUC was 0.817, the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed χ² = 2.428 and p = .965. When children with sepsis are admitted to the ICU, we recommend performing rapid scoring and rapid bedside lactate and glucose testing to determine the early prognosis.
... Lamentablemente, no existe un método estandarizado para su evaluación. Se sugiere realizarla a una temperatura ambiente de 20-25°C, aplicando una moderada presión por 5-10 segundos en el dedo medio o índice, el cual debe de estar ubicado a la altura del corazón, para lograr blanquear el pulpejo y luego, con cronómetro en mano, medir el tiempo que se demora en retomar la coloración basal 13 . El estudio ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 14 estandarizó la medición realizándola en el pulpejo del dedo de la mano que no tiene la línea arterial, para lo cual ocupó un portaobjetos y aplicó una presión hasta lograr blanquear dicho pulpejo y luego la mantuvo por 10 segundos. ...
Article
Full-text available
Sepsis is one of the main causes of admission to Intensive Care Units (ICU). The hemodynamic objectives usually sought during the resuscitation of the patient in septic shock correspond to macrohemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, central venous pressure). However, persistent alterations in microcirculation, despite the restoration of macrohemodynamic parameters, can cause organ failure. This dissociation between the macrocirculation and microcirculation originates the need to evaluate organ tissue perfusion, the most commonly used being urinary output, lactatemia, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2),and veno-arterial pCO2 gap. Because peripheral tissues, such as the skin, are sensitive to disturbances in perfusion, noninvasive monitoring of peripheral circulation, such as skin temperature gradient, capillary refill time, mottling score, and peripheral perfusion index may be helpful as early markers of the existence of systemic hemodynamic alterations. Peripheral circulation monitoring techniques are relatively easy to interpret and can be used directly at the patient’s bedside. This approach can be quickly applied in the intra or extra-ICU setting. The objective of this narrative review is to analyze the various existing tissue perfusion markers and to update the evidence that allows guiding hemodynamic support in a more individualized therapy for each patient.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose To evaluate physicians’ knowledge of the ABCDE (Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure) approach components. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 using an online questionnaire in order to collect data about the knowledge of the ABCDE approach’s components among physicians in different specialties in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Results The number of participants were 165 in total and the median knowledge score for all participants was 15.0, with an associated interquartile range (IQR) of 10.0 to 20.0. Intensive Care Medicine had the highest median knowledge score of 19.0 (IQR: 12.0–21.0), followed by Internal Medicine at 17.0 (IQR: 13.0–20.0). Conversely, Cardiology and Anesthesiology showed lower scores, with medians of 8.0 (IQR: 4.0–10.0) and 7.5 (IQR: 4.0–13.5), respectively (p = 0.011). Senior Registrars demonstrated the highest median knowledge score of 20.0 (IQR: 14.0–22.0), while Fellows had the lowest at 8.5 (IQR: 7.0–13.0) (p < 0.001). Practicing for 10 to 15 years and more than 15 years having medians of 20.0 (IQR: 16.0–23.0) and 19.0 (IQR: 17.0–22.0), respectively. However, participants with less experience, working for less than 5 years, had a median score of 12.0 (IQR: 8.5–16.5) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Knowledge scores of physicians representing various medical specialties found diverse levels regarding the ABCDE approach. Knowledge scores were significantly influenced by the primary area of practice, level of experience, and duration worked in the profession, highlighting the need for tailored training and education across different specialties and career stages. On the other hand, future studies should concentrate on finding new factors that influence practice adherence to the ABCDE approach and tying theoretical knowledge to clinical practice.
Article
The preterm neonates have a higher mortality rate, associated with their vulnerable state to minimal changes in their physiological parameters. 1 The hemodynamic status and the related assessment of neonatal perfusion are the integral components of a preterm neonate's physiological monitoring. One of the important parameters of this monitoring is capillary refill time (CRT). It is an indirect indicator of the cardiac output and peripheral circulation, which, if timely managed, can reduce the morbidity and mortality rates of these preterm neonates. 2,3,4 The nurses perform and record CRT in the nursing monitoring sheets as a routine procedure in neonatal intensive care units. The normal CRT of preterm neonates is less than 3 s; exceeding 4 s shows inadequate blood supply to the extremities. However, more than 5 s indicates decreased cardiac output. 5 In practice, the healthcare providers use the index finger with moderate pressure for 5 s over the chest to cause blenching on the skin and observe revascularization time to record as CRT. 6 The measurement of CRT is an essential clinical skill, and it helps quickly assess the condition of preterm neonates' blood circulation and averts adverse health outcomes. Nurses must possess adequate knowledge and skills related to CRT. Keeping that in mind, the present pilot study was conducted. Objective The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge and skills of nurses related to the measurement of CRT among preterm neonates admitted in the neonatal units of a tertiary care hospital in North India.
Chapter
The health of babies, children and young people is fundamentally different from that of adults, so their healthcare must reflect their unique needs and engage their parents, family members and communities. Paediatric Nursing in Australia and New Zealand introduces nursing students to the care of infants, children, young people and their families in a range of clinical and community settings across Australasia. This third edition includes New Zealand content and an increased focus on families. New chapters cover health services available for Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and Māori children, the transition to parenthood for new families, children's sleep patterns and behaviour, and paediatric health in school settings. Case studies and reflective questions encourage students to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Written by an expert team, Paediatric Nursing in Australia and New Zealand equips future nurses with the knowledge and skills to provide evidence-based care to babies, children and their families.
Article
Capillary refilling time (CRT) is defined as the time taken for the distal capillary bed to regain its color after the capillaries have been blanched through external skin compression. Measuring the CRT is a simple method of evaluating peripheral circulation in the clinic. Typically, the CRT is measured by manually recording the time taken for the skin color to be regained after blanching using a timer. However, this method is observer-dependent, which results in variability and subjectivity. In this study, a portable CRT measurement device was developed for simple quantitative measurement. This device standardizes the operator’s manual compression by measuring the manual compression force using a force sensor and displaying it as well as the duration of the compression on a display unit. The device also measures CRT by recording the change in skin color after fingertip compression using an RGB color sensor. The stability of CRT measurement by this device was compared with that of conventional CRT measurement, which involves manual compression and naked eye observation. These results showed that CRT measurement using this device was more stable than that by the conventional method. The proposed device can potentially improve the reliability of CRT measurement by reducing the variability in the manual compression force and ensuring accurate recording of the time.
Article
Full-text available
Importance: Capillary refill time (CRT) is widely recommended as part of the routine assessment of unwell children. Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of capillary refill time for a range of serious outcomes in children. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase and CINAHL from inception to June 2014. We included studies that measured both capillary refill time and a relevant clinical outcome such as mortality, dehydration, meningitis, or other serious illnesses in children aged up to 18 years of age. We screened 1,265 references, of which 24 papers were included in this review. Where sufficient studies were available, we conducted meta-analysis and constructed hierarchical summary ROC curves. Results: Meta-analysis on the relationship between capillary refill time and mortality resulted in sensitivity of 34.6% (95% CI 23.9 to 47.1%), specificity 92.3% (88.6 to 94.8%), positive likelihood ratio 4.49 (3.06 to 6.57), and negative likelihood ratio 0.71 (0.60 to 0.84). Studies of children attending Emergency Departments with vomiting and diarrhea showed that capillary refill time had specificity of 89 to 94% for identifying 5% dehydration, but sensitivity ranged from 0 to 94%. This level of heterogeneity precluded formal meta-analysis of this outcome. Meta-analysis was not possible for other outcomes due to insufficient data, but we found consistently high specificity for a range of outcomes including meningitis, sepsis, admission to hospital, hypoxia, severity of illness and dengue. Conclusions: Our results show that capillary refill time is a specific sign, indicating that it can be used as a "red-flag": children with prolonged capillary refill time have a four-fold risk of dying compared to children with normal capillary refill time. The low sensitivity means that a normal capillary refill time should not reassure clinicians.
Article
Background Most guidelines recommend the use of capillary refill time (CRT) as part of the routine assessment of unwell children, but there is little consensus on the optimum method of measurement and cut-off time. Methods We searched Medline (from 1948), Embase (from 1980) and CINAHL (from 1991) to June 2014 to identify studies with information on the normal range of CRT in healthy children, the validity of CRT compared with reference standard measures of haemodynamic status, reliability and factors influencing measurement of CRT, such as body site, pressing time and temperature. Findings We included 21 studies on 1915 children. Four studies provided information on the relationship between CRT and measures of cardiovascular status, 13 provided data on the normal range of CRT, 7 provided data on reliability and 10 assessed the effect of various confounding factors. In children over 7 days of age, the upper limit of normal CRT is approximately 2 s when measured on a finger, and 4 s when measured on the chest or foot, irrespective of whether the child is feverish or not. Longer pressing times and ambient temperature outside 20°C–25°C are associated with longer CRT. Evidence suggests that the use of stopwatches reduces variability between observers. Interpretation We recommend use of the following standardised CRT method of measurement: press on the finger for 5 s using moderate pressure at an ambient temperature of 20°C–25°C. A capillary refill time of 3 s or more should be considered abnormal.
Article
NICE recommendations and evidence from ambulatory settings promotes the use of vital signs in identifying serious infections in children. This appears to differ from usual clinical practice where GPs report measuring vital signs infrequently. To identify frequency of vital sign documentation by GPs, in the assessment of children with acute infections in primary care. Observational study in 15 general practice surgeries in Oxfordshire and Somerset, UK. A standardised proforma was used to extract consultation details including documentation of numerical vital signs, and words or phrases used by the GP in assessing vital signs, for 850 children aged 1 month to 16 years presenting with acute infection. Of the children presenting with acute infections 31.6% had one or more numerical vital signs recorded (269, 31.6%), however GP recording rate improved if free text proxies were also considered: at least one vital sign was then recorded in over half (54.1%) of children. In those with recorded numerical values for vital signs, the most frequent was temperature (210, 24.7%), followed by heart rate (62, 7.3%), respiratory rate (58, 6.8%), and capillary refill time (36, 4.2%). Words or phrases for vital signs were documented infrequently (temperature 17.6%, respiratory rate 14.6%, capillary refill time 12.5%, and heart rate 0.5%), Text relating to global assessment was documented in 313/850 (36.8%) of consultations. GPs record vital signs using words and phrases as well as numerical methods, although overall documentation of vital signs is infrequent in children presenting with acute infections.
Article
Our aim was to identify which clinical features have value in confirming or excluding the possibility of serious infection in children presenting to ambulatory care settings in developed countries. In this systematic review, we searched electronic databases (Medline, Embase, DARE, CINAHL), reference lists of relevant studies, and contacted experts to identify articles assessing clinical features of serious infection in children. 1939 potentially relevant studies were identified. Studies were selected on the basis of six criteria: design (studies of diagnostic accuracy or prediction rules), participants (otherwise healthy children aged 1 month to 18 years), setting (ambulatory care), outcome (serious infection), features assessed (assessable in ambulatory care setting), and sufficient data reported. Quality assessment was based on the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria. We calculated likelihood ratios for the presence (positive likelihood ratio) or absence (negative likelihood ratio) of each clinical feature and pre-test and post-test probabilities of the outcome. Clinical features with a positive likelihood ratio of more than 5.0 were deemed red flags (ie, warning signs for serious infection); features with a negative likelihood ratio of less than 0.2 were deemed rule-out signs. 30 studies were included in the analysis. Cyanosis (positive likelihood ratio range 2.66-52.20), rapid breathing (1.26-9.78), poor peripheral perfusion (2.39-38.80), and petechial rash (6.18-83.70) were identified as red flags in several studies. Parental concern (positive likelihood ratio 14.40, 95% CI 9.30-22.10) and clinician instinct (positive likelihood ratio 23.50, 95 % CI 16.80-32.70) were identified as strong red flags in one primary care study. Temperature of 40 degrees C or more has value as a red flag in settings with a low prevalence of serious infection. No single clinical feature has rule-out value but some combinations can be used to exclude the possibility of serious infection-for example, pneumonia is very unlikely (negative likelihood ratio 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.46) if the child is not short of breath and there is no parental concern. The Yale Observation Scale had little value in confirming (positive likelihood ratio range 1.10-6.70) or excluding (negative likelihood ratio range 0.16-0.97) the possibility of serious infection. The red flags for serious infection that we identified should be used routinely, but serious illness will still be missed without effective use of precautionary measures. We now need to identify the level of risk at which clinical action should be taken. Health Technology Assessment and National Institute for Health Research National School for Primary Care Research.