A preview of this full-text is provided by Karger Publishers.
Content available from Cardiology
This content is subject to copyright.
E-Mail karger@karger.com
Original Research
Cardiology 2017;136:79–89
DOI: 10.1159/000448088
The Effect of Exercise Training Intensity
on Quality of Life in Heart Failure Patients:
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Cecilia Ostman Daniel Jewiss Neil A. Smart
Schools of Rural Medicine and Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. , Australia
training (MD –8.56, 95% CI –12.77 to –4.35, p < 0.0001) but
not moderate-intensity training. A significant improvement
in the total MLWHF score was seen after aerobic training
(MD –3.87, 95% CI –6.97 to –0.78, p = 0.01), and combined
aerobic and resistance training (MD –9.82, 95% CI –15.71
to –3.92, p = 0.001), but not resistance training. Conclusions:
As exercise training intensity rises, so may the magnitude of
improvement in quality of life in exercising patients. Aerobic-
only or combined aerobic and resistance training may offer
the greatest improvements in quality of life.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
Introduction
Meta-analyses have shown exercise training to be ben-
eficial in heart failure patients in terms of improved car-
diorespiratory fitness and quality of life
[1, 2] . As heart
failure patients are severely de-conditioned, aerobic, re-
sistance or a combination of these exercise types will be
beneficial; however, aerobic exercise probably produces
the greatest improvements in physical measures of clini-
cal status such as peak V
O 2 [2] , left ventricular ejection
fraction
[3] , endothelial function [4] , and serum levels of
natriuretic peptides
[5] and pro-inflammatory cytokines
Key Words
Exercise intensity · Heart failure · Quality of life
Abstract
Objectives: To establish if exercise training intensity produc-
es different effect sizes for quality of life in heart failure.
Background: Exercise intensity is the primary stimulus for
physical and mental adaptation. Methods: We conducted a
MEDLINE search (1985 to February 2016) for exercise-based
rehabilitation trials in heart failure using the search terms
‘exercise training’, ‘left ventricular dysfunction’, ‘peak V
O 2 ’,
‘cardiomyopathy’, and ‘systolic heart dysfunction’. Results:
Twenty-five studies were included; 4 (16%) comprised
high-, 10 (40%) vigorous-, 9 (36%) moderate- and 0 (0%)
low-intensity groups; two studies were unclassified. The 25
studies provided a total of 2,385 participants, 1,223 exercis-
ing and 1,162 controls (36,056 patient-hours of training).
Analyses reported significant improvement in total Minne-
sota living with heart failure (MLWHF) total score [mean dif-
ference (MD) –8.24, 95% CI –11.55 to –4.92, p < 0.00001].
Physical MLWHF score
was significantly improved in all stud-
ies ( MD –2.89, 95% CI –4.27 to –1.50, p < 0.00001). MLWHF
total score was significantly reduced after high- (MD –13.74,
95% CI –21.34 to –6.14, p = 0.0004) and vigorous-intensity
Received: February 23, 2016
Accepted after revision: June 28, 2016
Published online: August 27, 2016
Assoc. Prof. Neil A. Smart
School of Science and Technology
University of New England
Armidale, NSW 2351 (Australia)
E-Mail nsmart2 @ une.edu.au
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
www.karger.com/crd