A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Pediatric Surgery International
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Improved outcomes after technical modifications in tubularized
incised plate urethroplasty for mid-shaft and proximal
hypospadias
Yuk Him Tam
1
•Kristine Kit Yi Pang
1
•Yuen Shan Wong
1
•Siu Yan Tsui
1
•
Hei Yi Wong
1
•Jennifer Wai Cheung Mou
1
•Kin Wai Chan
1
•Kim Hung Lee
1
Accepted: 27 July 2016 / Published online: 29 July 2016
ÓSpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Abstract
Purpose To investigate and compare the outcomes after
tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty in mid-shaft
and proximal hypospadias using a standard and a modified
technique.
Methods We conducted a retrospective study in 104 con-
secutive children who underwent mid-shaft or proximal
TIP repairs from Jan 2007 to Sept 2015. Patients in Cohort
One had dorsal dartos (DD) neourethral coverage while
patients in Cohort Two had either de-epithelialized split
preputial (DESP) or tunica vaginalis (TV) flap coverage.
TV flap was used only when DESP flap was not sufficient
to cover the neourethra.
Results There were 52 patients each in Cohort One (DD,
n=52) and Cohort Two (DESP, n=38; TV, n=14)
with no difference in ratio of mid-shaft/proximal between
the two cohorts. At a median follow-up of 28 months, 36
patients (34.6 %) developed 47 complications including
fistula (n=19; 18.3 %) and neourethral dehiscence
(n=4; 3.8 %). Cohort One patients had significantly more
fistula (28.8 vs 7.7 %; p=0.005) and neourethral dehis-
cence (7.7 vs 0 %; p=0.04) than Cohort Two. There was
no difference between the two cohorts in the complication
rates of meatal stenosis, recurrent ventral curvature and
neourethral stricture.
Conclusions Both DESP and TV flap appear to be superior
to DD in preventing fistula and neourethral dehiscence in
non-distal TIP repairs.
Keywords Hypospadias Tubularized incised plate
urethroplasty Dorsal dartos flap Tunica vaginalis flap
De-epithelialized split preputial flap
Introduction
It has been two decades since tubularized incised plate
(TIP) urethroplasty was described by Snodgrass for
hypospadias repair [1]. To date, TIP has become the most
popular technique for distal hypospadias repair [2,3]. A
recent systematic analysis has reported an overall compli-
cation rate less than 10 % for distal TIP repair [4]. Repair
of proximal hypospadias, however, remains a challenge
despite evolution of different techniques over the past
years. Reported complication rates of available techniques
vary from 15 to 45 % [5]. A single technique that is ideal
for every case of proximal hypospadias does not appear to
exist. Extending the use of TIP to more proximal defects
has been widely investigated in the recent decade [6–9].
The current evidence suggests that TIP is one of the
established techniques in proximal hypospadias repair
when the urethral plate can be preserved in the correction
of penile ventral curvature [5].
Urethrocutaneous fistula and neourethral dehiscence
have remained to be the major concern following non-
distal TIP repairs and such complications account for the
majority of reoperations [10,11]. Neourethral coverage
with an extra layer of vascularized tissue is found to reduce
the risk of reoperation [10] and using dorsal dartos (DD)
for barrier flap coverage has been widely adopted as a
&Yuk Him Tam
pyhtam@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
1
Division of Paediatric Surgery and Paediatric Urology,
Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital,
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT,
Hong Kong, China
123
Pediatr Surg Int (2016) 32:1087–1092
DOI 10.1007/s00383-016-3954-6
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.