ArticlePDF Available

Pre-weaning nutrition: How a little means a lot

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
PIG PROGRESS VOLUME 32, No. 4, 201632
Pre-weaning
nutrition:
How a little
means a lot
NUTRITION
In an environment with highly prolific sows and
challenging markets, it is vital to get piglets drinking
early and rapidly. This is essential not only in the
days and weeks surrounding weaning. Ongoing
research shows that a good start continues to pay
off later in life.
By Hubèrt van Hees, Trouw Nutrition R&D and Maartje De Vos,
Trouw Nutrition Benelux
Over the years, genetic selection has resulted in a
substantially increased number of piglets born
per sow in each litter worldwide. This increase
in litter size often means smaller and more vul-
nerable piglets, with greater variation within lit-
ters. At the same time, when sows deliver large litters, their milk
does not increase in proportion to the increased number of pig-
lets born and thus the piglets suffer from a milk shortage. As a
result, it is becoming increasingly common practice to provide
suckling piglets with feeds to supplement sow milk.
This article examines the relevance of early supplemental feeding
to supporting piglets’ growth and development.
Surveys of sows
In a recent survey of 224 sow farmers in Belgium carried out by
Ghent University, approximately 50% of the farmers had experi-
enced issues with the number of piglets exceeding the number of
functional teats on a sow (i.e. supernumerous piglets). In total,
90% of these farmers indicated that they used dry or gruel feed
and 49% used supplemental milk to alleviate the issues related to
supernumerous and small piglets.
Work recently conducted in the Netherlands yielded similar
results, with the proportion of farms using a milk supplement
increasing from 49% in 2014 to 54% in 2015. In this respect, the
market in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg (Benelux)
seems to be taking the lead.
Figure 1 shows that bigger litters of up to 15-16 generally mean
that total litter weights at weaning are increasing and the availa-
bility of milk per piglet is falling. As a result, there is a risk that
individual body weights at weaning will be reduced by 1 kg or
more if no corrective actions are taken.
Supplemental feeds aid ‘catch-up’
Data generated recently supports the view that it is worthwhile
supporting the less fortunate piglets in large litters during the
first weeks in life. For example, when analysing a data set of over
60,000 piglets born at three experimental stations, we concluded
that not only birth weight, but also weaning weight and the body
weight two weeks post-weaning are important determinants for
body weight at the end of the nursery phase. This concurs with
data from other groups that extended this observation up to
slaughter weight. Moreover, our analysis showed that lighter pig-
lets can catch up with their heavier peers because they seem to
have the ability to efficiently digest nutrients and grow like their
heavier littermates.
Importance of early feed intake
Typically, supplemental feed intake is relatively steady up to two
weeks of age and increases, first gradually then sharply, up to
weaning. This pattern coincides with the gap between milk pro-
duction and the nutrient requirements of the fast-growing litter
PHOTO: TROUW NUTRITION
PIG PROGRESS VOLUME 32, No. 4, 2016 33
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
LS-10 LS-11 LS-12 LS-13 LS-14 LS-15 LS-16
Litter size
Percentage of litter
Figure 2 - Increasing litter size stimulates more piglets in a litter to eat
supplemental feed. Pink bar = % eaters; Blue bar = non-eaters on day 20.
Source: Trouw Nutrition R&D, 2015
in the later phases of lactation. From studies conducted at the
Swine Research Centre in St Anthonis, the Netherlands, intakes
were observed that vary between 0 and over 1 kg of dry matter
per piglet over a 24-day lactation period, with 400 g being a
good average. The level of intake is influenced not only by litter
size, but also by lactation length, milk production and ambient
temperature. Milk production, in fact, depends on temperature:
a sow under heat stress will have a reduced milk output, forcing
her litter to find additional sources of nutrition.
Contrary to general belief, birth weight has only a limited influ-
ence on the supplemental feed intake of piglets. Our observa-
tions showed that the average birth weight of ‘eaters’ is similar to
that of ‘non-eaters’ and that, in both categories, piglets that are
very light (<1 kg) and heavy (>2 kg) are represented. Figure 2
clearly shows that individual piglets in larger litters are more
likely to consume supplemental feed. In this graph, the percent-
age of piglets that were identified as eaters was scored using a
faecal colour marker. The percentage of eaters increased with lit-
ter size.
The stimulatory effect of farm workers paying sufficient atten-
tion to supplemental feeding is demonstrated by the data in
Figure 3. In this work, a premium pre-weaning programme was
fed (Milkiwean Yoghurt and Milkiwean Precoce), either in a low
or a high, intensive regime. Clearly, the level of consumption was
raised by the more intensive feeding regime (four feedings per
day, versus two times per working day and one feeding in the
weekend) starting early in life. Supplemental feeding can, but
not always, affect body weight development until weanting. In
general, however, post-weaning performance and health will be
promoted. Also, especially with longer lactations, one might
observe that sows are better able to maintain body condition.
Sometimes effects are more subtle, as will be explained below.
A closer look at the gut
To explain how relatively low levels of supplemental feeding
affect post-weaning performance, a study was conducted into
pre-weaning gut development. The hypothesis was that creep
feed represents energy provision and – by its specific composi-
tion – induces the secretion of gut hormones that modulate
intestinal development. So a group of piglets was studied that
consumed a highly nutrient dense, complex milk replacer (i.e.
Milkiwean Yoghurt). By contrast, the control piglets had no
access to supplemental feed and solely relied on sow milk. The
piglets were from very prolific sows (at least 13.5 piglets) of sim-
ilar parities (3.6 ± 0.8). On day 21, these piglets’ body weight and
gut development was assessed. Supplemental milk consumption
was close to 70 g of dry matter per piglet per day and weight
Supplemental feeding
not only helps piglets
around weaning, but
also affects post-
weaning performance.
Milk production of the sow Per piglet
12500
11000
9500
8000
6000
5000
3500
1100
Sufficient
milk per piglet
Shortage in
milk per piglet
1050
1000
950
900
850
800
456789
Litter size piglets
Milk production of the sow (gr/day)
Available milk per piglet gr/day
10 11 12 13 14
Figure 1 - Milk production per litter and milk intake per individual piglet
in relation to litter size.
Source: Adapted from Dourmad, 2012.
PIG PROGRESS VOLUME 32, No. 4, 201634
1000
Feed intake per litter (grams dry matter)
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
78910111213141516
Days in lactation
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Low intensive feeding Intensive feeding
Figure 3 - Comparing a low intensive with an intensive
practice of supplemental feeding on feed intake of
litters.
Source: Trouw Nutrition R&D, 2015.
gain was 20% more (310 vs 255 g/day) in the milk-fed piglets
during the week prior to post-mortem analysis.
Close to 90% of the piglets consumed the supplement, which
underlines the desire of piglets in current production systems to
have access to supplemental nutrition, in addition to sow milk.
Besides the fact that the pigs fed a milk replacer were about half
a kilo heavier, litters were also more homogeneous than the con-
trol group. Moreover, the small intestine of the piglets was heavi-
er than that of the control animals, both in absolute terms and
when expressed as a percentage of their body weight. Also, the
gut of these animals showed signs of higher cell proliferation, i.e.
increased crypt depths and PCNA (a marker for cell prolifera-
tion). Furthermore, other indices for gut development and gut
function were more favourable in piglets fed the milk replacer.
Moreover, the animals fed a milk replacer had higher concentra-
tions of fermentation products (e.g. butyrate) in the large intes-
tine, indicating a higher microbial activity. It is conceivable that
all these changes in milk-fed piglets lead to a better response to
the weaning transition owing to an increased capacity for the
uptake of nutrients.
Importance of supplemental feeding
Larger litters mean the need for proper supplemental feeding
is increasingly important. Providing supplemental milk and
creep feed does not necessarily lead to a higher weaning
weight, especially when weaning occurs at an early age. The
main benefit arises from a better developed gut at weaning
and enhanced post-weaning performance. It is therefore
important to encourage farrowing room staff to stimulate feed
intake by providing palatable and well-balanced diets via dili-
gent feeding management.
Naturally ahead
Mycofi x® 5.0
Absolute Protection
M
Y
C
O
F
I
X
* Authorized by EU Regulations No
1115/2014, 1060/2013 and 1016/2013
for the reduction of contamination
with fumonisins, aflatoxins and
trichothecenes.
ADSORPTION
BIOTRANSFORMATION
BIOPROTECTION
mycofi x.biomin.net
Powered by science to actively
defend against multiple mycotoxins*
With 3 combined strategies
WATCH
THE NEW
VIDEO
Thesis
Full-text available
Research with weaned piglets has provided information that dietary fibre (DF) is implicated in gastrointestinal (GIT) maturation and health. Dietary fibre can mitigate the risk for intestinal infections and diarrhoea occurring in pigs that are weaned at 3 to 4 weeks of age, which is common practice on most farms. There is a paucity of scientific information, however, on the role of DF in the diet of suckling pigs. A pig is born with a relatively immature gastrointestinal tract able to digest and absorb nutrients from sow milk. To attain capacity to digest diets containing high levels of vegetable feedstuffs the GIT needs to go through a process of maturation. In a natural setting, a large part of a pig’s diet consists of vegetable fibrous feedstuffs, such as leaves, roots, tubers, fruits, and seeds. Wild boar and feral piglets are anticipated to start consuming non-milk feed items already early in life, including vegetable material. This allows gradual adaptation of the GIT and its harbouring intestinal microbiota to the solid diet before weaning, which is completed in nature at 10-17 weeks of age. The diet of farmed pigs also contains a high proportion of vegetable material, with varying levels of DF. Commercial pre-weaning diets , on the other hand, are formulated to be highly digestible and nutrient-dense, using sow milk as the benchmark. In this regard, there seems to be a major difference in diet characteristics between the natural diet and a typical commercial low-fibre, nutrient dense piglet diet. The implications of this difference for the maturation of the GIT are not known. Chapter 1 provides a literature overview of the significant maturational changes in dentition and the GIT after birth. For this thesis, it was decided to focus on the stomach, small and large intestine, as these organs play a central role in feed digestion and absorption. The available information shows that early nutrition of piglets modulates many aspects of the maturational processes of the GIT and the residential microbiota. The microbiota, mostly bacteria, are starting to colonize the GIT of the piglet from the immediate prenatal period onwards, especially in the large intestine where they are most abundant. Its composition develops with age of the pig in a complex coexistence with the host and the diet. The microbiota thrive on undigested nutrients, sloughed off intestinal cells and secretions (e.g., mucus, enzymes) through a process called fermentation. From the fermentation of carbohydrates, mostly volatile fatty acids are produced, such as acetate, propionate and butyrate. Volatile fatty acids are an energy source for the intestinal mucosa and the host. Furthermore, they play a role in many body processes, such as immune modulation, mineral and water absorption in the hind gut among many others. The end- products from protein fermentation, such as ammonia and branched-chain fatty acids and biogenic amines are mostly regarded as a risk for intestinal health. It is generally accepted that the intestinal microbiota play a pivotal role in GIT maturation and general health of animals, but the underlying mechanisms are still largely unclear. Dietary fibres are characterized by the fact that the pig’s own enzymes are unable to digest them. Consequently, they pass through the stomach and small intestine to subsequently arrive at the level of the large intestine as substrate for the microbiota. For the older pig, the large intestines are well developed, and the microbiome herein capable to digest and ferment DF to a large extent (up to 70%), provided it is well adapted (‘primed’) to the DF. A well-developed microbiome possesses a wide array of enzymes capable of digesting and fermenting DF. Dietary fibres consist of an array of chemical compounds, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, oligosaccharides, lignin, and pectin. Collectively, these compounds determine the physicochemical characteristics of DF and their effect in the GIT. Solubility, in this respect, is relevant as it is associated with the fermentability of the DF by the intestinal microbiota. On the other hand, an insoluble DF may exert maturational effects too, for instance through its bulking and abrasive effects in the GIT. However, a paucity of data exists on how, next to sow milk, DF in supplemental diet affects GIT maturation in suckling piglets. For this thesis we hypothesized that DF is important for early-life GIT maturation. Hence, the aim of this PhD was to evaluate the impact of DF enriched supplemental diets on GIT maturation in suckling pigs, including the capacity and functionality of stomach, small and large intestine, and the priming of GIT microbiota to ferment a typical post-weaning diet with plant-derived carbohydrates. The research questions deduced from this hypothesis were formulated in Chapter 2. A first study was performed to answer the question whether feral piglets start to ingest vegetable material from early life onwards and how this may be associated with GIT maturation (Chapter 3). To this aim, feral piglets were collected, and their age was estimated based on body size and their dentition. Stomachs were weighed and contents were examined to determine particle size distribution and to classify the diet items. Vegetable matter (mainly ‘leaves and stems’) was predominantly present in most piglets, representing a large part of their diet (on average 83% of total stomach contents by weight). This was reported earlier for older wild boars and feral pigs. Approximately 25% of the stomachs of piglets contained curd (clotted sow milk) representing on average 16 % by weight. Other diet items (e.g., insects, fruits, seeds, mammals), were less abundant or absent. The data also indicated that a large proportion of their diets consisted of larger feed particles. The stomach development of the feral pigs appeared to be advanced when compared to stomach of farmed piglets of similar age fed a nutrient-dense, finely ground diet. We inferred from these data that feral suckling piglets consume a variety of non-milk items, mainly consisting of vegetable material with a coarse particle size from their first week of life onwards. Moreover, their diet is associated with an enhanced stomach development compared to those of farmed piglets. In a next experiment (Chapter 4), the effect of DF on GIT maturation in suckling piglets was studied. From day two of life onwards, sow suckled piglets were fed either a nutrient dense, low fibre control diet or diets enriched with two types of DF: a diet with a soluble fermentable DF from wheat; a diet with a largely non-fermentable purified cellulose, or a diet containing both DF sources. Piglets consumed the fibre-containing milk supplements and creep diets well. Upon weaning at 25 days of age, their GIT and large intestinal microbiota composition were evaluated. Stomach size and small intestinal maturation were not affected by diet. Large intestinal fill was increased with the soluble DF only. Large intestinal weight and length was increased in piglets consuming the fibrous diet; length mainly by the insoluble cellulose. Cellulose also decreased ileal pH and tended to increase ileal DM content compared to the control diet. Moreover, the concentration of volatile fatty acids tended to increase in the caecum and especially in the large intestine by supplementation with cellulose. The soluble DF source stimulated caecal propionate only. The microbiota composition showed a high individual variation and only limited dietary impact. Nonetheless, cellulose induced minor shifts in specific genera, with notable reductions of putative pathogens. It was concluded that the DF altered large intestinal morphology with little effect on the small intestine and stomach. Moreover, changes in the large intestine were associated with greater fermentation and changes of the microbiota, with more prominent effects from the low-fermentable cellulose. In Chapter 5, it was investigated whether piglets consuming fibrous supplemental diets prior to weaning were more resilient when exposed to an oral infection with enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) one week after weaning. The suckling piglets were fed the same four supplemental diets as described for chapter 4. Upon weaning at approximately 25 days, piglets were fed the same low-fibre diet. Feed intake and body weight gain did not differ between treatments. Overall, indicators of GIT and general health of the piglets were similar between groups. Therefore, it was concluded that neither the supplementation of the soluble nor the insoluble DF source to the pre-weaning diet improved post-weaning growth or GIT health of piglets. In Chapter 6, the effect of inclusion of fine and coarsely ground oat hulls on gastrointestinal development of suckling pigs was studied. Piglets were fed one of three experimental diets. A finely ground low-fibre, nutrient dense diet served as control diet. For the high-fibre diets, heat-treated starch in the control diet was exchanged with finely or coarsely ground oat hulls. Oat hulls are a source of insoluble, slowly fermentable DF. The suckling piglets were fed the diets for approximately 3.5 weeks with their individual feed intake being recorded two times per day when separated from their dam. Feeding oat hulls did not impede clinical health or production performance of the piglets. The full stomach weights tended to be greater for the coarsely ground oat hulls compared to the finely ground oat hulls, whereas CON was intermediate. The coarse oat hulls increased GIT full weight and the weight of the caecum contents compared to piglets fed the control diet and the diet with finely ground oat hulls. Supplementing oat hulls increased villus height in the small intestines and dry matter concentration of the caecal contents. For the colon, inclusion of oat hulls increased its length, contents weight, short-chain fatty acid concentration and reduced total bacterial count as well as γ-proteobacteria count and proportion. Furthermore, feeding the coarse oat hulls reduced colonic crypt depth when compared to the finely ground oat hulls. It was concluded that supplementing oat hulls to a diet for suckling piglets exerted subtle developmental effects on gastrointestinal morphology and colonic microbial community. These effects were largely independent from the particle size of the oat hulls. In the last experiment (Chapter 7), the growth performance and faecal consistency of piglets from birth to eight weeks of age was recorded with the objective to evaluate the inclusion of oat hulls in the diet during suckling and in the nursery period. From two weeks prior to weaning until two weeks after weaning (phase 1), the same diets were fed as described in chapter 6. For phase 2 of the study (day 14-28 after weaning), the inclusion level of oat hulls was decreased from 15% to 5%. The inclusion of oat hulls resulted in a reduction of the dietary net energy concentration by 12% and 4% for phase 1 and 2, respectively. The general health of all piglets remained good, based on the low morbidity and mortality rates. Pre-weaning feed intake and growth were not affected by diet. Overall, faeces score, body weight gain, feed intake and feed efficiency were similar across treatments. The overall net energy efficiency for weight gain was improved for pigs fed the oat hull diets. It was concluded that diluting pre- and post-weaning diets with oat hulls did not significantly influence performance in piglets. In summary, with DF supplementation of diets for suckling piglets it was possible to alter the maturation of the gastrointestinal tract and large intestinal microbiota. This was associated with greater fermentation activity in the large intestine. The magnitude of the observed changes were, however, subtle. Early feeding of DF may represent a ‘window of opportunity’, but its relevance for post-weaning resilience of the piglet needs to be further elucidated. Still, the work described in this thesis shows that young pigs can adapt to fibrous diets, even before weaning, confirming data in grower-fattener pigs and sows. Further work is warranted to optimize DF nutrition in the youngest category of pigs, both with respect to inclusion level as well as for the period during which fibrous diets are fed. Increasing our understanding of the diet of pigs in nature may advance the development of healthy diets as part of a sustainable pig production system with high welfare standards.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.